Ionized moon dust hangs in the "air" and sticks to everything. Solar is not a great option on the moon, at least until we can develop ways to repel moon dust. It would be too high maintenance.
In a way, yes. But if I build a house that isn't up to code, and it passes inspection, it's the inspector that looses his job when the house collapses.
Yeah, because an user running an app causing the entire OS to crash for all users is totally acceptable.
Unsigned drivers making the OS crash may not be Vista's fault, but this definitely is.
I'm not certain of full/partial copies, but last I checked infringement included single songs as well as full albums. I would imagine that lack of distinction carries over here as well.
It hasn't been tested nationally, but lower courts have decided.
Not everything needs to go to the Supreme Court to be decided, that just adds finality to the decision.
Helping people to install software to perform what is considered to be fair use... that has yet to be determined.
I'm fairly certain the anti-circumvention provisions of the DMCA have been tested in court, specifically in relation to backing up DVDs.
Remember 321 Studios?
No, it's nothing like giving up your copyright, since you can relicense it at any time. Good luck getting someone to pay for it once you do, but you retain the right to do so since you own the copyright.
Not at all, copyright holds whether you "defend" it or not. In fact, current laws (via the Berne Convention) don't have any provision for "losing" copyright. You have to explicitly grant or give up rights.
Actually, there is no way to give up your copyright, either. At least, no easy way. That's why public domain licenses exist. You still own the copyright, but license it with no strings attached.
Slashdot Mirror
Don't dismiss new articles on previously covered topics out of hand.
Unless the previous article was from 2 days before the new one and covers nothing new.
Ionized moon dust hangs in the "air" and sticks to everything. Solar is not a great option on the moon, at least until we can develop ways to repel moon dust. It would be too high maintenance.
In a way, yes. But if I build a house that isn't up to code, and it passes inspection, it's the inspector that looses his job when the house collapses.
If they didn't pass WHQL, yes. If they did, no.
Yeah, because an user running an app causing the entire OS to crash for all users is totally acceptable. Unsigned drivers making the OS crash may not be Vista's fault, but this definitely is.
Anyone who can handle being stuck in the woods with 60 kids should be able to handle irate customers pretty easily.
I'm not certain of full/partial copies, but last I checked infringement included single songs as well as full albums. I would imagine that lack of distinction carries over here as well.
It hasn't been tested nationally, but lower courts have decided. Not everything needs to go to the Supreme Court to be decided, that just adds finality to the decision.
you're right. The law is fair. It's the enforcement that isn't fair. But that's the whole point of making everyone a criminal: harassing undesirables.
Actually, you can legally make a copy for a friend. This came up in the 80s with mix tapes.
Helping people to install software to perform what is considered to be fair use ... that has yet to be determined.
I'm fairly certain the anti-circumvention provisions of the DMCA have been tested in court, specifically in relation to backing up DVDs. Remember 321 Studios?
Yes, you do. Stop trolling.
And insider trading is legal for PIs?
I was referring the fact that there is no statutory means to renounce copyright.
No, it's nothing like giving up your copyright, since you can relicense it at any time. Good luck getting someone to pay for it once you do, but you retain the right to do so since you own the copyright.
Not at all, copyright holds whether you "defend" it or not. In fact, current laws (via the Berne Convention) don't have any provision for "losing" copyright. You have to explicitly grant or give up rights.
Actually, there is no way to give up your copyright, either. At least, no easy way. That's why public domain licenses exist. You still own the copyright, but license it with no strings attached.
So they use their Universal Terms of Service universally? And this is new why?
Where is this? Even Nevada gives you a ticket these days. The worst you'll get is "treatment".
So did anyone who can read SEC filings.
WebKit can run in a single thread.
That's why I never insure with anyone who advertises heavily. That money has to come from somewhere.
Not to mention the implications of a law being bad does not invalidate the law.
So you think a PI has access to non-public information?
Yes it does. Potheads get fined, which covers the court's costs somewhat, and lowers the case load, since nobody fights them.
What part allows them to ban Al Qaeda?