You seem to have missed the point. Yes, disk encryption is possible, but unless it's use is listed as a precondition to the program's proof of security, the proof is potentially meaningless in the real world where swaps happen and compilers and CPUs may or may not execute the code exactly as written.
memset_s is an optional feature of the C11 standard and as such isn't really portable. (AFAIK, there also are no conforming C11 implementations that provide the optional Annex K in which the function is defined.)
In other words, your compiler may pay lip service to memset_s by not throwing an error and still eliding the code.
Any religion can used for the basis of theocracy, so that's another bad thing about all religions. But religions which are deliberately theocratic are especially awful.
Atalin, Mao, and the N. Korean Kims have demonstrated that the state will serve as well if you need something to turn into a theocracy.
Your example is interesting since the Koran defines Christians and Jews as NOT infidels.
Crazy finds an excuse. If not the Koran, it'll be the White Album or the Slender Man. Kinison was right, Manson would have gotten the same thing from the Monkees. Stalin's deal was eliminating religion (and more or less turning the state into a religion).
Hitler, like many politicians today, paid lip service to religion when it suited his goals but showed no signs of actual belief.
TL;DR; I believe you have cause and effect reversed and you're not appropriately generalizing the observation.
Go back and read the thread, you seem confused as to who said what. As for I see no reason, unless it's a bouncing baby vampire, how likely is it in it's first year to encounter infected blood in the U.S.?
First, I have never claimed that babies have no immune system (that was someone else). I do know that many vaccines are delayed because the left over antibodies from the mother would prevent a sufficient reaction to the vaccine to confer immunity.
I also haven't claimed that HepB vaccine at birth for babies whose mothers have Hep B is a bad idea. Most countries only give Hep B vaccine at birth if the mother has Hep B.
I see no reason why a baby not in that risk group can't wait on Hep B vaccine unless a family member has it.
It shows that perhaps the schedule and recommendations in the U.S. are a bit much (the broader subject of the sub-thread).
But in answer to the rest, the risk for a baby born to an already infected mother is sufficient that even a small chance that the vaccine might actually have an effect is worth it. They also give IVIG in those cases.
Note that in most of that list, it is given only to specific high risk groups. In most of those countries, the ones given at birth are for when the mother is infected.
Look at table 1 in your link from the perspective of a nervous new parent who has seen ample evidence of over-medicalization already, as well as evidence that pharmaceutical companies really are out to gouge us for every penny they can squeeze out. They will be comparing the recommendations to their own childhood immunization in the '80s and their parents' in the '60s.
Not really misleading. Some doctors are spreading them out, but nevertheless, the recommendation I linked is direct from the CDC. I suspect those some doctors have recognized the excess and don't want the parents to choose none.
One issue I have heard from people who have concerns is the sheer number of vaccinations. According to the CDC, 19 vaccinations are recommended by the time a baby is 6 months old!
This creates a tendency to throw the baby out with the bath water. That is, rather than spread out the vaccinations, or just get the really important ones, get none. When everything is top priority, nothing is.
It doesn't help that there's a ton of mis-information attributing every possible bad thing that may happen to a vaccination. With so many packed into such a short time at a really vulnerable age, there's bound to be a lot of mis-attributions.
Meanwhile, the pharmaceutical industry seems bound and determined to ruin it's own reputation while giving everyone the finger, making it even harder to convince a parent that at least some of these vaccines are really important and not just yet another scheme to separate people from their money.
Remember way back in public school where each teacher individually assigned "just" 45 minutes of homework and proclaimed that 45 minutes is no big deal? And how by the end of the day you had accumulated 4.5 hours of homework?
Same here. Everyone thinks their password requirements are not that big of deal forgetting that their little assignment is far from the only one people are dealing with.
Don't tell them not to write it down, tell them where to write it down. And don't make them keep entering it every time something times out.
If you haven't instructed the users to write the password on a card and keep it in their wallet, never on a post-it stuck to their monitor and never in their desk, you have also failed. You forgot that in addition to your 12 character password, they also have passwords for the bank, amazon, power company, etc, etc, etc, ad nauseam.
Except for the followup to that where the kid himself doesn't really understand how it became that important to him and now sees other kids he finds to be disturbingly immersed in it. The parents must have done something right.
Gee, that works so well! At some point, most people in prison are to be released. They will either re-integrate into society or they will be forced to turn back to crime to survive. Most of us would prefer the former to the latter.
Slashdot Mirror
That's not how you boil a frog...
You seem to have missed the point. Yes, disk encryption is possible, but unless it's use is listed as a precondition to the program's proof of security, the proof is potentially meaningless in the real world where swaps happen and compilers and CPUs may or may not execute the code exactly as written.
An example of that caveat:
memset_s is an optional feature of the C11 standard and as such isn't really portable. (AFAIK, there also are no conforming C11 implementations that provide the optional Annex K in which the function is defined.)
In other words, your compiler may pay lip service to memset_s by not throwing an error and still eliding the code.
Any religion can used for the basis of theocracy, so that's another bad thing about all religions. But religions which are deliberately theocratic are especially awful.
Atalin, Mao, and the N. Korean Kims have demonstrated that the state will serve as well if you need something to turn into a theocracy.
Your example is interesting since the Koran defines Christians and Jews as NOT infidels.
Crazy finds an excuse. If not the Koran, it'll be the White Album or the Slender Man. Kinison was right, Manson would have gotten the same thing from the Monkees. Stalin's deal was eliminating religion (and more or less turning the state into a religion).
Hitler, like many politicians today, paid lip service to religion when it suited his goals but showed no signs of actual belief.
TL;DR; I believe you have cause and effect reversed and you're not appropriately generalizing the observation.
The "old shells" reentered the atmosphere ages ago.
You seem to be in a bit of a mental tailspin there, PULL UP!
Go back and read the thread, you seem confused as to who said what. As for I see no reason, unless it's a bouncing baby vampire, how likely is it in it's first year to encounter infected blood in the U.S.?
First, I have never claimed that babies have no immune system (that was someone else). I do know that many vaccines are delayed because the left over antibodies from the mother would prevent a sufficient reaction to the vaccine to confer immunity.
I also haven't claimed that HepB vaccine at birth for babies whose mothers have Hep B is a bad idea. Most countries only give Hep B vaccine at birth if the mother has Hep B.
I see no reason why a baby not in that risk group can't wait on Hep B vaccine unless a family member has it.
In Capitalist America, computer multitasks you!
It shows that perhaps the schedule and recommendations in the U.S. are a bit much (the broader subject of the sub-thread).
But in answer to the rest, the risk for a baby born to an already infected mother is sufficient that even a small chance that the vaccine might actually have an effect is worth it. They also give IVIG in those cases.
Note that in most of that list, it is given only to specific high risk groups. In most of those countries, the ones given at birth are for when the mother is infected.
Look at table 1 in your link from the perspective of a nervous new parent who has seen ample evidence of over-medicalization already, as well as evidence that pharmaceutical companies really are out to gouge us for every penny they can squeeze out. They will be comparing the recommendations to their own childhood immunization in the '80s and their parents' in the '60s.
There is a wide gulf between everything must be sterile and 19 vaccinations in 6 months.
Not really misleading. Some doctors are spreading them out, but nevertheless, the recommendation I linked is direct from the CDC. I suspect those some doctors have recognized the excess and don't want the parents to choose none.
The proposed patch was supposed to detect disagreement between the two AOA sensors and if found, turn on the disagree light and disengage MCAS.
It absolutely should have been doing that from the first plane off the assembly line as a standard feature.
One issue I have heard from people who have concerns is the sheer number of vaccinations. According to the CDC, 19 vaccinations are recommended by the time a baby is 6 months old!
This creates a tendency to throw the baby out with the bath water. That is, rather than spread out the vaccinations, or just get the really important ones, get none. When everything is top priority, nothing is.
It doesn't help that there's a ton of mis-information attributing every possible bad thing that may happen to a vaccination. With so many packed into such a short time at a really vulnerable age, there's bound to be a lot of mis-attributions.
Meanwhile, the pharmaceutical industry seems bound and determined to ruin it's own reputation while giving everyone the finger, making it even harder to convince a parent that at least some of these vaccines are really important and not just yet another scheme to separate people from their money.
I was under the impression that MCAS was supposed to auto disengage and the light come on now if sensors disagree.
Remember way back in public school where each teacher individually assigned "just" 45 minutes of homework and proclaimed that 45 minutes is no big deal? And how by the end of the day you had accumulated 4.5 hours of homework?
Same here. Everyone thinks their password requirements are not that big of deal forgetting that their little assignment is far from the only one people are dealing with.
Don't tell them not to write it down, tell them where to write it down. And don't make them keep entering it every time something times out.
If you haven't instructed the users to write the password on a card and keep it in their wallet, never on a post-it stuck to their monitor and never in their desk, you have also failed. You forgot that in addition to your 12 character password, they also have passwords for the bank, amazon, power company, etc, etc, etc, ad nauseam.
Based on comparisons from friends who previously lived in Chicago, they're quite similar.
It's 2 to 4 times thicker than the sheet in a typical door frame.
Except for the followup to that where the kid himself doesn't really understand how it became that important to him and now sees other kids he finds to be disturbingly immersed in it. The parents must have done something right.
Odds of a landlord springing for the quarter inch iron plates? ZERO.
It actually sounds more than a little creepy.
Gee, that works so well! At some point, most people in prison are to be released. They will either re-integrate into society or they will be forced to turn back to crime to survive. Most of us would prefer the former to the latter.