I'm certainly capable of getting past 4cam being already set up with the whitelist. If you don't mind sharing your JSON file... well, I'll probably have to do a lot of work on my own. But it always helps to have a working example.
And, from what I understand, I would just use the JSON file initially until I found a specific site that did not work.
To my understanding, some CDNs server a unique datafile to every response, instead of using cached files. This can be done by introducing meaningless arguments into the URL that resolve to the same location, but do not need to. It's similar to the 1 px transparent gifs.
Unlike the gifs, blackholeing the CDNs doesn't work, because the JS is required by the main page.
Is there a way to use some things (E.g. Google Maps) with known leaks, without exposing every activity to Google all the time on unrelated sites. It seems like limiting some domains make sense, but I'm thinking of things like cloudfront.net
Also, is there some way to prevent the CDN-style spying/extra downloads?
I'm sure that the radioactive material sensors can detect some percentage of people who try to make a dirty bomb. Maybe most of them. I don't really understand all technical issues, but I have no problem with that.
Bad guys are not binary: determined/uninformed. They have a skillset. 100% security is impossible. You'll never stop someone from stealing your life savings if they really want to and have skills and equipment. But you still would put it in a safe.
Which doesn't mean all these measures are good ideas. But I categorically reject "none of these matter" as categorically as I reject "all of these matter".
A system based on vocation seems quite poor. There are far more important things than your job, at least to some people. Some people's political beliefs are so circumscribed, but it seems like theya re already assuming that politics should embody their philosophy with this setup.
I should point out that all market failures arise from user choice. It's the choice of everyone to use IE that killed Netscape. Now, that choice was made cause MS made it very, very easy to use IE if you had a Windows computer. And then all the web site developers made a choice to anticipate IE's non-standards parsing because 99% of browsers were IE. And then other people made a choice to drop Netscape, cause sites didn't look good.
Then a bunch of corporations made a choice to use ActiveX components because JS didn't exist in IE yet. Then not rewriting all that code was a choice that made fiscal sense, and only necessitated staying on IE platforms.
Correct, Tor does not usually hide the fact that you are using it. There are some obscuring gateways into Tor, but those only work if you know about them and your adversary doesn't. I wouldn't trust that, and assume if I am using Tor, anyone who wants to know that fact can get it.
The bomb threat made at Harvard (via Tor) a while back was traced to the only person who was on Tor when it was sent. That was the primary thing that lead to his suspicion.
I thought the Windows Phone UI was pretty good. Certainly better than the Android UI, which I never liked. I suppose I consider the iOS UI in between the two.
I'm guessing the fragmentation of Android devices means I never picked up an Android device and felt that it worked the same as other Android devices. So those differences grated on me. I haven't used WP in a while. but it was pretty easy for me to get to the things I needed quickly.
Not likely. iOS 9 was supposed to extend how long you could use your iPhone 4S. Which makes sense. They make money off their hardware, but they make money off the app store.
"Eventually get pulled" is a kludge for no real security.
I agree, i want to be trusted. But there should be a big difference between "I sideloaded an app" and "I ran an app in admin mode". there doesn't seem to be, security-wise.
Use real costs. The fact that there is an "insurance cost" and a "self pay costs" tells us all we need to know about medical bills. They aren't tied to the actual cost of service in any meaningful way.
Who uses real costs for anything? I mean, is cell service at "real costs"
Or , you could export the patches, move them to another machine, and import them. Exacly what would happen automatically wiht push/pull. But it still will have the same information as far as changesets/etc. so it'll seemlessly work once its up.
So, instead of having an OS with security built into it, we get an OS with a weak security model, but it's okay because if you let Google control everything you see/get a cut they'll keep you safe?
There's no real reason the Google store is any safer than any sideloaded app. All google does is runs some automated detection software, and that could be run clientside.
longer delays tend to produce bigger swings, for the simple reason that a system can go off the rails longer before the market corrects it.
Longer delays mean that new information cannot affect the market for a longer period of time. Assuming that it's much faster to abort acting on the information than to begin acting on it, that gives a longer period of time for validation/analysis of that information. See also, the huge blips that comapnies get based on twitter rumors.
But there's an even more basic error in your reasoning, namely the assumption that market swings are bad or that we should adopt policies to reduce them.
Stability is a good thing. I'm not sure what value wild intra-day voitility provides. Longer term stability menas that longer term plans can be mad.e
I'd be fine with this, if they weren't allowed to unwind transactions because of "computer glitches". If they wanna automate trading, they should have to take the good and the bad. But now, if their software does something stupid (like repeatedly buying at 25.01, and selling at 25 even) and you take advantage of it, they sue you and get the trades reversed.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm certainly capable of getting past 4cam being already set up with the whitelist. If you don't mind sharing your JSON file... well, I'll probably have to do a lot of work on my own. But it always helps to have a working example.
And, from what I understand, I would just use the JSON file initially until I found a specific site that did not work.
Thank you for the recommendation, AC. I plan on experimenting with umatrix tonight.
I want to use Google maps. This means not blackholing all of Google to 127.0.0.1.
I want to use /. and other sites, without Google tracking me. Normally this means blackholing all of Google to 127.0.0.1
Sure, it's technically /. that put the tracking on their site, but the solution is normally to violently kill Google's IP.
Similar to how I typically keep FB from getting any requests, which means I could not log into FB if I want to.
Right, I want to use some Google services (e.g. Maps) while preventing a data-leak when not using their service (e.g. being on /.)
I get that I cannot use G.maps without telling Google things. I just want to only tell Google what I want to tell them explicitly.
To my understanding, some CDNs server a unique datafile to every response, instead of using cached files. This can be done by introducing meaningless arguments into the URL that resolve to the same location, but do not need to. It's similar to the 1 px transparent gifs.
Unlike the gifs, blackholeing the CDNs doesn't work, because the JS is required by the main page.
So, it's more expensive, but also more reliable.
Is there a way to use some things (E.g. Google Maps) with known leaks, without exposing every activity to Google all the time on unrelated sites. It seems like limiting some domains make sense, but I'm thinking of things like cloudfront.net
Also, is there some way to prevent the CDN-style spying/extra downloads?
I'm sure that the radioactive material sensors can detect some percentage of people who try to make a dirty bomb. Maybe most of them. I don't really understand all technical issues, but I have no problem with that.
Bad guys are not binary: determined/uninformed. They have a skillset. 100% security is impossible. You'll never stop someone from stealing your life savings if they really want to and have skills and equipment. But you still would put it in a safe.
Which doesn't mean all these measures are good ideas. But I categorically reject "none of these matter" as categorically as I reject "all of these matter".
At least they're reading Tom Clancy novels now. As opposed to being surprised by some obviousish things:
The current OS supports the last 5 generations of phone (back to the iPhone4S). That's one problem Apple saw and hs tried to fix.
Compare that to the fragmentation in Android, where you can buy a new device that doesn't work with the current app store.
Socialist societies rob people of motivation. It's pretty obvious.
A system based on vocation seems quite poor. There are far more important things than your job, at least to some people. Some people's political beliefs are so circumscribed, but it seems like theya re already assuming that politics should embody their philosophy with this setup.
I should point out that all market failures arise from user choice. It's the choice of everyone to use IE that killed Netscape. Now, that choice was made cause MS made it very, very easy to use IE if you had a Windows computer. And then all the web site developers made a choice to anticipate IE's non-standards parsing because 99% of browsers were IE. And then other people made a choice to drop Netscape, cause sites didn't look good.
Then a bunch of corporations made a choice to use ActiveX components because JS didn't exist in IE yet. Then not rewriting all that code was a choice that made fiscal sense, and only necessitated staying on IE platforms.
All sane, rational choices.
Oops, looks like XY tolerances are here
The tolerances of a Lego brick pretty well defines the problem space. A snippit but I cannot find wthe article it referes to.
It looks like a height tolerance of 40 microns (max). Not sure about the XY tolerances.
Correct, Tor does not usually hide the fact that you are using it. There are some obscuring gateways into Tor, but those only work if you know about them and your adversary doesn't. I wouldn't trust that, and assume if I am using Tor, anyone who wants to know that fact can get it.
The bomb threat made at Harvard (via Tor) a while back was traced to the only person who was on Tor when it was sent. That was the primary thing that lead to his suspicion.
I thought the Windows Phone UI was pretty good. Certainly better than the Android UI, which I never liked. I suppose I consider the iOS UI in between the two.
I'm guessing the fragmentation of Android devices means I never picked up an Android device and felt that it worked the same as other Android devices. So those differences grated on me. I haven't used WP in a while. but it was pretty easy for me to get to the things I needed quickly.
It's not like MS has ever had a poorly received product in a crowded marketplace, and just held on til it took off before...
Not likely. iOS 9 was supposed to extend how long you could use your iPhone 4S. Which makes sense. They make money off their hardware, but they make money off the app store.
"Eventually get pulled" is a kludge for no real security.
I agree, i want to be trusted. But there should be a big difference between "I sideloaded an app" and "I ran an app in admin mode". there doesn't seem to be, security-wise.
Who uses real costs for anything? I mean, is cell service at "real costs"
Or , you could export the patches, move them to another machine, and import them. Exacly what would happen automatically wiht push/pull. But it still will have the same information as far as changesets/etc. so it'll seemlessly work once its up.
That's why I have an office I can go to. You know, for all the working with coworkers,
So, instead of having an OS with security built into it, we get an OS with a weak security model, but it's okay because if you let Google control everything you see/get a cut they'll keep you safe?
There's no real reason the Google store is any safer than any sideloaded app. All google does is runs some automated detection software, and that could be run clientside.
Longer delays mean that new information cannot affect the market for a longer period of time. Assuming that it's much faster to abort acting on the information than to begin acting on it, that gives a longer period of time for validation/analysis of that information. See also, the huge blips that comapnies get based on twitter rumors.
Stability is a good thing. I'm not sure what value wild intra-day voitility provides. Longer term stability menas that longer term plans can be mad.e
I'd be fine with this, if they weren't allowed to unwind transactions because of "computer glitches". If they wanna automate trading, they should have to take the good and the bad. But now, if their software does something stupid (like repeatedly buying at 25.01, and selling at 25 even) and you take advantage of it, they sue you and get the trades reversed.