Slashdot Mirror


Logitech Makes 1 Billionth Mouse

Smivs writes "Logitech has hailed as a major landmark the production of their one billionth computer mouse. The news comes at a time when analysts claim the days of the mouse are numbered. 'It's rare in human history that a billionth of anything has been shipped by one company,' said Logitech's general manager Rory Dooley. 'Look at any other industry and it has never happened. This is a significant milestone.' The computer mouse will achieve a milestone of its own next week when it turns 40. It was 9 December 1968 when Douglas C. Engelbart and his group of researchers at Stanford University put the first mouse through its paces."

456 comments

  1. Do their software drivers by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1, Troll

    ...still come packaged with that WildTanget spyware mess?

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    1. Re:Do their software drivers by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh, I hope so! It'll go great with the CDs from my last 3 malfunctioning Logitech mice.

    2. Re:Do their software drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no

    3. Re:Do their software drivers by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      I never realized that they ever did. I haven't really needed a mouse driver from the manufacturer since DOS.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    4. Re:Do their software drivers by redxxx · · Score: 1

      You need mice with more buttons and wheels. Without some extra bit of software, mouse buttons 4-10 aren't going to do too much for you.

      You don't really 'need' one, but it does make life a lot easier if you use windows. They will also do things like monitor the power of wireless devices, so you will have some notice before the battery dies.

    5. Re:Do their software drivers by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      My mouse has 4 buttons, plus the scroll wheel, and the driver packaged with Windows has always worked beautifully for me. Maybe it stops working once you have an obscene number of buttons, but I've never had mouse driver issues.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    6. Re:Do their software drivers by redxxx · · Score: 1

      It's not that the drivers will stop working or anything, but most programs don't handle more than 3 or 4 mouse buttons. The rest aren't going to be too useful, unless something converts the clicks over to something programs will understand.

      The logitech drivers let you remap the unused, or poorly used, buttons. You can use 3rd party programs for this(you will have to if you run a Mac due to lack of support from Logitech), but their drivers work well.

    7. Re:Do their software drivers by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      Aha! I see what you mean now. I know the situation you mean, but not with mice... I have the same issue with my Saitek X52 joystick. Thankfully, Saitek makes wonderful software which will map joystick presses into keyboard presses, much like the drivers you mention.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    8. Re:Do their software drivers by kno3 · · Score: 1

      Actually windows can automatically configure extra non-standard buttons as standard now. Has done for a while I believe.
      I'm currently running vista with no extra drivers for my logitech G5 mouse and all the extra buttons are functioning fine.

  2. Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Insightful

    McDonalds anyone?

    Sheesh...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by junglee_iitk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What about pencil/ballpoint pen companies?

    2. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Cpt+Redbeard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My thoughts exactly. I bet we could think of plenty of companies who have shipped far more than a billion of something.

    3. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Coca-Cola? Pepsi? They've probably sold a billion+ of a variety of their individual product lines (i.e. over 1 billion bottles of Mountain Dew AND over 1 billion bottles of Pepsi Cola), as opposed to Logitech who sold a billion from a category of products that encompasses multiple products.

      Same for Budweiser - I wouldn't be surprised if they've hit 10 billion units or more.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    4. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Companies? I can name a few ex-girlfriends...

    5. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by tikram · · Score: 0

      Cigarettes? Tampons?

      I bet there are gazillions of other examples. Strange how short-sighted this statement is.

    6. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow nerds are lame when they try to be funny and clever.

      I never RTFAs but I'm sure a mouse is quite a bit more complicated than a 1/4 pounder with cheese and a super sized coca-cola. Has any company that makes electronic/mechanical (complex) devices shipped 1B of anything?

      I know that with all the wasteful bureaucratic spending here in the US that 1B seems like a trivial number, but to put things in perspective does anyone have a clue what was happening 1B seconds ago?

    7. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by shortbusridr · · Score: 1

      McDonald's does not actually SHIP anything. I don't know about pens/pencils, considering the abundance of brands who are all a similar price. However, Logitech can have online orders as well, and has a reputation.

    8. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm pretty sure I read that ARM ship a billion or so of their chips every year. Of course that may not count as they licence their designs to other companies who actually make the things.

      Talking of Coca Cola, if everyone in the world bought a bottle of Coke on average once every 5 years, they would ship a billion bottles a year. I'm pretty sure the figures are much higher than that.

    9. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by xstonedogx · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, I have only indirect evidence of this, but roughly 1 billion seconds ago my parents were getting busy.

    10. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, you need a lot of mice to make a big mac.

    11. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by portscan · · Score: 2, Informative

      see comment below about ARM shipping 1 billion processors last quarter

    12. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by maxume · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wouldn't be surprised if Budweiser ships (far in excess of?) 1 billion units a year (that's only 20 beers for 50 million people, or 50 beers for 20 million people, I'm not real sure how many people are low brow enough to drink Bud, but that seems pretty reasonable).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    13. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Smelly+Jeffrey · · Score: 5, Interesting

      does anyone have a clue what was happening 1B seconds ago?

      The Tenerife disaster occurred on March 27, 1977, which is about 1 billion seconds, or 31 years and 251 days, ago.

    14. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Amouth · · Score: 1

      humm one brand that would out do them

      BiC

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    15. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Toothpicks...

    16. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never RTFAs but I'm sure a mouse is quite a bit more complicated than a 1/4 pounder with cheese and a super sized coca-cola. Has any company that makes electronic/mechanical (complex) devices shipped 1B of anything?

      Who cares? His statement was "Look at any other industry and it has never happened." No one's being funny; they're calling him on his boasting.

    17. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Talderas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Every other example that has been brought up was a consumable rather than a long term product. While you could argue that a mouse is a consumable, it isn't/shouldn't be designed as such. All these other objects you use them, and you throw them away, so you have to get more.

      While the statement was indeed broad and vague, I believe that was the intent of it. So really, find me a single company that has shipped 1 billion units of a non-consumable product. Maybe Hanes with their underwear?

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    18. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by ziphnab · · Score: 1

      my first thought was the paperclip

      --
      --- Sometimes even music cannot substitute for tears. --Paul Simon, Cool Cool River
    19. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by ed.mps · · Score: 1

      hey, this is /., don't be afraid of talking 'bout your educative magazines ~

      --
      !sig
    20. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of which 16,328 still work.

    21. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by brianosaurus · · Score: 1

      If McDonalds doesn't ship anything, explain how the kangaroo meat gets to all of their restaurants? ;)

      And, please. McDonalds has truckloads of reputation (not always good, but they have it).

      --
      blog
    22. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by gsgriffin · · Score: 1

      Yep, your right. Making a hamburger is just like manufacturing a mouse.

      --
      jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
    23. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Bandman · · Score: 3, Funny

      cornflakes

    24. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by v1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      there's an industry term called durable goods [wikipedia.org] which I expect is the category Logitec was speaking of. Consumables such as cigarettes, cheeseburgers, ballpoint pens etc, do not fall into this category.

      An ARM processor is also a component, not a finished consumer product, so I would equally count them out of it.

      Once you get those two issues out of the way, Logitec's claim becomes a lot more solid. I'm sure there's a few others out there like them, but not the hundreds or thousands that people are speculating.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    25. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Bic sold it's 100 billionth pen back in 2005.

      source: http://www.psfk.com/2005/09/bic_celebrate_d.html

    26. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by sukotto · · Score: 5, Informative

      "A billion hours ago, human life appeared on earth. A billion minutes ago, Christianity emerged. A billion seconds ago, the Beatles changed music. A billion Coca-Colas ago was yesterday morning,"
        -- Robert Goizueta, CEO (1980-1997) Coca-Cola Company

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
    27. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      Think about all the work that went into assembling the 1/4-pounder with cheese, including all the processing of the ingredients and assembly in mass for shipping. Compare that to the work that went into assembling the mouse.

      --
      SRSLY.
    28. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you can add three frogs to that count, too.

    29. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      Once you get those two issues out of the way, Logitec's claim becomes a lot more solid.

      Yes, because a computer mouse is nothing like a component. It's not like you need a computer to get any use out of the mouse. No, it's a finished consumer product.

    30. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by shortbusridr · · Score: 1

      By reputation I meant a good reputation. Also, maybe BiC used to sell a lot of pens, but so does everyone else. There is much more competition in the pen market than in the mouse market. Mouses are coming close to being obsolete anyway.

    31. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An ARM processor is also a component, not a finished consumer product, so I would equally count them out of it.

      ... and we all know computer mice function just fine on their own. Just the other day I was using mine to scroll my way to the park for a nice game of point and click tennis.

    32. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by rvw · · Score: 1

      Companies? I can name a few ex-girlfriends...

      Where did you ship them to?

    33. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Kvasio · · Score: 1

      I never RTFAs but I'm sure a mouse is quite a bit more complicated than a 1/4 pounder with cheese and a super sized coca-cola.

      how about Le Big Mac? ;)

    34. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by tiananmen+tank+man · · Score: 1

      But with 1 billion pc mice made by logitech, there are at least 1 billion computers out there in the world.

    35. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by geobeck · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not just the processing, but the design. It's not like someone mixes up a big bowl of ground beef, a few eggs, spices and whatever, then roughly forms round-ish patties before shipping them out.*

      Everything produced for McDonald's is the result of a very stricly controlled manufacturing process to ensure that every meat-like patty, every tallow-spiked fry, every creepily long-lasting chocolate shake is the same to within very strict tolerances, whether you eat it in Miami or Whitehorse.

      Make no mistake; that Quarter Pounder with Orange Dairy-Like Substance(TM) is as much the product of a technical manufacturing process as your Cordless Trackball with Media Whiz-Bang!(TM).

      .

      *That only happens at good burger joints.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    36. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does anyone have a clue what was happening 1B seconds ago?

      The Tenerife disaster occurred on March 27, 1977, which is about 1 billion seconds, or 31 years and 251 days, ago.

      its a quote from a CEO, 31 years ago from 1997 was in the 60's, which was when the Beatles were still together.

    37. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 4, Funny

      Make no mistake; that Quarter Pounder with Orange Dairy-Like Substance(TM) is as much the product of a technical manufacturing process as your Cordless Trackball with Media Whiz-Bang!(TM).

      Same nutritional value, mind you.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    38. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 3, Funny

      find me a single company that has shipped 1 billion units of a non-consumable product. Maybe Hanes with their underwear?

      Believe me, I eat a lot of spicy foods. My Hanes last about as long as a consumable.....

    39. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by ranulf · · Score: 1
      I bet AOL have sent out over 100 billion coasters.

      I thought of this as apparently in December 2005, Sony had shipped over 1.87 billion games and surely they can't have been outdone by AOL...

    40. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by vux984 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Has any company that makes electronic/mechanical (complex) devices shipped 1B of anything?

      Seagate claims to have shipped 1 billion hard drives.

      http://www.seagate.com/ww/v/index.jsp?locale=en-US&name=null&vgnextoid=43afb55a61379110VgnVCM100000f5ee0a0aRCRD

    41. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by geobeck · · Score: 1

      While you could argue that a mouse is a consumable, it isn't/shouldn't be designed as such.

      I'd agree with shouldn't be, but not with isn't. Logitech is a typical consumer product manufacturing company, whose primary goal is to convince you to throw away the mouse you bought last year (or even last month) and replace it with the latest model. (Try our new 68-button MegaMedia(TM) Mouse with built-in subwoofer!!!)

      Of the 1 billion mice Logitech has sold, I wonder how many currently reside in a municipal landfill somewhere.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    42. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by ianare · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's fair to compare with a food or beverage company, or with things that typically cost much less. The output will obviously be much higher for those.
      On the other hand, I'm sure there's plenty of things of similar price that ship in similar quantities ... like tires for example.

    43. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      I never RTFAs but I'm sure a mouse is quite a bit more complicated than a 1/4 pounder with cheese and a super sized coca-cola.

      Not really both are equally complex when you look at it from the birth of the calf.

    44. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      Given that you only need one mouse per computer (normally, maybe two or three in an odd setup), but hard drives are in everything from computers, to DVRs, to MP3 players, to mass storage arrays (potentially thousands of them at a time in that case), this makes a lot of sense.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    45. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by geobeck · · Score: 1

      McDonald's does not actually SHIP anything.

      I wonder why they haven't tried this yet. With the sheer inorganic durability of their products, it's surprising that you can't go to McDonalds.com and order a Big Mac via USPS regular parcel service.

      Or they could fax it to you; it wouldn't increase the nutritional value that much.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    46. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, you've never shipped a broad before?

    47. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. I bet we could think of plenty of companies who have shipped far more than a trillion of something.

      FTFY.

      But no, really... one billion? Sure, it's a cool milestone. All that special? Not really.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    48. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Walpurgiss · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily true, conclusion does not follow the premise.

    49. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Jack in the Box used kangaroo meat.

    50. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Funny

      Depends what you consider a lot. Obviously you need one to direct the action, and maybe two or three others to gather all the components and.. oh wait. Oh God, that's not what you meant at all, is it? You sick, sick man.

    51. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by fm6 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wouldn't be surprised if Budweiser ships (far in excess of?) 1 billion units a year

      And that's just to Chico State!!

    52. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Which has absolutely nothing to do with this discussion. Just because there's 1 billion computers using mice does not mean they were all built by the same company.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    53. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get over yourself, what the hell do you drink? Wine, directly from the queens pee-hole?

    54. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Kelbear · · Score: 3, Interesting

      McDonalds ships a buttload of stuff to their chains all around the world. Their supply logistics are pretty damned complex(I'm bidding on their transportation contract right now). Getting the same frenchfries sold in places where they can't grow potatoes isn't easy.

      While the "sameness" of Mcdonalds food is repulsive to some, it's impressive that they manage to achieve such generic sameness in the markets they've established themselves in.

    55. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by RabidOverYou · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Bic sold it's 100 billionth pen back in 2005.

      Congratulations! You're the billionth Slashdot post to misspell its.

    56. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Often, Budweiser.

      Get over yourself.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    57. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by rk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Try our new 68-button MegaMedia(TM) Mouse with built-in subwoofer!!!

      I just finally threw caution to the wind last year and duct-taped an old mouse on the bottom of my keyboard. 108-button mouse, biatches! Doesn't have a subwoofer, but I still have duct tape left over.

    58. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Levi has made over 3.5 billion pairs of jeans, here is what I am basing that on. And since MSFT claims that 100 million copies of Vista sold I wouldn't be surprised that if you added up all the sales of Windows, from 1.0 to Vista, you would reach over 1 billion. After all look at how many years the 3 year upgrade cycle held up.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    59. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ARM doesn't make chips. Doesn't count since it would be several different companies and not one single entity and the fact that ARM only releases the spec.

    60. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Marc+Desrochers · · Score: 2, Funny

      The mouse is probably better for you...

    61. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I dunno.. I've got 2 Logitech mice, and while the pricey one could definitely be considered a durable good, this other one that came free with my keyboard probably won't make it through the winter.

      At any rate I seriously doubt Logitech has made anywhere close to 1 billion of any particular model. If we're counting ALL models, then I'm guessing Gilette has produced over 1 billion shaver handles, Kodak has probably produced over 1 billion cameras.. home phones (think old AT&T), cell phones, baseballs, baseball bats, golf clubs, tennis racquets, mouse pads, floppy discs, compact discs, DVDs, videotapes, audio tapes, vinyl records, computer cables, CRTs, keyboards, resistors, capacitors, ICs (and pretty much any other electronic component), shingles, ceiling tiles, bathroom tiles, bricks, gallons of paint, sqft of carpet, windows, wrenches, eating utensils, dishes, mugs, glasses, pots, plastic cups, knives, axes, guns, springs, ball bearings, Barbie dolls (confirmed), board games, books, sewing machines, buttons, zippers, jeans, brooms, mops, vacuum cleaners, electric motors, combustion engines, umbrellas..

      Maybe not all of those count as durable goods, or have been produced in quantities over 1B by any one company, but I'd be surprised if NONE of them have. I'd wager on Milton Bradley and Mattel producing at least 1B board games each, and possibly Monopoly sets alone. Zippo is at 700+ million, which isn't too bad when you consider their relatively limited target audience, although they've been in production for 70+ yrs. Craftsman has probably sold over 1B wrenches, and almost certainly that many when you expand the category to "hand tools" overall. At the same time, I doubt any non-consumable item has been produced in that quantity with the exact same specs, with the possible exception of bricks or cinder blocks.

    62. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Marc+Desrochers · · Score: 5, Funny

      That probably means something more like 976562500 hard drives.

    63. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Golddess · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought too, and I see a lot of posts agreeing with you and offering up additional companies, but every single one (that I saw, I did not check every post) has one thing in common.

      They are all consumables.

      I think there is a real difference between selling 1 billion items of food or 1 billion of a thing that has a guaranteed finite lifespan (think pens/pencils, eventually they run out of what makes them functional) vs selling 1 billion of something that I've still got working versions of that are 15+ years old, and can continue to function for the foreseeable future.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    64. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      As I posted above: Barbie Dolls.

    65. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by JayJay.br · · Score: 1

      Probably same taste also.

    66. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by mikiN · · Score: 1

      Complexity, ahh... such a beautiful word.

      Think of all the millions of years of evolution that produced the cattle that produced the beef and dairy stuff that went into that 1/4 pounder.

      The DNA in each individual cell contains more encoded (genetic) knowledge than all of the IP in all reasonable patents in the USPTO combined. ...and no, I'n not a creationist (not in the usual sense anyway), but Nature is way ahead of human invention in the area of complexity.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    67. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Coke and Pepsi.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    68. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lay's makes chips, and I'm sure they've shipped over a billion of 'em...

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    69. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      I think the number every year is closer to 30 billion world wide. Which is just 5 sodas for everyone in the world. Think about the people you know who down diet cokes like they're the secret to everlasting youth, and you'll see that number isn't too unreasonable.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    70. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Congratulations! You're the billionth grammar nazi to post on /.!

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    71. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well you need the chip to make the computer to work. The Mouse is an accessory product not needed for it to operate. Yea it is kinda of a fuzzy line. But the general rule of thumb is if you can get it at a retail store separately and it doesn't ware out after a designed period of use. Then it is a durable good.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    72. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by mikiN · · Score: 1

      The human brain is seen by many as the most complex entity in the known universe, so humanity itself (all the billions of us who (have ever) live(d)) takes the cake on this one.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    73. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      Maybe Hanes with their underwear?

      Clearly, you have never been to Japan.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    74. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by mikiN · · Score: 1

      ...it doesn't ware out after a designed period of use.

      Never used one of them (track-)ball mice, did you?

      I can testify that these wear out (i.e. degrade beyond repair) after some period of use, whether they were designed that way or not.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    75. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 4, Funny


      You assume that there isn't any mouse in the burger.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    76. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's tallow?

      I could only find this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tallow

      Is that why the fry's are so tasty?

    77. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Cowmonaut · · Score: 1

      IMO, mice will only be obsolete when we are able to get cybergenetic implants and use eye movements for controlling the pointer. Possibly it will be downgraded to a gaming input device rather than for the full system, but I don't find touch screens nearly as useful as a mouse. But then I'm also lazy and jackup my sensitivity so I only ever move it about a quarter inch at most.

    78. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      The point is that you can't find one that is actually counting... Those just don't count it anymore. Imagine a nail company! Or a paper clip!

      --
      -- dnl
    79. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      C'mon less than 2 beers per person in the world!!??! Its way much more! And I know their market is smaller than that

      --
      -- dnl
    80. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      I never RTFAs but I'm sure a mouse is quite a bit more complicated than a 1/4 pounder with cheese and a super sized coca-cola.

      Sorry man, but you are being redundant. This is slashdot. Of course you didn't RTFAs.

      --
      -- dnl
    81. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by colmore · · Score: 1

      Ok but what about other consumer devices that aren't meant to have a limited shelf-life? I think that's really the issue here. You could very well say "oh yeah, well what about transistors?" but that wouldn't be very relevant.

      There are certainly others, but not too many.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    82. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by rgviza · · Score: 1

      yea but the burger works as intended ;)
      Wish I could say the same for my MX-518

      --
      Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
    83. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GP's just a big fat Karma hoooor.

    84. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by madsenj37 · · Score: 1

      Although nails can be purchased one by one, most companies measure how many pounds or packs of nails as one product.

      --
      Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
    85. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      Obviously you need one to direct the action ...

      In typical movie exaggeration, this one does triple duty as a director, taster and human-liaison. No way a mouse can do so many things at once - he has only four feet!

    86. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by sfjoe · · Score: 1

      I don't know. Hasn't Ford produced a billion cars yet? I bet for sure there have been a billion Twinkies made.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    87. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by enoz · · Score: 1

      Congratulations! You're the billionth poster to invoke Godwin's Law.

    88. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      McDonalds ships a buttload of stuff to their chains all around the world. Their supply logistics are pretty damned complex(I'm bidding on their transportation contract right now).

      Santa?

    89. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by v1 · · Score: 1

      "durable goods" definition appears to be (unofficially) 3 years minimum average product lifespan. It's not meant to exclude things that last less than 3 years, but is more meant as a general rule to eliminate things like erasers, paper, TP, brake pads, ballpoint pens, and other "consumables". Things that you specifically buy periodically because they are used up. (more "used up" than "wore out", which becomes a grey line with some products)

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    90. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by slater86 · · Score: 1

      AOL CDs?

      --
      When people ask if I'm an optimist, I say "I hope so". --Bill Bailey
    91. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      Condoms.

      Oh no, wait, we're all good Catholics, aren't we?

    92. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I travelled overseas by ocean liner. Does that count?

    93. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha... real funny one! Man doncha just hate it when you buy a 1 TB hd and it appears to be 975 GB... ;-)

      Do those hd manufacturers have a special reason to count 1000 bytes in a kilobyte instead of 1024 like the rest of the world... or is it just simply a trick to jack up the specs?

    94. Re:Any othetr industry?? neve happened? by AncientPC · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget the 12-year-old McDonald's burger that looks as good as new.

  3. You'd need fewer mice if they were built to last by glennrrr · · Score: 2, Informative

    A colleague called me to his office the other day. His PowerMac was "locking up" not responsive to clicks. And when he'd reboot the optical drive would eject. Turns out his Logitech USB mouse was stuck in the left click position. (Macs eject their optical disk on restart if the mouse button is clicked.)

  4. One billionth? Ha, that's nothing by necro81 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "It's rare in human history that a billionth of anything has been shipped by one company," said Logitech's general manager Rory Dooley. "Look at any other industry and it has never happened. This is a significant milestone."

    I think McDonald's would disagree with you.

  5. 1 billion is not uncommon for some things by davidwr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Large manufacturers of small parts like screws can easily reach the billion mark in a decade.

    The same goes for "categories" of parts like mice, computers, microprocessors, phones, etc.

    I wonder how many CPUs Intel has shipped? I wonder how many phones the pre-1983-breakup version of AT&T shipped. I wonder how many screws and fasteners a large screw-making company ships in 10 years?

    No, a billion may be a milestone but it's not huge, not when you put it in context.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by GeneralSense · · Score: 1

      I remember an old-time newspaper add back in the day of the Acme Elevator Button Company breaking a billions buttons. Isn't this essentially the same?

    2. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by seanellis · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't know about Intel, but ARM shipped 1 billion processors last quarter, according to their Q3 results statement.

      Other things that must ship in the billions: screws, nails, paper clips, thumbtacks, staples, sweets (candy), baked beans, soda, LEDs (actually almost any discrete electronic component), copier paper, post-it notes, coins, pens, pencils, bin liners ... it's too easy.

    3. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Screws and Pepsis are very simple products, while a mouse is much more complex. I would agree with the comment that "it's very rare for one company to ship 1 billion of anything", where "anything" is qualified as a complex product.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    4. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by enemorales · · Score: 1

      Indeed, considering that each of those mice are connected to a computer...

    5. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Intel shipped their billionth chip a few years back. It was reported on /. at the time. ARM sell massively more chips than Intel.

    6. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by sloth+jr · · Score: 1

      or ironically, the components used to make those mice.

    7. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by scotch · · Score: 1

      Well, sure, substitute the meaning for any of several words in that statement and you can make it more true.

      Like 'rare' => 'not very rare' or 'ship' => 'snort' or 'billion' => 'google'.

      Fun.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    8. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Nokia has also gone past the billion mark quite a time ago with their phones - after all, they sell several hundred million every year. Nokia phones might well be the most widely sold non-trivial consumer products in the history.

    9. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about mobile phones? They're much more complex than mice (as evidenced by the fact that they used to cost thousands of dollars a piece) and Nokia alone sold over a billion of them by 2006.

    10. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Spaghetti.

    11. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Define 'complex product.'

    12. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by ConanG · · Score: 1

      Would a phone qualify as a complex product? Nokia has about a 40% market share in an industry that shipped 1.12 billion phones in '07. Let's say roughly 450 million. In 2007. Add to that 347 million they shipped in 2006, and you get about 850 million phones shipped in just two years. I'm pretty sure they passed the billion mark already.

    13. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Yes, phones qualify. Now there's Intel, Nokia, and Logitech. It's still rare.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    14. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by fbjon · · Score: 1

      A refined product, at the very least.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    15. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by 2short · · Score: 1

      Complex product: A product such that when you point out someone has shipped a billion of them in comparison to Logitech having shipped a billion mice, it doesn't make you look like a twit.

      HTH.

    16. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Funny

      Other things that must ship in the billions: screws, nails, paper clips, thumbtacks, staples, sweets (candy), baked beans, soda, LEDs (actually almost any discrete electronic component), copier paper, post-it notes, coins, pens, pencils, bin liners ...

      ... posts nitpicking that quote...

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    17. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't make exactly the same thing at home.

    18. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That number isn't really shipped by a single company, though; that's the total of all ARM cores shipped by all licensees producing them, which numbered somewhere in the dozens last time I looked.

    19. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Like Pepsi and screws?

    20. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I am more capable of making a mouse at home than I am of making a screw or Pepsi. Have you ever tried to produce either of those products at home?

    21. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by rk · · Score: 1

      You just won the internet. Congratulations.

    22. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by settrans · · Score: 1

      Don't know about Intel, but ARM shipped 1 billion processors last quarter

      No, their licensees shipped 1bn units. ARM doesn't manufacture anything.

      --
      "When I wake up in the morning I piss cryptographic excellence." - Bruce Schneier
    23. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by Lucid+3ntr0py · · Score: 1

      More True? It is either true or false. It cannot be both true and false.

    24. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by Voyager529 · · Score: 1
      But those items are purchased differently than mice are. Few (if any) retail stores sell mice in packages of more than one. The smallest box of paper clips I can get at Staples is 100, and I can buy them in quantities of 1,000 as well. if I go to Costco, I can get a box of 10,000 paper clips. As such, it's not terribly difficult to imagine a paper clip manufacturing plant pumping out a billion paper clips in a relatively short amount of time. Screws, nails, and other quantity purchased items fit into this category.

      1 billion Coca-Cola's is also an interesting metric that's not quite apples-to-apples. If I purchase a 12oz can of coke or a 3 liter bottle, does that number change? If I buy a 12 pack of cans, is that 1 unit or 12 sold? Is it based on SKUs sold or liters consumed? If I go to McDonalds and get a medium coke and refill it three times, how does that factor into their counting methodology? Yes, one can say that Coca Cola deals with such massive volumes of product manufactured and sold daily that my refilled fountain drink does not significantly impact their units sold, but it does add a variable to their sales that Logitech doesn't have. A mouse is sold. whether you get a larger mouse or a smaller mouse, it is still a single unit and the larger one is different from the smaller. A 12oz can of coke contains the exact same product as the 2 and 3 liter bottles; a consumer chooses the quantity of the product they wish to buy, not between two different products.

      Joey

    25. Re:1 billion is not uncommon for some things by neonsignal · · Score: 1

      and vegemite, don't forget 1 billion jars of vegemite :-)

  6. What about Microsoft? by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm curious to know how many mice Microsoft has shipped; theirs seem to be more plentiful than Logitech's in the wild. I know that I've got four or five MS mice sitting in the closet, plus two active ones, but the only Logitech mouse I have is the one at work.

    One mouse for every six people seems a bit steep for what is—in my limited personal experience—a minority player in the market.

    --
    Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    1. Re:What about Microsoft? by purpledinoz · · Score: 3, Funny

      A /. reader admitted to using an MS product! He must have no fear!

    2. Re:What about Microsoft? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Logitech have been shipping mice since 1981, giving them almost a two decade head start on Microsoft. Their early mice used balls and so needed replacing after a few years. Over the last 26 years, they have made mice that have been rebranded and shipped by numerous OEMs, including Apple, HP and Dell. For most of the '80s and '90s, any serious computer user had a logitech mouse (and less serious ones often had a cheap Logitech mouse with their computer maker's brand on it). Calling them a minority player is like calling Microsoft a minority player in the desktop OS market.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:What about Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I've owned is Logitech mice, and all I buy for work is Logitech too. I rarely see Microsoft mice my way.

    4. Re:What about Microsoft? by Roland+Piquepaille · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm curious to know how many mice Microsoft has shipped; theirs seem to be more plentiful than Logitech's in the wild.

      That's because they pull their own cords and escape to the woods. They're a lot less house-trained than their Logitech counterparts.

    5. Re:What about Microsoft? by SemiSpook · · Score: 1

      You all seem to forget that Logitech has (and probably continues to in some capacity) make mice for MS, even though the underlying technology is still Logitech's.

    6. Re:What about Microsoft? by Dysson · · Score: 1

      Amen. I've been using Logitech mice since I had my 8088 back in 1987. I'm not biased towards Logitech. I mean, Microsoft DOES make some nice mice.

      That being said...I agree, Logitech is pretty far from being a minority player in th hardware market.

    7. Re:What about Microsoft? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      As others have mentioned, if you turn over most of the OEM branded mice the come with a computer, you'll see a Logitech logo on it. As far as straight retail, I still tend to see Logitech mice in far greater numbers than Microsoft (Logitech used to dominate the keyboard market as well, and they're still a strong presence there but I notice more Microsoft keyboards that Logitech these days).

      They're far from a minority player. I'd even go so far as to say in the general consumer interface market, Logitech is probably the biggest player out there.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    8. Re:What about Microsoft? by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      The only obviously-rebranded mouse I've seen, from Dell, was a rebranded Microsoft one (and I think it even said "Dell by Microsoft"). I wasn't aware that they were so widespread. Thanks for the correction. :)

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    9. Re:What about Microsoft? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      It's OK to use Microsoft Mouse. It's the one thing they are good at.

    10. Re:What about Microsoft? by sunami · · Score: 1

      Yea, I used one Microsoft mouse for almost 10 years, until I discovered they don't make them good enough to survive being smashed against the wall.

    11. Re:What about Microsoft? by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      MS makes excellent products, so long as you're not talking about software of any kind, and you can overlook the odd RRoD on the XBox360. Also depends on how generous you consider "making" something to be, as quite a bit of what comes out of MS is just a rebanded product they bought from someone else (well, they bought the company anyway, which is more or less the same thing).

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    12. Re:What about Microsoft? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The Logitech ones were not obviously rebranded. I saw quite a few shipped by a smallish manufacturer (Evesham, I think), which were just white with their logo on a sticker on top. The only way you could tell they were by Logitech was some very small writing on the underside saying 'Logitechâ'.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    13. Re:What about Microsoft? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      No, the one thing they were good at was their joysticks for flight simulators. Their mice are sub-par compared to Logitech in my experience.

      Unfortunately, they've kept making mice and quit making joysticks.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    14. Re:What about Microsoft? by UnHolier+than+ever · · Score: 5, Funny

      Microsoft is an excellent mouse-making company. It's a shame people keep complaining about their failed OS sideline.

    15. Re:What about Microsoft? by R_Kulio · · Score: 3, Funny

      As others have mentioned, if you turn over most of the OEM branded mice the come with a computer, you'll see a Logitech logo on it.

      Thanks, I just turned over my lenovo mouse to check, and blinded myself with the laser

    16. Re:What about Microsoft? by DeathCarrot · · Score: 1

      some very small writing on the underside saying 'Logitechâ'.

      Is that the Mexican, non-union equivalent of Logitech?

    17. Re:What about Microsoft? by dave420 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Microsoft shipped their first mouse in 1983, so it's a head start of two years, not two decades. My first PC (back in the 80s) had a Microsoft mouse.

    18. Re:What about Microsoft? by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Yeah ... I remember how sad I was when I had to get rid of mine because all the new computers used expected everything to connect over USB.

      I'm going to miss it when I build my WIn98 Gaming rig (because it seems to be the only way I'll be able to play those games once Vista takes hold :( ).

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    19. Re:What about Microsoft? by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      I love my Sidewinder X5 mouse, and I'm looking forward to the new X8 although I'm a bit concerned as they've apparently removed the ability to change the weight of the mouse. I'll take the Sidewinder X5 over any mouse Logitech makes any day.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    20. Re:What about Microsoft? by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      However, their joysticks cost money, their mice can be had by the boatload when offices update their hardware, and they're a lot better than the opticals that Dell and IBM ship.

    21. Re:What about Microsoft? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      their first mouse was a rebranded logitech.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    22. Re:What about Microsoft? by pomakis · · Score: 1

      [Logitech's] early mice used balls and so needed replacing after a few years.

      That's funny. I've purchased exactly one mouse in my lifetime, a three-button Logitech ball mouse in the mid 1990s, and it hasn't given me a single problem at all over the 15 years of extensive use. I take the ball out and wipe off the contacts every few years, and that's enough to keep it going. My keyboard is in a similar situation. Both my mouse and my keyboard have outlived four host computers, and are still going strong. (I need an adaptor to plug the mouse in now, though, because computers don't seem to come with serial ports any more.) I really don't understand how there can be such a large market for mice and keyboards (as evidenced by the shelves of them in places like Best Buy). I guess the gaming market is somewhat of a driving force; people want the latest hot keys (or whatever) to give them that extra edge in their game du jour.

    23. Re:What about Microsoft? by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Meh, Dosbox is a compatibility environment for running those games that aren't happy on modern windows versions. You should be ok to use that for your old gaming needs.

    24. Re:What about Microsoft? by RKThoadan · · Score: 1

      I consider the MS Trackball Explorer to be the best pointing device ever built. Of course, since it was such an excellent product, they quit manufacturing it. It's legendary among trackball fans. If mine ever dies I will probably seriously spend the several hundred dollars it costs to get one now via E-bay or other channels. I'd much prefer for MS to start making them again or for Logitech to make a similar design.

    25. Re:What about Microsoft? by Sobrique · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I've just flipped over my 'dell' mouse at work to check.

      Can just about make out "Suzhou Logitech Electronics Co. Ltd. Made in China" in very tiny fontsize.

      So with my exhaustive sampling, I can say definitively that Logitech products are more ubiquitous than I thought.

    26. Re:What about Microsoft? by nategoose · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seriously. I've switched from Logitech to MS trackballs and keyboards, though Linux is my OS of choice.

    27. Re:What about Microsoft? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is an excellent mouse-making company. It's a shame people keep complaining about their failed OS sideline.

      I've always thought it was funny how Microsoft would always emphatically insist that they were not a hardware company, while their hardware input devices, especially their flight sticks but also mice, keyboards, and game pads, are some of the best-in-breed.

      I guess at Microsoft it's considered shameful to have a product that nobody is forced to buy, but people do anyway simply because it's very good at doing its job. No wonder they stopped making joysticks.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    28. Re:What about Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It's the one thing they are good at.

      Nope, they also make good keyboards and gamepads.

    29. Re:What about Microsoft? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I just turned over my lenovo mouse to check, and blinded myself with the laser

      Duh, I though eveyone knew you should keep one eye shut when looking at a laser.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    30. Re:What about Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't look into it with your remaining eye.

    31. Re:What about Microsoft? by Tuidjy · · Score: 1

      At home, I still use my "made in UK" IBM keyboard from '93, and I still have my first Logitech three button mouse, which I moved to my laptop once I switched to a Razer Diamondback for gaming.

      But once I got used to the Diamondback at home, I switched my work mouse as well. The extra buttons are handy for cut/paste/search/switch-two-words/reformat-block... Also, the Diamondback can be used at MUCH higher sensitivity, probably because of the higher resolution it supports. The Mouseman was great, but I would not go back.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
    32. Re:What about Microsoft? by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Not everyone intentionally gimps themselves to save fifteen bucks.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    33. Re:What about Microsoft? by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      And I consider the Logitech Trackman Marble Wheel to be the best pointing device ever built. Finger-operated trackballs just never cut it for me, and this particular model is one of the most comfortable designs ever, as well as having a scroll wheel that you can comfortably rest your middle finger on while having index and ring fingers on the left and right buttons. The only shortcoming of it is that they never built a newer model with more buttons.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    34. Re:What about Microsoft? by Draek · · Score: 1

      I've always said that in a fair market, Microsoft would have complete dominance of the PC peripheal market. Their mouses are excellent, their keyboards are second to none but IBM, and their gaming controllers have the best price/quality ratio of the industry by far (Logitech's either suck or cost a kidney and half).

      It's just a pity that their OS and Office software divisions are so bloody incompetent, and a shame that they also happen to be the most successful ones so far.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    35. Re:What about Microsoft? by xous · · Score: 1

      Hehe, I bought a Logitech Trackman Marble Wheel back in 2000 and it wore out last year. Searched for a few months and ended up paying $60 for a similar one. Good Mouse.

    36. Re:What about Microsoft? by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Sadly, mine didn't last quite that long. As I recall it gave out some time in 2003, whereupon I bought 2 more used ones. When those wore out a couple years later, I looked for more replacements for a while but finally gave up. :( Since then I've made do with the newer thumb-operated trackball they sell, which is still better than a mouse. But why can't they come out with at least one new model with the new features (ie. more buttons, sensativity adjustment, etc.) they've been putting on their mice for about 5 years now?? You'd think with all the scads of new mice models, they could spare the resources to do at least one good trackball.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    37. Re:What about Microsoft? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      /me plays another round of nethack

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    38. Re:What about Microsoft? by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      I just turned over my lenovo mouse to check, and blinded myself with the laser

      Guns don't kill people, laser mice blind people. Or something.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  7. Good Job Logitech! by purpledinoz · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've pretty much used Logitech mice exclusively since I've stared using a computer. They've consistently provided high-quality, low-priced products. My mouse I use at home is a simple $12 Logitech optical mouse, and it works perfectly. Unfortunately, I'm using a MS mouse at work. I think I will buy another Logitech mouse to replace this one.

    1. Re:Good Job Logitech! by hcmtnbiker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately, I'm using a MS mouse at work. I think I will buy another Logitech mouse to replace this one.

      MS Mice are almost exclusively Logitech OEMs. Why would you replace it with a duplicate?

      --
      If i had one dollar for every brain you dont have, i would have $1.
    2. Re:Good Job Logitech! by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      You know, it is quite OK to be consistently pleased by one company's products and then voice such pleasure in public forums. That hardly qualifies as fanboism (the most over used term on the Internet). I like my BMW. I would recommend it to others. I would go on a discussion board and tell other people about its qualities. What's the problem?

    3. Re:Good Job Logitech! by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      MS Mice are almost exclusively Logitech OEMs. Why would you replace it with a duplicate?

      So as not to have to deal with the horribly invasive drivers provided by Microsoft?

    4. Re:Good Job Logitech! by jmyers · · Score: 1

      "I've pretty much used Logitech mice exclusively since I've stared using a computer."

      You spoiled young whipper snapper. we didn't have mice when I started using a computer. We had to use the H J K and L keys, and we liked it!

      I wonder how many keyboards they have shipped, it seems like they would have produced more keyboards than mice, since mice are optional, or they used to be.

    5. Re:Good Job Logitech! by ShadoxPrime · · Score: 0

      Because you're saying you want to replace your Microsoft mouse solely on the grounds that it is not a Logitech mouse.

    6. Re:Good Job Logitech! by egomaniac · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. Where did he say it was "solely on the grounds that it is not a Logitech mouse"? All he said was that it was unfortunate he had to use it and that he wanted to replace it. Maybe it's unfortunate that he has to use it because... he's unhappy with it?

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    7. Re:Good Job Logitech! by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      Mice have drivers? I don't think I've ever bothered to install the driver disk for any mouse since the days of Windows 95.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    8. Re:Good Job Logitech! by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      My point exactly. Why does Microsoft insist that I install a bunch of drivers and system software just to use the mouse? Incidentally, I haven't been able to remove it from my system settings in OSX either, so if anyone knows how, I'm all ears.

    9. Re:Good Job Logitech! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think Microsoft mice drivers are invasive? You should check out Intel's CPU drivers.. they are even worse than Microsoft's!

    10. Re:Good Job Logitech! by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      So as not to have to deal with the horribly invasive drivers provided by Microsoft?

      You know drivers aren't necessary for USB mice right? They all use the standard USB HID Mouse driver if you don't. All the disk adds is a crappy bit of software that does the crappy button remapping stuff. Half the time it'll still keep the same mappings after uninstalling the software. I've never installed it and my MS mouse's extra buttons do forward/backward in most programs, and I tend to map mouse4 to reload in most games. Works perfectly.

    11. Re:Good Job Logitech! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because of the name "Microsoft"! DUH!

      Everybody knows that the Gucci handbag carries more than that potato sack (otherwise known as Notgucci).

    12. Re:Good Job Logitech! by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      So don't use the MS drivers? Windows has built-in drivers that work perfectly fine 99% of the time, and if you just HAVE to have extra features, use the Logitech drivers. They're better than MS drivers and work with their mice just fine. I would guess the same is true on OSX as well.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    13. Re:Good Job Logitech! by stewbacca · · Score: 1
      Well the Microsoft mouse features didn't work until I installed the Microsoft mouse stuff (I assumed driver was in there as well) that came with it. The scroll wheel and button mapping was not possible without the software (stupid, I know, but not my fault). The other thing was that the default speed was way out of whack, and I'm not able to adjust it without the MS software. The system mouse settings can be changed, but wihtout the MS stuff installed, the speed and accuracy are really awful. My Logitech, Dell, and Kensington mice have no such limitations and work right out of the box, as you stated.

      I'm not sure, but since it is a wireless mouse, it may have needed something for the USB thingy too. In any case, this is the only third party mouse I've ever used that didn't work out of the box without the software/driver install. To make matters worse, I can't get rid of the system stuff now, even though I no longer use that mouse, and it conflicts with my other 3rd party mice settings. (and no help from the MS documentation either).

    14. Re:Good Job Logitech! by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      I've got a Microsoft mouse and I've never installed any drivers for it, it works just fine.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    15. Re:Good Job Logitech! by sh33333p · · Score: 1

      I've pretty much used Logitech mice exclusively since I've stared using a computer. They've consistently provided high-quality, low-priced products. My mouse I use at home is a simple $12 Logitech optical mouse, and it works perfectly. Unfortunately, I'm using a MS mouse at work. I think I will buy another Logitech mouse to replace this one.

      As someone who also has consistently bought Logitech keyboards and mice, I agree on the durability/price point- but Logitech mice have never been very ergonomic. I think Microsoft excels in this area with their mice, and I'll probably get one of theirs once my MX518 bites the dust. What don't you like about the mouse at work, other than the brand?

    16. Re:Good Job Logitech! by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Thanks. But are you using Mac OSX, or a WindowsPC? Do you have other device drivers already installed that could be conflicting? Are you using the wireless version? I've got ANOTHER Microsoft mouse that works just fine (and didn't even come with the crappy system software install that this one did). Just because YOUR mouse works fine, doesn't mean this one isn't a steamy pile of dung that has clogged up my system with useless system software.

    17. Re:Good Job Logitech! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had the same MS Intellimouse Explorer for 8 years. You know, the good old ones that were for right hands only, didn't have the gummy-wheel, weren't fatter than my hand, and wired.

    18. Re:Good Job Logitech! by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      Thanks. But are you using Mac OSX, or a WindowsPC? Do you have other device drivers already installed that could be conflicting? Are you using the wireless version? I've got ANOTHER Microsoft mouse that works just fine (and didn't even come with the crappy system software install that this one did). Just because YOUR mouse works fine, doesn't mean this one isn't a steamy pile of dung that has clogged up my system with useless system software.

      Now lets see... Windows PC... no conflicts (did I say anything was broken?).. it's wired. Think that covers all the questions.

      My point was more that I've never known any mouse to actually require drivers to function properly on any of the current generation OSes (XP, OSX, Linux, BSD, etc.). Also just because the drivers that came with your mouse, whether it was Microsoft or some other brand mouse, happen to hose your system doesn't mean there bad, it could be some other problem with the system. Of course it also doesn't mean they aren't bad, but as I pointed out I've never had the problem because I never bother to install the drivers that come with any of the mice (if they even come with drivers in the first place).

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    19. Re:Good Job Logitech! by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstood. I'm not claiming drivers are necessary, just that the Microsoft experience has been horrible, in that it didn't work right out of the box. The mouse DIDN'T work properly, so I installed the bundled software. I HAD to do this in hopes that it would improve the tracking and enable the scroll wheel. It didn't really help, and only conflicts with my system mouse settings. Now I can't remove the MS stuff from my system settings either. Maybe "drivers" was the wrong term. All I know is that it soured my experience so greatly I will never use another MS mouse again.

    20. Re:Good Job Logitech! by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      I have a nice Microsoft mouse. Seems to run Ubuntu just fine without drivers. It would probably work OK with Windows too...

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
    21. Re:Good Job Logitech! by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      I've been a fan of Logitech mouse pointers--they're generally well-made, and the current models are actually quite good.

      I currently use the MX500 wired mouse pointer, a superb device with the right "hefty" feel and comfortable fit in your right hand. Pity that Logitech has not seen it fit to update their SetPoint software to accommodate this pointer uhder Windows Vista, because I like to be able to use Logitech's own software controls to reprogram the buttons on the MX500 and to adjust the mouse movement speed.

    22. Re:Good Job Logitech! by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      I also love my logitech optical mouse. But the Microsoft mouse I have at work is also very good, I have no complaints.

      It's really the no-name cheapo brands that I refuse to use... they just never feel very accurate.

  8. Days numbered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The news comes at a time when analysts claim the days of the mouse are numbered.

    [citation needed]

    No seriously, where is there a mainstream commentator predicting the demise of the mouse, and backing it up with hard data and logic?

    1. Re:Days numbered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7508842.stm

      Actually, if you click the link and look at the rhs-column you'll find the link to this article at the top of the list.

    2. Re:Days numbered? by ZDRuX · · Score: 1

      I was wondering the exact same thing. I guess I must have missed the email about the impending doom of computer mice. And exactly what would we replace it with? I haven't seen any promising replacements as of yet.

      --
      The magical number is: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    3. Re:Days numbered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, in one years time we will all be using touchscreens, or waving our arms in the air frantically in front of a camera, because both those systems are much more comfortable & accurate than a mouse.

      -sheesh-

    4. Re:Days numbered? by sammyF70 · · Score: 1

      And Good riddance I say! The mouse is going to join books and keyboards in the list of obsolete and dead technologies! (just in case, as this is /. and people tend to misunderstand thes kind of things : that was sarcasm)

      --
      "DRM is like the Ford Pinto: it's a smooth ride, right up the point at which it explodes and ruins your day."-C.Doctorow
    5. Re:Days numbered? by Tuidjy · · Score: 1

      That article is just stupid. Because an iPhone buzzes and blinks as you shake it, and because the Wii interface detects your waving your hands, the days of the mouse are numbered?! Riiiiight.

      There is nothing that comes close to the mouse when you need to point very precisely somewhere, while retaining the ability to quickly issue a number of distinct commands... without too much effort. For some applications, touch sensitive screens, motion detectors, facial recognition, etc... may be better. Guess what, joysticks and light guns also have their uses. But at least as far as I know, there isn't a device that threatens the mouse as of today.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
    6. Re:Days numbered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Gartner analyst Steve Prentice who said "the mouse will no longer be mainstream in three to five years."

      The Gartner Group has been run by idiots who'll say anything to get some press for about ten years now. They are quoted incessantly by internal corporate politicians who need some "evidence" to promote their pet projects or discredit an internal rival's. E.g: "See? Even Gartner agrees that we need to divert resources from the mouse divison to my division's Toeball 2000 project or the company will implode in three years!"

    7. Re:Days numbered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I can say that the mouse is being used incorrectly, compared to its inventor's idea of having a mouse in one hand a chording keyboard in the other. Modern systems require entirely too much moving your hand between the keyboard and the mouse; learning to type with a chord system would be more difficult, but allow for much better interaction with a computer via mouse.

      But, like most long lived half-assed implementations of good ideas, I figure the mainstream will never use the mouse the right way. I suppose that means I don't see it dying any time soon either though.

    8. Re:Days numbered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here.

    9. Re:Days numbered? by dosun88888 · · Score: 1

      I'd be willing to bet that the keyboard will outlive the book. Books are a neat novelty item, but as far as information stores they're inefficient and very heavy to lug around.

    10. Re:Days numbered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about logic, but I haven't used a mouse for 3 years. If I ever buy a Desktop PC again it will have a keyb with track-pad. Once you get used to them they are so much better than mouses that it sucks to use rodents again. With proper adaptations they would make for far better gaming too. This is not to say you can't FPS or RTS with a track-pad, they are just a bit worse than proper gaming mouses. Not enough that I would want to use a mouse again.

    11. Re:Days numbered? by dacut · · Score: 1

      But at least as far as I know, there isn't a device that threatens the mouse as of today.

      How about laptops? I'm typing this on a generic, work-issued Dell Latitude. It has a trackpad and a trackpoint, but no mouse. On my commute (a ferry across Puget Sound), I see a number of other folks all wielding mice-less laptops.

      Given that laptops are becoming more common purchases than desktops, I can see mice taking less of a market share in the future. Demise, though? Nah.

    12. Re:Days numbered? by Tuidjy · · Score: 1

      You definitely have a point about laptops. I use mine mostly with the trackpad, but when I can, I plug in the mouse. And if people are buying laptops as desktop replacements, they probably will also buy a mouse to use while gaming, drawing, or even working with Office. Can you click and drag reliably with a trackpad? I know I can not. And I have lately grown used to six mouse buttons while programming. Cutting, pasting, reformatting, compiling without running - I have bound all these, and unless I'm in emacs, I use them all the time.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
  9. Any Other industry?? by SL1200MKII · · Score: 1

    What about producers of nuts, bolts, screws, nails? They makes those by the billion every year.

    1. Re:Any Other industry?? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      They makes those by the billion every year^H^H^H^H^H week.

      Fix'd.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Any Other industry?? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Are a computer mouse and a nail comparable products?

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    3. Re:Any Other industry?? by scotch · · Score: 1

      In the context of "any other industry", yes.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    4. Re:Any Other industry?? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Right, but it's a meaningless comparison. Anyone can ship a billion small pieces of metal, it's not interesting.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  10. Marketshare ? by polyp2000 · · Score: 0

    Statistically this means that there are at least 1 Billion logitech mice out there.

    N.

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    1. Re:Marketshare ? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How do you figure that? If they have shipped a billion mice then that means that there are at most a billion Logitech mice out there. Considering that a lot of their early ball mice are almost certainly no longer in working order, the real number is likely a lot less.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Marketshare ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that a lot of their early ball mice are almost certainly no longer in working order, the real number is likely a lot less.

      Interestingly enough, I've got an old ball mouse (was one of them "new" ones that used the PS/2 port, not a DB-9 serial port!) that took 15 years of 2-3 hours/day daily use (on a system that regularly ran a GUI, and before that, it spent a few years on a gaming system) to wear out. Eventually, the mouse button wouldn't stay down for click-and-drag mechanisms, which turned moving files via drag-and-drop into a perilous adventure.

      Failure mechanism wasn't the Logitech white plastic housing that impinged upon the switch (although there was about 0.2mm of wear there, too). Failure mechanism was that the housing had worn about an 0.3mm groove into the red plastic "trigger" for the third-party-built, but Logitech-sourced, microswitch.

      15 years of daily use. That thing must have had millions of clicks on it.

      Repairing such a mouse is hardly an economical proposition, but I'd never seen a mouse die of old age before, there was certainly an element of personal curiosity there. So, just for shits and giggles, I grabbed a $1.99 mouse of comparable vintage (and size, so it was probably a clone of the original Logitech design) out of a local surplus store and took it apart. Clone suspicions confirmed; the microswitches inside were identical to the ones in the original mouse (right down to size, position, and layout). There were some minor differences in the plastic encoder wheels, but it was basically the same mouse.

      Long story short, 5 minutes of fiddling with a desoldering pump later, the 15-year-old mouse was quite literally as good as new.

      The only other "damage" is that the little teflon/plastic skids/pads fell off years ago, probably when the glue failed. The little molded plastic ring around the former pad has been worn into something just as smooth as the pad. It glides as smoothly as the "new" mouse did, so I didn't bother replacing the pads.

      Most people retired their serial mouse for a PS/2 mouse, and their PS/2 mouse for a USB mouse, in upgrade cycles of 5-10 years. Back to your original point -- the most fascinating thing about this mouse is that most of the old mice are probably still in working order, because most of them never saw 15 years of active use.

      It took 15 years of daily use for this one to die of old age, and even then, the repair took about 10 minutes and $2.00 in generic parts (whether from a surplus mouse, or by ordering the microswitches from Digi-Key) from start to finish. It's still in use today.

      If anyone from Logitech reads this, thanks. That's some damn good engineering for what is essentially an disposable consumer device.

    3. Re:Marketshare ? by theM_xl · · Score: 1

      Easy, they're breeding like mice! :)

      *ducks*

    4. Re:Marketshare ? by G00F · · Score: 1

      You talk about the pads on the bottom of the mouse, mine usually fall out within months, and I never notice, except there is this weird little sticker thing on my desk.

      I'm a gamer, and put my mice to good use from Dooms, Warcraft1/2, Quakes, starcraft, UO, etc. Their mice lasted, I've even had a logitech mouse side rubber fall apart(disintegrate) while the rest of the mouse was still good.

      I do have issues with their drivers as huge, and refusing to work with KVM's. I also haven't been sold on USB > PS/2 for mice/keyboards.

      --
      The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
    5. Re:Marketshare ? by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

      i didnt say they were still working - besides it was a joke!

      N.

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  11. How much of everything by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

    Quite a lot of mice are logitech mice. I wonder how many PC's have ever been built, and how many mice in total, to compare logitech with the other mouse brands.

  12. how can it be rare when there is an abundance? by jonas_sten · · Score: 4, Funny

    ball bearing balls? bottlecaps? shoes? Bolts? Lesbians!

    1. Re:how can it be rare when there is an abundance? by DigitalHammer · · Score: 1

      Hot lesbians? :P

    2. Re:how can it be rare when there is an abundance? by Explodicle · · Score: 1

      ball bearing balls? bottlecaps? shoes? Bolts? Lesbians!

      If you've got an abundance of caps, send them to me so I can get that "My First Infirmary" I've had my eye on.

    3. Re:how can it be rare when there is an abundance? by powerlord · · Score: 1

      ball bearing balls? bottlecaps? shoes? Bolts? Lesbians!

      I'll believe you on the ball bearings, bottlecaps shoes and bolts, but I'm afraid I'll need to see the Lesbians to believe them.

      (just send them over and tell them to use the side entrance)

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    4. Re:how can it be rare when there is an abundance? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I can't quite figure out if you are listing euphemisms for lesbians or products produced in the billions with some random lesbian action thrown in for good measure.

    5. Re:how can it be rare when there is an abundance? by thearkitex · · Score: 1

      Lesbians have breasts, therefore they are ALWAYS related. ALWAYS.

    6. Re:how can it be rare when there is an abundance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actual number of lesbians, 5 to 10%. Number of women who claim to be lesbians because you can't handle rejection in a mature manner, 95 to 99%.

  13. Quite impressive numbers by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    One billion units in under 40 years is remarkable. Especially when considering that they weren't mass produced until the 80s!

  14. Toothpicks? by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "It's rare in human history that a billionth of anything has been shipped by one company," said Logitech's general manager Rory Dooley. "Look at any other industry and it has never happened. This is a significant milestone."

    Gum? Pencils? Paper? Soft drink? Bag of chips? Stick of RAM? Screwdriver? Television set? Surely some of these items have been sold more than a billion times by a single company...

    1. Re:Toothpicks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drinking straws? Condoms? Scotch tape? Duct tape? Toothbrush? Sewing needles? Penicillin? Drugs? I thought condoms were sold more than computer mouses. jeezes.

    2. Re:Toothpicks? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Candy corn is the only product I can think of that has been sold more than a billion times by a single company. Or did you mean that more than a billion different units of each have been sold by a single company?

    3. Re:Toothpicks? by holden+caufield · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ammunition?

      --
      I'll create an amusing sig when I have something meaningful to post.
    4. Re:Toothpicks? by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      Thank you Lewis Black.

    5. Re:Toothpicks? by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Maybe you can name a company that has sold a billion tvs?

  15. razor blades by tcyun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i believe that the razor blade manufacturers hit their billionth mark within a decade of beginning production. yes, few companies ship billions- but logitech hit billion from multiple models. razor companies from the same model blade.

    1. Re:razor blades by Jazz-Masta · · Score: 1, Insightful

      When he was referring to the fact that not many companies ship a billion of anything, he was alluding to shipping a billion of what is supposed to be a non-consumable product.

      Razor blades, paper towels, burgers, etc, are considered consumables, whereas a mouse or microprocessor isn't.

      It's easy to ship a billion burgers when people can eat three of them a day. I'm sure if I went through 3 mice a day Logitech would be shipping far more than a billion. Considering my mouse lasts longer than the usefulness of my computer itself, shipping a billion is saying something. I must have gone through 15 computers with my Fujitsu AT keyboard and Logitech PS/2 mouse. Another 3 computers with my Logitech G15 keyboard and G5 mouse.

    2. Re:razor blades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Mod parent +1 insightful. Good point.

  16. Bus mouse by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Funny

    Remember when the "bus mouse" was the cool upgrade over a crappy serial-port mouse, and you had that extra 8-bit ISA card with the funny port on it? IRQs ? I/O ports ? That was back before teenage girls took over the Internet.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Bus mouse by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Funny

      God damn it I need another 25 pin to 9 pin adaptor, AND I need a gender bender! I wish those manufacturers would standardize... oh wait

            Yeah I remember playing with jumpers and dip switches to avoid IRQ conflicts. Damn I am too old. Funnily enough, cyberspace was a lot quieter back then. The punks couldn't afford it. Looking at the present economy, they won't be able to afford it again soon.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Bus mouse by machine321 · · Score: 1

      I need a gender bender!

      Please don't mention "gender bender" in a reply to a post about teenage girls.

    3. Re:Bus mouse by powerlord · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not to mention the wonderful years of playing with your config.sys and autoexec.bat file so you could make sure all your drivers loaded right (or the bastardized add-on sound card I got for my first laptop that plugged into the parallel port with a pass-through for the printer, but drivers that needed to be loaded in DOS which squeezed the precious memory even more).

      I think it gave an inherent understanding of the hardware to people who grew up with them (and used them).

      I feel like the people who grew up repairing their cars and bemoaning how automated they have become. :)

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    4. Re:Bus mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember playing with Jumpers and Dip switches and I am only 28 years old. So, if late twenties is old then bring on retirement.

    5. Re:Bus mouse by spiderbitendeath · · Score: 1

      I'm only 26, I remember playing with jumpers and dip switches. I remember playing around with my amazing black and white logitech hand held scanner. Heck, I remember when Norton Utilities actually worked.

      --
      Sometimes when I'm working on projects things disappear, I suspect gremlins.
    6. Re:Bus mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      teenage girls on the internet? where!?!!

    7. Re:Bus mouse by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 1

      Wow, I remember my dad being obsessed with tweaking autoexec.bat and config.sys, until the day came when I heard him shout "I BEAT MEMMAKER!" After that I remember him bragging that he could beat memmaker to his engineering friends and the look on their faces when he did.

      --
      We are the Borg...
    8. Re:Bus mouse by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Remember when the "bus mouse" was the cool upgrade over a crappy serial-port mouse, and you had that extra 8-bit ISA card with the funny port on it?

      No, but I remember plugging a mouse into my Amiga 1000 in 1985 and having it Just Work. Just think of all the geek S&M fun I missed.

      Nostalgia: the Amiga mouse was not managed by the CPU. You could (and I did, on accident) move the pointer around on a system with no CPU installed.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    9. Re:Bus mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've still got a bus mouse and it's 8-bit card in a box somewhere. I think it was originally from my dad's 486. Good times.

    10. Re:Bus mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Remember*? I'm still doing that sort of thing: I spent an hour last month figuring out how to get a Hayes-compatible ISA modem to work properly under Linux 2.6.

    11. Re:Bus mouse by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      If it took you an hour, it took too long. /dev/ttyS2, IRQ5, 0x3E8

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  17. One billion what? by Roland+Piquepaille · · Score: 1

    Look at any other industry and it has never happened. This is a significant milestone.

    I know it's rah-rah time at Logitech, but come on, talk about stretching the truth : industries routinely ships billions of stuff, if said stuff is small/ubiquitous enough. Remington and other manufacturers has produced and shipped countless billions of firearm cartridges, ball bearing manufacturers have probably stopped counting a long time ago, and McDonald's is even proud to have served a billion obese-making meals.

    1. Re:One billion what? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      if said stuff is small/ubiquitous enough

      Nice qualifier there. Now what about products as complex or more complex than a mouse? How many of those have been shipped 1 billion?

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    2. Re:One billion what? by scotch · · Score: 1

      Where do you get the idea that the complexity of the product has to be comparable?  Read the quote.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    3. Re:One billion what? by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      I'm quite sure Intel has shipped more than a billion CPUs (hell, probably more than a billion in the 80x86 family alone), and that's just off the top of my head without really doing any digging. I'm sure there are examples all over the place of companies shipping more than a billion of various complex products.

      As others have pointed out, "Look at any other industry and it has never happened. This is a significant milestone." is at best a rather ill-conceived bit of hyperbole, and sounds rather much like an off the cuff statement he made without bothering to do any real research. Yes I'm sure this is an amazing achievement for Logitech, and no it's not every day that a company ships a billion of a non-trivial product (which is a distinction he didn't even bother to make), but to say it doesn't happen, and that it's never happened seems to be pure idiocy.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    4. Re:One billion what? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Of course it's off the cuff, he even contradicts himself.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    5. Re:One billion what? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Because if it isn't comparable, the comparison does not make any sense, perhaps?

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    6. Re:One billion what? by 2short · · Score: 1

      It's a gee-wiz line in a press interview, not an engineering spec. Comprehend the quote.

    7. Re:One billion what? by shawb · · Score: 1

      What? No other industry has EVER, I repeat EVER shipped one billion Logitech mice.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  18. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by jeffmeden · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's weird. Why on earth would a Mac user not simply use the supplied Apple brand mouse? Oh, right.

    Speaking to your criticism directly, I have about half a dozen Logitech mice, spanning a decade, that all work flawlessly. The only reason I have bought more since the first one 11 years ago has been to keep pace with technology (optical, wireless, 2d scroll wheel, laser, etc.)

    Then again, it's not like I use mine for grueling tasks like ejecting CDs.

  19. And still no bluetooth trackballs! by danaris · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Come on, you can make, and sell, 1 billion mice; how hard can it be to make a minor variant of the Cordless Optical TrackMan that uses Bluetooth instead of an RF dongle???

    I can't imagine the market is smaller than for some of the weird niche mice I've seen out there...

    Dan Aris

    --
    Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
    1. Re:And still no bluetooth trackballs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe bluetooth has bad latency..

    2. Re:And still no bluetooth trackballs! by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find a alot of people on slashdot have blue balls.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:And still no bluetooth trackballs! by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      ... which is why both Nintendo and Sony use it for their game controllers? Bluetooth has excellent latency, it just requires chipsets that cost more than generic RF controllers.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    4. Re:And still no bluetooth trackballs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hum ! And so what ?

    5. Re:And still no bluetooth trackballs! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Come on, you can make, and sell, 1 billion mice;

      I can.. all it takes is 2 mice, a big cage and lots of food, wood shavings and little wheels.

      those suckers reproduce so fast it's nuts. as a kid I went away for camp and came back to 12 mice. they reproduce exponentially so it get's there rather quick.

      selling is another story.. but I can make them!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:And still no bluetooth trackballs! by danomac · · Score: 1

      I'd be even happier if I could get the Cordless Optical Trackman in a corded form. The other corded trackballs they have don't even compare in comfort to this one; yet I can't get a corded version. I despise wireless keyboards and mice, is it too much to ask?

      Trackballs don't move, so why on earth do they need to be cordless? Some people say they don't like to see the cord (or something similarly stupid), but every desk I've had had a keyboard drawer big enough for a keyboard plus mouse and all the cords are hidden from sight. Feh.

  20. Douglas Engelbart 1968 mouse demo video by mj01nir · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Obligatory Douglas Engelbart mouse demo video link:
    http://sloan.stanford.edu/mousesite/1968Demo.html

    --
    the no .sig .sig
    1. Re:Douglas Engelbart 1968 mouse demo video by mj01nir · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bah. They've fiddled with the link:
      http://sloan.stanford.edu/MouseSite/1968Demo.html

      --
      the no .sig .sig
    2. Re:Douglas Engelbart 1968 mouse demo video by maxume · · Score: 5, Informative

      Clicky:

      http://sloan.stanford.edu/MouseSite/1968Demo.html

      Unless you really, really like using tags (or it isn't available...), "Plain Old Text" works pretty well.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Douglas Engelbart 1968 mouse demo video by Phaedrus420 · · Score: 0

      Whut tha hell? What's up with the slash-roll? Where do I complain?

      --
      And what is good, Phaedrus, And what is not good... Need we ask anyone to tell us these things?
  21. You are our one billionth customer! by nameendingwith · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if when they ship this one billionth mouse to a customer, they will include in the box a flashing ad telling him that he is the one billionth customer and should click here to claim his prize.

  22. Coming Soon by Spencerian · · Score: 1

    ...the Logitech Limited Edition Pied Piper.

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
  23. A billion failures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    says a lot for the quality of their mice.

  24. Yes it is true. Very rare by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Funny
    It's rare in human history that a billionth of anything has been shipped by one company,"

    Yes, a billionth of most things are microscopic in size. So shipping it is quite difficult. Great job logitec.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Yes it is true. Very rare by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Actually, shipping it is easy. Finding it again is difficult.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    2. Re:Yes it is true. Very rare by sakonofie · · Score: 1

      Really, I do it all the time. I have frequently been known to ship a billion billonths at once even. Maybe I should patent this...

    3. Re:Yes it is true. Very rare by illama · · Score: 1

      It's rare in human history that a billionth of anything has been shipped by one company,"

      Yes, a billionth of most things are microscopic in size. So shipping it is quite difficult. Great job logitec.

      More like: Great logic, logitech.

  25. Wrong, sir. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bluetooth IS just as much RF as any other way to get signals from the mouse wirelessly. You may want to do some checking on your logic.

    1. Re:Wrong, sir. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to completely misread the post. The RF is not the problem. The problem is that he wants to avoid having a dongle sticking out of his USB port, waiting to be broken off by accident.

    2. Re:Wrong, sir. by Bwian_of_Nazareth · · Score: 1

      But danaris was refering to the RF dongle where dongle is the important part, not RF. So it is not logic but reading skills that seem to be lacking these days.

    3. Re:Wrong, sir. by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      But a Bluetooth mouse is universally compatible with other Bluetooth devices whereas the RF dongle version requires a dongle and a device that is compatible with that dongle.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    4. Re:Wrong, sir. by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      If your motherboard supports it: use a USB header off the mother board and an expansion slot. Leave the USB expansion slot inside the case (secured by wire tie). Plug in dongle. We do this a lot at work for people. We have had to call Dell or HP to get the USB expansion slot a few times however.

  26. Reciprocal mice by IanCal · · Score: 1

    "It's rare in human history that a billionth of anything has been shipped by one company,"

    I doubt that, a billionth is *tiny*.

  27. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Informative

    I too am a big fan of Logitech mice. My main computer rig actually sports a Razer Diamondback these days, but my laptop mouse is Logitech, as are the mice on my workstation and server rack's KVM at work. Over the years I've had countless ones. Like you, I mostly have upgraded to keep pace with technology: moving to one with a scroll wheel, moving to an optical, moving to USB, getting a mouse with more buttons, etc.

    Like all heavy use devices I've had a few failures (I've had 2 Logitech mice wear out on me), but overall compared with other mice I've still noticed them to be of a pretty high quality. When I used to work as a tech at a college many years ago, I can't count how many Microsoft Intellimouses had a scroll wheel that was jammed where it couldn't be moved anymore.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  28. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Informative

    Because Steve Jobs only recently relented and allowed a second button on them. Before the mighty mouse, Apple mice were pretty useless creatures.

  29. I know, it's been beat to death but... by east+coast · · Score: 1

    "It's rare in human history that a billionth of anything has been shipped by one company," said Logitech's general manager Rory Dooley. "Look at any other industry and it has never happened. This is a significant milestone."

    The people at Coca Cola and Anheuser Bush are pissing themselves out of laughter right about now. Coca Cola is likely to do that in a day.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  30. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by orclevegam · · Score: 2, Informative

    Much as I'm loath to admit it, the best mouse I've ever owned was manufactured by Microsoft.

    Logitech however does place a close second. Followed even more closely by virtually every other mouse I've ever owned by any company, I mean, it's a mouse, there's not all that much you can do to set it apart from the rest of the pack. If it moves the pointer around smoothly, has at least 3 buttons and a scroll wheel, and doesn't stick it's as good as at least 90% of the mice (is that even the right term?) out there.

    --
    Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
  31. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    Wow. That was a bit over-the-top in the Snark division. I don't think the guy was WANTING to use the left-mouse button-eject function, since the mouse button was stuck. But yeah, I like the Logitech mice too.

    But seriously...posts like yours, as aggrivatingly snarky as they are, are what keep me coming back. It's fun to become agitated AND I learned an OSX function I never new about ;-)

  32. Just in time by mariuszbi · · Score: 1

    One billionth mouse just in time for the Diablo III launch. Maybe Logitech is stacking up ...

  33. Seagate was first by Racemaniac · · Score: 1
  34. like grains of sand by m0llusk · · Score: 1

    but toxic

  35. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Hemlock+Stones · · Score: 1

    I have a Logitech C7 that still works, although it did need one ball transplant.

  36. I don't like logitech mice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Or logitech products in general. Seen way too many fail. and don't even get me started on their joysticks and gamepads.. pure crap.

    I like my super generic MOUSE from walmart over anything else i've found. it costed $5. throwaway. high dpi. good shape.

    where the logitech throwaway mice are at least 25-30 dollars.

    I like my cheap plastic crap to be cheap in price as well as quality.

    1. Re:I don't like logitech mice. by jrwr00 · · Score: 1

      i think i have the same mouse, Two tone - Blue / White, with letters (mi) in a script form

      this mouse is awesome, I've had mine for 2 years now

  37. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had an Macintosh Apple once. Tried to get the optical disk in and all it managed to do was slice the apple in half. It was much less messy just plugging the mouse in.

  38. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 1

    Because Steve Jobs only recently relented and allowed a second button on them. Before the mighty mouse, Apple mice were pretty useless creatures.

    He still hasn't relented with the Mighty Mouse. It's only got one button. Sure, there's a capacitative sensor that checks to see which finger is on the mouse, but if you're resting both fingers on the mouse, you can't right-click by pressing the right side of the mouse.

  39. Congratulations, now get to work by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

    Congratulations, now get to work on delivering a better Trackball.

    My Microsoft Trackball Explorer is ten years old, and in that time I haven't once found a suitable replacement from Logitec. There are a couple really odd ones, but nothing that comes close to the natural feel of the explorer.

    I hate mice.

    1. Re:Congratulations, now get to work by Xian97 · · Score: 1

      Different strokes, I have used the Logitech Trackman Wheel for years and it is the one that feels more natural to me. I tried the Microsoft Trackball Explorer but ended up giving it away. I guess it's what you become comfortable with. I am a big advocate of trackballs in general. The last mouse I used for an extended period of time was on my Atari ST in the mid 80s. My wrist kept hurting after extended use so I started using a Wico trackball, which had a billiard sized ball, and never had the problem again.

    2. Re:Congratulations, now get to work by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Logitech trackman marble FX. best trackball ever.

      I can kill-twitch in FPS easily with it, works great for daily computing...

      They DONT make a modern replacement,,

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  40. Mice? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Whoever makes cockroaches passed the billion mark a long time ago. And using a model with very few variations, too.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:Mice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... so lawyers would be factored into that of course. Wild.

    2. Re:Mice? by FlopEJoe · · Score: 1

      Got the joke but, just so you know, wiki claims there's about 4,000 species of cockroaches. I imagine all the companies combined haven't made 4000 different mice.

    3. Re:Mice? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Dude, cockroaches don't come from factories. Do I have to explain the birds, bees, and blattaria to you?

  41. Death of the Mouse?! by Androclese · · Score: 5, Informative
    FTFA:

    But sounding the death knell for the device is Gartner analyst Steve Prentice who said "the mouse will no longer be mainstream in three to five years."

    Yeah... right... it won't be mainstream in 3-5 years... sorry, but I call BS.

    Touchscreens and facial recognition software will not replace the mouse in an office environment. It won't replace it for gaming. Hell, it won't replace it period.

    Take gaming as a simple example. When I'm playing WoW, I'm often looking elsewhere, eating a snack, drinking a beer, or talking to my wife who is sitting on the other side of the room... the last thing I'm going to want to do is stare at the screen and make funny faces at it to move the mouse. Sorry, ain't gonna happen.

    Don't get me wrong here; touch screens are a huge boon and will have a place in specialized industries; auto interfaces, shared spaces, Cell Phones, etc.

    But making the claim that it will no longer be mainstream and large companies, lets say HR Block, will drop the mouse and replace everything with a touch screen and facial recognition software is the biggest load of crap I've heard in quote a long time.

    1. Re:Death of the Mouse?! by Layth · · Score: 1

      It seems like it could be made doable.

      For example a simple toggle button on the keyboard to control if it is currently tracking your eyes or not. This way you could look all around the screen, but it would only alter your view if the toggle is on.

      I'm sure it would include more advanced user interaction than that, and I agree with you that the 3-5 years is total BS and probably only there for shock value.

      I just don't agree with your outright dismissal of other tracking technologies entirely.

    2. Re:Death of the Mouse?! by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      Do you remember the HP-150 touchscreen PC that came out in 1983? It didn't sell that well. It turned out that people got tired lifting their hand up all the time.

    3. Re:Death of the Mouse?! by cowscows · · Score: 1

      That other input stuff is certainly coming, it's just not going to displace the mouse/keyboard, it's going to be included along side them, and create new capabilities for computers.

      Ten years from now, I'd expect the majority of monitors to have touch-screen capabilities built in. But for desktop use, 95% of the time those touchscreens will be ignored, because it's not efficient to use a touchscreen for a large portion of what computers are used for. Even if you mounted the screen into the desk in a way where I don't have to hold my arm up and out to use it, there's still efficiencies inherent to the mouse. The way mouse tracking/acceleration works, I can move the cursor clear across the screen while only having to move my hand/mouse an inch or so. The tip of the arrow cursor is much more precise than my fingertip. And I've also got a few buttons and a scroll wheel that I can easily operate, even while moving my hand.

      A keyboard allows for so many different inputs that it's hard to imagine replacing it with an equal number of hand movements or face gestures or voice commands. And that's ignoring the fact that things like voice commands or gestures become problematic when the user is in an environment containing other people.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

  42. I knew that. by Samschnooks · · Score: 2, Informative
    Go to any landfill and you'll see plenty of mice.

    I hope there will be a headline where computer equipment manufacturers are recycling this shit.

  43. Re:One billionth? Ha, that's nothing by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

    A single counter-example doesn't contest his statement about rarity at all.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  44. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Sechr+Nibw · · Score: 1

    That's not actually how the mighty mouse works. It's a single piece of plastic for the two buttons, yes, but there are two independent buttons inside that register the clicks. I've had to take mine apart to clean off the scroll ball.

  45. My logitech does more by Layth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Got a new logitech mouse recently. New to me anyway, it's a G5

    Has 2 buttons on it to increase or decrease the mouse sensitivity in real time. I don't play many games these days, but I could see that being very useful for first person shooters.. zoom in with a sniper rifle.. decrease mouse sensitivity at the press of a button ..etc

    Also the mouse has a weight cartridge with adjustable weight, so each user can adjust the physical feel of the mouse to their liking.

    Plus it's laser and my old optical one sucked.

    1. Re:My logitech does more by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      Try the Sidewinder X5, I upgraded to it from a G5. The shape of the X5 fits my hand much better than the G5 ever did, and the weight cartridge in the X5 is heavier as well. Other than the added weight and better shape, the X5 is nearly identical to the G5. Also, if you're interested in a wireless rechargeable mouse the Sidewinder X8 which is a wireless version of the X5 will be coming out in I believe February 2009, although to incorporate the wireless hardware they had to remove the weight package which may be a deal breaker for me (I like a heavy mouse).

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
  46. Re:One billionth? Ha, that's nothing by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

    "A single counter-example doesn't contest his statement about rarity at all."

    Ok, how about Coke? Pepsi? Two quick ones just off the top of my head.

  47. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

    I love their wired mice/keyboards. The mx518 is one of the most useful I/O devices I've ever had short of a keyboard.

    However, I've had horrible luck with their wireless products, usually only lasting about a year to a year and a half if they've been very carefully taken care of.

    I abuse the wired products to no end, and they JUST WON'T DIE. Put them in backpacks, toss them around, leave them somewhere in storage where stuff falls/sits on them. I've not tried hydrous immersion yet, but I don't think they'd survive that.

    Wait, my mom killed a keyboard on the computer I built for her a while ago. It took three cans of Pepsi and two cups of coffee over the course of 6 months.

    So, yeah, I like Logitech's wired stuff.

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  48. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup! And don't let us forget it - even Microsoft also can get something right. Not too often, not too complex, and with a lot of trumpet blowing - but, nevertheless, they end up getting something right. Not often, but it happens.
    Smile - you are having a good day. Don't spoil it !

  49. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by egomaniac · · Score: 3, Informative

    You are incorrect. The click detection is indeed done by detecting the capacitance of your fingers. I accept that there may be more than one physical microswitch inside the device, but that has nothing to do with left/right-click determination. The only thing that matters is whether your finger is resting on the left half of the device or not.

    --
    ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
  50. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd have a lot more respect for Logitech products if their QA and Support Managers would actually give a shit about resolving hardware/engineering flaws in their products, specifically mice, that have existed for years.

  51. who cares... by nimbius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    back in my day when we advertised a product like logitech(c) brand mice we used banners.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  52. Nokia has made a billion phones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nokia has made a billion phones.
    http://www.nokia.com/A4303016

  53. Re:One billionth? Ha, that's nothing by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

    Ok, how about Coke? Pepsi? Two quick ones just off the top of my head.

    Intel? I would also imagine quite a few products made by P&G as well as Colgate-Palmolive. Diapers and razor blades immediately come to mind.

  54. Re:One billionth? Ha, that's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So McDonald's ships and manufactures all their food now?

    There's a difference between service and retail.

  55. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by ivoras · · Score: 1

    Speaking to your criticism directly, I have about half a dozen Logitech mice, spanning a decade, that all work flawlessly. The only reason I have bought more since the first one 11 years ago has been to keep pace with technology (optical, wireless, 2d scroll wheel, laser, etc.)

    I think that's about right - you replaced your mouse every 1.5-2 years on average. Not exactly a typical interval for the rest of the IT hardware industry.

    --
    -- Sig down
  56. Re:One billionth? Ha, that's nothing by machine321 · · Score: 3, Funny

    No, he meant no other industry has shipped a billion mice.

  57. QC troubles? by subtraho · · Score: 1

    I've been a fan of Logitech for years, but the last two mice I've gotten from them (both the VX Revolution model - awesome mice, when they work anyway) have died in exactly the same way, within a couple months of each other. Makes me wonder if their QC has been slipping of late.

    --
    -subtraho
    1. Re:QC troubles? by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, the left button "doubleclicks" instead of single clicks sometimes?
      I've had mine replaced in the last 2 weeks after +/- 1 year of use.
      Their service department is great, but the quality of those micro switches have gone downhill :(

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
  58. How about... by TheLink · · Score: 1

    How about stuff like zippers? YKK makes a lot of them per year.

    I sure hope the zippers on my clothes are long term products, would be a problem otherwise :).

    Same goes for stuff like screws, nails, nuts, bolts etc.

    --
    1. Re:How about... by HoppyChris · · Score: 1

      There are about 15 billion zippers made per year and ykk makes well over 10% of them, so yeah, they've made more than a billion this year. It's a good analogy, too. Neither mice nor zippers do much on their own, but make other things work much better.

  59. "2.4GHz" vs. Bluetooth by DrYak · · Score: 1

    No, you're wrong :

    Bluetooth IS just as much RF

    Bluetooth is A form of RF. Among others.
    Most Logitech products come into 2 flavours :
    - either they use Bluetooth, in which case any Bluetooth enabled computer running a "BT-HID" aware OS can use them out-of-the box.
    - OR they use what Logitech calls "Wireless 2.4GHz" which, although using the same frequency, is an entirely different beast : it's a form of wireless usb designed by Cypress. As this standard isn't widespread at all, it requires using a special-purpose RF dongle (which usually plugs into an USB port)

    The parent was complaining that, apparently, where he lives, Bluetooth peripherals are rarer, which forces him to buy the other kind. That in turn forces him to always block 1 free USB port because of the RF dongle, and on some machine free USB port are a limited resources (subnotebooks, netbooks, or older laptops) or are inconvenient (with the exception of the mini-receiver, all other RF receiver are long and significantly stick out of the case requiring removal before putting a laptop in a bag - whereas nowadays Bluetooth is built-in).

    This situation is going to change soon as Bluetooth 3.0 is incorporating a different form of wireless USB : UWB.

    If Logitech needs that much wireless usb for the mice, they could switch to UWB and thus not require a cumbersome RF dongle if the laptop supports Bluetooth 3.0

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  60. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

    Much as I'm loath to admit it, the best mouse I've ever owned was manufactured by Microsoft.

    Doesn't Logitech actually make the Microsoft-branded mice for them, though? I mean, yes, it's Microsoft-designed and branded, but I thought manufacturing was done by Logitech (or so I've heard).

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  61. Re:One billionth? Ha, that's nothing by ConanG · · Score: 4, Funny

    McDonald's has probably shipped a billion mice, too.

  62. Not to be celebrated by Stiletto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wouldn't call this an event worthy of celebration. These billion mice (along with the billions of other plastic mass-produced products out there) will one day end up in a landfill somewhere, and will take hundreds of years to break down. The major consequence of mass-production is mass-consumption, and the drawback of mass-consumption is mass-disposal.

    I find it a bit sad that a device which, essentially, hasn't changed in 20 years isn't re-used more often. I have 10 year old keyboards and mice I still use.

    I guess it's just part of our "throw away, buy a new one" culture that seems to ignore what happens to things once they're in the bin. Out of sight, out of mind.

    1. Re:Not to be celebrated by mnslinky · · Score: 1

      While a bit off-topic for this thread, there is a bit of truth to what you're saying. I seldom subscribe to the 'hippy,' 'tree-hugger,' mentality, but I am on board with solid consumer products. I miss the way things were when I was younger, where you could buy something and expect it to last. Things weren't purchased with the idea, before-hand, that it would soon be replaced. This holds true in our current economy for everything from paper cups to automobiles.

      I've got a truck that's 11 years old. Sure, it's not new, and there are some problems with it, but I pay less in six month's of insurance that one month on a new vehicle with the same coverage. I don't make car payments. It still gets me to work every day.

      It is my hope, with the recession we're in, folks will learn to 'reduce, reuse, recycle' once again.

    2. Re:Not to be celebrated by TheSync · · Score: 1

      These billion mice (along with the billions of other plastic mass-produced products out there) will one day end up in a landfill somewhere, and will take hundreds of years to break down.

      They probably will never break down. Most landfills are anoxic and try to avoid break down (since it results in dangerous and greenhouse-causing methane gas).

      Of course, we have plenty of landfill space, so there really is no problem, it is a tradeoff of having useful technology to improve humanity (development of new drugs, playing cool video games).

    3. Re:Not to be celebrated by molo · · Score: 3, Informative

      While I do agree that mass-disposal is wasteful, the mouse has changed significantly in the last 20 years:

      1. computer interface: RS-232, PS/2, USB
      2. number of buttons
      3. scroll wheel
      4. mechanism: ball mouse with moving parts that wear out, optical mouse with special grid mousepad, modern optical mouse
      5. wireless mice: IR, RF, Bluetooth

      So its not like there hasn't been reasons to upgrade.

      -molo

      --
      Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    4. Re:Not to be celebrated by dedazo · · Score: 1

      What I find interesting about the story of PC input devices is that the trackball was never really advanced as a better alternative to mice.

      How many millions of cases of RSI (and often, associated medical costs) could have been prevented simply by using a trackball, which you work only with a few fingers instead of your arm and wrist.

      I've been using trackballs since Kensington came up with the classic "expert" (the one on the left here, for those that don't remember).

      Nowadays I use an old Trackman Marble FX at home. Unfortunately it's not made anymore, and it doesn't have a scroll wheel, which is pretty much its only drawback (if you have one of those in the box you can hoist it on eBay for $400, they're that sought after) as well as a newer Logitech Marble Mouse, which unfortunately also does not have a scroll wheel. I avoid TBs that have to worked with the thumb, because they're less precise.

      A few years ago I was hoping Logitech would come up with a revised TrackMan, but instead they committed the idiocy of releasing the most stupid product concept of all time: a cordless trackball. Sigh.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    5. Re:Not to be celebrated by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I find it a bit sad that a device which, essentially, hasn't changed in 20 years isn't re-used more often.

      You know this why? I'm using a several-year-old Microsoft trackball and Model M keyboard on a three-month-old Dell Vostro.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    6. Re:Not to be celebrated by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      There are a few problems with trying to keep input devices around for forever. The first problem is that input devices get a lot of handling and wear out (except for IBM Model M keyboards, which seem to last forever.) The mice I've used have generally lasted four to seven years before their keypress switches wore out, the ball rotational sensors broke, or other physical parts wore out rendering the unit inoperable. The second is that computers keep getting newer I/O interfaces and dropping older ones, making it a pain in the butt or impossible to attach old hardware. How many new computers have an RS-232 serial port any more? How many have a PS/2 port, let alone a full DIN AT mouse or keyboard port? Sure, you can get adapters, but those tend to be a little hit-and-miss compared to onboard hardware controllers for those ports.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    7. Re:Not to be celebrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us actually like scroll wheels and optical mice.

    8. Re:Not to be celebrated by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

      The first problem is that input devices get a lot of handling and wear out (except for IBM Model M keyboards, which seem to last forever.)

      I thought this was the GP's point - older keyboards, especially, were big, heavy... and lasted forever. Most companies don't make them like that anymore, because it's expensive, and if their major industry is peripherals, they'd put themselves out of business. The fact that older, reliable items like the Model M can't be used without some kind of adaptor is irritating - virtually every tower is going to have a keyboard plugged into it, so why not have a dedicated port for it?

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    9. Re:Not to be celebrated by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Oh really?

      I've got an old Logitech PS/2 ball mouse you can have. It works great on the still-useful 486s and the like, but doesn't work that well for things which need a higher resolution.

      Oh wait, that packaging material and the gas to get it to you would cost money, too, wouldn't it?

      Oh well, I could still keep it. But wait: then I'd have to get a larger house ($$$) to keep all my stuff, which would cost more for heating and cooling due to the size..

      Throwing things out that you no longer need and can find no suitable alternate use for (such as another person) is the ecologically responsible thing to do. Putting it underground to make better use of other existing resources instead of keeping it above ground, where it will get in the way, is a no brainer.

      I'm all for making things last, and for making use of what you've got (even when it's not the originally intended use) but guess what? We live in a maleable world with things which break down and decay. Things lose their relative utility as newer, more effective things become available for the same tasks (what, you didn't know that farmers don't use their great-grandaddy's horse-drawn plow or grandaddy's John Deere to plow their fields?).

      It's the way of life - it has been for every society in history, and always will be. If you don't believe me, go look for flint knappings and arrow heads and tell me they weren't disposed of or thrown out when something newer/better came along.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  63. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

    Weren't those mice made by Logitech too?

    --
    This is the sig that says NI (again)
  64. You all fail at geek... by Bonteaux-le-Kun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, McDonalds, screws, whatever, you got those... But you forgot:

    "Annual production of Lego bricks averages approximately 20 billion per year"

  65. Re:One billionth? Ha, that's nothing by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

    Live food provisioning for captive predators ?

    --
    What a depressingly stupid machine.
  66. plenty of ways to differentiate it by TheLink · · Score: 1

    There is something that optical mice could do better.

    I've noticed that for some optical mice, if you move them very fast, their sampling or something is not fast enough so the mouse makes a blind guess on the direction and magnitude of the move.

    This is bad for some games...

    The usual "ball" mice seem to better able to keep up.

    The other thing would be latency. My guess is wireless mice are more likely to have higher latency than wired mice since they have to encode/modulate stuff to RF/IR and then decode/demodulate.

    A few milliseconds here and there and it could add up to something significant.

    What I don't like about the ball mice is they tend to accumulate gunk in the rollers.

    --
    1. Re:plenty of ways to differentiate it by tylerni7 · · Score: 1

      I have the Logitech G7 wireless mouse.
      It's designed for gaming, so it's not quite the same as a normal wireless mouse, but the performance is great (it also has two Lithium Ion battery packs because it goes through them so quickly...)
      I can move the mouse as fast as I can on almost any surface and it doesn't lose track of how I am moving it, and even though it's wireless, I haven't noticed any latency problems at all.

      I don't have any numbers, just anecdotal evidence, but maybe you're just buying really cheap mice? or maybe they just don't bother fixing stuff like that unless they have to, so they can market the mice to gamers and charge more money for it...

    2. Re:plenty of ways to differentiate it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Skipping hasn't been a problem in years, unless you're still using a early generation (or cheap) optical, or have a really crappy (reflective?) mouse surface. I've had my Logitech MX300 since 2002 and it doesn't skip.

    3. Re:plenty of ways to differentiate it by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      "The other thing would be latency. My guess is wireless mice are more likely to have higher latency than wired mice since they have to encode/modulate stuff to RF/IR and then decode/demodulate.

      A few milliseconds here and there and it could add up to something significant.
      "

      Actually this isn't what's happening. You've actually witnessed the problem yourself earlier in your post.

      "I've noticed that for some optical mice, if you move them very fast, their sampling or something is not fast enough so the mouse makes a blind guess on the direction and magnitude of the move.
      "

      The old wireless mice faced a power consumption vs. performance problem. If they sampled fast enough to keep up, then the batteries are bled dry very quickly. Thus, they turned down the sample rate on those older wireless mice so they were incredibly unresponsive and inaccurate since they did not sample fast enough to keep up with hand movements even at basic desktop-use speeds (I've had one of these trashy wireless mice myself)

      However, newer mice like the MX Revolution or the G7 mentioned by the other poster use the other approach, higher performance and lower battery life. These mice now have rechargeable lithium batteries and dock stations so it remains a viable product despite fast battery drain. The G7 is for very high performance, and actually comes with 2 batteries for swapping since it drains the power so quickly. The end result however is that both function at the same speed as wired mice, the wireless G7 is identical to the wired G5.

      It should be noted that wireless mice must still combat interference while wired mice do not. So a wireless mouse will perform just as well, but there is the potential for the occasional hiccup from interference in an otherwise smooth experience. This can be costly for gamers and is why it's still better to seek out a wired mouse for games.

    4. Re:plenty of ways to differentiate it by TheLink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The G7 is also rather expensive IMO.

      So to answer the OP's: "there's not all that much you can do to set it apart from the rest of the pack"

      Something like the G7 but a lot cheaper would set it apart.

      Being a wired mouse is fine. The wires don't bother me much, expensive does bother me :).

      --
    5. Re:plenty of ways to differentiate it by genner · · Score: 1

      There is something that optical mice could do better. I've noticed that for some optical mice, if you move them very fast, their sampling or something is not fast enough so the mouse makes a blind guess on the direction and magnitude of the move. This is bad for some games... The usual "ball" mice seem to better able to keep up.

      You need a good gaming mouse to prevent that. The Razor Diamondback can keep up with super human wrist speeds and it's optical.

  67. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by tmalone · · Score: 1

    Hmm, my own experience has been different. I've owned two logitech mouse like devices, both of them have been great. The first was a logitech marbleman that I bought like 11 years ago. It finally kicked the bucket a few months ago. Now I have one of those bluetooth laser mice. It seems good so far.

  68. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

    I have a Compaq optical mouse I bought in Radioshack. I think it's 8 years old. Two buttons and a scroll wheel.

    Occasionally when I boot my computer I have to unplug and plug in my mouse to get it to work, but other than that it's survived 8 years of heavy use. I can't think of anything I've owned that's survived 8 years of heavy use and worked this well.

  69. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by K'Lyre · · Score: 2, Funny

    Funny. So did my uncle.

  70. Re:One billionth? Ha, that's nothing by DaFallus · · Score: 1

    A little off topic I guess, but McDonald's wasn't the first to hit 1 billion burgers either. I'm pretty sure White Castle hit 1 billion back in 1961.

    --
    No one cares what your captcha was

    Houston TX, USA
  71. The Haptic mouse. by Ostracus · · Score: 1
    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  72. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Much as I'm loath to admit it, the best mouse I've ever owned was manufactured by Microsoft. Logitech however does place a close second. Followed even more closely by virtually every other mouse I've ever owned by any company, I mean, it's a mouse, there's not all that much you can do to set it apart from the rest of the pack. If it moves the pointer around smoothly, has at least 3 buttons and a scroll wheel, and doesn't stick it's as good as at least 90% of the mice (is that even the right term?) out there.

    I bought my Microsoft Trackball optical when logitech stopped making the trackball i liked, and I have never looked back. The software was great (programmable "program dependant" buttons with macros) (If you stuck to the version 4.1) I even bought 5 of them from Microcenter when I learned they were being discontinued.
    I still have 4 new in the box, and I see they are going for about $150 on ebay now.

    The one I am using right now is... 4 years old I think.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
  73. A billion of anything? by thisisauniqueid · · Score: 1

    Other companies haven't shipped a billion of anything? What about paperclips? Sheets of paper? Ballpoint pens? Resistors? I'm sure it happens all the time...

  74. Lot's of companies ship 'billionth' products... by mnslinky · · Score: 1

    "Look at any other industry and it has never happened. This is a significant milestone."

    While I don't have exact numbers (or any), but I'm sure there are other companies, in other industries, that have shipped a billion of somethings. The 'gotcha' is that Logitech didn't ship 1Bn of a single model of mouse. They generalized and lumped all their mice together. As such, what about the Federal Reserve? I'm sure they've shipped 1Bn+ dollar bills in their time. What about screw/bolt manufacturers? About about lumber mills, when you consider linear feet? Paper mills? I'm sure they've shipped well over 1Bn pieces of paper. The list goes on...

  75. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd imagine that the manufacturing in all cases is done by Wun Hung Lo Light Industry and Pre-Used Organs Conglomerate in China. Branding is largely superficial.

    As an aside though, the Microsoft Explorer Trackball was a Microsoft custom job that Logitech have never produced a direct competitor for. I mention this because, being Microsoft, they killed it off despite its popularity in its niche. Used examples are now selling for $250 and rising on eBay, and there's even a market for cleaning kits and maintenance marketed specifically at this device; I doubt we'll ever see any particular Logitech branded pointing device being missed as much.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  76. Re:One billionth? Ha, that's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at any other industry and it has never happened.

    I think you need to look up what "never" means. A single counter example does in fact counter his statement about rarity.

  77. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Hellahulla · · Score: 1

    I still have an old Logitech ball mouse. Have no idea how long I've had it for, but it must be a while.
    In fact, my keyboard and mouse have outlived everything else I have had.

  78. Re:One billionth? Ha, that's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A single counter-example doesn't contest his statement about rarity at all.

    • Coke
    • Colgate
    • Miller
    • Budweiser
    • Pepsi
    • M&M
    • Levi's
    • Newspapers
    • Magazines
    • Book Publishers
    • Oil
    • Cleaners
    • Scott Tissue
    • Kleenex
    • Gillette
    • etc.
    • etc.
    • etc.
  79. Logitech problems by AlpineR · · Score: 1

    I was a fan of Logitech until I realized that one of their bluetooth mice was the source of many woes on my Powerbook G4. One, it came with crappy drivers that made the machine lock up when it went to sleep while the mouse was on. Two, the bluetooth mouse had movement lag compared to wired mice.

    I fixed both those problems by switching to a Kensington bluetooth mouse. I'm not wild about its design (buttons stop short of top end, annoying side-click mouse wheel, battery eject button right where my thumb and pinky grip the sides). But at least it doesn't choke Mac OS X.

  80. Re:One billionth? Ha, that's nothing by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

    So McDonald's ships and manufactures all their food now?

    You don't think your local McDonald's runs down to the grocery store for hamburgers and buns, do you?

  81. Logitech has nothing... by kaizendojo · · Score: 1

    .. on Mickey and Minnie; I'm sure they surpassed making a billion mice years ago. (You know they wepwoduce like wabbits, wight?)

  82. What are we going to do tonight, Brain? by hcdejong · · Score: 3, Funny

    Same thing we do very night, Pinky: try to take over the world! You see, I have commissioned a company by the name of Logitech to deliver ONE BILLION mice, an army large enough to overwhelm any defence system known to man.
    [ding dong]
    Ah, that will be my delivery. Soon, Pinky, the world will be ours for the taking.

    ...

    Crikey, Brain, these mice are kind of odd. Why are their tails so long, and what is this hard shell [toc] all around them?

  83. Re:One billionth? Ha, that's nothing by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

    Trojan
    Durex

  84. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by orclevegam · · Score: 1

    They probably make some, or even most, but I'm fairly certain the one I have (Sidewinder X5) is not manufactured by Logitech.

    --
    Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
  85. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by brianosaurus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Holy crap you're right! My parents have a Mighty Mouse on their iMac. I've been trying to right click with it for 2 weeks, with no luck, and its been driving me nuts. I just went upstairs and tried by lifting my index finger when I clicked, and voila: context menu! My reaction: "stupidest mouse ever."

    This has to be the worst human interface design ever. This goes way beyond non-intuitive and is in face counter-intuitive. Why should I have to lift one finger to press with another? Point-and-click is now point-lift-and-click? Its going to take forever to explain this to my mom!

    Seriously, who comes up with this crap? And how does it ever get past the testing stages? Does Apple deliberately retard their accessories in order to support a strong third party market?

    I wish Apple would stop sacrificing function for obscure coolness. "Check it out, my Apple mouse can tell where my fingers are! Sure its a pain in the ass to use it, but IT CAN TELL WHERE MY FINGERS ARE!!!"

    "Yeah? Well my Logitech mouse works right." Suck it, Steve.

    --
    blog
  86. Logitch... mmm.... by enigmastrat · · Score: 1

    The Logitech G5 Laser Gaming mouse may not be able to bear my children, but it will raise them.

    I'm pretty sure Logitech has brainwashed me. My wife's computer has a Logitch DiNovo Mouse/keyboard setup, I've got the G5, and my laptop has a logitech ball mouse. The other day, I woke up with a headache, couldn't remember the night before and I had a fresh Logitech symbol tattoo on my forehead.

    --
    Logic is flawed
    1. Re:Logitch... mmm.... by enigmastrat · · Score: 1

      Woops... heh. Logitch: What you get when you use your mouse... ehem... inappropriately.

      --
      Logic is flawed
  87. How many transistors? by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

    Forget CPU's. How many transistors has Intel shipped? It's probably on the order of billions per minute now days.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  88. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by FlopEJoe · · Score: 1

    I have a huge box full of mice due to looking for the perfect one for gaming that. Picked up the Logitech G9 on sale six months ago and it's about the best I've tried so far. Wish I would have gotten another one.

  89. Re:One billionth? Ha, that's nothing by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't think consumables can be fairly included in this topic. You could talk about bottles of milk, cans of oil, etc. All of those get consumed. I think the difference is that this is a nonconsumable, like a car or an air conditioner.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  90. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

    Much as I'm loath to admit it, the best mouse I've ever owned was manufactured by Microsoft.

    I'd have to agree.
    Their "IntelliMouse® Optical" (5 button version) is one of the most popular computer mice ever, to the point that they brought it back after trying to cancel it in favour of newer mice, and still sell it now. Popular with gamers because it has extra buttons and is very sensitive. It's ambidextrous. It just lasts forever. And it's dirt cheap.
    I have one that is five years old, and except for the scroll wheel needing cleaning out it still works like new.
    I also have a several-year-old updated version, the "IntelliMouse Explorer 3.0", which aside from being dark coloured and having both extra buttons on the left, is much the same.

    Just don't get a wireless mouse for normal computer use, the novelty quickly wears off.

  91. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've not tried hydrous immersion yet, but I don't think they'd survive that.

    I'll bet they would, if you let them dry out first. Before I donated an old computer a while ago I washed the keyboard off in the sink (no soap obviously) because I was embarrassed at thickness of the Dorito grime on the keys. Gave it a few days to dry, and it worked like new.

  92. Yeah! by The_Dougster · · Score: 1

    I've had scores of mice over the years. I've had them plug up with fibers, get beer spilled in them, have the buttons stop working, worn out the wheels, you name it. The Logitech ones always die hard, and the $20 USB wired optical wheel mice are great. It usually takes spilling something into them to wipe them out. As a gamer, I've clicked many a more expensive mouse into the trash bin in as short as a few months. Logitech makes fine products!

    --
    Clickety Click ...
  93. How about a trillion? by mikeboone · · Score: 1

    A company nearby recently produced its (estimated) trillionth gel capsule.

  94. My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft ball mice were my favorite up until 3 years ago or so. For me nothing could touch them for gaming. I don't know why people think a ball mouse won't last very long. I'm still using all of mine and they are close to 10 years old (good old ball Intellimouse). They do require more maintenance than an optical mouse though.

    With that said, 3 years ago I switched to a Logitech MX518 optical on my primary computer and it has been bulletproof. Pretty good for gaming I guess but I don't play games like I used to before I got this mouse (competition level stuff).

  95. I remember when Logitech was a new company... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...unless I'm on drugs (or getting old & decrepit), but didn't Logitech started as the maker of a Modula-2 compiler running on VAX?

    I don't remember when I saw my first *hardware* product labeled 'Logitech' nor what it was exactly. Was it a mouse, or could it have been speakers, or what? /ac

    p.s.: Taco, if you are reading this, I really hate the way /. looks on anything that is not MSIE 6 (Lynx does not count). This fancy-schmancy side-bar '25 comments / 23 full / 2 abbreviated / 0 hidden / 157 more ...' and the layout that goes with it is supremely dysfunctional IMHO. Please put a *VISIBLE* switch to have a 'MSIE6' mode so that /. can look the way ${deity} intended it to. I hate having to open MSIE to be able read & post on /. instead of FFox (or Konqueror or...).

  96. Millard Fillmore? Please explain by Bayoudegradeable · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why the Milliard (sic) Fillmore tag? What does the 13th president have to do with this. Sorry for my noob question...

    --
    Sig Registration Form 34c_766(a) submitted to Ministry of Signature Management. Approval pending.
    1. Re:Millard Fillmore? Please explain by Punk+CPA · · Score: 1

      Google makes a fine product. Here is what it came up with: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milliard It is the French term for "billion." Apparently, it's common in other languages. A little macaronic pun.

    2. Re:Millard Fillmore? Please explain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's a joke.

      As far as I'd guess, someone tagged the story with "milliard" to indicate that this is only a billion on the short scale (i.e., a milliard on the long scale; some people prefer that term for its unambiguity). I'd further guess that some jokster then tagged the story with "milliardfillmore" as a cheap pun on the word "milliard", jokingly insinuating that the "milliard" tag was supposed to refer to Fillmore as well and that it had just been misspelt. In other words, it's likely a lame joke.e

      I'm just guessing, but this is the best I can come up with.

    3. Re:Millard Fillmore? Please explain by ojintoad · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milliard is what it is. Not a noob question. And if you hadn't asked, I wouldn't have found this sweet item to give to my grandpa: http://www.amazon.com/Millard-Fillmore-Mouse-Pad/dp/B0013E3QB2

  97. Give credit to Logitech... by grumpyman · · Score: 1

    ... in comparison with Microsoft, I believe they still haven't shipped their 1 billion-th service pack yet, but they're catching up real quick!!!

  98. drivers by Jenovaside · · Score: 1

    1 billion mice, why cant they make drivers that don't suck?

    1. Re:drivers by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      IIRC the logitech drivers for DOS were actually pretty good.

      I don't know why they'd suck under Linux, in MS mode the protocol only changes button numbers and stuff. Should be easy to come up with a good Linux driver for it.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  99. TrackMan Marble FX TracBall by P-38Jbird · · Score: 1

    Best ever IMHO. I haven't used anything else since 199? Great for FPS. I've tried about every other trackball made and they suck in comparison. I hates mices to pieces.
    I have one at the office, and one on each of my 2 home computers. I have 1 dead one for spare parts, and 3 backups that I got off eBay for too dang much. Haven't had to use them, cause these things are still going strong. Superior construction. I which they would make these again. They had a similar wireless version, but it didn't feel right.

  100. One thing most of us here have: by jitterman · · Score: 1

    LEGO bricks!

    --
    For conscience is the wound, and there's naught to staunch it
  101. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by nabsltd · · Score: 1

    I don't use particularly old mice because I keep upgrading for features, but my everyday computer keyboard is over 15 years old: Northgate Omnikey Ultra

    Most of the older mice still work fine, but are in the parts bin in case I need a quick replacement.

  102. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by prestomation · · Score: 1

    I agree, I've been using a MS Intellimouse optical 5 button(plus the wheel) foreeevver.

    It's not going anywhere

  103. Is it just me or... by LatencyKills · · Score: 1

    Does on billion mice indicate that something on the order of one billion computers must have been sold (though admittedly not from any given vendor)? More than that even because there are other mice manufacturers out there, and not every computer comes with a mouse (laptops have the touch pad, for example).

    --
    Jealously hoarding mod points since 2007.
  104. So when are they going to fix their software? by Thaelon · · Score: 1

    Logitech mice have always been alright, but their drivers are terrible and the software is obnoxious, bloated, ugly, difficult to use, and extremely terrible.

    Not to mention I'm sick and tired of the middle mouse button being so hard to click and the notches being so easy to roll over that 50% of the time I roll the mouse when I mean to click it. Every mouse of theirs I've tried has this issue. I vastly prefer my razer diamondbacks, but support for those in linux is even worse.

    The only reason I have a Logitech mouse at work is because using my razer diamondback is non-feasible in linux due to no drivers and it being way too sensitive. X's mouse settings are designed to make slow mice accelerate, there's no good way to make a too-fast-mouse slow down that works worth a damn. But good luck finding an 800 DPI mouse these days, especially since that's not a specification element most manufacturers even list.

    --

    Question everything

  105. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by robthebloke · · Score: 1

    Which does make me wonder - how many of those logitech mice are now in a landfill site along with the billions of AOL CD's sent out in the nineties?

  106. Um, Cellphones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see, if we want to just pick technology, Nokia shipped its billionth phone in 2005 and ships several hundred million phones a year now, meaning they've probably done this at least twice now, if not three times.

    Yea, this is rare in human history, indeed.

  107. forget transistors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many electrons have they shipped?

  108. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by robthebloke · · Score: 4, Funny

    In fairness, they've improved it a lot for the mighty mouse 2. All you need to do for a right click, is to point your mouse at the screen, and slap your forehead with your left hand until the context menu appears.

  109. Re:Any othetr industry?? ok, maybe a few. by HoppyChris · · Score: 1

    Zippo lighters have only sold about 500 million.
    As of 2005 Nokia has sold more than a billion phones.

  110. Re:One billionth? Ha, that's nothing by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    No, he meant no other industry has shipped a billion mice.

    Snake snack suppliers?

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  111. Sounds great, but... by danaris · · Score: 1

    How do you deal with the unsightly bulge the 3"x3"x1" dongle leaves in your laptop's case? ;-)

    If I had a desktop, I wouldn't care: I'd just leave it plugged into the back of the tower, or to the hub.

    The point is, I don't want to have to get out the dongle, plug it into my laptop, have to worry about carrying the dongle when I move my laptop from place to place, then unplug the dongle and put it back in the bag every single day.

    Ideally, it could pair with multiple computers, too, so I could use it on my home laptop *and* my work laptop (the trackball is mine).

    Dan Aris

    --
    Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
  112. 5 years is short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mice replaced joysticks because they have increased precision and speed. Using a joystick to move a pointer is slow and error prone, but the mouse software can apply acceleration curves to make mouse operations quick and easy.

    Touch pads can also have acceleration curves applied, and this has allowed them to replace mice in most laptops. However, no acceleration curve can be applied to touch screens.

    Mouse gestures have been available in browsers for quite a while and are generally not used. The problem is that the gesture takes a unit of time and can't be done in parallel like pressing keys can be. For most things, a keyboard combination like Alt-F4 or Ctrl-Tab is easier than a mouse gesture, and keyboards will always be there.

    Touch screens are most useful where keyboards are too cumbersome to be used; otherwise, judicious use of the keyboard is generally better. In portable devices with touch-screen keyboards, gestures arguably have their place, but they would need to be standardized and perform necessary tasks to be worth while. Otherwise, people will just ignore them.

    And lastly, how much changes in 5 years? Iraq was invaded in 2003, it's not yet sorted out. We had Athlon's and P4's, AGP was being replaced by PCI-e. We already had LCD screens. 5 years is pretty short.

  113. Sir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are a LAZ douche. Get it. I am too lazy to bother spelling it correctly just as you are too lazy to plug in a frelling dongle. Give a dog a frickin' bone here.

    LAZY. Spell it with me. L-A-Z.

  114. Why does Logitech Dominate by fm6 · · Score: 1

    You know, I always seem to end up buying Logitech mice. I'm not brand-conscious, and I only want the most basic features (if you consider a scroll wheel and optical tracking "basic"). You'd expect such an item to be a beige commodity by now, but whenever I need a new mouse, the cheapest one in the store that looks like it would fit in my hand is always a Logitech.

  115. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Endo13 · · Score: 1

    Oh really?

    http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/mice_pointers/trackballs/devices/189&cl=us,en
    http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/mice_pointers/trackballs/devices/156&cl=us,en

    Not that it matters - finger-operated trackballs suck anyway, because you have to pick up your thumb and other fingers off the buttons to roll the ball. Which means every time you need to click, it takes that extra split-second or so to find the damn buttons again.

    Thumb-operated trackballs are much better, but apparently they're too much of a niche product to release a new model of, seeing as how the last one produced by either Logitech or Microsoft first came out about 7 years ago.

    --
    There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
  116. Re:Any othetr industry?? ok, maybe a few. by Phaedrus420 · · Score: 0

    Zippo was my first thought. Too bad for their planned non-obsolescence...

    Certainly the rare-to-have-shipped-so-many statement does not refer to consumables, but they couldn't be more specific because the consumers are supposed to be keeping up with the pace. Likewise the phones

    -1 redundant

    --
    And what is good, Phaedrus, And what is not good... Need we ask anyone to tell us these things?
  117. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ive still got the intellimouse optical i bought when back when the opticals first came out.... its still my primary mouse after, what, 10 years?

    Scroll wheel still works great, the only problem im having is that the plastic is starting to wear thin in the places where my fingers rest.

    Perhaps the difference is the fact that i wash my hands 3 or 4 times a day.

  118. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Endo13 · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately my G15 keyboard did not prove quite so durable. (And wouldn't you know, it's also one of only 2 or 3 keyboards they sell that has a 1-year warranty instead of 3-year.) It only took one can of pepsi to take out most of the numberpad and the little group of keys that includes insert, delete, etc. as well as print screen, scroll lock, and pause. The worst part of it is they have since discontinued that model of G15 and replaced it with a newer G15 that completely sucks compared to the original.

    --
    There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
  119. pshh by Vorpix · · Score: 1

    you gotta have a lot of balls to ship a billion mice

    --
    frog blast the vent core
  120. Thank You, Logitech! by GradyPhilpott · · Score: 1

    From my first introduction to the mouse in late 1994, I hated the things. For a decade, I used school and work computers and the mouse, next to the network, always seemed to be the weakest link. Then I got my own computer about five years ago and discovered the optical mouse, which came with my HP computer and thought I was in heaven. About ten months and maybe a billion batteries later, I bought a Logitech MX1000 laser mouse based solely on the rechargeable battery and I've been in love with this mouse ever since. What a masterpiece! Thank you, Logitech!

  121. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, submitter is crazy and the mods are irresponsible to let total stupidity into the summary.

  122. I am not a math or english major, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's rare in human history that a billionth of anything has been shipped by one company,"

    Isn't:
    1 Billionth = 1,000,000,000
    A Billionth = 0.000,000,001

    ??

  123. Totino's Pizzas anyone? by Crazy+Taco · · Score: 1

    McDonalds anyone?

    And they aren't the only one. You know all those Totino's party pizzas you always see in the supermarkets? The ones you used to eat so much of in college? The Totino's plant makes over 1.25 million pizzas a day. At that rate of production, it only takes about 800 days to produce 1 billion pizzas.

    And that don't forget about Totino's pizza rolls... 30 million of those are made daily. Totino's is truly an amazing story of high volume manufacturing (and Americans are amazing for being able to eat that many frozen pizzas a day, since this number doesn't even count other brands).

    --
    Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
  124. More than 1 billion non-consumable goods shipped by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

    How about:
    *Tables
    *Chairs
    *Doors
    *Beds
    *Couches
    *Drapes
    *Curtains
    *Blankets
    *Carpets

    That's just off the top of my head. And most of these are significantly more durable than computer mice.

  125. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    Uuuuh.....You mean like this? I'll admit I've never used trackball mice so I can only go by the pic you linked to but it certainly looks similar to me. And if it isn't close enough here is a whole page of them with balls on the top, side, large and small trackballs, wireless, etc. So I think that niche has plenty of choices to choose from.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  126. You're missing out by StreetStealth · · Score: 1

    It's not just hotkeys.

    Plug in a USB optical mouse some time and you'll be amazed at how much nicer it feels. The more accurate tracking afforded by the optical sensor combined with the vastly higher polling rate afforded by USB makes for a significantly more pleasant experience.

    Of course, I haven't bought a new mouse since my optical, USB MS Intellimouse Explorer in 2001, but I'd say that's where mouse technology last froze.

    --
    Your mind is clear / The things that you fear / Will fade with how much you / Believe what you hear
    1. Re:You're missing out by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Plug in a USB laser mouse some time and you'll be amazed at how much nicer it feels. The more accurate tracking afforded by the laser sensor combined with the vastly higher polling rate afforded by USB makes for a significantly more pleasant experience.

      Of course, I haven't bought a new mouse since my laser, USB Logitech MX 1000 in 2004, but I'd say that's where mouse technology last froze.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
  127. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by SydShamino · · Score: 1

    The right mouse button on my Logitech cordless optical mouse at home has started acting up. I'll be using mouselook in WoW and it acts as if I released and repressed the button, meaning that I tend to attack or interact with whatever I was mousing over at that moment. Alas, battery replacement didn't fix it, so I guess it's time for a new mouse.

    The next one will also be Logitech. That last mouse I carried from my last PC to my first Mac, and I discovered that use of a Logitech mouse and the installing of the Logitech control center was an easy way to avoid the stupid insane Mac mouse acceleration curve. I have to reward them with another purchase just for that.

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  128. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by genner · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's fun to become agitated AND I learned an OSX function I never new about ;-)

    That's the Mac experince in a nutshell.

  129. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    A colleague called me to his office the other day. His PowerMac was "locking up" not responsive to clicks. And when he'd reboot the optical drive would eject. Turns out his Logitech USB mouse was stuck in the left click position. (Macs eject their optical disk on restart if the mouse button is clicked.)

    You know, about that...

    I have a Logitech Optical Trackball - the original 3-button model... I probably bought it in 1997 or so. It started failing within the last year or so - buttons started failing. I could probably pop it open, replace those switches, and get another ten years of service out of it - apart from the fact that it's a PS/2 trackball and I don't feel like getting an adaptor or converting it... So when I overhauled my computer last month I also replaced the trackball with a newer Logitech model.

    Now, on the other hand, my current Logitech trackball at work is a later model of the same basic design: one of the silver ones with the scroll wheel, instead of the old beige one like I had at home. I got it in 2002 or so, still working great. However... - this model has a painted-on silver finish and some rubber external parts (including the scroll wheel itself...). Over time the silver finish has started flaking off and some of the rubber has dry-rotted. Basically it looks and feels like shit but it still works fine.

    I really wish they'd drop the metallic finish and the rubber parts. There's no reason why the actual working parts should be able to stand up to ten years of use but the outer shell should fall apart after less than six...

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  130. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the difference is the fact that i wash my hands 3 or 4 times a day.

    No offense but I'd call that kinda light. I have that many bathroom breaks per day. 1 washing per trip there, plus 1 before each meal, then several while cooking a meal, then again if I touch the dog. They add up pretty quickly. I'm literally closer to around 15-20 hand washings per day, but I'm just that way.

    The Intellimouse that I'm talking about specifically is the pre-optical one. The original one that introduced the scroll wheel. For whatever reason they just seemed prone to sticking. Logitechs on the other hand I've traditionally noticed buttons wear out on if they're going to fail.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  131. Re:One billionth? Ha, that's nothing by blackholepcs · · Score: 1
    I think Mattel would disagree as well. They shipped their billionth Hot Wheel car a while ago. Here is a quote from an article regarding a special car they made to commemorate it :

    Hot Wheels® today announced its year-long plans to celebrate the brand's 40-year heritage at the 105th American International Toy Fair®. Anniversary activities were kicked off with the unveiling of a custom jeweled 1:64-scale Hot Wheels® car, designed by celebrity jeweler Jason of Beverly Hills. This one-of-a-kind car, the most expensive in Hot Wheels® history, was made to commemorate the production of the four-billionth Hot Wheels® vehicle.

    I think Logitech just got over excited. Still a billion of anything is a lot.

    --
    Halitosis - (n.) Halle Berry's Camel Toe.
  132. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My family is still using a Logitech wheel mouse from 1995-1996. It is still one of the better ball mice I have used and better than many cheap optical mice made today. And i bet it only cost $20 more than some crap mouse that ended up in the landfill back in 1998.

    Organizations like Greenpeace should have a look at how long a product stays in use before they judge electric companies. My Nintendo Entertainment System is another ancient electrical product that I still use. Twenty years later.

  133. billionth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "billionth of anything"
    doeth he have a lithp?

  134. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by necro2607 · · Score: 1

    I've been trying to right click with it for 2 weeks, with no luck, and its been driving me nuts. I just went upstairs and tried by lifting my index finger when I clicked, and voila: context menu! My reaction: "stupidest mouse ever."

    I guess.. While I agree it happens relatively often that it treats your intended right-click as a regular left-click, I also became aware very quickly that it happens when your left finger is pressing down to a fair degree. What this means is, a simple adjustment of holding the mouse to cause less pressure on your fingers will make it pick up the right-click properly.

    My complaint with the Mighty Mouse was the "scroll ball" which would get jammed incessantly. I started using my ancient, second-hand crappy old Logitech USB optical mouse.

    However, Logitech isn't a lot better, at least in terms of hardware that works reliably. My less-than-year-old mouse from the $150~ MX5500 keyboard/mouse duo, no longer left clicks properly. It double clicks very very often, when I only click the button once. Needless to say this caused a lot of unintentional app launches, unintentional overwriting of local files when double-clicking in an FTP program instead of single clicking, etc. etc. etc. Same thing was happening with the previous Logitech mouse I used at work (MX5000 keybd/mouse duo).

  135. 1 billion made and they still last 1 year by necro2607 · · Score: 1

    I feel a bit surprised Logitech has made 1 billion mice now, considering even the absolute newest mice of theirs I've bought have had show-stopping failures, specifically the physical button-clicks.

    The last two Logitech mice I've used (I mean "last" in both relevant senses) have developed this problem where a single left-click very often results in the mouse sending a very fast double-click.

    Obviously this causes a lot of problems, like unintentionally opening documents (and thus launching applications I wasn't planning on opening), overwriting local files when accidentally downloading a remote file in an FTP client, closing two programs instead of just the one I was trying to close (because the "underlying" window would have had its close-window button clicked as well)... etc. etc. Had a pretty hard time not throwing the mouse across the freaking room, after a certain point.

    The most frustrating thing is that I've had the most recent mouse well under a year. I'll send it back for RMA, because it's unacceptable to have this kind of hardware defect, but the fact that it keeps happening is the most frustrating aspect.

    I'm curious to hear if other people experience this problem. I've read it on forums (seems like a huge problem of Logitech's actually), but wondering to hear some anecdotes in response to mine...

    1. Re:1 billion made and they still last 1 year by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      Damn. Subject line was supposed to say "they still last <1 year". As in, less than one year. :P

  136. Ford = 8 billion cars? by edcheevy · · Score: 1

    I Googled "how many cars has Ford made?" and saw 8 billion, but I have no idea if the number is accurate. Any thoughts?

    1. Re:Ford = 8 billion cars? by ambrosen · · Score: 1

      It produced 6 million vehicles last year. It hasn't been in business for a millenium yet, so at that rate, it looks unlikely.

    2. Re:Ford = 8 billion cars? by edcheevy · · Score: 1

      Thanks! Hmm, maybe they were including Hot Wheels... Hooray for the internet in (-) having completely erroneous information and (+) the ability for users to easily correct it.

  137. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

    Completely agreed. I also have the IntelliMouse Optical, and I wouldn't ever want another mouse. If mine ever breaks (God forbid), that's the first mouse I'll be going for.

    --
    "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
  138. half in the last 5 years by foxharp · · Score: 1

    note that the first 500K have already been discussed: http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/09/11/1854205

  139. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Admiral_Grinder · · Score: 1

    I have to agree about the Microsoft mouse. I got a Intellimouse Explorer v1 USB for a present at Christmas 2000. Several trips back and forth from college, lan parties, and long hours gaming...and it still works. Paint and rubber on it is well worn (pretty ugly to look at these days), but still functions perfectly. I'm pretty rough with these things to, beating on keys and buttons, but it has lasted me through 3 keyboards. To bad the v4 mouse I use at work is junk. I'm on my third one, the left button gets some dead spots in it.

  140. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by mikiN · · Score: 1

    Shhh, be quiet, you have just exposed the built-in lie detection circuit Big Brother uses to tell whether or not you click the "I Agree" button on an EULA with conviction or not. (If you're not sweating enough when you click, that will register as an abnormal capacitance level, time for them to call their lawyers)...

    --
    The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
  141. H2G2 by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    At this rate Douglas Adams will have got it right. In a few years they'll outnumber us and the world will be run by white mice, well beige ones at any rate.

  142. Their gaming mouses could use improvements. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) First off is bring back three full buttons on the top. Those tiny 3 mm above the scroll wheel aren't adequate for quick responses. And using the mouse wheel as a third button is ridiculous. You could accidently spin the wheel when trying to middle mouse click.

    2) Move the scroll wheel to the thumb. The thumb is a natural appendage for spinning. You would put the mouse wheel rotating from left to right and not up and down. Try it. It makes ergonomic sense. Fingers that spin the scroll wheel up and down cause other fingers to move meaning it's less natural.

    3) Don't force people to palm mice.
    a) The MX510 line of logitech forces the palm to be 1.5 inches above the surface.
    b) And the length of the mouse prevents the average hand(males and females) from resting the palm on the surface. This is detrimental to the 180 mouse flick cause you lose your pivot point.
    c) The buttons should be as close to the surface as possible. I'm not sure why it's elevated. If you rest your palm on a table, isn't that more comfortable than say resting with say a 2" book under just the finger tips?

    How about having a mouse design competition?

  143. Re:One billionth? Ha, that's nothing by stdarg · · Score: 1

    You consume the bottles and cans? You're hard core.

  144. But on the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see people retiring their old mice for new ones for new capabilities over the past two decades (improved ergonomics, more buttons, optical tracking, wireless)...but over a billion?

    I hope I'm wrong in inferring part of that can be attributed to shoddy designs or parts. Two personal examples: A wireless mouse that often had trouble talking to my computer, and a Microsoft mouse that zig-zagged all over my screen at random.

    In other news, my Atari 400 and all attached peripherals still work...

  145. AOL CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must have landfilled a billion of those all by myself.

  146. American grammar strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "1 Billionth Mouse"?

    Well, I don't see how they could make two or three. After they've made the billionth mouse, they can't make it again.

  147. just another counter-example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "it puts a rose on every cheek"

    http://grenfell.yourguide.com.au/news/local/news/general/vegemites-one-billionth-jar-at-large-somewhere-in-australia/1358557.aspx/

  148. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I think my collection of M$ mices have a lot more uses. They're great for target practice, door stops, swinging around in the subway to stop folks crowding around you. And the wireless models are great for skeet practice :)

  149. count() by Brain+Damaged+Bogan · · Score: 1

    "Logitech has hailed as a major landmark the production of their one billionth computer mouse. The news comes at a time when analysts claim the days of the mouse are numbered"
    and today that number is 1 billion :)

    --
    -- Sex is the antonym of pringles. Once you pop it's time to stop.
  150. Re:One billionth? Ha, that's nothing by Ambvai · · Score: 1

    I sure hope those are durable goods.

  151. Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do not look into the laser with remaining eye.

  152. Marketing hype -trillionth, billionth not uncommon by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1

    Sounds like some innumerate marketing hype. Many natural gas companies have shipped their trillionth cubic foot of gas, many oil companies their billionth barrel of oil ($10 - $150 each). The mints, billions of pennies etc, the Fed billions of many denominations of bills. Many consumables, gallons of milk, frozen chickens, toilet paper, reams of paper, pencils etc.

  153. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    You'd think those are competitors for the Microsoft Trackball Explorer, but having used them both (and a whole bunch of other trackballs over the years), they're not. They're not even close. Nothing that I've ever tried or seen is close.

    Your point about finger vs thumb operated balls is absolutely correct, and I understand that some weird mutants actually like thumb balls. But the joy of the Trackball Explorer is that the ball is precisely under the first two fingers, the (big) buttons 1 and 2 and the (big) scroll wheel/button 3 are precisely under the thumb, and the (big) buttons 4 and 5 are precisely under the ring and little fingers, so it's got finger-ball ease and accuracy without the need to lift any digits, ever. The most movement you ever have to make is a (very) small thumb movement to click, much less than you have to make with a thumb ball.

    The Cordless Trackman Optical is a nice try - it's what I'm using in the office - but the buttons are too small and fiddly, and the scroll wheel is in the wrong place, meaning you're back to finger lifting or unnatural extensions. It's not a patch on the Trackball Explorer which is truly ergonomic, and not in a bullshit marketing sense.

    I hope you get a chance to try one some time. I have two, and I am seriously considering springing for another as a backup, at any price, while they're still available. They really are that good.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  154. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    Mmm, they look superficially similar, but the only one that's even remotely in the same ballpark is the Logitech Cordless Trackman Optical, and that's a poor substitute. Once you go Trackball Explorer, everything else is fiddly and shoddy and a literal pain to use.

    I've enthused in detail above, but I'll give my wife the last word. She doesn't care about her computer hardware. She'll take whatever I give her. Doesn't care about the case or processor or RAM. Doesn't care about screens or printers or scanners or webcams. Cares a little about keyboards; likes them black, like her men. But once she'd "borrowed" my Trackball Explorer, it instantly and forever became her Trackball Explorer, and I had to score myself another one. Nobody touches it, not me, not the kids, not nobody, not no how.

    I'm looking into medication, and possibly some form of secure accomodation. Then I'll have two Trackball Explorers.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  155. 39 1/2 Year anniversary of carpal tunnel syndrome by charisma · · Score: 1

    The world's wrists writhe without a mention of their 39 plus years of pain since the mouse invention. No one would ever have known of Dr Carpal Tunnel and his discovery of the eponymous syndrome. Thanks Logitech, Microsoft and that famous development lab.

  156. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Mighty Mouse is basically Apple's solution for letting the fanboys claim that Apple ships a 2 button mouse, while at the same time not admitting that the critics of the one button mouse for the past 20 years were right. It's kind of one of those things that Steve's ego is not going to let go of, kind of like the menubar on the top of the screen and the lack of a maximize button.

  157. The majority of their 'premium' gaming range blow. by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    Well, it's true.

    Logitech seem to think flashier, weirder, blingier the better.
    I hate to be that whiny little dork with small hands......... but ..... I'm that whiny little dork with small hands!
    All their mice nowadays (Microsoft too) are like putting my hand on top of a smooth sliding SMALL FAMILY CAR with buttons on it.

    For goodness sakes, can we start to make a mouse which is small and full featured?
    I love all these gamers with massive, huge mice and 530 buttons on them but the mouse is massive.

    I've purchased a razor copperhead (and have a previous post here about it) the thing is slender and small and 214 feet long, I can barely touch the buttons with my fingers.
    Very few mice are made for finger mousers anymore, they are all made for palm mousers - good luck with your elbows in 20 years fellas.

    More information here.
    http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?threshold=-1&mode=nested&commentsort=3&op=Change&sid=188411&cid=15531265&pid=15531265

  158. Anniversary? by dukeofurl01 · · Score: 1

    If only they had waited another week, they would have made the 40th anniversary of that mouse. That would have been really something...

  159. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by shawb · · Score: 1

    A place I used to work would put keyboards through a dishwasher (no soap as well)as a last resort if they weren't working right. Usually worked to fix most problems.

    --
    I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  160. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Fred_A · · Score: 1

    On the other hand you have to remember that this is also for the kind of users that sometimes manage to miss the button on their single button mouse (actually told to me by an adamant Mac user some years ago defending the 1 button mouse as already complicated enough - needless to say I could do nothing but agree with him at that point...). Some Mac users can be pretty weird.

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  161. Subject by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    "It was 9 December 1968 when Douglas C. Engelbart and his group of researchers at Stanford University put the first mouse through its paces."

    And if it paralleled the history of the hard drive, it was as large as a Volvo and weighed 300 pounds.

  162. 10 billion shipped by one company, who has more? by tlk+nnr · · Score: 1

    The automotive industry beats 1 billion easily. For example, Bosch shipped more than 10 billion spark plugs, more than 8 billion just from one plant.

    Source: http://www.bosch.us/content/language1/html/715_5859.htm

    Who has more?
    Are there products that were shipped 100 billion times?

  163. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    Let me guess: you were fixing something on her PC and were stupid enough to leave it plugged in while you were away from it long enough for her to try it? If so i feel your pain bro. I was stupid enough to bring my brand new first gen Logitech optical gamer mouse out to fix my Mom's PC on a service call and did the same damned thing.

    I thought I'd do the good son bit and clean her Gateway ball mouse after I put up my tools only to come back to find her playing AoE I and $20 on the table next to the Gateway mouse. Clueless guy that I was I said "Mom you don't got to pay me, I was on my time, not shop time." to which I got "Oh, that's to let you buy yourself a better mouse, since that white one of yours is lousy.". Of course I was still not getting it and said "Uuuh, no. The white one is yours, and the black shiny one you have your hand on is mine" and got told "Uuh no. The nice black one is the one you gave me because you are a good son who didn't want his mother's fingers to hurt anymore from using that white mouse. But since I didn't want such a good boy to hurt his hands with the lousy white mouse I'm giving you $20 to go get yourself a nice one like mine."

    That is when i learned my mother is truly the undefeated champion of the Olympic sized guilt trip. So I gave up and simply tossed the white junker in the trash and had to buy a crappier one at Staples so I had something to use. So to this day my nice shiny black first gen Logitech optical mouse is stuck to a damned Gateway Astro playing AoE I every night. So good luck ever getting your trackball back buddy. I've learned a long time ago trying to get back any piece of hardware a female has "appropriated",be they GF,mother,sis,etc is about as productive as pissing in the wind. Better to just cut your losses.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  164. Re:You'd need fewer mice if they were built to las by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you've used a Mac for any decent amount of time then you know that "right-click" has always been achieved by holding Ctrl and clicking. The only reason I can think that the average computer user wouldn't have their non-mousing hand not on the keyboard is that they're wanking to porn. That being said, it doesn't take long at all to get used to lifting your finger to right-click. I just hate how the little scroll ball gunks up quickly. Plus if you don't like the mouse, swap it for a model you do like.