The tech is too new, this data will take quite a while before it can be gathered. Does it not strike you as a little strange and out of the ordinary to attempt to gather this information for this research project? Does it strike you as even slightly likely that this finding is true in well adjusted, healthy people?
Does anyone in the EU trust the EU with their data? No! It is mostly composed of "other nation states." The EU is not a federal entity like the US and it is therefore technically wrong to apply that type of security trust across borders. The less you trust other people's computers, and the more you control of your own computing platform, then the more you can guarantee any given outcome. Trust no one (to summarize).
This article is exactly true, well and truly this is so! I have studied these photographs again and again, they clearly deserve a budget to go back again from ROSCOSMOS Any good?:0)
It is enslavement to form such an agreement! The people who run these companies are REQUIRED to be smart enough to understand every aspect of the work or capitalism kills the company. Accountancy maths kills legit companies that are stupid. They are effectively taking revenge for the dependency relationship that their inability to understand the business devised itself, (presumably dressing the matter up for themselves as a Machiavellian tactic) by clawing apart the lives of hardworking ordinary citizens. Isn't business fun?
What if you use a re-buildable machine for software development? What if the suppliers server goes down? And in ten years time? Face it, your money has been stolen unless the disk installs offline without paranoid ulterior assaults on the user such as this online system. Assassins Creed - Brotherhood works fine like this. This is an old lesson that successful software houses learned in the 90s...
This so called Java, wouldn't we be better off with Fortran? It compiles on anything, it's completely portable, and it run's offline so you're not tied to any stupid service provider that may or may not be there next year. It's all in capital letters too, just like a ZX Spectrum, just to be cutsie. Sinch... From our "get it while it's hot department"
This is the usual deflective language trick that you always get from paranoids again. To be paranoid means to be controlling via means of a locked uncontrollable deformed mental state. As an aside, psychotic means to utilise deformed logic, normally as a result of a deformed mental state. So if it's controlling insane people that form part of this equation I would submit that if you remove the standard language deflection from the descriptor above – then the Legislators would be the paranoid psychotic party in this instance.
This OS wasn't broke before and was quite popular. Now it is (apparently). So who broke it? Who damaged the market? It had a good "stylus" metaphor which is way more precise than the stupid finger poking machines for artwork etc. And apparently it's open source now according to a recent press release. It has a very large amount of code and games written for it. I think the story isn't over yet...
Who is to say that these facilities will be around tomorrow - you don't control them and the user does not control or own them. So if I pay for such an application, at a random point in the future it will be stolen from me. Anyone with a solution that works for this? To win, if I buy some software I must still own it and be able to run it in (say) 40 years time...
That's funny, all the other nation states will be forced to copy when the subsequent products are released. I also believe there are some very high frequencies out there that are used now but have not been passed to civilians for use, (with lies attached:0) )! 70Ghz+ ish. No one considers these in their calculations but the tech is well understood...
Slashdot Mirror
I don't think this is a sane post. It reads like one of those self help groups ...
Comrades, the dangers of a resonance cascade scenario in this equation are infinitesimally small!
What do you expect from a bunch of hoo ha's ...
k ... k ... k ... k ... Rad Dude!
The tech is too new, this data will take quite a while before it can be gathered. Does it not strike you as a little strange and out of the ordinary to attempt to gather this information for this research project? Does it strike you as even slightly likely that this finding is true in well adjusted, healthy people?
Does anyone in the EU trust the EU with their data? No! It is mostly composed of "other nation states." The EU is not a federal entity like the US and it is therefore technically wrong to apply that type of security trust across borders. The less you trust other people's computers, and the more you control of your own computing platform, then the more you can guarantee any given outcome. Trust no one (to summarize).
So if I buy such a device, who's property is it then? This seems to contradict the property laws ...
I've still got one of these, they're indestructible! They're absolutely tiny too ...
This article is exactly true, well and truly this is so! I have studied these photographs again and again, they clearly deserve a budget to go back again from ROSCOSMOS Any good? :0)
I don't believe this post, it's skits force lies.
It is enslavement to form such an agreement! The people who run these companies are REQUIRED to be smart enough to understand every aspect of the work or capitalism kills the company. Accountancy maths kills legit companies that are stupid. They are effectively taking revenge for the dependency relationship that their inability to understand the business devised itself, (presumably dressing the matter up for themselves as a Machiavellian tactic) by clawing apart the lives of hardworking ordinary citizens. Isn't business fun?
Ooooo, has someone failed a standard test? Give us the rest of the dirt, pleeeeeeeese!
What if you use a re-buildable machine for software development? What if the suppliers server goes down? And in ten years time? Face it, your money has been stolen unless the disk installs offline without paranoid ulterior assaults on the user such as this online system. Assassins Creed - Brotherhood works fine like this. This is an old lesson that successful software houses learned in the 90s ...
This so called Java, wouldn't we be better off with Fortran? It compiles on anything, it's completely portable, and it run's offline so you're not tied to any stupid service provider that may or may not be there next year. It's all in capital letters too, just like a ZX Spectrum, just to be cutsie. Sinch ... From our "get it while it's hot department"
It'll never catch on here in the UK.
I wonder if it's got g77, someone broke it last time ...
Watch out, that's personal ID they'll be sharing without client authorization and by an NGO! That's a felony in most states ...
That's a good one too! Grab the source! Quickly!
This is the usual deflective language trick that you always get from paranoids again. To be paranoid means to be controlling via means of a locked uncontrollable deformed mental state. As an aside, psychotic means to utilise deformed logic, normally as a result of a deformed mental state. So if it's controlling insane people that form part of this equation I would submit that if you remove the standard language deflection from the descriptor above – then the Legislators would be the paranoid psychotic party in this instance.
This OS wasn't broke before and was quite popular. Now it is (apparently). So who broke it? Who damaged the market? It had a good "stylus" metaphor which is way more precise than the stupid finger poking machines for artwork etc. And apparently it's open source now according to a recent press release. It has a very large amount of code and games written for it. I think the story isn't over yet ...
Set fire to hydrogen, the most abundant stellar element! Next!
Who is to say that these facilities will be around tomorrow - you don't control them and the user does not control or own them. So if I pay for such an application, at a random point in the future it will be stolen from me. Anyone with a solution that works for this? To win, if I buy some software I must still own it and be able to run it in (say) 40 years time ...
No, I disagree without explaining my criteria! Any takers? :0)
That's funny, all the other nation states will be forced to copy when the subsequent products are released. I also believe there are some very high frequencies out there that are used now but have not been passed to civilians for use, (with lies attached :0) )! 70Ghz+ ish. No one considers these in their calculations but the tech is well understood ...
Sorry, the follow ups to this post do not possess the REAL information. Try again!