Slashdot Mirror


ITunes 8 a Real Killer App; Taking Down Vista

CWmike writes "Apple 's latest version of iTunes crashes Windows Vista when an iPod or iPhone is connected to the PC, scores of users have reported on Apple's support forum. Plug in and Vista crashes and shows the 'blue screen of death.' The errors began showing up immediately after updating iTunes to Version 8.0, which Apple released Tuesday as part of its iPod refresh. 'I just installed iTunes 8 over my iTunes 7 on Vista [and] now whenever I plug in my iPod, I get a blue screen death. Three times so far. Even if it is plugged in on boot, I get a blue screen," said a user identified as 'sambeckett' on the support forum about 90 minutes after Apple CEO Steve Jobs wrapped up the iPod launch."

735 comments

  1. Good Marketing by TheSpoom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Expect Apple to blame Vista.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:Good Marketing by gooman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Expect Slashdot comments to blame Vista too.

      --
      "Kittens give Morbo gas!"
    2. Re:Good Marketing by mweather · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, because an user running an app causing the entire OS to crash for all users is totally acceptable. Unsigned drivers making the OS crash may not be Vista's fault, but this definitely is.

    3. Re:Good Marketing by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Informative

      And yet, the update demonstrably does not crash XP...

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    4. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expect Slashdot to blame Vista.

      ftfy

    5. Re:Good Marketing by Binder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Regardless of what the itunes application might be doing it should not cause the OS to crash. The application to crash yes... but not the OS.
      One of the main jobs of the OS is to protect processes from badly behaving neighbors.

      This is definitely a bug in Vista.

    6. Re:Good Marketing by TheSpoom · · Score: 3, Informative

      Drivers like the one for the iPod?

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    7. Re:Good Marketing by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Funny

      So, it's MS's fault that an app released today crashes their year-old OS? Oh, they should have tested it, right?

    8. Re:Good Marketing by bhtooefr · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except the application installs drivers.

      And it's not necessarily a bug in the OS if drivers are causing it, unless you run all drivers in the userland like QNX does.

    9. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I blame Vista.

    10. Re:Good Marketing by fo0bar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, because an user running an app causing the entire OS to crash for all users is totally acceptable. Unsigned drivers making the OS crash may not be Vista's fault, but this definitely is.

      Yeah, because iTunes totally doesn't use a custom proprietary USB protocol to talk to iPods that would never require special drivers.

    11. Re:Good Marketing by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      The iPod drivers that interact with the kernel are probably different (and I assume there are some since there is hardware involved here).

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    12. Re:Good Marketing by mweather · · Score: 1

      If they didn't pass WHQL, yes. If they did, no.

    13. Re:Good Marketing by shuying · · Score: 1

      You know what, iTunes do install drivers and background services!

    14. Re:Good Marketing by Ossifer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, it does indeed refrain from BSOD'ing my XP Pro... It does however lock up the USB subsystem whenever my iPhone is *NOT* plugged in!

    15. Re:Good Marketing by Aphoxema · · Score: 5, Funny

      Expect Vista to bla #####

      A problem has been detected and Slashdot has been shut down to prevent damage to your discussion.

      The problem seems to be caused by the following file: BLAMEVISTA.SYS

      BLAME_FAULT_IN_MICROSOFT_AREA

      If this is the first time you've seen this Stop error comment, restart your discussion. If this comment appears again, follow these steps:

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    16. Re:Good Marketing by erroneus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I blame both!

      * Reality check --

      If Windows didn't allow such extensive use of making every bit of software installing useless drivers and daemons, Windows wouldn't be quite as VULNERABLE to misbehaving software as it is now. It inspires and propagates some really bad design and development.

      If developers wouldn't write every application to require drivers and other nonsense to run, the application wouldn't be able to take down the whole operating system. The whole purpose of separating user-land apps and system software is to prevent stuff like this from ever happening. I can't think of the last time I installed software on Linux that required that level of system hacking... okay, I take that back, VMWare does that but I can't imagine that lasting too long before some standard kernel interface for that sort of thing is built in... oh wait, there's Xen... anyway, another area all together. My point is that it is RARE. With Windows apps, it's more than frequent, it's the norm.

      So in short: Shame on Microsoft Windows for propagating the bad culture. Shame on Apple and other developers for using models that are bad for the OS.

    17. Re:Good Marketing by BaronHethorSamedi · · Score: 1

      Unsigned drivers making the OS crash may not be Vista's fault, but this definitely is.

      Explain how. My understanding was that you write applications for the OS, not the other way around.

    18. Re:Good Marketing by Malevolyn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, it does. Not only does iTunes 8 drag my XP machine into the depths of hell-lag (iTunes 7 didn't), it also causes a blue screen if I put a large number of songs in the conversion queue.

      --
      Your ad here.
    19. Re:Good Marketing by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here let me explain how computers work to you.

      Problem: Application crashes the OS.
      Blame: OS. Modern operating systems should not crash because of an application.

      Problem: Device driver crashes OS.
      Blame: In a monolithic OS the driver is at fault. So it is the drivers fault. If the driver is approved by the OS manufacturer then you can also blame the QA department of the OS manufacture.

      Problem: Application crashes.
      Blame: Application but maybe the OS if the Application works on a different version of the OS. No sane programmer uses undocumented interfaces any more. It is too risky and computers are fast enough. So the cause is broken compatibility.

      So in this case I would have to say that it is Microsoft's fault the OS crashes. It is Apples fault for not doing enough testing.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    20. Re:Good Marketing by TheSpoom · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Eh. Kinda. Ultimately I think this is a lack of testing on Apple's part though. I don't think you should be able to code together some drivers and then pass off any and all testing to Microsoft.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    21. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You'll be glad to know that it doesn't. An iPod is just a standard USB hard drive. All communications between iTunes and the iPod use standard file operations.

      Mac OS X is UNIX. Apple understands the "everything is a file" concept.

      The only "special" thing Apple installs is a service that checks if newly connected USB hard drives are iPods.

      This is 100% Vista's fault.

    22. Re:Good Marketing by Malevolyn · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I forgot to mention that last time it happened, I had to basically jump through loops to get my iTunes library back without readding all my music to a new library (which would have taken much, much longer).

      --
      Your ad here.
    23. Re:Good Marketing by Hyppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The special drivers are still signed by Microsoft. If they weren't it would be quite obvious due to the many "Arte you SURE?" messages.

    24. Re:Good Marketing by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      This is pretty much what I said above in another comment, but I'd argue that the blame falls more on the Apple side of the equation; WHQL isn't supposed to do all of your testing for you.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    25. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is Apple's fault. If you read the forum you'll note that they already tracked down the offending driver in the minidump. It is Apple's USB driver for the iPod: usbaapl64.sys.

    26. Re:Good Marketing by Hyppy · · Score: 1

      The only thing that should be able to cause a full system crash is a driver. These drivers are signed, so they must have been tested.

    27. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No it's not. If you are going to deploy an application and you are a well funded commercial entity it is your burden to test it on whatever platform you plan on supporting. While I am not letting Vista off the hook for this flaw you cannot say Apple is 100% in the clear here. Either they didn't test it, which is incompetence, or they didn't care.

      But I am sure if the next version of Microsoft Office somehow crashed OSX, the conspiracy nuts would be in here complaining about how Microsoft is trying to tarnish Apple's good name.

    28. Re:Good Marketing by fullgandoo · · Score: 1

      Apple wont blame Vista. They will never even acknowledge that there is a problem in the first place!
      And then quietly, they will release an upgrade.

    29. Re:Good Marketing by bonehead · · Score: 1

      Definitely Apple's fault. I'm no Microsoft fan, but come on. Is it really THAT difficult to imagine that iTunes might eventually get used with an iPod, and do testing on that scenario?

      I'm firmly in the "Windows is crap" camp, and hate to pass up any good opportunity to bash Microsoft, but the fact is that in this case, the blame belongs 100% with Apple.

    30. Re:Good Marketing by mweather · · Score: 1

      In a way, yes. But if I build a house that isn't up to code, and it passes inspection, it's the inspector that looses his job when the house collapses.

    31. Re:Good Marketing by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Isn't that what NVIDIA did at Vista's launch?

    32. Re:Good Marketing by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, Steve Jobs would be like, "Why the fuck did OSX crash?" It would get fixed.

    33. Re:Good Marketing by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Actually I disagree with you on one bit.

      Problem: Application crashes the OS.
      Blame: Probably a driver somewhere. In my personal case I'd blame nVidia, although I'd also be mad at MS for having a "Log OS crashes to the event log" option which does absolutely nothing.

      Problem: Application crashes.
      Blame: The application writer for not testing their application thoroughly. The only time I'd blame the OS writer is if the latest version of the app came out BEFORE the version of the OS I'm running, in which case it is the OS writer's responsibility to provide compatibility (which is the #1 priority with new Windows releases it seems).

      Also programmers still use undocumented interfaces. In fact most anti-virus software used to patch several kernel function call tables to intercept Registry and File API calls which meant the Windows team couldn't update those internal, not-meant-for-public-use tables in their new OSs without totally breaking those apps! It was such a big problem that in x64 Windows now, Windows bluescreens if it sees an app trying to do that. AV writers were all complaining that they wouldn't be able to make their apps Vista compatible (despite the fact that Microsoft's own Windows Live Anti-Virus was running fine on Vista at the time). AV writers are now forced to use proper APIs.

    34. Re:Good Marketing by TheSpoom · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Are you crazy?

      My MP3 player is a simple storage device. This is because I can just drop MP3s into it without any user or software intervention, and it plays them without complaint. (It's an old RCA Lyra, BTW; it's gone through the washing machine by accident twice and keeps on ticking.)

      Try doing that on an iPod. Go on, try it. No, without iTunes, and without any additional drivers. What was that? It doesn't work? Yeah, that's because Apple uses a crazy scheme whereby they update an index file every time you change something on the iPod hard drive. Don't update that file and you can't see it inside the iPod's UI.

      That's why there are a bunch of third party programs so you can treat it as a hard drive, but they are always updating that file in the background.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    35. Re:Good Marketing by FellowConspirator · · Score: 4, Informative

      The drivers are USB protocol drivers -- they run in user space. iTunes doesn't (shouldn't) load any kernel-space drivers. It is correct to say that, under the circumstances, it should be impossible for iTunes to crash the OS. iTunes should crash, but Vista shouldn't.

    36. Re:Good Marketing by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But if I build a house that isn't up to code, and it passes inspection, it's the inspector that looses his job when the house collapses.

      True, but it is you who is buried under the pile.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    37. Re:Good Marketing by camperdave · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The only thing that should be able to cause a full system crash is a memory fault or hard disk error. Why should shuffling bytes in and out of a USB port have any effect on the OS?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    38. Re:Good Marketing by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      If they are running in userspace, then it's definitely a flaw in Vista.

    39. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try plugging an iPod into a Linux machine. You can mount it (assuming you have the appropriate file system drivers), and poke around the file system just fine.

      Same with Windows. It's just a USB hard drive as far as Windows is concerned.

      Yes, there are those database files that are required to load music onto the iPod, but there's nothing special about them other than the iPod firmware using them. There are NO SPECIAL DRIVERS required to update those files. In fact, some people have reverse engineered the files and there are open source programs than can read and write the files.

      Even under Windows.

      There are no special drivers, just generic userspace software, and userspace programs SHOULD NEVER BE ABLE TO CAUSE A KERNEL PANIC!

    40. Re:Good Marketing by profplump · · Score: 1

      Welcome to Lyra. Please wait 15.4 minutes while I index your 68 GB of music. After that you'll be limited to playing your music randomly, in lexicographical order by file name, or you can create playlists manually using my 4-button interface.

      Seriously, I appreciate the simplicity of just playing files, but it's disingenuous at best to pretend it isn't useful.

    41. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oww come on, even I can write an application that will crash osx. Its not that hard

    42. Re:Good Marketing by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      And I thank them for getting me to move from Vista to Linux. :^P

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    43. Re:Good Marketing by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Either they didn't test it, which is incompetence, or they didn't care.

      So there exists only 2 possibilities here? I offer another. They did test it, but they couldn't test every single hardware/software permutation that exists which is not realistic. The fact that XP users don't seem to be affected points to problem unique only to Vista. I'm not saying it is not Apple's fault. It may be but until we have better understanding of the issue realize that this isn't the first application to crash Vista, and it probably won't be the last.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    44. Re:Good Marketing by Hyppy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pop quiz: What does the kernel use to access hard disks, memory, and whatever other hardware is in your system?

    45. Re:Good Marketing by Moridineas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If Windows didn't allow such extensive use of making every bit of software installing useless drivers and daemons

      I'm not sure how to parse that...what do you mean?

      With Windows apps, it's more than frequent, it's the norm.

      What other windows apps do you run that require drivers to be installed?

    46. Re:Good Marketing by repvik · · Score: 1

      Wasn't one of the "great things" with Vista that the drivers were moved to userspace?

    47. Re:Good Marketing by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Can you write those files with standard drivers? If so, then it's just a hard drive - albeit one that's particular about its contents.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    48. Re:Good Marketing by Lurching · · Score: 1

      That depends on your iPod. My iPod Touch shows NOTHING under Linux. I can only update it through iTunes. Their Windows USB drivers are crap. The last two time I tried to update the OS on it (2.0.1 & 2.0.2) it bricked and I had to take it to an Apple Store so that they could reload it from a Mac.

    49. Re:Good Marketing by mhazen · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.

      A single piece of software that crashes the underlying operating system isn't the fault of the operating system any more than a cement truck crashing through the front of a china shop is the fault of the street.

      --
      Rock is dead. Long live scissors and paper!
    50. Re:Good Marketing by init100 · · Score: 1

      What other windows apps do you run that require drivers to be installed?

      Daemon Tools? :P

    51. Re:Good Marketing by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      FWIW, windows since NT has been a hybrid kernel rather than a pure monolithic kernel.

      In this case, the problem seems to be a driver installed by the application. Unless you have any further information, your conclusion that MS is at fault would seem to be wrong.

    52. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, could be something that come in a recent patch Tuesday for Vista and so wasn't testable by Apple.

      For that matter, it could be that Apple found and reported a Vista bug and MS refused to fix it, so they said "fuck it, ship the thing anyway, *then* they'll fix it".

      Lots of possibilities.

    53. Re:Good Marketing by teridon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      iTunes is "GEAR powered"; i.e. it installs the GEAR CD/DVD burner ASPI drivers. See:
      http://www.gearsoftware.com/support/drivers.cfm
      http://www.gearsoftware.com/wiki/index.php?title=GEAR_Powered_Products#iTunes_for_Windows

      Wouldn't those be kernel-space drivers?

      --
      I hold it, that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing. -- Thomas Jefferson
    54. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      iTunes doesn't (shouldn't) load any kernel-space drivers.

      You are telling me that Usbaapl.sys is a user mode file? I think that .sys extension should be a dead give away.

    55. Re:Good Marketing by ravenshrike · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Of course, this still leads to a problem if it is those drivers.

      The GEAR drivers are signed by Microsoft Windows Hardware Compatibility, therefore are completely compatible with Windows Vista.

    56. Re:Good Marketing by repvik · · Score: 1

      Even if Apple has written a crappy driver, should the userspace driver be able to take down the ENTIRE OS with it?

    57. Re:Good Marketing by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Most probably it's everyone's fault. Apple wrote a faulty driver and failed to test it properly, Microsoft signed the thing without testing it properly and the user... probably did something wrong. Okay, maybe the user isn't at fault. Maybe.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    58. Re:Good Marketing by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. So why isn't the indexing done for all new or changed files on startup by the player itself? That wouldn't take nearly as much time (reading and parsing ID3 tags isn't difficult AFAIK) and would allow such changeability without additional software interaction.

      PS, I was mentioning my Lyra flash-based player. I don't really know what their HDD models are like, but mine starts in about three seconds.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    59. Re:Good Marketing by moderatorrater · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have never had a blue screen of death in Vista ever. Period. This is after a year of using it with many different programs and many different hardware configurations. It's much more stable than it's predecessors.

      I have never had an Apple program be stable on the Windows platform. iTunes is bloated at best, absolutely unusable if you catch it at the wrong time of the moon cycle, and just generally not that good. Safari crashes constantly for me whenever I've tried to use it. I've had iPods not work at all when trying to use them with windows.

      My money is on Apple being the fucked up one this time. Someone should verify that it requires administrator rights to install, and that will settle the deal. I'm guessing that they have DRM measures implemented in v8 that weren't in v7 and that's what's causing the problem.

    60. Re:Good Marketing by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      If Windows didn't allow such extensive use of making every bit of software installing useless drivers and daemons, Windows wouldn't be quite as VULNERABLE to misbehaving software as it is now.

      It sounds like you're blaming Windows for encouraging this behavior, which would be a valid point if the developers who made this program didn't come from a company dedicated to another operating system with a different modus operandi.

    61. Re:Good Marketing by kitgerrits · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apparently, you haven't tried mounting a recent iPod in a generic Linux machine.
      Hint: it won't work

      --
      "I was in love with a beautiful blonde once, dear. She drove me to drink. It's the one thing I am indebted to her for."
    62. Re:Good Marketing by spun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Eh? Bad analogy. Replace 'china shop' with 'cement barrier specifically designed to stop dump trucks.' That is one of the main things operating systems do, stop processes from interfering with each other. Understand? It is one of the fundamental reasons operating systems exist at all. To say it is not the fault of the operating system is to misunderstand the purpose of an operating system. Everything else (scheduling, memory and resource allocation) could be done cooperatively by each running program.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    63. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think its rather obvious, the most likely explanation is that the DRM built into vista, and the DRM built into iTunes simply are not playing well together.

      Combine this with a famously unstable OS, and presto BSOD!

      While its true a better OS would only see the application crash and not the whole OS, microsoft likes to integrate everything together, so its easier for one bad application to damage the whole systems functionality.

    64. Re:Good Marketing by lostguru · · Score: 1

      yes, that could be a kernel driver, but what cd drivers have to do with connecting a iPod/iPhone I don't know.

      --
      Jayne: "These are stone killers, little man. They ain't cuddly like me."
      98% of America's teens drink alcohol, smok
    65. Re:Good Marketing by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "his is because I can just drop MP3s into it without any user or software intervention"

      I would wager there is some software involved in moving those files.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    66. Re:Good Marketing by v1 · · Score: 1

      if you ignore the obvious insufficient testing, NO app like that should be able to totally tank the OS. The OS shouldn't allow it.

      Still on the front page:

      The Microsoft source blamed bad drivers from GPU companies and printer companies for the majority of Vista's early stability problems and described User Account Control as poorly implemented but defended it as necessary for the continued health of the Windows platform. He assailed OEM system builders for including bad, buggy, or just plain useless apps on their machines in exchange for a few bucks on the back end. Finally he conceded that Apple appeals to more and more consumers because the hardware is slick, the price is OK, and Apple doesn't annoy its customers (or allow third parties to).

      I'd call a BSD pretty annoying, wouldn't you? 3rd parties (Apple or otherwise) shouldn't be capable of bringing a solid system to its knees. Trying to get the 3rd parties to behave is a waste of time and is trying to redirect the blame.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    67. Re:Good Marketing by timster · · Score: 1

      Hi, your comment makes no sense. Many many many OS bugs cause crashes when an application does something that is correct according to the API. Complex applications very often expose OS bugs that nobody had noticed before.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    68. Re:Good Marketing by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, Safari crashes on Apple hardware. I've had at least a half dozen times that safari has crashed my iPhone and required a hard reset.

    69. Re:Good Marketing by cbreaker · · Score: 2, Funny

      The only decent software for Windows that Apple ever made was Quicktime. Even now, unfortunately, Quicktime is kinda flakey but the support libraries for Quicktime that many applications use work okay.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    70. Re:Good Marketing by pluther · · Score: 1

      Sure, I'll blame Vista.
      It seems to work just fine on XP.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    71. Re:Good Marketing by figleaf · · Score: 4, Informative

      I just installed iTunes 8 and happened to peak at the offending driver's import/exports.
      Its written uses the kernel mode driver framework and not the user-mode framework.
      BTW, User mode driver framework is available on XP too.

    72. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A BSOD is not an application crash. Every BSOD is the fault of the kernel, drivers, or hardware.

    73. Re:Good Marketing by fermion · · Score: 1
      I think this itunes is going to be a headache for everyone, I am not sure what all they did, what I do know is that Apple has once again combined feature and security updates. Shame on Apple for propagating bad culture.

      For the record, the first time I tried to sync my iPod with the new iTunes on my Powerbook, I had to reboot the computer due to unresponsiveness. It took several attempts to get the iPod to properly connect to iTunes, and iTunes became unresponsive several times. Though everything seems to working fine now, I wonder what kind of issues I will see in the future.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    74. Re:Good Marketing by quazee · · Score: 5, Informative

      Vista will not magically run kernel-mode USB device drivers in userspace.
      There *is* support for user-mode USB drivers via UMDF (User-mode driver framework). But, the driver has to be implemented differently for that to work.
      Apple USB driver (Usbaapl.sys) is a traditional kernel-mode driver.
      Any unhandled exception (or, perhaps, kernel memory corruption) in the driver will cause a blue screen.

      And there is, in fact, a redistributable version of UMDF for Windows XP (SP2 and later).

      --
      throw new SuccessException("Sig read successfully");
    75. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, you're bringing facts into this? What are you doing here?

    76. Re:Good Marketing by gsgriffin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is exactly what Apple is not well versed in doing...testing software that will have to run on millions of configurations and hardware scenarios. They are used to writing something that runs on a simple OS and hardware that is their design. Welcome to the big world that MS gets to play in and be blamed for everyday.

      --
      jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
    77. Re:Good Marketing by Khuffie · · Score: 1

      Quicktime? Decent? It's slow as molasses

    78. Re:Good Marketing by _KiTA_ · · Score: 1

      Expect Slashdot comments to blame Vista too.

      Expect it to actually be Vista's fault, but Apple will code a workaround.

    79. Re:Good Marketing by Khuffie · · Score: 1

      There are no special drivers, just generic userspace software, and userspace programs SHOULD NEVER BE ABLE TO CAUSE A KERNEL PANIC!

      Tell that to my coworker's iMac running Leopard, which has been crashing at least once a day for the last week while running video editing software.

    80. Re:Good Marketing by ignavus · · Score: 1

      "iTunes ain't done until Windows can't run."

      Mission accomplished.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    81. Re:Good Marketing by daveywest · · Score: 1

      So, you're saying that Vista isn't really crashing, but that iTunes 8 just simulates a BSOD?

    82. Re:Good Marketing by ChowRiit · · Score: 1

      I think the main point people are missing here is that whether the bug causing the crash is Vista or Apple's fault maybe, just maybe, Apple should have thought about bug testing before release? iPods and iTunes are marketed as Windows capable, so regardless of anything else it's Apple's responsibility to ensure a working, stable Windows version of their software.

      Bugs in Vista isn't massive news, but Apple not bothering to bug test their software properly is - if they can't spot a flaw this obvious (iTunes + Vista = crash), how can anyone use their products expecting them to have found and removed any and all security vulnerabilities?

    83. Re:Good Marketing by Brain+Damaged+Bogan · · Score: 1

      while vista is a steaming pile of shit... apple, nay any software distributor shouldn't be releasing software without first thoroughly testing it on all the "supported" platforms

      --
      -- Sex is the antonym of pringles. Once you pop it's time to stop.
    84. Re:Good Marketing by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      iTunes reads CD's and DVD's as well as iPods and iPhones. So the common link is iTunes between them; so that should answer what one has to do with the other.

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    85. Re:Good Marketing by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      going to be a headache for everyone

      Well not everyone. There are those of us that refuse to contribute to the coffers of badly behaved corporations. Never used dieTunes and probably never will.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    86. Re:Good Marketing by erroneus · · Score: 1

      You should go over the list of files that get installed with a wide variety of apps. Any time you see "*.vxd" you are looking at a virtual device driver. These VXDs are often the means by which applications gain access to more memory or other system resources that user-land programs wouldn't normally have access to. And while we're on it, how common is it for Windows apps to require Administrator privileges to run? Last I noticed, it is a very frequent problem and one that renders most Windows security measures completely moot.

      So we're back to Microsoft pretty much allowing this culture to persist. There are plenty of [unpopular] things they can do to fix or reverse the problem, but they won't because they fear losing their large developer base.

    87. Re:Good Marketing by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Vista is not a big truck, it's, it's a series of tubes!

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    88. Re:Good Marketing by compro01 · · Score: 1

      ID3 parsing isn't hard, but doing it for hundreds/thousands of files can end up being a fair wait. Sandisk's sansa flash-based players do it like that and you can be looking at 5+ minutes of "updating index. please wait" after adding/removing a song or two out of a few hundred.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    89. Re:Good Marketing by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      "Arte you SURE?".

      Mr. Johnson replies, "Veeeeelly interestink" and retreats behind the foliage.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    90. Re:Good Marketing by myc · · Score: 1

      I guess YMMV. My brand new Dell desktop running OEM installed Vista blue screens ALL THE TIME. In fact, this is what convinced me to switch to Macs at work, and when the Dell finally dies beyond repair to switch to Macs at home as well.

      --
      NO CARRIER
    91. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You don realize that iTunes installs proprietary drivers that run in kernel-mode, right?

      Time to revise your analysis.

    92. Re:Good Marketing by calmofthestorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is no excuse for not testing your app if you claim to support a system.
      There is no excuse for allowing an unprivileged userspace program (or evne most root programs) to cause a kernel panic.

      It's a bug in both Vista and iTunes.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    93. Re:Good Marketing by Threni · · Score: 1

      > I'd call a BSD pretty annoying, wouldn't you? 3rd parties (Apple or otherwise) shouldn't be capable of bringing a solid system to its knees.

      If it was solid, it wouldn't be brought to its knees. The OS shouldn't crash, and the app shouldn't crash the OS. Without knowing more about what the problem actually is, there's not much more to be said about it.

      I'm just amused that copying music to a hard drive over a USB cable is made so hard. It's only because Apple force people to use their lame software. I have an iPod and I will never buy any music using iTunes or any other online store. I buy the CD and I rip and do what I want with it. Why would I pay for lossily compressed files I can't copy onto whatever devices I choose to? It doesn't make any sense.

    94. Re:Good Marketing by afidel · · Score: 1

      Actually, the ipod driver SHOULD be running in userland, there's a userland driver framework for XP SP2 and Vista and something like a freaking ipod should be using it, there's absolutely nothing performance critical enough to justify running it in kernel space.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    95. Re:Good Marketing by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      I think the main point people are missing here is that whether the bug causing the crash is Vista or Apple's fault maybe, just maybe, Apple should have thought about bug testing before release? iPods and iTunes are marketed as Windows capable, so regardless of anything else it's Apple's responsibility to ensure a working, stable Windows version of their software.

      Bugs in Vista isn't massive news, but Apple not bothering to bug test their software properly is - if they can't spot a flaw this obvious (iTunes + Vista = crash), how can anyone use their products expecting them to have found and removed any and all security vulnerabilities?

      Maybe, just maybe they did? Maybe that's how they found that having old 3rd party drivers can blue-screen Vista when syncing the iPhone or iPod touch?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    96. Re:Good Marketing by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 0

      Expect Apple to blame Vista.

      They should. The only thing that should cause a BSOD when plugged into the USB port is a live 120V line.

    97. Re:Good Marketing by Sandbags · · Score: 4, Insightful

      BSOD in Vista is either hardw3are level resource conflicts, or an actual memory fault.

      I'm actually betting, based on the I/O is see in IT8 while it's building the thumbnail images, the massive background effort to create genius database info, and the high level of memory and disk I/O present in it's basic use that did not occur under IT7, that these machines were ALREADY FAULTY, but simply were not utilized enough to trigger these memory or hard disk faults.

      The DRM is exactly the same btw. No changes. Besides, DRM is a user space application, and can not cause BSOD. It;s impossible for that to be the cause...

      If you have not had vista BSOD, then all that means is your hardware is exceptionally well built and defect free, and that none of your components have resource conflicts with any others. My guess is your PC is OEM manufactured, likely by Dell, and is on the lower end of the spectrum (under $800 base system, that maybe you added a nice video card and some extra RAM to)

      Vista may not BSOD on you, but I bet you have frequent application crashes... I don't typically go more than a few days without an application bombing out, my desktop refreshing from an explorer crash, my printer loosing connection, or an app just hanging and needing to be killed by task manager.

      Sure, memory leaks may be a thing of the past, and generally when an app bombs, the machine stays up... My Mac has had those features for 6 years! When an app does bomb, I typically see in the logs that it;s a core driver or service at fault, and not even a file installed by the application.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    98. Re:Good Marketing by Cow+Jones · · Score: 1

      They did test it, but they couldn't test every single hardware/software permutation that exists which is not realistic.

      They're not even tying! They're so used to being in command over all of the hardware and software, that the PC situation is simply overwhelming them.

      This is hardly the first time that Apple has released buggy software, or broken patches. For example, I'm still waiting for a fixed version of their Bootcamp update. It will download (over 100MB, I forgot how much exactly, I'm running Linux at the moment), but it won't install. Want to know what the problem is? I'm using a German keyboard layout!

      For fuck's sake! They couldn't even be bothered to check if their update installed on computers with a different locale. And what is their response to this problem (which is hitting many thousands of users, btw)? Uninstall Bootcamp. Reboot. Set Windows to use the English keyboard mapping. Reboot. Re-install Bootcamp. Reboot. Install the Bootcamp upgrade. Reboot. Then set your keyboard back to your preferred setting. AND REBOOT. Are they fucking serious? How about just fixing their broken upgrade?

      But no, this is the Mac. Where things "just work".
      Right. Microsoft-bashing is fun and all, but I've never seen anything as bad as this with a MS patch. Or with Linux, for that matter.

      I'm seriously disappointed with Apple.
      And I wouldn't be at all surprised if the current mess with iTunes was their fault.

      CJ

      --

      Ah, arrogance and stupidity, all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari
    99. Re:Good Marketing by griffjon · · Score: 1

      It's probably a bug in iTunes, but a failure of Vista. BSODs for an application? Really?

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    100. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Windows didn't allow...

      Totally, I hate when I'm allowed to do whatever I want with my machine, that's why I use... a Mac!

    101. Re:Good Marketing by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      You should go over the list of files that get installed with a wide variety of apps.

      What other windows apps do you run that require drivers to be installed?

      how common is it for Windows apps to require Administrator privileges to run?

      Increasingly uncommon. When we first switched to roaming desktops at my office around 7 years ago, it was a big problem. Even everyday apps like Wordperfect malfunctioned without admin privileges. I personally can't remember the last time we've had a problem like this. With Vista, it's a bit more important that apps follow the guidelines, and I think this problem has diminished further.

      There are plenty of [unpopular] things they can do to fix or reverse the problem, but they won't because they fear losing their large developer base.

      Such as? What are some things Microsoft can do?

    102. Re:Good Marketing by danomac · · Score: 1

      I have never had a blue screen of death in Vista ever. Period.

      That's funny, when I tried to install Vista Ultimate x64 it bluescreened. It couldn't even load the installer. Turns out you can't boot from the DVD when you have 4GB of RAM in your machine. (Isn't the whole reason to go x64 for addressing more ram??)

      Once I removed a stick, installed it, installed SP1, and put the stick back did I get any stability.

      I haven't tried updating iTunes yet, maybe I won't bother. I'll get nightmares about trying to install Vista again...

    103. Re:Good Marketing by afidel · · Score: 1

      meh, I run all the business software for an entire S&P 500 company with hardly any users having admin privileges. It's not that hard to do. You might need to figure out what registry key the lazy dev forgot to have the installer set the security rights on, but rarely does an app really need admin privileges.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    104. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup really insightful rant - for the clueless.

      Ever try to write Windows apps?

      Ever see how often you have to write skanky crap like drivers and daemons because its not supported inside the general Win32 architecture? Probably not.

    105. Re:Good Marketing by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I'll agree that Apple's software for Windows sucks horribly.

      Oh, and I've only had eight or nine BSODs for all 2000-Vista versions of Windows.

      Six or seven of them were on one Vista machine with a failing hard drive - which can't be counted against Vista, I mean, that's a hardware failure. ;) (And that's the only Vista machine that I've ever used as my personal machine, and I had it for two weeks.)

    106. Re:Good Marketing by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because iTunes totally doesn't use a custom proprietary USB protocol to talk to iPods that would never require special drivers.

      Oh, really? Bummer, I guess I'm sticking with my firewire 5-gigger then.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    107. Re:Good Marketing by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      There are no special drivers, just generic userspace software, and userspace programs SHOULD NEVER BE ABLE TO CAUSE A KERNEL PANIC!

      Tell that to my coworker's iMac running Leopard, which has been crashing at least once a day for the last week while running video editing software.

      What video editing software? Usually repeated crashes of the whole OS (OS X) end up being hardware problems. For example, Adobe InDesign has numerous memory leaks and several reproducible bugs that will crash the program every time. The difference I've noted is that under OS X it just crashes the program and restarting the program recovers the memory. Under Windows XP and Vista the same crashes (cross platform bugs) will take down the entire OS and the only way to get memory back is to reboot the OS.

      I have no doubt there are programs that can crash OS X, just as there are programs that can crash Vista, but my experience has been OS X is more resistant to those problems, in general.

    108. Re:Good Marketing by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Then it is both their faults.
      Apple for not testing their driver and Microsoft for making there approval process nothing but a way to get money.
      WHQL= I paid Microsoft but it still could be total crap.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    109. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if I build a house that isn't up to code, and it passes inspection, it's the inspector that looses his job when the house collapses.

      True, but it is you who is buried under the pile.

      Unless you subsequently sell (or rent) the house, in which case the new buyer (or renter) is the one who will be buried.

      Captcha: repulse

    110. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, They sure will. Otherwise this would only happen if they didn't debug their code, which is pretty much an impossible scenario. Apple has to use their sketchy antics to get more mac users.

    111. Re:Good Marketing by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      But if I build a house that isn't up to code, and it passes inspection, it's the inspector that looses his job when the house collapses.

      True, but it is you who is buried under the pile.

      No, it's the poor sod who lives in the house who gets buried (i.e. end user caught in the middle), which in the vast majority of cases *isn't* the builder.

      It's more like [insert typical Slashdot flawed car analogy here] ;)

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    112. Re:Good Marketing by pesc · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pop quiz: What does the kernel use to access hard disks, memory, and whatever other hardware is in your system?

      iTunes?

      --

      )9TSS
    113. Re:Good Marketing by Sandbags · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hey bud, I'm a software tester for a disaster recovery company. Let me put this past you:

      - 4 identical hardware machines
      - 4 exact copies of an ISO of Vista EE
      - all 4 machines side by side, I make the same click on the same screen on each one.

      After installation is completed with exactly the same settings on all 4 machines, we install our corporate AV program, then allow the machines to download and install updates. Each of the 4 machines has exactly the same list of updates added in the same order.

      All 4 machines are benchmarked prior to and after installation, using 2 different tools from boot CDs. All 4 machines benchmark the same (within less than a second on a multi-million CPU cycle run, and withing 5 seconds on an multi-hour RAM test. No machines exhibit RAM, disk, or CPU issues and are regularly burned in and tested both before and after installations.

      of the 4 machines, 1 has a C: with 3.9GB used space. 1 has 4.7GB used, 1 has 5.2 GB used, and 1 has 8.2!

      One machine boots Vista in less than 22 seconds, one takes longer than 2 minutes. others are inbetween. Hard drive I/O pattern tests are run and all 4 drives exhibit nearly identical characteristics and I/O patterns for randomized I/O read/write testing.

      One machine has 860MB or RAM free out of 2GB, one has less thqan 200MB free out of 2GB. Others fall between.

      When we blank the drives and repeat the tests, machines exhibit completely different results. Sometimes the slowest one to boot in one test wiull be the fastest one to boot in another. Swapping components from system to system was no impact on the performance of a machine.

      We started doing this test a few years ago when I was setting up several exchange 2003 servers to be used in a classroom and noticed simalar wild divergence between system performance, install size, and more, even before service packs or patches were added. We have repeasted this test with every version of 2000, XP, Vista, 2003 servre, 2008 server, as well as older OS. Anything NT or previous, and installer seems to be very consistent. Anything 2000 or later, very inconsistent. The newer it is, the worse the installer inconsistancies.

      We have also done this test by repeating installations on the same single machine over and over, and the installation size on that machine is just as inconsistent.

      So, what's the deal? Why does the same installer batch file, which is basically a top down program that collects data based on pre-defined rules, and processes installation order based on documented, databased information, produce such inconsistancy?

      As a result, we no longer test product on a single machine, but we bought 4 each of 5 different machines, and installed the OS seperately on each one, then burned images of it. We test each application agains all 20 OS images with the same OS on each one, then swap images for each OS service pack and each OS supported. This can mean teasting a single application against over 70 Windows versions, each on 20 machines. This is a test base run of 1400 installs. After this, we release internally, and install to roughly 100 machines. We purposely buy only 2 or 3 of each model from a manufacturer to deploy in the company, so we have dozens of different machines, and allow each user to basically maintain their own box the way they like, creating what in other companies would be an IT nightmare, but in this case it;s a benefit (and each user is an admin on some level, and completely capable of maintaining their own machine). We'll find a dozen bugs we didn't find running through the 1400 image test run. After release to the field, when roughly a thousand customers get a hold of it, we'll find more bugs...

      You CAN NOT test for every hardware reviosion on every machine made, and every OS that could be on it. If you're asking Apple to do that,. you're expecting them to have access to over 10 million differing system images to test on. This is IMPOSSIBLE.

      The fault is ENTIRELY microsofts. If the soft

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    114. Re:Good Marketing by macshit · · Score: 1

      Why on earth does itunes need its own USB driver in the first place?!?

      What does it do that can't be done using the standard USB driver?

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    115. Re:Good Marketing by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I never had a kernel extension (driver) crash on OS X nor my friends did. You can thank to lack of 3rd party devices for it ;)

      I just bought a Serial-USB converter and it naturally comes with a kernel extension which is installed to /System/Extensions.

      In light of current story, I wondered what happens if a badly written extension crashes or it doesn't handle the device itself malfunction. Does it get unloaded? Do I get the stylish OSX BSOD? Does it get reloaded (launchd)?

      I think if it gets unloaded gracefully or reloaded, Apple's lack of Windows culture is to blame. It was same deal when Safari spitted all kinds of files to users Desktop bug. It took a while to make Apple understand what kind of a horrible security risk it is. I suicidally said on all Apple fan sites "Apple should hire windows only developers to code for Windows".

      About the conspiracy... Not just they did actually broke OS X security (Office install under 502 was a big deal), they keep breaking OS X compatibility and performance with possible horrible system wide browser crashes right now. "How?", by giving users option to install this piece of junk: http://preview.tinyurl.com/3blyfx (Windows Media Player for OS X)

      Giving away Windows Media Player/PPC, a code not touched since 2003, runs in Browser thread (plugins), has DRM layer running at admin level (nobody knows if it works). A plugin runs in Browser thread, half of Safaris would crash before Apple notices it and guess what? They can't touch third party plugin code too. If it is based on Netscape plugin standard, files are there, it will get loaded.

      How hard is it to put: "Up to OS X 10.3.9 and PowerPC only" notice? Did they forget to remove the offer? No! Their site had overhaul recently and those idiots also submitted it to Apple downloads. At least Apple downloads team should say "Stop! What the hell are you doing? Didn't you globally license working (flip4mac) modern code?" and reject it. If they had "Report bad software/malware" link, I wouldn't wait a second to click it.

      They know what they are doing. Believe me.

    116. Re:Good Marketing by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Sounds like bad RAM to me. If a machine kernel panics or freezes more than once every few months, unless you're doing something really unusual (e.g. plugging in a hard drive containing a dubious filesystem), 99% of the time, there's defective hardware involved.... The other 1% of the time, it is some broken third-party driver.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    117. Re:Good Marketing by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Apple for not testing their driver and Microsoft for making there approval process nothing but a way to get money.
      WHQL= I paid Microsoft but it still could be total crap.

      I think you might still be confused?

      I believe the driver is NOT WHQL approved. Last time I installed iTunes I got the unapproved driver popup at least...do you have further information?

    118. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I blame myself

    119. Re:Good Marketing by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Well, yea - the player is. But there's still a lot of software (although I'm not sure if Premiere still wants it) that uses the quicktime libraries to perform some functions. Quicktime provides a bunch of image manipulation libraries you can use in your applications.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    120. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can use the ipod shuffle this way.
      and i reccomend you do.
      theres a free python library out there to rebuild the db and indices that you have to run everytime you drag stuff in, but it works.

    121. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this informative? Because he is shifting the blame away from Apple? This post is blatantly wrong. Itunes does load a kernel mode driver, Usbaapl.sys. You can write usermode drivers for USB but Apple didn't.

    122. Re:Good Marketing by linuxpng · · Score: 1

      That's funny, when I tried to install Vista Ultimate x64 it worked fine with 4GB of RAM in my machine. Didn't have to remove any portion of memory so I think something else was up.

    123. Re:Good Marketing by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Tell him to run Apple Hardware Test
      http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1509
      I can bet on faulty memory chip or bad blocks on HD (yes they still exist) or a faulty logic board (mainboard).

      Video editing software requires massive amount of reads/writes to memory and hard disk. It "triggers" the issue, not that it is the issue itself. In case it crashes the whole system while importing movies from Camera, the kernel extension or the IO port (e.g. Firewire/USB) is to blame of course.

    124. Re:Good Marketing by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Not quite. WHQL actually doesn't do the testing, they merely accept the report from the testing house that did (and yes, you can do your testing in-house) and sign it if the report says all went well.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    125. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't see to understand that MS doesn't have a choice whether to allow something like this. If there were no way to install drivers, people would just patch the kernel.

      When MS bitchslaps somebody for not letting them patch the kernel (like when Intel wanted NSP in Win95), people yell monopoly!

      When MS warns people about unsigned drivers, the driver writers find ways of circumventing the warning.

      When MS makes signed drivers required, people bitch.

      Of course you could argue about Linux not having this culture, but there is no iTunes for Linux, so it's not like Linux's culture has any advantage here.

      dom

    126. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BSOD?

    127. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can fix this by buying a second iPhone and keeping it attached to USB all the time. Or you could just buy a Mac.

      - Steve

    128. Re:Good Marketing by winphreak · · Score: 1

      Thank god you're modded +5 Informative, I never knew about a UMDF for XP.

      --
      "I'm a well-wisher, in that I don't wish you any specific harm."
    129. Re:Good Marketing by Duhavid · · Score: 0

      Apple should not blame Vista, but really, an application crashed the OS. That is a fault in the OS.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    130. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, it's MS's fault that an app released today crashes their year-old OS? Oh, they should have tested it, right?

      I agree

    131. Re:Good Marketing by telemart73 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      How in God's name can an application crash the most secure operating system on the market? All joking aside, how can Vista crash based on one application?

    132. Re:Good Marketing by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Except that the part crashing is almost certainly the iPod USB driver.

      Funny thing about windows you might not know. Vista and XP do not have cross compatible drivers. So as far as bugs are concerned the two platforms are completely different pieces of software.

      This is why everybody's hardware didn't magically work with Vista when it was released. It wasn't that Vista was "bad" it was just that it required *new* drivers to be written which didn't exist.

      The problem is limited because we're talking to two different releases. IF it was iTunes itself crashing then you could say the legacy compatibility was bad and would be Vista's fault.

    133. Re:Good Marketing by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Obviously iTunes shouldn't crash Vista. But Vista should let any process take it down either. I expect there are two problems, one is Vistas and one is iTunes'. Plenty for everyone.

    134. Re:Good Marketing by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Windows hasn't prevented processes from interfering with each other for all that long.

      I remember when you could write to a bad pointer and overwrite your BIOS! It happened often enough we used to keep printouts of the hard drive settings so we could restore them easily.

    135. Re:Good Marketing by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      My second generation Nano will cause the blue screen of death on Windows XP if I plug it into the USB port on my PCMCIA card. It's done this consistently since I got it a year or so ago. It works fine in the port built into the computer. Strangely, my first generation Nano doesn't get the blue screen in either port. So I tend to think the problem is with Apple, just because going from an old Nano to a new Nano did the same thing.

    136. Re:Good Marketing by dizzydogg · · Score: 1

      I have never had a blue screen of death in Vista ever. Period.

      That's funny, when I tried to install Vista Ultimate x64 it bluescreened. It couldn't even load the installer. Turns out you can't boot from the DVD when you have 4GB of RAM in your machine. (Isn't the whole reason to go x64 for addressing more ram??)

      Once I removed a stick, installed it, installed SP1, and put the stick back did I get any stability.

      I haven't tried updating iTunes yet, maybe I won't bother. I'll get nightmares about trying to install Vista again...

      It's not a problem with the 4GB, we install several copies of ultimate daily with various makes of computers, with anywhere from 4-8gb of ram, with no problems whatsoever. Pretty much every blue-screen I have seen since vista came out has been the result of a hardware fault or occasionally bad drivers (I'm looking at you Nvidia) it is extremely rare that we get a system that blue-screens with any kind of frequency without solvable cause . And to give you an idea we go through ~20-30 Vista PCs a day at my shop, both repairs and software installs/bloatware cleanups on new units.

                          A lot of people like to bash vista, and while it's not perfect (damn UAC is poorly implemented) it is better for security in general than the OSes that Microsoft came out with for home users before it. We get many, many times more viruses on systems running older versions of windows than with vista (more than could be attributed to the fact that there are more XP installs out there than Vista).
                      The biggest problem we see with vista is program compatibility, since vista by default wont allow programs to molest your computer any way they damn well please, but that is fixable in 95% of cases by running the program as administrator. I find it odd that many of the same people who recommend running nothing as root unless absolutely necessary on their Linux box balk at this and complain about Microsoft basically enforcing good programing practices from third party developers. (Jebus, never thought i would have Microsoft & good programing practices in the same sentence). As programs start being written to put their files where Microsoft has been telling them to put them for YEARS this will go away. (Documents in %homepath%\documents folder, program settings in %appdata% instead of hard coding a location that could change with the next windows release etc... Hell there is still software being sold that won't work properly if installed anywhere other than c:\program files\ and that's on XP as well as Vista. Too bad for you if you want it on your second HDD)

                          70% of the complaints i get are a question of customer education, about the increased security and the new locations and look for everything ("Where is the start button? All i have is this little windows logo button thingy.") 20% are software compatibility (which are fixed most of the time with the aforementioned "run as administrator") The other 10% are usually justifiable complaints about the occasional Vista weirdness and/or performance (usually after upgrading to vista on an old machine or on a system with low ram, or with the default bloatware that came with their PC (HP/COMPAQ are STUFFED with crap)) Vista is slightly slower than XP, but then again XP is slower than W2K, which is slower than 98, which runs slower than 3.11.

    137. Re:Good Marketing by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Huh. I honestly can't think of that being the result of anything other than bad or unoptimized programming. Unless the CPU involved was really, really slow... slower than I'm thinking the one in most MP3s players actually is. Couldn't you just implement this in an SQLite DB?

      That said, I'm not an embedded systems programmer, so what do I know?

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    138. Re:Good Marketing by dizzydogg · · Score: 1

      iTunes for windows is not exactly known for being a well written piece of software. As has been pointed out earlier in the thread, Apple's iTunes installs their own kernel-level USB drivers instead of using the built in Vista/XP ones and also installs drivers/filters on the DVD/CD drives of the PC which has been known to cause some manufactures drives to stop reading/writing various types of disks or to disappear from the drive listing entirely. Fixing the filter problem disables the burning features of iTunes and causes iTunes to pop up an error message

      http://wizardcreations.wordpress.com/2008/01/27/itunes-makes-my-cddvd-drive-disappear/

      Any OS, including linux, with badly written drivers can crash.

      This isn't the first time iPods have caused damage to windows systems.
      http://www.apple.com/support/windowsvirus/

    139. Re:Good Marketing by danomac · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm assuming that you weren't installing on a raid setup. KB Article that mentions the problem. The issue is fixed in SP1.

      FWIW, once I got it installed with SP1 I have had zero problems with it.

    140. Re:Good Marketing by danomac · · Score: 1

      And to give you an idea we go through ~20-30 Vista PCs a day at my shop, both repairs and software installs/bloatware cleanups on new units.

      And I'll bet none are installed on a RAID array. I was trying to speed up Vista by running it on a RAID 0+1. This article has the details, and it apparently affects 32-bit installs as well. Right on the KB it says:

      Workaround: Remove 2 GB of RAM, and then restart the installation process. After Windows Vista is installed, reinstall the RAM.

      and then

      Microsoft has confirmed that this is a problem in the Microsoft products that are listed in the "Applies to" section. This problem was first corrected in Windows Vista Service Pack 1.

      I actually installed SP1 before reinstalling the RAM.

      FWIW, once I got it installed, I've had zero issues with it. I was rather puzzled at first, I've never had any install CD BSOD/panic (be it windows/linux/etc.)

    141. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be inclined to blame Apple, if Microsoft wasn't found guilty at their antitrust trial of putting code in Windows 95 to crash Quicktime. Google "microsoft knife the baby" to read their arm-twisting

    142. Re:Good Marketing by dizzydogg · · Score: 1

      True, the only system's I've installed with raid have been some of the more recent systems, people setting up media centers (becoming much more popular as various PVRs and DVD recorders support playback from WMP 11 over either USB or network and with the rise of cheap mass storage) and some of the new Sony laptops, and all have been with Vista SP1 which apparently fixed the issue.

    143. Re:Good Marketing by mattOzan · · Score: 1

      Ed Bott at ZDNet has reproduced the problem and focused attention on an updated version of the GEARAspiWDM.sys driver. This is one of the CD burning drivers that iTunes installs during the update (though to figure this out, he had to comb through the inflated installer packages manually and the System Restore history).

    144. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything else (scheduling, memory and resource allocation) could be done cooperatively by each running program.

      Spoken like someone who has no idea how intractable these allocation problems are.

      An operating system has one purpose in life: Make processes play nice with each other when it comes to access to hardware, time, and other resources. This one purpose tends to involve many things, because many problems are interconnected.

    145. Re:Good Marketing by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      Best post in this discussion. I'm glad to see there's an occasional poster on /. who even-handedly evaluates the situation and is willing to apportion blame where it's deserved, regardless of who that means deserves it.

    146. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which part of iTunes 8.0 installs a driver did you fail to read?

    147. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you that gets sued out of business. What was this supposed to prove?

    148. Re:Good Marketing by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      Not me. I hate 'em all equally. Hate! I cackled with gleeful ill will when I read the summary. The axis of IT evil turns on itself an self-destructs. *cackle* ;)

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    149. Re:Good Marketing by geekboybt · · Score: 1

      Try reinstalling. From my experience, the image provided by Dell SUCKS. Reinstalling fixed lots of issues related to crashing and such.

    150. Re:Good Marketing by Artuir · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? Well my Bill Gates could beat up your Steve Jobs!

    151. Re:Good Marketing by cnettel · · Score: 1

      Any time you see a program installing a vxd you realize it was written for Win9x and will only potentially load under the NTVDM 16-bit emulation layer, or not at all. Windows Me was the last Windows release loading any proper VXDs.

    152. Re:Good Marketing by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      You'll be glad to know that it doesn't. An iPod is just a standard USB hard drive. All communications between iTunes and the iPod use standard file operations.

      Mac OS X is UNIX. Apple understands the "everything is a file" concept.

      The only "special" thing Apple installs is a service that checks if newly connected USB hard drives are iPods.

      This is 100% Vista's fault.

      Depends on what iPod, or if it's the iPhone. iTunes has to support all of them.

    153. Re:Good Marketing by abigsmurf · · Score: 2, Informative
      The Bluescreening IS the protection. Bad drivers performing bad operations can physically harm hardware. Bluescreening from illegal memory access stops some programs going haywire when their memory is overwritten and prevents remote code execution.

      One example of a helpful bluescreening is if you short a USB socket. At first it'll turn off the socket for a short time if it detects a short, then if it keeps happening, windows will bluescreen. That's far preferable to a fried motherboard. The OS should come to a halt on these things

    154. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't up to Apple to do the quality assurance testing for their releases? How did they let this release out? I hope this isn't the beginning of a trend.

    155. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely iTunes installs and uses some driver for the iPod that will be causing the BSOD. I havenÂt seen any application bringing Vista down yet ... apart from itself

    156. Re:Good Marketing by Slayer · · Score: 1

      You can easily crash a Mac by running poorly written OpenGL-Software, and that's most likely what that video editing software does. Contrary to Vista's OpenGL implementation, Apple's is extremely finicky (read: forces you to do it right) and will reliably crash the whole system, even from user space programs run as ordinary user.

    157. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or much much more likely, Apple simply screwed up their CD-Ripping en USB drivers in a major way.

      It's simply extremely unlikely that only iTunes would have enough I/O activity to trigger this fault while other applications work fine.

      Microsoft's indexing en defragmentation software also cause massive I/O.

    158. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well....they probably should have tested Vista to make sure that no code running in userspace was capable of bringing the whole system down, yes.

    159. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expect Apple to blame Vista.

      Shame on you for thinking that way -- Apple won't blame Vista; they'll simply admit they accidentally slipstreamed their new antivirus product with the iTunes upgrade and that it acted properly.

    160. Re:Good Marketing by m50d · · Score: 1, Troll
      If you have not had vista BSOD, then all that means is your hardware is exceptionally well built and defect free, and that none of your components have resource conflicts with any others. My guess is your PC is OEM manufactured, likely by Dell, and is on the lower end of the spectrum (under $800 base system, that maybe you added a nice video card and some extra RAM to)

      Vista may not BSOD on you, but I bet you have frequent application crashes... I don't typically go more than a few days without an application bombing out, my desktop refreshing from an explorer crash, my printer loosing connection, or an app just hanging and needing to be killed by task manager.

      Sure, memory leaks may be a thing of the past, and generally when an app bombs, the machine stays up... My Mac has had those features for 6 years!

      This sort of shit is still getting +5s? I thought better of slashdot these days.

      I can't remember the last time I had an application crash in Vista. I'd no fan of windows, but this is just pure FUD.

      --
      I am trolling
    161. Re:Good Marketing by lassitude_manifested · · Score: 1

      Your hypothesis about DRM measure holds about as much water as a colander. Did you bother to read the post? It crashes when an iPod or iPhone is connected... it's clearly an issue with the driver that is being loaded NOT the DRM which would be loaded at all times that iTunes is running (and probably when it's not as well). If you've not seen a Vista BSOD, you're lucky. I'm a system administrator for a managed hosting company and even I have seen the BSOD. It wasn't on my machine (I use Linux) it was on another system administrators box, still though, we know what we're doing better than most and we've seen it. It's a hard thing to avoid.

    162. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This might be dangerous to say on Slashdot: but it might have been a driver running in kernel mode installed by iTunes...

    163. Re:Good Marketing by phillous · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Funny, cause I run vista, and have a personal policy against installing anything that falls out of Jobs' ass, and I haven't seen a BSOD since I killed XP (which felt good). Vista is a GOOD OS. There. I said it. Now get all of those bastard third party software vendors to sort thier shit out and windows might lose the reputation it has.

      Windows is a great OS and the only reason it ever fails is because it lets you do what you like. Apple is so DRM locked down that you're unable to make it crash cause they won't let you do anything with it. Linux at least doesn't crash for the right reasons - its stable and third party software is decent.

      If you're a sensible person and don't install shit software (such as apples) then you'll find Vista to -shock horror- actually work. Fill it up with the kind of shit DRM bollocks you get these days and what do you know - it falls over. Guess what. Thats YOUR fault, not microsofts.

      FYI - I am NOT a MS fanboi, I'm just sick to death of everyone saying vista is shit, when they probably havent tried it, and are probably just saying that because of stories like this where third parties are fucking incompetant.

    164. Re:Good Marketing by phillous · · Score: 1

      oh, and my rant isn't aimed at parent, jsut seemed like a good place to put it.

    165. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The crash happens when you plug in your iPod. It could be a driver bug. You know, the driver runs as part of the OS.

      Also, a good indication (although not perfect) that it is not a bug in the OS is that it does not crash with anything else. Yes, it is the iPod driver.

    166. Re:Good Marketing by teridon · · Score: 1

      I'd say it doesn't have anything to do with connecting an iPod. I was just pointing out that iTunes does load other drivers besides the USB one that apparently was causing the BSOD.

      --
      I hold it, that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing. -- Thomas Jefferson
    167. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Didnt your mom tell you the meaning of compatibility? Microsoft is not about to test other peoples shit extensively for pittance.

      Why dont you volunteer for testing?

      As it is the FOSS masters (developers) like to use the FOSS zombies (users) as guinea pigs(testers) for free anyway. LOL.

      Cmon, do the penguin dance.

    168. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree and disagree. I'll also admit to being a glass half full kind of guy. I've never had a single blue screen on Vista (in 10 YEARS! Just kidding), and that includes upgrading to iTunes 8 and syncing my iPhone. The summary is written to imply that iTunes 8 iPod/iPhone syncing simply doesn't work on Vista. WFM.

      Safari I don't use because my Vista machine is a home machine, not a machine I have to care about browser compatibility on and Safari doesn't block ads.

      But iTunes with iPhone is fantastic, despite the hatred here of "DRM". No other application/device combo I've used is as simple as iTunes if you want to organize music, buy music/TV/movies, make playlists, share library over WiFi, etc. I love it and I'll never go back. I don't own a Mac and don't intend to. My "main" machine at work is an Ubuntu box, which I also think is the bees knees. The passions in these arguments are ridiculous.

      I also recognize some deficiencies in iTunes, like UI unresponsiveness during syncing, slow start up, but none of that matters to me, it's pure gold the things you can do with this program. I'll never be able to convince myself that:

      1) Music should in all cases be free. I'm not super-excited about who gets the money, but I also don't intend to "make a stand" for the benefit of artists. I don't care.
      2) I'll ever need to play this music on more than 5 computers at once
      3) I could possibly tell the difference between the burned CD version of an iTunes Store song and the original. I'm ok that opinions vary on this point, because my opinion is the one that matters directly to me. It makes me not care about the backup or the "Apple disappears with the keys" arguments.

    169. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expect Vista to blame Vista too.... oh wai....

    170. Re:Good Marketing by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      The Microsoft source blamed bad drivers from GPU companies and printer companies for the majority of Vista's early stability problems

      I'd call a BSD pretty annoying, wouldn't you? 3rd parties (Apple or otherwise) shouldn't be capable of bringing a solid system to its knees. Trying to get the 3rd parties to behave is a waste of time and is trying to redirect the blame.

      Well, since not all Vista users seem to be affected, and since some who were could solve the problem by removing other 3rd party soft- or hardware (with drivers probably) - the question is: Who is to blame? Apple for not fixing other peoples Windows drivers? Or you, for not understanding that he was talking about Apple, maker of the Mac and OS X, not Apple, third-party app writer for Windows?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    171. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On my job, the guys that are running Vista have a couple of blue screens every week. They don't use or abuse the computers out of the ordinary either. At least, Vista knows how to dump what you are doing to the drive and restore it after reboot. It's kinda funny how often people come back from lunch and see that again, Vista just crashed and rebooted, so they have to login again.

      What this proves is that our anecdotes differ.

    172. Re:Good Marketing by erroneus · · Score: 1

      ...that's a new angle on "Windows Sucks" isn't it?

    173. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't do anything with it? For instance?

    174. Re:Good Marketing by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

      iTunes reads CD's and DVD's as well

      itunes takes over CDs and DVDs as well.

      There, fixed that for you.

    175. Re:Good Marketing by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

      If quicktime is the 'only' decent software for windows from Apple, I would be horrified to use anything from Apple at all.

      Quicktime is the worst piece of software I have ever used on windows - even RP and Creative shits were okay compared to this nightmare from Apple, because I had the option to remove them from startup and other places. Quicktime installs itself, refuses to be removed, and you will suddenly find 'new' shiny programs from Apple installed overnight!!!

    176. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets see:
      Heavy I/O, faulty, high level of memory, memory/hard disk faults = Vista sucks

      DRM exactly same, DRM user space application, impossibile to crash = Apple shits are shiny, never at fault.

      "Now somebody finally makes sense!! MOD UP!!" = Apple fanbois with mod points

    177. Re:Good Marketing by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      First of all, there was a ton of I/O. Scrolling through large lists of album artwork, I was hearing the HDD churn, so I launched monitoring tools and started peaking in. IT8 uses much more RAM, and has dramatic I/O utilization, which is attempting to read from the drives and display on the screen in real time.

      Defrag causes a lot of I/O, but it's large file reads with much less head movement, also, it has relatively limited CPU and ram use that coincides with that. Further, Vista defrags in the background, so large invasive defrags are not common under vista.

      IT8 is not craching when CD ripping, it's crashing when iPods (not iPhones or touches) are docked or undocked. Other devices (printers, cameras, camcorders, and more) have caused similar issues in vista. In fact virtually everything USB based that doesn't use Microsoft's included driver is extremely buggy, and even if it works one day, a windows patch can cause failures, even if the driver wasn't changed in the process.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    178. Re:Good Marketing by drerwk · · Score: 1

      ...cooperatively by each running program...

      I loved Systems 4 through 9. But cooperative multitasking, which was marketed by Apple as being much better than fascist pre-emptive multitasking, seemed like some variation of the Prisoner's dilemma.

    179. Re:Good Marketing by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      It is vista, if I can plug a little tool into the computer and totally make it crash,
      I could wreak havoc by sending out emails with virtual flash drives containing iPod 8 on there.
      Then every body's machines would have blue screens of death.
      I mentioned this to someone and they pointed out, that it was Apple's fault for not having good drivers. I say Vista for not being able to handle a bad call from a bad driver.

    180. Re:Good Marketing by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      I entirely agree. I was also surprised to find I can't do the rather fundamental task of viewing in full screen, unless I pay money. And let's not forget their entry in the Interface Hall of Shame (this was particularly worrying, when good UI is the thing that people claim Apple are good at).

      Whatever happened to "It Just Works"? It makes me distrust the "I can't explain why Apple is better, it just is, you just have to try it" mantra when, everytime I do try it, I have these experiences.

    181. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I expect other more gullible people to test new releases for me first. Human shields ftw. Thanks for taking the bullet.

    182. Re:Good Marketing by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Nope if it is not then in this case it would be Apples fault.
      I have just dealt with so many WHQL drivers that are total junk that I assumed that Apple's driver was WHQL as well.
      Like the Nvidia drivers that seemed to crash a lot and the huge number of USB serial devices that just stop working randomly.
      So yes if the driver is not approved in this case it isn't Microsoft's fault.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    183. Re:Good Marketing by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      iTunes should crash, but Vista shouldn't.

      Isn't the purpose of the whole thing that neither crashes ?

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    184. Re:Good Marketing by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Blaming both is a good answer, but let's be pragmatic for a moment. Average Joe doesn't care WHY something crashes, only that it does. Most Joe's will just chalk this up to another horrible Microsoft Windows experience.

    185. Re:Good Marketing by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Certainly Apple DID thoroughly test this, as would any software company that has processes. The problem is in the test platform itself. There are so many "what-if" scenarios available with Windows, it is impossible to test them all. If this were a wide-spread problem, then yeah, I'd blame Apple for lack of testing.

    186. Re:Good Marketing by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, did I in any way state bad hardware = vista sucks? no. Perhaps vista's failure to properly identify that bad hardware might be an iaaue, but generally, unless you run tests from boot media issues like this are hard to find. Mac's bomb just the same from hardweare issues when it effects kernel level processes, so does Unix. In fact, in my post, I actualy blamed the hardware, giving Vista a leg up and taking fault away from it.

      I do not support DRM, but, you can't blame it for system crashes. DRM is just an interpreter, and encryption layer. It either works or doesn't. It's not an application, driver, or process itself, it;s just a mathematic function that feeds data to other actual processes. It IS impossible for DRM, by it;s basic existence, to crash an application, let alone the kernel. Anything in user space memory by design is incapable of causing a BSOD. This is the basic definition of memory seperation. You clearly know nothing about system architecture, advanced memory management, OS design, or the OSI model, so maybe you should refrain from commenting here in /. It's only making George Bush look smart.

      I'm not an Apple Fanboi. I'm a system architect, and I use 5 differnt OS on a regular basis. Apple has a lot of advantages, but it's not nearly a perfect OS. The problem is, everyone who hasn;t actually used one extensively, and hasn't taken the time to learn what those advantages are, loves to bash Apple at the slightest hint of a fracture in their facade.

      In this case, it's clearly an issue of a device driver conflict. If the driver itself didn;t work, that would have been caught in testing. BTW: are you aware, that JUST in the english versions of Windows, there are aover 150 unique version of Windows that have to be tested against, multiply that by testing which has to be done on 15-20 different chipsets, and further with each of those systems having a slow and fats hard disk, and low and high memory, and you're talking about a testing process that is nearly 10,000 system configurations to test against. and that's but a SAMPLING of the complexity since we're not including application varition or system setting changes made by users. It is IMPOSSIBLE to test against all scenarios.

      Limiting Apple's driver testing just under Vista, there's 7 versions, doubled for SP0 and SP1, doubled again for 32 and 64 bit. So that's 28 OS releases a user is likely under vista, just in the USA, to install iTunes 8 on. Now, this is a USB driver issue, if you had RTFA (not a DRM issue), so we take a large sampling of common USB chipsets used over the last 5 years, and the common mainboard chipsets in circulation and build a test base for that.... Oh wait, that's over a THOUSAND SYSTEM IMAGES, and this is JUST to tset the USB driver.... and that's on just a sampling (about 30) different hardware configurations. This testing would take WEEKS for a team to do, and just for one of a hundred application features...

      Where's the blame here? It's basically on Microsoft for having a weak USB driver API that effects everyone. Apple can only be expected to reasonably test their application. I know a lot about their testing practices, including their closed non-disclosure beta processes, and I can assure you if the driver was directly at fault, it would not have worked with any of the vista versions, since they ALL use the same driver... This is a conflict issue, one that typically can't be tested for. Software has bugs, get over it.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    187. Re:Good Marketing by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Jesus Chris I said the player was kida crappy but the libraries that other software uses it for work pretty good and always have.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    188. Re:Good Marketing by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Is it Apple's fault, though? I mean, if the same type of offending driver was found in the minidump of the OSX build, yet OSX didn't crash, is it really Apple's fault? Just sayin'...

    189. Re:Good Marketing by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Microsoft can put out new kernels for WinXP and above that disallows any installation of anything that wants to run at Ring-0 unless it comes from Microsoft Windows Update. In theory, nothing should run in Ring-0 but the operating system. It is precisely the fact that so many apps want to insert their code into the OS that causes a lot of such instability. And what would that mean? Every company that makes a video card needs to submit their driver for admission into the next Windows Kernel... and this is as it should be.

      Further, and I am not entirely sure how Microsoft might serve to enforce it at all, but the other problem with a lot of software is that it insists are running "quick launch" processes that essentially pre-load their programs into memory killing the performance of machines when all programs behave this way.

      For years I have been advising people that run Windows not to install more than a very small handful of apps. The reason for this is clear -- the way things are now, if you run more than a handful of apps, you will kill your machine's performance.

      And what is the DEAL with every device maker wanting to install device monitoring software that serves to further kill performance of the machines? It is a culture that needs to be reigned in. It's bad for users and it is bad for the reputation for MS Windows and that is something that even Windows fanboys should be able to get behind.

    190. Re:Good Marketing by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      On the one Vista machine I can't get rid of? Trained pigeons, apparently.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    191. Re:Good Marketing by spun · · Score: 1

      I know how intractable those problems are, and any coherent system of doing those things cooperatively amounts to a kernel anyway, but it could be done. Keeping processes from screwing with each other or the system can, by the very nature of the problem, only be done by a kernel or hypervisor.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    192. Re:Good Marketing by v1 · · Score: 1

      For that matter, why should other people's Windows drivers be allowed to BSD the machine?

      No matter how far you kick the ball around, ultimately Windows is responsible for its own stability.

      When you have APIs that have notes in them like "be sure to supply a value from 1-5 here (because if you give us a 0 we will crash in flames)" is NOT the driver's fault when it passes Windows a 0 or -58236.75 and it takes a dump.

      Full Disclosure: I'm a programmer, and I pride myself in writing user-tolerant code. I've always believed that nothing a user does should be able to crash my code. It may not behave correctly, or may not produce the desired output, garbage in garbage out is acceptable. But it should not crash. If there's something they CAN do to crash my code, I consider it my problem, and I fix it. If you read the documentation on for example, OS X or Linux, the only real excuse a machine has for panicing is a hardware failure. Any example of software being able to incite a panic is considered a bug in the OS, and gets fixed in the OS.

      In the bigger scope of things, programs are allowed to crash. OS are NOT. Program bugs that lead to OS crash are not confined to being a program bug, they are a program bug that triggers an OS bug, and BOTH should be fixed.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    193. Re:Good Marketing by strjms72 · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't apple have tested this app on different os's before launching?

    194. Re:Good Marketing by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm a pessimist but I don't trust version X.0 of any software. That's Linux, BSD, Windows, or Apple. I usually wait for X.0.1 or even X.1 depending on the numbering structure. I didn't go and download this iTunes 8 even though it appears I wasn't affected. The problem with this it appears to be both Apple and MS fault. Since iTunes 8 works fine with XP, this is really a Vista only problem. Since MS signed the driver that may have caused all these problems, they didn't do their checks either. Vista has had more issues than any Windows release to date with drivers so it appears that they are harder to write. Apple should have know this and did more thorough checking.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    195. Re:Good Marketing by barrkel · · Score: 1

      100% wrong. Monolithic kernels can't protect themselves from rogue drivers, and the NT kernel is monolithic, just like Linux.

      And MacOS (modified Mach) isn't off the hook either - it's all running in a single address space to reduce cost of IPC, so it's about as stable as Win3.1 WRT drivers:

      http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Darwin/Conceptual/KernelProgramming/Mach/chapter_6_section_1.html

    196. Re:Good Marketing by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 0

      Oops, my bad - you may be right. But I have to let it out whenever QT comes in any discussion as far as the software goes.

    197. Re:Good Marketing by TheLostSamurai · · Score: 1

      I see a lot of this talk about how the OS should be able to prevent an application from killing the entire OS, which I completely agree with, but all of the comments act like Windows is the only OS that has this problem.

      If that's the case, explain to me why many apps on my iPhone, which runs a version of OS X, will very often cause a complete OS crash and a hard reboot of the device. I agree that Windows has problems, but they aren't the only ones.

      --
      I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
    198. Re:Good Marketing by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

      I don't think Microsoft signs others' drivers, they leave it to Verisign and the like. Anyway, the digital sig doesn't mean the driver is bug free, it merely means it came from a reputable source. Maybe Apple is no longer worthy of that title. Zdnet had a series of articles on this yesterday, where Apple is installing the MobileMe service when you install iTunes8, for God's sake. They install a bunch of other useless crap too, that bogs down the system.

      --
      -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
    199. Re:Good Marketing by spun · · Score: 1

      You aren't new here. Why act surprised at the MS bashing? We know other operating systems crash too, but we only care when Windows does it.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    200. Re:Good Marketing by Winter · · Score: 1

      And that one links to this, which is a new installer that apparently fixes the problem.

      --
      main(i){putchar(177663314>>6*(i-1)&63|!!(i<5)<<6)&&main(++i);}
    201. Re:Good Marketing by frogzilla · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't they? If the OS fails because of an application, no matter how poorly it is written, then the OS has failed. Shouldn't applications find it impossible to crash the OS?

    202. Re:Good Marketing by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      Separation anxiety. It's just lonely. You should buy it an iPhone of it's own. That's the humane thing to do.

    203. Re:Good Marketing by s0l1dsnak3123 · · Score: 1

      To be honest, even if it wasn't anything to do with OSs, or even computers, it is still Vista's fault. Example: "The world is so full of corrupt and evil people","Blame Vista"; "Where is God in this time of need?", "Blame Vista"; "My lawnmower won't start","Vista";"I hate Vista","Blame Vista".

    204. Re:Good Marketing by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Why the hell does iTunes requires a kernel system driver?

      Ah, DRM. Sorry. My bad.

    205. Re:Good Marketing by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      What other windows apps do you run that require drivers to be installed?

      Ok, so since you have failed to answer the question twice, I'm guessing you don't REALLY have a problem with this?

      Microsoft can put out new kernels for WinXP and above that disallows any installation of anything that wants to run at Ring-0 unless it comes from Microsoft Windows Update.

      Wow are you serious...? You're advocating a Microsoft operating system that will not support any hardware, unless MICROSOFT approves it. Talk about DRM/TPM etc! Whatever happened to the slashdot values of more power to the users? You're advocating Microsoft requiring users to update their entire operating system just to support new hardware? Talk about being locked into the upgrade cycle..unbelievable. I can't believe you honestly believe these things?

      It is precisely the fact that so many apps want to insert their code into the OS that causes a lot of such instability.

      For the third time, What other windows apps do you run that require drivers to be installed?

      For years I have been advising people that run Windows not to install more than a very small handful of apps. The reason for this is clear -- the way things are now, if you run more than a handful of apps, you will kill your machine's performance.

      Nonsense.

      You ARE correct that your average Dell/etc has a bunch of junk installed. iTunes/ipod/quicktime is amongst the worst. What does that have to do with Microsoft? If you recall, MS has had a few court difficulties with regards to requiring distributors to bundle/not bundle software...are you advocating that Microsoft should be able to control what Dell, HP, etc bundle with their computers? I have a hard time believing that's what you really want...

    206. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He probably only turns on his computer with Vista, once a week to check his email. Funny thing is, that takes more than twice as long in Vista than XP. I went back.

    207. Re:Good Marketing by slapout · · Score: 1

      Except that Vista's new driver model was suppose to prevent that.

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    208. Re:Good Marketing by msaulters · · Score: 1

      My tendency is to side with Microsoft on this one. Apple has a history of producing buggy, poor-quality software for the Windows platform. I suspect the strategy is to make people want to replace said platform with a Mac. Regardless of the motivation, I've been extremely unimpressed with iTunes on Windows in the past; massive always-on TSR plugins that ruin system performance, un-intuitive controls, poor performance, buggy/crashy installers that I can't get support for, inability to customize the interface to my liking, DRM, all of these are reasons I long ago banned iTunes from my system, and this was even before Vista. Man, Apple completely pissed me off when they started bundling iTunes with Quicktime, and the QT installer would fail with no explanation due to the bundled, buggy iTunes installer. You could install just QT, but you had to really go digging to find it, even though I was a paid registered QT user just trying to use the 'upgrade' option from within the software. To this day, I've never found an explanation or fix for the iTunes installer not working on my old XP machine.

      --
      These people looked deep into my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined.
    209. Re:Good Marketing by Big+Boss · · Score: 1

      Were you running Vista on the Powerbook? I installed iTunes8 before I heard about the problems on my Mac Mini running OSX and it worked fine. No lockups, or any real slowdowns. Even the Genius stuff was quick.

      In the past iTunes worked fine on my XP machines, but the story mentions Vista specifically so I assume I wouldn't have seen the bug on my boxes anyway.

    210. Re:Good Marketing by Big+Boss · · Score: 1

      I wonder is anyone that is affected has an XP drive/partition they can test on? It would be interesting to see if the hardware has a significant effect.

    211. Re:Good Marketing by mweather · · Score: 1

      I might get sued, but I'd win. I'd just show the court that it passed inspection.

    212. Re:Good Marketing by Big+Boss · · Score: 1

      My 5G 30Gig works fine. As have the last generation Nanos. (Just before the ones released this week. Haven't tried those.)

      You do have to enable disk mode first, or do the button dance, but it works fine. I haven't tried the touch or the latest released units. But the iPods have always worked that way for me.

      They can't play music I just drop on the disk, but they do work as standard USB Mass Storage devices. Personally, I don't WANT to manually manage all my music. Computers were invented to relieve the burden of repetitive tasks. I'd much rather have software to do that for me. iTunes does it as well as any other app I've tried, and has nice database-like options for searching and creating playlists.

    213. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      both older machines (2 years+) had hiccups with iTunes 8. These are PPC machines. Occasionally Apple does let software out that does not run perfectly on all machines. The last big example was the DVD on 12" powerbook. The iTunes issue was mild by comparison. However, since iTunes 8 appears to be a marketing update, vis a vis the new inability to turn off the iTunes Store link and the other marketing features, it seems like Apple may be getting into the bad habit of monetizing customers rather than delivering wonderful products that we are willing to be a premium for. I think that Apple users are going to suffer as Apple creates more cross platform products.

    214. Re:Good Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iTunes 8.0.0.35 will work extremely slowly on xp compared to last version. "NOT RESPONDING" will be even more common than before. as our current leaders would say - "mission accomplished" iTunes -

    215. Re:Good Marketing by sdstuart · · Score: 1

      It seems malicious and they are trying to create problems for Windows users. How can your issue and the iTunes problems make it through testing? Unless they aren't testing.

      --
      My SIG is a P220.
    216. Re:Good Marketing by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The drivers are USB protocol drivers -- they run in user space.
      They can be written as userspace drivers but they probablly aren't. Moving your driver to userspace means rewriting it and losing compatibility with a number of older windows versions. Not a very attractive proposition IMO.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    217. Re:Good Marketing by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      there's absolutely nothing performance critical enough to justify running it in kernel space.
      no but moving to a usermode driver would basically mean a complete rewrite and would reduce the number of windows versions supported. Doesn't seem very attractive to me.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    218. Re:Good Marketing by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Houses have pretty big safety margins, if most of the house is built to code the odd bad beam or joint isn't going to bring things crashing down.

      A driver is a peice of software written in a language without safety checks, running in an environment without process seperation, having to deal with obscure concepts like IRQL and often interacting directly with hardware. One bug can easilly bring the system crashing down and the chance of a test team finding every bug is pretty low even if they have access to read the source.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  2. BSOD... by james1983 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yay!! I was getting worried I was never going to see the BSOD again.. Welcome back old friend

  3. It's not Window's fault by B4light · · Score: 0

    It's not Window's fault.

    1. Re:It's not Window's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LEAVE WINDOWS ALONE!!!!!

  4. Shucks... by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thought you were going to say that Vista was causing the iPod metal shell to become highly charged and was responsible for electrocutions.

    After all, Vista kills babies!

    --
    1. Re:Shucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You realize your sig is especially lame these days, right?

    2. Re:Shucks... by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 2, Funny

      Clearly not!

      You must have clicked his link to reply---why else would anyone be posting as AC?

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    3. Re:Shucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slashdot: "Microsoft would like you to think they are against eating babies, But have you ever heard them take an anti-baby-eating position? Why so silent Microsoft? Too busy EATING BABIES?

    4. Re:Shucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Because I already used mod points in this thread.

    5. Re:Shucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize the mods must be drunk for modding you Insightful.

  5. Wow! by gentlemen_loser · · Score: 5, Funny

    That really IS horrible. I did not know that anyone was actually using Vista. - Steve J.

    1. Re:Wow! by spintriae · · Score: 1

      If you thought nobody was using Vista, who did you think was using Mac? A third of nobody?

    2. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You see those vapor trails up there in the sky???
      Those are jokes...

    3. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and why did you pay people to write software for computers that no one uses?
      I know... whooosh.

    4. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say go back to XP. They way people talk on this thread you would think this is the ONLY problem Vista has, after a year of running vista I went back to xp 2 days ago and I am perfectly happy, not to mention vm runs great and I can run ubuntu!

  6. Surprising by ohxten · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That this wasn't caught in the testing stages?

    --
    Need an automatic screenshot taker? Try here.
    1. Re:Surprising by roc97007 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, you know how it is; QA labs are always underfunded... Maybe their budget wouldn't stretch to a Vista license. Or they couldn't figure out which version to buy.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:Surprising by GumphMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      They hired an marketing expert so they could work those things out...

      It's just that the machine wouldn't stay up long enough to run through the test script when when they plugged in the iPod.

      --
      Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
    3. Re:Surprising by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it was, but this was a chance for Apple to make a jab at Windows.

      "What? Oh. The mac version doesn't crash. We'll get that cleaned up."

    4. Re:Surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [br][br]I went there.

      It's a pity "there" didn't include some basic HTML lessons.

    5. Re:Surprising by thelitend · · Score: 1

      Well, you know how it is; QA labs are always underfunded... Maybe their budget wouldn't stretch to a Vista license. Or they couldn't figure out which version to buy.

      Anyone who has had to work with Apple laughs at this comment not because it is sarcastic, but because its completely true.

    6. Re:Surprising by phoomp · · Score: 1

      Testing stages? It's been quite clear from the last couple of Apple software releases that there are no testing stages at Apple.

    7. Re:Surprising by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      I'm not surprised. I'll probably get modded troll or flamebait, but my experience has been horrible with pretty much every piece of apple software I've ever used on a windows platform.

      Every single version of quicktime for the last decade had caused me one problem or another on dozens of different machines with completely different configurations. The last 2 versions of itunes have been a PITA for my wife.

      I have no doubt that they can write a great OS, and that they can write great software for their own OS, but when it comes to writing for Windows, my opinion is they are either incompetent or just outright don't care enough to do it right.

    8. Re:Surprising by homesteader · · Score: 1

      Actually they had the money, planned on testing on all versions, but when the QA guys found out they had to test on:

      Vista Starter x86
      Vista Home Basic x86
      Vista Home Premium x86
      Vista Business x86
      Vista Ultimate x86
      Vista Enterprise x86

      they started crying. Then when they told them that they also had to test on:

      Vista Starter x64
      Vista Home Basic x64
      Vista Home Premium x64
      Vista Business x64
      Vista Ultimate x64
      Vista Enterprise x64

      they quit. So there wasn't too much testing done on Vista.

    9. Re:Surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you know how it is; QA labs are always underfunded.

      Underfuunded is hardly the word. The day I got laid off (from a different department) they also laid off most of the QA department.

      Hint: this was at the outfit that really has a lot to do with whether you get a loan and at what rate.

    10. Re:Surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not surprising at all. The cause was once again strange configurations. Logitech mouse drivers which are older than dirt. And it looks like Roxio's piece of crap software may also be involved.

      --Sam

    11. Re:Surprising by Chutulu · · Score: 1

      wait until they start testing all the Linux versions...

    12. Re:Surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We tried to plug a Vista machine into the Apple network, but it melted into a small puddle of slag...

    13. Re:Surprising by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      [br][br]I went there.

      It's a pity "there" didn't include some basic HTML lessons.

      Imagine that, a guy who can't get his facts straight about the cost of competing computer products ALSO can't understand basic HTML.

  7. Try listening to your rap now, smart guy! by CorporateSuit · · Score: 2, Informative

    What are the chances your 1,000 songs are also gone when you start your computer back up after it's done crying for mercy? I still haven't reloaded mine from the last time iTunes crashed windows. :(

    --
    I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    1. Re:Try listening to your rap now, smart guy! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Zero.
      I have yet to hear of any music lost due to this.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Try listening to your rap now, smart guy! by Fyz · · Score: 1

      My songs are all still there, but all the ratings I gave them are gone.

      A few years back, I was stupid enough to let it "consolidate" my music library, inadvertently and irrevocably destroying my carefully crafted file structure and making about 10,000 new directories on my HD.

      The disappointments iTunes have given me over the years are actually the main reason I haven't gone Mac. It boggles the mind how iTunes can be such a bloated program and not have any of the basic features one would expect from it.

  8. In Soviet Cupertino... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    iTunes ain't done, 'til Vista don't run!

    1. Re:In Soviet Cupertino... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      in Soviet Cupertino, Vista blames you!

    2. Re:In Soviet Cupertino... by dafing · · Score: 1

      thats the first one of those russian reversals that has made me laugh in a long time :) thankyou! It just goes to show what a heap of crap Vista is, oh god, why wont MS just die? Their best work was Windows 95 really, those were there best days surely, when they took over the market and seemed new and innovative.

      --
      --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    3. Re:In Soviet Cupertino... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no you got it backwards. It's "Vista ain't done till iTunes don't run". With the latest Windows updates Vista is finally complete.

  9. Does it seem like MS & Apple are fighting? by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 3, Funny
    Does it seem like MS & Apple are fighting hard for the consumer dollar? Trying to one up each other? Trying to win market share?

    It really seems that causing a BSoD is something that would have come up in testing, no?

    --
    Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
    1. Re:Does it seem like MS & Apple are fighting? by nbert · · Score: 1

      I see a general twist in Apple's strategy. Instead of trying everything to keep their ventures compatible they are starting to blame MS for things which are really in their realm. On the other hand MS has done this for years and Vista is no exception when it comes to Samba support and so on.

      A week ago I tried to set an appointment on me.com on a computer I don't have administrative access to and I had to use IE. When logging on to me.com I was informed that IE isn't currently supported and that I have to click "Continue" to use it anyways. In the end I didn't have any problem, but it reminded me of DR-DOS and MS.

      Nevertheless I don't feel sorry for those using Vista. In my eyes there are only two reasons to use it: Playing DX10 games or having bought a new computer which comes with it. Somehow I lack empathy for both groups.

  10. MS or Apple by JohnVanVliet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    well is it Apples fault OR is it MS Vista that has the problem . Apple would have debugged it on a vista box , But it is posable that a vista update killed it .By mistake or on purpose ,your guess is as good as mine.

    --
    "I don't pitch OpenSUSE Linux to my friends, i let Microsoft do it for me
    1. Re:MS or Apple by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Apple should have debugged it on a vista box

      Fixed that for you.

    2. Re:MS or Apple by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      well is it Apples fault OR is it MS Vista that has the problem . Apple would have debugged it on a vista box , But it is posable that a vista update killed it .By mistake or on purpose ,your guess is as good as mine.

      Looks to me like a standard iTunes update. Crashing and breaking things left and right both on the Mac and PC. Lots of other reported problems besides the BSOD. Apple hasn't been having much luck (or skill) with either iTunes or Quicktime of late. Both programs have problemmatic updates (see previous link for morbid details if you're interested).

      It's just not working for Steve these days. Maybe 10.6 will fix these issues on the OS X side, but I rather doubt it. Back up, test your restores and sacrifice the appropriate animal before upgrading.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:MS or Apple by Hyppy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Microsoft debugged it on a vista box

      Fixed that for you. Signed drivers, and all.

    4. Re:MS or Apple by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1

      Seinfeld's gonna have to sell Gates some nice wingtips in retaliation.

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    5. Re:MS or Apple by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      "Looks to me like a standard iTunes update. Crashing and breaking things left and right [macfixit.com] both on the Mac and PC. Lots of other reported problems besides the BSOD. Apple hasn't been having much luck (or skill) with either iTunes or Quicktime of late. Both programs have problemmatic (sic) updates (see previous link for morbid details if you're interested)."

      Running 10.5.4 (ppc) here on my somewhat elderly 1.42 Ghz Dual Processor FW800 Mac.

      New QuickTime and iTunes running flawlessly. No crashes, no freezes, so far, they've played every media file I've thrown at them.

      I don't know what either you or macfixit have been experiencing, but MY Mac is giving me 0 problems, vis a vis QT and iTunes 8.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    6. Re:MS or Apple by againjj · · Score: 1

      Microsoft tested it on a vista box

      Fixed that for you. Signed drivers, and all.

      Fixed that for you.

    7. Re:MS or Apple by Hyppy · · Score: 1

      You win.

    8. Re:MS or Apple by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Incorrect. Microsoft doesn't debug the drivers, they sign the drivers after receiving verification from a testing lab (or your own QA team, if you're so inclined) that the drivers have been tested.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  11. Sounds like a feature to me... by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 5, Funny

    This sounds like a feature, not a bug.

  12. The new "better" driver model sucks. by Sj0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know, it seems like there are an awful lot of problems with drivers under Vista. Certainly far more problems than I've seen on Vista.

    The thing that bothers me about that is the change in driver architecture was billed as a way to make Vista faster and more stable. Why, then, is it that most of the drivers for Vista are less stable and slower than the same hardware running in XP?

    --
    It's been a long time.
    1. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by truthsearch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For every major Windows release vendors spend a lot of time and money on new sets of drivers. My guess is that to save time and money some of them didn't rewrite their drivers from scratch for Vista, but instead migrated as much code as possible. That would let certain problems slip through the cracks, such as the kernel level security issues we've heard about.

    2. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

      The REAL "What The Fuck" is why iTunes should be installing a driver at ALL? Isn't there a generic data-path for USB peripherals like the "iPod" available on Windows Vista(TM)?

      If not, then why not? That would be a horrible flaw in Vista. Really, iTunes should not require administrative privilege to install; USB should have a standard handler (much the same as old-time regular serial ports).

      For some functions, the OS itself may become involved (storage device on a USB), but for generic devices this shouldn't be needed.

      I cannot believe that this is missing in Vista (please correct me). And, if it is present, why isn't iTunes using it?
       

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
    3. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      What's the point of a new driver model if you can just port old drivers and amplify the same bugs you were trying to kill in the first place?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    4. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by Sj0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can tell you that it DOES exist. My Creative Nomad Vision M would simply plug into any up-to-date Windows XP machine, and it would show up as a media device. I didn't need to install the software to see the files on it.

      Besides true chodes like Sony and Samsung, both of whom had gay software and stupid drivers last time I owned one, every mp3 player on the planet other than the iPod shows up in My Computer as either a drive or a media device.

      The reason, as far as I can tell, is that Apple wants to force you to use iTunes to change anything on your iPod. Kodak does a similar thing with their EasyShare cameras, which is the only real negative of those cameras. Thankfully, unlike an iPod, in a camera you can just pull out the memory card and stick it in your PC.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    5. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      Some of these "drivers" are millions of lines of c/c++. You would have to be insane to rewrite them from scratch. Nobody that I know writes drivers from scratch... it's always "porting".

    6. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by Vancorps · · Score: 4, Informative

      Vista and XP do have standard handlers for USB devices but Apple does not support this. That is why you can't plugin your iPod and iPhone and except your computer to be able to mess with it, that is why it requires special software adding protocols to your networking stack like bonjour and rDNS services. Of course if you configure so, the devices can be used as standard usb mass storage devices but you'll never get access to your music that way.

      This is the principle reason why the iPod sucks, it is everything that Apple stands for which is propietary technology which really requires Apple hardware to work with. I can hook up hundreds of other USB based MP3 players out there without added software but the iPod requires specific software to interface with and don't think about going cross platform, many an ipod has been wiped by going from Mac to PC and visa versa.

      You're right, iTunes should not require administrative privileges to install but all that DRM means Apple has to dig deep.

      Vista doesn't handle driver issues very well but the majority of this particular issue is definitely in Apple's court especially given all the issues with iTunes 8 on both sides of the isle. At least they are mostly getting OS X right now with a lot of the silly defaults getting changed. Samba support was atrocious for the longest time when the Linux camp had it down.

    7. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Point being, if you're going to make tens or hundreds of thousands of drivers useless, why set it up so the driver model actually fixes the problem you're trying to solve, so the ported drivers don't just re-implement the same undesirable kernel access, creating new bugs in the process that make your new OS slow and crashy?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    8. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      Is that what Vista does (abstract the drivers even more and create an extra layer between the OS and kernel?) The OS should do the abstractation between itself and the hardware... any additional layers (your example, not allowing the drivers to access the kernel) doesn't make sense. There is no need for this additional layer; maybe this is why Vista has failed--they tried to make an OS that looks great on paper but in the real world is horrible. Sure, the OS should restrict and monitor kernal calls, but distancing itself from reality helps nobody.

    9. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      By the way, if I were a cynic, I would absract the API; this way I can replace the underlying implementation from local to "cloud"; it'd sure make distributed applications easier (i.e. suddenly I decide to make my applications decentalised and executed over the internet rather than having a local app.)

    10. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by DM9290 · · Score: 1

      you can mount an ipod like a normal USB hard drive. I've done it on Mac, windows and linux.

      you can even access the mp3s stored within.

      --
      No one has a right to their *own* opinion. They have a right to the TRUTH.
    11. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by teridon · · Score: 1

      I believe iTunes uses a service called "iPod Service" to interact with the iPod, not a driver.

      iTunes does, however, install GEAR CD/DVD ASPI drivers for controlling CD/DVD burners.

      http://www.gearsoftware.com/support/drivers.cfm

      --
      I hold it, that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing. -- Thomas Jefferson
    12. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      Funny, I get the same sort of thing with iTunes 6.4 under Windows 2000 (or whatever the last version that's supposed to work with Win2K). It borks my USB stack and BSODs me.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    13. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by Vancorps · · Score: 2, Informative

      This was not my experience with any recent ipod especially if it wasn't setup for USB storage to begin with like 99% of the people out there have not done.

    14. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by againjj · · Score: 1

      You know, it seems like there are an awful lot of problems with drivers under Vista.

      Anything under an elephant will have an awful lot of problems.

    15. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by maxume · · Score: 1

      There are apps that take the place of iTunes (I don't own an iPod, but I imagine that they work just fine). I think they usually just use usb mass storage to transfer data and then build the music database. Floola looks pretty nifty, it will run directly from the iPod on several different platforms:

      http://www.floola.com/modules/wiwimod/index.php?page=WiwiHome

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    16. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, I updated Office 2007 last week, now all of a sudden, every time I close Word, I get an error box, and it asks me to submit an error and restart Word. First of all, I was just closing it... I don;t WANT to restart it.

      What was more intriguing is that in the details, it;s not Word crashing apparently, but my HP printer driver, whi is the SAME VERSION I installed 7 months ago, there IS no update to it!

      How the hell does an update to a word processor cause printer drivers to crash???

      I have no doubt this issue with IT8 and Vista relats back to faulty USB drivers and chipset level issues that have been plaguing Vista since Launch.

      Incidently, I have Vista EE on one machine, Ultimate on another, and business 64 bit on a 3rd. All have iTunes 8, none crash.

    17. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by jmpeax · · Score: 1

      you can even access the mp3s stored within

      This is simply wrong.

    18. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A friend of mine is a higher up in the Windows 'drivers group', and according to this person: that's pretty much exactly what happened. Hardware vendors were given advance notice (around two years) that they were going to need to substantially rearchitect their drivers to run in Vista. Very very very few of them heeded this warning, expecting that they'd just be able to pop in their old code and do some minor touch ups. Long story short: almost no vendors had working, stable drivers when Vista launched and, of course, this was blamed as Microsoft's failing.

    19. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, welcome to Engineering.

      Getting people to do what you want to do is a serious part of it.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    20. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      What I always wondered was WHY when I merely move a device from one USB port to another I have to re-install the drivers. This is a nasty bit of work for me 'cause when I'm moving my scanner to my PC from my mac I don't always remember what port it was in. And windows can't seem to find all the parts of the already installed and previously working drivers and I never remember where I put the latest version of the driver I had to install last time this happened.

      And sometimes a device will stop working on one port but when I move it to another it works again after I figure out where the driver parts are.

      None of this happens on my macbook so is it Windows only that does this? Come to think of it this never happened under OS 9 either. And it certainly doesn't happen under linux (I use ubuntu and debian).

    21. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An OS is millions lines of code. If you managed to write a driver that is million lines of code, you are either utterly incompetent or you've written a driver capable of communicating with females.

    22. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by earlymon · · Score: 1

      ...the iPod requires specific software to interface with and don't think about going cross platform, many an ipod has been wiped by going from Mac to PC and visa versa

      I don't pretend to be an expert, but I did find out an interesting fact when trying to take my iPod between WinXP and OS X - caution, this applies as accurate at the time but can't say if still true - I have one of the first iPod Nanos. So, I'm going to speak in present tense to 1) keep it straight in my own brane and 2) if it's still this way, I'm accidentally right!

      The iPod (Nano) was formatted using FAT32 out of the box - this was the heady days of transition from Firewire to USB and really targeting the Windows users. But you plug it into a Mac on Tuesday and stand in the corner (or maybe say don't sync and use as mass storage in addition to tunes as I did) and it reformats it as Mac OS Extended.

      Take it cross-platform once it's Mac OS Extended, and Win iTunes complains that it's unreadable - proceed from there and it does first things first - reformats it as FAT32.

      Fortunately for me, I stopped before proceeding. I was running WinXP under the dual-boot beta so I knew my iPod was ok minutes before. Had it been a different laptop - dedicated Win - I prolly would have proceeded to lose everything, thinking it was Windows or Win iTunes.

      But it's incompatible file systems as the root cause for cross platform woes.

      Not trying to debate merits - just trying to enlighten as an ounce of prevention. HTH.

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    23. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, then, is it that most of the drivers for Vista are less stable and slower than the same hardware running in XP?

      Oh, come on.

    24. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's called MTP. The Samsung devices (at least, the one I had) probably do the same, too - they just have silly bundled media player apps, but you can probably use the device just fine without it. (There's no way to tell based on the box, of course, so it's easier to just buy something else.) IIRC, the Windows drivers came with... Windows Media Player. Yeah... For Linux, see libmtp.

      Sony sounds like the ATRAC stuff? No experience with those (I guess I'm lucky).

    25. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by novakreo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      both of whom had gay software

      Their software was homosexual? Or are you just an asshole who uses the word 'gay' when you really mean 'stupid'?

      --
      O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!
    26. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      No, I saw the software trying to have sexual intercourse with software of the same gender. It was terrifying. I didn't think that software could either have a gender OR have sexual intercourse.

      Well, I know for SURE the Sony software was gay, I caught it red handed. I just assumed the Samsung software was too, because they're always hanging out and holding hands (another thing I didn't know software could do).

      --
      It's been a long time.
    27. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the software was happy?

    28. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      What's the point of a new driver model if you can just port old drivers and amplify the same bugs you were trying to kill in the first place?

      Of course! Everybody knows that re-writing perfectly working drivers from scratch is the best way to ensure there are no new bugs!

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    29. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Gee, I wonder why Apple sells so many iPods - it certainly can't be because copying songs to your MP3-player by treating them as files is so much easier than using a software that starts when you plug in your player, allows you to sync music and other data, manages your playlists, ...

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    30. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but all those other players aren't selling very well now are they?

      There's a reason they aren't selling well either. They are hard to use for the average user. The average user could not figure out how to get their music on to it.

      Like it or not, Apple figured it out.

    31. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      The REAL "What The Fuck" is why iTunes should be installing a driver at ALL?

      The same reason you have to install drivers for pretty much anything you want to use with Windows? That's the price you pay when you devise a system that is open to any third party. You get a nice fat market share, but you also get all the crap.

    32. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by theanorak · · Score: 1

      No, as earlier posters have pointed out, the files are stored in a hidden folder with hex names.

      It's absolutely correct.

      --
      === Ask yourself if it's really necessary...
    33. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by Kattspya · · Score: 1

      You're gay.

    34. Re:The new "better" driver model sucks. by BitCrazed · · Score: 1

      Most of the BSOD crashes in Windows are caused by 3rd party drivers - primarily graphics and printer drivers.

      For Vista, Microsoft undertook a massive re-architecture and rewrite of the video and printer driver architectures, enabling all code that didn't need to live in the kernel in order to communicate directly with hardware to be run outside the kernel in the user-mode driver infrastructure.

      This means that the majority of video/printer driver code runs OUTSIDE the kernel and has already resulted in a massive reduction in the number of BSOD on Vista.

      Of course, this means that drivers for video cards and printers needed to be rewritten. Whilst there were initially many issues with the video drivers in particular as the OEM's were getting used to working with the new driver model, most of those issues are now nailed. If you're still seeing stability/perf issues, try updating your drivers to the latest supported version and you should see your issues disappear.

      HOWEVER, these driver architecture changes do not apply to proprietary drivers written by a third party (like those from Apple) - if those drivers corrupt memory, overwrite system structures, deadlock, etc., then there's nothing that ANY commercial OS can do to prevent a core-dump/BSOD.

  13. I wonder . . . by catbertscousin · · Score: 5, Funny

    "iTunes has detected illegal music files. Now trashing your computer . . . please wait for the lawyers to show up."

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
    1. Re:I wonder . . . by lee1026 · · Score: 1

      Tthey really would NOT want to do that - I am willing to bet that most of their customer did NOT only use legit music.

  14. How apt by neokushan · · Score: 1

    With Apple slamming Vista at every opportunity, those who combine the two are surely asking for trouble.
    Of course, the next time an Apple exec tries to slam Vista, they might want to ensure they can actually write good software themselves before commenting on it.

    --
    +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    1. Re:How apt by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      It's perfectly good software if it worked the way it was intended.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    2. Re:How apt by UnknowingFool · · Score: 0, Troll

      Since we don't know what really caused it yet, can you absolutely say it was iTunes 8? It may be iTunes 8; it may be Vista. Right now all we know is the interaction of the two causes an issue. iTunes 7 and Vista don't have this problem. I would bet that iTunes 8 and XP doesn't have this problem. So that it could be that iTunes 8 has a serious bug that only crashes Vista or that Vista has a serious bug that iTunes 8 exposes like a bad API.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    3. Re:How apt by toleraen · · Score: 1

      No, it's pretty much been tracked down to one driver that iTunes 8 installs. If you copy over the driver from iTunes 7, it works fine.

    4. Re:How apt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ! ! ! WARNING ! ! !
      Reality distortion field is increasing!
      ! ! ! WARNING ! ! !

    5. Re:How apt by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Yes but the driver doesn't tell you if it's a bad API. If the driver called a Vista only API that crashes Vista or it calls a generic Windows API that crashes Vista but not XP, then it might be something that MS needs to look at. Of course the driver could have been badly written.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    6. Re:How apt by toleraen · · Score: 1

      Right, but if everything works with the previous driver, wouldn't it be safe to assume that the old driver would be calling the same APIs? I honestly have no idea, that's just what seems logical to me.

  15. Kernel mode driver by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 4, Informative

    AFAIK the only thing that can cause a BSOD is code running in the kernel space, ring 0.

    Quite why iTunes affects stuff that runs in kernel space is another matter... but I suspect it's probably to do with the Protected Media Path stuff. DRM, in other words. I can't think of anything in iTunes that should be running in kernel space - in Vista, all drivers apart from a component of the graphics driver are supposed to run in userspace.

    1. Re:Kernel mode driver by adisakp · · Score: 1

      Don't they run a USB watcher iPodService.exe as a OS service (as SYSTEM user) that hooks into the USB device chain in order to watch the USB ports for when an iPod is inserted. They also run a daemon iTunesHelper.exe that runs iTunes when the iPodService detects an iPod.

    2. Re:Kernel mode driver by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, they do (it's one of the things I particularly dislike about iTunes), but just running as SYSTEM doesn't mean it runs in kernel space - in the same way as running as root doesn't make it part of the kernel on Linux.

    3. Re:Kernel mode driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there's the custom USB drivers that handle Disk Mode capabilities. And the CD ripper. And the CD burner. None of those have anything to do with DRM.

    4. Re:Kernel mode driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah - its simpler than that. itunes uses a device driver to manipulate the ipod, and drivers can run in ring 0 in windows. buddy drivers cause bsods, apple writes buggy code.

    5. Re:Kernel mode driver by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Or probably it doesn't use standard USB Mass Storage drivers to talk to the iPod and it needs its own driver, which likely has a bug causing this BSoD. I don't run iTunes and I don't have an iPod, that's just my guess.

    6. Re:Kernel mode driver by FellowConspirator · · Score: 0

      Yes. None of that runs in kernel space. The iTunes USB protocol driver for the device runs in user space too. I don't know why it crashes the machine, but Vista *SHOULD* not be able to be crashed this way -- it should catch it and kill the app.

      I'm guessing that there's a bug in the system calls servicing the USB stack and that an improperly framed call to the USB driver causes kernel fault (i.e., Vista bug). Apple should have caught it, though.

    7. Re:Kernel mode driver by TheSpoom · · Score: 3, Informative

      They do, however, have a specialized USB driver for iPods below that level.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    8. Re:Kernel mode driver by petermgreen · · Score: 3, Informative

      in Vista, all drivers apart from a component of the graphics driver are supposed to run in userspace.
      Bullshit.

      A couple of driver types got major changes (most notablly display drivers which got the DX10 related stuff and printer drivers which were pushed into user mode) but by and large the driver model didn't really change significantly from XP to vista (despite this MS for some reason didn't allow XP drivers to install on vista, in most cases this can be worked arround by editing the inf file).

      MS did introduce a framework for allowing some types of drivers to be developed in user mode but there are many that have to be done in kernel mode (anything that has kernel mode clients, anything that uses a memory mapped bus, anything that handles interrups) and many more that are still kernel mode because that makes the driver portable to more windows versions.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    9. Re:Kernel mode driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not quite. It has to do with the proprietary USB driver that Apple uses to communicate with the iPod/iPhone. Running iTunes 8.0 by itself is fine, the system crashes when you try to connect the device to the computer, which attempts to load the driver, which fails in kernel space and takes the OS with it.

      The fault of this problem lies squarely on Apple.

    10. Re:Kernel mode driver by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Exactly - it's the driver that runs in the kernel, not the various (annoying) helper apps and services.

    11. Re:Kernel mode driver by teridon · · Score: 1

      Do device drivers (e.g. ASPI drivers) run in userspace as well?

      iTunes installs the GEAR ASPI drivers for controlling optical burners.
      http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=961419&cid=24970061

      --
      I hold it, that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing. -- Thomas Jefferson
    12. Re:Kernel mode driver by johkir · · Score: 0, Troll

      I suspect this may just be the first BSOD due to the Protected Media Path stuff. iTunes happens to be very very popular, so we all get to read about it. As more and more apps get developed to do something with A/V media, we'll see more and more problems. Apple happens to be the hot company du jour, so lots of coverage too.

      --
      These are some of the things molecules do...... given 4 billion years -Carl Sagan
    13. Re:Kernel mode driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in Vista, all drivers apart from a component of the graphics driver are supposed to run in userspace

      Hahahah, who the heck told you that?

    14. Re:Kernel mode driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are supposed to. The SDK is there, the samples are there - only is too cheap to do the coding for their ipod driver.
      They shouldnt use a custom driver anyways - there are default USB Drivers.

    15. Re:Kernel mode driver by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Gotta love the Windows haters who don't even have their fact straight... your idea might have some legitimacy if and only if all of the DRM stuff in Vista was in use if Apple was using it... remember, that stuff is only in use when required by a component/driver/application/etc... and how much do you want to bet that Apple is using their own system?... though if you still wanna blame the DRM despite this... you might as well just stuff you might as well play spin the wheel of blame as to what other not in use component is to blame.. my guess... the support for SCSI... afterall... how many of these systems were running SCSI at the time?

    16. Re:Kernel mode driver by TechForensics · · Score: 1

      Yet another reason to love Vista.

      --
      Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
    17. Re:Kernel mode driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK the only thing that can cause a BSOD is code running in the kernel space, ring 0.

      Quite why iTunes affects stuff that runs in kernel space is another matter... but I suspect it's probably to do with the Protected Media Path stuff. DRM, in other words. I can't think of anything in iTunes that should be running in kernel space - in Vista, all drivers apart from a component of the graphics driver are supposed to run in userspace.

      AFAIK the only thing that can cause a BSOD is code running in the kernel space, ring 0.

      Quite why iTunes affects stuff that runs in kernel space is another matter... but I suspect it's probably to do with the Protected Media Path stuff. DRM, in other words. I can't think of anything in iTunes that should be running in kernel space - in Vista, all drivers apart from a component of the graphics driver are supposed to run in userspace.

      Couldn't it be that the problem affects the kernel from a bug in the 'userspace'. If m$ would give more acces to theire code, devellopers could really test theire software on vista boxes. The usa isn't Europe, here m$ lost the 'souce code trial'

      An other question: does vista need iTunes to crash??

  16. 2 funny by jriding · · Score: 1

    Does anyone find the humor in the fact that Apple and Windows are not playing well together???

    --
    love the taste, hate the texture
  17. Sigh. by The+Fanta+Menace · · Score: 0

    How can an operating system be so stupidly written that what should be a user application can bring down the entire thing? What is iTunes doing that needs to run at a privileged level?

    --
    -- Even if a god did exist, why the fsck should I worship it?
    1. Re:Sigh. by Dynedain · · Score: 5, Informative

      iTunes installs its own CD drivers to manage ripping and burning, as well as always-on "helper" and updater processes, in addition to drivers for the iPod/iPhone.

      Asinine, but then again Apple doesn't follow Windows UI guidelines either.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    2. Re:Sigh. by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      It's pretty hard to write an application any other way. You can sandbox all you like, but there's always still something connecting all the layers to each other.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    3. Re:Sigh. by figleaf · · Score: 1

      Its most likely the buggy Apple drivers which are causing crashes not iTunes itself.
      The buggy drivers must be running in kernel mode.

    4. Re:Sigh. by cbrocious · · Score: 5, Informative

      Mod this bullshit down. The iTunes DRM is 100% inside quicktime.qts.

      (I'm the original author of PyTunes, the base for Pymusique -- I know a bit about Fairplay)

      --
      Disconnect and self-destruct, one bullet at a time.
    5. Re:Sigh. by JamesRose · · Score: 1

      You didn't even read the summary. It only happens when you plug an ipod in, ie, a piece of hardware is bringing the system down- probably through driver problems, but possibly for other reasons. To quote the summary " now whenever I plug in my iPod, I get a blue screen death." That's not software,thats hardware, and thus, much more likely to cause a crash if it isn't treated properly.

    6. Re:Sigh. by RocketScientist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      WMP doesn't follow windows UI guidelines. I think the UI guidelines for Windows specifically give media players a pass.

    7. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm blaming DRM until there's evidence that it's not caused by DRM.

    8. Re:Sigh. by ohcrapitssteve · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hehe, Apple doesn't follow Apple's UI guidelines :)

    9. Re:Sigh. by teridon · · Score: 1

      You probably already know this, but for the benefit of others -- those drivers are from GEAR software:
      http://www.gearsoftware.com/wiki/index.php?title=GEAR_Powered_Products#iTunes_for_Windows

      --
      I hold it, that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing. -- Thomas Jefferson
    10. Re:Sigh. by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Yet if you install the GEAR drivers separately (for us XP64 users), iTunes doesn't recognize them as valid (although it did in the past).

      <sarcasm>And of course, Windows doesn't already have disc burning built in. Apple needsd to make sure to include that.</sarcasm>

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    11. Re:Sigh. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      MS DRM, not Apple.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Sigh. by IdahoEv · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Asinine, but then again Apple doesn't follow Windows UI guidelines either.

      There are Windows UI guidelines? From the truly bizarre menagerie of inconsistent UIs I see in the 3rd-party windows software world, it wasn't clear to me that any guidelines even existed.

      Certainly very few people follow them.

      --
      I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
    13. Re:Sigh. by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Asinine, but then again Apple doesn't follow Windows UI guidelines either.

      Nobody follows the Windows UI guidelines. WMP doesn't, most CD burning apps don't, every single program you get with printers, cameras etc. insists on using what looks like its own private GUI toolkit... Consistency has been seriously out since shortly after XP was released. Writing a Windows app that looks like a Windows app is like using GTK+ 1 to write a new GNOME app.

      Admittedly, I'm exaggerating -- but only slightly. The multitude of non-fitting UIs in Windows is getting annoying. One of the things I like about OS X is that the users are so rabid about integration most developers actually make an effort to make their native app look native*. The same goes for Linux, but there it's because people keep submitting GUI patches until the programmer submits to peer pressure.


      * Of course the iTunes UI team is a special case. The iTunes UI team is special in many ways.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    14. Re:Sigh. by GuineaPigMan · · Score: 1

      I trust you entirely on the iTunes DRM front, but isn't the Windows Vista DRM integrated with the audio drivers? Or the USB drivers perhaps? If it's part of the USB driver, could that cause issues when a device that functions as a Mass Storage Device is connected? I know I've had issues transferring protected WMA's to other devices, so perhaps the DRM is integrated into the USB system...

    15. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CD drivers aren't written by Apple, but rather Gear Software. This is Apple's first real try at a Windows driver, and it sure shows.

    16. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows should have more frameworks and abstraction for talking to hardware available to developers - especially for things like USB.

      It would go a long way to avoid every app having to install its own drivers for common functions.

    17. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows just "borrows" Apple UI guidelines.

    18. Re:Sigh. by cbrocious · · Score: 1

      Audio drivers, yes (the PMP), but that doesn't come into play here. When it comes to USB, if it /is/ there (which I don't know), it'd be in the specific drivers, although it'd make more sense to handle this at the app level when the copy takes place, since the file would be unusable without transferring license info anyway. Regardless, this can't have any effect since the crash is in an Apple driver, as was specified elsewhere in the comments.

      --
      Disconnect and self-destruct, one bullet at a time.
    19. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word. I always turn that crap off. The line-blurring Audio framework / Windows Media player helpers on Vista also waste resources. I don't rip CD's and music CD burning is done through Roxio.

      Sleeper always-on helpers for music players is as stupid as having a sleeper flash or java updater, or boottime loader. MSOffice and OpenOffice load stuff at boot to "minimize" loading times at the expense of memory consumption and even slower boots.

      I can suck up the missing features and longer program load-times, but having my system run freely and closer to a me-controlled box has better performance and less side-effects...if done by an experienced hand

    20. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just curious, what is the CD driver and special USB driver for?

      Oh, for protected media and rights restrictions to what would otherwise be open systems? What do you call that?

      It may not be "fairplay" but it's still rights management, which is commonly referred to as DRM...

      Screw your closed systems, I've had an MP3 playing phone in my pocket since 2003. It has remote desktop, has GPS mapping, a touch screen, removable media storage, it plays MP3, AVI, DIvX and many many other media formats, It can record phone calls or voice notes, it works anywhere in the world on almost any service provider (dual band world phone), it syncs with any PC by USB without outside drivers, takes shitty pictures, works as a data modem in xp without drivers, I can program aps for it- ON IT, and can be used in radio silent mode (no broadcast what so ever) and about 2million software titles available, mostly for free. Plus, it has a copy paste function out of the box. To be fair, the browser pretty much sucks... luckily no less than 20 alternatives exist. Oh, and it's going on 6 years now with a week + of average use battery life on all original hardware.

      The Ipod/Iphone is late to the party and it came dressed in handcuffs. What is the appeal exactly?

    21. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither does Microsoft.

    22. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asinine, but then again Apple doesn't follow Windows UI guidelines either.

      There are Windows UI Guidelines?

    23. Re:Sigh. by eikonos · · Score: 1

      Asinine, but then again Apple doesn't follow Windows UI guidelines either.

      Does Microsoft follow Windows UI guidelines.. wait, are there are any Windows UI guidelines?

    24. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows has UI guidelines? Really? Based on... a random conglomeration of ideas?

      "Always

  18. "Hi, I'm a PC." "...And I'm a Mac." by AmericanPegasus · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Wow PC, it looks like your Vista users are really having headaches running great software like iTunes 8. Mac runs them just fine."

    "You son of a bitch." (Pulls out a gun)

    "Whoa PC, whoa, let's not..."

    BLAM.

  19. Not Mine by usul294 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I had to switch from Ubuntu to check, but iTunes 8 with my iPod is definitely not crashing my Vista Ultimate (free from school, I only keep it because of software for class that requires windows)

    1. Re:Not Mine by oahazmatt · · Score: 1

      I also find the use of the measurement "score" to be a bit odd. A score is what, 20 people? How many scores are we talking about? And how many confirmed scores of Vista users are out there? It's a very odd way to calculate affected users. (Plus, we've not even gotten into what other common software (other than Vista and iTunes) that these users are running. It could be something relating to Weatherbug or that Windows AV 2008 thing going around.

      --
      Those who believe the Internet is private,
      find their privates are on the Internet.
    2. Re:Not Mine by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lincoln wrote the bug tracking software.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    3. Re:Not Mine by maxume · · Score: 1

      In case you are being obtuse by accident, in current common usage, when referencing a number, 'scores' generally means 'many'.

      Definition 7:

      http://www.answers.com/score

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:Not Mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had to switch from Ubuntu to check...free from school, I only keep it because of software for class that requires windows

      Dude, relax. You can admit to using windows. We're all friends here...

  20. My advice by Kredal · · Score: 5, Informative

    This happened to me... I read the Apple thread, and followed simple instructions... unplugged my HP printer, and it stopped the BSOD's when I plugged in my iPhone. Most people are saying the problem is with the Apple USB drivers screwing with the drivers for HP printers and Logitech mice/keyboards. There may be other devices that cause the problem as well, but those two are the biggies.

    So until iTunes 8.1 is released, I can either charge my phone or print... but not both at the same time!

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    1. Re:My advice by Dynedain · · Score: 2

      So until iTunes 8.1 is released, some people can either charge their phones or use their keyboards... but not both at the same time!

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    2. Re:My advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, you know, you could plug your iPhone into the power adapter that was provided with your phone.

    3. Re:My advice by Kredal · · Score: 1

      s/charge/sync

      Happy?

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    4. Re:My advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There has been a classic battle of BSOD and other errors on Windows when HP and Epson drivers (actually the print monitor software services) are installed together. Any time you are dealing with a device driver reading/writing to a shared memory space in a cooperative manner with another vendor, things will get weird. Testing the permutations is a real pain. This is one reason why the validation process for drivers on Windows Datacenter Edition (or IBM z/OS) is so long and painful.

  21. Best roadblock ad ever by Sloppy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I went to RTFA. Before it showed me the article, though, I got a page that asked, "What are you waiting for? Make the move to Microsoft Vista with confidence."

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:Best roadblock ad ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny because you're bashing Vista.

      Of course, credit where credit is due, the great thing about iPods and Apple is that they just work.

    2. Re:Best roadblock ad ever by bonehead · · Score: 1

      Oh, where's the "+1 Irony" moderation option when you need it?

  22. iTunes ain't done ... by boxlight · · Score: 0, Redundant
  23. It's not a Vista problem but Mojave by OffTheLip · · Score: 1

    Let the blame fall where it will

  24. No BSOD here by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

    I'm on Vista 64 ultimate and no BSOD here with the iPhone.

    My speakers makes a wierd sort of distorted gurgling sound when the phone is connected, and then the phone does it's characteristic beep. But no BSOD.

       

  25. Vista ain't done... Dejavu by flyingfsck · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Vista ain't done, till iTunes won't run.

    Where did I hear that before?

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Vista ain't done... Dejavu by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      Riiiight... Because an update to *Vista* broke everything.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    2. Re:Vista ain't done... Dejavu by againjj · · Score: 1

      Here? (Maybe in a mirror?)

  26. The fault is by David+Gerard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Personally, I blame Linux.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
    1. Re:The fault is by bonehead · · Score: 1

      What? We're not blaming Canada for everything anymore?

    2. Re:The fault is by Drizzt+Do'Urden · · Score: 1

      Do like South Park and blame Canada!

    3. Re:The fault is by David+Gerard · · Score: 1
      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    4. Re:The fault is by David+Gerard · · Score: 1
      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
  27. media center by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wow, and here I was thinking it's time to upgrade the media center from that elderly, barely supported (but solid) XP Media Center Edition, to Vista. 26 gigs of music, and no way to get it on our ipods... Yeesh. Oh, I know it'll be fixed, but stories like this give me chills.

    Upon re-reading that, it sounded like I'm dissing Microsoft. Not really, just prudently waiting for these kinds of issues to settle -- no matter who's fault they are -- before thinking about upgrading. By then, the CPU upgrade necessary to run Vista should be really cheap. :-)

    This is off topic, but I have to say it: I may have to turn in my Linux geek hat for saying this, but I've been running XP Media Center Edition 2005 since it came out, under heavy daily use, and have not had a single bluescreen of death. Not one. (Nobody is more surprised than me. :-))

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:media center by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      Amazing what happens when Microsoft becomes militant and requires strict driver guidelines for XP Media Center. Many people have had similar experiences as you. Vista Media Center is much improved but it is more intensive on the hardware. It's more friendly if you can support it though.

      Also worth noting. iTunes 7 works just fine on Vista. These kinds of issues are always going to happen with dealing with the proprietary world of Apple.

    2. Re:media center by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > These kinds of issues are always going to happen with dealing with the proprietary world of Apple.

      Copy that.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    3. Re:media center by Techman83 · · Score: 1

      Just upgrade to Knoppmyth and free yourself from the shackles completely.

      mythbox:~$ uptime
      11:12:53 up 31 days, 21:12, 1 user, load average: 0.18, 0.13, 0.09

      Last time It got rebooted was to clean the dust out of the fans.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i cat
      Damn, my RAM is full of cats. MEOW!!
    4. Re:media center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you want to upgrade something that works fine?

    5. Re:media center by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > Just upgrade to Knoppmyth and free yourself from the shackles completely.

      Good point. Were it just me, I'd do that, but my wife and daughter are the heaviest users of the media center (I don't watch much tv) so any migration to mythtv would need to be fast and work the first time, or I descend into the hell of TV-deprived women.

      So every month or so, I check into myth, and installation is still iffy, would have to buy new capture hardware, would have to swap out my SATA disks for ATA disks, and so forth. Maybe some day, but on such an important (he says dryly) appliance, I can't afford to dink with it and be down several days. As someone else said, if it works, why mess with it?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    6. Re:media center by Techman83 · · Score: 1

      The hardest part these days is understanding the "mythtv-setup" section which is covered in the documentation.(which isn't all that hard)

      My better half is quite the opposite to me when it comes to computers and after I showed her a couple of buttons on the remote, she was away recording her programs, playing them back and watching live TV. The only drama comes from me being a slacker with only 1 tuner, combined with Australian broadcasters being unable to schedule anything properly!

      I don't know when you checked last, as I've been using SATA discs since I set my box up, which was over 2 years ago. I'm pretty sure as of R5F27 of Knoppmyth (Current version is R5.5) SATA was available via the "auto" method. As for Capture cards, I've used some pretty obscure Chinese junk (for my security box) and they work quite fine. The only time I've had to update a component by hand is using bleeding edge gear, even then it is possible to get it working. Quick search of the supported hardware list will reveal quickly if your hardware will work without any troubles. My box was built entirely (aside from the capture card and remote) out of parts I had lying around. In fact the mother board, cpu and ram are near on 6 years old and I do playback HD on it. (hardware that old needs the help of an nVidia card to play HD)

      I will give you points for "If it works" statement, but if you own a linux geek hat, I'd have to wonder how often you get frustrated with the hoops you have to jump through with a M$ MCE system. If you want to one day try it out, buy another hard drive (or if your like me, you'll probably have a stack in the corner) and throw an install on. I can have a basic box up in less then an hour, getting all my customisations done takes a little longer, but I have lots of documentation now! :P

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i cat
      Damn, my RAM is full of cats. MEOW!!
    7. Re:media center by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > I will give you points for "If it works" statement, but if you own a linux geek hat, I'd have to wonder how often you get frustrated with the hoops you have to jump through with a M$ MCE system.

      The only real frustration is that it won't time-shift programs in 1080. (The resulting video is not watchable.) Other than that, and it periodically having to pause and think, it works for the things I use it for. If it was more annoying, I might be able to talk the wife and daughter into trying something else.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    8. Re:media center by Techman83 · · Score: 1

      Just change it over, tell them it's an updated skin :P

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i cat
      Damn, my RAM is full of cats. MEOW!!
  28. But still... by Tmack · · Score: 4, Insightful
    A driver should not cause the OS to crash. Your printer should be able to load its driver in a manner such that if it catches fire the kernel stays alive and can tell you so.

    Tm

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    1. Re:But still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Clippy: It looks like your printer is on fire. Would you like to:
      * Call 911
      * Put it out.
      * Let it burn.

    2. Re:But still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's a nice philosophy, but anybody who's actually written a kernel-level driver will tell you that's impossible. Kernel-mode drivers require direct access to your computer's memory and bus, and anything with that level of access can cuse your kernel to panic, period.

      You can make non-kernel-mode drivers that are much safer, of course, but at the expense of performance and capability.

    3. Re:But still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe for userland drivers like printers under Vista using the latest driver model, okay, but if you mean that no driver should ever be able to crash the OS, you clearly don't understand how drivers work.

    4. Re:But still... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 0

      Good design fixes this, see minix.

    5. Re:But still... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Except "but at the expense of performance and capability" don't have to be a fact, do it? Sure it could be an issue, but something which is always true?

    6. Re:But still... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      A driver should not cause the OS to crash. Your printer should be able to load its driver in a manner such that if it catches fire the kernel stays alive and can tell you so.

      Tm

      Vista actually improved in that area, at least as for graphics card drivers. More can/must now be done in user space. I actually wonder what kind of driver this is about? Sound card? I mean, it sounds a bit far fetched that connecting an USB device like an iPod should require a Windows kernel driver. Or maybe it doesn't, but it still is one?

      I'd be much more interested in hearing the why's about that than the old arguments about operating systems, any operating systems, and kernel drivers.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    7. Re:But still... by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh and yeah, sound cards must also now (in Vista) run more in user space.

      That actually caused a ton of people to complain on Microsoft as it could no longer as easily do Creative EAX. Damn if you do, damn if you don't.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    8. Re:But still... by cpotoso · · Score: 0

      On a USB device? Why would a USB device need direct access to memory (esp. when the iphone is not a fast device itself)??? Complete and utter nonsense.

    9. Re:But still... by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good design does not fix the aforementioned performance problems. One of the big reasons no one had any interest in minix is the incredible performance hit the design entails.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    10. Re:But still... by Kjella · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can make non-kernel-mode drivers that are much safer, of course, but at the expense of performance and capability.

      That depends entirely on what the device is doing - USB drivers live in userspace (only the generic read/write support for USB devices live in kernel space) and it works fine and support everything AFAIK, but running a modern GPU from userspace I wouldn't try. The iPod is definately in the former category.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    11. Re:But still... by Balial · · Score: 0, Informative

      That's far more about the design of minix than the general principle.

      Have a look at the L4 microkernel:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L4_microkernel_family

      Qualcomm uses L4 in their mobile phones. If you want a platform with little to no headroom for performance overheads, look no further.

    12. Re:But still... by cbreaker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But, Apple does install drivers, and those drivers CAN crash the operating system.

      It's no different from any other popular operating system. If you have a bad OSX driver - boom. Grey box. If you have a bad Linux driver - boom. Kernel panic.

      The only utter nonsense is that Apple can't write a driver that doesn't crash the operating system. There's tens of thousands of drivers out there, and most of them run great. Apple is big enough to do proper testing. They didn't QA properly, obviously.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    13. Re:But still... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Clippy: Would you like me to stop helping you with fires?

      Yes!

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    14. Re:But still... by hey! · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Doesn't need" is not the same as "doesn't use." IIRC, if you want to port a kernel mode driver to the user mode driver framework in Windows, the path of least resistance is to rewrite it from plain old function oriented C to C++ with COM. So it's possible that it's got direct access because that's the old default and they'd have to rewrite it.

      If that's the case, Microsoft deserves a pat on the back for providing a framework for user mode drivers and a kick in the pants for making the framework totally incompatible. In any case older versions of windows don't support user mode drivers and not all Windows XP installations have the user mode framework.

      At this point, we don't know where the BSOD coming from yet. Obviously Apple's driver initiates it, but it doesn't mean that's what's crashing. This could be one of those cases where such and so feature is supported correctly in some hardware and not others, so the spec might say doing certain things are kosher and they test fine on the hardware you've got, then you find out that there's a lot of people with systems with broken system hardware or drivers.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    15. Re:But still... by Z34107 · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's entirely possible for some devices in Windows - the Windows Driver Foundation lets some drivers run in userland. In fact, "all" printer drivers run that way on Vista - the WDF runs as a service and acts as a broker of sorts between userspace and kernelspace.

      For other devices, it's just not possible. Try writing a user-mode graphics driver and get back to me.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    16. Re:But still... by _KiTA_ · · Score: 1

      On a USB device? Why would a USB device need direct access to memory (esp. when the iphone is not a fast device itself)??? Complete and utter nonsense.

      DRM, and you're right: Complete and utter nonsense.

    17. Re:But still... by cibyr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh god, have you ever used Minix? The microkernel/message passing approach makes everything horribly slow, and makes the code harder to follow because you can't actually trace calls. And if you crash any of the server processes (especially FS or PM) the whole system crashes anyway - we haven't actually gotten anything from the "trade-off".

      The whole OS is an utter abortion in a bunch of other ways as well. Minix 3 has no support for paging - you have to set the VM size of a process as a file attribute! The default installation of vim gives you an out-of-memory error when you run 'vim ~/.vimrc'! Networking is pathetically slow no matter what you do, and the design seems to be generally brain-dead.

      --
      It's not exactly rocket surgery.
    18. Re:But still... by Krneki · · Score: 1

      Clippy: Your printer has performed an illegal operation and it will be shot down!

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    19. Re:But still... by frostw · · Score: 2, Informative

      DMA?

      --
      http://www.sydney-webcam.com
    20. Re:But still... by xwipeoutx · · Score: 1

      * Call 0118 999 881 999 119 7253

      Fixed it for ya

    21. Re:But still... by ari+wins · · Score: 1

      Clippy: Did the test page print ok?

      --
      Don't worry if you're a kleptomaniac, you can always take something for it.
    22. Re:But still... by afidel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, thunking from kernel space to userland will always be more expensive than staying in kernel space however not many things are so performance critical that it's worth the risk. Graphics, network, file, and audio drivers are the ones that come to mind. Network and Audio only qualify if you are trying to do significantly more than your average user (IE full gig ethernet or multichannel recording).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    23. Re:But still... by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      On a USB device? Why would a USB device need direct access to memory (esp. when the iphone is not a fast device itself)??? Complete and utter nonsense.

      DRM.

    24. Re:But still... by antek9 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unfortunately, they changed the number to something to remember more easily:
      0118 999 881 999 119 725 3

      There is still the option to send an e-mail to the fire department, though.

      --
      A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
      Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
    25. Re:But still... by kevingolding2001 · · Score: 1

      They didn't QA properly, obviously.

      Ah, but they did!
      " iTunes ain't done till Vista won't run."

    26. Re:But still... by NovaHorizon · · Score: 1

      didn't QA properly? They didn't QA at all if they didn't even try at least once with the latest operating system from the largest consumer software company on the planet 0.o

    27. Re:But still... by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

      NT 3.51 and earlier had graphics driver in user-mode space. I remember there was quite an uproar about stability when NT4 came out with kernel-mode graphics drivers.

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    28. Re:But still... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One of the big reasons no one had any interest in minix is the incredible performance hit the design entails.

      At what point?

      I think the main reason no one had an interest in Minix was the cost, and the restrictive licensing. Linus admitted that he never expected Linux to be much more than a stopgap until GNU/HURD was released -- except that HURD took too long to get any kind of release out the door, so Linux already had adoption at that point.

      The best argument at the time was: You could spend the money and buy Minix, and install it. And then install the source code, and download a number of patches needed to get something approximating a modern OS, recompile, and reinstall.

      Or you could spend that same money on a faster computer (a 386), and get Linux for free. Linux could do everything Minix could, and it already ran in native 32-bit mode (which Minix needed patches for).

      In fact, that's one of several other ways Minix took performance hits -- ways that I'd call bad design. The filesystem, for example -- Minix has a non-threaded filesystem; Linux had a threaded filesystem.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    29. Re:But still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging by the slew of problems on /. every time a new apple product is released -- from osx networking bugs, iphone 3g suckage, the .mac replacement, to this -- Apple NEVER does ANY testing whatsoever of ANY kind of non-perfect conditions.

      They, more than microsoft, have teh 'fix it in a update' mentality

    30. Re:But still... by PsychicX · · Score: 1

      Yeah! It's a ridiculous idea to run a GPU driver in userspace. No major operating system would ever do such a thing.

      Oh wait.

      (To be fair, Vista drivers are comprised of a small kernel mode miniport driver, but the vast, vast majority is in userspace.)

    31. Re:But still... by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The "Printer On Fire" status code is strictly a UNIX phenomenon.

      Laugh all you want at Microsoft, but this one is mostly our fault :-P

      (For those not familiar with this meme, there was a certain brand of mainframe printer in the 1970s that was infamous for continuing to print after jamming, despite being able to correctly detect the jam and take the printer "off-line". This would cause an immense heat-buildup that would often lead to the paper catching on fire. Therefore, a printer that is somehow printing while off-line is reported by most Unices to have a status code of "Printer On Fire")

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    32. Re:But still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me a processor with 128 sets of registers and TLBs (set 0 and one other set directly accessible from kernel privilege level), with the extra set switchable when doing jump, and I can make a micro-kernel with no performance performance penalty.

    33. Re:But still... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Clippy likes fires.

    34. Re:But still... by Inner_Child · · Score: 1

      I love the way the smoke seems to be coming from the top of it. Just a second... I'm late for golf!

      --
      Today is red jello day - all workers must eat all of their red jello. Failure to comply will result in five demerits.
    35. Re:But still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let it burn.

    36. Re:But still... by AngryBacon · · Score: 1

      Microsoft deserves a pat on the back for providing a framework for user mode drivers and a kick in the pants for making the framework totally incompatible.

      Next time on Tip of the Hat, Wag of the Finger: Grizzly Adams!

    37. Re:But still... by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 2, Informative

      A driver should not cause the OS to crash. Your printer should be able to load its driver in a manner such that if it catches fire the kernel stays alive and can tell you so.

      Generic I/O level USB devices can, especially not in usermode. USB devices can be primary kernel level I/O devices (booting from USB anyone? anyone?) Let alone USB can even disrupt the mainboard itself of how the USB/PCI controllers are implemented. This is beyond the OS even.

      Cross the wires on your USB devices and plug them in and out of your laptop, tell us how that 'shouldn't' crash it while it catches the mainboard on fire, ok?

      In all seriousness if Apple wrote the drivers properly and KEPT THEM IN USERLAND, then it also wouldn't be able to crash Vista.

      Is Apple not bright enough to do this?

      Maybe, but the truth is their drivers AVOID usermode because they want to ensure their DRM pipeline is protected.

      So..
      Apple + DRM + Stupidity = bad device software

      Apple are not only sleezy, but bad at software, and yet fools RUN here with their fanboi badges to defend them. WTF is wrong with people?

    38. Re:But still... by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

      If it's my pos printer there needs to be a fourth option:

      * Burn motherfucker, burn.

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    39. Re:But still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      QA1: Oh! Someone is actually using Vista?

      --- silence ---

      QA1: I guess I should test that. Does somebody have Vista on their machine?

      --- silence ---

    40. Re:But still... by arminw · · Score: 1

      .....The only utter nonsense is that Apple can't write a driver that doesn't crash the operating system....

      I have not heard that this problem occurs on any other operating system besides VISTA. Is that because VISTA is bad or because writing a reliable driver for VISTA is very much harder than for other OS? Apparently, according to countless articles, getting working drivers for VISTA has been a major headache and a large factor in slowing down mass adoption of that particular OS.

      --
      All theory is gray
    41. Re:But still... by cp.tar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Clippy: It looks like your printer is on fire. Would you like to: * Call 911 * Put it out. * Let it burn.

      Please, let it burn. My DVD burner died, I'll put my DVDs in the printer.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    42. Re:But still... by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      You could, but then everyone would just complain about how they shouldn't have to have fast hardware to run your OS, when they're doing the same things they did ten years ago, albeit on a crappier OS.

    43. Re:But still... by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      It wasn't just EAX. People who mix sound for a living aren't thrilled about the added latency.

    44. Re:But still... by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of kernel-side USB drivers (everything that's part of the kernel, including USB mass storage, keyboards, mice, and in fact most common USB devices). Only libusb stuff runs in userspace.

      On the other hand, a nice chunk of the video drivers these days runs in userspace, as the Xorg driver.

    45. Re:But still... by Urkki · · Score: 2, Funny

      But does it run iTunes?

    46. Re:But still... by Saint+Gerbil · · Score: 1

      In a Managed Process OS which adds a substantial overhead there are only 2 managed OS's that I can think of and both of them have less than 0.0001% of the Market.

      The most recent of which is Singularlity. (http://research.microsoft.com/os/singularity/)

    47. Re:But still... by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      So Apple are big enough to do proper testing so drivers don't crash the OS

      Linux is obviously "big enough" as well since those don't seem to crash it either

      But Microsoft apparently is not!

      Or could it be that Apple drivers are written or tested by Apple, Linux drivers are (mostly) written by the Linux Community, and Windows drivers are written by the hardware companies...

      Microsoft's model for getting drivers written is broken ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    48. Re:But still... by Anpheus · · Score: 1

      I've got a pretty good idea where the crash is. Every time I plug in my iPhone, I get "Xerxes "

      Usually it's Chinese or maybe Japanese characters, but it definitely requires Asian font rendering. After that popup to import pictures, the phone correctly identifies itself in Computer and also under iTunes, it's only that initial popup that contains basically jibberish.

      I'm guessing it's reading from memory and trying to force characters to be rendered that don't exist on most people's operating systems. I opted to install the Asian language support pack.

    49. Re:But still... by m50d · · Score: 1

      A multithreaded filesystem is just a performance hack!

      --
      I am trolling
    50. Re:But still... by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      Do you know how S L O W your computer would be if every single driver on your system had to be fully sandboxed and run it's own tiny fireproof box?

      The problem here is not with the architecture OS, but with the fact that Apple do not properly TEST their software before releasing it. They're so paranoid about people stealing their ideas that they prefer to ask Steve to test it on *both* his computers and then release the software to their 20 gazillion users 10 minutes later when he says it's OK. The iPhone firmware is another very good example of this. Really basic things like calling people, and typing, simply do not work! (yes, I do have an iPhone 3G and have experienced both of these widely known problems).

    51. Re:But still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice try. Windows has had ASIO and Kernel Mode Streaming since XP.

    52. Re:But still... by LinuxDon · · Score: 1

      Usually when a Linux kernel module crashes it doesn't take down the OS. Instead it prints a debug/diagnostic message in the kernel logs and the rest of the OS just keeps on running. All the programs accessing the driver just hang indefinitely btw.

    53. Re:But still... by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      Oh this is a big pile of BS!

      I have seen drivers take down Linux as well. Not as colorful as Vista mind you. I remember my Canon scanner making Linux basically useless. Sure it ran, but no input, no output, no networking...

      A driver is special because it is a core part of the operating system. Yes an OS can be written such that it is completely protected, but the versions of Linux I have run are not that. And frankly I don't want it to be because the cost of that robustness is speed. On a server wanted, on a desktop problematic.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    54. Re:But still... by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Apple: Vista, install XYZ driver
      Vista: Installing...
      Vista: OK
      Aple: Install DRM++ on all outputs
      Vista: Installing...
      Vista:....
      Vista>.....
      Vista: Alert! DRM++ conflicts with Vista DRM .NET 2008, abort! abort! abor... *freezes*

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    55. Re:But still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple, at fault?? NEEVVVVVVEEEEEERRRRRRR!

      Thanks for the post - at least somebody has balls to say this.

      And you achieved the unachievable - point figuer at Apple and get positive modes!!!

    56. Re:But still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      afaik, vista made a bullet point of userspacing gpu drivers. also, if the bus is standard you shouldn't let any driver access to the bus, just write a bus driver and build userspace drivers on top of that - apple did this, and their driver development platform is really good.

    57. Re:But still... by amorsen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most Unices == Old Linux versions, in this case. And the mainframe printer explanation sounds completely made up.

      But I bet your version will become the official one now.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    58. Re:But still... by Weedlekin · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I remember there was quite an uproar about stability when NT4 came out with kernel-mode graphics drivers."

      MS decided to do the same with NT as Windows-95 because, as we all know, W-95 was a rock solid piece of wonderware that proved kernel-mode drivers were a brilliant idea that should have conferred instant saint-hood on whoever came up with it.

      OK, so there were a few unexplained crashes in W-95, sometimes even a few a day, hour, or minute, but it's now been proven that far from being caused by dodgy drivers running in kernel mode, they were actually the result of emotionally sensitive computers not getting enough of what scientists call "love vibes", a special heart-shaped wave that emanates from people who really, really adore their computers, and wouldn't think of shouting at them, let alone throwing them at the floor or through a window.

      Dr. Adrian Stoat of the National Center For Spurious Claims is one of the notable scientists who confirm that Pentium-2 computers were especially vulnerable to Love Deficit Disorder (LDD):

      "You'd be surprised how many Pentium-2 machines were brought to us for extensive courses of counselling that could easily end up costing their owners thousands of dollars. Yet despite this, some of them never recovered from the humiliation of being forced to display pornography for hours at a time, the stress of repeated verbal abuse, or living in constant fear of yet another savage beating with a copy of "The Road Ahead". Most of these machines have no future outside our special Caribbean Sanctuary For Sad Computers, where dedicated staff nurse them entirely at their owners' expense. Just think how much suffering and money could have been saved if only the people who bought these tragic systems had given them just a little love instead of erroneously assuming that Windows was to blame for every minor failure".

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    59. Re:But still... by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Yea, because we ALL KNOW that the Internets can't be wrong.

      Vista works for the vast majority of people that use it. Sure, there's been problems - and a lot of them are due to the fact that Microsoft broke with compatibility in some places to build a better system.

      Finding Vista drivers is easy, and they USUALLY work. Don't believe the hype. Well, I guess it's too late for you.

      It's funny: you're ACTUALLY trying to say that the crash is a Vista problem, even though it crashes because of an Apple driver that was poorly written. I'd be okay with that, if Apple didn't say "This release is compatible with Windows Vista." Obviously not.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    60. Re:But still... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      For other devices, it's just not possible under Windows. Try writing a user-mode graphics driver and get back to me.

      Fixed that for you, because I don't see anything resembling "ATI" or "Radeon" in

      $ kldstat
      Id Refs Address Size Name
      1 19 0xffffffff80100000 afa638 kernel
      2 1 0xffffffff80bfb000 1a680 snd_hda.ko
      3 2 0xffffffff80c16000 66480 sound.ko
      4 1 0xffffffffae591000 3473 linprocfs.ko
      5 1 0xffffffffae595000 17f1d linux.ko
      6 1 0xffffffffae634000 52f5 if_re.ko
      7 1 0xffffffffae73c000 15009 smbfs.ko
      8 2 0xffffffffae752000 1a2e libiconv.ko
      9 2 0xffffffffae754000 bba libmchain.ko

      and yet here I am looking at a nice eyecandyful KDE desktop.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    61. Re:But still... by Rabid+Elk · · Score: 1

      Good one. If Apple cant even follow basic MS guidelines for gui coding, why the hell do you think they would for kernel level drivers? If Apple want to use a phrase like "it just works", then surely it should apply to *ALL* their products?

    62. Re:But still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finding Vista drivers is easy, and they USUALLY work. Don't believe the hype. Well, I guess it's too late for you.

      It's not hype when you see it first hand. I recently head one of the top officers in American Airlines says that the media was just making too big a deal about problems flying. What a fool. My friends, family, and coworkers all have horror stories about flying, but he blames the media. You're like him, except not responsible. It's not hype. We're the ones facing the problems. I don't want a computer that USUALLY works. I don't want to "find" drivers. I want plug and play. Each USB device has a unique ID. Just automatically download and install the danged driver. I've got better things to do with my time.

    63. Re:But still... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      HURD's made it out the door? Then again, I haven't really looked into HURD since '98 or so.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    64. Re:But still... by wish+bot · · Score: 1

      I loved it, nevermind the mods.

      --
      lemonade was a popular drink and it still is
    65. Re:But still... by CrazyBusError · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, the odd variant of unix that ran on Honeywell Bull servers actually had an 'ethernet on fire' error (along with a 'crazy bus error').

      Never did figure out what either of them meant.

      --
      -Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience-
    66. Re:But still... by Tweenk · · Score: 1

      Depends. lirc_sir can lock up your machine without warning in some circumstances. The fact that some drivers recover from strange conditions is only because they are written to do so.

      --
      Those who would give up liberty to obtain working drivers, deserve neither liberty nor working drivers.
    67. Re:But still... by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Minix is open source and has been for a while. Maybe it cost money 17 years ago, but not anymore.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    68. Re:But still... by sagematt · · Score: 1

      +2 IT Crowd reference.

    69. Re:But still... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      I understand that this is the case now. I am pointing out why it failed in the first place -- note that I've used past tense in pretty much my entire post.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    70. Re:But still... by dougisfunny · · Score: 1

      We don't need no water....

      --
      This is not the funny you're looking for.
    71. Re:But still... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      More or less. HURD is at least in a bootable, runnable state, somewhat. I'm pretty sure that wasn't the case when Linux came out.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    72. Re:But still... by cyanidecircuitry · · Score: 1

      Don't use a fire extinguisher made in Britain though!

    73. Re:But still... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      USB drivers live in userspace (only the generic read/write support for USB devices live in kernel space)
      Afaict on windows most USB drivers live in kernel space. It is possible to make user mode USB drivers but if you do afaict they will not work on 2K or server 2K3 (this may have changed but if it has MS didn't bother to update thier faq and I don't have access to download the wdk anymore). Furthermore a user mode driver can't have kernel mode clients (which means you can't do keyboard/mouse drivers or mass storage drivers in userspace)

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    74. Re:But still... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      The message passing thing has shown a demonstrated 4% overhead impact. 13% on Mach IIRC due to security checks, and less on L4 because L4 doesn't bother with security checks in message passing. Minix uses a design that lets you avoid certain security checks (inherent security), so the stuff you do have to do is lightweight and easy.

  29. Obviously, this is Dell's fault by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    After all, software and OS manufacturers never ever cause any problems, so it must be the hardware manufacturer.

    Plus, it will certainly not be included in the warranty.

    (caveat - we got rid of our Vista machines)

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  30. Who uses iTunes on Windows? by gelfling · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Geesh the last three versions were bloated to the heavens. I think it takes about a minute to start now. A least few recent versions flat out crashed or did not update correctly. And is there any piece of application software that takes more time to update than iTunes? I don't think so.

    1. Re:Who uses iTunes on Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who uses iTunes on Windows?

      What kind of stupid question is that? Windows is by far the single most dominant OS. Millions of ipods have been sold. You think that every person who buys an ipod uses something other than Windows? I don't know a single person who both owns an ipod and primarily uses an OS other than Windows, with the exception of my Mac fanboy friend. I would even put money on the assumption that there are more ipod/Windows users then there are ipod/Mac users.

      According to Neilson, in January of 2006, the installed iTunes user base was at 18.6 million people. That was 2 and a half years ago, and that number tripled from the 5.4 million users in 01/05. Today the install base is probably between 25 and 35 million people, but it could easily be much higher. According to appleinsider.com, in March of 2007, a year and a half ago, the install base for OSX was at 22 million. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that there are probably quite a few Windows iTunes users. I'm not sure what reality you're living in where you ask questions like "who uses iTunes on Windows?"

    2. Re:Who uses iTunes on Windows? by greyspectre · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that the people who own an iPod and also have Windows as their primary (or only) operating system are the ones who use iTunes on Windows.

      In the real world, Windows is *still* the dominant OS.

    3. Re:Who uses iTunes on Windows? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I do.it takes less then 10 seconds for iTunes 8.0.0.35 on my XP laptop.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Who uses iTunes on Windows? by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      LOL!!!! You say that like it's something to be proud of! No, consider how simple and mature the functionality is on iTunes (we're not rendering massive 3D models here, folks!) and ask why the hell it should take even ten seconds to load on (what I'm guessing is) a relatively new computer. I hope it didn't interfere with the six Firefox youtube tabs you had open, right?

      Same old garbage: user interfaces that make you pop a blood vessel, all while we get lectured that Apple is the gold standard in user interface design.

      Btw, last night I had a .flac file I wanted to add to my library. Guess how *fun* it was to try to find out from the help features what file types iTunes supports? Apple's entire "help section" philosophy is: you can go google it your own damn self. Internet outage? Sucks to be you, bro.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    5. Re:Who uses iTunes on Windows? by gelfling · · Score: 1

      A lot of people with iPod's DO NOT USE iTunes. Fact. Now calm down.

    6. Re:Who uses iTunes on Windows? by gelfling · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean they're happy with it. Evident THIS article. iTunes 8 is broken. And it's the not the first version that is.

    7. Re:Who uses iTunes on Windows? by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 1

      A lot more people with iPods do use iTunes. Fact.

      In fact, I'd go so far as to say that the vast majority of people with iPods use iTunes. Most of the people I know with iTunes don't have the knowledge or interest to set up one of the alternatives, because iTunes does what they want and they're happy with it.

      --
      Goo goo g'joob.
    8. Re:Who uses iTunes on Windows? by m50d · · Score: 1
      And is there any piece of application software that takes more time to update than iTunes?

      I guess you're not one of the lucky folks like I am where Acrobat Reader spends an hour and a half "optimizing" its installer. (Or you did the sensible thing and upgraded to version 3.0)

      --
      I am trolling
    9. Re:Who uses iTunes on Windows? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      My computer is 3 years old, with he exception of the Video Card;which is 2.
      I have many thousands of pieces of music.

      I said 10 seconds not because it was spectacular, but to show that there could be some other issue with the posters PC.

      I run iTunes on a variety of different machines and never had it take a minute to come up.
      I just tested it on my 2 year old laptop, 7 seconds.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:Who uses iTunes on Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geesh the last three versions were bloated to the heavens. I think it takes about a minute to start now. A least few recent versions flat out crashed or did not update correctly...

      I'm confused... are you talking about iTunes or Windows?

  31. I hate ITunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ITunes for Windows is one of the all-time worst programs I've /ever/ installed on a PC. QuickTime botches several file formats in browsers, most notably TIFF. It's a resource hog. It launches all sorts of crap at startup; if you disable the crap, ITunes will re-enable the crap the next time it's launched. It's bloated; ITunes really doesn't need to include a freakin' browser and QTime.

    It's a horrible, horrible PoS.

    1. Re:I hate ITunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quicktime alternative, real alternative. I don't install those programs, but I need those codecs. So I just install that.

  32. I gotcha by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

    It's a new vista theme pack that comes with iTunes.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
  33. You both laugh now... by hellfire · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...but what if Apple pulled a Microsoft and put an intentional bug into the app? Sure, it might seem a little too sophisticated for such a small thing, and people will still blame iTunes since it's the main application, but what if tomorrow Steve releases a press release apologizing to Vista users but blames it squarely on Vista "oh sorry something in our new version invoked a buggy piece of vista and we had to work around it." And what if that's what all the support people at apple are instructed to say? What if friends down the street say "oh dude I have a Mac/XP and it works fine for me" might iPod users say "fuckin' vista!" With a little careful preparation, I think this might be possible... maybe only a little bit of a stretch? :)

    Sounds a little conspiracy theory-ish, but keep an eye out the next couple of days. You never know.

    I am a mac fan, but I don't put evil past Apple by any means, they are a corporation after all. At the same time, evil attacking evil is loads of fun to watch, but I pity the people who get caught in the middle who can't sync now until a fix is released.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:You both laugh now... by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      When was I laughing?

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    2. Re:You both laugh now... by Trespass · · Score: 1

      It doesn't require sophistication.

      Merely arrogance.

    3. Re:You both laugh now... by RDW · · Score: 1

      'but what if tomorrow Steve releases a press release apologizing to Vista users but blames it squarely on Vista "oh sorry something in our new version invoked a buggy piece of vista and we had to work around it."'

      No, that's not why they did it. It crashes so that anyone who just bought the largest capacity iPod won't find out it's 40Gb smaller than the previous model. (Except Mac uses, of course, but they'll just get all excited about how much thinner it is now, while stroking their MacBook Airs dreamily with the other hand. XP users haven't upgraded their Diamond Rios yet).

    4. Re:You both laugh now... by salmonmoose · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, MS may have verified faulty drivers simply to hurt iPhone/iPod. They can just as easily turn around and say "oh just use a Zune/WinMo they work fine". I wouldn't put it past either of them really.

    5. Re:You both laugh now... by matthobbs05 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised if some of what you are saying is slightly true, but I point the "finger of blame (TM)" on Apple's inability to develop for platforms other than their own. Apple does make some great software for their own platform, which looks and performs great. AFAIK, the only other platform Apple has attempted to develop for is Windows, and the software they develop for it consistently performs poorly and doesn't conform to the Windows GUI design standards (although, the latter is a minor issue). But their main rival, Microsoft, on the other hand has developed for Apple's MacOS, and their software for this platform performs consistently well and does conform to the MacOS GUI design standards. Not only that, but they have also developed software for Solaris and OS/2.

    6. Re:You both laugh now... by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      A lot more people own iPods than do iMacs. Would they risk pissing off millions and purposely put out a bad version of something they spend money and time on?

      I think it has more to do with Apple treating everything like a port. That is, rather than developing iTunes for Windows as a Windows program, making use of libraries and calls that Windows already provides, they do everything with the Mac frameworks in mind and then find hackish ways to bring everything over.

    7. Re:You both laugh now... by MojoStan · · Score: 1
      I have a hard time believing Apple would intentionally install shitty kernel mode drivers, but Apple has fucked up and blamed Microsoft in the past: "iPods Come Complete With Windows Virus"

      From TA:

      • "The Cupertino, Calif.-based company apologized on its Web site for the problem, but also used the opportunity to jab at Microsoft, its operating system rival.

        "As you might imagine, we are upset at Windows for not being more hardy against such viruses, and even more upset with ourselves for not catching it," Apple said on its site. "

      Sure, Apple was scolded by non-Microsoft security experts, but I'm sure Apple fanboys ate the bullshit all up.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    8. Re:You both laugh now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, can't believe this was modded up. A conspiracy by Apple is more likely than it actually being because of a bug in Vista?

      An application shouldn't be able to bring down the OS like this.

    9. Re:You both laugh now... by Naznarreb · · Score: 1

      What if friends down the street say "oh dude I have a Mac/XP and it works fine for me"

      I have a mac and got iTunes 8 a day or 2 ago, and it does not work fine on my system. It's a lot slower than 7, particularly the new "Grid View" which is so slow and choppy as to be unusable (at least for me) The new Genius system is interesting, seems to do a good job of putting together a random playlist that's actually pretty harmonious (as opposed to the jarring, discordant change-ups you get when putting the whole playlist on shuffle) but to get Genius, you have to opt in and allow Apple to scan your library and add it to their database. iTunes will then periodically phone home to Apple with updates about your playlist and listening habits. And the Genius sidebar? Nothing but ads from the iTunes Music Store keyed to whatever song you've currently got highlighted.

    10. Re:You both laugh now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but what if Apple pulled a Microsoft and put an intentional bug into the app? Sure, it might seem a little too sophisticated for such a small thing, and people will still blame iTunes since it's the main application, but what if tomorrow Steve releases.....

      I get a kick out of coming to this site to witness the daily microsoft bash... A company puts out a flawed product and it never fails, someone, somehow will find a way to blame MS.

      Anyway, your argument here is plausible if only it weren't for the fact that Microsoft owns almost half of Apple. They have for quite a while. So why would they bug their own app in attempt to screw vista which is owned by the same people that own apple?

      It's like those mac and pc commercials, they always remind me of what it would be like to have a schizophrenic with multiple personalities arguing with himself and trying to kick his own ass.

    11. Re:You both laugh now... by bar-agent · · Score: 1
      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  34. No Problems Here by Itchyeyes · · Score: 1

    Running, Vista x64, iTunes 8, with an iPhone 3G. No problems so far.

    1. Re:No Problems Here by vacantskies9 · · Score: 1

      Same here, ipod classic. No problems.

    2. Re:No Problems Here by Necroman · · Score: 1

      Same. Vista x64 Business with a 1st gen iPhone AND a iPod Shuffle, no problems here.

      --
      Its not what it is, its something else.
    3. Re:No Problems Here by Supergibbs · · Score: 1

      Me too :-)

      --
      First post! (just in case I am...)
  35. iTunes Really a Mac App by immcintosh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's always seemed to me that iTunes for Windows was just slapdash kludge for allowing compatibility between iPods and Windows. My experiences with it have been nothing but buggy and slooooooow. Honestly, I think it just needs to be rebuilt from the ground up for Windows.

    1. Re:iTunes Really a Mac App by Wizard+Drongo · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm partly of the opinion that Apple should just release Cocoa for windows. They have already ported it, since iTunes, QuickTime and Safari all use it on Windows for their custom UI. It's in there. I think it's even called "Cocoa.dll".
      They should maybe open it up for usage by everyone else (perhaps a plugin for X-Code to allow compilation for Windows) and thus make Cocoa the preferred cross-platform API for mac & windows. Not to mention mean that bugs like this would have to get stamped a lot quicker. It would put a down on Mac sales though.

      Then again, I'm also partly of the opinion that Apple should discontinue iTunes and Safari for Windows and give everyone a 10% off your next Mac voucher in place of it. Why support shitty OS's that let a media-player down the entire system?
      Windows is a bag of balls, Vista in particular. I know it, you know it, Steve knows it, Bill G knows it, we all know it.
      Sooner businesses stop buying Vista or Vista OEM machines the better.

      --
      The truth shall always be free: Boris Floricic is Tron.
    2. Re:iTunes Really a Mac App by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      slapdash kludge

      That would be a great name for a rock band.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  36. Both Vista Users Are Horrified! by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In other news 1000 Ubuntu users running under WINE without whining.

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  37. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC." "...And I'm a Mac." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn...and here I am wishing I still I had my mod-points. That's fracking hilarious.

  38. Good Call! by RingDev · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The tags right now are [+] bug, media, music, windows, haha (tagging beta)

    Odd that Apple, iPod, and iTunes aren't tags for a story about a bug in their software?

    Vista sucks for not encapsulating the exception, but it sure sounds like the bug is on Apple's side of the issue.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:Good Call! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Odd that Apple, iPod, and iTunes aren't tags for a story about a bug in their software?

      Is it a bug in their software? If they call some dosomething() function as per the published docs and it causes a BSOD, then it's not their fault. I'm not saying that's what happened, but you and I don't know that it's actually faulty Apple software causing the problem.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:Good Call! by Shippy · · Score: 1

      Vista sucks for not encapsulating the exception

      And how does your favorite operating system deal with fatal errors while in kernel mode?

      --
      -Shippy
  39. Quantum Leap! by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

    "Gushi! GUSHI!!! Center me on SAAAM!!!"

    1. Re:Quantum Leap! by SkullOne · · Score: 1

      I can't believe no other Slashdotters caught this...

      Is anyone driving this thing? I mean, fuck... submitter deliberately cited 'sambeckett'

      CLUE STICK

      --

      Brent Jones
    2. Re:Quantum Leap! by brendank310 · · Score: 1

      Oh boy!

    3. Re:Quantum Leap! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      So it's not a blue screen of death, it's just the leap effect?

      Then again, maybe the user chose his name after the Irish playwright.

      Then again, the posting is invisible to anyone not reading Slashdot at a filter level of 2.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  40. Closed doors for the closed minded by gawiedeboef · · Score: 0

    That's what happens when you code behind closed door... Death to the infidels!!

  41. Sabotoogy! by rpbird · · Score: 1

    Some evil little wabbit is at fault, I'm sure!

  42. All Apple's Fault by JamesRose · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I say that, not because of the code, but because of what itunes 8 is, it's Apple installing some more DRM to close a hole someone found, apple hates DRM, but then amazingly it spends a huge amount of effort maintaining it. Has anyone seen the NBC shows back on iTunes, they're CHEAPER than before, so turns out, Apple was inflating the price, not nbc. Just seems like apple screws you at every opportunity.

    1. Re:All Apple's Fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...except that NBC wanted to charge $4.99 per episode, which Apple refused. Now NBC rather has $1.99/2.99 episodes on iTunes than non at all ...

  43. yea, yea, that would be a killer for me by unity100 · · Score: 1

    Wow PC, it looks like your Vista users are really having headaches running

    • great software

    like iTunes 8. Mac runs them

    • just fine

    ."

    "GREAT" software. "JUST" fine. when they exaggerate using such words, i really go nuts. if you ask them to define what technically running "fine" on a computer means, they would start blabbering. but still use the word anyways.

  44. Not surprising by Idiomatick · · Score: 5, Informative

    Itunes in past has:

    - deleted your legit music

    - Unstalled othe mac applications without asking you

    - Hijacked volume control from windows

    - Modified code specifically to make it hard to work with the ipod outside of itunes

    - Is the largest pusher of DRM technology

      Really a BSOD isn't that big of a deal. And incase you are curious NO it isn't windows fault. Why is a music player installing drivers overtop of standard drivers that work perfectly? Aside from their hatred of doing things the same even when they are better only jobs knows. If windows tried to pull even half the bullship Apple has they would have been sued into dust. I find it disgusting its ok since its mac.

    1. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think it unstalled your speel checker.

    2. Re:Not surprising by geekoid · · Score: 1

      The first four never happened to me, and I have been using iTunes since it became available.
      not everything has DRM anymore, and they made it really easy to keep out of the way.

      "Really a BSOD isn't that big of a deal."

      Yes it is. Any kernel crash is a big deal, and inexcusable with modern design techniques.

      "And incase you are curious NO it isn't windows fault"

      BSODing is.

      "Why is a music player installing drivers overtop of standard drivers that work perfectly? "

      Who says there working perfectly?

      It isn't ok, but it is pretty complex. You need iTunes 8, Vista, and an HP printer all on the same usb channel.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Not surprising by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      I meant comparatively a bsod isnt bad. And yes windows should not have crashed BUT. Windows being an insane asylum itunes being trapped inside even with the pillow walls itunes managed to break something. Really, windows is trying but itunes had to go WAY out of its way to break itself. In the order of many thousands of lines just to screw up.
       
      "Who says there working perfectly?"
      HAH usb is an international standard used by millions with no problems if itunes hadnt tried so hard it wouldnt have broken anything.

    4. Re:Not surprising by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Not really. This is a power conflict with HP printers on the same USB 'channel'.

      So, lets say you haven't read this and HAve vista and an iPhone and iTunes 8. There all working fine, then you install your new HP printer and Vista starts BSoDing.
      Who would you blame for this? HP.
      This is turning out to be a power conflict between HP and Apple. So either:
      Apple violated the standarad, OR
      HP violated the standard,
      And/Or Vista isn't handling the conflict resolution properly.
      It could be that something new is using a function of the USB driver that it never needed, or the power consumption went up that exposed this flaw.
      It could be that Apple created this flaw.
      None of this is known at this time.

      I think this needs to be clear to demonstrate how stupid MS driver architecture is.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Not surprising by blankoboy · · Score: 1

      "deleted your legit music"? Is this a known problem from the past? I am currently considering the switch to OSX from Windows but hearing this has got me thinking twice. I have never installed Itunes on XP for this very reason, I have always had the tin-foil hat fear that it would attempt to delete my mp3's. Is there any online reference regarding this?

    6. Re:Not surprising by indiechild · · Score: 1

      Sounds like some random bullshit that the poster made up. I've been using iTunes since 2003 and have never heard of this happening.

    7. Re:Not surprising by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Itunes 7.0
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zfEMmgcuNc
       
      The problem occurred when you turn on itunes it tried to do an automatic sync (which you couldnt shut off) which it failed miserably and could delete all your music file in the folder you set. If you set this to root obviously it was quite a problem.
      I also heard that DRM in some versions could jump from one file to another. I never had this happen to me though so i assume that is just a myth however i keep it in mind.

  45. My computer won't boot with an iPod connected by moonbender · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On-topic enought to tell here: My computer won't even boot with an iPod attached. Might be just the shuffle, but I think having my old mini connected is a no-no, too. Won't even go past the BIOS screen, it hangs before the pseudo memory check at POST.

    Sometimes I don't even get an image on the screen, I think because it hangs too fast for the monitor too sync. I found this out the (very) hard way: Computer didn't boot, no image on screen, seemingly for no reason, so I did what I had to do, basic troubleshooting. Remove power cord and reconnect after a while, didn't do anything. So I started tearing out extension cards, disconnecting hard drives, removing RAM chips. Had pretty much the whole thing disassembled, short of removing the CPU (because removing the HSF is such a PITA). Erased the BIOS using a paperclip, nothing. Only then did I notice, by accident, that some USB devices, including the iPod, were still attached. Disconnected them, and the system booted fine. WTF.

    The whole thing is so strange that I promptly forgot about it and repeated the whole procedure half a year later. Doh!

    Note that everything works fine once the POST is done, I bet I could even boot of of it if I wanted to, and I can use them in Linux or Windows just fine. So really just a minor inconvenience, albeit a very odd one. (I blame my motherboard, BTW, not the iPod.)

    --
    Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    1. Re:My computer won't boot with an iPod connected by repvik · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your PC has serious hardware issues. The iPod is just a removeable disk.

    2. Re:My computer won't boot with an iPod connected by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      On-topic enought to tell here: My computer won't even boot with an iPod attached. Might be just the shuffle, but I think having my old mini connected is a no-no, too. Won't even go past the BIOS screen, it hangs before the pseudo memory check at POST.

      I get exactly that behaviour on my machine with my iPod Mini connected (but not every time) - if it's connected the machine hangs during POST. If I disconnect it, POST continues.

    3. Re:My computer won't boot with an iPod connected by citylivin · · Score: 1

      Thats because its trying to read the drive. You could 1) update your bios 2) set usb or removable drives to not be bootable 3) sometimes theres a setting where the bios wont treat the usb disk as a hard drive.

      Anyway, its not the disks fault its your crappy motherboard. Its a pretty common problem

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    4. Re:My computer won't boot with an iPod connected by moonbender · · Score: 1

      I've already got the most recent BIOS available. I'll try to disable booting from USB devices, but it does not appear to be at the point where it's trying to boot off the iPod... But yeah, like I said, I blame my motherboard, even though it's not that crappy overall, it's just a Rev 1.0 (or close enough to that).

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    5. Re:My computer won't boot with an iPod connected by moonbender · · Score: 1

      I've got some removeable storage attached pretty much all the time, and it's only the iPod that causing the hang. But yeah, hardware issue, not a serious one though seeing how everything works just fine after the POST.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    6. Re:My computer won't boot with an iPod connected by lowlymarine · · Score: 1

      See, I would buy this explanation except that I have several other USB disks (both hard drive based and flash drives) and none of them cause this. Yet my iPod as well as every other iPod I've ever connected to my computer causes this behavior. And not just on this ASUS M2N-SLI Deluxe, which admittedly is a POS. But also on my friend's EVGA 680i, another friend's Foxconn 750G, my old Inspiron 9300 (i915), my ThinkPad T61 (i965), and an extra old Dell desktop I have laying around (also i915). No other USB disks do this to any of these computers, only iPods. That can't just be one gigantic set of coincidences.

    7. Re:My computer won't boot with an iPod connected by shams42 · · Score: 1

      My laptop has the exact same issue. It will not boot when my iPod nano is connected. It will boot with any other USB mass storage device connected. I hadn't heard of anyone else having this issue.

    8. Re:My computer won't boot with an iPod connected by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I've seen this too. I'm pretty sure it it has little to do with booting from USB devices, and has to do with the BIOS going out looking for things that might be USB keyboards and getting confused or hung up when it finds something weird (I've seen non-iPods do cause it too). Most BIOSes do this fairly early so you can press F1 or whatever to get into the set up screen, which is why it'll hang before the memory test. If your BIOS has options for supporting USB keyboards or "USB Legacy Devices" you can try to turn it off and see if it improves things. Though if you use a USB keyboard you may lock yourself out of the BIOS so be careful or have a PS/2 keyboard handy.

    9. Re:My computer won't boot with an iPod connected by m50d · · Score: 1

      It's not the booting, you need to disable the "legacy USB device emulation" or similar option.

      --
      I am trolling
  46. Funny you should mention... by fuocoZERO · · Score: 1

    I just crashed Vista Business when I connected the iPhone to the computer with iTunes 8. I restarted and it has worked fine. Had this article come up 10 minutes earlier, I wouldn't be updating this iPhone right now!

  47. Re:Mod Parent Up by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    If I had points (and hadn't commented already like crazy) I'd mod you up here.

    DRM almost always doesn't need to (and does not) run in kernelspace. It's userland encryption.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  48. The REAL news here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is the iPod refresh braces for backlash

  49. iTunes-Windows is just poorly programmed software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iTunes is a hog on Windows. On a 3ghz Quad core it will use 25% cpu just resizing the window. It cranks up to 95MB memory usage just after opening. It's slower to open than any other app I have.

    It stopped recognizing my iPod (documented in Apple forums - a USB driver issue) after one of the 7.x updates. A bug Apple never fixed.

    Apple wants their Windows software to be second rate compared to the Mac versions. Bugs, crashes, inefficiency -- ignored.

  50. Seinfeld replaced QA at Microsoft by ryan.onsrc · · Score: 1

    Even Microsoft doesn't have the money for both a sufficient QA department *and* Seinfeld. I guess they figured that at least Seinfeld would make everyone laugh, as the ship sinks.

    1. Re:Seinfeld replaced QA at Microsoft by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > I guess they figured that at least Seinfeld would make everyone laugh [...]

      And yet, even in that, they did not get their money's worth.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  51. Music collection legalities by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 1

    Unless they come to my house and compare the files on my computer with the CDs in my collection, there's no way they can tell what's legal and what isn't.

    Uh... BRB I have to go lock some doors and turn out some lights.

    1. Re:Music collection legalities by SomeJoel · · Score: 1

      Unless they come to my house and compare the files on my computer with the CDs in my collection, there's no way they can tell what's legal and what isn't.

      Uh... BRB I have to go lock some doors and turn out some lights.

      Even then they wouldn't be able to. For all they know, the files were copied as fair use BACKUPS for CDs which were subsequently destroyed in a flood/fire/hurricane. Since they are backups, you have every right to listen to them even after the original media is gone.

      --
      <Complete your profile by adding a signature!>
    2. Re:Music collection legalities by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 1

      Since they are backups, you have every right to listen to them even after the original media is gone.

      You know that, and I know that, but they don't know that we know and they would rather we didn't know that :(

  52. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC." "...And I'm a Mac." by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    Hahaha, awesome, actually made me laugh out loud.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  53. What is the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe we should figure out what the problem actually is before we blame anyone.

  54. Annoying experience by agraham · · Score: 0

    I didn't have this problem (I'm on XP) but I was smacked with a bunch of problems:

    The Apple updater appears in Polish on my system. I have my "Language for non-Unicode programs" setting set to Polish (i.e. my system codepage is set to Polish) because I used to chat using a non-Unicode chat program that required it. Apple updater is literally the only other non-DOS program on my system that is non-Unicode.

    The OK for the updater appears off the bottom of my screen on my 480p projector that I use as the display for my media center (852*480). Luckily you can pick a random control that is not off the bottom and hit Enter and it moves through the pages, but it's a bit scary to be pressing buttons you can't see. This is not the only program with this problem but it sure is annoying.

    When Windows fonts are set to anything other than default size, the text fields in iTunes don't display correctly. For example my iPhone options are:
    [] Automatically sync when this iPhone is conne...
    [] Sync only checked song and vi...
    [] Manually manage music and vi...

    Luckily it's pretty obvious what they're supposed to say, but it's still a highschool programming error.

    And of course you can only write to the iTunes database through iTunes - not through your favorite media manager (like MediaMonkey) since Apple changed the secret hashing system in firmware 2.0; so you're forced to use iTunes on your desktop.

    The iPhone does rock - it too bad iTunes sucks so much.

    --
    To each, mine.
  55. no BSOD, iTunes 8 just won't hunt by itinko · · Score: 1

    Well, after I installed iTunes 8 I didn't get BSOD, but iTunes wouldn't load, it just generated a generic error and I could cancel or debug. iTunes 7 worked great before, so fortunately I still had that download and was able to restore 7 after a bunch of Googling and trial and error. Several reboots later.. and probably a couple of hours of my time.. I had the old iTunes 7 up and running. I was eager to have something running as a badly needed iPhone update is due out tomorrow! Hopefully the Safari browser on iPhone won't crash as often. Getting tired of these iBugs!!

  56. Hahaha by Serenissima · · Score: 1
    This reminds me of the mouseover text from this XKCD comic: http://xkcd.com/301/

    Fun game: try to post a YouTube comment so stupid that people realize you must be joking. (Hint: this is impossible)

    --
    Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. But light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  57. I had no idea that it was so successful... by argent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is the largest pusher of DRM technology

    You're saying that Apple has shipped more copies of iTunes than Microsoft has shipped copies of Windows XP and Vista (or Windows Media Player 9 for earlier versions of Windows)? That Apple has shipped more copies of iTunes than all DVD players combined (worldwide!)?

    Well, no, actually, I think you're pretty far off base with that one.

    1. Re:I had no idea that it was so successful... by ozphx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wrong metric.

      Apple is the largest supplier of DRM media via the iTunes store.

      Microsoft is one of many vendors who has been strongarmed into supporting playback of DRM files. You think they want to spend money developing DRM shit, or snorting blow off hookers?

      Content owners are pushing DRM the hardest. They get the most blame. Then the content providers that agree to push this bullshit onto their customers.

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
    2. Re:I had no idea that it was so successful... by argent · · Score: 1

      Apple is the largest supplier of DRM media via the iTunes store.

      Bigger than Blockbuster? I doubt very much that there's been more albums sold through the iTunes store than there's been DVDs shipped.

      Microsoft is one of many vendors who has been strongarmed into supporting playback of DRM files.

      Microsoft has aggressively marketed DRM. Windows is the only OS with kernel level support for strong DRM - Apple's DRM in itunes is practically "honor system" level... your DVD player has stronger DRM than that. Apple has actively opposed DRM ("we do not believe it is possible to protect digital content" -- Steve Jobs, the Rolling Stone interview, 2002), the iTunes store is the first major outlet to convince a label (EMI) to ship unprotected digital media.

      Yes, I believe that Microsoft execs much prefer developing DRM to snorting blow off hookers. They actually believe this shit works.

  58. but..... by darrenkopp · · Score: 1

    does it blend?

  59. Reiser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Hans Reiser coding media players now?

  60. I Blame DRM by kitgerrits · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If iPods were simply accessible as a USB mass storage device, I don't think there would have been a problem.
    From what I can see, Apple uses a proprietary device-type, so they can talk to it using an encrypted connection.
    All that, simply to keep you from copying files you supposedly don't have the right to copy.

    --
    "I was in love with a beautiful blonde once, dear. She drove me to drink. It's the one thing I am indebted to her for."
    1. Re:I Blame DRM by erroneus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Somehow the Linux software that works with iPod gets around that... doesn't it?

      But you're probably right about Apple using virtual device drivers as a means to keep things "protected" in kernel space... which is really a waste of effort since there are kernel space utilities to circumvent even that.

    2. Re:I Blame DRM by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Interesting
      All that, simply to keep you from copying files you supposedly don't have the right to copy.

      It might not be that. Encrypting the connection protects the files in transit, but who the hell ever sniffed the USB connection to break Apple DRM? There are far easier ways to free up your music in order to exercise your legitimate fair use rights.

      I suspect the encryption is there to make sure that only iTunes can talk to an iPod. That's Apple's profit right there: you're forced to manage your music collection using their application, with its inbuilt link up to their music store. And you get used to doing things the Apple way - hell, some day you might even buy a Mac. You're not supposed to use Amarok - God forbid! That way you don't join up with the Cult Of Steve!

      The part that pisses me off is they've done a pretty good job of encrypting the firmware updates too. Absolutely no way in for the Rockbox hackers. Pity, because I was thinking of buying a 160GB iPod Classic now that my old iRiver iHP-140 is full. That's a sale lost, then...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    3. Re:I Blame DRM by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If iPods were simply accessible as a USB mass storage device, I don't think there would have been a problem. From what I can see, Apple uses a proprietary device-type, so they can talk to it using an encrypted connection.

      Apple uses a proprietary device type so they can hash the files so reading them uses less battery than it would if it was arranged like a storage drive. I've never heard of any "encryption" for the USB connection and numerous other programs have figured out how to read the hash tables without any problems (e.g. Amarok, Banshee, Floola, gtkpod, MediaMonkey, Rhythmbox, SharePod, Songbird,Winamp, YamiPod). If Apple is trying to stop other programs from interfacing with iPods they're doing a lousy job of it.

      All that, simply to keep you from copying files you supposedly don't have the right to copy.

      I don't think you know what you're talking about.

    4. Re:I Blame DRM by bot24 · · Score: 1

      iPods are USB mass storage devices. The DRM is at the file level and copying the file off won't do you any good unless you have a license to play it. It's the library index format that requires special software to read and write.

    5. Re:I Blame DRM by leamanc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sorry, there is no DRM involved in mounting the iPod. It basically is a USB mass storage device. All Apple's drivers do is detect when a USB mass storage device matching an iPod's filesystem is plugged in, and launch iTunes. Seriously, that's it.

      The way that Apple keeps you from copying files is by hiding the directories that contain the music files. The files are then scattered amongst a bunch of obscurely-named directories to make it a little more difficult to find them, after you figure out how to show the hidden directories. (On a Mac or Linux, it's as simple as "ls -a" in a terminal.) An iPod database file is how the iPod and iTunes keep track of what files are on the device, and where to find them. Dozens of other applications (including Linux music players like Rhythmbox or Amarok) have figured out how to read the database. There's also apps that read the database and let you copy files directly, like the Mac app Senuti.

      The only DRM involved is in files purchased from the iTunes store. You can access and copy these files, but you just can't play them unless your computer is authorized for the account that purchased them.

      --
      :q!
    6. Re:I Blame DRM by gwait · · Score: 1

      Rubbish. The hashing would not even save the most trivial amount of power, and may actually cost a minute amount more, since the Song Name now absolutely has to come from inside the file instead of from the filesystem, meaning every "directory listing" on an ipod has to open up every file, parse the id3 tags and cache the results for display instead of simply showing the filename.

      This is simply a lame way of satisfying the RIAA that Ipods are not used for piracy.

      The 3G nanos have built in encryption and have yet to be hacked by any of those programs, and the Ipod Touch doesn't even offer disk mode anymore, most likely to keep the hackers out.

      It's most definitely about apple DRM.

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
    7. Re:I Blame DRM by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Rubbish. The hashing would not even save the most trivial amount of power, and may actually cost a minute amount more, since the Song Name now absolutely has to come from inside the file instead of from the filesystem, meaning every "directory listing" on an ipod has to open up every file, parse the id3 tags and cache the results for display instead of simply showing the filename.

      Funny I just read an IEEE article on forensic analysis of iPods that disagrees with you. [Pod Forensics: Forensically Sound Examination of an Apple iPod, Jill Slay; Andrew Przibilla, System Sciences, 2007. HICSS 2007]

      This is simply a lame way of satisfying the RIAA that Ipods are not used for piracy.

      I have no doubt that Apple did make certain things harder to do using iTunes at the request of the RIAA, but I don't think that is the reason for their hashing, which is so easily bypassed.

      The 3G nanos have built in encryption and have yet to be hacked by any of those programs...

      Are you talking about the checksum it took the Amarok people all of two days to work around?

      ...and the Ipod Touch doesn't even offer disk mode anymore, most likely to keep the hackers out.

      The iPod touch is using the same firmware as the iPhone so they keep it locked down the same way. All the other iPods work fine with third party music jukebox software I've used.

    8. Re:I Blame DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, what? All you have to do is toggle an option and you can access it as any other USB drive. One click is practically all it takes.

      And I don't even have an iPod, I just know it because I had to change some iTunes settings on my sister's account at one point.

    9. Re:I Blame DRM by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      That's a sale lost, then...

      I guess they'll have to choke back the tears :-)

    10. Re:I Blame DRM by 31415926535897 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The iPod being a mass storage device is true for pre-iPhone iPods. The iPhone and iPod Touch use a proprietary driver. Some people think this is so that nobody can hack the iPhone, but I believe it's for another reason. One issue for the iPod as a mass storage device is that it would upload all of the files, then upload a refreshed database. If the iPod got disconnected during a sync, then you don't quite know what state the files/database are in. With the new iPhone driver, they manage the database actively so that if you disconnect during a sync, there will be no ambiguity of state.

    11. Re:I Blame DRM by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Somehow the Linux software that works with iPod gets around that... doesn't it?

      Generally you have to jailbreak the latest iPods to get them to work in Linux because of the DRM. Older ones work fine, of course.

    12. Re:I Blame DRM by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The reason Apple doesn't support loading music (anything else, fine) onto the iPod as a mass storage device is that the database has to be updated. That allows the tiny little processor in the iPod to quickly let you search and play by genre, artist, whatever. You're perfectly free to load unDRMed files onto the device.

    13. Re:I Blame DRM by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      All the song metadata is stored in a database. THAT's why it takes less power: if someone decides they want to play everything in the Obscure Indie Chant genre, the iPod doesn't have to search through every file on the disk to determine if it should be played or not.

    14. Re:I Blame DRM by gwait · · Score: 1

      I HAVE a nano 3G, and as of a month ago Amarok did not work with it. It looks like it's working, but then you try the Ipod out by itself and there's nothing on it.
      I've had it since February, hardly cracked in two days.

      I also just looked up the article, it's a thesis for a student working towards a Bachelor's degree and it mentions Nothing about the name hashing technique with respect to power savings.
      It does state that the Ipod does a "lazy delete" which "may be used to save power", but absolutely no claim either way about hashing itself saving power. I guess you figure I wouldn't look it up?

      The point is, that your average joe doesn't have a clue how to pull songs from an ipod, so the name hashing technique "protects" the music from a large percentage of the population.

      Of course the Touch uses the Iphone firmware, and it's even more locked down. This shows a definite progression to stronger DRM:

      1: Simple file hash renaming technique
      2: Simple encryption (broken shortly after)
      3: Tougher encryption (3G nano, not broken yet, but probably soon)
      Also add encryption so you have to buy expensive apple cables to get video out to your TV screen.
      4: Lock out access to the filesystem entirely.

      Notice a trend?

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
    15. Re:I Blame DRM by gwait · · Score: 1

      That does make some sense, although a database is just a fancy filesystem, so it would only save power if the database data format itself was easier to parse than a simple filesystem.
      Either way, I'd suspect the power budget of looking up song names to be a trivial part of the total, so I still don't buy the theory that the hashing is there to save power, but rather is there to keep non techies from sharing songs ipod to ipod, thus satisfying the content publishers, thus getting them to sign up to ITunes.

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
    16. Re:I Blame DRM by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I don't think the power is really the important thing. The database is there to allow the iPod to put together lists by artist, genre, album or any of a number of other criteria quickly. If the iPod had to search 160 GB of songs every time I wanted to sort by genre then it definitely would use a lot of power, and it would take a LONG time. A database isn't a fancy file system, although some fancy filesystems include databases for metadata.

      You can't share songs iPod to iPod but how would you do that anyway? You can't connect two iPods. Do you mean using it as a drive to take songs to your friend? Go ahead. Every iPod except the touch mounts as a mass storage device just fine.

      It is absolutely trivial to share songs through iTunes. Just right click on the song, click the option to show it (in Finder, not sure what in Windows), and go ahead and do whatever you want with it. Or, iTunes will happily burn a CD for you.

      The anti-copying conspiracy theory just doesn't hold up.

    17. Re:I Blame DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking idiot and you don't know what you're talking about. The concentric hash structures inside an iPod are present to reduce file access time. It's a hash tree and a fucking first-year computer science student would understand the rationale. Look up "hash tree" on wikipedia for crying out loud; even the plebians who wrote that tripe understand it. The music names and etc are stored in a large flat-file database that is kept almost entirely in RAM, and the filenames present in the hashes are chosen to reduce the footprint of their attendant references in the database. You're a clueless paranoid dipshit and I hate you and your whole family and your entire life-philosophy. Also, you smell.

    18. Re:I Blame DRM by gwait · · Score: 1

      Yes, a database is a fancy file system.
      Take a file system, add some precalculated hash lookups for speeding up search, glue on an SQL interface, you have a database.

      I also agree, I don't think it is a power saving issue. That was proposed by the other commenter as an explanation for the hash system.

      A non techy Ipod user can not plug his/her ipod into someone elses PC and simply copy the songs to that person's hard drive. Many of my non tech freinds don't even know that the ipod can be set to act as a USB drive, and wouldn't know that they could find the songs squirreled away in a subdirectory with oddball names.

      Yes they could burn a CD and give it to their friends, who could then rip it back to a lossy compression file for their own ipods, but this is a pain in the neck for a novice computer user.

      I never claimed the hash thing was a good protection system, but it stops novice computer users cold. Since then Apple have shown a trend for even stronger DRM, so it's not at all a stretch to claim the file hashing was only the start.

      You're unconvinced, that's fine, we can agree to disagree..

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
    19. Re:I Blame DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new iPod touches have to be activated with iTunes before they can be used.

      No, really, I saw one yesterday.

    20. Re:I Blame DRM by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      I think the lack of Rockbox on new iPods has more to do with it being complete different and largely custom hardware than the 5G ones.

      I've used Rockbox on a 5.5G iPod and an iRiver H120 (iHP-120 if you prefer). All in all I thought the iRiver was a better experience. It's hard to move up or down just one list element with a scroll wheel. Obviously the screen is better on the iPod. But the H120's still running smooth, bless his little heart.

    21. Re:I Blame DRM by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      That has nothing to do with transfers.

    22. Re:I Blame DRM by Ma8thew · · Score: 1

      The part that pisses me off is they've done a pretty good job of encrypting the firmware updates too. Absolutely no way in for the Rockbox hackers. Pity, because I was thinking of buying a 160GB iPod Classic now that my old iRiver iHP-140 is full. That's a sale lost, then...

      Especially since Apple don't make that model any more.

    23. Re:I Blame DRM by he-sk · · Score: 1

      No, a file system is a crude database.

      Take a file system, add some precalculated hash lookups for speeding up search, glue on an SQL interface, you have a database.

      Translation: Take a filesystem, add a SQL database and you have a database. D'uh!

      --
      Free Manning, jail Obama.
    24. Re:I Blame DRM by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      I suspect the encryption is there to make sure that only iTunes can talk to an iPod.

      I use ubuntu and bashee to talk to my ipod just fine.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    25. Re:I Blame DRM by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      I HAVE a nano 3G, and as of a month ago Amarok did not work with it. It looks like it's working, but then you try the Ipod out by itself and there's nothing on it.

      I don't have an iPod of any sort, but my girlfriend's shuffle works fine with Amarok (1.4.9) under Ubuntu. What version of Amarok are you using?

      I also just looked up the article, it's a thesis for a student working towards a Bachelor's degree and it mentions Nothing about the name hashing technique with respect to power savings.

      It's on the second page where they describe the battery saving and wear leveling techniques.

      The point is, that your average joe doesn't have a clue how to pull songs from an ipod, so the name hashing technique "protects" the music from a large percentage of the population.

      For the average person finding the iPod and browsing the files on it has about the same difficulty level as googling, downloading, and running one of the many programs designed to let them easily do just that. If Apple was trying to make it hard to access, they could easily have implemented some minimal copy protection that would at least let them sue people who make such programs using the DMCA.

      Of course the Touch uses the Iphone firmware, and it's even more locked down. This shows a definite progression to stronger DRM

      Sigh. The trend at Apple has been to push for lesser DRM, but they also have to deal with DRM requirements from new markets they are entering. When they started supporting commercial video on iPods they added enough DRM to satisfy the MPAA. When they moved into the cell phone market, they added the protections they needed to get access to AT&T's network. Sure there's a progression towards more DRM (one of the reasons I don't own any of said products) but it is a progression tied closely to their move into new markets with DRM requirements as part of the barrier to entry. From Apple's perspective, all the DRM except the iPhone/touch is a necessary evil that costs them money and exists because they are dependent upon criminal cartels. For the iPhone it is partly to satisfy AT&T's requirement that certain programs that would compete with them are stopped and partly a security measure to try to improve the overall experience for the average, normal user. The chronology of DRM is unimportant unless you use it to link up to the other things Apple has done (new markets) that require said DRM.

    26. Re:I Blame DRM by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Yes, it does. SOMETHING has to build that metadata database. It makes a lot more sense to have the PC do the heavy lifting, rather than the iPod. Particularly for the iPods that basically run off of microcontrollers.

      If you're dumping mp3s onto the device using a file copy, the database doesn't get built.

  61. I'm old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    said a user identified as 'sambeckett'

    Oh boy!

  62. IT seems to only involve people with an by geekoid · · Score: 5, Informative

    HP Printer.

    Drivers on windows can be troublesome. It would suprise me if usbaapl64.sys has some issue previously undiscovered.

    This is fallout of shared component design MS uses.

    Should Apple have tested with HP printers? Probably, but no one can test every configuration of a PC.

    The USB set up MS is using is causing a fault in Ring 0. That's the only way I can see this causing a BSoD

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:IT seems to only involve people with an by sootman · · Score: 1

      In early 1995 my dad had a 486/DX2-66 with Windows 3.1, an HP B/W bubblejet printer, and I forget what kind of video card. When he printed there were always gaps in the print, always in the same place. Could be text from WordPerfect or an image from a browser (Chameleon, oh yeah!)--it didn't matter. It printed fine, though, if you dropped the display bit depth a notch (from 24-bit to 16, or 16 to 8, I forget which.) Nice to know nothing has changed.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    2. Re:IT seems to only involve people with an by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like your dad's computer was short on memory. Back then all printer drivers had similar problems when force to render in a tight space.

    3. Re:IT seems to only involve people with an by sootman · · Score: 1

      Don't think so. He had 16 MB or more--a lot at the time. :-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  63. Rational thinking be damned! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Having iTunes 8 work is probably more important to many people than having Vista eyecandy over XP. Who is actually technically at fault does not matter, public perception is more important.

    Given the bad rap that Vista is getting in the public eye, many Joe and Jane Sixpacks will be seeing this as just another in a long list of Vista problems rather than an Apple problem. "Crappy Vista can't can't run my old printer and now can't even run iTunes properly. My next PC is going to be a Mac. That way I can have a working system... and proper eye candy too!"

    Sure Apple will fix the problem, but they can spin it nicely: "Gee we had to work around a Vista screwup AGAIN!"

  64. If you're using Vista... by Alarindris · · Score: 1

    ... you're doing it wrong.

  65. blame the system by recharged95 · · Score: 1

    This has the smells of my old iPod Shuffle crashing the XP upon boot when connected--

    To some, there was a time (and still on mine at least) where you can't boot up in Windows XP with a iPod shuffle hooked up.

    For the life of me, I cannot have my shuffle plugged in at boot time--something hangs the system (USB boot somehow triggering it I think).

  66. Gad zooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're running iTunes and Vista, your computer kinda deserves to crash.

  67. Apple forums? by Richard+Frost · · Score: 1

    And how long was it before Apple deleted sambeckett's post?

  68. iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No problems here with iTunes on vista

    1. Re:iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problems here with iTunes on vista

      Very funny!

  69. Options? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Possible options...

    1. Upgrade to XP.
    2. Wait for iTunes 8.1 fix.
    3. Use Floola (or something similar) instead of iTunes.
    4. ???
    5. Profit!

  70. Mac too by dronkert · · Score: 1

    It crashed my iMac twice, also with iPod attached. Not sure about the exact steps to replicate, both crashes happened not immediately but after a while.

  71. I'm a Mac. I'm a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mac: Hey PC, why are you looking so Blue(screen)?

    PC: I haven't been the same since I installed iTunes. Crashing left and right.

    Mac: Well, that's because your system is easily crashed by buggy software.

    PC: Yes, but doesn't Apple(insert Euro symbol for the E) write iTunes?

    Mac: Yeah, but....but......

    PC: No so smug now, are you?

  72. Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Works on my iMac...and if it didn't, only iTunes would crash and not OS X...bitches.

  73. 4 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Malicious Software Removal Tool

  74. Not quite by geekoid · · Score: 2, Informative

    Most computers have 2-4 USB plugs on the motherboard. Each one is split into two ports(more?) you can plug devices into.
    Be sure your printer is on a different USB plug.
    This is a power struggle between HP and Apple..I mean electrical power between the devices, not corporate power.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Not quite by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't expect a power issue with a printer, as most printers draw no power from the USB port (they have their own power supply). More likely it's a driver issue between whatever crappy USB drivers Apple installs versus whatever crappy USB drivers HP and Logitech install.

    2. Re:Not quite by klossner · · Score: 1

      That's not how it works. Each USB port on a motherboard has its own independent 2.5-watt power supply. Power distribution has nothing to do with the USB topology on the board.

      If you use an external hub and don't hook up its external power supply (so it's a "bus-powered" hub instead of a "self-powered" hub), then there are only 2.5 watts for the hub and all downstream devices and power starvation can be a problem.

    3. Re:Not quite by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Look at your mother board. You will have a place to plug in your usb connector cable and it will split into two ports.
      If If an iDevice and and HP printer are plug into the usb slot that share the same mother board connection it seems to be the cause.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Not quite by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You are assuming the draw no power becasue they have a plug.
      Not wise.
      Sorry, I wrote control codes for HP printers, and nothing would surprise me.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  75. Bloatware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would anyone use iTunes these days? It has been way too bloated for years now. Personally, I don't want to waste hundreds of megabytes of RAM for a music player. There are plenty of better free alternatives out there.

  76. Dru by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just Apple's ploy to get people to switch to a Mac... "oh look Vista sucks so much you can't even hook up an IPOD to it, you better buy a Mac or you wont ever be able to use you IPOD"

  77. Reminds me of Lotus 1-2-3 by RonMcMahon · · Score: 1

    Apple would NEVER write any software that made Windows® look bad, would it?

  78. Steve Jobs crossed the streams! by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 4, Funny

    He mixed Apple iTunes sloppy code with Microsoft Vista sloppy code.

    That is why I don't use iTunes or Vista, both have sloppy code in them that cause crashed. When you cross both of them together you crash the system or at least cause it to lock up.

    It is also why my G3 iMac was never upgraded to Mac OSX and still runs Mac OS9, because of Apple's sloppy code in OSX. If I convert it to a new OS it will either be Linux or AROS, because both of them are stable and being ported to the PowerPC platform or have a port already.

    Apple "borrowed" a lot from Commodore, first it was the Vic-20 Commodore logo key copied as the Apple logo key on the Apple //e, then it was the Commodore Vic-20 and Commodore 64 compact design copied with the Apple //c, then it was the Amiga Workbench and co-processor support for 4096 colors and above with the Commodore Amiga in the Macintosh II (The Macintosh II was basically an Amiga 2000 rip-off after the Mr. Coffee Classic black and white Macintosh series was an epic fail), and then NeXT was an AmigaOS rip-off using BSD Unix (AmigaOS/AmigaDOS was based on the Unix-like TriPOS and Steve Jobs learned from his epic fail to use Unix as it is more like the Amiga to help make Next survive), Pixar ripped off the Newtek Video Toaster that Amigas had used (Steve Jobs saw how Amiga 2000s with the Video Toaster did great desktop video for movies and wanted to borrow that tech for Pixar), and then Mac OSX got the AROS and AmigaOS 3.X look and feel but with the Microsoft Windows bloat. AROS does not have the Windows bloat but still has the AmigaDOS/Workbench "less is more" approach in that it is memory efficient and doesn't need a high end processor with tons of memory to run it.

    Basically Apple started to slowly evolve into Microsoft, and Amiga and the Amiga technology evolved into what the Macintosh should have been in 1985, and evolved into what it should be with AROS into modern times.

    Apple even is suing people like Microsoft did like Pystar because of its EULA, which is very much like the one Microsoft has. Apple vs. Pystar is very much like Microsoft vs. IBM over OS/2, so Apple is evolving to what Microsoft was during the OS/2 years in the 1990's.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  79. Here is a test: by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Try plugginh an HP printer into the same usb Channel as your iPhone.
    This will cause the crash.
    In the scenerio I presented to you, whose fault would you think was the crash if you ahdn
    t read this story?
    Probably HPs.

    Just an example of how overly complex windows driver architecture is.
    This is why I feel we should go back to the applications installing everything it needs under a directory it creates.
    Less mess, easy trouble shooting easy uninstall, not files scattered all over your system.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Here is a test: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have Vista...I connected my Ipod last night (160GB Ipod Classic) and I have had Itunes 8 since launch day. While I couldn't get the Ipod to immediately eject after sync because "files were in use"....it didn't crash my system.

      Does that make me a bad person?

  80. It all depends on the drivers by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    Expect Apple to blame Vista.

    Probably, but this begs to me to ask what iTunes is doing to bring down the OS. If it is driver related, then surely all drivers used to communicate with the iPhone and iPod should be user space drivers? If they aren't it would seem Apple did something wrong, or does Vista not support user-space drivers? If Apple is using a user-space driver, then this would put the blame on vista.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  81. Forewarned is fore-armed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't say Apple didn't warn you about Vista!

  82. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC." "...And I'm a Mac." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...great software like iTunes 8..."

    Ha. Ha. Ha.

    Obviously this is new territory for you if you call iTunes great.

  83. But by Gr8Apes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe Apple did QA it properly.

    THink of the bad press for MS this heaps ontop of Vista. What are people going to remember? iTunes crashes Vista? Or Vista crashes when you plugin an iPod?

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    1. Re:But by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      Depends on whether they are using iTunes 7 first. If they were already an iTunes user they are familiar with the suck that it is and will place the blame squarely on Apple.

      Of course since the Slashdot folk don't seem to agree on who is to blame I would think that the public at large would also be split.

    2. Re:But by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      I'll second the notion that iTunes for Windows is a steaming heap of crap.

      iTunes for OS X is okay, but the only reason I use it is mostly because I haven't bothered to install something else.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    3. Re:But by andy55 · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's a great lightweight player called Play that may float your boat:

      http://sbooth.org/Play/

      Basically, it has the core functionality of iTunes, it's free as in beer, and isn't bloated.

    4. Re:But by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      Hrrmm.... It appears to be missing some of the shiny I've come to associate with OS X, but I'll take nerd endorsement :D

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    5. Re:But by Joe+U · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll second the notion that iTunes for Windows is a steaming heap of crap.

      You're being mean to crap everywhere.

      iTunes on Windows is on par with Realplayer, complete and total shit. Treat it like you would a virus, kill it. Avoid installing it.

      If you have to install it then use VMWare. VMWare traps the itunes shitstorm quite nicely.

    6. Re:But by cbreaker · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hehe shitstorm.

      I don't own an iPod, but I have family members that do and I immediately remove iTunes, install WinAMP, and done.

      WinAMP can manage an iPod okay, and it doesn't screw with my media library.

      On top of all of the crappiness of iTunes, my biggest problem with it is that if you plan on using iTunes, you *have* to manage your media with it. There's no "rescan library" function. If you do it manually, you get two of everything in your list. It sucks and shows much arrogance on Apple's part.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    7. Re:But by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      I don't own an iPod but I've set some people up with them and I usually just use WinAMP. It has sufficient iPod controlling abilities.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    8. Re:But by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Problem: There isn't something else for OSX. I have a very functional Hackintosh, and it was one of my biggest annoyances.

      I like the library layout of iTunes, and WinAMP (they are essentially the same.) But, no WinAMP for OSX and there's nothing else with a decent library function.

      Songbird was my biggest hope but development of that software is extremely slow. It's just finally becoming more usable, but it has been horrible for a long time if you have more than a few hundred songs in your library. Scanning a library of 40,000 MP3's takes hours and hours. WinAMP does it in 20 minutes on the same machine, in a virtual machine on Fusion.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    9. Re:But by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      Heh, at least you understood I meant OS X ;)

      I probably should have mentioned that I don't own an iPod. I'm looking for everything iTunes has sans iPod management functionality :P

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    10. Re:But by Golddess · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you have it backwards, people who use iTunes 7, like myself, obviously do not think that it sucks. It's the people who are unfamiliar with iTunes that, for right or wrong, will blame Apple. Generally speaking of course.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    11. Re:But by Shamenaught · · Score: 1

      They'll hear that Vista crashes after they update software from apple. They'll thus learn to not update apple software, and leave their computer open to threats because of it.

      I love how dumb people are.

      --
      mysql> SELECT * FROM `places` WHERE `place` LIKE 'home`; Empty set (0.00 sec)
    12. Re:But by sokoban · · Score: 1

      I like Max a lot for converting FLACs to ALAC, so I'll have to check out Play based on your recommendation.

      Been using your visualization software since the days of SoundJam. Still the best in the biz, IMO.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    13. Re:But by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Maybe Apple did QA it properly.

      Is there an ISO, W3C or IEEE standard tinfoil hat? I think I need one, but it has to be standard because it's Friday and I don't want my brain to crash before the raid on Kara.

      Yes, Apple could be pulling a nasty, but I wouldn't think so because that would open them to some fairly nasty conspiracy charges.

      On the other hand, ~n$B in market share vs. a possible injunction and fine...hmm.....

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    14. Re:But by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      Whoa...sweet Chieftains album in the screenshot. I'm sold.

    15. Re:But by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      Insightful?? A company would issue an update to probably their most famous, revenue-generating product, that would DELIBERATELY crash a rival's operating system? In the hope that people don't point the finger of blame at Apple? Absolutely utterly completely insane. Mods, hang your heads.

    16. Re:But by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      On top of all of the crappiness of iTunes, my biggest problem with it is that if you plan on using iTunes, you *have* to manage your media with it. There's no "rescan library" function.

      Ummm, what? I have iTunes on a couple of Macs that use a Samba share for a common music pool (along with my Linux laptop). When I add new music to the shared directory, the worst case scenario is that it doesn't appear in iTunes unless I drag the folder onto the iTunes window. If I've added a whole lot of songs, like when ripping a batch of CDs, I just drag the "root" music folder onto the iTunes window and it re-indexes the whole thing (without adding duplicates).

      Now, I much prefer Amarok where the whole process is even easier, but it's not very difficult in iTunes to begin with.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    17. Re:But by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      I have a 40,000 song shared library. There's no easy way for the several people using it to drag the new folders to iTunes without me sending them some sort of changelog or something.. Not feasable.

      Whenever I've ever used it, if I re-drag an existing folder - it absolutely does re-add it and create duplicates. The last time I used it was on MacOS, it was version 7.x something.

      So unless they've changed the behavior in the last 5 months or so, then you're wrong or have a plug-in or something.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    18. Re:But by TheLostSamurai · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you have it backwards, people who use iTunes 7, like myself, obviously do not think that it sucks. It's the people who are unfamiliar with iTunes that, for right or wrong, will blame Apple. Generally speaking of course.

      And people who use iTunes like myself, realize what a horrible piece of shit it is. I dare say it is an even bigger pile of excrement than RealPlayer was. iTunes is by far the worst part about owning an iPhone, because I have no choice but to use it. Had I known about the evil that is iTunes on Windows, not to mention all of the many many firmware problems my iPhone has had, I never would have bought one in the first place.

      By the way, I actually like OS X for the most part, but I can guarantee I will never buy another Apple product unless they do a total 180 on the quality of their support for non OS X users.

      --
      I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
    19. Re:But by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

      If the source is available, it should be "free as in freedom", right?

      "Free as in beer" is for when you don't have to pay for it, like iTunes.

    20. Re:But by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      OK, fair enough: I only manage about 10,000 songs this way. It's been about three years since I last installed iTunes (without any plugin or anything else), so I don't remember if it had a "duplicate file - skip or add?" dialog. Perhaps it did, and you told it to always add and don't ask again?

      Anyway, all I know is that it works perfectly here on three different machines - I said two earlier but I'd forgotten about the kids' computer - so I'm not sure what to tell you.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    21. Re:But by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Beer free is what most people care about though. I have a hard enough time getting my friends to even understand exactly what source code is much less making them care whether or not it's available.

      Generally I don't use the "beer/speecH" distinction. "Free" means no money and the other I call "open source". That might not jive with ideals of international geekery but it's a more logical and more easily understood terminology IMHO.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    22. Re:But by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Ok, having both a Mac and a PC, I will admit that it works better on the Mac, but the most evil thing I can assign to iTunes on Windows is that it's a bad video player - jumpy playback mainly. Other than that, particuarly for music, I can't really fault it. It's never crashed, the playlist functionality works well, it does a good job and grabbing and updating my subscribed podcasts, etc. It CERTAINLY doesn't have the pop ups, ads, and pleas to upgrade to the "paid" version that RealPlayer had, so I think you're either being unfair to Apple, or not quite remembering just how bad RealPlayer was if you want to compare the two.

      It might not be perfect, but it's certainly better than Miro (the wannabe clone of it). Songbird MIGHT be a good contender one day, but it's video playback is still woefully inadequate and it's still just a bit rough around the edges.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    23. Re:But by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

      Hmm.

      I was nitpicking on the parent's use of the "free as in beer" qualifier.

      If you don't use the "beer/speech" distinction, that's fine, but if you do use it, I suppose you should try to use it properly.

      So, uh, thanks for your thoughts anyway, I guess.

    24. Re:But by TheLostSamurai · · Score: 1

      First, let me clarify, I only use iTunes for loading things onto my iPhone, not as a player because I believe the interface to be far inferior to other programs such as WinAMP or even WMP.

      Also, I was comparing the software quality to RealPlayer, not necessarily the interface. At least I was actually able to install ReakPlayer back in the day. I am currently trying to install iTunes8 so I can update my phone firmware, but it goes into an infinite loop of install -> uninstall cycles. Been doing it for 30 minutes now and this is the 3rd time I've tried it. Fail.

      --
      I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
    25. Re:But by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      And I was picking on your nit picking, because this software is both free in beer AND in speech - they're not mutually exclusive. In my opinion he used the free as in beer distinction because in the more people care about it.

      So you wasn't incorrect in the first place.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    26. Re:But by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      So you wasn't incorrect in the first place.

      That should read "So he wasn't incorrect in the first place.". There are other mistakes in the first paragraph too, but I think the meaning is still clear. I have to start proofreading before hitting submit . . .

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    27. Re:But by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Nice moniker!

      Seriously, have you checked the numbers on that rival's product? it's less than 16% of the total market after 2 years and an all but guaranteed pipeline on all new PC sales. It's been labeled a dismal failure in the media.

      Itunes works fine on the other 85% or so percent of the market. So they just add one more nail into Vista's coffin and give people one more hesitation to move to Vista, or it's successor, Windows 7, which builds on Vista but wait, will make you coffee in the morning and take out the garbage.

      It might just have been done on purpose, which you would have concluded had you thought it through.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    28. Re:But by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Or, it could be that Apple didn't think Vista's market share worthy of testing. After all, MS has even declared Vista a failure (or so Maximum PC would have you think).

      But, conspiracy charges? Not unless they can prove that iTunes has code along the lines of
              if (os == vista) inject_BSOD_Payload

      similar to MS's Windows code running on DRDOS. And even then, it runs on everything but the most unpopular version of windows since... well, even ME was more liked.

      Also, there'd be no injunction or fine. What would be the basis? We didn't support a niche product? Should we also test on BeOS and Minix?

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  84. apple sucks....anything apple is unreliable, poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cant believe you ppl are using itunes crap.
    apple dont give it fk about you or anything that has to do with windows. man my 3rd gen nano is dead, need batter replacing etc... i fix it but why the fk did it brake down in just 13th months? piece of shit but i should have known better since my old ipod video broke down in 12months and 2 days. dead battery then the hd crap out. and now for whatever reason my iphone is dialing random numbers while i am sleeping...the flickering bright ass screen woke me up... one day i plug my ipod when it used to work on my friends computer and freaking itunes wipe out all my music how gay is that. fk apple freaking evil monopoly. Now I just use media monkey free for all my music and is fking amazing. WHY HASN'T THE U.S. GOVERNMENT SUE APPLE FOR ALL THEIR EVIL MONOPOLY.

  85. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC." "...And I'm a Mac." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Wow PC, it looks like your Vista users are really having headaches running great software like iTunes 8. Mac runs them just fine."

    "You son of a bitch." (Pulls out a gun)

    "Whoa PC, whoa, let's not..."

    BLAM.

    giggle...

  86. That's your answer - Apple fucks up in kernel mode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    As some of my siblings have mentioned, Itunes installs at least some modules in Kernel mode. So to all probability Apple fucked up. Now look at the functionality that Itunes offers. For everything it does, Windows has an API. It is a normal application, it should be able to run in usermode. Yet some people think it's perfectly okay to have Apple install drivers on their machine. That's why I think the customers carry part of the blame too: they should have known better and used something else.

  87. MS vs Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS doesn't win anything by making an Mac run poorly, but Mac wins whenever vista looks like its not running properly.

    I can't begin to describe how much I don't believe in supporting a company that basis its entire marketing campaign on smearing the competition.

  88. Other, better portable music players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I absolutely cannot fathom why people continue to buy iPods when there are so many better, more compatible and cheaper portable music players out there.

    Many of them act as standard USB block devices that you can just drop your music into, which is a big plus for Linux users (obviously) but is actually a lot more convenient in Windows too.

    I'm personally using a SanDisk Sansa right now, but I've been out looking for an older player that will support Rockbox firmware. It turns out that they're pretty hard to find.

  89. LOLOLOLOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What can I say? Vista=S**T & IPOD's=Even more. But you are the mugs using them, And paying for them. What do you expect when windows is microsft and apple is ipod? Miracles? Ha Ha Ha!!!

  90. Obviously not. by HornWumpus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Mac Geniuses decided they needed to put something in Kernel space for their POS to take down the OS.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:Obviously not. by archkittens · · Score: 0

      If you use Vista, your OS is a POS.

      vista, xp, 2000, ME, NT, 98, 95, 3.1, etc...

      and that's ignoring CE and mobile. in fairness, it's a POS that home users really aren't the target market for. didn't you hear? Microsoft only REALLY cares about the enterprise market. the only reason it matters if an app like iTunes X.x can run on the latest windows version is that people like to use at work what they use at home, and vice versa. when the CxO of whichever microsoft customer complains, expect the company with the bigger contract to care the most.

    2. Re:Obviously not. by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      They're spending $300 million on TV ads targeting home users. Aero is one of the biggest selling points of Vista, and it's useless for businesses. The Windows Live platform is seeing tons of development these days. I'd say they care somewhat. Maybe they're not as directly focused on that segment as Apple, but they care.

  91. no by Bizzeh · · Score: 1

    apple are gonna blame vista, but im using itunes 8, i have my ipod plugged in (im actually listening to music from my ipod, via itunes+pc speakers as i type this) and i didnt see anything that remotly looked like a bsod... so i dont know how it can be vista if some people get it, and some dont.

  92. Genius! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Genius!

  93. Vista on Mac does not crash with connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have installed iTunes8 on a macbook pro Vista partition and it does not crash when I connect my iphone. I have not tried the same test on my Vaio running vista. Both systems are running Vista business.

  94. This ought to be fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This ought to be fun. An entire forum filled with whiny apple fanboys discussing their hero's feet of lead.

    Of course, the mods will send this straight to the tank.

  95. A Bug With This Feature... by nathan.fulton · · Score: 1

    ...why does it wait until something is plugged in?

  96. Sansa by lindoran · · Score: 1

    Thats why i have a sansa... Wahh wah...

  97. It is everyone's fault by RulerOf · · Score: 1

    [...]and the user...

    ...installed iTunes.

    --
    Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
  98. It's not iTunes, it's Vista's USB stack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vista's notoriously disastrous USB driver stack is the root cause. It's not itunes that's panicking, it's the USB shell.

  99. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It would not be MS's fault if the application crashed itself, but left the OS running.

    The fact that it manages to take the OS down with it is entirely MS's fault. A well-designed OS doesn't go down when some top-level application dies.

  100. Well, I guess our QA dept isn't the only one.. by Rytr23 · · Score: 1

    That SUCKS FAT DONKEY DICK. I thought it was just our resident testing monkeys. Apparently it's an industry wide problem.. Good to know.

    --
    So many injustices..so little time..
  101. DRM? by Plekto · · Score: 1

    I bet it's 90% likely that Vista's DRM is messing things up. Still Apple's fault, but come on - Using Vista is like driving a GM car. Lots of people do because it's what's available, but really... is it what you aspire to own?

    Note - XP runs ITunes 8 just fine.

  102. white screen by neonsignal · · Score: 1

    IMHO they should have a white screen of death specially reserved for Apple products.

  103. Apple is actively troubling other programs. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    You are obviously new around here.

    When the iTouch came out and was jailbreaked Apple released new firmware that blocked the hack.

    Go on, scan Slashdot archive about Apple offerings, you will find article after article conveying the frustration of people daring to wish to use a device they paid for as they damn wish.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Apple is actively troubling other programs. by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 0

      You are obviously new around here.

      Hardly.

      When the iTouch came out and was jailbreaked Apple released new firmware that blocked the hack.

      Yeah, because it is the same firmware as the iPhone and they're trying to fix security flaws in that and are contractually obligated with AT&T to prevent arbitrary, unauthorized programs from running on it. What does that have to do with being able to read and write music to iPods in general?

      Go on, scan Slashdot archive about Apple offerings, you will find article after article conveying the frustration of people daring to wish to use a device they paid for as they damn wish.

      I see plenty of articles about people wanting to run arbitrary software on iPhones (and the iPod Touch handheld) but don't see much about people having problems putting music on or taking music off of iPods using programs other than iTunes, which is what the person I was replying to brought up... along with some sort of "encryption" used on the USB connection.

      I provided a nice list of ten programs other than iTunes that read and write music to the iPod. I think that pretty thoroughly debunks said point.

    2. Re:Apple is actively troubling other programs. by Tim+Browse · · Score: 4, Informative

      I see plenty of articles about people wanting to run arbitrary software on iPhones (and the iPod Touch handheld) but don't see much about people having problems putting music on or taking music off of iPods using programs other than iTunes, which is what the person I was replying to brought up... along with some sort of "encryption" used on the USB connection.

      I provided a nice list of ten programs other than iTunes that read and write music to the iPod. I think that pretty thoroughly debunks said point.

      I just went over that list of 10 programs through some (admittedly not thorough) googling, and checked them for compatibility with iPhone/iPod Touch, which are the models that cause the issue due to the encryption/hashing used.

      • Amarok - requires iPod Touch/iPhone to be jailbroken
      • gtkpod - requires iPod Touch/iPhone to be jailbroken
      • Rhythmbox - requires iPod Touch/iPhone to be jailbroken
      • Songbird - requires iPod Touch/iPhone to be jailbroken
      • Winamp - seems to need jailbreak, but mlipod/iphonefs may provide a real solution (in future!)
      • MediaMonkey - supports iPod Touch/iPhone but only v1 of firmware, so largely useless
      • Banshee - no support
      • Floola - no support
      • SharePod - no support
      • YamiPod - no support

      So perhaps your nice list of programs is less useful than you thought, and does not debunk the point.

      As far as I know, there is no program other than iTunes that will let you put music on an iPod Touch/iPhone (with v2 firmware) without hacking the device's OS. iirc, hacking the OS voids the warranty, so obviously most people don't want to do this.

    3. Re:Apple is actively troubling other programs. by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      I just went over that list of 10 programs through some (admittedly not thorough) googling, and checked them for compatibility with iPhone/iPod Touch, which are the models that cause the issue due to the encryption/hashing used.

      Yep, most of those have problems with the iPhone/iPod touch, but they work just fine with all the other iPods which use the hashing technique we are describing. The iPhone is not primarily an iPod, but a smartphone/PDA which is locked down for completely different reasons than the potential of copying music (as should be obvious to pretty much everyone with a clue) and using completely different techniques that have nothing to do with mounting it as a hard drive.

      My point stands.

    4. Re:Apple is actively troubling other programs. by Plekto · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the real problem, then, is with the iPod...

      I have a nice Sandisk player and it has none of these issues, none of the DRM, and plays nicely with pretty much everything.

      Oh - and it cost $100 or so less. Go figure.

  104. If the roles were reversed... by EvolutionsPeak · · Score: 1

    If the roles were reversed /. would be screaming about MS' anti-competitive behavior.

  105. Rockbox by Samah · · Score: 1, Informative

    Or, don't install iTunes on your PC/Mac at all, and install Rockbox on your iPod.
    Problem solved.

    --
    Homonyms are fun!
    You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    1. Re:Rockbox by Ma8thew · · Score: 1

      As long as you have an older iPod, ie, the previous generation iPod classic, or the first generation iPod nano.

    2. Re:Rockbox by Samah · · Score: 1

      Rockbox supports 60/80gb iPod Video. If you have an iPod Touch, you're out of luck.

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    3. Re:Rockbox by Ma8thew · · Score: 1

      Yes, not the CURRENT generation iPod classic.

    4. Re:Rockbox by Samah · · Score: 1

      My bad, I thought the iPod Video was the current generation.

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
  106. I feel so smug..... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... using music players that use standards drivers that work with Linux.

    I am missing both the Windows Vista and iTunes experience. I feel sooo excluded.

    When people ask why standards should be followed, this is an excellent point in case.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  107. ConEd by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

    IOW. Learn how to be a con artist using this fictional philosophy as a framework.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  108. itunes 7? by JPortal · · Score: 1

    Didn't a few revisions of iTunes 7 also cause a lot of problems on Windows? Apple seems to have trouble delivering Windows software recently.

    1. Re:itunes 7? by Shados · · Score: 1

      iTunes on a Windows computer has about the same effect as installing a mainstream anti-virus such as Norton or McAfee, and its been like that basically for all available versions.

  109. How strange by DJNephilim · · Score: 1

    It feels so strange. I keep reading all of these "ZOMG teh crashes!!1one" horror stories about iTunes 8 and Vista, and yet I upgraded to 8 on Tuesday and have had not a single issue with it, my iPod, or my iPhone. AFAICT it even runs a little better than 7 did (granted, purely anecdotal...no testing done whatsoever).

    Am I the aberration in this case, or are the vocal minority getting WAY out of hand again?

    Hmmm....

    --
    Enemy of the Sun
  110. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC." "...And I'm a Mac." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You forgot:

    Mac throws an iPod at PC.

    PC catches the iPod out of reflex.

    PC freezes in place and then falls straight back over.

    Linux walks by while munching on a bag of chips, looks down at PC on the floor. "Too bad. Doesn't even play Ogg files, anyways." Linux holds up the bag for Mac which has a PPC logo on it. "Chip?"

    Mac waves a hand, "No thanks. Trying to quit."

  111. Time for MS to release a compatibility update by atmurray · · Score: 1

    If it really is Apple's fault for releasing a buggy driver, Microsoft should put out an update that marks the latest iTunes as having compatibility issues with Vista.

    1. Re:Time for MS to release a compatibility update by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      You really should meet my missus.

      Whenever she forgets to send a birthday card to her mother, it's my fault for not reminding her.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  112. Fix already available by Tacvek · · Score: 4, Informative

    Please see this apple knowledge base page: http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2280

    --
    Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    1. Re:Fix already available by russotto · · Score: 1

      Eh, when I pull that page up it's entitled "iTunes 8: If Windows Vista displays a blue screen error message when connecting iPhone or iPod", but the content of the article is just "BUY A MAC, D00D" in 200-point type.

    2. Re:Fix already available by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      It is supposed to tell you to uninstall both iTunes and Apple Mobile Device Support using the control panel, reboot, and then download the latest (fixed) iTunes 8 setup program and run it.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
  113. Works fine for me by JasonEngel · · Score: 1

    Works fine for me. iPod Touch, Vista Ultimate x64, iTunes 8, all very happy with each other.

  114. Microsoft doesn't sign the drivers at all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the developers do, with any code signing certificate from a root certificate authority.

  115. iTunes == Bad && iPod == Worse by Crazy+Taco · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I know someone's going to tag me a fanboy, but believe me, I've only been this way about a week, ever since my Zune arrived and it blew my expectations, which have been kept artificially low by the feature light iPods and iTunes software.

    Seriously people, get a Zune. iPods have the edge in marketing and "coolness", but Zunes destroy iPods based on features (FM radio, wireless sharing with friends, etc), ease of use, and the Zune software! iTunes 7 would drag my machine to a crawl, even scrolling up and down in the library was painful. I couldn't believe how snappy the Zune software was. And it was easier to use with better features.

    And the best part about the Zune is the way Microsoft treats their mp3 player customers. I know it sounds crazy that someone would say Microsoft treats them well, but seriously, think about it! Apple's iPod batteries were dying right after the warranty was up. Apple's answer? For a long time it was "go buy a new iPod". The iPod shuffle randomly irreperably corrupts itself... for THOUSANDS upon THOUSANDS of owners, including myself (just google orange and green blinking light issue). Apparently it was caused, at least in some cases, by the iTunes software itself. Apple's answer? Buy a new one. Unlock an iPhone you purchased? Apple bricks it, go buy a new one.

    Contrast that with the Zune. I bought it last week, and this week Microsoft announces a new Zune and lots of new features, such as the incredible "buy from radio" feature. If you listen to a song on the Zune's radio and like it, you can just tell the Zune you want to buy it (even if you have no idea what it is or who it is you are listening to), and it will figure out what song it was, and as soon as you get within range of a WiFi hotspot, it will download it and buy it for you. My heart fell when I heard I had bought a Zune a week before the announcement, until Microsoft did the exact opposite of Apple. Their answer was not "buy a new Zune to get this feature". Their answer was, "Everyone gets these features, just download the new firmware when we release it." So yeah, I'm sticking with a Zune, and I will NEVER go back to Apple.

    --
    Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
  116. iTunes ain't done until Vista won't run. by fazookus · · Score: 1

    Had to be said.

  117. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC." "...And I'm a Mac." by Puffy+Director+Pants · · Score: 1

    Has the jury reached a verdict? Yes, we have. Completely justifiable homicide.

  118. This goes for the Apple and Ubuntu fanbois too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In this day and age, ANY OS that lets an app take it out is a piece of shit.

  119. This is terrible! by PPH · · Score: 1

    Steve Jobs must be rolling over in his grave.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  120. Somebody please correct me by hotfireball · · Score: 1

    Sorry, folks, but lemme make it clear to myself... So if an application crashes entire OS, then how the heck it can be called "Good OS"? I understand iTunes 8 is a bugware, but in general, is it good operating system that can not withstand stupid software and jail it? I would love see the same thing with Solaris, for example. Or even with the OSX. It sounds to me more like a security problem, because you can write stupid C/C++ program that crashes your Vista machine, put it somehow somewhere (different topic though) and then trigger when it is "needed"... Am I am missing something?..

    1. Re:Somebody please correct me by Urkki · · Score: 2, Informative

      iTunes installs system level drivers. System level drivers by definition have the ability to crash the OS. And the reason for the system level drivers, the ultimate evil, it is DRM. You can't allow the user to easily get between the music files and the playback or burning, and you can do that only with system level drivers directly coupled with the user space software.

      I think there is a Microsoft framwork for that too, but apparently iTunes doesn't use it, but instead wants to use it's own drivers for whatever reason.

  121. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC." "...And I'm a Mac." by Bilbo · · Score: 1
    Dang! Where are mod points when you need them?

    (Remember, that's the HOT CHICK Linux [from the Novel spoofs] sauntering by...)

    --
    Your Servant, B. Baggins
  122. itunes...vista? by Vexorian · · Score: 1

    Pick your poison...

    --

    Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  123. Apple Sucks.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just more evidence that iTunes sucks and Apple has no QC testing. First the second iPhone sucks, then Mobile Me sucks, now iTunes 8 sucks too. Apple is losing its luster and people are starting to notice. Get off your fucking high horse Apple, people won't put up with crap not working for long. Test your shit before you release it to the dimwitted public that would buy the Apple iShit pile of shit as long as it came in fancy packaging...

  124. Not just bad for Vista by mmeister · · Score: 1

    iTunes 8 isn't just a problem on Vista, it's buggy on Mac OS X too.

    They pushed this thing out without real testing and spent way too much time on bullshit features like album covert art display and "Genius" up-sell feature.

    How about making it rock solid to sync with iPods and iPhones -- you know, the main purpose behind iTunes in the first place. They keep grafting on eye-candy, but I think the architecture is starting to show its age.

    Fact is, they should require a brand new iTunes with every new iPod. They should be using some plug-in mechanism to support new iPods. Come on. Of course, it wasn't designed with real extensibility in mind.

    Apple needs to rewrite iTunes so that we don't have to always wait for N.0.1 release to fix all the nasty bugs they decided to ship with. Apple should be embarrassed over iTunes 8.

  125. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Vista has not crashed once...i have an iphone, a nano, a new nano, and a 30gb gen 5 ipod. all work fine.

  126. UPDATE!! by Beefslaya · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's the combination of iTunes 8, Windows Vista and the latest mailer virus that overloads the RAM causing the blue screen.

    Solution:

    Buy an OS that can control its own RAM and not freak out when an app runs away. (i.e. OSX, UNIX, LINUX, blah blah)

  127. What is it about the iPod that you dont like? by dafing · · Score: 1
    Just asking, I mean I bought a jailbroken iPhone before they came to my country, so I can understand, sort of, but then its not like you have to pay money to get the iPod working (250 NZ dollars our money a month! wtf! for refference a big meal at mcdonalds etc would cost a little under 10 dollars).

    Ive heard that people use Rockbox because it lets the iPod play more formats?

    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  128. Secondary problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Upgraded iTunes on my XP desktop and it created over 9k of duplicate entries when I reread the network library.

    On Vista, 8.0 missed about 2k songs from the same network library.

  129. What I do by NXprime · · Score: 1

    Well since Apple doesn't do real updates to their software (only downloading the whole thing again), I uninstalled iTunes 7, rebooted, and THEN installed iTunes 8. Then I uninstalled Bonjour, Apple Software Update, and Apple mobile service. Had to click off a message box bitching that Bonjour wasn't installed properly but that's about it. Haven't seen any blue screens, just some screen corruption to some text once or twice. That's about it. No crashes or bluescreens for my 5G iPod.

    What I do want them to fix is adding support for even LARGER text sizes in the program. I have a 24" monitor and have to lean forward to read user comments, tv show descriptions... ect. Any way I can fix that?

  130. This is documented by chrysalis · · Score: 1
    --
    {{.sig}}
  131. Design Bug by krischik · · Score: 1

    If the x86 OS crashes because of an errand device driver it's still an OS bug. It wasn't in the 70th an 80th but it is today. Because x86 from from 386 onwards offer 4 level of hardware protection and it is a design bug if an OS running on x386 is using only two of them.

    One should have placed device driver into Ring 1 - then they could not blue screen the system

  132. Why is iTunes mandatory by Aceticon · · Score: 1

    This a joke - why should people need to install a (bloated) program just to copy files to an MP3 player?

    There's plenty of players out there that simply implement the USB Mass Storage Device protocol and thus look like a plain old USB flash disk: plug it in to the USB port on a Mac, Windows or Linux machine (even XBox360 and PSP3) and just copy files to and from the player.

    Instead with the iPod we get the privilege of installing the iTunes bloatware and can't even copy files out from the player.

    But hey, it's Apple .... uuuh, shinny

  133. to the incredibly smart people blaming vista... by Bafoon · · Score: 0

    if i were to give you a bad patch for the kernel and you used it and your linux hanged upon using what ever feature that patch was promised to add...you would blame Linus? Because drivers in windows do the exact same thing. You have to blame the developer of the drivers NOT vista.I actually bet they don't have drivers ready for the x64 version because those actually have to get certified by microsoft.That means they would work. Freaking geniuses...

  134. No new iPod for me then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use my iPod mini extensively as a small portable harddrive to shuttle files from and to the office.

    I was going to get a new Touch this weekend, but if it can't be used as a drive, I'll pass.

    Thanks Apple, for reducing the capability of an otherwise fine gadget.

  135. I've had it now with Apple by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 1

    iTunes 7 was big enough, what with Bonjour, Apple service, QuickTime etc all being loaded quietly in the background.

    As far as I'm concerned, Apple have fucked up iTunes too much now; these drivers that seem completely unnecessary, MobileMe, AND the above? System stability & performance on your machine come second to Apple controlling it's ecosystem exactly how it wants to apparently.

    Apple seems to think it has the right to load anything it wants onto my system, and worse, without even telling me, and for me they've crossed the line.

    --
    throw new NoSignatureException();
  136. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good, fuck em, who cares. I hope they made the bug on purpose. Poor Microsoft.

  137. ReadyBoost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vista, crippled by the poor memory allocations in modern PCs is attempting to use the iPod as a Readyboost source, in the most promiscuous manner

  138. The real problem is..... by wernox1987 · · Score: 1

    Genius doesn't like my canadian music. He has no suggestions for Dust Rhinos, Great Big Sea or Blue Rodeo....... But the vista-itunes 8 combo worked fine for me.

  139. It's all marketing really by crivens · · Score: 1

    It's a marketing ploy! Simple really - they update iTunes, which crashes Vista and then they release another commercial showing how unstable Vista is!

  140. APPLE!!! by Friendly+Pyro · · Score: 1

    I hate apple, expect them to blame Microsoft for them making a program that can't run on PC's.

  141. Yet another example of bad CPU and PL design by master_p · · Score: 1

    The lack of hardware in-process component isolation coupled with the non-safety of C/C++ can make operating systems like crash...

  142. VISTA is DEAD !! iTunes CONFIRMS it !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Datsdafax

  143. All seems to be ok here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No issues here, Im running server 08 on one machine and win xp on another pc. The rest of my usb ports still work when the iphone is plugged in as well.

  144. Marc Barrett... is that you? by DG · · Score: 1

    Seriously dude... I'm an Amiga guy from way back in the day; I owned a 2000, a 3000, and a 4000, all bought new from C=. I was a CATS member. I still have a copy of the ROM kernal manual lying around here somewhere. My Amiga credentials are pretty solid, OK.

    Apple didn't copy Commodore; if anything, it was the other way around... and even then, "copy" is way too harsh a word. "Inspire" is probably better.

    The Mac's hardware design was always odd, and inferior to the Amiga (not for nothing could an Amiga 4000/040 emulate a Mac in software faster than the Mac itself ran natively) but when it came to look and feel and genral UI-ness, Apple was always far superior. Even the add-on packages for Workbench (MUI and that other one) couldn't make up the difference.

    I did web development in 1995/1996 using an Amiga 4000. All the programming was done on the native Amiga, but the web browser was Netscape for Mac emulated using Shapeshifter.

    Amiga hardware with Mac UI would have made for a killer machine.

    DG

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
    1. Re:Marc Barrett... is that you? by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      The Amiga history clearly shows the Amiga was based on Atari technology way before the Macintosh was even developed.

      Nice try, but someone who used to work at Commodore Amiga knows the history of the Amiga better than most.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  145. Quantum Leap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sadly surprised that no one has taken the golden opportunity to say that "user" "SamBeckett" is really traveling through time putting right what once went wrong.....theres a perfect Vista joke in there people!

  146. Early adapter by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

    I had this start on my XP machine over a year ago. If I plugged in my iPod and started iTunes the system would do a core dump and blue screen. Interestingly, the core dump was detected by Norton's and Avast as a virus.

  147. Bonjour is the culprit by geniusxyz · · Score: 1

    This is happening because of the Bon Jour service... i tried uninstalling after encountering similar problem on my Vista.. I was able to uninstall Apple updater, ITunes and Quick time player without issues but when i tried to uninstall the Bon Jour, the blue screen of death struck again... I really hate the Bon Jour.. earlier in my XP machine, it was twice effected by viruses. its one crappy piece of s/w

  148. No problems here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Running vista business on a dell e1505 with itunes 8 and a 1st gen iphone....

  149. Ipod related stuff seems to suck by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

    I'm not an Apple hater...I like my Apple workstation a lot, and prefer to use it when possible, but ITunes sucks even on OSX. Slow, memory hog, forces file conversions on me (and quite often doesn't make the conversion correctly, so I have to deal with broken song files).

    My wife got an IPod as a gift, and I can't WAIT till the POS dies. It locks up daily, runs its battery down when shut of, and doesn't disconnect from Itunes correctly. I had a RIO Karma, arguably the biggest POS mp3 player of all time, that I had less trouble with.

    Now I have to worry about Itunes sneaking in an update and blue screening her computer. Great.

    Note to Apple: If you keep fucking up like this, you're going to be enjoying another decade of declining market share. Pretty design means nothing if your crap is breaking all the time.

  150. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC." "...And I'm a Mac." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I banish U!

    U Banished!

    +20HP

  151. No problem for me by Myrkridian42 · · Score: 1

    For me, my iPod and iTunes 8 are working fine with Vista... on Boot Camp.

  152. whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eat shit itunes

  153. worked by wolfwood2099 · · Score: 1

    must be lucky i installed it last night on my pc running vista and had no issues everything worked fine for mehttp://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=961419&op=reply&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=

  154. I haven't had this problem yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iTunes 8 works fine under Vista for me. iPod plugged in and all.

  155. obvious solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hi im a pc, and im a mac, PC: itunes 8 crashes my computer, Mac: itunes runs great one me, the obvious solution is to buy a mac.

  156. Looks great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does the new iTunes still have that bloated and choppy interface like the old one does?

  157. Maybe the program got swiss-cheesed... by jkiller · · Score: 1

    User "sambeckett" should know better and just have Al ping Ziggy for a resolution to the matter.