The reason the prosecutor can make those charges is because that's the law. I agree that the law is too strict, but you can't blame the prosecutor for that.
Oh yes, you can, as was established in the Nuremberg trials after World War 2:
Following orders, such as the law, even when threatened with death for disobedience, is not an excuse.
So the prosecutor is guilty in the same way that many german soldiers were.
Or in other words: Damned if you do, damned if you do not.
Fortunately the validity of the scientific theory of Global Climate Change doesn't rest on whether, or not, Black Parrot provides a citation for every comment he/she makes on Slashdot.
Actually, it does. This absence of evidence is evidence of absence of validity. And your answer is evidence of your incompetence.
But this sounds precisely like standard error correction. Since turbo codes were discovered in the 90ies, transmissions can now be sent at near their theoretical maximal speed. So, what is different here? Some kind of RAID5 similar scheme? A data fountain? All well known not new technology.
I use light bulbs in the winter, because winter is dark, which summer is not. I also use electric ovens in the winter, because winter is cold, and electric heating is the only allowed in my apartment. So: I only use light bulbs when I also need electric heat, which the light bulbs also make. The result: I only need one oven, because I can heat the other rooms with light bulbs, and get a lot of nice light in the process. In other words: Light bulbs are ovens that I must use, but which give off nice light as a byproduct.
And light bulbs have a nice reddish spectrum, which do not mess up peoples sleep cycle so much.
You seem to understand it. A defect of this method is electromagnetic radiation, which means that undetectable eavesdropping can be done, and the speed of light and relativity, which means there is no simultaneity of changing of resistors. In other words, Eve can eavesdrop by passively listen at two different locations on the wire, thus seeing differences in Alice and Bobs signaling.
In the book Sundiver by Robert L. Forward, a research ship traveling inside the Sun gets its drive sabotaged, and they escape by using the cooling laser as a drive, freezing everyone aboard.
Lasers are today used to cool to a few milli Kelvins, and below, very close to absolute zero temperature. The reflected colour of the laser is a little bit less pure, as the thermal vibrations are removed by increasing the entropy of the laser light.
The same principle is going on in this light diode.
3000 equations is a LOT, so this is surely unnecessarily complicated, and thus very unlikely to work. If just one expert gives a wrong part, then the whole model can become faulty. And there appear to be no testing of this model.
This is surely going to give even more wrong results than the climate models and nutrition models.
Evil is good because of some random rule? Just because something is a right does not mean that it is the right thing to do. The more rights, rules, and law there are, the more resources are wasted, especially on lawyers.
The slashdotters adamantly stating that something is right because of rules, probably have Aspergers syndrome. They do not analyze consequences.
The pictures show a big expensive jointed float. Wind turbines are also big and expensive stiff machines. When I as a physicist and engineer ponder on this, I get cheap light efficient constructions of film, like paragliders and balloons. Why is this so? Perhaps generators are expensive to subsidize industry. Perhaps I am a genius. Which is more likely?
There have been myriads of systems like this. I was contacted by a french company doing the same, with their own sound encoding system, which was quite similar to DTFM of the keys on old keypad tones. Then there were a similar system made by an european crypto-key calculator producer, which actually used DTFM.
The principle is so simple that any good crypto programmer could have made it with an ordinary modem. I take this as a strong sign that this kind of technology, including near field communications, are hindered by some other factor, such as disinterest from banks.
Slashdot Mirror
The reason the prosecutor can make those charges is because that's the law. I agree that the law is too strict, but you can't blame the prosecutor for that.
Oh yes, you can, as was established in the Nuremberg trials after World War 2:
Following orders, such as the law, even when threatened with death for disobedience, is not an excuse.
So the prosecutor is guilty in the same way that many german soldiers were.
Or in other words: Damned if you do, damned if you do not.
The coworker is NOT smart.
Only smart programmers can write simple code.
Kim0+
Fortunately the validity of the scientific theory of Global Climate Change doesn't rest on whether, or not, Black Parrot provides a citation for every comment he/she makes on Slashdot.
Actually, it does.
This absence of evidence is evidence of absence of validity.
And your answer is evidence of your incompetence.
But why stop at evidence? I can prove that I am right:
http://kim.oyhus.no/AbsenceOfEvidence.html
That was a lot of empty claims about evidence.
This absence of evidence is evidence of absence.
Data is not owned.
Data is known.
In practice, but not in legal theory.
But this sounds precisely like standard error correction.
Since turbo codes were discovered in the 90ies, transmissions can now be sent at near their theoretical maximal speed.
So, what is different here? Some kind of RAID5 similar scheme? A data fountain? All well known not new technology.
Work harder, not smarter!
This is the real message I got from employment.
Magnets are not minds.
I use light bulbs in the winter, because winter is dark, which summer is not.
I also use electric ovens in the winter, because winter is cold, and electric heating is the only allowed in my apartment.
So: I only use light bulbs when I also need electric heat, which the light bulbs also make.
The result: I only need one oven, because I can heat the other rooms with light bulbs, and get a lot of nice light in the process.
In other words: Light bulbs are ovens that I must use, but which give off nice light as a byproduct.
And light bulbs have a nice reddish spectrum, which do not mess up peoples sleep cycle so much.
Lawyers and lawmakers earn more on unspecific, complicated or vague rules.
When you have succeeded in finding a few used public lands, you will become better at guessing where others might be.
You seem to understand it.
A defect of this method is electromagnetic radiation, which means that undetectable eavesdropping can be done, and the speed of light and relativity, which means there is no simultaneity of changing of resistors.
In other words, Eve can eavesdrop by passively listen at two different locations on the wire, thus seeing differences in Alice and Bobs signaling.
"Stealing data" is another way of saying "offsite backup".
I do it even better with my Accelerated Market Research, which is based on Bayesian reasoning.
http://oyhus.no/AcceleratedMarketResearch.html
In the book Sundiver by Robert L. Forward, a research ship traveling inside the Sun gets its drive sabotaged, and they escape by using the cooling laser as a drive, freezing everyone aboard.
Lasers are today used to cool to a few milli Kelvins, and below, very close to absolute zero temperature. The reflected colour of the laser is a little bit less pure, as the thermal vibrations are removed by increasing the entropy of the laser light.
The same principle is going on in this light diode.
So, you claim he probably is guilty of being guilty of being guilty of being of being guilty of .... etc.
I got cooling with CO2 when I did a better experiment.
Using the Sun instead of lamps is more realistic.
http://kim.oyhus.no/CO2.html
There is nothing here but lies. The only thing you can KNOW FOR SURE is that NONE of this is true.
Plenty of absence of evidence in that story, which is evidence of absence of truth, as proved here:
http://kim.oyhus.no/AbsenceOfEvidence.html
Only a moron believes human behavior can be modeled with 3,000 equations. Or 30,000 equations. Or 300,000 equations. Or, well, you get the picture.
Yes. 30 equations would be better, due to Ockhams razor.
3000 equations is a LOT, so this is surely unnecessarily complicated, and thus very unlikely to work.
If just one expert gives a wrong part, then the whole model can become faulty.
And there appear to be no testing of this model.
This is surely going to give even more wrong results than the climate models and nutrition models.
Evil is good because of some random rule?
Just because something is a right does not mean that it is the right thing to do.
The more rights, rules, and law there are, the more resources are wasted, especially on lawyers.
The slashdotters adamantly stating that something is right because of rules,
probably have Aspergers syndrome. They do not analyze consequences.
The pictures show a big expensive jointed float.
Wind turbines are also big and expensive stiff machines.
When I as a physicist and engineer ponder on this, I get cheap light efficient constructions of film, like paragliders and balloons.
Why is this so?
Perhaps generators are expensive to subsidize industry.
Perhaps I am a genius.
Which is more likely?
Sounds like interns are perfect for spying on companies.
Just pay them something. How can they refuse when they are so poor and desperate?
Sounds like interns are perfect material for spying on companies.
Just pay them something. How can they refuse when they are so poor and desperate?
There have been myriads of systems like this.
I was contacted by a french company doing the same, with their own sound encoding system,
which was quite similar to DTFM of the keys on old keypad tones.
Then there were a similar system made by an european crypto-key calculator producer,
which actually used DTFM.
The principle is so simple that any good crypto programmer could have made it with an
ordinary modem. I take this as a strong sign that this kind of technology, including
near field communications, are hindered by some other factor, such as disinterest from banks.