Soldiers are not heroes. If you don't believe me you can ask a few people who fought in the war on "terror" or Vietnam vets. None of the people I know will even tell anyone what they did there.
You've hit it on the nose.
And apparently also only when on US soil. Scratch that, not too long ago they declared they had those powers right here at home. They can legally grab a random person off the street anywhere in the US imprison them until they feel like releasing them, torture them, kill them, and never even have to go through the formality of charging them with a crime, or even admitting that the person existed in the first place.
You seem to have failed to understand that temporarily removing your freedoms is the purpose of prison. Also, by the Constitution, you were still allowed to own your guns while you were in prison, you just didn't have the freedom to use them because you were in prison. You still had the right to those weapons, just not the freedom to access them. As soon as you got out you could happily and legally go straight home use your guns in any way that was not criminal. The shit we deal with now is entirely unconstitutional. You lose your rights to own a gun for life if convicted of any federal crime or any type of domestic violence.
Agreed, I will also add that the protections to the "people" were not intended to apply only to legal citizens. They were to protect all people from our government. That way a politician could not revoke someone's citizenship then send them to the torture chamber without as much as a farce trial.
All these people should be released without bail to await a new trial, period. There should be no exceptions since it is clear that all these trials were tainted. If they cannot be convicted again without the evidence that was tainted then they should not be in jail. If the local prosecution cannot handle all the extra cases, well, tough shit, they made their bed and it is time to lay in it. There should also be investigations into all the prosecutors, police, and judges involved, because I highly doubt they were not in on this.
Yes, and the sentence should be proportional to the damage done. So, in this case it looks like they should all be executed multiple times. Looks like we need to find a necromancer to carry out the punishment.
Well, we sincerely feel sorry for you since you are intellectually incapable of questioning what the phrase "social justice warrior" actually means instead of translating it to your infantile "a smelly poo-head".
It is because masculinity is the only thing that makes a man important in society. Masculinity encompasses many things, but I will go over some of the most important ones for you.
1. courage - you must have courage in order fight for your country/family/group whenever there is danger, also so that you can do the most dangerous jobs that are needed to provide for the community and in turn your wife and kids.
2. strength - you have to be able to do those jobs and survive them, a man who can't survive his duties has no worth.
3. protector and provider - this is the willingness and capability to provide for your wife and children, often others as well.
Without these traits a man is entirely worthless to society. Any random loser can be a sperm donor, but that does not help society, it adds extra burden. It takes a real man to take a wife, provide for her every need, have children, and then provide for their every need. That is the essence of masculinity, to protect and provide for your wife, children, other family, village, and country. Society has these duties for men and only expects men to uphold their end on them. If you can't do your duties you are no longer masculine, you can't be called a man, your new title is pussy. Oh, and did I mention that you are shunned by both the men and women of society for being a pussy?
I find it very interesting, but not at all surprising that nearly all of the organizations pushing this are feminist, Jewish, or Muslim. Also not surprising after a cursory glance is that it looks to be half to three quarters feminist.
People looking for equality do not advocate for censorship, only people who already have power advocate for censorship. People who are oppressed advocate for freedom of speech, like Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. did. He was fighting for equality for an oppressed people, first the black community, and then the working class in general(which history books and the media seem to have conveniently forgotten).
Women already have disproportionate power codified into law and ingrained into society. Feminists are attempting to greatly increase that power to complete dominance.
Don't know about those in particular, but there certainly a few kinds of fungus that do. http://awesci.com/radiotrophic...
There are much more reliable sources, but I'm lazy...
Just because it sounds racist doesn't mean it isn't true. Trace back the ownership of all the major corporations in the world and you will quickly find that you keep running into the same couple of families which are heavily intermarried and do happen to be Jewish. These people are the ones that created the stereotype, they also happen to own well over 90% of the banks in the world to include the central bank in all but 3 or 4 countries.
I happened to notice that the article failed to mention which groups these threats were coming from. If these threats were from gamer gate I am certain that it would have been mentioned multiple times. Who else might have made these threats? Who would they be so intimidated by that they were afraid to point out who they were? Which side is it that can ruin a career in a single day with a concentrated campaign of accusations without the need for any proof? It sure as hell isn't the gamer gate crowd, but the professional victims and feminists can do this, and they do it for a living.
Do you know how to find the privileged class? You look for the group that rallies behind someone calling for genocide without any backlash from the media like several prominent feminists have done in calling for the genocide of men.
Did nobody else read the word "approximately" in the fucking article? That means they fucking rounded the number for simplicity. And that means since he successfully made a pick at 2:29 that they rounded backwards to the half-hour mark, so there was less of a time gap than 9 minutes. Even if it was that long it is still well within reason.
Obviously yours is pretty low since your reading comprehension is so bad that you can't understand what I was saying, so I suspect you wouldn't stand a chance anyway. Maybe It would help getting you the special needs care that you require though.
Please allow me to put it in a more direct manner so that you can comprehend.
It does not matter what you score on an intelligence test, it says nothing about how stupid you are.
Some of dumbest people I have ever met have an IQ well over 100. This does not mean that they are not, in fact, complete dumbasses.
Well, I did a little research and some math on this issue. These are yearly figures taken from the FBI's website
murders per 100,000: 5
killed by police per 100,000: 0.3449
number of criminals arrested per year: 12,196,959
number of police: 765,000
number of people arrested per year per officer: 16.34
Now, when we adjust the police kill rate up for the difference in the number of police compared to criminals we get:
adjusted killed by police per 100,000: 5.6
Now think about this for a minute. This is only counting people who are arrested, not all the criminals. This means that an encounter with a police officer is far more dangerous than an encounter with a criminal.
Your fear of criminals and trust of police is based on a fantasy world which does not exist.
Well, let's see. How about gun shows? Gun ranges? Have you ever heard of a gun store?
If you knew that someone who was pissing you off had a gun would you pull out your own in anger, or would you have second thoughts about it?
If you were dumb enough to pull your gun then you deserve to die in the first place. Oh, and I'll let you in on a little secret, the psychopaths who wouldn't think twice about killing you care far more about their own safety than you care about your own, unless you happen to be one of them too. They are not going to endanger their own lives if the odds are against them. In fact they are not going to unless the odds are stacked in their favor. When anyone around them could be armed the odds are not in their favor.
I suppose you are correct, it will make their job much harder. This is because protecting the public is not, and never has been their job. Their job is to protect the rich and prevent their assets from becoming the poor people's assets. In other words, their job is to maintain the power imbalance.
No it wouldn't. Light can be bent in powerful magnetic fields. This has been known for decades and immediately ignored in every discussion on astronomy.
If you think that we can measure the magnetic field of the galaxy accurately, or even vaguely close to accurately, then you are a fool. We have very little understanding of the magnetic fields in our own solar system, much less the entire galaxy.
Here is your answer: http://www.electricuniverse.in...
The theory was discounted without any testing or any real discussion at all by the primary academic groups, but there is a fringe of physicists who have been actively working on this for several decades. They are considered lunatics by the establishment, but many of their predictions are proving to be true with newer evidence that leaves the establishment scrambling for a new "dark matter" to slap onto their theories.
Slashdot Mirror
Soldiers are not heroes. If you don't believe me you can ask a few people who fought in the war on "terror" or Vietnam vets. None of the people I know will even tell anyone what they did there.
I know, it's almost as if it were a religious argument.
You've hit it on the nose.
And apparently also only when on US soil. Scratch that, not too long ago they declared they had those powers right here at home. They can legally grab a random person off the street anywhere in the US imprison them until they feel like releasing them, torture them, kill them, and never even have to go through the formality of charging them with a crime, or even admitting that the person existed in the first place.
You seem to have failed to understand that temporarily removing your freedoms is the purpose of prison. Also, by the Constitution, you were still allowed to own your guns while you were in prison, you just didn't have the freedom to use them because you were in prison. You still had the right to those weapons, just not the freedom to access them. As soon as you got out you could happily and legally go straight home use your guns in any way that was not criminal. The shit we deal with now is entirely unconstitutional. You lose your rights to own a gun for life if convicted of any federal crime or any type of domestic violence.
Agreed, I will also add that the protections to the "people" were not intended to apply only to legal citizens. They were to protect all people from our government. That way a politician could not revoke someone's citizenship then send them to the torture chamber without as much as a farce trial.
They are sitting there saying "told you so" and laughing while a single tear falls to remind them that their worst nightmares are actually real.
I think you missed the point here. Innocent people went to jail instead of the guilty.
All these people should be released without bail to await a new trial, period. There should be no exceptions since it is clear that all these trials were tainted. If they cannot be convicted again without the evidence that was tainted then they should not be in jail. If the local prosecution cannot handle all the extra cases, well, tough shit, they made their bed and it is time to lay in it. There should also be investigations into all the prosecutors, police, and judges involved, because I highly doubt they were not in on this.
Yes, and the sentence should be proportional to the damage done. So, in this case it looks like they should all be executed multiple times. Looks like we need to find a necromancer to carry out the punishment.
You raise a very valid point. This is showing a clear bias from the judge against the defendants and for the police.
Well, we sincerely feel sorry for you since you are intellectually incapable of questioning what the phrase "social justice warrior" actually means instead of translating it to your infantile "a smelly poo-head".
It is because masculinity is the only thing that makes a man important in society. Masculinity encompasses many things, but I will go over some of the most important ones for you.
1. courage - you must have courage in order fight for your country/family/group whenever there is danger, also so that you can do the most dangerous jobs that are needed to provide for the community and in turn your wife and kids.
2. strength - you have to be able to do those jobs and survive them, a man who can't survive his duties has no worth.
3. protector and provider - this is the willingness and capability to provide for your wife and children, often others as well.
Without these traits a man is entirely worthless to society. Any random loser can be a sperm donor, but that does not help society, it adds extra burden. It takes a real man to take a wife, provide for her every need, have children, and then provide for their every need. That is the essence of masculinity, to protect and provide for your wife, children, other family, village, and country. Society has these duties for men and only expects men to uphold their end on them. If you can't do your duties you are no longer masculine, you can't be called a man, your new title is pussy. Oh, and did I mention that you are shunned by both the men and women of society for being a pussy?
I find it very interesting, but not at all surprising that nearly all of the organizations pushing this are feminist, Jewish, or Muslim. Also not surprising after a cursory glance is that it looks to be half to three quarters feminist.
People looking for equality do not advocate for censorship, only people who already have power advocate for censorship. People who are oppressed advocate for freedom of speech, like Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. did. He was fighting for equality for an oppressed people, first the black community, and then the working class in general(which history books and the media seem to have conveniently forgotten).
Women already have disproportionate power codified into law and ingrained into society. Feminists are attempting to greatly increase that power to complete dominance.
Don't know about those in particular, but there certainly a few kinds of fungus that do. http://awesci.com/radiotrophic...
There are much more reliable sources, but I'm lazy...
Just because it sounds racist doesn't mean it isn't true. Trace back the ownership of all the major corporations in the world and you will quickly find that you keep running into the same couple of families which are heavily intermarried and do happen to be Jewish. These people are the ones that created the stereotype, they also happen to own well over 90% of the banks in the world to include the central bank in all but 3 or 4 countries.
I happened to notice that the article failed to mention which groups these threats were coming from. If these threats were from gamer gate I am certain that it would have been mentioned multiple times. Who else might have made these threats? Who would they be so intimidated by that they were afraid to point out who they were? Which side is it that can ruin a career in a single day with a concentrated campaign of accusations without the need for any proof? It sure as hell isn't the gamer gate crowd, but the professional victims and feminists can do this, and they do it for a living.
Do you know how to find the privileged class? You look for the group that rallies behind someone calling for genocide without any backlash from the media like several prominent feminists have done in calling for the genocide of men.
Did nobody else read the word "approximately" in the fucking article? That means they fucking rounded the number for simplicity. And that means since he successfully made a pick at 2:29 that they rounded backwards to the half-hour mark, so there was less of a time gap than 9 minutes. Even if it was that long it is still well within reason.
Obviously yours is pretty low since your reading comprehension is so bad that you can't understand what I was saying, so I suspect you wouldn't stand a chance anyway. Maybe It would help getting you the special needs care that you require though.
Please allow me to put it in a more direct manner so that you can comprehend.
It does not matter what you score on an intelligence test, it says nothing about how stupid you are.
Some of dumbest people I have ever met have an IQ well over 100. This does not mean that they are not, in fact, complete dumbasses.
Well, I did a little research and some math on this issue. These are yearly figures taken from the FBI's website
murders per 100,000: 5
killed by police per 100,000: 0.3449
number of criminals arrested per year: 12,196,959
number of police: 765,000
number of people arrested per year per officer: 16.34
Now, when we adjust the police kill rate up for the difference in the number of police compared to criminals we get:
adjusted killed by police per 100,000: 5.6
Now think about this for a minute. This is only counting people who are arrested, not all the criminals. This means that an encounter with a police officer is far more dangerous than an encounter with a criminal.
Your fear of criminals and trust of police is based on a fantasy world which does not exist.
Well, let's see. How about gun shows? Gun ranges? Have you ever heard of a gun store?
If you knew that someone who was pissing you off had a gun would you pull out your own in anger, or would you have second thoughts about it?
If you were dumb enough to pull your gun then you deserve to die in the first place. Oh, and I'll let you in on a little secret, the psychopaths who wouldn't think twice about killing you care far more about their own safety than you care about your own, unless you happen to be one of them too. They are not going to endanger their own lives if the odds are against them. In fact they are not going to unless the odds are stacked in their favor. When anyone around them could be armed the odds are not in their favor.
I suppose you are correct, it will make their job much harder. This is because protecting the public is not, and never has been their job. Their job is to protect the rich and prevent their assets from becoming the poor people's assets. In other words, their job is to maintain the power imbalance.
No it wouldn't. Light can be bent in powerful magnetic fields. This has been known for decades and immediately ignored in every discussion on astronomy.
If you think that we can measure the magnetic field of the galaxy accurately, or even vaguely close to accurately, then you are a fool. We have very little understanding of the magnetic fields in our own solar system, much less the entire galaxy.
Here is your answer: http://www.electricuniverse.in...
The theory was discounted without any testing or any real discussion at all by the primary academic groups, but there is a fringe of physicists who have been actively working on this for several decades. They are considered lunatics by the establishment, but many of their predictions are proving to be true with newer evidence that leaves the establishment scrambling for a new "dark matter" to slap onto their theories.
Wow, that is the most sane post I have seen so far in this thread.