Docbook defines a standard for a document markup language.
The XML style sheets (XSLT) that invarrably happen to come with 'a docbook distribution' are not a component of that standard. Your free to change them at will.
How you do that, I haven clue 1 beyond 'edit the.xsl' Im sure ORA has a book or 10 on the subject.
But then agian, an "editor" or rather, a compiler of short works, ie a book of poems, usualy clams copyright over the _collection_. If you cite only one poem you have to recogonize the collections editor and publisher.
I remember specificly asking about quoting someone in a university paper. Even if it was a "well known" quote, I would have to cite the media outlet who was responsible for me seeing it.. Even if I was quoting a speech from a live news conference I would have to cite CNN.
Yes, its only accadamia, and no Im not sugesting that RH has, or should have, rights to the component packages, but a collection _is_ generaly treated as a special case.
One of the actual changes in 'Fedora' over 'Red Hat Linux' is the terms of the copyright. 'Red Hat Linux' is copyrighted with a very specific requirements for use.
Significantly, you couldnt sell CDs with 'Red Hat Linux' on them and call it 'Red Hat Linux'.... The product included support, and RH was getting lots of calls from people who had bought 'Red Hat Linux' out of the back of a van (or whatever:P)
With 'Fedora', OTOH, anyone can burn off CDs and call it 'Fedora'.. Well, more people can, there are still some restrictions Im sure.
GNOME Office is a meta-project, with the mission to coordinate productivity applications for the GNOME Desktop. We intend to produce a productivity suite composed of entirely free software.
Gnome office isn't. An office suite in the traditionan sence that a single entity is building a grand collection of applications. Integration is at the top of the list of things going for it with all the othere office suites. Gnome-Office apps use libraries and components desigined to allow for interoperability, interoperability isnt the goal of ie, Gnumeric or Abiword.
Use it as a 'form' and embed replacement strings
on
PDF Writers?
·
· Score: 1
Your outputting some kind of report that needs exact formating right?
Generate a template in your WYSIWYG editor of choice, export to PDF. And then edit the PDF with a text editor and insert @@@VAR_1@@@ type srtings as approiate. Then use something as simple as sed to replace them all.
Hmm.. Maby not, looking at a few pdfs taht I happen to have lying around the important part is encoded somehow.. Fuckers. Ok, do the same, generating a template as PS, do the subsutition on the template PS and then ps2pdf....
I have only ever once read a SAMS book. That was enough.
You say pass session information around in forms. Ok, what about the other 95% of the time when users click on links and not POST a form? Where do you get your state-on-the-client data from then?
Webmasters can set session timeout limites to stupid values so sessions suck? WTF? With state-on-the-client your trusing the client for all your data arn't you? Security risk much. Your coffee buddy gets up and then someone else sits down and has his session. State-on-the-client NEVER times out. You want to be paranoid about security then timeout sessions at 30 seconds. Leave it up to the client and your fucked.
Session information should be fairly small. I would rather have 100k in cheep and getting cheeper memory then have 100k POSTed to me accross the expensive and staying the same network.
See, your the kind of developer that learnt how do to something in 1994 and has never looked at anything since. No thinking about the evolving state of the art, just "Thats the way I learnt to do it and thats all I care about. Good enough for Berners-Lee, good enough for me."
are you using that it dosent have Persistence, (Affinity in cisco-speak)...
Especially when you can get it for free linux virtual server. Yes you could pass along all your values in hidden form fields. But then you could also write a C++ compiler in cobol.
Sory buddy, since the dawn of the web browser people have been using it as the standard client for client/server apps. Write it for web standards and it will work on any client. Or so the theroy goes.
What are ISP's out their doing? Patching BIND? Firewalling off the siteminder site? Letters?
As a member of the BOD of a non-profit ISP Ive called on our board to send Verisign a letter requesting the suspension of the service and to star talking to the main stream press. What is everyone else doing?
...he spent at least a few years dictating code to someone else his hands were so screwed up.
But in all seriousness, Dvorak, of the alternat two handed keyboard fame, also developed keboards for one handed use, both right hand and left hand. Unfortunatly, on quick googling around I can only find reference to this as a component of the Dvorak history - no pages where you can purchase one.
(I have no idea if mentioning RMS in a non software section will be good or bad for my karma... hmm...)
Your all right. It dosent happen all the time. But it was just an example, ok? The underlying logic applies.
Re:Yes, a cat's got my tongue, OK?
on
Can You Raed Tihs?
·
· Score: 0, Flamebait
What the fuck are you talking about?
Re:Yes, a cat's got my tongue, OK?
on
Can You Raed Tihs?
·
· Score: 1, Informative
Because english words are made up of some common components. 'i' always comes before 'e' in 'ie' pairs, for example. Compression is about rewriting common strings (of bits, not just strings of characters) into shorter strings - uncommon strings may end up being longer post compression. If your effectivly randomizing most of the text then there wont be any common strings. Or at least less then what occures in natural, ordered, prose. And there wont ever be whole words you can compress down.
Cyrus dosent bother its self with either accounts or passwords: there the job of something else. Specificly whatever you configure the SASL library to use. The only thing special you need to do to allow mail access for you existing user database is to create them a mailbox.
But first, do you realy want to use gentoo in a production machine? It may be fun to recompile everything, but for a production server, especially with something as important as email, gentoo isnt even a contender.
Anyway.. Cyrus IMAP seems to be the best of breed IMAP server. Its desigined to work in a 'black box' enviroment, where the users dont need 'real' accounts on the machine - and if they did would have to use IMAP to access their mail anyway.
Its ACL features might be of significant use for a work enviroment (Im planning on deplying it in an ISP enviroment, so its not much help to me). Its heavy reliance on SASL is a bit tricky to get working, but recent IETF decisions seem to mean that SASL is a necessity for just about anything.
http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/cyrus-overview-TOC.ht ml
Sun's traditional products have been Unix workstations, and because there necessary for unix workstations, unix servers. And of course software to run on them.
In the grand scheme of things, only recently has Sun started producing realy big boxes. And simotaniously, the need for big boxes has decreased: its clusterd micros as far as the eye can see.
For a general purpose unix workstation, a PC with Linux is cheeper, and more powerfull.. I daresay that the likes of Redhat is easier to manage then Solaris. For high end deskops for visualization, get a (Intel based) SGI with its fancy software. For entry level server, linux rocks. For mid range stuff, a cluster of linux boxen on Intel based SMP boxes is better then a single, or a smaller cluster of Suns. And for realy high end stuff, IBM is the only game in town: whatever else you can say about them they have made rock solid mainframes for 50 years, that work all the time, period. If you need such a machine, why would you risk getting one from a company that has been in that market for what? 2 years.
I priced a Sun PCI SCSI card last week. $500. No RAID, no cache, just a vanila SCSI card with a Sun sticker (and solaris support). Thats just insane.
So why? Why would anyone ever go to Sun for anything?
One of our users here had his email address in the documentation of a wildly distributed utility - ghostscript. Personaly, he was getting more then 10,000 messages per day.
Slashdot Mirror
The XML style sheets (XSLT) that invarrably happen to come with 'a docbook distribution' are not a component of that standard. Your free to change them at will.
How you do that, I haven clue 1 beyond 'edit the .xsl' Im sure ORA has a book or 10 on the subject.
Since most of the docs are out of date and talk about stupid and near-impossible to configure tools, I also mention xlmto to do the actual conversion.
SPLOOGE... Commercial messages delivered via 'genetic material'.
But then agian, an "editor" or rather, a compiler of short works, ie a book of poems, usualy clams copyright over the _collection_. If you cite only one poem you have to recogonize the collections editor and publisher.
I remember specificly asking about quoting someone in a university paper. Even if it was a "well known" quote, I would have to cite the media outlet who was responsible for me seeing it.. Even if I was quoting a speech from a live news conference I would have to cite CNN.
Yes, its only accadamia, and no Im not sugesting that RH has, or should have, rights to the component packages, but a collection _is_ generaly treated as a special case.
Significantly, you couldnt sell CDs with 'Red Hat Linux' on them and call it 'Red Hat Linux'.... The product included support, and RH was getting lots of calls from people who had bought 'Red Hat Linux' out of the back of a van (or whatever :P)
With 'Fedora', OTOH, anyone can burn off CDs and call it 'Fedora'.. Well, more people can, there are still some restrictions Im sure.
WTF is that?
Generate a template in your WYSIWYG editor of choice, export to PDF. And then edit the PDF with a text editor and insert @@@VAR_1@@@ type srtings as approiate. Then use something as simple as sed to replace them all.
Hmm.. Maby not, looking at a few pdfs taht I happen to have lying around the important part is encoded somehow.. Fuckers. Ok, do the same, generating a template as PS, do the subsutition on the template PS and then ps2pdf....
You say pass session information around in forms. Ok, what about the other 95% of the time when users click on links and not POST a form? Where do you get your state-on-the-client data from then?
Webmasters can set session timeout limites to stupid values so sessions suck? WTF? With state-on-the-client your trusing the client for all your data arn't you? Security risk much. Your coffee buddy gets up and then someone else sits down and has his session. State-on-the-client NEVER times out. You want to be paranoid about security then timeout sessions at 30 seconds. Leave it up to the client and your fucked.
Session information should be fairly small. I would rather have 100k in cheep and getting cheeper memory then have 100k POSTed to me accross the expensive and staying the same network.
See, your the kind of developer that learnt how do to something in 1994 and has never looked at anything since. No thinking about the evolving state of the art, just "Thats the way I learnt to do it and thats all I care about. Good enough for Berners-Lee, good enough for me."
Especially when you can get it for free linux virtual server. Yes you could pass along all your values in hidden form fields. But then you could also write a C++ compiler in cobol.
Sory buddy, since the dawn of the web browser people have been using it as the standard client for client/server apps. Write it for web standards and it will work on any client. Or so the theroy goes.
Are you stupid or something? Where did you ever hear that speeding limits dont apply to the passing lane?
As a member of the BOD of a non-profit ISP Ive called on our board to send Verisign a letter requesting the suspension of the service and to star talking to the main stream press. What is everyone else doing?
But in all seriousness, Dvorak, of the alternat two handed keyboard fame, also developed keboards for one handed use, both right hand and left hand. Unfortunatly, on quick googling around I can only find reference to this as a component of the Dvorak history - no pages where you can purchase one.
(I have no idea if mentioning RMS in a non software section will be good or bad for my karma... hmm...)
Your all right. It dosent happen all the time. But it was just an example, ok? The underlying logic applies.
What the fuck are you talking about?
Because english words are made up of some common components. 'i' always comes before 'e' in 'ie' pairs, for example. Compression is about rewriting common strings (of bits, not just strings of characters) into shorter strings - uncommon strings may end up being longer post compression. If your effectivly randomizing most of the text then there wont be any common strings. Or at least less then what occures in natural, ordered, prose. And there wont ever be whole words you can compress down.
Ford is not in the computer business.
There written for some type of graphics API, DirectX and/or OpenGL. The days of writing to bare hardware were over more then a decade ago.
Cyrus dosent bother its self with either accounts or passwords: there the job of something else. Specificly whatever you configure the SASL library to use. The only thing special you need to do to allow mail access for you existing user database is to create them a mailbox.
Anyway.. Cyrus IMAP seems to be the best of breed IMAP server. Its desigined to work in a 'black box' enviroment, where the users dont need 'real' accounts on the machine - and if they did would have to use IMAP to access their mail anyway.
Its ACL features might be of significant use for a work enviroment (Im planning on deplying it in an ISP enviroment, so its not much help to me). Its heavy reliance on SASL is a bit tricky to get working, but recent IETF decisions seem to mean that SASL is a necessity for just about anything.
http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/cyrus-overview-TOC.ht ml
Sun's traditional products have been Unix workstations, and because there necessary for unix workstations, unix servers. And of course software to run on them.
In the grand scheme of things, only recently has Sun started producing realy big boxes. And simotaniously, the need for big boxes has decreased: its clusterd micros as far as the eye can see.
For a general purpose unix workstation, a PC with Linux is cheeper, and more powerfull.. I daresay that the likes of Redhat is easier to manage then Solaris. For high end deskops for visualization, get a (Intel based) SGI with its fancy software. For entry level server, linux rocks. For mid range stuff, a cluster of linux boxen on Intel based SMP boxes is better then a single, or a smaller cluster of Suns. And for realy high end stuff, IBM is the only game in town: whatever else you can say about them they have made rock solid mainframes for 50 years, that work all the time, period. If you need such a machine, why would you risk getting one from a company that has been in that market for what? 2 years.
I priced a Sun PCI SCSI card last week. $500. No RAID, no cache, just a vanila SCSI card with a Sun sticker (and solaris support). Thats just insane.
So why? Why would anyone ever go to Sun for anything?
The question is when the attack is over, do you loosen up the ACL's?
One of our users here had his email address in the documentation of a wildly distributed utility - ghostscript. Personaly, he was getting more then 10,000 messages per day.