Why do you falsely presume that people have only *just now* discovered it to begin with? Nothing in the summary or in the linked article even remotely said or implied any such thing that AdBlock Plus was something new. But, the fact that Apple finally put in content blocking into iOS has been a major source of news mostly because advertisers have been bawwwing like babies. But that doesn't mean that no one in the media knew about AdBlock Plus.
Slashdot Mirror
Have fun with your class action lawsuit there Verizon., you're gonna end up giving all the grandfathered accounts free unlimited for life.
Unless you can prove the contract illegal, have fun trying to get a class action lawsuit when you agreed to Supreme-Court-upheld forced arbitration.
What court? You agreed to forced arbitration which the Supreme Court upheld as legal.
Seriously? Who uses Verizon?
More than 1/3rd of the US population.
Not when the contract has a clause that says they can do exactly that. If you don't like the change, the contract allows you to back out.
No, that's why neither the summary nor the article use the term. You got butthurt out of something you imagined out of thin air.
How can you own code?
You slap your copyright on it? Either way, your arguing against something I never said. What I said was:
Since he is the repo owner
He's the owner of the repo.
Stop being an apologist. They shouldn't be referred to as "fake apps".
Because you're being autistic? Anyone who isn't being intentionally dense understands what the phrase meant.
Are you just being incredibly obtuse? A "fake" app is one that is trying to pass itself off as another app but is not that app
Fake as in "imitation". Which is precisely what a "knock-off" is.
Yes, if you are the owner you *should* have the last say. That's the whole point of being the *owner*.
Furthermore, should something like this be omitted simply because Linus doesn't like it? Is his opinion the only one that counts?
Since he is the repo owner, yes, his opinion is the only one that counts in the end.
Yeah, we know already. You already whined about this as AC above. If you don't want it, there's a simple solution. Ignore it and don't install it.
Fuck you. Don't want this fucking garbage on Android.
Then don't install it. Phew, that was hard.
Oops, that seems to be the model that HP sold. But the 4th Gen "Photo" came out on October 26, 2004. That may be the model that is being referenced.
The 4th Gen Classic in 20/40GB size came out in July of 2004.
But the more pressing question: What did Steve Jobs think of her face?
Why has the mass media finally 'discovered' it?
Why do you falsely presume that people have only *just now* discovered it to begin with? Nothing in the summary or in the linked article even remotely said or implied any such thing that AdBlock Plus was something new. But, the fact that Apple finally put in content blocking into iOS has been a major source of news mostly because advertisers have been bawwwing like babies. But that doesn't mean that no one in the media knew about AdBlock Plus.
Yeah it's just like real jobs where almost everything is a "group project".
Cool story, brah.
Yeah, it's a total joke that the car companies were able to self-certify their emissions tests.
Screenshot on that page showing a screen you'd only love to use on a tablet.
Not true. It's actually shitty even on a tablet.
Maybe, but the person they responded to was obviously talking about the market as a whole.
Yeah, right ...
So you disagree with the sales data from computer OEMs?
Every year appears an idiot saying that the desktop is dead.
Good for them. I stated no such thing.
I hear that power crystals are amazing treatments.