Perhaps the word more suited for his beliefs would be agnostic, but I consider myself an atheist too, and practically share all his beliefs. Btw, I studied about several religions, just out of curiosity.
The thing is most people wonder the beauty of nature, and proclaim that only god could have created it. I wonder the beauty of nature and the complex mathematical dynamics that evolved it. But I would certainly never call math a god.
Actually, if it was a Linux OS, there would also be some folks bashing it. It's the "group mentality" that makes people so much partial.
To the point: my Aspire One booted Linspire in 15 seconds, and now boots Ubuntu Netbook Remix in 25 seconds, so I can't see the revolution they're talking about.
Actually, it's 1900x1200 pixels, that sure is bigger (memory-wise) than my Desktop's resolution. And yes, it has the XVideo extension since the first beta versions, so the stretching part is hardware accelerated. I doubt the decoding part would be implemented in hardware, so my guess (I didn't RTFA) it's just a better processor.
Actually, I do! And also I release my projects under the GPL, as a way to payback the community. The most used one seems to be a little tool called dnatagger, google it.
Bring it on, I say. It's funny to watch the corporate idiots wasting their time and money on nonsense, rather than adapting to the world we live in today.
Remember, if you buy their products, it's your money being spent. I use GNU/Linux exclusively since 2001, so that's a non-issue to me.
The problem is not that it got religious, as it kept doing its job. The problem (better fitted to this context) would be if it developed tentacles and... well, you got the picture.
Godel found that, within a system of axioms, there are questions you can't answer using only those axioms. The specification of an OS, although extensive, is not composed of "hard" questions. You don't need to prove P=NP for an OS to work.
Slashdot Mirror
[...] you can just as easily write .cs files in Notepad.exe and [...]
You can just as easily punch your nuts repeatedly, and I assure you'd feel much better than using notepad.exe.
You forgot to say your friend's name: Rin Tin Tin.
Perhaps the word more suited for his beliefs would be agnostic, but I consider myself an atheist too, and practically share all his beliefs. Btw, I studied about several religions, just out of curiosity.
The thing is most people wonder the beauty of nature, and proclaim that only god could have created it. I wonder the beauty of nature and the complex mathematical dynamics that evolved it. But I would certainly never call math a god.
The unlimited that is limited, the free you have to pay. And Orwell and I laughing in the newspeak sense.
The story is tagged badtitle when in fact it should be wrongtitle, or even better toostupidtomakeagoodtitle.
I upgraded a machine from 8.04 to 9.04 and everything went smoothly. But YMMV.
BHWTETA!
Not necessarily, they could skip a step entirely, just like WinXP was followed by Win 7.
$ q_dec ~/unencryptableMessage.txt
0011100
0100010
1000001
1000001
1000001
0100010
0011100
Actually, if it was a Linux OS, there would also be some folks bashing it. It's the "group mentality" that makes people so much partial.
To the point: my Aspire One booted Linspire in 15 seconds, and now boots Ubuntu Netbook Remix in 25 seconds, so I can't see the revolution they're talking about.
Indeed. It'll be cool when we'll be able to receive some butterfly genes, and see ultraviolet.
Don't underestimate the power of incompetence.
Ooops, my bad! Thank you for the correction. Mods, please mod me "-1, Misinformative"
Actually, it's 1900x1200 pixels, that sure is bigger (memory-wise) than my Desktop's resolution. And yes, it has the XVideo extension since the first beta versions, so the stretching part is hardware accelerated. I doubt the decoding part would be implemented in hardware, so my guess (I didn't RTFA) it's just a better processor.
Actually, I do! And also I release my projects under the GPL, as a way to payback the community. The most used one seems to be a little tool called dnatagger, google it.
Now, may I know what you do?
I'm included in Everybody, but let me explicitly sign in
-- dmbasso
Bring it on, I say. It's funny to watch the corporate idiots wasting their time and money on nonsense, rather than adapting to the world we live in today.
Remember, if you buy their products, it's your money being spent. I use GNU/Linux exclusively since 2001, so that's a non-issue to me.
I wonder if it is just me, but every time I read it as "Slow Leopard".
The problem is not that it got religious, as it kept doing its job. The problem (better fitted to this context) would be if it developed tentacles and... well, you got the picture.
sudo apt-get install oz-flight-simulator
Godel found that, within a system of axioms, there are questions you can't answer using only those axioms. The specification of an OS, although extensive, is not composed of "hard" questions. You don't need to prove P=NP for an OS to work.
To accurately reproduce the function of a human brain, you must reproduce most of the linkages, stimuli, output, feedback, etc
FTFY. And the simulation needs to be only sufficiently good, not perfect.
Don't worry, there are lots of people working on it, and they (we) are aware of it.
For me, 2001 was the year of Linux on my desktop (exclusively). What others say about 'the year' is really irrelevant, isn't it?
Alan Cocks will be responsible for the pistons.
So the question is: will it run in Linus?
Wow, that was a nice reasoning! ~50 years of research "failed", therefore it is useless to keep going on -- we'll never achieve human intelligence!
Perhaps you're right, human intelligence is too difficult for us to achieve. But I guess that in ten years AI will reach your level of intelligence.
And pretty soon after that, AI will be as intelligent as a hamster!