You know, now with such "research", social science people will be rattling on about it as if it became a solid scientific finding "backed by research", rather than a conventional wisdom that it really is and remains so.
But the Wii factor is marginal. Three year old kid, loaded gun, don't need much catalyst of any sort for such a tragedy - the kid could have mistaken the gun for whole lotta other things.
"Now, in an exciting development, Regenerative Sciences Inc. in Colorado has found a way to skirt the FDA and provide these same stem cell treatments to humans."
And if you call in the next 15 minutes, you get 5 plastic syringes, absolutely free.
Call now.
* The free syringes may or may not be new pending supply.
Probably good arguments, but the dynamics of atmosphere is deemed a non-linear system, isn't it. Besides, the fact that we clearcut forest without regard to climate effect doesn't mean there is no effect on the climate.
It sounds like articles cared for by people that stick around turn out better than ones edited by drive-by people, eh?
Interesting and all, but you know, this sorta studies get cited to support all kindsa wackjob social "theories", don't they? I mean, citing such studies are deemed "rigor" and whatnot.
Slashdot Mirror
On a side note, our legal system forces us all to lie.
You know, now with such "research", social science people will be rattling on about it as if it became a solid scientific finding "backed by research", rather than a conventional wisdom that it really is and remains so.
Stereotypes work.
So what you are saying is, harness the evil for the good? Embrace and extend, am I getting it right?
That's why we in the know sticks to IE5.
Because the Wii angle is the hook taco chose to stir up slashdot gamer mujahiddens.
But the Wii factor is marginal. Three year old kid, loaded gun, don't need much catalyst of any sort for such a tragedy - the kid could have mistaken the gun for whole lotta other things.
The dude did manage to drag the company through slashdot - there is no water muddier.
Uh-huh. "Because of mistake", they say.
THAT'S NO MISTAKE!!!
Saw the ship sinking, jumped it and went on extended cheap backpacking. Rode out good part of the bust. Good times.
"Legit" apps sells your info just as well as the others. That's another plug of open source software.
And if you call in the next 15 minutes, you get 5 plastic syringes, absolutely free.
Call now.
* The free syringes may or may not be new pending supply.
Trower, I mean, not Trevor.
It's just like MS. They may not succeed at first... Actually, they never succeed at first try, at anything.
And yet, they manage eventually - see how they kicked out Trevor in the end. It's no coincidence.
Linux is not a malware. Such smear tactic at slashdot must stop.
yeah, but at least it's not sarcoidosis.
Probably good arguments, but the dynamics of atmosphere is deemed a non-linear system, isn't it. Besides, the fact that we clearcut forest without regard to climate effect doesn't mean there is no effect on the climate.
Ooooh, the climate mafia still afraid of some righteous sunlight, eh. Scared of a simple question? Pathetic.
If enough wind farms are set up to actually contribute significant energy volume, I wonder what would be its impact on the climate.
I mean, it is sucking the kinetic energy directly out of the movement of air.
Stop hyperventilating, you carbon zombies!
Breath in. And then breath out. Actually forget the out bit, if you, really, truly care about CO2 emission. ;-)
ABC stuck it to Cablevision. I hope someone can summarize the terms of the contract.
HBR should do case study on this.
This is hilarious.
Let's come up with something to replace HTTP/JavaScript/Flash/what-have-you. It's huge waste, but even worse, distortion.
We have the technology. We can do better than this.
x86 assembly, bogus sessions, they do not have to be fate.
Right? Right?
Expect a lot more of these stuff.
The people who start social networks are a different breed than those that cooked up tech startups of past decades.
Meh. It's not so bad, really. They give you karma here, you know. Even mod points, sometimes.
Beats working, anyways.
It sounds like articles cared for by people that stick around turn out better than ones edited by drive-by people, eh?
Interesting and all, but you know, this sorta studies get cited to support all kindsa wackjob social "theories", don't they? I mean, citing such studies are deemed "rigor" and whatnot.