Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it. -- Ronald Regan, February 4, 1986
so true..
Rep [r]: Whats this MySpace thing Bob? Rep [d]: I dont know but its unregulated so it must be illegal.... Free nation ehh.. where?
Alright breathing is a bad example. (however its simple, and that was my aim.)
So would you prefer to argue if you have a right to privacy? I argue that you do, as you need not show your property upon request to anyone. However the word privacy does not appear in the constitution.
... well no.. but your heart is in the right place.. I just dont like this defenition because if they made a law against breathing.. would you still have a right to breath? Of corse you would.. but there is no constituional admendment providing or protecting any such a right to breathe.
You see, your rights dont come from the constitution, nor from judges, but they exist outside of government. The constitution helps.. but often the wording is to flexable in it to be reliable.
For instance "reasonable" search and seasure, could mean.. "We are the government and our requests to search are always reasonable." It's peppred with words like that.. as it comes from an era when people had common sense..
Yeah, we never did control it. Generally in our system the people inflenunce the government to some degree. (I dont believe *that* is true anymore however.. I think they tell "soundbite america" what to believe in the news.)
I think the best system is... where as I dont think our model is a bad one.. very very little government (or no government) is a better option.
The patriot act, is not constitutional, therefore is not and can never be legal. If the government is breaking the laws it becomes a criminal orgination much like the mob itself. It has no basis for its athority and rules most people out of fear just like the mob.. Part of the problem the people have getting rid of it might be.. people often try to change government with government.
Actually it could also be said "..to become a criminal one must *perform* an unlawful act. (emphasis on arresting people for actual crimes they commit vs. arresting people for crimes they *might* commit) The Patriot Act is more about stoping crimes before they happen.. and thats also a problem.
It was created to restrain the terrible power of government from abusing the sovereign rights of the people.
Government is the worst invention of man. It has created the most terrible acts of all history and has only one tool at its command.. that is force. If you try to say no to a government you will eventually be fined, if you don't like the fines, you will be put in a cage, and if you try to resist the men that come to put you in one you will be killed. Your rights are not granted to you by any such government. They exist outside of government, so a piece of paper can not fully define what rights you have. (The Constitution itself even says that)
*WE* do not control government anymore. We are the governed. We don't limit it anymore.. we just roll over on our rights, and its entirely run away.. but that's ok because since the people of the country understand so little of what freedom and liberty mean.. anything else they could come up with now would be WORSE. (can you imagine if congress had to re-write the bill of rights now??)
If the people fail to understand that government must be limited.. it matters very little what pieces of paper we have or who controls what office.
I don't know.. but I do know that when the majority of the people ask the question "What is the government going to do about Katrina?" Then we have a very serious problem..
Why? We spent $600 billion on that, and with that kind of number the people kind of wash over it as its not possible for many of them to grasp a number like that.. but just the creation of and spending that much will cost every American on average $2,400 in inflation alone. You, me, your, children, everyone.. and that is BEFORE we actually get to pay it back in taxes. The government loves to spend money on stuff like that because it buys votes.. and afterall.. its free to them so why worry?
Congress could stop the war and impeach the president today. Do you wonder why they do not? The Democrats want the war just as much as the Republicans. Beyond making many many negative statements about the presidents handeling of the war to the press can you name one signifiant thing the Democrats have actually done to stop the administration do anything?
"file charges" under the illegal Patriot act and ligitimise it?
People like you piss me off because you know somethings wrong with your country but your entirally ignorant of what it is. The problem is not corprations paying off the Government.. the problem *IS* the Government. Corprations themselves are a fictious entity created by Government regulation on buisness, these immorral, share holder run, money making monsters, wouldnt even exist without government.
Our government is absolutly out of control and is destroying our freedom and ignoring the law to achieve what it thinks is a good idea at the time. Today its the war on terror, tommrow it will be the war on drugs, and the day after that the war on poverty will comence. We need to limit what they can do, we must tell them they do not poessess the athority to grant us rights, they do not posess the athority to control us. Without creating limits on government, it matters very little who is in control of it.
Remember, your government is just other people.. They have no moral right to rule you. A group of people no matter how large can't tell a person what they should be allowed do.. that is for them alone to decide. All they can do is band together for a common defense and protect the peace.. thus that is a governments sole legitimate role.
The problem is not the government, its that the people in America dont understand what freedom means anymore. They are all too ready to pass a law or rule about this or that, or concerned about what they can pass to get something from government, on the fly withouth thinking about what that means. Hell half of them don't even bother to vote and just roll over when a new law is passed restricting their freedom. I mean really.. how many people do you think are *actually* going to get up in arms about this program?
Your government does not have the athority to control what you do with your life, they are just to protect the peace and provide defence. Until people learn this.. even if our opressive government disapeared overnight what would replace it would be worse still. (can you imagine the laws people would try to put into a new bill of rights?)..and if you dont believe me you can look at Russia where opression is just getting its second wind because the people didnt know they needed to do anything to prevent it.
Right, because it does not support mounts and uses crazy alphabet soup drive letter. (ya see there is a fundamental problem with it in addition to a use problem. I guess they might support mounts but, its not easy or much in use in the home market.)
I blame Microsoft for the program menu because they do the same thing.. And apple looses here to as they don't use a program menu or sorting at all (yet there is spotlight) You mentioned Linux and Gnome is very very good as far as being user friendly but the underlying system has some qwerkyness.
I would think that Microsoft can set user interface guidelines but if they have them.. they themselves ignore them. (as even MS software looks radically different from program to program, look at the latest versions of Outlook, Word, and Explorer. wtf?)
Windows has the same problem with program names.
What does "Power Point" do? What does "Excel" do? What does "Acrobat" do? What does "WinRAR" do?
>> Also, unless we hold the airlines responsible for security failures, giving them the job is >> pointless. Having the same organzation responsible for both security and security failures is >> the only way it should work.
?? The Government is not held liable for ANYTHING. Nothing ever, its never governments fault, they never take the hit. If they airlines fuck it up they loose money. If the Government fucks it up.. that means they MAKE money. (We just need a better bigger more expensive program THEN it will work.)
You just absolutely made my point, yes I agree, that the airlines should be, and are the only ones that can be held responsible for their security on their own aircraft.
The BEST thing to do is to tell the federal government they do not have the athority to do this. We need to control them, not the other way around.
Do not get this, stop it, interfere with it, break it. If you cant fly without it then dont fly. If you cant open a bank account then dont open a bank account. If you are somehow "forced" to get it, break the RFID chip in the ID with a hammer or microwave it. I'm standing me ground on this, I will not comply with it under any amount of force.
You apperntly don't want it.. WTF is with you? "if they're really dead-set on going ahead with it, it cannot be avoided." I've decided I will go to jail for this, and your just going to accept it without any fight at all? Screw you.
Same things happened with Montana, back in the 70's we voted in Vegas style gambling. The people voted for it, the law was passed, but it was never signed. And again with the Drinking age.. and again with the seatbelt and helmet laws.
Here is how a state gets out of this.. they tell the feds.. That sounds like a great idea.. take away our hi-way funds. We will sell some of our roads, and some of the land around them off to private people. Private people can open up shops or casinos or whatever, or use the land for advertising if they keep the road itself in good condition.
The people in the state win, the itself state wins, and the Fed looses.
What they are going to allow us to wait before they enact total control?
Airline companies should decide who can, and who can not, fly on their own air planes. They should decide who must be searched and who must present ID. Why the government is involved, I'll never understand.
This is absurd.. its like saying.. "You don't like the interest rate? Well how about.. no payments for 60 days on your 21% interest loan. ehh? good deal there son."
I'm.. actually scared to do this.. but I'm drawing the line here. I declare that I will not be spied upon! I will not be recorded! RFID tagged! or video taped!..and I'm inventing methods to break systems that will try to. I am aware I will probably go to jail but I am not going to willfully allow this.
C: is just a "insider" computer term that everyone seems to know ans is comfortable with.. but its still not right and its not "easy" by any streach. It should be called Hard Disk and ALL system files should be located in "System" or maybe "Windows" Its a throw back to anchient computing and was a bad idea way back then too.
You also touched on another confusing problem that is.. Program Files. In start menu, programs are listed not by what they do, but by.. "vendor name" how absurd is that. I mean, doesn't everyone think of the word "Nullsoft" when they want to play music? Sorting applications like this is, was, and always will be a bad idea.
It's very appernt that windows does not have a logical drive layout because ever advrage joe novice I see has personal files thrown around the system in every place humanly possible. how many people have seen C:\Downloads and C:\stuff with photos, documents, music, and movies all scattred inside? If Windows had a useful simple drive layout this would not happen. (OS X is a prime example of a better system, yet they dont get everything right.)
et cetera makes sense as its not just configuration, you have init, password and "various" other stuff found there. etc.. etc..
A better questions is.. why does Windows Vista (the most advanced OS on planet earth per Steve and Bill) use alphabet device names in 2007?
I can hear computer novices saying..
Novice: "Why is my primary drive C and not A?" Master: "A and B are reserved for floppy drives." Novice: "What's a floppy drive?" Master: ".. Something we don't use anymore." Novice: "Why are they still reserved then?" Master: "They just are." Novice: "Why isn't A the primary and C or Z reserved?" Master: "... just use Unix, explaining/etc is much less confusing ok."
Yeah, its not just Bush, this sort of stuff has been going on for years and years.. its just getting to a point where people are finaly able to see it.
Well.. heh.. once you understand that people will not help you unless they get something out of it you will find it much easier to get help. I've found that RDM or NIN in the upper levels are quite a task. (especially rdm/brd doing 3 songs, refreshing 5 and still keeping an eye on debuffs. ugg.) I can't play like that for very long.. wears my mind out. WoW has some skill to fighting as in what order to use abilities also..
Yeah, Ive been on PVP's I think there is some tradeoff between both games. Played both quite a bit really.
. FFXI though older, looks better, it pushes the limits of even recent hardware, and there is great detail in objects. . WoW has a much better UI. The menu system of FFXI is limited. . I find it's practically impossible to navigate FFXI without a Dual Shock Controller.. although if you have one you can easily do anything except talking with it and running and talking is easier on FFXI. (as most people can use there left to move and right to type, even if your using the mouse to move in wow your right hand is tied up.) . WoW you dont need a controler. (can you even use one?) but the / commands and things require some more typeing. . There are more abilities in WoW and they are creative, also the "paths" are a nice addition. but by contrast.. FFXI's job system means you don't need to "re-roll" to do something different or partake in a limited or caped group event. . FFXI's grind is hellish. Nuff said. . WoW's Quests are better and a lot of fun. FFXI's quests usually involve killing something far above your level for a drop. . Both have good story lines but WoW's is much faster paced. . I have never felt the excitement of doing thing in WoW that I have in FFXI, (Killing Maat, soloing SMN avatars, some close Prommy fights. Honestly I've had some real OMFG! moments in FFXI.) . In a group in WoW members don't have as well of defined roles as they do in FFXI. This is a good and a bad thing. in FFXI's sense only certain types of groups work, however some jobs are very hard to master their role. (Red Mage or Ninja are busy jobs.) . FFXI is very item centric. This is a bad thing as uber items are sometimes "required" just for normal play. . Crafting is better in WoW, party much flat out, its more fun, more rewarding, and far easier. . WoW has the option not to group, this is not always the case with FFXI, Damage dealing jobs get the worst of this as they are picked last for groups...however people know they need to work together so they are more willing to try. . FFXI has Monk that is widely known as the greatest job/class of all time in the known world.;-)
If I had to say what game is "better" I would say WoW is probably better but I think FFXI can be more exciting at times and just feels more rewarding.
Really I would like to see a updated client for FFXI, but bigest problem with the game is they need to support the limitations of the PS2.. and always will.. this leaves little room for the development team to work.. yet they have pulled some tricks with the codebase to make certan things possible. FFXI-2 for PS3 or XboX360 would be really nice to see.
> > If you don't play WoW, you either aren't interested or you would have started by now. >
Thats not true, I've gone from FFXI to WoW after ToAU, or post BC. First impresions after a month of WoW BC?
50% of the Horde is Elvan. WoW is very easy vs FFXI. (doing things seem unrewarding) It's fun to play, but may not have long term intrest for me. There is not much comunity, I think in a month I have talked to 2 people, and not been in a group yet. Far as I can tell it might as well be a single player Warcraft 4.
I dunno, I complain about certan things but overall its a fun game, its really good for quick play. So apprently if I'm joining it now It's still picking up players.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm suprised that they ever allowed that kind of government control. It boggles the mind why you would ever give up your right to privacy.
Don't feel bad tho.. unless we do something soon, the people of America will be joining you guys soon as a fellow oppressed nation.
Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it. -- Ronald Regan, February 4, 1986
... Free nation ehh.. where?
so true..
Rep [r]: Whats this MySpace thing Bob?
Rep [d]: I dont know but its unregulated so it must be illegal.
Alright breathing is a bad example. (however its simple, and that was my aim.)
So would you prefer to argue if you have a right to privacy? I argue that you do, as you need not show your property upon request to anyone. However the word privacy does not appear in the constitution.
Since its not in there.. do you have it?
... well no.. but your heart is in the right place.. I just dont like this defenition because if they made a law against breathing.. would you still have a right to breath? Of corse you would.. but there is no constituional admendment providing or protecting any such a right to breathe.
.. as it comes from an era when people had common sense..
You see, your rights dont come from the constitution, nor from judges, but they exist outside of government. The constitution helps.. but often the wording is to flexable in it to be reliable.
For instance "reasonable" search and seasure, could mean.. "We are the government and our requests to search are always reasonable." It's peppred with words like that
Yeah, we never did control it. Generally in our system the people inflenunce the government to some degree. (I dont believe *that* is true anymore however.. I think they tell "soundbite america" what to believe in the news.)
I think the best system is... where as I dont think our model is a bad one.. very very little government (or no government) is a better option.
Well said.
The patriot act, is not constitutional, therefore is not and can never be legal. If the government is breaking the laws it becomes a criminal orgination much like the mob itself. It has no basis for its athority and rules most people out of fear just like the mob.. Part of the problem the people have getting rid of it might be.. people often try to change government with government.
Actually it could also be said "..to become a criminal one must *perform* an unlawful act. (emphasis on arresting people for actual crimes they commit vs. arresting people for crimes they *might* commit) The Patriot Act is more about stoping crimes before they happen.. and thats also a problem.
It was created to restrain the terrible power of government from abusing the sovereign rights of the people.
Government is the worst invention of man. It has created the most terrible acts of all history and has only one tool at its command.. that is force. If you try to say no to a government you will eventually be fined, if you don't like the fines, you will be put in a cage, and if you try to resist the men that come to put you in one you will be killed. Your rights are not granted to you by any such government. They exist outside of government, so a piece of paper can not fully define what rights you have. (The Constitution itself even says that)
*WE* do not control government anymore. We are the governed. We don't limit it anymore.. we just roll over on our rights, and its entirely run away.. but that's ok because since the people of the country understand so little of what freedom and liberty mean.. anything else they could come up with now would be WORSE. (can you imagine if congress had to re-write the bill of rights now??)
If the people fail to understand that government must be limited.. it matters very little what pieces of paper we have or who controls what office.
The Patriot Act *itself* is abuse of power.
I don't know.. but I do know that when the majority of the people ask the question "What is the government going to do about Katrina?" Then we have a very serious problem..
Why? We spent $600 billion on that, and with that kind of number the people kind of wash over it as its not possible for many of them to grasp a number like that.. but just the creation of and spending that much will cost every American on average $2,400 in inflation alone. You, me, your, children, everyone.. and that is BEFORE we actually get to pay it back in taxes. The government loves to spend money on stuff like that because it buys votes.. and afterall.. its free to them so why worry?
Congress could stop the war and impeach the president today. Do you wonder why they do not? The Democrats want the war just as much as the Republicans. Beyond making many many negative statements about the presidents handeling of the war to the press can you name one signifiant thing the Democrats have actually done to stop the administration do anything?
"file charges" under the illegal Patriot act and ligitimise it?
People like you piss me off because you know somethings wrong with your country but your entirally ignorant of what it is. The problem is not corprations paying off the Government.. the problem *IS* the Government. Corprations themselves are a fictious entity created by Government regulation on buisness, these immorral, share holder run, money making monsters, wouldnt even exist without government.
Our government is absolutly out of control and is destroying our freedom and ignoring the law to achieve what it thinks is a good idea at the time. Today its the war on terror, tommrow it will be the war on drugs, and the day after that the war on poverty will comence. We need to limit what they can do, we must tell them they do not poessess the athority to grant us rights, they do not posess the athority to control us. Without creating limits on government, it matters very little who is in control of it.
Remember, your government is just other people.. They have no moral right to rule you. A group of people no matter how large can't tell a person what they should be allowed do.. that is for them alone to decide. All they can do is band together for a common defense and protect the peace.. thus that is a governments sole legitimate role.
Can you stop the hicks fighting in the street with words?
Have you been able to stop the war with words?
Real humans solve problems with action.
The problem is not the government, its that the people in America dont understand what freedom means anymore. They are all too ready to pass a law or rule about this or that, or concerned about what they can pass to get something from government, on the fly withouth thinking about what that means. Hell half of them don't even bother to vote and just roll over when a new law is passed restricting their freedom. I mean really.. how many people do you think are *actually* going to get up in arms about this program?
..and if you dont believe me you can look at Russia where opression is just getting its second wind because the people didnt know they needed to do anything to prevent it.
Your government does not have the athority to control what you do with your life, they are just to protect the peace and provide defence. Until people learn this.. even if our opressive government disapeared overnight what would replace it would be worse still. (can you imagine the laws people would try to put into a new bill of rights?)
The government can't make a law against speach. A forum or private party can make any sort of conduct rules they want.
Whats the diffrence? well.. jail mostly.. the forum can't put you in jail.
Right, because it does not support mounts and uses crazy alphabet soup drive letter. (ya see there is a fundamental problem with it in addition to a use problem. I guess they might support mounts but, its not easy or much in use in the home market.)
I blame Microsoft for the program menu because they do the same thing.. And apple looses here to as they don't use a program menu or sorting at all (yet there is spotlight) You mentioned Linux and Gnome is very very good as far as being user friendly but the underlying system has some qwerkyness.
I would think that Microsoft can set user interface guidelines but if they have them.. they themselves ignore them. (as even MS software looks radically different from program to program, look at the latest versions of Outlook, Word, and Explorer. wtf?)
Windows has the same problem with program names.
What does "Power Point" do?
What does "Excel" do?
What does "Acrobat" do?
What does "WinRAR" do?
>> Also, unless we hold the airlines responsible for security failures, giving them the job is
>> pointless. Having the same organzation responsible for both security and security failures is
>> the only way it should work.
?? The Government is not held liable for ANYTHING. Nothing ever, its never governments fault, they never take the hit. If they airlines fuck it up they loose money. If the Government fucks it up.. that means they MAKE money. (We just need a better bigger more expensive program THEN it will work.)
You just absolutely made my point, yes I agree, that the airlines should be, and are the only ones that can be held responsible for their security on their own aircraft.
Nice one, this is good for blocking the credit cards, and I wont be getting a federal one.
The BEST thing to do is to tell the federal government they do not have the athority to do this. We need to control them, not the other way around.
Do not get this, stop it, interfere with it, break it. If you cant fly without it then dont fly. If you cant open a bank account then dont open a bank account. If you are somehow "forced" to get it, break the RFID chip in the ID with a hammer or microwave it. I'm standing me ground on this, I will not comply with it under any amount of force.
You apperntly don't want it.. WTF is with you? "if they're really dead-set on going ahead with it, it cannot be avoided." I've decided I will go to jail for this, and your just going to accept it without any fight at all? Screw you.
Same things happened with Montana, back in the 70's we voted in Vegas style gambling. The people voted for it, the law was passed, but it was never signed. And again with the Drinking age.. and again with the seatbelt and helmet laws.
Here is how a state gets out of this.. they tell the feds.. That sounds like a great idea.. take away our hi-way funds. We will sell some of our roads, and some of the land around them off to private people. Private people can open up shops or casinos or whatever, or use the land for advertising if they keep the road itself in good condition.
The people in the state win, the itself state wins, and the Fed looses.
What they are going to allow us to wait before they enact total control?
..and I'm inventing methods to break systems that will try to. I am aware I will probably go to jail but I am not going to willfully allow this.
Airline companies should decide who can, and who can not, fly on their own air planes. They should decide who must be searched and who must present ID. Why the government is involved, I'll never understand.
This is absurd.. its like saying.. "You don't like the interest rate? Well how about.. no payments for 60 days on your 21% interest loan. ehh? good deal there son."
I'm.. actually scared to do this.. but I'm drawing the line here. I declare that I will not be spied upon! I will not be recorded! RFID tagged! or video taped!
C: is just a "insider" computer term that everyone seems to know ans is comfortable with.. but its still not right and its not "easy" by any streach. It should be called Hard Disk and ALL system files should be located in "System" or maybe "Windows" Its a throw back to anchient computing and was a bad idea way back then too.
You also touched on another confusing problem that is.. Program Files. In start menu, programs are listed not by what they do, but by.. "vendor name" how absurd is that. I mean, doesn't everyone think of the word "Nullsoft" when they want to play music? Sorting applications like this is, was, and always will be a bad idea.
It's very appernt that windows does not have a logical drive layout because ever advrage joe novice I see has personal files thrown around the system in every place humanly possible. how many people have seen C:\Downloads and C:\stuff with photos, documents, music, and movies all scattred inside? If Windows had a useful simple drive layout this would not happen. (OS X is a prime example of a better system, yet they dont get everything right.)
et cetera makes sense as its not just configuration, you have init, password and "various" other stuff found there. etc.. etc..
/etc is much less confusing ok."
A better questions is.. why does Windows Vista (the most advanced OS on planet earth per Steve and Bill) use alphabet device names in 2007?
I can hear computer novices saying..
Novice: "Why is my primary drive C and not A?"
Master: "A and B are reserved for floppy drives."
Novice: "What's a floppy drive?"
Master: ".. Something we don't use anymore."
Novice: "Why are they still reserved then?"
Master: "They just are."
Novice: "Why isn't A the primary and C or Z reserved?"
Master: "... just use Unix, explaining
Yeah, its not just Bush, this sort of stuff has been going on for years and years.. its just getting to a point where people are finaly able to see it.
Well.. heh.. once you understand that people will not help you unless they get something out of it you will find it much easier to get help. I've found that RDM or NIN in the upper levels are quite a task. (especially rdm/brd doing 3 songs, refreshing 5 and still keeping an eye on debuffs. ugg.) I can't play like that for very long.. wears my mind out. WoW has some skill to fighting as in what order to use abilities also..
Yeah, Ive been on PVP's I think there is some tradeoff between both games. Played both quite a bit really.
..however people know they need to work together so they are more willing to try. ;-)
. FFXI though older, looks better, it pushes the limits of even recent hardware, and there is great detail in objects.
. WoW has a much better UI. The menu system of FFXI is limited.
. I find it's practically impossible to navigate FFXI without a Dual Shock Controller.. although if you have one you can easily do anything except talking with it and running and talking is easier on FFXI. (as most people can use there left to move and right to type, even if your using the mouse to move in wow your right hand is tied up.)
. WoW you dont need a controler. (can you even use one?) but the / commands and things require some more typeing.
. There are more abilities in WoW and they are creative, also the "paths" are a nice addition. but by contrast.. FFXI's job system means you don't need to "re-roll" to do something different or partake in a limited or caped group event.
. FFXI's grind is hellish. Nuff said.
. WoW's Quests are better and a lot of fun. FFXI's quests usually involve killing something far above your level for a drop.
. Both have good story lines but WoW's is much faster paced.
. I have never felt the excitement of doing thing in WoW that I have in FFXI, (Killing Maat, soloing SMN avatars, some close Prommy fights. Honestly I've had some real OMFG! moments in FFXI.)
. In a group in WoW members don't have as well of defined roles as they do in FFXI. This is a good and a bad thing. in FFXI's sense only certain types of groups work, however some jobs are very hard to master their role. (Red Mage or Ninja are busy jobs.)
. FFXI is very item centric. This is a bad thing as uber items are sometimes "required" just for normal play.
. Crafting is better in WoW, party much flat out, its more fun, more rewarding, and far easier.
. WoW has the option not to group, this is not always the case with FFXI, Damage dealing jobs get the worst of this as they are picked last for groups.
. FFXI has Monk that is widely known as the greatest job/class of all time in the known world.
If I had to say what game is "better" I would say WoW is probably better but I think FFXI can be more exciting at times and just feels more rewarding.
Really I would like to see a updated client for FFXI, but bigest problem with the game is they need to support the limitations of the PS2.. and always will.. this leaves little room for the development team to work.. yet they have pulled some tricks with the codebase to make certan things possible. FFXI-2 for PS3 or XboX360 would be really nice to see.
>
> If you don't play WoW, you either aren't interested or you would have started by now.
>
Thats not true, I've gone from FFXI to WoW after ToAU, or post BC. First impresions after a month of WoW BC?
50% of the Horde is Elvan.
WoW is very easy vs FFXI. (doing things seem unrewarding)
It's fun to play, but may not have long term intrest for me.
There is not much comunity, I think in a month I have talked to 2 people, and not been in a group yet. Far as I can tell it might as well be a single player Warcraft 4.
I dunno, I complain about certan things but overall its a fun game, its really good for quick play. So apprently if I'm joining it now It's still picking up players.