I used gentoo for over a year and a half. So, I actually was speaking from experience.:)
I guess the actual portage system isn't too bad. I think the part I don't care for is Gentoo's QA--or lack thereof. So while portage may be okay, it's not worth formatting a BSD box over; IMHO.
Don't try to pass off ATi's cobbled-together drivers as a myth. The only myth is ATi's "Linux support". I bought a Radeon 9500 after hearing about ATi's "support". After using it in Linux I gave it to my girlfriend (since she still uses Windows) and went back to my Ti4200. Yeah, it's that bad.
I want Open Source to succeed more than most people; I only buy hardware from companies that have Linux support. Putting out sub-standard drivers that make brand new cards perform worse than the last-generation cards isn't support in my book. Nvidia is releasing drivers that are at least as good as their Windows equivalent. To me, that's "Linux support".
nVidia is the only choice right now for high performance 3d in Linux. There's no way you can convince me it's better to spend over $300 to get an ATi card with 3D performance on the same level as a $50 nVidia card.
ATi has superior hardware, but their drivers are holding them back. Let me know when they have Open Source drivers that are anywhere close to the performance of their Windows drivers and I'll be the first one to switch. Until then I'll stick with the company that actually supports Linux instead of just using it for PR.
But how many Linux boxes have Apache (with or without PHP) and/or sendmail? None of my boxes have sendmail, and only one has Apache--which is kept updated.
The Linux environment is much more diverse than the Windows environment. Not to mention that--from my observations--Linux admins tend to do a better job of keeping their systems patched. Not necessarily just because they're Linux admins, mind you. Just because at this point in time, people running Linux tend to be more technologically adept. Obviously this will change as more people move to Linux and unskilled admins are put in charge of "that Linux server thing" instead of "that Windows server thing".
I don't doubt it would be possible to create an effective virus for Linux. My only dispute is that I believe the effect of such a virus (at this point in time) would be limited in impact to something less than even a minor Windows virus.
Linux isn't quite the easy target that Windows is. Almost every Linux box is completely different when compared to another. Not everyone is using the same mail client, there are several different browsers that may or may not be used, and several different daemons that may or may not be available or exploitable.
You just can't easily write a virus that will infect a massive number of Linux machines.
Note that I'm not saying Linux machines are impervious to viruses; just that I'd be shocked if there was any Linux virus that infects more than a handful of machines.
The Qt Free Edition is provided under both the Q Public License ("QPL") and the GPL. This specifies that you may freely use the Qt Free Edition for:
Running software developed by others (e.g. KDE)
Development of open source/non-proprietary software
The Qt Professional / Enterprise Editions are available for development of commercial/proprietary software. If you wish to evaluate Qt/X11 for commercial use, please contact sales@trolltech.com.
I wouldn't want to touch Helix even with a very, very long pole.
Why would you want to avoid it? No email except the confirmation. No "spyware" (or any other software for that matter), just the player.
I don't recall anyone here claiming it was "free software", let alone claiming that as a reason for considering use of Helix. The fact is that it's better than any of their Real-series players, open or closed.
Things may change once it's finished the development stages, but right now it works similar to Totem (albeit with quite a few less features).
I have no problem with Helix and if is released functioning the way it is now (simple interface and non-intrusive default installation), I'll have a lot more respect for RealNetworks.
Just update your LVM utils, compile dev-mapper support into the kernl, and you'll be set. LVM2 will find and activate LVM1 VGs.
It's been a long time since I made the transition, but I don't recall having any problems at all. In fact I remember thinking, "Wow, that was a lot easier than I thought it would be."
Merrium-Webster seems to disagree with you... (emphasis mine)
Pronunciation: "ir-i-'gard-l&s Function: adverb Etymology: probably blend of irrespective and regardless Date: circa 1912 nonstandard : REGARDLESS usage Irregardless originated in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that "there is no such word." There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose. Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance. Use regardless instead.
I was looking for some more information about this on the Winamp forums. I happened to run across this thread which seems to have links to a Linux nsv-encoder/server for the NSV.
I'm still looking for a Linux player, if anyone has any links I'd appreciate it. I don't want to have to resort to WINE.
So because they captured Hussein, that validates the invasion of Iraq?
I'm not sure I follow your logic.
The Iraq invasion was based on false pretenses and always has been and will continue to be a bad idea. It is good that they captured Hussein, but that doesn't change the fact that the invasion wasn't a good idea.
Why would Democratic candidates have anything to respond to? The only point that can no longer be made is "we still haven't found Hussein", all others remain true.
Maybe you could explain where in my post I said it was a "secure system"?
I was explaining why they use the terminology they do, and why it makes sense. I don't think a properly configured OpenBSD is any more secure than a properly configured Linux.
Please take the time to comprehend posts before you waste the time responding to a point that wasn't made.
Slashdot Mirror
Go give it a try and see for yourself.
:)
I used gentoo for over a year and a half. So, I actually was speaking from experience.
I guess the actual portage system isn't too bad. I think the part I don't care for is Gentoo's QA--or lack thereof. So while portage may be okay, it's not worth formatting a BSD box over; IMHO.
Even if Gentoo portage is as good as it sounds
;)
Don't worry, it's not anywhere near as good as it sounds.
Just stick with FreeBSD, it works much better.
Yeah, last time I needed my car fixed I just shipped it to China. ;)
[accent="outrageous french"] No thanks, I've already got one, you see. It's very ni-suh.[/accent]
Also, I believe that you are now given the choice of using Wimp when you install Gaim on Windows.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I haven't installed the Windows version for quite a while now.
Did you forget about these?
;)
Even if you assume the NiMH lasts only 1/2 as long as Li-ion, that's $60 less than the $99 replacement battery.
Not to mention I've heard you can get a pack of Energizer 4AA,2AAA NiMH and a recharger at some wholesale club for $20 on sale.
I don't disagree with Apple's descision to have a "non-replacable" Li-ion. I think that's the best solution for the iPod.
I'm just being an ass by noting that you missed a critical point in your argument.
Don't try to pass off ATi's cobbled-together drivers as a myth. The only myth is ATi's "Linux support". I bought a Radeon 9500 after hearing about ATi's "support". After using it in Linux I gave it to my girlfriend (since she still uses Windows) and went back to my Ti4200. Yeah, it's that bad.
I want Open Source to succeed more than most people; I only buy hardware from companies that have Linux support. Putting out sub-standard drivers that make brand new cards perform worse than the last-generation cards isn't support in my book. Nvidia is releasing drivers that are at least as good as their Windows equivalent. To me, that's "Linux support".
nVidia is the only choice right now for high performance 3d in Linux. There's no way you can convince me it's better to spend over $300 to get an ATi card with 3D performance on the same level as a $50 nVidia card.
ATi has superior hardware, but their drivers are holding them back. Let me know when they have Open Source drivers that are anywhere close to the performance of their Windows drivers and I'll be the first one to switch. Until then I'll stick with the company that actually supports Linux instead of just using it for PR.
And their drivers are awsome
:)
Obviously you don't use Linux or FreeBSD.
But how many Linux boxes have Apache (with or without PHP) and/or sendmail? None of my boxes have sendmail, and only one has Apache--which is kept updated.
The Linux environment is much more diverse than the Windows environment. Not to mention that--from my observations--Linux admins tend to do a better job of keeping their systems patched. Not necessarily just because they're Linux admins, mind you. Just because at this point in time, people running Linux tend to be more technologically adept. Obviously this will change as more people move to Linux and unskilled admins are put in charge of "that Linux server thing" instead of "that Windows server thing".
I don't doubt it would be possible to create an effective virus for Linux. My only dispute is that I believe the effect of such a virus (at this point in time) would be limited in impact to something less than even a minor Windows virus.
And how do you propose this virus would spread?
Linux isn't quite the easy target that Windows is. Almost every Linux box is completely different when compared to another. Not everyone is using the same mail client, there are several different browsers that may or may not be used, and several different daemons that may or may not be available or exploitable.
You just can't easily write a virus that will infect a massive number of Linux machines.
Note that I'm not saying Linux machines are impervious to viruses; just that I'd be shocked if there was any Linux virus that infects more than a handful of machines.
Where are my modpoints when I need them. :)
That's actually the one I'm in favor of as well. :)
There was a logo mock-up posted on the list with an 'e' at the center of the debian swirl. Very good idea for a logo IMO.
The only problems with the name are:
1) Need approval from the Debian group to use their trademark
2) "Debian" has less name recognition than "Linux"
Maybe something better will come up, but right now I like the name "Enterprise Debian" in spite of those potential problems.
The name isn't finalized. There's currently several discussions on the mailing list about what the name should be.
Right now "Enterprise Debian" and "Business Linux" seem to be the most popular choices. Although some still want to stick with the UserLinux name.
The Qt Free Edition is provided under both the Q Public License ("QPL") and the GPL. This specifies that you may freely use the Qt Free Edition for:
Running software developed by others (e.g. KDE)
Development of open source/non-proprietary software
The Qt Professional / Enterprise Editions are available for development of commercial/proprietary software. If you wish to evaluate Qt/X11 for commercial use, please contact sales@trolltech.com.
KDE is a common default for most distros...
Except among those targetting enterprise customers.
Which is the same group UserLinux is going for.
There's a reason Gnome is more popular for business-focused distros.
I wouldn't want to touch Helix even with a very, very long pole.
Why would you want to avoid it?
No email except the confirmation.
No "spyware" (or any other software for that matter), just the player.
I don't recall anyone here claiming it was "free software", let alone claiming that as a reason for considering use of Helix. The fact is that it's better than any of their Real-series players, open or closed.
Things may change once it's finished the development stages, but right now it works similar to Totem (albeit with quite a few less features).
I have no problem with Helix and if is released functioning the way it is now (simple interface and non-intrusive default installation), I'll have a lot more respect for RealNetworks.
If by "really nice defaults" you mean being able to cross the monitor (horizontally at 1280x1024) in 52 seconds. ;) This is on Debian Sid, btw.
Any idea where you change these settings?
Yeah, you have to agree to their license to use the development version...
;)
I haven't received any email or spam from the address I signed up with. Just the confirmation email.
It's really not as evil as you think.
That's why they're working on this:
https://www.helixcommunity.org/
Just update your LVM utils, compile dev-mapper support into the kernl, and you'll be set.
LVM2 will find and activate LVM1 VGs.
It's been a long time since I made the transition, but I don't recall having any problems at all. In fact I remember thinking, "Wow, that was a lot easier than I thought it would be."
Merrium-Webster seems to disagree with you... (emphasis mine)
Pronunciation: "ir-i-'gard-l&s
Function: adverb
Etymology: probably blend of irrespective and regardless
Date: circa 1912
nonstandard : REGARDLESS
usage Irregardless originated in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that "there is no such word." There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose. Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance. Use regardless instead.
I was looking for some more information about this on the Winamp forums.
I happened to run across this thread which seems to have links to a Linux nsv-encoder/server for the NSV.
I'm still looking for a Linux player, if anyone has any links I'd appreciate it. I don't want to have to resort to WINE.
So because they captured Hussein, that validates the invasion of Iraq?
I'm not sure I follow your logic.
The Iraq invasion was based on false pretenses and always has been and will continue to be a bad idea. It is good that they captured Hussein, but that doesn't change the fact that the invasion wasn't a good idea.
Why would Democratic candidates have anything to respond to? The only point that can no longer be made is "we still haven't found Hussein", all others remain true.
If you're only playing the campaigns that come with the game you're missing out on 99% of the fun.
;)
It's like complaining that you don't like the Half-Life because the single-player game is too linear.
Maybe you could explain where in my post I said it was a "secure system"?
I was explaining why they use the terminology they do, and why it makes sense. I don't think a properly configured OpenBSD is any more secure than a properly configured Linux.
Please take the time to comprehend posts before you waste the time responding to a point that wasn't made.