Slashdot Mirror


Debris From India's Anti-Satellite Test Poses Threat To ISS, Says NASA (npr.org)

When India blew apart one of its satellites orbiting Earth last week, it created hundreds of pieces of orbital debris, and some of those pieces are large enough and high enough to pose a potential threat to the International Space Station, NASA says. "That is a terrible, terrible thing to create an event that sends debris in an apogee that goes above the International Space Station," NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine said, referring to the debris' highest point in orbit. "And that kind of activity is not compatible with the future of human space flight that we need to see happen." NPR reports: In calculating the Indian test's potential impact last week, he said NASA determined that the risk of small debris hitting the space station was increased by 44 percent over a period of 10 days. "It's unacceptable, and NASA needs to be very clear about what its impact to us is," Bridenstine said, discussing space debris and India's anti-satellite test at a town hall event Monday.

As he spoke about the heightened risk, the NASA administrator also emphasized that both the space station and the astronauts aboard it are safe. The station can be maneuvered out of harm's way if needed, he added. But another danger, he said, is that "when one country does it, then other countries feel like they have to do it, as well." "The good thing is, it's low enough in Earth orbit that over time, this will all dissipate," Bridenstine said on Monday. Those pieces are expected to burn up as they re-enter Earth's atmosphere. India's intercept of its own satellite created 400 pieces of orbital debris, Bridenstine said.
"What we are tracking right now -- objects big enough to track, we're talking about 10 centimeters [4 inches] or bigger -- about 60 pieces have been tracked," he said. "Of those 60, we know that 24 of them are going above the apogee of the International Space Station."

217 comments

  1. We have space program b*itch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Stop making shitting-street jokes, we have space program now!

    *proceeds to shit all over the outer space*

    1. Re:We have space program b*itch! by infolation · · Score: 1, Informative

      India is being called out or this *now* because they have only just joined the 'blowing satellites up' club. Meanwhile America (among others) developed this tech back in the 1950s and developed their own test program that deposited a fair chunk of space debris as a result (Weapon System WS-199A).

    2. Re: We have space program b*itch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In theory it should have worked

    3. Re:We have space program b*itch! by DutchUncle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, India is being called out for this because they did it when there are people (and other satellites) to be put in danger.

    4. Re: We have space program b*itch! by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 0, Troll

      If the H1Bs that we hire are their "best and brightest" then India as a nation is screwed.

    5. Re: We have space program b*itch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H1Bs only have to be ever so slightly smarter than an average American to make it in the tech industry.

    6. Re: We have space program b*itch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      its one thing to have target practise in an empty field back in the 1950's, but now that old field is now a thriving suburb full of houses.

    7. Re:We have space program b*itch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? so you're saying they should have done it BEFORE anyone put satellites or humans in space like a 50 years ago (like US and Soviets) and let all the junk just float around so it becomes a huge threat for countries in the future to go to space? Yes that seems to be the right logic...

    8. Re:We have space program b*itch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that now that US has already converted space into a landfill, India shouldn't throw a banana peel in it?

    9. Re: We have space program b*itch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H1Bs only have to be ever so slightly smarter than an average American to make it in the tech industry.

      The average American is white trash. Stupid, indolent, rude.

      I am a man of constant sorrow, I've just seen trouble all my days...

    10. Re:We have space program b*itch! by Brett+Buck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, they are called out for doing something stupid and irresponsible.

    11. Re:We have space program b*itch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they should have done their test in a manner that doesn't put more junk into occupied orbital planes, which were pretty effin empty when the US was doing their testing.

      This is a well know problem, and may result in a chain reaction of destruction that could disable most satellites in LEO

      Read Seveneves for a dramatization of the situation.

    12. Re: We have space program b*itch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you misunderstand. The US may have been testing this sort of thing (including blow up nuclear weapons in orbit) for a long time but that doesnâ(TM)t mean they stopped a long time ago. Both the US and other countries have done this recently, while the ISS is up there. So this seems to be a pot calling the kettle black situation.

    13. Re: We have space program b*itch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last US ASAT test was in 2006: Operation Burnt Frost.

      Very far from 1950.
      Please do not lie and spread misinformation.

    14. Re: We have space program b*itch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, they just have to be cheaper.

    15. Re:We have space program b*itch! by Megol · · Score: 1

      Starting to wonder how to force the internet-genie back into the bottle so that anonymous idiots have to communicate via newsletters again...

    16. Re: We have space program b*itch! by ghoul · · Score: 1

      More like its a Superfund site due to all the leftover shells and you are cribbing about someone doing some artillery practice on the old range.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    17. Re: We have space program b*itch! by LazarusQLong · · Score: 1

      gee, citation please? Or are you just one of the many that enjoy denigrating others?

      --
      "Governments have been dominated by the corporate entities and citizens have ceased to matter in public policy" true in
    18. Re:We have space program b*itch! by thereddaikon · · Score: 1

      While other nations like the US and Russia have done this in the past, we have learned a lot over the years and dont do it again. We made those mistakes and now nobody else should have to repeat them. There are treaties and best practices in place that is supposed to mitigate the issue of orbital debris. Satellites in a low enough orbit are now supposed to deorbit, satellites too high for that are supposed to boost themselves into a graveyard orbit out of the way. First China and now India have shown their hubris by violating these norms and creating debris with their hamfisted attempts to wear big boy pants. China is an even worse example because they aren't even good stewards of their own trash. It was last year we were worried about what their derelict space station would crash into after they let it reenter.

      And it's so easy to sit back and say the US government are hypocrites and point at skylab and strfish prime. But that is about as valid an argument as a 16 year old calling his dad a hypocrite for saying he cant smoke. Just because someone made stupid decisions in the past does not invalidate their position. I would also argue that Star Fish was a case of nobody knew it would knock out all of those satellites, not to mention it knocked out nobodies but our own and space was still strictly the playground of government projects and not the massive commercial sector it is today. The only people they wronged by launching that nuke were themselves. As for skylab, that was never intended to reenter. That one is a failure of bureaucracy in not getting the STS online fast enough as planned.

      With this missile though, India not only has past examples to go off of but the US has also demonstrated the right way to do these things. As the last time they shot a satellite down, it was done in such as way that it did not create extra debris. They intended to flex their muscles and show everyone their might. What they really did was demonstrate how they have no idea what they are doing. Merely children playing with toys.

    19. Re: We have space program b*itch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Racist.

    20. Re: We have space program b*itch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you post the citation for that? Because what that operation was has nothing to do with this. They were blowing up something that needed to be blew up. But you know that.

    21. Re:We have space program b*itch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Multiple wrongs never add up to a right.

    22. Re:We have space program b*itch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      irresponsible? Did you open your mouth when US/China/Russia did the same test and several other launches which created more than 90% of space debris? Indian has a total of 81 debris and there is over 4000 debris which is created by US. Care to talk about that?

      First and foremost irresponsible idiots are one who does the most damage, which is USA.

      Extract from "https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-6434277/The-countries-space-junk-REVEALED-Infographic-shows-worst-offenders.html"

      The US has the most amount of debris in space, with 4,037 items, closely followed by Russia with 4,035 pieces orbiting.
      China may be one of the biggest countries in the world, but they have 3,524 items of space debris circulating Earth.
      Countries such as France have a lot fewer items of debris - 334 in total.
      The countries which have fewer than 100 items in orbit include India (81), Japan (52), the People’s Republic of China and Brazil (52), Canada (5) and the UK (1).

      Some more statistics:
      United States is about 3 times bigger than India. India is approximately 3,287,263 sq km, while United States is approximately 9,833,517 sq km. Meanwhile, the population of India is ~1.3 billion people (955.3 million fewer people live in United States)

    23. Re: We have space program b*itch! by sjames · · Score: 1

      The "old shells" reentered the atmosphere ages ago.

  2. India It would seem never saw the movie gravity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Perhaps it should be made compulsory for anyone working in the space sector.

    1. Re:India It would seem never saw the movie gravity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is so much wrong with that movie...

      including the bit about the space debris...

    2. Re:India It would seem never saw the movie gravity by Just+A+Gigolo · · Score: 5, Informative

      The space debris scenario is valid : The Kessler syndrome (also called the Kessler effect,[1][2] collisional cascading or ablation cascade), proposed by the NASA scientist Donald J. Kessler in 1978, is a scenario in which the density of objects in low Earth orbit (LEO) is high enough that collisions between objects could cause a cascade where each collision generates space debris that increases the likelihood of further collisions.[3] One implication is that the distribution of debris in orbit could render space activities and the use of satellites in specific orbital ranges impractical for many generations.[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    3. Re:India It would seem never saw the movie gravity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is so much wrong with that movie...

      including the bit about the space debris...

      Was working with the US Military (specifically NORAD/USSPACECOM) going as far back as the early 90s. There's a valid reason we spend billions tracking the 16,000+ objects we had floating in our garbagesphere, and that justification continues today. Remember we have to navigate through that shitstorm at some point to get off this rock, so tracking it is rather key for that reason too.

      We can call bullshit on the special effects and argue about physics all day with that movie, but that worst case scenario unfolding wouldn't even be worth a smug "I told you so" retort, because we would ALL be feeling the impact in a rather huge way.

      Forget major satellites for a moment. Killing just the GPS satellite network would cripple this planet, so your "different orbits" argument falls flat when all we need to target is one of them to cause a major disruption and create chaos.

    4. Re:India It would seem never saw the movie gravity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't have to get off 'this rock'

      This. Why in the world we'd leave the most beautiful planet in the Universe [as far as we know], to face a life of uncertainty and tooling, in a barren outer solar system rock?

      Sheesh.

    5. Re:India It would seem never saw the movie gravity by gtall · · Score: 1

      Relax, we won't be going anywhere except maybe to the Moon in another vain ego boost for la Presidanta Tweetie.

      The space nutters conveniently forget about radiation. Even our Earth-orbiting astronauts are running into long term effects of radiation. I can see the advert for the Mars mission: Come see Mars in person today, enjoy dodging cancer for the rest of your life...sign up NOW!!!

    6. Re:India It would seem never saw the movie gravity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who will pay for it? I would charge $100 of my time if I am a space scientist. Will you pay me $200 to watch it?

    7. Re:India It would seem never saw the movie gravity by Megane · · Score: 1

      I have more or a problem with the hopping about from place to place in various orbits like you were going out to the Circle K up the street for a soda and snacks, with no respect for the reality of orbital mechanics. Other than that, it's a very pretty bit of total science fantasy. At least the guy who wrote The Martian made an effort to come up with plot problems and solutions that didn't completely ignore laws of physics.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    8. Re:India It would seem never saw the movie gravity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A new life awaits you in the Off-world colonies. The chance to begin again in a golden land of opportunity and adventure."

  3. WindBourne will be along to blame China soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grrr why did China weaponize space? America and Russia were so peaceful up there.

    No wait he already did

    1. Re:WindBourne will be along to blame China soon by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 2

      Thank you, cadre Ping. Your social credit score just earned two points!

    2. Re:WindBourne will be along to blame China soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many points behind WindBourne does that put me?

    3. Re:WindBourne will be along to blame China soon by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      322

    4. Re: WindBourne will be along to blame China soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, he's getting further ahead.

  4. why am i not surprised by yanyan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Indians have a problem (putting it extremely lightly) with pollution, garbage, littering, and all sorts of fun, unsanitary stuff on their streets and even in their most holy river -- in their own country. Did anyone think they'd actually respect the rest of the planet? Or even space?

    1. Re:why am i not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      > The Indians have a problem (putting it extremely lightly) with pollution, garbage, littering [...]

      If it only were the Indians. All of us have a problem in that, and we in the industrialized nations have a headstart of 50-100 years. And we are running into problems because of that.

      The worst criminals are those in denial. C'mon: if the Koch brothers keep paying people to say "oh, CO2 and warming are not a thing", and they sell coal... they should go to jail.

      That bit of space debris pales in comparison. It is as if someone points at a stain on the wall while rats are all over the floor (not saying that it is a good idea, tho).

    2. Re:why am i not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All of us have a problem in that, and we in the industrialized nations have a headstart of 50-100 years.

      Nonsense. Many industrialized nations have done significant cleanup since the turn of the century. Also, many of those nations have sewage waste treatment plants and an organization of pipe systems to bring sewage to those facilities. India doesn't - most raw sewage ends up untreated in the ditches of their streets and rivers.

      The worst criminals are those in denial. C'mon: if the Koch brothers keep paying people to say "oh, CO2 and warming are not a thing", and they sell coal... they should go to jail

      Amusingly, you're shoving out as much nonsense propaganda as they do.

      That bit of space debris pales in comparison. It is as if someone points at a stain on the wall while rats are all over the floor (not saying that it is a good idea, tho).

      Sorry, your metaphor doesn't really apply here. Please try again, thank you.

    3. Re:why am i not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Nonsense. Many industrialized nations have done significant cleanup since the turn of the century. ...which means exporting their "problematic" garbage to Chia, Indonesia and a couple of African states.

      You have no clue.

    4. Re: why am i not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HACKING BEAR! Calling... Oh shit, run!

    5. Re:why am i not surprised by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      All part of the plan to make the rest of the world "untouchable"

      #caste-society

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    6. Re:why am i not surprised by MrKaos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was in an Indian city some time ago on a work thing. I thought it would be a good opportunity to see what was going on there if this is where all the IT work was going. I don't feel so threatened anymore, having seen the infrastructure.

      I was driven around looking at the barely controlled chaos that the country was when I saw a man walking across the bridge we'd stopped on. With obvious intentional momentum he swing a bag of garbage from the side of his body opposite the side of the bridge high over head in a well practiced arc right into the river.

      Later, in a large group of Indian fellas (I had told the muslim fellow that as guest was god he must have beer with us all - which was a funny pickle to put him in) they asked me what I thought best and worst about India.

      I told them I thought their culture was very colorful and beautiful and they seem much more family oriented there. I told them they have all this fantastic red soil that it looks like anything will grow in. I also told them I liked the ass washing devices that all the toilets had to which they had a merry chuckle.

      I remembered the man on the bridge when I told them that the worst thing about India is that the people don't seem to care about what they have been blessed with and treat the place like shit.

      My observation about both India and China is they seem determined to make the same mistakes that the west has already made instead of learning from them.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    7. Re:why am i not surprised by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Maybe if they just had a bunch of cellphones fall from space... ;)

    8. Re:why am i not surprised by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      It's kind of hard to give India much of a reprimand over some of that, when we're not much better. Someone from San Francisco made a poop map where people could report all of the human shit on the streets. India at least has some people who seem to care about fixing those problems whereas we in the U.S. seem content with letting the problems we have get worse or fighting against people trying to help solve them.

    9. Re:why am i not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I remembered the man on the bridge when I told them that the worst thing about India is that the people don't seem to care about what they have been blessed with and treat the place like shit.

      Meanwhile, the western world is so overly concerned about pollution that they get all cranked up about trivial crap like straws, and want to ban it. I'd hazard a guess that a lot of the plastic pollution is coming from people in India and China and other developing nations tossing crap into rivers, like you observed, and not from more industrialized countries.

      That's not to say there aren't parts of the industrialized world that don't have trash problems. Just walk around in Philly for just a little and you'll realize some US cities have the same damn problem of many people just tossing shit around and not caring. You have to wade through the trash in many parts of Philly. In Rome, and I think Paris they just let their dogs shit on the sidewalk and don't give a damn to pick it up.

    10. Re: why am i not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. But wasnâ(TM)t that the same for every country in 1950s ?
      I mean reaching for the Moon in 1969 was a colossal waste of money just because a dead president had desired it to hide the fact that he failed miserably in bay of pigs.

    11. Re:why am i not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hang on, you say 'we' but San Francisco is one city and isn't an indicator of the entire nation's culture as a whole. That's like saying all of Europe has a problem if one city in France does and is a terrible example of whataboutism.

    12. Re:why am i not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Indians have a problem (putting it extremely lightly) with pollution, garbage, littering, and all sorts of fun, unsanitary stuff on their streets and even in their most holy river -- in their own country. Did anyone think they'd actually respect the rest of the planet? Or even space?

      They don't even respect each other [Caste System].

    13. Re: why am i not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      San Francisco is a shut hole. Normal cities in America don't allow this.

    14. Re: why am i not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bay of pigs happen exactly how it was supposed to happen.

    15. Re: why am i not surprised by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Not allowed in SF either. The problem is the homeless population, and they do this in every city large and small where there's a large homeless population. Doesn't matter if it's illegal, if there's no law enforcement nearby you can get away with it.

    16. Re:why am i not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Indians have a problem (putting it extremely lightly) with pollution, garbage, littering, and all sorts of fun, unsanitary stuff on their streets and even in their most holy river -- in their own country. Did anyone think they'd actually respect the rest of the planet? Or even space?

      Ahh !! As if the same thing does not happen elsewhere in the world. Gee your world view is so big to have missed your neighborhood decorations.
      The western world goes into ape-shit mode with such comment every time India did what it needed to be done. When you point a finger at other the remaining four point back at you.

    17. Re:why am i not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes... We are getting cleaned quickly. People are getting changed. Ganga is clean now. Go check.

  5. 44% larger risk by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    44% larger is the number I've been seeing for the extra risk.

    So, what's the baseline risk? 0.01% chance of being hit any given year? 44% larger then becomes 0.0144% chance of being hit with the debris of that satellite. Hardly a significant risk, really....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    1. Re: 44% larger risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if your number is only off by 1% its the difference between no problem and a major crash. I guess there's no way no prevent failure? Many many hours of tedious calculations corrected and re-corrected by a second pair of eyes might be just what the doctor ordered: accuracy to more than three significant digits.

    2. Re:44% larger risk by supremebob · · Score: 1

      If the impact risk was really significant, wouldn't they would send up Space Force to clean up the mess?

      I mean, Space Force is a thing now, right? Trump announced it almost a year ago, so they must have their own fleet of big beautiful space ships by now with lasers and other cool junk cleaning junk on them.

    3. Re:44% larger risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nasa tracks space debris so they can steer clear of it; largest they can currently track is 4cm diameter objects.

      A 4cm diameter object has double the diameter and, if made of lead, 4-8 times the volume of a 12 gauge shotgun slug and likely around the total mass of a 50BMG bullet.

      To reach orbit one must achieve a velocity of around 25000 feet per second; a 50BMG round travels at around this speed.

      If the object is travelling in a transverse or opposing vector (so not in the same direction of the craft but either in the opposite direction or cross-ways), you have a risk of impact.

      Putting this together, you have an object with under the volume of a 50BMG Round, some unknown mass and density (could be insulation, could be shattered aluminum fuselage, could be a shart of a hardened steel bolt), that can strike the space station at least at 25000 feet per second and at upto 50,000 feet per second. That object is not alone, there's an entire debris field is changing shape as it follows its ballistic trajectory, bounces off of itself, the thin atmosphere, and gets hit by rays of the sun and heated.

      So the best way to think about this is the ISS Is a goose and India decided to fire a single 12 gauge defender round (that has both large balls and tiny ones) at within the effective range of the round. You fire a shotgun 100 times, you will get a different spread each time, and out of those spreads, 44 times they will hit the goose.

      The worst thing that can happen here is a hardened bolt was shattered by the impact into a hundred tiny bits in a very tight pattern and happens to hit the station. That's like shooting the side of the ISS with 12 gauge buckshot except the velocity is upto 50 times what a 12 gauge is capible of putting out. We don't know density, but knowing what home made shotgun rounds filled with legomen can do to thin metal, thanks to youtube, I am not optimistic a feather hitting the ISS at 50,000 feet per second is just going to bounce off.

      And that's if we know upfront the impact happened. You can get hit and not know for months, then find out at the worst possible time.

      So yeah. This was a dick move by India. However, given they don't participate in our space program, I don't think they really care.

    4. Re:44% larger risk by rmdingler · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nasa tracks space debris so they can steer clear of it; largest they can currently track is 4cm diameter objects.

      Interesting post, but I think you meant smallest they can currently track is 4cm diameter objects. Your results may vary depending on who is estimating the numbers, but there are conservatively tens of thousands of objects larger than 10cm, hundreds of thousands between 1-10cm, and 100 million+ objects

      Regarding India, they just want a seat at the table when the power players discuss satellite defense and weaponry. This is a classic tragedy of the commons.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    5. Re:44% larger risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0.0144% chance of destroying $100G means destroying $14M in expected value. NASA's outrage seems appropriate.

    6. Re: 44% larger risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would orbital bits of chapati, clumps of curry powder, globs of chutney be dangerous?

    7. Re:44% larger risk by Gilgaron · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well yes but they're busy building a wall between Earth and Mars.

    8. Re:44% larger risk by link-error · · Score: 1

      You have to also consider that objects 2-4cm, which they can't track, can have significantly different trajectories because their smaller mass, they likely have much higher velocities from the explosion.

      --
      -Unresolved symbol? Byte me!
    9. Re:44% larger risk by White+Yeti · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, lots of politics (domestic and international) behind this test.

      One correction to the GP: NASA doesn't track the objects in orbit. CSpOC takes care of the tracking and distribution of data. NASA does statistical sampling and modeling of the environment, as well as impact testing and evaluation of shielding designs. Also, NASA scientists typically use metric (though the hardware people often still use inch-pound-second).

    10. Re:44% larger risk by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      To reach orbit one must achieve a velocity of around 25000 feet per second; a 50BMG round travels at around this speed.

      Actually that's a little over 8 times faster than the muzzle velocity of a 50BMG. 2700 to 3000 ft/sec is the typical velocity for a 50. 25k ft/sec is 3X what the Navy's railgun muzzle velocity is. So it's quite a bit faster.

    11. Re:44% larger risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to re-read Liu Cixin Three Body Problem and wonder at the wisdom of Trump's space militarization initiative "Space Force."

    12. Re:44% larger risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To reach orbit one must achieve a velocity of around 25000 feet per second; a 50BMG round travels at around this speed.

      Wow, not even close. A .50 BMG round has a muzzle velocity of about 2800 FPS, a bit over 1/10th of the velocity you stated. Due to the way modern gunpowders work, you can get close to 4000 FPS with some cartridges (such as .220 Swift) but you are not getting over that. The velocity you are claiming is railgun territory, not firearm territory.

    13. Re: 44% larger risk by c6gunner · · Score: 2

      The United States Space Force is currently in the proposal stage, waiting on approval by Congress. If approved it will be implemented beginning in 2020, with full capability established by 2024.

      As of 2019 only one nation has an operational Space Force: the People's Republic of China.

      The more you know!

    14. Re:44% larger risk by ghoul · · Score: 2

      Join the SPACE FORCE, travel to an EXOTIC LOCATION, pick up trash!!!!

      I can just see the recruitment poster.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    15. Re:44% larger risk by thereddaikon · · Score: 1

      To reach orbit one must achieve a velocity of around 25000 feet per second; a 50BMG round travels at around this speed.

      No it does not. 50 BMG has a muzzle velocity closer to 2500 feet per second. You are an entire order of magnitude off. 50 BMG is fast but its not at orbital velocity.

    16. Re: 44% larger risk by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      lolwut?

      I'm wondering if you have a definition of "Space Force" that isn't shared by... anyone else.
      The US has a "Space Force". The proposal is to turn it into its own branch. We had an air force before the U.S. Air Force was an independent branch of the military as well.
      The Russian Federation does as well. And the French. And the Brits. And the Indians.

      Or did you really think the nuclear powers of the world were sitting here while only China had a space military command?

      The more you know, amirite???

    17. Re: 44% larger risk by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering if you have a definition of "Space Force" that isn't shared by... anyone else.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...

      The more you know, amirite???

      Yw!

    18. Re:44% larger risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      44% larger for two weeks. After that it is pretty small. The lifetime risk is less than 0.1%

    19. Re: 44% larger risk by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1
      Wondering if you read that article.

      Current space forces and military space commands:
      China:
      +++ People's Liberation Army Strategic Support Force
      France:
      +++ Joint Space Command
      India:
      +++ Integrated Space Cell
      Russia:
      +++ Russian Aerospace Forces
      ++++++ Russian Space Forces
      United Kingdom:
      +++ Royal Air Force
      ++++++ No. 11 Group RAF
      United States:
      +++ United States Air Force
      ++++++ U.S. Air Force Space Command

      Thanks? lol.

    20. Re: 44% larger risk by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Wondering if you know what the word "and" means.

    21. Re: 44% larger risk by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      Oh-I get it. You think a "Space Force" and a Space Command are different. I gotcha. You're imagining little luke skywalkers flying around in X-Wings and shit. That's awesome. Keep drinking that Trump-aid, chief.

    22. Re: 44% larger risk by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I guess that's a "no", then.

    23. Re: 44% larger risk by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      Are you really so fucking stupid as to require me to spell this out for you, or are you deflecting because you've begun to smell a hint of the mistake you've made?

      Assuming a modicum from intelligence for you is a stretch, I'll admit, but I had hoped for better than your normal ignorant opinions fired off in the guise of fact.
      A "Space Force" and a "Space Command" are the same thing. China doesn't even have an independent Space Command. It's part of the PLA's Strategic Forces, which is responsible for electronic, space, and cyber warfare.
      That article was written largely by a single person with zero citations for any of his assertions; it did however get one thing right- lumping "Space Forces" with "Space Commands"

      In summary, literally every single thing you said was wrong.

    24. Re: 44% larger risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're retarded.

    25. Re: 44% larger risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      50 BMG travels much closer to 2500fps than 25000. Just saying.

  6. It was a message by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Interesting

    India sent a message loud and clear: we will do this, and we don't care if it causes space junk. I hope everyone got the message. The US State Department is very big on "sending messages" with its actions. Let's see how they like being on the receiving end for once. I think it'll be very educational for them to attend another country's lesson instead of being the one dishing it out.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:It was a message by oic0 · · Score: 5, Informative

      "international" space station. Not US space station. They didn't shit in our pool, they shit in the community pool.

    2. Re:It was a message by mythix · · Score: 0

      It is very much a project of the western world though. With a lot of help from the russians as of lately.

    3. Re: It was a message by TigerPlish · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Much hatred, such wow.

      Listen, my anti-American friend, we learned those lessons long ago, which is why we are the way we are now. We went to school with the natives, the English, the Germans (twice in 25 years), the Soviets, and more. What we learned is that no one is to be trusted, to do the other guy in before he does you. You know, like when you discover as you leave childhood or maybe even earlier that the world is a nasty angry place full of people who wish you harm or take what you have.

      So know India has a satellite killer. Message received, you are now worthy of increased scrutiny and intel gathering. As if having nukes didn't already put them on out to-watch list.

      But what their littering of space really shows is that still have that retarded lack of attention to detail that also plagues their software. That shit-for-brains "oh it's good enough don't worry about it" attitude that kills in aerospace.

      That's why their shit will always be shit. Not because they're Indians, but because they don't strive for perfection. In some fields perfection and precision are must-haves.

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    4. Re:It was a message by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      India has no meaningful stake in it. Tip: whenever you see "international" in any name, it's probably American bullying in disguise.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re: It was a message by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      Can't even say I disagree with you. The only tragedy here is that you have perfected this attitude both towards to outside and inside... or do you really have the feeling that you are still one united nation under the same flag?

    6. Re: It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also the motel owners

    7. Re: It was a message by TigerPlish · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Selective reading comprehension fail much?

      I didn't say Indians are shit for brains. I called their attitude shit for brains. Can't see the difference? One is tarring and feathering an entire race, the other is pointing out that there's a trait that is not compatible with precision work, and they have that trait in spades.

      If I tell someone "machine me a piece of bar stock to .00001 inch precision" and they deliver something hacked with a file to .1 inch precision and they tell me it's good enough, that's shit for brains.

      If the project required the software to do X, and what they deliver (over budget and over time) falls well short of that and they tell me it's good enough, that's shit for brains.

      And guess what? That's what I see from india all the time, in hardware and software. To the point that I refuse to buy support anything made like that, no matter where it came from.

      Still think it's racist? Then you can't hear the truth for it hurts you.

      I get it, going against the librul groupthink is wrong. Fuck it. Time to call bullshit where there is bullshit, and fuck the overly sensitive who can't handle it.

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    8. Re: It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iâ(TM)ll clue you in, there both shit for actual information, they are just playing to a certain world view, please seek an actual source for real news.

    9. Re:It was a message by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      The US State Department is very big on "sending messages" with its actions. Let's see how they like being on the receiving end for once.

      Actually, that was a message to CHINA. With Russian and Chinese troops now in Venezuela, that could be a hotbed for WW3; "Communism" (authoritarianism really) never ended. The Cold War was just World War on hiatus.

      As for the Pacific, yes, a total cluster fuck is about to occur between China, Russia, Pakistan, North Korea (axis) and US, Australia, Canada, South Korea, Japan (allies) and other pacific island nations.

      I recommend stocking up on some potassium iodide pills. Keep them in a bug-out bag. Also invest in lead (if you know what I mean).

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    10. Re:It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone thinking that barbarism is an acceptable reaction to other barbarism should be exterminated.

      Let's face reality: Civilized beings and barbarians cannot co-exist. Someday, eventually, one will HAVE to exterminate the other.

    11. Re: It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they dot just have shit for brains ... they have shit all over their left hand and their feet and all over their polluted country.

    12. Re: It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I tell someone "machine me a piece of bar stock to .00001 inch precision" and they deliver something hacked with a file to .1 inch precision and they tell me it's good enough, that's shit for brains.

      Dunno, anyone using inches for such lengths does seem rather odd. Probably .1 inches would be fine.

      Otherwise you'd probably be saying .01 mil. And then you'd realize that you're an idiot and just made something up.

    13. Re:It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything "international" is US property, as every other nation ranks lower than the US. We simply allow them to call it "international" property because, while we own them and everything they may ever have by right, we accept that giving them some semblance of independence increases their (pathetically low) work ethic and productivity. As American's we own the entirety of the Earth, so if someone shits in the "community" pool they've really just shit in OUR pool.

      Keep talking shit there, Rome. Your arrogance will make Brexit look like a walk in the park.

      (150 years ago, England was the center of the universe, and the world based their currency off the GBP, not the USD. Empires don't last forever.)

    14. Re: It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you suggesting that escalation of this back-and-forth war posturing is supposed to alleviate the situation?

    15. Re: It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You left out Turkey. Not sure which side they will be on though. Crazy times.

    16. Re: It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't even say I disagree with you. The only tragedy here is that you have perfected this attitude both towards to outside and inside... or do you really have the feeling that you are still one united nation under the same flag?

      Well DUH, we hate everyone else more than each other, so yes.

    17. Re: It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      So what was up with Trump's son trying to setup a secret line of communication to Moscow?

      You can explain it all away as stupidity, missing context, or whatever and I'll probably buy that, but I also can't blame anyone for hearing stuff like that and thinking where there's smoke there might be fire. That's how this whole investigation got started after all.

      If you were suspicious of Obama's birth certificate, you should be suspicious of a LOT of activity in the Trump 2016 campaign. We'll only be hearing more and more details of that when the report is actually released.

    18. Re: It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't want them picking up the phone in their left hand

    19. Re: It was a message by TigerPlish · · Score: 3, Interesting

      or do you really have the feeling that you are still one united nation under the same flag?

      Nope, we're divided, and hard. I think it was Vietnam that did the initial seismic split and it's only gotten worse. My sig is an oblique reference to that era. I came up with it after noticing that all our present ills can be traced mostly to that year, or more generally the decade of 1965 - 1975.

      People on all sides - left, right, up, down - and all permutations that encourage widening this divide are the real traitors... although I will concede the lies of the Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon admins over Vietnam are what did it. They threw the first punch.

      The traitors are those who drive the wedges that have split us, and the criminals are those who profit from it. On all sides. Am I being clear? I detest the right and the left, although I consider the left more dangerous to our country because they seek to dismantle what little remains of it. As the saying goes, "The road to hell is paved with good intentions." In their misguided effort to protect the environment and "raise all boats" they'll drown us all.

      Fight the split, people. Get rid of the traitors and criminals who split us and profit from it. No matter what party they're in. Do it now, or watch our country finally succumb to its wounds and end up like All The Rest.

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    20. Re:It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India sent a message loud and clear: we will do this, and we don't care if it causes space junk. I hope everyone got the message. The US State Department is very big on "sending messages" with its actions. Let's see how they like being on the receiving end for once. I think it'll be very educational for them to attend another country's lesson instead of being the one dishing it out.

      So their message, according to dns-and-blind, was to the entire world, "we can ruin space for everyone"?

      They have nukes already, and space launch vehicles. They could make a new crater on the moon if they wanted to, but there's no point. This was an anti-sat test that had unintended consequences. There's little need to prove to the rest of the world you can do anti-sat, there's all kinds to ways to send junk up there that's worse than a targeted hit anyway.

    21. Re:It was a message by Kjella · · Score: 2, Interesting

      After the US, Soviet and China shit in it first. Whenever a big nation goes "We've already have weapons with that capability, but you shouldn't have it." they're not exactly coming from neutral ground. The US is very often trying to freeze the status quo when it's to the American advantage, while acting oblivious to the fact that they're asking to carve permanent differences in stone. Take for example CO2 emissions, the US has one of the highest rates per capita in the world but the American focus has been about curbing growth. Which is nice, if you're already a post-industrial high-pollution low-growth country. But if you're China or India you look at that graph and think fuck that, why should I have to pollute less than an American? It's just as much my planet as yours. I'm not a huge fan of India doing this, but US criticism is the pot calling the kettle black.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    22. Re:It was a message by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Then, as such, we can take it as an act of war, and to tell the truth, I would agree. It is a real threat that must be dealt with.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    23. Re:It was a message by PPH · · Score: 1

      But if you're China or India you look at that graph and think fuck that, why should I have to pollute less than an American?

      Because it's in their best interest to adopt the state of the art in energy production and consumption. Which, as a by-product, pollutes less. Sure, America went through the big-ass cars with tail fins era. But everyone doesn't have to follow that same path.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    24. Re: It was a message by Kjella · · Score: 2

      If I tell someone "machine me a piece of bar stock to .00001 inch precision" and they deliver something hacked with a file to .1 inch precision and they tell me it's good enough, that's shit for brains.

      I see this as a variation of the Scotty factor for time estimates, where they're used to most requirements being bullshit that somebody set early and padded once because the design might work with 0.1 inches but let's get 0.01 inches because it's a long and formal process that'll be hell to change both in terms of time and money later and because they have a reputation for over-promising and under-delivering let's order 0.0001 inches so we're on the safe side.

      On the other side they know how much bullshit is added and try to deliver some cheap junk that's more in line with the price being paid. Then you fix the things the client screams the loudest about until attrition kicks in and you can close out with a shoddy result because they're in too deep to declare the project a failure and scrap it. I've seen a lot of projects that were near-train wrecks be declared a success because they did just enough to clear the 1.0 hurdle with a huge backlog of cut features, manual processes and lacking tools/documentation. And I don't necessarily mean outsourcing...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    25. Re:It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have missed the furor over Russia and China's ASAT tests. They even made a whole movie inspired by the Russian incident. I take it you've never seen gravity?

    26. Re: It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      lol, this from somebody who still thinks that Obama was born in Kenya

      you are approaching the density of a neutron star, good thing that you do not have much human contact, you might just consume them via your personal gravity

    27. Re:It was a message by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      And no one gets to shit in the community pool other than the 3 members who started the community dammit!

    28. Re: It was a message by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      That is Muslims that have the thing about their left hands.

      These are the people that allow perfectly good food to walk the streets while the greater majority starve.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    29. Re: It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that you need to go further back to the New Deal under FDR, the resulting 80% marginal income tax rates for the 1% and their creation of organizations and think tanks (John Birch Society, Heritage Foundation, etc...) to push for deregulation and the shifting of tax burden from the wealthy to the middle class and poor.

      The constant lies and propaganda which use emotions to get people to vote against their own best interests have damaged the psyche of the entire country.

    30. Re: It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's completely racist. You are characterizing an entire race/nation based your extremely limited personal experience. 1.3 billion people live in India. What percentage of them have you personally interacted with? Whatever the number is, I'm fairly certain we can safely round it to 0% without losing much precision. Grow up.

    31. Re:It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a much richer Western country can't keep their emissions down per capita, while maintaining their GDP, why should a much poorer country be able to keep their emissions down, while trying to reach economic parity with the richer country?

      The richer countries since they had a head start and were polluting long before all the poorer countries have a onus to provide cleaner tech at CHEAP prices. If that means foregoing patents, etc. to make cleaner tech cheaper than coal then they should do so. If China didn't try to drive down the cost of solar panels, where would we be today. We wouldn't even have an alternative...

    32. Re: It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus m8, it was just a little hyperbole and real world analogue. I've seen stuff come out of India that was off spec by a factor of 1,000. Is that so much better than being off by a factor of 10,000?

    33. Re:It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so international if you ask me...more like G8 space station. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_International_Space_Station_visitors

    34. Re:It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets see: The Greenies always claim that more efficient/less polluting is also more economical. And the USA got it's ass kicked by the Chinese with solar tech, the Germans and Japanese with better auto tech (until the USA screamed "Chicken Tax!") and the French with nuclear power technology (for sale to absolutely anyone). So tell me all about our head start.

    35. Re: It was a message by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Don't forget all the folks running NASA, Google , Microsoft , Apple and Citibank.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    36. Re: It was a message by ghoul · · Score: 1

      What do you have against dogs?

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    37. Re: It was a message by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Yeah right. The Indians got their Mars mission to work on the first go. Lets not talk about how many times NASA screwed up before getting it right. Attention to the important details is what Indians excel at as well as knowing which details are the important ones.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    38. Re:It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Axe to grind, have we?

    39. Re: It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, programmer/machinist here.

      The above poster (Engineer bro?) is actually more accurate than you, even though you called him an idiot and assumed he "just made something up"

      ->0.00001", since machinists using decimal inch tend to work in the neighborhood of 0.001" (One "Thou"), this isn't wrong. The prescribed tolerance of
      "One Hundredth Thou", is probably tool and die maker territory. Necessary for things such as, you know, space and aviation.

      My assumption would be that it could be a grinding operation, but maybe by "Machining" to 0.00001", it is probably turning on a hyper expensive CNC center that requires you not to be a cycle-start idiot to operate or you crash it.

      Machine tools come in inch or metric. You work in the unit of the machine, should be able to do both, and it's useful as a check to convert.

    40. Re:It was a message by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      Wha?
      Where the hell did you get that idea?
      That station isn't even operable without the Russian components. The very first module launched was fucking Russian.
      It's always came as a surprise to me that we allowed it to take that form, though it's great that we decided to cooperate at that level.

    41. Re:It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EVeryone got the message, you are assholes.

    42. Re: It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's silly. First, you list WWI and WWII as if it were the same, when they were extremely different in nature. Then, notably the West started the aggression on the USSR even before it existed, supporting the tsarist troops. This is particularly interesting, because the russian civil war was significantly influenced by resistance to participation in WWI. And withdrawal from WWI was one of the excuses for the Allied to fight against the Red Army and get involved in Russia's civil war.
      Of course, the long list of countries invaded by USA without an initial aggression to the USA further illustrates how far fetched of an excuse that is. Mexico did not invade US first, the alleged attack by Spain in Cuba was most probably a sham (even if not, it hardly acts as an excuse for what followed), and all of the inteventions in Latin America through the 70s were initiated by the USA. Panama? Most famously, the Vietnam War was only justified by a far fetched "domino effect" theory that gives little to no justification. Just recently, the wars from 2003 to date have been blunt moves for strategic superiority with little relation (actually backfiring) on the purported excuses wielded to initiate them.
      US also had a small participation in the Second Opium Wars. The Opium Wars are a shameful example of Western powers imperialism during XIX and XX centuries.
      That self justification logic of "its us or them" is the root cause of most mistakes in history, whether this Indian mistake or the long list of mistakes by other nations, including the very long list of atrocities commited by the USA.

    43. Re: It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'mon, stop with the American-only parochialism. Credit where it's due! Rupert Murdoch, admittedly now a US citizen, was Australian by birth.

    44. Re: It was a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember the definition of Acceptance Testing: The painful process of modifying the requirements to match the as built.

  7. T-Series plot!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all a T-Series plot to shut down significant portions of the Internet and win their war on Pewdiepie!

  8. Need vs wish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the future of human space flight that we *wish* to see happen.

    Just stating that some (agreeable or not) wish is a "need" does not make it such.

    (and I do share that wish, but I don't like wishful thinking or distorted use of speech, such in propaganda and agenda pushing)

  9. 44% increase from nothing by r2kordmaa · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Normal 10 day risk of ISS getting hit can't be very significant to begin with, so does 44% increase from nothing really amount to significant risk?

    And does anyone have a public list of TLEs for the debris cloud? Or at least a list of apogees and perigees?

    1. Re: 44% increase from nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No idea, but a Canadian astronaut personally watched a 10cm hole being blown through a solar panel in the ISS. It was mentioned in a Netflix documentary.

  10. Scale down by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    The solution is to scale down. OK, so they shot up a missile the blew up a satellite and made a bunch of junk. So now, send up a bunch of smaller missiles to blow up the bits of junk. Then send a bigger batch of smaller still missiles to blow up the now smaller junk. Rinse repeat until no problem.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    1. Re:Scale down by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Or send a spaceship up there to do the job of firing on the debris. Here's a simulation.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:Scale down by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Get nasa on the phone!

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  11. The U.S. has no right to complain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because it is the single largest pollution criminal when it comes to earth orbital pollution. Stop trying to make India out as a criminal because their space program is harvesting success after success. Get over yourself, NASA.

  12. "International" just not China iraq syria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Africa South america etc

  13. Think that's bad, don't go to the beach! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cuz those beaches. Man, those beaches!

  14. Wait for call centres! by TJHook3r · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can just imagine NASA receiving a call from Bangalore after the ISS gets hit... 'hello, we understand you have been in an accident that was not your fault?'

    1. Re:Wait for call centres! by Megane · · Score: 1

      "Have you tried turning it off and on again?"

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  15. We must retaliate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an act of war perpetrated by the Indian government. We should glass the entire Indian subcontinent immediately.

    1. Re:We must retaliate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better nuke the whole planet from orbit to be sure. And destroy the sun while you're at it.

    2. Re:We must retaliate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you're just being silly. Nuking the planet? Sure, that's reasonable. We can do that. We don't have the technology to destroy the sun (yet!).

  16. Alternate Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ISS poses threat to India's Satellite Debris, says ISRO

  17. Re: India It would seem never saw the movie gravit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Says someone who doesn't appreciate the technology they use regularly that resulted from space exploration.

    https://spinoff.nasa.gov/Spinoff2008/tech_benefits.html

  18. Serious-minded Action by necro81 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe I am a bit naive to even suggest this, but it seems to me that now would be an appropriate time for the nations of the world to enter into a treaty specifically designed to avoid one-or-more jackasses from ruining space access for the entire human race. I would call it the Kessler Avoidance Treaty (KAT).

    It is, generally, a set of rules to avoid a tragedy of the (space) commons - a general agreement not to shit all over the near-Earth environment (100 km to, say, 600 km). Among its provisions would be:
    * A blanket ban on anti-satellite missiles or other ways of destroying satellites that create debris clouds. This includes not only the deployment of such weapons, but also their development and testing.
    * Require whoever launches a rocket to ensure that all orbital-velocity, non-payload masses (e.g., upper stages, payload fairings, etc.) have a built in method to guarantee de-orbiting within, say, three months. (I suppose parking in a higher orbit, like 5000 km, would also be acceptable.)
    * Active payloads (i.e., satellites) must have a documented plan for end-of-life that ensures de-orbiting within, say, 1 year after end-of-service.
    * A service fee attached to all orbital launches (including those that pass through near-Earth to other orbits, like geosynchronous) to fund the development and eventual deployment of measures to remove debris and other hazards from the near-Earth environment. This could be lasers, satellites that tether to and de-orbit other satellites, and who knows what else. The service fee would be based on rocket gross weight at liftoff (although probably on a logarithmic, rather than linear scale).
    * The development of international design standards for satellite manufacturers and launch providers to reduce small fragmentary debris: paint chips, frangible bolts, etc.)

    Yup, this will make space launches a bit more expensive: it will slightly lower the payload that a particular rocket can deliver. I call that chump change compared to the catastrophic cost of a full-blown Kessler syndrome, which would wipe out >$100B of already-launched assets, degrade the $Trillions of annual economic activity that utilizes space services, endanger the lives of humans in space, and render access-to-space difficult or impossible for a generation.

    There is plenty of precedent for humans creating and enforcing treaties against generally-bad behavior. The treaties banning atmospheric nuclear weapons tests are one good example. The Montreal Protocol for eliminating CFCs is another. These are imperfect measures, certainly, and not universal ratified. But they have gotten most of the major players on the same page, and drastically reduced the harm that could otherwise have happened. It also provides a moral framework for punishing non-ratifiers.

    Right now is the best time to implement this kind of treaty. (Well, really, 5-10 years ago.) Humanity is drastically lowering the barriers to accessing space, and so we're on the cusp of a huge surge of launches. We ought to agree upon the rules now before there are 100 new players. At the same time, we are ever-more dependent on using orbiting satellites for all manner of daily activities, and there are untold riches still to be reaped.

    I am, however, dreadfully pessimistic about the chances of such a treaty coming about under (present) US leadership. We have the most to gain and the most to lose. It would also be a chance to reassert some global leadership against strategic rivals such as China and Russia. But our present executive demonstrates no particular strategic thinking, and I'm sure this kind of topic and its rational solution aren't on his radar.

    1. Re:Serious-minded Action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should understand that Indian satellite destroyed has removed debris from unused satellite. Those debris will lose momentum over a week and fall into lower atmosphere and destroy itself. India is quite responsible not to pollute space for rest of humanity.

    2. Re:Serious-minded Action by pnutjam · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What your proposing is exactly why India did this. They see the blanket ban coming and want to ensure they get a seat at the table of have's instead of being pushed into the have-not's and can't ever have pile.

    3. Re:Serious-minded Action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm.. but the satellite was already in an orbit where it would have fallen into the atmosphere on it's own. So instead of one easy to track object there are now thousands, each one in it's own orbit.

    4. Re:Serious-minded Action by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The fundamental problem why people do this is precisely because they see history as a list of *The USA / (insert other questionable country here) did it then banned it for everyone else* achievements.

    5. Re:Serious-minded Action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Treaties have to be agreed upon to be of any use. There is no incentive for any country that plans to develop anti-satellite technology in the future to sign on to the treaty. Neither India, Pakistan nor Israel signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty because they intended to or already had developed nuclear weapons and the treaty restricts their ownership to the big 5. They same would happen with this treaty. Any country which had already developed secretly, or planned to develop the technology would just not join the treaty. Sure everyone else could decide to sanction them, but we see how well that has worked in stopping India from developing nukes.

    6. Re:Serious-minded Action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The satellite was put up there as a target about a month ago.

    7. Re:Serious-minded Action by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      ....I am, however, dreadfully pessimistic about the chances of such a treaty coming about under (present) US leadership. We have the most to gain and the most to lose. It would also be a chance to reassert some global leadership against strategic rivals such as China and Russia. But our present executive demonstrates no particular strategic thinking, and I'm sure this kind of topic and its rational solution aren't on his radar.

      You were doing so well too. Great post until the end where you lost focus and dropped the ball. If you want to get anything large scale done you have to learn to work with people you actually don't like. This means not insulting them openly. The idea of such a ban is still great and needed, just learn to get along with others.

    8. Re:Serious-minded Action by necro81 · · Score: 1

      Treaties have to be agreed upon to be of any use. There is no incentive for any country that plans to develop anti-satellite technology in the future to sign on to the treaty. Neither India, Pakistan nor Israel signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty because they intended to or already had developed nuclear weapons and the treaty restricts their ownership to the big 5. They same would happen with this treaty. Any country which had already developed secretly, or planned to develop the technology would just not join the treaty. Sure everyone else could decide to sanction them, but we see how well that has worked in stopping India from developing nukes

      So...because it is not 100% effective in its goals, is a reason to do nothing?

      Besides, the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty did get South Africa to relinquish its nuclear weapons program. It also provides a framework for the rest of the world to crack down on other countries that may consider developing such weapons, such as North Korea (which ratified, then pulled out). It didn't prevent India and Pakistan. Frankly, we don't know how many more nuclear-capable countries would exist today without the treaty.

  19. India's danger is to my profession by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

    The endangered American IT professional. The best in the world. But India is cheaper!!!

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
  20. indians are so f'in dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe they should try mastering indoor plumbing before going to space.

  21. Not really surprising by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    I wish I could say I'm surprised. India is a country where even in major cities you can see people literally squat and shit in the street. It isn't hard to understand why they have no problem with metaphorically taking a dump right on the doorstep of humanity's gateway to space.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:Not really surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've only seen two people take a dump in the street in my entire life - one was in NYC and the other in Toronto. Never in India.

    2. Re:Not really surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once walked to the center of the (small) hedge maze behind the colonial governor's residence in Williamsburg VA and there was a large human poo right in the middle.

      I think that goes on everywhere.

      India does seem to have a worse-than-average problem with human corpses clogging up alleys and bobbing in the rivers people wash in though.

    3. Re:Not really surprising by ghoul · · Score: 1

      I have only seen Human shit on the street in San Jose and San Francisco. Never in India. Cow shit - yes. Human shit no.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    4. Re:Not really surprising by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you haven't been looking.

      "My feet were prepared for what lay ahead. I was not. I did not expect to see people cleaning human waste from the roads right in the heart of Mumbai, a booming financial capital and the face of modern India."

      https://www.cnn.com/2014/10/02/world/asia/india-waste-scavengers/index.html

      https://www.bbc.com/news/health-33980904

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  22. Shithole India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's the "don't blow shit up in space" treaty? Are these countries stupid?

  23. Absolutely designated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is it these people can figure out anti-satellite technology but can't figure out how to poop in a toilet?

    1. Re:Absolutely designated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well they just figured out how to poo in LEO, now all they need to do is change one letter!

  24. So what have NASA done about all the debris before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what have NASA done about all the space debris before, as seen in many PBS.org documentaries.

    People would have forgot about it, if NASA had not echoed it. It sounds like NASA is instigating, and hoping to sell the weapons tech to other countries who want to follow suit. Not about anyone's safety, look at their track record.
    It's all about money, keeping all currencies pegged to USD.

  25. Re: India It would seem never saw the movie gravit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't use any of that stuff.

  26. UN by gDLL · · Score: 1

    so the UN is american "bullying" in disguise ? lol....

  27. (authoritarianism really) by gDLL · · Score: 1

    This is bullshit. If it would be merely or even mostly just authoritarianism then they wouldn't try take your private property nor impose their morality on you. They would leave you mostly alone if you don't challenge the oligarchy, but alas that is not what happend.

  28. lol by gDLL · · Score: 1

    Does your second sentence contradict your first, or does the first contradict the second ?

    1. Re: lol by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure his first sentence contradicts itself.

    2. Re: lol by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You were sure about pilot error too.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  29. Re: India It would seem never saw the movie gravit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, the technology came first, then it resulted in your space exploration.

  30. They used SI units! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yay!

  31. New thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Designated shitting orbits.

  32. Re: India It would seem never saw the movie gravit by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    The ocean nutters conveniently forget about scurvy. Even our shore-hugging sailors are running into long term effects of scurvy. I can see the advert for the India mission: Come see India in person today, enjoy your teeth falling out for the rest of your life...sign up NOW!!!

  33. At least it's not me! by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    With all the stupid shit my country has been doing in the commons lately, I'm just glad that it's somebody else's turn to be "that guy"--even if it's for just a minute.

    Not posting AC. I'll own it. Not that it'll help.

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  34. He hangs the Earth upon nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For this reason, God sends them a powerful delusion(operation of wandering)(planet) so that they will believe the lie.

    Mystery Red of the Great American Eclipse
    It has blood on it!
    ABCNews: Eclipse makes pendulum wander
    Sound of Silence
    Sun researchers find strange eclipse reading

  35. Re: India It would seem never saw the movie gravit by Bradac_55 · · Score: 1

    A AC & a damn lair, what a combo.

  36. Good job India! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, sending 100 tons of bearing balls into orbit will halt space exploration for several decades. Good job India!

  37. Stop lying WindBourne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you always lie?

  38. Re: India It would seem never saw the movie gravit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ignore the troll. The girl he lusted after while in high school first friendzoned him, then unfriended and ghosted him, then married a handsome aerospace engineer with whom she had four beautiful kids. After he started stalking her and harassing her (very patient) husband, she had a restraining order filed against him. He violated it, proceeded to threaten the family at a parking lot with a knife, and managed to cut himself. He jumped up and down howling like a wounded dog before a laughing crowd then passed out. And that is one of the many reason he's so mad about space stuff. :)

  39. Amusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just reading back all the comments about "But no it's totally fine guys" from the previous news
    https://science.slashdot.org/s...

  40. Failed policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should have done what the US did and claim they were blowing up a failed satellite to protect the earth from it's crash.

  41. Send India the bill by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    If their stupid stunt ends up destroying the ISS and / or requires its abandonment due to their incompetence.

  42. What NORAD isn't saying by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

    NORAD can't tell you how small an object they can actually track, or how many of them. What they have actually disclosed is probably only the tip of the iceberg.

    1. Re:What NORAD isn't saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the wavelength, half that is about as small an object you can efficiently detect in a vacuum with a single transmitter receiver. The power requirements are massive from the sea level and mountain tops or satellite stations are preferred.

  43. Re: India It would seem never saw the movie gravi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blaming users like you blame the pilots ay? You are such a fuckboy.

  44. It exists for a reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The divide exists for a reason. We're tired of your shit. We don't think like you, we don't act like you, and we certainly aren't gonna support your agendas that are usually designed specifically to harm us. Enough with this "both sides" bullshit. You know the republican/conservative group is the problem here. That's why you guys are all of a sudden calling for peace and bipartisanship, and for every to just get along. Your side is LOSING and you know it.

    You're that shitty boyfriend that is on his knees begging for us to not throw him out and give him one more chance. You swear you won't hit us again but you've lied about it so many times before. It's time to get the fuck out and lay in the street like the dog you are.

  45. Whose fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I put a diamon on the curb side outside your home and your car runs over it, whose fault? ISS is in public space. If it is affected by space debris, it needs to take care. Alternative is to make a law about it. Cannot just say no to India while other countries have carried out the same tests in the past.

  46. India treating space like the Ganges. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typical. This is a people that shits in their main river, you think they are going to treat space any better?

  47. TLEs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get on spacetrack and they're there. Look for things with the right start date.

  48. Pot calling kettle black. by GillBates0 · · Score: 1
    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  49. Bitchy pot calling kettle black by GillBates0 · · Score: 1
    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  50. Went through? Us is still far worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Per person India is at least an order of magnitude cleaner. Even China is only half as polluting as US.
    Americans are so fucking stupid they don't realize or don't care. Who knows.

  51. They aren't following the same path by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their cars, aircon, food supply, travel etc are already better than the US. Why else did you think their per person CO2 was only half the level of an American?