And yet we still have people (some even scientists) proclaiming that there is no difference at all between the brains of men and women.
Why are people so desperate to believe that there are no differences between the sexes?
It's as if people think that any provable difference that isn't sexual organs means that we can't regard each other as equal.
I will assure you that all men and women who think this way are equally stupid.
While we are at lets start a campaign to get more straight men into the beautician industry. There is an extreme gender and sexuality gap in this industry. Here we have women constantly bullying men out of the field to the point that they make up far less than 10% of the workers. It is time to do a study to find out what these horrible women and gay men are doing which is preventing straight men from entering the field.
Next it is imperative that we consider the garbage collection industry. Women in this field are so rare that I have never met or even seen one. It is in fact so rare that there has never even been an outrage over the name containing the word "man". What will it take? Mandatory gender diversity classes for the men in the field, a concerted effort at recruitment of women by the industry, a women's only garbage collection classes in high school, or should we do all of these until the gender ratio is 50/50.
I disagree with you completely. The primary issue here is that men in our field tend to treat women the same as everyone else or slightly better. The women do not like being treated equally, they demand to be treated as if they are special. This is where the issue comes from, not from men treating women different, but from treating them as equals.
Dude, do you still live on planet earth? The state of Israel is over 10 times larger than it was when it was created. All the extra land was taken by force from the Palestinians, you know, the group that is not given billions of dollars a year specifically for their military by the US.
News flash, if you are a US citizen you help pay for genocide.
Sadly not all of my games run on Linux. That is, however, the only thing I do on Windows outside of work, and when I am working on it at work it is always fixing it or installing it.
Well why don't you just perch yourself on that throne of self-righteousness.
If you weren't fucking blind you would see how SJW's affect people's lives. Take for instance male college students. Feminist SJW's have managed to get the rules changed so that it is practically impossible to fight a false rape accusation. The level of evidence to have them permanently expelled has been lowered to "a preponderance of evidence" and the accused is not allowed to defend himself at all. He is not allowed to know the evidence against him, and in some places he is not even allowed to know who his accuser is. To add to this already gross injustice, the very definition for rape used by the college has been changed to allow a woman who felt ashamed of her decision the next day to claim rape, while excluding all ways in which a man can be raped, except by another man. This is also the definition used when reporting rape statistics to include the infamous 1 in 4 college girls which is paraded around all the time. So, to get this statistic they had to include "I said yes, but I had regrets the next day" as a terrible crime committed against a woman.
There is no grounds for firing the cheaters, there are in fact laws that would protect those that outed Lance Armstrong if the company were large enough, but Bill Cosby, if he did it, certainly should be fired. The real issue there is that even if he were innocent and vindicated in court public opinion would prevent him from being in a successful movie or show. We don't always have perfect answers for everything, but making a law which can easily be abused is worse than no law.
It is certainly true that the list of people that one person classifies under some banner such as SJW will not be the same as those another person attributes that label. If you want to play the game of more exceptions than the rule I challenge you to define misogamist and let me give you a list of exceptions. Either you will have to accept that your petty game is complete bullshit, or declare that misogamists do not and never have existed. If you don't believe it, try me.
I was about to respond with some snarky "you are full of shit", but then I realized I had misread your post. You are actually pretty spot on here. There are no laws against bigoted speech and we do not need them. The jackass was well within his rights to donate money to a bigoted campaign and people were well within their rights to boycott Mozilla because of it. We do however need to make a clear distinction between a company firing one of their workers and a primary shareholder stepping down to protect the value of his stocks. This was his decision, heavily influenced by the rest of the board, but ultimately his decision.
There is nothing in US law currently protecting your opinions, I challenge you to find any law that says otherwise.
You are quite correct here. There is no such law in the US, but there are constantly interest groups pushing for just such laws and it is terrifying. These types of laws are already rampant in in Europe. For instance, the majority of countries in Europe have a law against questioning the official story of the Jewish holocaust during WWII. This does not even mean that it is illegal deny anything happened, it means it is illegal to challenge any part of the story at all. You will be put in prison if you question the 6,000,000 Jews figure which is demonstrably false from census records.
The intent of these laws is not to protect an underprivileged class from persecution, it is to establish a dominant class.
No, try again.
When you attempt to get someone fired by protesting them outside their workplace and constantly calling their employer demanding that they fire you, or make threats against someone and their family you have gone into the realm of extreme harassment and threats of violence.
By the way, these are primary tactics of those who we refer to as SJW's. I'm not talking about their last resort tactics, these are their first resort tactics, and if those do not work they escalate from there.
Sorry to inform you, but conspiracy to commit assault is a crime you can be arrested for, which your pathetic example clearly falls into. The real issues that would prevent those people from being arrested is a corrupt police department or the witnesses being indifferent. Speech codes do not help these problems at all.
I couldn't have said it better myself.
SJW is not a term used for those actually seeking equality, it is a term used to describe those who already have disproportionate power who are using that power to shirk responsibility for their own actions by claiming to have been wronged by society. They also often use that power to demonize entire classes of people which they hate(you know, actual bigotry) while securing even more power for themselves by preying on men's natural instinct to put the lives and comfort of women before their own.
Martin Luther King Jr. was not a SJW.
He was fighting against real oppression. There is an obvious difference between him and SJW's. He and his supporters were routinely attacked by police, under FBI surveillance, and did not have the power to silence his critics in nearly all spaces. SJW's on the other hand have no reason to fear police, in fact the police are almost always on their side, they are not viewed as terrorists by the government, and they constantly silence their critics with threats, intimidation, harassment, and attempts to remove them from their job. These are not characteristics of an oppressed group. They are the characteristics of a group with disproportionate power over their enemies.
How dare you lump such a man with the filth of SJW's.
It is rather interesting isn't it? I'm pretty sure anyone who cries for "safe spaces" does not deserve them, and are the reason that some others actually do need them.
Yes, I do think they can, we outnumber and out-gun them by an overwhelming majority. Who do you think the original American revolutionaries were? They were not part of the army, they were regular citizens.
I see you continue to have the reading comprehension of a toddler. Either that or your religious belief in gun control prevents you from understanding plain English. There is one simple fact you need to understand. Governments do not enforce gun control to protect citizens from each other, they use gun control to protect themselves from the citizens. They have nothing to fear from an unarmed populace, and they know they can do anything they want to a disarmed populace. They also know they have a great deal to fear from armed citizens if they try to abuse them too much.
By law, all you have to give police to identify yourself is your name and address. No ID of any kind is required. That is not to say this is how it works in reality though.
I actually already found and read this one. There was no actual observations to support this. It was nothing but a simulation based on speculation. It is an interesting thought experiment though.
Slashdot Mirror
Holy shit, the cognitive dissonance is strong with this one!
Acceptable behavior in society has always been dictated by women.
Very true, also everyone around them would be completely convinced they were gay.
And yet we still have people (some even scientists) proclaiming that there is no difference at all between the brains of men and women.
Why are people so desperate to believe that there are no differences between the sexes?
It's as if people think that any provable difference that isn't sexual organs means that we can't regard each other as equal.
I will assure you that all men and women who think this way are equally stupid.
While we are at lets start a campaign to get more straight men into the beautician industry. There is an extreme gender and sexuality gap in this industry. Here we have women constantly bullying men out of the field to the point that they make up far less than 10% of the workers. It is time to do a study to find out what these horrible women and gay men are doing which is preventing straight men from entering the field.
Next it is imperative that we consider the garbage collection industry. Women in this field are so rare that I have never met or even seen one. It is in fact so rare that there has never even been an outrage over the name containing the word "man". What will it take? Mandatory gender diversity classes for the men in the field, a concerted effort at recruitment of women by the industry, a women's only garbage collection classes in high school, or should we do all of these until the gender ratio is 50/50.
No, it doesn't have shit to do with role models. Men and women are innately drawn to different work. That is all there is to it.
I disagree with you completely. The primary issue here is that men in our field tend to treat women the same as everyone else or slightly better. The women do not like being treated equally, they demand to be treated as if they are special. This is where the issue comes from, not from men treating women different, but from treating them as equals.
Dude, do you still live on planet earth? The state of Israel is over 10 times larger than it was when it was created. All the extra land was taken by force from the Palestinians, you know, the group that is not given billions of dollars a year specifically for their military by the US.
News flash, if you are a US citizen you help pay for genocide.
Sadly not all of my games run on Linux. That is, however, the only thing I do on Windows outside of work, and when I am working on it at work it is always fixing it or installing it.
Well why don't you just perch yourself on that throne of self-righteousness.
If you weren't fucking blind you would see how SJW's affect people's lives. Take for instance male college students. Feminist SJW's have managed to get the rules changed so that it is practically impossible to fight a false rape accusation. The level of evidence to have them permanently expelled has been lowered to "a preponderance of evidence" and the accused is not allowed to defend himself at all. He is not allowed to know the evidence against him, and in some places he is not even allowed to know who his accuser is. To add to this already gross injustice, the very definition for rape used by the college has been changed to allow a woman who felt ashamed of her decision the next day to claim rape, while excluding all ways in which a man can be raped, except by another man. This is also the definition used when reporting rape statistics to include the infamous 1 in 4 college girls which is paraded around all the time. So, to get this statistic they had to include "I said yes, but I had regrets the next day" as a terrible crime committed against a woman.
There is no grounds for firing the cheaters, there are in fact laws that would protect those that outed Lance Armstrong if the company were large enough, but Bill Cosby, if he did it, certainly should be fired. The real issue there is that even if he were innocent and vindicated in court public opinion would prevent him from being in a successful movie or show. We don't always have perfect answers for everything, but making a law which can easily be abused is worse than no law.
It is certainly true that the list of people that one person classifies under some banner such as SJW will not be the same as those another person attributes that label.
If you want to play the game of more exceptions than the rule I challenge you to define misogamist and let me give you a list of exceptions. Either you will have to accept that your petty game is complete bullshit, or declare that misogamists do not and never have existed. If you don't believe it, try me.
There are no laws against bigoted speech and we do not need them. The jackass was well within his rights to donate money to a bigoted campaign and people were well within their rights to boycott Mozilla because of it. We do however need to make a clear distinction between a company firing one of their workers and a primary shareholder stepping down to protect the value of his stocks. This was his decision, heavily influenced by the rest of the board, but ultimately his decision.
You are quite correct here. There is no such law in the US, but there are constantly interest groups pushing for just such laws and it is terrifying. These types of laws are already rampant in in Europe. For instance, the majority of countries in Europe have a law against questioning the official story of the Jewish holocaust during WWII. This does not even mean that it is illegal deny anything happened, it means it is illegal to challenge any part of the story at all. You will be put in prison if you question the 6,000,000 Jews figure which is demonstrably false from census records.
The intent of these laws is not to protect an underprivileged class from persecution, it is to establish a dominant class.
No, try again.
When you attempt to get someone fired by protesting them outside their workplace and constantly calling their employer demanding that they fire you, or make threats against someone and their family you have gone into the realm of extreme harassment and threats of violence.
By the way, these are primary tactics of those who we refer to as SJW's. I'm not talking about their last resort tactics, these are their first resort tactics, and if those do not work they escalate from there.
Sorry to inform you, but conspiracy to commit assault is a crime you can be arrested for, which your pathetic example clearly falls into. The real issues that would prevent those people from being arrested is a corrupt police department or the witnesses being indifferent. Speech codes do not help these problems at all.
Sadly true.
I couldn't have said it better myself.
SJW is not a term used for those actually seeking equality, it is a term used to describe those who already have disproportionate power who are using that power to shirk responsibility for their own actions by claiming to have been wronged by society. They also often use that power to demonize entire classes of people which they hate(you know, actual bigotry) while securing even more power for themselves by preying on men's natural instinct to put the lives and comfort of women before their own.
Martin Luther King Jr. was not a SJW.
He was fighting against real oppression. There is an obvious difference between him and SJW's. He and his supporters were routinely attacked by police, under FBI surveillance, and did not have the power to silence his critics in nearly all spaces. SJW's on the other hand have no reason to fear police, in fact the police are almost always on their side, they are not viewed as terrorists by the government, and they constantly silence their critics with threats, intimidation, harassment, and attempts to remove them from their job. These are not characteristics of an oppressed group. They are the characteristics of a group with disproportionate power over their enemies.
How dare you lump such a man with the filth of SJW's.
It is rather interesting isn't it?
I'm pretty sure anyone who cries for "safe spaces" does not deserve them, and are the reason that some others actually do need them.
Yes, I do think they can, we outnumber and out-gun them by an overwhelming majority.
Who do you think the original American revolutionaries were? They were not part of the army, they were regular citizens.
I see you continue to have the reading comprehension of a toddler. Either that or your religious belief in gun control prevents you from understanding plain English.
There is one simple fact you need to understand. Governments do not enforce gun control to protect citizens from each other, they use gun control to protect themselves from the citizens. They have nothing to fear from an unarmed populace, and they know they can do anything they want to a disarmed populace. They also know they have a great deal to fear from armed citizens if they try to abuse them too much.
Which is why our economy is based on debt instead of produced products.
By law, all you have to give police to identify yourself is your name and address. No ID of any kind is required. That is not to say this is how it works in reality though.
I was still only referring to social sciences.
There, I fixed that for you.
I'm pretty sure it is SJWs attempting to discredit those who call them on their lies.
I actually already found and read this one. There was no actual observations to support this. It was nothing but a simulation based on speculation. It is an interesting thought experiment though.