See if you don't mind porn, but you're not the type to go looking for it, it's almost like christmas! "Darn, I didn't get (insert random movie) but hey, this isn't that bad!"
Psh, now you're just being serious. I say we convine some gullible nation it's a spy satellite and they should shoot it out the sky. Or heck we could position it to jib the rock further away instead of closer.
Saying that social engineering is lying or scamming is like saying that all fighting is boxing or wrestling. They can be kinds of social engineering, but all social engineering is not lying or scamming. Yay analogies!
The implication that you present is that there is some clearly defined goal/reason to develop these social skills. Guys have to have a goal to reach for in order to want to attempt it. This is why the ones who develop these skills more often than not are doing it for the goal of getting laid a lot. Those who are not just interested in just getting laid have no reason to try. Furthermore because of the stigma they're well aware of, those who do try are often considered to be just trying to get laid, whether they are or not. So it's an uphill battle trying to get those without social skills to develop them. Your best arguement is that they will be able to have meaningful conversations with women, and that's marred by the fact as you just said that women tend to talk sometimes for the sake of talking. They have to come to their own decision that learning social skills is something they want, or it's just not gonna happen.
Speaking of ads, why the fuck should we feel obligated to pay for something AND watch the ads? Aren't they getting paid for the ads? Why should they get to get paid on both sides, and then bitch when we try to get it with out paying AND rip the ads out. If they want money for it, it needs to not have ads, if it has ads, it needs to be free. As far as I'm concerned if the only option they offer is pay for it AND see ads, I'll find whatever means neccessary to not pay and not see ads. Or just not watch.
But it really bugs me when someplace says "Hey look at this cool thing we figured out how to do!" And then just doesn't tell you how it's done. And they post this info on places where there's a reasonable percent of people who would actually want to know these things. And try to treat them like the rest of the people that just want stuff to work.
So a large breasted woman could power all kind of devices right? And the "power" captured would be taking stress away from the skin. So they would be less inclined to sag in the future right? You could prolly even tell who was natural and who wasn't by the power output, as the fake one's tend to be more.. solid. This should be done for the good of mankind!
I can't imagine big business thinking that it'd be a good idea to put their information security in someone else's hands. This is because you understand how information security works. What you have to keep in mind is that they don't care how it works, just how much it costs.
The question is what kind of respect do you have for yourself? What would you do for the next fix? Is there a limit? Odd's are there is. Just imagine the act, then go do it. If you can think of there being a limit to what you would be willing to do, a line you won't cross, then that habit is just as low as that action. You can now detest that habit just as much as whatever that act is. It won't work unless you really sit down and think of the lowest thing you can that is just past what you'd be willing to do. You may chance losing some respect for yourself, but that was illusory respect that you thought you had because you were lying to yourself about how low you'd go. The respect you just gained back from kicking the habit can never be taken away.
Can we even concieve inputs into our head that operate on anything other than the existing electric impulses goin on in our heads right now? Because that's all we would replicate and all we would know to test would go into our brain in exactly the same fashion as all the lovely VR things will one day do. The results of any test we would do would just go into our heads as the ones and zeros we already think in. This would prove nothing. If it would, please explain.
Slashdot Mirror
Psh, if they're so benign they can't be that smart... It's the Evil genius that gets all the credit.
See if you don't mind porn, but you're not the type to go looking for it, it's almost like christmas! "Darn, I didn't get (insert random movie) but hey, this isn't that bad!"
Psh, now you're just being serious. I say we convine some gullible nation it's a spy satellite and they should shoot it out the sky. Or heck we could position it to jib the rock further away instead of closer.
So why don't we just blow up the satellite? Worst case some company's out a few mil. Problem solved.
Saying that social engineering is lying or scamming is like saying that all fighting is boxing or wrestling. They can be kinds of social engineering, but all social engineering is not lying or scamming. Yay analogies!
Please, that couldn't have been going on for more than, what? 10,000 years? Max?
You'd think some kind of outcome would have resulted by now... It'd get kind boring after a while.
Actually they didn't lie when asked. The help desk told that guy he had spyware. This is true. They just didn't mention it was theirs.
Those bastards!
Psh, same thing.
If you have the knowledge you might as well wire it into the light switch so that it's not visible...
The implication that you present is that there is some clearly defined goal/reason to develop these social skills. Guys have to have a goal to reach for in order to want to attempt it. This is why the ones who develop these skills more often than not are doing it for the goal of getting laid a lot. Those who are not just interested in just getting laid have no reason to try. Furthermore because of the stigma they're well aware of, those who do try are often considered to be just trying to get laid, whether they are or not. So it's an uphill battle trying to get those without social skills to develop them. Your best arguement is that they will be able to have meaningful conversations with women, and that's marred by the fact as you just said that women tend to talk sometimes for the sake of talking. They have to come to their own decision that learning social skills is something they want, or it's just not gonna happen.
So wait the amount of radiation that we don't want to go into our landfills it's perfectly ok to put into our wastewater? Well that makes sense....
Ok, censorship is bad. Spam is bad. Two wrongs don't make a right... Right? Someone?
Wow Core 2 processors with 1600MHz Front Side Bus!! AMD watch out!! Wait... nvmd.
And they can start with ALL government and law enforcement officials. Since they have nothing to hide...
Speaking of ads, why the fuck should we feel obligated to pay for something AND watch the ads? Aren't they getting paid for the ads? Why should they get to get paid on both sides, and then bitch when we try to get it with out paying AND rip the ads out. If they want money for it, it needs to not have ads, if it has ads, it needs to be free. As far as I'm concerned if the only option they offer is pay for it AND see ads, I'll find whatever means neccessary to not pay and not see ads. Or just not watch.
Perhaps the *AA's got tired of throwing money at every judge that comes along...
Kudos on the paper writing, that's good shit.
But it really bugs me when someplace says "Hey look at this cool thing we figured out how to do!" And then just doesn't tell you how it's done. And they post this info on places where there's a reasonable percent of people who would actually want to know these things. And try to treat them like the rest of the people that just want stuff to work.
So a large breasted woman could power all kind of devices right? And the "power" captured would be taking stress away from the skin. So they would be less inclined to sag in the future right? You could prolly even tell who was natural and who wasn't by the power output, as the fake one's tend to be more.. solid. This should be done for the good of mankind!
Engineers tend to be trained to think. This is a problem for people in charge.
The question is what kind of respect do you have for yourself? What would you do for the next fix? Is there a limit? Odd's are there is. Just imagine the act, then go do it. If you can think of there being a limit to what you would be willing to do, a line you won't cross, then that habit is just as low as that action. You can now detest that habit just as much as whatever that act is. It won't work unless you really sit down and think of the lowest thing you can that is just past what you'd be willing to do. You may chance losing some respect for yourself, but that was illusory respect that you thought you had because you were lying to yourself about how low you'd go. The respect you just gained back from kicking the habit can never be taken away.
Can we even concieve inputs into our head that operate on anything other than the existing electric impulses goin on in our heads right now? Because that's all we would replicate and all we would know to test would go into our brain in exactly the same fashion as all the lovely VR things will one day do. The results of any test we would do would just go into our heads as the ones and zeros we already think in. This would prove nothing. If it would, please explain.