You need an app which sends a random screenshot from 400 ready made ones when asked from the net. That'd solve that problem and they wouldn't know any difference..
oh wait, well you'd need to change the time and date, etc.. well you figure it out..
Why would they need to do that, only ONE person needs to get it working right then SHARE it.
They don't even need to use Red Flag, you could install any number of KDE distros then make it look like Red Flag. Do you seriously think the any government is competent enough to check?
and the last point, they're using Red Flag in the government too, do you think they'd allow backdoor into their own systems, they're not that moronic.
All this whining over backdoors, yet have you found any? You can easily download red flag no problem it's up to you to provide the proof..
The borg aren't that bad you know.. Everyone pitches in their fair share of work, no crime and while regenerating they enter a dream land where they all get to socialise and have fun.
I think the borg have a rough deal tbh they're much better then any other race in the universe. All hail the machines!
Even worse then America. This happens in Thailand too. Internet cafes are gaming hubs and there are laws preventing kids from being in internet cafes on weekdays and at certain times of the day.
Even if it were about monitoring it would fail because they government doesn't have access to the hardware the owner does which lets them mod the software or prevent any traffic they don't want from leaving the router to the internet.
'We're pleased that Judge Pechman recognized the innovation underlying our 1-Click feature,' said Jeff Bezos
This should be on The Onion, it's so ridiculous.
Re:They blacklist sites without checking the reaso
on
Google's Gatekeepers
·
· Score: 1
sway over their own company to choose to do business there or not, and to follow such policies or not.
So denying a country 99% of useful information because Google can't give them that 1% of information they probably didn't want or could get anyway isn't evil to you?
Lets not forget that it's you that finds censorship wrong, not the people of the country in question.
Re:They blacklist sites without checking the reaso
on
Google's Gatekeepers
·
· Score: 1
It's not censored it just doesn't show up in Google searches. That doesn't mean you still can not access the content, just that you can not find it on Google. That just means Google sucks at finding kiddy fuck stories.
I will however tell you anyway why your outlook on this is wrong, because this question comes up a lot on slashdot and I think you need help if you can't see what's wrong with this.
When you're part of a community or group which encourages a behaviour such as child sex via fantasy then all you're doing is encouraging that behaviour to become more common within someone's daily lives.
The members get twisted into their own delusions into believing that this kind of behaviour is normal, at which point it escalates from not just reading child sex novels but perhaps to something more such as child pornography.
At some point their desires transition into the real world, where other people are effected.
The same thing goes for terrorists, alien adoptees to internet pirates. The deeper in you go the more warped your look on life becomes until you can't judge anymore that what you're doing is morally wrong.
You consider things to be morally just. Look at that child molester in Australia, I forget the name. He never admitted doing anything wrong, because by his standards he didn't. He fantasised about having sex with children for so long that his brain just swung the moral compass right around to the point where he was deluding himself and just went ahead with having sex with children.
I can only assume by your response to another commenter that you, yourself are undergoing this transition of moral compass swinging. You obviously see no problem in thinking about having sex with children.
Now get it over with by telling me how wrong I am then you can go back and cry on your kiddy sex message board. I'm sure they'll tell you all about how the world "doesn't understand" and make you feel better about yourself.
Thankfully it's the wikipedia admins that answer that question via deletions, submitters can happily add what the want and see what sticks. So no "how much attention does this research really merit" questions ever need to be answered by a normal user.
I don't understand you're reasoning of it being "evil". In fact I find the concept of someone with no knowledge on a subject beginning new page pretty retarded.
If I go to Wikipedia, search for "trees" and there's no article on "trees" then I don't start a damn article about a subject I have no knowledge of, that's why I am searching for it in the first place!
Why don't you just think up something you know about and search for it?
Re:They blacklist sites without checking the reaso
on
Google's Gatekeepers
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Why is it up to Google to do the work of the United Nations?
Google is a company just like any other, they have to operate within the law wherever they operate.
Not censoring a youtube video almost had Google employees arrested in Thailand until the bowed to pressure and deleted the lamest movie on YT with like 20 views. Governments have Google by the balls not the other way around.
I suggest you reassess your opinion of how much influence Google holds over governments because you'll find it's almost nothing, if any at all.
Slashdot Mirror
Forget Linux, I'm just waiting for the level of spam to reduce by 3000%.
ah yes, but isn't this a case of china using Linux and keeping their modifications private at the country level?
; )
You need an app which sends a random screenshot from 400 ready made ones when asked from the net. That'd solve that problem and they wouldn't know any difference..
oh wait, well you'd need to change the time and date, etc.. well you figure it out..
Ubuntu is from the UK, the name is from Africa. Everything to do with Ubuntu apart from the employees is based in the UK.
Canonical is a UK company based on the isle of man (for tax purposes obviously), the main servers are in the UK, etc.
It won't, however that's never going to happen, so why worry about it?
Why would they need to do that, only ONE person needs to get it working right then SHARE it.
They don't even need to use Red Flag, you could install any number of KDE distros then make it look like Red Flag. Do you seriously think the any government is competent enough to check?
and the last point, they're using Red Flag in the government too, do you think they'd allow backdoor into their own systems, they're not that moronic.
All this whining over backdoors, yet have you found any? You can easily download red flag no problem it's up to you to provide the proof..
It's linux so yeah, however one linux looks like the next.
There's nothing stopping them from install a different distribution and making it look like red flag.
The borg aren't that bad you know.. Everyone pitches in their fair share of work, no crime and while regenerating they enter a dream land where they all get to socialise and have fun.
I think the borg have a rough deal tbh they're much better then any other race in the universe. All hail the machines!
Even worse then America. This happens in Thailand too. Internet cafes are gaming hubs and there are laws preventing kids from being in internet cafes on weekdays and at certain times of the day.
Even if it were about monitoring it would fail because they government doesn't have access to the hardware the owner does which lets them mod the software or prevent any traffic they don't want from leaving the router to the internet.
Microsoft wouldn't need to modify anything, they have a big list of exploits that they haven't got around to fixing which they could hand out.
What's stopping you from installing any other distro and putting the red flag linux theme on?
They won't know a difference.
and bush did 9/11.... Get serious or get the fuck out.
Not really both are equally complex when you look at it from the birth of the calf.
Just to add, there's nothing wrong with a monopoly.
It's abuse of a monopoly that's the problem, using your status as the only gig in town to get or sell what you want, crush competitors, etc.
The environmentalists aren't going to be happy about this one...
1) Read title ....
2) Click "read more" knowing someone has already written YoLD meme
3)
4) Profit!!!
because you might want to use Linux and programs built for windows?
I'm in the same boat. I never buy from Amazon anymore and I hope people like Jeff Bezos die in a fire.
This should be on The Onion, it's so ridiculous.
So denying a country 99% of useful information because Google can't give them that 1% of information they probably didn't want or could get anyway isn't evil to you?
Lets not forget that it's you that finds censorship wrong, not the people of the country in question.
It's not censored it just doesn't show up in Google searches. That doesn't mean you still can not access the content, just that you can not find it on Google. That just means Google sucks at finding kiddy fuck stories.
I will however tell you anyway why your outlook on this is wrong, because this question comes up a lot on slashdot and I think you need help if you can't see what's wrong with this.
When you're part of a community or group which encourages a behaviour such as child sex via fantasy then all you're doing is encouraging that behaviour to become more common within someone's daily lives.
The members get twisted into their own delusions into believing that this kind of behaviour is normal, at which point it escalates from not just reading child sex novels but perhaps to something more such as child pornography.
At some point their desires transition into the real world, where other people are effected.
The same thing goes for terrorists, alien adoptees to internet pirates. The deeper in you go the more warped your look on life becomes until you can't judge anymore that what you're doing is morally wrong.
You consider things to be morally just. Look at that child molester in Australia, I forget the name. He never admitted doing anything wrong, because by his standards he didn't. He fantasised about having sex with children for so long that his brain just swung the moral compass right around to the point where he was deluding himself and just went ahead with having sex with children.
I can only assume by your response to another commenter that you, yourself are undergoing this transition of moral compass swinging. You obviously see no problem in thinking about having sex with children.
Now get it over with by telling me how wrong I am then you can go back and cry on your kiddy sex message board. I'm sure they'll tell you all about how the world "doesn't understand" and make you feel better about yourself.
Thankfully it's the wikipedia admins that answer that question via deletions, submitters can happily add what the want and see what sticks. So no "how much attention does this research really merit" questions ever need to be answered by a normal user.
I don't understand you're reasoning of it being "evil". In fact I find the concept of someone with no knowledge on a subject beginning new page pretty retarded.
If I go to Wikipedia, search for "trees" and there's no article on "trees" then I don't start a damn article about a subject I have no knowledge of, that's why I am searching for it in the first place!
You're being theoretical the GP is being practical. Wake the fuck up.
Why don't you just think up something you know about and search for it?
Why is it up to Google to do the work of the United Nations?
Google is a company just like any other, they have to operate within the law wherever they operate.
Not censoring a youtube video almost had Google employees arrested in Thailand until the bowed to pressure and deleted the lamest movie on YT with like 20 views. Governments have Google by the balls not the other way around.
I suggest you reassess your opinion of how much influence Google holds over governments because you'll find it's almost nothing, if any at all.