Really, that's like getting married for the purpose of "saving" the relationship. Making it complicated won't save a doomed relationship, allot of people seem to try that route in vein.
However it's still a historical fact. If someone writes about you on a blog, truthfully (I don't advocate the publishing of inaccuracies) then what right to you have to censor them in 10 years time?
This seems like it's set to become the next DMCA. Don't like what someone wrote; censor them.
Now with online dating, the market has basically evened out somewhat for men as women are openly competing for mates, thus they have become more like sellers, allowing men to start behaving somewhat more like buyers.
Nope, prostitution has been around longer than on-line dating.
Citizens have the right to privacy, that includes not having their personal details disclosed for the world to listen in on. There is absolutely no excuse for law enforcement to be using unsecured communications.
It's in the public's best interest that all police communication be encrypted and unbreakable. Reading private information over unencrypted radio is simply unacceptable, especially with encryption technology to widely available.
All police are going this route and shortly the encryption will be broken or cloned radios will be available, so for thugs in the know it's a non-issue, for the news they will have to foster better connections with the people in the department, for the stupid, well you deserve what you get.
Ok, can you provide proof of concept for your claim?
In Australia many police radios have been encrypted for years. No one has broken them yet.
Slashdot Mirror
In the UK they just like to put on a show.
Yup, this article is just more anti-nuclear scaremongering.
Just wait, next thing we know Greenpeace will be setting up roadblocks.
It works everywhere by everyone and all the time with no hassles.
So long as you have an internet connection.
It's somewhat fruitless to try and hide from Google if you're a Gmail user.
Don't forget to download files from their computers. For analysis, of course?
Have any evidence to backup your defamatory statement?
Really, that's like getting married for the purpose of "saving" the relationship. Making it complicated won't save a doomed relationship, allot of people seem to try that route in vein.
Also outside of christanity, the only people for marriage is government types.
and Gays.
Wow, from Ubuntu it now tells me Firefox 7.0.1 on UNIX
It got the browser right however saying "UNIX" for operating system is far more inaccurate than saying "WinNT" for Windows 7.
Set up mail forwarding to the new domain so you always hit 'reply' from there. Never reply on the old domain.
Also if you filter the mail into a separate folder it helps you to find contacts and services still using the old address.
Don't forget one of our state parliaments actively defends Paedophiles in their own house.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/child-porn-sites-accessed-at-nsw-parliament-audit-finds/story-fn59niix-1225964504174
and
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/parliament-porn-users-id-a-secret-20101216-18zqk.html
It tells me that my Operating System is "NT" not specifically NT 6.1 or Win7 and my browser is "Desktop".
Cell phones are digital. It doesn't matter what data they transmit the carrier wave is digital.
But it's not like a square (sharp) wave can cut you.
Of course you can deploy truth to discredit someone. The so called "Right to be forgotten" will be used as a censorship tool to avoid criticism.
But it does.
By own blog?
You mean the thing I use to write about scammers and con-artists. I wonder how many of them would like to censor a blog that exposes them?
People, especially young people, make mistakes. It doesn't make them nitwits, it makes them human.
and society understands this.
However it's still a historical fact. If someone writes about you on a blog, truthfully (I don't advocate the publishing of inaccuracies) then what right to you have to censor them in 10 years time?
This seems like it's set to become the next DMCA. Don't like what someone wrote; censor them.
Now with online dating, the market has basically evened out somewhat for men as women are openly competing for mates, thus they have become more like sellers, allowing men to start behaving somewhat more like buyers.
Nope, prostitution has been around longer than on-line dating.
DRM format?
iTunes doesn't have DRM.
How's your tin-foil hat treating you today?
Citizens have the right to privacy, that includes not having their personal details disclosed for the world to listen in on. There is absolutely no excuse for law enforcement to be using unsecured communications.
It's in the public's best interest that all police communication be encrypted and unbreakable. Reading private information over unencrypted radio is simply unacceptable, especially with encryption technology to widely available.
Why not present the radio traffic time lapsed on the web?
Because it defeats the purpose of encryption.
All police are going this route and shortly the encryption will be broken or cloned radios will be available, so for thugs in the know it's a non-issue, for the news they will have to foster better connections with the people in the department, for the stupid, well you deserve what you get.
Ok, can you provide proof of concept for your claim?
In Australia many police radios have been encrypted for years.
No one has broken them yet.
Seems Anonymous has been looking out for the little guy so far.
Yes, by leaking their credit cards and personal information.