Before even considering your method of verification, statistical sampling problems, or the propsed rate of temperature increase by global-warming advocates, I have to ask you this:
You don't have $5000 now, nor do you expect to have $5000 is 10 years? Pretty pathetic.
The present value of $100 in 2015 for me is nearly $0 - certainly not big enough to justify any effort for contract writing nor enough to satisfy the "put you money where your mouth is" aspect of this bet.
Let's make a wager. In 10 years, April 1, 2015, if the evidence for global warming is as strong or stronger as it is today, you pay me $5000. If not, I pay you $5000. In 20 years, April 1, 2025, if the evidence for global warming is as strong or stronger as it is today, you pay me $10000. If not, I pay you $10000.
Interested? If so, give me your address and I'll draw up a contract.
Answer the question. Why did you choose the option of being presented with many more choices (select individual packages) and then come on slashdot and bitch about "too much choice"?
Why did you bother selecting individual packages? You could have just selected desktop or server or workstation or whatever the choices are. One can only conclude that you are a moron.
Re:sane error messages when using templates
on
GCC 4.0 Preview
·
· Score: 1
The whole rebate scam seems like a great piece for one of those sensationalist TV investigative journalism shows to do - they have the resources to buy lots of shit, document everything, follup, then make every American scared. Anyone know if it has been done?
While I don't think the USPS is that bad considering the task they do when you stop and think about it, you've probably just never noticed anything lost in the mail. Based on the number of wrongly delivered items I get at my house (at least 1 a week), I conclude that 100% delivery is not achieved. Direct evidence is hard on this one. I send these miss-delived items back to the mail-carrier, but I'm sure many people open them or throw them away.
Did you test it with a not trivial iterator class? One that doesn't compile down to a pointer like the std::vector::iterator will? One that has non trivial (and potentially expensive) construct and copy?
If you need overflow checking, write a trivial checked integer class. The language makes it easy. Since your definition of "do something sensible" is sure to differ from mine, custom classes are basically required for things like this. This is a good exercise for someone trying to learn policy based design and template programming.
Also, make sure your passengers have more than 8kHz of bandwidth in their voice, their voices don't break up randomly, have body language and other non-verbal language boosters, and are aware of the environment and can adapt the pacing of their conversation to it.
Not true, of course. Alcohol is just like everything else - the effects of it varies among individuals. I don't know what the solution is, but based on what I've seen on the roads, people aren't responsible to make the right decisions on their own with respect to cell phone use. Just like with drinking and driving.
If you're at the wheel of a machine with lethal force, maybe you should put the bus down. Take the bus if you need to socialize while you drive.
Not really. You could emulate virtual methods correctly in C, but it takes a lot more work than what you describe. Lot's of people do virtual inheritence and OO like stuff in C. Seems like if it's such a common feature to implement, you might want language support for these things rather than inventing them yourself.
Slashdot Mirror
You don't have $5000 now, nor do you expect to have $5000 is 10 years? Pretty pathetic.
The present value of $100 in 2015 for me is nearly $0 - certainly not big enough to justify any effort for contract writing nor enough to satisfy the "put you money where your mouth is" aspect of this bet.
Interested? If so, give me your address and I'll draw up a contract.
Amen brother! I would also choose that every US citizen give me $0.01 a year. Fucking anti-choice country.
Answer the question. Why did you choose the option of being presented with many more choices (select individual packages) and then come on slashdot and bitch about "too much choice"?
Why did you bother selecting individual packages? You could have just selected desktop or server or workstation or whatever the choices are. One can only conclude that you are a moron.
Is that the suicide solution?
The whole rebate scam seems like a great piece for one of those sensationalist TV investigative journalism shows to do - they have the resources to buy lots of shit, document everything, follup, then make every American scared. Anyone know if it has been done?
While I don't think the USPS is that bad considering the task they do when you stop and think about it, you've probably just never noticed anything lost in the mail. Based on the number of wrongly delivered items I get at my house (at least 1 a week), I conclude that 100% delivery is not achieved. Direct evidence is hard on this one. I send these miss-delived items back to the mail-carrier, but I'm sure many people open them or throw them away.
LOL - no kidding - who the fuck has a $2000 limit on their credit card? This guy must work for a felon or something.
Did you test it with a not trivial iterator class? One that doesn't compile down to a pointer like the std::vector::iterator will? One that has non trivial (and potentially expensive) construct and copy?
Pareent post is not a troll.
Which of these apply:
?
If you need overflow checking, write a trivial checked integer class. The language makes it easy. Since your definition of "do something sensible" is sure to differ from mine, custom classes are basically required for things like this. This is a good exercise for someone trying to learn policy based design and template programming.
Also, make sure your passengers have more than 8kHz of bandwidth in their voice, their voices don't break up randomly, have body language and other non-verbal language boosters, and are aware of the environment and can adapt the pacing of their conversation to it.
Not true, of course. Alcohol is just like everything else - the effects of it varies among individuals. I don't know what the solution is, but based on what I've seen on the roads, people aren't responsible to make the right decisions on their own with respect to cell phone use. Just like with drinking and driving.
If you're at the wheel of a machine with lethal force, maybe you should put the bus down. Take the bus if you need to socialize while you drive.
Baxter, not Egan.
Depends on what you're smoking in the laboratory.
Just don't use aquafresh.
Not really. You could emulate virtual methods correctly in C, but it takes a lot more work than what you describe. Lot's of people do virtual inheritence and OO like stuff in C. Seems like if it's such a common feature to implement, you might want language support for these things rather than inventing them yourself.
I looked at it - hardly seems like a worthy feature list to jump major versions with.
"Opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one, but the goatse guy has the biggest one around."
Who is John-Henri Holmberg? His objection seems weak and illogical to me.
"Opions vary" == "Road House"? You obviously have no taste.
What about the Gripping Hand?