Maybe (citation needed), but Christian dogma says that as long as you accept Jesus you're forgiven - basically, you can commit whatever crime you want and still be forgiven. How can that concept breed morality?
Which is exactly the purpose of these attacks. The response will be to increase the military intervention in Syria as well as putting pressure on local Muslim communities by the security services.
The worrying thing is that it's an effective strategy. Make Western residents think Muslims are out to get them, and vice versa. These people want a war between Muslims and the rest of the world.
You're probably right in this case, if Google cars are clearly sign written as being a driverless car.
However, I have no problem with the police stopping a slow driver. It's often an indicator of drink driving, or could be an indicator that the driver's sight is impaired.
I followed somebody home last night - at 11 - and they were doing 30-35 in a 50mph. I contemplated overtaking and then decided against it - mainly because I didn't trust them not to do something stupid. I then watched the car swerve as it came up to a roundabout - almost like the drive didn't see the well lit, well signed junction.
You should be - they say it will cost between 15-20k per day. It's the military, so we'll assume they're out by an order of magnitude, that's still [according to the summary] about a quarter of the running cost of a destroyer.
Our office did hovercrafting for our Christmas outing/dinner - these kind of single seater hovercrafts. They were far more physically demanding than any of us imagined. Like you say, when you turned them, the just kept going the same direction, but at right angles to the direction of travel. The trick was to lean into the turn and use the friction of the skirt to change the direction of travel. You basically knelt in the them and used your weight to steer.
I have a colleague who is perfectly happy to throw away his rights - "I don't care what they do if it's anti-terror related" and "we need to get rid of all this human rights bullshit", which was in response to my mention of civil rights, namely being detained without charge and warrant-less access of private data.
The problem is that civil/human rights don't feature very high up on people's priorities because they don't need the obvious ones on a daily basis, and they don't realise how much of our daily lives is made possible because of those rights. More succinctly - people don't care about their rights until they need them.
In a way, it's very similar to how all these people are leaving their countries to join ISIL - they're blind to the freedoms they've been afforded and go off to fight the kind of regimes their parents fought to escape from.
I think MagickalMyst is referring to paedophiles - there have been a number high ranking politicians who have been accused of paedophilia or sex abuse. It's important to note the "accused" bit, because most of them are dead (or suffer from dementia). The problem is that they're being accused posthumously which means that they can't defend themselves, and even if they were guilty they'd never pay for their crimes.
This was kicked off in the UK by the revelations that a popular entertainer - Jimmy Saville - had a history of sex abuse. This only came to light after his death when people were willing to come forward. Previous allegations had been swept under the carpet due to his connections with the BBC, politicians & royalty. Other people - notably Rolf Harris - have been convicted, whilst others have had their names dragged through the mud.
Put simply, it's a cluster-fuck. People are being deemed guilty by the general public because they've simply been arrested, whilst others have [most likely] gotten away with their crimes because of friends in high places. The only positive thing to come of this is that some offenders have been brought to justice (far to late, but anyhow), and the police are [hopefully] going to take action when reports of sexual abuse are made.
It's not just celebrities though - there was also the Rotherham abuse scandal - where it is "conservatively estimated that 1,400 children had been sexually abused in the town between 1997 and 2013". In that case the authorities were reluctant to pursue allegations " for fear of "giving oxygen" to racism."
Cablelink in Dublin (then ntl, not sure what it's called now - possibly UPC) had BBC proper. I was never sure how that worked as surely that would break licencing.
I've always used both Britain and The British, or Ireland or The Irish when referring to governments. It tends to be pretty bloody clear from the context as to what/who you're referring to. Some people really seem to go out of their way to get annoyed...
Don't be daft, that'll never happen. It does however raise an interesting point - which will end first, Klingon conflicts or the Metric vs Imperial debate?
I'm still waiting for an independently verified e-cat which measures the energy input/output properly rather than "look - steam - it's obviously working"
Why should they? People in France are likely to use Google.fr because it's more relevant (and the correct language). Should EU courts also be allowed to force companies to filter content when they receive phone calls from within the EU?
If you don't want your citizens viewing content that is not allowed to be served in your county then block it yourself, don't expect others to do your dirty work for you. Fortunately, the people in charge are slowly waking up to the idea that that isn't even remotely possible.
Slashdot Mirror
You'll have to explain what these are...
The idea of an all out conflict between Muslims and infidels? That's all I can figure out.
Meanwhile in the 21st century...
These are people who get angry at the idea of some dude from 1400 years ago appearing in a cartoon.
I for one would like to hear them described in the BBC as murderous cunts.
Maybe (citation needed), but Christian dogma says that as long as you accept Jesus you're forgiven - basically, you can commit whatever crime you want and still be forgiven. How can that concept breed morality?
Apart from the Syrian and Egyptian passports - from that notoriously right wing source "The Independent":
http://www.independent.co.uk/n...
That would be anti-theism. Atheism is simply a lack of belief.
Which is exactly the purpose of these attacks. The response will be to increase the military intervention in Syria as well as putting pressure on local Muslim communities by the security services.
The worrying thing is that it's an effective strategy. Make Western residents think Muslims are out to get them, and vice versa. These people want a war between Muslims and the rest of the world.
You're probably right in this case, if Google cars are clearly sign written as being a driverless car.
However, I have no problem with the police stopping a slow driver. It's often an indicator of drink driving, or could be an indicator that the driver's sight is impaired.
I followed somebody home last night - at 11 - and they were doing 30-35 in a 50mph. I contemplated overtaking and then decided against it - mainly because I didn't trust them not to do something stupid. I then watched the car swerve as it came up to a roundabout - almost like the drive didn't see the well lit, well signed junction.
You should be - they say it will cost between 15-20k per day. It's the military, so we'll assume they're out by an order of magnitude, that's still [according to the summary] about a quarter of the running cost of a destroyer.
Our office did hovercrafting for our Christmas outing/dinner - these kind of single seater hovercrafts. They were far more physically demanding than any of us imagined. Like you say, when you turned them, the just kept going the same direction, but at right angles to the direction of travel. The trick was to lean into the turn and use the friction of the skirt to change the direction of travel. You basically knelt in the them and used your weight to steer.
I have a colleague who is perfectly happy to throw away his rights - "I don't care what they do if it's anti-terror related" and "we need to get rid of all this human rights bullshit", which was in response to my mention of civil rights, namely being detained without charge and warrant-less access of private data.
The problem is that civil/human rights don't feature very high up on people's priorities because they don't need the obvious ones on a daily basis, and they don't realise how much of our daily lives is made possible because of those rights. More succinctly - people don't care about their rights until they need them.
In a way, it's very similar to how all these people are leaving their countries to join ISIL - they're blind to the freedoms they've been afforded and go off to fight the kind of regimes their parents fought to escape from.
I haven't looked at the numbers, but could tidal forces have a heating effect?
...web tracking that makes this bill awful.
That and the fact that the authorities won't need a warrant to access this data. fishing trips are going to get very popular.
I think MagickalMyst is referring to paedophiles - there have been a number high ranking politicians who have been accused of paedophilia or sex abuse. It's important to note the "accused" bit, because most of them are dead (or suffer from dementia). The problem is that they're being accused posthumously which means that they can't defend themselves, and even if they were guilty they'd never pay for their crimes.
This was kicked off in the UK by the revelations that a popular entertainer - Jimmy Saville - had a history of sex abuse. This only came to light after his death when people were willing to come forward. Previous allegations had been swept under the carpet due to his connections with the BBC, politicians & royalty. Other people - notably Rolf Harris - have been convicted, whilst others have had their names dragged through the mud.
Put simply, it's a cluster-fuck. People are being deemed guilty by the general public because they've simply been arrested, whilst others have [most likely] gotten away with their crimes because of friends in high places. The only positive thing to come of this is that some offenders have been brought to justice (far to late, but anyhow), and the police are [hopefully] going to take action when reports of sexual abuse are made.
It's not just celebrities though - there was also the Rotherham abuse scandal - where it is "conservatively estimated that 1,400 children had been sexually abused in the town between 1997 and 2013". In that case the authorities were reluctant to pursue allegations " for fear of "giving oxygen" to racism."
Cablelink in Dublin (then ntl, not sure what it's called now - possibly UPC) had BBC proper. I was never sure how that worked as surely that would break licencing.
So is the UN.
It's very convenient to start counting *after* WW2, isn't it.
I've always used both Britain and The British, or Ireland or The Irish when referring to governments. It tends to be pretty bloody clear from the context as to what/who you're referring to. Some people really seem to go out of their way to get annoyed...
Don't be daft, that'll never happen. It does however raise an interesting point - which will end first, Klingon conflicts or the Metric vs Imperial debate?
I'm still waiting for an independently verified e-cat which measures the energy input/output properly rather than "look - steam - it's obviously working"
Except that in this case she knew that her daughter had no interest in computers, but sent her anyway.
Why should they? People in France are likely to use Google.fr because it's more relevant (and the correct language).
Should EU courts also be allowed to force companies to filter content when they receive phone calls from within the EU?
If you don't want your citizens viewing content that is not allowed to be served in your county then block it yourself, don't expect others to do your dirty work for you. Fortunately, the people in charge are slowly waking up to the idea that that isn't even remotely possible.
PTFE tape is adhesive?
Or possibly cancer is more easily diagnosed that it was in the past.