Slashdot Mirror


How Steve Jobs Outsmarted Carly Fiorina

HughPickens.com writes: Carly Fiorina likes to boast about her friendship with Apple founder Steve Jobs but Fortune Magazine reports that it turns out Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late leader. In January 2004, Steve Jobs and Carly Fiorina cut a deal where HP could slap its name on Apple's wildly successful iPod and sell it through HP retail channels but HP still managed to botch things up. The MP3 player worked just like a regular iPod, but it had HP's logo on the back and in return HP agreed to continue pre-loading iTunes onto its PCs. According to Steven Levy soon after the deal with HP was inked, Apple upgraded the iPod, making HP's version outdated and because of Fiorina's deal HP was banned from selling its own music player until August 2006. "This was a highly strategic move to block HP/Compaq from installing Windows Media Store on their PCs," says one Apple source. "We wanted iTunes Music store to be a definitive winner. Steve only did this deal because of that."

In short, Fiorina's "good friend" Steve Jobs blithely mugged her and HP's shareholders. By getting Fiorina to adopt the iPod as HP's music player, Jobs had effectively gotten his software installed on millions of computers for free, stifled his main competitor, and gotten a company that prided itself on invention to declare that Apple was a superior inventor.

328 comments

  1. Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late leader by sexconker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late leader

    Why do you even post things anymore, timothy?

  2. A ya don't say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A, ya don't say.

    1. Re:A ya don't say by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Of your post I read timothy's editorialification.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  3. Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late leader. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    seriously, timothy?!

  4. weakly disguised hit-piece by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Aside from the incomprehensibility of "...it turns out Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late leader.." anyone else find it curious that we suddenly see a deal between HP and Apple (that allowed a downward-trending computer mfg company to tie itself to the "big up and comer") spun as "Jobs OUTFOXED Fiorina"?

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Considering she's running for president, it shouldn't be surprising at all that her record gets raked over with a fine-toothed comb.

      As for the deal itself, it definitely sounds like HP tried to gain advantage, but Apple came out as the clear winner, with HP (and Fiorinia) looking entirely foolish. Given the rest of her tenure at HP (and elsewhere), I'm not surprised in the least to hear it. She's never been any sort of true visionary, and having Jobs leave her in the dust with having doubled down on what was soon to be yesterday's technology, while he focused on what was really key is exactly what I would expect.

      So is it really a "hit piece" to tell what happened, and put it in proper context? Why was HP wasting its time doing things like buying Compaq, and trying to piggyback on Apple's successes? If she was really a visionary, shouldn't she have been leading the market and innovating the way Jobs was?

    2. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You may not be aware of this, but Fiorina has been citing Jobs to deflect criticism of her for being fired by HP's board. She says that after she was fired he called her up and said "been there!" She's implying that because Jobs was fired and came back even stronger, her being fired from HP is proof she's a genius just like Jobs.

      Since she brought up Jobs to make herself look good, it was inevitable that Jobs would be used to make her look bad. She opened that door.

    3. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think this comment is a weakly disguised hit piece on this article.

    4. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I tend to agree. As much as I dislike Carly trading off a non-existent success record with HP, how exactly did Apple mug HP here? Was HP unable, per the agreement, to upgrade to the new iPod version? That seems unlikely.

      More likely HP didn't want to upgrade, or couldn't for any of a thousand different internal reasons. All of which would be HP's failing, not Apple's. And it further seems unlikely that Apple would know in advance these failings would exist or have that outcome.

    5. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by kaizendojo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fiorina couldn't lead lemmings to a cliff. Given the two bad alternatives, I'd have to choose Trump.

    6. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Sometimes corporate executives just make stupid mistakes and sometimes corporate executives are paid to make stupid mistakes by their competitors. There a billions of dollars hidden in secret accounts in tax havens with millions shifting from account to account all of the time.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    7. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Funny

      Time for Putin to pull the wool over her eyes if by some fluke she becomes president.
      "We're allowed to put our American flag logo on the back of all Russian missiles fired in Syria."

    8. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She is. Republican so therefore hates technology. We need more hit pieces!

    9. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by HiThere · · Score: 3, Insightful

      HP made a *really* stupid agreement. It wasn't the only one, and at least this one was legal, but it sure doesn't make Fionna look good. She'd have been better off to not cause this idiocy to be brought back to light.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    10. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by hirschma · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, she was outfoxed.

      The PJB-100, the first disk-based MP3 player, was in my hands in 1999 - a full two years before the iPod. HP owned fundamental patents that could have taxed each unit that Apple sold - but seemed to be entirely unaware of that ownership.

      Instead, they paid Apple to resell their own inventions. Brilliant!

      So yeah, she just totally sucked.

    11. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

      "Aside from the incomprehensibility of "...it turns out Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late leader.." anyone else find it curious that we suddenly see a deal between HP and Apple (that allowed a downward-trending computer mfg company to tie itself to the "big up and comer") spun as "Jobs OUTFOXED Fiorina"?"

      No, because we read the rest of the summary, where it quite clearly explains how Jobs screwed her. You should try it sometime! (Not screwing her. I wouldn't wish that on anyone. I mean reading the whole summary before posting something so stupid)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    12. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Jobs was an alpha psychopath.

      With this story, she looks even stupider than she already did when she claimed she did a great job at HP.

      Now we see that after doing his part to put a knife into her back (in addition to the knife in her gut which she did to herself), Jobs then pretends to be her friend and falsely sympathizes with her.

      Fiorina is one of the worst candidates I can imagine for the presidency of the U.S.A. I hope that she, Hillary Clinton, and Jeb Bush all die of stomach cancer.

    13. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      You lost me at Jobs being innovating.

      Don't get me wrong, he was one hell of a salesman (On top of being a swindler when it came to the wages of the rank and file workers due to an illegal non-poach agreement) but I haven't seen anything innovative come out of apple since the 1980's. Absolutely everything I saw him sale was stuff others had invented.

      He was about as inventive as a box of rocks for over 2 decades before his death.

      Captcha: Blonde.....

    14. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by cas2000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Given that the rest of the Republican candidates seem to be experts at leading lemmings off cliffs, I'd say that was a point in her favour.

    15. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or you know, vote for the decent alternative, Bernie Sanders (even if you disagree with his politics you have to admit the man is objectively a decent human being such rare, much weird, wow)

      captcha: Decoys

    16. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You lost me at Jobs being innovating.

      Bitch please! Jobs was like super innovative. Did you know he pioneered treating cancer with a diet based on apples? That's pretty fucking innovative if you ask me. Just a few little kinks to work out of course. Like the not working at all. And the dying. But other than that, the whole apple therapy was pretty innovative.

    17. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      Make her look bad Her? Not Apple?

      I was just wondering how different things would have been, without iTunes. How different Slashdot would have been, had this new batch could have been the real deal, if they had kept the faith and stayed the course. And ignored those products from the walled garden.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    18. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by ChrisMaple · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      To call a man decent because he admits that he wants to steal everything you own, is missing the point.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    19. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by ChrisMaple · · Score: 0

      Your hatred blinds you to practical reality. Dying from stomach cancer can take a long time. Think of the damage they could do while still alive!

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    20. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear Fidel Castro may be looking for a retirement hobby...

    21. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by jcr · · Score: 1

      How many patents do you have, sunshine?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    22. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Solandri · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So is it really a "hit piece" to tell what happened, and put it in proper context?

      The facts may be right, but the context it presents seems suspect. AFAIK HP never made its own MP3 player. If the presented context were correct, HP would've made one as soon as their contractual prohibition with Apple expired in 2006. That doesn't seem to have happened.

      So the proper context is probably that HP didn't want to make an MP3 player, but they wanted to keep their name recognition up in the MP3 player market just in case they were wrong and it took off. So they inked a deal with the most successful MP3 player maker. And they tricked Jobs into giving additional concessions by agreeing not to build their own MP3 player - something they weren't planning on doing anyway.

      If that's what happened, in retrospect HP did the smart thing. The MP3 player market died when phones picked up music playback capability. So HP came out ahead by never devoting resources to developing an MP3 player. Of course they totally missed the boat on smartphones, even though they used to be one of the leaders in the PDA market.

    23. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      I'm not a huge fan of Apple but are you seriously trying to bring back this old argument?

      No, they didn't invent computing or touch screens or cell phones or fingerprint readers or most of the components that are part of the things they sell. But the value of what they sell, to those who buy them, is greater than the sum of parts.

      Just look at cell phones before the iPhone and ever since. Every major phone since 2007 has a very similar design. If Apple didn't invent a good design, then why was it nonexistent before Apple did it and copied by everyone since?

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    24. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Bernie is great, but in a hypothetical scenario where you have to choose from the Republican candidates, which one would you pick? That's kinda what we're talking about here.

      Personally, I'd pick Trump easily. All the others are either religious wackos, Objectivism fans, or one of the worst CEOs in recent history. Trump is the only one of the bunch who's sane and connected.

    25. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Oh please, this is just dumb. The iPod click-wheel isn't innovative? The iPhone wasn't innovative? No, Apple never was the absolute first to market with something, but under Jobs they were frequently first to market with something that people actually really liked, and which caught on, and a big part of that was doing a good job with product design (e.g., compare the old WinCE phones with the first iPhone--who the fuck wants to use a stylus on a phone?).

    26. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Grishnakh · · Score: 0

      Throw in Cruz and Carson and Santorum and Huckabee too. I'll spare Walker since he dropped out.

      This is really a horrible set of candidates we have this time around, except for Sanders. The top three IMO are Sanders, Biden (who isn't even running yet), and Trump (and that's just because there isn't anyone better).

    27. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You should try it sometime! (Not screwing her. I wouldn't wish that on anyone.

      Even her ex-husband is bashing her publicly. Poor guy is probably mentally scarred for life.

    28. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To call a man decent because he admits that he wants to steal everything you own, is missing the point.

      Since when did Bernie Sanders become a Capitalist?

    29. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      The grim bit isn't so much having a given deal work out less well than hoped; but the downright absurd category error that made the idea seem even remotely sensible.

      When you are peddling a bunch of expensive, reasonably tightly interconnected, enterprise datacenter widgetry and 'solutions'; it's not terribly uncommon to have re-badge versions of competitor's products, in areas you are weak in, so that you can satisfy the customer who wants everything wrapped up in a single vendor relationship, single point of contact, warranty and support agreement across the entire package, and so on. To this day, for instance, HP will sell you HP-colored Cisco switch gear that slots into their blade server chassis. They would obviously prefer that you buy their own, which they also have; but they'd rather sell you a big pile of HP blades and some Cisco switches than sell you nothing because you can't get the switches you want. Other vendors do the same sort of thing, as customer demand and the strengths and weaknesses of their offerings dictate. I'm sure it works out better some times than others; but it's broadly sensible.

      The mindblowingly incompetent bit is, for some reason, applying the same logic to a consumer electronics widget; and then sealing the defeat by failing to secure important basics like "will our rebadged model get updated when the ipod does, or will we be left peddling last year's toy for as long as Apple feels like it?". That's what is just grim about this little tale. You don't come out ahead in every deal, yeah, so it goes; but running a company that sells, and has for years, to both enterprise customers and individuals; and not understanding the difference clearly enough to see that ipod buyers have different priorities than people buying blades or SANs? Seriously?

    30. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      If she voluntarily brought that parallel up, she's either desperate or stupid. Jobs got booted and went on to outdo Apple sufficently that they ended up buying him back and more or less gutting their own products to rebuild them around his. Fiorina? I, um, must have missed that part of her career.

    31. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd pick Trump too, in the same way that I would choose to drink bleach rather than ammonia or nitric acid.

      As for the Democrats, right now it seems like a choice between Dr. Pepper and Coke Zero.

    32. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

      socialism: public safety nets. much cheaper and higher quality healthcare. affordable higher education. source: canada, denmark, germany, norway, etc... countries richer, healthier, happier, better educated, and *freer* than the usa: no financial parasites funneling money out of their society via cozy relationships paid for by corrupt elections, for nothing in return, because regulating corporations and plutocrats is "against freedom"

      communism: gulags and mass starvation and no free speech and no free press and no freedom of religion and control and fear and genocide and hour long lines to get scratchy toilet paper. that's canada and germany, right?

      american moron: socialism = communism, because hysterical low iq propaganda that hasn't had an original thought since mccarthy's 1950s red scare bullshit means that binary choices between communism and capitalism are the only choices in a subject matter, economics, that in reality, has thousands of complex variations. but... we'll just stick to our ignorant kneejerk biases, because it serves our plutocrat masters who produce the propaganda to keep us misinformed, poor and unhealthy, and we like it because we're useful fools

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    33. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Really it should be Jobs and Fiorina conspired to outfox consumers.

    34. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for the insight. Not only does it seem reasonable, but the notion that Fiorina negotiated the details for rebranded iPods seems a little far fetched anyway. Who Its far easier for me to suppose that she understood that aligning herself with Jobs was a much better choice than chaining herself to Glazer, especially since there was much less competition with Apple than Real Networks, at the time.

    35. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by unixisc · · Score: 2

      You forgot his leadership of a company called NEXT, where he came out w/ one of the most intuitive UNIX-like workstations of the time. If that wasn't innovative, I have no idea what is

    36. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by unixisc · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      If the only guy you like is a Socialist, maybe you could swap places w/ somebody from Cuba, and settle down under Raul Castro. We've had Obama the last 8 years, and if he is not leftist enough for you, you should consider moving

    37. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Well, Trump did lead a number of companies into bankruptcy...I suppose that could make him better at leading the US.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    38. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Compared only to the other Republican candidates.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    39. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the only guy you like is a Socialist, maybe you could swap places w/ somebody from Cuba, and settle down under Raul Castro. We've had Obama the last 8 years, and if he is not leftist enough for you, you should consider moving

      First, please google "socialism vs communism".

      I'm from Europe & I'm often amazed at how some folks in the US seem to have such a skewed view of politics. By world standards the US Democratic party is viewed as being center-right & the Republicans more far-right. Even right-leaning Europeans don't view Socialist as being a dirty word, it's just (to them) a different set of priorities/approach. IMO, governments change & we get a truly more balanced approach.

      Frankly, the fact that (especially) Republicans deride Socialists but embrace the stupidity or *insanity* (yes, religious nuts don't get a free pass from me) of people who deny evolution, climate change, etc is ... well just stunning.

      Also, suggesting that people should leave your country if they disagree with your view seems very arrogant. If enough Americans want a Socialist in the White House should that not happen because you say not?

      I'm not trying to change your politics ... of course, you're perfectly entitled to believe in far-right government for example ... but maybe have a think about some of the above & do some investigation yourself to see if my assertion that your view is skewed is correct.

      If your views are so entrenched that you don't want to learn the facts, well I've just wasted a bunch or 1s & 0s.

    40. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by countach74 · · Score: 1

      Socialism, as you describe it, is what's typically called "democratic socialism." It is not the sort of socialism described by Karl Marx. As time passes, it seems the "democratic" portion is getting left out more and more and the original meaning lost. If you go back to the original meaning of socialism (and communism), it makes little sense to call someone a moron for failing to make a clear distinction. After all, not even Karl Marx laid it out very clearly. Communism, in that context, is generally thought of as a higher form of socialism, achieved after a time of prosperity caused by the proletariat overthrowing the bourgeois... or something like that. Again, it's all fuzzy. Communism was never supposed to be a totalitarian idea. It was supposed to bring freedom (to most). The trouble is, in practice, the only way to enforce the principles is via totalitarianism. It's rather self defeating. Anyways, all of that to say: it's not moronic to think socialism = communism.

    41. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      trump wants the banksters and their mba friends off a cliff. more power to him.

    42. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Close your eyes and see Obama for what he really is. Yes, he's a member of the Democratic party but his actions are hardly what I would call left of center.

      The Affordable Care Act looks like a Democratic bread and circuses giveaway and it is: to the insurance companies. Big Business.

      Isn't that traditionally the milieu of the Republicans? How about the giveaways to Wall Street courtesy of Obama's attorney general, Eric Holder, who said that prosecuting the systemically dangerous institutes could cause a financial crisis and thus merely fined them?

      The reality is that modern Democrats (as of Bill Clinton's term) are right of center and, in an attempt to appear conservative, the Republicans move ever further right than they historically have been.

    43. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      and libertarianism as originally defined was about social issues: i can wear what i want, say what i want, use what drugs i want, no constraints

      then it got adapted as "don't tax the rich" by plutocrats and their sycophants in the usa and american morons lapped it up, and now it has a mostly economic meaning in the usa

      words like these are complex with many overlapping meanings by time period and location

      suffice it to say, if you ask a european what socialism is, they will answer as i described, and bernie sanders will answer as you describe, because the usa has altered notions of word meaning

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    44. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      your healthcare system costs 100-1,000x less than ours does and you live longer with a higher quality of life

      your higher education is so cheap, you'll even take americans for free if they do good on their exams, no need to even learn german

      http://www.bbc.com/news/magazi...

      of course germany has problems, every nation does, you're an idiot if you think i was describing germany as some sort of paradise

      but from this side of the pond, germany is clearly and unequivocally doing better on the issue of social safety nets, for which us americans are paying many multiples of, for far less benefit, because morons here think it's a free market, and plutocrats corrupt our elected officials to keep thew gravy train flowing

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    45. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If she voluntarily brought that parallel up, she's either desperate or stupid

      http://www.cultofmac.com/38927...

    46. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      and libertarianism as originally defined was about social issues: i can wear what i want, say what i want, use what drugs i want, no constraints

      then it got adapted as "don't tax the rich" by plutocrats and their sycophants in the usa and american morons lapped it up, and now it has a mostly economic meaning in the usa

      I think you mean liberalism, which meaning has been drifting further left in the US, but drifted right in Europe. Libertarianism is an American neologism to compensate for that, and appears specifically used to by people who favors economic cronyism.

    47. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most importantly, on average Germans cannot afford kids (Fertility 1.7 per woman). Germany consumes itself and replaces the non-existent kids with random (no qualification required) folks who are aggressive enough to move to Germany.

      Merkel has no kids, Schröder has no kids and these are supposedly members of the elite. Millions of women work hard in the business world and "do not have time to have kids".

      Germany is an unsustainable socialist mess, ruled by idealist idiots, propagandized by Maoists in the media.

      Another nugget, we have lots of engineers here who earn less than the IG Metall workers in the car factory here. That is all justified using the Communist/Maoist propaganda of the lefties.

      And the "free" education system - whoever has a serious job will pay through the nose for it by means of taxes and tax-lite stuff. It will easily eat 50% of your income if you are single. If you have kids it is slightly better and it will get bearable if you are married. Just never get divorced. So "marriage" is more important to the German state than kids.

      Lions Led By Idiots.

    48. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to see the future of Germany, get yourself a GMX email account and compare it to mail.ru and gmail.

      The only reason for GMX might(!) be that the NSA snoopers don't have so easy access.

    49. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HP is a model how MBAs are wholly incapable of competing with real businesspeople like Jobs, Ellison, Gates. The latter group don't just know the beancounting and marketing B.S. - they know quite a bit about technology and how it can be turned into a competitive advantage.

      The MBAers often hate engineers, because they are often embarrassed by them and because - deep down - they know the real Value Creators are the engineers. I have seen a bit of HP from the inside 1993 to 1997 and I sensed then that the beancounters were taking over. Bill and Dave had real skills, but they "rationalized" that they should hand over the company to the beancounters. So they gave HP to Lew Platt. And they were infected by some lefty "progressive" stupidness which would bend over for "women, minorities (and tortured ants)".

      The "old white, male engineer" was obviously to be decimated and be replaced by a female beancounter. That was the shitty essence of their misguided morals.

      Now, some old white men like Gates and Ellison killed off the business of these pussies. By using engineers, of course.

      The old white engineer rules at Google, at VW (ignore their current troubles, it will be over soon), at BMW, at Analog and many other places where he is put to good use. OWE just needs to stop listening to communist pussies.

    50. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well Germany is doing so weel that the brightest are moving from DE to US.

      On the other hand there are thousands of refugees moving to DE.

    51. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      You really have no idea on what you are talking about do you.
      Jobs, Gates, Ellidon while extreamly successful with the lack of business school, they are blips. The 1% in the US of 300 million people is well 3 million people.

      Jobs and Gates took a risk and got lucky that the market was hungry for something.
      Many engineers do have an MBA you go to these MBA classes and they are full of computer scientist and engineers. They often take the MBA as to give them more leverage dealing with higher management and make them more sellable as outside consultants.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    52. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot humor.

    53. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Food for thought:

      Evil people often choose the lesser of two evils.

      Captcha: lifeboat

    54. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does everyone else.

    55. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      The iPod click-wheel isn't innovative?

      It isn't. There were controls like that on stereos already (with a button next to them) and click-wheels already existed on mice and on the first PCS phone.

      The iPhone wasn't innovative?

      It's been repeatedly demonstrated that it wasn't, in fact. It was just a better effort than similar devices which preceded it.

      No, Apple never was the absolute first to market with something, but under Jobs they were frequently first to market with something that people actually really liked, and which caught on, and a big part of that was doing a good job with product design

      Right, but not innovation. That's not what this is about.

      (e.g., compare the old WinCE phones with the first iPhone--who the fuck wants to use a stylus on a phone?).

      There are a shitload of styluses sold for Android devices, and people do use the few that actually improve precision on phones. But speaking as someone who actually carried one of those shitty old WinCE phones, an ATT Fuze (HTC Raphael 110) and before that one of those shitty old WinCE PDAs (an iPaq H2215 running Familiar Linux/GPE) I can tell you that you could use it without the stylus if you used it as people normally use their phones. It's only if you wanted to use it as people use a computer that you really needed to drag out the stylus. However, you could actually do that with it, and at the time, it was the only platform which fit that description. You could cheaply get a development system, write your own software, and load it onto the phone without spending any additional money. Furthermore, you had a reasonable expectation that it would run on other devices. With Java of the day, it was normal that you would need anywhere from three to seven different versions of a MIDlet to cover Symbian, BREW, etc... and the different supported profiles.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    56. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Jobs got booted and went on to outdo Apple sufficently that they ended up buying him back and more or less gutting their own products to rebuild them around his.

      Not really. Jobs got booted and went on to meander around aimlessly in computing. His success was with Pixar, not with NeXT. The only reason NeXTStep was superior to Apple's other options is that they had been dicking around incompetently with a variety of OS projects which never went anywhere. It's also not clear that NeXTStep was actually a better option than BeOS, but it's cleat that Jobs and NeXT were a package deal, and the rest is history.

      The fact that NeXTStep, an overpriced and antiquated wacky Unix variant based around a development system and language nobody wanted to use at the time was superior to MacOS of the day is a testament to how aimless and pointless Apple was without Jobs, not to the quality (or success) of NeXTStep.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    57. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why was HP wasting its time doing things like buying Compaq, and trying to piggyback on Apple's successes? If she was really a visionary, shouldn't she have been leading the market and innovating the way Jobs was?

      Good questions, but the first one should be directed at Robert Palmer, the CEO of Digital when they bought Compaq.

    58. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fiorina couldn't lead lemmings to a cliff.

      Er...I think that's the one thing she's demonstrated an ability to do very well.

    59. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      who the fuck wants to use a stylus on a phone?

      Didn't Apple just release a $99 pencil?

    60. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's been repeatedly demonstrated that it wasn't, in fact. It was just a better effort than similar devices which preceded it.

      Right, but not innovation. That's not what this is about.

      Oh please. I hate to defend Apple of all companies, but "innovation" is not being the first to come up with the very first version of something, that's "invention". The two are not the same. Putting together existing parts (and refining them significantly) into a new overall package is innovation; it's really the same thing as engineering, but also combined with design.

      I still remember when the iPhone first came out. It was truly intuitive and easy to use for people who hadn't used one before, and it was actually attractive; this just wasn't true for preceding devices with their tiny screens with resistive touchscreens and crappy OSes. Thankfully, Android came along later (though it has major problems too, namely mfgrs abandoning devices quickly), but I have to give credit where it's due. The iPhone is the whole reason everyone has a smartphone now; no one cared about them before because they really weren't easy to use (nor attractive).

    61. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slashdot: lack of capitalization. misuse of periods. poor grammar. and "holier than thou" attitudes poorly supported by flawed reasoning and childish insults.

    62. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Biden is just the backup institutional candidate in case hillary flames out. He's great at the down-homey gaffes, but for all intents and purposes, he's a hillary clone.

    63. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by pepty · · Score: 1

      Most importantly, on average Germans cannot afford kids (Fertility 1.7 per woman).

      Pretty much the same rate as for white non-hispanic women in the US, where we replace the non-existent kids with random folks who are aggressive enough to move to the US.

    64. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by pepty · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd pick Trump easily. All the others are either religious wackos, Objectivism fans, or one of the worst CEOs in recent history. Trump is the only one of the bunch who's sane and connected.

      Remaining personally rich while sending your corporations into bankruptcy describes both Trump and Fiorina. If either was elected I'm sure they would personally do just fine after a disastrous term.

    65. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple was aimless and pointless with Jobs which is why he had to be fired. The management that fired him kept the aimlessness and pointlessness because , um, reasons. Jobs leaned how to be lucky (The type of general Napoleon liked!) again which is why he was brought back.

    66. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by pepty · · Score: 1

      Would you say a guitarist isn't innovative unless he invented a new pickup or effect pedal? Innovation isn't limited to the first iteration of a new technology. It can also be the implementation, the combination of technologies and how they interact, the user interface, and the appearance of the device, all of which were strongly directed by Jobs.

    67. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering she's A REPUBLICAN running for president, it shouldn't be surprising at all that her record gets raked over with a fine-toothed comb. ...

      FTFY.

      That's why Barack Obama's college transcripts have been available for years, and have been thoroughly examined...

    68. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that the rest of the Republican candidates seem to be experts at leading lemmings off cliffs, I'd say that was a point in her favour.

      Barack Obama's gonna "pivot to jobs" any day now, after he establishes a "red line" in the Middle East to prevent any continued escalation of violence there, and cleans up the mess between Russia and Ukraine, all because he's a better leader than W.

      What was that you said about lemmings and cliffs?

    69. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And socialism, of course, somehow magically makes the plutocrats and corrupt politicians disappear? Pray tell how.

    70. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by countach74 · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree with you. My point is that its not fair to call people morons who can't see a difference since the terms are still somewhat ambiguous. It really depends on the demographic you talk to. Economists will tend towards the old definitions, for instance.

    71. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Tell me, which new version of the iPod came out shortly after the deal that HP did not sell under license?

    72. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      it doesn't moron. ther'es always problems, nothing's perfect. it's just better than the bullshit we have

      why do you think "it's not perfect" is an adequate reply to how i illustrate how germany is clearly doing better than usa?

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    73. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      exactly. cherry picking propaganda morons are all over slashdot, choosing the info that only reinforces their biases. germany is clearly doing better than the usa

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    74. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      http://www.alternet.org/story/...

      http://www.marketwatch.com/sto...

      of course germans have problems. you just don't understand america's problems are different and worse in aggregate

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    75. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      you're an uneducated idiot. stop talking about topics you don't understand. libertarianism was originally about social issues in europe. then it got coopted and repurposed (so stolen... ironically) to be used as a term for economic issues in the usa

      to the point that people now can call themselves libertarians in europe, or libertarians in the usa, and actually stand for completely oppposite positions in the economic and social spheres

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      The term libertarian was first used by late-Enlightenment freethinkers to refer to the metaphysical belief in free will, as opposed to determinism.[12] The first recorded use was in 1789, when William Belsham wrote about libertarianism in opposition to "necessitarian", i.e. determinist, views.[13][14]

      Libertarian came to mean an advocate or defender of liberty, especially in the political and social spheres, as early as 1796, when the London Packet printed on 12 February: "Lately marched out of the Prison at Bristol, 450 of the French Libertarians."[15] The word was again used in a political sense in 1802, in a short piece critiquing a poem by "the author of Gebir", and has since been used with this meaning.[16][17][18]

      The use of the word libertarian to describe a new set of political positions has been traced to the French cognate, libertaire, coined in a scathing letter French libertarian communist Joseph Déjacque wrote to mutualist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon in 1857, castigating him for his sexist political views.[19][20] Déjacque also used the term for his anarchist publication Le Libertaire: Journal du Mouvement Social, which was printed from 9 June 1858 to 4 February 1861 in New York City.[21][22] In the mid-1890s, Sébastien Faure began publishing a new Le Libertaire while France's Third Republic enacted the lois scélérates ("villainous laws"), which banned anarchist publications in France. Libertarianism has frequently been used as a synonym for anarchism since this time.[23][24][25]

      Although the word libertarian continues to be widely used to refer to socialists internationally, its meaning in the United States has deviated from its political origins.[26][27] Libertarianism in the United States has been described as conservative on economic issues and liberal on personal freedom[28] (for common meanings of conservative and liberal in the United States); it is also often associated with a foreign policy of non-interventionism.[29][30] Since the resurgence of neoliberalism in the 1970s, free-market capitalist libertarianism has spread beyond North America via think tanks and political parties.[31]

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    76. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not for a phone.

    77. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      you want to give the benefit of the doubt. it is mostly stupid people out there. nine times out of ten, they genuinely don't understand what the fuck they are talking about but open their mouths anyway

      if i am having a conversation here with mostly europeans, and the difference is therefore in terminology (there are dumb europeans as well as dumb americans, but the terminology differences means indeed i have to side with caution), then i apologize

      but if i am talking to the usual low iq propagandized american retard on this topic, there is no apology necessary

      i am not using empty insults. we are talking about, objectively, morons. who talk about economic concepts they don't understand, merely regurgitating quasireligous beliefs their propaganda channels spoonfeed to the useful fools. genuine morons

      do you respect a creationist when talking about evolution? an antivaxxer when talking about biology? no and no. these people need to be castigated and rejected. they reject reason so there is no use arguing with them. so it is with free market fundamentalist retards. they have beliefs that only exist when ignoring economics and simple history

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    78. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      don't forget about the anonymous trolls who have to derail the topic

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    79. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by sudon't · · Score: 1

      Most CEOs are psychopaths. So are most politicians, for that matter. I have some bad news for you, though: Some psychopath will be the next president of the US, no matter who gets stomach cancer.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    80. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by doccus · · Score: 1

      Fiorina couldn't lead lemmings to a cliff. Given the two bad alternatives, I'd have to choose Trump.

      Actually, I am concerned that, in fact, she COULD lead lemmings to a cliff, while behaving like a disney nature show producer herself. And, unfortunately, the American electorate is full of lemmings who most certainly are likely to get pushed off the cliff, if they elect her..

    81. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by doccus · · Score: 1

      America is the hands down winner in the propoganda wars. you'll have to admit. No country in recorded history has had as much time to indoctrinater it's citizens so powerfully. Even the former Soviet Union is a distant second.
      And it's Soo easy to recognize someone who's been brainwashed. Knee jerk reactions using stock phrases to replace critical thinking.. such as "they're just commies" or "they hate us because they're just jealous of our freedom" or "if they don't have our idea of 'democracy' they're just dictators". Perhaps the reason americans submit to religious cults so easily is because they've already been conditioned into brainwashing all their lives at home and in school ...

    82. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany is a single culture about the size of Maryland and a small population. You cannot compare small European countries to places like the USA, or Russia, or China or even Canada.

    83. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      But I didn't actually say I was voting in the GOP primary.

    84. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      you're making excuses. there's plenty of differences but not of the kind and of the type to make germany different enough that basic economic facts about socialized healthcare and higher education wouldn't work in the usa

      you're desperate and reaching for straws to bvoid the obvious lesson

      "germany is less square miles so gravity doesn't work the same in germany"

      that's what you sound like

      we're talking basic economic principles here

      you're not being intellectually honest

      "cultural differences" is the new cheat by pridefully ignorant assholes to avoid basic lessons about the reality they live in

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    85. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 1

      The very article you linked to describes NeXT as having a clear technical direction rather than aimless development. In fact, it specifically says that NeXT was carrying on with the same technical direction that had been going on inside of Apple.

      Insisting on this change in direction was part of what got Steve Jobs the ax from people more interested in short-term profitability.

    86. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, so the USA should be more like the socialist Utopia that is Germany. First we must kick out all the parasitic Jews. Then we must kill all the so called African Americans to better reflect the genetic make up of the ohh so pure Socialist germans. Then we can all live in a socialists utopia that is Germany. Now I know why david Duke was a liberal democrat. Compared to you ohh so pure and right minded liberal socialist, I am glad to be an evil right wing Republican.

    87. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      eh, i give it 6/10

      an effective troll can't traffic in such an easy cartoon character, you have to give your faked retard comment some pathos

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    88. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The very article you linked to describes NeXT as having a clear technical direction rather than aimless development.

      NeXT never had significant market success.

      In fact, it specifically says that NeXT was carrying on with the same technical direction that had been going on inside of Apple.

      Apple didn't have a technical direction. That's why they needed a new OS.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    89. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      communism: gulags and mass starvation and no free speech and no free press and no freedom of religion and control and fear and genocide and hour long lines to get scratchy toilet paper. that's canada and germany, right?

      You just described my country Venezuela. Literally. I'm not kidding. And we are supposed to be socialist.

    90. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Apple invented basically none of the UI metaphors they capitalized on. What they did was put them all together in a way that wouldn't shit the bed constantly. That's no small achievement, they were the first to manage it with smartphones and you have to give them credit for that, and for successfully appropriating all these UI concepts. But that's about where it stops. That's a significant couple of achievements, but still don't add up to innovation. It's really just about taking the time to refine what you're doing before you add more features, which is a lesson which more corporations (and people, probably) could stand to learn.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    91. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's not forget about Pixar. All new cartoon movies can thank Pixar.

    92. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Jobs and Gates took a risk and got lucky that the market was hungry for something.

      Luck, and Gates trading on his mom's business connections to sell early Microsoft products to IBM, something Jobs didn't have.

    93. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      NeXT never had significant market success.

      Apple didn't buy Next for their market success, but for the operating system and development environment, so your observation is a bit of a non sequitur. But congrats for capitalizing the x.

    94. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      You just described my country Venezuela. Literally. I'm not kidding. And we are supposed to be socialist.

      Or maybe you just outed yourself a fascist. I'm not kidding, either.

    95. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      That's no small achievement, they were the first to manage it with smartphones and you have to give them credit for that, and for successfully appropriating all these UI concepts. But that's about where it stops. That's a significant couple of achievements, but still don't add up to innovation.

      They had both innovation and invention,, Haterade Distortion Field be damned.

    96. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Apple invented basically none of the UI metaphors they capitalized on.

      So who invented double-clicking? Who invented drag-and- drop file manipulation? Windows you didn't have to manually update? Drop-down menus? Keyboard mouse-modifiers (e.g. Shift-click)?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    97. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      who the fuck wants to use a stylus on a phone?

      Didn't Apple just release a $99 pencil?

      Who uses a 12" tablet as a phone? Apart from Samsung fanatics of course?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    98. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Tell me, which new version of the iPod came out shortly after the deal that HP did not sell under license?

      The iPod Photo - which wasn't really a new version, but a top-end variation of the same iPod HP sold, just with a color display, to look at photos. Ignoring that littly fact, according to the Wikipedia article on this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... - "HP later added the iPod mini, the iPod photo, and the iPod shuffle to the lineup."

      Which means this article is so wrong it isn't even wrong, because for the term of the contract HP sold the whole line-up of iPods (at least later on).

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    99. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Exactly. You can find HP iPod photos on eBay right now.

    100. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Libetarianism was original about social issue because it is a French synonym for Liberalism, much like Republicanism was, they all meant the same thing: Liberalism. It had multiple additional names when it was young, but you wouldn't recognize them.

  5. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're talking about Carly Fiorina here. So outwitting her isn't going to be that much of a feat...

    1. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's like a normal athlete being able to beat one of the retards from the Special Olympics in a race. Yeah, real big accomplishment.

    2. Re:So? by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Well, Jobs was an ass, but Carly still got the last laugh. She's alive and doing fine, while Jobs is rotting in his grave.

      I don't think she will be the next President. Neither will Jobs.

    3. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHA nice!... Yeah i bet if Fiorina gets cancer she will listen to her doctors and not freaking kill herself...

  6. TLDR, Jobs was a raging piece of s*** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So the takeaway is, Steve Jobs was a raging piece of s***. We already knew that. I'm glad that, despite him skating his way to the top of the transplant list due to his wealth and influence, he still died. F*** that a**hole.

    1. Re:TLDR, Jobs was a raging piece of s*** by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Well he certainly proved for the rest of us that you can't outsmart Cancer with a vegetarian diet plan. He should have sprung for the chemo.

    2. Re:TLDR, Jobs was a raging piece of s*** by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      He should have sprung for the chemo

      And started a meth lab with a former dropout. And taken on the cartel. And shipped product to Europe. And showed everyone how to live.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    3. Re:TLDR, Jobs was a raging piece of s*** by dj245 · · Score: 1

      So the takeaway is, Steve Jobs was a raging piece of s***. We already knew that. I'm glad that, despite him skating his way to the top of the transplant list due to his wealth and influence, he still died. F*** that a**hole.

      Yeah, it's definitely a dick move. The company I work for has been growing at 20-50 percent per year for the last 5 years or so. And we are in a very mature industry (steam turbine repair). We try to treat both our customers, contractors, and vendors with respect and every deal like part of a long relationship. We do a lot of work for several of our direct competitors for this reason.

      It's sad to see that the largest companies on the planet can't seem to function that way too.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  7. Sad to see the HP culture disappearing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They used to have a great work/life balance. I always took a full week of vacation off when I worked there. Now, the vast majority of my friends that work for Apple never take a day off because of the brutal schedules.

    1. Re:Sad to see the HP culture disappearing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I always took a full week of vacation off when I worked there.

      Is this what USasians think is a generous vacation policy? You're seriously impressed about being able to take a whole week of vacation?!? LOL.

    2. Re: Sad to see the HP culture disappearing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Work life balance died here long ago. HP's self-destruction isn't causing the loss of anything valuable.

    3. Re: Sad to see the HP culture disappearing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They used to have a great work/life balance.

      That died long ago. Now vacation time is basically not granted for a lot of the teams, and with the push to hire only unmarried people, we are expected to not take time off to be with family.

    4. Re:Sad to see the HP culture disappearing by Narcocide · · Score: 4, Informative

      I KNOW! If you tell these guys what minimum mandated vacation time looks like in France they flat out think you're lying.

    5. Re: Sad to see the HP culture disappearing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being from the US is now a race?

    6. Re: Sad to see the HP culture disappearing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To the bottom?

    7. Re:Sad to see the HP culture disappearing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple shuts down for the week of thanksgiving, and between christmas and new year's day every year. Got any more bullshit to trot out?

    8. Re:Sad to see the HP culture disappearing by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Is this what USasians think is a generous vacation policy? You're seriously impressed about being able to take a whole week of vacation?!? LOL.

      He's talking about the tech industry. Not every place in the US is like that, nor is every tech company, that's really more about the high-profile (=high pressure) ones.

      In most industries, 2-4 weeks per year is the norm, sometimes more in government positions.

      But yeah, if you work at Apple, don't expect to take much vacation time.

    9. Re: Sad to see the HP culture disappearing by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      And of course some racist has to start spouting hate. There's a reason Western society is so successful. It is because we work hard and are not lazy.

      The US is not a race. The US is also not all of Western society. In fact, the US barely resembles the rest of Western society. The US is also not very successful anymore.

    10. Re:Sad to see the HP culture disappearing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wasn't a choice, they shut down the company AND it counted against your vacation time.... yeah that was great.

    11. Re:Sad to see the HP culture disappearing by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Is this what USasians think is a generous vacation policy? You're seriously impressed about being able to take a whole week of vacation?!? LOL.

      No.
      HP used to have a really nice sabbatical program, where you could take a whole year off.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    12. Re: Sad to see the HP culture disappearing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And of course some racist has to start spouting hate. There's a reason Western society is so successful. It is because we work hard and are not lazy.

      The US is not a race. The US is also not all of Western society. In fact, the US barely resembles the rest of Western society. The US is also not very successful anymore.

      True, true, true, and false.

    13. Re:Sad to see the HP culture disappearing by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      HP used to have a really nice sabbatical program, where you could take a whole year off.

      Yeah, and what'll really blow your mind, is so did Apple. I remember reading about it ages ago (as a kid, srsly) and thinking I'd really like to work there. By the time I was growed up and knew better than to think I'd like to work at Apple, they had cancelled that benefit anyway.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Sad to see the HP culture disappearing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The OP is a anti-Indian troll. You just fed the troll.

  8. "Steve Jobs blithely mugged her..." by turkeydance · · Score: 0

    and you

    1. Re:"Steve Jobs blithely mugged her..." by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      If you bought an HP product, then Jobs was only the 2nd person to mug you after HP.

  9. What about the face? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 0

    But the more pressing question: What did Steve Jobs think of her face?

    1. Re:What about the face? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She has a beautiful face; a beautiful woman. - D. Trump

  10. Not that hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'll be easier to make a list of people who hasn't outsmarted Carly Fiorina.

  11. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by hawguy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late leader

    Why do you even post things anymore, timothy?

    "Why do you even of things anymore, timothy?".

    Fixed that for you.

  12. Re: Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She is gaining momentum in her campaign so we need to do something to slow her down. If the Republicans get a womanish person in the general election then we are in trouble.

  13. I still don't understand why iTunes sucks so much by laserhead · · Score: 2, Interesting

    on Windows.

  14. Even Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Late Steve would likely outfox Carly. Is there a requirement that the Republican presidential candidate must be living?

    1. Re:Even Now by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Steve was a Democrat. Had he been around, he could have led the Democrat primary at this stage

  15. Bad example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jamaal Charles, the starting running back from Kansas City Chiefs, competed in the Special Olympics.

    1. Re:Bad example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      He's also not one of the retards I was referring to.

  16. Re:I still don't understand why iTunes sucks so mu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows

    Your answer is right there.

  17. She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by trout007 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I honestly wouldn't vote for her for that reason alone.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    1. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What was the Corvalis Group going to do? Keep making really nice but rather expensive, calculators for an ever dwindling market? It's not a sustainable product line that could scale today to be anything but a nostalgia product. Besides which, the HP calculators have a high enough build quality that if you really need one you can track one down used for a price that is about the same as you'd pay, inflation adjusted, for a new one. There's nothing new to be added. Your HP-41, 48, or 15 is out there to acquire if you need it, for the few who want one.

    2. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      What was the Corvalis Group going to do? Keep making really nice but rather expensive, calculators for an ever dwindling market?

      Make them really nice but less expensive.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by trout007 · · Score: 2

      That's what I did. I bought 2 extra 48G's and they are sitting in plastic bags with silica gel in my safe. I use my primary every day for the unit conversion feature alone. It is a great tool I bought in 1993. It would be even better with a better screen and faster processor.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    4. Re:She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair someone would have had to do it.

      You can get a pretty bad ass calculator now on pretty much every phone out there for a couple of bucks...

      She fucked a lot of things up. But that is one thing that needed to happen at some point.

    5. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by wbean · · Score: 1

      Yup. I still have two 41cv's that I bought new 40+/- years ago. They both work fine, although it's getting harder to find N cells.

    6. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Problem is that those products were popular when computers, in general, were expensive, and also, when the built in calculators were the simple ones that just did your basic operations - addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, percentages.... Particularly in Windows 3.1, Windows 95 & 98 and so on. So if you wanted something that just did calculations that gave you sines, cosines, logarithms, these calculators were nice to have.

      That's changed since Windows 7 or iOS, when the calculators included scientific, statistical and programming functions, while now, Windows 10 includes unit conversions as well. So one can get the same thing in a phone or tablet built for this purpose. So there isn't a compelling reason to buy one of these calculators when one can get something w/ the same functionality in a similar form factor plus a slew of more apps.

    7. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      What was the Corvalis Group going to do? Keep making really nice but rather expensive, calculators for an ever dwindling market?

      Make them really nice but less expensive.

      You can get from a dollar store occasionally a scientific calculator that will do pretty much everything you'll need through the end of a basic STEM degree, at least at those times where you're not able to access a spreadsheet program or Wolfram Alpha.

      Honestly, I don't think anybody's going to offer me a calculator that I'd spend much for, simply because to get me to pay more than a few bucks for one I'd want to get something on the level of Wolfram Alpha, at least for straight-up math, without the need for an internet connection--that said, I'd pay a decent amount for precisely that.

    8. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I bought 2 extra 48G's and they are sitting in plastic bags with silica gel in my safe. I use my primary every day for the unit conversion feature alone. It is a great tool I bought in 1993. It would be even better with a better screen and faster processor.

      Sounds like a R-Pi project to me, or p'raps a beagle. Interfacing the keyboard should be a relatively simple task...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Carly Fiorina was an aweful CEO because of the Compaq merger.

      Choosing the iPod over the Zune, or choosing the iPod over its own HP-made mp3 player, I can't fault her for that.

      That would have been a good decision even if she wouldn't have done the temporary deal with Apple. A company can't be the winner in every category. It has to pick and choose its battles (even if no company pays you to lay down your weapons). Also, it takes a lot more than just a good hardware product to win in a particular category (take Nokia as an example).

      And no, I don't even know if HP's music players were any good. May be they were, may be they weren't. For me, the locked down iPod or Zune were always out of the question. I only bought mp3 players from Creative Labs (but of course, that wouldn't make me the ideal customer for any of them since I didn't like getting locked into a single source).

    10. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by trout007 · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean R-Pi-N?

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    11. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by trout007 · · Score: 2

      If you ever used a 48 with their unit system you wouldn't say that. Nothing is as fast or capable anywhere. As long as units were the same dimensions you could add them in the stack. 3 N*mm + 30 oz*in? No problem it's a couple of button presses.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    12. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by trout007 · · Score: 1

      Actually I lied. It won't let you do that since oz is a unit of mass. You need to convert it so 3 N*mm + 30 oz*in * 32.2 ft/s^2 works perfect. That's why I love this thing.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    13. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Better yet, just make an Android app. There's already one that does most of what the HP RPN calculators did; it's called "RealCalc".

      Why bother carrying around an extra calculator when you can just do it with your phone?

    14. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      RPN. There are no quality RPN calculators today.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    15. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by Walter+White · · Score: 0

      Who cares about calculators when calculations can be done much more easily in a spreadsheet.

    16. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by unixisc · · Score: 1

      If somebody asked you to calculate something from a serial input of numbers, you'd much prefer using a calculator, rather than firing up a spreadsheet. The latter is something you'd do when you have to deal w/ multiple data sets

    17. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by yooy · · Score: 1

      Well, my HP48G is sitting at home. On a daily basis I use a HP48G Android App. Same thing. HP Prime looks interesting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... But I guess I am fine with the HP48G Android App and Sage Math Client App: https://play.google.com/store/... Yes, it was a nice calculator. But in theses days I don't need a calculator anymore. Neither do I need a watch or a camera. All these things a sufficiently done based on my needs by my Android phone.

    18. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so, how do you fit that computer you need to run the spreadsheet in your pocket?

      how long does it take to power up that device, solve your problem and put it away again compared to using a calculator?

      how long does the batteries for it last?

      how much time are you wasting by inputting numbers, and writing function calls via an interface that was specifically not designed for it?

      Calculators still have a place. Only ignorant morons argues otherwise. Spreadsheets are a complement, useful when you need to larger calculations or lots of tables or diagrams. A computer as such is necessary if you're doing very heavy calculations but the spreadsheet is not the tool to use then. All these tools complement each other, none of them is a replacement for one of the another. Use different, appropriate, tools for different jobs, don't be one.

    19. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because using a touch screen for input sucks .

    20. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't. It's a compromise, just like anything else. Having dedicated, high-quality keys with excellent tactile feedback is ideal, however it isn't always practical. There's no way you can do that on a phone with apps, for instance, because every app is different and you need to be able to reconfigure it on the fly. Having it on a Model M keyboard works fine, because you don't expect it to change and there's plenty of room there for lots of keys, unlike a phone. And the keyboard sits on your desk; it's not mobile, so there's no real penalty for it being big. The HP48-series calculators were great in their time (though slow for a lot of things, especially anything involving the menus), but they were about as big as a modern phablet, and that's all they did.

      If you're already carrying around a 5" screen smartphone, why not have an app that does most of that stuff (esp. when you can just use the free version and not pay anything)? Maybe you like hauling around a dedicated calculator everywhere you go on the off change you want to convert degrees to radians, but I'm not going to; an Android app works just fine for that.

    21. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can google 3 N*mm + 30 oz*in * 32.2 ft/s^2 and you'll get an answer to the problem though. I just use Google as my calculator nowadays.

    22. Re:She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why. The calculator group was making HP money every day it operated. It would be like a land lord selling off a set of low rent condos that were making money day in day out. in the mistaken belief that she could turn those low rent condos to high rent condos, rather that just investing in the profits from the low rent condos to buy a new set of high rent condos. She sold a sure thing for a hope of future profits that never materialized. It represents bad judgment on her part. It is the reason she should not be elected to the most powerful office in the USA. It is the reason Trump should be. If is also the reason all the intelligencia hate trump. e.g they don't give a fuck about real estate in the USA. They all have nice houses in Dubai.

    23. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how you start out by flat out contradicting me, and then just line up point after point to demonstrate that I'm right. I fail to see how the inability to use tactile feedback keys on a phone is a problem with the calculator, for a start. You just said it. You can't have it on a phone, score one for the calculator.

      That ought also answer the question why you wouldn't want an app for it. The calculator does one thing, and it excels at it. It has an interface that is specialized to input numbers, and it has a battery that lasts months or years, depending on model and usage. You press a key and it's on, with no penalty or interference with / from other tasks, and when you're done you shut it down again just a quickly. You can even easily look at the numbers and talk to someone on the phone at the same time, if you want to..

      Using a touch screen is just a cheap, bad compromise. Be honest. As a interface to a calculator it just flat out sucks. It's tiresome, prone to mistyping, missed keystrokes etc etc. That does not mean, as you seem to take it, that it's not possible to use for it. Just that it is immensely frustrating, angering and distracting. If you feel comfy dealing with crap like that when you need to punch numbers, more power to you. Personally, I'd rather not. I need to focus my poor brain at the real task, not dealing with a shitty compromise for an interface.

    24. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      As I said, if you want to haul around a graphing calculator in your pocket everywhere you go, feel free. I'm not going to.

      I guess if you never leave your parents' basement, then portability issues aren't a problem for you.

    25. Re:She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by tvlr · · Score: 1

      I honestly wouldn't vote for her for that reason alone.

      Yes, this revelation will surely cost her the EE demographic. (I'm sure she's very concerned.)

      I got my 48G in 1992, and I still use it. The only really comparable alternative I've found so far is Emacs Calc.

      As for Ms Fiorina, I know what else she did to HP, and I would only vote for her if I was curious enough to see how the situation in America could get even worse.

    26. Re:She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      It is the reason Trump should be.

      Because you want him to drive the United States into the ground to the point where it has to declare bankruptcy? Because that is Trump's primary skill set: losing other people's money.

    27. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Having dedicated, high-quality keys with excellent tactile feedback is ideal, however it isn't always practical. There's no way you can do that on a phone with apps, for instance, because every app is different and you need to be able to reconfigure it on the fly.

      Or connect a bluetooth keyboard, or bluetooth num pad, if you need to do a serious amount of work with your smartphone app. Logitech, at least, makes a few keyboards where you can easily switch between different bluetooth devices.

  18. What new version of the iPod? by Bartles · · Score: 1

    What new version of the iPod was released shortly after January 2004? The shuffle? Mini? Nano? The next generation of iPod wasn't released until late 2005. Timothy, this story doesn't hold water.

    1. Re:What new version of the iPod? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      The 4th Gen Classic in 20/40GB size came out in July of 2004.

    2. Re:What new version of the iPod? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

      Oops, that seems to be the model that HP sold. But the 4th Gen "Photo" came out on October 26, 2004. That may be the model that is being referenced.

    3. Re:What new version of the iPod? by Desler · · Score: 3

      This one.

      The iPod Photo is a portable media player designed and marketed by Apple Inc. It was the top-of-the-line model in Apple's iPod family. It was positioned as a premium higher-end spin-off of the fourth-generation iPod on October 26, 2004.

    4. Re:What new version of the iPod? by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1
      The cNet link doesn't even support the supposed "article summary".

      Hewlett-Packard is ending a high-profile deal to resell Apple Computer's iPod. The deal, unveiled with much fanfare at the January 2004 Consumer Electronics Show, took awhile to get going, with HP taking seven months to announce its first product. "We do remain committed to our digital-entertainment strategy," HP spokesman Ross Camp said Friday. "We decided that reselling the iPod does not fit within that strategy."

      Although HP plans to stop selling Apple's players, it will take some time for that to happen. The computer maker recently announced a new lineup of HP-branded iPods. Camp said HP plans to continue reselling the music players through the end of September, when it expects to have sold through its inventory of iPods, iPod Minis and iPod Shuffles.

      Camp said that HP's "current plan" is to continue including Apple's iTunes software on its desktop and notebook PCs, as it has done since last year.

      Under the terms of HP's deal with Apple, the computer maker cannot develop or market a rival digital music player to the iPod until August 2006.

    5. Re: What new version of the iPod? by Bartles · · Score: 2

      "Initially, HP only offered the 20 and 40 GB 4th-generation iPods. HP later added the iPod mini, the iPod photo, and the iPod shuffle to the lineup.[4] Thanks to HP's distribution network, the iPod+HP was sold in retailers where Apple did not have any presence at the time, which included Wal-Mart, RadioShack, and Office Depot. Many of these retailers now sell Apple iPods."

      From Wikipedia

    6. Re:What new version of the iPod? by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      Based on this, it doesn't sound like Jobs outfoxed HP, more like HP shot themselves in the foot.

      This is no different than HP announcing the HP Touchpad and then immediately turning around and discontinuing the product, dumping them at firesale prices. Granted, they would have had a tough slog against apple, but if they had kept at it they could have carved out a nice profitable niche. WebOS was ahead of Android in so many ways....

    7. Re:What new version of the iPod? by Bartles · · Score: 1
    8. Re:What new version of the iPod? by Bartles · · Score: 1
    9. Re:What new version of the iPod? by Bartles · · Score: 1

      http://www.ebay.com/itm/Apple-iPod-photo-classic-4th-Generation-from-HP-White-30-GB-/262075051217?hash=item3d04e3ecd1

      Try again

  19. How Steve job scammed HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That is how it should have been titled, and another reason to hate Apple.

    1. Re:How Steve job scammed HP by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Interesting. When Steve ran NEXT, he had a deal w/ HP to put NEXTSTEP on PA RISC workstations. Wonder what came of that?

    2. Re: How Steve job scammed HP by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I have an original copy of the NextStep installer media for PA Risc. It's so sad, I would really rather have a copy for X86 or even POWER. But mine is probably very rare now for collectors.

    3. Re: How Steve job scammed HP by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I thought it was a shame that NEXT, whose workstations weren't cheap by any means, wasn't based on PA-RISC or SPARC rather than the 68k. Or that HP didn't make NEXTSTEP one of the choices of OSs for HP 9000 workstations

  20. Re: I still don't understand why iTunes sucks so m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It ran through an OSX emulation layer, that was half baked.

  21. Big Whoop by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Informative

    A three-legged cat could out-fox Carly Fiorina.

    http://www.politico.com/magazi...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Big Whoop by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      Comparing HP, a single company, to the tech index, or to "other tech companies" is basically a lie in broad daylight. How about to competitors?

      Oh, there it is

      Compaq was a mistake, no question. The "learning from your mistakes" bullet point is more about acknowledging in public - she could have learned, but still puts on a front in public. Much of the rest of that is really just personal attack, for which Fiorina should be reviled, but this author trusted, or more about Compaq.

      Certainly she's no saint, and has no reason leading any country. But there is so much in the way of skewed opinion that it's impossible to have a discussion about the real failings.

      There is no better way to convince your debate opponent that they are right than to present a clearly shoddy argument. And that's what you linked to. If I liked her, I would continue to do so. If not, I would continue to not like her. There are all kinds of psychological tricks at work here, including the Backfire effect, certainly the Dunning-Kruger effect, and many others.

      I continue to point out the flaws in arguments because I guess I expected better of "nerds".

    2. Re:Big Whoop by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

      You mean the chart that is a lie? Really I have to wonder how long it took the author to dream it up.
      In the period of time Sun had already decided to stop production on 64 bit Sparcs. They considered themselves strongly into the transition from a hardware to a software company. In fact that 200% blip is caused from the hype around Java and it distorts everything in the graph.

      Remove Sun and Carly's record does not look so good. Add Apple ( which is noticably absent ) and it looks even worse.

    3. Re:Big Whoop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sun had it worse, so HP is not bad argument. Really?

    4. Re:Big Whoop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't take Jeffrey Sonnenfeld seriously when in his first line he speaks of the president of the USA as leader of the free world. Hahahahahahaha. Go bomb a wedding.

    5. Re:Big Whoop by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The chart compares HP to Sun, IBM and Dell.

      Try making a chart with some other tech companies for the same period, say, Microsoft, Apple and Intel. Or just make a chart from that period with the entire tech sector.

      There is no better way to convince your debate opponent that they are right than to present a clearly shoddy argument.

      And that is exactly what you have done.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:Big Whoop by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      I compared their competitors. You propose unrelated companies. That's a shoddy argument.

      HP and its competitors suffered basically the same problems, and had the same results. At this point, I'm going to point out that, as I said, the Compaq deal was stupid, and HP still managed to be in the range of its competitors. Meaning that perhaps Carly The Stupid managed to pull off something fairly amazing.

      Now I feel dirty, having said that. You have the responsibility to explain why we should compare random tech companies instead of direct competitors.

    7. Re:Big Whoop by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      Is Apple a competitor? Just barely. Omit Sun because they are stupid. And IBM sold to Lenovo in 2005.

      Apple sells hardware? Sure. HP, Dell, and IBM sold consumer hardware featuring Microsoft operating systems to consumers, and Apple didn't.

      HP, Dell, and IBM sold commodity computers with little margin. Apple sold premium software on commodity hardware, with better margins and limited variability in hardware, limiting the cost of development and testing.

      Apple is not something you want to include in a comparison unless you are an ignorant fool. Not just ignorant, and not just a fool.

  22. Motorola by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Informative

    There was a deal with Motorola too, to put a music player on a phone, which was limited to 100 songs or something. At the time I thought Apple came out ahead on that one.

    1. Re:Motorola by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      What did Apple get from that deal?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Motorola by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Bragging rights in a time where the iPod could hold your entire music collection and not the equivalent of 7 CDs.

  23. Re: Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lea by unixisc · · Score: 1

    The Donald can do it. While he may have been humiliated by her on the face comment, he certainly exposed her when analyzing her reign @ HP.

  24. Outfoxed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another example of Steve jobs being a sneaky asshole f**king people over, but somehow getting credit for being great.
    When will the world wake up

    1. Re:Outfoxed by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Really? I though he had the reputation of being a visionary prick with strong aesthetic ideas, who tried, not always successfully, to demand technological perfection.

      I can't think of a single place where I've run across someone lauding his friendly nature in business practices.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  25. I don't see how this hurt HP by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    HP didn't want to enter the music player gizmo biz, otherwise they wouldn't do the iPod deal to begin with. And not having Microsoft's music spam-ware on HP's PC's didn't hurt HP, it hurt Microsoft.

    The only way it would hurt HP is if MS was contractually locked out from bribing HP to put the MS spam-ware on the HP PC's. But we don't know how much MS was willing to pay.

    1. Re:I don't see how this hurt HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good CEO should have known what Steve was trying to do and asked for something in exchange for blocking out Microsoft. Instead Carly got nothing because she failed to see the big picture.

    2. Re:I don't see how this hurt HP by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      HP was already in the music player biz, but the fact that you didn't know that is kinda the point of why this was such a bad deal for them. They pulled their players when the HP iPod debuted. And Apple didn't have to pay to get iTunes onto those computers. HP computers, simply on account of there being so many of them getting sold at the time, were valuable real estate: get your software on those machines and millions upon millions of people would likely be using it. They could have sold that right for tens or hundreds of millions of dollars.

      Instead, they gave it away for free, pulled their own product, locked themselves out of the market for a year (ensuring that the iPod became the dominant product), and made themselves look like clueless, me-too buffoons.

    3. Re:I don't see how this hurt HP by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      HP provided an installed based of iTunes users around 2005.

      In comparison, Microsoft was under anti-trust monitoring until at least 2007, so there would be very little that Microsoft could do without attracting unwanted attention. "Willing to pay" maybe, but it would have at a minimum extended the monitoring. Which doesn't sound bad, unless you understand a little more about how business decisions were made during those times.

      HP may not have lost anything, but it gave an awful lot to Apple when it could have gained something in exchange. To me, that's the failing. Trade for patents or tech, or something? Anything?

    4. Re:I don't see how this hurt HP by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If HP thought their music player was any good, they wouldn't have sought cross-branded iPods because they wouldn't need it. They likely already concluded they lost the music gizmo race when they made the deal.

      I agree they lost the potential revenue of Apple paying them to pre-install iTunes. They apparently gambled that an HP branded iPod would help their image in exchange for no iTunes or MS-Music-Spam install revenue for a while.

      Trying to predict what future Apple products would be like is a dark art, especially since that was early in the Steve Boom.

    5. Re:I don't see how this hurt HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point is that he used her/HP to hurt MS. Being used is generally not a signifier of success.

  26. Works both ways? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why couldn't HP have stopped bundling iTunes after its next release?

  27. sad by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The fact that these candidates are the best that we as a country can muster is pretty pathetic. I know we have really thoughtful and intelligent people in this country, but for whatever reason, they don't seem to be able (or want) to compete with the horribly inept batch of clowns that we inevitably get.

    America is basically like a very badly run company (e.g. like HP). The mediocre rise to the top. Actually Carly seems exactly like the sort of president we deserve. She can speak well enough to disguise the fact that what she is saying is completely retarded. Compare this skillset to Ted Cruz, Rick Perry, and Trump, and it makes her look like a teacher in a room full of shitty kids.

    1. Re: sad by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      You left out the pathetic and inept detris running under the other party's banner, to say nothing of the entire Washington incumbency presently in place.

      Come now, be more inclusive.

    2. Re:sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      these aren't the candidates that we as a country mustered... these are the candidates that the 2 ruling "parties" that have a mutually beneficial stranglehold on the american political process have served up to us.

      they don't want america to benefit... they want to make sure they are both still standing in power tomorrow, egging on the infighting while they cash in our tax dollars at the nearest steakhouse/titty bar.

    3. Re:sad by Voyager529 · · Score: 2

      I know we have really thoughtful and intelligent people in this country, but for whatever reason, they don't seem to be able (or want) to compete with the horribly inept batch of clowns that we inevitably get.

      What smart person wants to be blamed for every bad decision that other people make, every bad outcome no matter how much planning went into something, arguing with the "Pepsi" people who just don't want to agree with something from "Team Coke", owe this one a favor for lending support of a bill of theirs that inevitably means putting your name on something you don't actually support, make decisions that will affect thousands of lives in ways that couldn't possibly be foreseen (in some cases literally condemning some to die), and spend a billion dollars to do it?

      Being the president is a crappy job, and every smart person realizes that.

    4. Re:sad by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of intelligent people who are willing to do other crappy jobs. There are people who have jobs helping kids who are dying of cancer.

      I think the problem is that we as a country are not capable of electing the right people. We are a bunch of dummies electing other dummies to represent us.

    5. Re: sad by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      This article was about Carly Fiorina, and we haven't seen Carly Fiorina debating any democrats in this election yet. Furthermore we haven't even seen any democrats debating yet this election.

      I know the democrats have some pretty pathetic candidates as well, but on average the don't seem as bad, and there are less of them. I think Hillary is a fucking disaster. I think she is actually a bad human being, which is arguably worse than being some idiot republican. If the election were held today, I'd probably vote for Bernie.

      But in terms of being inclusive, If we were going to grade republican and democrat candidates based on how terrible they are, currently the democrats score 1/2 and republicans are 17/17.

    6. Re:sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compare this skillset to Ted Cruz, Rick Perry, and Trump, and it makes her look like a teacher in a room full of shitty kids.

      Given that Cruz, despite his oddities, is praised even by highly liberal opponents (but former coworkers) as among the most brilliant minds they've encountered (not kidding), including nearly everyone who is or has in recent years been inside of the Supreme Court in some way...

      I call partisan [clueless] bullshit.

      Pertty + Trump I don't know enough about but just given that one gaff (vs. the people who have actually worked with...and published all about...Ted Cruz) I think it's safe to ignore you on this kind of thing.

    7. Re:sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe its so good here, outside of a vocal group, that people cant be bothered enough to care. That works too.

    8. Re:sad by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      1. I don't know Ted Cruz personally. Maybe he's a genius. All I can go by is the idiotic things he says in public, and give him the benefit of the doubt that he is honest and actually believes what he says.
      2. Please provide citations of who praised Ted Cruz as "among the most brilliant minds they've encountered". I am very curious. Please don't tell me to just google it. I want to know which peoples' endorsements of Cruz are notable.
      3. I don't know why you value the opinions of Ted Cruz's highly liberal opponents so highly. I know I don't.
      4. You are an anonymous coward so who gives a shit what you have to say.

    9. Re:sad by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but those other crappy jobs don't typically involve gambling a billion dollars (usually of someone else's money, who will then be owed a favor upon your success) to get the job. They also tend not to involve decisions where the options are "a thousand soldiers die" and "a hundred civilians die".

      Anyone who WANTS to gamble a billion dollars to make those kinds of decisions is highly suspect at best.

    10. Re:sad by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      If you are someone who believes they could make a successful presidential run, but doesn't, they are making the choice between "make a choice between a thousand of soldiers die or a hundred civilians die" and "let some woefully incompetent person make that decision". Apparently people are much more comfortable with the latter decision. I would hope that more people realize that inaction is actually also an action that has consequences.

  28. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Funny

    Powerful you have become. The Timothy I sense in you.

  29. And *NOBODY* pointed out the contract flaw?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's amazing is that so many people around her didn't run the different scenarios in their heads and point out the flaws in her contract. Or they did and they didn't want to raise it with her.

    Perhaps she simply doesn't respond well to being told she's made a mistake. So they didn't tell her for an easier life than have her rant and scream.

    What licensee doesn't demand rights to future versions of the product?
    plus advances warning of any new version,
    plus clauses defining the type of product in case they change the name and claim its a different product....
    plus 50 other micro details designed to ensure the company doesn't get stiffed!

    1. Re:And *NOBODY* pointed out the contract flaw?? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Fiorina and Jobs were like Bush and Putin. Said Bush of Putin, "I looked the man in the eye. I found him to be very straightforward and trustworthy."

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  30. Yeah, more smear articles to get people to hate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice going, sharing an article meant to smear Carly and make her appear unfit for office. That's all this is, nothing else, and it's thinly veiled at that. But hey, the programmable and easily manipulated mooks out there will eat it up. They do as they're told and yet left feeling as if they're free thinkers, thinking for themselves... however in reality, it's those same rubes that are getting rolled on. They can't figure it out.

  31. If you're gonna get screwed, get screwed by a pro by goodmanj · · Score: 4, Funny

    I dunno. If I had to choose between negotiating with Steve Jobs or Vladimir Putin, I think I'd pick Putin as the safer choice.

  32. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by Rei · · Score: 5, Funny

    I personally believe that the Timothy are unable to do so because, uh, some, uh, people out there in our nation don't have spellcheck and, uh, I believe that our education like such as in South Africa and, uh, the Iraq, everywhere like such as, and, I believe that they should, our education over here in the U.S. should help the U.S., uh, or, uh, should help South Africa and should help the Iraq and the Asian countries, so we will be able to build up our future for our children.

    --
    The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems.
  33. Did Carly get paid? by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

    To the top executives, that's really the only question. They will happily load a company up with debt, execute massive stock buybacks to boost the share price, and to hell with the future and everyone else, I got mine.

    So, did Carly get paid? If she did, it's perfectly understandable.

    What's troubling is, if she didn't get paid, then she got owned, and getting owned so strategically like this is not a quality one would want in a national leader. Lack of strategic vision is very problematic. Merely being self-confident enough to be able to lead a large organization is insufficient for the presidency.

    1. Re:Did Carly get paid? by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Merely being self-confident enough to be able to lead a large organization is insufficient for the presidency.

      Being a community organizer is good, though.

  34. Because 2016 elections... by denzacar · · Score: 2

    Thus gossip about a stuuuuupid presidential candidate's former business deal (from 2004) with an asshole who's been dead since 2011 - is suddenly click-worthy "news".

    In other news... Pangea broke up. Suck it.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Because 2016 elections... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 0

      Fiorina's not stupid. What she lacks is the business acumen to detect that she's being snookered. It's the flaw that allows Democrats to fool Republicans into bad deals, and Iranians to fool Obama into a disastrous treaty. It's an unacceptable attribute for a CEO or a U.S. president.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    2. Re:Because 2016 elections... by lucm · · Score: 2

      It's the flaw that allows Democrats to fool Republicans

      Except Bush. He can't get fooled again.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    3. Re:Because 2016 elections... by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fiorina's not stupid.

      Stupid? Maybe not. Incompetent? Hell, yeah. Just ask anyone who worked at Lucent, HP or Compaq.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:Because 2016 elections... by serbanp · · Score: 2

      Reunite Gondwana! Petition is now open.

    5. Re: Because 2016 elections... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A CEO who lacks business acumen is... ill-suited to lead a complex organization.

      Can you imagine what damage she could do from the Oval Orifice?

    6. Re:Because 2016 elections... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      You can't fool "The Decider"

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    7. Re:Because 2016 elections... by ultranova · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Thus gossip about a stuuuuupid presidential candidate's former business deal (from 2004) with an asshole who's been dead since 2011 - is suddenly click-worthy "news".

      A presidential candidate's demonstrated incompetence in a leadership position is "stuff that matters". So is major corporate executive's, since it helps dispell the lingering idea that leaders get paid more than underlings because they're worth more, rather than just more powerful. The remains of the myth of the divinely appointed kings are hindering our democracies by making the decision-making positions extremely attractive to psychopaths, narcissists and people with other mental issues, and need to die.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    8. Re:Because 2016 elections... by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      I wasn't huge on stock investing, but I did pretty well. The few horrible choices I made was Sun Microsystems and Lucent. I thought of all my choices, Lucent was the hands down safest bet. They were a spin-off of Bell Labs with some of the smartest people in the business. They OWNED the market for Fiber Optic -- and heck, AT&T was a shoe-in for a captive market. The got rid of the fat, and had nothing but muscle.

      When their stock tanked, I asked someone at Lucent years later what was wrong. He replied; "management." If it was Carly at the helm during that period -- well, I detect a pattern. It might show savvy if she were a corporate pillager and rented Lucent's property back to them, but if she was TRYING to make them successful? My disrespect for her has grown. Can't the Republicans find a greedy bastard with an IQ? Do they all HAVE to be lipstick on a pig? I digress...

      It seems AT&T will be using that twisted pair crap in U=verse and all their other data systems until we have people on Mars. They've got a few million miles of the stuff so -- no need for fiber. Everyone else looking at a new installation; fiber. But AT&T will just multiplex that copper crap and hope nobody demands too much bandwidth. I'm sure for a few larger customers they've done fiber.

      Anyway, I bought Apple at $19 per share around the time Steve Jobs came back (after learning his lessons at NeXT), and sold everything August 2008 when the Reserve Requirement went to zero. Sure I should have held onto it, but all the other stock took a beating that too many were surprised by.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    9. Re:Because 2016 elections... by denzacar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A presidential candidate's demonstrated incompetence in a leadership position is "stuff that matters". So is major corporate executive's, since it helps dispell the lingering idea that leaders get paid more than underlings because they're worth more, rather than just more powerful. The remains of the myth of the divinely appointed kings are hindering our democracies by making the decision-making positions extremely attractive to psychopaths, narcissists and people with other mental issues, and need to die.

      One - incompetence has NEVER stopped anyone getting elected.
      Nobody cares about incompetence. Neither the people at the voting booth NOR the people in the party pushing that person for office.
      People care about "Is he/she like me?". Can they identify with the candidate and his/her ideas or in other words - do they LIKE the candidate.
      It's a popularity contest.

      Just a while ago US had an incompetent lunatic with a history of substance abuse problem who believes he talks to god, with god giving him instructions on how to run the country - running the country and starting decades long wars.
      Remember that time when an undiagnosed Alzheimer's patient ran a country, with plans to "win" a nuclear war with USSR by using "lazors"?
      Remember that airhead from Alaska being and actual presidential candidate?
      Remember that other guy being "a robot" and "not cool" to be president?
      Remember that certain senator from Kansas being "too old"?

      It's a popularity contest. People vote for whom they like more based on their public image.
      Hint: A sex scandal does not mean someone is incompetent at their job - except in politics.
      People don't care about competence. If they did, there'd be a test and an "experience in office" requirement for political positions.
      You know... something to show that a politician actually knows how government works.
      Imagine THAT crazy thing - politicians with actual governing GRADES and stats.

      Instead, elections are about the ability to pretend to be everything to everyone.
      Which is what's "making the decision-making positions extremely attractive to psychopaths, narcissists and people with other mental issues" - not a myth of divine kings.

      Thus, elections being a popularity contest...
      "Jobs fucked Fiorina" is irrelevant historical information (over a decade old) which, were elections about competence, would actually indicate more that she was a high stakes player who once lost to Divine Steve.
      But it's not.
      It's a cheap, "dirty laundry" attempt at painting old news as relevant in order to affect someone's popularity by labeling them as "totally tricked" and "outsmarted" instead of what they are - incompetent at running a company.

      Which might actually mean that she has great chances - in politics.
      After all... People loved that other MBA who kept ruining businesses he ran. Maybe she should get herself a baseball team?

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    10. Re:Because 2016 elections... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have a brain, so I just blindly repeat my user name from the top of my post into the body of my post. I am incapable of understanding why no one else does this, so I keep on doing it with my own posts out of sheer stubborn habit. I have no clue.

      -jcr

    11. Re: Because 2016 elections... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rofl...you sir, win an Internet

    12. Re:Because 2016 elections... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      or she knew, and didnt care

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    13. Re: Because 2016 elections... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I told him to throw away those nitrate filled hot dogs because somebody might die. He prob just stashed em in his fridge.

    14. Re: Because 2016 elections... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because it's a habit. He does
      It in emails, other forums, maybe even IM chat. At this point he probably doesn't even know he does it. It's automaticZ

    15. Re:Because 2016 elections... by jcr · · Score: 1

      What if I told you I do it just so you'll have an aneurism and die?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    16. Re: Because 2016 elections... by jcr · · Score: 1

      he probably doesn't even know he does it.

      Keep guessing.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  35. Who cares by Blue6 · · Score: 0

    I've been in IT 20 + years still don't get the whole cult of personality around Jobs. Its been said countless times but Apple has made their money off salve labor. Yet it seems to be celebrated I don't know but fuck you all. Carly fuck her to I worked at HP as she ran that country into the ground. What does all this mean - YOUR ALL SHEEPLE eating the same shit from 1980 - piece out loser

    --
    EGOTIST, n. A person of low taste, more interested in himself than in me.
    1. Re:Who cares by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      " Its been said countless times but Apple has made their money off salve labor. "

      Oh dear god.... The rumors are true and that explains where all the interns go.

      They freaking turn them into a salve!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Who cares by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Oh dear god.... The rumors are true and that explains where all the interns go.
      They freaking turn them into a salve!

      It puts the intern in the basket

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  36. The trump card ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. is that she out-lived him, and can tap-dance on his grave.

  37. Re:I still don't understand why iTunes sucks so mu by dwywit · · Score: 1

    Because it's programmed by Apple employees?

    --
    They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
  38. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

    That was damned eloquent.

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  39. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by nickweller · · Score: 2

    @sexconker: "Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late leader/"

    'Why do you even post things anymore, timothy?'

    I do wonder that myself, especially consider what isn't chosen from Slashdot Recent ..

  40. Re:If you're gonna get screwed, get screwed by a p by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

    I dunno. If I had to choose between negotiating with Steve Jobs or Vladimir Putin, I think I'd pick Putin as the safer choice.

    Yeah, all things considered I'd say Putin wishes he was Jobs. I mean, the odds are pretty good that if Putin dropped dead tomorrow...there'd be a huge party on his grave right after his funeral...and it'd only not be replacing his funeral is because, well, appearances.

    It's unlikely that even now you could manage to get anywhere near the same turnout for a party on Jobs's grave, even this long after his death. Instead, he has a mourning cult of personality that seems relatively healthy.

    If you're going to compare to compare Steve Jobs to a Russian leader of the past century or so, try Lenin or Stalin. (I have across from me one of Stalin's distant relatives taking offense, though, because that's not fair to Stalin...)

  41. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Funny

    This begs the question...

    Did Carly may have outlived of by Apple's late leader?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  42. Seems more like shitty attitude by hyperar · · Score: 1

    Which is pretty standard in business.

  43. I sure hope one of the other ten candidates by raymorris · · Score: 2

    I sure hope neither Fiorina or Trump gets the nomination. And Biden rather than Sanders or Clinton. Dr. Carson seems like a far more capable and thoughtful person. Cruz knows what he's talking about and has actually produced full workable legislation like a federal budget, whereas the other candidates only produced sound bites. There are several options better than Fiorina and Trump.

    1. Re:I sure hope one of the other ten candidates by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Carson is a young-earth creationist and a crackpot. He's definitely not "thoughtful".

      Cruz follows Dominionist Theology and keeps trying to shut the government down.

      I like Sanders, but I'll take Trump any day over these two wackos. Biden would probably be OK too.

    2. Re: I sure hope one of the other ten candidates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carson has stated that he believes Margaret Sanger was a eugenicist and that no Muslim should be allowed to be president. He also wants to define Planned Parenthood because of his own personal religious beliefs.

      He's no Jack Kennedy.

    3. Re:I sure hope one of the other ten candidates by unixisc · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I sure hope neither Fiorina or Trump gets the nomination. And Biden rather than Sanders or Clinton. Dr. Carson seems like a far more capable and thoughtful person. Cruz knows what he's talking about and has actually produced full workable legislation like a federal budget, whereas the other candidates only produced sound bites. There are several options better than Fiorina and Trump.

      Cruz, Trump and Carson are all my top choices. Cruz is right on all the issues, but seems too one dimensional. Trump has a handle on all his critics and knows how to fight back at personal attacks, and take on the media. In addition to that, his reading of foreign policy, like the situation in Syria, happens to be spot on: whether it's as a result of knowing the issue or accidentally getting it right is yet to be seen. Carson is right on the issues, but his personality seems to suggest that he might be too much of a pushover, particularly when it comes to dealing w/ Congress people like Pelosi, McCain, Graham, McCarthy, Reid. For this reason, either Trump or Cruz would be better than him. Actually, a Trump/Cruz ticket would be ideal, since both complement each other very well.

    4. Re: I sure hope one of the other ten candidates by unixisc · · Score: 1

      He didn't say that. He said that no Muslim should be elected President - or more precisely, that he wouldn't elect one. That's perfectly fair. Especially given that Islam i.e. the Qur'an explicitly states (18:26 & 42:10) that all decisions are left to allah, and there is no room for any human (read US constitutional in this case) to share in that practice

    5. Re:I sure hope one of the other ten candidates by phantomfive · · Score: 0

      Cruz knows what he's talking about and has actually produced full workable legislation like a federal budget,

      I see Cruz as a person who will risk shutting down government for no other purpose than to draw attention to himself. He's a walking egomaniac.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:I sure hope one of the other ten candidates by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      I hate to say this, but I like Trumps foreign policy and more important for me, his H1B policy is spot on. This may be the first time, I might consider voting for a republican candidate. I hope sanders comes up with something better.

    7. Re: I sure hope one of the other ten candidates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      expect some nasty things regarding trump. he has offended more than one rich, corrupt and nasty group.

      they already fume in anger how it could be possible that a patriot would rise so high. these folks are accustomed to shitting on the average joe in order to get one more country castle. and surely they know how to pull off dirty tricks.

    8. Re:I sure hope one of the other ten candidates by pepty · · Score: 1

      So no different than most of Congress (both houses) these days.

    9. Re:I sure hope one of the other ten candidates by Uberbah · · Score: 2

      Carson is a young-earth creationist and a crackpot. He's definitely not "thoughtful".

      Carson is a brilliant surgeon - freaking genius, really. Any other subject and he's as smart as a bag of hammers.

      Cruz follows Dominionist Theology and keeps trying to shut the government down.

      Saw a meme floating around last week....a Canadian, a Cuban, and a white supremacist walk into a bar. Bartender says, 'hello, Senator Cruz'.

      but I'll take Trump any day over these two wackos.

      Who's primary skillset is losing other people's money in bankruptcy court? Why not get Lincoln Chafee to switch back, since he's not overly bloodthirsty or a Christofascist?

      Biden would probably be OK too.

      Eh. Supported the Iraq war, supported the 2006 bankruptcy bill that makes it harder to discharge debt (unless it's for your vacation home), and brags about writing the Patriot Act. Unlike Hillary, he's likable and actually has a personality - but agrees with her on policy.

  44. That was underhanded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I were in charge of HP after getting screwed over by Apple like that, I probably would have rolled out HP drivers that caused mysterious issues with iTunes. Let all HP users have their first taste of iTunes as glitchy software. Oh gee 1 million users now instantly hate your software. The ones that are smart enough to know it was HP causing the issue would also have uninstalled bloatware to begin with.

  45. In case anyone doesn't realize Carly is an idiot.. by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2
    Here's what Carly said about Net Neutrality during an interview back in May:

    JOHN FUND: You, at Lucent, and at Hewlett Packard, began at the dawn of the internet era, seeing the possibilities of what that would bring. And here we are, 20 odd years after the World Wide Web, and we've created a marvelous industry, marvelous possibilities. The Obama administration has decided, this can't be left to its own devices, we need Net Neutrality. And even though Congress doesn't want it, and people in both parties in Congress don't want it, and the courts have blocked them consistently, they're moving forward of course with what they call executive action, which I call the divine right of kings. Uh, what do you think about Net Neutrality, and how should we fight it if we should?

    CARLY: Well we should- it's ridiculous. We now have an FCC, deciding on a 3-2 vote, that the Internet will be regulated with 400 pages of legislation. Terrible idea. Terrible idea. Of course, the dirty little secret of that regulation, which is the same dirty little secret of Obamacare or Dodd-Frank or all of these other huge complicated pieces of regulation or legislation, is that they don't get written on their own, they get written in part by lobbyists for big companies who want to understand that the rules are going to work for them. And this is part of what people see. Look, crony capitalism is alive and well. Elizabeth Warren, of course, is wrong about what to do about it. She claims that the way to <airquotes>solve</airquotes> crony capitalism is more complexity, more regulation, more legislation. Worse tax codes. And of course the more complicated government gets- and it's really complicated now- the less the small and the powerless can deal with it. And so the big get bigger, the powerful get more powerful, the wealthy and the well-connected get more wealthy and more well-connected. I mean, that's a fact. It's what's happening. And it's partially why people feel so disconnected. So, the dirty little secret of those 400 pages of legislation in Net Neutrality was, who was in the middle of arguing for net neutrality? Verizon, Comcast, Google, I mean, all these companies were playing. They weren't saying "we don't need this," they were saying "we need it." And so, the only way to level the playing field, so that the small, the new, the entrepreneurial, the powerless, have a shot, is to reduce all this complexity. And meanwhile, while, you know, the big are getting bigger, we're crushing the small. So we're now for the first time in history, we are destroying more businesses than we are creating. We are destroying more businesses than we are creating- it's a terrible statistic. And it means that we're never going to get this economy growing and growing again, yes I had the great privilege of playing uh, important roles in Lucent and Hewlett Packard, but like most people I started out at a little company. I started out as a secretary in a nine-person real estate firm. My husband started out driving a tow truck for a family-owned auto body shop. Most Americans start in little humble businesses, which create 2/3 of the new jobs and employ half the people. So when we're crushing those little businesses, as we are every time we roll out a new, complicated piece of legislation or regulation, we're crushing the possibilities of this economy.

    JOHN FUND: I grew up in Northern California, and part of the ethos was, reading about Hewlett and Packard starting their business in a garage.

    CARLY: A garage. Two guys in a garage. By the way, Google started out that way too, in a dorm room. But they seem to have forgotten that. [audience laughs]

    JOHN FUND: Well, uh, they have new friends in Washington.

    CARLY: Yes, they do. Yes they do.

    The transcript doesn't do it justice at all- her tics and mannerisms while shoveling this horseshit will make you want to smack her upside the head. Carly is a clueless liar- but I have to admit, I can never tell exactly when she's lying and when she's just being clueless.

  46. Re: Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lea by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Funny

    She is gaining momentum in her campaign so we need to do something to slow her down

    Slowing her down isn't necessary on slashdot. While we have a solid conservative majority in the slashdot user base, the overwhelming majority of slashdot conservatives will vote for whoever has the (R) after their name. In november if the ballot says Ghost of Ronald Reagan (D) vs Ficus Tree (R), the Tree will win the slashdot electorate by a landslide.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  47. Steve Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sometimes I joke and say Steve Jobs didn't get sick with cancer. Cancer got sick with Steve Jobs.

  48. Not hard to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A small salad bar can outfox her.

  49. Carly may have been outfoxed by a rock by frovingslosh · · Score: 2

    Carly Fiorina pretty much seemed to be doing all she could to destroy HP. When she bought Compaq she was already thought to be ready to be pushed out the door and many even suggested her main motive in doing so was to get the board to wait and see how that purchase worked out before showing her the door, buying her some more time. And it is worth remembering that the purchase of ailing Compaq brought little or nothing to HP that they didn't already have, and was at a higher price than even what the Chinese bought the IBM PC business for and renamed it Lenovo.

    So the deal with Apple was bad for HP? I'm shocked I tell you, shocked!

    Not that I would consider her malicious. Beyond putting her personal income beyond the needs of HP and all the employees that got laid off, I would say most of what happened under her reign was just due to incompetence.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re: Carly may have been outfoxed by a rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She got what she came for, the golden parachute.

    2. Re:Carly may have been outfoxed by a rock by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

      Not that I would consider her malicious. Beyond putting her personal income beyond the needs of HP and all the employees that got laid off, I would say most of what happened under her reign was just due to incompetence.

      Not that I would consider her malicious. Beyond putting her personal income beyond the needs of HP and all the employees that got laid off, I would say most of what happened under her reign was just due to incompetence.

      Malicious no. Machiavellian, in the sense that she doesn't care how her actions affect other people, as long as they cause good things for Carly.

      The saddest thing is the way that she is redefining her record. She is even going around saying she is the woman that saved HP. Her campaign paid for a full page ad in the NYT where Tom Perkins says it was a big mistake for the board to fire her.

      Bloomberg published this little thing claiming to show she wasn't all that bad. Chart that shows Carly was not a bad CEO

      I tried to get a story up here on that, I don't know why they rejected it.

    3. Re:Carly may have been outfoxed by a rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When she bought Compaq

      You have your history mixed up. Robert Palmer was the DEC CEO when buying Compaq in 1998. http://money.cnn.com/1998/01/26/technology/compaq/

  50. Re: Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steve jobs is for apks.apk says hoooooosts!!hoooosts!!hoooosts says the apk.You all Steve jobs' apks.

  51. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

    foxed that for you.

  52. out smarted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He caught the Mother ship way before her...yep.

  53. Re: In case anyone doesn't realize Carly is an idi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When she talks about tech, she is clever enough to fool up to the 85th percentile. But when it's social issues, she comes across as a low grade moron. She is a walking disaster.

  54. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by TWX · · Score: 1

    Powerful you have become. The Timothy I sense in you.

    To quote TV's Craig Ferguson, "is that a sex-thing?"

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  55. "Cruz follows Dominionist Theology" by Nova+Express · · Score: 1, Insightful

    [[Citation Needed]]

    Preferably not something from The Big Popup Book of Liberal Political Smears...

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:"Cruz follows Dominionist Theology" by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Just Google "Cruz dominionist" for lots of links.

      https://www.quora.com/Is-Ted-C...
      http://www.politicususa.com/20...

      The last one might be "liberal", but it has a video from Cruz's own father. If that's not good enough for you, I don't know what is.

  56. I never saw itunes coming by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

    In 1999, everyone was using Napster and such to freely share music and media. I honestly didn't think itunes would catch on since I thought as a generation we learned the power of the Internet to share free music. I thought the concept of charging for bits of information that cost nothing to copy would go out like the buggy whip lobby. I thought music would be distributed for free, and musicians would make their money on merchandising and concerts. So for itunes to be successful caught me by surprise too.

  57. Margaret Sanger DID Belive in Eugenics by Nova+Express · · Score: 2
    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:Margaret Sanger DID Belive in Eugenics by obsess5 · · Score: 1

      Last year, I read An Image of God: The Catholic Struggle with Eugenics by Sharon M. Leon. The book presented eugenics as conventional wisdom at the time, generally a popular, non-controversial idea; who didn't want healthy smart kids. The Catholic Church supported the movement's goals and some Catholics were among the movement's movers and shakers. However, the Catholic Church eventually began to part way with the movement on the subject of contraception use and forced sterilization. In other words, Margaret Sanger was not out of the mainstream with respect to eugenics at that time.

  58. confirms the dude was trash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and people are lining up to pay tributes.. make movies.. what a travesty

  59. Re: In case anyone doesn't realize Carly is an idi by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

    Please state, explicitly, where she lied in the statement you posted.

  60. Re: Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late le by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah mr FUD lobber, give us more of your communist propaganda. the banksters wil reward your work !

    trump is highly qualified exactly because the mainstream media badmouthes him. they fear for all their corrupt mechanisms of selfish enrichment. and they have bought themselves commie idiots like you.

  61. Re: In case anyone doesn't realize Carly is an idi by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 3, Informative

    Verizon and Comcast were not pushing for Net Neutrality and saying "we need it"; they were the principal forces opposing it, and they were the reason that FCC regulations were required to preserve it in the first place. They had plans for paid prioritization of traffic that would basically amount to charging websites for the privilege of not having their traffic throttled on the "last mile" link between the ISP and its customers. Google was diametrically opposed to this, as well as most small web sites and 3.7 million individuals who sent letters to the FCC.

    The fact that an ex-CEO of HP, of all people, is pontificating about Net Neutrality while exposing her ignorance of even the most basic facts about who was involved and what sides they were on seems incredible. Was she merely confused herself or just trying to confuse everyone else? I have no idea.

  62. Carly Fiorina is human garbage by Aboroth · · Score: 1

    So was Steve Jobs.

  63. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by DeBaas · · Score: 0

    foxed that for you.

    you mean you took something out of context and blamed Obama for something?

    --
    ---
  64. How is this relevant to anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story seems to just trash Carly then anything else. Who cares, not the first time Apple got the best part of a deal and won't be the last. Apple almost always
    comes out on top with deals. Look at how Apple bought Beats and HP was licensing Beats as a audio premium feature in its PC's. HP was also one of the first PC makers to embrace Chromebook's as a choice for its PC line. I think HP has always been open to selling whatever as long as they get a cut.

  65. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late leader

    Why do you even post things anymore, timothy?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKz_jPxS8XI

  66. Outsmarted? by tsotha · · Score: 1

    That's not the word I would have chosen. "Swindled" is a better way to put it.

  67. Seriously, comparing to Sun? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Look, what you really, really do not want to do is resort to comparing something to Sun Microsystems, because Sun crashed and burned. If you have to bring Sun in to make another company look good, then that company is circling the bowl.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Seriously, comparing to Sun? by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      So ignore Sun, they are obviously on the bottom of the chart anyway. HP was on the bottom briefly for about 4 months, and if you exclude Sun, was on the bottom but trending upwards when Fiorina left.

      The trend lines are essentially the same, especially if you exclude Sun.

      So...... I guess your point is I'm basically right? Or did someone miss the chance to mod you "funny but irrelevant"?

    2. Re:Seriously, comparing to Sun? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The trend lines are essentially the same, especially if you exclude Sun.

      Well, no, you have that exactly backwards. The trend lines are essentially the same only if you do not exclude Sun. Here's how you can use simple software tools to find out that you're being willfully ignorant by continuing to read that graph, as printed, as if it meant something. Crop everything off above 50 or 60 or so on the graph, then scale the image so that it's square. Now look at the graph again. You can see clearly that HP went right in the shithole as soon as they hired Fiorina. It was starting to rebound when they shitcanned her, presumably because they felt she would interfere with the rebound. They didn't can her at the very bottom because that would mean admitting they were wrong, and confidence was already at the absolute low so firing the CEO would have been a bad idea then. They included Sun to stuff the vertical axis so that it would look like Carly wasn't the complete failure that she was.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  68. He could still do it... by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    today.

  69. interesting article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thanks for the link

  70. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since you don't have any clue what the phrase "begging the question" means, and aren't willing to learn, then stop using it.

  71. How Sony and Apple dumbed down the human race. by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    Once upon a time there was this thing called High Fidelity, and it wasn't just about sound quality. It also involved a certain level of expectation consumers placed on consumer products, standard features, lines that engineers dare not cross. Throughout the era of magnetic tape -- from giant reel-to-reels and cart machines used by broadcasters to the successful and long-lived boom box cassette, no one would have dared to introduce a product that could not record.

    There were just too many reasons in those days why people would want to record their own sound. From children recording the family opening presents on Christmas morning ("open this first!") to playing 'radio announcer', making simple start-stop 'mix' tapes from favorite radio stations, recording lectures, meetings or conferences, even phone calls (remember the suction cup induction coil?), it was a staple of childhood and adulthood that at several key stages in life, for whatever reason, we would rely on these devices to capture and play back voices, acoustic music for entertainment or transcription. The AGC circuit and built-in electret condenser microphone were perfected through the the 70s and were standard on every portable tape system. As quality improved the only real feature tier was whether the device could record in stereo, and whether it could accept line inputs. But mono/AGC recording was a standard feature.

    Then around 1980, things began to improve --- but also take a turn for the worse. The Walkman series was marketed aggressively with the promise of improved fidelity and portability, and in that initial design, a gambit:how would the consumer react to a playback-only device? A small measure of additional engineering, some re-tooling at modest cost, could have placed a 'record' button on the Walkman too. There was risk. But they had decided to play a new game, and undoubtedly some argued that the demand record capability, where it existed, would result in the purchase of an additional full-featured recorder. The gambit paid off. The playback Walkman became very popular, even to the point of becoming a high demand fashion accessory among the youth. I loved audio and gadgets but was never tempted to get a Walkman, its lack of record capability made it a damaged product and seeing it become popular made me uneasy in ways I can only describe now.

    And so it was that for a great many households on countless Christmas mornings, a brain-damaged by design Walkman was unwrapped and in place of that second present --- the 10-pack of blank cassettes ("Open this one next!")... there was a half dozen pre-recorded music cassettes selected by the parents (at $10 a pop) that weren't quite what the kids wanted to hear, but never mind, they'll soon be spending their own money for more. Walkmans were expensive. No real cassette recorder under the tree this year. And so a record of the voices of the family on Christmas morning became a thing of the past, and as has happened many times in this era of "progress", something that was possible in the past was no longer in the present.

    By slow and painful degrees, as popular read-only portable sound devices and the pre-recorded music to play on them sapped peoples' money, recording became the provenance of non-portable cassette decks owned by those serious money to spend. And along the way, collateral damage was done as the average person 'lost' the ability to, on impulse, record voices or music or the spaces around them. Wouldn't it be bizarre if you could point to a period in history where people, modern literate people, stopped carrying around pen and paper, stopped writing things down as they had before? In which a certain cultural forgetfulness arose? That is how I feel about the practical 'loss' of our ability to record cassettes.

    And so it was some twenty years later when Apple hit the second and third round of iPod design. Apple had none of the excuses, and was taking none of the risks that Sony had taken b

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  72. Re: Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lea by pepty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In november if the ballot says Ghost of Ronald Reagan (D) vs Ficus Tree (R), the Tree will win the slashdot electorate by a landslide.

    Considering how far (R) has shifted to the right since the 80's the party would immediately declare the Ghost of Ronald Reagan to be a Dem. That and declare him satanic.

  73. iPod Versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The version from the announcement was the 3rd Generation (in Blue), but HP ended up selling the 4th Generation, Mini, and Shuffle, right alongside Apple. When the iPod Photo was launched, HP got it too. It seems like someone is drinking some sort of flavor aid, instead of actually checking facts, and bashing Mr. Jobs and Ms. Fiorina without cause.

    1. Re:iPod Versions by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I have looked everywhere and can't seem to find the model of iPod that fits the scenario in this story. Timothy's premise is fatally flawed. The story doesn't hold water, and all these "smart" slashdotters haen't even bothered to check the basic facts of the story.

  74. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is everyone on slashdot completely dumb? Hint: do you think these repeated obvious mistakes are accidents? And if not, what response do they expect to provoke? And are they succeeding?
    Christ...

  75. Re: Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lea by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Considering how far (R) has shifted to the right since the 80's the party would immediately declare the Ghost of Ronald Reagan to be a Dem.

    That is logically sound, indeed Reagan is too liberal to be a republican. However one of the unshakable requirements for republicans is to praise him regardless; and they are not bothered by the hypocrisy (indeed they don't even acknowledge it). So while they should throw him out for being too liberal, they would be unable to bring themselves to do so.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  76. This story doesn't hold water. by Bartles · · Score: 1

    Can anyone tell me which model of iPod was released shortly after January 2004 that HP did not sell?

    1. Re:This story doesn't hold water. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be the iPod 4G. But hey, don't believe me. Here's a link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    2. Re:This story doesn't hold water. by Bartles · · Score: 1

      What is an iPod 4G? You mean the iPod Touch 4G that was released in 2007? Try again, that doesn't fit the timeline.

    3. Re:This story doesn't hold water. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, I mean the iPod 4G, announced 7/19/2004. Guessing you must be confusing it with an iPhone model, or perhaps you're just a lying shill?

      BTW, I'd be posting under my real ID if I hadn't already rated a posting earlier in this thread.

    4. Re:This story doesn't hold water. by Bartles · · Score: 1

      You're talking about the iPod Photo, 4th generation, which HP sold under license. You're the shill who hasn't checked the facts.

  77. I see the problem by Nova+Express · · Score: 1

    Liberals use "Dominionist" the same way they use "fascist": As an ignorant synonym for "something they don't like."

    Conspicuously missing: Cruz proclaiming they're "Dominionists" as opposed to "Christians."

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:I see the problem by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, it's not about being "Christian", dominionists are a particular strain that wants Christians to have dominion over everyone, hence the name.

      It's just like how only some Christians believe in Prosperity Theology ("God loves rich people more, and that's why he's blessed them with wealth." Dominionists are closely related), and only some Christians believe in speaking in tongues. Christians aren't all the same.

      As for Cruz's claims, obviously he keeps that quiet. His father spells it all out.

  78. I don't know why they rejected it. by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    I tried to get a story up here on that, I don't know why they rejected it.

    I suspect I know why it was rejected. I've had posts moderated up to "5" and then flagged as "Flame bait" or "Troll" and moderated back down. When they get modded back up they get flagged as "Troll" or "Flame bait" again and moderated down. Does anyone really believe that a "Flame bait" post is repeatedly being modded up to "5" or is it more likely that someone who believes differently than me just wants to silence me? (And has no valid opposite view to contribute to the discussion.) I think you hit the same thing, a Slashdot staff member who simply didn't want to see that viewpoint discussed.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  79. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by doccus · · Score: 1

    I personally believe that the Timothy are unable to do so because, uh, some, uh, people out there in our nation don't have spellcheck and, uh, I believe that our education like such as in South Africa and, uh, the Iraq, everywhere like such as, and, I believe that they should, our education over here in the U.S. should help the U.S., uh, or, uh, should help South Africa and should help the Iraq and the Asian countries, so we will be able to build up our future for our children.

    I've clearly been on the internet too long. I understood that.. (!)

  80. Re:I still don't understand why iTunes sucks so mu by sudon't · · Score: 1

    I don't know about "on Windows", but I'd like to know why iTunes sucked so much, and continues to suck much, after version 10.7. That might be your answer, right there.

    --
    -- sudon't

    Air-ride Equipped

  81. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks. Now I understand American better.

  82. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

    Something like that. I blame cats, though. They always fight foxes.

  83. IMO: Fiorina did remarkable well by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Fiorina is completely incompetent and never accomplished anything worthwhile.

    Yet she became extremely wealthy, and influential. For reasons I cannot explain, a lot of people still listen to her.

    Apple has always been a dickish a company, and Jobs was the worst dick of them all.

    That Apple pulled a fast one, on somebody as incapable as Fiorina, is hardly surprising.

  84. Re: Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late le by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this. Much better than cows and sheep.

  85. Re: Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lea by Uberbah · · Score: 2

    That is logically sound, indeed Reagan is too liberal to be a republican.

    Hell, these days, he's too liberal to be a democrat. Started prosecutions of bankers when Obama bailed out the banks for a fraud dozens of times as large as the S&N crisis. Insisted that Social Security had nothing to do with the deficit - tell that to Obama's Catfood Commission. Withdrew from Grenada and Lebanon (though he never should have gone in in the first place), whereas Obama has made plans to continue the occupation of Afghanistan through two terms of his successor, whoever they turn out to be.

  86. He learned so much by sad_ · · Score: 1

    Seems like Steve Jobs learned a lot from his past dealings with Bill Gates.
    Anyway, i like this story a lot. It should be an eye openered for the Jobs fan boys that he wasn't all zen and a nice guy.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  87. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by sh00z · · Score: 1

    Aaaaannnd... Whoooooosh!

  88. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by dl_sledding · · Score: 1

    President Bush, is that you?

  89. Does the text in that first link text ... by fuzzy2k · · Score: 1

    really look like a well formed thought to you, Timothy? What about Timothy's editor? Hello? Anyone home?

    --
    --- Say something clever. Pretend it was me. Thanks.
  90. Re: Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot used to be a mix of Libertarians and Democrats. It still is from my vantage point.

    You won't see many science deniers and immigrant hate here.

    They are to the right on guns, don't need many abortions, and are against more H1-B visas though.

  91. Not really by JohnStock · · Score: 1

    Carly Fiorina is still alive.