Slashdot Mirror


Spammers Announce World War III

schliz writes with the stub of a disheartening article at IT News: "Hackers are deluging web users with malware-laden spam claiming that World War III has started following a US invasion of Iran. Security experts warned [yesterday] that spam emails with subject lines including 'Third World War has begun,' '20000 US Soldiers in Iran,' and 'US Army crossed Iran's borders' have been intercepted. The emails contain links to a malicious webpage that displays what appears to be a video player showing the mushroom cloud of a nuclear explosion."

334 comments

  1. That spam was shopped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can tell from the text and seeing quite a few spams in my time.

    1. Re:That spam was shopped by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Funny

      the shadows are all off too

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:That spam was shopped by Victor+louis · · Score: 1

      Only a few spam filters can defeat the spammers in world war three and one of the spam filter i would like to mention here is Abaca's ReceiverNet service.ReceiverNet technology characterizes each protected user based on the percentage of spam they receive and then uses those reputations to rate the incoming message flow. Download the Osterman Research white paper from this link http://abaca.com/downloads/A%20New%20Approach%20to%20Defeating%20Spam.pdf for more information.

  2. Breaking news! by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This just in: malware propagators have learned that sending a mass e-mail that will grab the attention of anyone who reads it is the best way to spread malware. More at 11.

    --
    "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    1. Re:Breaking news! by pitchpipe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yup. At least they're doing something new and interesting instead of trying to enlarge my P3N!$, or send a high ranking official in Nigeria my money. I hate spam as much as the next guy, but a least this is fucking different.

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    2. Re:Breaking news! by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Funny

      This just in: The US and its allies, having established the capacity to censor the entire middle east during the recent destruction of undersea cables, is now sowing misinformation across the internet coupled to a malware payload. Billions of emails sent in this fashion will create enough noise to render all information that doesn't come through official highly suspect.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    3. Re:Breaking news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      This just in, the US invades Iran with 12,000,000 troops and nuclear bazookas. Click here to see exclusive footage!

    4. Re:Breaking news! by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This isn't new or interesting -- it's a classic pump and dump, most likely on the price of oil.

      (1) Buy oil futures
      (2) Pump spam/disinformation about a US military strike in Iran.
      (2a) Do this when US/Israeli officials are making strong statements
      (2b) because Iran has just tested some missiles
      (3) Watch the price of oil go up 4-5% in a day http://www.bloomberg.com/energy/
      (4) (Sell your oil futures at a) Profit!

      Yawn . . .

    5. Re:Breaking news! by The+FNP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or you could just buy oil futures and let it go up on its own since Americans can't let go of their Suburbans, Tahoes, and Hummers, and Toyota can't make priusi fast enough.

      --The FNP

    6. Re:Breaking news! by LandDolphin · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's why we need to get the Government out of the Economy. Things like that would not happen in a free market!

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    7. Re:Breaking news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed a step: 4)????

    8. Re:Breaking news! by maxume · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your comment is delightfully self-contradictory.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    9. Re:Breaking news! by inkyblue2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      oil futures aren't exactly a junk stock. good luck making an impact on those prices with a spam email campaign. there's a reason they usually target little stuff you've never heard of.

    10. Re:Breaking news! by vvillyhill · · Score: 0, Troll

      exactly. They are behind WWI and WWII. They controlled the New York Bank, which finance both axis and allied powers.

      And they now controlled both Russia (communism) and Israel (zionism), both democratic party and republican party in America.

      These force need to be exterminated before human will enter enlightment.

      --
      [twitter: Erris Mactrope gnutoo inTheLoo willeyhill westbake Odder ibane deadzero freenix] See my homepage for info
    11. Re:Breaking news! by HiThere · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, it isn't. A single Prius might not use much gas compared to a single Hummer, but lots and lots of Priuses still use lots and lots of gas.

      A workable solution is not obvious, but it *is* clear that we aren't heading for one. Electric vehicles would work if there was a decent source of electricity. Such are possible, but progress in that direction appears slow and diffuse. The real stumbling block seems to be how to store large quantities of electricity, as the desirable ways of generation seem to all be intermittent. (I'm not including nuclear fission, as I consider that to be a "last resort" kind of thing, though if one allows breeder reactors it's probably better than coal.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    12. Re:Breaking news! by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      The problem with the Prius is the energy cost of battery production. While the study that came out a while back drew a nonsensical conclusion, it does appear that the lifetime energy cost of the Prius is similar to that of a Hummer.

      Supposedly this problem will be greatly mitigated when the new battery plant opens in Fremont, CA. (IIRC it was Fremont, anyway.)

      Yes, if one allows breeders nuclear is certainly better than coal; coal puts absolute craploads of nuclear material (including a small percentage of fissile uranium) into the atmosphere; in fact, so much that if you could extract it and use it in nuclear reactors (it is mostly thorium, followed by non-fissile uranium) it would produce more energy than the coal burned.

      Coal is horrible, nuclear is potentially not so terrible, but without breeders is definitely pretty foul. Anyway there are two feasible sources of electricity available to us right now: Small-scale wind farms are cheap and easy to build and attach to the grid, and small vertical wind turbines could be installed on almost any roof and grid-tied, and photovoltaic solar panels pay back the energy cost of their production in less than seven years, and have been known to do so for over thirty years.

      Solar is kind of dirty, but the wind turbines can be made out of almost anything. And a lot of the dirtiness of solar production is involved in the energy input. But the whole point of the exercise is producing more energy output which requires a minimum additional investment in energy consumption and pollution - so long that it can be done at an acceptable environmental cost.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Breaking news! by mortonda · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think Iran would be well aware of an attack, what with all the bombs going off... ;)

    14. Re:Breaking news! by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but that increase has been priced in for months. If you want to make profit now you have to change the game a little.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    15. Re:Breaking news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw an interview with the CEO of chevron on Larry King Live recently. He said that growth in Asia is causing a shortage just as much as our usage in the US. We used to get our extra oil from regions not using very much, but now china and india are exploding with jobs and cars getting them to work. Don't worry, the US won't be the biggest problem in a few years. Most of my family (and my wife's) drive cars. I have to go pretty distant to get to a SUV aside from one aunt who has a 1995 Chevy Blazer. I'm sick of getting the blame for oil prices. Usage is up everywhere and the figures in the states are lower than last year at this time.

    16. Re:Breaking news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh!

      Irrespective of whether this incident was manufactured or not (conspiracy theorists rejoice!), I think there's a pretty good chance it 'll be used as a weapon against "internet news". TV, radio and printed media are kinda easier to control me thinks...

      Random n00b question: Is there such a thing as a redundant news protocol? P2P style? Slashdot of the future? :-)

    17. Re:Breaking news! by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      I think the really interesting point here is that a large part of the populace is more than willing to believe a spam with that headline. The only reason *I* would not believe it is because it lands in my mailbox from some address that I don't know, if it was reported on google news then I'd believe it in a heartbeat.

      GWB has a negative credit rating here, he's already started one war on false premises, why disbelieve it if he starts another one ? Especially if it drives the price of oil up.

      It's amazing the guy can get away with as much as he does without getting impeached, it raises the bar for impeachment to incredible heights.

    18. Re:Breaking news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG! Do u have that news link???

    19. Re:Breaking news! by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      I think RUSIA would be well aware of an attack, what with all the bombs going off... ;)

      There I fixed it for you... because... In soviet Rusia bombs atack you..oh wait..

    20. Re:Breaking news! by saxoholic · · Score: 1

      This isn't new or interesting -- it's a classic pump and dump, most likely on the price of oil.

      (1) Buy oil futures
      (2) Pump spam/disinformation about a US military strike in Iran.
      (2a) Do this when US/Israeli officials are making strong statements
      (2b) because Iran has just tested some missiles
      (3) Watch the price of oil go up 4-5% in a day http://www.bloomberg.com/energy/
      (4) (Sell your oil futures at a) Profit!

      Yawn . . .

      But you skipped the ??? step.

    21. Re:Breaking news! by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Because sometimes pennystocks pay off legitimately.

      Take for instance CCUR aka Concurrent Computer, http://www.ccur.com/ (now CCURD)
      For quite awhile they've been trading at $1 per share, most recently even down to the $0.60 a share range. Before all of this happened they'd announced some nice contracts, including millitary contracts.
      Apparently they made some money on those contracts because the company announced a sizable buyback & the approval of a reverse split, today CCURD is priced at roughly $6.50 a share.

      Anyone who bought it at the $0.60 a share range is looking at a roughly 400% return after the reverse split/etc. All based on the company, not the media.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    22. Re:Breaking news! by Stuy+2+MIT · · Score: 2, Informative

      On one hand, I completely agree with the sentiment of the poster - it's ridiculous to think that a spam campaign can affect a futures market - an average investor doesn't have access to such markets, and doesn't even have enough capital to trade a single oil futures contract.
      On the other hand, though, I've seen rumors of this sort achieve exactly that result. On March 27th, 2007, around 5PM ET, a rumor was spread all over the wire services that Iran had fired on an US Navy ship in the Persian Gulf. The futures markets were closed, and electronic trading was very thin, so because of this rumor, the futures prices was taken all the way from $63 to $68 a barrel, almost 10% - in less than 5 minutes!! Within 15 minutes, though, the news spread that this rumor was not confirmed, and after 15 minutes of frenetic trading, the prices settled back to around $64 (I guess a dollar of a risk premium was priced in, just in case!). Within those 15 minutes, even with the markets closed, millions of dollars changed hands. Here's a link to a story from that day - http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idUKN2722461720070327 . Predictably, no one knows where the rumor came from, yet someone profited quite handsomely off of it.

    23. Re:Breaking news! by MickLinux · · Score: 1

      Of course, that isn't the way it often goes. Rather, it goes more like this:

      (1) Arrange line of credit with your current bank account as collateral
      (2) Buy oil futures
      (3) Pump spam/disinformation about a US military strike in Iran
          (3a) Do this when US/Israeli officials are making strong statements, because
          (3b) Iran has just tested some missiles.
      (4) Watch the price of oil go *down* 10% as major players sell
      (5) Take call from stockbroker calling in collateral, and selling your futures at 10% loss
      (6) Watch major players *buy*, sending up the price 15-17% (and collecting your bank
              account in the process)
      (7) Profit! (For someone anyhow, not you).

      Needless to say, this is just one of the myriad of ways to lose everything on the stock market.

      Yawn...

      --
      Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    24. Re:Breaking news! by somersault · · Score: 1

      May I point out that while usage may be up in other places, I'd expect American cars to be the heaviest and therefore least fuel efficient of any other country's cars (though Australia makes similarly large cars). European and Japanese markets tend to buy much smaller cars. We also probably have a lot more diesel cars which will increase our average mileage even further.. I've not got any figures, but I don't think anyone who has actually seen the difference between the cars in America and elsewhere could disagree. I have a friend in America who reckons that her 4.0 litre car is an 'economy' version. That amuses me :)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    25. Re:Breaking news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a litre?

      Sincerely,
      America

    26. Re:Breaking news! by somersault · · Score: 1

      61.0237441 cubic inches. So about a 244ci engine. I think that's what you guys measure them in anyway. Or alternatively 1 litre is 1 liter. Something like that.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    27. Re:Breaking news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Sigh*

      Twitter, enough. Seriously. Using a similar name and sig almost fooled me. Until I spotted the 1.3M UID anyway. Well, that and the fact it's completely differently worded to the way willeyhill writes...

      Start a new account, drop the random attacks on people, the zealotry (So some people actually like MS products, ranting won't change that, regardless of any advantages FOSS has) and the shilling, and see what happens. You might actually get an account out of the karma-hell you're in.

    28. Re:Breaking news! by magicbutton · · Score: 1

      I agree with your call for more nuclear power. It's the cleanest power source at our disposal. Even the founder of Greenpeace says so. MORE NUKES, MORE NUKES.

      This constant drum beat for wind power is total crap, however

      -For starters, for the majority of the area of the US, you can't depend on enough wind with the necessary velocity to sustain the necessary RPM's on the turbine. Think what you want about 'big energy', but, if there was a way for them to essentially generate FREE power don't you think they'd be putting up freaking towers like a madman? But they don't. Because it won't fill the need.

      -Second, so many of those crying 'wind power' always want to plop them down on top of a building, or near a residential area. WRONG. Those wind turbines are LOUD. Let me put one in your back yard and you'll run screaming from the house in less than 24hrs.
      Not to mention destroying what view you may have. And speaking of destroy, ask the bird population how much they like us sticking a bunch of food processor blades into the air?

    29. Re:Breaking news! by Paranatural · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm tired of this crap about Prius being the same lifetime energy cost as a Hummer. It's total bunk, and here's why: The Hummer's energy cost is in moving a giant object around inefficiently, which expends a lot of energy (Gasoline). The Prius's energy cost is creating it's batteries, which it then uses to move it around a lot more efficiently. However, when the lifetime of the Prius is over, all that energy isn't wasted. The batteries don't disappear. They are still there and can easily (And it's incredibly cost-efficient to do so) be recycled. Thus the 'total energy cost' of the next set of batteries is drastically lower.

      So yes, the initial 'startup cost' of the batteries is high, but thereafter the batteries can be recycled an theoretically infinite number of times, which brings it's 'total lifetime energy cost' far below what a Hummer could ever expect.

    30. Re:Breaking news! by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      The problem with Nuclear Reactors is Nuclear Waste; that garbage will ruin your whole day. The nuclear waste issue still hasn't changed, until someone finds a way to filter out the Radio Active stuff from the Non Radio Active stuff, nuclear waste is f'ing dangerous. As for the "Energy to Produce" argument that is proudly strutted out by oil's mediocrity; one can only ask, "who profits by such an argument?"

    31. Re:Breaking news! by Scuzzm0nkey · · Score: 1

      There's also the considerable expense and environmental damage associated with the manufacture of all the parts that go into the Prius. Nickle for the batteries is mined (itself a filthy process), then shipped to China for manufacture, then shipped to Japan for assembly, then shipped to US or EU for use. i read somewhere (will cite if can find) that some components essentially go completely around the world before the assembled product winds up in (insert environmentally-conscious civilized nation here). Not trolling, but there is more to consider when you call a vehicle "green" than the emissions or mpg.

      --
      People are like slinkies; useless but fun to watch when you push them down the stairs
    32. Re:Breaking news! by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Those wind turbines are LOUD. Let me put one in your back yard and you'll run screaming from the house in less than 24hrs. ... ask the bird population how much they like us sticking a bunch of food processor blades into the air?

      FUD, FUD, FUD.

      Modern wind turbines are neither shaped like a propeller, nor do they operate at high speeds. Consequently, they don't make much noise, either.

      The most efficient designs are all vertical turbines, many of which actually operate at fairly low RPMs, and some of which were used by the ancient Romans. So actually, ancient wind turbines didn't have these problems either.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    33. Re:Breaking news! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      However, when the lifetime of the Prius is over, all that energy isn't wasted. The batteries don't disappear. They are still there and can easily (And it's incredibly cost-efficient to do so) be recycled. Thus the 'total energy cost' of the next set of batteries is drastically lower.

      The energy cost of recycling the batteries is actually not drastically lower either; much of the cost of manufacturing the Prius batteries is in the shipping costs. Guess what they're doing to do when they recycle batteries? It's cheaper to do it almost anywhere but in the US due to environmental restrictions.

      the batteries can be recycled an theoretically infinite number of times

      heh heh.

      Nothing is free, anyway. The recycling process is not just shaking some pixie dust on the old batteries.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    34. Re:Breaking news! by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The nuclear waste issue still hasn't changed, until someone finds a way to filter out the Radio Active stuff from the Non Radio Active stuff, nuclear waste is f'ing dangerous.

      Breeder reactors make that waste dramatically less dangerous and reduce the half-life to something potentially manageable on a human time scale.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    35. Re:Breaking news! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This is pretty much the reason why its energy cost is so incredibly high. The next question to be answered (which cannot be done with a simple google search, at least not yet) is where and how will the batteries be recycled?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    36. Re:Breaking news! by wattrlz · · Score: 1

      Has parent ever considered how much oil goes into the making of a prius?

    37. Re:Breaking news! by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      RUSIA: Hmmm. Recording US Industry Association? Does the RIAA have competition now? And they have a Soviet counterpart huh? Would that organization have branches in... Rus s ia?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    38. Re:Breaking news! by magicbutton · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      FUD, FUD, FUD.

      Modern wind turbines are neither shaped like a propeller, nor do they operate at high speeds. Consequently, they don't make much noise, either.

      Try living NEXT to one, as I have, and then you can cry FUD. Also, are you claiming that this supposedly low speed they operate at won't kill everything that comes in contact with it? Don't be absurd.

      I just love how the alternative energy crowd, the same people that have a coronary over things like the Alaskan pipeline disturbing the delicate wildlife movements and oil spills that supposedly destroy every pristine shoreline known to man every 3 seconds, have noooo problem with snatching up miles of public (or at times private) land and plopping down hundreds or thousands of giant propellers and then pretend that it doesn't have any impact on that same delicate wildlife. Or they find a way to shrug it off. How convenient.

    39. Re:Breaking news! by hasdikarlsam · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that breeders actually burn more than about half a percent of the fuel, reducing waste volume by a factor of fifty to two hundred or so, in addition to making the waste considerably hotter (and thus faster to become safe).

    40. Re:Breaking news! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Also, are you claiming that this supposedly low speed they operate at won't kill everything that comes in contact with it? Don't be absurd.

      Some of the designs move slowly enough that you could step on and off of them.

      Smaller wind turbines don't have the problem either, but for a different reason. There's not some super-long turbine blade coming in from the side where it doesn't make any sense to the bird. Birds are used to dodging things, just not those.

      I just love how the alternative energy crowd, the same people that have a coronary over things like the Alaskan pipeline disturbing the delicate wildlife movements and oil spills that supposedly destroy every pristine shoreline known to man every 3 seconds, have noooo problem with snatching up miles of public (or at times private) land and plopping down hundreds or thousands of giant propellers and then pretend that it doesn't have any impact on that same delicate wildlife. Or they find a way to shrug it off. How convenient.

      You're an ass. You simply can't claim that all "environmentalists" (people who, unlike you, do not want to shit where they eat) are the same. I didn't put up those shitty wind turbines.

      Incidentally, the public land we want to use for most of these alternative energy products is "managed" by the BLM. Some of it is a bunch of desert. Some of it is lightly wooded, but the BLM clear-cuts all the time, and they also provide free or cheap access to natural gas and oil to various cronies of the powers-that-be. Putting in solar and wind could only be more positive than that bullshit, unless it was done as a deliberate act of sabotage by those who wanted it to fail, and engineered in that direction.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    41. Re:Breaking news! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hate to double-reply, too, but are those batteries actually going to be used in the next generation of electric car? The answer of course is probably not. They will be used to replace battery packs in existing cars: by the time these battery packs are ready for recycling, they'll be moving on to a new kind of battery. And you have to include the cost of battery recycling in the ongoing lifetime cost of the vehicle. If you assume that it will last 300,000 miles (not impossible I guess) then you're going to have to service the batteries at least once in that period, further raising the lifetime energy cost of the vehicle. Maybe they'll put the recycled batteries into some pissed off golf carts, though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    42. Re:Breaking news! by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 0

      That's why Aminidinadijad keeps stirring shit up. He can sell his oil a superhigh prices making a superhigh profit. Aminidinididididjad doesn't really want a war, just to keep scaring the oil market.

      --
      ...
    43. Re:Breaking news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Paranatural,

      I'm sick of all these soap box idiots forgetting about the costs of SHIPPING!!!!

      Shipping parts around the world costs energy, and pollutes.

      Also, tell me where these batteries will be recycled? (More pollution due to shipping)
      How many batteries will you use throughout the lifecycle of the vehicle? (More pollution due to shipping)

      As the initial poster stated:

      Supposedly this problem will be greatly mitigated when the new battery plant opens in Fremont, CA. (IIRC it was Fremont, anyway.)

      Fremont is closer, thus SHIPPING costs are mitigated.

      Anyone who leaves shipping costs out of the equation, is naive.

    44. Re:Breaking news! by magicbutton · · Score: 0

      You're an ass.

      Typical leftist. Intead of discussing the issue, you have to turn it into personal attacks.

      But you've touched on yet another double standard. Using 'a bunch of desert' or clear cutting in the woods for these fly-by-night ideas somehow escapes any criticism from the usual special interest environmental groups (or at least not at the shrieking volumes we are accustomed to). But, dare we suggest that we should drill for oil in ANWAR and we get a virtual eruption of freakish yelling at the mere act of entertaining the thought.

      Do try to to be civil. It's so unseemly in front of the kids.

    45. Re:Breaking news! by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

      an average investor doesn't have access to such markets

      Actually, the average investor DOES have easy access to such markets. There are ETFs that you can buy like a stock that will do the investing for you. There are even ETFs that allow you to bet on declines in oil futures.

    46. Re:Breaking news! by Stuy+2+MIT · · Score: 1

      An average investor does not have access to a FUTURES market, which was my point. No sane investment advisor would ever recommend it, considering the 10 to 1 or so leverage. Sure, investors can buy 1 share of an ETF, worth 100 bucks. A single oil contract represents $145,000 of oil! So even though there is arbitrage between ETFs and the futures, average investors would never trade enough in these markets to move a futures market a single tick.

    47. Re:Breaking news! by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Breeder plants have been on the books since the early 1970's. Fundamentally, they're a good idea; interesting thing is that South Africa is buying the Soviets missiles, and converting them to be used in reactor plants. Some good things might come from this. Namely (1)the turning of "swords" to "plowshares", (ie. missiles to energy plants). (2) It gives time for the intelligent types time to invent some kind of massive filter method for depleting radio active matter for reuse. (3) Maybe drive down the cost of shipping by installing nuclear reactors in cargo ships.

    48. Re:Breaking news! by maxume · · Score: 1

      The relative life-cycle efficiency of the two types of vehicles doesn't have anything to do with the fact that Americans really are abandoning their SUVs, often for hybrids, which happens to be the contradiction that I was talking about in the original comment.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    49. Re:Breaking news! by ralphclark · · Score: 1

      FUD, FUD, FUD

      yup, that's the exact noise those giant fan blades make.

    50. Re:Breaking news! by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

      What, exactly, do you think that the ETFs are investing in? Many, probably most, are using futures markets to match their target index rather than buying the physical commodities (see PCRIX, DBC, GSG, CRSAX, and GCC for example). Your $100 ETF investment gets levered up the same way a direct purchase of a futures contract would be. The ETF offers the advantage that since it is mimicking an index of commodities, you are able to spread your $100 investment across several commodities instead of just one, thus reducing your risk.

      Have you not been paying attention to the financial news lately? These ETFs are at the center of the entire speculation vs. supply/demand controversy over why oil prices have become so high so fast. The ETFs are being bought by pension and endowment funds seeking to diversify their portfolios away from the usual stocks/bonds investments. Lots of individual investors have been doing the same thing in the past year or two.

  3. How the hell... by HerculesMO · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Did spam make it to the front page?

    It has to be a really slow news day if we get an article explaining what is in specific pieces of spam.

    I'm waiting patiently for Slashdot to post the Nigerian folks that always email for the millions they have to give away. Because you know -- that is real news. For nerds. Stuff that matters.

    --
    The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    1. Re:How the hell... by Michael+O-P · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously. This is a routine virus, and a routine social exploit. This doesn't even qualify as news that doesn't matter, because then it would have to be news.

      --
      I'm Peggy.
    2. Re:How the hell... by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 5, Funny

      It has to be a really slow news day if we get an article explaining what is in specific pieces of spam.

      I'm a fan of the subjects. Here's a handful I've received recently:

      • Satify your spouses bed needs easier
      • Obama found dead in shock accident
      • shaman like skills
      • Love package at a low price
      • Please your lassie like never before!
      • Girls will be shocked at your new size
      • Bang her till she passes out
      • Have the pecker of her dreams
      • Natalie Portman shaves again
      • Bomb her womb from your huge cannon!

      It's basic marketing / copywriting.

      --
      "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
    3. Re:How the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be dropping your e-mail at some different places than I visit...

    4. Re:How the hell... by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Here's a handful I've received recently

      Can't believe you've missed out on this gem:

      "Speed up your nightclub successes with a realistic diamond-studded Rollex"

      I've blocked about 20,000 of those in the last 24 hours.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re:How the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG OMG OMG!! What!? WWIII!? Already! I knew it! I knew it! - rocking back and forth -

    6. Re:How the hell... by Klaus_1250 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Natalie Portman spam ... you lucky bastard.

      --
      It only takes one man to change the Wisdom of the Crowd to Tyranny of the Masses.
    7. Re:How the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      .
              1 Satify your spouses bed needs easier
              2 Obama found dead in shock accident
              3 shaman like skills
              4 Love package at a low price
              5 Please your lassie like never before!
              6 Girls will be shocked at your new size
              7 Bang her till she passes out
              8 Have the pecker of her dreams
              9 Natalie Portman shaves again
              10 Bomb her womb from your huge cannon!

      1. 50% off Serta Mattresses at Mattress Warehouse?
            3. Learn to levitate?
            4. Box o' Chocolates?
            5. I would do no such thing with a dog...
            6. So go to the god damn gym.
            7. If she's had that much to drink, you should probably cut it out.
           

    8. Re:How the hell... by Dogtanian · · Score: 5, Funny

      Natalie Portman shaves again

      I'm glad to hear that, I never really liked her with the beard.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    9. Re:How the hell... by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 4, Funny
      • Bomb her womb from your huge cannon!

      I've never seen that one before -- and it's simultaneously the funniest euphemism for that I've heard in a while, and the most shockingly wrong way to put that!

    10. Re:How the hell... by theantipop · · Score: 4, Funny
      My spam is praying on my low self-esteem. Here's a couple I received in the past week:
      • What a stupid face you have here
      • You look really stupid

      *sigh*

    11. Re:How the hell... by SPY_jmr1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      My spam is praying on my low self-esteem. Here's a couple I received in the past week:

      • What a stupid face you have here
      • You look really stupid

      *sigh*

      Strong Bad must be ramping up his spammertisments again.

    12. Re:How the hell... by girasquid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I started up a twitter account for some of the weirder ones I got: http://twitter.com/spamtitles

    13. Re:How the hell... by wild_quinine · · Score: 5, Funny
      My favourite spam ever came on a real stinker of a day at work. You know the kind, nothing goes right, people fuck you over, you're in work all day to come away worse off than when you went in... It was that sort of day. Then I got this spam, which simply said:

      'Louder screaming is only the beginning'

      That may be the one and only spam that made my day better.

    14. Re:How the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your spam might want to pray you don't fall prey to a grammar nazi too... oh wait...

    15. Re:How the hell... by DarkOx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The most invoative one I saw slip by my filter recently was:

      Increase the effectiveness of your copulation organ

      I found this troubling in that the only word I could safely blacklist on our corporate mail filters is probably

      copulation

      I can't imagine anyone except maybe the HR department needing to send work related message with that word in the subject, and even then I can't imagine it would be hit our public MX.
      If copulation could be eliminated then blocking a spam like this will only be possible via the statistical analysis of the entire message; sure this entire specific subject might be filterable but not the individual words.
      Unless something is a miss in the headers its going to get by.

      It made me wonder if the doom and gloom folks might be correct in that SPAM will make traditional mail realy useless. Sadly SPF and related methods are not an option as we just can't count on our customers to implement it and risk not being about to exchange mail with them. Sure if a problem is discovered whitelists can be used but by then you may have lost an account.

      The other interesting thing is that would anyone educated enough to have the vocabulary to required understand that subject be ignorant enough to respond? I know the economics of SPAM are such that even if 1 in a million people bite, its worth it but as that first number approches 0 its gotta stop being worth while somewhere.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    16. Re:How the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Natalie Portman shaves again

      I'm glad to hear that, I never really liked her with the beard.

      especially the downstairs beard

    17. Re:How the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did spam make it to the front page?

      This spam is unique and newsworthy in that it may serve as a wake-up call to U.S. intelligence and the people whose JOB IT IS TO ENFORCE anti-spam legislation that spammers could ultimately cause a lot more trouble than just a few tens of thousands of idiots poisoned by tainted black market V14GARA and C1AL15 tablets.

    18. Re:How the hell... by Bad+Ad · · Score: 0

      Funny I've been getting "Adam you are moron" constantly for the last couple of weeks.

      It actually gets past 3 spam filters everytime (SpamAssassin, Spamihilator (with Spam DCC-Filter enabled) and Thunderbird).

      :-(

    19. Re:How the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The other interesting thing is that would anyone educated enough to have the vocabulary to required understand that subject be ignorant enough to respond?

      An interesting question, undoubtedly the forte of many an erudite scholar, but by this point in your post I was far to enthralled by my quest for illicit viagra to ponder its myriad complexities.

    20. Re:How the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here, I get spam all the time saying "You have a very small penis."

      My captcha: "persuade" -- ironic!

    21. Re:How the hell... by jcuervo · · Score: 1

      It actually gets past 3 spam filters everytime (SpamAssassin, Spamihilator (with Spam DCC-Filter enabled) and Thunderbird).

      header ADAM_ARE_MORON Subject =~ /^Adam you are moron/
      describe ADAM_ARE_MORON Adam you are moron
      score ADAM_ARE_MORON 100000000000000

      :-(

      :-)

      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    22. Re:How the hell... by ponraul · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then, I take it you're a big fan of Spamusement.

    23. Re:How the hell... by bursch-X · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's no spam, that's your girlfriend.

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
    24. Re:How the hell... by vikstar · · Score: 1

      Because it isn't just spam, it is a pre-emptive strike to get people associating a USA invasion of Iran with WW3. I Nigerian lottery will hurt the person who believes in the scam. This particular email looks like political propaganda (note, propaganda isn't necessarily bad: "Propaganda is a concerted set of messages aimed at influencing the opinions or behaviors of large number of people.").

      This isn't ordinary spam, but tries to get americans to wake up to themselves and associate the USA invasion of the arabic countries with the German invasion of Poland.

      When Germany invaded they were told that it was the for the good of the country in pretty much the exact same way USA is doing. If you've ever caught yourself thinking "why did the Germans invade, didn't the population see this was wrong?" then look at the population of USA, as history is repeating itself. This spam is an attempt to stop it.

      --
      The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.
    25. Re:How the hell... by inkyblue2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      the most shockingly wrong way to put that

      yeah, cannons don't shoot bombs.

    26. Re:How the hell... by zobier · · Score: 1

      If copulation could be eliminated then blocking a spam like this will only be possible via the statistical analysis of the entire message; sure this entire specific subject might be filterable but not the individual words.

      I don't see why not;

      Increase the effectiveness of your organ.

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
    27. Re:How the hell... by zobier · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just another thought, what if they were to start using marketing buzzwords like "Total interactive throughput"? Not only could they bypass your filter but most executives wouldn't be able to tell it from legitimate communication.

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
    28. Re:How the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It was that sort of day. Then I got this spam, which simply said:
      'Louder screaming is only the beginning'

      That may be the one and only spam that made my day better.

      Days like that you need Garfield Minus Garfield: http://garfieldminusgarfield.net/

    29. Re:How the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey HerculesMO you forgot to mention all the spam we get from other countries wanting to pay you money to cash a check or deposit it in your bank account which of coarse they will automically deposit so they can get your bank info to wipe you out. Or the emails from some guy in Nigeria somewhere that wants to send you a check in your name have you cash it, you keep X amount of dollars or percentage then wire them the rest. Of course they don't have their bank accounts set up yet. I mean come on... that's front page news right there. lol

    30. Re:How the hell... by mortonda · · Score: 1

      I'm still trying to figure out wha this is: $B!V8=6b+F02s}5!!W$G$9!*$*6b$,$"$J$?$N8}:B$K+F0E*$KF~6b$5$l$^$9!*(B

    31. Re:How the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think Anakin was covering for her?

    32. Re:How the hell... by mike2R · · Score: 1

      > Please your lassie like never before!

      Woof! Woof!

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    33. Re:How the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, citizen, have just made a shitty morning wonderful. Cheers!

    34. Re:How the hell... by Katalyst23 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The most wtf spam I've been sent so far is: "I know what females do on a farm. NEVER leave them there abandoned!"

      --
      It's turtles all the way down!
    35. Re:How the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's not your girlfriend, that's your mother.

    36. Re:How the hell... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Loser,[Chris]~~~~, is that you?

    37. Re:How the hell... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I got one: "Teen girls want you!" If only they had told me that when I was a teenager. I had no idea!

    38. Re:How the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was far to enthralled

      Well, you were doing well until this point. Nice try, but I'm afraid you won't be able to confince us of your intelegence.

    39. Re:How the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, that's rather tempting. I have been wanting to play Toccata and Fugue in D Minor so that the whole city can hear it.

      Does the package come with a phantom mask, too?

  4. Censorship set up? by myCopyWrong · · Score: 0, Troll

    So all the ISP filters are ready to tune out the real thing. That will keep people from talking about the invasion of Iran when it really does happen. Then all those Haliburton jails for "illegal aliens" will be put to use.

    We should expect Russia, China, France and others to declare war on the US under such circumstances, but it will be a phony war like the UK and French declaration of war after the German invasion of Poland. Fake only for short time. Mass arrests will follow in the US because the Bush administration will finally get the big war it wants.

    1. Re:Censorship set up? by halsver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you might need to loosen your tinfoil hat there a little bit buddy...

      --
      Roughly half my comments are never submitted. You may be reading the better half...
    2. Re:Censorship set up? by CowboyNealOption · · Score: 1

      I thought it was so the government could make a list of the first people to arrest?

    3. Re:Censorship set up? by Ihmhi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right, because once e-mail filters out the messages there's absolutely no way for anyone to get information anymore. Well, except for websites, BBSes, Usenet, television, radio, telephone, letters...

  5. Hmm by Aussenseiter · · Score: 5, Funny

    World War III is starting? Oh god, I still haven't received my check from that Nigerian prince! And where's my viagra?

    1. Re:Hmm by mikael · · Score: 5, Funny

      Survivalist Suppliers announces - buy a lifetimes supply of Viagra for your mountain forest bunker today. What are you going to do when the black gold runs out - you won't be able to drive to the pharmacy then. One large box lasts 5 years and only costs $99.99. Buy a lifetimes supply and get an extra 50% absolutely free. Cash payments only.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:Hmm by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      World War III is starting? Oh god, I still haven't received my check from that Nigerian prince! And where's my viagra?

      Yeah, because that's the first thing I'm going to be worried about when WWIII starts: Boners.

      Though I guess it is a legitimate concern, due to the widespread boner shortage in the states in WWII, which didn't end until after the war when the market was flooded with them.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:Hmm by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Funny

      See, we have to preserve our purity. of. essence. and repopulate the planet.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    4. Re:Hmm by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      If I end up as the last male on the planet and must single handedly repopulate the planet, then I will be needing plenty of Viagra if I'm going to maintain a raging boner while subsisting on a diet of smash and spam and having to copulate repeatedly with radiation affected deformed women, 24/7 so that my few remaining un-irradiated sperm can hit target.

      If i'm lucky though, the penis enlargement will not be necessary, as my penis will mutate like a worm at Chernobyl and become 50% longer.

    5. Re:Hmm by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. I could do that without the Viagra, and if mine grew by 50%, I'd be limited to procreating with 8' tall women..

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    6. Re:Hmm by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mr. President; we must not allow a mine-shaft gap!

      --
      FGD 135
    7. Re:Hmm by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't worry, once the mutations start there will will be plenty of 8' tall women.

    8. Re:Hmm by Idbar · · Score: 1

      You almost tricked me, until I read "viagra". This is /.! What would you use that for?

    9. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it bad that I thought that a great opportunity to rid the gene pool of guys who can't keep it up?

    10. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you buy a lifetime supply why do you need the 50% extra?

    11. Re:Hmm by TheNucleon · · Score: 1

      Great - now, next thing you know, someone will make a movie out of this.

      I couldn't figure out from your post whether you would see this scenario as a nightmare, or if some part of you was hoping for just these events to happen.

      --
      My comments are my own, and do not represent the views of my employer, my spouse, my children, or my cats.
    12. Re:Hmm by Darundal · · Score: 1

      Cowpat, I thought the line was "Bunker Gap."

    13. Re:Hmm by hack++slash · · Score: 4, Funny

      "there will be plenty of 8' tall women."

      Death by snoo snoo?

      --
      To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
    14. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You apparently need the lifetime supply of brain-pills plus the 50% extra if you order within three days.

      Or the short form: Whoooooooosh!

    15. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ohhh when will those anti-depressants get here...

    16. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With zee 10:1 female to male ratio in zee bunker, a substantial supply is essential!

    17. Re:Hmm by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 4, Funny

      hmm, I was just pondering, and living underground, eating crap food, knowing only a few other hideous looking people, for the average basement dwelling nerd, the end of the world wouldn't be must different. The only change would be the constant sex to repopulate the world, so all in all the end of the world would greatly improve most nerds lives.

    18. Re:Hmm by Walkingshark · · Score: 3, Funny

      You can't fight in here! This is the war room!

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    19. Re:Hmm by dlanod · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mein Shaft!!!

      (It all comes back to the Viagra jokes...)

    20. Re:Hmm by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      Amazon woman: 'He good at snoo snoo.'

      Rest of Fry's lovers: 'Meh.'

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    21. Re:Hmm by hiryuu · · Score: 1

      Death by snoo snoo?

      At one of my jobs, we hired a woman in one department who stands 6'4" tall. I couldn't decide how much of a jerk it made me that, when I first walked by her in the hall, the first thing that ran through my head was that line. :)

      --
      Karma: Excellent, but still won't get you laid.
    22. Re:Hmm by PachmanP · · Score: 1
      (Score:5, Funny)

      Funny? This is increadibly insightful. My world has been rocked. I must now devote myself to hastening Armageddon (sp?).

      That said the only means I really have to do that safely from the basement is to troll foriegn forums which, incidently, is mostly what I do. I must have subconciously know this for a while.

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    23. Re:Hmm by PachmanP · · Score: 1

      If you buy a lifetime supply why do you need the 50% extra?

      Running start for your mutant childern?

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    24. Re:Hmm by thexile · · Score: 1

      For your afterlife.

    25. Re:Hmm by mcmonkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      If I end up as the last male on the planet and must single handedly repopulate the planet...

      If you're doing it single handedly, you're not going to produce much of a repopulation.

    26. Re:Hmm by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Source for that joke: Mojo Nixon's Tie My Pecker To My Leg. He sings "I need a woman that's six feet ten, she gotta be that tall so's I can get it all in."

      I presume you need a four foot tall or shorter woman or it's too loose?

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    27. Re:Hmm by mikael · · Score: 1

      Standard marketing psychology used for discount TV channel marketing;

      " buy an nvidia GX280 graphics card 160 stream processors within the next hour, and we'll throw in another 80 stream processors absolutely free!!!"

      "Order our 3 Gigabyte memory ultimate gaming rig and we'll give you an extra 1 Gigabyte of memory at no extra charge ..."

      Supermarkets used to do this all the time, but then the consumer advice columns starting giving out warnings.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    28. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

      captcha: charcoal -- how apt! :D

  6. Repercussions by TheMeuge · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder what the possible effects of a coordinated disinformation attack of such nature would be, if it managed to deliver said news to a large segment of the world's population (that have access to email). If such an act was coupled with a successful hacking operation on even one of the major news network's websites, serious consequences may erupt.

    1. Re:Repercussions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what the possible effects of a coordinated disinformation attack of such nature would be, if it managed to deliver said news to a large segment of the world's population (that have access to email). If such an act was coupled with a successful hacking operation on even one of the major news network's websites, serious consequences may erupt.

      One would fucking hope that said group of morons would have the brains to either A)pick up the telephone or B)confirm said "news" with another source before believing spam and/or a single hacked news website. I suppose thats one good thing about the good ol' boob tube. Most of us still know how to use THAT instead of a computer to get/confirm any SERIOUS news story.

    2. Re:Repercussions by Narpak · · Score: 1

      As we know if enough people believe it it becomes true. Just like what happened with global warming!

      Now if we could just make more people believe in world peace and free cheddar we might actually get somewhere civilized.

      Though I guess that will never happen as long as people still believe that the mail in their inbox isn't spam.

    3. Re:Repercussions by colfer · · Score: 1

      US Gov't plot to put malware on Middle Eastern PCs more likely. Goes along with the coordinated cuts of undersea telcom cables which cut off internet access last year. Just sayin'

    4. Re:Repercussions by DarkOx · · Score: 2, Funny

      free cheddar

      As long as you have a plan to stop the barbarions from dyeing it yellow, you have my full support.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    5. Re:Repercussions by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      I wonder what the possible effects of a coordinated disinformation attack of such nature would be, if it managed to deliver said news to a large segment of the world's population (that have access to email).

      I don't know about you, but I take everything I receive by e-mail as the honest truth, and as far as I know, everyone else does too. Very dangerous.

    6. Re:Repercussions by famebait · · Score: 1

      Aha! The US government is behind it. Learning from the hideous expenses of Iraq, and the the simple fact that they've got no soldiers left, they finally started listening to analysts and realized that if you can convince enough people that the war has happened, it will have the same effect as if it had.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    7. Re:Repercussions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serious like what exactly? All that would happen is the other news networks would run a "x news network hacked" story. What drastic thing with serious consequences would anyone (who did just read the one news story) actually do? At best they'd get slightly worried and maybe tell their friends. And then be told it's a hoax.

      The fact is, in the 21st century, our massive level of interconnectedness means it's pretty hard for one source to deceive any noticeable percentage of any population. That H G Wells thing could never happen now.

  7. I found one of these this morning in my inbox by mzs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I simply deleted it, just like all the other spam. About once or twice a month I see a clever newish kind of spam subject. Tell me again why this particular spam meme hit the homepage of /.?

    1. Re:I found one of these this morning in my inbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I sue them for discrimination? I haven't received any!

    2. Re:I found one of these this morning in my inbox by brkello · · Score: 1

      I think I prefer spam to reading the word meme. I don't know why, I just find it that annoying.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  8. Doesn't sound like spam... by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Doesn't spam generally imply that something is being sold? Granted, this unsolicited email could be a way for the spammers to recruit systems to their bot-nets to push out more spam, but there's no indication in the summary that there is any actual attempt to sell something here.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Doesn't sound like spam... by spleen_blender · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that bot-nets are designed to just push out more spam? Encryption crack much? Because with the kind of horsepower the world's largest botnets have, they could be very effective for such a job.

    2. Re:Doesn't sound like spam... by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Informative

      Doesn't spam generally imply that something is being sold?

      Bot nets are used to push out more malware-pushing content, the better to grow the bot net. These can be used very effectively to extort cash from web site operators by means of a site-debilitating distributed denial of service attacks. Many bot nets are used to try hugely random (and somewhat successful) SQL injection attacks from all sorts of random IP addresses, the better to target specific users of specific web sites with JS-based malware iFrames, etc. The days of just trying to get you to buy something are ... quaint, now. The good ol' days.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:Doesn't sound like spam... by Penguin+Programmer · · Score: 1

      If it's a bulk mailing that you didn't opt into, it's spam. There's no requirement that the email is commercial.

    4. Re:Doesn't sound like spam... by auspiv · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Any news that sounds like WWIII has begun would sure drive up oil prices... very easy to make money just riding the price up.

    5. Re:Doesn't sound like spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The standard definition of spam is "unsolicited bulk email". Remember, it's about consent, not content.

    6. Re:Doesn't sound like spam... by forand · · Score: 1

      Actually it is the bot-nets themselves. They have become sentient and are trying to take over. Unfortunately they cannot tell that they live in a world where what you read is not always true. So they think that by simply saying WWIII started makes it so.

    7. Re:Doesn't sound like spam... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      I got some spam a while ago that was "selling" islam.

      And no, I didn't "buy" it.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    8. Re:Doesn't sound like spam... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1, Informative

      UCE - Unsolicited Commercial Email.

      Spam - Unwanted emails of a bulk, impersonal nature.

      Spam is what people don't want. I know people that sign up for mailing lists (often thinking that it would be a monthly or less newsletter that might be interesting, but instead is daily "specials" and such), then tag their list they opted-into as spam. They don't want it, and they often don't have a single click opt-out (either through replies or web sites). Once they don't want it, it's spam, no matter whether they opted-in. Also, people refer to emails they get from friends and family that is bulk joke lists and such as spam. Non-commercial emails are still considered unwanted annoyances, and thus spam. The You-CAN-SPAM act has specific definitions that allow spamming from non-profits, those that you have a business relationship with, anyone that wants to send you unwanted emails if they will let you opt out, and such. That's the legal standard at which it becomes criminal spam. That's not the general public standard at which it becomes spam. Spam isn't illegal, just certain kinds of spam.

    9. Re:Doesn't sound like spam... by dwye · · Score: 1

      > I got some spam a while ago that was "selling" islam.

      How much does it sell for, these days?

      Is this an exclusive, or just personal, version?

    10. Re:Doesn't sound like spam... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that bot-nets are designed to just push out more spam?

      I didn't say that is all they do. But it is certainly one thing that they are used for. Take a look at Leo Kuvayev on wikipedia and see how some spammers are linked to the botnets.

      Though considering the fact that I've seen over 250 different IP addresses attempt to break the root password on my machine in the past 24 hours, I know very well that bot nets do a lot more than just pump out spam.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    11. Re:Doesn't sound like spam... by IhuntCIA · · Score: 1

      This unwanted e-mail looks more like a news. It seems that someone is trying to spread information, not to push "pharmacy" or other consumer products. Can't say for sure, I'm getting all pharmacy and iPHONe spam only.

      I'll keep this link in my bookmark, just in case something comes up in the news at 11.

  9. Google could help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Like their "report phishing" email flag, a similar "report virus/trojan link" button could help a lot of people, tie this to their badware project and testing the reported site (if x number of users report the same mail)
    and it could do a lot for cutting down bot traffic targeted at GMail users
    takes me 2 seconds to check a mail (they are easy to spot over the Viagra/Penis spam) call it "distributed malware reporting"

    nearly everyday i get multiple emails with a provocative title that contains a link leading to a malware distribution point
    Google could help their entire userbase in this regard

    1. Re:Google could help by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      If they offered a service like that, how quickly do you think microsoft.com would be flagged.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  10. This is the way the world ends by hansamurai · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not with a bang but a can of luncheon meat.

  11. World War III? by Syrente · · Score: 1

    Fine, I declare the War on Spammerism. Suggestions on where to invade, plz. Other than peoples' inboxes...

    1. Re:World War III? by gmuslera · · Score: 1
      What about invading 1st countries where most spammers hide and are somewhat protected by their government? It worked with Afghanistan and Iraq regarding terrorism, so should work with spam too.

      According with Spamhaus the top 10 countries the 1st one is US, then at 1/3-1/4 of that amount is china, then Russia, UK, etc. Would be interesting to see UN/US army invading those countries from 1st to last.

    2. Re:World War III? by RanCossack · · Score: 1

      According with Spamhaus the top 10 countries the 1st one is US, then at 1/3-1/4 of that amount is china, then Russia, UK, etc. Would be interesting to see UN/US army invading those countries from 1st to last.

      With headlines like 'Third World War has begun,' '20000 US Soldiers in US,' and 'China Army crossed China's borders'...

      I hear the UK is already setting up a transitional government to guide the citizens of the UK toward democracy, with new laws designed to eliminate spam.

    3. Re:World War III? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It worked with Afghanistan and Iraq regarding terrorism,

      Oh dear. Those "terrorists" appeared in Iraq after the invasion. Please, for the sake of your critical thinking skills, do some research.

  12. Choose your weapons by Travis+Mansbridge · · Score: 1

    I say we take the war to them.

  13. Slashdot is just a good corporate citizen. by myCopyWrong · · Score: 5, Funny

    Be sure you filter out any email about Iran to help out Uncle Sam. Oh yeah, buy war bonds and get back to wark.

    1. Re:Slashdot is just a good corporate citizen. by tepples · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, buy war bonds

      Foreign investors have been buying plenty of bonds. That's part of what has caused the dollar to drop.

    2. Re:Slashdot is just a good corporate citizen. by neostorm · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      what do chocobos have to do with this?!

    3. Re:Slashdot is just a good corporate citizen. by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1

      No, I think you have it backwards. Non-US governments buying bonds has been one of the few things keeping the greenback from collapsing. It's when they *stop* buying USD that you'll see a *real* drop.

    4. Re:Slashdot is just a good corporate citizen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you know I worked for the gov't, no seriously?

  14. SPAM by arizwebfoot · · Score: 1

    And all this time, I thought SPAM was what you fried in the skillet and put eggs on before consuming.

    My bad.

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
    1. Re:SPAM by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

      Yes, your bad.

      Nobody actually eats Spam.
      How it manages to still be available at the grocery store is a mystery to me.

    2. Re:SPAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hawaiians eat spam.
      It's called spam musubi: you take a chunk of sticky rice and you put a slice of fried spam on top. Wrap the whole thing in a piece of seaweed and sell it for $3 to ignorant fat hawaiians. Bonus points if you throw bits of it at any white people you can find. Make sure you call 'em "haole" too.
      Now you're thinking Hawaiian.

  15. I would have Fired the Nukes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since I am one of the many men and women behind the nuclear forces in the US, I for one did not turn the key.

    Also let Iran be the first to welcome it's new American overlords.

  16. GWASTED by Stanistani · · Score: 4, Funny

    This gives me a new hope.

    Now we can divert some of the resources from the Global War On Terror (GWOT) and fight the Global War Against Spam, Terror, & Erectile Dysfunction (GWASTED).

    1. Re:GWASTED by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Funny

      GWASTED

      Don't mind if I do!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:GWASTED by angryfirelord · · Score: 0

      Now we can divert some of the resources from the Global War On Terror (GWOT) and fight the Global War Against...Erectile Dysfunction

      I don't know if I would trust the government's version of ED pills. Might have something weird in it.

    3. Re:GWASTED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GOURANGA!

    4. Re:GWASTED by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      TOWANDA!!!!!

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    5. Re:GWASTED by Gewalt · · Score: 3, Funny

      gWasted.....Wait... free beer with text ads on the labels? oh fuck ya, count me in

      --
      Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
    6. Re:GWASTED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you but I think I'll wait 'til it comes out of beta.

    7. Re:GWASTED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This gives me a new hope.

      Now we can divert some of the resources from the Global War On Terror (GWOT) and fight the Global War Against Spam, Terror, & Erectile Dysfunction (GWASTED).

      Sad day when the G spot is WASTED... thank man for batteries. lol

    8. Re:GWASTED by anilg · · Score: 1

      gWasted..

      Sigh.. the kind of things GNOME is into these days i might as well move to kde.

      --
      http://dilemma.gulecha.org - My philospohical short film.
  17. Spam that tells of WW3!? by MrMage · · Score: 1

    Sell that on Ebay! Right next to religious idol toast and french fries that look like celebrities.

  18. Easy by geekoid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    this is is particularly eye catching, given current work events. Since it is different, many people will click on it anyways.
    I know some people who I will be sending an email to about this story so they don't click on it.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Easy by maxume · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's happening at work?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Easy by dyefade · · Score: 1

      No kidding. If you're having to mark it as sarcasm, it would ruin the joke.

      "Humour, like a dog, is less fun once dissected." - some guy. (Groucho Marx?)

    3. Re:Easy by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you realize how many people get angry, and how many conversation turn ugly becasue someone didn't realize it was sarcasm.
      Sarcasm, while funny, is different then a joke.

      Analyzing humor is like dissecting a frog. Few people are interested, and the frog dies of it. - E.B.White

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Easy by cliveholloway · · Score: 1

      "work events"? Just where the hell do you work?

      --
      -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
    5. Re:Easy by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Do you realize how many people get angry, and how many conversation turn ugly becasue someone didn't realize it was sarcasm.

      That would suggest that it's safer not to use sarcasm at all, rather than to use it and try to mark it as such - especially in such a cryptic fashion.

  19. Fools by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

    WWIII isn't scheduled to begin for another two weeks, and it's going to involve a fake attack on the US by "Iran" (actually the CIA) followed by a massive "retaliatory strike", not an invasion by any US forces. Can't these spammers get anything right?

    1. Re:Fools by Me-The-Person · · Score: 1

      Oh boy... you're on the watchlists now!

    2. Re:Fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, it's gunna be the j00z that start it! T3h J00ZZZZ!!!!

    3. Re:Fools by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's nice to see you post kere Mr Cheney..or maybe I should just call you dick.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Fools by cstdenis · · Score: 2

      Worked for them on 9/11

      --
      1984 was not supposed to be an instruction manual.
    5. Re:Fools by n+dot+l · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, no, no. Two weeks from now Europe, Russia, and Central Asia unite and declare the second Soviet Union. Then the CIA (which is secretly a branch of the KGB) sends secret agents to hijack the International Space Station (secretly insured by the guy that owned the Twin Towers) and crash it onto their own headquarters. After that, Canada, the USA, Mexico, and (just because it'd be weird) Chile unite and invade Iran, at which point the Chinese (who are secretly controlled by New Zealand) nuke us. Then we nuke them. And then the Russians nuke Australia, just for good measure.

      In the mean time, Charlton Heston (who secretly isn't actually dead) has somehow gotten into a light-speed rocket, and...

      Did I miss anything? Oh right, the Antichrist. Well fuck him, this conspiracy theory is already full. Besides, nobody likes Dick Cheney anyway.

    6. Re:Fools by theralfinator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Okay, this is actually kinda funny. But why would this be modded insightful? I mean seriously now.

    7. Re:Fools by dbIII · · Score: 1

      and it's going to involve a fake attack on the US by "Iran" (actually the CIA)

      I was worried there for a second. Since it's the CIA they will get lost, invade Turkey instead, get repelled by a few small boys minding goats and then return home to tell everyone about the huge imaginary Iranian nuclear missile bunker they destroyed.

    8. Re:Fools by __aaahtg7394 · · Score: 1

      Wait, what expansion pack contains Chile? I've been playing Illuminati for a while, and that game sounds plausible, but I've not seen those cards before...

    9. Re:Fools by Fluffy_Kitten · · Score: 1

      Which is entirely possible given the US's past attacks on Iran.

      --
      People who have no sig are cool
    10. Re:Fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odd -- I thought the CIA was actually controlled by the Congressional Wives, which was under the thumb of Evil Geniuses For A Better Tomorrow (aided by Cycle Gangs), in turn reporting to the Society of Assassins ---- all of them facing off against the Chinese Communist Party, which was at the beck and call of the Semiconsious Liberation Army, which in turn kowtowed to the Boy Sprouts (aided by the Men in Black, and I don't mean the alien control group), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Gnomes of Zurich.

    11. Re:Fools by halivar · · Score: 1

      Hur! Hur! Hur! *snork* Hur!

      You know the way the average slashdotter sees creationists? That's how I see 9/11 troofers.

      Just wait for the mothership to come back, and all will be right with the world again...

  20. What obvious poppycock! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's amazing how people can be tricked by something that is on its surface so laughable that it should be dismissed outright!

    After all, how could World War III possibly have started when World War II hasn't even ended yet?! Just because there's no obvious troop movements or visible battles doesn't mean that merged ghosts of Churchill and Roosevelt along with their dark ally Zombie Stalin don't yet wage war against the forces of Hitler's Head and the demon-animated armor of Hirohito! No, you can see the effects of this conflict every day in the fluctuations of the price of milk to the record of the Essex cricket team. So don't believe anything you read about some ludicrous World War III until you see the purple flag of the Undying Allies flying over the White House, indicating our inevitable triumph!

    After that, though, it's fair game.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:What obvious poppycock! by Emperor+Zombie · · Score: 1

      Oh man I would totally watch that movie

      --
      I'm so excited I just made water in my pantaloons!
    2. Re:What obvious poppycock! by FeepingCreature · · Score: 1

      No, you can see the effects of this conflict every day in the fluctuations of the price of milk [...]

      Beware the cows! Not all milk is enriched!

    3. Re:What obvious poppycock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone needs to make this game.

    4. Re:What obvious poppycock! by rk · · Score: 2, Funny

      You'd watch? Hell, with a name like "Emperor Zombie" you could probably get a leading role!

    5. Re:What obvious poppycock! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Yeah unfortunately between your comment that you'd watch the movie and the other saying they should make the game, I'm worried that the only one who would option my script would be Uwe Boll.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  21. massively stupid by inode_buddha · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Jesus H Christ, whoever originates this kind of spam is just colossally stupid, for political reasons. No, its not funny. and yes, I'm a USian.

    --
    C|N>K
    1. Re:massively stupid by maxume · · Score: 2, Funny

      What political reasons? Do you think the US government gets its intelligence from Spam?

      Hell, I would think that the paranoid position is that they just go ahead and make it up...

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  22. Run! by quokkapox · · Score: 1

    I heard they've got heat rays and chemical weapons (and other weapons of mass destruction).

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
  23. very interesting, may it somehow prevent this war by justdrew · · Score: 1

    what's the payload? just directs to a web site?

  24. An offshoot of the penny stock spam? by adamstew · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if this has something to do with the penny stock spams...you know, spammers send a bunch of emails promoting a penny stock so the price goes up, then they sell the stock while it's up...

    Perhaps, they bought a bunch of oil, sent out a spam about Iran being invaded to get speculators to buy oil, driving the price up, and then cash in?

    They finally filled in the ???

    1. Buy oil
    2. Send out Spam saying Iran has been invaded.
    3. Speculators buy on the "news" (formerly ???)
    4. Profit!

    1. Re:An offshoot of the penny stock spam? by Gat0r30y · · Score: 3, Interesting

      On a serious note i saw a cool article at physorg yesterday about speculation in the oil market. From the article it would appear there is a major oil bubble about to burst. Though I'm certainly no expert in the matter.
      I suspect they just figured a way around some spam filters for a little while. Most anything novel should get by for a while, once it starts getting flagged it should dissipate.

      --
      Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
    2. Re:An offshoot of the penny stock spam? by dwye · · Score: 1

      > 3. Speculators buy on the "news" (formerly ???)

      But everyone knows that you SELL on the news. You BUY on the rumor.

      They should have sent something out reporting major troop concentrations in Iraq moving eastwards, and give a URL to a faked google earth pointer. THAT would get a good rumor going.

  25. In an effort to immitate spammers... by tOaOMiB · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdot posts article containing the words "World War III" in it's headline, hoping this attracts attention. Once users click to "read more" they are ambushed by trolls masquerading as insightful or funny comments, but in fact containing insidious messages....

    1. Re:In an effort to immitate spammers... by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      So... same as ever?

  26. WWIII by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1, Informative

    Sadly enough WWIII is called the War on Terror, and it has already started since September 11, 2001.

    So the next war will be World War IV, which a BBS software package WWIV was named after. :)

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:WWIII by peipas · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting the War on Drugs. WWV comes next.

    2. Re:WWIII by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly enough WWIII is called the War on Terror, and it has already started since September 11, 2001.

      Exactly how does that involve the world? It's basically the USA versus a few radical groups (not even nations!) in the middle east.

    3. Re:WWIII by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that the relatives of the Australians burned alive in a vacation nightclub bombing in Bali would feel differently. Or the families of the people killed in Madrid, or London. Anyone with an interest in a stable energy market has an interest in not allowing those few radical groups to stir up civil wars, kill leaders or candidates in places like Pakistan, plan (as in Canada) or execute (as in India) attacks on parliments... all in the name of moving the entire middle east back into a medieval land o' murderous theocracy. The world's invoived, whether it likes it or not. China can't function without the US economy able to buy things, and as much disdain as Europeans love to have for the US, that's with whom they do a hugely important share of their trade in food, manufacturing, and more.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:WWIII by lazyDog86 · · Score: 1

      And please don't forget the War on Poverty. With a long string of successes like this, we don't want any of the wars to get crowded out.

      --
      my insights may be modded Funny, but at least some of my jokes are modded Insightful
    5. Re:WWIII by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      has an interest in not allowing those few radical groups to stir up civil wars, kill leaders...

      Which radical groups are you talking about?

      [ ] The Bush Family of Presidents (TM)?
      [ ] The neoliberals
      [ ] Fundamentalist Islamics?
      [ ] All of the above

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    6. Re:WWIII by LentoMan · · Score: 1

      Wait! If cold war was WWIII, then war on terror (Terra) would be WWIV, global war(ming) would be WWV and the next war would be...WWVI?

    7. Re:WWIII by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

      you left out the war on drugs

  27. The Iranians are coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    One if by Spam,
    Two if by sea.

  28. it works because it's too plausible by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

    and will probably happen. i feel the war drums reverberating as they approach crescendo.

    --
    "If still these truths be held to be
    Self evident."
    -Edna St. Vincent Millay
  29. Blowing up the Earth? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

    Crap, that's where I keep all my stuff.

    1. Re:Blowing up the Earth? by H0p313ss · · Score: 2, Funny

      Crap, that's where I keep all my stuff.

      Tell me about it, I just finished renegotiating my mortgage!

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  30. Broken news! by myCopyWrong · · Score: 0

    The pill pushing comes after the malware infestation. The choice of topic is one that stirs people up, but this one can has worse effects than the average urban legend or Paris Hilton XXX stuff. Filtering messages by subject text strings is not best practice.

  31. The obligatory "Obligatory" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Re:The obligatory "Obligatory" by mrmeval · · Score: 4, Funny

      The sad thing is I offer swords for sale that are airbrushed.

      The sadder thing is people buy them. ;)

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    2. Re:The obligatory "Obligatory" by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Funny

      Do they do white damage?

    3. Re:The obligatory "Obligatory" by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      The saddest thing is you don't have a link!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:The obligatory "Obligatory" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Do they do white damage?

      Obviously. As everyone learned from Zelda, wooden swords are TWICE as strong once painted white!

    5. Re:The obligatory "Obligatory" by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is I offer swords for sale that are airbrushed.

      If some fat and psychotic weeaboo who's seen too many Ninja movies was going to sneak into my apartment and behead me (perhaps for trolling him on the internets) in one fluid notion whilst screaming "BANZAIIII", I think I'd feel better that he used an airbrushed sword.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    6. Re:The obligatory "Obligatory" by Emb3rz · · Score: 4, Funny

      I personally prefer to have solid notions. They're more stable, easier to execute.

      |> letslaughbecauseoftypos (tagging beta)

    7. Re:The obligatory "Obligatory" by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Hnn, naybe there is sonething wromg with this keyboard.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    8. Re:The obligatory "Obligatory" by lpzie · · Score: 0
    9. Re:The obligatory "Obligatory" by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Actually the blade and scabbard are airbrushed on some of them with art of dubious merit but they sell ok.

      Depending on how much you want to spend a sword can be anything from decorative Chinese imported stainless (no head choppy), 'machete' quality commercial carbon steel stamped (leaves a mess), formed and heat treated to hand forged ones ranging from 300 (ok but still somewhat messy) to insane (the head's eyes still roll) depending on maker and options.

      My silliness aside this URL points to a sword by a "Living Treasure" of Japan. No it's not airbrushed or photoshopped. ;) I don't sell these. :(

      http://www.ricecracker.com/japanese_swords/wakizashi/sw10.htm

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  32. Word of thought. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a word of thought... Nobody should ever joke about such a theme, neither stupid script kiddies nor spammers.
    The world situation today would never surprise me if it ended in a WW 3.

  33. Mein Führer! I can walk! by falken0905 · · Score: 0

    Gosh, I hope no one at the Pentagon or the White House gets this SPAM. If it arrives in an email or it's on CNN then it must be true and they could actually kick off WW-III.
    "Mr. President, I'm not saying we wouldn't get our hair mussed. But I do say no more than ten to twenty million killed, tops. Uh, depending on the breaks."
    "I'm afraid, sir, I must ask you for the key, and the recall code. Have you got them handy, sir?"

  34. Same with the earthquake by dedazo · · Score: 1

    I started seeing these when the Chinese earthquake happened earlier this year as well. The Outlook 2003 client filter did a surprisingly good job of catching those, and it's catching these as well.

    Simple and effective social engineering. Proven to work on dumb people. Profit.

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  35. Defining SPAM Re:Doesn't sound like spam... by Essron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think SPAM is best defined as any email you receive that you don't want and was sent without your specific permission. The intent of the email is irrelevant.

    I've sent SPAM on behalf of a government agency before (coerced by management after weeks of resistance) and all they wanted to do was give people information they didn't want about lead paint poisoning. AOL blacklisted us as SPAMmers and they were right to do so, even tho their actual motive was just to charge us money to deliver email.

    Another good example is that band's mailing list you signed up for at a bar 4 years ago that refuses to stop telling you how some guy you don't know's new band's fucking Alaskan tour is going. I hate that guy.

  36. And? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

    Spammers use fake headlines to trick people into downloads all the time. I get notices of fake chinese earthquakes like twice a day.

    Why is this news?

    --
    StoneCypher is Full of BS
  37. World War III?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not a "World war" when only the US and Iran are at war.

    1. Re:World War III?? by chill · · Score: 1

      Its not a "World war" when only the US and Iran are at war.

      Have you thought that Disney might be right after all? It really is a small world after all.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  38. Are you sure the emails are fake? by pinkstuff · · Score: 1

    Or is that just what 'the man' wants you to think? - sarcasm

  39. Confiscate their computers by clampolo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everyone who is a part of a botnet should have their computer confiscated. They are too dumb to be allowed to have one.

    We can easily wipe, the machine's hard drive and then install a new OS and you have a computer to give away to schools.

    Two problems solved at once: one less idiot on the net and a free computer for a school.

    1. Re:Confiscate their computers by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Have you seen computers at schools? Frankly? There are reasons why schools use products like Deepfreeze.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    2. Re:Confiscate their computers by Ironlenny · · Score: 1

      Everyone who is a part of a botnet should have their computer confiscated. They are too dumb to be allowed to have one.

      We can easily wipe, the machine's hard drive and then install a new OS and you have a computer to give away to schools.

      Two problems solved at once: one less idiot on the net and a free computer for a school.

      In other words:
      1.)Take computers away from idiots.
      2.)Give computers back to idiots.
      3.)???
      4.)Profit

      --
      There is a system for subverting the system and you should use that system!
    3. Re:Confiscate their computers by Suhas · · Score: 1

      Two problems solved at once: one less idiot on the net and a free computer for a school.

      Stop posting on the internet. That will take care of the first problem right away.

    4. Re:Confiscate their computers by clampolo · · Score: 1

      Stop posting on the internet. That will take care of the first problem right away.

      Here's a better one. How about you go drink a bottle of bleach. Then your whole family, neighborhood, and all of Slashdot can celebrate.

      And while you're at it, take a bath too, Hindu

    5. Re:Confiscate their computers by MariusBoo · · Score: 1

      If they payed for it they have every right to have one. Let the schools get their own computers. - You can't own property, man. - I can. But that's because I'm not a penniless hippie.

  40. I'm sick of spam by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 1

    Yeah I've been getting a zillion of these, too. They must have figured that selling Viagra, cheap meds, male organ enhancement products, emails claiming to be from Zimbabwe's lottery agency or some long lost uncle that wants to park a billion bucks in your bank account, and emails claiming to be from hot girls who have a secret crush on you, isn't getting enough people to waste enough time clicking on bogus links to virus-laden scam websites, so now they're using the fact that many people don't know what's happening on their street, let alone in Iran, coupled with word on the street about the tests Iran has been running with all kinds of missiles, coupled with the rumors that Israel is going to blow up Iran that began when Israel flew some planes to Greece a few weeks ago (Greece is approximately the same distance from Israel as Iran), and other nonsense to get people clicking their links. How these spammers manage to avoid getting their face punched in is simply beyond me. It's gonna be like the boy who cried wolf. When something really does blow up, nobody will believe it's actually happening.

    --
    McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
    1. Re:I'm sick of spam by nerverunner · · Score: 1

      Enough is enough! I've had it with this motherfucking spam on this motherfucking internet!

  41. Spammers started World War III by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ... a long time ago.

  42. is there another one saying Slashdot RIP? by shippo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Because this dreadful front-page topic is quite frankly the last straw with this place. Goodbye....

    1. Re:is there another one saying Slashdot RIP? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Good riddance.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:is there another one saying Slashdot RIP? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      What a brilliant idea~

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    3. Re:is there another one saying Slashdot RIP? by rk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't let the FIN packet hit your ass on the way out.

    4. Re:is there another one saying Slashdot RIP? by chord.wav · · Score: 1

      You can't get out. You'll come back, eventually. So, see you in the next post!

  43. Why cannot the spammers be brought to justice? by ClarisseMcClellan · · Score: 0, Troll

    I really do not understand this spam thing. I would be surprised if anyone ever buys anything after reading a spam email. Is there really a huge demand for the prescription meds that get 'advertised' in every inbox every day? Has anyone ever been busted for selling them online in spam emails? It must be relatively easy for the perps to be caught, but it does not seem to happen.

    Bill gates was going to fix the spam problem, what happen? Nothing. If people hijacked the radio airwaves to sell prescription meds there would be an instant response from the authorities. Why can email communications be allowed to be rendered effectively useless due to sheer volume of spam?

    There are vested interests in the spam, and given the amount of money in A/V software I have my suspicions. Time for Linux users to launch a class action against those retards that use that pretend operating system known as Windows. They are the disease and should not be allowed on the interwebs with their inherently unsafe machines and petty hangups.

  44. Impossible, or highly unlikely for quite some time by EdIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A world war is a war affecting the majority of the world's most powerful and populous nations. World wars have spanned several continents, and lasted for years.

    World War III is just not going to happen anytime soon, at least a non-nuclear war. If it is nuclear than everyone is fucked everywhere and it's a moot point. We may go in and destroy Iran, but that is hardly going to escalate into WWIII. Just look at the countries and continents involved.

    Antarctica and the Artic: Hmmmm, last the checked the Intuit peoples and the Penguins did not have some sort of secret alliance and hidden military. Probably not a player in WWIII.

    Australia: Kind of remote. Might contribute troops but hardly the location for WWIII or the political force to cause it either.

    Greenland: Too busy with awesome blond chicks, high tech data centers, and hot spas. Not interested in causing it and no one is interested in attacking it.

    North America - Canada: Highly doubtful. If anything, they will be an innocent bystander that gets hurt when the US gets attacked. Won't start WWIII either.

    North America - United States: Oh, the US will be involved. Bet your ass on that. Could start it too most likely if we have another idiot child president. Will it host the war on its own continent? Probably not. Getting troops and equipment to the US is a heck of a lot harder than Red Dawn made it out to be. Candidate for World War III.

    North America - Mexico: They have problems of their own right now with the drug cartels and political scandals. Don't have anything military wise capable of waging a strategic war away from their own continent. No one is interested in attacking them, and they don't seem to be interested in attacking anyone else either.

    South America - All: Way to involved in their own affairs and completely lack any military infrastructure capable of operations away from their home soil. Other than having a country with a president that likes to verbally attack the US, not much to see here. Who wants to invade and attack them? I dunno either.

    Europe: Look at the countries that make up the EU. They don't want to start anything anywhere. They are far more diplomatic about dealing with the middle east than the US is. I doubt they will be invaded and I don't see them causing World War III either. Took a major chill pill after World War II. They are on break, and don't even get me started on the French.

    Eastern Europe: Still getting on their feet IMO. Lack the resources or the will to put up much of fight for anything. I know there are some tensions between some east european countries and Russia regarding missile defense, but not very likely to start World War III.

    Japan: Too busy making and selling entertainment equipment, cars, and used womens panties. They figured out the best way to wage war was with skyscrapers and advanced technology in products. Next.

    Africa: Yeah, right. They are too busy being butt raped for resources by the rest of the world and dealing with chronic disease and gang rapes of women. Next.

    South East Asia: Not very likely. I can't see any country being invaded or doing the invading.

    North Korea: Will launch a single attack and promptly be totally destroyed within days. Everybody will ignore the rotting corpse and nobody will come to their aid, certainly not China. China would only object if there was a nuclear response to North Korea which is not totally necessary.

    India: More interesting. If anything happens they might take the opportunity to attack Pakistan since they just love each other.

    Russia: Who are they going to fight? US? China? Not until resources become absolutely critical. We got the missile defense deal going, which does remind me of the Cuban Missile crisis, but actuall

  45. I for one... by IronMagnus · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new prophetic spammer overlords.

  46. The Link by HaeMaker · · Score: 2, Funny
    1. Re:The Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love noscript.

  47. Motives for Spam and Country of origin by spineboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    More than likely, it is just a shock type of attention getting mail. However, what if it is state sponsored spam by another country.
    Obviously, there are countries out there that would like the US&As reputation damaged, and this may help do that. There are countries with states sponsored hackers, trying to hack US government/Pentagon computers, so why wouldn't they also attempt psychological damage as well?

    If you here rumors, over and over again about someones behavior, then you might start to think that the person (or country) might behave that way, and maybe think less of them.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:Motives for Spam and Country of origin by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      > If you here rumors, over and over again about someones behavior, then you might start to think that the person (or country) might behave that way, and maybe think less of them.

      Every Fox News watcher now has malware on his computer because he thought it was his patriotic duty to open the mails?

    2. Re:Motives for Spam and Country of origin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obviously, there are countries out there that would like the US&As reputation damaged, and this may help do that.

      Where have you been for the past seven and a half years? The US's reputation has been shot for some time now.

    3. Re:Motives for Spam and Country of origin by Rigrig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Obviously, there are countries out there that would like the US&As reputation damaged, and this may help do that.

      I'd say the USA is doing that just fine, they don't need any help.

      --
      **TODO** [X] Steal someone elses sig.
    4. Re:Motives for Spam and Country of origin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's somewhat funy that you seem to believe than this is part of some sort of espionage or psychological warfare camnpaign. Here's what's happening:
      1) Spammer sends e-mail with shocking, attention-grabbing subject line.
      2) The recipient clicks on the link to watch this news unfold but actually installs a truck-load of malware
      3) Malware proceeds to do its damage, file encryption for ransom, credit card number harvesting, etc.

      That's it. There is not 3.5)???. There is no consipracy.

  48. Re:WWIII is the Cold War by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Well actually, WWIII was the Cold War. WWIV would be the Holy Wars II: Islam strikes back.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  49. Spammers are sub-human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only crime for which I would whole-heartedly support the death penalty. Not even child molesters are this low.

  50. Re:Impossible, or highly unlikely for quite some t by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Look at the countries that make up the EU. They don't want to start anything anywhere. They are far more diplomatic about dealing with the middle east than the US is. I doubt they will be invaded and I don't see them causing World War III either. Took a major chill pill after World War II. They are on break, and don't even get me started on the French.

    More like they were castrated after WW/II by American Troops being stationed throughout Europe to prevent them from starting yet another war. There is no question WW/III would have happened if the United States hadn't taken over nearly all the military operations in Europe.

    They are diplomatic because that's all the power they have at this point. This is a double-edged sword; Europe is now nearly powerless to start another war, but they're also close to useless when it comes to helping out when military action is really needed.

    (Some younger Europeans will probably be peeved about this post, but they really need to read their own unbelievably bloodthirsty history)

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  51. Re:Impossible, or highly unlikely for quite some t by AnalogyShark · · Score: 1

    California: Will break off from the rest of the US and go hang out with Hawaii. Alaska can come too.

  52. Ripped off again by glittalogik · · Score: 1

    This totally reminds me of the CH34p C1al!s I bought last month:

    Spam: "Blast Iran with your man-cannon!"
    Reality: America's weaponry malfunctions. All of a sudden "Mission Accomplished!" becomes "I'm sorry baby. This has never happened to me before, I swear!" after which the US throws up all over Iran's bedroom floor and staggers outside to wait for the taxi they forgot to call.

  53. John Titor's in the spam business? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Clearly, John Titor has gotten into the eerily-precognitive spam business.

    Oh, come on. Y'all know that a war's coming. We're all fucked.

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  54. Re:Impossible, or highly unlikely for quite some t by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Russia has been flexing their air mussle lately.
    China has an abonence of men, never a sign of peace.
    Chine Business, and committee are at odds. The economic part of china is a tiny peace.
    Also, don't underestimate the fact that they need oil from the mid-east as well.

    Russia would love to attack China. You do know that the US was Russia number 2 enemy during the cld war, right? There number one being China.
    There is still a lot of tension along that border.

    Russia is having economic problems, and the largest group of growing economic minority in Russia is now Chinese.

    hmm, someone that looks different and is an easy target to blame for societies ills. Nothing could possible go wrong~

    Resources will be gone quicker then 50 years.
    Oil:
    Most OPEC nations now inport as much as the export.
    WE need to find an addition 30 million barrels a day by 2010 ten just to keep up with demand.
    Nobody knows where that's going to come from. They are looking, and looking hard. The worlds energy demands are going up. Most of the OPEC nations are third world countries getting a lot of money. That leads to there own energy needs going through the roof.

    If we don't start doing something now, we will be back to 1900 very quickly.
    There are a lot of things we can do, this administration keeps hamstring them.

    All that said, It seems that no one really wants a big war, including Americans. What they want is enough security that they won't lose their homes, be able to play with there kids during there free time, and eat.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  55. And here I thought by geekoid · · Score: 1

    nothing would be worse then goatse

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  56. Listen To George Noory Much? by maz2331 · · Score: 1

    That actually sounds like a normal night's Coast To Coast AM show.

  57. OK, Here's my top picks from the past week or so. by FilthCatcher · · Score: 5, Funny
    • Reserve in us a means for increase of the member and you quickly will achieve desired result.
    • Make an impression of successful person wearing expensive looking watch.
    • Negroes admire with the of the size - we will surpass them! - not sure whether I should be amused, bemused or deeply offended - probably a combination of all of the above.
    • Say goodbye to your diseases!
    • Increase Your Penis Width (Girth) By upto 20%.
    • Be the master of the universe, with a huge broadsword in your pants?
  58. So Much for the NIE by banished · · Score: 1

    First the intel team got it wrong with Iraq having WMDs; now they've got it wrong with Iran not having them. Jeesh!

    Get on your knees and bow to the East...

  59. Re:Impossible, or highly unlikely for quite some t by iminplaya · · Score: 1
    --
    What?
  60. Conspiracy!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all a big conspiracy. The American government has control over media, and are now sending out this "spam". This is to invalidate any mass-emailing alarming people about the new world war. The man is holding us down!!!

  61. Not unreasonable - duck and cover by itsybitsy · · Score: 1

    Last week CNN reported that the USA has sent insurgents/agents into Iran to spy on and disrupt the Iranians.

    You could easily say that WWIII or WWIV (Iraq is WWIII in some peoples minds) has started when the one super power (no not China, that's in two years) invades an adversary next to a country that the USA DID IN FACT INVADE. Of course the Iranains are likely guilty of invading Iraq as well...

    thus the cycle of violence and power grabbing continues... duck and cover

  62. Are spam-feeding suckers a scarce resource? by shanen · · Score: 1

    My suggestion for Gmail to reduce the amount of spam. In summary, make it much easier for good Samaritans to take down the spammers' websites before the spammer finds a sucker to send money. It basically works on the theory that there are more Samaritans than suckers. Actually it does rather more than that, but this /. venue only calls for the very short summary.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  63. Wolf! by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

    And the next time wolf is heard
    (the third world war!)
    we'll just think it's a hoax. Those who want to start a world war
    (the wolves)
    could desensitize the victims to the news with a series of anonymous emails until the real news is ignored and people don't bother hiding in or even building bunkers. In the fable, at the end there's always a
    (war)
    wolf.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  64. i hate spammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SomePunkAssMailers Piss me off

  65. Next: Cold War II? by jsiren · · Score: 1

    Funny, that :)

    On a more serious note, I wouldn't wonder if the situation with Iran and Iraq plus some other up-and-coming nations with nuclear capability resulted (directly or indirectly) in another cold war (Cold War II?) See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_War for comparison.

    --
    Usage: km/h for speed (kilometers per hour); kph for very slow impulses (kilopond hours).
  66. Consider the target audience. by Loopy · · Score: 1

    Take a moment to think objectively (I know, it hurts, doesn't it?) about who would be emotionally charged about the aforementioned subject matter. Then consider a key element in most successful social engineering attacks. Then consider the fairly common commentary here on /. with regards to the people who would be involved in leading said WW3.

    Sounds fairly on-target for /. to me. :P

  67. What seems scary to me by dgbrownnt · · Score: 1
    What seems scary to me is that, for a fleeting moment, the thought came across my mind "What if WWIII really did start and the government is keeping it a secret?!"

    Now it could just be that I watched half of season 3 of Babylon 5 last night, but I'm sure that's completely unrelated...

  68. The video here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suppose that is what this dude was talking about, I wondered if he had lost his mind when I saw the post on his blog:

    http://blog.didierstevens.com/2008/07/09/more-fireworks/

  69. Gnome vs. KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    > Global War Against Spam, Terror, & Erectile Dysfunction (GWASTED).

    Yeah, but then the KDE folks will drop everything and release a kWasted as soon as possible...

  70. Silly spammers by Duradin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It can't be WWIII. We don't declare war anymore. Too many hoops to jump through.

    Iran would be YAPA (Yet Another Police Action).

  71. Making connections out of the info fragments by FeatureBug · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I foresee this major oil bubble serving an extremely useful purpose if Iran really were attacked very soon.

    Let's assume the expected oil price minus all the speculation, is per IEA calculations, around $70-80/barrel. If Iran gets attacked, it is likely they will attempt to block the Straits of Hormuz by destroying passing oil tankers. If they succeed, it will at a stroke remove 60% of world oil supply from the market. The shock of that happening would cause the oil price to spike to well over $200/barrel, with devastating consequences to world stock markets.

    Speculation has already pushed the price up close to $150/barrel. However, the speculative bubble can be quickly and deliberately popped with the help of a trillion dollar hedge fund around the same time that war breaks out and the Straits get blocked. There would be much less of a surge in the oil price.

    Who's to say the big speculators haven't been playing the market for this very purpose, in clever anticipation of upcoming attacks on Iran in September?

    The good news for us is that after it is all over, the oil price should fall back around $70-80.

  72. Not likely by istartedi · · Score: 1

    There are ways to play the volatility of oil prices without resorting to anything illegal. Also, spammers can't have much of an impact on something as heavily traded as oil. That's why most spam-based pump-n-dump scams operate on thinly traded "penny stocks" that are traded "over the counter". In that market, there might be only a handful of trades a day on a particular issue. If you can convince a few dozen people to buy such a stock, you can move the price.

    However, it would not surprise me at all if Iranians, through straw purchasers, had loaded up just prior to the sabre rattling. The ability to fire missiles over the shipping lanes for 40% of the oil, and to control the timing thereof, is a signficantly more potent market mover than spam.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  73. Re:Impossible, or highly unlikely for quite some t by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

    Greenland: Too busy with awesome blond chicks, high tech data centers, and hot spas. Not interested in causing it and no one is interested in attacking it.

    Well, nobody was interested in attacking it until you described it like that!

  74. But what if... by camperdave · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting patiently for Slashdot to post the Nigerian folks that always email for the millions they have to give away.

    But what if it were true?

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  75. High Creep Factor. by myCopyWrong · · Score: 0, Troll

    The point is smear and to keep people from sharing genuine feelings so that they will better accept broadcast opinion. People like me, don't want another war of aggression are going to have their email mysteriously vanish but very few will be able to put that together with the "spam news" that only tech people will hear about. Everyone else is just going to associate the risks of such an invasion with crackpot spam and penis pills. Messages passed here, on BBS, Usenet and elsewhere will have been dealt with in advance.

    The silence and humiliated objectors will be easy to arrest. With just a little more smear, there will be popular support for it. Welcome to the police state. It will lead to WW3.

    1. Re:High Creep Factor. by dedazo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Jesus christ twitter, are you for real? How dumb do you feel when you post things like these and then a few hours someone finds your new account?

      When do you calculate you'll stop creating new sockpuppets? When the Slashdot user table overflows DB_INT?

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  76. ?? I have never seen this warning! by aqk · · Score: 1

    I get a lot of "Grow 3 inches, aqk!" (geez- I'm happy with my height now)
    - and
    "you have a really stupid face, aqk!" (this one was evidently meant for someone else)
    but -
    I have yet to receive this WW3 warning.

    OMG! Am I out of the loop?
    ,
    .

  77. Link: The war with Iran has already begun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    In fact, the Bush administration has already started another war in Iran. If you pay taxes in the U.S., you don't get to participate in the choice to go to war. You only get to pay for it.

    The war with Iran is to try to get even more control over the supply of oil, to make the price go even higher by restricting the supply. Bush and Cheney are oil and weapons investors and they are working to put more money in their pockets.

  78. WW3 was over 17 yrs ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WW3 == Cold War (1950-1991). History will show the Cold War was full, global scale war. It may not have been completely continuous during that time span but it was a war nonetheless. The 100 years war also was not continuous but it is considered a singular war.

    The beginning of WW4 roughly corresponds to Operation Desert Storm but an argument could be made that it began with the bombing of US barracks in Lebanon or with the Iranian hostage crisis.

  79. In 2008, war was beginning by hcdejong · · Score: 1

    Somebody set up us the spam!

  80. Spam... by MK_CSGuy · · Score: 1

    ...or psychological warfare?

  81. Re:Impossible, or highly unlikely for quite some t by smoker2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You are a complete tosser. The US troops were left in Europe to hold the USSR back, not to prevent another war in Europe. In fact Europe was to be the battleground.
    Firstly, if each EU nation decided to turn on the American troops based in their countries, what are the US going to do ? Bomb their own troops ? (probably, going by past events).
    Secondly, how much does the US spend on its military every day ? And how much of that is spent to maintain defences on foreign soil.
    Seems like the EU gets the best deal financially speaking, and as it's only the US that wants to start wars recently, why should we waste all our cash ?
    As for your last point, the USA has only existed for a couple of centuries. Europe has had nation states for thousands of years. And yet the US seems to be intent on catching up in the bloodthirsty stakes. Only you like to keep it at arms length. Let's see, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Turkey, Afghanistan, Korea and Vietnam to mention a few. There is also the interference in Southern American countries, so I would watch where you point that finger.

  82. HR 362 / SR 580 : Rep. Gary Ackerman calls for war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I suspect attaching this to a non-event like a spam attack won't be read by many, but there is a serious side to this little non-article. Have a look at HR 362 / SR 580, and you'll see that certain individuals are actively planning authorisation to commit the first overt act of war against Iran.

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?aid=9377&context=va

    http://www.infowars.com/?p=3202

    I quote from HR 362: "Whereas nothing in this resolution shall be construed as an authorization of the use of force against Iran"

    Well, that's all well and good, but doesn't sound so friendly when later followed by:

    "...imposing stringent inspection requirements on all persons, vehicles, ships, planes, trains, and cargo entering or departing Iran..."

    By gumbo, that sounds pretty much like an act of war to me, folks.

    Fred Thompson might be a has-been contender for POTUS, but he's still got clout and buddies ...
    http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/west-urged-to-blockade-iran/2007/06/20/1182019197725.html

    From what I can tell, the bill is due for a vote today (Friday) ... HR 362's co-sponsors include 96 House Democrats and 111 House Republicans.

  83. Re:Impossible, or highly unlikely for quite some t by maypull · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is no question WW/III would have happened if the United States hadn't taken over nearly all the military operations in Europe.

    "No question"? Really? [citation needed].

    Perhaps you're thinking about the Morgenthau Plan, which was a primarily economic effort (which only lasted a few years) to "industrially disarm" Germany.

    To the best of my knowledge, the primary reason for the stationing of US troops in Europe was to expand the US sphere of influence here (yes, I'm European) as a bulwark against the Soviets -- with whom relations were already beginning to deteriorate at the close of the war.

    And no, I can't be bothered to dig up references for that, which I suppose makes me a hypocrite but hey, technically I should be working! :)

  84. Re:Impossible, or highly unlikely for quite some t by Tazor · · Score: 1

    Greenland: Too busy with awesome blond chicks, high tech data centers, and hot spas. Not interested in causing it and no one is interested in attacking it.

    Since when is Greenland full of blond chicks, data centers and hot spas??
    I thought Greenland was full of ice, polar bears and drunk people.. you must be thinking of Finland or something.

    --
    "I find your lack of faith disturbing"
  85. Fight fire with fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always been convinced that the best way to fight spam is to fight fire with fire - the old "make love not spam" scheme was great and we need more of that.

    It has been proved that DDoS attacks on both spam sources (choke the zombie PCs off the net) and the websites peddling the spamvertised junk works very well. We've seen violent reactions from the spam mafia against smaller outfits attempting such schemes so we know it works and it hurts. That's why we need much more of that. A full all-out war where a huge part of the legitimate internet (including backbone sites with huge bandwidth at its disposal) coordinates and sustains a massive DDoS attack against the spammer sites. It will kick them off the net and it most likely will kick their providers off the net as well (serves them right for providing connectivity to spammers) and if sustained long enough it will drive both spammers and spamvertizers out of business. If stupid people don't get the spams and can't buy the junk, the money goes away and the business collapses. Any startups will get killed before they even sell their first bottle of viagra.

  86. The clue is in the article by Ted+Freeman · · Score: 0
    Oil futures don't move because a few hundred or a few thousand people get obviously false spam news in their inbox. Future traders have Reuters and Bloomberg live news feeds on their desks in front of them. The reason for this is to sucker people in to visiting their poisoned website.

    However, Sophos warned that users visiting the webpage and clicking on the 'video player' run the risk of being infected with the Troj/Tibs-UO Trojan and a malicious JavaScript hidden on the website as Mal/ObfJS-AY.

  87. Petrol car batteries too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are enormously expensive to make.

    However, like Prius batteries, that expense means it is worth recycling.

    Which is less expensive than making new ones.

    Duh.

  88. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's no girlfriend, it's a moon!

    1. Re:Obligatory by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      that's no moon, it's a broom!

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  89. Snake..?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Snake? Snake?!?!?! Snnnaaaakkkkeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  90. Re:Impossible, or highly unlikely for quite some t by salec · · Score: 1

    Greenland: Too busy with awesome blond chicks, high tech data centers, and hot spas. Not interested in causing it and no one is interested in attacking it.

    Clearly, a slip of a mind. According to his associations, he must have meant Iceland, not Greenland.

  91. Re:Impossible, or highly unlikely for quite some t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Antarctica and the Artic: Hmmmm, last the checked the Intuit peoples and the Penguins did not have some sort of secret alliance and hidden military. Probably not a player in WWIII."

    Yeah, if the Intuit peoples and the Penguins had any kind of "secret alliance," surely we'd have a version of Quicken for Linux by now...

    Oh, you meant Inuit? My bad...

  92. Not impossible nor unlikely by mu51c10rd · · Score: 1

    China and Russia are big importers of oil from Iran. Does anyone think they will standby as we attack their oil source? Yes our economies are intertwined, but that probably wouldn't stop a country from protecting their oil source.

  93. Re:Impossible, or highly unlikely for quite some t by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

    "No question"? Really? [citation needed].

    What, after TWO (count 'em) unbelievably bloody wars, you think the nature of Europe just changed overnight? All the ancient hatred "just went away"? Come on.

    And yes, much of the reason was to hold back the Soviets, but make no mistake that there was an undercurrent of making damn sure Europe didn't screw up the world again.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  94. Good riddance by azzuth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hopefully it wiped out their computers. Should keep them off the forums long enough for some intelligence to seep back into online discussions...

  95. Re:Impossible, or highly unlikely for quite some t by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The US troops were left in Europe to hold the USSR back, not to prevent another war in Europe. In fact Europe was to be the battleground.

    It's true that much of the reason was to hold the USSR back (though, let's not forget that Eastern Europe is still Europe), but after two world wars, do you really think the nature of the countries of Europe suddenly turned into peaceful loving countries? Hardly. The United States might've primarily been talking about holding back the USSR from aggressive expansion (which was absolutely a threat), but there was no doubt that Western Europe still had all the old hatreds and desires. You would think they would have learned after WW/I, but they didn't. And they didn't learn after WW/II. They were just forced to learn.

    For some bizarre reason, Europe has now styled itself as always having been this mature, peace loving continent. And I'm not going to get into a worthless debate about the wars of the United States in the 20th century that you'll never agree with. It's fashionable to bash the US, so I highly doubt you'll be objective. I'll just say that the wars the US is involved with have had fundamentally different motivations than the wars of Europe.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  96. Want me to foward you this one? by azzuth · · Score: 1

    I got one this morning titled: "Grow a Kangaroo in two weeks!"

    I was almost intrigued enough to click on it, but thankfully gmail quoted the message inside : "Tom Cruse crashes a helicopter over the Pacific Ocean, body not yet found..."

    While I admit the possibility of both being true excited me extremely, I figure the probability of both having my own kangaroo and Tom Cruse dying within the same day/email to be a little outside the realm of believability.

    *sigh* well there is still the chance that my letter to Tom trying convincing him to "liberate" a kangaroo from the zoo will yield one success, and should he fail I will have an excuse for the other...

  97. Keep your servers up,at least! by nicks,nicks,nicks! · · Score: 1

    The only problem is that they can't even keep their servers up.Knowing that it's spam,I clicked the link to find out what crap they put up to support their claim,Last time I tried,FF 3.0 on Ubuntu 8.04 errored out with Cannot connect to Server. At the very least,they should be sure they can serve out the malware they advertise so gratuitously.

  98. Re:Impossible, or highly unlikely for quite some t by nicks,nicks,nicks! · · Score: 1

    Somebody forgot the tensions between India and China.

  99. In 200 years... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    ...we'll see documentaries about spam as a literary genre, comparing the early "na tural v|agra ci4lis" era to the wild post "World War III" years. Dissertations will be written about 419 in the context of contemporary popular culture. There will also be dissertations (as people tend to get things wrong after a while) about whether prolific spam artist DVD Jon really died from recreational abuse of aspirine generics.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  100. Re:Impossible, or highly unlikely for quite some t by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

    While China and India are both formidable world powers, they lack the sort of elaborate treaty and alliance structures that drug everyone into WWI and WWII.

    --
    -
  101. Re:Impossible, or highly unlikely for quite some t by EdIII · · Score: 1

    LOL!

    BWAHAHHA

    I had no idea what you were talking about it for a minute or two. Then BAM!. Yeah... I meant the Inuit people's not the software company :)

  102. Re:OK, Here's my top picks from the past week or s by Mike610544 · · Score: 1

    Best one I've seen: "You have a big heart ... but a small penis."

    --
    ... also, I can kill you with my brain.
  103. Link is available? by ObamaRama7 · · Score: 1

    Is there still a link hosted on http://www.digitalfuntown.com?

    --
    -- Hot chick + lightsaber = http://tinyurl.com/sxtmsg