According to TFA, the developer of this system was a contractor and seeing as how the DoD wouldn't just use Amazon Cloud Anything for servers running sensitive data, it's reasonable to assume it was a contractor who did this.
I can't seem to replicate this issue. I wonder if there's something else going on to make this happen to these users. When I type "it" or use "it" in a sentence both of my autocorrect's first response is "it" or "It" if it's the first word in a sentence. This is on an iPhone X running iOS 11.1.2.
If you came off this overbearing in your interview - it's hardly surprising why you got passed over. Just because you were passed over doesn't mean the company was or was not serious about their product or "audio." It just means that you were missing something they deemed valuable.
My guess is that a "cornerstone" feature like this isn't so much artificially restricted as it is just disabled because Apple isn't testing iPhone 7s. That's not to say they won't backport, but their hands are probably pretty full just fixing iOS 11's messes.
> Wait, what? Are fucking nuts? Most of the users are software developers. For reasons.
Ideological perhaps. What support do I have for Linux development? Eclipse? Hahahaha, fucking yeah right. That piece of shit doesn't even touch a fraction of what Visual Studio does. And I don't need shit Java to fucking run it.
> That's because under Linux very few pieces of hardware require any vendor "support," most things are supported out of the box.
Oh yeah? Just like that huh? This page (http://www.linuxjournal.com/supportedhardware) exists specifically because hardware support is shit. Oh sure my video card is supported - with reduced feature sets and framerates and decreased performance compared to a Windows box. Oh what about my printers? Maybe if I do some weird ass work arounds and use half baked software I can emulate 70% of what any off the shelf "All in One" printer is capable of.
> Look up a company called "RedHat," and then eat your hat.
Look up the thousands - neigh - millions of companies providing Windows training. Look at Microsoft's certification programs. Look at their training options, the volumes of books, websites, and articles. And we're just scratching the professional shit. If you're comparing what Microsoft offers, what the Windows world offers compared to Red Hat - you a serious head thump.
> Hahahahahahahahahahaha, oh, you were serious. For high-end enterprise grade service, Windows doesn't even get mentioned.
This simply and entirely untrue. Yes, web servers are generally Linux - but application servers and many database servers are Windows based. They're generally not open to the outside internet. I've worked with numerous large health systems across the US and Canada. Most are Windows environments and it's because that's what the software that they rely on runs on.
Epic isn't writing anything beyond its database module for Linux. Cerner is mostly Windows servers as well (if memory serves). Most revenue cycle management software runs on Windows. Major industry vendors like 3M's 360 Encompass, Midas, McKesson, and Hyland Onbase are all Windows based. Most health systems are using Windows for mission critical software on the server side, the bed side, and the business side.
The 2010s called and they left message about your shit Windows memes needing to back to the early 2000s.
Outlook provides capabilities that aren't really matched well on Linux. Yes, I suppose I could have one vendor's email application and another vendor's Calendar application which then both talk to a third and forth vendor's server. And none of these tend to have third-party module capabilities found in Outlook. I can link Salesforce functionality into my Outlook client and use my Outlook client to do 75-90% of my organizing job for me. I can then push this all back to Skype for Business (Lync) with full presence management and Outlook-based logging.
Of course I get apps for Windows phone, Android, iOS, and even a web-based client. I can even shunt the management of my actual email server to Microsoft directly. Throw in an LDAP feed to sync new hire/termination/name changes and link that into the HR system I use and have a nearly fully automated email/calendar/communications platform.
I can't easily do that with Linux from any one vendor. I have to manage and maintain way too many things and ontop of that I have to retrain my users away from what is an undeniable standard method of communication. Most of whom don't give two fucks about Linux, the reason for its existence, or Open Source Software at all. And they never will. Period.
That's why Microsoft won this.
Except it is a good product - for the purposes of what the end-users want. Linux is all well and fine and great and dandy, except when it comes to:
A) 3rd party development support
B) Hardware vendor support
C) Enterprise grade support
D) End-user training programs and support
This is why Linux continues to struggle in adopt-ability. And no - Android doesn't count. The Android system that everyone sees/utilizes is abstracted away from Linux to the point that the underlying OS isn't ever truly known to the (general, everyday) end user.
Patently untrue. iOS 11 supports back to 5s. That's for a phone released in September of 2013. Meaning the Galaxy S5 which was released in April of 2014 will not be getting the upgrade (from Samsung). From a support model perspective, Apple wins hands down. It supports the devices longer with more frequent updates than even the best Android manufacturer.
The highest adoption rate is Marshmallow at 32% and Lollipop (with API 22) at 21%. That's the one big benefit of Apple: you get updates (for at least a handful number of years).
What criterion do you base your hypothesis on? What are you defining as "science"? What about the technologies produced/influenced/spun off from research done for Manned Space Flight? Pacemakers, for example, utilize several technologies developed by NASA engineers for the manned spaceflight operations.
12 hour shifts managing not only the lives of 6 people, but also ~$150 billion in costs (not including human lives currently onboard), and an internationally coordinated project that has taken damn near 19 years. Imagine being the guy who buffed up and destroyed all of that. Goodbye career.
Theft is a crime. The US Constitution specifically calls out the government's ability to tax. For all of your patriotism spouting, you don't seem like you've read the Constitution. And no, the Constitution places absolutely ZERO limits on the amount it may or may not tax you. It merely stipulates that what it taxes you must be used for debts, defence, and the General Welfare of the people.
So no, it is not patriotic to avoid paying your taxes. It is laziness and against our very Constitution. Pay your debt to society or give up your citizenship and leave. Find yourself a nice 3rd world shithole Libertarian nation and live there. Freeloader.
Once you give up physical access to your device, you give up security. This is no different than the possibility that a locksmith could use a copy of a key he made for you. It's stupid.
Yeah real MURICAN you are. I saw your post advocating on asking Muslims to renounce their faith and then shooting them if they say no. Real fucking anti-statist of you. You're are disgusting human being.
At some point I question this "common sense". My parents and my grandparents could live on minimum wage. My aunt put herself through nursing school and then law school on a minimum wage (at that time) job, had a car, could go out to eat on occasion (or to the bar), and paid for her apartment. My grandfather didn't make a lot of money - but he was able to have a house, a car, a farm, and a family which included 3 kids. Single household income. He was far from rich. What has changed? Why has it changed? There has always been a livable wage concept, it's just that Profit>People types of baby boomers have gotten to the point in society where they were able to shift that. Now you're "lazy" if you're a burger flipper. It doesn't matter if you put in 40 hours a week or 60 hours a week. You're still "lazy" and "deserve" to be poor.
No one is advocating that everyone deserves mansions and Lambos. But a roof over the head, food on the table, clothes on the back, a car if public transportation doesn't exist (or sucks) and the occasional entertainment night? That's not asking a whole lot in my opinion.
For reference my aunt made all of $2/hr wiping ass as a nurse. That was late 70s and early 80s. That's roughly about $7-$8 (average)/hr. She could afford her education, car, apartment, food, clothing, and everything else on a wage that people today balk at.
It's odd when facts don't meet fantasy and the facts are that the boomers could do this - they had living wage.
> Piracy is an important facet of the free market. It's an indicator that the seller's product is priced too high. Everything the seller does contributes to this indicator. It can be that the seller puts too many obstacles in place for paying customers to make use of the product, making the product less valuable, or any number of things that makes the cost exceed the worth. When this happens, piracy is the relief valve.
You mean not purchasing the product is a facet of the free market. That's like your employer saying he's not going to pay you for the job you're doing, because it's an important facet of labor negotiation - to figure out just how low a job force is willing to be paid. Piracy is pure and simple entitlement. Before digital content, it would've been called theft. Now you have mental gymnasts trying to justify consuming content and not paying for it.
I think it's a bad idea, it panders to corporations and shows my state's continual "Profit > People" concept. How is this? Because the only group allowed to ban are HOAs - generally they're business entities. If I live in a non-HOA area, however, my neighbors and I are not considered worthy enough to challenge the great corporations. Only fellow businesses have that right. It's total upheaval of the rights of a neighborhood or city in preference of business. It seems that Republicans, increasingly, believe equality matters if it's pro-business. If it's pro-people, it's a hinderance.
Slashdot Mirror
According to TFA, the developer of this system was a contractor and seeing as how the DoD wouldn't just use Amazon Cloud Anything for servers running sensitive data, it's reasonable to assume it was a contractor who did this.
He's just upset because you potentially insulted his sister-wife.
I can't seem to replicate this issue. I wonder if there's something else going on to make this happen to these users. When I type "it" or use "it" in a sentence both of my autocorrect's first response is "it" or "It" if it's the first word in a sentence. This is on an iPhone X running iOS 11.1.2.
If you came off this overbearing in your interview - it's hardly surprising why you got passed over. Just because you were passed over doesn't mean the company was or was not serious about their product or "audio." It just means that you were missing something they deemed valuable.
My guess is that a "cornerstone" feature like this isn't so much artificially restricted as it is just disabled because Apple isn't testing iPhone 7s. That's not to say they won't backport, but their hands are probably pretty full just fixing iOS 11's messes.
Well I recommend unplugging your computer if privacy is most important to you. Your ISP knows. Your VPN provider knows.
> Wait, what? Are fucking nuts? Most of the users are software developers. For reasons.
Ideological perhaps. What support do I have for Linux development? Eclipse? Hahahaha, fucking yeah right. That piece of shit doesn't even touch a fraction of what Visual Studio does. And I don't need shit Java to fucking run it.
> That's because under Linux very few pieces of hardware require any vendor "support," most things are supported out of the box.
Oh yeah? Just like that huh? This page (http://www.linuxjournal.com/supportedhardware) exists specifically because hardware support is shit. Oh sure my video card is supported - with reduced feature sets and framerates and decreased performance compared to a Windows box. Oh what about my printers? Maybe if I do some weird ass work arounds and use half baked software I can emulate 70% of what any off the shelf "All in One" printer is capable of.
> Look up a company called "RedHat," and then eat your hat.
Look up the thousands - neigh - millions of companies providing Windows training. Look at Microsoft's certification programs. Look at their training options, the volumes of books, websites, and articles. And we're just scratching the professional shit. If you're comparing what Microsoft offers, what the Windows world offers compared to Red Hat - you a serious head thump.
> Hahahahahahahahahahaha, oh, you were serious. For high-end enterprise grade service, Windows doesn't even get mentioned.
This simply and entirely untrue. Yes, web servers are generally Linux - but application servers and many database servers are Windows based. They're generally not open to the outside internet. I've worked with numerous large health systems across the US and Canada. Most are Windows environments and it's because that's what the software that they rely on runs on.
Epic isn't writing anything beyond its database module for Linux. Cerner is mostly Windows servers as well (if memory serves). Most revenue cycle management software runs on Windows. Major industry vendors like 3M's 360 Encompass, Midas, McKesson, and Hyland Onbase are all Windows based. Most health systems are using Windows for mission critical software on the server side, the bed side, and the business side.
The 2010s called and they left message about your shit Windows memes needing to back to the early 2000s.
Outlook provides capabilities that aren't really matched well on Linux. Yes, I suppose I could have one vendor's email application and another vendor's Calendar application which then both talk to a third and forth vendor's server. And none of these tend to have third-party module capabilities found in Outlook. I can link Salesforce functionality into my Outlook client and use my Outlook client to do 75-90% of my organizing job for me. I can then push this all back to Skype for Business (Lync) with full presence management and Outlook-based logging. Of course I get apps for Windows phone, Android, iOS, and even a web-based client. I can even shunt the management of my actual email server to Microsoft directly. Throw in an LDAP feed to sync new hire/termination/name changes and link that into the HR system I use and have a nearly fully automated email/calendar/communications platform. I can't easily do that with Linux from any one vendor. I have to manage and maintain way too many things and ontop of that I have to retrain my users away from what is an undeniable standard method of communication. Most of whom don't give two fucks about Linux, the reason for its existence, or Open Source Software at all. And they never will. Period. That's why Microsoft won this.
Except it is a good product - for the purposes of what the end-users want. Linux is all well and fine and great and dandy, except when it comes to: A) 3rd party development support B) Hardware vendor support C) Enterprise grade support D) End-user training programs and support This is why Linux continues to struggle in adopt-ability. And no - Android doesn't count. The Android system that everyone sees/utilizes is abstracted away from Linux to the point that the underlying OS isn't ever truly known to the (general, everyday) end user.
Patently untrue. iOS 11 supports back to 5s. That's for a phone released in September of 2013. Meaning the Galaxy S5 which was released in April of 2014 will not be getting the upgrade (from Samsung). From a support model perspective, Apple wins hands down. It supports the devices longer with more frequent updates than even the best Android manufacturer.
The highest adoption rate is Marshmallow at 32% and Lollipop (with API 22) at 21%. That's the one big benefit of Apple: you get updates (for at least a handful number of years).
...I'll bookmark this for later.
One word: Hipsters.
> Manned spaceflight produces very little science
What criterion do you base your hypothesis on? What are you defining as "science"? What about the technologies produced/influenced/spun off from research done for Manned Space Flight? Pacemakers, for example, utilize several technologies developed by NASA engineers for the manned spaceflight operations.
Ah the sciencey people need to stop doing science to do science. Only a Conservative could loop their head around that logic!
12 hour shifts managing not only the lives of 6 people, but also ~$150 billion in costs (not including human lives currently onboard), and an internationally coordinated project that has taken damn near 19 years. Imagine being the guy who buffed up and destroyed all of that. Goodbye career.
The minute Samsung/LG/etc comes out with their own version, fragmentation will render this library useless.
Hey - how bout that anti-stateism?
Theft is a crime. The US Constitution specifically calls out the government's ability to tax. For all of your patriotism spouting, you don't seem like you've read the Constitution. And no, the Constitution places absolutely ZERO limits on the amount it may or may not tax you. It merely stipulates that what it taxes you must be used for debts, defence, and the General Welfare of the people.
So no, it is not patriotic to avoid paying your taxes. It is laziness and against our very Constitution. Pay your debt to society or give up your citizenship and leave. Find yourself a nice 3rd world shithole Libertarian nation and live there. Freeloader.
Once you give up physical access to your device, you give up security. This is no different than the possibility that a locksmith could use a copy of a key he made for you. It's stupid.
Yeah real MURICAN you are. I saw your post advocating on asking Muslims to renounce their faith and then shooting them if they say no. Real fucking anti-statist of you. You're are disgusting human being.
At some point I question this "common sense". My parents and my grandparents could live on minimum wage. My aunt put herself through nursing school and then law school on a minimum wage (at that time) job, had a car, could go out to eat on occasion (or to the bar), and paid for her apartment. My grandfather didn't make a lot of money - but he was able to have a house, a car, a farm, and a family which included 3 kids. Single household income. He was far from rich. What has changed? Why has it changed? There has always been a livable wage concept, it's just that Profit>People types of baby boomers have gotten to the point in society where they were able to shift that. Now you're "lazy" if you're a burger flipper. It doesn't matter if you put in 40 hours a week or 60 hours a week. You're still "lazy" and "deserve" to be poor.
No one is advocating that everyone deserves mansions and Lambos. But a roof over the head, food on the table, clothes on the back, a car if public transportation doesn't exist (or sucks) and the occasional entertainment night? That's not asking a whole lot in my opinion.
For reference my aunt made all of $2/hr wiping ass as a nurse. That was late 70s and early 80s. That's roughly about $7-$8 (average)/hr. She could afford her education, car, apartment, food, clothing, and everything else on a wage that people today balk at.
It's odd when facts don't meet fantasy and the facts are that the boomers could do this - they had living wage.
> Piracy is an important facet of the free market. It's an indicator that the seller's product is priced too high. Everything the seller does contributes to this indicator. It can be that the seller puts too many obstacles in place for paying customers to make use of the product, making the product less valuable, or any number of things that makes the cost exceed the worth. When this happens, piracy is the relief valve.
You mean not purchasing the product is a facet of the free market. That's like your employer saying he's not going to pay you for the job you're doing, because it's an important facet of labor negotiation - to figure out just how low a job force is willing to be paid. Piracy is pure and simple entitlement. Before digital content, it would've been called theft. Now you have mental gymnasts trying to justify consuming content and not paying for it.
I think it's a bad idea, it panders to corporations and shows my state's continual "Profit > People" concept. How is this? Because the only group allowed to ban are HOAs - generally they're business entities. If I live in a non-HOA area, however, my neighbors and I are not considered worthy enough to challenge the great corporations. Only fellow businesses have that right. It's total upheaval of the rights of a neighborhood or city in preference of business. It seems that Republicans, increasingly, believe equality matters if it's pro-business. If it's pro-people, it's a hinderance.