Literally avoiding the issue that you weren't vulnerable anyway until you installed some other software. Perhaps you should have blocked the Intel site with some sort of hosts file?
Perhaps I wasn't clear. I mean internal port blocking at a switch level. Hardening windows will do nothing against the exploit proper. Blocking these ports at a hardware level is a mitagation until the firmware is patched.
If you blocked them internally, your LAN was never vulnerable so I'm not quite sure what your point was. This is mainly aimed at the (relatively) small set of servers that may have these features in hardware and enabled, not home users. All you've showed was that you managed to enable a software based version of the vulnerability and then disable it in software.
For the more complicated functions that it can perform. But see this.
Traffic on ports 16992-16995 are directly intercepted by Intel AMT within the chipset before being passed to the host operating system... once Intel AMT is in a configured and accessible state.
and
Intel AMT enables reliable power control of the platform, booting for a network based ISO image, integration Keyboard-Video-Mouse (KVM), and more.
So a remote exploit could just consist of power cycling to boot from a external boot image. Only OS requests are sent to the OS, everything else is supposed to be caught at the hardware level.
You've clearly got some hackneyed version of it as it runs without drivers on supporting hardware. Sounds like you've got some sort of winmodem-style version of this. Read the summary...
I think you miss the point. It runs at the most basic hardware level, if it's enabled and supported by your motherboard. Having to install extra software to enable it suggests your motherboard does not directly support it, so this test is meaningless. It does not require additional software to work....
I'm claiming Irish citizenship through a reverse agreement. Anyone born on the island before 2005 can claim it. On a darker note, I didn't say it would bring peace. If anything it will inflame tensions in NI. Source : From NI
They lost Ireland years ago. If you mean Northern Ireland, there is little impetus there to change what people are seeing as peace. Factions on the far sides might want to play it that way but it's basically not going to happen. The south was/is in a financial crisis that was solved by the UK saying we'll bankroll them and their own austerity. Norway is not in the Euro but has accepted the schengen agreement for free travel. They do not pay so much in but they get more say on domestic rights.
"You can set the Integer pref browser.backspace_action to 2 on the about:config page to disable the backspace action. BTW Shift + Backspace does the reverse: going Forward if possible, so that is taken as well."
https://support.mozilla.org/en...
I can get behind your argument but that they subtly added a new lock screen without asking is a new level of dickery. Imagine if GIMP decideded to fuck with your login background to get you to pay money.
I noticed this had come up a few weeks ago for me. My lock screen -- the one when the phone is actually locked showed some large battery image and an ad. Only app updated that night was ES. Googled it and people seemed to agree that it was ES. Removed it and problem went away. I think that they cant override the actual lock screen but an app if given root can replace the screen shown when your phone is locked.
Your reasoning for the criminal cases is basically the idea behind the EU right to be forgotten. I know it's not a popular view but I can see the logic behind it. If you've done something and served your time, why does everybody and their dog need to know that you've left prison? With that sort of system, any offender is almost enforced into a life of crime...
I had had a few beers and wanted to see how far he'd argue his nonsense :D
Literally avoiding the issue that you weren't vulnerable anyway until you installed some other software. Perhaps you should have blocked the Intel site with some sort of hosts file?
Yes, secure for decades by the virtue that the processor predates the features(2008ish).
Perhaps I wasn't clear. I mean internal port blocking at a switch level. Hardening windows will do nothing against the exploit proper. Blocking these ports at a hardware level is a mitagation until the firmware is patched.
If you blocked them internally, your LAN was never vulnerable so I'm not quite sure what your point was. This is mainly aimed at the (relatively) small set of servers that may have these features in hardware and enabled, not home users. All you've showed was that you managed to enable a software based version of the vulnerability and then disable it in software.
and
So a remote exploit could just consist of power cycling to boot from a external boot image. Only OS requests are sent to the OS, everything else is supposed to be caught at the hardware level.
You've clearly got some hackneyed version of it as it runs without drivers on supporting hardware. Sounds like you've got some sort of winmodem-style version of this. Read the summary...
I think you miss the point. It runs at the most basic hardware level, if it's enabled and supported by your motherboard. Having to install extra software to enable it suggests your motherboard does not directly support it, so this test is meaningless. It does not require additional software to work....
It would either fix it or make it so broken that you could send it back :D
Flying pigs will never be commercially viable.
And that the actual paying customers of spotify are not being affected. This sounds like FUD. Perhaps we should all use itunes now?
Some states forgive the debt if you die as well. So some of these may be worthless - CT
Perhaps that's why they all called you. They saw you had a great credit rating. I'd take it as a compliment. :)
Replying to undo mistaken moderation
Because it's not about the UK where people wear top hats, monocles and would look down on that sort of witlessness. .
I'm claiming Irish citizenship through a reverse agreement. Anyone born on the island before 2005 can claim it. On a darker note, I didn't say it would bring peace. If anything it will inflame tensions in NI. Source : From NI
They lost Ireland years ago. If you mean Northern Ireland, there is little impetus there to change what people are seeing as peace. Factions on the far sides might want to play it that way but it's basically not going to happen. The south was/is in a financial crisis that was solved by the UK saying we'll bankroll them and their own austerity. Norway is not in the Euro but has accepted the schengen agreement for free travel. They do not pay so much in but they get more say on domestic rights.
Who would be held culpable for a kernel panic?
"You can set the Integer pref browser.backspace_action to 2 on the about:config page to disable the backspace action. BTW Shift + Backspace does the reverse: going Forward if possible, so that is taken as well." https://support.mozilla.org/en...
I can get behind your argument but that they subtly added a new lock screen without asking is a new level of dickery. Imagine if GIMP decideded to fuck with your login background to get you to pay money.
Tho i guess with root you can do anything....
I noticed this had come up a few weeks ago for me. My lock screen -- the one when the phone is actually locked showed some large battery image and an ad. Only app updated that night was ES. Googled it and people seemed to agree that it was ES. Removed it and problem went away. I think that they cant override the actual lock screen but an app if given root can replace the screen shown when your phone is locked.
So the sensible thing would be to drop the case except that you'd end up paying lawyers fees?
Your reasoning for the criminal cases is basically the idea behind the EU right to be forgotten. I know it's not a popular view but I can see the logic behind it. If you've done something and served your time, why does everybody and their dog need to know that you've left prison? With that sort of system, any offender is almost enforced into a life of crime...
Damn belters