You're wrong, but only sorta. I just sent a test message to myself using google apps. The message id was "...@mydomain.com" (not "...@gmail.com").
I think what you meant it that you can see the smtp path in the header, which hits all kinds of google servers as it makes its way around the internet.
I don't really think anyone cares about that, though.
Never trust a preacher who wears a five thousand dollar suit preaching in a million dollar church.
Five thousand dollar suit... that part I agree with. But a million dollars for a church, I think you need to check real estate prices again. In Seattle, for instance, a million dollars isn't that much.
The church I used to go to (before moving to Seattle) built a multi-million dollar facility. This isn't a building made of gold or anything, either. It's just big (it houses a congregation of thousands and acts as a hub for local, regional, and world-wide ministries).
I'm not a fan of the blingy churches. I just wanted to point out that your numbers a bit out of scale.
Nor is it even remotely recent that it has been this way. While the cases of the Lisa and early Macs didn't look anything like the pretty things Apple sells today, feature and interface-wise, it was just as cutting edge. And Steve Jobs was just as crazy... er... visionary... (and it worked)
I, for one, hate the fact that I like Apple stuff right now. It took a while to be convinced. The fact of the matter is that everyone else is playing catch up right now (we've on v2 of the iPhone and still waiting for the killer), and, if you have the money, it's some pretty cool stuff to have.
A space station also lacks the blind spot that you get with a moon base... you know... for when the aliens come and hide on the other side...
But then again, I've only seen a half dozen b-rated movies on SciFi with that as part of the plot...
What seems scary to me is that, for a fleeting moment, the thought came across my mind "What if WWIII really did start and the government is keeping it a secret?!"
Now it could just be that I watched half of season 3 of Babylon 5 last night, but I'm sure that's completely unrelated...
Will by the time we realise this is a problem will it be too late?
Correct me if I'm being slow here, but as an element, I don't think zinc is biodegradable (at least not without some 1337 alchemy skillz). This means that all of those things that we didn't recycle will still be sitting wherever we put them before (ie, landfills). Unless we start sinking it to the bottom of the ocean or firing it into space, "too late" is subjective (at least as far as zinc is concerned).
I have a sneaking suspicion that our children and their children will be doing the global equivalent of dumpster diving for centuries to come.
It may be more accurate to say that each particle is independently reading the same variable in some higher dimension. I love any astrophysics explanation that can double as an interview question relating to memory pointers and race conditions...
even kids twice her age, do not tend to use good judgement.
I know people 4-5 times her age that constantly fail to use good judgment, but that's not the point here (as their parents are no longer liable)
I'm not a parent, but I do have to side with the parents. I can see the original posts dilemma -- I imagine some of the parenting software out there might really suck. It seems, though, that this older sibling should be working with the parents to fix that, though, not completely cut it out.
I'm not entirely sure what you're point is. If you're talking about "statutory" laws, you're slightly off. At least in the states I've lived in, it's a range below a certain age, not a hard line. IE, long long ago, when I turned 18, my gf was 16 (soon to turn 17). We weren't doing anything where we would worry about that law, but, had we, it would have been legal. The reason is the age difference was only 2 years (rounding up). At least in that state, there would have been no issue.
The concern is more if someone in their 20's, 30's, or higher was with a teenager. Adults have too much power to manipulate and abuse a minor in that instance. It's not part of normal development (as opposed to people of similar age) and more about asymmetrical objectives that will, in likeliness, be damaging to the minor.
As a fat, bearded slob, I take offense at being compared to warlocks. I mean seriously, standing back cursing people while they're little demons scamper around... any drunk could do that.
So yeah, um *cough* pallies rule...
But, more on topic, I don't see why you need this much computer for WoW. I mean, there are tons of games deserving (graphics-wise) of this, and WoW is not one of them. If you're going to play WoW on a laptop, and that's all, I recommend the Macbook Pro. It's what I use, and it runs WoW with all graphics options on high (nice and smooth).
It's not even a remotely new concept, though, to have aircraft monitor freeway speeds. As far back as I can remember, Oregon has had the "bear in the air" enforcing the speed limit down the interstate and some rural hiways. Personally, I've been saved a ticket by spotting it through some trees before it flew over (came around the next corner and a dozen police units were waiting, ready to take down a pack of speeders).
Of course, in most parts of Oregon it's possible to safely go the speed limit (or at least reasonably close). Now that I live in Seattle, that's a dangerous idea in some areas and times of day. Of course, I haven't seen anybody get a ticket during those times unless they were going reasonably faster than the rest of traffic.
Wow. If this guy doesn't get warrants out for his arrest because of this story I'll be really surprised.
Well, it depends. A big part of the reason the article about a 2006 record-breaking run comes out a year later are the statutes of limitations in the various precincts they traveled through. Since they mention having a lawyer working with them, I would guess they've looked up the rules regarding moving violations in the states, counties, and cities that they traveled through.
Now, of course, that doesn't mean someone can't nitpick and possibly find a law they broke that they missed in the first run. I'm guessing, however, with their futures on the line and a year to work on it, they were pretty thorough.
I don't think either side was right or wrong on this. I do think this should be a learning experience for everyone.
I've been to all kinds of nerdy functions, including stuff centered on electronics. In fact, I've made key chains in the past that could easily get you in trouble at an airport (however harmless they were). You go from something like that to the real world and you tend to forget. I could see myself doing something really nerdy, then getting a call from a friend to pick them up at the airport and not even thinking about it.
However, if I was a security guard or the police and saw someone wearing something like that, I wouldn't take the time to inspect it. I don't know if I would be pointing machine guns at her, but I wouldn't be taking it lightly.
Now when it comes to charging her, I dunno. I'm all about intention. If she really was just clueless about how it looked, then she's not guilty of a hoax. That requires intent. IMHO, this should be filed under a misunderstanding, everyone should be VERY thankful that she didn't die and nobody blew up, and we should go forward from there. It shouldn't be about polarized opinions and blame.
Slashdot Mirror
You're wrong, but only sorta. I just sent a test message to myself using google apps. The message id was "...@mydomain.com" (not "...@gmail.com").
I think what you meant it that you can see the smtp path in the header, which hits all kinds of google servers as it makes its way around the internet.
I don't really think anyone cares about that, though.
It is, in short, the birthplace of solar weather.
Fixed that for you.
Teal
Technically (wow, this is a tiny box), he did post 8 emails, it's just that 7 of them are him talking back and forth with noob@aol.com
Never trust a preacher who wears a five thousand dollar suit preaching in a million dollar church.
Five thousand dollar suit... that part I agree with. But a million dollars for a church, I think you need to check real estate prices again. In Seattle, for instance, a million dollars isn't that much.
The church I used to go to (before moving to Seattle) built a multi-million dollar facility. This isn't a building made of gold or anything, either. It's just big (it houses a congregation of thousands and acts as a hub for local, regional, and world-wide ministries).
I'm not a fan of the blingy churches. I just wanted to point out that your numbers a bit out of scale.
Nor is it even remotely recent that it has been this way. While the cases of the Lisa and early Macs didn't look anything like the pretty things Apple sells today, feature and interface-wise, it was just as cutting edge. And Steve Jobs was just as crazy... er... visionary... (and it worked)
I, for one, hate the fact that I like Apple stuff right now. It took a while to be convinced. The fact of the matter is that everyone else is playing catch up right now (we've on v2 of the iPhone and still waiting for the killer), and, if you have the money, it's some pretty cool stuff to have.
A space station also lacks the blind spot that you get with a moon base... you know... for when the aliens come and hide on the other side... But then again, I've only seen a half dozen b-rated movies on SciFi with that as part of the plot...
Now it could just be that I watched half of season 3 of Babylon 5 last night, but I'm sure that's completely unrelated...
Will by the time we realise this is a problem will it be too late?
Correct me if I'm being slow here, but as an element, I don't think zinc is biodegradable (at least not without some 1337 alchemy skillz). This means that all of those things that we didn't recycle will still be sitting wherever we put them before (ie, landfills). Unless we start sinking it to the bottom of the ocean or firing it into space, "too late" is subjective (at least as far as zinc is concerned).
I have a sneaking suspicion that our children and their children will be doing the global equivalent of dumpster diving for centuries to come.
I love any astrophysics explanation that can double as an interview question relating to memory pointers and race conditions...
Existentialism at it's finest!
I'm just sad my PowerShot SD950IS isn't on the list [yet] :-(
(my EOS 10D is laughing at it from the other room)
I wonder how beards interact with the http://xkcd.com/323/Ballmer Peak...
"Fry, why must you analyze everything with your relentless logic?"
:-P)
(it was a joke about putting a microphone near the sun, though, obviously, it wasn't a very good one
Of course, your microphone wouldn't bear much resemblance to a terrestrial one; measuring pressures that low is a tricky thing.
Not to mention the whole disintegrating part...
Conversely, as you will be serving **Oregon**, how will you keep the Oregon beer in the NW so we can horde it all? ;-)
I know people 4-5 times her age that constantly fail to use good judgment, but that's not the point here (as their parents are no longer liable)
I'm not a parent, but I do have to side with the parents. I can see the original posts dilemma -- I imagine some of the parenting software out there might really suck. It seems, though, that this older sibling should be working with the parents to fix that, though, not completely cut it out.
Actually, the old Apple designs still look pretty cool.
This ThinkPad, however, fails to bring sexy back. Too bad.
So I guess nobody in my state will get to fly on airplanes in 6 years (unless the state changes it mind and goes with the ID). Too bad...
I'm not entirely sure what you're point is. If you're talking about "statutory" laws, you're slightly off. At least in the states I've lived in, it's a range below a certain age, not a hard line. IE, long long ago, when I turned 18, my gf was 16 (soon to turn 17). We weren't doing anything where we would worry about that law, but, had we, it would have been legal. The reason is the age difference was only 2 years (rounding up). At least in that state, there would have been no issue.
The concern is more if someone in their 20's, 30's, or higher was with a teenager. Adults have too much power to manipulate and abuse a minor in that instance. It's not part of normal development (as opposed to people of similar age) and more about asymmetrical objectives that will, in likeliness, be damaging to the minor.
As a fat, bearded slob, I take offense at being compared to warlocks. I mean seriously, standing back cursing people while they're little demons scamper around... any drunk could do that.
So yeah, um *cough* pallies rule...
But, more on topic, I don't see why you need this much computer for WoW. I mean, there are tons of games deserving (graphics-wise) of this, and WoW is not one of them. If you're going to play WoW on a laptop, and that's all, I recommend the Macbook Pro. It's what I use, and it runs WoW with all graphics options on high (nice and smooth).
But aren't aliens deathly allergic to contact with water?
It's not even a remotely new concept, though, to have aircraft monitor freeway speeds. As far back as I can remember, Oregon has had the "bear in the air" enforcing the speed limit down the interstate and some rural hiways. Personally, I've been saved a ticket by spotting it through some trees before it flew over (came around the next corner and a dozen police units were waiting, ready to take down a pack of speeders).
Of course, in most parts of Oregon it's possible to safely go the speed limit (or at least reasonably close). Now that I live in Seattle, that's a dangerous idea in some areas and times of day. Of course, I haven't seen anybody get a ticket during those times unless they were going reasonably faster than the rest of traffic.
Well, it depends. A big part of the reason the article about a 2006 record-breaking run comes out a year later are the statutes of limitations in the various precincts they traveled through. Since they mention having a lawyer working with them, I would guess they've looked up the rules regarding moving violations in the states, counties, and cities that they traveled through.
Now, of course, that doesn't mean someone can't nitpick and possibly find a law they broke that they missed in the first run. I'm guessing, however, with their futures on the line and a year to work on it, they were pretty thorough.
I don't think either side was right or wrong on this. I do think this should be a learning experience for everyone.
I've been to all kinds of nerdy functions, including stuff centered on electronics. In fact, I've made key chains in the past that could easily get you in trouble at an airport (however harmless they were). You go from something like that to the real world and you tend to forget. I could see myself doing something really nerdy, then getting a call from a friend to pick them up at the airport and not even thinking about it.
However, if I was a security guard or the police and saw someone wearing something like that, I wouldn't take the time to inspect it. I don't know if I would be pointing machine guns at her, but I wouldn't be taking it lightly.
Now when it comes to charging her, I dunno. I'm all about intention. If she really was just clueless about how it looked, then she's not guilty of a hoax. That requires intent. IMHO, this should be filed under a misunderstanding, everyone should be VERY thankful that she didn't die and nobody blew up, and we should go forward from there. It shouldn't be about polarized opinions and blame.