Slashdot Mirror


AMD Hates Laptop Stickers As Much As You Do

pickens writes "David Pogue writes in the NY Times that when you buy a new Windows PC, it comes festooned with stickers on the palm rests: one for Windows, one for Skype, one for Intel, one for the laptop company, maybe an Energy Star sticker and so on. 'It's like buying a new, luxury car — and discovering that it comes with non-removable bumper stickers that promote the motor oil, the floor mat maker, the windshield-fluid company and the pine tree air freshener you have no intention of ever using,' writes Pogue. But the worst thing is that when you peel them off, they shred, leaving adhesive crud behind. 'When you've just spent big bucks on a laptop, should you really be obligated to spend the first 20 minutes trying to dissolve away the sticker goop with WD40?' But AMD has a solution. Starting next year, AMD will switch to new stickers that peel off easily, leaving no residue; after that, it's considering eliminating the sticker program altogether."

597 comments

  1. WD40 by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Informative

    Baby oil works better.

    1. Re:WD40 by nschubach · · Score: 5, Informative

      Goo Gone... works for everything I throw it on. (sometimes even paint...)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    2. Re:WD40 by butterflysrage · · Score: 1, Informative

      simple nail polish remover will do the job extremely well.

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    3. Re:WD40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      because it contains acetone, which can also do the job to the case.

    4. Re:WD40 by tangelogee · · Score: 2, Informative

      removing your noses despite your faces?

      I believe you mean "removing your nose TO SPITE your face..."

    5. Re:WD40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darn right. We should all be forced to bear those stickers proudly because we all just dropped $1500 on that laptop to get Windows 7, not a computer. I didn't pay that kind of money to have a choice about anything! What you freetards fail to realize is that the sticker is an essential component that will completely ruin your experience with the computer if you remove it. I mean, how else will you know what software is pre-installed and next to impossible to remove?

    6. Re:WD40 by istartedi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Jojoba oil. Expensive, but a little dab 'l do ya. Also, natural, sustainable and sometimes "organic". Most retail jojoba is "cosmetic grade" so it shouldn't bother your skin either. In fact, it's chemicly similar to the oils that come out of your skin anyway.

      I haven't actually tried it on laptop stickers; but it does an excellent job of emulsifying the fat/charcoal combination you get from your gril. It also lubed a sticky pantry door latch for at least a year now, with just one drop. It would be brilliant if the people who make electric razors would put a small tube of jojoba in the package instead of that nasty mineral stuff that has toxic warnings on it. You can *drink* jojoba and they say it'll give you the runs like Olestra chips; but it's generally non-toxic.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    7. Re:WD40 by mark72005 · · Score: 1

      You can peel it off by hand, and then rub your finger over and over the goo fast enough to heat it up and eventually, it balls up and comes off.

      No chemicals needed.

    8. Re:WD40 by Ark42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Watch out for glossy "piano finish" surfaces like found around many newer TVs, monitors, and laptops. Goo Gone will actually smear the glossy surface as well as remove any gunk, leaving you with basically melted plastic that hardens into dull rough matte plastic after a short while. My 46" LCD looks great after I removed some stupid sticker from the side of it ::rolls eyes::

    9. Re:WD40 by Inda · · Score: 1

      Go careful with it though. It's acetone, as you know.

      When I worked with nasty plastics and other chemicals, we only kept two of them outside in metal explosion cabinets. One was paraffin, the other was acetone.

      I'm forever telling the missus to open a window, else the air/acetone ratio could lead to the inevitable.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    10. Re:WD40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lighter fluid works wonders on sticker gunk. I'm sure there's something that it will actually damage, but I've never come across it. I use the stuff to clean sticker/price tag residue off books, record sleeves, DVD cases (including the RFID tags inside), hammers, etc etc etc. Zips it off in seconds.

    11. Re:WD40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I frequently use near-anhydrous acetone (the 99% kind) to clean glass as well as a bunch of other stuff. Any advice on how not to blow myself up? It has always seemed fairly stable to me.

    12. Re:WD40 by yoyhed · · Score: 1

      I do this on laptops, games - anything that comes with bastardly stickers. It works really well but eventually you burn your finger and smooth the outer layers of skin to the point where a) you can't feel touch as well, b) you don't have as prominent of a fingerprint, and c) it hurts.

      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    13. Re:WD40 by MaxBooger · · Score: 1

      I've always had great success using the pealed sticker itself. After removing, rub the portion of the sticker with adhesive on the crud stuck to the laptop. Repeat a few times and you'll end up with a clean surface. Works great, no need for other products.

    14. Re:WD40 by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Why do you freetards insist on removing your noses despite your faces?

      Why do you trolls insist on being so culturally illiterate? It's "cutting off your nose to spite your face", you illiterate dumbass.

      And thats the LEAST of the inaccuracies in your post. Trying to annoy someone? You succeeded, idiot.

    15. Re:WD40 by alphax45 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Blow dryer is the best. Melts the glue and no residue. My dad is a truck driver and this is what he use to use to remove the decals when he switched companies. Works for every sticker I have ever tried so far.

      --
      K Man
    16. Re:WD40 by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I had to read this a second time, but slower.

    17. Re:WD40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      zip.

    18. Re:WD40 by Slightly+Askew · · Score: 3, Funny

      Really? I read it 14 times, each time with a different voice, gradually getting faster and faster.

      --
      Public use of any portable music system is a virtually guaranteed indicator of sociopathic tendencies. -- Zoso
    19. Re:WD40 by TW+Burger · · Score: 1

      I use lighter fluid. I hate stickers: I am currently looking at four on this laptop and 5 on my desktop.

    20. Re:WD40 by Dunega · · Score: 1

      You people need to look into the mirror and reevaluate your lives.

      Hmmm... that is all.

    21. Re:WD40 by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Do you use the kind made from real or imitation babies?

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    22. Re:WD40 by maxwells_deamon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Peanut butter is the best stuff for removing sticky. The mix of polar and dipolar in a thick paste will cut everything in a mild way. Then sponge off with soapy water.

      Really, it works

    23. Re:WD40 by pspahn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When I lived in Tahoe, we would go up to Boreal Ski Area in the late afternoon and ask the people leaving for their tickets. Crank the heater up in the truck and put the ticket+wicket over the heat for a few minutes and you could peel it right off and stick it on a new wicket and ride for free when the mountain was open at night.

      I'm sure that by now they use those perforated tickets, so probably not feasible anymore. Good times while they lasted.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    24. Re:WD40 by Reece400 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Last time I used goo gone, it softened the plastic and when I went to scrub the goo off it permanently marred the shiny finish... Always test on an inconspicuos location as they suggest!

    25. Re:WD40 by TheJediGeek · · Score: 1

      removing your noses despite your faces?

      I believe you mean "removing your nose TO SPITE your face..."

      As opposed to the plethora of other issues with that post?

    26. Re:WD40 by HolyCrapSCOsux · · Score: 1

      You can drink mineral oil also. Buy it in the laxative aisle.

      --
      0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88
    27. Re:WD40 by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1

      Come on now, let's not confuse the poor bloke any further.

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    28. Re:WD40 by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1

      Why bother, I just use my cached results from the first evaluation.

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    29. Re:WD40 by uniquegeek · · Score: 1

      Or buy jelly candies. Many are made of mineral oil. They are found in the candy aisle :)

    30. Re:WD40 by somersault · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn.. not only does it make for great breakfast every morning, but it can help clean my gadgets too? This makes me wonder if you can legally marry peanut butter.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    31. Re:WD40 by Ozan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nooo! It contains acetone or ethyl acetate, both of which are good solvents for most kinds of plastic, like your laptop handrest. It can seriously f%$# up the surface, making it look worse than with stickers.

      On metal or glass it works great though.

    32. Re:WD40 by DerPflanz · · Score: 1

      Baby oil works better.

      simple nail polish remover will do the job extremely well.

      Wait a second ... am I still on Slashdot? Baby oil, nail polish, are you secretly all hot mothers?

      --
      -- The Internet is a too slow way of doing things, you'd never do without it.
    33. Re:WD40 by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not on laptop stickers. In fact, using the term "sticker" is misleading. They're superglued on badges that are usually impossible to remove without damaging your finish. I've seen intel badges that were practically structural elements.

    34. Re:WD40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in the mid 80's I worked at a retail outlet. At that time, we still had price tags on items (scanners came in while I was still there). When there was a price change, we were sent around with new price sticker sheets and a lighter. A quick hit from the flame (even when the package was plastic / cellophane) and the sticker would come right off.

    35. Re:WD40 by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I use sugar as an abrasive to remove the gook

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    36. Re:WD40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "When you buy a new Windows PC" ???
      Surely he means "LAPTOP"?

      Am I missing something here? Does the author actually not know the difference between a PC and a laptop?

    37. Re:WD40 by mark72005 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nota Bene: You should not make a great breakfast with it after cleaning gadgets.

    38. Re:WD40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      make sure it's made from organic free-range babies.

    39. Re:WD40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be very careful with Goo Gone. It's likely to destroy the smooth finish of many plastics.

    40. Re:WD40 by retchdog · · Score: 1

      from the obvious source: "Acetone has been studied extensively and is generally recognized to have low acute and chronic toxicity if ingested and/or inhaled... Inhalation 500 ppm of acetone in the air caused no symptoms of irritation in humans even after 2 hours of exposure... Acetone has been rated as a GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) substance when present in beverages, baked goods, desserts, and preserves at concentrations ranging from 5 to 8 mg/L."

      That is, using it for a few minutes to scrub off a sticker won't hurt you at all.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    41. Re:WD40 by box4831 · · Score: 1

      Natural? *ears perk up*

      organic??? *starts breathing heavily*

      SUSTAINABLE?!! *shaking with delight*

      and could it be... oh my gosh yes! more expensive! It even has an exotic sounding name! White urban people all around are now messing their hemp home-sewn shorts.

      --
      Miller Lite tastes like water that's somehow managed to rot.
    42. Re:WD40 by ejasons · · Score: 1

      Damn.. not only does it make for great breakfast every morning, but it can help clean my gadgets too? This makes me wonder if you can legally marry peanut butter.

      It's a dessert topping and a floor wax! (SNL reference)

    43. Re:WD40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not having any stupid stickers on the machines in the first place works best.

    44. Re:WD40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Staedtler erasers work as well on a lot of surfaces too. From snowboard decks, TV's, laptops, cars, anything with a "plasticy" or relatively smooth surface.

    45. Re:WD40 by somersault · · Score: 2, Funny

      What about after "marrying" it?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    46. Re:WD40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DESPITE his face

    47. Re:WD40 by ultranova · · Score: 1

      What about after "marrying" it?

      Whatever works for you.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    48. Re:WD40 by onionman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Blow dryer is the best. Melts the glue and no residue.

      I was working in the lab once and need to remove some stickers. A colleague made your suggestion about a hair dryer. We didn't have a hair dryer, but we did have a heat gun (for shrink wrapping stuff). It turns out that a heat gun will melt your monitor about two seconds after it gets the stickers hot enough to slide off.

    49. Re:WD40 by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Good job, man. Slashdot is now "Hints from Heloise"

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    50. Re:WD40 by squidfood · · Score: 1

      I was working in the lab once [...] didn't have a hair dryer, but we did have a heat gun...

      Why was I hoping that story would end very differently?

    51. Re:WD40 by Fri13 · · Score: 1

      Butter (animal fat) is best. Maybe the oldest trick to get all glue and similar stuff from tapes and so on off. Too bad thing is that the material need to be such what can take the butter. So do not use your most expensive silk to wash the butter off...

      But that is nice news that ONE sticker will be removable easier. Now how about the physical brands behind screens and under the screen and so on? I want plain laptop. Apple has done great work with this, expect they have the lighten Apple logo in their screen.

      But it is not nice to see "ACER TRAVELMATE XIAIXXAAYY" in big letters in the body. Or "DELL" or "SONY VAIO". When someone makes speakers to say every 15 minutes "This computers manufacturer was DELL, only the best!" then it is enough!

    52. Re:WD40 by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      I think perhaps he meant be careful because it could discolor or damage the laptop itself, not just the sticker residue.

    53. Re:WD40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're so concerned, tell the manufacturers to stick them on the bottom.

    54. Re:WD40 by zonker · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile Intel is working on requiring laser etching their logo...

    55. Re:WD40 by Carnivore · · Score: 3, Informative

      I hate stickers with an OCD fervor, so I have become an expert at removing them. I have found that one of the most effective methods is to use the adhesive itself--most of the time when you peel a sticker off, some of the adhesive stays on the sticker. If you put that patch on the adhesive that stayed on the surface and make a small twisting motion, you can remove the residue quickly and without solvents or much heat build up.

    56. Re:WD40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes dear,we are. Oh and bring those dirty dishes next time you come up from downstairs.

      --Mom

    57. Re:WD40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's what she said...

    58. Re:WD40 by pregister · · Score: 1

      For all intensive purposes, the OP was correct irregardless of what you think. I could care less but its his perogative which to use.

    59. Re:WD40 by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

      Ha ha ha! That's perfect. Maybe they'll give Kim Komando an editor position.

    60. Re:WD40 by Stu_28 · · Score: 1

      I go with Ronsonol lighter fluid. It works on most adhesive residue, doesn't damage the underlying surface, and it evaporates quickly.

    61. Re:WD40 by deathguppie · · Score: 1

      I deal with this kind of residue all the time at work. Toluol or Tolulene does the job best of all.. but that is a pretty harsh chemical for all you girly men out there in nerd land to use

      --
      once more into the breach
    62. Re:WD40 by blair1q · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nose oil.

      No, seriously.

      Peel off as much of the sticker as you can, preferably until there's just a schmutz of glue left, then rub your finger on the side of your nose and use that to loosen the rest of the glue. After a little rubbing, you can wipe it all away with a cloth or towel.

      It's free, all-natural, always handy, and something you want to get rid of anyway.

    63. Re:WD40 by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Yeah I'd agree with that and suggest rubbing alcohol instead (noting that this still contains a a fraction of a percent of acetone by mass).

      However "air/acetone ratio could lead to the inevitable" seems to suggest health concerns.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    64. Re:WD40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I'd agree with that and suggest rubbing alcohol instead (noting that this still contains a a fraction of a percent of acetone by mass).

      However "air/acetone ratio could lead to the inevitable" seems to suggest health concerns.

      I prefer to use dihydrogen monoxide.. but you have to be careful with it.. nasty stuff it is.

    65. Re:WD40 by evanspw · · Score: 1

      Turps works for all glues used in labelling. Then you might want a little soapy water on a cloth to wipe away the turps ;)

      --
      Interstitial spaces are filled with cream.
    66. Re:WD40 by evanspw · · Score: 1

      that's acetone and acetone will etch PVC plastics quite nicely.

      --
      Interstitial spaces are filled with cream.
    67. Re:WD40 by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Maybe the warnings on the small tube of mineral oil that came with the last razor I bought were just CYA language from their legal department then.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    68. Re:WD40 by ReneeJade · · Score: 1

      Eucalyptus oil works amazingly well and smells quite nice. Can you get it in the Northern Hemisphere? I'd be careful with it on piano gloss (I'm assuming piano gloss finish plastics are made of acrylics), but I think it would be ok.
      Nail polish remover is not a good idea. I once got it on my aunties antique dining table. The table was coated with an acrylic resin. Needless to say, I felt pretty terrible.

    69. Re:WD40 by amazin0 · · Score: 1

      I like the stickers on there. Its nice to promote what chips you are using to people that get a glance at your laptop.

    70. Re:WD40 by burisch_research · · Score: 1

      True, but if you do it quickly the plastic won't have time to dissolve. Have used acetone plenty of times, and swear by it.

      --
      char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
    71. Re:WD40 by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      You might be able to improve the surface of your TV by wet-sanding it to a very fine grit then polishing with 3M fine cut rubbing compound. All available in the automotive aisle at Wal*Mart.

      Depending, of course, on just what they put on it. I'm hoping for your sake it's a polyeurethane clear-coat or similar.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    72. Re:WD40 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This is hilarious because I've removed soft and hard stickers alike, both intel and AMD, nVidia and ATI (yea, even unto the pre-AMD days, when they had their own sticker) and ALL of them came off JUST FINE if I just put my thumb over them until they heated up. MOST of them just SLIDE off leaving a big gooey smear when you do this, it cleans up very nicely with olive oil or really any kind of oil. Cooking oil is most unlikely to damage the paint, which is just plastic (binder) with pigment in it... and these days, usually some pearl. Some of the hard stickers required some peeling but ALL responded to heating.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    73. Re:WD40 by ooshna · · Score: 1

      Yes finally a way to make sure those damn CSI's can't find out I'm the killer.

    74. Re:WD40 by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Tolulene can and will cause cancer and brain damage. I've known people who woulf huff it to get high, and invariably wound up with permanent speech impediments because of the brain damage.

      It's fine for using for paint thinner in a ventilated area, but you'd have to be huffing "tulio" to use it when a less toxic method of whatever you're doing is available. These days it doesn't even work as paint thinner, because most paints these days are acrylic.

      Also, tolulene may mar some plastic surfaces.

    75. Re:WD40 by Ark42 · · Score: 1

      Can I get these things at Home Depot or Autozone instead?
      Define "very fine grit": 400, 600, steel wool?
      Does wet sanding mean using a sponge sand paper instead of flat?

      I have no idea what Samsung coats their LNS4696D with.

    76. Re:WD40 by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      I don't know about Home Depot, Autozone probably (Canadian Tire for sure :) )

      You want 3M wet/dry sand paper, it's approximately made for this task: cars are coated with a polyurethane clear coat which needs to be sanded and polished before it looks right.

      The key to shiny is SMOOTH

      The key to smooth is starting a grit which is big enough to take of the tops of the mountains (picture your plastic at the microscopic level), and then work up to smaller and smaller grits. If you start too big, you'll create new scratches; if you start too small, you'll be polishing the peaks and the valleys, wearing away too much base material.

      If I had to take a guess at your TV, without seeing it first-hand, I'd say start with 400 or maybe 600 grit, then move up to 800 or 1000, then 1500, 2000, then rubbing compoound.

      If you were doing a car, after rubbing compound you'd use polishing compound, but that probably won't do anything on the TV's plastic. I recommended 3M Fine Cut rubbing compound because it is extremely aggressive for a rubbing compound and /will/ polish plastic. Any good name-brand rubbing compound is probably okay, though.

      When you're sanding, you need to be wet sanding. That means dipping the sandpaper in water regularly. This keeps the crud out of the sand paper, allowing it to do it's job, and avoids re-scratching. When you have finished with a particular grit, you will feel like the paper is no longer doing much and kind of sticks to the surface. Same effect as two wet mirrors sticking to each other. If you are wet-sanding a largish surface, back the sandpaper with a sanding block to avoid introducing waves.

      A bottle of rubbing compound should run about $8. You can probably get an automotive multipac of 3M wet/dry sandpaper with the right grits in it (a couple of 1/3 sheets of various grits) for $5 or so.

      Good luck. And I suggest testing on a tiny patch first...

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    77. Re:WD40 by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure you can get Eucalyptus oil here. As to fingernail polish, when I was a kid my sister ruined the finish on my mom's dresser with it. Boy, was she in trouble!

  2. buy a mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    us mac users have never had this problem.

    1. Re:buy a mac by treeves · · Score: 1

      No problem with Lenovo either. At least not on the Thinkpad I have.
      Just one "Intel Centrino 2" sticker that I don't mind leaving on. It's got that nice holographic part that changes colors as you view it from different angles, and it's small.

      I often leave stickers on things as long as they look clean - it makes me feel like it's still new! I suppose leaving them on longer makes them harder to remove once I do decide to remove them though.

      I thought it was going to be about how they don't like people to put their own stickers on after they buy them, a la Robin Williams with his "Pure Vibe" sticker on his laptop in the movie "RV".

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    2. Re:buy a mac by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      The gigantic glowing logo, on the other hand...

    3. Re:buy a mac by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      I suppose leaving them on longer makes them harder to remove once I do decide to remove them though.

      From my own experience I would say no. Eventually the adhesive will lose its grip entirely and the sticker will slide off. From what I've seen, when that happens the sticker tends to take all the adhesive with it, leaving pretty much no mess.

      If the vendors were clever, they'd probably chose an adhesive that would release right around when your warranty expires...

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    4. Re:buy a mac by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are plenty of laptops where the stickers leave more of a mark and are harder to remove if you leave them in place.

      A colleague of mine and me got identical Dell Precision laptops through work, I removed all stickers immediately, he left his stickers in place for several months. When he finally removed them they left a lot of residue and on top of that the laptop was slightly darker under the stickers (apparently the almost-black gray plastic becomes slightly less almost-black with age/wear and tear). So removing the stickers right away is probably a good idea, a razor and a steady hand helps a lot.

      Also, I'm glad my home workstation is a mac, compared to other pre-built computers they definitely have an advantage with no pointless stickers as well as no pile of bloatware to uninstall...

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    5. Re:buy a mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only does Lenovo laptops have these stickers, they have their own. My new T410 has a 'Windows 7' sticker, 'intel Core i5' sticker, and a 'lenovo enhanced experience' sticker...

    6. Re:buy a mac by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1
      I suppose leaving them on longer makes them harder to remove once I do decide to remove them though.

      But once you do remove them, they leave pristine spots underneath that make the rest of your old laptop look dingy by comparison.

    7. Re:buy a mac by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      To be honest, neither have I. The last two machines I've got hold of (a Toshiba laptop and Asus netbook) had the stickers taken off while linux was installing....no problems at all.

      The "Made For Windows" stickers went on the bin and a box of matches. That's just me though...I'll be happy to send you my next set.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    8. Re:buy a mac by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Who needs stickers when you've already got the tattoo?

    9. Re:buy a mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's nice to buy a computer where not only does it lack sticker ads, but the desktop is completely free of adware and bloatware shortcuts.

      As for the big Apple logo on the back, that's an opportunity for you: It's much easier to cover it with your own sticker than to remove somebody else's sticker. Lots of Mac users cover up the apple logo with something more personal.

    10. Re:buy a mac by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I thought it was going to be about how they don't like people to put their own stickers on after they buy them, a la Robin Williams with his "Pure Vibe" sticker on his laptop in the movie "RV".

      Or any of the Big Bang Theory nerds' laptops.

    11. Re:buy a mac by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      leaving pretty much no mess.
      Unfortunately you can often see a section of unworn plastic that sticks out like a sore thumb from the worn plastic surrounding it.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    12. Re:buy a mac by pregister · · Score: 1

      How'd the linux install on the Acer go? I'm downloading ubuntu netbook version as I type.

      And I took the stickers off about 20 minutes ago (when I started reading this). Odd.

    13. Re:buy a mac by pregister · · Score: 1

      And of course NOW I reread your post and see you said Asus not Acer. Meh.

    14. Re:buy a mac by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately you can often see a section of unworn plastic that sticks out like a sore thumb from the worn plastic surrounding it.

      Sandpaper has been invented, you know.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    15. Re:buy a mac by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The nice thing about the Thinkpads was that once you peel off the stickers, the laptop looks no different than a Thinkpad from 10 years ago to a casual observer. Maybe not the thing for those that consider their laptop a fashion accessory instead of a tool, but I found it rather amusing how many people refused to believe that I had bought a new laptop back when my Thinkpad was new.

  3. I like stickers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like them

    1. Re:I like stickers by Hatta · · Score: 5, Funny

      I peel them off and put them on other things. My Atari 2600 has Intel inside.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:I like stickers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, my old feature phone ran Windows Vista. Speaking of stickers, I have an eMachines desktop in the attic from the Windows 98 era with a big sticker on the front that says "Never Obsolete."

    3. Re:I like stickers by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      -Pentium ][ sticker on C64
      -Designed for Windows XP on my old cell phone

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    4. Re:I like stickers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep peeling off my windows stickers and putting them on our mac user's cases. It's fun to watch them have an aneurysm, especially when I use crazy glue.

    5. Re:I like stickers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to put them on toilet seat lids.

    6. Re:I like stickers by Fumus · · Score: 4, Funny

      When the "Designed for Windows" sticker came off by itself after two years of using my ThinkPad, I put that sticker on my wall, next to the window.

    7. Re:I like stickers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My roommate had a rice cooker with 3d-NOW! technology.

    8. Re:I like stickers by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I've seen a heavy-duty paper/media shredder designed for Windows Vista!

      (well, ok, that was my fault. I pulled the sticker off a display laptop and stuck it on front of the shredder display model. it stayed that way for week at least :D)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    9. Re:I like stickers by superpenguin · · Score: 1

      My Gameboy Advance is red, so it was already fast, but it runs even faster since I put an AMD Phenom X4 sticker on it.

    10. Re:I like stickers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My old Swingline stapler at work is year 2000 compliant.. I think I beat you there... :O)

    11. Re:I like stickers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's interesting, because my toilet lid says Atari.

    12. Re:I like stickers by lrdplatypus · · Score: 1

      My water boiler has Intel Centrino inside.

    13. Re:I like stickers by Kamineko · · Score: 1

      Who the hell is Laptop Stickers? Is he related to Bill Stickers? Why does everybody seem to hate these guys?

    14. Re:I like stickers by dfm3 · · Score: 1

      I peel them off and put them on other things. My Atari 2600 has Intel inside.

      Indeed. My blender and trash bin are now both "certified for Windows Vista".

    15. Re:I like stickers by mirix · · Score: 1

      What was wrong with the "MOS inside" sticker?!

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    16. Re:I like stickers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all my 'designed for windows' stickers are on trashcans, figured that was a perfect fit!

  4. Two words: rubbing alcohol by uptownguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A bottle of rubbing alcohol costs 99 cents. Lasts for years. A tiny dab on a microfiber cloth and that sticky residue is history. Takes about 30 seconds. Leaves your laptop looking nice and bare.

    --


    I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
    1. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by Chemicles · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Agreed. The reason WD40, baby oil, and rubbing alcohol all work great (as opposed to water) is because they are much more non-polar than water and dissolve the adhesives and other goop from the stickers much more easily. Anyone remember "like dissolves like" from general chemistry?

      Rubbing alcohol is my preferred goop cleaner because, as the parent says, it's cheap and lasts for years.

    2. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by arth1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unless you have a laptop with a lacquered finish where the rubbing alcohol will affect the lacquer, which will either lose its lustre, or start peeling off three months down the road due to your alcohol abuse today.

      IME, the best thing to use to remove residual glue is the sticker itself. Press it back on, lift, repeat until all the glue is gone.

    3. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by IICV · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And if you put it in a spray bottle (99 cents) and mix it with a lighter (another 99 cents) you've got hours and hours of entertainment! The fire is relatively low-temperature, so you can do stupid shit like put some on your hand and light it. Burns really cleanly too, so it doesn't set off most fire alarms.

      And if you put some rubbing alcohol into one of those 5 gallon drums, shake it up to disperse the stuff well, then drop a match into the throat you'll get a pretty awesome gout of flame. Just, you know, make sure you're not aiming it at anything you care about.

      Basically, pyromania knows no bounds with rubbing alcohol.

    4. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but this is just not true. Perhaps you are confusing rubbing alcohol with acetone? Goo Gone is the sure fire method of removing the sticky residue without damaging the surface.

    5. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by dubbreak · · Score: 1

      Leaves your laptop looking nice and bare.

      If you're into that.

      My preferred way to avoid unsightly stickers is to pickup some rubber cement (couple of dollars at the craft store) and affix a merkin. Who doesn't like a little padding?

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    6. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by IICV · · Score: 1

      Because the previous post got upmodded and I'm not very clear: the fire that comes from pouring some rubbing alcohol on your hand and lighting it is relatively low-temperature (in fact, you can put a bit on a piece of paper and light it - the paper won't burn immediately, it'll actually wick the surrounding rubbing alcohol up for a little while before the paper catches fire). Keep in mind that it's still fire and it will hurt in a second, especially if you have hairy hands.

      The fire that comes lighting a mist of rubbing alcohol, on the other hand (and preferably the hand you didn't just set on fire), can be very hot indeed. I wouldn't put my hand (or someone else's face) in it.

    7. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by frosty_tsm · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's so much easier to say "Kids, don't try this at home."

    8. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by IICV · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course not! Try it in someone else's home, your shit is flammable.

    9. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by adolf · · Score: 1

      Depends on the concentration.

      I use 96% alcohol as a firestarter. It works fast and burns hot.

      Lesser grades are slower and lower in temperature.

    10. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jackass

    11. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by nschubach · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When I was a kid, I always took that to mean: "Try it now!"

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    12. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by BobZee1 · · Score: 1

      cory? is that you? man, good times were had by all... well, maybe not all.

      --
      dumber people are doing harder things everyday
    13. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      Excellent prison weapon too. Most guards will assume it's just water in the spray bottle.

    14. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by gvaness · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cause their shit is inflammable?

    15. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Too late :)

    16. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by sootman · · Score: 1

      If you take a cup of water and a cup of alcohol and mix them, two neat things will happen: 1) you'll wind up with less than two cups of solution because of the different sizes of the molecules (or so it was explained to me) like how you can mix a gallon of marbles and a gallon of sand and wind up with less than 2 gallons of sandy marbles, and 2) if you hold a cotton* handkerchief with a pair of metal tongs, dip it in the solution, and light it, the alcohol will burn but the water will keep the cloth from getting hot enough to burn.

      Also: the key word in the phrase "put some on your hand and light it" is "some". Fire WILL burn you (yes, really) and it'll burn the hair off your hands, too. If you really want to do this put just a bit of the stuff (like a shallow puddle the size of a nickel) into your palm and light it. Be prepared to shake your hand and blow, and possibly have some water nearby to dunk your hand into. Remember kids, start small and work your way up.

      * not polyester, not silk

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    17. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uncontrolled vaporized alcohol is EXPLOSIVE under the right conditions.

      What you're doing is fucking stupid... Even for a pyro.

      But darwin will take care of it. When you hit the right fuel air mixture and blow youself up.

      Just stay the hell away from all other people while being this stupid.

      Thanks.

    18. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      Yep, isoprop alccohol's the best thing I can think of for most plastics. Annoyingly, in the UK you can't buy the bloody stuff any more! Chemists won't sell it, presumably because some idiot has decided that people are likely to drink it or something. The only way I can get hold of it is by buying the impregnated individual paper toweletters designed for removing sticking plasters...!

    19. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Funny

      if my shit is flammable then I've got bigger problems

    20. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, sex shops can be a source of the stuff, although not in pure form. There are various kinds of cleaning sprays for toys and I know of one that's essentially water, isoprop alcohol and a few additives. It's not going to dissolve paint but I found that it works well on most organic stains, having used it successfully on everything from dirty glasses to a fridge bearing a crust of former ice cream.

      Now if they only sold the stuff in liter bottles...

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    21. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      I like perchlorethelyne for similar reasons - cheap, available, and WAY more effective than isopropanol. You should check it in an inconspicuous surface.

      Most know this as a dry-cleaning chemical, but it is most readily available as brake rotor cleaner. Read the can carefully. The greenies are trying to get everybody to change to trichlorethelyne, which for some reason isn't quite as effective.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    22. Re:Two words: rubbing alcohol by ultranova · · Score: 1

      if my shit is flammable then I've got bigger problems

      Everything that decomposes also burns. Your shit is flammable.

      You did know both your body and bacteria get their energy by burning things, right?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  5. The solution. by DraconPern · · Score: 1

    Laser etched logos on the laptop. That why there's no label, no glue crud, and you won't have to spend 20 mins taking it off! :D

    1. Re:The solution. by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, I'm gonna spend 20 minutes sandblasting them.

    2. Re:The solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not. I don't want ANY stupid ads on my computer. When they start dropping the price for every single sticker/etching on it, then we'll talk.

      And what I'll talk about is paying the higher price to remove all those damned ads.

  6. I miss... by ArcSecond · · Score: 1

    ...the fun of carefully placing the wrap-around stickers on floppy disks. As for removing sticker crud from a new laptop? I would use a Dremel.

    --

    I've got a bad attitude and karma to burn. Go ahead. Mod me down.

  7. I thought they always peeled off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know; I haven't bought a new laptop for at least 3 years, but I happily and easily peeled off my windows xp and intel core duo stickers that came with it.

    It sounds like new laptops have even more stickers though.

  8. Asus G71 by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

    I got an Asus G71 a couple months ago and had no problem with the residue, maybe it's the coating on the laptop, but they peeled right off and left nothing.

    1. Re:Asus G71 by Posting=!Working · · Score: 1

      You probably got one that was built, shipped and sold quickly. If it sat in a hot warehouse for months before being sold, the adhesive would probably be harder to remove.

      --
      This sentence no verb.
    2. Re:Asus G71 by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      I got it at the first of May in Anchorage, even if it had sat in a warehouse up here, it wouldn't have been hot ;)

  9. Not on Mac? Really? by e065c8515d206cb0e190 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Try to remove that huge apple that says "I overpay my hardware" with WD40...

    1. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If you buy a Mac for the hardware alone, you're doing it wrong.

    2. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You're still overpaying. A 50% premium on hardware compared to a PC is definitely a drawback. Mac OS X is a decent OS, but it does NOT justify the price difference. The price difference comes from what people are willing to pay to think they're cool.

    3. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by mark72005 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apple makes money because people don't buy hardware specs, they buy function.

      And aside from that, a PC running Windows plus a bunch of YourPCNameHere bloatware plus all the requisite security software might have better specs, but it may or may not run any faster.

      "A GB is a GB" is a myopic way to look at things.

    4. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

      Is that why they were recently pressured into improving their Open GL driver, simply because games on the newly released Steam for Mac, were running like crap compared to their Windows counterparts?

      Many companies are now porting games to Mac simply because Steam is set up and ready to go on it. People who once didn't care about hardware, are now starting to. For the money, Apple needs to be giving much better graphics capabilities than they do.

    5. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I would have to disagree. I just got an Macbook for development. For the price it is a very well made PC. I have used Lenovo and IBM thinkpads and Fujitsu life books.
      The MacBook has great battery life and a very good display.

      Frankly I am a build your own PC kinda guy but the Macbook is a very good piece of kit that gets the job done well.
      Throw in the lack of crappletts and it really is a joy to use.
      That and the power adapter really is a nice idea Over all it is just a well made computer.
      Most notebooks are over powered for the average user. I am not even an average user and I have to wish that the Macbook was faster. Even the compile times are pretty good.
      If I had to pay for it myself I would probably get a $500 laptop but I am cheap.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by ihatejobs · · Score: 0, Troll
      If you buy Apple, you are paying for your hardware and paying to get raped up the butt and apparently you love every minute of it.

      And aside from that, a PC running Windows plus a bunch of YourPCNameHere bloatware plus all the requisite security software might have better specs, but it may or may not run any faster.

      Thankfully you can just hit the format button and get rid of all that junk.
      Here's my two step process on how to make a machine run better than anything OS X has to offer:

      1) Buy Laptop.
      2) Install Linux.

      When you are evaluating buying a computer, the ONLY thing you should be evaluating is the hardware, since computer hardware comes with the innate ability to install whatever the fuck software you want on it. If you throw in the software on top of it, you are just allowing yourself to get played. Enjoy your assrape though :).

      --
      Can anyone tell me why 99% of /. users are total assclowns?
    7. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many companies are now porting games to Mac simply because Steam is set up and ready to go on it.

      Citation needed.

    8. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Really, I've got dual Xeon Mac Pro whose specs meet and whose price beats a Dell workstation with similar hardware.

      As soon as Apple released the Xeon Mac Pros I went to an Apple Store with my friend who is an engineer at Intel and just had gotten a new workstation for his AutoDesk programs, he just cursed at the price, went to Dell.com and looked up his new station, a full $980 more than the similarly spec'ed Apple.

      Yea, he could have saved close to a thousand dollars and bootcamped with XP.

      But keep telling yourself that

    9. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by NiceGeek · · Score: 3, Informative

      "1) Buy Laptop.
        2) Install Linux."

        3) Pray that all the features of the laptop are supported under Linux (not a troll - I have a Toshiba NB 205 Netbook that I'd love to run Linux on but there isn't a single distribution out there that supports all the features, at least not reliably or without heroic efforts)

       

    10. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by DeadboltX · · Score: 5, Funny

      You may not be able to remove it with WD40 but you can sure cover it up with a WD40 sticker

    11. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Yea? How well does the software my work has me use run on Linux?

      Final Cut
      DVD Studio
      Photoshop
      Illustrator
      Word
      Duxbury Braille Translator

    12. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Read the release notes on the patch for "Graphics patch to correct issues with Portal on Steam"...As the patch was labeled this in software update, I think that is a pretty good indicator of the problem.

      Here is an article speaking about it, I just ran this patch yesterday on my Mac Pro:

      http://news.softpedia.com/news/Apple-Releases-Snow-Leopard-Graphics-Update-Download-Here-152614.shtml

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    13. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation needed.
      I've done this before... go to dell.com vs apple.com, try to configure a decent workstation. Apple has always been 50% more expensive (their RAM and hard drives are outrageous).

    14. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me fix that for you

      Apple makes money because people don't buy hardware specs, they buy form.

    15. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Cool, I can afford it :)

      It means that Apple then have more money to devote to R&D, more money to pay for decent staff and bringing me more product that generally does just work than that's good with me.

      I'm willing to pay more for an easier life, for hardware that looks nice. A laptop PSU that isn't a cheap nasty black brick on a rope. Decent packaging too! that you can actually get the product back into, not have to spend 5 minutes compacting cables and scratching your head before settling for a bulging box.

      If you can show me a laptop that is 50% of the cost of a Macbook Pro that runs Aperture, Logic Studio and Final Cut pro, isn't butt ugly and has an OS that isn't made by Microsoft then I'll take one :)

    16. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Exception != Rule

      Dumbass

    17. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What the hell are you talking about Mr Mac-Hating Fanboy?

      I switched to Mac in 2001 because I could run the entire LAMP stack without emulation or dual-booting and access it from a commandline and whatever GUI tools while being able to run apps like Creative Suite that were a 100% requirement. That's something you can't do on either Linux or Windows. And that's what I paid for. Nice looks, good UI and lightweight form-factor are all just icing on the cake.

      So maybe your needs aren't as intensive as mine, but when it comes to a professional solution for software architects and web developers, OS X is the best platform out there hands down.

      FYI, Tim Berners-Lee created HTTP on a Next, which is essentially the precursor to OS X.
      So in a way, you owe those shiny apples your ability to post your bullshit drivel on this site to begin with.

    18. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by mark72005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People buy function. Gaming is not one of the functions that Mac buyers are typically very interested in.

    19. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by mark72005 · · Score: 1

      The average slashdotter can do that (although I'd bet the majority still choose not to), but the average PC user has never even heard of Linux, let alone is willing or capable of making the jump over.

    20. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by mark72005 · · Score: 1

      This is an oft-repeated meme, but the price for the hardware (which again is a poor basis for comparison) is much closer than it used to be.

      Sure, the Apple store rapes you for pre-installed harware upgrades, but Dell or any of the other customized PC purveyors will too.

    21. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the microsoft drone reply. Show me a cloner computer with the same or better specs for the price. No, not some marketing bs like Dell just did with lesser parts (older/slower cpu,etc..). And don't forget to add in the Anti-virus + sub, Anti-spyware, Intrusion detection, etc..., not to mention all the software Apple gives you with a Mac, like iLife.

    22. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by sexconker · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yea? How well does the software my work has me use run on Linux?

      Final Cut
      DVD Studio
      Photoshop
      Illustrator
      Word
      Duxbury Braille Translator

      Final Cut and DVD Studio are dog turds.
      Them not running at all would be an improvement.

    23. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by cHALiTO · · Score: 1

      I just bought an Asus 1201PN and installed Lucid on it. It installed in a matter of minutes and it works like a charm. The only tweaking it needed was changing one line to /etc/defaults/grub to enable some of the Fn keys, and update the nvidia driver to get sound over hdmi.

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    24. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      There are dvd editors available on linux.
      Gimp is about equal to photoshop for all but the most finicky image editing tasks, and as of the last version, it even has a better UI.
      OpenOffice works fine compared to word.

      As for the other 3? I have no idea, never had to deal with their kind.

      Or... You could make your job pay for your work machine and use whatever you like at home, be it mac, linux or windows.

    25. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by mhamel · · Score: 1

      I first read "They buy fiction".

      Which was much more fun and probably very true also ;-)

    26. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by cpscotti · · Score: 1

      Dude, your work sucks!

    27. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps in the past that might have been the case but PCs with Windows 7 are just as stable and reliable as any Mac I've ever used. I also disagree that people don't buy hardware specs. The whole processor wars were based on people buying for the specs. Just because Apple is slow to adopt the latest hardware doesn't mean its not important.

    28. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, if you're not an idiot, you already did research, found one of the many laptops that works out of the box, and it works fine.

    29. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by mlts · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the cost of the hardware is just a part of the job:

      If someone knows what they are doing and are building a gaming rig, then obviously, Macs are not a good choice for this. A 12 core Mac Pro will be a good game machine, but I'm sure equal performance can be gotten elsewhere for much, much less.

      If someone is buying a PC as a desktop machine and knows what he or she are doing (imaging the original stuff off, erasing the HDD, putting on a new OS), then a Mac may not be what they need, because they know what they are doing, usually have some type of backup facility (even if it is just the OS imaging stuff), and have basic protection against malware (Adblock, Privoxy, etc.)

      If someone is using Linux, a BSD, or another OS on generic x86 hardware, a Mac may not be the best choice either, because EFI is less compatible for booting than plain old BIOS.

      However, Macs are good if one factors in total costs of ownership for a non technical user (the Joe Sixpacks, Jane Artist, and Aunt Tillie):

      Take a $1500 iMac. One can build similar with a monitor in the PC environment for less. However, the average user will usually end up having to reinstall the Windows box due to an infection once or twice, and because most sub-1000 PCs (except for Dells) have no restore CDs, that is an additional $100+ expense. A "delousing" of a machine can take a good chunk of change if the user is in a place where he/she doesn't have any Windows-savvy friends. So, for the average non-technical user, not having to pony up for periodic service would sway things a lot better in the Mac's direction.

      In an extreme case, buying a Mac might shield a person from identity theft, bank account fraud, and other online crimes which Windows has had problems with, because it is the focus of so many blackhats. These items could cost a user thousands to remedy, so having a platform that isn't the target of criminals across the globe may make the TCO swing a lot better in Apple's direction.

      The key is knowing what the end user wants, and their skill level.

    30. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? And what function does a Mac have that any other platform doesn't or couldn't have?

    31. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by kyrio · · Score: 1
    32. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by ogdenk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have a mac because I like UNIX and I like native versions of common software packages that I actually enjoy using without having to resort to a compatibility layer. That's worth a premium to me.

      i.e. Photoshop and Logic Audio

      That and the proprietary Apple API's and subsystems are actually pretty good. I like Core MIDI and Core Audio for example. And for multimedia/creative work, Apple's GUI layer is far more capable than X. Native PDF output from any app is neat as well. System-wide spellchecking that works with EVERY native app in a consistent manner. Wish they kept the network transparency from NeXTstep in current OSX releases for GUI apps but for that I still have X11.

      Before people get pissy, believe me, I love GIMP and use the crap out of it but it is not Photoshop yet when it comes to huge RAW images and CMYK work. YET. I believe it will be one day and I hope they get around to doing a Cocoa UI for it some day as well.

      Ardour is cool but it has nothing akin to "Flex Time" and having native common commercial plugins instead of relying on a VST plugin hack is way preferable. Ardour's interface is more akin to something like MOTU DP and doesn't fit well with my typical workflow and I spend too much time dicking with Ardour and less recording or composing. And I like Core Audio and Core MIDI. And yes, there's FOSS plugins and some are pretty good but show me a real suitable replacement for Amplitube.... or a Korg M1 emulator......

      It ships with a decent X server and Macports makes it easy to get my FOSS fix as well.

      The base-model Macbook is actually very capable and comparable in price to a similar Dell, Acer, etc. At least when I bought mine in Feb 2009 it was. The rest of the lineup is a bit overpriced but that's why we have the OSx86 project. And for people who can't pull it off, it may be worth the extra price to make the leap just for the nice OS and great hardware integration.

      On PC's and servers I typically run BSD but there's simply no FOSS replacement for some things that I do and OSX really is pretty awesome. Even if Steve Jobs is an engineer-abusing, manipulative dick. I have nothing against PC's, just never cared for MS OS's or running software targeted for MS OS's in a compatibility layer.

      I also, for the record, HATE the glowing Apple on their laptops. It's like a big bullseye that says STEAL ME. I got one of the fake leather MacAlly form-fitting cases just to cover this. It also just seems kinda pompous.

    33. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > Gimp is about equal to photoshop for all but the most finicky image editing tasks, and as of the last version, it even has a better UI.

      LOL. Let me know when 2.6 supports _all_ of Photoshop's [layer] blend modes, and layer grouping/folders...

    34. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An idiot on a mac is just as bad as an idiot on a pc. There is no such thing as bloatware if you spend 15 minutes familiarizing yourself with common security practices. The only reason mac doesn't have bloatware, is because no one gives a fuck about the data of mac users. Your 2% marketshare does NOT explain you 300% inflated ego.

    35. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      If configuring such a machine, wether from apple, dell or elsewhere i would always buy easily upgradable things like ram and drives separately...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    36. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by ihatejobs · · Score: 1

      If that were true, which it isn't, it still wouldn't matter. Ignorance of the subject matter is your own fault. If you want to buy a Mac and spend 50% more for the same hardware, that is your call. Or you can take a couple hours to educate yourself and save your hard earned cash. Look, with the internet at our fingertips these days, even Joe Average has no excuse for not taking some time to educate themselves before making purchases. If you don't, you really have no one to blame but yourself.

      Someone at my office went out and bought a laptop and installed Ubuntu on it herself. The only reason I even know is because I walked past her desk and she had it setup. This is an average office worker who knows about as much about computers as your average user. The reason she used Ubuntu? She didn't want to dish out 400+ dollars for an office suite. I didn't have the heart to tell her OOo works on Windows since she went to all that trouble. I'd rather she get the better computing experience of Linux.

      --
      Can anyone tell me why 99% of /. users are total assclowns?
    37. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      The only advantage Linux has over OSX is the fact that it's free and runs on commodity parts you can scrape out of the closet in any IT department.

      X.org even w/ Composite has NOTHING on the mac windowing system. The mac API for writing GUI apps is also a helluva lot nicer. The sound subsystem is way ahead of anything for Linux. There's ONE generally accepted widget toolkit that makes for a much more consistent UI.

      For example, GIMP uses GTK, Scribus uses QT. There's no GTK Scribus and no QT gimp and no theming kludge is gonna fix that.

      Linux isn't crap and is a great kernel but that alone isn't enough. More of a BSD fan myself but anyway....

      I use FOSS every day for real work and I love it but don't try to claim it's anywhere near a complete replacement for OSX for every use case.

      Yes, Compiz and KDE4 are pretty. Yes, they use hardware acceleration but to claim it offers any benefits besides "Oooh, pretty" and a little less CPU utilization is a joke. Quartz is VERY powerful and used for more than making windows move smoother.

    38. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by ihatejobs · · Score: 1

      DVD editors for Linux are easy to find. Hell, Ubuntu comes with one pre-installed IIRC. Same goes for your office suite and image editing software. A 2 second google search found several Braille translators for Linux. So I guess to answer your question "Pretty well". Of course if you are really picky there is always Wine, but I shy away from that myself. I'd rather support free, open alternatives to the trash software MS/Adobe/etc have been jamming down our throats for years.

      --
      Can anyone tell me why 99% of /. users are total assclowns?
    39. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by ihatejobs · · Score: 1

      Or do 15 minutes of research to pick the right laptop... Expecting every distro to support every piece of hardware under the sun is simply unrealistic. Educate yourself and make informed decisions :)

      --
      Can anyone tell me why 99% of /. users are total assclowns?
    40. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK so... your basic argument here is that OS X looks prettier than Linux. Well, you sure got us beat there! Enjoy paying more to have a prettier interface. The rest of us will get along just fine without thanks. I don't know about you but to me, paying extra to gain 0 functionality is really, really stupid.

    41. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Yeah all the Unix stuff Mac OS is built on is sooo limiting when you could be using DOS batch files. And without Desktop Linux how can you experience the joy of being able to hand reconfigure complex permissions and config files just so sound works in all your apps! Damn Apple for taking away my batch files and hand edited config files!

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    42. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      No, I'm saying OSX has a more FUNCTIONAL interface for end users that's more consistent with better developer API's for writing applications while retaining compatibility with traditional UNIX apps.

      The OSX windowing system also kicks X11's ass on the performance front as well as under the hood. The only thing lost is network transparency which isn't important to most end users anyway.

      Oh, and native well-polished versions of commercial apps with no FOSS equivalent is nice as well. Running WINE for Photoshop or pro audio apps is lame. Ardour ain't Logic or ProTools and GIMP ain't Photoshop (yet at least, getting closer).

    43. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by e065c8515d206cb0e190 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't get me wrong, I think Mac OS X is a great OS. And I use it. On "PC hardware" actually (whatever that means... because really it's the same, except for the SMC chip). I don't think I mentioned anything about their software, which is what your post is about. I mention their hardware. +$500 for a RAM upgrade when the same component can be bought for +$150 is killing me. Yes it is. That's just raping my ass. No matter how good the OS is.

    44. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a sticker, it's a feature!

    45. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by ogdenk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dell wouldn't be much nicer in that regard. Same rules apply. If you know how to remove a screw or 2, save $500 and spend $75 at TigerDirect or NewEgg.

    46. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      FYI, Tim Berners-Lee created HTTP on a Next, which is essentially the precursor to OS X. So in a way, you owe those shiny apples your ability to post your bullshit drivel on this site to begin with.

      So really in no way any sane person could ever reason out?

    47. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple makes money because people don't buy hardware specs, they buy form.

    48. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Timmmm · · Score: 1

      Why? Their hardware is indisputably excellent. Find me a metal-bodied laptop with a nice large touch pad for £700 that isn't a Macbook Pro.

      I do wish it didn't have that poncy apple cut-out though. Maybe I could cover it up with a sticker or something. :-P

    49. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      you forgot
      0) research laptops to find one that common distros support, or ship with linux.

    50. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what does the L in LAMP stand for again?

    51. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by node+3 · · Score: 1

      You're still overpaying. A 50% premium on hardware compared to a PC is definitely a drawback.

      Time after time people say this, but when you actually try to build a truly similar PC to a Mac, you find the prices are extremely similar, oftentimes with the Mac coming in cheaper. NEVER do you find a "50% premium".

      Sure, you can build a MiniITX PC the same as a Mac mini for less, in a case that is over 4x larger. Or you can build a Core i7 PC similarly specced to a Core i7 iMac for about $500-$700 less, but you won't have a 27" IPS display, and you'll have a separate, noisy, ATX case.

      On the other hand, if you don't care about such things as size and noise, such that you see no difference between a Shuttle PC and a Mac mini, then a PC is quite the value.

    52. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by NiceGeek · · Score: 1

      For all those telling me to research for specific laptops that work with Linux. If I was going to restrict my purchases to computers that are comparable with a certain operating system, why not just buy a Mac laptop?

    53. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by NiceGeek · · Score: 1

      Sigh..."compatible"

    54. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by grapeape · · Score: 1

      Really? My Vaio was more than a standard macbook and has just about the same specs, sure you can find a gateway or MSI thats a beast spec wise for half what a decent business class machine is going to run...but you generally get what you pay for. The Mac's are overpriced mantra has been mostly a myth for years.

    55. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OS X = Unix for Eunuchs

    56. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      I remove that by clicking on the Wintel box next to it before inserting my CC number.

    57. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by ihatejobs · · Score: 1

      Generally because a Linux or Windows OS is compatible with a far wider range of hardware than OS X. Plus, the hardware is cheaper, so you get to save money instead of giving it all away to Mr. Jobs.

      The last 4 laptops I've owned have been fully and completely compatible with Linux. The first two I didn't even do research on, I just got lucky.

      --
      Can anyone tell me why 99% of /. users are total assclowns?
    58. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by NiceGeek · · Score: 1

      On the bright side, I decided to give MeeGo a try, sound and Wifi worked out of the box. It also flies on my little netbook.

    59. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I allowed for the loosening of the restrictions with OSX, so you might want to get that twitchy knee looked at.

      Also, 2001 called. It wants its complaints about Linux configuration back.

    60. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or buy a laptop DESIGNED for GNU/Linux www.thinkpenguin.com. Only company selling systems with all the hardware based on free drivers and firmware (except the BIOS for now).

    61. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by the_womble · · Score: 1

      Alternative:

      1) Buy a laptop with Linux preinstalled: list of vendors around the world
      2) Do your research.: http://www.linux-laptop.net/, http://tuxmobil.org/mylaptops.html, and Google.
      3) Ask the retailer if you can boot the laptop off a live CD or USB stick and check everything works.

    62. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by the_womble · · Score: 1

      If I had your requirements, I would probably use a Mac as well. My graphics and audio requirements are considerably simpler and different (can a Mac play multiple streams to multiple sound cards btw?).

      Your requirements are quire unusual. Most Mac users need a web browser, office software, a mail client and other fairly standard stuff.

    63. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by mr+exploiter · · Score: 1

      Heroic effort? What is so hard on downloading the kernel sources, applying the distribution patch, configuring the kernel for your hardware, compiling and installing?

    64. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      Name one PC manufacturer that doesn't put their logo on their hardware.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    65. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      You may not be able to remove it with WD40 but you can sure cover it up with a WD40 sticker

      Microsoft has already done that...

    66. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      The sound subsystem is way ahead of anything for Linux.

      You have obviously never used JACK the professional audio api for linux, there is an os x port too, kicks mac os x's ass in regards to latency and also more functional (you can't route arbitrary streams with core audio, need separate app for it etc etc) (and yes I do have a full digital audio workstation with seq/synths/controllers and it's quite lovely).

      For example, GIMP uses GTK, Scribus uses QT. There's no GTK Scribus and no QT gimp and no theming kludge is gonna fix that.

      Some people don't mind different options, or in this case different styles. While os x apps are typically extremely consistent most of us aren't OCD enough to really care so long as it just works.

      Take zsnes for example, it's ui is written entirely in assembly code, resembles nothing else I've seen out there but is very nice. Or blender, completely different again and while most newbies bitch, once learned it's extremely efficient compared to other methods.

      Yes, Compiz and KDE4 are pretty. Yes, they use hardware acceleration but to claim it offers any benefits besides "Oooh, pretty" and a little less CPU utilization is a joke. Quartz is VERY powerful and used for more than making windows move smoother.

      For people that do actual work, who cares about form over function? while I use kde4 I disabled compiz etc just because I fail to see the usefulness of shiny.

    67. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Aboroth · · Score: 1

      Eh, I was forced to use a Mac at work and I don't get where this "better interface" claim is coming from. I've found OS X to be cumbersome and annoying, and probably one of the worst ones on a modern OS. I've used many different interfaces on many, many different operating systems, and I always get used to them and use all of the ways to efficiently do things like using keyboard shortcuts. But when I use OS X, I feel like I'm slowly sloshing through, and the interface seems to always just get in the way, and everything I do feels like it takes forever. Also the interface is most definitely not consistent; in fact I've found it to be even less consistent than pretty much every version of Windows ever. I'd have to say that I actually prefer Windows 7 to OS X, and coming from me, that is saying a lot.

    68. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      > If you buy Apple, you are paying for your hardware and paying to get raped up the butt and apparently you love every minute of it.

      Stop tempting me, damn you.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    69. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Hell, my mom's low-end Vaio has compatibility problems with the preinstalled Windows! But that's mostly because Sony couldn't write a working WiFi driver if their lives depended on it (but insist that you use their driver instead of the chipset manufacturer's). Or implement Num-Lock properly.

      You feel a lot less bad about paying 1000 Euros for a notebook after you've seen what 300 EUR notebooks are like.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    70. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird. I've got a Toshiba NB2somethingorother (don't remember exact model number), and Ubuntu Netbook Remix runs with no issues. Can't vouch for bluetooth, since I never use it, but everything else works.

    71. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

      because linux compatible laptops dont come from one single vendor, and dont carry a hefty price premium just because it can run a certain piece of software

      (and because even though they share a common technological base, apple and the linux ecosystem couldnt be further from each other in terms of ideology)

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    72. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Apple makes money because people don't buy hardware specs, they buy fiction.

      There, fixed that for you... :)

    73. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      You always buy after-market.

      Mac Pro's from experience are cheaper than Dell or HP workstations when they launch a new model. They even have hardware that is unavailable to other manufacturers.

      Macs are fairly priced, apart from the latest Mac Mini. Have you checked out the new iMac's, the 21.5inch model they must be making a loss. their MacBook and MacBook Pro's are well priced.

    74. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

      HA Ha ha!!!! Thank you.

      --
      Take off every 'sig' !!
    75. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The way you get the 50% premium is that you go build/configure the PC you want first. Then go and try and configure a Mac to have what the PC does. You'll easily find the Mac costs 50% or more in many cases. Usually because with the Mac you have to purchase a whole lot of stuff you don't need (like a Xeon processor) to get something you do want (a decent graphics chipset).

    76. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I much prefer the small IBM logo* (about the size of a quarter) on my laptop instead of a gigantic glowing apple, myself.

      *Yes, I know the IBM Thinkpad is dead :(

    77. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      You have obviously never used JACK the professional audio api for linux, there is an os x port too, kicks mac os x's ass in regards to latency and also more functional (you can't route arbitrary streams with core audio, need separate app for it etc etc) (and yes I do have a full digital audio workstation with seq/synths/controllers and it's quite lovely).

      Yes, I've used JACK and I never said it sucked but I've counted no less than 7 audio API's for Linux over the years.

      And the low-latency goes away when you're forced to use VST plugins in a compatibility box. And if you try to say there's an open source equivalent to something as nice as Amplitube I'm going to laugh in your face.

      Ardour's UI is downright awful but it's a cool app. It still ain't Logic or ProTools.

      Some people don't mind different options,

      It's not an "option" if you're forced to put yourself through that pain just to have a complete enough toolkit to get your job done.

      And then have to jump through extra hoops just to find pantone color presets, etc.

      For people that do actual work, who cares about form over function? while I use kde4 I disabled compiz etc just because I fail to see the usefulness of shiny.

      Ummm.... what I was getting at is compiz is all form, the UI effects in OSX are really inexpensive in terms of CPU and GPU usage and are more of a side effect of the WAY more advanced compositing features in Apple's UI.

      Ever wonder why EVERY OSX app can spit out an incredibly accurate PDF with no effort and what you see on the screen is a really accurate representation of what is spit out on a printer? Mac devs get it for free with no effort. We also get things like system-wide spellchecking that actually works and isn't dependent on half a dozen choices of GPL'd spellchecker libs.

      I've never said Linux sucks but for creatives who want to create without dicking with the OS constantly or dealing with cumbersome UI's that get in the way of creating, Linux is a poor choice.

    78. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      If I had your requirements, I would probably use a Mac as well. My graphics and audio requirements are considerably simpler and different

      For machines with simpler requirements I typically run some form of BSD. NetBSD on SPARC, FreeBSD on x86. Both have Linux binary compatibility and are very clean well thought-out systems.

      (can a Mac play multiple streams to multiple sound cards btw?).

      Yeah but there's no easy UI to get to the functionality. I'm sure there's an app somewhere for it. Not something I typically do usually.

      Your requirements are quire unusual. Most Mac users need a web browser, office software, a mail client and other fairly standard stuff.

      Most studios I've seen have a couple Macs and a copy of ProTools and/or Logic. Macs are great recording rigs.

      Most people buy a mac for things like iMovie, etc. If they just needed a web browser and mail client any piece of crap Winders box for $300 will do. People know this. They aren't quite as dumb as we think.

    79. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      system-wide spellchecking that actually works and isn't dependent on half a dozen choices of GPL'd spellchecker libs.

      Of course, a single library (libaspell) is really so very difficult on linux, lol

      And the low-latency goes away when you're forced to use VST plugins in a compatibility box.

      If you are using vst's instead of native ladspa plugins and native synths, you kind of deserve all of that pain you are self inflicting upon yourself.

      And if you try to say there's an open source equivalent to something as nice as Amplitube I'm going to laugh in your face.

      Can't say I'm much of a fan of emulating guitar amp noise etc since I primarily deal with other instruments, however essentially the entire arturia range can be replaced very nicely by the bristol audio synth.

      Here we have an emulated analog synth that sells for a few thousand dollars replaced by another program that does the exact same job that is gpl and free. This is just one example, if you wish I could find more, it becomes more of a case of people not knowing what is out there and what works well together.

      Ardour's UI is downright awful but it's a cool app. It still ain't Logic or ProTools.

      Of course, logic and pro-tools attempt to be all in one integrated solutions. Sequencer/synths/post processing etc all in one. Ardour is simply a digital audio workstation for recording/mastering etc.

      With jack I can feed any program to any other program and chain them just fine and dandy, the interface between programs is nice and standardised and especially from a coder-musicians standpoint a lot nicer.

      It's not an "option" if you're forced to put yourself through that pain just to have a complete enough toolkit to get your job done.

      The right tool for the right job, different jobs require different tools, so I don't see it as a problem at all that i have different programs for sequencing and for synths etc at all. Each task is different so why make one unholy program that does it all?

      My best friend is a mac user and swears by logic, but upon inspection of my setup he has commented both that it is capable of anything logic can do and some things it can't, and that the complexity of my setup scares him.

      I agree more knowledge is needed than turnkey solutions such as protools and logic, but to me at least I don't see the problem with becoming knowledgeable about something that you have a passion for.

    80. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by Uzuri · · Score: 1

      FCP isn't a DVD editor. Nothing comes close to it in non-linear video editing; certainly nothing FOSS. If something existed I'd marry it.

      --
      I'm a she-slashdotter... but I make up for it by living with my folks.
    81. Re:Not on Mac? Really? by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      Of course, a single library (libaspell) is really so very difficult on linux, lol

      That's one of several but admittedly aspell is the most common.

      If you are using vst's instead of native ladspa plugins and native synths, you kind of deserve all of that pain you are self inflicting upon yourself.

      Not saying they aren't making strides but last I checked Ardour, Jack and LADSPA lack much industry support.

      For example, I can't get a good Korg M1 emulator as a LADSPA plugin. And most of the existing LADSPA plugins I've heard kinda suck. Is this LADSPA's fault? No. Not Jack's fault either. Neither LADSPA or Jack are the only game in town either. And then there's half a dozen sound systems that can be used under that with sparse documentation on making them all play nice.

      And I prefer AU plugins to VST because they can be used with ANY mac audio app.

      Can't say I'm much of a fan of emulating guitar amp noise etc since I primarily deal with other instruments, however essentially the entire arturia range can be replaced very nicely by the bristol audio synth.

      Here we have an emulated analog synth that sells for a few thousand dollars replaced by another program that does the exact same job that is gpl and free. This is just one example, if you wish I could find more, it becomes more of a case of people not knowing what is out there and what works well together.

      I know exactly what's out there, have gone through the pain of actually making it work in a decent fashion and found myself far less productive with it.

      Can it get the job done? Yes. Is it pleasant? No.

      Of course, logic and pro-tools attempt to be all in one integrated solutions. Sequencer/synths/post processing etc all in one. Ardour is simply a digital audio workstation for recording/mastering etc.

      With jack I can feed any program to any other program and chain them just fine and dandy, the interface between programs is nice and standardised and especially from a coder-musicians standpoint a lot nicer.

      Heard of CoreAudio and Rewire? Works great.

      To me API's and libraries that are not only consistent but actually good as well is worth the mac premium.

      I am a programmer, musician and long time UNIX SysAdmin and pleasant tools that make me a bit more productive are worth $150.

      The right tool for the right job, different jobs require different tools, so I don't see it as a problem at all that i have different programs for sequencing and for synths etc at all. Each task is different so why make one unholy program that does it all?

      My best friend is a mac user and swears by logic, but upon inspection of my setup he has commented both that it is capable of anything logic can do and some things it can't, and that the complexity of my setup scares him.

      I agree more knowledge is needed than turnkey solutions such as protools and logic, but to me at least I don't see the problem with becoming knowledgeable about something that you have a passion for.

      Ummm.... the problem is that only half the tools in the open source chain are what I would describe as good. Most Linux MIDI sequencers I've seen remind me of half-aborted Atari ST GEM apps from back in my earlier days of computing. Yes my first MIDI experiences were on an ST...

      And does Ardour do "Flex Time" yet? That was a major killer feature that is missing.

      I have the knowledge, and the passion, but my passion when composing is focused on creativity and making music, NOT dicking with the audio subsystem or trying to find replacement plugins that sound as good.

      Linux is awesome but I can't really recommend it for a DAW yet. Gets in the way too much though I didn't find it any worse than Windows. Still not as pleasant as my mac for such tasks.

      Will it work for a lot of situations? Sure. Will it be fun to set up and learn? For most assuming they are running a decent distro. Would I use it as my primary DAW? Not yet.

      If you're broke and piracy offends you, Ardour is certainly capable.

  10. nice.... by mayberry42 · · Score: 1

    but what about the other dozen stickers on the laptop?

    1. Re:nice.... by swanzilla · · Score: 2, Funny

      but what about the other dozen stickers on the laptop?

      I think you may have purchased a Nascar.

    2. Re:nice.... by nschubach · · Score: 1

      If this is the case, be very careful setting it on your lap. Sometimes the tires mar the couch cushions.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  11. AMD? by Ltap · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It makes sense, but aren't the ones who add the stickers the manufacturers? Also, I assumed the stickers were there by the request of the component manufacturers, how can they be so easily "eliminated"?

    --
    Yet Another Tech Blog
    (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
    http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    1. Re:AMD? by Kepesk · · Score: 1

      Laptop stickers... The new-computer crapware that you can't uninstall.

    2. Re:AMD? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      AMD can stop making them and not license other people to make them. That would stop that right there. Personally, I don't think the stickers are the problem so much as the fact that the stickers are so hard to remove cleanly. That's the main reason why mine stay on, not because I want them, but because they're a pain to get off cleanly.

    3. Re:AMD? by Ltap · · Score: 1

      Indeed - my laptop came with large, metallic stickers that were difficult to get off, but if you pried them off (they were stiff) they didn't really leave any residue.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    4. Re:AMD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AMD would retain some control of the stickers since they are copyrighted. They are probably supplying them when they ship the processors.

  12. lol, of course this is coming from AMD by Pojut · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Never mind the fact that AMD will be the source of confusion for "normal" folks in the not-too-distant future. Yay for having Intel and AMD stickers on the same system!

    Note: yes, I'm aware that most nerds won't be affected by this...but it will certainly confuse some normal folk, I guarantee it.

    1. Re:lol, of course this is coming from AMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no it wont, long as it says dell on the back they dont give a crap

    2. Re:lol, of course this is coming from AMD by Moridin42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apparently you missed the second set of "Radeon Graphics" and "FirePro Graphics" where there is no mention of AMD. Specifically for machines that will be bearing the Intel Inside stickers.

      So.. pay up on your failed guarantee.

      --
      I don't expect morality, equality, consistency, or justice from the law. I expect only legality.
    3. Re:lol, of course this is coming from AMD by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

      there will be Radeon stickers without the AMD branding on them as well, so no confusion..

      If people do associate AMD with red and Intel with Blue, most probabply they do know the difference between the CPU and GPU

    4. Re:lol, of course this is coming from AMD by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      You need to hang with normal people.
      How many megahertz does this have?
      How much ram does the Hard Disk have?

      Normal people don't know ATI from Nvidia from HP!
      They will look at how big the numbers are, how big the screen is, and how low the price is.
      Unlike me that will look how big the numbers are, how big the screen is, how heavy it is, does it support Linux, and how cheap it is....
      Hey it is notebook.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:lol, of course this is coming from AMD by Ephemeriis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Never mind the fact that AMD will be the source of confusion for "normal" folks in the not-too-distant future. Yay for having Intel and AMD stickers on the same system!

      Note: yes, I'm aware that most nerds won't be affected by this...but it will certainly confuse some normal folk, I guarantee it.

      Nah. Most normal folk don't even know what companies do what. Sure, they've probably heard the names Intel and AMD... And maybe even know that they both make processors... And maybe they've even noticed that you typically only have one or the other on a box... But normal folk aren't even going to ponder why they've now got both on a box. They'll just buy the machine with the most gigawhosits and call it done.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    6. Re:lol, of course this is coming from AMD by hoggoth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, normal folk will have no idea what AMD is and will think, rightly, that it must refer to some magical component inside the computer.
      They only vaguely know that Intel has something to do with people in clean-room bunny suits.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    7. Re:lol, of course this is coming from AMD by rhook · · Score: 1

      As shown in the article the new stickers will not say ATI or AMD on them. They will simply say Radeon.

    8. Re:lol, of course this is coming from AMD by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Unlike me that will look how big the numbers are, how big the screen is, how heavy it is, does it support Linux, and how cheap it is....
      I also tend to read the service manual (and consider it a major minus point if I can't get the service manual). How easy is it to upgrade the ram? how easy is it to pull the hard drive etc are important to me when buying a laptop.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  13. Goo Gone by rennerik · · Score: 2, Informative

    Goo Gone works amazingly well, on even the most ridiculously adhesive residue I've encountered... and it's cheap.

  14. Not just laptops.. by slashkitty · · Score: 4, Funny

    They have them on desktops too, even some monitors have obtrusive logos. One of the things that Apple got right with their computer products.

    --
    -- these are only opinions and they might not be mine.
    1. Re:Not just laptops.. by xenapan · · Score: 1

      what? the part where you cant even remove their logo at all so you basically advertise for them regardless unless you get a case?

      --
      insert funny sig here
    2. Re:Not just laptops.. by qoncept · · Score: 0

      Really? Because it took over a month of occasional rubbing alcohol wipe downs to get all the adhesive off my aluminum iMac from the clear plastic sheets that protect it from scratches in shipping.

      --
      Whale
    3. Re:Not just laptops.. by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Funny

      Those Apple logos are no more advertising than are the "Jesus loves you" bumper stickers on the car of a born-again Christian. If you own an Apple product how could you possibly not want to tell the world about it? Think of the souls you might save!

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    4. Re:Not just laptops.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, a lot of us are don't mind which OS you use as long as it's not anything from Microsoft.

      Windows is a toy OS. All the damn games are on it, why would you run a business on a toy OS?
      OS X is a desktop work OS for productivity, creation of content, etc.
      Linux is a desktop and server OS to run websites, email, coding, etc.
      BSD is the OS of choice for the living dead.

    5. Re:Not just laptops.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really?

      As Slashdot loves car analogies - why are you advertising the car you drive? Have you not removed the badge? How about a custom body kit?

      Didn't think so - you're just a stooge for THE MAN!

    6. Re:Not just laptops.. by Alanbly · · Score: 1

      Wierd. Never had any issues from that stuff. Nor from any other sticker actually

      --
      -- Adam McCormick
    7. Re:Not just laptops.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An Apple bash on Slashdot? Very clever, dude.

    8. Re:Not just laptops.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, a lot of us are don't mind which OS you use as long as it's not anything from Microsoft.

      Windows is a toy OS. All the damn games are on it, why would you run a business on a toy OS?
      OS X is a desktop work OS for productivity, creation of content, etc.
      Linux is a desktop and server OS to run websites, email, coding, etc.
      BSD is the OS of choice for the living dead.

      Balmer said it best.

      Developers, developers, developers, developers, developers, developers!

      What OS do most developers develop for? Windows.

      Turns out that includes both application developers and game developers.

      It's interesting to see who the 3 largest developers are for the OSX ecosystem: Apple, Adobe, and Microsoft. Apple is trying their damnedest to piss Adobe off, too. If that happens and Adobe abandons OSX, I imagine Microsoft will seize the opportunity, killing off their Mac business unit and steamrolling over what little corporate usage of OSX remains.

    9. Re:Not just laptops.. by stimpleton · · Score: 1

      I presume you mean actual physical stickers. I purchased a new monitor the other day. Once I got the thick plastic protecting the screen off, two stickers were on each side, and wider than the side trim, overlapping the screen by about 4.5 mm.

      I assumed they would just fall away. But no. 20 minutes of careful wetting with water, and the ol' fingernail. Doubly difficult when you can just press hard as you like on the screen itself.

      --

      In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
    10. Re:Not just laptops.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the non-branded car is available without waiting much longer and paying much more, yeah, I'll take that. Same with clothes: If I have two otherwise identical pieces of clothing, I'll pick the one that doesn't make me a walking bill board.

    11. Re:Not just laptops.. by Gryphia · · Score: 1

      what? the part where you cant even remove their logo at all so you basically advertise for them regardless unless you get a case?

      Right, unlike Dell, HP, Lenovo Lenovo, Acer (Acer . . . .

    12. Re:Not just laptops.. by fermion · · Score: 1
      Exactly, if you don't want a sticker, buy an Apple(but not the fruit since they all have stickers now). So it stands to reason that the sticker is not really an issue given that most people believe a Windows based laptop is a better value.

      The fact that AMD is saying this is funny since they are the worst culprit on any Windows machine I have every used.

      As far as the car analogy, car manufacturers have often put ornaments on cars, and the fancier the car the fancier the ornament. Some people like plain cars, so they buy cars with minimal ornamentation. What we are talking abou here is the reseller, such as CarMax, adding ornaments that indicate one bought a cut rate car.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    13. Re:Not just laptops.. by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1
      They have them on cars, too -- at least in the US. Ever noticed the number of cars that have dealer stickers/license plate frames/badges indicating where it was purchased from? I make them take it off (since for some reason they're not willing to give me a couple thousand in advertising fees), but it seems that few people do.

      I suspect it's the same for laptops; my wife left hers on for months until I took them off. It just never occurred to her to want to remove them. I suspect that for many people who don't use computers all/every day, that's the case.

    14. Re:Not just laptops.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the things that Apple got right with their computer products.

      Liar!!!! Every Mac I ever bought came with stickers. And they didn't even take the effort to put them on the hardware. Had to do that myself.

    15. Re:Not just laptops.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all just a race to the bottom with you, isn't it?

    16. Re:Not just laptops.. by quenda · · Score: 1

      Its on everything: DVD players, TVs, even fridges have those.
      And if people really hate them so much, why do so many people leave them on?
      You still see homes with colourful but faded stickers covering the front panel of the disused VHS-player ("Super-FF", "Long Play", ...)

      And why does every home and office still have those stupid Energy Rating stickers on their fridges, years after they bought them?
      They even peel off cleanly. (Go remove yours now!)

    17. Re:Not just laptops.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, a company as big as apple that's been in business for as long as they have, is bound to do ONE thing right in all those years.. such a shame they wasted it on going sticky-free.

  15. sweet! by __aatirs3925 · · Score: 0

    Sweet! But too bad I've been using Intel for the past 5 years and until AMD surpasses Intel I'll have to stick with the adhesive. If that time has already come and AMD / ATI is better than Intel / NVIDIA, please let me know, I haven't payed attention to these things this year.

    1. Re:sweet! by AnonGCB · · Score: 1

      AMD/ATI is better, AMD always has been and ATI has been kicking ass with their 5000 series cards. Unless you're going for absolute, price is not an issue performance, then AMD has intel soundly beaten.

      --
      http://CryoLANparty.com/ A lan I'm staff on!
    2. Re:sweet! by Alanbly · · Score: 1

      In general right now ATI beats NVIDIA but Intel Beats AMD. Go figure

      --
      -- Adam McCormick
  16. Really? Stickers on your laptop? by synthesizerpatel · · Score: 0

    I guess when you've been beaten down by an industry that reduces cost so drastically that cases are now just thin plastic husks with advertising splattered across it you might think you're spending 'big bucks' on a laptop.

    However, you can spend actual 'big bucks' and get a macbook with a metal case and no stickers (well, it does come with two nice stickers. they just aren't affixed to the laptop)

    1. Re:Really? Stickers on your laptop? by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which contains the same shitty foxconn made parts.

    2. Re:Really? Stickers on your laptop? by Z80xxc! · · Score: 1

      You know, you can also spend moderate bucks on a PC with a metal case with better performance for a lower price than a macbook (pro) and remove the two stickers yourself. There are lots of crappy PCs out there, but there are also some very nice ones that still cost much less than the Apple equivalent.

    3. Re:Really? Stickers on your laptop? by happydan · · Score: 1

      I keep hearing this from friends. I recently bought a MBP refurb and I love it. As a grown up who's free time is becoming more and more of a special treat, I don't want to tinker and fix just to get things working. Since moving to Apple, I've had to do ZERO hacking to sort things out. I use the machine to DJ, produce music, browse, play games (on Steam). It's all been plug and play (usually hotplugged). Seriously, anyone! Link me to a 13-15 inch notebook PC with comparable specs (in and out) to the Macbook range. Including a beautiful multi-touch trackpad. I would have been more than happy to buy it but no one has managed to find any for me.

  17. Seriously? This makes Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To me this isn't much of a problem. I just leave the stickers there until they start to come off and then I peel them off and wipe the wrist rest with a tissue. It's a one minute task I have to deal with every 3 years or whatever length of time it takes me to buy a new laptop.

    If AMD thinks it's necessary to reformulate sticker glue then fine...I guess. It's not going to be part of my buying decision on my next laptop though.

  18. Nobody likes it but... by grumpyman · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... it's probably calculated into their cost / profit-margin.

    1. Re:Nobody likes it but... by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 2

      Intended as humor or not... The cost of the product is offset by paid advertisements (stickers) and installed bloatware.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    2. Re:Nobody likes it but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. I'll gladly accept $2 per week to keep their adverts on my laptop.

  19. AMD, you don't need to switch stickers! by Dumnezeu · · Score: 1

    From all of the above comments, I see that people are FINE with stickers, they just don't know how to take them off and they complain about the glue. They don't feel "forced" (as TFA suggests). I actually keep the stickers for as long as possible (until they get dirty) because it gives me the feeling of "new" :)

    --
    Yes, it's sarcasm. Deal with it!
    1. Re:AMD, you don't need to switch stickers! by davev2.0 · · Score: 1

      Why should the people who buy laptops have to take off any stickers?

      It is not like they gave me the laptop or paid me for the advertising space. They didn't ask me if they could put the stickers on my laptop. Why should I have to spend my time and money removing the stickers?

      What is next, stickers on the back of the screen for better advertising?

    2. Re:AMD, you don't need to switch stickers! by sammyF70 · · Score: 1

      or even worse : some giant glowing logo?

      --
      "DRM is like the Ford Pinto: it's a smooth ride, right up the point at which it explodes and ruins your day."-C.Doctorow
    3. Re:AMD, you don't need to switch stickers! by davev2.0 · · Score: 1

      True that.

  20. I like the stickers by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Makes me feel like a NASCAR driver. Vrooom...vroooom!

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:I like the stickers by men0s · · Score: 2, Interesting

      After putting together my last full tower, I ended up having various stickers from all the components I bought (power supply, CPU, RAM, motherboard, and even the CPU cooler). Since I'm a bit of a pack-rat, and tend to not like throwing things out, I decided I wanted to put them somewhere on my nice and clean brushed aluminum case. Turns out the full tower had one of those front panels that swings open to reveal the air intake and drive bays, so I decided to place all the stickers on the inside of that. It'll be nice to keep adding more stickers as I keep the case and upgrade/refresh the components.

    2. Re:I like the stickers by Haffner · · Score: 5, Funny

      left turn! left turn! left turn!

      --
      "Going to war without the French is like going deer hunting without your accordion." ~General Norman Schwarzkopf
    3. Re:I like the stickers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use my laptop as a desktop. So it's closed all the time and the stickers only bother me a little bit. I have upgraded a few things in there so if I wanted to I could change the Windows sticker from VHB to 7HP and the processor sticker from Celeron mobile to Pentium Dual Core mobile. But since I only see them when turning on the laptop after a power outage (2-3 times a year) it's not worth the $3 apiece they'd cost on FleaBay.

  21. Stickers by 0racle · · Score: 4, Funny

    My MacBook had nothing of the like. It just didn't.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    1. Re:Stickers by Thyamine · · Score: 2, Informative

      They mention that in the article, and it makes sense given how controlling Apple/Jobs is about product look and feel. Why spend thousands of man hours researching design if you are just going to gum it up with stickers almost as an afterthought. For the most part I don't mind the Intel sticker, but the rest do bug me. I appreciate my Macbook Pro being clean from the get-go.

      --
      I will shred my adversaries. Pull their eyes out just enough to turn them towards their mewing, mutilated faces. Illyria
    2. Re:Stickers by chrisj_0 · · Score: 1

      someone use the fanboi mod for parent

    3. Re:Stickers by davev2.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is because Apple subscribes to the Model T school of production. "You can have whatever you want, as long as it is what we give you."

    4. Re:Stickers by fusiongyro · · Score: 1

      Ironic, then, that in the choice-laden PC laptop market, you don't get to choose not having these fucking stickers.

    5. Re:Stickers by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Maybe you have a casemod :)

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    6. Re:Stickers by mlts · · Score: 1

      There is something about seeing an "Intel Inside" and a "Designed for Windows XP" sticker affixed to an IBM z-Series mainframe rack which is both funny and sacrilegious at the same time.

    7. Re:Stickers by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      My MacBook had nothing of the like. It just didn't.

      Except for that big, fat, glowing apple etched into the back, you mean?

    8. Re:Stickers by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      My MacBook had nothing of the like. It just didn't.

      Yep, and same goes for bloatware and trialware that doesn't belong to Windows.

      Actually, there were stickers for my Mac now that I think about it. Free for you to use, but not stuck to the computer.

      What a novel idea! Let the user decide!

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    9. Re:Stickers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I've switch jobs and gone from a Mac to a HP laptop. I do miss the cleanness of the Mac in regards to stickers. Though I haven't scratch off the Windows 7 sticker even though I don't run Windows.

      Other thing I miss going from Mac to PC is the single power light*. The HP right now has 13 lights/LEDs on. It's like a disco.

      *A hard drive light on the Mac would be good though. But there is a software alternative for that.

    10. Re:Stickers by aiht · · Score: 1

      You seem to be forgetting that pretty much all laptops or brand-name computers or electronics products of any kind have the manufacturers' logos on them.
      That's not the issue here, the problem is the crappy stickers (plural) that are all over the place and leave goo if you try to remove them.
      Even once you've got the stickers off, a Windows computer will still have the manufacturer's logo too - which is fine.

    11. Re:Stickers by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Actually, every modern Mac I've heard of ships with two white Apple stickers. The difference is that they're in the little box with the paperwork and the DVDs instead of stuck onto your computer.

      I certainly wouldn't mind the other manufacturers doing it like that.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  22. Next step: by poptones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow great! So I can buy a shiny new laptop and not have to spend the first twenty minutes of its life removing the ugly mess of stickers that the manufacturer seems obliged to festoon upon its creation? Or no, I just have one fewer to remove because AMD is just one company (or two, I suppose, depending on the motherboard chipset and graphics subsystem). So all that would be left for many is that ugly "Windows" sticker...

    Wonder if AMD will do anything about that? Sure would be nice to be able to buy a shiny new laptop and not have to spend the first hours of its new life formatting and loading an operating system that doesn't suck.

    Ah, who am I kidding? It could come loaded with the latest and greatest uber-Ubuntu and I'd still reload it just because it's not partitioned the way I want it...

    1. Re:Next step: by Alanbly · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up.

      --
      -- Adam McCormick
    2. Re:Next step: by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      You could always do what a lot of people do; just ignore them. I admit it looks a little amateurish when your rig is covered with those damn stickers, but a lot of people just don't let it bother them and move on. As far as removal goes; anything with acetate will dissolve those adhesives quick. Nail polish remover == acetone. Of course if your a geek guy w/no gf, I guess your sol...

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    3. Re:Next step: by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      For me, the Windows sticker is the first one that comes off, as I'm bitter about paying Windows tax on a machine I'm going to wipe it from The Intel or AMD stickers may stay for a while, depending on my mood. (Zippo lighter fluid is my weapon of choice for removing the sticker residue, it works very well.)

    4. Re:Next step: by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nail polish remover == acetone. Of course if your a geek guy w/no gf, I guess your sol...

      Horseshit. If you *think* you're a geek guy and you don't have a handful of random solvents in your garage/basement/car trunk/etc then you need to reconsider your claim to geekdom. Solvents are right up there with pencils, duct tape, and string as must-have accessories.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    5. Re:Next step: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, I spent about an hour installing sidux...including updating, and installing extra software...

    6. Re:Next step: by DigitalJanitor · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of LVM? Well, OK, maybe *YOU* have... but the Ubuntu folks sure haven't.

    7. Re:Next step: by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Don't be too sure. My wife is extremely sensitive to chemicals. Didn't see that comin' did ya?

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    8. Re:Next step: by walllaby · · Score: 1

      My wife didn't see it coming either. Guess that's why I'm sleeping on the couch tonight.

    9. Re:Next step: by poptones · · Score: 1

      Sure they have. If you select "encrypted" it's an installation auto-option available through the guided gui. The PROBLEM is there's very little support for it after that - they'll walk you right through setting it up but good luck finding help if, say, your encrypted drive suddenly and mysteriously no longer seems to be valid... or even if you just want to reload the OS without screwing up your /home partition in the encrypted lvm sector.

      Not to mention it blindly lets you install a swap in the encrypted lvm, which totally hoses performance.

    10. Re:Next step: by aiht · · Score: 1

      Pro-geek-tip: don't rub solvents on your wife, even if her laptop has stickers on it.

    11. Re:Next step: by DigitalJanitor · · Score: 1

      Yes, I see. This make perfect sense. What I want is a better way to partition my drives so I need to follow the 'encrypted' path. Can't imagine why I missed that...

  23. This is one place Apple has it right by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is one place where apple really shines. You buy a new machine, it comes with no stickers on it. It looks really sleek. No stickers, nice clean lines, really helps the machine look nice. I don't know why none of the PC makers can do this. Make a machine that is esthetically pleasing, and don't mess it up with stickers. Also, does anybody find it odd how they related it to cars? When you buy a car, it has the manufacturer's logo, possibly a hood ornament, the type of car (sunbird, tempo, Ranger), the model of the car (SX,ZX,whatever). Also you get the dealership slapping their name on it too. Often the dealer will not only put their name on the body of the car, but also around the license plate. It's basically a billboard for the manufacturer and the dealership. I kind of equate it to buying a $50 t-shirt with some designer name printed across the front. Basically you're a walking billboard. I would love to be able to buy a car with no markings at all on it.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by KillaGouge · · Score: 2, Informative

      You do know they make it mostly easy to remove 90% of what you just complained about. http://www.ehow.com/how_2042739_remove-emblems-from-cars.html

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
    2. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Pysslingen · · Score: 1

      Kick-backs. The Intel-Inside program was a strategy whereby dealers got rebates for putting on the stickers. See http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,624233,00.html . Apple pays more for the CPU's if it doesn't have to pu the stickers on.

    3. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by h3 · · Score: 1

      Also you get the dealership slapping their name on it too. Often the dealer will not only put their name on the body of the car, but also around the license plate.

      I live in southern California and you don't see this much around here- in fact I'd never seen it at all until I moved out of state for a while (Wisconsin, where it seemed all cars had it).

      I imagine particularly in the Los Angeles region (where I am), this would not fly. I personally would not stand for it. If I'm dropping tens of thousands of dollars on a car, I would demand that dealer badges be removed or there would be no sale. Period.

      I find it curious that other people (like you, apparently) don't, and just accept it.

    4. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      In California dealerships don't attach their logos except for maybe a license plate frame or temporary plate. I'm not sure if that's because they aren't permitted or if it's just a cultural thing. I've seen lots of cars from out of state with the permanently-affixed logos you're talking about, though. I've never understood why people tolerate them.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    5. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Alanbly · · Score: 1

      I just refused to buy any of the cars with the emblem. Most dealerships don't even apply the emblem until purchase time so they can trade with other dealers in the area. They didn't put the ugly plate on my shiny new car.

      --
      -- Adam McCormick
    6. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely agree with you, except for the Apple bit: Apple has a tendency to emblazon their logo really prominently on their products, even more so then their competitors.

    7. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some brands allow you to purchase the car with branding removed. It's a no cost option for BMWs, but you still get the propeller.

    8. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by devent · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You have one big fat apple "sticker" on the back. With that everybody knows your are a Apple whore. It's like a t-shirt with coca cola commercial that you have to wear everywhere.

      --
      http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
    9. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by MonoSynth · · Score: 1

      I don't know why none of the PC makers can do this

      Because PC makers work with far lower margins. If one of the component-makers give you a $0.50 discount on their components if you put their sticker on every laptop, and if you know that all your competitors already do so and have a 50 cent advantage in their battle for the customer (or any step between you and the customer), you don't have any justification to not also add another useless sticker.

      Apple has far higher margins. Part of the design-tax is the absence of stickers. Which costs them money.

    10. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is one place where apple really shines.

      This sentence is ironic on so many levels ... what with the giant glowing Apple logo on their laptops and all :D

    11. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you're right, apple really SHINES with that glowing logo draining your laptop battery.

    12. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who gives a shit? When I buy a computer it is for the functions it performs rather than the way it looks. If they can cut the price of the laptop by including stickers and adware, so be it. There are easy ways to remedy both those problems.

      This is why I hate apple fanboys because they are so caught up in the aesthetics of their laptop and its OS rather than focusing on what it can do for them. Well, I just label them as idiots because they spend 4x the price for the same spec hardware (albeit SLIGHTLY better quality).

    13. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by interval1066 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'd rather spend the 20 minutes removing a bunch of crap off a machine that I can really use rather than marvel at how clean my shiny, overpriced, and useless Mac is.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    14. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Above · · Score: 1

      While folks seem to want to complain about the Apple Logo on the back as a "sticker" that's no different than any other laptop which also has the Logo, in plastic, on the back. It is orthogonal to the sticker issue. Indeed, I think the plain Apple is much more tasteful than most other companies logos.

      But, Apple actually goes a step forward. Every machine I've purchased, and several non-computer Apple devices come with a sticker in the box. A ready for you to apply where YOU want sticker. Want it on your laptop, put it there. Want it on your car, put it there. Want to leave it in the box, good for you. If you like the Nascar look go for it, and if not, well, you have some taste.

      For what it is worth, none of my cars have a dealership logo on them, because I ordered them and specified that they should not add one; they were quite happy to honor that request.

    15. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by not-my-real-name · · Score: 1

      That would be the manufacturer's logo.

      --
      un-ALTERED reproduction and dissimination of this IMPORTANT information is ENCOURAGED
    16. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Move to California. The only place on a new car where a dealer puts their name is the license-plate holder, which is easily changed, and usually changed about 3 minutes after a car leaves the lot. Paper plates on cars with no permanent plates yet? Easily covered with the novelty "plates" in different designs that are sold in auto supply stores. Manufacturer badges/model badges? Many shops remove them and fill/cover the holes so no evidence is visible - almost always done on customized cars. Keep those badges; you could probably sell them online.

      Lots of car lovers here like the sleek, elegant plain look that you describe. I've often thought that if I moved out-of-state and bought a car, I might try and make them order a trunk lid with no dealer sticker/badge on it!

    17. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by glwtta · · Score: 1

      When you buy a car, it has the manufacturer's logo, possibly a hood ornament, the type of car (sunbird, tempo, Ranger), the model of the car (SX,ZX,whatever). Also you get the dealership slapping their name on it too.

      Most laptops have the manufacturer's name, logo, and the laptop model somewhere on the body, not as stickers. The self-promotional crap that the dealers stick on is most similar to the annoying "Some Bullshit Inside" stickers that cover the palm rest area.

      Anyway, I've found they are relatively easy to remove off of Lenovos.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    18. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Function > Fashion.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    19. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by irid77 · · Score: 1

      But every computer has the manufacturer icon in that spot, not just apple.

    20. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by tooyoung · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's like a t-shirt with coca cola commercial that you have to wear everywhere.

      No, it is like a coca cola bottle with a coca cola logo on it.

    21. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You have one big fat apple "sticker" on the back. With that everybody knows your are a Apple whore. It's like a t-shirt with coca cola commercial that you have to wear everywhere.

      There are so many people posting things like this, that I wasn't sure who to respond to.

      I've got a Toshiba notebook here. It has the name TOSHIBA written on the top. It is not a sticker, or screen-printed on top of the case, it is permanent and non-removable. I've got a desktop here with the word eMachines stamped into the front plate. Have you seen any of Dell's computers lately?

      This is not the problem. Would you complain that your BMW has a BMW logo on it?

      The problem is the crappy stickers and the residue they leave when you try to remove them. On notebooks it is even worse because the sticks are often placed on wrist-rests where they'll eventually be rubbed off, exposing the sticky gunk, even if you don't wsant to do that.

    22. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Patience with a hair dryer and some dental floss will easily remove any badges on your car. Just warm them up to melt the glue (not the paint!) and use the floss to work behind it and peel it off. Alcohol or some mild solvent will get rid of the residue and you'll have your clean car.

      Unless your car is really old. Then the faded paint will give it away.

    23. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by pclminion · · Score: 1

      You have one big fat apple "sticker" on the back. With that everybody knows your are a Apple whore. It's like a t-shirt with coca cola commercial that you have to wear everywhere.

      Yeah, it's totally shocking. What the hell comes next, Coca Cola putting their logo on bottles of Coke? Jesus, what has the world come to.

    24. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by sconeu · · Score: 1

      In Calif, I think they can only do the plateholders. I've seen cars from other states, where the dealer's name is put on like another automotive namebadge.

      If I bought a car from a dealer who did that, I'd insist that they remove it first. If they refused, then I'd tell them "no sale, unless you pay me for the advertising I'm giving you".

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    25. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That only works on stickers. The dealership my car came from paints their name on cars.

    26. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by dotfile · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say the dealers are happy to honor my request to deliver the car sans dealer advertising. However, when I explain to them that I will refuse delivery if it shows up with their name or logo anywhere on it, they eventually get over it and comply. One didn't take me seriously and brought the car around with their logo and name in nice shiny chrome on the ass end... they claimed they put it on as soon as the car leaves the transport, and they can't take them off without damaging the paint. I told them the deal was off and started to leave. They figured out pretty quickly how to get it off.

    27. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      Also, does anybody find it odd how they related it to cars?

      They knew the story was going to make it onto Slashdot and they were trying to get a jump on us.

    28. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the LCD backlight.

    29. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      As far as the dealer markings - refuse to accept delivery of the car unless they compensate you for advertising or remove them. They're not going to refuse -- they don't want to lose a sale over something they can do in 30 seconds. I never understood why so many people leave those on - are they *that* fond of the dealership that they just love advertising for them?

    30. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks really sleek.

      And there you put your finger on it: Apple products look nice.

      End of story.

      So, install linux then download Mac4Lin and install that.

      Bingo, a computer that looks Macish but actually works.

      And doesn't cost a fortune.

    31. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Tideflat · · Score: 1

      But if that was true, then people putting stickers on windows computers is just like having a Canadian flag on the space shuttle's arm.

    32. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cousin over in Colorado bought a car with the dealer name painted on the back, after the sale completed, she asked for it to be removed, they refused saying they couldn't take it off. She then demanded $200 a month in marketing fees for the dealership as long as the logo remained on the car. They took the logo off.

    33. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      I bought a Thinkpad T61 a few years ago with Red Hat linux preinstalled, not windows. Not only was there no Windows sticker, but there weren't any other stickers except for an Intel one, which frankly I don't really mind. The cheaper Lenovo laptops come with the full slew of stickers - I know a few people who have them - but they treat the more expensive ones well. Similar price range as macbooks... in almost anything, once you go higher-end the logos play less of a role. Sure you can buy designer clothes with huge logos, but the actually nice stuff usually won't have a logo at all except on the inside.

      My main computer now is a macbook pro, though, and yes I did appreciate the clean design when I got it. I did cover up the glowing apple logo on the back, though, with black gaffer's tape and a drawing in silver sharpie.

    34. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... I would love to be able to buy a car with no markings at all on it.

      My dealership only put a removable license plate bracket with their name on the back (on my new car and my parents' new car from the same dealer). I'm pleased they didn't put a sticker or other dealer marking on it. When when a dealer has excellent service they don't resort to such advertising, because their customers advertise by word of mouth. Just like this, I buy from Bob Turner's Ford of Albuquerque.

    35. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by index0 · · Score: 1

      "Basically you're a walking billboard" Wow, the RDF is in full effect. You know that big apple logo that lights up on the lids of apple laptops? What purpose does that serve besides you showing everyone you have a apple product?

    36. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by wkk2 · · Score: 1

      Make no dealer logos a condition of the purchase. It usually works until you bring it back for a service appointment and they fix the missing logos.

    37. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can. Tell the dealer to remove their markings.

    38. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by zurmikopa · · Score: 1

      You can generally ask the dealer to debadge it, and they'll take off all those markings for you. I know someone who does this when they buy cars.

    39. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Meest · · Score: 1

      Then why don't you buy a car with no logo's?? If they want to sell the car they'll do it. Last 2 cars I've bought I've told them if they want to sell it, to remove all their billboard advertising from the car including the annoying paper license plate place holders

      Heck I've had them remove pin-striping before I would buy it. I de-badged my pickup of all forms of brand (You could still tell it was an S10 by its shape) on the outside with the addition of a billet grill that I wanted..

      Have you ever ASKED them to remove it?

    40. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      I have a cheap Lenovo (n500) and it only came with Intel's sticker. The laptop came without any OS, and no graphics or sound card (everything integrated on the board), so there weren't many to choose from, but even the Intel one is quite small and not shiny. I had to put a Kubuntu sticker on so that the black space in front of the keyboard doesn't look so empty.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    41. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      This is one place where apple really shines

      Yeah, and they REALLY shine at night when the logo on the back illuminates!

      By the way, I recently put my own machine together. My ThermalTake case had no stickers on it.
      I know it's not the same as buying a laptop but you can get nice looking PCs. :-)

    42. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In Calif, I think they can only do the plateholders. I've seen cars from other states, where the dealer's name is put on like another automotive namebadge.

      If you tell the dealer to remove that sticker or you won't buy the car, they will remove it. They usually respond well to heat, especially when they are new. Dealers respond well to money. Just refuse to sign the papers until you see a clean car sans dealer badge. Even factory badges are usually applied without locating pins today; the vast majority of them are now simply a sticker. It does less damage to your car when someone steals a sticker than when there's a metal peg through the ornament and they pry it off with a screwdriver.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    43. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not wanna call you a Apple fanboi. But you get it just as wrong as the article, if not worse.
      The article has it wrong when comparing to non-removable stickers on a car. The stickers on a computer are removable and actually it never took me 20min. Of course it's the first thing I do on a laptop, before powering on the first time.

      You get it very wrong when saying that Macs have nothing, but then comparing it cars and the manufactures logo. Last time I checked there was an Apple logo on any Apple computer. In the same way that Toshiba has it on their laptops, HP, ASUS, Dell, etc. All of them. You also find things like "MacBook" etc written on those machines. Also I don't know how it is done with the latest Macs but at the bottom I'm sure is more information to find. A sitcker, engraved, somehow. E.g. a model number.
      Please explain how this is different to what the manufacturer puts on a car?

      If one likes the look and feel of a Mac is simply personal preference. Not more not less. But it has things on it in the same way that cars have a manufacturer logo on them. Full Stop.

      Why none of the other PC makers can do it without stickers?
      Because Toshiba competes with IBM competes with Dell competes with HP competes with ASUS competes with Gateway competes with >>fill in consumer computer manufacturer here. If they get a component cheaper or any possible advantage by putting a sticker on the case they'll do it. Apple does not compete with the others in that sense.

    44. Re:This is one place Apple has it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is one place where apple really shines. You buy a new machine, it comes with no stickers on it

      WTF it comes with a HUGE LIT UP STICKER ON THE LID YOU F_CKING MORON.

  24. This is an opportunity! by Whyte+Panther · · Score: 1

    Don't just remove the stickers, add another one adverstising a product designed to remove the sticker goo. AMD recommends Goo Gone for sticker residue. It's a new revenue source!

  25. I thought... by KillaGouge · · Score: 0

    I thought stickers on computers where like the stickers on cars, the more you have, the faster you go?

    --
    GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
    1. Re:I thought... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      You're confusing stickers with speed holes.

      Now that I think about it, it might explain the speed of the Mac Pro...

  26. That's why by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's why I buy Apple, I hate branding so much that I am happy to report it came out of the package without stickers marking my allegiance to one company or another. It also comes with this cool light on the back in a funny shape that's not really useful, but I'm sure I'll figure it out its purpose someday. It's really cool, you guys should try it.

    --
    Qxe4
    1. Re:That's why by Atriqus · · Score: 4, Funny

      I buy Apple

      ...

      I hate branding

      *Head Explodes*

      --
      Hey, look! It's Bono's brother.
    2. Re:That's why by davev2.0 · · Score: 1

      You mean besides the big glowing apple on the back of the screen, right?

    3. Re:That's why by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      ...I'll figure it out its purpose someday.

      It is connected to an identical light on Steve Jobs, like the glowing android necklaces in Star Trek "I, Mudd". It allows remote fanbois to get immediate instructions for dealing with criticism of Apple: beep, beep, beeeeeeep... Steve Jobs coordinate!

    4. Re:That's why by Dancindan84 · · Score: 1

      It also comes with this cool light on the back in a funny shape that's not really useful, but I'm sure I'll figure it out its purpose someday.

      You didn't even really try to hide the sarcasm, and yet you still managed to get a couple bites...

      --
      "Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much." - Oscar Wilde
    5. Re:That's why by men0s · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It shouldn't have exploded but merely felt a nice breeze as something went sailing over your head.

    6. Re:That's why by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Can't hide the sarcasm too well, otherwise no one will know you are joking! With all the crazies on the internet, no matter how crazy your statement, there will be SOMEONE who actually believes that.

      --
      Qxe4
    7. Re:That's why by Infonaut · · Score: 1

      You will probably also be annoyed at Jonathan Swift. His dastardly pamphlet, "A Modest Proposal" is even more onerous than phantomfive's obvious stupidity.

      --
      Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    8. Re:That's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eventually, you'll figure out that it's where the antennas live... awful hard to put radio waves through solid aluminum.

    9. Re:That's why by speedlaw · · Score: 1

      Mussst buy ipad......mussst buy ipad......

    10. Re:That's why by interval1066 · · Score: 0

      "...That's why I buy Apple, I hate branding so much that I am happy to report it came out of the package without..."

      Wow, some one drank an extra helping of Jobs' kool-aid this morning. I don't suppose that huge monochrome apple-shaped bit of branding that you can see on almost every block of San Francisco, Chicago, and New York gave you pause before you started typing that little message in, did it?

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    11. Re:That's why by synthesizerpatel · · Score: 1

      If you use your laptop in such a way that you spend most of your time looking at that cool light, you might try turning it around -- you'll get more done.

    12. Re:That's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also comes with this cool light on the back in a funny shape that's not really useful, but I'm sure I'll figure it out its purpose someday.

      I give you a hint.

    13. Re:That's why by Xmastrspy · · Score: 1

      Wooosh!

    14. Re:That's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your head must have exploded from the whooosh over your head.

    15. Re:That's why by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Yeah.... but in all seriousness, if manufacturers like Intel or AMD would spend the money to make sure new laptops were designed with cool glowing, backlit versions of their logos on new notebooks - I don't think you'd see all the complaining!

      People simply don't like the stickers because they make the whole machine look cheap and tacky, especially when they start wearing or peeling off in one corner after a while, but still refuse to come off cleanly.
      Nothing like a sticker that says "ntel Insi" with wear marks on the sides!

    16. Re:That's why by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      I love my macbook pro, and I also hate branding. Not everyone who uses apple products do it for the brand image. I covered the glowing apple logo, myself.

      I refuse to get an iPhone (I have a Nexus One... which has a big Google logo on the back...), greatly dislike iPods, and most every other thing Apple does these days, but their computers - especially the laptops - are great. I use what's best for my purposes (that I can afford anyway), not what my favorite brand makes. I mainly use Microsoft mice, for example, but I don't use Windows on anything.

    17. Re:That's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I buy Apple ...

      I hate branding

      *Head Explodes*

      Forensic investigators determined that the fatal explosion of Atriqus' head was caused by a sudden and massive change in pressure, possibly due to something whooshing past.

      BTW, the other day I saw a Packard Bell PC (we still have them in Europe), and alongside a white and luminous green Test Icicles band sticker (nice name, tasteful sticker!) someone had stuck an Apple sticker on it. Nice. :-)

    18. Re:That's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, the irony.

    19. Re:That's why by Atriqus · · Score: 1

      Damn; apparently making a joke that's derived from a satirical post isn't allowed on slashdot.

      Lesson learned.

      --
      Hey, look! It's Bono's brother.
  27. Cry me a river... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Are people really buying laptops that often that this becomes a significant time-suck? The last laptop I bought, I bought 8 or 9 years ago - and I still use it. I basically just let the stickers fall off on their own; over time they lost their hold and were lost to time.

    Unfortunately the same applied to the rubber feet underneath the laptop; that was something that should have been affixed with a stronger adhesive. I'm still trying to find replacements for those little buggers...

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Cry me a river... by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      buy some shoe goo.

    2. Re:Cry me a river... by hedge49 · · Score: 1

      Try the cabinet hardware dept at your local home improvement superstore. Little door/drawer bumpers work, and if your laptop outlasts them, they come on sheets of 20 or so.

    3. Re:Cry me a river... by fusiongyro · · Score: 1

      Maybe the problem is that in the time it takes you to remove the stickers, you've already gotten three viruses.

    4. Re:Cry me a river... by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      "Are people really buying laptops that often that this becomes a significant time-suck? "

      Got a notebook for Xmas about 4 years ago, and it was a pretty nice one, and a great gift, but then the netbooks came out and being huge fan of small, light, and not needing a built-in cd writer (more small & light), and not having picked out the notebook myself, I decided to get another one, this one I picked myself, and I'm very happy with it. And I take it with me most of the time so I can work wherever. My wife also had this huge, old Dell piece of crap, so she got a netbook, which got sat on, so she got another one, which was stolen when our house got broken into (again, I had mine with me, so it wasn't lost). The insurance money brought her the one she has now. So after 5 or so notebook-style computers, yes; I got pretty tired of the damn stickers. Sometimes people buy a bunch of laptops.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    5. Re:Cry me a river... by sofayam · · Score: 1
      --
      sofa -- so good
    6. Re:Cry me a river... by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Easy - attach them with stickers.

    7. Re:Cry me a river... by WED+Fan · · Score: 1

      You're not looking very hard. I was at the grocery store today, in the little household goods aisle right next to the super glue were these little rubber stick on feet. Fits perfectly on my Dell laptop.

      --
      Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    8. Re:Cry me a river... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      You're not looking very hard. I was at the grocery store today, in the little household goods aisle right next to the super glue were these little rubber stick on feet. Fits perfectly on my Dell laptop.

      Except that my laptop has long narrow feet on the underside that are fairly tall. Hence nothing commonly carried anywhere fits, and the manufacturer doesn't even have a part number for these 8-or-so year-old parts anymore.

      But thanks for assuming I'm lazy and/or stupid when you didn't have enough information.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    9. Re:Cry me a river... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it's time for you to cut feet out of some other feet.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Cry me a river... by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Get some of those giant (1.5"?) stick-on feet from an old school tower case.

      Stick four of them on, careful not to block any vents. They should be taller than your existing feet and simply replace them. And you'll give your laptop lots of nice fresh air.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    11. Re:Cry me a river... by WED+Fan · · Score: 1

      Well, Sonny Jim, there was no offense meant where you took it. As for shape, shape rarely matters when replacing the feet unless the person is a bit retentive. You can always mount new round rubber feet outside of the space provided, or do what others have suggested and fashion your own feet.

      Thin skinned is never fashionable.

      --
      Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
  28. On a related note ... how about video games? by WankersRevenge · · Score: 1

    How about all those logos before a video game starts? First we have the developer logo, then the publisher logl, then the graphics engine logo followed by the physics game logo, and then some legaleese. And then maybe a cutscene kicks into gear. I timed one video game (Bad Company 2, I think) and it was just over sixty seconds before I could even interact with the menu. I gotta give props to Fallout 3. Insert game. Press start. Alas, that's an exception.

    1. Re:On a related note ... how about video games? by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

      I notice this the most with games that use the Unreal engine. It's almost like a requirement of the engine license that the game must take at least a minute to load from all the logos for the tech that was used to build the game. Another one that was bad was Crysis. The first time you load it, they made you watch all the company logos, tech logos, and the intro video, with no option to skip. It literally took around 8 minutes to get to the menu the first time.

    2. Re:On a related note ... how about video games? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      The same thing happens in a lot of movies too. And then the forced previews that you can't skip...

    3. Re:On a related note ... how about video games? by TehClaws · · Score: 1

      Yeah, don't try baby oil on those.

  29. If they hated them as much as I do... by topham · · Score: 1

    They wouldn't include them at all, ever. period.

  30. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by NReitzel · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those of you who prefer completely natural cleaners, d-limonene (orange oil) works wonders. Goo Gone is limonene diluted with a (cheaper) petroleum solvent.

    The only downside for pure citrus orange oil is that your laptop may smell like oranges for days.

    --

    Don't take life too seriously; it isn't permanent.

  31. Stickers by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Right now my bamboo plant on my file cabinet is running an Intel Core i5 and Windows 7 based on the stickers.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  32. I don't I know anyone who has complained... by flabbergast · · Score: 1

    I don't know anyone who has complained about this. My HP has two stickers, nVidia and Intel. My old E6400 had Intel and Vista Compatible. My current machine, M11x, doesn't have any.

    And I've never had someone lament to me "Man, I wish my laptop didn't have stickers. They suck!" I guess it depends on the survey question.

    1. Re:I don't I know anyone who has complained... by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

      Take a look at the HP dv series, dont know about the new ones, byut a friend has a DV6000 and the entire palmrest is covered with stickers

  33. The only thing i hate worse... by theghost · · Score: 1

    The only thing i hate worse than taking off those stickers is leaving them on.

    My in-laws' just leave them on and it drives me nuts. I'm also the kind of guy who pretty much refuses to wear shirts and jackets with prominent logos. I'm sure you can see how mild anti-corporate sentiments plus a tendency towards some mild OCD-esque behaviors might come to a head on that point.

    --
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    1. Re:The only thing i hate worse... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      ...refuses to wear shirts and jackets with prominent logos.

      I'm with you on that. Some mainstream clothing brands with decent products I will pass by only because they have a big goofy patch or embroidered logo. I vaguely remember popular logos being a consideration when I was a kid, but as an adult it would be an embarrassment. The one exception I put up with now is Levi jeans.

    2. Re:The only thing i hate worse... by CR0 · · Score: 1

      I am not alone. ahhhhhhhhh

    3. Re:The only thing i hate worse... by quitte · · Score: 1

      Indeed, your inlaws aren't the only ones that leave those stickers on. In fact I think people might get angry if Laptops stop shipping with those stickers. After all how is it supposed to go fast if it isn't red?

      What's even worse than peoples' attachment to those stickers is their attachment to the foil covering the panel thingies on remotes and all the tiny display screens. I keep peeling those off, telling them that they are a protective measure for production and "look how shiny it is now
      ". Still most panic when I do it to their devices and demand I put half peeled foil back.

      I hate those foils and what they do to people with a passion.

    4. Re:The only thing i hate worse... by rcastro0 · · Score: 1

      Some mainstream clothing brands with decent products I will pass by only because they have a big goofy patch or embroidered logo.

      Same here. I will not pay to get a job as a walking billboard for clothing brands.

      But I am not as radical as a cab driver I met, who would take out all signs from the automaker from his car. He even covered the logo at the center of the driving wheel with a red sticker... "This is not Ford's -- this is my car -- I paid for it, I am still paying for it!"

      --
      Quem a paca cara compra, paca cara pagará.
    5. Re:The only thing i hate worse... by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you can see how mild anti-corporate sentiments plus a tendency towards some mild OCD-esque behaviors might come to a head on that point.

      While I don't really have any OCD tendencies I do have serious issues with visible logos, sometimes you just don't have a choice (try finding a good snowboarding jacket that's actually designed to work well with the way you move your body while snowboarding that doesn't have a logo somewhere on it. No, the $30 fluffy bargain bin noname jacket doesn't count, it may be warm but it's not exactly ideal for snowboarding). When it comes to everyday clothing like t-shirts, pants, socks and such I try to avoid logos and brand names as much as possible though, why should I pay just so I can walk around displaying someone's brand?

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  34. Why are they there? by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    Has anyone asked why the stickers are there in the first place? Do they have any utilitarian or aesthetic purpose? Is it perhaps to make the hardware as loathsome and ugly as the Windows OS under the hood? It is really obnoxious and they should stop this practice immediately.

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  35. Next can we get rid of TV logos? by Picass0 · · Score: 1

    I wish all of the TV networks would follow this example. I don't need the network logo in the corner of my show for the entire hour. Even if they threw it up there once or twice an episode it would be tolerable. Some of the channels aren't satisfied with just a watermark either, and go for full color and sometimes animated logos.

    And news channels: I'm not reading your scroll bars and I doubt anyone else does either. Stop making your news channels look like web pages. FFS when there a major breaking story do you think people might want to see the f'ing video?

    In a world filled with advertisements and spam, it's nice to see AMD get a clue.

    1. Re:Next can we get rid of TV logos? by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      I like the scroll bars on news channels, because most of the stuff they're actually talking about is absolute drivel and that way I can look at something else. I only tend to watch those channels if I'm sitting in an airport or somewhere like that, and it's often not when the interesting shows with decent news are on, so the scroll bars are great if I don't want to use my nexus one or laptop (assuming there's free wifi) while I wait.

      Also, I was in Thailand for a couple months and don't know the language well enough to keep up with fast-paced news. They would sometimes have English headlines scroll by the bottom, though, so I had something to read while my companions listened.

  36. Next step by e065c8515d206cb0e190 · · Score: 1

    Remove the bloatware too!

  37. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by ThatMegathronDude · · Score: 5, Funny

    The only downside for pure citrus orange oil is that your laptop may smell like oranges for days.

    That's a downside?

  38. New stickers then out? by davev2.0 · · Score: 1

    Why not just get rid of them if they are so hated? It is like ad bugs and snipes on TV. They are hated but the producers keep putting them out.

  39. I wouldn't mind if they. . . by JSBiff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wouldn't mind a single technical information summary sticker on the underside of the laptop. You know, where the manufacturer typically puts a sticker with serial number, model number, etc.? Something which is sort of the computer equivalent of the 'nutrition facts' box on food packaging, which included info about:

    * CPU make/model/revision/speed/number of cores.
    * Amount of RAM originally installed
    * List of built-in devices (wifi chip, ethernet chip, audio chip, GPU, memory card reader chip, etc)

    Only thing is, I think putting all that info on a sticker, in text large enough to read, would lead to a giant sticker, which might interfere with things like removable batteries, removable access panels (e.g. the panel you normally remove to access the memory slots, etc), cooling vents, removable drives, etc, which are all usually accessed on the bottom of the laptop.

    1. Re:I wouldn't mind if they. . . by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Variability == expense.

      They wouldn't even put the S/N on a sticker if it wasn't how they tell when your warranty's expired.

    2. Re:I wouldn't mind if they. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put it in a PDF417 or MaxiCode barcode. The only people who care about that information can probably get access to a scanner, and PDF417 will decode with a 1D or 2D scanner anyway.

  40. Vodka by jbridleman · · Score: 1

    Vodka works great for stickers and band-aids and...

    1. Re:Vodka by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      ...and my tummy...but not my head.

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  41. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by hedwards · · Score: 3, Funny

    It makes a certain black man get confused and think that there's a kid in trouble.

  42. Stickers are everywhere! Worst Experience? by NEDHead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps the most annoying sticker placement I have ever encountered is on the mating surface of copper plumbing fittings. Makes a 10 second cleaning job into a five minute ordeal. Any other sad or funny stories?

  43. Wow i'm the only one using the sticker to clean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I remove those stickers I use the sticker itself to remove the extra adhesive. Simply reapply the sticker glue on glue over and over and it will remove it all and leave no trace.

  44. They aren't useless though! by baerd · · Score: 1

    I have a few friends with laptops and the stickers are literally the ONLY way they can tell what kind of computer it is. Other than who makes it (because you can't remove the Dell or Acer or whatever logo) they have zero idea how much RAM, what kind of processor, how big hard drive etc. it has except for the stickers the manufacturer puts there. Its so much easier asking idiots to "Read the stickers" then it is to get them to even right-click on the Computer button in Windows and go to Properties.

    --
    I wish I had a lawn.
    1. Re:They aren't useless though! by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

      Guess thats why business machines(Thinkpads,Latitudes) are free from the stickers

  45. I leave two just for fun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I peel off other stickers than the most hated ones, Intel and Windows. Even though first thing I do with my laptops is to install some Linux distribution on them.

  46. I love "designed for Microsoft Windows" stickers.. by wagadog · · Score: 1

    ...on the inside of the toilet bowl lid.

  47. Way to be bold, AMD! by Infonaut · · Score: 2, Funny

    Easy off stickers next year, and maybe, some time in the future, no stickers at all! And people say big corporations can't be nimble.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  48. Not just laptops by AntEater · · Score: 2, Funny

    "It's like buying a new, luxury car — and discovering that it comes with non-removable bumper stickers"

    Funny, that's pretty much the same reason why I'll never consider getting a tattoo either.

    --
    Alex, I'll take keybindings not used by Emacs for $400....
    1. Re:Not just laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... or date a girl with one.

    2. Re:Not just laptops by ovu · · Score: 1

      we call that a tramp stamp around here.

    3. Re:Not just laptops by sinai · · Score: 1

      "It's like buying a new, luxury car -- and discovering that it comes with non-removable bumper stickers"

      Funny, that's pretty much the same reason why I'll never consider getting a tattoo either.

      Perhaps, but with *most* tattoos, one willingly applies the sticker...right?

      At any rate I always have to stifle a chuckle when I notice machines where the person just decided (or undecided?) to leave the stickers on. Just another one of those mysterious details of the personal computer that some folks are completely oblivious to. Naturally most machines I see like that are also hindered by a host of other "details".

    4. Re:Not just laptops by hawguy · · Score: 1

      At any rate I always have to stifle a chuckle when I notice machines where the person just decided (or undecided?) to leave the stickers on. Just another one of those mysterious details of the personal computer that some folks are completely oblivious to. Naturally most machines I see like that are also hindered by a host of other "details".

      What is there to chuckle about? Many (most?) people buy a laptop to get work done, not to spend time removing stickers so it meets some aesthetic goal -- most of those people worried enough about aesthetics to remove the stickers probably buy Macs anyway so they don't have any stickers to deal with.

    5. Re:Not just laptops by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      You don't know what you're missing ;)

    6. Re:Not just laptops by dangitman · · Score: 1

      What is there to chuckle about? Many (most?) people buy a laptop to get work done, not to spend time removing stickers so it meets some aesthetic goal -- most of those people worried enough about aesthetics to remove the stickers probably buy Macs anyway so they don't have any stickers to deal with.

      Pretty much. I actually do care about this, I have a couple of laptops at work which have about a dozen ugly stickers each. I started trying to remove them, but they don't come off easily, so I stopped. I'm not going to waste my time on that.

      I'm just going to order Macs for work in the future. I don't give a fuck if they cost more, they just don't waste my time. The stickers are only a secondary issue - the PC laptops have such shitty hardware and are constantly wasting my time. They really are sub-standard. The fact that the manufacturers rely on income from fucking stickers and pre-installed software really says a lot about their product.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  49. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by KlomDark · · Score: 1

    Scatman Crothers FTW!! :)

  50. Business laptops by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 4, Funny

    Perhaps you could look at business laptops, generally they only come with 1 or 2 stickers

    1 for the Chipset/Processor
    other for the OS(If it was included)

    and, removing the stickers on thinkpads is extremely easy, run Prime 95 + Furmark for 15-20 minutes, use TPFC to disable the fan. Soon the sticker area heats up enough that you can just peel it off with minimal residue..

    And, its unlikely that a short burst of high temp's will damage the processor in any way

    1. Re:Business laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Normally I wouldn't go to this length on Slashdot...... but are you fucking kidding me? Overheat the laptop *on purpose* to remove a sticker?

    2. Re:Business laptops by Kozz · · Score: 1

      And, its unlikely that a short burst of high temp's will damage the processor in any way

      By any chance are you a contractor? ;)

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    3. Re:Business laptops by moonbender · · Score: 1

      ... so you can also put it in the oven for 2 to 3 minutes at 220C.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    4. Re:Business laptops by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      On my most recent laptop (not counting the one that Dell said would ship this past Monday), I had an AMD sticker.

      The decal part wore off, leaving a nice shiny mirror surface on the sticker. That eventually fell off, too. The Windows sticker has survived.

      Maybe AMD is just embarrassed that their stickers self-destruct, so they're changing them to make it look like they want them to come off?

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  51. This cracks me up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is about the most inane post, and I've been around here for a while. It's so inane, it cracks me up.

    Ok, well, one of the most inane non-Apple post. Apple posts and their fanbois are annoying instead.

  52. Post it notes or Static cling? by meerling · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not like the technology hasn't been around and in use for the past couple decades or anything...

  53. "Designed for Microsoft Windows XP" by DrJimbo · · Score: 4, Funny

    My kitchen garbage has been adorned with this sticker for over a decade.

    --
    We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
    -- Anais Nin
    1. Re:"Designed for Microsoft Windows XP" by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I have one of those on my vacuum cleaner, and I swear it makes it faster. It's like recompiling the sucker with -O4 -mfpmath=sse,387 -ffast-math -fweb -frename-registers -ftree-vectorize.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:"Designed for Microsoft Windows XP" by armanox · · Score: 1

      We placed one of them on the bathroom door in the college dorm. Someone else added Intel Inside to the toilet.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    3. Re:"Designed for Microsoft Windows XP" by Brianwa · · Score: 1

      My graphing calculator boasts a Pentium 4 with hyperthreading.

    4. Re:"Designed for Microsoft Windows XP" by JonJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There were stickers out before the release of the system? "Over a decade" seems somewhat ambitious when the system was released in 2001...

      --
      -- Linux user #369862
    5. Re:"Designed for Microsoft Windows XP" by DrJimbo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, the stickers were released before the OS. They did a similar thing with Vista.

      --
      We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
      -- Anais Nin
    6. Re:"Designed for Microsoft Windows XP" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My shredder has this sticker. Right over the CD/DVD shredding slot.

    7. Re:"Designed for Microsoft Windows XP" by Radish03 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I tried that with a Vista sticker on my toaster. The day after putting the sticker on, the toaster died.

      I suspect the toaster took it as a threat and just offed itself, lest it suffer a worse fate.

    8. Re:"Designed for Microsoft Windows XP" by Skraut · · Score: 1

      For some reason my Sig is compelling me to reply to your comment...

      --
      Introducing Microsoft Vacuum 1.0 The first Microsoft product that doesn't suck.
    9. Re:"Designed for Microsoft Windows XP" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, my alarm clock also has the "Designed for Windows XP" sticker!

      It fails to go off and wake me up 2 days a week on average.

    10. Re:"Designed for Microsoft Windows XP" by SheeEttin · · Score: 1

      Of course, Toasters are supposed to run NetBSD.
      (Or something like that.)

    11. Re:"Designed for Microsoft Windows XP" by greenguy · · Score: 1

      Three notes related to this.

      1. I followed your example, and after five years, pulled the "Designed for Windows XP" sticker off my main laptop and put it on my toaster. I hope it does better than yours, but if not, no big loss.

      2. It wasn't a sticker. It was an actual piece of metal glued to my keyboard.

      3. I, for one, love laptop stickers. I've put dozens on to express my taste in politics and music.

      --
      What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
    12. Re:"Designed for Microsoft Windows XP" by MrNiCeGUi · · Score: 1

      XP was launched in October 2001. You've gotten shortchanged on your decade, methinks.

    13. Re:"Designed for Microsoft Windows XP" by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the toaster was just waiting for you to respond.

      "The heating assembly is attempting to draw power. [Cancel][Allow]"

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    14. Re:"Designed for Microsoft Windows XP" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did manufacturers start printing "Designed for XP" stickers more than a year before it was released (2001)?

  54. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by pegdhcp · · Score: 1

    Superb, I was thinking about how to explain this, in a short sentence. But you sir, showed that no explanation is necessary.

  55. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by N0Man74 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I prefer to use C4. I prefer the smell of almonds to oranges.

  56. Re:Stickers are everywhere! Worst Experience? by MadCow42 · · Score: 1

    Actually, if you use your soldering torch on them for a few seconds, they usually burn up pretty easily. A quick cleaning after that is pretty simple.

    That advice works well for copper fittings... probably not so well for laptops. :)

    --
    I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
  57. Vinyl by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Just use those clear vinyl sticker that are normally on cell phone LCD screens? Peel off with no glue.

  58. stickers everywhere by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    I bought a cheap laser printer, then I tried to remove the garish sticker describing all the features and how to operate the demo mode. I shredded, apparently not meant to be removed. I never did manage to get all of the weird vinyl sticker off. Why can't we have products with a simple company logo, and maybe a permanent product information sticker on the bottom?
    Do I need green, blue, and yellow stickers all over every PC, camera and printer I buy?

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  59. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just assumed this was a reference to Kel.

  60. Well, now I'm not buying any AMD products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because damnit, I like the stickers. Not that I look at them, not that they impact why I bought the system, but because...well, they just break up the lines, and no other reason.

  61. TV-Rip by tepples · · Score: 1

    I don't need the network logo in the corner of my show for the entire hour.

    The station ID bug serves a couple purposes: 1. it reminds viewers what channel they're watching even if they use analog cable or the low-end cable box without channel names, and 2. it helps to provide evidence of the source of a TV-Rip.

  62. wait! by Carebears · · Score: 1

    without the sticker, how am i gonna impress the girls?!?!?!?

  63. The ubiquitous OS and the stickers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there are no laptops in the market without that ubiquitous OS. I don't want to waste time chasing them for a refund.

  64. Apple.. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    Apple laptops don't come covered in stickers (i guess steve jobs hates them too, or thinks they would ruin the aesthetics)...

    What other laptop manufacturers don't include all these stickers?

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  65. remove slowly. no chemicals. no issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i've had plenty of employer-supplied and personally-bought laptops over the years (dell, HP, vaio) and have not had an issue with any. unstick a corner. peel off s..l..o..w..l..y.... no residue. no issue. of course its a pain that suppliers do this in the first place, but 1-2mins per sticker is no problem.

    in fact, those colleauges of mine who don't remove theirs leave their laptops looking worse with age, as they slowly rub the logos of the stickers.

  66. No, they don't. by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

    If AMD hated laptop stickers as much as I do, they would have already done away with them. QED.

    --
    Sent from my iPhone
  67. Chemical Free approach by Bourdain · · Score: 1

    I always just use strong tape to remove adhesive glue from surfaces

    i.e. I repeatedly apply and reapply a piece of packing tape to any left over adhesive a few times and it removes residue quite easily

  68. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

    You're thinking of Explosive No. 808. To my knowledge C4 doesn't smell like anything in particular.

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  69. Re:Stickers are everywhere! Worst Experience? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Burn then off with the torch you will be soldering with. There I just saved you the five minutes.

  70. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It smells like victory.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  71. Auto stickers. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    It's like buying a new, luxury car -- and discovering that it comes with non-removable bumper stickers ...

    I only have a Honda Civic and CR-V, but made the dealer take off all their dealer stickers and logos as a purchase condition (and replace their logo wheel cover with the original Honda cover - which was nicer anyway.). Though they showed me that the stickers were actually fairly easy to remove, having them do it made them responsible for any screw ups. I like my dealership, but won't give them free advertising...

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  72. Stickers + Useless software by dangro · · Score: 1

    The stickers are half the problem. Try getting rid of the (crap|bloat)ware that comes with most Windows notebooks!

  73. removing sticker residue by solune · · Score: 1

    Here's a great "susie homemaker" idea for removing sticker residues: peanut butter. Between the oil and soft abrasion of the peanuts, it works great!

    As for that "big apple" problem, I cover my undesirable deco-plates with...wait for it....

    Stickers!

    Usually bigger, automotive (bumper) stickers. I have a nice "Steal your face" VW over my eee logo, and on my bigger laptop used one I got from a HOPE convention.

  74. b-o-o h-o-o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mommy, the mean computer companies put stickers on my laptop. What am I ever going to do?

    It's stuff like this that makes geeks look like retards.

  75. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 2, Informative

    No no, that's napalm!

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  76. I actually like the stickers... by znerk · · Score: 1

    Leaving the stickers on makes it easier to tell the system specs at a glance, even if the machine is off.

    I would guess that 90% of consumers never upgrade their systems, which means that what it says on the box is usually what's inside. The ones who do upgrade their systems are quick to tell you about it, because they turned their three-year-old $1200 system into a brand new computer, simply by spending $300 on new insides.

    It's fun to tell them that for $600, they could have built a brand new one that really is brand new, and would be three times as fast as their upgraded system for only twice what they spent... especially when their $300 upgrade didn't get them any faster than buying a $300 system at walmart would have...

    --
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
  77. Screen Scratches by pentalive · · Score: 1

    I have a lenovo y510 with one of those "Centrino inside intell swoop" stickers on it.

    The sticker has scratched a sticker shaped mark on the screen part of the laptop.

    It is just a clear plastic cover - perhaps something will buff out the mark...or make it worse.

  78. Now where will I get ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... all those "Designed for Microsoft Windows" stickers I put on my toilet tank?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  79. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Thaelon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whether or not it's "natural" depends entirely on your definition of the word.

    Are we going to start calling citric acid artificial because a lemon tree made it? Or call honey artificial, because a bunch of bees made it?

    We're just as a part of nature as bees and lemon trees, so why is stuff we made suddenly unnatural?

    Moreover, since it's completely arbitrary, why does it matter where we draw the line?

    It's a completely useless definition. That is, unless you want to make millions off of people who think "natural" things are better than "unnatural" things. Barnum called those people "suckers".

    --

    Question everything

  80. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by retchdog · · Score: 1

    Be careful with this and do a spot test first; essential oils destabilize some plastics. I'd recommend starting out with something simpler like ethanol/isopropyl. Plain old rubbing alcohol plus friction has always done the trick for me.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  81. Damn this article by snsh · · Score: 1

    I never paid attention to the stickers on my laptop before. Now after reading this post I suddenly notice them and feel violated.

    Fuck you, slashdot!

  82. Is that really you Pogue? by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

    The bizarre thing is that computer companies are trying to make their laptops beautiful these days. A.M.D. reps showed me, for example, a gorgeous new Hewlett-Packard ultralight laptop. Sleek. Shiny. Elegant.

    Wow, David Pogue said something complimentary about a Win Laptop without immediately following it up with ", though utterly failing in light of Apple's recent MacBook Pro offerings."

    Has he been Cringely'd?

  83. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, that stuff smells like gasoline.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  84. Could I please make another request? by Trelane · · Score: 1

    I don't care about the stickers. Gimme non-horked ACPI data please. Sure, you don't manufacture the motherboards, but you can provide the OOEMs and OEMs the same sort of incentives that drive their sticker adoption.

    --

    --
    Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
  85. but the best part of a windows laptop is the flair by wardk · · Score: 1

    more stickers please

  86. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by BlitzTech · · Score: 1

    C4 has no smell. 'Almond' smell is usually attributed to cyanide. If anything, C4 smells like plastic... because of the binder, not the actual material.

  87. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by cpscotti · · Score: 1

    According to Tyler , it is made from Gasoline+Orange Juice!

  88. Love the stickers by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    Love the stickers. They divide the sane from the idiots. I find anyone keeping the stickers being a free billboard and thus an idiot. They however find me an idiot for bothering at all. I however have a Mac that came with none.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    1. Re:Love the stickers by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      I however have a Mac that came with none.

      Nope. Nothing on that Mac. Just ignore that big, lit up, funny shaped thing on the back of your laptop. Probably some sort of "iLight" or something so you can see in the dark while you're working on your laptop...

    2. Re:Love the stickers by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      It's fairly easy to ignore if you're looking at the right side of the lid. The trick is to look just below you, and if you see a keyboard then you have your MacBook the right way around. Also makes it easier to use.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    3. Re:Love the stickers by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

      Besides, the apple shaped lighting logo is pretty well styled and doesn't bother me. It doesn't compare with cheap stickers.

      PS: Not an Apple fanboy but I like the hardware I'm punching on right now.

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  89. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Cwix · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was a combat engineer in the army.. your right C4 has little to no odor.

    --
    You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
  90. Alienware gets it mostly right by Audiophyle · · Score: 1

    On my m15x, there were no stickers below the keyboard, unlike one you would buy from Best Buy or NewEgg. I think there's a Windows ID sticker underneath that is ugly and likes to flake off over time. Alienware's laptops aren't quite as sleek as Apple's, nor are they quite as robust-feeling, but they are doing some things right. The amount of crapware loaded on the laptop was also very minimal, akin to Apple's method, which I appreciate wholeheartedly. I still put Ubuntu on it though. ;)

  91. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by ultranova · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We're just as a part of nature as bees and lemon trees, so why is stuff we made suddenly unnatural?

    Mainly because our minds can invent new things faster than our bodies can adapt to them, thus something invented by us is more likely to cause serious trouble for our metabolism than something that bees or trees invented millions of years ago.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  92. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer to use my anus. I prefer the smell of feces to almonds.

  93. New laptop 2 weeks ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just got a new laptop a few weeks ago. It had 3 stickers on it. All of them came off without any real effort beyond a finger nail. I used to purchase AMD CPUs, but switched to Intel with the C2D line. The i5, Win7, and .... whatever the other sticker was - came off easily on the first day I opened the box. The laptop was built and mailed directly from the vendor, so there was ZERO sitting on a shelf.

    Perhaps this is an AMD issue or due to laptops sitting in hot trucks?

  94. Comparing a Honda to a Laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like to think of a Laptop like my friends Honda. Each sticker adds +10 horsepower.

    Not to mention the droning of a loud exhaust and crappy speakers.

  95. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by JorDan+Clock · · Score: 1

    Bull. Just because something is "natural" has no bearing on its safety or efficacy. Natural is just a feel good word. It's a marketing tool, that's all.

  96. ask store to remove them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just tell the store that you will buy it only if they take off the sticker

  97. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by nschubach · · Score: 1

    Oil was created millions of years ago... but I wouldn't bathe in it. ;)

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  98. Re:Specs are everything. Opt for the blowup girl. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're absolutely right. That Xeon E5620 in your Mac is *NOT* the same as the Xeon E5620 I have in my PC. In fact, yours is probably much better and faster. Oh, and did I mention dearer?

  99. Pogue might be mildly retarded by frist · · Score: 1

    That is all.

  100. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by N0Man74 · · Score: 1

    I am not "thinking" of anything. I'm making a joke that is referencing a trope. I didn't make it up, even if it is not accurate (and jokes don't have to be accurate).

    I do suggest the following links though:

    http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_explosive_smells_like_almonds

    http://ask.metafilter.com/157267/Does-C4-smell-like-Almonds

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humour

  101. Re:Stickers are everywhere! Worst Experience? by NEDHead · · Score: 1

    simplistic analysis, actually, as the residue from the burned sticker still needs to be removed. If you ever do any plumbing you will see this.

  102. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by N0Man74 · · Score: 1

    Nerds... is there anything we won't argue about?

  103. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by bkpark · · Score: 1

    How about "organic", or, since that term is taken, "natural" if the product is produced through a biological process?

    Under this criterion, 100-proof alcohol is, for example, unnatural because the only way you can get that high percentage of alcohol in any fluid is through distillation, an unnatural chemical process (as opposed to natural fermentation that gives you wines with 14% or so alcohol by volume).

    Of course, this makes cobra venom "natural" as well (in its naturally occurring concentration), but then, I'm not the one equating "natural" with "good".

  104. Cover/modify it by penguinchris · · Score: 1

    I covered mine with gaffer's tape and drew a penguin on it (personal trademark, not Tux - see my username - though I am a linux user as well). Used silver sharpie so it matches the nice brushed aluminum.

    Doesn't fool anyone into thinking it's not a mac, but it's not as obvious. I'm "thinking different" rather than looking like all the other people with macbooks with that glowing apple on them.

    I've been considering of doing something less rough-looking (it's literally just a 3x1 inch piece of black gaffer's tape...) and cutting out the design from the tape so that it glows through the penguin design rather than just completely covering up the light, but I haven't gotten around to it.

    All that said, yes, I think the design of the aluminum macbook pro is very nice and it would look ridiculous with all those stupid stickers on it every other laptop has. I can't say I really give them a lot of credit for not putting the stickers on... it should be obvious *not* to put stickers on, not to default to putting stickers on. The fact that every manufacturer loads them on is a sign of mindless corporate copying. I can't imagine there's any real benefit to doing it.

  105. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    What about his left C4?

  106. And free stickers! by antdude · · Score: 1

    And Apple give you free stickers to use anywhere you want! :D

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  107. Re:Stickers are everywhere! Worst Experience? by CyberDragon777 · · Score: 1

    D-link DIR 300 router, probably others.

    It has a big, ugly orange sticker covering the Ethernet ports with "RTFM before connecting!!!" written on it.
    The adhesive is strong, but the sticker itself is not and turns into shreds. It takes forever to rub/pick it off from the matte black plastic surface.

    --
    We both said a lot of things that you are going to regret.
  108. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  109. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    I prefer to use C4. I prefer the smell of almonds to oranges.

    Suggesting that one uses a highly explosive substance merely because it smells of almonds is highly irresponsible. Particularly when so many non-explosive alternatives exist, like prussic acid.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  110. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  111. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what about your left C4??

  112. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Informative

    Protip: You can get ~20% alcohol with the correct yeast. This may or may not be legal in your jurisdiction.

  113. Actually by Eggbloke · · Score: 1

    I kinda like those stickers. Even considered buying some once, then I remembered I prefer food.

    My computer has a big "Powered by Ubuntu" sticker on it. =D

    --
    I care not for your karma and your mod points.
  114. Right, the world would end... by smith6174 · · Score: 1

    Would the world end instantly if forced to make quality products? It seems like almost all companies compete by making their products cheaper. This means reducing quality and selling space for ads and other crapware. Stickers have never helped sell a computer, for the simple reason that for all of the product's useful life a sticker only shows how obsolete you are. I have owned computers with stickers: windows 98, Y2k, Celeron, etc. How many of these stickers influenced ANYONE who was looking for a new computer. On the other hand, yes I paid more for a mac. No cool stickers. However, it makes quite an impression when you trip on the power cord and nothing bad happens due to the magsafe. Buy whatever you want I guess.

  115. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by xaxa · · Score: 1

    Nerds... is there anything we won't argue about?

    Does arguing suggest listening to the other person's view?

    If so, we won't argue about Windows vs. Linux, or VI vs. Emacs.

  116. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Whether or not it's "natural" depends entirely on your definition of the word. We're just as a part of nature as bees and lemon trees, so why is stuff we made suddenly unnatural?

    Because that's the common definition of the word. The bigger question is why some people assume natural means better and why some people, like you, get so upset by them that they feel they need to challenge the definition of a perfectly useful word. Seriously. You know what the word means and so do I, so it's useful for communication. Just because some new age hippie thinks natural means better doesn't mean you need to change the definition.

  117. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by xaxa · · Score: 1

    I like the term some other European languages use for "organic" food, which is "ecological". Presumably, meaning something which is part of the ecosystem without human intervention.

  118. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But your left C4 smells like almonds, right?

  119. I have not cared for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care for the stickers myself. They look tacky. After you try to peel them off, they feel tacky. As a Linux user, I don't really care for a windblows sticker on my computer. Some of the Linux distros tried to put "Linux Inside" stickers in some of their packages. I don't use them. I've heard of using WD-40 to get them off, also baby oil, and my suggestion is what I use to remove tree sap from cloth: Purell hand sanitizer. The alcohol is mild enough to get rid of the stick without doing anything to plastic. It smells nice afterward too.

  120. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh...at least it doesn't smell like an Apple!

  121. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by McNally · · Score: 2, Funny

    thus something invented by us is more likely to cause serious trouble for our metabolism than something that bees or trees invented millions of years ago.

    I've got some foxglove growing out in my yard if you want to test that theory.. And if you survive that, there's a local amanita variant I can probably find without too much trouble if I go looking for it.

  122. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    Natural is generally used to mean "is accessible irregardless of the state of industry", as I understand it, and I think the implication is that its "tried and true", and unlikely to have bizarre side effects that we wont know about for 20 years. For example, asprin has been used thru willow bark for thousands of years, so its pretty likely that willow bark / salicylic acid isnt likely to produce bizarre birth defects. Artificial sweeteners on the other hand are newer, hence why people are able to claim all sorts of things about them-- true or not, they dont have a multi-thousand year track record.

    Youre right that the word isnt terribly useful if you try to get technical, but lets be honest here, people usually arent that careful with their words. I was having a (pedantic) argument with someone a few weeks ago about intrinsic value, and whether gold has any-- in a very real sense, the word "intrinsic" is arbitrary-- does gold have any value in itself? Why would money-- that is paper-- not also? But of course when you talk of gold's intrinsic value people understand what you mean; we're not using technical language, but that doesnt mean the word is utterly useful so long as there is a general understanding communicated through it.

    I assume, after all, that if someone said that yellow #5 (tartrazine / coal tar extract) isnt "natural" you would understand roughly what they mean and are getting at, and im sure if they said that glucose wasnt "natural" you would be quick to point out that it really is.

  123. Apple stickers by AlpineR · · Score: 1

    I bought a bunch of apples last week and each one had a sticker on it. "Fuji 4224". Had to carefully peel them off before biting into them. I don't think they're digestible.

    Oh, you mean the computer company. Capital 'A'. Gotcha.

  124. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by severoon · · Score: 1

    One flew east, and one flew west...

    --
    but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
  125. Looks good on the outside but ... by franz · · Score: 1

    ... Intel inside.

    If you can't remove the sticker, try adding one of your own.

  126. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by catbutt · · Score: 1

    Because "natural", in that context, means "not man-made". Just as "artificial" means "man made" (and "artifact" is something made by humans).

    Being humans, it is expected that we would have words to refer to things made by our own species, to distinguish them from things that occur outside of our species' influence.

    If you don't like the word, don't use it, but that is its meaning.

  127. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While it's true that something natural can still be just as unsafe as something unnatural, they are generally better understood than something unnatural. Natural things created by trees and birds have been used by our ancestors for thousands of years and we've had a chance to observe the effects. We're lucky if stuff we come up with has undergone 1 or 2 human trials prior to being offered to the public.

  128. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've found that eucalyptus oil works well, too.

  129. Correction by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    According to the most frothing of the opposed-to-homosexual-marriage ideologues, it's pets we'll be marrying, not food items. :P

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  130. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by SEE · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Modern staple foods are almost universally descended from plants that were deliberately exposed to high levels of artificial ionizing radiation or chemical mutagens in order to induce mutations. Mankind induced the mutations, then mankind artificially and selectively bred the mutations into the food supply. Outside a few minor heirloom varieties, there is virtually no maize, wheat, rice, or soy on the planet which isn't the result of these artificially-induced alterations of the plant genomes.

    Which is to say, no, there is almost nothing you can eat "which is part of the ecosystem without human intervention." It's all been meddled with.

  131. I was expecting something like that... by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    I've occasionally used dark nail polish to label metal objects though (as regular markers tend to rub off).

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  132. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mainly because our minds can invent new things faster than our bodies can adapt to them, thus something invented by us is more likely to cause serious trouble for our metabolism than something that bees or trees invented millions of years ago.

    No one claims the things we make are as easily or quickly adapted to.
    Nor is anyone claiming the things we make are not more likely to cause problems for our metabolism.

    Neither of those facts makes something natural or not natural however.

    Our manufactured yet natural stuff is just worse for us :P

  133. BFD. seriously. n/t. by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    n/t.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  134. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by blair1q · · Score: 1

    Well, the difference between natural saturated fat (as found in cows) and artificial saturated fat (hydrogenated oils) is trans-fatty acids, which will clog your arteries quite a bit faster.

    The thing about the "artificial" label is that it tells you that it wasn't made by a process that evolved over billions of years to be efficient and produce a safe, high-quality material for use elsewhere in the system, but was probably made by the cheapest process achievable and with the least quality control needed to convince the consumer to pick the product up off the shelf, which is decreased by a ton when you consider the power of advertising and packaging.

  135. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Khyber · · Score: 1

    "For those of you who prefer completely natural cleaners"

    An application of heat will work better than anything else and is the most natural thing possible. This is why we attach/remove the labels with heat guns, people.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  136. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Khyber · · Score: 1

    C4 itself doesn't stink but the RDX most certainly does once it burns.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  137. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Khyber · · Score: 1

    No, natural isn't too much marketing-oriented. Organic, on the other hand...

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  138. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Keep your stuff below 25C for high-proof alcohols and you can use almost any yeast up to about 30%, and specialized yeasts boast theoretical 40%. The hardest part is keeping it alive during fermentation.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  139. No stickers, please. by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    People trying to sell me things are real quick to remove stickers when I tell them I have a $1000/day advertising fee that they must agree to before I'll buy something with stickers on it. It works especially well with cars. Those dealer advertising stickers just fly right off somehow.

  140. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by quenda · · Score: 1

    For those of you who prefer completely natural cleaners, ...

    What!? You mean baby oil is synthetic?

  141. The hell? by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

    Where are you people getting your stuff from? I've never had any electronics/computers that had stickers that took more than 5 seconds to yank off and rub the residue completely off with my thumb. A lot of these suggestions on this page will dissolve the paint on the surface of the components...

  142. I use them creatively by SharpFang · · Score: 2, Funny

    I peel them off carefully then stick creatively.

    My waste bin is designed for Windows XP.
    I have a Gigabyte brand microwave oven.
    My TI-82 calculator sports an Intel Dual Core CPU.
    The flush tank has Intel Inside.
    My kitchen clock can be overclocked jumper-free.
    And I have a NVidia VHS video player.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  143. Maybe I'm too greasy by imhennessy · · Score: 1

    I peel 'em off with my thumbnail and smudge it a bit with my finger. All gone.

    I have to admit, These are all older computers; the newest one I've tried it one was about three when I got it, stickers intact. Have they switched to a more obnoxious sticker system?

    --
    Like to brew? Want to talk about it? Brattlebrew: groups.yahoo.com/group/brattlebrew
  144. Scratch and Smell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they changed the stickers to the scratch and smell kind I would definitely support that.

  145. Put your money where your mouth is. by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1

    AMD hates them but not as much as Apple it seems. Article mentions that they "millions on the table" by refusing to apply Intel's stickers.

    --
    Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
  146. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Things are natural when we and all sorts of other creatures evolved for millions of years to adapt to them.
    Things that do not readily occur in nature will more often than not be harmful.

  147. Good point, but people are strange by woolio · · Score: 1

    I kind of equate it to buying a $50 t-shirt with some designer name printed across the front. Basically you're a walking billboard.

    I fully agree with your statement. However, the funny thing is that many people prefer to have a designer name printed across the front (and gladly over-pay for the privilege)!

  148. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    The problem is that the general acceptance of the word "natural" in it's "you know what I mean" use has lead to a very large portion of the population NOT knowing what it they mean. I had a conversation with a woman recently that told me that food shouldn't be grown with "technology". It should be natural. That "natural" was better. So, I asked... "You mean we shouldn't use plows in farming?".

    Apparently, she had gotten the idea that hydroponics was performed by having a bunch of mad scientists down in an hollowed out volcano, performing bizarre experiments on the food supply in beakers full of multicolored bubbling chemicals. Ok, maybe not quite that bad, but close. When asked more questions, the poor woman could not actually say what she thought was "natural" other than she would know it when she saw it, and it was the stuff that said so on the packaging.

  149. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by nacturation · · Score: 1

    I like the term some other European languages use for "organic" food, which is "ecological". Presumably, meaning something which is part of the ecosystem without human intervention.

    Makes sense. After all, inorganic food is rather difficult to digest.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  150. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    I'm still waiting for someone to create Vimacs to settle the argument . . .

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  151. I LOVE those stickers by RenderSeven · · Score: 1

    Without all those handy Windows stickers peeled from laptops, what else would I stick to my coworkers' Linux workstations? And to me 'Intel Inside' looks as good on their Prius' gas cap as the "EnergyStar" sticker looks on their Yukon's.

  152. Luxury? by russotto · · Score: 1

    Nonsense. If you'd bought a new, luxury, laptop, it would be all shiny and have no stickers on the palm rests. Just an Apple on the back.

  153. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by seeker_1us · · Score: 1
    It is if your laptop is from Apple.

    The only downside for pure citrus orange oil is that your laptop may smell like oranges for days.

    That's a downside?

  154. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    De-solv-it is another natural cleaner that works very well. That'll take the brake dust stains right off your car's rims too, BTW.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  155. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by the_womble · · Score: 1

    whoosh!

  156. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by the_womble · · Score: 1

    Selective breeding lead to a far lower rate of introduction of new substances than synthesising chemicals (or, potentially, genetic engineering ).

    There is also a much wider range of substances that can be produced in large amounts: you can synthesise pure compounds in any quantity very quickly and cheaply.

    Of course, there is still a lot of irrationality about food, as well, but not anything like as much as about health,

  157. The Evil of stickers by mlush · · Score: 1

    A few years ago I was trying to install Linux on my lappy (on the train home) the X windows was having none of it,. The next day I idlely picked off the Designed for Microsoft Windows and found it booted Linux perfectly.

    Clearly it was the stickers malign influence that was causing the problems (I still have it, If my employers ever hack me off I will affix it somewhere in their server room and leave... try debugging that one:->

  158. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by noidentity · · Score: 1

    The word natural is a boon to sellers of natural products, that's for sure.

  159. The stickers themselves by noidentity · · Score: 1

    Only in the last few years did I learn the trick of using the sticker to peel the rest of the gunk off. Just re-stick it and quickly remove several times and most of it comes off. I sometimes use masking tape for the rest. The nice thing about this approach is that you aren't using any harsh chemicals that might alter the surface (someone here mentioned the piano finish on newer displays).

  160. I can see the counter move already... by advocate_one · · Score: 1

    Microsoft and Intel demanding that the OEMs emboss the logos into the plastic case or use a hotfoil strip as a condition of the discount (as part of the market development funds "kickbacks")

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  161. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can someone explain the reference?

  162. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the real problem is you were talking to a stupid and/or ignorant, but strongly opinionated, woman?

    I don't believe that some individual having a very strong opinion on something they have no useful knowledge of is really evidence of any kind of problem with our language, or a particular word in our language. Stupid people will say and think stupid things regardless of what words they're using to say them.

  163. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 5, Funny

    These days most of the babies used to make baby oil are kept in cages and fed a genetically-engineered diet which is designed to greatly boost the production of the fats which most of the oil is squeezed from. So it's not really "natural" anymore; as they saying goes: garbage in, garbage out.

    If you can, try to find baby oil which is squeezed from organic free range babies. It has a much higher quality due to the more varied diets and additional nutrients they get from natural foraging behaviour; however it's a fair bit more expensive and many stores don't carry it at all. I think the average free range baby yields about 3 litres of baby oil when squeezed; you get around 10L from a battery-farm baby.

  164. What will I put on my trash cans ? by Going_Digital · · Score: 1

    For many years now the first thing I have done when a new machine arrives is take the designed for windows stickers and place them on the front of the trash cans all around the office.

  165. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by geggo98 · · Score: 1

    Whether or not it's "natural" depends entirely on your definition of the word.

    Are we going to start calling citric acid artificial because a lemon tree made it? Or call honey artificial, because a bunch of bees made it?

    I think it's not so much about how it was made but how it will be "decomposed". If something can be easily composted, I would call it natural.

    Of course how it was made is also important. If something needs an industrial process to be made with lots of unwanted byproducts, I will call it "artificial". When there a natural organism can produce the exactly same substance, I still will call the substance made by man "artificial". This is not because of the substance itself but because of the byproducts produced when it was made.

    So in my point of view "artificial" or "natural" is not so much about the substance itself, but about the processes to create and dispose that substance. The wording is not perfect, but I think the concept is clear to most people.

  166. Try using an eraser by oven · · Score: 1

    A normal rubber eraser is excellent for removing all kinds of sticky stuff.

  167. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by kmoser · · Score: 1

    Be very careful when removing the sticker from this laptop.

  168. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people have a sixth finger, perfectly natural but not normal. Likewise, bees are natural, but I don't want them anywhere on my new laptop.

  169. eucalyptus oil by delusrexpert · · Score: 0

    eucalyptus oil removes crap better then anything else.

  170. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read 'The Shining' by Stephen King.

  171. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Noughmad · · Score: 1

    Yes, because Lindows settled the other argument so well...

    --
    PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
  172. Don't get all OCD with the stickers by bazorg · · Score: 1

    [...]should you really be obligated to spend the first 20 minutes trying to dissolve away the sticker goop with WD40?[...]

    Wait a moment there... what if you open your computer box, first things first you start cleaning away like crazy and then the computer is a DOA? Are you going to the shop to swap it while the thing is still moist and smelling of WD40? Your "big bucks" might not come back as soon as you want them...

  173. I miss one sticker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The TCO-certificate sticker is sadly missing on most computer equipment these days. It's the only sticker that provide valuable information to a buyer or user (i.e. if you have to work at a computer screen that is lacking this sticker, you know beforehand that it likely sucks, it will make you stupid at work and you will feel exhausted, with strained eyes, at the end of the day, at least you can plan ahead and cancel all the fun you originally planned to do after work).

  174. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by thijsh · · Score: 1

    Humans are an integral part of the ecosystem too.

  175. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

    I have no particular opinion one way or the other, but I'd like to point out that (non-monsanto) maize plants will keep breeding and producing when humans stop intervening, whereas the production of 100% alcohol will come to a full stop.

    --
    What a depressingly stupid machine.
  176. 90% Rubbing Alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you really want to do it right, use 90% rubbing alcohol. No residue, evaporates in seconds. I personally wouldn't even consider using WD40 or any type of oil-based product. It will remove the sticky crud, but in the process, you just created a brand new problem.

    Put it this way: you wouldn't use WD40 to clean the thermal grease off your processor, would you? I sure hope not.

  177. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2

    You should also insist on cold-pressed baby oil. The other stuff is crud and could as well be made of seniors.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  178. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Whether or not it's "natural" depends entirely on your definition of the word.

    Yeah, it pretty much means stuff that happens by accident. DNA just happens. Proteins only fold so many ways so DNA can only produce a finite (yet staggering) number of outcomes. DNA-based creatures (the only kind we have found here so far, anything else alive doesn't deserve to be called a creature) can only produce certain compounds. Those compounds are what is natural. It is important to remember, however, that Arsenic is natural (and forever.)

    We're just as a part of nature as bees and lemon trees, so why is stuff we made suddenly unnatural?

    By definition certain acts are unnatural.

    Moreover, since it's completely arbitrary, why does it matter where we draw the line?

    It's not really relevant. What is really wanted is to decide what is harmful.

    It's a completely useless definition. That is, unless you want to make millions off of people who think "natural" things are better than "unnatural" things. Barnum called those people "suckers".

    It's a fairly useful way to identify products which do not contain ingredients produced by dumping chemicals in a vat and running a current through it. That's all it's good for, but that is pretty good, because that approach causes problems regarding purity which you do not encounter any other way. It of course also solves some such problems, but in general the only real benefit is cost.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  179. Good article summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good summary:

    'It's like buying a new, luxury car — and discovering that it comes with non-removable bumper stickers that promote the motor oil, the floor mat maker, the windshield-fluid company and the pine tree air freshener you have no intention of ever using,'

    Comes complete with a apt car analogy.

  180. MSI Wind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My MSI Wind came with the desktop sized "Windows XP" logo, an AMD sticker of similar size, and this massive 2"x3" reflective sticker with all the features. There's no free space left on the palm rest.

  181. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Even+on+Slashdot+FOE · · Score: 1

    No, that stuff IS gasoline. And orange juice concentrate. And Styrofoam.

  182. Case Badges by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember those. Every computer used to come with them. Any case you bought would have a square little place for a case badge. Sometimes it would already be populated with the case logo. The cool part, was at one point companies would make custom case badges and sell them, so you could use new ones, or replace old ones. I know I have an old BP6 Dual Celly gathering dust with a custom case and a "2CPU.COM" case badge. Fun times. I also remember you could just get various graphic etc...

  183. The best part by zimboptoo · · Score: 1

    I built a new desktop recently, ordered all the parts off of Newegg, mostly OEM. Nearly every major component came with a sticker: Mobo, RAM, processor, graphics card, even the case. As if they expected me to stick them on myself?

  184. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    Well, that may be true. The problem is that what you or I would call stupid makes up the vast majority of the population. The smart people generally won't use the word other than when talking to the stupid, or when comparing it to the supernatural. So, pretty much the "you know what" definition is for the stupid, and they are the ones that get confused by it's use.

  185. Re:The hardest part by conureman · · Score: 1

    I think drinking that shite is the hardest part. Bigfoot @ 9.6% is about as far as I can go, but only because of the generous hoppage. 7% seems to be the sweet spot for balance, as is 50% for whusky. YMMV. I think for wine it may be around 13% but I haven't done the research.

    --
    The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
  186. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you get your baby oil at a farmer's market, you could watch them squeeze the oil, and also be assured that you are supporting your local baby oil farmers.

  187. Re:Heloise sez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I apply my chosen solvent to a cotton ball and use that to clean the residue, as I prefer not to allow substances to seep into my equipment and this provides better control. If I can't find the Goo-Gone, the Mia Rose is always by the WC. Wintergreen oil travels a little too well for my taste, BTW, and I don't feel comfortable letting that emigrate into my electronic stuff.

  188. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So we're still talking about smelling nuts?

  189. Re:Goo Gone or limonene by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

    Uh, "woosh" much? The video linked is to the famous "I love the smell of napalm in the morning" scene from Apocalypse Now, in which Kilgore declares that napalm smells like victory...

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  190. Stop The Sticker Nonsense by cugrhntr · · Score: 1

    That's the first thing I do when purchase a new laptop. I will go as far as removing all stickers, badges, Ect. Minimal as possible for this guy.