There is, but it used a 64-byte packet. Likely because the standard calls for the packet to be hand written on a piece of paper in Hex. While I'm usually in favour of sticking to standards, I think in this case I'll make an exception.
If the revenue from left handed market cost of developing for left handed people then it makes sense from a business perspective. Keep in mind that there's probably left-handed people who buy it and play it right-handed anyway if they really want it, so the market they're cutting out may not be as big as you'd first assume.
Canada has a blank media levy (from the 80s era of mix tapes I believe, but that's not explained in this article) that a judge ruled gives us carte blanche to download (but not upload) music to burn to those media. Maybe the *IAA pushing for levies will backfire on them.
This just in: Providing a service doesn't follow the same price changes over time as providing a product. There's much more support and infrastructure maintenance/upgrading involved.
It seems to be censored, but I can still imagine some unwanted results possibly popping up at inopportune moments. "Honestly Dear, I was in the middle of searching for gigantic asteroids and that just popped up on the screen. Hun...?"
Yeah, and somebody with an ISP (and DNS) in Ireland connecting to a server in England doesn't have their traffic go anywhere near the US. The steam forums would be full of Europeans complaining about the lag. The US could try to leverage ICANN to pooch root DNS, but alt DNS already exists and it wouldn't take long for the world to adjust to a USless Internet.
Wasn't the internet built so that it doesn't have a single point of failure? By the US government/military? I'm sure they can shut down the "tubes" within and linking to the US, but there's DNS, hosts and switches outside of their control.
Backwards compatibility is the other big factor after cost. If USB3.0 is backwards compatible (which I assume it is) that's going to be a huge advantage. Why get something better but more expensive when I still have a camera, printer, external HDD etc. etc. that can't use it when I can get something almost as good that will work for all those (and my new USB3.0 versions of them as I replace them).
I'm not American and I don't think the American court system should have any jurisdiction over non-American websites either. I'm just commenting on this situation.
Ok, I can see how that person should be able to sue for damages in the UK courts then (which the defendant could probably ignore unless he plans to travel to the UK in the future), but I still don't see how that should get the site that's no where near UK jurisdiction shut down.
IANAL, but isn't there any kind of jurisdiction regarding stuff like this. Why is a law needed for, "Courts that have no jurisdiction here can't have jurisdiction here."?
From the ISP's perspective:
1. The ISP is American (I assume), and
2. The client is American, and
3. If the client and/or ISP haven't broken any American laws
why should they use a UK cease and desist for anything other than toilet paper?
If the client and/or ISP HAVE broken American laws, the person should sue using the American court system.
Re:Wikipedia is the source?
on
UVB-76 Explained
·
· Score: 5, Funny
It cites a way-back-machine archive of a Russian language geocities page that's no longer available. I've seen more credible citations carved into bathroom stalls.
I like the way the combat system works for magic, as it alleviates the players trying a fight/rest/fight/rest type of dungeon crawl. Outside of that I much preferred 3.5. I was thinking of trying a hybrid campaign where we used the 3.5 rules for everything except magic, which would use the 4th ed turn/combat/daily magic use.
The people who visit sites like pcpro and/. already know it's BS, and the people who would fall for the BS aren't the type of people who frequent those sites or look for hardware reviews online. We're preaching to the choir as it were.
I understand trying to make the distinction between buying with stocks, but the way the summary is worded it made me picture dump trucks full of $100s being dumped on McAfee's front lawn.
Slashdot Mirror
Diaspora is the current Open Source equivalent of Paris Hilton... subject to such high expectations.
Wait... what?
Sorry. I agree with most of what you said, but I couldn't let that slide.
"there isn't a benchmark for pigeon data speeds"
There is, but it used a 64-byte packet. Likely because the standard calls for the packet to be hand written on a piece of paper in Hex. While I'm usually in favour of sticking to standards, I think in this case I'll make an exception.
If the revenue from left handed market < cost of developing for left handed people then it makes sense from a business perspective.
If the revenue from left handed market cost of developing for left handed people then it makes sense from a business perspective. Keep in mind that there's probably left-handed people who buy it and play it right-handed anyway if they really want it, so the market they're cutting out may not be as big as you'd first assume.
Canada has a blank media levy (from the 80s era of mix tapes I believe, but that's not explained in this article) that a judge ruled gives us carte blanche to download (but not upload) music to burn to those media. Maybe the *IAA pushing for levies will backfire on them.
This just in: Providing a service doesn't follow the same price changes over time as providing a product. There's much more support and infrastructure maintenance/upgrading involved.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
It seems to be censored, but I can still imagine some unwanted results possibly popping up at inopportune moments. "Honestly Dear, I was in the middle of searching for gigantic asteroids and that just popped up on the screen. Hun...?"
For when you're searching for "big black couch" to refurnish your rec room.
(Tiny Lister alone makes it worth watching.)
By not being in it? It was Michael Clarke Duncan playing the gigantic black guy in Armageddon.
I'm not sure that an article on quantum computing is best peer reviewed by 120 philosophers...
It also comes with this cool light on the back in a funny shape that's not really useful, but I'm sure I'll figure it out its purpose someday.
You didn't even really try to hide the sarcasm, and yet you still managed to get a couple bites...
Yeah, and somebody with an ISP (and DNS) in Ireland connecting to a server in England doesn't have their traffic go anywhere near the US. The steam forums would be full of Europeans complaining about the lag. The US could try to leverage ICANN to pooch root DNS, but alt DNS already exists and it wouldn't take long for the world to adjust to a USless Internet.
Wasn't the internet built so that it doesn't have a single point of failure? By the US government/military? I'm sure they can shut down the "tubes" within and linking to the US, but there's DNS, hosts and switches outside of their control.
A mapquest clone called traceroute?
Anybody who files an indecency complaint with the FCC should be required to swear
But then won't they get fined themselves?
Backwards compatibility is the other big factor after cost. If USB3.0 is backwards compatible (which I assume it is) that's going to be a huge advantage. Why get something better but more expensive when I still have a camera, printer, external HDD etc. etc. that can't use it when I can get something almost as good that will work for all those (and my new USB3.0 versions of them as I replace them).
I'm not American and I don't think the American court system should have any jurisdiction over non-American websites either. I'm just commenting on this situation.
Ok, I can see how that person should be able to sue for damages in the UK courts then (which the defendant could probably ignore unless he plans to travel to the UK in the future), but I still don't see how that should get the site that's no where near UK jurisdiction shut down.
IANAL, but isn't there any kind of jurisdiction regarding stuff like this. Why is a law needed for, "Courts that have no jurisdiction here can't have jurisdiction here."? From the ISP's perspective: 1. The ISP is American (I assume), and 2. The client is American, and 3. If the client and/or ISP haven't broken any American laws why should they use a UK cease and desist for anything other than toilet paper? If the client and/or ISP HAVE broken American laws, the person should sue using the American court system.
It cites a way-back-machine archive of a Russian language geocities page that's no longer available. I've seen more credible citations carved into bathroom stalls.
I like the way the combat system works for magic, as it alleviates the players trying a fight/rest/fight/rest type of dungeon crawl. Outside of that I much preferred 3.5. I was thinking of trying a hybrid campaign where we used the 3.5 rules for everything except magic, which would use the 4th ed turn/combat/daily magic use.
The people who visit sites like pcpro and /. already know it's BS, and the people who would fall for the BS aren't the type of people who frequent those sites or look for hardware reviews online. We're preaching to the choir as it were.
Because reading a book while you walk through a crowd is less suspicious than looking around while walking through a crowd?
I understand trying to make the distinction between buying with stocks, but the way the summary is worded it made me picture dump trucks full of $100s being dumped on McAfee's front lawn.