Overbooking their network capacity was never something Comcast has shown any hesitation in doing. What makes you think that having enough bandwidth to handle their entire customer base was ever a concern for which they bothered accounting?
It requires Microsoft windows which is exactly what I meant by "relying on the Microsoft ecology" but then, you knew that already didn't you? Stop trying to confuse the issue with this nonsense attempt to merely look pedantic. I see what you're doing.
Isn't it interesting how the solutions relying on the Microsoft ecology all seem to deadlock you to Intel hardware too, when none of the other virtualization technology seems to have that problem. I wonder if you've learned your lesson yet.
"No really guys. Don't buy that AMD chip yet. We promise that the next-gen chip we're making that will be so much faster than theirs really exists! We only need about 4 more quarters worth of earnings to prove it..."
Please tell me you posted this as a joke. (Just in case it went over anyone else's head; Wells Fargo was recently in the news getting caught proving that "phishing scam" and "actually from the company" are not mutually exclusive.)
You can lie about who you are in the public-facing profile data as long as it falls under the legal definition of satirical use, but you still are required to give your real legal name to the sign-up form when the account is initially created.
They're just re-using attack vectors our own governments and commercial sectors have been relying on for decades. There's almost no money to be made in securing other people's data (mostly because they're too uneducated or uncreative to quantify the threat) but there's tons of money to be made selling it.
Russian troll. They keep trying to confuse people into thinking the NSA and NASA are the same thing. I'm not sure why, but it's not the first time I've seen this one.
If you're willing to shell out extra for the business-class connection, most the other providers are just fine too. Most households can't afford to spend $105 per month on a network connection though.
The same thing that happened last time; local municipalities still have the rights to change their own laws to spite "mom-and-pop" internet providers, and they absolutely will when the town mayor is personally paid in a large solid gold statue of a bear. Then you're right back to square one of needing big bad evil government to step in with their jackbooted thugs and forcibly throat-stomp a free market onto these bought-and-paid for capitalists.
They ditched the old CSS/HTML renderer, but up until very very recently even the original Netscape Plugin API was still being carted around by Firefox.
Funny story about that. It turns out we don't actually have a two-party system, we just have a system where the biggest current two parties have been getting away with saying that while illegally strangling additional parties in crib for over a century.
Your post is accurate except for one minor point: When Comcast throttles your internet connection it'll be to 128kbps not 10mbps. This will even slow down small file transfers and basic terminal use.
Look, it's not even illegal everywhere in the US. Moreover, the impact will affect vastly more innocents than exploiters. Who this bill will really punish is single mothers in rural areas who will now have to hit the streets to keep their kids from starving. You've backed a solution that increases exploitation and illegal prostitution, the two things you claim to hate so much. Good job.
Slashdot Mirror
Overbooking their network capacity was never something Comcast has shown any hesitation in doing. What makes you think that having enough bandwidth to handle their entire customer base was ever a concern for which they bothered accounting?
It requires Microsoft windows which is exactly what I meant by "relying on the Microsoft ecology" but then, you knew that already didn't you? Stop trying to confuse the issue with this nonsense attempt to merely look pedantic. I see what you're doing.
You're a fucking liar.
(Pro tip: try it with Linux!)
Isn't it interesting how the solutions relying on the Microsoft ecology all seem to deadlock you to Intel hardware too, when none of the other virtualization technology seems to have that problem. I wonder if you've learned your lesson yet.
"No really guys. Don't buy that AMD chip yet. We promise that the next-gen chip we're making that will be so much faster than theirs really exists! We only need about 4 more quarters worth of earnings to prove it..."
Please tell me you posted this as a joke. (Just in case it went over anyone else's head; Wells Fargo was recently in the news getting caught proving that "phishing scam" and "actually from the company" are not mutually exclusive.)
You can lie about who you are in the public-facing profile data as long as it falls under the legal definition of satirical use, but you still are required to give your real legal name to the sign-up form when the account is initially created.
Drupal and php are so well secured and up to date that this can happen is simply inconceivable
You keep using that word... I do not think it means what you think it means.
F- on retaining them.
They're just re-using attack vectors our own governments and commercial sectors have been relying on for decades. There's almost no money to be made in securing other people's data (mostly because they're too uneducated or uncreative to quantify the threat) but there's tons of money to be made selling it.
You're hilarious.
Russian troll. They keep trying to confuse people into thinking the NSA and NASA are the same thing. I'm not sure why, but it's not the first time I've seen this one.
They just want to steal the secret contact lists so they can set up robo dialers to offer their own brand of health insurance.
Maybe they made it off this rock and we are the descendants of some pets that got left behind to run wild.
Interestingly enough, this roughly correlates with ancient Sumerian "mythology."
...positive market ramifications of repealing Net Neutrality.
You should probably stop pretending you know anything either.
This sounds so stupid that I'm now certain it's going to turn out to be true.
If you're willing to shell out extra for the business-class connection, most the other providers are just fine too. Most households can't afford to spend $105 per month on a network connection though.
The same thing that happened last time; local municipalities still have the rights to change their own laws to spite "mom-and-pop" internet providers, and they absolutely will when the town mayor is personally paid in a large solid gold statue of a bear. Then you're right back to square one of needing big bad evil government to step in with their jackbooted thugs and forcibly throat-stomp a free market onto these bought-and-paid for capitalists.
They ditched the old CSS/HTML renderer, but up until very very recently even the original Netscape Plugin API was still being carted around by Firefox.
Funny story about that. It turns out we don't actually have a two-party system, we just have a system where the biggest current two parties have been getting away with saying that while illegally strangling additional parties in crib for over a century.
Your post is accurate except for one minor point: When Comcast throttles your internet connection it'll be to 128kbps not 10mbps. This will even slow down small file transfers and basic terminal use.
I hate to burst your bubble, but humans aren't about to be superseded by anything other than radioactive and slightly annoyed cockroaches.
Yes.
Look, it's not even illegal everywhere in the US. Moreover, the impact will affect vastly more innocents than exploiters. Who this bill will really punish is single mothers in rural areas who will now have to hit the streets to keep their kids from starving. You've backed a solution that increases exploitation and illegal prostitution, the two things you claim to hate so much. Good job.