Slashdot Mirror


KDE 3.4 goes Beta

wikinerd writes "KDE 3.4 has reached its beta testing phase. The KDE 3.4beta1 is codenamed 'Krokodile' and pre-compiled packages are already available for Slackware, but if you need to compile it by yourself first check its compilation requirements."

242 comments

  1. Anti-aliased fonts by Lindsay+Lohan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Re: the KDE 3.4 Compilation Requirements...

    I would categorize the X Render Extension as recommended as opposed to optional. Aren't anti-aliased fonts a basic feature of any modern desktop environment?

    1. Re:Anti-aliased fonts by green+pizza · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Aren't anti-aliased fonts a basic feature of any modern desktop environment?
      If you have the CPU power, sure. But there are those of us that want to run the latest software on older existing hardware. I generally forgo AA on everything except for my semi-modern main PC at home. The machines at work, at the church, and my older PCs suffer too much of a hit when I use AA.

    2. Re:Anti-aliased fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was wondering where Slashdot's lastest 'man posing as a woman karma whore' was today. Who are you? Garcia?

    3. Re:Anti-aliased fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have the CPU power, sure. But there are those of us that want to run the latest software on older existing hardware

      I think what OP was saying is it should be included as a recommended feature, not that you *have* to use it.

    4. Re:Anti-aliased fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basic feature? No. Much desired feature? Yes. Rendering fonts at all is a basic feature.

    5. Re:Anti-aliased fonts by Jameth · · Score: 1

      "Aren't anti-aliased fonts a basic feature of any modern desktop environment?"

      Yes, they are a basic feature. However, they in no way relate to the desktop functioning well. If you don't have them, nothing will slow down or be left useless. By contrast, many programs actually depend on ghostscript, so it is recommended. Without it, the desktop still runs, although some programs will not.

    6. Re:Anti-aliased fonts by green+pizza · · Score: 1

      I think what OP was saying is it should be included as a recommended feature, not that you *have* to use it.
      Oh! Good point! I was too quick to reply.

    7. Re:Anti-aliased fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he is busy finding new wank-off material for his site. Speaking of wanking-off, I'll be at XNXX if someone asks for me.

      Being sysadmin is just perfect for me.

    8. Re:Anti-aliased fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey im in the fanclub so STFU asslicker

    9. Re:Anti-aliased fonts by MrHanky · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Are you sure this has much to do with CPU power? I use xrender AA on my Powerbook G3 266 MHz (running Debian Sid), and it's far from shockingly slow. If I have to guess, I'd say it's because the ATI graphics chipset (Mach64, i think) is moderately well supported.

      And of course, if you haven't tried xrender on the machines lately, you could test it again. Xrender has improved a bit since it was introdused some years ago.

    10. Re:Anti-aliased fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anti aliased fonts are for people who think "jaggies" are "bad". They'll put up with blurry fonts because they're told it makes them look better, when a plain one bit rendering of a font is clearer and more readable than its anti aliased counterpart.

      On top of that, you need to use outline fonts to create an anti aliased version, which basically means instead of just writing text to a screen, there's the processing overhead of loading an outline font, rendering it down to a small size, anti aliasing it, and then displaying it.

      And it still looks worse. Try with and without antialiasing for a week, I guarantee you'll stick without antialiasing from then on.

    11. Re:Anti-aliased fonts by mczak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, if you have a supported graphic card, AA fonts can be quite fast. The dri supported radeons (meaning everything from original radeon 7000 up to 9250 and all radeon igp except the brand-new of the xpress 200 chipset) for instance have render acceleration, which can speed up aa font rendering up by a factor of 10 or more.
      This particular driver doesn't support (accelerated) subpixel hinting, though.

    12. Re:Anti-aliased fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well this really isn't a cpu issue but a video hardware issue since RENDER with DRI is pretty low effort even with a weak CPU. RENDER and AA fonts without DRI on the otherhand can be painful even on fast CPUs

    13. Re:Anti-aliased fonts by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 1

      That sucks, Windows 98 (win95 + ie 4 too) could get aa fonts and it didn't load things too much...

    14. Re:Anti-aliased fonts by boomgopher · · Score: 1

      The machines at work, at the church, and my older PCs suffer too much of a hit when I use AA.

      Actually, most anything, including churches and old PCs, will suffer when you hit it with Anti-aircraft.


      --
      Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
    15. Re:Anti-aliased fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like the blurriness of anti-aliasing, either.

      Fonts are jagged under Linux because they're not hinted, and they're not hinted because of Apple's patent on TrueType font hinting.

    16. Re:Anti-aliased fonts by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Yes, think of the Pentium II 233 MHz users who wish to run KDE 3.4! ;-)

      I think the question is: Should they slow down development for e.g. better text readability and visual functionality to accomodate the needs of a user base probably in minority? Or should those stick to either more bare bones, or older windows managers that were made at the time their computers were? What role is KDE supposed to have? Personally, I'd really like to have a window manager trying to compete with Mac OS X and the upcoming Longhorn. :-) I think the Linux community needs an option for those wanting a cool GUI, stuff like this tend to make people more eager to switch to it, believe it or not. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    17. Re:Anti-aliased fonts by Malc · · Score: 1

      CPU power? What kind of innefficient algorithms are they running? I was using AA fonts under NT4 on Pentium and Pentium Pros (i.e. 200MHz or less) seven years ago. AA has always sucked (appearance-wise) under X compared with Windows, but are you telling that they're implemented that poorly at the source level too?

  2. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Kall me when there's a release kandidate.

    1. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kokkror!

    2. Re:Meh by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 3, Funny

      You forgot to leave your gnumber!

    3. Re:Meh by Philzli · · Score: 0

      Meh too!

  3. Excited about KDE 3.4 by green+pizza · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm looking forward to giving 3.4 a try. Why? Because on my modest hardware it seems like Qt has gotten faster over the past 2 years while GTK2 has gotten slower.

    1. Re:Excited about KDE 3.4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has. And roll on 2005, because newer GCC/binutils combined with Qt 4 is going to much things much faster.

    2. Re:Excited about KDE 3.4 by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      I think you're a little confused, actually quite confused.

      Qt and GTK have little to do with the overall speed of any desktop envirenment. Judging from the numbers of "independent" applications, I think you'll see that GTK is still a great toolkit.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    3. Re:Excited about KDE 3.4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry, no. If every GTK+ application on my system has a noticable delay even opening a menu, yet all the Qt applications are fine, that's a problem with the toolkit.

      I think it's pretty arrogant for you to call somebody "confused" for observing that GTK+ 2.0 is quite slow. Even fans of that toolkit admit that 2.0 is quite a bit slower than 1.x.

    4. Re:Excited about KDE 3.4 by tpgp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm looking forward to giving 3.4 a try. Why? Because on my modest hardware it seems like Qt has gotten faster over the past 2 years while GTK2 has gotten slower.

      Why has this piece of flamebait been modded informative?

      Try and say something about KDE 3.4, the story, or KDE's speed in general.

      A post comparing old versions of KDE to old versions of GTK is a troll. A pathetic one at that.

      --
      My pics.
    5. Re:Excited about KDE 3.4 by Jason+Hood · · Score: 2, Informative

      So you really have no basis to make this claim? Saying that GTK is "great" seems like you really dont know what the differences are in the rendering methodology of the two.

      If you knew the frameworks that drive these to graphics engines, you would know that Qt is far more advanced. Qt Faster? probably but its apples and oranges. GTK more usable? Sure is but that comes at a price.

      --
      Are you intolerant of intolerant people?
    6. Re:Excited about KDE 3.4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There, probably, is your problem... using the old GTK+ 2.0

      Menus on my modest 800mhz machine with GTK+ 2.4 applications open without noticable delay.

    7. Re:Excited about KDE 3.4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I don't pay much attention to GTK+ upgrades because not many applications on my system use it. The last big release of GTK+ I heard about was 2.0, but I just checked, and the version installed on my system is 2.4.14. This is on an Athlon 1900XP.

      I don't know why it is, but the GTK+ interface is noticably sluggish for me. Not only opening menus, but moving down the entries, and applications have a tendency to freeze and not draw properly when they are busy doing something. I notice it across the few GTK+ applications I use, but not anything Qt or KDE based.

      Make of it what you will, I'm only reporting what I see - same as the person who was accused of being "confused" about what was slower and faster on his own system.

    8. Re:Excited about KDE 3.4 by gnalle · · Score: 1

      First time I open the start menu after reboot it takes 0.5 sec. Next time I open the menu it is faster. Is there some memory buffering involved in all this? Is this buffering related to my choice of kernel? (gnome 2.8, amd 1200mhz, kernel 2.6.8)

    9. Re:Excited about KDE 3.4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look up:

      "Virtual Memory Managment"

      It's called "cache"

    10. Re:Excited about KDE 3.4 by LuSiDe · · Score: 1

      GTK+ != QT. QT is a lot more. It would be more accurate to say: Glib + GTK+ + Pango is similar to QT whereas Pango is one of the many options for rendering (others include e.g. Cairo). The problem is that Pango is slow. Oh and Python + GTK2 (PyGTK using Pango) applications are horrible slow...

      --
      WE DON'T NEED NO BLOG CONTROL.
    11. Re:Excited about KDE 3.4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why has this piece of flamebait been modded informative?

      Hellooo... slashdot... KDE. Of course it was modded informative. If you posted a message saying that using GNOME/GTK caused cancer and KDE could cure it, it would be +5 informative in moments.

    12. Re:Excited about KDE 3.4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you knew the frameworks that drive these to graphics engines,

      What utterly mindless technobabble

      you would know that Qt is far more advanced.

      Would we really? I bet you were wanking when you wrote that.

    13. Re:Excited about KDE 3.4 by Emil+Brink · · Score: 1

      Certainly, this is the much talked-about "Start Menu caching driver", by R.U. Inseign. If you built your kernel to include it, you will have a device node (major 666, minor 257) at /dev/startmenu through which the desktop's panel can access the functionality. I think the driver was merged in kernel 2.6.5 or there abouts, so you might have it.

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
    14. Re:Excited about KDE 3.4 by Makarakalax · · Score: 1

      But it is true that Qt has gotten to be very fast in recent versions.

      Although I agree, Qt has nothing to do with the KDE 3.4-beta release, so it is a troll, albeit one based on truth.

    15. Re:Excited about KDE 3.4 by rikkus-x · · Score: 1

      Yes, there is. I seem to remember tweaking its implementation a few years ago.

    16. Re:Excited about KDE 3.4 by Snaller · · Score: 1

      A dissenting opnion is not a troll.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  4. If you need to Kompile it yourself... by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Troll

    I pity you.

    The final version will be out by the time you're done.

    I once made the mistake of compiling KDE to "optimize" it for my system. Once.

    As an aside.. KDE, Mozilla, OOo, are all good examples of the inherent problem with source-based distrobution.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by CajunArson · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not that bad on Gentoo. I mean, I have a mid-range P4 system that will spend roughly 6 hours compiling a full KDE install even with all the crap that I could forgo but don't bother to. As long as I'm not trying to play a 3D game or anything I can still get work done without any hassles.
      Hey, I bet all the guys who have Athlon-64's will chime in now about how they get done compiling before they even have the packages downloaded :)

      --
      AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
    2. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      How are they inherent problems with source-base distros?

      Gentoo has binary packages available for mozilla, OOo, firefox, thunderbird, and other commonly used large applications.

      When I compiled KDE 3.3.2 a few months ago, I didn't compile the whole KDE set, but just the packages I wanted. And compiling large applications like this isn't really a big deal if you do it right. Just start it before you go to sleep. When you wake up, it's done. That might sound like I'm joking, but it's really a painless process if you are interested in getting bleeding edge software.

    3. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      I meant source based distrobution, as opposed to putting out binaries. I wasn't talking about specific linux distros like Gentoo.

      It's fine for geeks, but normal folk just want to install it and be using it 5 minutes later.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I compile everything from ports. I even compiled cvsup (go go Modula-3!). I compiled KDE from scratch, and will do it again when 3.4 hits ports. It's not a big deal, even on old hardware.

      What IS a big deal is compiling an app like Azureus, and it has Mozilla as a dependency. I have the entire Mozilla browser on my system, alongside Firefox (which I also compiled), because Azureus probably uses some small library that only comes with Mozilla.

      KDE does a good job of separating out things into applications and libraries, without fragmenting things all to hell like gnome does. As always, the beauty of open source is that you can fork if the previous team is doing a shitty job.

    5. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by Stevyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh okay, I gotcha. Sorry for the gentoo rant then.

      They probably do it because the people using are testers and this way they can find more bugs.

    6. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 0

      I have an AMD Opteron with 2GB of RAM. I have recomplied kde in less than two hours. I can't recall the exact amount of time right now, but I know it is a lot less than my home system that I usually try to save for recompiling at night or when I'm at work.

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    7. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Source-based distribution is] fine for geeks, but normal folk just want to install it

      Normal folk aren't the intended recipient of what KDE puts out. Distribution vendors are. The KDE project recognises that providing a complete solution for the myriad different platforms it supports is nigh-on impossible, and instead hands off the responsibility to the people whose job it is to integrate stuff like this.

      Personally, I think that's fairly reasonable. Distributions generally make tweaks here and there anyway, for something like KDE, end-users should get updates from their vendor.

    8. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by deathazre · · Score: 1
      let's see what genlop has to say about this.

      Wed Jan 12 21:23:22 2005 --> kde-base/kdebase-3.3.2-r1
      merge time: 51 minutes and 43 seconds.

      Wed Jan 12 20:27:43 2005 --> kde-base/kdelibs-3.3.2-r2
      merge time: 51 minutes and 2 seconds.

      Thu Jan 13 14:53:26 2005 --> app-office/openoffice-1.1.4
      merge time: 5 hours, 16 minutes, and 31 seconds.

      Sun Nov 21 08:50:11 2004 --> net-www/mozilla-firefox-1.0
      merge time: 1 hour, 1 minute, and 22 seconds.


      where's the problem exactly?
      --
      Karma: Negative (Mostly affected by dorm trolling)
    9. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by user317 · · Score: 1

      the inherent problem with source based distro's is a lack of a proper progress bar. would you really care if its an rpm being installed or something being compiled as long as there is a bar and an indicator of how much time is left?

      --
      me fail english? thats unpossible
    10. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

      Three things...

      1) Compiling KDE takes 6 hours tops on my Athlon XP 2800+, and that's not even considered that powerful these days. I can start it right before I go to sleep, and it's done before I wake up.

      2) I can't stand vanilla OOo. I use Ximian's patchset (ooo-build) with as much KDE integration as possible. I've yet to see a binary for it, so source is my only choice.

      3) Mozilla has stopped putting XFT-disabled Firefox (and Thunderbird) builds on their website. I used to just grab the binary there, but I can't do that now. Compiling it from source is the only way I can get Firefox (or Thunderbird) without XFT support.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    11. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by damiam · · Score: 1

      Great! Let's see you get those times on my 733Mhz PIII.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    12. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      What are you running? OO took TEN hours for me

    13. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by Miffe · · Score: 1

      Sorcerer [1] has an estimated time left to compile.

      [1] http://sorcerer.wox.org/

    14. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by deathazre · · Score: 1

      2600+/333 t'bred B, and a somewhat decent day on the college network.

      --
      Karma: Negative (Mostly affected by dorm trolling)
    15. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call it a shot in the dark, but I'd guess that he's running something twice as fast as you.

    16. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by deathazre · · Score: 1

      okay, so kde is going to take 10 hours to compile.

      do it overnight. do it in a knoppix session. do both, like I did.

      --
      Karma: Negative (Mostly affected by dorm trolling)
    17. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      I'm on a 2000+/266 FSB with 256 megs of ram. At least I was out for most of the compile ;)

    18. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by deathazre · · Score: 1

      I just did the installation from inside knoppix (mainly because the gentoo livecd's won't boot on this system for some odd reason. saw someone talking about the same problem on freenode/#gentoo the other day, nobody seemed to know about it) and did most of the heavy compiling overnight, so wasn't too bad.

      As for now, I'm kinda liking the scheduler in ck-sources -- almost can't tell anything's compiling

      --
      Karma: Negative (Mostly affected by dorm trolling)
    19. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      I compiled from Knoppix, but put off the openoffice install as long as possible.

      I started the compile, showered, went out to lunch, had a haircut, mowed the lawn, visited some friends.

      Then waited another 5 hours ;)

    20. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Nothing should take 10-20 hours to "install" on an end-user desktop.

      What use would a progress bar be? You'd need a 40 foot wide screen to even see it moving.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    21. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      The problem would be it took you >8 hours to install a web browser, desktop environment and office suite.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    22. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by deathazre · · Score: 1

      8 hours?

      hmm, I seem to remember working for 16 hours straight a few times this summer.

      more than enough to emerge kde openoffice mozilla-firefox mozilla-thunderbird ...

      --
      Karma: Negative (Mostly affected by dorm trolling)
    23. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 2) I can't stand vanilla OOo. I use Ximian's patchset (ooo-build) with as much KDE integration as possible. I've yet to see a binary for it, so source is my only choice.

      Ironically, I am pretty sure that Gentoo has a binary build with the KDE integration turned on.

    24. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Distcc is your friend

    25. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by SparklingClearWit · · Score: 0, Troll

      Conversely, I can 'sudo apt-get install' the kde desktop environment, wait 10 minutes, restart my X session, and have a complete new working environment. Sure, it's probably 5% slower, but I'll take the small performance hit for NOT WASTING MY LIFE.

      Keep making it hard, and Linux will never move past Linus' hypothetical basement.

      Synaptic, Click-n-Run, stuff like that is what will keep people interested in Linux and other OSS avenues. Not watching random text scroll in a window to make me feel like a 'geek'.

    26. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked there isn't a 3.2GHz Palomino.

    27. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

      Ironically, I am pretty sure that Gentoo has a binary build with the KDE integration turned on.

      The binary is of a very outdated version of the patchset. The binary is at version 1.1.53 and the source package is at 1.3.7. Furthermore, either KDE integration is turned off in the binary or the version used was so old, it didn't support KDE integration.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    28. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Well, you only do it once (really, just leave it compiling overnight or something). After that, you just upgrade. And while you upgrade, the older versions of the desktop, word-processor and browser are at your disposal.

      If you want to have all the apps available right away, may I suggest Knoppix?

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    29. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      It's fine for geeks, but normal folk just want to install it and be using it 5 minutes later.


      "Normal folks" can run Mandrake, Ubuntu, Fedora, Suse etc. etc., while the geeks can run Gentoo. I mean, it's not like there's no choice when it comes to Linux-distros. And for those geeks who choose to use Gentoo, the compile-times are not really a problem. They made a conscious decision to use Gentoo, and they knew it involves compiling. So apparently compiling is not a problem for them. If it is a problem for someone, he can use some other distro.

      I really fail to see the problem here. Don't like source-based distro? Use a binary-based distro then!
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    30. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      I don't see why you should get your panties in a bunch if someone uses Gentoo. Does it somehow "ruin the Linux-experience" for you, if you know that somewhere, someone is using Gentoo and he's *gasp* compiling?

      Apprently compiling is a big no-no for you, and you chose your distro accordingly. Compiling is NOT a problem for me, so I can run Gentoo just fine. And what are you going to do about it? Hit me in the face for not seeing the true light? Does it annoy you that I'm "wasting my life"? You can take comfort from the fact that I don't feel like wasting my life. Really, compiling does not make my life one bit harder. Hell, it doesn't even make my Linux-use one bit harder! I can leave the system compiling overnight, or I can do some other stuff with the computer while it compiles (Linux has this magical feature called "multitasking"). Or, I can (heaven forbid!) step away from the computer for few hours!

      I wont die if I don't have latest and greatest version of KDE up&running 5 minutes after it's been released. And I think that in the end Gentoo-users are NOT "behind the curve" when it comes to the software they run, quite the contrary! Gentoo usually release new version quite fast, so it could be that by the time binary-packages are available for some binary-distro, Gentoo-users are already using the new version, even though it takes them _few hours_ to compile it.

      Really, KDE is just about as big as they come, and it's written in C++ (GCC is slow with C++). And it takes me about... 6-7 hours to compile it. Oh the humanity! How can I tolerate it??? I'm obviously missing out on something great since I have to wait for _so long_ to get KDE!

      I used to run Debian before I switched to Gentoo, so I know of the goodness of apt-get. I also remember that it took Debian something like 1 year to get KDE3, they were stuck at 2.2.2 for a long time.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    31. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by SparklingClearWit · · Score: 0, Troll

      Your overly defensive and sarcastic post notwithstanding...

      I'm glad you like Gentoo. I personally don't give much of a damn about it. My comment was more about Linux being user friendly, and not about the nuts and bolts.

      Multitasking is fine; if that's what you're into. From all the rabid Gentoo users (and you guys are fanatical - you're like the Rush Limbaughs or Al Frankens of the Linux world), it seems you spend more time with -emerge or recompiling the latest packages, instead of just using your computers. If that's what you want, cool. I like to have my OS just give me the shit I want - web browser, MP3 playback, IM, an editor or two, RDP into my Windows servers, ssh to my Unix/Linux clients, stuff like that. Right now, BeatrIX Linux does that for me. Not all apt users are Debian users. :) I've used Red Hat, Debian, Slack, Knoppix, Mandrake, SuSE (whatever the cap is), and I'm currently running BeatrIX Linux.

      Whichever Linux you use, good for you. If you like it, you like it.

    32. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      My comment was more about Linux being user friendly, and not about the nuts and bolts.


      If Gentoo wasn't user-friendly, I wouldn't use it. You might not consider it to be user-friendly, but you are not me.

      From all the rabid Gentoo users (and you guys are fanatical - you're like the Rush Limbaughs or Al Frankens of the Linux world)


      We are almost as fanatical as the rabid anti-Gentoo crowd that seems to gather in to places like Slashdot ;). Seriously, it doesn't seem to take much to be labeled as "Gentoo-fanatic". If someone says "I have [insert name of brand new software-release here] already running on my Fedora-machine", nobody gives a damn. But if someone says the exact same thing, only substituting "Fedora" with "Gentoo", you will get half a dozen morons calling the original poster a "Gentoo-fanatic".

      it seems you spend more time with -emerge or recompiling the latest packages, instead of just using your computers.


      Well, you are wrong. It takes just few minutes to get info about the latest versions (emerge sync) and it takes few seconds to type in the required commands to start the update-process (emerge -u world). After that, I'm free to do something else. This might come as a shock to you, but I'm in no way required to stare at the output of the compile-process while the software gets compiled. But hey, if multitasking goes beyong your skillset, that really is your problem, and not Gentoo-users problem.

      I like to have my OS just give me the shit I want - web browser, MP3 playback, IM, an editor or two, RDP into my Windows servers, ssh to my Unix/Linux clients, stuff like that.


      Funny, I have all that on my Gentoo-machine. I must be doing something wrong! Maybe I should recompile everything, and then spend the next 15-20 hours staring at the screen as it compiles? I guess that's what all Gentoo-users do, right?

      Right now, BeatrIX Linux does that for me.


      Good for you! And Gentoo does it for me. Who are you to say that my personal choice for the distro I use is somehow "wrong"?

      Whichever Linux you use, good for you. If you like it, you like it.


      And I like it. It's you who seems to have serious problems accepting the fact that some Linux-users actually prefer Gentoo over the alternatives.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    33. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by twener · · Score: 1

      2) For OOo/KDE binary see http://dot.kde.org/1101482981/

    34. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by GraemeDonaldson · · Score: 1

      Wasting your life? I don't know about you, but us human beings have this daily ritual called "sleep". There's nothing on my Gentoo box that takes so long to compile that I can't do it before I go to sleep and it'll be done the next morning or at the very worst by the time I return home from work the next evening. I'm no Gentoo fanboy, in fact I believe that it's not for everyone, but this whole "compiling from source takes too long" is a load of crap IMHO.

      --
      I think, therefore I am. I think?
    35. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Well, I have to use Gentoo because I couldn't get anything else to run on my amd64 at the time, and guess what, Linux multitasks !

      That is I can actually emerge KDE and keep on doing whatever it was I was doing while the machine works in the background...

      I can even, get this, run KDE while I compile and install a new version.

      Frankly there is no need to do the upgrade at night, it's not like your machine is running Windows 3.1.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    36. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by m50d · · Score: 1

      BS. I've got as far as kdetoys already, on an 800mhz Duron - real speed demon there. Just leave it running overnight.

      --
      I am trolling
    37. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Geeks run Slack or BSD...

    38. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember that Sorcerer died. When did it reanimate? I'm curious. The website doesn't give any clue.

    39. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by simp · · Score: 1

      At the moment I'm compiling KDE 3.3.2 on my 400MHz ultrasparc. After almost 48 hours it is now on package 51 of 54. It seems that .cpp code compiles very slowly, as the cpu load is high and the disk & swap activity are minimal: load average: 1.40, 1.34, 1.62.

      But the machine is very responsive so other tasks are not influenced.

    40. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by Daengbo · · Score: 1
      Well, I'm going to guess that the Sorcerer page was defaced, though I can't be sure. Looks as though The Hype page (which only contains screenshots) was edited to contain this message:
      Feel free to peruse our humble eye candy. The backgrounds, themes, icon sets, so on are freely available to you so that you may use them in your GUI of choice. Of course, they only really feel right if you're using them with non-free software like Sorcerer.

      I've left the project and taken the artwork that I (and dogalope, as he requested it of me) hacked up with me. Later kids.
      The link leads to a blog by a former developer about how the project screwed itself, and the history of Sourcemage.
      The license. I don't care if this is the way that anybody else remembers things ... I know what I perceived as happening when the fit hit the shan. A while after Sorcerer experienced a rather substantial slashdotting, people started to become annoyed for much the same reasons that I am. Things were changing radically overnight, shit was breaking, fire and brimstone, cats sleeping with dogs, et cetera. Since everything was licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License at that point, some of those that were hollaring the loudest about the problems basically told the sole coder to fuck off ... they were going to fork the codebase and take off running with thier own distro. It was originally called Lunar Penguin, but it's been shortened to just Lunar nowadays. So what happened?

      Aforementioned sole coder seemingly went batshit. Nuked any trace of SGL and put up a nasty note in its place that explained that anybody that ever forks a codebase should roughly fuck off and die. Where did this leave the folks that did not run off with the coder's code?
    41. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      Umm, yeah I know this. Where did you conclude that I thought you had to actually close out KDE to upgrade it? I do this at night so my system doesn't slow down while I'm working on it. I do this all the time, but these laptop hard drives are a little slow and so compiling makes for a slow system which I don't particularly enjoy.

      And I never said there was a need to upgrade at night, I simply said how it avoids the problem of gcc using lots of resources while you're at the computer trying to use it.

    42. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Well, ok, I'll let you off for using a laptop.

      But I've seen so many users doing their upgrades when they don't use their machines on desktop systems where you don't actually notice the compilation in the background that I automatically went into my "it multitasks!" routine. Sorry about that :)

      I know that compilations weren't really noticeable on my previous machine (800MHz Athlon w/ 256MiB RAM) and they certainly aren't on the current one. On my laptop (which is old but very compact), well, given that when I had to compile Scribus it took a good 3 hours and pretty much hosed the machine, I think I'll stick with Mandrake.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  5. Screenshots? by schnits0r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are there any screenshots of this? What does it look like? Is it pretty? Does it have new features both usably, and visually?

    1. Re:Screenshots? by froggero1 · · Score: 0, Troll
      Is that why you use linux???

      It's kinda like having this huge, powerful dump truck then saying how pretty the seats are...

      --
      ~/.sig: No such file or directory
    2. Re:Screenshots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why people bother with the screenshots, it's just going to be an image with a nice theme/wallpaper with The GIMP running. It always is.

    3. Re:Screenshots? by Mindmatter · · Score: 1

      LOL The GIMP is to make the screen shot exciting. But I think I can think of a few other things that would make it a bit more exciting.

    4. Re:Screenshots? by schnits0r · · Score: 1

      Well, if people don't care about HCI when they develop software and it has a very poor interface, it makes it hard to use. Likewise, I was wondering if they had any innovations to their desktop.

    5. Re:Screenshots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! I'm one of those microsoft junkies that started to get attracted to linux because of it's similarities in terms of GUI. Then it got prettier. This is going to be a serious motivating factor in getting linux to the desktop en masse. It's not going to happen without it. Yes, we need more app's and what not, but this will be a deal breaker.

    6. Re:Screenshots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      plastik as the default style
      SVG wallpapers now possible
      kicker refactored and with a new cool animation
      kdm now themeable
      experimental traslucency windows
      HAL support
      little polishing on the menus
      ability to download and install new themes directly from the desktop
      trash applet in kicker and trash, media, settings kioslaves
      kpdf almost completely rewritten
      emoticons in kmail
      systemtray icon hiding in kicker

      still, too many icons on the konqueror toolbar. luckily it doesn't take too much time to remove them. but it should be the default..
      anyway, 3.4 is gonna be one of the best kde releases ever.

    7. Re:Screenshots? by froggero1 · · Score: 1
      I know what you mean, it is a powerful tool to attract new linux users, but beyond that, shouldn't the focus move more towards better apps?

      I guess it just comes down to what people like to code. Some like to code pratical, easy to use applications such as postfix, neomail, and gambas. Others however, like to make flashy looks-good-on-your-desktop things, and that's ok. It's just that it's generally an easier sell if it can do more things than look better IMHO.

      --
      ~/.sig: No such file or directory
    8. Re:Screenshots? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      Is that why you use linux???

      It was one of the things which initially caught my attention. I like art, and I like having some artistic flair in my surroundings - real or virtual.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    9. Re:Screenshots? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Ever been in a modern dumptruck, or any other piece of machinery? It'll blow the doors off any lexus you ever sat in.

      If I spent 200 large on a dump truck, damn fucking skippy I'd expect the cab to be decked out.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    10. Re:Screenshots? by froggero1 · · Score: 1
      what if the dumptruck was free?

      by the way, i just picked myself off the floor after lmao

      what i was saying however, was that linux has an incredible amount of power, and that's why you use it (for the most part, in networks, as servers). You would never buy a dumptruck becasue of the seats, you'd buy it because you need it.

      and a side note to the mods, my post wasn't ment to bait flame... or to be funny. it's just a metaphor, perhaps a little insightful, but that's about it.

      --
      ~/.sig: No such file or directory
    11. Re:Screenshots? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      If you had to sit in said dumptruck for 10 hours a day, 5 days a week, surely the seating would be a factor in your decision. You may even take a truck with a lesser payload, or weaker engine, because the cab is more comfortable.

      If you're going to use a computer for 10 hours a day, 5 days a week, surely the aesthetics and usability are going to be a factor in your decision.

      Linux doesn't have to spend it's entire existence in the server room. Or maybe it does.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    12. Re:Screenshots? by ballwall · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With every project I've worked on it work, I've slowly learned that regardless of how sophisticated a piece of software is, or how elegant the design is, or how reliable, the response from the PHB is always one of two things:

      "Wow, that looks great"
      or
      "Oh, ok."

      If it doesn't look clean or cool or have little moving clickable things people just aren't impressed.

    13. Re:Screenshots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have clearly not learned your lesson from microsoft.

    14. Re:Screenshots? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      I know what you mean, it is a powerful tool to attract new linux users, but beyond that, shouldn't the focus move more towards better apps?


      KDE already has some kick-ass apps. K3B is propably the best CD-burning-app on Linux, Amarok is among the best music-players, Juk is a great jukebox-app, Konqueror is a good web-browser/filemanager, Kstars is propably the best desktop planetarium on Linux, Kopete is a great IM-client, Quanta+ is a great web-developement-app, Kdevelop is a great IDE, Kontact is a great PIM etc. etc.

      I remember not long ago when people complained that while KDE is a great desktop, it doesn't hae great apps. That area has dramatically improved over the last few years.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    15. Re:Screenshots? by wraith0x29a · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm, I would want my dumptruck seats to be comfortable, ergonomic, adjustable and have built-in heat and vibrating massage pads - much like the operator's chair in front of my keyboard.

      It's covered in duct-tape and looks like crap but I can comfortably sit in it for a 14-hour coding/fragging/slashdotting session and still feel my bum afterwards*. Who cares what it looks like?

      Aesthetics are just the icing on the cake and who eats just icing?

      After all, Windows XP ~looks~ pretty.

      * I mean in an 'oh, it's still there' kind of way, nothing smutty.

      --
      ~ Better a freak than a sheep. ~
    16. Re:Screenshots? by Malc · · Score: 1

      Have they increased the spacing between the menus on the menu bar?

    17. Re:Screenshots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they have.

    18. Re:Screenshots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hu? That already happened with KDE 3.3.

  6. Krokodile? by woah · · Score: 0

    ... how kum?

    1. Re:Krokodile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because... :)

    2. Re:Krokodile? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Ich bin Schnappi, das kleine Krokodille. ...
      Schni Schna Schnappi
      Schnappi Schnappi Schnap
      Hey!
      Schni Schna Schnappi
      Schnappi Schnappi Schnap!

      (skal skylles ud med snaps)

  7. Damn, not Qt4 yet by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

    I was hoping for a release using Qt 4 - mmm, double buffering....

    I'll patiently wait :)

    1. Re:Damn, not Qt4 yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I expect KDE4 to be QT4 based.

  8. Is it named "Krokodile" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...because of that Snappy tune sweeping Germany?

    1. Re:Is it named "Krokodile" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deutchland Uber Alles?

    2. Re:Is it named "Krokodile" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Maybe the next version can be called Kasselhoff.

    3. Re:Is it named "Krokodile" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo!

      That's the ticket.

    4. Re:Is it named "Krokodile" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or 'Rule Britannia'?

  9. oh crap... by myowntrueself · · Score: 4, Funny

    just when you thought debian sarge was going to go stable some time this year...

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    1. Re:oh crap... by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

      I was just thinking that. The only brought 3.3 into -testing like a week ago.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    2. Re:oh crap... by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      Even when Sarge FINALLY DOES get released (actually it's so late I'd say when it 'escapes') it will be so long in the tooth as to be useless. I gave up on Debian about 1.5 years ago when testing wouldn't install any gnome or kde packages (it was broken for at least 6 months) and looked for something else. Fedora core was too buggy, slackware was interresting but has too few packages so I would have ended up building alot of stuff from source or installing rouge rpm's. I finally just went with Gentoo.

  10. pango by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pango is what makes GTK 2.x so slow even if you are not using anti-aliased fonts. Besides you can always use GTK 1.x if you want sheer speed. Or Xaw3D, heh.

  11. It's not that hard to compile by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    Even some folks on Nekochan.net have managed to compile 3.3.x on SGI IRIX. Believe me, if you can get code to compile on SGI's overly-anal MIPSpro compiler, you can get it to compile ANYWHERE!

    Ditto for Mozilla. OOo is another story though :(

    1. Re:It's not that hard to compile by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      I never said it was hard. It just takes forever.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  12. KDE 4.0... by Jameth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm actually most excited because this means that, in not too long, people will start really working on KDE 4.0. That's the release I want. 3.4 is a finalization of the 3's, really. It's got some nice cleanup of what's there and will run a little better, but almost all the features that were ever going into the 3's are already there.

    But 4.0...oh, I can hardly wait...

    1. Re:KDE 4.0... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No doubt, I bet that it will finally work a lot like XP in the 4.x series!

    2. Re:KDE 4.0... by Galahad2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you're wondering, here is a feature plan for 4.0.

    3. Re:KDE 4.0... by scotch · · Score: 1

      I looked at it - hardly seems like a worthy feature list to jump major versions with.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    4. Re:KDE 4.0... by chill · · Score: 4, Informative

      KDE changes major number when they break binary backwards compatibility.

      The major change will be the move to QT4. KDE major release numbers match QT major release numbers.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    5. Re:KDE 4.0... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KDE just jumps major versions when Qt does.

    6. Re:KDE 4.0... by Drathos · · Score: 0, Redundant

      They bump the major version to match that of the version of QT it uses.

      --
      End of line..
    7. Re:KDE 4.0... by Mornelithe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, that's hardly a complete list. Most developers aren't thinking about KDE 4.0 yet, because they're working on KDE 3.4. Once 3.4 is released, and all the stuff from the 3.4 feature plan that couldn't be completed is pushed to the 4.0 plan, and everyone makes their new forecasts for 4.0, you can then comment on the amount of new features.

      KDE 4.0 will be based off of Qt 4.0, so that's already a major jump right there, and it means that things like pluggable rendering backends including an OpenGL backend will be included, at some point at least. KDE 4.0 will have significant differences from 3.x.

      --

      I've come for the woman, and your head.

    8. Re:KDE 4.0... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's simply a list of things who couldn't be done in time for 3.4
      just look at the cvs logs, many developers moved these features from 3.4 changelog to 4.0 changelog

      4.0 planned features are still unknown to the developers themselves

    9. Re:KDE 4.0... by LMCBoy · · Score: 1

      That list is very preliminary and very incomplete. Notably, there are no kdelibs improvements listed...

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    10. Re:KDE 4.0... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      There will be alot more changes than that in 4.0. They just didn't list them all, because they haven't decided everything yet. Hell, 4.0 is still very much in the air. And I bet that feature-plan for 3.4 doesn't list all the changes either.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    11. Re:KDE 4.0... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like they still have a lot of work to do before that http://developer.kde.org/development-versions/kde- 3.4-features.html

  13. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They guy that made this site doesn't even understand the issues well enough to seperate technical issues from incorrect information.
    Oh crap, and I used that page as the main source for my final dissertation.
  14. Features? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1
    KDE's site is pretty slashdotted right now and unresponsive and I can't find info on this release.

    What does 3.4 include? Features? bugfixes? etc?

    1. Re:Features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Features? by jd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, it has features and bugfixes. Oh, you wanted to know which ones!!! Well, why didn't you say so? I haven't the faintest.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:Features? by vonstroodl · · Score: 1
      Quite a long list can be found here: http://developer.kde.org/development-versions/kde- 3.4-features.html#inprogress

      I'm sure there's a summary of the major changes somewhere, i just can't find it- good hunting

    4. Re:features? by wraith0x29a · · Score: 1

      The feature plan for 3.4 can be found here (taken from The Hunger's post)

      --
      ~ Better a freak than a sheep. ~
  15. Obligatory "K" thread. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please post your silly "K" related threads here.

    1. Re:Obligatory "K" thread. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Qeep in mind that if you asc for it, it doesn't seem quite cosher.

    2. Re:Obligatory "K" thread. by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 4, Funny
      The next 17000 versions will be named:
      perl -ne "print if s/^c(.*)/k\1/;" < /usr/share/dict/words
      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    3. Re:Obligatory "K" thread. by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      What? Are you smoking krakk?

    4. Re:Obligatory "K" thread. by Agret · · Score: 1

      I can't wait for the kystadenosarcoma, kaesalpiniaceous and kaducibranchiate releases!

      --
      Have you metaroderated recently?
    5. Re:Obligatory "K" thread. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only 7921 words by my count... I must have a small dictionary...

      Maybe I need some Kenzyte!!

    6. Re:Obligatory "K" thread. by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Um. It's spelled correctly... in German.

      Beyond that, there's apparently a very popular song of the same title on the top of the charts... in Germany.

      Why is it that people can't understand that many of the 'k's in KDE apps and codenames are because many of the developers are in Germany.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    7. Re:Obligatory "K" thread. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it that people can't understand that many of the 'k's in KDE apps and codenames are because many of the developers are in Germany.

      Code names, yes, but most of the apps don't have a 'k' because it makes their name a valid German word... Not that I'm complaining... :)

  16. DBUS ? by Foktip · · Score: 1

    Does it use DBUS yet? Thats what im waiting for... better hardware response. I dont mean to complain, but everytime i try to unmount a usb drive, etc. my windows using friend makes snide remarks about Linux... its starting to drive me nuts. Usually im not running anything that should be accessing it either (the most used command on my computer is pkill -9 konqueror, lol).

    1. Re:DBUS ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      everytime i try to unmount a usb drive, etc. my windows using friend makes snide remarks about Linux...

      Umm... huh? When I want to use my usb drive, I plug it in and use it. When I want to stop using it, I unplug it. No mounting or unmounting necessary.

      If your system doesn't do this, get a better distro.

    2. Re:DBUS ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, that one blows alright. I always used to find that the File Alteration Monitor (FAM) used to hang onto directories long after a konqueror window had looked at them.
      Then my distro (mandrake) replaced FAM with GAM and the problem disappeared overnight.

    3. Re:DBUS ? by Foktip · · Score: 1

      If you do just unplug a device, everything screws up... device nodes in use, etc. Then you have to force it to unmount. Also things (namely konqueror) start to crash after that. In SUSE, just unplugging it can sometimes STALL YOUR COMPUTER. In fact, i found just leaving a drive mounted with a folder open to it stalled the whole computer. Something to do with periodically unmounting "unused" devices, lol. But thats not KDEs fault - its mostly Subfs/suse's fault. I have, over the last year or so used Gentoo, Debian, SuSE, Mandrake, Yopper, and a few others - none of them, in Gnome or in KDE, has what i consider to be anywhere near Windows equivalent usb-storage device useability. But thats what i want. I dont care whatsoever about adding network config menus, samba config menus, wireless app monitors and config menus, etc... other similar apps already exist. I never could get that wireless config menu to "remember" my settings anyway- am i missing something? There was no "save" option, i press apply, go to another menu, go back, bamf~ settings erased. Settings werent applied on startup, werent remembered, nothing. Useless.

    4. Re:DBUS ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obivously you have never used a distro with HAL rather then some crappy non-desktop-level integration

    5. Re:DBUS ? by Brandybuck · · Score: 3, Informative

      Huh? I use KDE on FreeBSD, and I can unmount a USB drive in about a tenth of a second with one mouse click. Under Windows (XP) it usually takes me ten or more seconds and four mouse clicks. Sometimes, maybe one in twenty, it takes up to a couple of minutes to unmount with the entire system frozen in the meantime. And this is the system everyone says Unix should emulate? No fscking way!

      p.s. DBUS may or may not be a good idea, I haven't looked into it closely. But I'm not expecting any performance increases from it, because that's not what it is. If you have problem with DCOP, then blame your distro for shoddy integration.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    6. Re:DBUS ? by withoutfeathers · · Score: 1

      Have to agree: USB no problem in Linux. If you're using KDE anyway, try using the desktop Hard Disk device. Handles my Sandisk Titanium very smoothly. The only time it takes a while to unmount is when I've moved alot of stuff to the device and it has to commit those changes.

    7. Re:DBUS ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can fix that by adding the sync option that device's fstab line

    8. Re:DBUS ? by Cus · · Score: 1

      Yep - I had the same problem as you with the remembered settings. I gave up and manually entering stuff into /etc/network/interfaces to set the details.

    9. Re:DBUS ? by Foktip · · Score: 1

      i use gnome/hal on my laptop, i like it a lot. i like some things in kde and some things in gnome... ugghh.

  17. Masive i18n by Forge · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Notice how the translations are larger than everything else combined ?

    That I partially reflects the share number of languages available. It also shows how modular KDE's design is. I.e. You can strip out everything language dependent into a separate package without breaking the rest. (Yes, it compiles in English without the i18n package).

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    1. Re:Masive i18n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Default - the sweetest two words in the English language

    2. Re:Masive i18n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh dearie me...

      ALL projects using GNU gettext get that feature *for free*. For being modular KDE is software engineering nightmare. It barely understands the concept of dependencies and modularisation. There's Qt... and then KDE is essentially one feckin huge blob of code sitting on top it. It's a shocking mess.

  18. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't see a pro debian slant to that site, only poking fun at gentoo zealots. In my opinion, there are four types of linux users. Gentoo zealots, Debian zealots, Linux zealots, and everyone else. You are obviously a Gentoo zealot because Gentoo zealtots think everyone who isn't a Gentoo zealot is a Debian zealot, because in your world there is only source vs rpm.

  19. KDE by TechnologyX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Say what you want about KDE, but after playing with 3.3, I finally made the switch from GNOME to KDE. I especially like the level of integration in between apps, the transparency settings for menus and applications, and KDevelop. Gnome is awesome too, especially 2.8, but KDE just seems to have more polish to it.

    --
    Slashdot sucks
    1. Re:KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Gnome is awesome too, especially 2.8, but KDE just seems to have more polish to it.

      I'm the exact opposite towards KDE. When I tried KDE (3.2.3) a while ago, I found it counter-intuitive in some places, unpolished, and generally a configurative mess when it came to doing things. I didn't like it. Likewise, I tried it again on my OTHER Linux box (Gentoo) and found that almost nothing from 3.2.3 to 3.3.2 had changed, aside from a few internal bugfixes. It looked the same.
      Lets just say that if it weren't for GNOME 2.6 and now 2.8, I'd probably be using an infamous OS made in Redmond. GNOME just feels better to use. But thats the beauty of open source - choices, and the ability to use multiple environments which cater to your tastes.

    2. Re:KDE by wraith0x29a · · Score: 1

      I have to agree for much the same reasons, I can get koqueror customised exactly to my liking but found gnome a bit less flexible.

      Something I have been desperate for has been 'real transparency' in konsole and more transparency features for apps in general (I ideally want to watch TV semi-transparently over my entire working desktop).

      Having read the feature list this looks tantalisingly close.

      --
      ~ Better a freak than a sheep. ~
  20. You hadn't heard? by jd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Debian's auto-release script is hard-wired to a Brownian Motion Vector Plotter and a realy hot cup of tea. The release after next will be out sometime last year.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:You hadn't heard? by bucky0 · · Score: 0

      nice hhgg reference :)

      --

      -Bucky
  21. Nonsense. by brunes69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can start a compile of kdelibs, kdebase, kdenetwork, kdepim, kdegraphics, and kdeoffice, on my modest XP 1800, let it run overnight, and I have a new desktop in the morning.

    It is called *multitasking*. You can do other things with the computer while it is compiling you know.

    1. Re:Nonsense. by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      It is called *multitasking*. You can do other things with the computer while it is compiling you know.

      But these newbies from Windowsland don't know that. If their Windows is anything like the Windows I have to use at work then experience has told them that a background compile will render all other apps unusable. Even with XP+SP2 I'm aghast that Windows still can't do two things at the same time without throwing up.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    2. Re:Nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My work machine w/ XP SP2 and 1.5 GB of Ram does just fine at multitasking even with high CPU tasks in the background.

      RAM helps XP quite a bit.

    3. Re:Nonsense. by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      But the point is I'm comparing WinXP to KDE/FreeBSD on the same machine.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  22. Er.... by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    That type of function has nothing at all todo with DBUS in its current state. You should be looking into hotplug. My stock Gentoo install, which I have hardly tweaked at all, automagically mounts and unmounts my USB drive, no problems whatsoever.

    1. Re:Er.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Er... yes it does. HAL puts hardware events onto DBUS where an app can spot the removal / addition and handle mounting / unmounting, just like gnome-volume-manager.

  23. Just remember... by jd · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't download the pre-release marked "krakatoa"

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Just remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope the KDE 4 will use code name "klitoris". :-)
      Jeez, would the geeks download in hordes or what? :-D

  24. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Ironically, Debian doesn't really use RPM, it uses deb packages.

    I don't even want to know what Gentoo zealots things of Fedora and Mandrake users (by which I mean those us with better things to do than compile packages all day).

  25. hmmmm....little late? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

    I actually compiled this about a week ago, seems like. Took me about 20 hours of course (like 15 without QT, seems like).... It seemed a little bit unstable to me, but then, I've never been great at diagnosing the exact problem in Linux =)

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    1. Re:hmmmm....little late? by SirTalon42 · · Score: 1
    2. Re:hmmmm....little late? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KDE 3.4 Beta has been tagged in CVS a week ago.

  26. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by gl4ss · · Score: 1, Informative

    ..what exactly there is a "seperate technical issue"?

    the guy didn't make the stuff up even, just copied from gentoo zealots.

    the stuff is so silly that it IS funny.

    (gentoo is a great distro but it sure does a crappy job of discouraging idiots who don't know what they're doing from thinking that they know what they're doing)

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  27. I used to love KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But since moving to Ubuntu I'm a new Gnome-enthusiast. Gnome is just so beautiful (although missing out on a number of features) but it looks so good I can't possibly go back to KDE. KDE just looks ugly, plain and simple, it needs a hell of a lot of work to get it to look anything other than embarassing. What KDE needs to work on in my eyes is menus; they need to be sorted out, I don't like having 1,000 things in one menu, they could learn a thing or two form Gnome there, and also Look, they look shit. Myaybe better default icons and FONT, all their fonts are pisspoor, simple as, if they sorted those things out I'd love to give it another go.

  28. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by IdleTime · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a Gentoo user of nearly 3 years, I have no special thoughts about Debian, RedHat, Mandrake or other distro's users. I'm sure they are all fine people and enjoy their distributions just as much as I enjoy Gentoo.

    --
    If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
  29. Re:Just what I always wanted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are like the first person to ever make a "KDE uses a lot of K names in it's applications, so I'll replace every 'C' with a 'K'" joke! You are sooooo funny. Whatever your job is right now, you should quit and go into comedy. Seriously.

  30. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well you see, that right there is what makes you NOT a Gentoo zealot. It relegates to the much more sensible ranks of fan, advocate, or promoter.

  31. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I use FreeBSD. My needs include having specific times when I can download, i.e., I have to have everything downloaded before compiling starts. Gentoo can't even handle that for their base system.

  32. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's complete bullshit. "emerge fetch" does exactly what you claim Gentoo can't handle.

  33. Beware out the "Krokodile" by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    it may byte you in the ass..
    I guess I need to build a screw around machine. I have so much trying beta on my production machine. I get up each day and tell myself, "Well now, everything is working fine. Let's fix that!"...

  34. Ich bin Schnappi das kleine Krokodil by Brandybuck · · Score: 3, Funny

    If this release is named "Krokodile", I think the default startup music should be "Schnappi!"

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    1. Re:Ich bin Schnappi das kleine Krokodil by mikrorechner · · Score: 1


      Actually, this song has a rather interesting history.

      It was written and recorded 4 years ago for and by the composer's 5-year old niece. The song had a brief appearance in the popular German TV show "Sendung mit der Maus", was published on a sampler and soon forgotten. But somebody seemed to like it and shared it via p2p networks. The song slowly took of, and last year, it was played by some radio stations. The powers that be noticed, and republished it as a single at the end of 2004. By now, the song is number one in the German single charts and a huge hit in dance clubs and private parties.

      Talk about how p2p destroys the music industry.

      Look here for more information (in German). If you want to listen to it, I'm shure you'll find it in your favourite p2p network if you search for "Schnappi".

      --
      "Oh, a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-my-own-Grandpa." - Dr Hubert Farnsworth
    2. Re:Ich bin Schnappi das kleine Krokodil by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      If you want to listen to it, I'm shure you'll find it in your favourite p2p network if you search for "Schnappi".

      Why not just use the link I provided?

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  35. autospellcheck on kate? by sewagemaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    does anyone have any luck with autospellcheck (spellcheck as you type, red underlining of words if you make a spelling mistake) in kate? They were saying that this was going to be released in 3.2 but it doesnt seem to be there. bugs.kde.org has closed the wishlist/feature request ticket. I'm using 3.3.1 currently. The feature's there in konqueror, kmail and kword, but for us folks that use kile (which depends on kate) as the LaTeX source editor, we would sure find it a good feature to have.

    1. Re:autospellcheck on kate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure you have aspell/ispell installed?

    2. Re:autospellcheck on kate? by crivens · · Score: 1

      You need the aspell-devel package installed.

  36. Think GTK is slow, try XFCE4. by asv108 · · Score: 1
    Seriously, this comment has no technical merit what so over. How does "I tried GTK2 and its slow" get modded to the top?

    Install XFCE, and then try to tell me that GTK2 is slow.

    1. Re:Think GTK is slow, try XFCE4. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you linux folk need to find better names for your products and I mean *fast*.. the last thing i want to use is XFeces 4....

    2. Re:Think GTK is slow, try XFCE4. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think he's one of the "linux folk"?

    3. Re:Think GTK is slow, try XFCE4. by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Touche. I plug XFCE4 whenever i can, and it's because it's amazing. It looks gorgeous, it's great to use, and it runs fast. VERY fast. And yes, it's running GTK2.

    4. Re:Think GTK is slow, try XFCE4. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because he knows what something called XFCE4 is?

    5. Re:Think GTK is slow, try XFCE4. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't make me think that he is one of the "linux folk". That makes me think you are ignorant or trolling. Xfce runs on multiple platforms, including Windows and Mac OS X.

  37. Krikey! by TrancePhreak · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Krikey! He's a big one! Carefull or he'll bite you in the bum. OW, just like that. Just watch as I stick my hand in his mouth....

    --

    -]Phreak Out[-
  38. features? by dioscaido · · Score: 1

    Where's the list of features in this new version? Or should I just be excited that it's a higher number?

  39. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod parent up

  40. simple progress bar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ProgressBarMin = 1
    ProgressBarMax = make -n | wc -l

    then just 'make', count the lines as they come, and move the progress bar...

    Doh!

    errors go to stderr so they don't count. It works try it.

  41. Installing package without override the kde 3.3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is possibile?

    1. Re:Installing package without override the kde 3.3 by wraith0x29a · · Score: 1

      I assume you mean having KDE 3.3 and KDE 3.4 on the same machine and not conflicting.

      If you are compiling yourself you should be able to do this, I'm sure the instructions for this will be in the INSTALL notes somewhere.

      It ~should~ just be a case of giving configure an option of where the KDE base dirs and libraries should go when compiling and then changing a couple of environment variables ($KDEBASE and $KDELIBS??) before running KDE (you can of course do this from a startup script). Been a while since I ran two versions of KDE on the same machine though so check the notes that come with the source.

      --
      ~ Better a freak than a sheep. ~
  42. Tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    best new stuff IMHO are two apps: kpdf and akregator

    kpdf was pretty crappy in kde 3.3. It's a lot better now. Faster than xpdf/acroread/gpdf/kghostview. Almost as many features as Adobe Acrobat reader. Wonderful.

    akregator is a nice RSS browser that is now part of kdepim. It behaves just like kmail. I'm glad to see this part of kotnact, because thunderbird has RSS support, and I fell in love with that.

  43. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by swillden · · Score: 2, Funny

    As a Gentoo user of nearly 3 years, I have no special thoughts about Debian, RedHat, Mandrake or other distro's users. I'm sure they are all fine people and enjoy their distributions just as much as I enjoy Gentoo.

    I see that Gentoo zealots have moved to an entirely new level of rabid fanboyism. Recognizing that the blatant, in-your-face evangelism approach has done all it can, you're now starting down a new path, subtly working away at our resistance through calm, rational and even apparently tolerant discussion... all the better to enhance the shock effect of your next frontal assault.

    But we're wise to you, oh, yes. The evil will not take our machines, sapping their cycles with endless compilation. We will hold our Debian swirls high and beat back the honeyed words just like the bombastic venom they so cleverly disguise.

    Or maybe we'll just cave and buy a faster machine.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  44. price by dioscaido · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Won't be an issue. By 2006 the current middle tier cards that can rock Doom 3 will be lower end, and cost next to nothing. And for those of us who like to run on older systems, well, we wouldn't run windows anyway, right?

    1. Re:price by dioscaido · · Score: 1

      LOL... wrong story.

  45. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by SirTalon42 · · Score: 1

    emerge --fetchonly system && emerge system

    That will download, then compile and install the base system.

  46. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by SirTalon42 · · Score: 1

    I run Fedora and Gentoo... Am I some sort of half breed hated by all?

  47. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod parent down

  48. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

    Yes. Boooo! Go back to Russia, hippy. We don't take kindly to your kind 'round here.

  49. You shouldn't kompile KDE Johnny... by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    my brother kompiled KDE once.... once!.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  50. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [Replying to the two replies to the grandparent of this post]

    FreeBSD's entire base system comes on one CD. You can install FreeBSD and recompile the base system (targetted to your specific architecture) without ever needing a network. Trying the same with a stage 1 Gentoo livecd results in it dying because it can't download the stuff it needs.

    FreeBSD's excellence is from such a powerful and configurable system resulting from such a simple start point. Gentoo failed to copy that and is worse for the failure.

  51. Qt4 by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Qt4 is a really major change. It is most definitely non-trivial to port code to Qt4, even with the Qt3 compatiblity libraries.

    As someone facing the need to port their code to Qt4 sometime in the coming year, I'm all too aware of this.

    I wouldn't expect a Qt4 based KDE in any hurry. Even if they're already porting to the Qt4 beta, I expect it'll take them a fair darn while even after Qt4 stable comes out before they can put together a Qt4 desktop. Even then, I'll be surprised if some apps don't continue to use Qt3 for a while after that.

  52. Most of the magic is in Qt by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The really impressive translation magic is in Qt's i18n tools ( QObject::tr(), lupdate, lrelease, etc). It "just works" - you code your app in English, but mark strings as translatable and translators can translate your app using external files generated from the source that can be distributed separately.

    It's fantastic.

    Sure, there's more work involved in making external resources like HTML help translatable, but the real magic happens in Qt.

    1. Re:Most of the magic is in Qt by sbryant · · Score: 1

      That's not all! Different users on the same machine can have their desktop and apps in whichever language they choose, as long as the relevant i18n pack has been installed. Some other programs support this behaviour too (eg: give out different messages according to $LANG).

      Having localised builds sucks, IMnsHO. OOo and Firefox are only available in one language at a time. I don't want to install two complete copies and start fiddling with paths, so I'm limited to only one language.

      -- Steve

  53. On what? a VAX? by bluGill · · Score: 1

    What were you compiling on? I know that I have no problem compiling KDE on my system, which is overclocked to 200MHz. (dual, but still...) Any reasonably modern system should be able to compile the parts of kde you want in just a short time.

    Now if the beta cycle for KDE was expected to run for 3 hours or so, then your point would stand. However the planned release date gives you plenty of time to compile on any system you would want to run it on.

  54. Offtopic linux distribution question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Offtopic to KDE, relative to Linux as a platform.

    Been long looking for a distribution that 'just works' with MS Virtual PC 2004. (Formerly Connectix). Many of the distros (fedore, gentoo, slackware) require (albiet small) hacks to run properly graphically under MS VPC. Are there any that 'just work'?

    Granted, the latest Fedora Core has been fantastic after the initial setup.. But it would be nice to avoid any special configuration to run a current Linux system under Windows. Without a dual-boot scenario.

    Note: VMWare has proven a bit less problematic. However, I already have a liscensed copy of MS VPC. I find it hard to believe that other Linux hackers don't use it, and am greatly suprised by the lack of support in the base Linux and X11 libraries. Just one of those things that should work out of the box, in this developers opinion. On any distro. :)

  55. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FreeBSD's entire base system comes on one CD.

    The same goes for Gentoo. Actually, now that I think about it, didn't FreeBSD 5.3 come on 3 CDs? (I use both).

    You can install FreeBSD and recompile the base system (targetted to your specific architecture) without ever needing a network. Trying the same with a stage 1 Gentoo livecd results in it dying...

    Dying is a strong word to use, considering you can use a stage 3 tarball to install a non-optimised, fully-functional system with no Internet connection whatsoever.

    Your argument is that, even though you can install a fully functional system without the Internet, and then download later at your leisure to optimise your system, Gentoo is a failure because you cant optimise your system until you get an Internet connection? You seem to have not only high requirements, but unusual ones too.

    Why don't you just do an emerge --fetch system and dump /usr/portage/distfiles onto a CD in advance? Then, when you are installing the system, you can simply dump these files into your system, and emerge at will. Problem solved.

    FreeBSD's excellence is from such a powerful and configurable system resulting from such a simple start point. Gentoo failed to copy that

    This is rubbish. It just so happens that the default FreeBSD CDs are handy in your unusual situation. I see absolutely no reason to make claims about the general situation because of that.

    Yeah, it's handy to have the source. Yeah, FreeBSD CDs come with it and Gentoo CDs don't. But if it bothers you that much, it's trivial to dump the needed source onto CD in advance. It's hardly a reason to state that one is categorically better than the other.

  56. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess the point I was trying to get at was that FreeBSD solves the bootstrap problem. You can take a FreeBSD livecd (miniinst) and turn it into a fully functional OS. One of the advertised advantages of Gentoo is that everything is custom tailored to your computer, even from installation, but FreeBSD solves this problem better than Gentoo.

  57. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why bother? If you've got an enormous fat pipe for downloading thousands of debian binary dependencies all day, why bother waiting 5 minutes for something like Eterm to compile? :-D

  58. Multicolumn view is finally fixed! by todorb · · Score: 0

    with a recent patch by Martin Koller the multicolumn view in konqueror will no longer truncate filenames. this was one of the most irritating aspects of the filemanager for years. thanks Martin!!! :)

    check out this thread: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42587

    ------- Additional Comment #18 From Martin Koller 2004-12-04 13:07 -------
    CVS commit by mkoller:

    BUG: 42587
    GUI: The maximum text width used in konqis multi column view is now configurable in konqis appearance dialog. The default is 600 pixel, which should be enough to not wordwrap the files text.
    Now the iconview determines the column width dynamically, so it's no longer fixed for all columns.

    M +27 -6 kcontrol/konq/fontopts.cpp 1.59
    M +1 -1 kcontrol/konq/fontopts.h 1.25
    M +1 -0 libkonq/konq_defaults.h 1.29
    M +30 -15 libkonq/konq_iconviewwidget.cc 1.306

  59. Re: M0D PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nnod parent up

  60. KDE 3.4 Feature Plan by thehunger · · Score: 1

    The feature plan for 3.4 can be found here.

  61. Compiled KDE lots of times by carlmenezes · · Score: 1

    Have an LFS installation. Have been compiling KDE for every new release since 2.2

    Yeah, it takes some time. I just start the compile process before I leave for the office. My compile script shuts down the PC when it's done. By the time I'm back, it's done. Simple. No time wasted. It could take 8 minutes or 8 hours - no matter to me coz I'm not using the machine at the time - no slowdown noticed.

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
  62. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

    all the better to enhance the shock effect of your next frontal assault.
    The next attack will be against BSD, not binary linux.
    http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@gentoo.org/ msg02991.html

  63. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by swillden · · Score: 1

    The next attack will be against BSD, not binary linux.

    Who said anything about Linux? I said Debian.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  64. australia by Stepping+Razor · · Score: 1

    i've got a fairly off-topic question about kde vs gnome. i've heard that gnome is big in the states and kde is big in europe. i may be emigrating to australia soon and i was wondering which camp they tend towards down under.

  65. Never do in Perl... by Oestergaard · · Score: 1

    ...what you can do in awk.

    Never do in awk what you can do in sed.

    Never do in sed what you can do in tr.

    tr cC kK < /usr/share/dict/words

    1. Re:Never do in Perl... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not what the poster did. Only initial c's are changed, hence the caret.

  66. Yeah but the interface is still an unfocused mess by MRKisThatKid · · Score: 1

    KDE are one of those enterprises that singularly fail to understand the theory "less is more". Their interface is a distracting mess, have you any idea how hard it is to concentrate on something when the interface is THAT busy?