I just installed tomato on my e3000, I've been using it all of 15mins and I highly recommend it over dd-wrt. To answer your question it does support dual band, I have separate SSIDs for each band. I like that it shows device info for devices with satic IPs, dd-wrt did not show this. Tomato also shows wireless connection strength for each device which is nice for bridges with no connection info. Tomato also knocked about 200ms off the latency reported in WoW, I'm not sure this can be accurate but that is what I'm seeing, and I haven't setup QoS yet.
I've been running dd-wrt on an e3000 and have been happy with it, great performance. After reading about tomato I think I'm going to reflash the router tonight and give it a try. My e3000 runs rather hot, I believe it was around 140F with a temp gun measured on the plastic case, perspective buyers be aware of that, I actually placed a netbook cooler under it as I was worried about burning it up on hot summer days. The dd-wrt forum I have not found to be friendly, I had general questions about issues with QoS policies that I think may have been firmware version related, but my thread kept getting deleted. Also, the update process for dd-wrt seems convoluted, where some articles explicitly state to flash with an initial flash firmware then the target firmware.
So can/. expect a C&D on its supposedly inferior mod system? Or does the prior art citation allow/. to continue(I don't get the concept here).
"The primary authority, as well as the contributing authorities, may add authorities to the evaluation system by designating and delegating authority to new contributing authorities. Correspondingly, contributing authorities may be removed from the evaluation system through the revocation of authority. By delegating additional authority to, or revoking existing authority from, previously designated contributing authorities, a primary authority or a contributing authority may alter the relative authority of the contributing authorities within the evaluation system."
This sounds like a shit-ton of work to moderate our own drivel that has a realistic TTL of what, 4-6 hours. Seems like the system would need to balance bias of a few authorities vs. popular trends of group-think authorities.
Is it true the iphone4(s) use lithium polymer batteries? Those seem to be the more volatile and less tolerant to abuse than lithium ion. Lithium polymer batteries can start unfavorable chemical reactions going slightly outside their voltage range, seems a poor choice for consumer electronics.
Maybe it's early, but I was having a hard time seeing the comparisons they were trying to make. Also when Ars was comparing pricing, X system is 400k and Y system is 600k, what the hell was that, usually stats like that would be accompanied with a link or site to said system. It said benchmarks were "here", I didn't see any. I'd like to see benchmark details such as OS. May be too early to judge as this is the first generation chip, and will the Bulldozer perform better under the next iteration of windows(if that was the control)?
Anybody try reading articles from the site? Since when is a ppt style slide show a valid means to present an article, and the index for the article I was viewing showed 21+ slides, wtf.
Spamhaus seemed like one of the less shady and even more trustworthy blocklists(blacklist, whaterver). I have seen some (maybe it was backscatter) that wanted $100 to get off the list sooner than the standard 30day TTL, usually you don't have to worry about anybody using these lists. However, one time I did run into somebody that subscribes to a service that enlists multiple blocklists and was using one of these shady ones, luckily it was only a single client.
I found myself pulling the virtual plug a bunch of times after having a WTF moment.
Seems they have brought us to "click hell". Win XP, requires you to click shutdown twice, which was made more efficient removing the secondary menu and with Win7 clicking shutdown actually shuts down the PC. Win8 we're essentially back to clicking shutdown twice and it seems now everything is under a secondary menu, i'm still trying to figure out the most efficient way to the "control panel". Who the hell wants to first "open" the desktop to launch something off of it?
You lost me at "The flow between the apps and tasks...", I need an explanation for this. I used Fedora 15 since release up until about a month ago, it seemed to create situations where extra mouse inputs were required and there is something about being able to put alias/shortcuts/objects (whatever you want to call them) on the desktop to be addressed later.
Slashdot Mirror
What is this "phone call" that you speak of?
I've become hooked on Operas speed dial.
I read a few stories on ads in chrome and removed it from the one PC I had it installed on.
I just installed tomato on my e3000, I've been using it all of 15mins and I highly recommend it over dd-wrt. To answer your question it does support dual band, I have separate SSIDs for each band. I like that it shows device info for devices with satic IPs, dd-wrt did not show this. Tomato also shows wireless connection strength for each device which is nice for bridges with no connection info. Tomato also knocked about 200ms off the latency reported in WoW, I'm not sure this can be accurate but that is what I'm seeing, and I haven't setup QoS yet.
I've been running dd-wrt on an e3000 and have been happy with it, great performance. After reading about tomato I think I'm going to reflash the router tonight and give it a try. My e3000 runs rather hot, I believe it was around 140F with a temp gun measured on the plastic case, perspective buyers be aware of that, I actually placed a netbook cooler under it as I was worried about burning it up on hot summer days. The dd-wrt forum I have not found to be friendly, I had general questions about issues with QoS policies that I think may have been firmware version related, but my thread kept getting deleted. Also, the update process for dd-wrt seems convoluted, where some articles explicitly state to flash with an initial flash firmware then the target firmware.
So can /. expect a C&D on its supposedly inferior mod system? Or does the prior art citation allow /. to continue(I don't get the concept here).
"The primary authority, as well as the contributing authorities, may add authorities to the evaluation system by designating and delegating authority to new contributing authorities. Correspondingly, contributing authorities may be removed from the evaluation system through the revocation of authority. By delegating additional authority to, or revoking existing authority from, previously designated contributing authorities, a primary authority or a contributing authority may alter the relative authority of the contributing authorities within the evaluation system."
This sounds like a shit-ton of work to moderate our own drivel that has a realistic TTL of what, 4-6 hours. Seems like the system would need to balance bias of a few authorities vs. popular trends of group-think authorities.
I just posted above about the volatile nature of lithium polymer batteries, a poor choice for consumer electronics.
Is it true the iphone4(s) use lithium polymer batteries? Those seem to be the more volatile and less tolerant to abuse than lithium ion. Lithium polymer batteries can start unfavorable chemical reactions going slightly outside their voltage range, seems a poor choice for consumer electronics.
Maybe it's early, but I was having a hard time seeing the comparisons they were trying to make. Also when Ars was comparing pricing, X system is 400k and Y system is 600k, what the hell was that, usually stats like that would be accompanied with a link or site to said system. It said benchmarks were "here", I didn't see any. I'd like to see benchmark details such as OS. May be too early to judge as this is the first generation chip, and will the Bulldozer perform better under the next iteration of windows(if that was the control)?
Wake me up when they have a 3D flash.. err HTML5 model of the moon.
When do we test them?
I'm going to need you to summarize each patent now, mmkay..
Besides, changing my SSID would require WAY too much work in reconnecting all wireless devices.
Hopefully they can be improved upon. I remember the first P4s had enough suck to be the target of a class-action suit.
Anybody try reading articles from the site? Since when is a ppt style slide show a valid means to present an article, and the index for the article I was viewing showed 21+ slides, wtf.
I agree with Oswald's "follow the money" line of reasoning.
Think if they upheld the same amount that Thomas chic was liable for at $80,000USD per song.
Spamhaus seemed like one of the less shady and even more trustworthy blocklists(blacklist, whaterver). I have seen some (maybe it was backscatter) that wanted $100 to get off the list sooner than the standard 30day TTL, usually you don't have to worry about anybody using these lists. However, one time I did run into somebody that subscribes to a service that enlists multiple blocklists and was using one of these shady ones, luckily it was only a single client.
Granted it is fox news.. =(
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/05/17/13-year-old-boy-questioned-secret-service-facebook-posting/
I hope MS patents "opening" the desktop, so no other GUI/OS will ever stumble down this road.
I found myself pulling the virtual plug a bunch of times after having a WTF moment.
Seems they have brought us to "click hell". Win XP, requires you to click shutdown twice, which was made more efficient removing the secondary menu and with Win7 clicking shutdown actually shuts down the PC. Win8 we're essentially back to clicking shutdown twice and it seems now everything is under a secondary menu, i'm still trying to figure out the most efficient way to the "control panel".
Who the hell wants to first "open" the desktop to launch something off of it?
Farnsworth: No, I remembered that I'd built one last year.
But with these you won't have animal rights activists hounding you when you install horns and send waves charging the enemy.
The palm pre I use to use and miss had no problem with /. comments.
Damnit I want one.
You lost me at "The flow between the apps and tasks...", I need an explanation for this. I used Fedora 15 since release up until about a month ago, it seemed to create situations where extra mouse inputs were required and there is something about being able to put alias/shortcuts/objects (whatever you want to call them) on the desktop to be addressed later.