As an answer, I've used Virtual Dimensions and Dexpot a lot. Last I used one, I preferred Dexpot.
Now, a slight variant of the question. Are there any truly multi-monitor aware virtual desktops. I mainly am looking for the ability to run the two screens as independent virtual desktops and change them independently.
I may be a simpleton, but your data seems to corroborate the GP's claim that Java demand is declining. It shows that GP is overstating the decline, but supports the base contention.
Disclaimer: I've been primarily a "Java Guy" for over a decade. Interestingly, the first place I used/learned Java was on a cross-platform project that ran on several UNIX variants, Linux, and Windows. The only cross-platform pain we had was a poorly thought-out installation process that needed to do *way* too much work during installation.
If cleanliness is the goal, surely a traditional keyboard is completely the wrong design. Touchscreen would be ideal and easy to clean with an inexpensive wipe. Who requires a high level of cleanliness but uses a keyboard enough that a traditional keyboard is required? Do neurosurgeons have their personal assistants 'take letters' during surgery?
Not familiar with computerized medical records, are we?
Well, that raises some interesting copyright questions. A quick perusal of Wikipedia did not make it clear how the copyright stands. Pretty strong argument that it went PD in 1980, regardless of wider distribution.
By modern standards, it was copyright as soon as it was "penned". The standard of the day required an explicit claim of copyright or it was PD by default. Three paths, all lead to PD no later than 1980. The university that published it in 2010 could only claim copyright to their derivative work, I'd think.
Others have made the point that the first three are best. I'd go farther, the later ones, that are basically different perspectives on the first group, are probably very uninteresting out of that context.
Um, circular logic there. What you're saying is that people who use a service designed to help optimize the revenue stream tend to be developers looking to optimize the revenue stream.
Don't/. editors check stories for troll submissions these days?
Apparently not, given the amount of articles I stories I have reading recently where the first few comments for each article all point out lacking information/source/validity or that it is just plain fud (4 so far today!).
I personally suspect/. editing has been handed over to a redesigned spam filter.
Wow! the incomprehensibility of that first sentence hurts. It really does.
As an answer, I've used Virtual Dimensions and Dexpot a lot. Last I used one, I preferred Dexpot.
Now, a slight variant of the question. Are there any truly multi-monitor aware virtual desktops. I mainly am looking for the ability to run the two screens as independent virtual desktops and change them independently.
I knew I was gonna get that reference wrong. Oh well. ;-)
Most major breweries in the U.S. (even Guinness - *SOB*) are owned and operated from overseas. Brew your own!
This may be one of the most (unintentionally?) funny things I've ever read on /. No kidding? A famous UK brand isn't US-owned? Wow?
I'm pretty sure my gTablet would handle a USB floppy drive just fine. However, I've never touched one.
Um, you should perhaps not attend classes with so many meth-heads?
He's right. Vi is a sucky word-processor. It's a phenomenal text editor and I fully expect it to last forever in that role.
When they give up on greater security out-of-the-box?
I may be a simpleton, but your data seems to corroborate the GP's claim that Java demand is declining. It shows that GP is overstating the decline, but supports the base contention.
Disclaimer: I've been primarily a "Java Guy" for over a decade. Interestingly, the first place I used/learned Java was on a cross-platform project that ran on several UNIX variants, Linux, and Windows. The only cross-platform pain we had was a poorly thought-out installation process that needed to do *way* too much work during installation.
If cleanliness is the goal, surely a traditional keyboard is completely the wrong design. Touchscreen would be ideal and easy to clean with an inexpensive wipe. Who requires a high level of cleanliness but uses a keyboard enough that a traditional keyboard is required? Do neurosurgeons have their personal assistants 'take letters' during surgery?
Not familiar with computerized medical records, are we?
Kids these days! It was *AMAZING* when I upgraded to a PC w/ DOS. Third system, if I recall correctly.
It's also already been deused.
Well, that raises some interesting copyright questions. A quick perusal of Wikipedia did not make it clear how the copyright stands. Pretty strong argument that it went PD in 1980, regardless of wider distribution.
By modern standards, it was copyright as soon as it was "penned". The standard of the day required an explicit claim of copyright or it was PD by default. Three paths, all lead to PD no later than 1980. The university that published it in 2010 could only claim copyright to their derivative work, I'd think.
Hmm. Now I'm very curious.
That's 2, maybe 3 novels without counting waiting-in-airports time. Each way.
But then, I just noticed your username. Maybe no links was more fitting.
No links? What kind of pseudo-self-promotion is this?
Others have made the point that the first three are best. I'd go farther, the later ones, that are basically different perspectives on the first group, are probably very uninteresting out of that context.
The man died in 1910. How could his autobiography not be public domain?
You got me all excited thinking Crickett had a kid's shotgun. Tease.
My daughter loves her Pink Crickett. Although, US law does require that, technically, I own it until she's 21.
Um, circular logic there. What you're saying is that people who use a service designed to help optimize the revenue stream tend to be developers looking to optimize the revenue stream.
Um, sticky bit?
Um, ghosting these drives then reporting them destroyed might just be punishable as treason.
I'm thinking that cable-companies and/or local stations showing regional ads during national broadcasts might qualify as prior-art.
That abomination has nothing to do with the real Norton Ghost. Any Norton product that runs in Windows sucks. It's a simple rule to follow.
Don't /. editors check stories for troll submissions these days?
Apparently not, given the amount of articles I stories I have reading recently where the first few comments for each article all point out lacking information/source/validity or that it is just plain fud (4 so far today!).
I personally suspect /. editing has been handed over to a redesigned spam filter.
Wow! the incomprehensibility of that first sentence hurts. It really does.
Try googling "The Fifth Imperium".