Slashdot Mirror


Rumors of Mini iPods

TheKidWho writes "According to Thinksecret: 'Reliable sources inside and outside of Apple have confirmed Apple will announce the new pocket-size iPods in a number of capacities and in various colors, including stripes. Capacities will be 2 and 4GB -- meaning users could store some 400 and 800 songs, respectively. Prices will start at around $100US, Think Secret has learned. It is not known if the new product line will be available immediately after introduction. It is also expected that current iPod models will be revamped to add body colors as well.' With the $99 price tag, it seems these rumored iPods could make big headway in the low end mp3 player market."

621 comments

  1. Batteries? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But will they introduce a user replaceable battery?

    --
    Evil people are out to get you.
    1. Re:Batteries? by Goyuix · · Score: 0, Interesting

      What I want at least as much as a replacable battery is for the MP3 player to just show up as removeable storage... that way it is easier to have it be cross platform, and the software can simply read and write it like a file system because it is.

      There are a few players out there that support this - and here is to hoping (even though it is in vain) that Apple makes this dream come true.

    2. Re:Batteries? by Gandalf+Teh+Ghey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i want an mp3 player that can record with an internal microphone. thats way more useful than a camera-in-a-cellphone

    3. Re:Batteries? by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's really conducive to DRM encorcement.

    4. Re:Batteries? by shawnce · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ummm... the iPod already does this. Or are you talking about having this in just a smaller form factor?

    5. Re:Batteries? by geoffspear · · Score: 2, Redundant

      Yes, moderators, that's an interesting comment, describing a feature that already exists in the iPod.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    6. Re:Batteries? by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and 2gb removable usb drive for 100$...

      not bad imho, though as always it remains to be seen. apple hw is funny in the sense that the RUMOURS are told in the fashion that normal announcements would be otherwise(and likewise, rumours used as facts when comparing to other upcoming hw with shipping dates, specs and reviews).

      -

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:Batteries? by Aliencow · · Score: 0

      What my ipod-owning friends told me is that the ipod does that indeed.. yet if you just copy an mp3 to it it doesn't show up on it and you can't play it because it's not registered in a database or playlist or something... is that even remotely true or are they just dumb?

    8. Re:Batteries? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, the iPod shows up as removable storage. It is either a mac FS or FAT32. And you can dump files into it using third party programs, such as EphPod and PodWerks.

      What you're asking for is already done.

      What ISN'T done, is the ability to manage files by directory: to drag and drop them using your os and "just have it work." This isn't done for several reasons, not the least of which is indexing. Maintaining an index of the ID3 data inside an MP3 file is as important as its name...because it is this metadata that allows you to search by genre, artist, 'star' rating, etc. If you just dragged and dropped the files, you'd either have to a) build this index on disconnect, which could lead to LOTS of trouble, not to mention a lengthy startup time or b) build this index when the files are copied, which means having to attach data to the driver, and gets you no closed to cross platform compatibility than having a uniform application.

      Another reason is to assuade fears that Apple was making a file swapping tool. Apple's software is one way only...copy to the ipod or delete it. You can't copy from it. Therefore, Apple can't be sued for abetting piracy...since all the pirates have to use third party tools, of which there are several good ones for Windows, Linux and OSX.

      All told, the iPod is the best cross platform solution around. Apple just doesn't make a Linux version of its software...and there are TONS of compatible options for Linux users. They've already made your dream come true. And they've just answered essential questions you didn't even think to pose in the process.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    9. Re:Batteries? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is certainly the crux of the matter. IMO the solution is to make it run off 2-3V external power, and then sell a battery pack that will snap on, plugs into the AC adapter hole (though it probably won't have one, instead running off USB) and you can slap alkalines, nicds, or nimhs in it. Sony has made a number of small portable devices powered on just this plan, and it worked really well. Then they can sell it with a removable battery pack with whatever battery technology they want in it, and you can replace it with an apple-sold or aftermarket (but unsupported) battery pack as well.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Batteries? by CSharpMinor · · Score: 0, Troll

      The iPod doesn't "already do this."

      The iPod recognizes two different kinds of files: data, which are files stored using the iPod as a removable drive and that can be transferred to any computer of your choice; and music, which are loaded onto the iPod through iTunes/Musicmatch/whatever and that cannot be transferred to a different computer.

      You can load anything as data (including MP3s and AACs), but the iPod will only play files loaded as music.

      So no, it certainly doesn't "already do this."

      --

      Whatever it is I'm complaining about, I'm sure the Republicans did it. This is /., after all.
    11. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      mac FS

      That's odd, I could have sworn apple dropped MFS in favor of HFS back in the '80s....

    12. Re:Batteries? by OmniVector · · Score: 4, Informative

      sacrificing design to make a (tops) 1 hour chore that you have to do once ever 18-30 months slightly easier is not in my opinion a worthwhile choice. so what if you have to buy the battery for $50 or pay apple $99 to replace it. do you see the other mp3 players offering replacable batteries or battery replacement programs?

      really? i didn't think so either.

      --
      - tristan
    13. Re:Batteries? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 0

      That's odd, I don't know shit about file systems on my Mac, since the one that came with it is so good. So, I said "*A* mac FS"...meaning "some unknown filesystem that macintosh computers support..."

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    14. Re:Batteries? by Jason1729 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course not. If a $500 iPod is disposable, a $100 one certainly is.

      What really annoys me is I can't carry a spare battery with me to swap if it dies when I'm out. I'll have to wait until I can recharge the battery before I can use the iPod again.

      Jason
      ProfQuotes

    15. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      belkin makes a battery pack that allows you to snap in AA batteries. Sure it's $70 CAD more, but you get 20 hours of playtime out of it.

    16. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's bigger than the iPod itself, you end up attaching the iPod to the battery pack. If you're going to destroy the tiny, streamlined effect, what's the point?

      Also, you only get 20 hours out of 4AA's with that pack. A minidisc player gives you 40 hours from a single AA, and with the replaceable battery, it's still smaller than an iPod.

    17. Re:Batteries? by charlesparks · · Score: 1

      This is a portable mp3 player though. Having an additional battery pack doesn't make sense for a portable player.

    18. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Original request was:
      What I want at least as much as a replacable battery is for the MP3 player to just show up as removeable storage... that way it is easier to have it be cross platform, and the software can simply read and write it like a file system because it is.
      The iPod does indeed show up as removable storage. Nobody said anything about copying an MP3 to it meaning that the MP3 would show up. That would be fairly useless anyway - with the kind of volumes of MP3s et al you store on an hard drive based MP3 player, you need playlists to make it work. Imagine scrolling through 500 MP3s (the average limit on the 2G model, all other iPods will have songs in the thousands) to select the next song to play. Madness!
    19. Re:Batteries? by udecker · · Score: 3, Informative

      Several vendors have external batteries (or chargers) for the iPod.

      A quick search gave me two AA powered solutions.

      Myself, I just keep mine plugged in in the car and have 10 hours of charge whenever I leave the car. Easy enough?

    20. Re:Batteries? by aszoth · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can see and remove all the music from an ipod without any third party software. You just have to access it from a command line. It's just enough for the common man to think you can't do it. And they did do some other things to make it annoying, but it is quite doable. As for accessing the file system on the ipod, you can also mount it as a firewire drive you just have to make the selection in the ipod controls on itunes. Now to my knowledge you can't just drop songs into one of the music directories (they are invisible) on the ipod and expect them to play but then I've never tried so I'm not sure.

    21. Re:Batteries? by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "Another reason is to assuade fears that Apple was making a file swapping tool. Apple's software is one way only...copy to the ipod or delete it. You can't copy from it. Therefore, Apple can't be sued for abetting piracy...since all the pirates have to use third party tools, of which there are several good ones for Windows, Linux and OSX."

      Abetting piracy? If that was a legitimate charge, we wouldn't have USB JumpDrives on the market. They are nearing the 1gig level now, after all.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    22. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      to drag and drop them using your os and "just have it work."

      Someone'll make an ipod kioslave soon enough.

    23. Re:Batteries? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Legitimate charge? Maybe not. But this way, Apple doesn't have to waste its time and money defending itself against the RIAA, whose members are also their business partners in the ITMS venture. It doesn't hurt its users, since we have other options.

      So while it is a bit of an inconvenience that I can't drag playlists from my iPod to my hard drive before I burn them (somethimes I use a 3rd party program with more features than ITunes, such as precise waveform editing), it isn't impossible, or enough of an inconvenience to necesitate my buying another player. I'm content...the "Industry" is content...and Apple's lawyers can sleep soundly. Best possible combo, no?

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    24. Re:Batteries? by Finuvir · · Score: 1

      I have a 10GB iPod with a little over 1000 tracks on it. I don't use playlists. I choose a song I want to hear, scroll through the 1000 tracks, and select it. After that, the iPod is set to play random tracks. Easy.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    25. Re:Batteries? by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Legitimate charge? Maybe not. But this way, Apple doesn't have to waste its time and money defending itself against the RIAA, whose members are also their business partners in the ITMS venture. It doesn't hurt its users, since we have other options."

      A challenge by the RIAA against the iPod would've never made it to court. The RIAA sued Diamond over the very first portable MP3 player, the Rio. The RIAA lost. That was the case that set the prescident.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    26. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
      Oh, okay, we get understand now. You don't want to use the iPod to store and/or transfer data files, which it already does. You want to use it to steal music. Yea, it's not very good for that. You need to use some other software written by hackers.

      Why didn't you just say that you want to steal music right away, and save the confusion?

    27. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      So on vacation, you have 10 hours of total use or you have to invest another $40 and triple the size of your iPod? If the MD with an optical drive can get 40 hours of play time out of a single AA battery, why can't the iPod with it's hard drive get a decent play time?

      I can buy a 4 pack of alkaline batteries for $2, and I've got over 100 hours of playtime on my MD player. When I'm not on vacation, I use NiMH batteries. They cost $2.50 each to replace, not $100 like the iPod, and I carry spares with me, so there's no downtime.

      Your car charger idea also won't work for me. I work downtown, and commute by subway. Including the commute and time at work, I listen to my player for over 10 hours/day, and often go a few days at a time without being in the car.

    28. Re:Batteries? by anagama · · Score: 2, Funny


      Sure - it will cost $99 and you will be responsible for shipping and handling charges both ways.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    29. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought iPods used Firewire, not USB?

    30. Re:Batteries? by w3weasel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      just to clarify... you can not load music (mp3, aac etc.) files via the os and have them show up in the ipod's playlists. You can manage files by directory using only the OS's GUI, as long as you dont want them to be available in the ipod's playlists.

      If you are reasonably adept at the CLI, you can shoe-horn files into and out of the active playlists directory on your ipod. This would be a laborious task, and there is no reason to do so, when the iTunes interface is so slick.

      As for flexibility from your iPod, I'm shocked that no-one mentioned this: http://ipodlinux.sourceforge.net/

      The hardware you want, with the OS you want.

      -----------------------
      quit crying you fscking baby!

      --

      Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

    31. Re:Batteries? by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 3, Interesting
      What ISN'T done, is the ability to manage files by directory: to drag and drop them using your os and "just have it work."
      Just to clarify, the iPod does allow you to manage files by directory, and allow you to drag and drop them using the OS, however it does not allow you to do this with MP3 or AAC files that you wish to listen to with the iPod. iTunes manages music files on the iPod, but Finder (or Windows explorer) manages the rest of the files on your iPod (for when it is in firewire disk mode).

      I'm not sure about how it works on Windows, but on a Mac you can have it in firewire disk mode and have iTunes open at the same time, which provides you access to both modes quite easily.
    32. Re:Batteries? by rworne · · Score: 1
      i want an mp3 player that can record with an internal microphone. thats way more useful than a camera-in-a-cellphone


      Ask and ye shall receive.
      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    33. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure is amusing working your life around a broken engineering decision.

    34. Re:Batteries? by CapnRob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, but what you *can* do is carry a wall adapter with you, and charge where you are. Wall adapters are cheaper and lighter than the batteries - true, they're bulkier, and they're not terribly handy in every case, but it does work in most.

    35. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a design tradeoff: hard drive based MP3 player that is as small as possible = "easily" replaceable battery is not possible. (The battery IS replaceable - it just takes a little effort. Maybe not such a bad tradeoff if it only need to be done once every 2 years! And if you don't feel comfortable doing this yourself, Apple will do it for you but for a price if it is out of warranty.) Take a look at how the battery fits into the current generation of iPod players:

      http://www.ipodbattery.com/slimipodinstall.htm

      The battery is literally sandwiched between the hard drive (which fills the entire back area of the case) and the circuit boards (which fill the front side of the case.) One of the circuit boards has an area cut away for the battery. How you are suppose to make this battery "easily" replaceable is beyond me. Certainly you could have some type of hatch with the battery on the back side but this will increase the thickness of the design as you are now "wasting" the interior space the battery occupied.

    36. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But why should I be tied to a power outlet? That doesn't work when travelling, even if I'm just doing things around my hometown, I have to remember to charge the thing every night. As another poster said, why should I have to work around apple's lousy engineering? If it were the only option, it might be more worthwhile, but the MD player clearly doesn't have these issues.

    37. Re:Batteries? by NanoGator · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      " thats way more useful than a camera-in-a-cellphone"

      No, it's not.

      Besides, my cell phone records both sound and pictures.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    38. Re:Batteries? by coffeer · · Score: 1

      According to the Daily Mail [UK] today, they are working on replaceable batteries [for the 20/40gig anyway]

    39. Re:Batteries? by iuyterw · · Score: 1

      ask and you shall receive...something other than what you asked for. :)

      That Belkin recorder looks suspiciously external.

    40. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dumbass. Music loaded through iTunes can most certainly be transferred to a different computer. If you took 2 seconds to see how the filesystem is set up on the iPod, you'd see that all of the music is stored under a hidden directory that is more than visible when doing a simple `ls` in a terminal window. Furthermore, you can just download TinkerTool for free and see those hidden directories in the Finder. It's not hard.

    41. Re:Batteries? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Congratulations on the most predictable post possible. Don't you people realise that most MP3 jukeboxes do not have user replaceable batteries?

    42. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. All of the music loaded into an iPod via iTunes (or whatever you use on a PC) is just tossed into a set of directories under a "hidden" directory (i.e. one that starts with "."). The iPod then reads in a huge XML file that locates where the music file is.

      It's just a plain HFS filesystem on there... nothing magical or mystical.

      The only annoying thing is that the music is not organized in the filesystem. The subdirectories just have a mix of music from all different albums. I guess that makes it slightly harder to deal with if you intend to use the iPod to "steal" music. However, a simple Perl script could easily read the XML file and perform a 2-way sync operation (perhaps with the aid of Mac::iTunes).

    43. Re:Batteries? by JK+Master-Slave · · Score: 1

      Entire User Interface designs are based around broken engineering decisions.

      Why shouldn't the tradition continue?

    44. Re:Batteries? by aldoman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. This behaviour is far better, I mean the 'newbies' won't ever use the iPod as a hard drive, and if they stumbled across the music on a folder on their desktop (the iPod mounted) then they might be tempted to start uploading through there, instead of keeping a proper libary of music sync'd up through iTunes...

    45. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you suggesting that because some broken engineering decisions are around, I should make my mp3 player purchase decision around a broken one?

      I should (and did) look for the least broken.

    46. Re:Batteries? by aldoman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Good old Daily 'racist' mail. Maybe they said it was the illegal immagrants fault for this iPod battery problem, as they came into your house at night and started listening to it, draining down the batteries?

    47. Re:Batteries? by devnullify · · Score: 1

      My MP3 CD player has this. It also came with a pair of slim-format NiMH...which last for well over 10 hours. I've never had to use the external battery pack, but I carry it around in my backpack just in case I forget to charge the NiMH. It's really a convenience more than anything else. If you want the extended life, you can take the external pack with you, otherwise just use the built in batteries.

    48. Re:Batteries? by MrEntropy · · Score: 1
      You can't copy from it.


      Actually, I don't believe this to be true. You can copy from it, but the file names and directory paths are somewhat obfuscated, making it diffcult (but not impossible) to do so when it is mounted as a FAT filesystem. At least I think thats what you are talking about.

    49. Re:Batteries? by EddWo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Thats funny these people have always claimed to have had the first portable MP3 Player on the market.

      --
      "Taligent is still pure vapor. Maybe they'll be the last who jumps up on Openstep... "
    50. Re:Batteries? by rworne · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you got me.

      But still, it has the capabilities of adding external components. Microphone, several wireless remotes, FM tuners, external batteries and a crappy (read: slow) memory card storage device.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    51. Re:Batteries? by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 1

      how about this ?

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    52. Re:Batteries? by msborg · · Score: 1

      http://www.ipodbattery.com/ It helps to run something by Google before posting your ignorance for all the world to see.

    53. Re:Batteries? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Having an additional battery pack doesn't make sense for a portable player.

      What's so inconvenient about having the audio player in one pocket, the battery pack in another pocket, and headphones on the user's head?

    54. Re:Batteries? by raverbuzzy · · Score: 1

      You are wrong.

      You can do a simple 'ls' to view the hidden music directory but unlike the user's home music directory the music on the ipod is sure as hell not stored in the same nice structure for you to browse.

      There are 3rd party tools to make it easy to see the music on your ipod and copy it off but forget about using the finder or terminal.

    55. Re:Batteries? by b17bmbr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure about how it works on Windows, but on a Mac you can have it in firewire disk mode and have iTunes open at the same time, which provides you access to both modes quite easily.

      you know this and i know this because we have ipods. but around here, not reading the articles or not having actually using a product doesn't disqualify one from making preposterous claims and scurrilous reviews.

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    56. Re:Batteries? by talnkyo · · Score: 1

      Because most people can't spare two pockets. I know I can't. I have to keep track of my wallet, keys, iPod, sometimes gum, sometimes other miscellany.

      Because Apple uses all-in-one policies. They created the iMac, remember. Also, you're probably the kind of people who would like to see smaller laptops without trackpads so you could use an external mouse.

    57. Re:Batteries? by KyolFrilander · · Score: 1

      The most recent ones do both. You may need to buy an adaptor cable, but that's no big.

      --
      Buddha says, "Shut your karma hole."
    58. Re:Batteries? by KyolFrilander · · Score: 1

      Most places I go on vacation have this thing called e-lec-tric-ity. So does your office. If you're planning on hiking Everest, no, the iPod probably isn't for you. If you're like 95+% of vacationers though, this is a BS argument.

      --
      Buddha says, "Shut your karma hole."
    59. Re:Batteries? by KyolFrilander · · Score: 1

      I hope you don't call yourself a geek. The average lifestyle burden includes getting home at night and taking your cellphone, GBA SP, iPod, laptop, and PDA out to charge overnight. It's like a little religious ritual with a shrine and everything.

      --
      Buddha says, "Shut your karma hole."
    60. Re:Batteries? by KyolFrilander · · Score: 1

      pssssst - it doesn't matter. If you can't nick the batteries out of your portable pocket joy rocket when your music device finally winds down, it's simply NOT WORTH HAVING. Who cares if user replacable batteries inevitably make a device unusually shaped and generally larger than it would otherwise be - you will need to change batteries when you're in Southern Mongolia looking at the colorful natives while totally rocking out to the latest Crystal Method album! PARTY TIME! EXCELLENT! WAYNES WORLD WAYNES WORLD!

      --
      Buddha says, "Shut your karma hole."
    61. Re:Batteries? by kngborg · · Score: 1
      ...since all the pirates have to use third party tools, of which there are several good ones for Windows, Linux and OSX.
      third party tool? i'm running Mac OS X and all i need is the unix command 'cp' to copy those mp3's
    62. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you say that, I call you a pathetic excuse for a subgeek. An ubergeek doesn't warp his life around his toys and worship them. A true geek makes his gadgets work for him.

    63. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not so pathetic that on my vacation all I have to do is charge my electronics.

      Gee, I just visited the Tower of London, Big Ben, and Madame Tusaud's. The main thing on my mind is I better get back to the hotel so I can charge my iPod with my over-priced apple power converter.

    64. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >IMO the solution is to make it run off 2-3V external power, and then sell a
      >battery pack that will snap on, plugs into the AC adapter hole#

      Ugh! What a horrible frig. You're a programmer, right?

      Still, good to see Apple listening to all the people who want to listen to music, but who don't want to spend as much as they spent on their entire hifi on a laptop hd in a white box.

    65. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New York, Massachusetts, and Washington

    66. Re:Batteries? by bwy · · Score: 1

      Sometimes its nice to have a spare battery that you can swap out easily though, when the primary one dies on you during a trip. This is a real benefit of the cheaper solid state units that run off of a single AAA.

    67. Re:Batteries? by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1

      external mice are much better than trackpads or pencil erasers.

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    68. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HFS+ loves you.

    69. Re:Batteries? by hesiod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Having an additional battery pack doesn't make sense for a portable player.

      Excuse my bold assumption, but you've got to be an idiot. What, then, do you think a battery pack WOULD be good for? Your fucking home audio setup?!?!?! Battery packs are FOR *gasp* portable devices! This is EXACTLY the type of purpose for which battery packs were MADE!

      Sorry for being so blunt & insulting, but I have no idea how anyone can honestly make the statement you just did while possessing the ability to use a mouse or keyboard.

      The only way you would make sense is if it was referring to a battery pack attached to a long cord, but I doubt many companies these days are that stupid. Plus, the original poster said:
      > > sell a battery pack that will snap on [...]

    70. Re:Batteries? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      I just keep mine plugged in in the car and have 10 hours of charge whenever I leave the car. Easy enough?

      I have a message from the future. It's "I'm sorry to hear that someone smashed your car window and made off with your $400 portable music player."

    71. Re:Batteries? by darien · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dunno about your iPod, but on my Windows one I can just open "My Computer", click my way into the relevant folder on the iPod and copy, play or edit my mp3s to my heart's content. The only "restriction" is that the iPod software uses a cached database of songs rather than indexing the actual drive (which seems to me like a better option than scanning thousands of ID3 tags in realtime), so if you just dump a file in that directory the iPod won't see it until you update the DB using something like EphPod. Obviously if you use iTunes / EphPod / whatever to copy the file there in the first place then that program will also update the DB for you.

    72. Re:Batteries? by charlesparks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When I say battery pack, I think of an expansion. Something that the product wasn't intended to work with. In this case, the iPod was created as a portable device and only a portable device. For this reason why should Apple create an interface w/o a battery and then allow expansion with a battery pack?

    73. Re:Batteries? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Something that the product wasn't intended to work with.

      Computers weren't intended to play games... Okay, that's a stretch, but allowing something to do more than intended seems to be a good thing.

      > why should Apple create an interface w/o a battery and then allow expansion with a battery pack?

      Well, if they were to make it themselves, I would say "3) Profit." As for allowing others to make it, I'm not sure what their incentive would be. Maybe because they realize that more addons & features makes people more likely to purchase one. Dunno if this is the case.

      A better question might be "Why shouldn't they?"

    74. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the case that set the prescident.

      And of course, Apple should take legal advice from a guy who can't spell "precedent".

    75. Re:Batteries? by NeoBeans · · Score: 1
      I have a message from the future. It's "I'm sorry to hear that someone smashed your car window and made off with your $400 portable music player.

      Ummm, you do realize that it can charge while it is playing in the car, right? I have this exact same setup in my car, and when I get ot of my car, I simply take my iPod with me.

      (And unlike a "detachable faceplate" for a car stereo, the iPod can be used as a walkman when it's not in the car. Score one for the 'pod)

    76. Re:Batteries? by Zach+Fine · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I wrote up the following screed, and then realized I should start right off the bat with the most pertinent point:
      The iPod battery is user-replaceable for $49. See below for a link to one vendor.
      The iPod was obviously designed for optimal simplicity, elegance, and small-size. Apple crammed a flat battery into the thing that is about the size of the entire back of the device, and thus managed to make the highest capacity/size ratio portable mp3 player available.

      Adding an easily user-accessible battery door would (to my mind) break the seamlessness of the iPod's design and possibly require that it be larger as well (consider a door that's the size of practically the entire back of the device -- or whether the dimensions would change if some sort of snap-release tab-in-slot mechanism was added to the entire length and breadth of the current iPod back).

      Given that the battery lasts at least 18-months, I'd prefer to have a seamless design, and then have a little fun with a screwdriver when the time comes (rarely) to change the battery. In addition, I wonder how long the tiny hard drive will last given the conditions in which it's used and the forces to which it's subjected -- it wouldn't surprise me if (had I an iPod) I'd only need to replace the battery once.

      What's that, you didn't know the battery IS user-replaceable? See IpodBattery.com for details on the $49 ipod batteries they sell and to read the installation instructions. It doesn't look all that difficult for anyone who knows how to use a screwdriver.

      People seem to like to pile on criticism of the fact that the iPod battery is not easily replaceable. But I haven't heard the same sort of griping about the non-easily-user-replaceable lithium-ion batteries built into most PDAs (Palm Tungstens, Sony Clies, RIM Blackberrys, Compaq Ipaq, etc). I doubt all these companies forgo providing easy access to the batteries as some conspiracy to force consumers to replace the devices or pay to have a new battery installed, but rather the devices are designed to be as small and tightly packed as possible, and given this concern less regard is rightly given to putting the battery in an easily accessible spot and adding a door.

      It is worth griping a bit about Apple's previous battery replacement policy (they wanted $255 to replace the battery), but they've since changed their tune quite a bit and it'll now cost $99 to have them replace the battery for you. In addition, when buying an iPod, an additional $59 gets the warranty extended to two years.

      'Course, the iPod is out of my price range. I spent less than the cost of a $49 iPod battery on my teensy 128Mb USB-memory-stick-mp3-player-voice-recorder toy (Andus resound, flashed with some similar player's firmware to allow it to be mounted on Macs, Windows, and whatever-else as a real generic USB storage device), and find that this is a more than adequate amount of memory for a few hours of jogging. But if I were to buy an iPod, it would be because I appreciate things that are well designed and a joy to use, and the battery issue wouldn't even be on my radar.

    77. Re:Batteries? by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

      You're exactly right. I keep trying to tell people the same thing, but people are too busy spreading FUD and blindly hating "the evil Apple" to listen to reason.

    78. Re:Batteries? by the+argonaut · · Score: 1

      And for the command-line wary, you can use an application like TinkerTool (available from finer download site such as MacUpdate or VersionTracker) to show invisible files in the Finder, or if you don't want to muck around with that:

      In the Finder, select "Go To Folder..." from the "Go" menu (or hit cmd-shift-G on the keyboard, type in '/Volumes/NAMEOFYOURIPOD/iPod_Control/Music/F$$' where NAMEOFYOURIPOD is, you guessed it, the name of your iPod and $$ is a number starting at 00 and counting up (01, 02, 03...mine goes up to 19, I don't know if it's a fixed number so your's may be more or less). You'll find your files place seemingly randomly with slightly mangled filenames in those directories. Unfortunately, you can't just go to the Music directory and pick one because they're all hidden folders as well.

      While it's totally safe to copy the files out of there, as another poster stated you wouldn't want to just drop a file in one of them as your iPod won't recognize and play it.

      --
      fuck you.
    79. Re:Batteries? by valmont · · Score: 1

      hear hear. i echoed some your points on two previous posts.

      A lotta geeks like to believe they have a clue about industrial design and engineering challenges associated therewith. Glad to see a non-iPod user with a sense of objectivity. *tips hat*. u've just earned a fan.

    80. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I humbly submit that if you listen to music for 10 hours efd, then you have no life in the first place. Only someone with no fucking life would want to tune it out with music for 10 hours a day. I bet you think you are "successful", dont you?

    81. Re:Batteries? by Refrag · · Score: 1

      Are you going to carry a spare battery with you every day for the years it takes for the iPod's battery to fail?

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    82. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But did the RIAA have to pay Diamond's court costs?

      Was Diamond able to discuss other matters, like an online music store, with the RIAA before/during/after the lawsuit? Or did RIAA members give them the cold shoulder?

      Aren't the answers obvious?

    83. Re:Batteries? by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Did you read the context of my post (and the other replies which 'got it')?

      The iPod battery doesn't last for years; it lasts for about 10 hours of use. Then it has to be recharged. If I can't expect to get somewhere I can recharge my iPod within 10 hours (and then be unable to use it for the hour or so it takes to charge), then it's totally useless.

      A product that takes ordinary batteries can use NiMH rechargables and then I can carry as many NiMH or alkalines as necessary for my situation.

      In my case, I don't want to be bothered remembering to charge it every day when I get home. My MD player lasts for about 30 hours of use on a NiMH battery. I also carry an Alkaline spare. When the NiMH dies, I switch to the Alkaline and then when I remember in the next couple of days, I switch back to the NiMH that has been waiting in the charger since last time.

    84. Re:Batteries? by Refrag · · Score: 1

      There are add on battery packs for your purpose.

      In the real world, it isn't too difficult to drop the iPod onto its dock at the end of the day. In fact, mine spends most of its time there.

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
  2. $99 iPod by hendridm · · Score: 0, Troll

    Well, since the iPods are disposable, this will make it a little easier to swallow when you have to buy a new one in 18 months.

    Or maybe they're using a similar model as printer manufacturers. Sell the device cheap, make money on the replacement batteries?

    1. Re:$99 iPod by jkeyes · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I was just thinking that if you cannot replace the battery then why buy one? I mean would it really kill them to make the battery replacable similar to a cordless phone or PDA?

    2. Re:$99 iPod by shawnce · · Score: 1

      Take a look inside of one and decide for yourself... hint not much room for any standard battery type.

    3. Re:$99 iPod by evn · · Score: 5, Informative

      The life of the battery is NOT 18 months in all cases. The majority of iPods (many are >2 years old) are still working flawlessly. The manufacturer of the iPod battery claims that the battery should still function after three years of use (or about 500 cycles). YMMV based on the frequency and type of use but so far most 1G iPods are still working so there isn't a reason to suspect this claim is false.

      On occasion you will get a 'dud' something common to all consumer electronics. While it's unfortunate that Apple didn't have a battery replacement/warranty program when those two gentlemen made their movie, that is no longer an issue now. Applecare and battery programs were announces before the ipod's dirty secret domain was even registered.

      Furthermore, if you don't want to pay apple to supply and replace your battery, you can do it yourself - see ipodbattery.com

      Mod down if you must:I know it gets annoying seeing the same old "ipods aren't disposable" posts every day but I'd be upset if someone didn't buy me an iPod for christmas because they saw the parrent post and asusmed it was accurate.

    4. Re:$99 iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn. I'm starting to change my sig file to read "iPod batteries are replacable!" in bold text. How much longer is all this uninformed FUD about iPod batteries going to go on?

    5. Re:$99 iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, their "replacement program" costs as much as buying a new iPod. Nice try though, try reading the original article.

    6. Re:$99 iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, and their difficult enough to install to the point where you have to pry off the cover and the original "brothers" ended up making theirs non-functional. Yeah, they're replacable, but not in an acceptable manner or price.

    7. Re:$99 iPod by Unregistered · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, i'm much sicker of seeing all these uninformed ipods are disposable posts.

      A little more info on ipod batteries.
      The batteries cost about $50. That's a damn good deal for a Li-Poly battery. Apple just charges you $50 more for them to replace it for you. If it's not wrth it to you, buy a battery, pop the case off, and replace it. pretty easy. Yes your cell phone battery is cheaper, but that's becasue it's a low-capacity NiMH battery. A similar battery would almosy double the size of the ipod and last about for 30 mins of music.

      Apple can' use a standard battery. Cylinder cells hold little charge and are huge. Apple's custom batteries can be molded to make use of every spare area inside the ipod. I remember people comlaining about how the smaller G2 ipods had a shorter battery life. It if was a standard (which doesnn't exist) battery, it would be a lot worse. And a battery hat neesds to be replaced every 300 charges (whiich is about 3 years for most people; the ones whose batteries are dying must charge it too often) doesn't need a little door. THe case isn't that hard to remove.

      Disclaimer, etc:
      I'm a mac fan. Also i just got my new G5 Sunday and am still getting used to the new keyboard, so sorr about the bad typing.

    8. Re:$99 iPod by afidel · · Score: 1

      You CAN replace the iPod's battery if you aren't a pansy about opening consumer electronics. In fact for series 1 and 2 iPod's you can get an ~20% higher capacity replacement. The folks at the strangely named ipodbattery.com will be happy to sell them to you and they even include instructions on how to do it =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    9. Re:$99 iPod by Vint+Cerf · · Score: 0

      Hint: make it bigger. It's as if Apple would rather have it look good (note: it doesn't) than make it actually work.

    10. Re:$99 iPod by geekoid · · Score: 1

      the issues is that it is not consumer friendly to change the battery.

      You or I can do it, but what about average consumers?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:$99 iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it has long been established that the "original brothers" as you call them are a pair of ass clowns. Opening the iPod is easy. Replacing the battery is not a big deal. Apple support is not perfect, but better than most. If you listened to anything they had to say, all I can tell you is YHBT.

    12. Re:$99 iPod by wackybrit · · Score: 0, Troll

      Face it, the iPod is totally let down by its battery. 500 cycles? That sucks! My NiMH cellphone can do far more (and it's at about 500 now, I've had it four years, still holds as much charge as it ever did).

      And 8 hours battery time on a charge? When I flew to LA I got up at 5.30am and was out of the door, with CD player, at 6am. Got to the airport at 8am, flight left at midday. Flight then took 10.5 hours, and then had to wait an hour at LAX. An iPod would have barely lasted until I GOT ON THE FLIGHT. It's ridiculous. Carrying a stack of CDs is hardly fun, but even Minidisc players or portable MP3 CD players can get 40 hours or so battery time. And you can always carry spare batteries to use!

      I think most of the people who buy iPods are either part-time music listeners (no problem with that) or dumb style-schmucks. It's not a viable purchase for those of us who can't recharge at every single place we go.

      Thankfully Apple is clearly targeting the iPod at the trendy people, so those of us music lovers with more practical needs can stick with our MP3 CD players and still have music going half way across the Atlantic.

    13. Re:$99 iPod by jeko · · Score: 1
      While it's unfortunate that Apple didn't have a battery replacement/warranty program when those two gentlemen made their movie, that is no longer an issue now.

      Do you honestly believe Apple would be replacing batteries at all right now had these two gentlemen not gotten nationwide press?

      --
      He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    14. Re:$99 iPod by galaxy300 · · Score: 1

      From what I understand, Apple instituted a replacement program about two weeks *before* the video hit the 'net. The two gentlemen decided to release it anyway, cause they knew it would generate tons of press.

    15. Re:$99 iPod by emilymildew · · Score: 1

      Do you ever RTFA or do you just listen to other asshats on /.? They registered their domain ONE DAY before Apple announced their $99 replacement program.

      They didn't start anything.

    16. Re:$99 iPod by JK+Master-Slave · · Score: 1

      Cylinder cells hold little charge and are huge.

      If this were true, it would beg the question 'what the heck are the battery vendors putting in those cylinders, then?'

      Of course, this is merely a hypothetical question, though I'm sure conspiracy theories will be spawned by my mere mention here of the notion.

      If the assertion were true, there'd be battery vendors producing big cylindrical batteries with almost infinite life, since they could cram in more of the 'good' whatever that's supposedly only in the tiny little expensive batteries sanctioned by Apple.

    17. Re:$99 iPod by chicogeek · · Score: 1

      Give me a friggin' break! Have you looked at the batteries at ipodbattery.com? They're thin and rectangular and would be simple to make user-replaceable. It's not as if they're molded around internal components. I think Apple was just looking to generate future revenue.

    18. Re:$99 iPod by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      the issues is that it is not consumer friendly to change the battery.

      You or I can do it, but what about average consumers?


      Somehow, i end up doing it for them.

    19. Re:$99 iPod by fsharp · · Score: 1
      Let me ask you this, how long does your laptop last on a NiMH battery? 8 hours? If you travel with your laptop, do you take along the charger, just in case? I can toss a 12 inch firewire cable and along with the charger and I'm all set. When I'm at the airport stuck in limbo, I just pull out the charger and plug in. Suprise electrical outlets are all over the place. And I can plug my iPod into my laptop and charge it while working.

      It is not terribly difficult to replace the battery in the iPod, I wish it was easier, but so be it. If the average consumer doesn't want to mess with it, they can send it in to Apple and pay the $50.00 labor charge. Heck the average consumer does this all the time when they take their car in for service.

      You final argument on "people who buy iPods" is simply poor logic on your part. According to you, there are only two types of people, trendy and music lovers with practical needs. If you buy an iPod you are trendy if not, your are a music lover with practical needs. Can I turn the argument around and say that the definition of a practical music lover is someone who doesn't own an iPod?

      Isn't it quite possible that there are music lovers who decide based on set of criteria that the iPod is the best device for them? If so, are they trendy?

    20. Re:$99 iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get back to me when you can get a cylindrical lithium-polymer battery.

      Idiot.

    21. Re:$99 iPod by wackybrit · · Score: 0

      When I'm at the airport stuck in limbo, I just pull out the charger and plug in. Suprise electrical outlets are all over the place. And I can plug my iPod into my laptop and charge it while working.

      You're not meant to though. The amount of 'actually for public use' power sockets all over the place is very low. Jacking into the sockets meant for the cleaning staff is do-able, but not 'the way'. Either way, this is why I don't travel with a laptop/notebook. The battery times are abysmal.

      Can I turn the argument around and say that the definition of a practical music lover is someone who doesn't own an iPod?

      Isn't it quite possible that there are music lovers who decide based on set of criteria that the iPod is the best device for them? If so, are they trendy?


      My definition of 'music lover' is different to yours. In my opinion, a music lover who's out of the house for more than 8 hours a shot would require more than eight hours' battery time on a portable music device.

      Sure, you can still be a music lover with your iPod, at home, but music lovers on the move either have to put up with only having eight hours of music (i.e. 'teh sux') from their iPod, or go get something with a decent battery life.

      I could suck up 8 hours of iPod time in a single journey with ease. Therefore, it's not good for me. Sure, it's great for those people who 'commute' an hour a day to work, as they can charge it every few days, but it's not great for everyone (nothing is).

    22. Re:$99 iPod by KyolFrilander · · Score: 1

      Um. So you know about ipodbattery.com. So you know that they, like, _are_ user replacable, right? WARNING DOES NOT COMPUTE!

      --
      Buddha says, "Shut your karma hole."
    23. Re:$99 iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My definition of 'music lover' is different to yours. In my opinion, a music lover who's out of the house for more than 8 hours a shot would require more than eight hours' battery time on a portable music device.

      Ah, see, that's my definition of a friendless geek. OMFG... CAN'T.. GO.. EIGHT. HOURS... WITHOUT... PRECIOUS.. INDIGO. GIRLS! *gakk*

    24. Re:$99 iPod by KyolFrilander · · Score: 1

      Wait, I think this has been totally missed - what PDA has a user replacable battery? Like that I could just go down to the local PDA Hut at the mall and pick up a spare or two or three for the next time I go off into BFE for a month or four. I'll admit to being slightly out of this loop, but I've never particularly _noticed_ 'em floating around.

      Cellphones I'll grant. But what sorta consumer numbers are there for cellphones versus iPods? As ubiquitous as iPods are, I don't think they even dent cellphone numbers.

      --
      Buddha says, "Shut your karma hole."
    25. Re:$99 iPod by enigmatichmachine · · Score: 1

      random question: why are batteries cylinders? wouldn't a cube or rectangle make more sense, i mean, in the end they always end up in a rectangular hole, so isn't the difference in area just lost space that could be used for more mAh? also, anyone want to do the math, and want to tell me what the percentage diference between a cylinder and a rectangle is?

      --
      -and occasionaly a giant moose.
    26. Re:$99 iPod by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Uh, the difference in area between a circle and a square x height?

      x being the length of a side, the area of the square is x*x
      The same area of a circle is Pi*x*x/4

      So a square is x*x(1-Pi/4) bigger than a circle, and x*x(1-Pi/4)*h denser than a cylinder.

      The percentage difference? A rectangle would be 4/Pi-1 times denser.

    27. Re:$99 iPod by chicogeek · · Score: 1

      Um. So the point is that Apple does not make it easy for the battery to be replaced. Note the ipodbattery.com installation instructions: "Begin prying 6 cm down left or right seam..." and "insert screwdriver...". On a $400 device one should not have to pry the case open to replace the battery, would you not agree?

    28. Re:$99 iPod by wackybrit · · Score: 1

      A friendless geek wouldn't be out of the house for more than 8 hours though ;-)

    29. Re:$99 iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Let me ask you this, how long does your laptop last on a NiMH battery? 8 hours?

      Irrelevant. A laptop battery is designed to be replaceable, the iPod is not. In fact, it seems as though Apple's intent was to design it difficult to replace.

  3. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    iCan afford one!

    1. Re:Finally! by Boo+Robin · · Score: 1

      Too bad it comes after Christmas. Now I can't milk the parents and siblings for one. ;D

      Otherwise, this is a great announcement. I'm certain that I will purchase one when I get enough cash. Makes more sense too, I barely have 200 songs...

      -Robin

      --
      'Give me one more medicated peaceful moment'
    2. Re:Finally! by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      It's not an announcement. It's yet another made up product from the people at ThinkSecret, which doesn't belong on Slashdot at all, let alone on the front page.

      God, the ThinkSecret story doesn't even have a forged picture of the device like they did the last 3 times they announced Apple was releasing a PDA.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    3. Re:Finally! by TheKidWho · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ThinkSecret actually has the best track record out of any apple rumor site. And I dont think Thinksecret EVER released any pictures of a forged Apple PDA.

    4. Re:Finally! by Golias · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's not an announcement. It's a rumor on a Mac rumors web site.

      It will not come out right after Chritmas, but rather it will ship on the same day as the 17" CRT Bondi iMac, the AMD x86 Macintosh tower, and the tablet-style iBook.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    5. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > it will ship on the same day as the 17" CRT Bondi iMac, the AMD x86 Macintosh tower, and the tablet-style iBook.

      Good! I've been waiting forever for these!

    6. Re:Finally! by fleener · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, it sounds affordable until they announce the price of the battery.

    7. Re:Finally! by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      They're hit or miss. The best, IMO, is Macrumors.com. If Arn says it's so, take it to the bank.

      --
      "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
    8. Re:Finally! by stewart.hector · · Score: 1

      You do realise this Rumour was posted on ThinkSecret then MacRumours posted it on their site

      Such rumours have been floating about for a few weeks.

      TS has a good track record, and I too like MR

      --
    9. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding. If this is indeed a real product and not another rumor a la iWalk, then Apple should have done everything possible to get it out before Christmas. Well, I'm sure they would have, and if true, then it probably just didn't get done in time.

      A friend of mine wanted an MP3 player, wasn't really deadset on an iPod. So his wife asked me for advice and I said iPod of course, but she thought it was too expensive. So he's getting some crappy 256MB solid state player that won't work well (if at all) with his shiny G5. If these were out before Christmas, it'd have been a no-brainer.

    10. Re:Finally! by radish · · Score: 1

      Ya know - there are players already which meet these specs. Just without the stripes, or the Apple logo.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    11. Re:Finally! by cens0r · · Score: 1
      I like my 256 MB solid state player, thank you ver much. It easily holds everything I need to get me too and from work, and I get 12 hours or so off of one rechargeable NiMH battery. It's small, light, and there are no moving parts.

      Perhaps one day I will replace it, but not until there is a player with the feature set I need:
      • Support for FLAC. OGG Vorbis would be nice, but I archive my music in FLAC so I would like this much more
      • An FM tuner. We do have good FM radio in seattle, plus I'd like to listen to NPR or the news sometimes on the way to work
      • At least 10 hours of battery time. (that's one work week worth of listening)
      • Priced around $200
      Basically I want to combine the features of the Rio Karma and iRiver players. Hopefully such a player will exist in the next year or so.
      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  4. Cat got my tounge!~~ by Leffe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apple realized that you'll have to hide your iPod when you want to be with your 'cool' Windows using friends.

    If they would see the iPod you'd instantly be removed from their hardcore powergaming group!

  5. Most excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 100 dollar price point was the threshold I was waiting for before purchasing one of these things finally, thanks Apple!

  6. Color iPods? by TheKidWho · · Score: 1, Funny

    I want mine in Vomit!

    1. Re:Color iPods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      troll your own story......nice

    2. Re:Color iPods? by rbuysse · · Score: 1

      Is Lightning close enough?

      --
      An infinite number of monkeys at an infinite number of typewriters still wouldn't repost stories on /.
  7. this is good for joggers by Savatte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The smaller and lighter the mp3 player, the better for joggers and runners. cd players are too bulky and heavy, but this could easily work.

    1. Re:this is good for joggers by ankit · · Score: 1

      Not if it uses a hard drive.

      --
      Don't Panic
    2. Re:this is good for joggers by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      Presumably, a mini-ipod would also have no moving parts. I.e. it's 2-4GB capacity so it must be flash.

    3. Re:this is good for joggers by TheKidWho · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, 2gb of flash memory is VERY expenisive, that would make the MP3 player cost at least $500 The new miniPods will most likely use the new 1" toshiba platters and have 32mb RAM like the current iPods do to load MP3s to prevent skipping.

    4. Re:this is good for joggers by CmdrWiggle · · Score: 1

      I read stories all the time about drives getting blitzed from movement. Does anybody know how the hard drives in these devices protect themselves from the impact of things like jogging?

    5. Re:this is good for joggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2-4 gig of flash ram for $100? bullshit.

    6. Re:this is good for joggers by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I seriously doubt the 1" Toshiba drives are sub-$100. They're smaller than the 1.8" drives Apple currently uses for iPods, and are likely to be more expensive as a result.

      I have to be honest, I'll believe this when I see it. I hope I'm proven wrong, but I think either the price is wrong ($200 maybe?), the capacity is wrong (256Mb perhaps?), or they're planning something evil, like tying the machine to a more expensive version of the iTMS.

      Or maybe it's "$99 for the ePod, $299 for the special connecting cable" ;-)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    7. Re:this is good for joggers by ucblockhead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That depends...as a jogger, the real question is whether this device is solid state or harddrive based. I've never been willing to trust a hard drive to last while running.

      It has little to do with bulk. I've run with things as large as an iPod. I'm just afraid that a few months of the bouncing would cause a hard drive failure. It's why I haven't gotten one.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    8. Re:this is good for joggers by Cyph · · Score: 1

      I think the most important part to consider if you're going to be buying this for the purpose of jogging would be whether these iPods use a solid-state drive, instead of a hard drive for storage. Obviously jogging with a regular hard drive isn't a very good idea.

    9. Re:this is good for joggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I jog while carrying an iPod almost daily. No damage to report on the HD, although it did turn itself off once.

    10. Re:this is good for joggers by xombo · · Score: 4, Informative

      The iPod precaches all the music you're listening to to 32mb of RAM so it plays for about 30 minutes before spinning the hard drive up again. It works fine for all the joggers I know and I've never had a problem with it in my car, with rattles constantly and can't support a CD player without more than 10 seconds of buffer.

    11. Re:this is good for joggers by transient · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know anecdotal evidence isn't worth much, but I thought I should at least mention that my iPod hasn't been affected by my running at all. I've only had it for a few months though.

      --

      irb(main):001:0>
    12. Re:this is good for joggers by dasmegabyte · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Ipod hard disc has lasted quite well for my running. I've pulled at least 200 miles with it since May. I got freezes at one point but the last update cleared them up.

      The hard drive in there spins real slow (spindle speed being the major component of shock damage) and it only spins when it's seeking for music. Start a playlist and it'll load 32 meg of your list into memory IMMEDIATELY...and only spin up to add more, which it can usually do in under 10 seconds. This equates to 20-30 seconds of hard disk spin during a 45 minute run.

      Combine that with the one year warranty and an iSkin (with which I've dropped mine a number of times onto concrete from 4 feet, no problems) and you've got the best solution joggers ever had.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    13. Re:this is good for joggers by ljavelin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I run at least 18 miles a week with my iPod for the last 14 months or so. So far, no problems.

      Of course it can't last forever, but it's lookin' good so far.

    14. Re:this is good for joggers by svanstrom · · Score: 1
      I've never been willing to trust a hard drive to last while running.


      Neither did I, until I just had to get to the store asap... I'd been runing for about 15 minutes before realizing that, "hey, I'm actually listening to a harddisk-based MP3-player without any problems whatsoever".

      That's when I finally got rid of the "I've got to take it easy or it'll break"-thoughts.

      Ok, so let's get back to the size; now that I've been using my iPod more or less daily since the 20 gig ones were released, would I replace it with a smaller one?

      Yes, and no!

      I'm always carrying with me too much stuff, so a smaller iPod would really be nice, but I've currently got more than 10 GB of music...

      I won't... can't... repleace my iPod with a smaller one, not until the day they can hold all my music (and maybe 2-3 GB worth of backups); actually, I'm considering buying a new 40 GB iPod simply because as it is now every now and then I can't carry with me all the data I need.
      --
      perl -e'print$_{$_} for sort%_=`lynx -dump svanstrom.com/t`'
    15. Re:this is good for joggers by k3vmo · · Score: 0

      I can't see this as a solid state product. Think about the USB flash drives. They're only up to 1GB and cost almost $300. The price point seems to low for a solid state device. For that much, I'd say its a HD.

    16. Re:this is good for joggers by FurryFeet · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You forgot "$99 for batteries".

    17. Re:this is good for joggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If any current iPods are too heavy for you while jogging, maybe you should lay off the treadmill and hit the bench press. I have a first gen 20 gig and run with it all the time, I don't even notice it.

    18. Re:this is good for joggers by ljavelin · · Score: 1

      Nah, I don't think that Apple will sell a $200 device - that's too close in price to the current iPod, and too much money versus the low cost competition.

      And I can't imagine that Apple would do something like have different prices for iTMS. That just doesn't sound like something Apple would do for such a high profile product.

      Apple does have a pricing advantage - they already have the basic software for the device thanks to the "papa" iPod. So that should make the mini "iPod" that much less expensive.

      But as for storage - got me! I have no idea where Apple can source a couple GB of storage at such a low price point. Perhaps it's a new storage product someone is working on (Apple does work very closely with component manufacturers).

      I'd bet that it uses a new, lower-cost, CF-form rotating storage mechanism. Apple has had a lot of good experiences with disk so far, so why change?

    19. Re:this is good for joggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, no. The original 5 GB iPods seem to be good for jogging, but all other models typically have problems with skipping or the iPod resetting itself. Problem is, you don't know just when it's going to spin up the hard drive to get more data, so you're probably still flailing around like an idiot when it does, and that causes problem even in that brief period.

    20. Re:this is good for joggers by joe_bruin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      no, not flash, DRAM.

      2 GB of flash is currently much too expensive. however, in volume, dram should be sufficiently cheap. yes, it's volatile. but if they have enough battery power to spin up and power a hard-drive, keeping dram alive for a few days at a time should not be a big deal. if you plug it into a usb port every few days, it should never lose power. and if it dies, well, you just have to reload all your music.

      pretty clever.

    21. Re:this is good for joggers by Finque · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting that Apple uses the iTMS to sell iPods (they make no/little actual profit from the store).

      Perhaps the case will be the same with these "miniPods", or at least on the supposed low-end $99 model.

    22. Re:this is good for joggers by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative
      How do you figure that spindle speed is the major component in shock damage? The great danger of a hard drive is that the heads will crash into the media, which will likely rip the heads off or at least damage them at any speed, or at the very least strip some of the coating off the platters and spread it around the hard drive, causing it to do more damage, and probably knocking the heads out of axial alignment.

      Therefore I should think that the primary thing that would make a drive more susceptible to shock would be the way the arms the heads are attached to are designed; the way they're mounted, their shape, their length, and the material they're made of. The arm can't be very short because the heads have to hold more or less the same angle to the media at different distances from the spindle/the inner cylinder, so this is basically a function of platter diameter and head travel.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:this is good for joggers by tantalus · · Score: 1
      I run at least 18 miles a week with my iPod for the last 14 months or so. So far, no problems.


      Really? What a concidence! I've run 18 miles (cumulatively) in the last 14 months or so without any problems either!
    24. Re:this is good for joggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm not forgetting anything. Read my comment again. (Geez, I knew some idiot would post this reply but I still didn't pre-emptively put the words "more expensive version" in bold. What the hell was I thinking?)

    25. Re:this is good for joggers by Jonathan_S · · Score: 1
      How do you figure that spindle speed is the major component in shock damage?
      Well you get damage when the platters and the read head intersect. This could be because either the head or the platters moved with respect to the disk casing. All else being equal a faster spinning platter will resist being rotated out of its spinning plane (gyroscopic effect) more than a slower platter. So if the iPod were to rotate and the head/arm assembly was stiff enough so as to retain its alignment with the case then the extra deflection of the faster platters might cause a head crash.

      That being said, the main protection the iPod harddrive has is that smaller form factor disks can be much more rigid because of the smaller platters and shorter arms.

      Also it spins down the disk as much as possible, which it can get away with doing because of the very fast spin-up spin-down times of the smaller platters. (Less rotational inertia to overcome)
    26. Re:this is good for joggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, 2gb of flash memory is VERY expenisive,

      Nope.
      A wholesale buyer can get 2Gig Flash for less than a hundred right now and several major fabs have been making 4Gig for months already.

    27. Re:this is good for joggers by KyolFrilander · · Score: 1

      Mainly by spinning up as little as absolutely possible. There's some inconsequential padding which is more to prevent rattles than anything else. I suspect, but I do not know (not being a total geek) that portable-sized drives have some kind of accelerometer like device that judges if a shock will cause a head crash, and parks the heads before it can, but that might just be totally wishful thinking.

      --
      Buddha says, "Shut your karma hole."
    28. Re:this is good for joggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I have the original version of the ipod and I have had it 'come out' of the little pouch I made for it on my mtn. bike handlebars two times. I was going at least 15 mph and it hit the pavement and I thought 'oh #@$%! I just lost my pod! It was scratched and the center of the wheel came off but it works perfectly. Amazing

    29. Re:this is good for joggers by kimble3 · · Score: 1

      What I think would be an interesting design would be if they created a player that takes multiple memory cards. Right now 1gb cards are too expensive for a low end player. But what if the player had room for four cards for example? The device could ship with a single small card to keep the cost low much like digital cameras do. Then users could add more/bigger cards at a later time. If they used something like Sony memory sticks it certainly wouldn't take up that much space. They might even group the cards together in a RAID configuration so they appear as a single volume to iTunes. The real question is the display. Would it be as easy to use as an iPod if it didn't have the large LCD?

    30. Re:this is good for joggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How expensive those PCMCIA-form factor drives? I had heard they were in the sub-$100 price range, or a little over $100 with PCMCIA interface, packaging, shiny manual, etc.

      Maybe not a couple GB for that range, butcheaper than Flash for a GB?

  8. smaller == cheaper?? by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 5, Funny

    what? Don't these people know how electronics work?! Gah.. well I for one refuse to buy one until they make it cost three times as much as a normal-sized one.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    1. Re:smaller == cheaper?? by m00by · · Score: 1

      you just lemme know, and I'll sell you one for that inflated price ;)

  9. Pocket-size? by kutuz_off · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What do they call iPod's size now?

    1. Re:Pocket-size? by vicparedes · · Score: 1

      Now it's Coin-Pocket-Size.

    2. Re:Pocket-size? by Performaman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Tall, Venti, and Grande, of couse!

      --

      I have gas, but my car uses petrol.
  10. The Sony Way? by Destoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So that's how it's going to work. Kill the current market by spreading specs and rumors.

    100$ for a 2gb lightweight device by apple? amazing indeed.

    Just like the Playstation 2's specs killed the Dreamcast.

    Sorry, I'm just bitter.
    I probably just need more brandy in my coffee.
    Merry Xmas

    --
    Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
    1. Re:The Sony Way? by DeltaSigma · · Score: 5, Insightful

      PS2's specs killed the dreamcast because consoles are released on a much larger time table. New MP3 players come out all the time. They're far closer to commodity hardware than gaming consoles are, thus, someone's not going to wait more than a few months for this ipod to materialize before they go out and buy from a different manufacturer.

    2. Re:The Sony Way? by OmniVector · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. Apple tends to have quite a following, so unlike many other companies it has many rumor sites. You don't really see a sonyrumors.com, or dellrumors.com?

      Just off the top of my head i can name:
      thinksecret.com
      spymac.com
      macrumors.com

      and i'm sure there are a lot more. i seriously doubt this is apple using a pr stunt, as these sorts of leaks happen often within apple and apple isn't to happy about it usually.

      --
      - tristan
    3. Re:The Sony Way? by synergy3000 · · Score: 1

      Who do you believe is spreading these specs and rumors? If you knew much about Apple and their relationship with the rumor sites you would know that Apple would not leak this stuff. It may not even be real since it's a "rumor". Yeesh, you are bitter and need more than just brandy to take your edge off. Whoever modded your post up needs the same.

    4. Re:The Sony Way? by faust2097 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just like the Playstation 2's specs killed the Dreamcast.

      I'm sick of that argument. Sega did a perfectly fine job of running the Dreamcast into the ground all by themselves, Sony just helped them along.

    5. Re:The Sony Way? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wouldn't worry. Think Secret has been wrong so often, a rumour from them actually makes it LESS likely that something is true.

      Seriously, Slashdot, why are you still posting rumours from the people who cried "G5s in the new Powerbooks," "New PDAs from Apple," and other insane, no-chance-is-it-true rumors? Their "reliable sources" aren't.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    6. Re:The Sony Way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell would Apple leak this intentionally? It only lessens demand for their own products. And as stupid as it would be to do something like that ever, doing it right before the biggest retail event of the year would be even more stupid.

      To summarize: you're an idiot. Find something better to do with your time than inventing hollow conspiracy theories.

    7. Re:The Sony Way? by Destoo · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I'm just tired of this overhyping game. Movies, hardware, software... Marketdroids just keep raising our expectations. And that happens each time a new product hits the shelves.

      "Oh.. don't buy that. Company X is releasing a better faster quicker cheaper equivalent in a few months. Here are the specs and the benchmarks of that widget that is still in pre-design phase."

      It's a marketting war and I was just giving my two cents.

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
    8. Re:The Sony Way? by RickHunter · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I remember the ad campaign well. Ads everywhere within a month of launch... For crappy sports game. Then nothing about the console's fighting games or RPGs or platformers. Then cancellation.

    9. Re:The Sony Way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fair enough. The trick is to see through all of it and decide what's best for you as a consumer.

    10. Re:The Sony Way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know that Thinksecret was a marketing driven corporation.

    11. Re:The Sony Way? by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      When I visited Apple HQ a couple of years ago (as a developer) I was told by one of the Apple guys that it was a standing company joke that Apple is the only ship that leaks from the top :-)

    12. Re:The Sony Way? by fr0dicus · · Score: 1

      PS2 killed the dreamcast because it plays DVDs. It doesn't get any simpler than that.

    13. Re:The Sony Way? by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

      I suppose... ...personally I only played The Matrix on it once on my brother's to see how well it worked (pretty good). But I haven't even tested the functionality on my own PS2 since I acquired it.

      However, I did appreciate the increased capacity (and thus a greater number of potential media including levels to play) that the DVD capability provided for my games.

    14. Re:The Sony Way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha, yeah right. out of all my friends who bought a ps2, all of them besides one had dvd players, and that friend ended up buying a separate dvd player because the ps2 dvd player is so crippled (it wouldn't play vcd, svcd, etc). but all my friends waited for the ps2 instead of buying the dreamcast because they bit into the hype, which was barely any better than the DC.

    15. Re:The Sony Way? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because Apple is famous for releasing product specs ahead of time.

      What color is your sky?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    16. Re:The Sony Way? by scottgfx · · Score: 1

      Apple hasn't announced anything. Sony on the other hand, did announce a plan to produce an ipod like device. That was this fall I believe. No actual product, just a thought that they might make something as cool as the ipod.

      It looks to me that they want to kill the ipod the SAME WAY.

      --
      It's mandatory to wash your hands before returning to the land of Dairy Queen.
  11. Ooooh... ipods for the Philistines!!! by cnelzie · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...and unwashed masses that aren't 'rear-conscious' enough to spend the exhorbinant fees attached to the full-size ipods...

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:Ooooh... ipods for the Philistines!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes me wonder if I get the same 'pleasure' out of it. The bigger the merrier used to be true about this sort of things.

  12. How about a PDA? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Redundant


    Please?

    You know that Apple-fanatics will think it will be the greatest thing even if its 10 lbs and has pointy barbs sticking out of it, but I just want to see what would direction they would go.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    1. Re:How about a PDA? by Darthnice · · Score: 1

      Seen a Newton lately?

    2. Re:How about a PDA? by kurosawdust · · Score: 2, Funny
      You know that Apple-fanatics will think it will be the greatest thing even if its 10 lbs and has pointy barbs sticking out of it...

      The iPoke?

    3. Re:How about a PDA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Seen a Newton lately?

      No, where can I buy one new?
    4. Re:How about a PDA? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      That is huge, have very little memory and is missing alot from what is expected in PDAs.

      I want to see what they can do today.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    5. Re:How about a PDA? by Laplace · · Score: 4, Funny

      even if its 10 lbs and has pointy barbs sticking out of it,

      Apple is going to release a 10# PDA that has pointy barbs sticking out if it? Sweet!

      --
      The middle mind speaks!
    6. Re:How about a PDA? by luigi22_ · · Score: 1

      Even with 2GB, it would have more memory than any PDA on th market tdoay. The iPod would destroy all the crap Pocket PC's out there

      --
      On /., first you get the karma, then you get the power, then you get the women.
    7. Re:How about a PDA? by OmniVector · · Score: 1

      In reply to all the "Hello, the newton?" posts, let me say that the newton is not up to par with modern pdas.

      now that i have that ouf the way. apple's stance on pda's is pretty simple, and i totally agree with the way steve is moving this direction. pdas are mostly useless in that it's hard to keep contacts synced with your phone and powerbook/imac/etc. apple's all about the "digital" lifestyle right now, and a pda doesn't fit in on the consumer level. if you do see anything come out of apple it's going to be a cellphone. however that won't happen for awhlie, as the competition for cellphone hardware is still quite fierce, and there's not much they can offer service wise yet. (the iPod has the itunes music store, the powerbooks have os x, ilife, final cut pro). you don't see apple with software written for pdas yet, so they would be diving into a platform where they would have to reinvent every wheel. this really, all boils down to entering a flooded market with little incentive, low margines already, and no basis to give the market value.

      i'm willing to be though, that the ipod will turn more and more into a pda as it evolves. it's already got contacts, calendars, and a few basic games.

      --
      - tristan
    8. Re:How about a PDA? by muonzoo · · Score: 1


      Been there, done that. It wasn't pretty. I got suckered too. er, I mean "I was an early adopter".

      How many Newton owners does it take to change a lightbulb?
      Thee to eat lemons, axe gravy soup.

    9. Re:How about a PDA? by charlesparks · · Score: 1

      Obviously the Newton isn't on par with modern PDAs. Most computers releaseed at the time of the release of the Newton (early 90s) aren't on par with my Sharp Zaurus. Where I fail to see how the PDA doesn't fit into the digital lifestyle...even on the consumer level. So, we've got our music, we've got our connectivity at home. But what about when you're on the street and you want to call someone. This is at the consumer level. My Zaurus is my compromise for having a computer with me at all times. For me it functions as a full fledged computer. I can surf the Internet in the bathtub and I can word process while I'm waiting at the doctors office. In my mind, the PDA is completing factor in the digital lifestyle. I can tell you that being connected is never further than my pocket.

    10. Re:How about a PDA? by thdexter · · Score: 1

      I have an idea for a name for it: the Apple Newton!

      --
      I'm on a road shaped like a figure eight; I'm going nowhere but I'm guaranteed to be late.
    11. Re:How about a PDA? by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know that Apple-fanatics will think it will be the greatest thing even if its 10 lbs and has pointy barbs sticking out of it

      Yes, it will come with a handy carrying chain and will be called the iMace.
      I will swing it mercilessly at anyone using Microsoft crap who dares call me an Apple fanatic...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    12. Re:How about a PDA? by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

      Because we all know Apple has a proven track record of poorly designed products.

      Come on. Quit posting lame, trollish comments. Apple products are consistently the most elegant pieces of equipment on the market, asthetically (and often technically).

      --
      -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    13. Re:How about a PDA? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 0

      Come on. Quit posting lame, trollish comments. Apple products are consistently the most elegant pieces of equipment on the market, asthetically (and often technically).

      Riigghht. That Apple newton sitting is my basement works perfectly. I like clicking my hockey-puck mouse with my upper-palm too.

      You're exactly the kind of "Apple can do no wrong" fanboy the grandparent post was talking about. Apple has made its share of mistakes.

      The comment you responded to wasn't about Apple consistently making crappy products, it was about loopy Apple fans who believe that they can do no wrong.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    14. Re:How about a PDA? by momerath2003 · · Score: 1

      PDA = Personal Destructor Assistant?

      I'm thinking mace and chain, here.

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    15. Re:How about a PDA? by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 1

      Sorry to burst your bubble... but if Apple calls it the Imace, they would fail again. If it's on a chain, it should be the "iFlail" not iMace. ;-)

    16. Re:How about a PDA? by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      The iPod will never make a useful PDA without the kind of redesigning that would pretty much make it not an iPod anymore. Input, for one thing, would have to be tacked on and I can't think of any elegent way of doing that without throwing away the iPod's simple, sleek design. Without input, it simply isn't a PDA. An basic organizer, maybe, but no more.

      I, for one, would love to see an Apple PDA. They're in a great position to make one, all they need is a scaled-down version of OS X, similar to Windows CE or that Pocket PC version of XP. I'd be surprised if they didn't already have one somewhere for experimental purposes. They've already got a slew of applications that would go great on a PDA: Apple Mail, Address Book, iCal, iPhoto, etc, could all be made to sync seamlessly with your Mac. Add Inkwell for handwriting recognition and you're set.

      A truly useful PDA would also include Bluetooth and 802.11g, of course. I can dream, can't I?

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    17. Re:How about a PDA? by scottgfx · · Score: 1

      I'm suddenly reminded of Steve Martin's "Cruel Shoes" :)

      --
      It's mandatory to wash your hands before returning to the land of Dairy Queen.
    18. Re:How about a PDA? by jayratch · · Score: 1

      Nah. Check the local Apple store, and you'll find plenty of PDAs from Palm.

      A new PDA would be very unlikely to boost their bottom line, although come to think of it it could probably have a higher profit margin than the iPod.

      Thing is, Palm already comes "close enough" to the Mac aesthetic for most people's tastes. Can they design a product that does the job better than a Palm Tungsten?

      No, Apple's role in the PDA market was simply to kick start it, to define the category, then wait for Palm to create it and MS to copy it.

      Also, what would this do for Apple's bottom line? Nobody is likely to switch their PC over a paired PDA any more than they did for the iPod, and to succeed it would have to be cross platform anyway. And from a marketing standpoint- what do you call it, and how do you convince people to buy this AND an iPod and carry two extra devices plus the cell phone?

      On the other hand, if they used their ipod experience to cram a 20 gig hard drive into a slightly thicker equivalent of Palm's Tungsten, then I suppose I'd buy it and carry my MAME roms along with my MP3s.

      <really tangential rant, end real post.>
      And batteries? Show me a PDA with replacable batteries on today's market and stop bitching about the $99 fee on your ipod. I have a $300 Sony paperweight a year out of the store, which is simply not worth the cost to fix.
      --

      Moderate me an insightful interesting troll!

  13. if only there was a release date... by ed.han · · Score: 1

    i want one of these in the worst way as i said relatively recently here: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=88765&cid=7679 795

    that's an awful lot of room. the article doesn't mention battery life, which one would hope would support the storage capacity.

    ed

  14. Pocket-Sized?? by Th0th · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thank god, it's about time! The current Ipods are so bulky and unwieldly, I can't believe apple even introduced them!

    --
    "BadTimes will make you fall in love with a penguin" - Laika
    1. Re:Pocket-Sized?? by scrod · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn right. I need an iPod so freakin' small that it can get lodged in my ear canal!

  15. but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    will the headphones still be white? otherwise, how could i identify with other pods?

    1. Re:but by ruiner13 · · Score: 3, Funny
      "will the headphones still be white? otherwise, how could i identify with other pods?"

      you can still spot users by their uncontrollable, spastic dancing wherever they go.

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    2. Re:but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About a week ago in school, I was walking to some class, listening to some Motorhead, I think, on my iPod, using the supplied headphone because I forgot my regular ones. And I see this douchebag walking toward me with the white headphones, doing this retarded head-bob like a bobblehead doll on speed, and when we're a step away from each other, he gives me this look and this headnod as if to say, "Hey there, fellow iPodder!" I'm surprised he didn't pull out his headphones to try and swap with me (I forgot where I read about people doing that). I just shook my head no and mouthed, "What the fuck?!!?!"

    3. Re:but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also, they are very gay.

  16. This can't be true! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would mean the current pocket-sized iPods are not actually pocket-sized and apple is perfect and never wrong so there will never be an iPod smaller than the current small perfection of the current iPod.

    1. Re:This can't be true! by xombo · · Score: 1

      Maybe they'll make the new one's "Lip Stick Pocket Sized" (the little pocket inside the big pocket in those stylish new ladie's jeans).

  17. Xmas? by clmensch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wouldn't it have been smarter to release these BEFORE the holidays? Are they so down to the wire that a Jan. 6 announcement is the last possible day they can release them?

    --
    There is no gravity...the earth just sucks.
    1. Re:Xmas? by McAddress · · Score: 3, Interesting

      the entire idea is to release them after the holidays, this way no one will get a low cost iPod instead of a $300 dollar one. wether this will work or not remains to be seen.

    2. Re:Xmas? by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Jan 6 is MacWorld. Apple has a habit of announcing new and upcoming products at, you guessed it, MacWorld.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  18. Pocket SIzed? Huh? by ilsa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The current models fit my jacket pocket just fine, thank you kindly. And it holds lots more music.

    My only thought is that by getting into the ~$100 range, that makes it something parents will buy for spoiled teens more readily. That would make it pocketbook sized. Assuming there is any truth to the rumor, of course.

    --
    -- I Am Not A Terrorist.
  19. Why buy an ipod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    When you can get a cheap PII 100, install bsd on it, spend a week setting up a web interface and uploading all your songs, buying a cheap sound card, getting a car battery, put it all in a backpack and viola: Open Source MP3 player!

    1. Re:Why buy an ipod by grub · · Score: 1

      Haha! My sides are sore, thank you. :)

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Why buy an ipod by MoronGames · · Score: 1

      "a cheap PII 100"

      Psst... There is no PII 100.

      --
      hey!
    3. Re:Why buy an ipod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is if you underclock it. Which, in the same way as overclocking a CPU causes excess heat, actually sucks heat out of the surrounding environment. 100MHz PIIs are excellent in places like Florida.

    4. Re:Why buy an ipod by MyHair · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tsk, tsk. Setting up the web interface for any self respecting geek takes just a few minutes. The rest of the week is getting the PHP, PNG, SVG and--in some cases--Flash to look just right and self-adjusting to every mp3 you have.

      And you left out the time for decorative case modding.

    5. Re:Why buy an ipod by toganet · · Score: 1

      Well, obviously he is underclocking so he can run fanless without scorching his butt cheeks through his nylon backpack!

    6. Re:Why buy an ipod by Performaman · · Score: 1

      Or, why not buy an old, monochrome iPaq 3100, install Familiar, attach however much storage you want with a CF or PCMCIA jacket and use that?

      --

      I have gas, but my car uses petrol.
    7. Re:Why buy an ipod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of geek uses PHP, PNG, SVG, and especially Flash for the interface to their mp3 player? PHP is for web faggots, PNG is for screenshots, SVG is for nothing because that's how useful it is, and Flash is the most evil way of producing web content since Java. What you've described sounds more like something a Slashdot Mac user would do. And thecase modding is something an overclocking Counter Strike player would do.

      Since when does Geek include a bunch of wannabes with computers? Next you'll be adding Visual BASIC programmers.

    8. Re:Why buy an ipod by JK+Master-Slave · · Score: 1

      Pentium II 100?

      Are you underclocking? Intel never made a 100 MHz in the Pentium II generation.

      Maybe the underclocking is so that it can run on a lighter motorcycle battery?

    9. Re:Why buy an ipod by Moofie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because it would be the size of a small dog?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  20. Pocket size! by Otter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, damnit, I expect it to be half the size of the current iPod *AND* powered by a standard 9V battery! Otherwise, I'll throw it out when the battery dies and sue Apple!

    1. Re:Pocket size! by AssClown2520 · · Score: 1

      Okay, your comment is kind of funny, but your sig is great! I was thinking the same thing the other day when I saw the ad for the slashdot personnels.

    2. Re:Pocket size! by ljavelin · · Score: 1

      You really want a 9v? That's CRAZY! I'll only withstand an AA.

      Given the price point of the device, I doubt that they'll build in a battery. Then they'd have to included a charger, and the next thing you know it's all getting rather expensive to produce.

      Having the device use AA or AAA batteries is the easiest route to bring down the price.

      I haven't had a device that required a 9v since, um, my 7 transistor GE AM portable radio of 1972. 9v's are relatively expensive and don't supply much power relative to size. After all, internally, a 9V has 6 cells. Yuk!

    3. Re:Pocket size! by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      What about your smoke detectors?

    4. Re:Pocket size! by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      9v batteries are to fat to fit in the spec you just outlined.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    5. Re:Pocket size! by ljavelin · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah! Also: garage door openers. I stand corrected.

      Happily, those items are very lower power and can last for years on a single battery. I use AA NiMH batteries whenever I can. Nothing cheaper or easier than that!

    6. Re:Pocket size! by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

      Off-topic on Slashdot personals: Is it just me or is Claire Danes really hard up for work these days?

    7. Re:Pocket size! by jandrese · · Score: 1

      There are NiMH 9V batteries. They're fairly expensive though. One thing you notice immediatly is how little power a 9V actually supplies. The NiMH ones were good for ~150mAh IIRC. That's something like 1/4 of the total capacity of a single AAA.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    8. Re:Pocket size! by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Of course just as I hit submit I remember that the units are mAh, not watts. So the capacity is similar, but not spectacular. There aren't a lot of chargers for the 9V NiMHs though.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    9. Re:Pocket size! by theEd · · Score: 1

      9v won't last long enough I want it to run a 12v car battery, but still be able to fit in my shirt pocket!!!

      Actaully I got a 20GB iPod and a single charge can last all day at work, unless I mount plug it in the USB port on the machine at work to transfer files. Then it may not last the walk home. If my desktop at work only had a firewire port then I could have it charge all day, or better yet, have iTunes play the songs on my iPod. Eventhough iTunes won't let you copy the songs off your iPod you can play them. It's not just an MP3 player it's a portable music library!

      --
      "And now you shall learn the secret of boot to the head"
  21. Brand Dilution by kiwioddBall · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Can this be true?

    Steve Jobs is well known for keeping a clean image on his products - it seems strange to me that he would allow rainbow iPods. Rumour has it he objected to the coloured backgrounds in the iPod adverts.

    It seems strange that he would dilute the iPod brand at such a critical point in its existence.

    Hmm.

    Small iPods - no hard drives, only RAM based??

    1. Re:Brand Dilution by Bryant · · Score: 2

      You may recall a number of colorful Apple products sold several years ago: do the iBook and the iMac ring a bell? Jobs is well known for worrying about brand consistency; that doesn't mean he's not willing to rebrand products as necessary.

    2. Re:Brand Dilution by acidrain69 · · Score: 2, Informative

      2-4 gigs? I think not. A gig of flash memory costs more, and this comes with an MP3 player. It's probably still hard drive based. Fewer platters, maybe smaller diameter.

      Kudos to apple if they can actually pull this off. Maybe I will consider buying one of their products now. I don't need to carry around 20 gigs of music anyway, that's excessive. Maybe if I was backpacking across Europe. In normal use, I would never be more than a few days away from my home machine, so I could replenish the music supply when needed.

      And it better have user-accessible batteries. It's funny how people think of Mac as some superior technology, and here is Apple, gouging customers with $99 replacement batteries. Whatever.

      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    3. Re:Brand Dilution by Golias · · Score: 1
      I don't need to carry around 20 gigs of music anyway, that's excessive.

      Funny you should say that. I have a 10 Gig iPod, and I'm considering selling it to a friend and buying the 30. At 10 GB, I have almost my entire pop music collection with me at all times. At 30 GB, I will be able to have every last entire album I own, along with every song I've downloaded, and still have room to store lots of data files and any music I buy over the next couple years. From my perspective, it's not "excessive"... it's "enough."

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    4. Re:Brand Dilution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay.. but didn't Jobs introduce the "flavored" iMacs and iBooks??

    5. Re:Brand Dilution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You thing a $99 battery is expensive... you should have seen how much Dell charged me for a replacement Laptop battery!

    6. Re:Brand Dilution by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      gouging? what ever. with the flexibility of the full iPod, the drop in version is well worth 99 dollars for a replacement battery IF your battery fails. so far VERY FEW people have experienced this problem, and even fewer have experienced this while out of warranty (smart people buy extended warranties on expensive electronics like 400 dollar MP3 players, laptops, computers, and plasma TVs, etc.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    7. Re:Brand Dilution by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      *Sigh* for the last time:

      The cheapest consumer price for the battery in the new iPod is $45. For a Lithium Ion battery, $45 is not bad. And no NiMH battery in that form factor would last as long, by HALF!

      Meaning that Apple is charging folks $54 to open their iPods, replace the battery, and send them back. I think we can all agree that $54 is not a bad labor rate for any electronics repair...my stereo guy charges $75!

      And that's not all. Because Apple wants as fast a turnaround as possible, they're sending refurb units out for battery repairs. Meaning for your $99, you're actually getting a newly certified unit. Note that their cost for OTHER repairs is about $150...meaning that you can save $51 off the cost of repairs by saying your battery is bad ;).

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    8. Re:Brand Dilution by filmsmith · · Score: 1, Troll

      *Sigh* for the last time:

      Oh, don't worry. It won't be the last time. Stupids and their misinformation never die.

      fs

    9. Re:Brand Dilution by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Misinformed people are never stupid. Just lazy!

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    10. Re:Brand Dilution by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      That still doesn't explain why the iPod doesn't have a removable battery (like many cameras do) in the first place. You think $50 labour is cheap. I think it's $50 more than I'd have to pay if Apple had of made the right decision in the first place.

    11. Re:Brand Dilution by Disco+Stu · · Score: 1

      extended warranty?! how could I lose?

    12. Re:Brand Dilution by flamingantichimp · · Score: 1

      If you had been keeping up with the story, you would know that only recently has Apple offered AppleCare on iPods-extending the warranty to two years.

    13. Re:Brand Dilution by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      apple care has been available on all new apple products at the time of purchase. from what I have read, Apple is now offering Apple care to those who did not buy it and are out of warranty.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    14. Re:Brand Dilution by diverman · · Score: 1

      Look at the original iMacs. I expect they'll go along these lines with certain shades of colors. They'll probably be similar to the colors used in the commercials. I don't think it's brand dilution. A ton of people put colored skins on them anyway. I think they'll push for form and button layout to carry the "branding".

      Well, these are still unconfirmed rumors... so time will tell.

      -Alex

    15. Re:Brand Dilution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't Steve Jobs head of apple when those computers came out? You know the ones that were named after fruits and came in different colors? The iMacs, one of apples biggest succeses? I wouldn't bet against them being multi-colored.

    16. Re:Brand Dilution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...unless you live in FL.

      Stupid easy to con retirees.

    17. Re:Brand Dilution by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      They did make the right decision. Their decision was to make an enclosed machine that couldn't get muddled by sweat, couldn't shatter if dropped, a machine that had no moving parts and no weak points. They did a good job. We bought the thing BECAUSE it was an all-enclosed device.

      Batteries on cameras are easy to replace because they don't last long. Believe me, if they could make a digital camera battery that could last for 8 hours, somebody would make an all-enclosed unit (probably Canon).

      Now some people are upset that they can't get inside easily? Kind of a dumb argument, if you asked me. Besides, it is relatively simple to open an iPod case: squeeze the sides gently until they start to separate, then slip a credit card in gently.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    18. Re:Brand Dilution by scottgfx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Quote: "I don't need to carry around 20 gigs of music anyway..."

      Nobody does. But what I've found after owning a 10GB ipod is, that I use it more to shuffle files between home and work. About half of the drive is uncompressed video files for design and compositing work. Of all the things I own, I think it's my favorite. :)

      --
      It's mandatory to wash your hands before returning to the land of Dairy Queen.
    19. Re:Brand Dilution by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

      Wow, $54 to open a case and pop in a battery? WHAT A FUCKING DEAL! And I thought the $75 Best Buy used to charge to install memory was a great idea.

      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    20. Re:Brand Dilution by stripes · · Score: 1
      Batteries on cameras are easy to replace because they don't last long. Believe me, if they could make a digital camera battery that could last for 8 hours, somebody would make an all-enclosed unit (probably Canon).

      The battery on the Canon EOS-D30 is good for around 500 (available light) pictures. The portrait/battery grip lets you load two batteries into the camera at once. It took it on a week long trip to the UK and only had to change batteries once (I had to change CF cards a whole lot more).

      The D30 was discontinued around 2 years ago, but I would be surprised if the EOS-D10 or Digital Rebel wasn't roughly similar (well, other then the Digital Rebel probably not having a portrait grip for marketing reasons).

    21. Re:Brand Dilution by Cujo · · Score: 1

      If we got the 40 GB iPod, we could put about half of our CDs (about 20 of which are "pop music") on it. It won't be excessive until it's about 100 GB, and then we'll just have to get more CDs.

      --

      Helium balloons want to be free.

  22. open-up this source! by kjba · · Score: 1

    Numerous sources have confirmed the keynote will be...
    Sources said Jobs will unveil...
    Sources anticipate that the suite's core applications...
    Sources wouldn't rule out other software announcements...
    In addition, sources point to developments...
    While sources confirmed the announcements
    Sources have confirmed there will be no new CPU announcements...
    What is the open-source-minded geek supposed to think of this?

  23. back to their roots by musikit · · Score: 4, Informative

    thank you slashdot for going back to your original roots. RUMORS. now we can use slashdot as a archival of vaporware that never made it to market.

  24. You what? by TwistedSquare · · Score: 0

    Maybe I'm having a dumb day but does this part make any sense to anyone: "It is not known if the new product line will be available immediately after introduction" ?

    1. Re:You what? by Bryant · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Introduction" is probably the wrong word; "announcement" would be a better way to put it. Apple, not unusually, often announces products prior to the actual ship date. Sometimes we Apple fanatics (read: frothing fanbois, but we mean well) use "introduction" as synonymous with "announcement."

  25. perfect gift by soundofthemoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This would be really great. I'd love to be able to give something like this to my teenage nieces. Sure they could use a full-size iPod, but $400 is a lot for a teen to carry around and probably lose or break. $100 would be cheap enough that pain of loss wouldn't be too awful.

    Then I could just give them iTMS gift certificates for all future gifts. I'd be the best uncle ever!

    1. Re:perfect gift by metrazol · · Score: 1

      Forget perfect gift, it makes them, for the first time giftable at all! You aren't going to drop $400 on an iPod for a friend of relative unless you KNOW they want it, can use it, know how to use it, have enough music to actually make a dent in the thing's capacity, have a pc (and previously a Mac) with a firewire port, and don't drop their small electronics, or run with them, or get them wet, etc. The design of the iPod and the high price point preclude it from being very "givable" because of the type and variety of supporting factors it needs. You don't give just anybody a terrabyte file server or a desktop spectral analyzer either, do you? (But I want one, so somebody pony up!)

      Now, a $100 iPod which holds a rational amount of music (Come on, you have 10 GB, but do you need ALL of it ALL the time?) and maybe does away with that stupid hard disk and replaces it with say, flash memory so you can jog with it and drop it without it going berserk, now that would be sweet. A $100 gift is more typical for family members and close friends, while $400 is much more of a, "Now Junior, don't expect much else, we had to give Apple your little sister for that!"

      --
      "Life's funny sometimes." "And sometimes it isn't." --Cat's Cradle
    2. Re:perfect gift by Woy · · Score: 1
      Then I could just give them iTMS gift certificates for all future gifts. I'd be the best uncle ever!

      Give a man a iTMS gift certificate and you'll entertain him for a day, give him kazzalite and you'll entertain him for 10 lifetimes.

      --
      "If God created us in his own image we have more than reciprocated." - Voltaire
    3. Re:perfect gift by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Nieces? You mean you don't have any nephew?
      Where do I apply?

    4. Re:perfect gift by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      the mini hard drives in those are very impact resistant. you would have to hit it with a sledge hammer to damage the data.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    5. Re:perfect gift by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      More like give a man Kazaa Lite and he'll be entertained until the next version of Kazaa comes out.

    6. Re:perfect gift by radish · · Score: 1

      Why not just get a Rio Nitrus? 1.5gb Cornice drive, plays many more formats than an iPod, costs around $150 street, and more importantly is available now :)

      Oh, and it isn't stripey. Which is a bonus in my book.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    7. Re:perfect gift by soundofthemoon · · Score: 1

      Because $200 is a lot for 1.5GB, and I'd like something that works with the downloads from iTMS.

    8. Re:perfect gift by radish · · Score: 1

      Well I'd like a $200 ferrari, but I'm not holding out much hope :) Seriously, the Nitrus is not $200, it's $160 after rebate (remember, as the manufacturer is not Apple, discounts exist). If you want better bang for your buck how does 20gb for $250 sound? I mean I can see the appeal of iPod for the average consumer, but this is slashdot. iPod is just about the worst possible value. It baffles me why perfectly knowledgable people who would never pay full price for any computer bits get suckered into paying so far over the odds.

      Oh well.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    9. Re:perfect gift by soundofthemoon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because I'm a software geek, not a hardware geek. Sure, I'll spend a weekend building a PHP/MySQL app to organize my DVD collection, but the most I'll do with hardware is install a new hard drive or memory. I don't get off on "some assembly required" gear, and you can bet my nieces don't either. Now, $250 for 20GB is a pretty good price, but how well does it work? I love how well my iPod works, and it's nice to have all my phone numbers etc with me wherever I go too. Add to that the add-ons like the hookup for dumping photos from a digicam. So yeah it might cost more, but you get a lot more too. There's always a market for quality and features, and even some of us on slashdot shop that way sometimes.

    10. Re:perfect gift by denisonbigred · · Score: 2, Funny

      More like you'll put him in debt for 10 lifetimes (if the RIAA has anything to say about it).

      --

      "There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals."
    11. Re:perfect gift by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      It looks like the Nitrus plays MP3 and WMA. How is that "many more formats" than an iPod which plays MP3 and AAC? Last time I took a math class, two was equal to two.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    12. Re:perfect gift by Spyritus · · Score: 1

      Actually, the iPod plays AAC, MP3, WAV and AIFF, so that's 4 formats.

  26. Pocket-sized iPod* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *bib overalls no longer requirement for pocket-sized claim.

  27. well... by grmb1 · · Score: 1

    ...100$ for 2GB player sounds like a good deal for me.

    --
    -- grmbl woz heer
    1. Re:well... by Performaman · · Score: 1

      Yeah. My MD player cost $100 on sale, and only came with 1 74 minute disk (I bought more). This will kill everything else in the $50-$100 range.

      --

      I have gas, but my car uses petrol.
  28. If it took standard batteries... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If it took regular AA or AAA batteries, I might get one.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:If it took standard batteries... by ljavelin · · Score: 1

      I'd love it to take one AA. That'd be perfect, since I've standardized on NiMH "AA" batteries.

      My camera, my Garmin Legend GPS, and my portable Sangean radio all take AA. I have no desire to fumble around with smaller-but-lower-capacity AAAs.

    2. Re:If it took standard batteries... by Exiler · · Score: 1

      I imagine you'd spend almost as much, if not more, money on decent name brand batteries in an 18 month time span as you would on the Apple replacement.

      --
      Banaaaana!
    3. Re:If it took standard batteries... by DaSkiBum · · Score: 1

      You mean like this ?

      http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects /A ppleStore.woa/72204/wo/Aa4Za3pnDdrh2QydyzX17nAOkN7 /3.4.0.5.10.11.5.13.0

      Belkin Battery Pack for iPod

  29. Ogg Vorbis by gspr · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Time for Ogg Vorbis support too, don't you think?

    1. Re:Ogg Vorbis by MyHair · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Time for Ogg Vorbis support too, don't you think?

      From our point of view, yes. But from Apple, I wonder if a cheap 2 or 4GB iPod will be iTunes music only?

      Just a thought.

    2. Re:Ogg Vorbis by bogie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't see why. I mean yea some people use Ogg, but why bother supporting a format that almost nobody uses? Sure I know you probably use it and converted your whole collection to it. Don't you think you should have just stuck with the format that 99% of people use and actually has industry wide support from portable music hardware vendors?

      I'm honestly not trying to make fun of you or say something bad about ogg(it's AS good as mp3), but I see no reason to support it just like I don't see any reason to support, FLAC,Monkey's Audio, Real Audio, etc in this particular application. I would be nice to have support for all audio formats in every audio player, but I don't think that is too realistic a thing to ask for right now. It's just not what the majority of Apple's customers are using or asking for.

      I guess as a Linux and OpenSource user I'm supposed to stand up for what's open, but that doesn't change the fact that MP3 is the defacto portable digital audio standard. Maybe over time the Music Store vendors will be able to snuff it out in favor of a "secure" audio format, but until then I'm perfectly content with plain old functional MP3 for portable music players. Just IMHO, YMMV, blah, blah.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    3. Re:Ogg Vorbis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Short answer: NO...

    4. Re:Ogg Vorbis by OmniVector · · Score: 1

      apple has 0 incentive to support ogg. now before you get mad at me, realize that ogg caters to a very small niche right now, and the cost of incorporating it and keeping it maintained on an ipod would probably outweight the marginal increase in sales.

      --
      - tristan
    5. Re:Ogg Vorbis by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      I talked to the guys from Ogg not long ago at the SoCal Linux Expo. I asked them about Apple. They told me that Apple Engineers like and use Vorbis all the time (you can get a plugin for iTunes). But as much as the engineering team may like it, it doesn't make much business sense for Apple since they're trying to push AAC. They had to support MP3, since it's the most common file format. Vorbis doesn't have enough people clamoring for it, or using it. Remember, Slashdot is not the real world.

    6. Re:Ogg Vorbis by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      the only thing that makes WMA or AAC secure is the fact that MS/Apple has encrypted the file. the format itself does not support DRM, the applications that play them however do support it and can decrypt the file.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    7. Re:Ogg Vorbis by cbuskirk · · Score: 1

      Why? Apple does not make much money at all on iTMS. They load only the most basic and easily defeatable DRM to pacify the music labels. It would make no sence for them to make it iTunes exclusive, especially since they arn't the only game in town.

      Oh and on the Ogg Vorbis point... If they supported it then you would not have droves of Ogg Vorbis fans bitching about lack of support, and that is free publicity.

    8. Re:Ogg Vorbis by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      What? The cost of incorporating it is one day out of one programmer's work schedule. You simply take an existing plugin that decodes ogg, and add it to the ipod. And as for maintaining it, I doubt there's going to be a major change to the file format. There's nothing to maintain.

      In fact, the IPod should just allow its owners to write their own plugins for the ipod. That way apple doesnt have to even spend time incorporating it and "maintaining" it at all. If apple allowed us to write our own plugins, not only could I use MP3 and OGG, but I could use SPC as well. (SPC is a file format for Super Nintendo game music.)

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
  30. Planning to work there much longer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cannot beleive that you still have a job!

  31. Perfect! by Tyrdium · · Score: 1

    I was just saying last night in IRC how I wanted a smaller, cheaper iPod... This is great! I don't want to spend a couple hundred bucks on an MP3 player, and I don't need that much storage (2 or 4 gigs should be plenty), but flash players are either too small (128-256 megs), or too expensive (>$150 or so). I'll probably end up buying one of these after I see a review on them... Now, any word on Ogg Vorbis support? FLAC would be nice, too...

    1. Re:Perfect! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I was just saying last night in IRC how I wanted a smaller, cheaper iPod...

      OMG! So was I!

      Then I said: I want a more powerfull and cheaper car.
      And a bigger and cheaper appartment.
      And a sexier and quieter girlfriend...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:Perfect! by Catnapster · · Score: 1

      And an easier, higher-paying job...

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
  32. a $99 iPod AFTER CHRISTMAS? by ILL+Clinton · · Score: 1
    Why would they release a product that would make for such an obvious gift AFTER Christmas?

    It doesn't make any business sense. If this rumor is to be believed I think we would have heard it 2 months ago.

    1. Re:a $99 iPod AFTER CHRISTMAS? by xxyyxxzz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because Apple's bottom line is far better served if a person spends $400 on a 20 gig model than $100 on a 2 gig model.

      In that sense, it makes perfect business sense.

    2. Re:a $99 iPod AFTER CHRISTMAS? by hibiki_r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If I was on Apple's shoes, and knew I'd not be able to manufacture enough units on time for christmas, I'd release it in the summer, and make sure the product is not announced until AFTER christmas, to avoid competing against the normal Ipod.

      Nintendo has used a similar tactic in the past when releasing new Gameboy "flavors", It makes the best business sense IMHO. It's just that we've heard about the new product a week too soon.

    3. Re:a $99 iPod AFTER CHRISTMAS? by xombo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Reason being that any wise business will want to get rid of their stock before releasing their product. It will do them no good to liquidate the older iPods at a loss. People will still buy the new iPod if they release it (allbeit unlikely), even if it's after Christmas.

    4. Re:a $99 iPod AFTER CHRISTMAS? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1
      If you'd have heard the rumour 2 months ago, it would have cut Xmas sales of the current iPod considerably.

      Apple *always* does some major product releases in January at MacWorld. If a MiniPod is one of this years releases, it'll still be around to make a bundle at Xmas 2004.

  33. User Interface by CmdrWiggle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am iterested to see what kind of user interface Apple comes up with for such a small device. As a G3 iPod owner, I think the control pad is about perfect. Any smaller, and it wouldn't be as usable. Not to mention the hassle of scrolling through 5 gigs of songs on a smaller display.

    But, I am usually impressed with Apple's industrial design, so I'll probably be impressed again (except for the color choices - I mean *stripes*? Ugh).

    1. Re:User Interface by reiggin · · Score: 1

      You mean "3G." G3 iPod would be something akin to a iMac/iPod hybrid, methinks.

    2. Re:User Interface by CmdrWiggle · · Score: 1

      Er. Yse -- I.. I.. mean YES, 3G.
      Thank you for pointing out my fat fingers. Although "Generation: 3" sounds kind of like a Sci-Fi spinoff.

    3. Re:User Interface by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      My guess is they'd keep the shuttle wheel, as that is a major USP for iPods. Maybe make the wheel a bit smaller, and have a 2 line display rather than a full one.

    4. Re:User Interface by reiggin · · Score: 1
      FWIW, "Generation: 3" is the long-name for the PowerPC 750 processor found in all "G3" Macs. Generation 1 was the PPC 601. Generation 2 was the PPC 603/604 families. Generation 4 (G4) and Generation 5 (G5) are the PPC 7400 and PPC 970 families, respectively.

      Sorry for the OT post.

  34. Storage device? by John_Booty · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What kind of storage device would these use?

    My first thought was the CompactFlash-sized "microdrive" hard drives developed by IBM (not sure if they belong to Hitachi now). A 1GB microdrive sells for about $200, though. Even with the volume discount Apple would surely get, it's hard to image they could hit that $99 price point at any capacity. And I guess flash memory is ruled out for price reasons too....

    --

    OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    1. Re:Storage device? by eddy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe a 'Cornice Storage Element', like the iGP-100?

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    2. Re:Storage device? by John_Booty · · Score: 1

      Correction: looks like you can get a 2GB microdrive and not a 1GB one for about $200, actually. But, still... doesn't seem feasible price-wise...

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    3. Re:Storage device? by jhoffoss · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they're banking on income from iTunes, the same way video game console makers bank on income from game sales? Far-fetched, but it wouldn't shock me.

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    4. Re:Storage device? by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      According to Apple, they make very little money off of iTMS. They said the main reason they do it though is to sell iPods.

    5. Re:Storage device? by stuartkahler · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Up until now, the only demand for Microdrives has been camera owners who want a single Compact Flash card to take thousands of high resolution pictures. Microdrives use very few parts compared to a regular hard drive, so if they were produced in massive quantities, they could slash the price to a small fraction of the current one. Building the assembly line is likely the greatest expense in producing the drives.

      If Apple came to IBM with an offer to buy a million of the 1 gig drives at $40 each, ($40,000,000 contract), I'm sure some VP would work their ass off to make it happen. Especially since it would help them reduce their price on CF Mirco Drives, and push regular flash memory out of the market. There's a massive market for 1-2 gig Micro Drives that is waiting for the price to get reasonable. Portable USB storage, video and photo cameras, MP3 players, PDAs, digital picture frames, just to name a few. It's actually pretty amazing that a solid state storage device has greater market share than a disc based one right now.

    6. Re:Storage device? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I think Fujitsu is entering the market, possibly other players too.

      I don't think it is too outlandish, because at the time, iPods used hard drives that cost about as much per unit as the entire iPod did.

    7. Re:Storage device? by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      Hey, maybe somebody knows, is there any MP3 players that can read compactflash?

      The only one I've seen is the Frontier Labs Nex products, which is crippled with a horrible name and it's kinda chunky looking, and it seems too big. Ideally what I'd want is a tiny-sized MP3 player that can hold the same compactflash memory card I use in my digital camera. Though I could live with it being slightly larger to accomodate a MicroDrive, I really don't consider this a necessity. You can get 1GB compactflash these days, and the no-moving-parts solution really seems the way to go.

      I guess I don't see what's so great about MicroDrive. If it had 100x the capacity of CompactFlash, that would be one thing. But it has maybe 4x the capacity. As both those numbers are bound to go up, 4x doesn't seem compelling to add moving parts to the system. Plus it uses 3x more power and takes up 2x the room. I'm not seeing the value of Microdrive here. Though, if I already had one for my camera, I would think it's great.

    8. Re:Storage device? by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      Didnt we just see a story here on /. about 1" Toshiba hard drives?

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    9. Re:Storage device? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only one I've seen is the Frontier Labs Nex products, which is crippled with a horrible name and it's kinda chunky looking, and it seems too big.

      They're only slightly larger than a deck of cards. You can't get much smaller and still have room for 2 AAs and a CF card.

      I've seen other CF MP3 players, but I don't know if they're still around... It seems like retail places only want to carry things that take StupidMedia and such, which probably has a serious impact on the ability to sell them.

      You can get 1GB compactflash these days

      You can actually get 4GB CompactFlash, but not everything can use them (the evils of FAT16), and they're insanely expensive.

    10. Re:Storage device? by StarManta · · Score: 0

      Yes.

      --
      StarManta
      I don't think BMW has ever complained about their 2% marketshare. Neither has Apple.
  35. Karaoke Recorder by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    want an mp3 player that can record with an internal microphone

    4 gigs full of karaoke. Yeecchhh! :)

    Not to mention an accumulation of embarassing bathroom sounds because you forgot to turn it off at some point during the day.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Karaoke Recorder by Gandalf+Teh+Ghey · · Score: 1

      nooooooo not for karaoke, so I can record memos, etc etc

    2. Re:Karaoke Recorder by lactose99 · · Score: 1

      Actually, my Samsung YEPP has a built-in microphone. Its perfect for recording little self-memos and such.

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    3. Re:Karaoke Recorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couple that with an easy way to set reminders. I'm thinking a UI like:

      Hit remind
      Hit 1hour increment
      Hold record - speak message - release

      Then in one hour it'd beep like a pager, and you could listen to the reminder. THAT would help me a great deal, since I lost my memory in the cola wars.

    4. Re:Karaoke Recorder by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > not for karaoke, so I can record memo

      Hate to break it to you, but personal audio recorders (audio memos) have been around for years. The only thing you will get out of MP3 recording would be better access time, but only when compared to a tape-based device. There are plenty of digital recorders already.

    5. Re:Karaoke Recorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to break it to you, but.. Well, choose one:

      Carrying around an MP3 player that functions better than a digital recorder, with dozens, if not hundreds, of hours of recording time... Or...

      The same MP3 player without the digital recorder function, and a digital recorder.

      Hm. Tough call, tough call.

    6. Re:Karaoke Recorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, lets make it even more simple:

      An MP3 player that allows recording, optical in/out, etc. but has a form factor that prevents storage in a pocket?

      An MP3 player that fits in a pocket, along with a digital recorder that fits in that same pocket?

      But this is funny since the latest iPods allow recording.

  36. Roll on iTunes music store by adamwright · · Score: 5, Interesting

    All I want is the iTunes music store in the UK. My new 40G iPod is reading, meerly 2gig full. My credit card is ready, my bank account is ready. I've got enough of a buy list to spend 100 in 30 seconds.

    So where the hell's the store!?

    1. Re:Roll on iTunes music store by 5lash · · Score: 1

      Why did you buy a 40gig iPod when you only have 2 gigs worth of music? You can still buy CDs from shops ya know.

    2. Re:Roll on iTunes music store by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      Talk to your local version of the RIAA about that. I'm sure that they are the fly in the ointment.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    3. Re:Roll on iTunes music store by tobes · · Score: 1

      You could always fill up your iPod by using my site. I link directly to the itunes music store, and you can browse music based on what you currently listen to. Sorry for the shameless self promotion, but what the heck.

    4. Re:Roll on iTunes music store by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

      The iTunes Music Store (iTMS) is overrated. The quality of the recordings is really not worth paying almost as much as a CD, unless you're really in too much of a hurry to buy your CDs online, and/or too lazy to drive to the CD store. It makes better financial sense at this point to just keep buying CDs and ripping your own compressed digital audio tracks as you see fit. The quality will be noticeably better, along with the selection, ease of use and durability. Also, you get a nice CD case, with nice artwork and lyrics on occasion. I was excited about the iTMS at first, and bought a couple albums as soon as it opened. I quickly realized that 128 kbit AAC is really quite crappy, and no where near worth $1 per song. Just be happy with CDs, encode your own MP3 or AAC files at whatever bitrate you want for your iPod, and enjoy the extra fidelity.

      --
      "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
    5. Re:Roll on iTunes music store by kantai · · Score: 1

      Ugh, buy some CD's. They are better quality, more permanent, almost as cheap ($16 for CD vs $10 for full CD on ITMS), can be used anywhere, aren't locked in a proprietary format, and have no DRM. Ripping CD's in iTunes is very fast. (Between 18-25x for 256 kbps MP3) Filling a 40 GB I-Pod may be a challenge but will cost thousands of dollars if done the ITMS way.

    6. Re:Roll on iTunes music store by switcha · · Score: 5, Funny
      Filling a 40 GB I-Pod may be a challenge but will cost thousands of dollars if done the ITMS way.

      And will be, what, free if done by buying cd's? You just said that cd's are more $. Good closing argument.

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    7. Re:Roll on iTunes music store by kantai · · Score: 0

      I've filled 25 Gigs of my I-Pod without spending any money. I already have CD's, I don't already have AAC files.

    8. Re:Roll on iTunes music store by mojowantshappy · · Score: 1

      You could send some of that money to me, I have a use for it.

      --

      This page was generated by a Barrel of Circus Midgets, and that is the way I like it!!!

    9. Re:Roll on iTunes music store by switcha · · Score: 2, Funny
      Good for you for having cd's. The parent, however, said I've got enough of a buy list to spend 100 in 30 seconds.

      I think it's safe to assume he doesn't already have those songs/albums on cd.

      I've filled 25 Gigs of my I-Pod without spending any money. I already have CD's...

      So your music collection is worth nothing? It figures.

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    10. Re:Roll on iTunes music store by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Filling a 40 GB I-Pod may be a challenge but will cost thousands of dollars if done the ITMS way.

      But it's still cheaper than the CD way: 40gb of CDs == 60% more expensive than 40gb off the iTMS, using your $16 per CD and $10 per iTMS album.

      So if it costs $1k on the iTMS, it will cost $1.6k with real CDs; and that isn't even counting the fact that on some CDs you save money because you only spend $3 or $4 on the tracks you want, instead of $16 on 12 tracks you don't want.

    11. Re:Roll on iTunes music store by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Used CDs are usually cheaper than $10. I've bought a bunch of them for $6 or $7. If you can find a good used CD store near you, then get over there and stock up.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    12. Re:Roll on iTunes music store by stripes · · Score: 1
      All I want is the iTunes music store in the UK. My new 40G iPod is reading, meerly 2gig full. My credit card is ready, my bank account is ready. I've got enough of a buy list to spend 100 in 30 seconds.

      Rent a US mail box, get a US credit card, buy. Come on, if Mastercard offers my dog credit cards surely you qualify! (Hmmm, of corse my dog subscribes to Outdoor Photographer, so maybe you need a magazine subscription as well...)

      Ok, I know that's not a real answer unless you happen to travel to the USA.

      There are pre-payed credit cards, you can probbably manage to get one of those. The trick is how to get a US address on one. If you have any friends in the USA they ought to be able to buy it for you and mail it on (and by "friend", I mean anyone you can trust with $100 or so of your money to buy the card for you)

  37. That's me...low end by VoyagerRadio · · Score: 1

    That's sounds just about right for me--a lower-priced, AAC-compatible player. However, wait--I wanted to be able to play mp3PRO files, too. Where's that player?

    --
    Harold
  38. Re:Hello all! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    sorry, you must have meant to visit this site.

  39. Steve Jobs, clean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...Steve Jobs is well known for keeping a clean image on his products ..."

    I bet you won't say that about the iPod he keeps in his back pocket, the next time he craps his pants over the concept of redesigning a motor scooter

  40. Re:Cat got my tongue!~~ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    These might even be small enough to internally smuggle music into prison. This will become much more important when all of the illegal file sharing music lovers are locked away and tunes have more barter value than cigarettes.

  41. Um ... you're forgetting Newton. by gellenburg · · Score: 1

    'Nuff said.

    1. Re:Um ... you're forgetting Newton. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the Newton hasn't been produced for several years.

  42. Re:Mini iPod by yoriknme · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why would you care what my cock looks like? Just out of curiosity. Nothing personal intended.

  43. We KNOW they are replacable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We know the batteries are replacable, just like car engines are replacable. Any part can be replaced, but sometimes you might as well just replace the whole thing if the cost is so high.

    Please see www.ipodbattery.com. What a scam; these batteries start out at 10 times the cost of typical replacement batteries.

  44. I'd buy one in a second, but by unassimilatible · · Score: 1, Interesting

    as an AAPL shareholder, I do wonder what the margins would be on these.

    Plus, would a new battery cost $99 too?

    One thing I'd like to see is an AM/FM module on these. I have an AM/FM radio on my Sony MD player, which is nice.

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
    1. Re:I'd buy one in a second, but by ljavelin · · Score: 1

      AM radio? No thanks! FM is all I want. Please feel free to leave the AM radio behind.

      A built-in FM -transmitter- would be VERY cool.

  45. Re:mini ipods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU WIN: A Sleek new Slashdot 4 Slice Fart Toaster!

    You and yours (that you met at Slashdot) will enjoy the benefits of being able to Fart Toast 4 slices at one time!

    No more waiting for Fart Toast!

  46. Never Ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never ask a man what MP3-player he uses.

    If it's a iPod, he'll tell you.
    If it's not, why embarrass him?

  47. interview by mabu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Consumer: Sounds cool. What about the battery? Have you all thought about having a user-replaceable battery?

    Steve Jobs: STRIPES! The new iPod will come in STRIPES! Who cares about the battery when you have STRIPES!

    1. Re:interview by njpomeroy · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think you have the speakers reversed. I haven't met anyone with an iPod who cared a flying fig about the battery. HOWEVER, every one of them agonized about what style of case to put it in.

      The consumer DOESN'T CARE about the minutia of the technology. They DO care about how it works and how it LOOKS.

      My $.02.

  48. Pricetag by moriya · · Score: 0, Insightful

    This does not mathematically make any sense. 2GB or 4GB for 100? Whereas 3 to 5 times the price gets you 10x the space?

    If there's one thing that I can't stand is the Apple pricing. It's not a wonder why I've always considered Apple products to be part of a small niche market. I don't care if this is what Apple has decided on for a pricing system. It's not getting them any more customers when a 40GB mp3 player can be had for considerably less than what they're offering.

    1. Re:Pricetag by evn · · Score: 1

      $750cdn is what it'll cost for ($603 with ADC discount) for a 40gb iPod because it's small. A 60gb nomad zen xtra will cost you half that much - but it's bigger (weight/volume) than the ipod. You're paying for it being compact. Just like Canon Elf digi-cams cost a lot, and tiny cellphones cost more than brick-sized disocunt pieces - small mp3 players that store a couple thousand songs are going to cost a fair ammount too. compare with the Nomad MuVo2: 1.5gb - $200 after $30 mail in rebate from crutchfield.com. If apple can get theirs out for $99 then they'll be one of the most cost-effective units in the low-gb MP3 player arena. Not everyone needs 21 days of music all the time. To carry 40 CDs in say half the size of an ipod would be a wonderful thing for many people. Especially if they could change those in a minute or two by plugging into firewire.

    2. Re:Pricetag by presearch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well... there's like a display, and a case, and some buttons, and some sockets, and a charger, and some headphones,
      and some chips, and a circuit board, and a battery, and a CD, and box, and some profit. Stuff like that.

      They could ship the same device, 'cept for a smaller drive, and people will bitch.
      or they'll reduce the form factor or use lesser components and people will bitch.
      They could have the exact same product they sell today, reduce the price by $150,
      give $150 iTunes credit, and people would -still- bitch.

    3. Re:Pricetag by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      You do realize that making things smaller costs more money? That's why laptops are considerably more than computers (when same specs).

    4. Re:Pricetag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you like to bet that this new smaller, cheaper iPod will NOT get Apple more customers? Would you really?

      It's a $100 device. It stores more audio than similarly priced MP3 players. It's an iPod, and it works with the iTunes Music Store (whose entire purpose is to drive iPod sales).

      Portable CD players used to cost over $100, and consumers ate them up. Anyone who shied away from purchasing an iPod before due to pricing will now take another look and say "oh, only $100? wow." and buy one. People will eat these up.

      You'd be a fool to think otherwise.

    5. Re:Pricetag by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      Many of us do not need the space, and don't have the money. These min-iPods are a perfect solution - all the space I need at a price I can afford.

      By comparison, I haven't filled up my computer's 6GB drive in 5 years, why would I want to buy a now-typical 60GB model? I'd rather pay 25% as much for 10% the space. That other 75% is money down the drain.

    6. Re:Pricetag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the mathematical concept is "non-linear growth". In the States, you are usually exposed to it by the 8th grade. Moron.

      And please, post where I can get a 40GB mp3 player for "considerably less than" $100! I personally got very excited by this because 1) I like compact electronics, 2) I don't like paying for more than I need, even if it is a "good deal" to people who just consider ratios. I would even have bought a full-sized iPod at $100 for a hit to the storage (though maybe I'd expect >4 GB).

      Honestly, 40GB of storage alone (in a chunk three times the size of an iPod and designed to the exacting specifications of Maxtor) will cost you $70. Oy.

    7. Re:Pricetag by cjhuitt · · Score: 1
      This does not mathematically make any sense. 2GB or 4GB for 100? Whereas 3 to 5 times the price gets you 10x the space?

      Well, of course it doesn't make any sense, if you think the only thing in the iPod is a hard drive. But let's take a quick look at one, without going too far into it:

      • Hard drive - this will probably go down in price as capacity is reduced, but probably not as a linear function
      • LCD screen - This probably won't go down much in price, other than due to volume discounts.
      • Buttons/Wheel - probably won't be any cheaper
      • Battery - if Apple does like everyone is whining about and makes one removable, this may increase the cost (more parts to manufacture/assemble)
      • Assorted other circuitry - As with the LCD screen.
      Yes, there is a lot more in an iPod, at a glance, than just a HD. So why would a iPod that is 1/10th the capacity be 1/10th the price again?


      (FWIW, a couple of months ago I bought a new 40 GB HD for cheap. The price of the 80 GB model was a little less than double, yes, but wouldn't you know it - I could't find a 20 GB model for anything less than about $10 below the price for the 40 GB. That's half-capacity for about 3/4 the price.)

  49. Apple to offer a budget product? Ha! by xtermin8 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yeah right. This seems highly unlikely, unless Apple is going to tie a subscription to Itunes to the product. The company has never been able to compete by discounting its products. A Ipod "Zire" for doesn't make business sense, unless extra income can be guarenteed by Itune purchases

  50. Low end? by pla · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Amusing, that they call this a "low end" player... "Only" 400-800 songs? Gimme a break - How many of us spend so long away from a PC that we need more than 800 songs on a portable device?

    If it plays Ogg Vorbis, they can consider me a potential customer. If not, well, I suppose they haven't lost me, since I'd never spend $400 for what amounts to a walkman-type device anyway. But I hope it does, because this sounds like almost exactly what I want in a portable music player (assuming it plays Vorbis, as I mentioned).

    Hmm, one more qualification before I promise to buy it - If they plan to charge $100 to replace a $10 battery that dies within six months of the warrantee ending, I'll pass.

    1. Re:Low end? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      you could try to hack it and add Ogg support via flashing the system ROM.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:Low end? by EddydaSquige · · Score: 1, Insightful
      If it plays Ogg Vorbis, they can consider me a potential customer. If not, well, I suppose they haven't lost me, since I'd never spend $400 for what amounts to a walkman-type device anyway. But I hope it does, because this sounds like almost exactly what I want in a portable music player (assuming it plays Vorbis, as I mentioned).

      I wish I could reach through the computer and slap you. You'll never see apple supporting oog in the ipod, I doubt you'll ever see a mainstream (meaning you can buy it at Best Buy) player that supports oog. AAC is the format of the future, deal with it. However I do agree with the $400 bit, I'm not sure I would even spend $150, but $99.99 and you've got me.

    3. Re:Low end? by Catnapster · · Score: 1
      Gimme a break - How many of us spend so long away from a PC that we need more than 800 songs on a portable device?
      Well, since you asked... I'd say a good deal of Slashdotters go to school of some kind. Even if you have a laptop, a small mp3 player is better for listening to a song or two between classes. Some school-going Slashdotters listen to music enough that 800 songs isn't all that much.

      My personal opinion is that if you're going to buy an mp3 player, you might as well be able to carry all of your music on it. And besides, this is Slashdot... who really has 10,000 songs they want to listen to? Why buy a 60gb iPod? Because we can.
      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
    4. Re:Low end? by tang · · Score: 1

      The Rio Karma plays Ogg Vorbis. They sell them in Best Buy.

    5. Re:Low end? by EddydaSquige · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected.

  51. The miniPod! by gellenburg · · Score: 1

    Woot!

    1. Re:The miniPod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that be "min-iPod"?

  52. No, they are SOLD OUT! by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

    It doesnt really matter to apple because all the iPods have been sold out this christmas season.

  53. 400 Songs Nothing by MBCook · · Score: 1, Informative
    I'd just like to point out that if you want, you can fit WAY more than 400 songs onto a 2 gig player. I have ripped a large part of my CD collection into iTunes (I use Windows for what it's worth). They are all in VBR MP3s, and average ~200 kbps acording to Windows XP.

    That said, I have 1286 songs (totaling 2.2 days) and it only occupies about 1.5 gigs. It may seem like nothing compared to a 40 gig iPod, but you can hold a TON of music on a 2 gig player.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:400 Songs Nothing by Trollificus · · Score: 1
      Considering that I'm still carrying around my mp3/wma Rio Volt CD player, even 2 gigs in a portable can be a godsend.

      This may be a great reason to finally pick one up. My collection is small enough to fit on a four gig player, so I won't have to break the bank picking up a 20-gig model which I will never fill up anyway.

      --

      "People should be allowed to keep midgets as pets."
      - Gov. Jesse Ventura

    2. Re:400 Songs Nothing by elgrinner · · Score: 1

      So your mp3's have an avg. size of about 1,2 megs? At 200kbit/s that is not even an avg of one minute per song. What do you listen to? Only the refrain of the songs?

      --
      But my Mom says I'm cool! -Milhouse
    3. Re:400 Songs Nothing by MBCook · · Score: 1
      I understand your point, I'm just saying that while it may hold 400 128kbps songs, it could hold my collection (~3x as much) easily since it's VBR.

      I too only have an MP3 CD player, so I'd love one of these things too (unless I get a iPod in two days). I'm just saying that it can hold MORE than 400 songs. Four gigs really is a lot of space (unless everything you have is 384kbps CBR files).

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    4. Re:400 Songs Nothing by Trollificus · · Score: 1
      " I'm just saying that it can hold MORE than 400 songs."

      Oh, I wasn't debating your point. I agree completely. My collection is in 192k all ripped from CD and I couldn't fill a four gig partition with what little I have(although it is still over 1000 songs). I'm just saying that this would be a great idea for those who don't want to spend $500+ on an mp3 player and don't really need that much space anyway.

      --

      "People should be allowed to keep midgets as pets."
      - Gov. Jesse Ventura

    5. Re:400 Songs Nothing by arasinen · · Score: 1

      From the data it's easy to calculate the average bitrate, which seems to be 66 kbit/s. (1,5 gigabytes * 1024**2 * 8 / 2.2 days * 24 hours/day * 3600 s/hour)

      By using a bitrate of 32 kbit/s, you could double the amount of songs on a 2 GB player. This is fine for those who do not hear the compression artifacts. Most people would say it sounds like crap, though.

      Apple, however, uses the default iTunes bitrate when quoting the amount of songs. Most Apple sites follow this as well.

      --
      [ Antti Rasinen ]
  54. Screw the little one. . . by jafac · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The *big* one, speculated about on http://www.macosrumors.com/

    seems more interesting to me. . .

    Sounds like an ideal companion to a mini-dv camcorder. If one could dump video to it in the field, and possibly do edits to it (portable iMovie?) - that'd be great. I don't really have much use for an ipod - too big for pocket transportability (really). Too small (storage-wise) to be useful as a semi-portable "desktop music server" - (though a G4 iBook serves that purpose pretty well).

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    1. Re:Screw the little one. . . by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      Interesting, but I'd bet on ThinkSecret's accuracy before MOSR.com's 100 times out of 100.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
  55. please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    my open source luggable MP3 player runs Gentoo .. it's far superior to BSD. Does BSD have portage? No .. in fact /usr/portage doesn't even exist. Clearly an inferior design.

    1. Re:please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      def addtolist(mylist,curdir):
      """(list, dir) --- Takes an array(list) and appends all files from dir down
      the directory tree. Returns nothing. list is modified."""
      for x in os.listdir("."):
      if os.path.isdir(x):
      os.chdir(x)
      addtolist(mylist,curdir+x+"/")
      os.chdir("..")
      else:
      if curdir+x not in mylist:
      mylist.append(curdir+x)

      def searchindex(myindex,myitem):
      """(index,item) -- Finds the offset and length of the file 'item' in the
      datasegment via the index 'index' provided."""
      mylen=len(myitem)
      myindexlen=len(myindex)
      startpos=0
      while ((startpos+8)
      from class digraph:

      def copy(self):
      mygraph=digraph()
      for x in self.dict.keys():
      mygraph.dict[x]=self.dict[x][:]
      mygraph.okeys=self.okeys[:]
      return mygraph

      Who the fuck wants Portage? It's the worst example of engineering in a widely-used piece of free software this year.

  56. Other players offer battery replacement programs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "so what if you have to buy the battery for $50 or pay apple $99 to replace it. do you see the other mp3 players offering replacable batteries or battery replacement programs?"

    Yes, they do. It's called going to the 7-11 and getting a $2.99 set of Ray-O-Vac's.

  57. I think it would be Perfect Timing by mesach · · Score: 5, Insightful

    since they are set to "sell" 100 million songs through the Pepsi promotion...

    All you have to do is introduce a cheap player and then they have the free music, and you have the Apple Ipod cast in stone as the mp3 player to buy.

    --
    moo.
    1. Re:I think it would be Perfect Timing by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      ...aaah, now the "stripes" thing makes sense! Any color stripes you want, as long as it is blue on the top, white in the middle, and red on the bottom!

  58. The Cornice Storage Element by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Linq.. Just for the record, I think the $99 might be a bit optimistic, being a rumor and all.

  59. Can they be white stripes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd love to have an ipod with some white stripes on it.

    1. Re:Can they be white stripes? by jred · · Score: 1

      ipods already have white stripes... white stripes on a white background :)

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  60. 1" Hard Drive? by Alpha_Geek · · Score: 3, Informative

    When I saw this story it immediately made me think of this story from back in November on macrumors.

    This snippet is what I recalled:
    Toshiba plans to expand into 1" hard drives in the future. 1" form factor drives are already being produced by Hitachi at this time.

    Toshiba supplies 1.8" drives for the current iPods. Seems a 1" drive is more likely than solid state memory for the new miniPods.

  61. Just the right size? by indros13 · · Score: 1
    When will Apple realize that 640K ought to be enough for anyone?

    Seriously, though, I will really appreciate this addition to the mp3 player market. For price/performance (and coolness), there is nothing between the 128/256MB for $100 and the iPod for $400. I honestly don't need 10GB or more and will find the small form factor a double bonus.

    Merry January to Me!

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  62. ipods are so bulky and unwieldly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For runners, which you are not you fat fuck, iPods are impossible to use.

    You would have to duct tape it to your back or something.

    1. Re:ipods are so bulky and unwieldly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use my iPod for running. I clip it onto my waste with a leather case I bought.

    2. Re:ipods are so bulky and unwieldly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to CD players, which fit perfectly in your pocket.

    3. Re:ipods are so bulky and unwieldly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like those other hard disk based MP3 players are sooooo much smaller... be careful not to sit on them though, they may get lost in your anus, much like your head.

    4. Re:ipods are so bulky and unwieldly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I use my iPod for running. I clip it onto my waste with a leather case I bought.

      That's disgusting.

    5. Re:ipods are so bulky and unwieldly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you need music to distract you from the thrilling rush of running -- becoming one with both wind and road -- you're not a "runner". You're practicing running's bastard second-cousin, "jogging".

  63. I'd spend a lot less with actual batteries by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    I'd spend a lot less. I have a set of excellent fast-charging AA's that I purchsed with a charger for about $20. These batteries are easy to change (and charge), and if I am caught between charges, I can run digital cameras, etc "with the bunny inside".

    Not so with the iPod. This appears to be some sort of bad design trick by Apple to make the user suffer while they get large profits for the batteries. Look for a hardware hack to make the iPod run with regular batteries. Or would this invite DMCA suits?

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:I'd spend a lot less with actual batteries by Unregistered · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you can make a regular batery fit inside an ipod and give the same charge time, you've got a job waiting for you at any electronics company out there.

    2. Re:I'd spend a lot less with actual batteries by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the point of the Lion battery is that it holds a much bigger charge than your punny AA rechargeable batteries.

      why not build a laptop with AA!!!! woo

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:I'd spend a lot less with actual batteries by qa'lth · · Score: 1

      Actually, Belkin makes a battery backpack for the iPod that takes 4 normal AA's. You can find it somewhere on the Apple Store.

  64. Plain old MP3's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not too familiar with the iPod... do you have to use the iTunes software, or can you load regular mp3's on there via a standard USB-filesystem interface? Or even if you have to use their software, can it work with my lame-encoded MP3 collection?

    1. Re:Plain old MP3's? by FueledByRamen · · Score: 2, Informative

      It does present a standard USB (or firewire) FS interface (FAT32 for the Windows ones, HFS+ for the Mac iPods). I don't know if you can load songs onto it that way directly; you probably will still need a program to update the song DB files, but there are several OSS projects to do so (mostly directed towards Linux, obviously). I'd just use the iTunes software, but if you don't like it for whatever reason, try one of the free (as in GPL, iTunes already being free as in beer) iPod loaders. It takes standard MP3 files (both VBR and CBR encoded, so your lameenc collection should work just fine) and AAC files.

      --
      Every cloud has a silver lining (except for the mushroom shaped ones, which have a lining of Iridium & Strontium 90)
  65. Re:so the iMac is crippled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are a complete fag.

  66. Cellphones by shog9 · · Score: 1

    Actually, i'm fairly certain more than a few cellphones have this capability built in. Even the ones without cameras... ;)

    (voice recordings can be compressed a *lot*, so it doesn't exactly take a 2GB iPod to make this feature useful)

    1. Re:Cellphones by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Cellphone without a camera? Yes, please!
      Who ever came up with that "Hey, let's add a sucky webcam to every phone model on the market"-conspiracy should definately be obliterated with a chainsaw. Better yet, scissors!

  67. Lots of Music by man_ls · · Score: 1

    This, while a great idea and I might even buy one, is pretty woefully undersized for my needs.

    3455 songs totaling just shy of 20GB of data....10.5 days of solid played time, arranged by artist and title. (Yes, I own most of the CDs.)

    And I listen to a lot of it at any given time...a track here, a track there, so that I really do use most of the collection all the time.

    Too bad I think iPods suck, or I'd buy a 30GB one.

    1. Re:Lots of Music by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      why do you think they suck?

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:Lots of Music by man_ls · · Score: 1

      Scratch too easily, not enough advantages over say a Zen or iRiver of the same size to justify the extra price...basically it costs more because it says Apple without really being *superior.* imo.

    3. Re:Lots of Music by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      well, reviews of them say that the interface IS superior, but if an extra 50 bucks is worth fumbling with more awkward controls and zero integration to the system, then fine, have fun.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    4. Re:Lots of Music by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      They suck because they scratch too easily? Come on, you can do better than that. :-P BTW, get a case.

  68. "stylish ladie's jeans"??? by quandrum · · Score: 1

    Ever single pair I own has a 5th pocket, all of them mens. Some were embrassingly 5$ walmart brand, some were embarrassingly $70 'chic' label brand.

    But more on topic, yes, I would love if it fit in there

    1. Re:"stylish ladie's jeans"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I know what you're talking about, and looking at the dimensions of that pocket, you'll find that it fits the description of "condom pocket" much better than "lipstick pocket."

      I'm guessing the extra pocket in ladies jeans is different enough to be called a lipstick pocket.

  69. Re:Staying power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stupid troll...

  70. PDAs are a waste, that's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any Mac user who needs a PDA just buys a Bluetooth mobile phone and keeps their data synced to it.

    When I had a Palm V, it was a pain in the ass to carry it around-- always had to be conscious of it if it was in your pocket because sitting the wrong way would break it. My T68i slips into the change pocket of my jeans and I forget it's even in there during the day unless it rings/beeps from an incoming call, SMS or IM, or one of my calendar event alarms goes off.

    1. Re:PDAs are a waste, that's why by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 1
      Wow, what an entirely new level of asinine post from someone who's never used iSync with a newer model cell phone and a Mac.

      I don't have a top of the line Bluetooth phone, I have to connect my lil' ol' Motorola v60i via a USB cable, but since I got it, my Palm M130 sits at home, unused. And I sit and play blackjack while bored instead.

      --
      "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
    2. Re:PDAs are a waste, that's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Mac users have all your gizmos in the pocket it seems. Are you a hiphoper?

    3. Re:PDAs are a waste, that's why by pla · · Score: 1

      from someone who's never used iSync with a newer model cell phone and a Mac.

      True enough, since my phone and PC address books sync just fine. I don't, however, have a native C compiler for my phone. Do you?

      Anyway, I think you missed my point... You can't say that you no longer need a PDA because your phone acts like one, as an argument against including basic PDA functionality in other portable devices such as an iPod.

      More relevantly, and the justification for my sarcasm, your reason for no longer needing a standalone PDA has NOTHING to do with your use of a Mac. Nothing at all. Yet, you mentioned it as though you had some magical combination, rather than just two devices following a particular standardized interface.

      If anything, you could thank Motorola for making a cell-phone include those aspects of a PDA you find most useful.


      (Okay, Zealots, I've tossed you another one to mod down. When will I learn to keep my mouth shut in any thread having anything to do with Apple? Ah well, I have karma to burn. Bite me, rabid fanboys!)

  71. going the way of cellphones by GerbilSocks · · Score: 0
    They are getting cheaper and cheaper. Soon iPods will be disposable, just like razor blades, disposable digicams and cellphone cards.

    When they introduce plastic-memory and solarcell rechargeable batteries to flood the digital music market, we'll all look back at buying $500 MP3 players and laugh like we did with the 8-track.

  72. Re:Other players offer battery replacement program by OmniVector · · Score: 1

    that would work fine and dandy for a flashcard based mp3 player with little moving parts, and a small LCD. otherwise you're going to get a couple hours out of those batteries in an mp3 player with a large lcd with a backlight, the ability to play games, and a hard drive all while listening to music.

    --
    - tristan
  73. Finally by tang101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Finally - I can deal with a $100 iPod.

    Apple tends to think that we all have oodles of money we can just throw at their neat gadets.

    My budget has been cut since the economic down turn. Nice to see Apple givin' us po' boys a chance to participate.

  74. Re:mini ipods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think they will catch on. Once you've had the iPod, any mini will seem inadequate.

  75. Wow by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

    2 gig for $99 almost seems too good to be true. Although my need for an MP3 player is small, I gotta admit that at that price point, I'd probably pick one up. Assuming they can keep the form factor as nice as the current iPods of course.

  76. Makes perfect sense by SengirV · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why sell a prodeut for $100 when people are buying in droves at $299 - $499?

    So the idea of releasing them for xmas is a horrible one indeed.

    I think that the timing of the cheaper miniPods coincides nicely with the $100 mill Pepsi give-a-way starting in February.

    It's all a game, the game called 'Maximize Profits'. And selling only the current iPods for xmas make you a big fat winner winner chicken dinner. Also, how many people are going to return their $150 128 meg POS flash MP3 player to Best Buy to get one of these new miniPods? I'd say more than a few.

    --

    Prof. Farnsworth - "Oh a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!"

  77. I'll believe it.. by Lars+T. · · Score: 4, Funny

    when it's leaked on Apple's web pages.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    1. Re:I'll believe it.. by burns210 · · Score: 1

      or how about you believe it when Steve Jobs announces it at Macworld in San Francisco.

      God, it is amazing the hype Apple can get over the possibility of products. Michael Dell must be jealous as all hell at the type of market loyalists Apple has.

      P.S. this is coming from a guy who plans to buy a 12" powerbook in 2 weeks :)

  78. Why you can't use AA's by TClevenger · · Score: 2, Informative
    To fit the space available, Apple went with a custom-sized Lithium Polymer battery (picture). These are of a size and shape that you're not going to be able to easily put together with Lithium Ion cells like a standard cellphone battery, so it's going to cost more.

    That said, since a 600mAh Lithium polymer cell phone battery costs $34.95, the 850mAh or 1200mAh iPod batteries aren't a bad deal at $49.00, and Apple will even do the labor and return shipping for $50 more.

    1. Re:Why you can't use AA's by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, and its also fucking larger than the iPod.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  79. Think Microdrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sizes are just right for microdrives

  80. iPod is fine for joggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Maybe I'm just lucky. I trained for the New York Marathon, which involves running over 500 miles over 6 months or so. I carried by little 5GB iPod, listening to books on tape, music, etc.

    I had no problems before, during or after the runs. I think it is because the hard drive is mostly not running - it grabs 20 minutes of music and puts them in flash memory and then spins down until it needs another 20.

    So, on a 3.5 hour run, it will have accessed the hard drive 7 or 8 times. I recall that, on maybe two or three times over the entire 6 month period, the iPod paused between songs because (I think) the hard drive was trying to re-fill the Flash memory at the time I jostled it. It paused 2 or 3 seconds, and then continued on its merry way.

    Now, I suppose it's possible that I'm just a very lucky guy. But that was some serious testing of the old iPod, and the wild joy of killing hours on a long run listening to music or getting lost in a good book -- well, give that up at your own risk based on some "running and iPods don't mix" theory, but my experience is that the fear is either overblown or altogether unfounded.

    By the way, I take my 40GB out on runs now (much more modest, 4-5 miles a pop). No problems yet.

    1. Re:iPod is fine for joggers by Golias · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Maybe I'm just lucky. I trained for the New York Marathon, which involves running over 500 miles over 6 months or so. I carried by little 5GB iPod, listening to books on tape, music, etc.

      If you are training for the New York, you probably have developed much more graceful mechanics than the people complaining of frequent HD problems.

      Instead of insisting on a solid-state MP3 player, those who think the iPod can't handle their jogging should work on inproving their stride. They way they are running, they are probably far more likely to damage their backs and knees than their iPod hard drives.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:iPod is fine for joggers by bware · · Score: 1


      I probably have bad mechanics, and I am not training for marathons, but I run sub-7 minute miles, and my iPod doesn't like it. It freezes as soon as the cache empties.

      My battery is dying also, after 18 months.

      I love my iPod, but I'm not minimizing its shortcomings either. Now 12 more people can post telling me how they can "jog" with theirs (I don't jog, I run), and how their battery is lasting just fine. But they have their anecdotes, and I have mine.

  81. and for storage, they will use... by ELiTeUI · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Toshiba's new 0.85-inch hard disks!

    ...or at least it would be QUITE a coincidence if they did not use these drives.

    ELiTeUI

  82. 640K? by sulli · · Score: 1

    Yes, 640,000 songs ought to be enough for anyone, at least at this point.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  83. Good Point by Razzak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With the $99 price point, replacing the battery is no longer necessary. Just buy a new one when your old one dies.

    So you've got:

    People buying iPods and exposure to 'Mac Life'
    People buying Music to go with their iPods
    People re-buying iPods to match their music when their iPod dies.

    Is Steve finally giving apple a smart business plan to go along with smart products?

    1. Re:Good Point by mabu · · Score: 1
      With the $99 price point, replacing the battery is no longer necessary. Just buy a new one when your old one dies.


      It's that kind of wasteful, shallow, selfish attitude that really ticks me off. The components of this unit have the ability to last twenty times longer than the battery, so the notion of throwing it away because it's cheaper is narrow-minded and short-sighted, and certainly not in the spirit of Slashdotters who like to make products exceed their expectations and not contribute to the continued, totally avoidable, piling up of trash. I'll tell you what, give us your address and we'll dump all these dead units in your front yard and you can see how you like it.
    2. Re:Good Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like you're slashdot-smart enough to find his address on your own. But I'm willing to bet you're the type of person who runs a Mac Plus as his fax server, wasting tons of energy, but think it's a "good thing" for the environment.

      Self-righteousness won't win you any converts.

  84. ipod sucks for jogggers by isoga · · Score: 1
    Hi run 3-4 times a week, 3-6 miles each time, I don't take my ipod with me anymore.

    • Once it's played all teh songs in the cache it freezes up. The HDD cant handle reading while bouncing up and down. You have to walk for a few steps while it sloops up the next 32MB.
    • It's too heavy to run comfortably with.
    • Wouldnt bet it doing the ipod any good either
    • dave

    1. Re:ipod sucks for jogggers by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Informative

      Which iPod do you have, Gen 1 or 2, or Gen 3?

      Mine (gen 3 30 gb) USED to do what your describing, occasionally, if I was running on the road with the 'pod in my hand. It never did it on trails or on a cushioned indoor track. The last update (2.1) fixed the problem. Something to think about.

      And it is certainly not too heavy to run with. My friend's wife (who is around 115 lbs) runs with his, but wouldn't do so until he bought her an iSkin. The iSkin, besides protecting the shell from impact, is silicon and really sticky...when you hold it, you can't imagine EVER dropping it. With the newest revision (which has more rear surface area than the old one) I can put the iPod on my dashboard and take corners without it slipping. And before I got the iSkin, I used to use a forearm strap which was really cool...didn't get in my way at all and never skipped.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    2. Re:ipod sucks for jogggers by isoga · · Score: 1

      thx, good info. I'm still on 2.0.2.

    3. Re:ipod sucks for jogggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good runners don't bounce. Try improving your form and you'll have better luck with the iPod, and improve your distance. :-)

    4. Re:ipod sucks for jogggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too Heavy to run with!?!?!?

      I think you should stop jogging and start hitting the weight room.

  85. hope Best Buy carries them by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

    I hope Best Buy carries these min-iPods. My bonus this year was a gift card to BB. My wife and I have been seriously talking about an iPod as a way to play our music collection in our vehicles (which have standard cassette, no CD). The problem is they're expensive (I'd hate to have someone break into our car to steal it) and still a bit too large (I'm not going to want the thing in my pocket for a couple hours). We don't have an extensive music collection - it would fit a couple times over on the 10GB iPod. This sounds like a perfect fit for us.

    1. Re:hope Best Buy carries them by forkboy · · Score: 1

      You know, for around $100-200 you can get an actual car stereo CD player installed that not only reads music CDs but also CD-ROMs containing MP3 files. Just so you know.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    2. Re:hope Best Buy carries them by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      True, but then we have to drag along the physical CDs, and we won't have the one we want when we want it, etc. If our entire collection can fit on an iPod, which is transferrable to whichever vehicle we're driving, that would be sweet.

    3. Re:hope Best Buy carries them by forkboy · · Score: 1

      True...I was thinking more towards burning your own mp3 compilations, though. 700mb is still a decent playlist and you can just leave a few CD-Rs in the car without having to worry about losing much if they get stolen.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  86. Cell phone sized hard drives were just announced.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too lazy to look up the story... but just the other day on /. one of the major hard drive manufacturers annouced hard drives that have platters the size of a nickel.

  87. Misattribution of blame by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    You're blaming Apple for ThinkSecret's rumors?

    If I were to sell an iPod, I would use the current model, not a future release; any more than I would use OS X Panther vs XP, and not vs Longhorn.

  88. 2 short-term reasons by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    1. Lock-in all those customers who converted their audio collections into *.ogg

    2. Have anyone who sees an *.ogg, think about the only player which can play them

  89. 2.2G microdrive for $180 by slithytove · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can get a 2.2G one by some company called magicstore new off ebay for $180. Since its a standalone product and more of a niche one than an ipod the profit margin is probably considerable. Still it seems too good to be true that I could get an ipod with 2G for $99 anytime real soon. Also- if they used cf sized microdrives I'd hope they'd just use a cf slot so you could expand. Such players exist, but nothing with the looks, interface or sound quality of an ipod.
    Personally I use an ipaq 2215 (sdio/cf/bluetooth/400mhz) as my portable audio/video player (and pda funcs). Now if only there were a bootloader that worked with it and linux I wouldn't feel dirty every time I use it:)

  90. neuros.. by gimpboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    the neuros does pretty cheap too my emph' added:


    The NiMH batteries in the Neuros and the Lithium Ion battery in the Neuros HD are expected to last at least 1 1/2 - 2 years (depending on usage). Only our Neuros technical team can replace the battery for you and, as a result, it is not consumer-serviceable. Our battery replacement policy is as follows.

    Within Warranty (90 days parts, 1 year labor)
    -If within first 90 days of purchase - NO CHARGE
    -Past 90 days, but within 1 year- $7

    Outside of Warranty
    Neuros 128- $8
    Neuros HD- $12

    To have your battery replaced, please send us the Backpack portion of your Neuros in a padded envelope with your name, address, phone number, e-mail (along with a check payable to Neuros Audio) to:

    Neuros Audio
    Attn: Battery Replacement
    1941 N Hawthorne Ave
    Melrose Park, IL 60160


    really? i didn't think so either.

    you're a pretty comprehensive thinker.

    --
    -- john
  91. Ha! by geekoid · · Score: 1

    I want it to be smaller then a standard 9v battery, and be powerd by a standard 9V battery!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  92. Head crash is problem by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    The problem with hard drive damage is that constant vibration or jarring will cause damage to the read/write heads. And if your lucky, it will cause minute pits to the platters film (Even if the platters are glass substrate).

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  93. Size matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're compensating for something, aren't you?

  94. Re:WHY DO PEOPLE BUY APPLE? (Hint: free market) by ajkst1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I owned a 1G iPod that had a battery failure. Yeah, it sucked. But the difference is that I abused that little thing and it lived. I also put it through some harsh conditions and it lived. I bought a 3G 10 GB iPod on eBay for $225. Microsoft couldn't do it and not many other companies could because Apple has a loyal fan base. If you ever use an iPod on a daily basis, you'll realize why people continue to buy them. There are also fixes for the battery problem and replacements that are 3rd-party solutions for less than what Apple charges. It's a rechargable battery smaller than a credit card. It's not something you can just go out to the store and pick up. Ask Dell if their new music player has a user-replaceable battery. $5 says it's not. To quote their own website "Fixed rechargeable battery with up to 16 hours battery life." Key word there is FIXED. And if they have a battery problem, they'll have a replacement program.

  95. Comparable to Rio Nitrus? by FroBugg · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Rio has had their Nitrus player out for a few months now. It's got a very small hard drive with a 1.5GB capacity, and is selling for about $175-$200. Apple's iPod is currently priced higher than Rio's Karma, which has comparable storage space (20GB). Can Apple really produce something with better specs at a lower price? It would sure be a first for them.

  96. I hope they keep the games by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I just got an iPod for Solstice (actually, I got it a few weeks early), and the single best feature about it is the games.

    That's right. The 4 crappy games that came on it are a blessing.

    I HATE shopping. I've hated shopping since I was young and my mother dragged me out to malls to shop around. Back then, they didn't even have chairs everywhere. I stood around and hated the experience. Now, when I go shopping there are chairs everywhere, but nothing to do. It turns out, I still hate the experience.

    But now that I have an iPod, I can listen to the music, toodle around with Parachute or Name that Song, and look up every once in a while to say, "Yes dear, that looks great." I don't know if any of the other MP3 players out there have these little time wasters on them, but they should.

    (Oh, I hear the iPod does other things, too, like keep your contacts, alarms, notes and files. So handy!)

    1. Re:I hope they keep the games by Isbiten · · Score: 1

      Or you could get a java cellphone and download tons of games. Or maybe you want a portable SNES? (Read Gameboy advance)

      --
      I fought the corporate America, and the corporate America bought the law.
    2. Re:I hope they keep the games by 1ini · · Score: 1

      Archos Recorders using the open source RockBox firmware have games. I play sokoban while on the bus. They even have video(beta) support. Yay for RockBox!

    3. Re:I hope they keep the games by Quasar1999 · · Score: 1

      And having those features enabled is what causes your battery life to be crap (even when you aren't using the iPod and you think it's off)... don't take my word for it... ask an Apple engineer about a little part they left out of the iPod... namely an RTC... Without which, any PIM app (such as a calendar, alarm, etc), requires the CPU to fully power on once a second to update itself...

      Apple engineers are idiots... if they want to add support for PIM functionality, they should ensure the hardware has the functionality they need... No wonder everyone is bitching about battery life... Even if you don't use the iPod to play music, you constantly have to recharge it... probably once every day or two... 3 years of typical usage my ass!

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    4. Re:I hope they keep the games by Cokelee · · Score: 1
      4 crappy games

      Four GAMES?!?!? I don't have four games! I have three!!

      Name that Song

      Name that Song?!?!? I don't have "Name that Song" I have solitaire I have bricks, I have parachute, but I want "Name that Song!" I don't understand where is the fourth game? can I get it? how do you have it? new ipod 4 games? older ipod 3 ? nooooooo

    5. Re:I hope they keep the games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, its called SOLITARE.

    6. Re:I hope they keep the games by nick+this · · Score: 1
      The "Name That Tune" game is part of firmware update 2.1.

      If you are mac user, it should have been in your software update weeks ago.

      If you have the misfortune to be a PC user (I'm sorry. :) you can download it here: iPod firmaware update 2.1.

      Cheers.

    7. Re:I hope they keep the games by ITR81 · · Score: 1

      Maybe your an idiot for calling someone an idiot. First I don't charge my iPod everyday but I use it everyday. It usually needs a full charge every 2-3 days on avg. and sometimes even 4 days. Sounds like your the idiot now. My friend currently has Gen 1 iPod and it still has about 80% of it's battery left and it's now almost 3 yrs old. Apparently you don't talk to many iPod owners.

    8. Re:I hope they keep the games by Cokelee · · Score: 1

      Thank you. You have eased my pain.

    9. Re:I hope they keep the games by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      It's definitely on the new Gen 3 iPods. I was also under the impression that the newest firmware update would put the game on your iPod.

    10. Re:I hope they keep the games by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Despite this obvious flamebait/troll, I'll answer anyway.

      I'm quite atheist, so I personally find it hypocritical to celebrate Christmas. I don't even like paying lip-service to a holiday that I don't even have the slightest belief in. It's best for everyone this way. I don't feel like a hypocrite, and people that actually DO want to celebrate the birth of Christ don't have me polluting their holiday by making it a commercial event. Instead, I celebrate the Solstice. Here in Edmonton, when this time of year comes around, the amount of daylight that we get is much too little, so celebrating the lengthening of days again is something I can get behind. I don't have any pagan beliefs either - no 'official' ones anyway - so I'm just happy that the days are getting longer.

      As for buying gifts, this is a good time of year to do it. Lots of sales. :)

    11. Re:I hope they keep the games by Eridius · · Score: 1

      If there's no RTC, then answer these 2 questions: 1) How does it tell itself to power up the CPU every second? There would have to be *some* kind of measurement device in there 2) What would possibly be the point of leaving out an RTC on a device with a clock in it? Even if you're not using calendars or anything, there's still the clock functionality. So basically, I'm calling bull on you. There's *got* to be an RTC in there. In fact, if you were right then my iPod which I haven't charged in close to a month (I haven't used it recently because I haven't gone anywhere, just sat in my dorm room until I came home for christmas, and now in my house we have music playing constantly so what's an iPod for there?) and it still has battery left (and, in fact, I used it since my last charge for probably about an hour, so that's additional battery drain). So basically, prove that there's no RTC or shut up.

  97. Part Price List by morelife · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mini iPod 99.
    Battery 99.
    Song .99

    1. Re:Part Price List by giantsfan89 · · Score: 1

      3 year warranty: priceless

      --
      Don't ping my cheese with your bandwidth!
  98. Damn You Apple!! by ckuske · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just purchased a 10GB iPod for my fiancee for Christmas.

    She'll never fill it up, and I knew that, but she wanted an iPod.

    Now there are smaller ones that are $200 cheaper, and in colors as well, after I shelled out another $50 and got a custom paint job on it at ColorWare.

    Apple, damn you!

    1. Re:Damn You Apple!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I know you. You're that guy who compiled your kernel the night before the new release came out.

    2. Re:Damn You Apple!! by ckuske · · Score: 1

      Nah... although I used to be that way. I've decided to let things be if it works the way it should.

      More importantly, I lose my precious uptime if I install a new kernel!

  99. Major news would be the $/GB factor... by X86Daddy · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know of a tiny form-factor storage media that costs roughly $50 / GB?! I'd love some miniature removable media at that price point! So far, the best I've seen is the MagicStor 2GB CF hard drive for about $200.

    Maybe it'll just use the same 1.8" hard drive tech as the existing iPod line, with the rest of the electronics shrunk... :-(

  100. Ahem by sbszine · · Score: 1

    You do know what the HD in 'Neuros HD', stands for, right? It's backlit too, by the way.

    --

    Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

  101. Perhaps it will be like the new Creative MuVo? by kansei · · Score: 1

    Small size (2.6" x 2.6" x 0.8"), 1.5 GB or 4 GB capacity, starting at $199?

    http://www.nomadworld.com/products/muvo_2_15/

  102. Use one of these: by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
    I have one of these and it works great. It is small and light, uses a AAA battery (which is easily replaced and doesn't cost $99) and doubles as a USB drive. Doesn't hold 2GB, but it holds plenty.

    I also have a Nex II which uses compact flash and could use a MicroDrive. It has a nice screen and more navigation capabilities, but it has no advantages for jogging over the pen drive.

  103. Competition by mmortal03 · · Score: 1

    As we are seeing, a new niche in the mp3 player market is being created. Creative just released a compact 4GB micro-drive MuVo2 MP3 player, here , and we have already seen a "pocket-sized" 1.5 GB player released by Rio, here. Apple is just bringing out the competition now. They will be tough to compete with.

  104. i don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I still don't understand why anybody would want an ipod over an iriver 390t (msrp $199) - see http://www.iriveramerica.com/products/iFP-390T.asp

    iPods are overrated and overpriced - couple that with a hard drive (read: moving parts) and, well, ugh.

    1. Re:i don't get it by martyn+s · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe because it only has, um, 256MB of memory?

    2. Re:i don't get it by martyn+s · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This isn't insightful, this is SLASHDOT, NOTHING on /. is insightful!!!!!!!! MOD PARENT DOWN.

    3. Re:i don't get it by zpok · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're absolutely right. On the same note, I still can't understand why people were so critical of the Citroen 2CV. A wonderful car, wonderful!

      --
      I think, therefore I am...I think.
  105. Only So they Can Really Say by Bruha · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Sir it would be cheaper to buy a new model than replace the battery"

    Or

    "Would you like to buy the battery replacement plan for 99 dollars sir?"

    1. Re:Only So they Can Really Say by dbirchall · · Score: 1

      You forgot "Would you like to buy AppleCare for 59 dollars sir?" That lasts for 3 years, so thsoe "iPod battery only last 18 months" folks (must have used it as a flashlight or something) would've been covered.

  106. Would the name be... by payndz · · Score: 1
    ...the miniPod?

    Storage-wise, a 2-4Gb iPod wouldn't be a problem for me. My old-model 5Gb iPod, even with 500+ tracks on it, still hasn't exceeded 2.5Gb of content - and a lot of the tracks on it are just ones I 'kinda' like, rather than love. I can keep them on my iBook if I don't want to listen to them on the move.

    And at $100 (probably UK 100, even though the exchange rate is now massively in the UK's favour - it should only be about 65) I can live with the battery issue.

    (Although it'll probably only be OS X 10.3 compatible, which would rule me out as I'm still running 8.6/9.2 and have *no* compelling reason - and this is not open for debate for X-zealots, since my primary app on my elderly but beloved 450Ghz graphite clamshell iBook is Word 5.1 - to change...)

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  107. Try an i-bead by kwandar · · Score: 1

    I-beads are great little MP3 players. 256 Mb, rechargeable off the USB port, keychain, with that built in microphone you want. I found mine at www.mp3playerstore.com but you can look around. There seem to be more places selling it outside North America.

    1. Re:Try an i-bead by jtrascap · · Score: 1

      Err...256MB?

      Ahem - wrong discussion methinks... 2-4Gb is a completely different class.

  108. Small MixUp by rblancarte · · Score: 2, Informative

    It was SpyMac that announced and had forged VIDEO (not just pictures) of the fake Apple PDA (called the iWalk). Looking at their site now doesn't turn up much of any news, fake or real.

    This is not to say that ThinkSecret is clear of wrongdoing. They did post about an Apple PDA called the MacMate back in 1999, but obviously that never came to fruition.

    RonB

    --
    It is human nature to take shortcuts in thinking.
    1. Re:Small MixUp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for whtever it's worth, spymac stopped being a rumor centered site about a year ago, and now is basically a "teens aged 13~16 that love macs" site, with a fair amout of gay population thrown in for good measure. No, I'm not kidding, that's Spymac.

  109. Hope this comes true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've felt for a while that there wasn't any really good options for mp3 players for most users. Flash based mp3 players are either really low capacity (256mbs or less) or start going up significantly in price. The HD based one's seem to be just inflating the size with out decreasing the price and are far beyond the capacity of what most people need. The 2-4gb size range would seem to be the sweet point for me and if apple can put something as slick as thier Current iPods out at the 100-150$ price range I think it's gonna be a huge hit.

    I recall some arcticle on slashdot i think about some drive manufacturer working on small 2-4gb hd's that they where trying to decrease cost and power consumption by integrating as many things into a single chip on the drive as possible, eliminating the caching on the drive etc. Basically just simple cheap low power storage for portable devices. Sound like the type of thing they would be using.

  110. vaporware?? by 3Suns · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "From the vaporware dept"... Michael, How can anything be vaporware if the company hasn't announced the product yet and its very existance is only a rumor?

    --

    -3Suns

    ~~~~
    The Revolution will be Slashdotted
  111. Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'd just like to point out that if you want, you can fit WAY more than 400 songs onto a 2 gig player. I have ripped a large part of my CD collection into iTunes (I use Windows for what it's worth). They are all in VBR MP3s, and average ~200 kbps acording to Windows XP. That said, I have 1286 songs (totaling 2.2 days) and it only occupies about 1.5 gigs.

    • 1.5 Gigs / 1286 songs = average of 1.2 Megabytes/song
    • 1.2Mb / 200kbps = 48 seconds on average

    In other words, you can only pack 1286 songs at 200kbps into 1.5 gigs if each song lasts 48 seconds on average.

    My collection is about 1400 songs in size (approximately the same number of songs in your collection). Each song lasts a little over 4 minutes on average. They're all ripped somewhere between 128kbps and 160kbps (less than your 200kbps). My collection takes up over 6 Gigabytes.

    1. Re:Doesn't add up by MBCook · · Score: 1

      Yeah, someone else pointed that out. I do have quite a few short songs, but most are 2 minutes or more. They are recorded at 64-386kbps (or something like that). I'm amazed they are so small too, but they sound fantastic and they're tiny, so I'm not complaining.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  112. Re:Cat got my tongue!~~ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Five long years, he wore this iPod up his ass. Then he died of dysentery, he gave me the iPod. I hid this uncomfortable hunk of music up my ass two years. Then after seven years, I was sent home on parole. And now, little man, I give this iPod to you.

  113. Grammar police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean, "as the current iPods do".

    1. Re:Grammar police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the grammar police. We have the school surrounded. Come out with your pens up, and your grammar mistakes in plain sight. You have the right to remain illiterate. Every grammar mistake you make can and will be used against you in a court of slashdot.

  114. what we really need ... by BigGar' · · Score: 2, Funny

    is a mega-Ipod that will store a billion songs and be worn in a backpack like case and the battery worn around the waist like Batman's utility belt. At least that's what I think :-P

    --


    Shop smart, Shop S-Mart.
  115. Re:so the iMac is crippled? by jaysones · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is not at all the case. Copying your music to the iPod happens automatically by default. You can get songs off the iPod with lots of 3rd party software tools. It's much easier than any other mp3 player I've seen.

    If you have to mortgage your house for a 50 dollar battery, you need to move anyway.

  116. Creative offers replacable batteries by jmichaelg · · Score: 3, Informative
    Almost all of Creative's players have removable batteries.

    Notice that the copy even suggests why you would want replaceable batteries as a standard feature - road trips. Also notice that they aren't dinging you for $100, plus shipping, to replace a battery.

    Don't be surprised when Apple finally caves and makes iPod batteries easily replaceable. They'll claim it's a great new feature.

    i didn't think so either.
    Yep, I agree. You didn't think.

    1. Re:Creative offers replacable batteries by JK+Master-Slave · · Score: 0, Troll
      No. Apple absolutely cannot put a replacable battery in the iPod now.

      Attention has been drawn to the fact that their current model does not have a replacable battery.

      The priesthood at Apple has explained why it is a good thing that it is not replacable.

      The idea for a replacable battery did not come from within Apple (the Apple NIHNI* tradition) ((* Not Invented Here, Not Interested!)

      An illustration of this sort of entrenched design decision, look to Apples single-button-mouse tradition.

    2. Re:Creative offers replacable batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "An illustration of this sort of entrenched design decision, look to Apples single-button-mouse tradition."

      Pure stubborness at this point; its irrelevant except with the powerbook and ibook; you can't replace what's built-in.

    3. Re:Creative offers replacable batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Creative has replacable batteries.

      I should know, my friend started with a Nomad 6GB, had the batteries die, got it swapped up for a 10GB (Future Shop warranty), had those ones die, replaced, had those ones die, and is waiting to replace them again.

      So, yea, obviously the solution is to make the batteries user replacable, instead of having the fucking things just work the first time.

    4. Re:Creative offers replacable batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad all of Creative's players blow the form factor in order to have that "feature".

      Not to mention they often blow the rest of the package too. But, hey, enjoy your player... while it works...

  117. Belkin makes an external battery pack for 3G iPods by teridon · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you are willing to put up with the added bulk, you can add it on to your 3G iPod. The external battery pack uses 4 AA batteries.

    --
    I hold it, that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing. -- Thomas Jefferson
  118. Preposterous by Godai · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is just silly. The only DAPs similar to these 'mini-iPods' are the Rio Nitrus @ US$219.99 SRP and the RCA Lyra RD2760 @ US$249.99 SRP.

    So what we are to believe is that Apple is going to put out a 'mini-iPod' that has 3 times the capacity for less than half the price? Make sense: after all, Apple is known for putting out products that are all of sleek, stylish, well-made and cheap.

    Wait, no, they aren't; we forgot the Apple Tax(tm)!

    I can believe that possibly Apple is reading a 'mini-iPod', but if it's less than US$300 I'll be damned surprised.

    --
    Wood Shavings!
    - Godai
    1. Re:Preposterous by burns210 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      why don't they just reintroduce the 5gig model for sub $200? I mean, everyone would like an ipod, but they are friggin expensive to most people.

      The only reason i am not getting one for christmas is becasue of price. If my significant other could have saved 100 bucks and gotten a 5gig instead of 10gig, i could be rockin out christmas night to my cool new mp3 player.

    2. Re:Preposterous by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      I am in nearly the same boat. But in my case, it comes down to the fact that having a portable mp3 player is not worth the price to me.

      Or in other words:
      The money it costs is worth more to me than the iPod is.

      Fortunately I got a Nike/Panasonic 256MB limited edition doohiky. Just in time for my skiing trip on X-mas day.

    3. Re:Preposterous by burns210 · · Score: 2, Funny

      don't forget, you don't just get an mp3 player with the ipod, you can play games like breakout...and stuff on there...

      remember breakout? ya, good times.

    4. Re:Preposterous by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      If I want games, I'll buy a gameboy. ]:3}>

    5. Re:Preposterous by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      www.ebay.com

  119. DRM + Ogg by Phantasmo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apple's in a very good position right now - they've managed to get themselves into the good books of both the Free software community and the music industry.

    However, if they add Ogg Vorbis support to the iPod then they'll have to

    • add DRM technology to the Ogg container format, thereby pissing off the Free software people
    • or add support for another DRM-free format to their player, and infuriate the music industry

    It seems that they are pursuing the third option: ignore Ogg Vorbis and piss off the very small (and to them, not particularly useful) Xiph community.

    --

    The US Army: promoting democracy through unquestioned obedience
    1. Re:DRM + Ogg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You must be and idiot.


      iTunes/iPod currently supports AAC, mp3, wav, and aiff audio. Of those, only 1 has DRM, and only if it's a file you bought from iTMS.


      There's no reason RIAA should be upset over the use of another non-DRM format. If Apple doesn't support ogg, it's probably because they're pushing aac/mp4, and the number of new sales from ogg support is limited.

  120. This is not quite correct by tkrotchko · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Apple's software is one way only...copy to the ipod or delete it. You can't copy from it. "

    Apple's software, yes. But XPlay lets you drag and drop music either to or from the iPod; I find its a more elegant solution than iTunes, because it lets you use the pieces you like for downloading, ripping, managing ID3 tags. Then when you connect an iPod, it shows a special music folder that you drag and drop your music.

    And yes music comes off as easily as it goes on.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  121. Re:Pocket SIzed? Huh? by DoorFrame · · Score: 1

    So parents buying the cheaper iPod for their kids makes the teens spoiled? What, exactly, would buying them the original iPod have been?

    To say that parents might consider a cheaper version of the iPod is not a good argument in favor of their kids being spoiled.

  122. Perhaps for the graceless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " For runners, which you are not you fat fuck, iPods are impossible to use."

    If you're running in such a way that you can pound an iPod to death, that's the least of your worries. You're pounding the connective tissue in your kness to powder.

    Try to run with a little grace. Study the example of nature. Watch a gazelle or cheetah run. No bounce, a flow. As you run, envision that you are flowing like a stream. Make no noise, you should be able to run in your bare feet without drama.

    Its a common thing for westerners to stomp around like that; its why your kind has so much trouble with the concept of "grace". Its just pound pound pound and you think you're accomplishing something.

  123. Moving with the times???? by willtsmith · · Score: 0

    I see this as a move to put the iPod in the ideal form factor. Eventually, the current size iPods should go away.

    Hopefully, Apple will finally realize that there is something that can replace that form factor. A PDA!!!!!!

    Base it on Pocket Linux, give it a snazzy GUI, a iPod(ish) form factor and call it a PocketMac.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  124. I don't think WinXP reports VBR bitrates correctly by necere · · Score: 1

    i just encoded a cd the other day in vbr (lame's alt preset standard) and the average bitrate of the files is between 154kbps-196kbps, yet winxp tells me that the files are anywhere between 400-500kbps, and some seem to be read as 128kbps (they're not).. so i'd say winxp probably isn't calculating the values in vbr correctly. and if my results are any indication, i'd guess your mp3s are actually encoded at somewhere around an average bitrate of 100kbps or less. at the bitrate i used, a 70-minute cd takes up about 90MB, so 2gigs is roughly 1500 minutes of music, or 375-400 4-minute songs.

    --


    .necere.
  125. I'll have my credit card ready by idiot900 · · Score: 2, Informative

    2GB? $100? Made by Apple? I will buy one of these the very second they become available. At that price I won't worry about the battery dying after a couple years, I won't have iPod envy when the new version comes out, I won't cry if I drop it on the floor and break it. A wonderful idea, Apple - I only wonder if they will be able to make enough of them.

  126. iPod battery FAQ by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Informative

    (Not in relation to the mini-iPods, as I don't know their specifications, but there seem to be enough idiotic battery posts, so...)

    Q: Is the iPod's battery replacable?

    A: Yes. Apple has an official battery replacement program for $99. You send your iPod in (any model iPod), and Apple will replace the battery for $99.

    Q: Is the iPod's battery user-replaceable?

    A: Yes and no. The iPod's case is not designed to be opened, so, in that repsect, it's not what you would generally refer to as "user-replaceable". But, the case can be opened, and there are several third parties that offer replacement batteries for the iPod, such as iPodBattery.com (instructions available at that link) and PDASmart, for as low as $49. Some will even do the replacement for you if you send it it.

    Q: What's the deal? Does Apple think the iPod is disposable?

    A: No.

    Q: I heard that the iPod's battery only lasts 18 months, and then you have to buy a new iPod, is that true?

    A: NO! The vast, vast majority of even the earliest iPods, now over two years old, continue to function just fine. Some iPods, however, have had issues with batteries. Lithium ion batteries are only good for 300 to 500 charge/discharge cycles. For this reason, certain customers' usage patterns may cause the batteries to degrade, or fail, sooner than others.

    A2: If the battery does fail, and the iPod is no longer under its original one year warranty or $59 AppleCare Protection Plan, or any of numerous third party service plans, you don't have to buy a new iPod. You may replace the battery yourself for as little as $49, or have Apple perform the replacement for $99.

    Q: Why didn't Apple use better batteries?

    A: Apple used the best lithium ion battery technology available from leading battery manufacturers. This is the best, most cost effective battery technology available given the requirements of the device. The lithium ion batteries Apple uses are no different than lithium ion batteries used by anyone else. The battery should last most normal users several years.

    Q: Why doesn't Apple make the battery easily replaceable, then? Or use different batteries, like AA?

    A: Because if they did either, the size of the batteries and/or the access panels and mechanisms required to access the battery would make the unit significantly larger than it is, likely by several milimeters in thickness at a minimum, and it may possibly affect other dimensions as well. It was an engineering decision to use an integrated battery; if it were not integrated, the unit would not have the small, sleek form factor that makes it so attractive. Additionally, the iPod's battery is indeed replaceable, as has been discussed above.

    Q: Well, no one else does that!

    A: Wrong. Prime example: Dell's new DJ portable music player uses an integrated, non-user-replaceable lithium ion battery, just like the iPod. Dell also has no plan or program to replace batteries outside of warranty at this time.

    Q: But, Apple only released their battery replacement service because of all the bad publicity from the Neistat brothers' video.

    Wrong again. Apple released the battery replacement program as early as November 14. ipodsdirtysecret.com was only registered on November 20, and started being heavily publicized on November 21. Additionally, Apple had been planning the battery replacement program for months - these types of service programs don't just happen overnight - before Casey Neistat even had his first contact with Apple. The video campaign had nothing to do with Apple's rollout of the battery replacement program.

    1. Re:iPod battery FAQ by Brat+Food · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Course, theres also a little bit of economics to consider here:

      Lets say, the iPod had the choice of using 2AA batteries. Lets's say you got your AA's at $0.50(too high? too low? i dont have to buy them). Lets's see what youve paid for JUST BATTERIES over the "300-500" charge average lifetime of apples built in battery:

      err, $300-$500... I made my math too easy =(

      Probably more depending on how much you use the ipod, if the ipod could run on only 2AAs, and what quality battery you buy for it. Still complaining? If you are really desperate, i think some companies offer *gasp* external battery packs. But even at 99 bucks, Apples battery replacement nost likely means your not gonna blow double that much on batteries over the next few years.

      *CHEERS*

      --

      "Stuff... In my home!? NEVER!" - Zim on Invader Zim
      "I want the toilet seat!" - Little Dog on Two Stupid Dogs
    2. Re:iPod battery FAQ by Cap'nCrunk · · Score: 1

      Lets say, the iPod had the choice of using 2AA batteries. Lets's say you got your AA's at $0.50(too high? too low? i dont have to buy them). Lets's see what youve paid for JUST BATTERIES over the "300-500" charge average lifetime of apples built in battery:

      err, $300-$500... I made my math too easy =(

      Yeah, but there's a difference between spending $6.00 on a 12 pack of batteries every month or two and forking over $100 at one time.

      It may be more expensive in the long run, but it's hard for some people to scrape up $100 the moment their battery craps out.

    3. Re:iPod battery FAQ by rimmon · · Score: 1

      yes, but those people usually don't buy a mp3-player for a couple hundred bucks...
      plus, you can get a replacement for 49$. What's the matter with you people? There is no story concerning the batteries of iPods. Just move on and get a freakin life.

    4. Re:iPod battery FAQ by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      there is nothing wrong with [the iPod having a non-user-serviceable battery]. It is not fundamentally flawed in any way.

      Bull.

      If users are complaining about it, it's a flaw. Because the flaw can not be fixed without significant re-engineering, it's fundamental.

      Apple, your customers are speaking. Are you listening?

    5. Re:iPod battery FAQ by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Informative

      If users are complaining about it, it's a flaw. Because the flaw can not be fixed without significant re-engineering, it's fundamental.

      Um, no, not everything that is complained about is a flaw. This issue affects a very, very small portion of iPod owners. The second part of that statement is rendered invalid. Additionally, there is an official program to replace the batteries, if need be, as well as numerous ways to do it yourself. Just because the Neistat brothers couldn't do it means nothing. The instructions are here, with pictures: old, new.

      The vast, vast majority of iPod owners' batteries will last the life of the product. These premature failures are fringe cases. Lithium ion batteries are good for 300 to 500 charge/discharge cycles. If you are a heavy user, i.e., recharging an average of once a day or more, and using the unit daily, AND are always running the unit down to completely dead (a big no-no for all lithium ion batteries) you could conceivably be in a situation where your battery has degraded prematurely. But the plain fact of the matter is that almost all first generation iPods, some of which are over two years old, continue to function just fine, and will continue to do so.

      Other manufacturers are doing the same thing: integrating batteries on hard drive-based players specifically for the purpose of reducing the size.

      Apple, your customers are speaking. Are you listening?

      Apple, an extremely small, vocal percentage of your customers are making an issue out of nothing (since there are several reasonable ways to replace the battery, including official ways through Apple itself) - er, wait, some people who don't even own iPods, but just relish in anything negative related to Apple - are you listening?

      Oh, wait...you already did.

      (Note: if Apple's rumored new "cheap" iPods have easily accessible user-replaceable batteries, it won't be because of slashdot, the Neistat brothers, or "bad press", because the products have been in development for ages before this ever even came up.)

    6. Re:iPod battery FAQ by Enucite · · Score: 1

      Did you forget about these?

      Even if you assume the NiMH lasts only 1/2 as long as Li-ion, that's $60 less than the $99 replacement battery.

      Not to mention I've heard you can get a pack of Energizer 4AA,2AAA NiMH and a recharger at some wholesale club for $20 on sale.

      I don't disagree with Apple's descision to have a "non-replacable" Li-ion. I think that's the best solution for the iPod.

      I'm just being an ass by noting that you missed a critical point in your argument. ;)

  127. this is nonsense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    apple make quality stuff but quality costs. $100-150 is not going to happen. Just a silly rumour I would be a trillion dollars on it.

  128. How I got a FREE iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    This is a true story, but I DO NOT advocate that anyone else try this themselves because it depends on refined artistic ability to pull off:

    I wanted an iPod very badly after getting a chance to hold one at BestBuy a couple months back, but decided against it because of the high sticker price. Then, a few weeks back, a friend of mine gets an iPod, and I got to handle it a bit more, and my lust grew and grew, but my wallet did not. And so, I hatched a plan then and there to get myself a "free" iPod.

    I'm a product designer by trade, and often work with clay when fleshing out prototypes, and so one day I borrowed my friend's iPod and made a detailed mold. You can probably see where I'm going with this, so I'll skip some of the finer HOWTO details.

    To make a long story short, I made a dummy iPod that looked just like the real thing with a great paintjob, weighing just as much with the fishing lead-weights I embedded inside. I then returned to BestBuy and asked to see the 40GB iPod demo unit again. Those guys tend to watch you like a hawk, though, so I casually said to the salesperson, "Let me see how well this fits in my pocket for walks through the park and such," and I proceeded to slip it into in my pocket where I immediately swapped it for the dummy unit. I continued to pretend to play with the dummy unit, then handed it back. Now the moment of truth: my heart skipped a beep, but the salesman was nonethewiser as he put my dummy unit back on the display shelf.

    I walked out with a brand new iPod that day I am in LOVE with it! I do feel a little guilty about the whole "stealing thing" - I have never ever done something like this before - so I have resolved to buy a new overpriced Macintosh next year as payback.

    1. Re:How I got a FREE iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thanks for the idea! I'm going to go out and do the same thing!

      This is just like the time I got the bright idea to blow off my fingers from the anarchists cookbook!!!

    2. Re:How I got a FREE iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you deal with making the metal back and clear cover around the indented iskin buttons?

  129. Don't forget by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    it better play ogg too. AND have three mouse buttons.

  130. and viola by stere0 · · Score: 1

    Why would you want a string instrument for your open source iPod? So you can play along? Or for the jokes maybe?

    --
    Trollem mirabilem hanc subnotationis exigiutas non caperet
  131. What do you mean Pocket size by dalek_killer · · Score: 1

    This sounds stupid, My 5Gig iPod is already pocket size. I have no trouble getting it in to my front pocket of my jeans.

  132. Sold by bmantz65 · · Score: 1

    The capacity and price will be exactly in my range. Apple, consider me a future customer.

  133. GET RID OF THAT G5 CRAP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  134. Grammar police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean, "The lithium ion batteries that Apple uses are no different from the lithium ion batteries that are used by anyone else."

  135. Re:OGG support? by tuxedobob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Okay, this is probably just a troll, since it says it isn't one, but it's a new troll to me. Anyway...

    Is there support for OGG files?

    Probably not. Yes, OGG is an open standard. Yay. That's nice. I don't feel like re-encoding 10GB of songs.

    Can I use it between my home PC and my work PC both of which run Linux?

    Hasn't someone released software to let your Linux-using PC's talk to the iPod? I think so.

    Can I copy a new track to the iPod at home and then download from it to my work PC?

    Yes, just use the iPod like a FireWire hard drive, which it is.

    Will it play those files that I want to copy FROM IT to my other PC?

    This is the same question you just asked. Are you expecting a different answer?

    Oh, and if Apple thinks I am going to pay $100 for a portable player and then $50 for batteries, they are nuts.

    What does the Neuros run on? Happy rays of sunshine? I couldn't tell from the site. Maybe it said it in the "demo", but I'm not downloading flash over dialup.

    BTW, if you don't want DRM, don't download music from a music service. That's the only way you get it, and that's true for any service, not just the iTMS.

    Also, if you get modded, you'll probably be modded flamebait. A troll has to actually look like he knows what he's talking about.

  136. Re:Batteries? (Creative Nomad) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Such a smug attitude from someone who is painfully
    ignorant about other mp3 players on the market.
    Have you ever looked at anything else or do you just
    clutch your iPod close to your chest while you
    rock back and forth in the dark closet to an
    endless loop of "Steve Jobs is infallible, Apple
    is heaven, they make no bad design descisions and
    everyone else is simply inferior...."

    The Creative Nomad Zen NX has a removable battery
    (you simply snap the lock on the front bottom of
    the player and the cover pops off. Viola, battery.)

    The battery is also standard, so therefore, will
    cost less to replace. The battery also lasts longer,
    of about 14-17 hours straight. The hard drive in
    the Nomad is also a standard notebook hard drive.
    Easy to replace the drive or upgrade with standard
    parts. Oh. And the Nomad 30GB model is $150
    cheaper than the iPod's 30GB model.

    Aside from trendy factor, the iPod doesn't really
    have much going for it compared to some other
    mp3 players on the market.

    Lest I forget... PCMag did white noise playback
    analysis of more than a dozen different mp3
    players. The iPod has a bit of sound colorization
    and a brick wall cut off at around 17khz (or was
    it 19? I can't remember) ... the Nomad was one of
    the most consistent in sound playback AND it only
    has a slight dip AFTER 20khz. Compared to the
    Nomad, you can't call the iPod audiophile quality.

    Oh well. Apple zealots will always be much more
    ignorant and self righteous than the rest of 'em
    out there.

  137. More Corroboration by amcox · · Score: 1

    MacRumors has a more complete history of the rumors surrounding the mini iPods. Think Secret is not the only source pointing toward their introduction.

  138. Re:OGG support? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 0, Troll
    Probably not. Yes, OGG is an open standard. Yay. That's nice. I don't feel like re-encoding 10GB of songs.
    Just because you do not feel like it, doesn't mean that there are not many out there that WOULD rather use Open Source.
    This is the same question you just asked. Are you expecting a different answer?
    I thought I read in a post that if you copy music to the iPod as a regualer hard drive, then the iPod won't play it. If that is the case, then it is pretty worthless IMO.
    What does the Neuros run on? Happy rays of sunshine?
    Well, according to the Neuros Products faq, it has 10 hours of continuous playback. The NiMH batteries in the Neuros and the Lithium Ion battery in the Neuros HD are expected to last at least 1 1/2 - 2 years.

    Oh, and their batter replacement policy is FAR cheaper then Apples:
    Within Warranty (90 days parts, 1 year labor)
    -If within first 90 days of purchase - NO CHARGE
    -Past 90 days, but within 1 year- $7

    Outside of Warranty
    Neuros 128- $8
    Neuros HD- $12
    $7 - $12 dollars compared to $50 for the iPod.
    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  139. in other words ipods are too overpriced by modme2 · · Score: 0

    couldnt agree more these prices look good, id even be tempted

  140. 2gigs for 400 songs? by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    "Capacities will be 2 and 4GB -- meaning users could store some 400 and 800 songs, respectively."

    Perhaps it's just a misprint, but at the ~1 meg per minute that mp3s are (and nearly every other popular compressed music format) that's 2000 minutes on 2gig, or nearly 600 songs averaging 3m 20s a song. 400 songs would average 5 minutes per song, which seems a bit long for the average song.

    Example: a recent complilation CD I created of modern hip-hop & rock music had 20 songs in 78 minutes, or 3.9 minutes per song.

    Course using the same numbers (3m 20s per song) the 4gig unit would hold 1200 songs, not 800 as reported.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    1. Re:2gigs for 400 songs? by berniecase · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Most of my songs are over the 5 minute mark. Then I completely blow that away with a 20 minute version of Moby Dick from the Led Zeppelin DVD. Or, In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida. Or a two-hour trance mix from Oakenfold. I've found I just have to limit my playlists on my iPod by MB rather than time.

  141. Re:WHY DO PEOPLE BUY APPLE? by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

    That's not how you spell cavalier, dumbass. (Or their, for that matter.) If you're going to troll, at least learn to spell first.

    Oh, and no entry found for fagotry. Did you mean factory?

  142. You are confused in so many ways. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, let me say that sexual orientation is no big deal, but I think you're confused about this. You say:

    " I owned a 1G iPod that had a battery failure [...]and it lived"

    So did it fail or did it "live"?

    1. Re:You are confused in so many ways. by ITR81 · · Score: 1

      Think about it this way Coward you can have car battery die and the car is dead. Replace the battery and the car is alive again because it's running like it use to before the battery failure.

  143. Mini-Ipod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it support Linux? Does it have a replaceable NIMH battery? Does it have a line input? Does it have an external microphone? If not... I will stick with my iRiver 380-T

  144. do you truely believe this? by gimpboy · · Score: 1

    ignoring your indignance, your assumption was flawed. why would anyone in their right mind only buy disposable batteries?

    a few years ago, rechargable batteries were invented. so you pay $11 for some 2200 mA NiMH energizers' and 15 for a charger. then you've spend about $30 after taxes. after about 1.5 years, you run those down and fork out another $11. plus there is always the convenience of being able to use batteries you can pick up from any store when you dont have the opportunity to charge your device.

    --
    -- john
    1. Re:do you truely believe this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      truely?

      I hope you learned something other than basic English at your university.

  145. where's the recording ipod?? by nycfoobar · · Score: 1

    i almost got my girlfriend an ipod for xmas, but i am holding back. her birthday is in march, maybe by then i can get an ipod that can do live music recordings of her singing. i used to have an archos recorder, but it was quite flaky and then died.... ah well...

    --
    wtf is a sig?
  146. "Stealing music" by tepples · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Oh, so you did steal the music that was loaded onto the iPod. And this isn't your typical RIAA "copyright infringement is stealing" sort of FUD but actual shoplifting.

    1. Re:"Stealing music" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no no he didn't steal the music on this ipod, it still copywright infrigment. he did steal the ipod tho. the funny thing is he'd probably get into more trouble for any music on the ipod, then for the ipod itself.

      i bet the parents that have settled with the riaa wish thier kids stuck with shoplifting cd's and didn't infringe on copywright.

  147. rotfl (nt) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashdot makes me have text here...

  148. Creative Nomad= low tech by djupedal · · Score: 1

    Yep, I just hate being able to update and charge my iPod with just one cable....not nearly as fun as all those extra cables and chargers included, or available for an additional fee, with the more advanced units on the market these days.

    1. Re:Creative Nomad= low tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When your iPod is dead and you're paying $50 for a battery and you probably break your $400 iPod instaling it, that cable is going to really matter to you.

  149. doubtful.. by dave1212 · · Score: 1

    I think this is overly optimistic, as Apple doesn't like to service cheap items. Colours maybe, hopefully not in the same shades as the iPod ads.. but not minis.
    Having just assembled my music collection this week, and finding that I have close to 70 GB of mp3s and mp4s (m4a), I won't be buying anything smaller, that's for sure.. hope they drop a big (80 or so) one on us.

    Going to put them on DVD now, as half the CDs I've burned with MP3s (over 100) are suffering from data loss due to unreadable files.. only 2 years after being burned! Any of the Kodak ones are still working fine.. just other brands. Hope to get a home jukebox for MP3 DVDs.

  150. New mini-iPod release date? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wondering if there are any rumours as to a release date for these things? I want to buy one soon, but I'd probably prefer a 2GB iPod over a 10GB iPod..

  151. OMG these things are 10X better than an iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It costs less and can transmit to my stereo!!!

    1. Re:OMG these things are 10X better than an iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 times bigger!

    2. Re:OMG these things are 10X better than an iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And sounds good while doing it!

  152. "Sacrificing design" by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
    sacrificing design to make a (tops) 1 hour chore that you have to do once ever 18-30 months slightly easier is not in my opinion a worthwhile choice.

    Well, then you're too much of an aesthete for me, buddy.

    No iPod will be dragged kicking and screaming to the brink of kitsch if it is redesigned to overcome the present deficiency. That's merely a canard of your making.

    Apple's current iPod iteration, in fact, has already sacrificed form for function. The first generation's face is purer and less cluttered; its beauty is what launched this craze. But nobody is clamoring for a return to vulnerable moving parts.

    If Apple's competitors make market gains because of the battery issue, you'll see Ives quickly make the battery replaceable and that will be that.

    1. Re:"Sacrificing design" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, then you're too much of an aesthete for me, buddy.

      Design isn't just about aesthetics, moron. An easily-replacable battery would have made the iPod heavier, significantly bulkier, and less durable.

  153. Minipod that should have been by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple really should consider either releasing there own or co-branding an iPhone with a company like sony.

    A full featured phone the size of the Sonyericsson T68i with a full 2 gig / 4 gig minipod built in.

    It would open up Apple back to the PDA market while innovating another sector. Your purchased iTunes songs could then be used as ring tones.

  154. Re:Cat got my tongue!~~ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perverted women!

  155. Minimize Dillution by denisonbigred · · Score: 1

    If he keeps the full sized ones white and makes only the mini iPods colored, then they will appear as much different products to many people, and some (with sufficient bankroll) might buy one of each, for the classic white look (undeniably tasteful) and a mini one for jogging.

    --

    "There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals."
  156. Do you have any idea what you're asking? by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
    And that's not all. Because Apple wants as fast a turnaround as possible, they're sending refurb units out for battery repairs. Meaning for your $99, you're actually getting a newly certified unit.

    And surrender my collection of 5,000 Bay City Rollers outtakes, demos, and rarities?

    I think not, sir. I think not.

  157. MOD PARENT UP! by aminorex · · Score: 1

    "kicking and screaming to the brink of kitsch"
    and the image of duck manufacture, in the
    words of Yeats, "from a mouthful of air"....
    Such acts of surreality *must* not go unrewarded.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  158. Re:Batteries? (Creative Nomad) by OmniVector · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    the nice thing about apple products, is i spend more time using them rather than more time figuring the interfaces of competitors who couldn't afford to hire a usability designer if you put a gun to the CEO's head.

    you seem to be your average feature bloat windows user, why don't you go get one of dell's mass produced pieces of shit, since it's right in your ball park of piss poor engineering along with windows. hell i might even be wrong about you being a windows user, but it wouldn't be a stones throw away from a linux zealot who bitches about not having ogg playback support.

    ipods use the same battery as creative, and the same harddrives! (gasp). i guess that makes it just as "standard" as the creative. and if you didn't see my previous post about batteries lasting for 18+ months then reread it. if you're actually in the extreme minority of people who really has two lithium ion batteries, then the ability to change the battery out is useful to you. but that still puts you in the extreme minority.

    oh, and incase you didn't check, apple has the #1 online music store and #1 mp3 player, so i guess all your comments are pretty pointless since apparently apple is doing something right.

    --
    - tristan
  159. Windows is the same. by quintessent · · Score: 1

    The iPod shows up as a new drive and synchs with iTunes at the same time.

  160. Compact Flash MP3 player by quintessent · · Score: 1

    They keep getting harder to find. I bought one about a year ago called a Diva. It's tiny and light and lasts forever on one AA battery.

    The downside: the UI designer must have been a 12 year-old intern.

  161. Re:Batteries? (Creative Nomad) by the_duke_of_hazzard · · Score: 1

    By your logic, Dell and Windows are "doing something right".

  162. Re:Batteries? (Creative Nomad) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > By your logic, Dell and Windows are "doing something right".

    They are appealing to people's love of crap.

  163. Re:OGG support? by JoshNorton · · Score: 1

    Gods, I can't believe I'm replying to this.

    If you don't like the product, here's something new you might try...

    Don't buy it.

    (Myself, I'm looking forward to a potential companion to my Riovolt sp250.)

    --
    "Stupid! Stupid stupid stupid stupid! I touched the hot wire right there - I'm an idiot!"
  164. Even better... by Theaetetus · · Score: 2, Informative
    Additionally, if you install TinkerTool and turn on the "show hidden files" option, you'll find a music directory on your iPod that holds all of your audio files. You are then free to copy them off.

    Not that I've used this for ripping from friends' iPods...

    -T

  165. Re:Belkin makes an external battery pack for 3G iP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Belkin makes an external battery pack for 3G iPods...but every eight hours it plays an advertisement for another fine Belkin product.

  166. Re:Batteries? (Creative Nomad) by OmniVector · · Score: 1

    when you've locked in the industry, and you've become a monopoly people don't really seek out alternatives. i've showed people at work my powerbook and none of them had seen a mac in awhile but all the ones i showed it to were blown away. most people don't even consider them. dell's just profiting off the fact that windows is the #1 OS. if it were mac os x, or linux, you better believe they'd ditch windows as long as it was profitable. they're a business, in the most pure sense, who's sole purpose is to reduce costs and increase profits and to hell with the customer as long as it's "good enough" that the customer will buy it.

    they're the exact opposite of apple, who's interested in capturing the consumer through innovation and quality, not reducing costs and mass producing.

    --
    - tristan
  167. Small HD by hoyty · · Score: 1

    I see all these comments saying you can't make it cheap enough via RAM or Flash and that there aren't HD's small enough. What about this from Cornice. Also mentioned here.

    --
    Hoyty
  168. Re:OGG support? by tuxedobob · · Score: 3, Informative

    Oh, forgot to reply to this:

    I thought I read in a post that if you copy music to the iPod as a regualer hard drive, then the iPod won't play it. If that is the case, then it is pretty worthless IMO.

    Okay, here's how it works. The iPod is one drive that works in two different ways. One way is an automatic sync up with iTunes (which you can also do yourself). The other is to use it as a detachable hard drive. The files iTunes puts on your iPod aren't visible when you view it as a hard drive. This makes sense, actually, as it keeps the two uses of it logically separate.

    Now, to copy music back to a computer and be able to play it on your iPod, there are two ways to do it.

    First, is the simple way. Copy the file to your iPod when it's acting as a hard drive. Copy it to the computer in question. Drop it into iTunes (or whatever) and let it copy back to the iPod.

    Second, you can open up the iPod when it's acting as a hard drive, go into the invisible iPod_Control folder, then the Music folder. Next you'll have various folders to choose from. I have F00 - F19. You file will be in one of these folders. Why it spreads your music across 20 folders, I don't know. Maybe it's to try to prevent copying back (but that's a pretty weak scheme for doing so). Maybe it's because the iPod can find a song more easily using some sort of hash (but why not simply access by filename?). Doing it this way, however, you'll notice that all non-alphanumeric and non-period characters have been turned to underscores. I can only assume that's so they can use the same code on the Windows side, which doesn't allow nearly as many characters in filenames as the Mac does.

    (It's interesting to note that each of the folders, F00 - F19, has files running A-Z. It doesn't split up based on first letter, at the very least.)

  169. Terrific... by herrvinny · · Score: 1

    Like I needed an ipod with 8GB of capacity or something. I'm fully capable of just copying songs over whenever I feel a change of music style. 800 songs is still a lot, and this makes it a lot more affordable for me. If this is real, I'm buying one as soon as it hits the retailors.

  170. rumors, truths and sceptics by zpok · · Score: 1

    A rumor does not a truth make. But OTOH I'm savoring all the scepticism and mention of Apple Tax here. If the rumors and the prices quoted are true, I'm not going to stop gloating.

    After all, the rumors could be true, It wouldn't surprise me. Why?

    1) They are determined to make this iTunes thing work. The iPod is a huge factor in this. Up until now they've catered for the fashion conscious and music freaks. In order to really corner the market, they now have to go for 'the rest of us'. For the first time they have the opportunity to make a cheap mass produced thingy that still has Apple appeal and quality. You think they let this one pass by?

    2) There've been tech reviews of smaller drives, ram and whatnot. Since the original iPods were made with the best and the latest, why not now? With the sales experience they have now, they know they can't go wrong if the price is right. And some of the stuff that goes in those white thingies must have gotten cheaper, no?

    3) If all's said: what's so surprising in Apple attacking a large niche market with competitive prices? Some of their professional software is dirt cheap (in its class) and some of those packets are best of breed. That's exactly what the iPod was: competitive (in its class) and best of breed. Some of Apple's computers are very competitively priced. Look at their laptop offering, the emacs and the dual 1.8 Gig G5. In their class they kick ass and you can't go much cheaper without either sacrificing in features and quality or investing time and effort in building your own - without the usual warranties...

    In short: while this is a rumor, it's not so far out if you look objectively at Apple in general and their iTunes/iPod story specifically.

    Rant over :-)

    --
    I think, therefore I am...I think.
  171. Re:Oh please... by zpok · · Score: 1

    Final Cut Pro
    Logic
    Keynote
    iLife
    Wireless keyboard and mouse
    Dual 1.8 G5
    Most of their portables

    While some of these are pretty expensive, they're competitive pricewise and are extremely useful. Affordable of course depends on your budget. Wish I could buy a G5, but it's affordable in the sense of "If you need a high performance computer, that one gives you plenty of oompf for your bucks".

    If memory serves, you work for CompUSA.

    I'm sure CompUSA sells some stupid PC stuff as well. You never get cynical when pushing these over the counter?

    BTW totally unrelated: what about writing it all down "Diary of a computer salesman" would sell, if spicy enough :-)

    --
    I think, therefore I am...I think.
  172. Re:WHY DO PEOPLE BUY APPLE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One day they'll make an iPod that's small enough to fit even between your cheeks, you redneck rabid tight-ass.

  173. I don't own an iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't own an iPod. I don't plan to buy one. And no mini-Pod either. Seems to me, after hearing what happened to Casey, that they're a bad bet.

    Why should I give my money to these callous people who are not only trying to rip me off, but maintain an image of being lily white?

    Someone please tell me. I really don't understand this idiotic hysteria. The only people who benefit by this are Apple stockholders.

  174. Re:Oh please... by ErikZ · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Apple's image involves a limited selection of high priced items.

    The PC world has a lot of junk, but at least it's cheap junk.

    Heh, I suppose people are interested in the pain and suffering of others. It would sell pretty well.

    And I shouldn't be working there for long, turned in the paperwork for a real job. Hopefully, it won't suck. Ah well. More pain and suffering, I guess I should be writing this down.

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  175. Steve Jobs to his minions: by valmont · · Score: 1

    ...

    I shall call it ... MiniPod

    *puts pinky finger to corner of mouth*.

  176. Re:Batteries? (Creative Nomad) by valmont · · Score: 5, Insightful

    what are the dimensions of a Nomad Zen NX? would you care to give a comparison to iPod's dimensions? i haven't found on their site any documentation about which battery it uses, how much it costs, and what it takes to replace it. It does say it's a replaceable battery, but technically, iPod *also* has a replaceable battery.

    hint: if the iPod is a smaller, more portable form-factor while touting similar capacity, while being less confusing, with less holes to plug shit in, less buttons to fuck with, your average consumer ain't guna give a shit about a device that's a geek's dream. detachable this or that, believe it or not, is confusing to the average user. It's a matter of which audience you cater to. More on this later.

    There are reasons why there are tradeoffs. the iPod is extremely small for the capacity it offers, it is extremely portable and unintrusive. i have fit mine (2G) in just about any pocket i've had. Furthermore, many of my co-workers had bought competing players, absolutely every single one of them complained about either its form-factor or lack of capacity. Nomad Jukebox3 is a big square-ish size, much like today's CD players that are basically the size of a CD, which is NOT a form factor that is nearly as appealing as one of an iPod's. Don't get me wrong the features and interoperability capabilities of the Nomad jukebox3 are simply impressive but when a device's form-factor is not really a constraint, you can go to town with features. That doesn't mean this is necessarily what the average user Apple targets will be drawn to. The Jukebox3's affluence of buttons and holes to plug things in also make it, to your average non-computer geek, a "complicated", "confusing" device, while geeks see those features as a God-Sent. it's all relative. Sure the lack of replaceable battery is frustrating. But it ain't the first time, nor is it ever guna be the last time this sort of issue will plague consumer electronics.

    Replacing an iPod battery is NOT that hard, you just gotta be careful and requires a bit of skills. If that doesn't do it, then pay the $100 for the cost of the battery and to have someone else install it and be done with it. Or buy extended warranty such as AppleCare or one from Fry's, Best Buy, CompUSA, FNAC, or whoever sells you the iPod. It ain't that bad. People always pit the price of a battery against the price of the device it goes into and get infuriated to "pay $100 for a battery for a device that's only $400". No no no and no. Most resilient, quality batteries are expensive and that's the fucking way it is. Especially the type of flat one required for the iPod, it is quite a nice piece of engineering. When it dies, you gotta pay. period. Take a deep fucking breath and accept this fact.

    It always works like this: you shop for some device, it tells you it's rechargeable, but no one ever cares to ask "yes but for how long, what do i do when it can no-longer hold a charge" to make an informed purchasing decision based on those questions. They don't think, then get pissed when the inevitable happens, then go whine at their lawyers, who in the end will be the only winners in the upcoming class-action lawsuit. Once people also get the device they rarely ever look at best practices included in their manual to enhance battery life. There you have it.

    feel free to read a couple more ideas about why things may be the way they are.

    this isn't about zealotry. some people happened to have understood why Apple has made the compromises it did at the time it did and accept 'em without whining all fucking day, and will eventually vote with their feet and potentially wait for improvements, others choose to bitch around, karma-whoring on slashdot, thinking they're smart and have a fucking clue about industrial design and stating the obvious ad nauseum, bragging about how device X or Y has a detachable this or that while never addres

  177. 3 days old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story is still the latest on appledot, and it's three days old? What did you guys do - leave town????

  178. Impossible? A big risk if possible? by TxdoHawk · · Score: 1

    As much as I'd like to, I can't see a $99 iPod happening.

    Jobs is steadfastly commited to unrelenting quality, but the real price one pays is for the "Apple experience" if you will. Plenty of people have a good chuckle at the idea of the "Apple tax", but that's the best way to describe it. In the end, wether you know it or not, you're paying that extra dough for an iPod because Jobs wants a very specific experience given to his customers, from the packaging, to the interface, to the zen-like simplicity of the operation, even down to the matching white headphones. A $99 iPod would mean that Jobs would have to cut some serious corners, and even though you couldn't keep a $99 iPod on the shelves it would sell so fast, I think that kind of price point would make Jobs too uncomfortable with what he'd have to give up in the process.

    Time will tell though...I think a "low-end" iPod is inevitable. It's obvious that the iPod appeals to more than the hardcore, everything-on-CD-ripped-at-VBR-minimum-320kbps digital music crowd, and vision aside, Jobs is no stranger to supporting the less fanatical, with things like the iBook and eMac. So why not make low-capacity iPods?

    In my mind, the real question is, how low will Jobs go? Anyone can see why a $99 iPod would be an awesome thing, but look at how much criticism the full-fledged iPod has gotten from the vocal sect. You can practically picture the anti-mac-zealots in the wings, eagerly awaiting to rip apart this supposed foray into mass-market electronics. Considering how many would be bought, even the slightest flaw in a low-profit-margin, low-end iPod would spread like a vocal wildfire amongst owners, having the potential to severely tarnish the reputation of Jobs' beloved company, one of it's greatest assets.

  179. Re:Batteries? (Creative Nomad) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shit, fuck, shit, fucking, shit, fuck, fuck!

  180. Re:Batteries? (Creative Nomad) by the_duke_of_hazzard · · Score: 1

    I don't argue with any of your points; I was merely illustrating that the parent's arguments were conflicting: it was saying Apple sell a lot, and therefore they must be doing something right, while contrasting Apple with Dell and Windows. I thought the parent stood up on itself without the final flourish. Sales are no indication of quality, though they are an indication of a *business* doing *something* right. Apple is successful partly because of high quality orignal engineering, but also because of its marketing, which plays to these strengths and can lead to blind slaving consumer behaviour as pernicious as that which MS rely upon. Jobs is a very successful businessman, and you don't become one of those simply by being a good engineer. I have an iPod, run Linux at home, Windows and Unix (remotely) at work from a Dell machine. I guess I'm just a technology whore.

  181. Two different form factors? by Refrag · · Score: 1

    I think that having two different form factors will destroy the iPod brand. It'll introduce descrimination between people with proper iPods and those with mini iPods and will confuse people when an iPod is mentioned. "Wait, which iPod?"

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
  182. Re:Batteries? (Creative Nomad) by Myrcurial · · Score: 1

    Good points - all of them - especially the last... to which I would like to add...

    It's Voila, not "wallah".

  183. Re:Batteries? (Creative Nomad) by HaloZero · · Score: 1

    Holy crap!

    Go valmont! Good post.

    [topic] Err. Yeah. Go iPods, too? Yeah, that'll do.

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
  184. who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    apple sucks ass

  185. Re:Batteries? (Creative Nomad) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For me to poop on!

  186. yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pkgsrc 0wnz j00