Yeah I don't get this, the heat need to leave the laptop somehow, and since the refrigerator will have to be within the laptop the heat remains inside it
The refrigerator's exterior heat exchanging pipes don't have to be inside the refrigerator itself. They didn't give any technical specs, so what are you worried about? Surely if they are working on this project, they'll have thought or experienced this problem if they were putting all items in the same location.
Also, consider that, to a point, the ambient heat inside a laptop can be higher, as long as the PUs are kept cool. Of course if this were the only consideration, eventually the ambient heat would screw all the components except for the processors, but, as I said, they've considered this already. I'm sure of it.
Me - I think I could only handle one relationship - otherwise I don't feel I would do justice to the other person. I don't want to just "keep her happy and feeling loved" I want her to be the most important person in my life. I worked hard on making sure she was the best for me, I'll be damned if I show her that she isn't.
Yeah, I know, totally OT, just struck a chord with me.
Not sure if you were just being funny or if you were trying to sneak bad logic in.
In case the latter is true - you wouldn't expect the resultant information on the dice to be the same in most situations, but in a completely controlled environment, if you rolled the dice exactly the same way, they should come up exactly the same in the exact same position. Now, that kind of control is impossible to expect, therefore dice have some inherent degree of randomness.
Now - the OP was also wrong in referring to that "definition of insanity", as the public perceptions are so easily molded. Just because it didn't work today, doesn't mean that it won't tomorrow, who knows what strange thing that people notice, what moronic chain e-mail goes around, what insipid advertisement will catch the public's eye and allow the old message to be received well.
These guys didn't get into this level of politics without knowing at least something about how to manipulate public opinion.
What you are thinking about isn't a true orbit - it would require constant heavy fuel consumption. A true orbit around both would put the ISS so far away from Earth at all times that the purpose you described would be defeated.
Mine was on the 7th sector from the left, measured later to be accurate. All animals have specimens that can exceed expectations, but unless you would like to quote a study that indicates a neural wiring issue that causes baboons to be unable to count, I would prefer to keep this in the realm of "I should have kept that interesting idea and sent it in to a local primatologist for evaluation".
Flamebait? Probably. Get off his lawn, err farm.
Re:Does it disturb anyone else?
on
Linux 2.6.26 Out
·
· Score: 2, Funny
And because SATA presents the ATA interface to the system (the difference being how the chips are connected to the drive), you could say there's an additional joke in there, but one only those using SCSI would find funny.
If they want ratings, then they need a three-column spreadsheet for any real accuracy - Vidjeh, Number of viewers, number of views. Done.
Introduce three sets of columns, Viacom video, other copyrighted material, and freely-distributed video. Create a comparative chart and go on about your business. Assuming an easy export process, after the data is gathered, this would take what, 2-3 minutes to get a good graph?
This would not determine Google's willfulness in the project. The way to determine willfulness should be more along the lines of proving that YouTube showed Google that the traffic flow moved more to copyrighted material than anything else.
If I were writing a thesis for any teacher that passed critical thinking in grade school, then I would expect them to tell me to get a new thesis statement if I intended to use traffic information *from the offender's server* to determine that I knew beforehand how the market would play out. That is inductive reasoning combined with backwards extrapolation which is not provable. (That they want IP addresses and names says something else entirely.)
His idealism isn't. You see, our company actually makes a point of ensuring that we know that we are allowed to keep personal information (in a folder with a reasonable size limit) on the network. In such a case, it is considered a breach of trust to snoop in this information, as no legal framework exists beyond the word of mouth acknowledgment. You see, his use of the word "personal" automatically identifies it as not belonging to the company hosting such information.
Easy - I don't care. If the employer wants to snoop and understands his legal rights and wants me to assist him, then I make sure that he signs an agreement that I was simply a tool and he had sole liability.
How long is eventually? I've been using this same Razr since it came out. I have even been fairly rough with it, but it works just fine. The flip phone before that was working fine after 4 years.
Slashdot Mirror
Why exactly does what Wired decides to do make it applicable to the rest of us?
Internet = the whole enchilada - the "cloud", if you will.
internet = any group of networks
Yeah I don't get this, the heat need to leave the laptop somehow, and since the refrigerator will have to be within the laptop the heat remains inside it
The refrigerator's exterior heat exchanging pipes don't have to be inside the refrigerator itself. They didn't give any technical specs, so what are you worried about? Surely if they are working on this project, they'll have thought or experienced this problem if they were putting all items in the same location.
Also, consider that, to a point, the ambient heat inside a laptop can be higher, as long as the PUs are kept cool. Of course if this were the only consideration, eventually the ambient heat would screw all the components except for the processors, but, as I said, they've considered this already. I'm sure of it.
I seem to remember a good sig on the subject. Think '~'
If that many people didn't get 'it'
How many was that exactly? I got it.
I don't see what the isssue is here.
Come on, this was funnier that that +2.
Me - I think I could only handle one relationship - otherwise I don't feel I would do justice to the other person. I don't want to just "keep her happy and feeling loved" I want her to be the most important person in my life. I worked hard on making sure she was the best for me, I'll be damned if I show her that she isn't.
Yeah, I know, totally OT, just struck a chord with me.
Supposedly the employers like computer engineers from tech schools more - hands on training and the like.
Seems to be the case for me, although I intend to transition into a research/dev type of degree when I go for my masters.
That is orthogonal to the point he is making here. It doesn't make him any less right.
Not sure if you were just being funny or if you were trying to sneak bad logic in.
In case the latter is true - you wouldn't expect the resultant information on the dice to be the same in most situations, but in a completely controlled environment, if you rolled the dice exactly the same way, they should come up exactly the same in the exact same position. Now, that kind of control is impossible to expect, therefore dice have some inherent degree of randomness.
Now - the OP was also wrong in referring to that "definition of insanity", as the public perceptions are so easily molded. Just because it didn't work today, doesn't mean that it won't tomorrow, who knows what strange thing that people notice, what moronic chain e-mail goes around, what insipid advertisement will catch the public's eye and allow the old message to be received well.
These guys didn't get into this level of politics without knowing at least something about how to manipulate public opinion.
What you are thinking about isn't a true orbit - it would require constant heavy fuel consumption. A true orbit around both would put the ISS so far away from Earth at all times that the purpose you described would be defeated.
Mine was on the 7th sector from the left, measured later to be accurate. All animals have specimens that can exceed expectations, but unless you would like to quote a study that indicates a neural wiring issue that causes baboons to be unable to count, I would prefer to keep this in the realm of "I should have kept that interesting idea and sent it in to a local primatologist for evaluation".
Flamebait? Probably. Get off his lawn, err farm.
Too true.
LDoSroll! ugh
By Shia minority, you mean majority, right?
You just violated.. hell, nm.
Amusingly, if Viacom were getting the most recent records, this would really fuck up their marketing strategies.
I don't think you have any connection to this conversation at all.
If they want ratings, then they need a three-column spreadsheet for any real accuracy - Vidjeh, Number of viewers, number of views. Done.
Introduce three sets of columns, Viacom video, other copyrighted material, and freely-distributed video. Create a comparative chart and go on about your business. Assuming an easy export process, after the data is gathered, this would take what, 2-3 minutes to get a good graph?
This would not determine Google's willfulness in the project. The way to determine willfulness should be more along the lines of proving that YouTube showed Google that the traffic flow moved more to copyrighted material than anything else.
If I were writing a thesis for any teacher that passed critical thinking in grade school, then I would expect them to tell me to get a new thesis statement if I intended to use traffic information *from the offender's server* to determine that I knew beforehand how the market would play out. That is inductive reasoning combined with backwards extrapolation which is not provable. (That they want IP addresses and names says something else entirely.)
They like it because it is so PiMP.
His idealism isn't. You see, our company actually makes a point of ensuring that we know that we are allowed to keep personal information (in a folder with a reasonable size limit) on the network. In such a case, it is considered a breach of trust to snoop in this information, as no legal framework exists beyond the word of mouth acknowledgment. You see, his use of the word "personal" automatically identifies it as not belonging to the company hosting such information.
Easy - I don't care. If the employer wants to snoop and understands his legal rights and wants me to assist him, then I make sure that he signs an agreement that I was simply a tool and he had sole liability.
OK, I'll post that soon, thanks.
All I want to say is: "Thank you, Andrew Hamilton."
That is all.
How long is eventually? I've been using this same Razr since it came out. I have even been fairly rough with it, but it works just fine. The flip phone before that was working fine after 4 years.