Just for fun, do a whois freewebemail.com. Compare that to the output of whois designerlove.com...
The listed registrar of freewebemail is compleatly bogus. The address and phone number are invalid.
The whole point of certficates is that someone does analysis on who is buying them. The CA dosent care who you are, only that you are who you say you are. Domain registrars on the other hand, dont give a flying fuck who you say you are, as long as your CC goes through.
RBL's durring the SMTP phase, content filtering durring the SMTP phase, receive and filter with spamassassin. Mail servers inspect messeges and decide what to do with them based on content all the time.
The reason why it shouldnt be allowed on foot paths is that that would totaly defeat the purpose of foot paths.
Footpaths exist for a varity of reasons, from pure entertainment of walking / hiking to encourging a healthy lifestile to allowing for the appreciation of nature.
A segway would destroy any entertainment value of walking / hiking. It promotes sedation, not activity. And if the path is good enough to allow for a segway to travel on it, then your conquring nature, not appreciatin it.
Unfair competition only comes into place if you have a monopoly and thus can by force alone crush competition.
Cisco is big, but cisco is not the only company in that industry. Cisco can sell whatever it wants at whatever price it wants to anyone it wants. Or not at all.
Speed problems can be solved by throwning hardware at the problem. Faster disks, more ram, more servers. A filesystem not desigined with stability in mind wont be stable regardless of the hardware.
Stability should be at the top of the list when desigining a filesystem. If its a quetsion of stability or speed, stability should win.
Question for all you non-lawyers out there:
If Microsoft publishes a study that shows a MS product beating out, say a Redhat one, and that makes someone purchase shares of MSFT over RHAD, and then time proves the RH stuff better, MSFT plunges and RHAD goes through the roof, could the FEC fine or otherwise punish them? Not that they _would_, but is that type of scenerio regulated agianst?
Stallman is a lot of things. But when it comes time to be throwing quotes from powerfull people around when discissing the future of the computer world, his name should be at the bottom of the list.
Java might be a threat to his free software utopia that exists (only in) his mind, but in the real world its not a problem.
NDS can be exposed with LDAP. There is a PAM LDAP module.. What wouldnt work here? Im actualy asking, as I might have to do the same thing in the future.
The underlying theroy is that _people_ are not electing the US president or the EU Council(ers?), the states/member nations are.
The problem is that the popular interpertation of the US Presidential Election is that it is an election by the people. And its not. Merrits of the system asside, there is a serious divergence in what the US PE is being sold as - and though to be - compared to what it is.
From what I understand, there is little downside to what India is planning. There not going to implement internet voting or retina scans or anything wiz-bang crazy. Just electronic counting machines.
(Im assuming your a 'merkin since your jumping to the US' defence).. It has been prooven that the punch card system in use all over your great country dosent work. Not only do the mechanics of US elections not work, but the theroy of US presidental elections - the electorial colage - would be laughable if it diddnt effect the rest of the world so much.
Your damm right its expensive to be the worlds policeman. The UN pays the nations who deploy peacekeepers into the field on a less-then, but not to bad, cost recovery basis.
This would be far easier to do if all of the member nations paid there dues.
If the worlds policemen were deployed more often then there would be less of a need for the worlds shoot-first-and-never-ask-questions SWAT team. To do anything.
Its a good thing that care of Jon Stewart the US is sending IRAQ that FTD 'Sory we invaded you country based on forged documents' flower basket. It takes a big country to admit when there flat out wrong.
What is happening is SCO is suing IBM for copying the code and transfering it to the public domain. The maximum fine could be in around $1billion dollars. SCO's current market cap is around $110million. And thats about 4 times what it was worth in December.
So if IBM felt like it - Im sure they have or could easily get the $110m - they could just buy SCO outright. Hostile takeover and all. Im not a broker or anything but yes, Im sure if that happened the stock price would rise. But by only moving legal paper around its value has increased 400% in 6 months, over what was a stable price for a year. So its overvalued and will only go so much higher.
And if not just IBM, then IBM and Sun and HP and RedHat and anyone else who still has to pay UNIX(TM) royalties would get together, buy it out and just put it all in the public domain.
If your compiling everything from source, then it compleatly defeats the purpose of using an OS / distribution with "built in" binary package management.
Only installing what you need is always a good idea, but if your looking for long term stability then versions not yet available in binary format is the exact opposite of what you want to do.
Aircraft carriers, when they dont have the air wing aboard, have next to no offensive weponry. Which is why both naval aviatiors have a shoot first and ask questions later policy on unfriendlys who stray within 200mi of there boat, and why carries have upwards of a dozen ships in there screening force.
Slashdot Mirror
So in the geek world, ordered by colour isnt necessaraly all that bad.
In all that time of typing, have you never come accross a keyboard with a shift key?
95 diddnt have any USB support. Your thinking about the 98 demo.
Just for fun, do a whois freewebemail.com. Compare that to the output of whois designerlove.com...
The listed registrar of freewebemail is compleatly bogus. The address and phone number are invalid.
The whole point of certficates is that someone does analysis on who is buying them. The CA dosent care who you are, only that you are who you say you are. Domain registrars on the other hand, dont give a flying fuck who you say you are, as long as your CC goes through.
Footpaths exist for a varity of reasons, from pure entertainment of walking / hiking to encourging a healthy lifestile to allowing for the appreciation of nature.
A segway would destroy any entertainment value of walking / hiking. It promotes sedation, not activity. And if the path is good enough to allow for a segway to travel on it, then your conquring nature, not appreciatin it.
I know how to google.
Cisco is big, but cisco is not the only company in that industry. Cisco can sell whatever it wants at whatever price it wants to anyone it wants. Or not at all.
-rw-r--r-- 1 ftp ftp 140869632 Jul 20 22:03 taroon-i386-as-disc1.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 ftp ftp 666238976 Jul 20 21:58 taroon-i386-disc2.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 ftp ftp 568131584 Jul 20 22:03 taroon-i386-disc3.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 ftp ftp 327122944 Jul 20 22:05 taroon-i386-ws-disc1.iso Different install, and the workstation version haas about 160mb more avialable packages. Makes sense to me.
Stability should be at the top of the list when desigining a filesystem. If its a quetsion of stability or speed, stability should win.
Redhat even had FS ACLs and userland tools in one of there betas and removed it because they couldnt get it right.
Id love to see someone who actualy got this up and running.
Not at all. First rule of litigation is to sue everyone. And there pizza delevery guys. And "unnamed plaintifs" as well.
Question for all you non-lawyers out there:
If Microsoft publishes a study that shows a MS product beating out, say a Redhat one, and that makes someone purchase shares of MSFT over RHAD, and then time proves the RH stuff better, MSFT plunges and RHAD goes through the roof, could the FEC fine or otherwise punish them? Not that they _would_, but is that type of scenerio regulated agianst?
Java might be a threat to his free software utopia that exists (only in) his mind, but in the real world its not a problem.
NDS can be exposed with LDAP. There is a PAM LDAP module.. What wouldnt work here? Im actualy asking, as I might have to do the same thing in the future.
The problem is that the popular interpertation of the US Presidential Election is that it is an election by the people. And its not. Merrits of the system asside, there is a serious divergence in what the US PE is being sold as - and though to be - compared to what it is.
From what I understand, there is little downside to what India is planning. There not going to implement internet voting or retina scans or anything wiz-bang crazy. Just electronic counting machines.
(Im assuming your a 'merkin since your jumping to the US' defence).. It has been prooven that the punch card system in use all over your great country dosent work. Not only do the mechanics of US elections not work, but the theroy of US presidental elections - the electorial colage - would be laughable if it diddnt effect the rest of the world so much.
At least the version numbers are increase with time. Sun's version numbers on another hand....
This would be far easier to do if all of the member nations paid there dues.
If the worlds policemen were deployed more often then there would be less of a need for the worlds shoot-first-and-never-ask-questions SWAT team. To do anything.
Its a good thing that care of Jon Stewart the US is sending IRAQ that FTD 'Sory we invaded you country based on forged documents' flower basket. It takes a big country to admit when there flat out wrong.
JWZ's proof of concept pos. Note that he gave up, but IIRC thats because he couldnt find drunk-goon proof hardware.
So if IBM felt like it - Im sure they have or could easily get the $110m - they could just buy SCO outright. Hostile takeover and all. Im not a broker or anything but yes, Im sure if that happened the stock price would rise. But by only moving legal paper around its value has increased 400% in 6 months, over what was a stable price for a year. So its overvalued and will only go so much higher.
And if not just IBM, then IBM and Sun and HP and RedHat and anyone else who still has to pay UNIX(TM) royalties would get together, buy it out and just put it all in the public domain.
Only installing what you need is always a good idea, but if your looking for long term stability then versions not yet available in binary format is the exact opposite of what you want to do.