VMs are awesome, right now I'm posting from ubuntu running in a vm on a gentoo vm on a DSL vm on a windows XP vm on an atari host. If you don't know how to do that without it being explained though, maybe vms aren't for you and you'll never be as cool as me.
Plus going into the passenger compartment (even far enough to grab the hood latch) requires probable cause and in many cases, a warrant. Which simply placing the device on the car does not. So if they already have enough probable cause to enter the car, they probably won't need the tracer.
Not that I disagree with you, but there is a pretty wide gap between saying something like this on the Internet and actually following through with it in the real world.
.
The fact that there is such a wide gap there is a large problem with our country right now. It used to be that words MEANT something real. Now it's just spouting off on a semi-anonymous website where you don't have to have any balls to go with your bark. And then you can go back to doing whatever the government tells you and giving them 30% or more of every single paycheck without any resistance at all.
but the tracking widget isn't "Lost" it's deliberately placed into your custody (whether you know or not). So, and I'm very pro law enforcement, I believe you can do whatever you want with it without being liable. I have not read any laws to back that up but the general rule that law enforcement uses is, if it's abandoned, we can search it. So if the Law abandons it then I believe anyone else can do what they will with it.
I know this if off-topic but holy crap ' doesn't mean "WATCH OUT HERE COMES AN S" WTF?! Explain why anyone should think your point has merit when you can't even pluralize words!
The answer to your question is this really strange and I know, hard to understand, concept of.... Ready... Different countries sometimes don't have all their laws written exactly the same.... I know it's crazy huh? Never would have thought of it.
been convinced that there was any real connection between "bars" and actual signal strength. The entire time I've been using cell phones I've observed many places where I have 5 bars but cant get a call to connect or 1 bar and get more clarity than almost anywhere else. I do live in a mountainous, rural area but I have serious doubts that bars mean anything at all. I love the ad campaign "more bars in more places" WTF?! you can make more bars in more places by changing the phone programming. I'm gonna start a phone company and just program all the phones to always show 20 bars.
Yeah the cop being patient has everything to do with him being asian and absolutely nothing to do with the video camera in his face and his government trying to look friendly to the outside world.
Maybe the sinners are not the politicians or the people who vote for them, but the people who KNOW BETTER and don't work up the nerve to become politicians. Can you really blame the voting public for making a bad choice when the only choices available to them are bad choices? So maybe it's us (yeah let's just try this crazy thing by not blaming everyone else), the people sitting here on our high horses espousing all of the solutions to world problems and doing nothing of consequence with them, who are the sinners. I'm just sayin'.
If you really believe that's how cops work then I have pity for you. I would never want to live in a country if I thought the police were that corrupt. Sounds too much like mexico to me. The truth is, police officers have to document all of their actions, and legally justify them. Especially here in Arizona. We are in the ninth circuit and have much more stringent rules and laws governing police behavior than most areas. If police don't have any legitimate search or seizure theory to support their actions, any evidence gained as a result of it is excluded from any court proceeding. And due to the fact that it will very likely lead to discipline of the officer at the least and in extreme cases can lead to the officer being personally liable or even criminally charged for violations of search and seizure law, officers are extremely good at self correcting and keeping their co-workers out of trouble.
Police aren't quite as evil as you seem to think. Most of them actually seem to enjoy helping people, it's just that since the job of arresting people also falls to them, not quite as many people love them as do firefighters.
a "lawful encounter" is hardly ambiguous. It may be to you, but that's only because you haven't done any research on it. The idea of a "lawful" encounter and the scope of all different types of encounters is the subject of the single largest block of training in most police academies, "Search and Seizure". Seizure of persons, or "lawful encounters" is the most important concept in that training. Police spend conservatively 75% of their total continuing education time on search and seizure updates. These issues are litigated in nearly every case that goes before a jury and the case law involved is monumental. Yes, GP is right, police have to have a reason to stop someone, they can ask in such a way that any reasonable person would feel free to leave, to talk to you without other reason. But to require you to identify yourself or produce any kind of documentation, an officer must have a reasonable suspicion that you are committing or have committed a crime. That is precisely what "Lawful Encounter" means. If you regularly have "lawful encounters" with cops, you either spend a lot of time hanging around with them or are always around when crimes are being committed.
Tasers leave VERY visible traces. Most of the time it's the metal probes sticking out of you and the burn marks around them... It really easy to see that someone's been hit with a taser. It's been over a year for me and I still have the marks from when I became certified in taser use.
He was the supervisor. Being a director there, he really would have very little direct supervision, if any, more like a board meeting once a week or month
Slashdot Mirror
Pfft.it's obviously Al Gore's fault.
VMs are awesome, right now I'm posting from ubuntu running in a vm on a gentoo vm on a DSL vm on a windows XP vm on an atari host. If you don't know how to do that without it being explained though, maybe vms aren't for you and you'll never be as cool as me.
Really? I mean doesn't that seem a little extreme, shouldn't it still work pretty close to the previous versions of OS X? Seriously just asking,
...Even missing some movie's...
Ok, you got it right with "shows", "things", "books", "hours" etc. why do people insist on putting apostrophe's into plural word's
they would fine him $17.00 for every time the electrons changed directions, multiplied by every possible outlet/load device.
Plus going into the passenger compartment (even far enough to grab the hood latch) requires probable cause and in many cases, a warrant. Which simply placing the device on the car does not. So if they already have enough probable cause to enter the car, they probably won't need the tracer.
Not that I disagree with you, but there is a pretty wide gap between saying something like this on the Internet and actually following through with it in the real world.
.
The fact that there is such a wide gap there is a large problem with our country right now. It used to be that words MEANT something real. Now it's just spouting off on a semi-anonymous website where you don't have to have any balls to go with your bark. And then you can go back to doing whatever the government tells you and giving them 30% or more of every single paycheck without any resistance at all.
but the tracking widget isn't "Lost" it's deliberately placed into your custody (whether you know or not). So, and I'm very pro law enforcement, I believe you can do whatever you want with it without being liable. I have not read any laws to back that up but the general rule that law enforcement uses is, if it's abandoned, we can search it. So if the Law abandons it then I believe anyone else can do what they will with it.
I know this if off-topic but holy crap ' doesn't mean "WATCH OUT HERE COMES AN S" WTF?! Explain why anyone should think your point has merit when you can't even pluralize words!
and who needs jobs?
Pollution Online Shops for YOU!
would you do that any day? or just some days? or conversely, any day?
The answer to your question is this really strange and I know, hard to understand, concept of.... Ready... Different countries sometimes don't have all their laws written exactly the same.... I know it's crazy huh? Never would have thought of it.
But it's not trendy on slashdot to be logical about government and police practices!
BUT IT'S TEH IPHOWN! IT HAZ TO BEE DA ROKZORZ!!!
Wow, slashdot filter just chided me for yelling. Sorry Slashdot
been convinced that there was any real connection between "bars" and actual signal strength. The entire time I've been using cell phones I've observed many places where I have 5 bars but cant get a call to connect or 1 bar and get more clarity than almost anywhere else. I do live in a mountainous, rural area but I have serious doubts that bars mean anything at all. I love the ad campaign "more bars in more places" WTF?! you can make more bars in more places by changing the phone programming. I'm gonna start a phone company and just program all the phones to always show 20 bars.
Yeah the cop being patient has everything to do with him being asian and absolutely nothing to do with the video camera in his face and his government trying to look friendly to the outside world.
Maybe the sinners are not the politicians or the people who vote for them, but the people who KNOW BETTER and don't work up the nerve to become politicians. Can you really blame the voting public for making a bad choice when the only choices available to them are bad choices? So maybe it's us (yeah let's just try this crazy thing by not blaming everyone else), the people sitting here on our high horses espousing all of the solutions to world problems and doing nothing of consequence with them, who are the sinners. I'm just sayin'.
Now I feel guilty. Damn
If you really believe that's how cops work then I have pity for you. I would never want to live in a country if I thought the police were that corrupt. Sounds too much like mexico to me. The truth is, police officers have to document all of their actions, and legally justify them. Especially here in Arizona. We are in the ninth circuit and have much more stringent rules and laws governing police behavior than most areas. If police don't have any legitimate search or seizure theory to support their actions, any evidence gained as a result of it is excluded from any court proceeding. And due to the fact that it will very likely lead to discipline of the officer at the least and in extreme cases can lead to the officer being personally liable or even criminally charged for violations of search and seizure law, officers are extremely good at self correcting and keeping their co-workers out of trouble. Police aren't quite as evil as you seem to think. Most of them actually seem to enjoy helping people, it's just that since the job of arresting people also falls to them, not quite as many people love them as do firefighters.
a "lawful encounter" is hardly ambiguous. It may be to you, but that's only because you haven't done any research on it. The idea of a "lawful" encounter and the scope of all different types of encounters is the subject of the single largest block of training in most police academies, "Search and Seizure". Seizure of persons, or "lawful encounters" is the most important concept in that training. Police spend conservatively 75% of their total continuing education time on search and seizure updates. These issues are litigated in nearly every case that goes before a jury and the case law involved is monumental. Yes, GP is right, police have to have a reason to stop someone, they can ask in such a way that any reasonable person would feel free to leave, to talk to you without other reason. But to require you to identify yourself or produce any kind of documentation, an officer must have a reasonable suspicion that you are committing or have committed a crime. That is precisely what "Lawful Encounter" means. If you regularly have "lawful encounters" with cops, you either spend a lot of time hanging around with them or are always around when crimes are being committed.
Tasers leave VERY visible traces. Most of the time it's the metal probes sticking out of you and the burn marks around them... It really easy to see that someone's been hit with a taser. It's been over a year for me and I still have the marks from when I became certified in taser use.
He was the supervisor. Being a director there, he really would have very little direct supervision, if any, more like a board meeting once a week or month
That's what my dad used to call smoking. "They say they'll kill you on the package..."
Can you prove "PJ" exists? No? Than shut the fuck up.
It's If...Then not If...Than. *IF you don't know that *THEN you shut the fuck up and get off of this site
I happen to work in law enforcement. That's what I mean by firsthand knowledge.