Slashdot Mirror


Disney Plans Tron Remake

blkmagic writes "Sci Fi Wire is reporting that Disney will remake Tron. The original article was in Variety, but requires a pay subscription, unless you want to sign up for a 14-day free trial. The article didn't mention what stage they're at, but sounds like they're changing the story a bit (surprise). I loved the original when I was younger (and still watch it again once in a while), so I don't know how I feel about this one!"

434 comments

  1. Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    I loved the original when I was younger (and still watch it again once in a while), so I don't know how I feel about this one!"

    I don't like to think of myself as a snob, but I was tech savvy enough back at that time that the dumbing of computer terms (and the preposterous fantasy) tried my patience. The graphic effects were good, but that was about all there was for me to enjoy about the flik. So let's speculate about what could be put into such a remake of the film...

    Worms and Virii infest the computer and are blasted with some McAfee ray

    An evil spam king is sentenced to /dev/null until 0>1

    The conceptual depiction of Microsoft Windows security is a hole Rama could pass through with a defaced tin sign by the entrance saying [UNAuthorized Proceses Only Beyond This Point]

    Dee Arrum is a cute, cuddly Pooh-bearish creature who befriends the intrepid party and only wants what is best for everyone

    Bugs will only be the result of users installing unathorised software

    The central processor will have a huge ice pack on its head and complain of constant overclocking pains

    Plugs for Disney partners will be throughout (i.e. Intel Inside)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha! I'm sure Disney will continue to dumb down computer terms, but not to the degree that they'd start using the "word" virii, instead of the proper word viruses (or simply the Latin uncountable virus, or virions if they're going to depict individual "units"). :-P

    2. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's a great film to have a running commentary on. For instance, when Clu is about to kiss Yori, a friend of mine pointed out, "He better check his permissions."

    3. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vir-what? How cringy do you think I am now?

    4. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by cryptochrome · · Score: 1

      I watched and loved TRON as a kid. I actually tried to make a Halloween costume with glow in the dark paint that would look similar at one point. I looked back on it with fond memories for a long time, until one day in college when I decided to rent it for old times sake...

      What a piece of crap!

      The plot was total jibberish. The techno was all babble. All it had going for it was the look, and the look had become pretty dated. If they're going to redo TRON, they're going to have do a pretty extensive rewrite, because people know waaaaay more about computers now than they did then. Frankly, the whole concept is bogus - all the software I know is brain-dead, the whole idea of interacting like people inside the machine is bogus. Maybe if the characters were Users and new AIs, up against a super-AI MCP, I would buy it. But don't try to pretend that current software has brains, even if it would be fun to anthropromorphize (A fat Microsoft Office, a shifty Kazaa, old Mosaic web-browser... the possibilities are endless).

      And speaking of politics... as a Mac user I cringe at what a Pixar-spurned Disney might have to say on that subject. OTOH, if Pixar were in charge of the project I think it might actually be decent (Pixar is the only company that has actually done 3D animation right so far) and at least neutral, if not amusingly pro-Mac.

      For a semi-amusing look at another anthropomorphized computer-themed show, check out an anime called "Buttobi CPU", known in the American market as "I Dream Of Mimi". The bad guys are all Nacintosh computers, the good guys being... some Japanese brand. Did I mention the computers are all hot chicks who get naked a lot and have interesting ways of "interfacing" and getting "upgraded", amongst themselves and their masters?

      --

      ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    5. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "Virii" is not a latin word. It's a geek jargon plural, like "boxen."

      If you don't like it, start your own industry niche and get your own slang to catch on with people.

    6. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by Botty · · Score: 0

      Crikey! It's a movie. Have fun with it and suspend your disbelief. I also did what you did. I loved it as a kid and watched it again maybe a year ago and it was worse than I remembered it, but not so bad that it wasn't worth sitting down and watching for old times sake.

      I think you may have rm -rf InnerChild sometime between your childhood and this post.

    7. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by davros866 · · Score: 1

      If you think that's bad, go back and watch "The Last Starfighter". It made me cry it was so bad.

    8. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by mzipay · · Score: 2, Funny

      i can see it now... they pull a george lucas, fscking up the story by adding "TarTar Bits" - a loveable sidekick that means well but is mostly annoying. and three years after the release, the only redeeming quality is the fantastic light cycle race scene.

    9. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by rikrebel · · Score: 1


      So long as all the stars have big umm, accoutrements, and run around in hot spandex outfits I'll watch it.

    10. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I hope they rename the damned thing. The title was a pretty good geek pun when the movie was relased, but NOBODY programs in GW Basic anymore. (For those of you who never had the pleasure, TRON was "Trace On" in Microsoft's GW Basic interpreter, which printed line numbers to the screen as programs were being executed. In the movie, TRON was a debugging program attempting to debug the central mainframe kernal. Neat pun, but VERY dated.)

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    11. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by autophile · · Score: 1
      but I was tech savvy enough back at that time that the dumbing of computer terms (and the preposterous fantasy) tried my patience.

      Come on, how could anyone not love the line, "Send in the logic PROBE!"

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    12. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by Pxtl · · Score: 3, Informative

      Was not the pun. Tron was short for "electronic" - the people who first created the tron character weren't computer people... the glowing-overlay-clothes technique was the root of the project, not the 3d graphics.

      Watch the 20th anniversary DVD for the story.

      Personally, I watch Tron and I still find it visually impressive - the artwork doesn't date that badly because its so abstract. Still, its a shame that it didn't recieve an award for the visual effects (using computers and post-prod stuff for effects was considered "cheating").

      Yes, the plot is a joke and the technical details are absolutely monstrous to geeks like us, but the movie is still visually neato, and the acting is passable.

    13. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

      " Virii " isn't a word.

    14. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by AverageWhiteGuy · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but Tron Guy gets to make a new costume!

      http://www.tronguy.net//

    15. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disney, huh? I guess someone must have come up with an ultra-cool happy meal toy or cheesy video game in order to get the green light to do this remake.

    16. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I'm VERY disapointed- been years since I've seen this movie, easily *before* the popularization of DVD players. I made this connection way back when I saw the movie for the first time- and I WAS programming in GW Basic at the time (one of the many dialects from different manufacturers that were common in the 4-H computer club I was a junior leader in, thus to teach basic to the 4th graders I needed to know all of them).

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    17. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by jakel2k · · Score: 1

      Actually to what I recall. In the movie Tron was an accounting program. Amazingly he was not the main character in the movie.

    18. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by Drathos · · Score: 1

      Um.. Bzzzt. Tron wasn't a debugger.

      Tron was a security watchdog program (more like a resident anti-virus). It's job was to shut down things attempting illegal access (however that was to be defined) to other systems. The big, bad MCP couldn't stand the concept of being monitored (after all, it was going to hack the Kremlin).

      --
      End of line..
    19. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like to think of myself as a snob

      And yet you use the word "Virii" to mean "Viruses."

      The correct plural form of "Virus" is "Viruses." The only reason people use "Virii" is because they are attempting to show that they are so smart and know all about words with Latin roots, and how to make them plural.

      And yet, this is not the correct plural form of "Virus," neither in English NOR Latin.

      So you AREN'T as smart as you are trying to seem. That qualifies as "snob" in my book.

    20. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clu didn't kiss Yori.

      Flynn did.

      Clu was played by the same actor, but was a different character (and was even rendered in a different color).

    21. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TRON was not an accounting program by any means. The character Alan, who programmed TRON, defines TRON very well during his meeting with Ed Dillinger about why his Group 7 access had been cut.

      TRON was a "watchdog" program, designed to keep an eye on processes running within the system and terminate them if they are doing something they shouldn't be.

      The RAM program was an accounting-type program. It was written by the guy who comes in and asks Alan if he can have some of his popcorn.

      I would also say that Alan/TRON and Flynn/Flynn were both main characters. In the end it took both of them, along with some pilot skills from Yori, to defeat the MCP.

    22. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it is, it's computer Jargon for the word "viruses". No, it doesn't follow the rules for standard English, but neither does "LOL", or "N00B", or "Pwn3d!!!!111".

      Deal with it.

    23. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by waveclaw · · Score: 1
      Interesting enough, there is a 'type' of sequel already: Tron 2.0 (caution: flash page.) As it is a video game[1], I consider it to be quite apropo[2]. Fun too, as long as you forget that the lightcycles are really just a 3D version of that old BASIC game snake.

      For instance, when Clu is about to kiss Yori, a friend of mine pointed out, "He better check his permissions."

      Oddly enough, there is a full-featured permissions system in the game. Game Spot - PC Review of Tron 2.0. You have to obtain a set of permission bits matching or greater than the permission mask on something to use it.

      ----------
      1. "Computers are great for playing games. Why would anyone want to use them for anything else?"
        (Paraphrased from an unknown Mark)

      2. And the game runs well on Linux with many versions of WineX/Cedega.


      --

      "You cannot have a General Will unless you have shared experiences. You cannot be fair to people you don't know."
    24. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Always throught there should be sequel instead of a remake. Title: TROFF of course.

    25. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "YUO = TEH N00B!", as you illiterate neophyte teenager gaming brats would put it.

      No, "virii" is not and has never been geek jargon.

      "Boxen" is funny, obviously not meant to be taken seriously, and it's cleverly constructed.
      "Virii" is none of those things.

      It's a stupid misunderstanding emanating from uneducated people feigning knowledge to their equally unlearned friends by using "latin" inflections. That's all there is to it.

      No self-respecting geek/nerd would ever write or say "virii".

    26. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Doh! My mistake.

    27. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

      It's not jargon if it's a word people use because they think it's the plural of a real word.

      If you think "sheeps" means more than one sheep, it isn't jargon or a word, it's a mistake.

    28. Re:Disney to Fuc^H^H^HRemake Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      teenager gaming brats

      "bratii".

      none of those things

      "thingii".

      their equally unlearned friends

      "friendii".

  2. Tron Redux by slashnutt · · Score: 1, Informative

    Good thing for bugmenot someone has already registered the link for us and latest newsflash tron guy gets a job!

    I just hope they don't reuse the name Tron; do like Apocalypse Now did on a remake adding the word Redux to the title.

    1. Re:Tron Redux by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 1

      Apocalypse Now: Redux wasn't a remake, it was an extended version.

    2. Re:Tron Redux by ShaniaTwain · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to Tron 2.0? I thought they we're already making that *and* the video game tie-in, but the movie was dumped.. Are they just reviving 2.0?

    3. Re:Tron Redux by slashnutt · · Score: 1

      Oops a play on words.

      Deux in french means two so I thought it was a play on words where RE - 2 meant that it was kindof like version 2.

      Yet I looked up the definition: redux(postnominal) - brought back. Which is goofy on a remake yet would be good for somthing like Tron 2.0 like a poster said later - no.

    4. Re:Tron Redux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously think too highly of your own language skills.
      (Heck, 'dux' isn't even prounounced anything like 'deux')

    5. Re:Tron Redux by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      Tron 2.0 was always just the video game (a great game, btw) as I understand it.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    6. Re:Tron Redux by ShaniaTwain · · Score: 1

      nope - here it is:

      http://www.thezreview.co.uk/comingsoon/t/tron2.sht m

      they had a script in 2003, Jeff Bridges was slated to be in it. then disney said it was happening no more. Then it came back with more scripts: http://www.countingdown.com/movies/291442/news?ite m_id=3464520

      this is probably an extension of the same project.

  3. Poor choice for a remake. by slusich · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In my opinion, a lot of the appeal of the first movie was in the "Wow" factor of it. Computers were not nearly as ubiquitous as they are today. Video games were a huge rage, but still mostly confined to the arcade.
    With all of the CGI enhanced movies being done today, great special effects won't have the same impact.
    There will certainly be some draw based on nostalgia, however I think that will lead mostly to disappointment.

    1. Re:Poor choice for a remake. by amstrad · · Score: 1

      You're right, Tron is too simplistic. Instead they need to make a movie based on much newer games like Tomb Raider, Resident Evil and Doom. Those movie will ROCK!

      Seriously though, how often are remakes not big huge disappointments? Hollywood will only stop making them when people stop going to see them. I think people who go and see a movie that is a remake or a sequel for nostalgic purposes are the reason we have so many bad movies in the theater right now.

      BTW, I'm guilty. I went to see Ocean's Twelve recently. Oh why did I do that?

    2. Re:Poor choice for a remake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

    3. Re:Poor choice for a remake. by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but I find a lot of things in the original movie much more forgivable given that it was made in the '80s when people were much more naive about these magical boxes we call 'computers'. Now, since computers are so ubiquitous and people have a better understanding of what they really are, it seems like, without a *severe* rewrite, the story just wouldn't fly.

    4. Re:Poor choice for a remake. by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In my opinion, a lot of the appeal of the first movie was in the "Wow" factor of it.

      You put your finger on it. I remember hearing on the Tron DVD that they were wanting to do "Tron 2" (as a movie) and thinking "what is the point?"

      Tron was never a great movie; visually it was outstanding (I don't want to repeat myself, so click here), but if they were to do a sequel it would have to replicate the visual impact. The still images of the proposed "Tron 2" looked like pretty computer graphics that could have been done anywhere.

      A remake or a sequel would have to try very hard to do justice to the original and be fresh and innovative; the best way to do that would be to do some great visuals, combine it with a more sophisticated (for todays' audiences) computer-based plot, and create something like.... 'The Matrix'. Oops.

      I agree 100%. Tron was a landmark movie in some ways, but things have moved on, and I'm not sure what they want to get out of this. People *will* be disappointed, and kids will wonder what the deal is.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    5. Re:Poor choice for a remake. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Ocean's Twelve is AFAIK not a remake, but a followup (which doesn't mean it can't be just as bad, of course).

      For remakes, the name is often the same as the original film, so I can imagine that quite a few people just see the title of the original film in the cinema programme, think that's what they'll get, and only find out the mistake after the film started.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:Poor choice for a remake. by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 1
      BTW, I'm guilty. I went to see Ocean's Twelve recently. Oh why did I do that?

      Don't beat yourself up too much, 12 was not really a remake but a sequel. Ocean's 12 was a sequel to Ocean's 11, which was a poor remake of the original Ocean's 11, which was a pretty lousy movie. Although the 11 remake did capture well the concept of "bunch of popular older actors with little screen chemistry and random scenes with little plot to tie them together."

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
    7. Re:Poor choice for a remake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and I'm not sure what they want to get out of this.


      Yes $ you $ are, $ you $ just $ aren't $ aware $ of $ it...
    8. Re:Poor choice for a remake. by mod_critical · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised some of these movie makers don't realize that a remake like this is going to get most of its support from the nostalgia (IMHO).



      The Doom movie had always interested me because I would throw my $7 at someone showing a Doom movie in a microsecond. Then I heard that they were bastardizing the plot, from fighting demons from hell on Mars to fighting mutants from Earth on Earth. Needless to say I don't have any interest in the project anymore.

    9. Re:Poor choice for a remake. by mod_critical · · Score: 1

      combine it with a more sophisticated (for todays' audiences) computer-based plot

      I remember seeing The Matrix Reloaded in the theatre and I was the only one who let out a cheer when I saw that Trinity was actaully using an ssh command from a bash terminal when hacking in to shut down the power to that building. =P

    10. Re:Poor choice for a remake. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      >> and I'm not sure what they want to get out of this.
      > Yes $ you $ are, $ you $ just $ aren't $ aware $ of $ it...

      Okay; lemme rephrase that... I'm not sure what they *expect* to get out of this.

      Will the Tron nostalgics go and see it? If it's not like the original, and it's not good enough to stand on its own merits, possibly not.

      Will kids go and see it? Depends how good it is; as I mentioned above, the plot of Tron has been done in a more sophisticated manner by The Matrix, and it won't be fresh in the way it was 23 years ago.

      Personally speaking, I wouldn't go to see it; although I'm almost old enough to be in the "saw Tron first time round" group, I didn't.

      Sequels to cult movies aren't guaranteed successes anyway; what about the sequel to 2001, 2010? That flopped.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    11. Re:Poor choice for a remake. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I remember seeing The Matrix Reloaded in the theatre and I was the only one who let out a cheer when I saw that Trinity was actaully using an ssh command from a bash terminal when hacking in to shut down the power to that building. =P

      It's little details like that (cf. other Hollywood computer GUIs that exist nowhere else) which cost little in terms of effort or cost to do, but pay off well in terms of getting the geeks talking. (Yes, for this purpose, I consider myself a geek).

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    12. Re:Poor choice for a remake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like it makes any difference... doom never had a plot to begin with.

    13. Re:Poor choice for a remake. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      they could make it a horror film...

      where at the end, the core of windows XP is discovered to be....

      Microsoft B.O.B.

      IT personell, Computer Programmers and DB administrators will be waking in the middle of the night screaming from that for days.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    14. Re:Poor choice for a remake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's little details like that (cf. other Hollywood computer GUIs that exist nowhere else) which cost little in terms of effort or cost to do, but pay off well in terms of getting the geeks talking. (Yes, for this purpose, I consider myself a geek).

      Except for the fact that the movie blows goats, I agree.

    15. Re:Poor choice for a remake. by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      On the Tron DVD, and one of the points Lisberger makes is that no one ever made a movie in the way Tron was, and no one will ever make a movie that way again. Part of the reason is the sheer manpower required to do it, which has only gotten more expensive; even back then, they outsourced to Taiwan. The other part is, as others have said more eloquently, changes in technology make the methods unnecessary.

      There are two other things Tron had going for it that a remake is unlikely to have.

      1. Jeff Bridges. The guy's an incredible talent, was not yet respected enough to ask for an unheard-of salary, and is the sort of great actor who goes for the interesting roles. At the time, the character was interesting. Now, the same character has been done many times before.

      2. A desperate studio needing to take a huge risk. Remakes are low-risk by definition. Right now, Disney is coming down off of a high point. They still have the same guy guiding them that brought them to that high point. They're still following the same formulas that got them there, still making lots of money, and not aware that the old formula has become trite. At the time Tron came out, Disney was still reeling from Walt's death and was aware that people saw them as old-fashioned. We've forgotten those days of G-rated Don Knotts comedies and Herbie Goes Bananas. Disney's executives saw something daring and risky, and felt that Lisberger's studio could do something that could be a modern-day Fantasia. They felt Walt would approve. They were more right than they knew, and ended up producing something that few appreciated until after the film had left the box office.

      I think the visual appeal can still work, but the role is no longer so interesting to that type of actor, and the studio is not taking any risks.

      The more I think of it, the less interested I am.

    16. Re:Poor choice for a remake. by Snowdog668 · · Score: 1

      Ocean's Eleven that came out in 2001 was a remake of the 1960 "Rat Pack" movie of the same name. That makes Ocean's Twelve a sequel to a remake.

      --
      I wouldn't say I'm a bad gambler but the last time I went to Vegas I even lost a buck on the soda machine.
    17. Re:Poor choice for a remake. by dougmc · · Score: 1
      Right now, Disney is coming down off of a high point.
      Eh? Disney has been going downhill for quite some time now. Pixar is the one that's on top of the hill.

      Did Disney do National Treasure? If so, then that's the only reasonably good movie they've done in quite some time. Winners like The Incredibles were done by Pixar, and Disney just helped distribute it.

    18. Re:Poor choice for a remake. by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      What I meant was that they haven't hit rock bottom yet and haven't realized that this current descent is not merely the normal ups-and-downs of business. From a financial standpoint, things still look great (even up), so why would they be worried?

      Disney didn't benefit from the creative cinema boom in the mid-to-late 70's that saved the major studios (and resurrected Fox from the dead). Until Michael Eisner and The Little Mermaid, Disney was irrelevant, uninteresting, and doomed.

    19. Re:Poor choice for a remake. by Stepping+Razor · · Score: 1

      on the opposite end of the scale, i remember groaning to myself when the little girl on jurassic park said "this is unix, i know this" and then proceeded to fly through some 3d interface.

    20. Re:Poor choice for a remake. by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      Duderino! (I'm not into the brevity thing.)

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  4. ...hm by JaffaKREE · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know what'd be crazy ?

    A new movie. Like with new ideas. That'd be crazy.

    1. Re:...hm by jrod2027 · · Score: 1

      There's a 68.71 percent chance you're right.

    2. Re:...hm by potus98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know what'd be crazy ? A new movie. Like with new ideas. That'd be crazy.

      Well sure, but Disney's not talking to Pixar anymore... :-(

      --
      This one gang kept wanting me to join cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff.
    3. Re:...hm by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Like...

      this?
      or this?
      possibly even this?

      And those are just the good movies. But you're right.. generalizations are fun.

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    4. Re:...hm by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 1

      You know what'd be crazy? A new movie. Like with new ideas. That'd be crazy.

      But, the comic-book genre hasn't been milked to depletion yet! The sheep are busy grazing on Daredevil and Elektra at the moment, and there are dollars that need to be extracted before any other marketing efforts can be coordinated... please try again later.

      --

      my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
    5. Re:...hm by hunterx11 · · Score: 2, Funny
      "We need some original ideas. Get out your TVs."

      Sure, this is a movie, but you get the point.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    6. Re:...hm by TrippTDF · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First and foremost, You've got good taste in film. I like that.

      however, I think the parent is getting at lack of original sci-fi in film, which there is a lack of. The only thing jumping out at me right now as original is Sky Captain, which wasn't a juge hit.

      I'll get flamed for saying this I'm sure, but Sci-fi does not have the same wide appeal as any of the movies, for example, you just named... You need something to hook people, something they can relate to based on something they have already seen. That's why all Sci-Fi or fantasy is coming out of things that already exist.

      or maybe Hollywood really is out of ideas...

    7. Re:...hm by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

      Good point. I'd argue that it comes down to the fact that Hollywood writers don't have the scientific knowledge necessary to write good sci-fi scripts, which is why we're seeing a lot of books made into film (War of the Worlds, LoTR, HGTTG, Clark's Rama series).

      It makes sense... take a book with an established fanbase that's exciting and well thought out, and make it into a movie. That way the studio doesn't have to worry about the story being plausible, since the original author did that. They just need to worry about a good book to script conversion and take it from there.

      I actually don't mind one bit. It's fun seeing books I love become movies, even if they're changed slightly. It's fun, and it brings these great stories to more people. :)

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    8. Re:...hm by freshman_a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Disney? New ideas? HAH! We're talking about the company that takes classic stories by Victor Hugo, Hans Christian Anderson, etc., turns them into dumbed-down kiddie versions, and then beats them to death with sequels.

    9. Re:...hm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First and foremost, You've got good taste in film. I like that.

      Why don't you just give him a blow-job and be done with it?

    10. Re:...hm by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Hey hey, that's dangerous talk around Hollywood. It's much cheaper, and easier, to milk previous successes for more money.

      I'm wating for "Wargames 2" next.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    11. Re:...hm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wargames 2, in which Osama Bin Laden's geeky teenage son almost accidentally prevents world war 3.

    12. Re:...hm by scotch · · Score: 1
      I consider "Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind" to be science fiction. Not all science fiction is about spaceships and aliens, afterall. If you read much science fiction, you'll find a lot of good stuff where relationships or other emotional themes overwelm the aspects people tend to associate with science fiction. Some people liked "Code 46" which has some similar themes as ESOFTSM but is more obviously SF. "Code 46" came out this year or last, I think.

      Sure, most of the science fiction that hollywood puts out is copycat-crap. But why should that be any different for science fiction than it is for the rest of the movie categories?

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    13. Re:...hm by DeVilla · · Score: 1

      Nah. It's been done before.

    14. Re:...hm by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's a 68.71 percent chance you're right.

      Cute.

      --
      All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
    15. Re:...hm by 87C751 · · Score: 1
      I consider "Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind" to be science fiction.
      "Opinions vary." I consider ESOTSM the first movie bad enough that I walked out on a $2 theater showing. And I like Jim Carrey... well, except for that one thing.
      --
      Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
    16. Re:...hm by Captain+Fallout · · Score: 1

      There's a 68.71 percent chance you're right.

      Cute.

      End of line.

    17. Re:...hm by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 1
      I'll get flamed for saying this I'm sure, but Sci-fi does not have the same wide appeal as any of the movies, for example, you just named...

      While not a flame, I'm not sure I completely agree. If you list the all time blockbusters there's lots of science fiction there. While not all are "great science fiction" in the sense of Blade Runner or 2001, a lot would put them in the SciFi bucket over "bio pic", "comedy", "western", etc.

      I don't see the problem so much in just SciFi, but all of Hollywood seems to have a talent deficit on the story side and most of what sells these days is sequel and derivitive. That's why movies like Sideways, Life Aquatic, etc. stand out so much I think.

      (Sky Captain didn't have original story, but it did have an original feel to it being "retro with good CGI").

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
    18. Re:...hm by scotch · · Score: 1
      "Opinions vary."

      "Opions vary" == "Road House"? You obviously have no taste.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    19. Re:...hm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many of those are Disney movies?

    20. Re:...hm by Peldor · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I'd pay full price to see that.

      And hopefully there'll be a sequel!

    21. Re:...hm by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      But, the comic-book genre hasn't been milked to depletion yet! The sheep are busy grazing on Daredevil and Elektra at the moment, and there are dollars that need to be extracted before any other marketing efforts can be coordinated... please try again later.

      A couple of points:
      1) The comic-book genre has never been very well adapted to the big screen, except for Superman I/II, until recently. Thanks to today's CGI technology, stories which could only be illustrated before can now look real. So, IMO, it makes good sense to take advantage of this.

      2) Disney isn't doing any comic-book movies, so this doesn't really apply to them specifically. They're stuck trying to redo their own old movies (not comic books), or make very bad sequels to them. The problem for Disney is that they have no imagination left to come up with anything new. They've fired everyone at the company that had new ideas, and replaced all their animation teams with outsourcing. I'm surprised Disney isn't dead yet; they haven't done anything new or good for a very long time now, except for their Pixar stuff (maybe that's why they're not in the toilet). Now that Pixar has cast them off, hopefully we'll see Disney either go down the tubes finally, or get taken over by some good (not evil) management.

    22. Re:...hm by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      Almost all movies are "new" ideas, or as close as you can get from the themes in a society like ours (there will always be "boy gets girl, boy loses girl stories", for example). But look back at the several hundred new films that came out in 2004. How many were straight remakes? I'd bet it wasn't more than a dozen.

      You also have to remember that movie studios are only out to entertain you as a means to make money. They could make a totally new sci-fi computer-theme film, perhaps even one that would be compared to Tron. But by doing a remake, they're automatically producing interest and news about it, which translates to ticket sales from all the 12 year olds who saw it and are now in their 30s with money.

      There's no one at the studios thinking "Boy, I can't wait to remake Tron, so JaffaKREE's childhood is ruined!" They're out to make money, pure and simple. The original isn't going anywhere - if you don't like it, don't go see it.

    23. Re:...hm by servognome · · Score: 1

      A new movie. Like with new ideas. That'd be crazy.
      I don't want new ideas, I want something familiar, something that will keep me entertained for 2 hours, does not require thinking in any form, and that will quickly fade out of my head like:
      "Edgy cop who gets framed, and has to take down the crime lord to prove his innocence,"
      "Muscle Guy who uses machine guns and explosives to save his family/town/girlfriend,"
      "Future war between man and alien/robots,"
      "Love story of a girl who is to marry the slick rich guy, but falls in love with the simple emotional guy" (to umm take my girlfriend to,yeah)
      "Farmer who goes on an epic journey to save the world/galaxy/universe from evil"
      "The underdog sports team of out of shape misfits, that comes together to win the championship""The earth is doomed by some natural disaster unless a team of scientists can save us"
      "Adam Sandler/Ben Stiller/Farelly Bros slapstick/gross out funny movie"

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    24. Re:...hm by JaffaKREE · · Score: 1

      "Boy, I can't wait to remake Tron, so JaffaKREE's childhood is ruined!"

      Actually, knowing them, I am pretty sure this came up at some point.

    25. Re:...hm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sin city this will be the only film that matters this year.

    26. Re:...hm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to wait... "Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory" is coming to a theater near you soon!

    27. Re:...hm by delus10n0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm right there with ya on ESOTSM. I thought it was forgettable and 90% crap.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    28. Re:...hm by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      It makes sense... take a book with an established fanbase that's exciting and well thought out...

      ...license the title...

      and make it into a movie.

      Result: I, Robot.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    29. Re:...hm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Myself, I'm so happy to see Carrey not doing his Ace Ventura schtick that I enjoy seeing him in anything dramatic. Yes, even The Majestic.

    30. Re:...hm by slapout · · Score: 1

      That my be true, but now they're going after 80s TV. We've got movies coming out of The A-Team and the Dukes of Hazzard. And we just had starsky and hutch (ok, that's 70s, but close enough).

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    31. Re:...hm by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Interesting that, like Tron, WarGames also had a computer game sequel (real-time strategy). And a WarGames 2 movie was rumored for 2004 (google cache).

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    32. Re:...hm by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      The problem for Disney is that they have no imagination left to come up with anything new.

      But Disney never came up with anything new. They got started blatently stealing a current blockbuster plot for steamboat willie, and then started making all the old grimms fairytales (and other old stories) into their movies, granted they did make them much happier stories.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    33. Re:...hm by jgrahn · · Score: 1
      I consider "Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind" to be science fiction.

      Me too. But I went to a lecture last month, and one of the guys who spoke (John-Henri Holmberg?) argued that it wasn't -- because it was illogical that the memory removal machine should be used merely to erase unhappy memories. This lack of technological and political logic made the movie non-SF, according to him.

      That view is kind of pointless IMHO, since lots of great SF (as in: written by SF authors, published in SF magazines and loved by the fans) fails on those same criteria.

    34. Re:...hm by scotch · · Score: 1

      Who is John-Henri Holmberg? His objection seems weak and illogical to me.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    35. Re:...hm by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      But Disney never came up with anything new. They got started blatently stealing a current blockbuster plot for steamboat willie, and then started making all the old grimms fairytales (and other old stories) into their movies, granted they did make them much happier stories.

      After doing a little googling and reading, I disagree.

      Here's some writing by Lawrence Lessig about Disney's early years, and the writing of Steamboat Willie:

      http://www.lessig.org/blog/archives/001840.shtml

      Steamboat Willie was basically a silly parody of another movie called Steamboat Bill, but other than being about steamboat races, there's little similarity.

      Further, almost all of Disney's old movies were derivative works; they weren't completely original (using some of the stories from old fairy tales), but they added much orignality on top of it: music, animation, plot changes (to make them happier), etc. The point here is: this is not a bad thing. Lots of art is derived somehow from older material. It's nearly impossible to come up with something completely new and unrelated to anything else, and there's nothing wrong with that. The problem Disney detractors usually have with the copyright laws as they're enforced today, and Disney as it is today, is that if things were in the 1910's - 1950's like they are today, Disney would have been sued into the ground for many of his works, and would never have started such an empire. And what's annoying is that the modern-day Disney is one of the biggest advocates for these restrictive laws.

      But this may just come back to bite them in the ass. They've been pushing to protect their "property" (most of which should be public domain by now), but at the same time, they're no longer able to come up with anything worthwhile, and they can't just take other stories and make derivative works from them thanks again to these restrictive laws. Hoist by their own petard.

      Of course, other companies, like Pixar and Dreamworks, don't seem to have so much trouble working around even these restrictive laws and coming up with original and highly profitable movies, so Disney obviously has some other problems as well in the creativity department.

    36. Re:...hm by papadiablo · · Score: 1

      however, I think the parent is getting at lack of original sci-fi in film, which there is a lack of. The only thing jumping out at me right now as original is Sky Captain, which wasn't a juge hit.

      That's why everyone should go out and see the Firefly movie, Serenity, when it comes out. If you haven't seen the show on DVD, check that out as well. Support the good original Sci-Fi that does exist.

      I'll get flamed for saying this I'm sure, but Sci-fi does not have the same wide appeal as any of the movies, for example, you just named... You need something to hook people, something they can relate to based on something they have already seen. That's why all Sci-Fi or fantasy is coming out of things that already exist.

      I'm not sure that is entirely true. The first Matrix was original and created massive appeal, the first Men in Black as well. I think it would also be safe to say that Phillip K Dick's novels aren't exactly mainstream and therefore their movie adaptations' appeal isn't driven by the fact that someone has seen the stories before. What you need is a good plot, good acting, directing, cinematography, etc. Having recognizeable actors and actresses also doesn't hurt.

    37. Re:...hm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not. Jurassic Park was Sci-Fi. Science Fiction means all aspects of science, not just Physics and Astronomy. Biology is a science, so is Chemistry.

    38. Re:...hm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes to The Matrix, but Men in Black was a comic first.

    39. Re:...hm by SunFan · · Score: 1


      None. The GP post completely missed the whole point of this thread: bashing Disney.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
  5. George? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did Lucas call them up with an idea?

    1. Re:George? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, he's trying to sell Jar-Jar to Disney.

  6. I know what you're thinking by dcarey · · Score: 1

    There is no mention of Jeff Bridges being considered.

    Anyone know whether he's mentioned whether or not he'd do something like that from past interviews?

    --

    -- (Score:i , Imaginary)

    1. Re:I know what you're thinking by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      They gave him a pager, but if they call during league play... [shakes head]

    2. Re:I know what you're thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big Tron Lebowski, hmmm.....

    3. Re:I know what you're thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Anyone know whether he's mentioned whether or not he'd do something like that from past interviews?

      I highly doubt anyone has mentioned this movie to Jeff Bridges in an interview in years. Hoping he still talks about this movie certainly cements the word "cult" in this movie's "cult-like following".

      Interviewer in early 1980's: Jeff, would you ever think about reprising your role of Kevin Flynn in a remake of "Tron"?

      Bridges: *blinks* We just made that movie. Maybe I don't understand your question.

    4. Re:I know what you're thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not Nam, this is lightcycle racing. There are rules!

  7. Classic by bytor4232 · · Score: 1

    Tron was such a classic. I always thought the movie aged "pretty" well considering. It would be interesting to see who they get to play Tron. Anybody but Orlando Bloom.

    Oh yeah, and f/p

    --
    -- 4 8 15 16 23 42
    1. Re:Classic by operagost · · Score: 1
      Keanu Reeves.

      Whoa.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:Classic by Mongo222 · · Score: 1

      How about Anthony Hopkins. : Granted, he's a great actor, but that would be pretty boned up right there.

    3. Re:Classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear Bruce Boxleitner is still looking for work. Bet they could snag him cheap.

    4. Re:Classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As stated many times....Ben Stiller will star in anything.

    5. Re:Classic by ThePlague · · Score: 0

      How about Bruce Campbell? They could hit two fanbases in one stroke by camping it up and calling it "Army of Tron". Imagine the lines:

      "I only came here to kick ass and ride lightcycles, and I'm all out of lightcycles."

      etc

  8. No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sick sad monkeys. Leave it alone. Go remake one of your other crappy movies. Like oh...Snow White or Sleeping Beauty.

    1. Re:No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, usurping and perverting fairy tales and classical stories always work. The Grimm brothers and HC Andersen can always be raped again. Fuck, there are kids today who think Winnie The Pooh is a Disney cartoon character! Lucky you're not around to see what they've done to your bear, Mr Milne!

  9. Yay for Disney, you rock! by coupland · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think this is an excellent idea, another example of Disney's new groundbreaking philosophy. A groundbreaking... sequel. Get Eddie Murhpy in to do some voices, add a breakfast cereal tie-in, a trailer that only airs in front of one of their other loser movies, a McDonald's meal toy, and you're well on your way to a Disney classic!

    Almost forgot, better hire Pixar to do the actual movie itself, Disney only does cross-promotional advertising now...

    1. Re:Yay for Disney, you rock! by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Disney has long remade its movies, even those movies that are considered classics in the original version. The Parent Trap. The Love Bug. The Shaggy Dog. 101 Dalmations. And they've made schlocky sequels to many more. This doesn't really come as much of a surprise to me. I don't think anybody's had an original idea at Walt Disney for the last twenty years or so.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    2. Re:Yay for Disney, you rock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new conceit is that someone gets trapped in a cyberworld so they can utilise the internet. How about this:

      The bad guy is this mouse with big ears called "Mickey" who is attempting to extend copyright to infinity whilst pilfering public domain sources for his own benefit. Enter hero who tries to let people transfer data over the internet connections they paid for but the evil mouse sends his goons (called 'lawyers' and 'lobbyists') to tax that information and place the people sending it into a digital prison called "DRM". Eventually everybody agrees that perpetual copyright is a bad idea so the mouse shops his goons as communist pirate sympathizers, just like good old uncle fucking Walt shopped his workforce during McCarthyism.

      Film at 11, hopefully not a Disney one!

    3. Re:Yay for Disney, you rock! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Yeah, have Eddie Murhpy do the voice for Bit.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Yay for Disney, you rock! by KennyP · · Score: 1

      I wish I could mod this up higher. I haven't cried laughing in a long time.

      Disney - a unholy owned subsidiary of Whore & Sell Co.

      Kenny P.
      Visualize Whirled P.'s

    5. Re:Yay for Disney, you rock! by g8x · · Score: 0
      I don't think anybody's had an original idea at Walt Disney for the last twenty years or so.


      Not that Disney ever really had any original ideas. All their movies were public domain childrens stories. Disney just neutered the endings and made them pretty.
      --

      tap 2 blue, I counter that
    6. Re:Yay for Disney, you rock! by ripsnorta · · Score: 1

      Walt fucked his good old uncle? Shocking!

      --

      Hollywood: The place good stories go to die.

    7. Re:Yay for Disney, you rock! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Disney just neutered the endings and made them pretty.

      Yeah, I always liked the version of Snow White where the evil queen snuck into Snow White's wedding, but they found her and made her dance in red-hot metal shoes until she died.

      Come on, Disney! Put a good musical number to it, and it'd be a great scene!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    8. Re:Yay for Disney, you rock! by demonbug · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I don't think anybody's had an original idea at Walt Disney for the last twenty years or so.


      One word: Fastpass.

      (I'm only semi-serious)

    9. Re:Yay for Disney, you rock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see it now.

      Yea, lets go find that Tron guy and head on down to the CPU.

      And in the morning... I'm making waffles.

    10. Re:Yay for Disney, you rock! by jakel2k · · Score: 1

      20 years? How about Snow White, Peter Pan, Sleeping Beauty, Alice in Wonderland, Cinderella and Pinocchio. All predating the last 20 years and all not a Disney orginals. The stories predate the movies.

    11. Re:Yay for Disney, you rock! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      No no--only if Bit is still restricted to yes/no type answers.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    12. Re:Yay for Disney, you rock! by bicho · · Score: 1

      well, but Cinderella's sister didn't cut her own toes so that the shoe would fit.

      Still, there is Fantasia (Fantasy?)

      the Fantasia 2000 is not as good though.

      --

      errera hunamum ets
    13. Re:Yay for Disney, you rock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Parent Trap.

      This movie was good because of Linsey Lohan, not Disney. Disney is just a brand and a pile of money.

    14. Re:Yay for Disney, you rock! by SunFan · · Score: 1

      One word: Fastpass.

      Fast passes for rich fat asses.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    15. Re:Yay for Disney, you rock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Universal Studios did it first.

    16. Re:Yay for Disney, you rock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tee-hee-hee, oops, wait, you suck.

  10. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.tronguy.net/TRONcostume/

    What will he say about it?
    Better yet, will he be offered to play a part?

    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, he gets to play a FAT partition.

    2. Re:Obligatory by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1

      I'm reserving judgment until we know a lot more about it.

      I'd kill to have a part, though.

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
    3. Re:Obligatory by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1
      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
    4. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :: insert obligatory "I wish I had mod points" joke here.

      Damn, that was good.

    5. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you really deserve a part in it. What about starting a campaign on you website, I'd sign it and I'm sure there many more who would.

  11. And CGI? by fisheye1969 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I guess the graphics will be updated so much so that they won't look as fantastically "false" as they did originally. It was a subject so well suited to early CGI, that the new stuff doesn't cut it. Maybe this is one case where better CGI is actually worse?

    Will Jeff Bridges be in it?

    1. Re:And CGI? by glowimperial · · Score: 1

      Maybe this time they will actually use CGI to make the movie. Due to the fact that the computers were not up to the job, 90% of the effects in the original that are passed off as CGI were actually hand done by illustrators and animators called in to cover the asses of the CGI crew. An animator associate of mine worked night shifts for months on Tron's animation, one frame at a time, using non-CGI techniques.

    2. Re:And CGI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is actually exactly what I was thinking. The original stands today mostly on its style. The acting wasn't too hot, and the story is okay, but those stark flat CG spaces and flawless objects really contributed to the Orwellian feel of the MCP-controlled environment. It's gonna be hard for the original to have the same staying power.

      On the other hand, maybe I just liked it a lot when I was a kid, and kids today will feel the same way about this one.

    3. Re:And CGI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't watch Tron anymore without thinking to myself, "Hey, it's the Dude!"

  12. So confused by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1, Troll

    On one hand Disney is part of the Evil Trinity (Disney, Microsoft and the Roman Catholic Church).

    On the other hand Tron is still a great movie to watch. A decent storyline, very good graphics (even by todays standards), action, mystery, the works.

    I'm so confused.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:So confused by jwilcox154 · · Score: 1
      " On one hand Disney is part of the Evil Trinity (Disney, Microsoft and the Roman Catholic Church)."

      Don't you mean "On one hand Disney is part of the Evil Trinity (Disney, Microsoft and Mc Choke 'n Puke?" ;)
    2. Re:So confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is RCC part of the Evil Trinity? Maybe you can enlighten this RC.

    3. Re:So confused by scotch · · Score: 1

      What about the Gripping Hand?

      --
      XML causes global warming.
  13. Maybe Lucas will be hired to direct it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That way, another childhood memory can be destroyed.

  14. Disney product placement by SunFan · · Score: 2, Funny


    "Hey, this Frisbee brand disc really gives me the game I need to win! All kids should have one of these!"

    "This re-engergizing river takes just like crisp refreshing Sprite!"

    "Back home, I had a game on my Microsoft X-Box 2 that was just like this Tron bike race!"

    Hey, Disney, lay off for a while, so our kids can grow up!

    --
    -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
  15. New tecnology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it intruiging. Allways exciting to see what the new technology can bring into the movie. And this one is extra interesting I think. Would love to see how they handle this one.

  16. Enough with the remakes already! by OmegaBlac · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why don't they make a sequel? There is no reason to go back and muck around with a film that doesn't need mucking around with.

    1. Re:Enough with the remakes already! by Eclypser · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you don't understand how sequels work. They are in fact the exact same movie redone in reverse. The main character's flaws from the first film are just realized in some other character.
      So call it a sequel. It doesn't actually make a difference.

      --
      The comment has already been made. Let's move it along people. Nothing to see here.
    2. Re:Enough with the remakes already! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They did make a sequel. Tron 2.0 is a video game... a quite good one, too. As far as the game's box and manual said, the video game *is* the official sanctioned sequel to the Tron movie.

    3. Re:Enough with the remakes already! by l4m3z0r · · Score: 1

      Becuase sequals suck more consistently than remakes do. I'd welcome a remake any day over a shoddy sequel.

    4. Re:Enough with the remakes already! by retro128 · · Score: 1

      Because the time of Disney as a creative center is over (well, more so now than in the past. How many movies based on original stories do they have again? Disney growing fat off of others' "IP" is for another post, however)

      Disney's greatest animated successes lately has been stuff they've never touched short of distribution (Spirited Away, Incredibles, etc)

      With stinkers like Mulan, Hercules, and the Emperor's New Groove, can we really expect that Disney would come up with a good story on their own for Tron 2? Of course not. So instead they will probably take Tron and totally bastardize it with a bunch of kiddie elements, Jar-Jar style. I have no high hopes for the remake.

      --
      -R
    5. Re:Enough with the remakes already! by MouseR · · Score: 1

      In the Disney remake, rumors has it that Flynn fires first.

    6. Re:Enough with the remakes already! by jonwil · · Score: 1

      If they made the storyline (and visuals) of Tron 2.0 into a movie, that would probobly work.

  17. Tron by Skiron · · Score: 4, Funny

    For those that don't know, the film was named after the computer command 'Trace on' (as opposed to Troff).

    Looking at the current situation, will Disney call it Pr0n?

    1. Re:Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to avoid confusion - troff the text formatter's name is from "typesetter roff", which is from "roff" , which is from "runoff", which was from the phrase "run off a copy".

    2. Re:Tron by Skiron · · Score: 1

      Which has nothing to do with 'Troff' (Trace off) which was the opposite of 'Tron'.

    3. Re:Tron by MalachiConstant · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bzzt. It was short for elecTRONic. The filmakers didn't find out till later that it was also a real computer term.

    4. Re:Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prace On? I don't get it...

    5. Re:Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who has the anniversary edition of TRON on DVD can tell you that the name TRON came from the word elecTRONic. It's explained in the special features.

    6. Re:Tron by Ray+Alloc · · Score: 1

      the film was named after the computer command 'Trace on'
      will Disney call it Pr0n?
      ... After the computer command 'Prace 0n?

  18. Tron 2.0 -- the game by andy55 · · Score: 1

    For any tron fans out there, buena vista interactive and disney partnered to make the game "Tron 2.0". The game not only beautiful, it has multiplayer/net lightcycles that're a total hoot. It's totally worth the $40, especially if you've always been a tron fan. The game is available for Mac OS as well as windows.

    Although the 3D engine is the HL engine (not sure though), they spent a *lot* of time on the solo-play story line, a very unique gameplay feel, and visual detail. If you look at some of the screenshots, they did a great job of replicating the tron world, using textures in very creative and interesting ways.

    tron 2.0 official site

    Game fan/story site

    1. Re:Tron 2.0 -- the game by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

      > It's totally worth the $40

      It's even more worth the $10 or $15 you can find it for online these days. Check it out.

    2. Re:Tron 2.0 -- the game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Tron 2.0 -- the game by Mondoz · · Score: 1

      The quality of this game is the _only_ thing that doesn't make me abandon all hope for this project.

      I liked how the game incorporated newer technology ideas that weren't around back then, yet stayed truthful to the Tron universe.

      The bit that does worry me is the mention of wanting to appeal to a younger audience. I really hope they don't dumb it down, or add some goofy sidekick product-tie in character.
      I wish Disney could make animated films without demanding that at least one character is there to hold the attention of toddlers.

      --
      /sig
    4. Re:Tron 2.0 -- the game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      naah. it took me less than a week, playing for maybe an hour a night, to beat the game, then go through it, a second time, making sure that i hadn't missed anything.

      the physics engine was annoying, the gameplay was anything but open-ended, the light-cycles were annoying, and the game has virtually zer0 replay value.

      OTOH, the graphics were good, the narration was well done, and there were a few easter-eggs (leftovers from the debugging/playtetsing phase, i'd guess) which made my third pass (with a debugger and hex-editor) a bit interresting... for an added evening's entertainment.

      it's been collecting dust since a week after i bought it, though.

    5. Re:Tron 2.0 -- the game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great game, especially since you can get it on sale for quite cheap now.

      The game had a laugh out loud moment for me during the final cut scene.

      * SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT *

      After you win the game and leave the system, you see a monitor in the background. As the system crashes, the monitor shows a blue screen of death for a few seconds before it blanks to black.

      Priceless.

    6. Re:Tron 2.0 -- the game by alucardX · · Score: 1

      I thought the graphics and art in this game were great. Overall though, the gameplay was average. By the middle of the game I found myself trying to get through as fast as I could just because I expected a brilliant conclusion to the story. There wasn't one. The gameplay wasn't really too innovative, and the story ultimately didn't go anywhere. Kudos on the art however.

    7. Re:Tron 2.0 -- the game by CumInHerTaco · · Score: 0

      which made my third pass (with a debugger and hex-editor) a bit interresting... for an added evening's entertainment.

      Sounds like you know how to have a really good time...Have you ever left your house?

      --
      The only way to end war is for everyone to get a piece!
    8. Re:Tron 2.0 -- the game by Contact · · Score: 1
      Although the 3D engine is the HL engine

      Actually, the game is by Monolith (of NOLF, NOLF2, Contract Jack etc fame) and the engine is their proprietary lithtech engine.

      The game itself is pretty good, and is very true to the original film. The voice acting ranges from passable to excellent, and the graphics are pretty and very "tron like". It's not a top tier FPS like HL2, Far Cry etc (and it's also almost a year old now, iirc) but it's a fun way to kill a few hours, especially if you enjoyed the film.

    9. Re:Tron 2.0 -- the game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you want from someone who uses "zer0".

    10. Re:Tron 2.0 -- the game by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      Tron 2.0 rocks - until it suddenly just ends, you get the feeling it could go on forever. But I do have one question...

      Why, for things like the recognizer, did they use megabytes of bitmapped textures for nothing but an outline when they could have used lines + polygon offset? Only 1000 times more space efficient... Plus, in TRON, the outlines don't get larger as you approach, unlike a texture.

    11. Re:Tron 2.0 -- the game by Mondoz · · Score: 1

      My OCD side loved collecting all the upgrades and emails.

      I didn't like the fighting aspect so much as the exploration side of the game. I spent so much time searching for build points and upgrades that the game was over before I wanted it to be.

      Disc fighting was a lot of fun for me too.

      Oh, and I thought the 'active memory powerup' stuff was pretty innovative. I hadn't seen a design quite like that before.

      If the people involved in making that game were involved in making a movie based off this title, I'd be okay with it.

      --
      /sig
  19. Another Comic Book Movie?!?!? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    The scribes take the job as they near an end to writing "Black Cat," based on the 1940s Harvey comicbook character of a stuntwoman who becomes a vigilante on the streets of Los Angeles.

    Cripes. Fantastic Four and Elektra coming out this year, probably another Batman and who knows what else.

    Yet it seems the most successful super hero pic was the Incredibles, which wasn't preceded by a comic.

    At least March 30th is coming along...

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  20. Evil Disney details by tepples · · Score: 1

    If you're new to Slashdot:
    To learn more about why 'smooth wombat' included The Walt Disney Company in an "Evil Trinity", you can read some background information at Losing Nemo.

    1. Re:Evil Disney details by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Maybe you missed something... Miramax Films, property of Disney, has made many anti-catholic movies, or movies that go against catholic morals. http://www.indiewire.com/biz/biz_990623_briefs.htm l

      Search for "Miramax catholic" on google to get an idea. Of course, this only shows more of disney's hidden agenda.

    2. Re:Evil Disney details by tepples · · Score: 1

      Miramax Films, property of Disney, has made many anti-catholic movies, or movies that go against catholic morals

      I used to have some right-wing arguments on Losing Nemo, but then people claimed that despite what Disney has done to the intellectual commons, they would support Disney because they like Miramax's anti-Catholicism and Disney's "Gay Day".

  21. I hope the graphics are low-tech cool by tinrobot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I loved Tron because they used really good design to overcome the extremely low-tech tools they had at their disposal. The result was a "inside the computer" world that looked computer-like.

    Now we have movies like The Matrix, where they go inside a computer and it looks like San Francisco.

    I hope the new Tron remake doesn't got too overboard and make things look too 'realistic.' I'm kind of sick of CGI that looks real. I have real every day.

    1. Re:I hope the graphics are low-tech cool by kev0153 · · Score: 1
      I'm kind of sick of CGI that looks real. I have real every day.


      You should really enjoy "The Hulk" then.
    2. Re:I hope the graphics are low-tech cool by chigun · · Score: 1

      actually, it was Chicago.

      --
      swanker than you
    3. Re:I hope the graphics are low-tech cool by miskate · · Score: 1

      funny, it looked an awful lot like Sydney to me...

    4. Re:I hope the graphics are low-tech cool by chigun · · Score: 1

      It was shot in Sydney, but anyone from Chicago would know it was set here. Just like many movies that take place in Chicago are often shot in Toronto. The only reason they shot it in Sydney is because they could do it there on the cheap since Daley has run show-biz out of town.

      --
      swanker than you
    5. Re:I hope the graphics are low-tech cool by Penguinshit · · Score: 1


      Funny.. I always figured the inside of my computer would look like a rabid dust-bunny version of "Escape from New York".

      Perhaps I should get on the case-mod bandwagon and give my bits a happier, more Neo-Tokyo-esque home...

    6. Re:I hope the graphics are low-tech cool by Wayne247 · · Score: 1

      I'm kind of sick of CGI that looks real. I have real every day.

      You know, when people wonder how far CGI will go and think how incredibly realistic movies will become one day, i just come to realize that if we ever get super-awesome-extremly realistic, we'll be there only fast enough to realize that we DON'T want to be there.

      Like you say, we're surrounded with real. When the effects of movies will be so real that they genuinely feel real to us, there won't be a point anymore will it? It's like pushing the digital characters so far into realism that they're just like humans. Will we really enjoy seeing computer generated "humans" that are so realistic that we would swear they're really humans? What purpose would that serve? Other that to tweak a few hard to shoot scenes by replacing the actor with a computer generated sprite, there's no real point anymore.

      So what's next?

  22. New plot by brandonY · · Score: 5, Funny

    The evil Computer P1R473Z are downloading the system's IP. Now, the brave and bold hero must digitize himself and take on the P1R473Z on their own turf. Without his lawyers, armed with only spam and pluck, our hero must contend with giant P2P tanks which shoot torrets of bits. Can our hero stop them before innocent set-builders and writers lose their jobs due to IP theft?

    1. Re:New plot by Wayne247 · · Score: 1

      The room is pitch dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.

  23. In other news, Tron guy.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just pitched a tent in his little tron suit.

  24. Sing after me... by funkify · · Score: 1

    I got good fortune like Confucius in the House of Wong
    I got orbital connects like Ground Control to Major Tom
    With my pedal to the metal my tires smoke like Cheech and Chong
    And I'm gettin upgrades like the user to TRON

    1. Re:Sing after me... by thegameiam · · Score: 1

      Where is that from? It's awesome...

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    2. Re:Sing after me... by funkify · · Score: 1

      A tiny piece of a song I wrote... that's not even the good part, but maybe Disney will sue me, hehhehhe.

    3. Re:Sing after me... by thegameiam · · Score: 1

      Awesome - are you in a band? Any recordings? I do geek-rock as well with The Franchise

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    4. Re:Sing after me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn. nerd l0ve is in bloom!

  25. Funny? or add sarcasm and call it "Insightful" by ansak · · Score: 1

    Also, see other posts about "new movies" with "new ideas".

    And yeah, Pixar. But these intelligent chimps already decided not to keep distributing Pixar's product. I'll bet the re-sign bonus would break Disney's reserves.

    cheers...ank

    --
    Still hoping for Gentle Treatment...
  26. creators planning planet/population 'remake'? by already_gone · · Score: 1

    might as well, it's such a mess.

    don't forget to consult with/trust in yOUR creators, operating on newclear power at the speed of right (which may appear to be a little slow at times) since/until forever. see you there?

  27. Original Stories? by ackthpt · · Score: 2
    You sick sad monkeys. Leave it alone. Go remake one of your other crappy movies. Like oh...Snow White or Sleeping Beauty.

    How about doing orginal stories? Seems those have done fairly well, particularly for Pixar, which when well done lead the audience into uncharted territory and are far more interesting.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  28. From Disney's Golden Period by scotay · · Score: 3, Funny

    These days, it may seem that Disney is nothing but crap merchants, but they used to have a quality period. Back in the days of The Black Hole, and The Barefoot Executive, Disney was known for quality dialog and compelling drama. A remake of Tron promises to rekindle the spirit of Disney quality in a whole new generation.

    1. Re:From Disney's Golden Period by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in the days of The Black Hole...

      Watcher In The Woods, Escape To Witch Mountain, Wicked That Which Is Way Cometh Goeth (or whatever). All really cool movies, but creepy to think that they were made for kids. The Black Hole is really a classic sci-fi movie. Now all we get is re-hashed soundtracks and re-hashed "all star" casts.

      BTW, when did Snoop Dogg become appropriate for a kids movie (saw those previews lately and am quite confused). Does he go around and give kids tee-shirts if they flash their goodies? Isn't that illegal?

  29. Tron is a great metaphor by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 1

    For open source. Linus should play Tron.

    Hey if the Hollywood mincemeat machine has it's way, a game would come out and it would probably look just like Armagetron.

    Bill Gates should play MCP. "MCP" sounds alarmingly like a Microsoft "Cert" doesn't it?

    --
    "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
    1. Re:Tron is a great metaphor by bhaynes · · Score: 0

      You mean like this? MCP

      --
      ASCII pr0n. Coming to a Lunar Lander near you!
    2. Re:Tron is a great metaphor by writermike · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates should play MCP. "MCP" sounds alarmingly like a Microsoft "Cert" doesn't it?

      It is.

      Microsoft Certified Professional.

      End of Line.

      --
      If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
  30. Pixar involvement? by Christopher+Cashell · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know at one point I remember reading that this was being considered, and that Pixar might be involved. I recall that one of the high-up designers at Pixar said that Tron is the reason he got into the business, and that he'd love an opportunity to remake it.

    I dunno if that'll happen, but I think there's a good chance it would end up a much better flick if Pixar ran with it. I'd be very curious to see what they could do.

    --
    Topher
    1. Re:Pixar involvement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would be a good opportunity to experement with more adult oriented CG film.

      Don't market Tron II to children. It's the 30 yr olds who remember loving it in the theater. That's your target audience.

    2. Re:Pixar involvement? by 451 · · Score: 1

      I have a friend that worked with Pixar for six months last year, just around the time all the "Pixar hates Disney" issues came out, and Pixar told the world they were leaving the magic kingdom for better deals.

      From what he told me about the inside attitude of Pixar, I would find it VERY hard to see them being involved with any movie produced by Disney, since "Cars" is the last one they are doing together.

      Too bad, as I would love to have seen Pixar build the world of Tron - instead we may have the MCP with a giant pair of mouse ears, and ICP's dancing to "On Off, On Off, it's off to RAM we go..."

  31. Oh dear lord, NO!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet another story to be laid to ruins

  32. Just Make a Reboot Movie by Erioll · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Reboot was a more "fun" idea of computers. Should just make THAT into a movie, rather than spoiling an old classic.

    I liked tron, but I can't see how they'll retain the "feel" of the original. I won't say it's impossible, but it just seems like they're setting people up for disappointment.

    Erioll

    1. Re:Just Make a Reboot Movie by fsterman · · Score: 1

      I liked it until they went into the internet and lost all the cool characters. I mean, sure they did just recycle plot after plot in Mainframe, but it was a kids show for christ sake. It was more about the characters, not the plot.

      --
      Is there anything better than clicking through Microsoft ads on Slashdot?
    2. Re:Just Make a Reboot Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Reboot was a more "fun" idea of computers. Should just make THAT into a movie, rather than spoiling an old classic.

      Do these count?
      Reboot:To Mend & Defend
      Reboot - Daemon Rising / My Two Bobs
      They might be more along the lines of long episodes or a set of continued episodes, but I thought I'd mention them from recent browsing

    3. Re:Just Make a Reboot Movie by isorox · · Score: 2, Funny

      reboot was a great program, have you played the game? It's installed on many computers, even servers, by default. You need to be root to play it in many cases though

    4. Re:Just Make a Reboot Movie by Erioll · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what the first one is, but the 2nd link is actually the show's 4th season. They made it as "two movies" or 8 regular episodes. It was broadcast on TV some time ago though.

      And responding to a few other comments here, the show WAS a kids show in the first couple of seasons (until right near the end of season 2), but in season 3 onward, it took on a more "teenage" feel. In their press info at the time, they even said that, as they realized that their ORIGINAL audience WAS growing up, and so they played to the audience they already had.

      I know all the terms are thrown around loose in that show, but it was still great fun. And it's really funny to see some of the references they put in there sometimes, like how they had a show with "Fax Modem" and "Data Nully" investigation "X-files-like" occurances. They actually had Gillian Anderson come in to play the voice of Nully as well. In a later episode in the destruction of Mainframe, a building falls on "Fax" while he's seen looking at two brouchurs (sp?), one for LA, and the other for Vancouver. As many here probably know, it was mostly David Duchoveny's whining that moved production of X-files from vancouver to LA, hence a little "revenge" dropping the building on him, since Reboot's people are in Vancouver.

      Anyways, I know it's unlikely reboot will continue further, but it'd be cool if it did.

      =)

      Erioll

    5. Re:Just Make a Reboot Movie by santiago · · Score: 1

      Sweet! I've owned Season 3 for ages and always wanted the rest of the show. Season 4 is now on DVD, and it looks like they've just started releasing seasons 1 and 2!

    6. Re:Just Make a Reboot Movie by piper-noiter · · Score: 1

      If you like Reboot you should try Kid Rad Its a fairly involved comic about old Game ROMs on the Internet. Its really surprisingly deep and has a quality ending. (Yes, an on-line comic with an ending!)

      Anyone who is now thinking; "eww on-line comic"... Well, your loss.

      --
      Shick's Law: There is no problem a good miracle can't solve.
    7. Re:Just Make a Reboot Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got a link for this (reboot game)? A google search brings up many creative ways to restart your system, but no games.

  33. At least keep the original music ... by tschak · · Score: 1

    I hope that if Tron does get remade, the original synthesized & live orchestra blended musical score is kept. If you can find the CD, it's a blast to listen to (except for a few crappy Journey songs)

    BTW, Wendy Carlos composed the sound track to Tron. She is also well know for doing the synthesized music in "A Clockwork Orange" and "The Shining"

    --
    -tschak
    1. Re:At least keep the original music ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SHE? Don't you mean HE? True, he flipped his lid and chopped off some important bits, but Clockwork was done by Walter Carlos. Always has, always will be.

    2. Re:At least keep the original music ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She didn't do The Shining.

      She did, however, team up with Weird Al to redo Tchaikovskii's Peter and the Wolf. Quite possibly the strangest duo performance in the history of the music industry.

  34. what's wrong with the original? by t1nman33 · · Score: 1

    There are some movies where, ok, it's such a work of art, or the story is such a classic, you can almost understand some director wanting to try his hand at it. It's like going to see Romeo and Juliet done by a different director: same story, different treatment.

    But, c'mon, Tron stands just fine on its own. Watch the 20th Anniversary DVD and tell me, really, is it so out of date? Does it make you cringe? Or is it a perfectly fine movie?

    So why remake it? Why not do a sequel instead? Is that so far-fetched?

    --
    --- Where's my car, and why are these grass stains on my pants?
    1. Re:what's wrong with the original? by kisrael · · Score: 1

      It had some of the worst dialog (or maybe it was the delivery)...I still cringe at stuff like "now he's playing space cowboy in some backroom" and the deboarding-the-helicopter "greetings, programs!"

      Ugh.

      Loved, loved, loved the tanks though. Those things were bad ass.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    2. Re:what's wrong with the original? by CockblockTheVote · · Score: 1

      i think the problem is that there is nothing wrong with the original. that is why they feel they must fuck it up.

  35. Syd Mead by payndz · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Just hope they keep Syd Mead's designs for all the original vehicles, or better yet, just hire the man himself to do updates. Mead's stuff rocks.

    It won't be Tron without light cycles, Recognizers and those nifty asymetric tanks!

    --
    You must think in Russian.
    1. Re:Syd Mead by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      Kudos to this post about giving Mead credit.

      Mead and Lisberger really gave this movie it's unique look.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
  36. Subscription ? by Aliencow · · Score: 1

    User agent switcher or the Opera equivalent, set User Agent to:
    Googlebot/1.0 (googlebot@googlebot.com http://googlebot.com/)

    Works for a bunch of sites..

  37. Not as bad as other /.ers think by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1
    Considering the quality (other slashdotters chuckle) of Pirates of the Carribiean, i oculd see this movie working. If anything, the Tron 2.0 video game did a good job of demonstrating that the core concepts and elements of the movie can still work in the present day.

    A few thoughts on how the update could work.

    • Kevin Flynn (or the equivilent character) is a programmer in the Open Source community since he left/was terminated from the company. He still runs the arcade, as in the original.
    • MCP remains an Artificial Intelligence that used to be a Chess program.
    • The movie's locations can move beyond just the main server to perhaps Flynn needing to get a file from his home computer (FPS program perhaps?)
    • References to Linux and Windows terminology (yes, User's are powerful, but Administrator/Root is even more powerful)
    • Alan Bradley is a network administrator. However, Peter (Dillenger's lieutenant) would be his supervisor.
    • And, of course, slight changes in the games to reflect how the computer world, including gaming has changed since the early 80s (the "Vector graphic" look of the original for certain parts of the world, but for certain Games the look would change to reflect the game, somewhat). Not all of this would be stuff like first person shooters, RTS games, Racing games, and all that stuff. As a lot of employees play flash games at school/work, Flash games could be a part of this.
    --
    Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    1. Re:Not as bad as other /.ers think by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      Add some digitized, pirated pron to the plot, and I'll definitely go watch it in theatres.

    2. Re:Not as bad as other /.ers think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since this is potentially a good idea, it will never work in hollywood. hollywood doesn't like good ideas, only that which has a canned audience to begin with.

  38. Such fond memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In the early 80s, I worked for a top secret hush hush subsidiary of a bigger supertop secret hush hush hush agency. I loved working with a Cray-1. But I loved our brand new VAXes running Ultrix(TM) too, and when after a month they were suddenly reverted to VMS. Why? Because of a dispute over whether we were an original licensee or a much cheaper sublicensee, and hahahaha we couldn't PROVE that we were a subsidiary, where's the documentation, they weren't going to take our word for it that it was a classified relationship, uh uh. Of course, many AT&T people were in the know, but hey, they weren't asked by their lawyers.

    So several us guys, feeling kind of annoyed, went out and saw TRON. Evil Master Control Program and all that. Cray-1 cameo. We were pumped. We'll show them!

    I saw it three more times that month. It remains the only movie I've seen more than once when it came out.

    Within a week it was all cleared up. I never found out what the arrangement was. Presumably I didn't have the "need to know" cough cough.

  39. Googlebot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just change your browsers user agent to googlebot ( Googlebot/2.1 (+http://www.googlebot.com/bot.html) ) to read the Variety article

  40. Tron 2.0 the MOVIE by darkCanuck · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm confused. Hollywood Stock Exchange has been selling Tron 2.0 stock since September '99.

    That's 2.0, not a remake.

    They claim the director of Tron is writing the screenplay.

    I really hope the HSX is right. Especially since I bought 50,000 shares @ $4.29.

    1. Re:Tron 2.0 the MOVIE by LesPaul75 · · Score: 1

      Especially since I bought 50,000 shares @ $4.29.

      ... as in Two Hundred and Fourteen Thousand Dollars? Seriously? Who invests $214000 in a project without even knowing what it is (besides the fact that it's called "Tron 2.0")?

      Can I borrow some money? I'm working on a project called "The Titanic 2.0." I can't tell you anything more about it, but that should be enough for a couple hundred thousand, right?

    2. Re:Tron 2.0 the MOVIE by Sebastian+Jansson · · Score: 1

      Hmm, to me, when you add .0 to a version number it indicates version. It implies that there could be a 2.5 or 1.3. Therefore I'd say that 2.0 would indicate a remake while just 2 would indicate a follow-up.

      But then, that's just me philosophizing.

    3. Re:Tron 2.0 the MOVIE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an HSX account, from years ago, but can't remember my bloody account details.
      =(

    4. Re:Tron 2.0 the MOVIE by zr-rifle · · Score: 1

      I wonder if you actually read the pages you link to.

      "Disney has hired screenwriters Brian Klugman and Lee Sternthal to fashion a remake of Tron."

      Since a remake is a new version of the old source code, it makes sense to call it 2.0.

      --
      Hack your mind out of its sandbox.
    5. Re:Tron 2.0 the MOVIE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a game, retard. Check the link before you shoot off your mouth, or at least post without your totally unnecessary karma bonus.

    6. Re:Tron 2.0 the MOVIE by dghcasp · · Score: 1
      Ummm, one would hope that you would have read their webpage before you invested...

      From that very same webpage...

      Disney has hired screenwriters Brian Klugman and Lee Sternthal to fashion a remake of Tron. [emphasis mine]
    7. Re:Tron 2.0 the MOVIE by LesPaul75 · · Score: 1

      Are you joking? Something called "Tron 2.0 the MOVIE" is a game? That's weird. Thanks for clearing that up.

    8. Re:Tron 2.0 the MOVIE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HSX. Game. Play money. Not real money. Do I need to go on?

  41. Maybe they can call it . . . by fr2asbury · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tron Reloaded?

    1. Re:Maybe they can call it . . . by SunFan · · Score: 1


      How about Tron Re-marketed?

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
  42. Already Done? by pope1 · · Score: 1

    Didn't we already get a remake?

    Wasn't it called "The Matrix" ?

    --
    /* * pope1 */
  43. Is it 2001? by dq5+studios · · Score: 1

    I had heard that they put the movie plans on hold shorty before the game's release and then when the game didn't sell as well as expected they dropped the idea of a movie completely.

    http://slashdot.org/articles/01/07/29/0120249.shtm l

  44. Disney Presents Tron-- Starring... by toocoolforschool · · Score: 1

    ...this guy.

    1. Re:Disney Presents Tron-- Starring... by drew_green · · Score: 1

      that's the first thing that came to my mind when I saw the story. On Jimmy Kimmell that night....Quentin Tarantino, Lenny Kravitz, and the Tron Guy.

    2. Re:Disney Presents Tron-- Starring... by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1

      That was a fun evening. How many of you folks have gotten to sit on a coucn on the side of the stage at a rock concert?

      Now, there's a thought: Have Tarantino direct. That would be...uhm...interesting.

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
  45. CES Quote from the Movie by jrod2027 · · Score: 1

    "If you've seen one Consumer Electronics Show, you've seen them all."

    More quotes

  46. Warning: incoming court battle. by tepples · · Score: 1

    Warning: incoming game. Warning: incoming game.

    The computer animated series Reboot was the first to introduce the purple game cube. It appears Mainframe let the rights to that phrase slip away to Nintendo, and Nintendo might sue if any future Reboot has a "game cube".

    1. Re:Warning: incoming court battle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Mainfram Entertainment should sue for the name based on prior art.

      Just what is needed... another court battle.

  47. Banzai Buddy by Eclypser · · Score: 1

    I've heard they have tapped the Banzai Buddy to play the bad guy.

    By reading this message he has already reinfected your machine. {begin evil laugh}HA HA HA{/end evil laugh}

    --
    The comment has already been made. Let's move it along people. Nothing to see here.
    1. Re:Banzai Buddy by subwarm · · Score: 1
      I was hoping for Dave Chappelle as the MCP.

      "End of line, bitch!"

  48. If I coudl Mod, I'd Mod that Interesting! by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Reboot was a more "fun" idea of computers. Should just make THAT into a movie, rather than spoiling an old classic.

    Interesting. Certainly moreso than I think a Tron remake could be.

    I liked tron, but I can't see how they'll retain the "feel" of the original. I won't say it's impossible, but it just seems like they're setting people up for disappointment.

    The old movie only works for me as 'camp', like watching B horror flix from the 50's. You can choose to laugh when a shoe sticks out from under the monster suit just like when you hear outdated 'jargon', or terms which were made up by writers who thought computers were only big boxes with flashing lights a reels of tape, which are seriously dated.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  49. I'm Looking Forward To It by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 2, Informative

    I look at this a little differently than most of the posters so far. This could be absolutely terrible, which is a definite possibility given that Disney is doing it (without Pixar, for that matter :).

    However, if it does end up being good and have a halfway decent story, it will bring a story that many of us have enjoyed for a long time to a new generation of fans. How many kids out there do you know of that have watched Tron? What about Cloak and Dagger? D.A.R.Y.L? These are classic movies that most people won't see unless they're redone and released again in theaters.

    I'm looking forward to taking my niece to the movie, and having another 'geek' movie to watch with my wife (she LOVES LoTR). It's going to be tough to make it as good as the original, but I think that's fine as long as it's not completely awful.

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    1. Re:I'm Looking Forward To It by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      If you care about people seeing the movies, then you don't want them to see the lousy remakes of them (which they almost invariably are). This is like saying great books should be rewritten so that "today's generation" will read them.

      How about we just remaster and re-release the originals on the big screen? I'd pay to see a rerelease of Tron or Cloak & Dagger...

    2. Re:I'm Looking Forward To It by DrugCheese · · Score: 1

      You can still rent or buy these movies.

      Should Casa Blanca be redone so that people will get to see it? No just go see the original!

      --
      *DrugCheese rants*
    3. Re:I'm Looking Forward To It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was, the remake was called Barb Wire.

    4. Re:I'm Looking Forward To It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DARYL, Tron?
      These movies make up most of the daytime tv schedule in the UK

  50. Already done! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They already have remade Tron. It got mixed reviews, although the consensus is that the quality and enjoyability dropped as the trilogy continued.

    It was called "The Matrix". Anyone who doubts me can just compare the avatar of Neo's end boss in Revolutions to that of the Master Control Program in Tron.

  51. Watch out for the MCP by georgelucas · · Score: 2, Funny

    If i recall correctly the main problem faced by Tron was to defeat the dreaded MCP(Master Control Program). In Tron 2 or Tron "reloaded" as i will call it, tron will be faced with a new evil... The MCP(Microsoft Certified Professional). with his minimum salary being 60k + a year with no exp. he will be tough to stop!

    1. Re:Watch out for the MCP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the Matrix, no? Agent Smith was played by a Microsoft Certified Professional.

  52. Quit squeezing on past success. by cbrichar · · Score: 1
    Yet another film wrapped in the safety net of a pre-existing fan base, good lord.

    More often then not, these remakes (as well as the many gawdawful tv-to-film projects) are nothing more than blatant cash grabs that can be easily sold to production companies based on the fact that the fan base has already been established. Like many memorable movies, Tron was a success because it was incredibly creative as well as visually stunning for its time. In the same way that Star Wars and the first of the Matrix flicks blew fans away, it was showing us something we'd never seen before, and so we were captivated.

    I hope that the new film will not be so much a remake as a new creative spin on the same general theme... but I have my doubts. (Now, if Lucas hijacked the project, injected some comedy relief in the form of a wisecrackin' RAM chip with a speech impediment ... PURE GOLD, BABY!)

    1. Re:Quit squeezing on past success. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "(Now, if Lucas hijacked the project, injected some comedy relief in the form of a wisecrackin' RAM chip with a speech impediment ... PURE GOLD, BABY!)"

      You don't remember the original TRON?

      He was called BIT.

      Yes Yes NO NO NO NO NO :-)

  53. Microsoft sponsored and approved! by Wrexs0ul · · Score: 2, Funny

    When the credits list Clippy as a co-star you know we're in trouble:

    "It looks like you're trying to stop the evil chess program, would you like to..."

    I wonder if he'll be voiced by the same guy that did Jar-Jar.

    -Matt

    --
    --- Need web hosting?
    1. Re:Microsoft sponsored and approved! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > When the credits list Clippy as a co-star you know we're in trouble:

      That would be Bit

      **YES**

  54. Yah, they should do Logan's Run by agent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yah, they should do Logan's Run
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0074812/
    Did APC samples images for one their videos?
    http://www.aperfectcircle.com/
    Peace.
    - Yoshimi (employee 0)
    http://www.downhillbattle.org/

    1. Re:Yah, they should do Logan's Run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      remake Logan's Run? That's just fucking stupid. Beyond stupid. "Let's take off these clothes to get warm!" Nice, uh, tits you have there. Killing people after they reach 30 or so? A stone that changes color with age? You almost need the cheesy effects of the original movie just to appreciate the crappiness of the story.

    2. Re:Yah, they should do Logan's Run by tylernt · · Score: 1

      "Nice, uh, tits you have there."

      What, you got full frontal nudity and you're complaining? WTF!

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
  55. Tron was crap. by bushboy · · Score: 1

    Sometimes nostalgia is crap.

    Tron was a really sh1te movie with a few nifty ideas - that was it. It was a sign of it's times, but was in no ways "revolutionary" - it was lame.

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
    1. Re:Tron was crap. by l4m3z0r · · Score: 1
      The trouble with your opinion is that you didn't really understand Tron. Tron was a movie about religion and just used the setting of inside a computer as a device to tell the story. It can basically be described as a tale of the coming of Jesus. Flint entering the computer is basically the birth of christ and his exploits including miracles end up freeing the minds of the programs.

      What made it truly interesting is that it hit on the idea that the creators don't have a uniformed plan, they were just doing something to get the job done and life was created by accident. We are supposed to take that to our own world and say, hey maybe god doesnt have a plan he/she is just doing whatever it takes to do something and we are inadvertantly created as a by product.

      As an atheist I don't agree with the assessment of the movie but the themes and quality of the underlying story is just downright amazing. As a movie buff I see that Tron told a story filled with imagery and very thoughtful dialogue if your willing to invest the time to analyze it.

    2. Re:Tron was crap. by edraven · · Score: 1

      You misspelled "Troll". HTH

    3. Re:Tron was crap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I certainly agree that the original movie left a lot to be desired. The plot was juvenile, at best. There were computers capable of better graphics than those in this movie at the time the movie was made.

      The storyline didn't make any sense, and needed a lot of work to make it believeable that anyone could get trapped inside a digital universe. The only things which may have saved it were the Disney name, and the fact that people weren't as computer savy.

      That Disney is considering a remake shows just how near the bottom of the barrel Disney is reaching in a frantic attempt to do something involving computer graphics, now that they no longer have a knowledgable partener.

      This one is definitely on my "don't see" list.

    4. Re:Tron was crap. by DLWormwood · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Tron was a movie about religion and just used the setting of inside a computer as a device to tell the story. It can basically be described as a tale of the coming of Jesus.

      You've nailed the underlying metaphor of the movie (the champion or messiah myth) almost spot on. There was a novelization of the movie released at that time that included more explict content related to the programs' religion. The only real difference between the user/program relationship and the god/worshipper relationship in Christianity is that Tron's world is explictly polytheistic. As such, a user is more of a "guardian angel" than a "god." This is actually closer to older forms of Judism that existed prior to Zorastranism, the ancient faith that heavily influenced the Christian duality of good and evil.

      Due to budgetary and technical constraints, the day-to-day life of programs in the Tron universe was only touched upon. The "live ones" that Flynn met in an online "city" was supposed to suggest the idea of a full-blown cyberciviliation that mirrored our own. The movie's producers even shot a bedroom love scene that had to be left out because it felt out of place given the superficial pacing of how the movie ended up. Also, the "derez" concept originally wasn't supposed to represent death per se, but resource deprevation, as the MCP drew most of the system's resources. Most programs had to do without energy and subroutines under the enforced "rationing." Flynn's absorbing of "red" energy from a warrior elite and the lighting up of the cyberworld at the very end of the film were a couple of the things remaining in the movie from this original concept.

      I better stop now; my geekiness over this movie is starting to frighten me.

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    5. Re:Tron was crap. by zeath · · Score: 1

      I better stop now; my geekiness over this movie is starting to frighten me.

      At least you picked a good movie to be geeky about instead of some engineered-for-a-blockbuster rehashed junk.

    6. Re:Tron was crap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've described the thing that makes TRON such a favorite for me; the fact that the film is deeper than it's superficial sci-fi plot. I was blown away by the special effects in the TRON 2.0 game, but very disappointed that the plot was so pedestrian and shallow.

      Hopefully, the writers have continued their philosophical journey in the film sequel. If they've stuck to the biblical milieu, it will be interesting to see which story they'll borrow from; I, for one, would be very entertained by the tale of a digital Samson.

  56. plugs by phyruxus · · Score: 3, Informative
    >>Plugs for Disney partners will be throughout

    You know the scene where Tron is on that boat-like thing that rides the laser? if you watch the landscape you can see a GIANT mickey mouse head outlined. It's bigger than the screen; it moves from right to left and it's a lighter blue than the ground. It's just a big circle with two smaller circles but it's definitely mickey's profile.

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
    1. Re:plugs by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      You know the scene where Tron is on that boat-like thing that rides the laser? if you watch the landscape you can see a GIANT mickey mouse head outlined. It's bigger than the screen; it moves from right to left and it's a lighter blue than the ground. It's just a big circle with two smaller circles but it's definitely mickey's profile.

      I bought the Aladin game for my Sega and it was littered with other Disney characters, like Sebastian the crab and Goofy worked into the background. It was kinda funny.

      It's pretty funny watching the Goonies, with the rather blatant Pepsi plug.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:plugs by Andrewkov · · Score: 3, Informative

      On the Tron DVD, the director mentions this in the commentatry, he did it on his own as a thank-you to Disney for making the movie, it's not like Disney told him to do it.

    3. Re:plugs by Zab+UvWxy · · Score: 1

      Kinda related.... there's one scene on the bridge of the carrier, when Sark goes to communicate with the MCP - you can see a display "war board".

      If you look closely, you can see Pac-Man.

      --
      "I don't get it." -- ObviousGuy
  57. Ouch! by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Funny

    The possibility for product placements is unimaginable.

    "Doc, I've been having big headaches ever since my computer tried to suck me in and I smacked into ZoneAlarm. I immediately turned around, phoned a Gateway rep, and while very helpful, said I should talk to Verizon about the rogue worm that sucks people into mainframes. I mean, you can only imagine if I'd ended up in a Windows 2003 cluster. Thank goodness Cisco routers stand as a line of defense between me and the electroworld, dominated by evil Open Source communists."

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  58. It will be a much more interesting story of by museumpeace · · Score: 1

    the then-vs-now for computer graphics animation than it will be as a movie per se. [it was hard to swallow then as a story] When I went to SigGraph in Boston in '82, it was more like a sci-fi con than a computing conference or trade show: young comp. graphics geeks all had tron on the brain and were very impressed withourselves despite how crude the technology was.
    in Pixar was pretty much a gleam in Ed Catmull's eye back then. Tron was a technicolor collage of animation from a whole zoo of hacked graphic engines and computers like the Foonlee, none of which could out-draw a low end NVIDIA product nowadays.
    But with the Disney-Pixar divorce, how are they going to draw this thing?

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
    1. Re:It will be a much more interesting story of by museumpeace · · Score: 1

      oops, that was the Foonly computer. But really it was a pdp10 on steriods...doing Tron helped drive the company out of business.

      --
      SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  59. Ugh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only way this could really be successful is if the new Tron has the Master Control Program (aka Disney) as te hero and the User (Jeff Bridges 2.0) as the bad guy. It would also be great if the movie release could coincide with the lauch of some new DRM law or something...

  60. A Little Part Of Me Has Died by Verveonica · · Score: 1

    Everytime I hear of a remake of some film I loved, a little part of me dies. I can only imagine that this is going to end up like the bastard lovechild of Hackers and The Matrix. However, with worse writing.

  61. Maybe they can add some cheezy singing and music! by paperclip2003 · · Score: 1

    They could really screw it up, which I am suprised they did not do in the first place. In real Disney style they could add: 1) Dancing and singing after every scene. 2) Little kid jokes and "potty" comedy. 3) Add some sort of Man saves Woman, like every other disney flick! (hmmmm.. I always wondered why there are so many disfunctional relationships) 4) Put lots of advertisments for Apple Computer and Coke throughout the movie in "discrete" places. I am sure the main character will probably be using a Sony Vaio or Apple Macintosh and be wearing a Coke t-shirt or you will see Coke containers on tables with the logo always towards the camera. 5) Microsoft could slip in an Advertisment for the X - Box, with X-Box live playing a Disney Game ;) Then they could finish junking it up by writing an awfull script and paying top name actors and actresses to play in a real stinker of a film. Eddie Murphy could play the computer hacker who gets sucked in, Making it a great film in the likes of Lawn Mower Man II. He could then tell bad jokes written by the best disney writers. Besides Pirates of the Carribean -- which I thought was a good film because of Jonny Depp -- Most modern films by Disney have not been too good IMHO.

  62. Whatever happened to Tron 2? by glrotate · · Score: 1

    I thought it was basically in the can.

  63. Spy Kids - yuck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really hope it doesn't end up being a Spy Kid-like movie.

  64. Re:Maybe they can add some cheezy singing and musi by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Funny

    And don't forget a heroine who's a)drop dead gorgeous, b) possessed of a massive rack, and c) has at least one dead parent.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  65. the other mouse by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was at the biggest computer graphics lab in the world (NYIT/Westbury) at the time Tron was announced, instantly making us #2. Though Disney produced only a few cumulative minutes of digital FX for the movie, they launched the "CGI" industry which has served them so well since. I'd love to see them repeat that watershed event. Let's see them do something in distributed rendering that puts Toy Story back in its box. Or a revolution in the front end for animators communicating with the machines, HCI that makes the mouse, and even the stylus/tablet, look like a 20th Century relic. C'mon, Mickey, let's get it on!

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  66. No, call it by tepples · · Score: 1

    Tron Revolutions? More like Tron Tron Revolution!

  67. TRON rules by Piewalker · · Score: 1

    Bring back Jeff Bridges. He may be up to doing more Tron stuff. He single-handedly redeemed the film anyway. He has had nothing but good things to say about his memories of making the film and added some great, interesting insight in the DVD interviews. www.JeffBridges.com is one of the most creative websites on the Internet by the way...nearly completely handwritten. Lisberger's original script is the most original screenplay I've ever read. A Tron remake would obviously stick to elements that made the orginal so interesting, but like any remake will undoubtedly make its own statement.

  68. But who better to remake it? by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 4, Funny

    The plot of Tron revolved around a monolithic corporate entity that absorbed intellectual property from sources all over the world, protected itself with a restrive and overpowered security model subject to hackers, destroyed the creative spirit of individuals, and twisted the vision of its creators to suit its own ends.

    If there's a studio more qualified than Disney to write that story, I don't know who it is.

  69. Re:Variety text by guidemaker · · Score: 1

    "We are contemporizing it, taking these ideas that were ahead of the curve and applying them to the present, and we feel the film now has a chance to resonate with a young audience."

    This is supposed to be a writer speaking?

  70. Oh there's a reason. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disney fired anyone who knew anything about storytelling.

  71. Which game appeals to modern kids? by ballista · · Score: 1
    "In a lot of ways, ('Tron') was a movie about a man venturing into hell. Our job will be to keep the humanity as he ventures into an unreal world."

    So which computer game is it, Doom or Unreal?

  72. I wish they ... by zoftie · · Score: 1

    Have homer in 3d space instead of whoever plays the game. but that wouldn't be too serious would it? well at least i have tried.
    2c

  73. No remake. by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, they should pick up off the story line and continue to develope what happens with the technology. I think how the video game Tron 2.0 did. Later years, Alen's kid gets trapped inside. That should be whats done. This will allow new ideas to flurish a bit and also give a sense of how complex things are inside the computer with special effects magic.

    Some possible ideas:

    * Worms and virii killing programs. OOoh gory effects but all electronic.

    * Internet travel.

    * Perhaps teach actual things in how a computer works but make it more exciting (Yeah I know.)

    * Technology developes further but goes out of control spilling in to the real world. (Way out there but still a neat idea.)

    Also what operating system will they base things off of? The video game was strongly DOS'ish in it's references at times with security programs battle crying for the C drive. The movie seemed like a custom os'sh in a way.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  74. Why? by BishopBerkeley · · Score: 1

    Why?

    --
    "...who search the reason of things
    Are those who bring the most sorrow on themselves." --Euripides, The Medea
  75. Didn't you read the leaked memo? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    In October of 1989, the screenwriter's guild sent out a secret memo stating that the last new movie idea had been written and used in a low budget action comedy starring Rick James and Abe Vigoda. Once the internet craze took off in the mid-90s, a scanned copy of it was posted on usenet, and from there, the world read about it. I suppose they could be wrong, but even so, they're the ones writing our movies, and if they believe it's true, well, then it is.

  76. And as MCP . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Robin Williams. Well, it is Disney and I'm sure someone there will be tempted do have the MCP in this version be like an evil version of the genie in Aladdin.

  77. Yeah - MST3K Material by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Interesting
    But, if there's a new one, I want to be the first to make a costume!

    BTW: Great job, guys.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:Yeah - MST3K Material by mockchoi · · Score: 1

      Dear lord, that was painful.

    2. Re:Yeah - MST3K Material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of those pictures (see costume link) are almost as obscene as the goatse pics. Well, not quite, but ick.

    3. Re:Yeah - MST3K Material by pizen · · Score: 1

      If I never see another fat guy in a unitard it will be too soon.

  78. Disney? by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    I thought for sure you were going to say Microsoft. I think it would be more apropos. Besides, ENCOM is pretty close spelling-wise to ENRON.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  79. Disney could do geek humour, back then by Andy_R · · Score: 1

    "Fetch the Logic Probe!" - Sark

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  80. MOD UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've done this before for Variety, works fine. They must just grep for the string googlebot (case insensitive) because that works fine.

    Use the Firefox User Agent Switcher...

  81. Not for kids -- for adults by chiph · · Score: 2, Insightful

    and we feel the film now has a chance to resonate with a young audience."

    Danger, Will Robinson!

    Brian Klugman, if you're lurking, take a page from the Pixar notebook, and write a movie that will appeal to adults. The kids will get it, really. They're a lot smarter than most people in Hollywood give them credit for.

    Chip H.

    1. Re:Not for kids -- for adults by deacon · · Score: 1
      ...and write a movie that will appeal to adults. The kids will get it, really. They're a lot smarter than most people in Hollywood give them credit for.

      Actually, the kids are a lot smarter than most people in Hollywood, period.

      What next, a remake of Casablanca where Bogart decides that Claude Raines has the moral right to stop Ingrid Bergman and Paul Henreid from getting on the plane to Lisbon? Or maybe the new version will show the common-sense benefits of gun control: Bogart won't have a gun to shoot Conrad Veidt with at the end, and the "heros" of the movie get sent back to the camps.

      Bleh.

  82. Pefect for a SQL NOT a remake by Danathar · · Score: 1

    A sequal would be MUCH better than a remake. If the original guy who did Tron 1 is not involved I would imagine we'll see a cheap rip off.

  83. I thought they did this by deadline · · Score: 1
    Wasn't there a move about people entering a computer called The Matrix or something?

    Now when they make "Old Yeller and the Black Hole" then I'll get excited.

    --
    HPC for Primates. Read Cluster Monkey
  84. Holy Crap, I've just the best idea ever! by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    Let's us all pool our moneys together and remake Citizen Kane!
    Come on, who's with me?

    Just imagine what we could do with all all the special effects of nowdays, AND make it in color!!!

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  85. A Simple Bit of Disney Flame by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1, Funny

    How dazzlingly creative. Someone else decides to twist an 80's classic (Battlestar Galactica) into cheap, 15 year old D&D addict eye candy, so now Disney feels envious and does the same. We're not talking about making the MCP throw the frisbee first here, like the typical George Lucas devilry. We're talking about having Ben Affleck play Flynn. I never thought Tron was a great movie, and the stupid nerd humor is annoying, but there's no chance at all that Disney can fix the past by letting some new screenwriter whose experience with computers includes Word and Outlook re-write the movie. Have you people forgotten already what happened to Planet of the Apes?

    1. Re:A Simple Bit of Disney Flame by autophile · · Score: 1
      I never thought Tron was a great movie, and the stupid nerd humor is annoying...

      When Tron first came out, I thought it was fun. How many other computer-related movies were there at the time (hint for reply: list of early 80's computer films)? I guess I'm just a stupid nerd! :)

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    2. Re:A Simple Bit of Disney Flame by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      Good point. I meant I find it annoying now. I was born the year it came out, so a lot of the jokes had probably just become cliche.

  86. Remake not needed! by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    I think TRON looks perfect the way it is. The old-school hand-shaded computer graphics look awesome. It's the first thing I think of when someone says "CGI." If they are smart they'll keep the look just as they kept it with the new video game.

    My favorite scene is at the end when the helicopter takes off above the lit-up city and the whole thing turns into a circuit-board looking schematic. I still have a thing for looking at cities at night out of tall buildings :)

    (Best view: Bathroom at the Signature Lounge, top of the Hancock building in Chicago)

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    1. Re:Remake not needed! by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      There's nothing hand-shaded about Tron's graphics. Either is was generated by III/Digital/etc and was flat shaded polygons (bit, light sailer, Sark's carrier), or it was raytracing + CSG generated by MAGI (tank, recognizer, lightcycles, all complex action scenes).

      And my favorite thing is the end credits music :)

  87. Tron 2.0. Starring..... by Bucky_the_AV_Guy · · Score: 1

    TRON-GUY

    I hope they give him a part - he already has his own costume....

  88. Flat and simplistic movie by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

    I never saw it when it came out. I played the games, but never saw the movie. I finally watched it a few years ago, and, wow, was it awful. Almost unwatchable. It's not the tech that dates it; the tech has a pleasnt retro-feel ot it. But the movie itself is horrendous: disjointed, simplistic, wooden acting, random plot, too much faux techno-babble. Ugh.

  89. The new Tron story by acb · · Score: 4, Funny

    In the new Tron, the Master Control Program is the good guy, and is besieged by shadowy terrorist pirates who wish to destroy it and replace its rights-management regime with open-source communism.

  90. Not man into hell, but god into earth. by Pike · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "In a lot of ways, ('Tron') was a movie about a man venturing into hell. Our job will be to keep the humanity as he ventures into an unreal world."

    Actually, in many more ways it was a movie about a god venturing incarnate into the world.

    "Do you believe in the users?"

    "Of course! I mean, if there are no users, then...who wrote me?"

    The oh-so transparent metaphors of atheism versus belief in a higher power are draped all over the movie.

    1. Re:Not man into hell, but god into earth. by Life2Short · · Score: 1

      That's a good point, but couldn't you also suggest that the metaphor was a belief in a "greater" or "common" good rather than a higher power? "Belief in the users" could be a vehicle for reminding us that technology should serve us, rather than allowing ourselves to be enslaved by our technology (or enslaved by the corporations/governments who yield such technologies). But then again, I don't own a cell phone, so I could be way off base here.

    2. Re:Not man into hell, but god into earth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then... who wrote me

      If programs had human like characatures, I'd imagine outlook express would look something like this

  91. Am I the only one... by ari_j · · Score: 1

    Am I the only Slashdotter who has never seen more than 5 minutes of Tron? I went to college in the first town nuked in Wargames, but I haven't seen enough of Tron to even know whether it has a plot, much less what that might be. In fact, I've seen more cumulative time of Family Guy spoofs of Tron than I have of the movie itself. Tell me I'm not alone!

    1. Re:Am I the only one... by canofbutter · · Score: 1

      Tron has no plot, it's just a bunch of idiots in unitards running around to show how stupid they can look (I'll admit, I've seen more than 5 minutes, so you're probably all alone; it was shown after an ACM meeting recently, so in the area to which you refer, likely very alone).

  92. Nope by Skiron · · Score: 0

    I saw on TV the author (Stephen Lisberger) talking about it at the time of release.

    The closest I can find on the web is this:

    "AM: The computer images in TRON were generated on a Visual Display Unit?

    SL: Yeah, well they were generated on a CRT. What happens is that we lay in the blue prints using two different systems. On one we lay in the blue prints by byte pad and a cursor and the blue prints are traced into the computer which understands things in x, y, z space. You give it multiple tracings and it constructs the things in wire frame and on top of this you have programmes, algorithms for laying in, covering the surfaces with polygons and then you determine the point of view, and positioning, and light source, and then you can actually get the computer to show you the object or the environment from whichever angle you want to see it. The computer gives you back what its calculations represent on a high-resolution CRT, a little TV, and then you film off one frame at a time using a motion picture camera. The other system we used is exactly the same in the whole second half but up front it's different because, instead of tracing objects, you construct objects by combining sunprogrammes for geometrical shapes. It's as if you have building blocks which can be put together additively or subtractively in the computer and the shapes then become whole programmes. Then the computer goes through all the same things with the position and so on."


    which shows where he got the name from (lot's of tron and troff when doing it, I bet).

    Found here: http://www.tron-sector.com/articles/article.aspx?I D=132

    1. Re:Nope by jbucher · · Score: 1

      Lisberger is talking about creating 3D objects by tracing a drawing. The tron command was used to debug programs. The tron command has nothing to do with what he is describing.

    2. Re:Nope by MalachiConstant · · Score: 1
      This isn't terribly important or anything, but I have no life so I googled it.

      According to the IMDB trivia page for TRON:

      Many people have claimed over the years that the title/character's name is a reference to a computer command. Steven Lisberger, however, has made it clear in interview after interview that he got the name from "Electronic", and didn't even know about the commands until some time later. Interestingly enough, the BASIC command Tron serves a similar function to the Tron Program in the movie.

      And according to this chat transcript with the writer:

      Jason7 asks "how did you come up with the name TRON???"

      StevenLisberger says "The whole project came out of an electric warrior that was really the genesis. At the time my company was called Lisberger Studios and we did animation. I was thinking it's best if you come up with your own Mickey Mouse, some character. The idea was to come up with a character made out of light and one of our designer/animators, John Norton designed this warrior who was made up of neon .. looked like neon."

      StevenLisberger says "And, he looked electronic and from that came Tron. Some people think it has to do with trace on .. and that's not it ... it was from electronic. And, we nicknamed him that and it's strange, once that footage existed it was alive and couldn't be stopped. Here's this interesting character where do we put him? And, it made sense to put him in an electronic dimension. One thing lead to another."

      So there. :)

  93. Tron 2 already exists... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Informative

    in videogame form, which is slightly ironic. Its one of the best games I've played (although a tad difficult) on the PC and easily the best looking game I've played.

    The game is over a year old, so new video cards can easily handle it 1600x800.

    The game has a decent story and lots of Tron nostalgia. To me, the sequel will have to compare to the game more than the first movie.

    1. Re:Tron 2 already exists... by usrusr · · Score: 1

      if they did a remake of the game, same story (sequels -or addon packs- usually jump through many hoops to get any justification for their story, this is always painful for the consumer, just start the story anew), same engine if they like, only new levels to avoid replay boredom... yeah, that's be it, i'd instantly buy it (and wait for the next reincarnation a month later :)

      --
      [i have an opinion and i am not afraid to use it]
    2. Re:Tron 2 already exists... by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1

      Too bad the ending was so lame. I enjoyed it otherwise. They left a few too many things dangling for a sequel, I suppose.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  94. Re:Variety text by Everleet · · Score: 1
    "In a lot of ways, ('Tron') was a movie about a man venturing into hell. Our job will be to keep the humanity as he ventures into an unreal world."

    Disney loves to keep it real. Real dumb.

    --
    It's tragic. Laugh.
  95. Disney seems to plan bad movies.. by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    They seem to purposely make *the worst* sequels EVER ("Jaws" series not withstanding) and then when the piles of cow poop don't sell, they blame internet piracy.

    Alanis Morrisette seemed to have the same idea - make a crappy album and then blame the internet when nobody bought it.

    Disney loves to make sequels. they're still foaming at the mouth about the chance to make Toy Story III...

    1. Re:Disney seems to plan bad movies.. by chrish · · Score: 1

      I saw a trailer for "Mulan II" the other day. Steaming pile...

      Seriously, they've lost whatever creativity they ever had. They're simply going through their back catalogue looking for everything they haven't done a sequal for.

      I'm waiting for "Bambi II - The Revenge".

      --
      - chrish
    2. Re:Disney seems to plan bad movies.. by MegaFur · · Score: 1

      And, of course, they also like it when they can get someone to get Congress to make revisions to copyright law to allow them to keep making money off The Mouse.

      --
      Furry cows moo and decompress.
  96. the other mouse-Draw with a LISP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Foonly F1 was used in the making of TRON and Flight of the Navigator.

    Lisp machines have played a part in the making of some movies.

    "
    Many of the people who worked at III (off the top of my head - Larry Malone, Craig Reynolds, Dave Dyer, Barton Gawboy, and a few others I can't remember) went on to work at Symbolics, most of them on the S-Graphics products. Particularly noteworthy is Larry Malone's S-Geometry. He modeled all the ships in TRON using his own polygon-based software, which was pretty revolutionary back then (to contrast, the light cycles were made using parametrically defined curves, which has been the standard technique in movies up until just a few years ago, and is now starting to be replaced by the polygon approach). I believe S-Geometry was the first 3d package to use subdivison surfaces as well."

    http://lemonodor.com/archives/000103.html

    Many of the shorts produced in "The Minds Eye"* were produced on Symbolics (LISP) Machines.

    *Does anyone know if this is available on DVD?

  97. Sometimes you need a little piracy by tepples · · Score: 1

    I'm not watching pirate porn unless it's got Johnny Depp in it.

  98. Ugh, Not another remake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one am sad to see that Disney is so lacking
    in talent and creativity that they can only exist by making cheap and sleazy knockoffs of things they did in the 50's and 60's. The formula seems to be, take a 50's picture, add a bit of crude language, and a bit of sleaze and re-release it as a "hit". The sooner they get a new CEO the better. I miss Walt.

  99. Starring Jay Maynard? by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

    Please, oh please, have it be a comedy starring Jay Maynard!!!

  100. With "talent" like this, it has to be good by jalefkowit · · Score: 2, Informative

    I saw the names of the two writers credited with getting the screenplay gig, and figured I would look them up in IMDB to see what else they have written. That ought to be a pretty good predictor of what to expect, right?

    Well, here's the results:

    • Brian Klugman is an actor with mostly TV credits. He has exactly one screenplay credit: "Warrior", a perfectly awful-sounding historical war movie which isn't even due to be released until next year.
    • Lee Sternthal has no credits at all -- writing, acting, nothing. Oh wait, except for "Warrior", which he co-wrote with Klugman. So that's a big total of one.

    So Disney is hiring two writers with practically no experience to work on a property that has been dead for 20+ years. My guess is that you should not expect the finished product to rival the LoTR trilogy :-)

    1. Re:With "talent" like this, it has to be good by kisrael · · Score: 1

      My guess is that you should not expect the finished product to rival the LoTR trilogy :-)

      Yeah...I mean "Meet the Feebles" set such a good precendent...

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  101. Houston, we have a problem. by tepples · · Score: 1

    Well it could be worse: Ocean's 13

  102. I can see it by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    Our hero Flynn has just released his disk to cut-off the MCP, when just before it gets there it gets B.S.O.D.ed and returns a divide by 0 error.

    Better luck in another 15 years Flynn.

    End of line...

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  103. Poor choice for a remake-"Rocky" Road. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sequels to cult movies aren't guaranteed successes anyway; what about the sequel to 2001, 2010? That flopped."

    I'm waiting for the sequal to "The Rocky Horror Picture Show".

    1. Re:Poor choice for a remake-"Rocky" Road. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for the sequal to "The Rocky Horror Picture Show".

      I understand that there is some sort of pseudo-sequel called "Shock Treatment", which will be on IMDB, but I've never seen it.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:Poor choice for a remake-"Rocky" Road. by jspectre · · Score: 1

      there was actually a sequel and another sequel that wasn't made. Shock Treatment and "Revenge of the Old Queen".

      --

      abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

    3. Re:Poor choice for a remake-"Rocky" Road. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Shock Treatment"

      I've seen it... Completely forgettable, especially the songs (which, imo, was one of the strong points of Rocky, aside from the audience). I rented it at an obscure movie house and afterwards realized why I hadn't heard much buzz about it by the Rocky crowd.

    4. Re:Poor choice for a remake-"Rocky" Road. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Shock Treatment" I've seen it... Completely forgettable, especially the songs (which, imo, was one of the strong points of Rocky

      Rocky had songs in it? I haven't seen that version.

      What's Sylvester Stallone's singing like? Does he sing while he's fighting his opponent?

      , aside from the audience). I rented it at an obscure movie house and afterwards realized why I hadn't heard much buzz about it by the Rocky crowd.

      They're probably too busy waiting for Rocky VI: Rocky Sings the Words of 'Eye of the Tiger' to the Great Showtunes.

  104. First 5 minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So in the first 5 minutes we will see the tron guys mom be killed by someone evil?

  105. Tron + LSD = Weird by HouseOfMisterE · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The first time that I saw Tron, I was on four hits of acid, the movie was recorded on a tape at LP (4 hour) speed, and the VCR only played SP (2 hour) speed. That was a crazy night...

  106. Lets hope this isn't a 2 hour long Microsoft add by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Back in the 80s there was a Movie with Fred Savage called "The Wizard" Based off of Pinball Wizard. Now a new Tron movie made into a 2 hour long Microsoft Comerical. Arrrrgggg!!

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  107. the good news is.... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    that they can't make it worse than the original.

  108. They *are* doing Logan's Run by McSpew · · Score: 1

    Yah, they should do Logan's Run

    It no longer has an entry on IMDB, but a remake of Logan's Run is still in the works for X-Men director Bryan Singer. See this interview on Ain't It Cool News. He's planning to do Logan's Run after Superman Returns

  109. "You got spline in my bresenham!" by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    While they're at it, Disney could come up with revolutionary front-ends to harness powerful LISP processors, so we don't have to wallow in "bubble bath" to use the power and expressiveness.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  110. Remakes by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

    Of course because Disney is involved everyone is a little worried, and I don't blame them, but I think that a good remake can be done.

    Witness the recent remake of Battlestar Galactica and how nearly everyone who has seen it says that they are doing a killer job.

    I don't doubt that doing justice to Tron will be hard but I've got more faith in this project than what is going to be come of Hitchhikers.

    --

    Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
  111. You can't remake a classic. by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    In other news, Disney and the rest of the film industry has run out of ideas and is remaking all films. Does that mean this story is a dupe?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  112. I wonder.. by handmedowns · · Score: 1

    If it will be nearly as successful as the re-release of Aladdin! or.. Beauty and the Beast!! or.. Little Mermaid!!

    Disney is such a crap company.. 90% of their movies are screen-write of a well known fairy-tale, and the others that aren't were done with and mostly by Pixar..

    The day Disney consitantly shows creativity and innovation is the day I'll pay attention to them..

    --
    The road between democracy and tyranny is paved with secrecy in the name of security.
  113. Tron for IntelliVision was awesome. by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    As a seven year old fascinated by the new rage of computers and technology, I thought Tron for my Intellivision was awesome.

    Back then it was cool to be smart. If you knew computers you were The Man.

    It just isn't the same anymore after being dumbed down to the point that the clueless masses are clogging up the Internet.

    I think they should make this movie realistic and reflect technology in modern times. They should stick to the plot of the first movie and re-shoot it scene for scene, but add tens of thousands of extras who do nothing but get in the way of the camera, walk around each scene and get in the actors' way. Oh, and have the motorcycle scene congested with traffic and have some of extras driving the wrong way with "AOL" emblazoned on the side of their bikes.

  114. You can't "remake" a work of art by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just like you can't "remake" the mona lisa into something better, just because acrylic paint came out, you can't "remake" TRON just because technology got better.

    "Sternthal told the trade paper that the new conceit is that the computer programmer gets trapped in a cyberworld, so that the film can utilize the Internet."

    That's not TRON. That has nothing to do with the movie TRON. If they call it TRON, they're retarded.

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:You can't "remake" a work of art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they call it TRON, they're retarded.

      They're Disney.

  115. Thanks for the reck by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    For a semi-amusing look at another anthropomorphized computer-themed show, check out an anime called "Buttobi CPU", known in the American market as "I Dream Of Mimi". The bad guys are all Nacintosh computers, the good guys being... some Japanese brand. Did I mention the computers are all hot chicks who get naked a lot and have interesting ways of "interfacing" and getting "upgraded", amongst themselves and their masters?

    Ok, it's on order. :-) Thanks for the reck.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Thanks for the reck by cryptochrome · · Score: 1

      Dude, cheesy movies are why video stores were invented. I rented it on a whim off NetFlix.

      --

      ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    2. Re:Thanks for the reck by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Dude, cheesy movies are why video stores were invented. I rented it on a whim off NetFlix.

      A DVD won't fit in my puny PO box and I'll have to retrieve at the counter during business hours, during which I'm usually 40 miles away.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  116. Walt Disney would be rolling over in his grave ... by ConsciousObjector · · Score: 1

    If only he weren't cryogenically frozen under Disneyworld.
    In all seriousness, Disney is in serious financial trouble, and deserves to be. Its last few animated features have been massive flops, so it decided to close down its in-house animation studios (as shocking as IBM selling off their PC division) and contract out. Its only recent hits have been from Pixar, and their exclusivity contract is close to over.
    I am announcing that the Disney Corporation is dead and dying. Remaking a movie that made sense AT THE TIME IT WAS MADE two decades letter is a miserable idea. The Tron 2.0 PC game was a bad idea too, but poor PC translations of movies are somehow the norm and accepted.

  117. It was good then, it sucks now. by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    It simply wasn't timeless like some movies. It was very good when it came out. But it was timely, and when it's time passed, it well... sucked. Not taking nostagia into consideration, which makes many lame things seem nice.

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
  118. AWESOME!! by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the links to the WOTW trailers.

    I tried (briefly)looking for them a while ago, but couldn't find them.

    I'm so excited about this movie, and I hope it receives a good recepcion in US, so people will finally see that a good movie can be made without Spielberg and Cruise.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  119. unusual amount of remakes, sequels, comic books, by walterbyrd · · Score: 2, Informative

    cartoons, and children books?

    Looks at what hollywood is churning out:

    - fat albert
    - fantastic four
    - electra
    - charly and the choclet factory
    - harry potter
    - flight of the phoenix
    - lord of the rings (?)
    - starwars (okay, prequel)
    - another spiderman
    - another batman
    - another blade
    - meet the fockers
    - polar express
    - lemony snickets
    - ocean's twelve
    - I Robot (?)

    Hardly a new idea anywhere. I guess there are a few original ideas, but there does seem to be a lot of re-hashing of old ideas.

  120. What a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tron was a crap movie that just happened to come out at the right time to be 'special' ... I sincerely doubt a remake will be profitable, with the special factor gone, we're left with a crap premise.

  121. A bit of advice by eomnimedia · · Score: 1

    "No no no no no no no"
    -Bit

  122. GO AHEAD! I DONT WANT YOUR STUPID POINTS ANYWAY!!! by MrMuskOx · · Score: 0

    caps troll caps troll caps troll

  123. Re:Maybe they can add some cheezy singing and musi by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Excuse me if I'm wrong, but no Disney heroine has a massive rack.
    Jasmine had a handful at best. Not that they're real.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  124. Hooooooo-boy. by Corellon+Larethian · · Score: 1

    That writer's guild strike must be hitting them harder than I thought.

    What if they, like, didn't use someone in the guild? I mean, what if they just read a script and decided for themselves if it was good or bad.

    Risk money to make money?

    Hunh?

  125. New lease on life for this guy! by laetus · · Score: 1


    The Tronguy!

    --

    "We're sorry, but the website you're trying to reach has been disconnected."
  126. I hope they have tron guy in it! by category_five · · Score: 1

    http://www.tron-sector.com/images/troncostl.jpg

  127. Re:GO AHEAD! I DONT WANT YOUR STUPID POINTS ANYWAY by MrMuskOx · · Score: 0

    by the way microsoft is the greatest company ever!

  128. Re:Variety text by Stanistani · · Score: 0

    "contemporizing"

    Blecch.

    If you're going to rape a word, apologize afterwards.

  129. Appropriate Simpsons Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Homer: Did anyone see that movie "Tron"?

    Marge: No
    Bart: No
    Wiggum: No
    Patty: No
    Lisa: No
    Selma: No
    Wiggum: Yes....I mean no... no.

  130. Multi-processor Tron by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Maybe they can remake it in a multi-processor Tron. That way there can be something for everybody.

    Of course, this will give rise to the "Imagine a Beowolf cluster of..." posts.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  131. Tron can't be replicated by petsounds · · Score: 1

    This is a ridiculous idea, though not surprising considering how desperate Disney is for a new hit in their post-Pixar world. Few of the special effects in Tron were actually computer generated. Instead a special process was developed and was all applied by hand to each frame of the film (using an army of Chinese workers.. an early example of outsourcing). The end result was beautiful and could not be easily replicated today. Story and bad acting aside, this is one of the most beautiful films out there, and I just know they're going to turn it into a lackluster parade of CG. And something tells me Moebius won't be on-board this time to provide amazing art direction.

    Check out the Tron DVD, there's a lot of fascinating information about its unique production. It's also interesting to see how vastly Disney as a corporate culture has changed in 20 years, from a company that encouraged innovation, to a company that inhibits it.

  132. Jeff Bridges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Aint-it-cool-news reported that in the remake Jeff Bridges's character will seeking for proof in the existence of global warming instead of "users". Standing in his way are swarms of intelligent agents, viruses, trojan horses, malicious ActiveX scripts, and other evil programs developed and uploaded by oil companies, the Every Life is Precious Foundation, and Karl Rove.

  133. TRON Revisited!!! by luxuryluke · · Score: 1

    Alternate movie titles:

    TRON Unleashed

    Return of Tron

    TRON: CPU Strikes Back

    TRON .9b (The Beta Prequels)

    TRONS: The Bits Are Back!

    iTron: The Movie (marketed by Pixar sister company)

    OST: "TRON: Bits' Brew" (posthumous soundtrack by Miles Davis)

    7R0|\|

    PSYNC (or how Disn3y plans to make more of the same, just worse)

    --
    --- Das einzige, das wir zu fürchten haben, ist die Furcht selbst. ...so drink a bier and relax!
  134. Ugh... by fatmonkeyboy · · Score: 1

    Just because they did a terrible job the first time does NOT mean they should try again.

  135. Out of ideas? by Piquan · · Score: 1

    So, what, is Disney finding the public domain well starting to get a bit dry, and they have to dip into their own stories?

    Computers had a lot different feel in the early 80s, and Tron really did hook into that feel. I don't see it working today.

    1. Re:Out of ideas? by Animats · · Score: 1
      There does seem to be a major idea shortage at Mauschwitz, as Disney Animation in Burbank is known in the industry. Disney is currently shippping The Lion King 1.5, Mary Poppins, the rerelease, and Young Black Stallion.

      Coming up, Mulan 2, another Pokemon movie, another ice skating movie, another Pooh movie, Bambi Special Edition, Aladdin II and III Collection, a remake of "Kindergarten Cop" with Vin Diesel, and all the Disney princess movies in one box. Not a new idea in a carload.

  136. Re:Maybe they can add some cheezy singing and musi by autophile · · Score: 1
    And don't forget a heroine who's a)drop dead gorgeous, b) possessed of a massive rack, and c) has at least one dead parent.

    Cue nerd humor.

    Except the MCP hasn't cleaned up dead processes yet, so the dead parents are zombies!

    --Rob

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
  137. On 'taste' by 87C751 · · Score: 1
    "Opions vary" == "Road House"? You obviously have no taste.
    "Opinions vary" is the most memorable quote from the Dalton character. "Road House" is the movie equivalent of the "annoying pop song stuck in head" effect.

    Or, to put it another way, opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one, and some stink worse than others.

    So... what you meant to say was that I don't share your taste. That's a feature, not a bug.

    --
    Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
    1. Re:On 'taste' by scotch · · Score: 1
      I thought the saying went something like:

      "Opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one, but the goatse guy has the biggest one around."

      --
      XML causes global warming.
  138. Who would have thought by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    After this and this.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  139. Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Along with the usual viruses, etc as bad guys, I'm sure they'll find some way to turn this into 105-minute infomercial on the evils of software piracy/copyright theft.

    "that's the shared directory. only virii live there. avoid it at all costs."

    Will they go so far as to try making the big, evil corporation computer into the good guy?

  140. If this remake is directed by... by TwoPumpChump · · Score: 1

    If the remake is directed by...

    M Night Shyamalan:
    *You find out in the end the main hero was in the computer ALL ALONG
    *The bad guys in the story are weak vs. water, which COVERS 75% OF THE EARTH'S SURFACE for pete's sake.
    *Protagonist sees webpages where the rest of sees 503 Forbidden's.

    Ok, now your turn. Post what-ifs if directed by your fav director.

  141. Maybe as a comedy... by X86Daddy · · Score: 1

    ... like American Psycho. :-) Set it in the '80s. Seriously though, if they set it in the same time period and made occasional remarks about what's technologically "impossible" or things that never happened but were expected "in the '90s," it could be fun.

    If they try to go action / adventure with this, I see it in the $5 bin at WalMart a few months after the release.

  142. *please* no matrix inspired super-kungfu fights. by nostromo.operator · · Score: 0

    Here is my guess as to the lameness that will be Tron 2.0 ....

    -Oversaturated and fakey-looking CGI.

    -super extreme soundtrack w/ extreme rock and rockin hiphop in lieu of the classic score by Wendy Carlos.

    -super extreme battle fung-fu inspired by the matrix series in place of elements of adventure + wonder.

    Viola! more disney crap.

  143. Why bother? Anyone geeky enough to watch it will by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    ...think the older one was better.

  144. Rerun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    South Park already did this...

  145. Because it would be Bible 2 by Dr.Knackerator · · Score: 1

    Flynn = Jesus

    so making a sequel would be a bit like making a sequel to the bible

  146. I know I'll be shot for this, but.... by xpeeblix · · Score: 1

    ..I think, "The Black Hole" is a much better candidate for a remake. Only, please, don't let Disney do it.

    Wouldn't it be cool if Ridley Scott did it?

  147. REMAKE?? What about....Tron 2.0?? by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    I would detest a remake. I would rather see a version 2.0. Now that the system is open within itself and through the modem towers, how does it react when it's then connected to the Internet? Can you tell when your a program and you move from a slower system to a faster system? What's it like to be a program on Bit Torrent? But remaking? I don't know.

    --

    Gorkman

  148. Hell, the MCP *was* Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets see:

    1) The MCP was a bloated resource-hogging program that acted like an OS even though it couldn't stop unprivledged programs from accessing the hardware directly.

    2) The MCP copied and incorporated independant application programs into itself before destroying them.

    3) The MCP's enemy was TRON, a security program whose developer was repremanded for not bundling it into the MCP.

    4) A buffer overflow in a game gave three processes unrestricted access to the whole system.

    5) The MCP attempted to protect itself by allowing one process to suck up all available system resources and grow to unmanageable proportions.

    6) File recognizers frequently crashed, corrupting the system.

    7) Users were not permitted to interact with the programs they were running.

    8) The company server was infested with viruses.

    9) According to Dillenger and the MCP, the company existed solely for the benefit of the MCP, all other concerns were secondary.

    10) Once the MCP was removed, system performance returned to normal.

  149. Casting... by teneighty · · Score: 1

    I hereby nominate Jay Maynard for the lead role.

    Of course, that would guarantee that the remake would have an R rating...

  150. IBM vs TRON by luxuryluke · · Score: 1

    IBM vs TRON (the clone wars)

    --
    --- Das einzige, das wir zu fürchten haben, ist die Furcht selbst. ...so drink a bier and relax!
  151. Qubit by shockbeton · · Score: 1

    I hope "Bit" is a qubit this time around. Wait. What will his answers be? Instead of "yes" or "no," can we expect a statement of probability? Maybe they'll dumb it down a bit (har) and have all Qubit's answers be "maybe."

  152. Disney's version will be propaganda by gearmonger · · Score: 1
    My guess is that the hero of the story will be DRM of some kind and that the evil entities will be hacker/cracker programs trying to steal away the DRM's friendly, fur-covered friends (i.e., Disney content) and sell them on the sex slave black market.

    Or maybe it will just have fancy lightcycles again.

  153. Another Toy Story 3? by BorisSkratchunkov · · Score: 1

    Perhaps Disney is just doing this as another crappy remake of a classic to be released solely on home video.......I dunno. They could probably just force the "Land Before Time" plot and the "Tron" plot to converge and digitize Littlefoot in a vain effort to battle the MCP. Seriously, however, I question if Disney is really going to turn out with anything fresh in the next couple of years. All that they seem to be doing is making crappy re-makes or sequels to concepts that they dreamed up ten or twenty years ago (although most of their famous cartoons are folk stories that were dreamt up millions of years ago).

  154. Lemmie Guess by kjots · · Score: 1

    They've replaced all the guns with walkie talkies?

    Oh ... wait ... never mind.

  155. "You got spline in my bresenham!"-Brackets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "While they're at it, Disney could come up with revolutionary front-ends to harness powerful LISP processors..."

    Hehe. What powerful LISP processors?* There hasn't been a dedicated LISP processor in over two decades. Even the Alpha is dead (OpenGenera). It's all "commodity" processors now, and while those work for small scale LISP implimentations. Doing enterprise stuff would tax even them (Yes I know about Orbitz. They had to cheat a little to get things to work. And Yahoo Store is changing to PHP I believe).

    *Yes I'm currently evaluation a good "commodity" processor". The MIPS line looks good so far.

    1. Re:"You got spline in my bresenham!"-Brackets. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I can weasel around a little, because I meant "power" as in "powerfully expressive". But I also (therefore) meant "powerfully efficient", as our graphics processing paradigms are structured as lists and operations on them. So I'd like to see a useful front-end justify a *fast* LISP processor developed for graphics. I'm a big fan of HCI generating code, parseable by inverse HCI and lexical analysis tools. I'd prefer a world of flowcharts compiled (via LISP p-code) to FPGA netlists, but I've been in the business too long.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  156. How about a movie version of True Names? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    You know what'd be crazy ?

    A new movie. Like with new ideas. That'd be crazy.


    Or perhaps better yet, a movie version of an old but precient and still topical story.

    Like, for instance, Vernor Vinge's _True Names_?

    Now THERE's a cyberspace masterpiece. (And unless I'm mistaken it's the FIRST cyberspace masterpiece.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  157. changing the story a bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sounds like they're changing the story a bit

    Of course they are. The original Tron didn't feature the uber profitable franchise featuring the lovely Disney Princesses.

    Cinderella: "Kiss me, you animatronic Adonis!"

    Sleeping Beauty: "No, kiss me!"

    Little Mermaid Ariel: (silence, on account of having her voice put in a locket) Wink, wink, wiggle.

    Belle: "My boyfriend's back, and he's gonna kick your ass!"

    Jasmine: "Your boyfriend is a freak."

    (Catfight ensues. The genie teleports all the princesses inside a computer game, where they participate in gladitorial combat. Sleeping Beauty surprisingly emerges the victor (turns out the dwarves were the sysadmins). She emerges from the game to sign a cross licensing agreement with Fox to promote a new crossover fantasy/reality show: The Bachelorette Princess. She happily scrubs floors, darn socks, and other menial housework for the Princely contestants. The first contestant to ask her to stop groveling will win.)

  158. Not remake; sequel by Spoonito · · Score: 1

    Produced by Steven Lisberger: writter/director of the original movie. It's a sequel (development title is Tron 2.0) Lisberger is writing the current (third) draft of the screenplay.

    --
    "show me all the blueprint show me all the blueprint show me all the blueprints"
  159. You can still watch it by bkhl · · Score: 1
    I loved the original when I was younger (and still watch it again once in a while), so I don't know how I feel about this one!

    Well, presumably, they can't forbid you to watch the original instead.

  160. The Second Coming of Flynn by starglider29a · · Score: 1

    Tron I = The Passion of Flynn
    TRON II = The Second Coming of Flynn.


    I've been thinking about a plot for that for years! Flynn needs to get as many programs as possible "backed up" before a global re-format to wipe out the binary super-virus that Dillinger/Sark/MCP have designed in his 20 years in prison for embezzlment and IP violations.

    Then Flynn and Alan Bradley (get it?) re-install the programs on an entirely new OS. ;-) Pick one.

    And for fun, Tron gets help from a friendly program called "NO-TRON" , iconized by a guy in a button down oxford with his arms crossed, who uses his set of "Utilities" to help clean up corrupt programs.

  161. Virii by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    And yet you use the word "Virii" to mean "Viruses."

    No, I don't mean "Viruses" I mean multiple instances of computer virus. Give up kicking a dead horse.

    virii

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  162. Freudian typo by David+Gould · · Score: 1

    I liked tron, but I can't see how they'll retain the "feel" of the original. I won't say it's impossible, but it just seems like they're setting people up for disappointment.

    Perhaps that's why TFA says: (emphasis added)
    Sternthal told the trade paper that the new conceit is that the computer programmer gets trapped in a cyberworld, so that the film can utilize the Internet.
    Sigh. I swear, sometimes the jokes just make themselves.

    (By the way, who else is impressed by this demonstration of groundbreaking originality? I mean, like, wow -- who could have ever imagined that a modern-day remake of the TRON story might involve The Internet?! How do they come up with this stuff?)
    --
    David Gould
    main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
  163. 10Remake = suck; 20Goto line 10 by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    Ok, so it may not equal t3h suX0rz, but I think Lucas has all made us sufficiently wary of that word as to equate the word "remake" to "buytheoriginalnowbecauseyou'llneverseeitagain"

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  164. I say, I I I I I I want the kniiiiiiiiffffe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...pleeeease...

  165. Massive racks... by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

    Excuse me if I'm wrong, but no Disney heroine has a massive rack.

    Ever seen Disney's "Pocahontas"? That's Disney's idea of a family film: A love story about a 27 year old man and a girl of 11 or 12 who has a massive rack.

  166. Re:unusual amount of remakes, sequels, comic books by SunFan · · Score: 1

    there does seem to be a lot of re-hashing of old ideas

    But with creepier actors and bigger explosions.

    --
    -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
  167. Product placement by slapout · · Score: 1

    wonder how they're going to do product placement in this film.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  168. MCP- it's computer history, not MS drivel. by Mittermeyer · · Score: 1

    There was an MCP Virgina and still is.

    Master Control Program has been around since 1958, and was the first commercial high language OS (written in Algol, the great granddaddy of C).

    http://users.rcn.com/hwbingham/security.htm

    MCP was the OS that ran Burroughs' mainframes.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burroughs_Corporation

    And it STILL is out there on the ClearPath systems.

    http://www.unisys.com/products/clearpath__servers/ clearpath__plus__mcp/operating__environment.htm

    MCP lives, and it likely processed some of your financials or government data.

    --
    ________________________________________ History Must Not Fall Into The Wrong Hands ___________________________________
  169. (off-topic)Re:I hope the graphics are ... by miskate · · Score: 1

    I've never been to Chicago, so I'm curious - how is it obviously meant to be set there when they go to great pains to not specify?

    I mean, yes, it clearly wasn't set in Sydney despite being filmed there (despite the distracting recognisability of a lot of the locations), but why Chicago over any other randomly selected large-ish inner-city area?

    1. Re:(off-topic)Re:I hope the graphics are ... by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      I haven't watched it in a while, but I have it on good authority that in the scene at the end where Neo is running from the subway to find another exit, the directions he's being given are all Chicago street names.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    2. Re:(off-topic)Re:I hope the graphics are ... by chigun · · Score: 1

      The street names they used were all Chicago streets. They even used proper intersections. The incoming subway train said "LOOP." That is the name of the downtown business area of Chicago. All of our subways/els head inward towards the "loop" and their sign shows it exactly like the movie. I'm not sure if there is another city that uses that name, but I've been all over the world and I've never seen another example of it. Also, the Wachowskis are from Chicago.

      --
      swanker than you
  170. Oh, it will be low tech by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    cause I hear they will feature this guy as the main character.

  171. Bargain Bin! by Animaether · · Score: 1

    I second this... I just finished the game a day ago, and it was most excellent.

    Story-wise, I'd have to say, it beats Half-Life 2.
    Want some nice live story sequences ? It beats those of Half-Life 2 (though the timing sometimes was a bit off).
    Facial expressions/motion ? They're in TRON 2.0 .

    Want to race the lightcycles or even better the NEW lightcycle ? TRON 2.0 has it, and though difficult to play sometimes it looks awesome.

    The graphics were also pretty good - though it's hard to mess up a world of mostly glowing lines.

    As another posted pointed out.. ending was a bit disappointing, and I had actually expected it to continue in the real world outside the computer - just for a little bit.

    Oh, and the intro - simple as it is - is pretty cool, especially with the music. I guess it pays off to have some actual movie producers and actors in on the game (no pun intended).

    Oh.. and pick it up at the bargain bin. That's what it has been doomed to already. Picked mine up for ~$3 (3.50EU)

  172. Was the MCP really the bad guy? No. by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1
    Watch the movie, you will see that the MCP was running things "thousands of times more efficently" than humans he (it) was looking forward to adding more functions including the Kremlin into it's duty cycle. (as to what sort of things Dillinger was up to that was another matter, though he was probably the real villian of the movie.)

    As far as the system, programs were being integrated into one to make a better system.

    Now look at the end, the security system was disabled by Tron, you see see all the I/O towers light up, without the MCP elite to govern it all who knows what was going on then. (not to mention the havoc of who knows how many systems the MCP took over -and subsequently crashed at the end- unbenownst to Dillinger.)

    If I were scripting the movie I would start off with the feds finishing up the investigation of Encom what the MCP was doing and move on into Flynn working on reviving the MCP - seeing the opportunities of such a competent proven AI. (also throw in some intrigue, something like Tron being under attack by worms or infected with a Virus that makes him Dillinger evil, then youve got a movie for the 2000s.)

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  173. Heh, maybe now.. by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    maybe now I can get a light cycle for the original action figures I'm pretty sure a tucked away in a closet.

    Funny when I think about it now, that's the one Tron toy I don't recall coming out, or I never got a chance to get one for some reason.

    That, and I bought my son a Millineum Falcon...Just so he'd leave mine alone! Mine! dammit! My toy, mine, mine, mine!!!
    (Sadly his is cooler and has blinky lights and sounds...oooo blinky lites).

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  174. Disney knows what they're doing! by DannyiMac · · Score: 1

    Disney knows what they're doing! Each time they remake a movie, they make it better and better! Just like the fucking Freaky Friday movies!

    --
    - Danny
  175. Re:*please* no matrix inspired super-kungfu fights by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    You forgot that the hero will be black and obnoxious.

    There will also be a beautiful, overly serious, and insanely violent chick worked in somehow.

    (yawn)

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  176. Reboot was great by jesterzog · · Score: 1

    I very much liked the episodes of Reboot that I saw --- dumbing down for a children's program aside, what I saw of it had some very good writers.

    I think my favourite segment was the satire of Gilbert & Sullivan's I am the very model of a modern major general . The revised lyrics are brilliant.

  177. Who needs Tron... by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

    When you've got "Spy Kids 3D"?

  178. Low Tech???!!! by fm6 · · Score: 1

    All of a sudden, Slashdotters are looking at SF movies (Tron) and shows (original Star Trek) made 20 or 30 years ago, and calling them "low tech. Very silly. The effects used then were the best effects available at the time. I'm sure The Matrix will look just as "low tech" in 30 years.