"This will come as a blow to owners of enthusiast memory, such as Corsair's 2.133MHz DDR3 Dominator RAM, which needs 2V to run at its full speed with 9-9-9-24 timings."
I think some one forgot to proof read. Either that or manufacturers are REALLY pushing the data width technology as opposed to clock speed...
Yes..what I was quoting from was "The switch will form part of a half duplex 10Mbps local area network (LAN) on board the International Space Station (ISS)" in the article. I'm just curious as to why it is still a half duplex 10Mbit network...
I..third (?) this. My Treo 700p + pssh + screen + irrsi has let me further fuel my IRC addiction.. Admittedly, I don't have VPN software installed, but I use an internet facing server anyway..soo..
(insert fat, deep laugh) Just because I'm unafraid of thermal detonators, collaborate with bounty hunters, have a small rat-like thingy, gammorean guards and a passion for live, frozen wall ornaments does NOT make me fat!
Not everyone gets addicted to cheese burgers, but everyone who smokes ends up addicted. I've been a casual smoker for years now. Guess what? I'm not addicted. I smoke to relax myself. I am by no means addicted. Sorry, not EVERYONE who smokes ends up addicted.
I can eat a cheese burger now and then and it does me no harm Lets think about this. If it did NO harm the first time, there would be no harm the second, third or 582nd time. It's simple math.
f(a) = h * o, where h is the harm, n is the number of occurances, and a is the overall loss of health.
0 * 1 = 0. Ok, your logic works.
0 * 3000 = 0. Sorry.. your logic fails.
If there is any harm done, it happens with the first time you do it. Whether or not symptoms of it are witnessed is another issue, but there is always harm done.
Have you taken a look at the market share for web server software at the moment? Apache currently has 60% of the market while Microsoft only has around 30%. While this is slightly different than the whole GNU/Linux vs. Windows popularity debate, it makes the same point. Also, Linux is fundamentally more secure than Windows for a couple different reasons. One is the history. Windows was originally a single user operating system that was designed with very little to no security in mind. GNU/Linux was based off of Unix and was a true multi-user, multi-tasking operating system from the start. Microsoft had to tack "multi-user" capabilities and security on their single-user operating systems. They have been doing this since the NT days and the problems STILL have not been worked out.
Any operating system is only as secure as its admin allows it to be. Any idiot admin can make any OS insecure. But fundamentally, GNU/Linux had security and the whole idea of multi-user from the start, while Microsoft later tacked it onto their existing products. This is just one of many reasons why the whole "security-by-obfuscation" is for the most part invalid.
Some of the accusations made against HP and Microsoft in this blog are not accurate. OEM's are indeed allowed to distribute media from Microsoft, but many chose to distribute a drive image or a custumized install disk. The reason for this is 1) If they use a drive image, an installation can take as little at 10-15 minutes and 2) If they use a custom disk, they can slipstream updates, drivers, and the software that comes with the machine on the disk.
Also, the key that is on the computer does NOT only work with the disk. It is an OEM license and one can therefore use an XP OEM disk to install using this key. This is the same with Dell, Lenovo/IBM, Toshiba, Alienware...the list goes on and on. These manufacturers all get OEM licenses that work with a clean XP OEM disk.
Slashdot Mirror
"This will come as a blow to owners of enthusiast memory, such as Corsair's 2.133MHz DDR3 Dominator RAM, which needs 2V to run at its full speed with 9-9-9-24 timings." I think some one forgot to proof read. Either that or manufacturers are REALLY pushing the data width technology as opposed to clock speed...
Yes..what I was quoting from was "The switch will form part of a half duplex 10Mbps local area network (LAN) on board the International Space Station (ISS)" in the article. I'm just curious as to why it is still a half duplex 10Mbit network...
10Mbit switch? Am I the only one who thought "Gee, I would have though NASA could have afforded at least 100Mbit!"
The only reason I can come up with is the possibility of higher packet loss with all of the radiation. Does anyone know for sure?
I..third (?) this. My Treo 700p + pssh + screen + irrsi has let me further fuel my IRC addiction.. Admittedly, I don't have VPN software installed, but I use an internet facing server anyway..soo..
(insert fat, deep laugh) Just because I'm unafraid of thermal detonators, collaborate with bounty hunters, have a small rat-like thingy, gammorean guards and a passion for live, frozen wall ornaments does NOT make me fat!
PS, Where's my money Solo?
0 * 1 = 0. Ok, your logic works.
0 * 3000 = 0. Sorry.. your logic fails.
If there is any harm done, it happens with the first time you do it. Whether or not symptoms of it are witnessed is another issue, but there is always harm done.
Wait..You are going to say a whole OS sucks because you can't get a remote to work? You are aware there are fully compatible USB remotes, right?
It seems to be YOUR fault that you didn't investigate the hardware before buying it. You act as if Linux is the only OS to not have drivers for stuff.
I seem to remember 64-bit versions of Windows missing lots of print drivers.. Get over it, spend $25 to get a working remote.
Have you taken a look at the market share for web server software at the moment? Apache currently has 60% of the market while Microsoft only has around 30%. While this is slightly different than the whole GNU/Linux vs. Windows popularity debate, it makes the same point. Also, Linux is fundamentally more secure than Windows for a couple different reasons. One is the history. Windows was originally a single user operating system that was designed with very little to no security in mind. GNU/Linux was based off of Unix and was a true multi-user, multi-tasking operating system from the start. Microsoft had to tack "multi-user" capabilities and security on their single-user operating systems. They have been doing this since the NT days and the problems STILL have not been worked out.
e y.html)
Any operating system is only as secure as its admin allows it to be. Any idiot admin can make any OS insecure. But fundamentally, GNU/Linux had security and the whole idea of multi-user from the start, while Microsoft later tacked it onto their existing products. This is just one of many reasons why the whole "security-by-obfuscation" is for the most part invalid.
(Web server surveys - http://news.netcraft.com/archives/web_server_surv
Some of the accusations made against HP and Microsoft in this blog are not accurate. OEM's are indeed allowed to distribute media from Microsoft, but many chose to distribute a drive image or a custumized install disk. The reason for this is 1) If they use a drive image, an installation can take as little at 10-15 minutes and 2) If they use a custom disk, they can slipstream updates, drivers, and the software that comes with the machine on the disk.
Also, the key that is on the computer does NOT only work with the disk. It is an OEM license and one can therefore use an XP OEM disk to install using this key. This is the same with Dell, Lenovo/IBM, Toshiba, Alienware...the list goes on and on. These manufacturers all get OEM licenses that work with a clean XP OEM disk.