So far I have plenty of reason to believe she is, if you believe otherwise maybe you could state your reasons for that. Until then, I take being disgusting to you as a compliment.
You can not accuse just anyone to have stolen things from your room which are then found in theirs, for one.
He was in her room, she never was in his.
Then there's the bruises. She has an explanation for them, he has nothing.
Which reminds me, then there is his dumb fucking blog post in response, where he just calls he mentally unstable, and that it should be no surprise to anyone that she would make that up. What psycho fucking bully would leave it at that?
So while you wait for more evidence or someone else to figure it out for you (with that mindset, how can you even say that's what the cops are for: if YOU are unable to figure shit out, how can you verify they are?), I kinda heard enough.
I'm old enough to remember McMartin and how quickly the court of public opinion can crucify somebody only to later turn out to be bullshit
Then why are you not also old enough to remember all the women who got raped or otherwise abused, and were at best ignored, at worst attacked when they asked for help? On what planet is men wrongfully being accused of rape an issue even *visible* next to women being raped?
Just look at this thread and at how many people joke about it, or bend over backwards to pretend there isn't enough information to have an opinion either way, or how technically she could have just as well attacked him. All sorts of insane, cowardly bullshit by spineless anonymous fucks. "rape culture" is not just an empty phrase, it's an atmosphere so thick one can slice it.
Kudos for posting with your account, I guess you're a good dude but I disagree with you. Part of me genuinely wishes she could have simply have cracked his skull. Then it would have been her word against his dead rapist body, and this hardly a story.
That post totally works against him. He seems to think rational argument works the same way as his idea of lovemaking? I posted a comment, but I doubt that coward would approve it (seeing there are 0 comments so far, yeah right), so I'll post it here as well:
So your "argument" is basically "she is mentally unstable". Because you claim that.
How about I claim that you're a rapist, so "none of your post is surprising"?
Try again maybe, this time actually addressing the evidence, the fact that you stole from her room, and how come you've both been bruised after your visit to her.
Oh, actually: if she, according to you, is so clearly mentally unstable, that you are not even surprised she would falsely claim you raped her -- why did you go to her room in the first place??
Why add to being caught, being caught in your own web of lies? You're just adding to it. This isn't looking good for you. Not good at all.
f there wasn't sufficient evidence to move forward with charges, then there isn't sufficient evidence to justify her naming and shaming him.
The fuck? How about she actually was in that situation?
And no, it doesn't show any courage on her part, it makes her a part of the problem, as it encourages people to see rape survivors as gold diggers and sociopaths
This is classic victim blaming. And looking around in this thread, I don't think people need encouragement for that. Fucking disgusting.
LOL! You move goalposts, then complain about a logical fallacy? That's fucking rich. You originally said "How strongly do they believe animal testing is morally wrong?", and the rape analogy stands as is; address it or don't.
Then going elsewhere will just delay the inevitable. If we can't survive here, where it's still rather lush, then good luck where it's fucking bleak in comparison.. where just about everything we have there we will have brought from here, and where our current behaviour would end the adventure even quicker than it might on Earth.
"Endless growth" is the strategy of a virus, or of cancer; if you *need* endless growth to just survive, something is super fucked up. What is destroying our planet and our society is supposed to save us? Yeah, right.
I bet you, the difference between everybody doing that, and nobody doing it, is several power plants. Necessity of life? First-world boredom, more like.
What sides? Obama didn't dismantle anything of the police state created under Bush. Both parties are sponsored by the same corporations, effectively. Yeah yeah, the values they pay lip service differ - so?
It's not just racial slurs, they have just random insults it seems, at least for German son of a bitch, bum, child fucker -- those are certainly not nice things to say, but what does this have to do with genocide? This is so frightfully stupid.
What we saw in utopian science fiction was people addicted to consuming gimmicks, becoming transparent insects under the watchful, unblinking and increasingly all-seeing (also very, very opaque) eyes of states and corporations, who use information to milk and manage the populations? How about, "LOLNOPE" ?
Or maybe you read dystopian stuff like Nineteen-Eightyfour and thought it was supposed to be a happy tale, or a manual or something. Again, nope..
What has been created by this half century of massive corporate propaganda is what's called "anti-politics". So that anything that goes wrong, you blame the government. Well okay, there's plenty to blame the government about, but the government is the one institution that people can change... the one institution that you can affect without institutional change. That's exactly why all the anger and fear has been directed at the government. The government has a defect - it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect - they're pure tyrannies. So therefore you want to keep corporations invisible, and focus all anger on the government. So if you don't like something, you know, your wages are going down, you blame the government. Not blame the guys in the Fortune 500, because you don't read the Fortune 500. You just read what they tell you in the newspapers... so you don't read about the dazzling profits and the stupendous dizz, and the wages going down and so on, all you know is that the bad government is doing something, so let's get mad at the government.
That's the the point, you mindless parent, read statistics, not "the news". The news don't give you a reasonable overview over what to worry about, they mostly hype random stuff while distracting you from things that actually matter. That you're a parent doesn't entitle you to be stupid, it's actually the other way around.
You'd rather hand over ALL children to the predators that is marketing, just so you know where the kidnapping of a select few (in comparison) took place? Let's just throw the kids to the lions, on the off chance they might be kidnapped, because journalism can't be arsed to inform citizens on the stuff they need to keep their democracy intact and movies are so scary. That's nuts to me. It's not like it can prevent anything, or will magically make them easily retrievable, you know, it just might help a bit after the fact.
I completely uninstalled Flash along with Java about a week ago, and haven't looked back since. Whenever something doesn't work without flash, as cool it as may be, I can *always* answer the question with "do I need this, as opposed to just wanting it?" with a resounding no... your mileage may vary, but I dare doubt it does:P http://www.youtube.com/html5 is working better and better for me, too.
Slashdot Mirror
So far I have plenty of reason to believe she is, if you believe otherwise maybe you could state your reasons for that. Until then, I take being disgusting to you as a compliment.
What crime did I excuse that way? Killing someone in self-defense by accident?
Even just reading his post is pretty fucking damning.
Now try it with your real name attached, you disgusting asshole.
You can not accuse just anyone to have stolen things from your room which are then found in theirs, for one.
He was in her room, she never was in his.
Then there's the bruises. She has an explanation for them, he has nothing.
Which reminds me, then there is his dumb fucking blog post in response, where he just calls he mentally unstable, and that it should be no surprise to anyone that she would make that up. What psycho fucking bully would leave it at that?
So while you wait for more evidence or someone else to figure it out for you (with that mindset, how can you even say that's what the cops are for: if YOU are unable to figure shit out, how can you verify they are?), I kinda heard enough.
Then why are you not also old enough to remember all the women who got raped or otherwise abused, and were at best ignored, at worst attacked when they asked for help? On what planet is men wrongfully being accused of rape an issue even *visible* next to women being raped?
Just look at this thread and at how many people joke about it, or bend over backwards to pretend there isn't enough information to have an opinion either way, or how technically she could have just as well attacked him. All sorts of insane, cowardly bullshit by spineless anonymous fucks. "rape culture" is not just an empty phrase, it's an atmosphere so thick one can slice it.
Kudos for posting with your account, I guess you're a good dude but I disagree with you. Part of me genuinely wishes she could have simply have cracked his skull. Then it would have been her word against his dead rapist body, and this hardly a story.
That post totally works against him. He seems to think rational argument works the same way as his idea of lovemaking? I posted a comment, but I doubt that coward would approve it (seeing there are 0 comments so far, yeah right), so I'll post it here as well:
The fuck? How about she actually was in that situation?
This is classic victim blaming. And looking around in this thread, I don't think people need encouragement for that. Fucking disgusting.
LOL! You move goalposts, then complain about a logical fallacy? That's fucking rich. You originally said "How strongly do they believe animal testing is morally wrong?", and the rape analogy stands as is; address it or don't.
You're spot on, and the self-righteous backpatting in here is nauseating.
And when she wants to inject heroin, you hold her hair, right?
Then going elsewhere will just delay the inevitable. If we can't survive here, where it's still rather lush, then good luck where it's fucking bleak in comparison.. where just about everything we have there we will have brought from here, and where our current behaviour would end the adventure even quicker than it might on Earth.
"Endless growth" is the strategy of a virus, or of cancer; if you *need* endless growth to just survive, something is super fucked up. What is destroying our planet and our society is supposed to save us? Yeah, right.
.... news at 11.
I bet you, the difference between everybody doing that, and nobody doing it, is several power plants. Necessity of life? First-world boredom, more like.
It's only a singularity for an outside observer. Those in it experience it in all the gory and mediocre detail.
Why would you keep it on. Unless you're torrenting or something that's just pointless, and a huge waste of energy.
What sides? Obama didn't dismantle anything of the police state created under Bush. Both parties are sponsored by the same corporations, effectively. Yeah yeah, the values they pay lip service differ - so?
It's not just racial slurs, they have just random insults it seems, at least for German son of a bitch, bum, child fucker -- those are certainly not nice things to say, but what does this have to do with genocide? This is so frightfully stupid.
What we saw in utopian science fiction was people addicted to consuming gimmicks, becoming transparent insects under the watchful, unblinking and increasingly all-seeing (also very, very opaque) eyes of states and corporations, who use information to milk and manage the populations? How about, "LOLNOPE" ?
Or maybe you read dystopian stuff like Nineteen-Eightyfour and thought it was supposed to be a happy tale, or a manual or something. Again, nope..
In the words of Chomsky:
mod parent up.. please?
"You're saying because less kids are kidnapped now nobody should worry about their kid being kidnapped"
Thanks for your input, Captain Reading Comprehension ^^
That's the the point, you mindless parent, read statistics, not "the news". The news don't give you a reasonable overview over what to worry about, they mostly hype random stuff while distracting you from things that actually matter. That you're a parent doesn't entitle you to be stupid, it's actually the other way around.
You'd rather hand over ALL children to the predators that is marketing, just so you know where the kidnapping of a select few (in comparison) took place? Let's just throw the kids to the lions, on the off chance they might be kidnapped, because journalism can't be arsed to inform citizens on the stuff they need to keep their democracy intact and movies are so scary. That's nuts to me. It's not like it can prevent anything, or will magically make them easily retrievable, you know, it just might help a bit after the fact.
Relevant:
http://www.w3.org/community/fedsocweb/2013/02/11/socml-a-standardized-social-media-data-standard/
http://laist.com/2013/02/07/christopher_dorners_manifesto_in_fu.php
Well, read the manifesto or something.
I completely uninstalled Flash along with Java about a week ago, and haven't looked back since. Whenever something doesn't work without flash, as cool it as may be, I can *always* answer the question with "do I need this, as opposed to just wanting it?" with a resounding no... your mileage may vary, but I dare doubt it does :P http://www.youtube.com/html5 is working better and better for me, too.