Any employer that wants to make sure you're typing fast enough and look over your shoulder every 10 minutes and count against you if they can't see your screen is definitely NOT looking to pay you well. They're looking for monkeys and intend to pay peanuts.
That analysis may not be 100% reliable, but it's the smart way to bet.
Hitting space and backspace constantly is "activity" but it's not useful work. keystrokes and/or keystroke rate is a valuable metric for a typist. For a developer though, if they sit quietly for a bit and then type in the perfect line of code that works better than the naive 20 lines of code a monkey could come up with, it's good work.
Innovation in quick charging is like "innovation" in dinner forks. UNNEEDED. Any of the current schemes will be fine, they all get the job done. The only problem is that there are too many and they don't inter-operate.
A lot of things don't cost at all, like the park. But if you're going to confine it to things you pay for, there's live concerts in small venues, the amusement park, minor league ballgames, community theater, museums, the zoo, dinner with friends...
I guess you missed "logic day" in school. Who are they going to buy 4G from at any price if there is no service in their area?
Perhaps they'll need to get together and organize some sort of joint action. A sort of comming together of Citizens for mutual benefit. They can call that a "government".
OH wait! we already have one of those. Perhaps it would be more efficient to use the one we already have.
You apparently stopped thinking too soon. If those rural areas can't communicate and get on with the business of producing food, the urbanites will have nothing but rats and litter to eat. And that won't last long.
Clearly you have forgotten the state of affairs before the EU pressured manufacturers the last time, back when even different models from the same manufacturer had their own special snowflake chargers. Without that, they wouldn't be USB at all.
In the private sector sure. This is government, they probably have the oldest still (somewhat) functional IP phones ever. The ones with the 'pass through' that might or might not actually pass-through, and if they did, it was 10Mbps half duplex.
Agreed to a point. Enlarging, if you just want a privacy fence you don't hire an architect, an engineer, a general contractor, and a work crew. You just hire one guy who probably doesn't have a degree in anything and he hires a couple helpers and they put up a fence. You certainly don't hire people degreed in materials science and physics.
Likewise, you don't need to hire a EE to put a dimmer switch in your dining room. You don't hire an ME to figure out why your Ford stumbles on acceleration.
The guys who install home theater speakers aren't acoustic engineers.
Given the many false accusations, it is also reasonable to argue that a mere accusation is worthless to any policy, particularly when there is no legal consequence at all for a false accusation. Where's the proof, preferably in the form of a finding by a court of law?
Essentially an argument that given the public knowledge that the accusations tend to be based on nothing more than buggy algorithms and scanners that have been publicly documented to not only flag non-infringing content but also to accuse the wrong source IP, the mere receipt of such a report is not actionable. Further that the 13 strikes rule was based on the assumption, now proven false, that the *AA and it's agents would perform some reasonable level of due diligence before sending a complaint.
Evidence for CO2 emissions being harmful is legion. Climatologists have gathered their data and applied a hypothesis to make a prediction. The prediction is coming true.
Of course none of that would have anything to do with the RIAA frivolously filing DMCA complaints for birdsong, personal non-music recordings titled similarly to an RIAA song, brief bits of songe in the background of recordings, and similar ass-hattery.
Pole neutrality is restricting the incumbant's on the pole by not allowing them to block the newcomer. Net neutrality is restricting the ISPs from blocking 3rd parties in support of their own services.
The internet is a DARPA project that made good and the ISPs are using that as well as access to the public domain ( through right-of-way). If not for those two things, there would BE no ISPs.
The only reason non-neutrality can work out for an ISP is the sweetheart deals they got from government that allowed them to dominate whole regions of the country. Pole neutrality says Comcast has to get out of the way for Google. Net neutrality says Time-Warner has to get out of the way for Netflix.
If you don't like net neutrality, you are effectively fine with Ford producing cars where only a Chevron station's nozzle can fill the tank, even if, through special deals, there isn't a non-ford dealership to be found within 500 miles of you.
Probably because the incumbents have been treating a public right-of-way that they have been graciously permitted to use as if it was their own private property. If you leave your bike in the common hallway, eventually someone will move it out back against the wall.
Slashdot Mirror
Any employer that wants to make sure you're typing fast enough and look over your shoulder every 10 minutes and count against you if they can't see your screen is definitely NOT looking to pay you well. They're looking for monkeys and intend to pay peanuts.
That analysis may not be 100% reliable, but it's the smart way to bet.
Hitting space and backspace constantly is "activity" but it's not useful work. keystrokes and/or keystroke rate is a valuable metric for a typist. For a developer though, if they sit quietly for a bit and then type in the perfect line of code that works better than the naive 20 lines of code a monkey could come up with, it's good work.
That's why the last mile should be a public resource.
Innovation in quick charging is like "innovation" in dinner forks. UNNEEDED. Any of the current schemes will be fine, they all get the job done. The only problem is that there are too many and they don't inter-operate.
SQUACK!!!
What was that?
It's as if thousands of shorts shat their pants in terror then stood in shocked silence!
A lot of things don't cost at all, like the park. But if you're going to confine it to things you pay for, there's live concerts in small venues, the amusement park, minor league ballgames, community theater, museums, the zoo, dinner with friends...
I guess you missed "logic day" in school. Who are they going to buy 4G from at any price if there is no service in their area?
Perhaps they'll need to get together and organize some sort of joint action. A sort of comming together of Citizens for mutual benefit. They can call that a "government".
OH wait! we already have one of those. Perhaps it would be more efficient to use the one we already have.
You apparently stopped thinking too soon. If those rural areas can't communicate and get on with the business of producing food, the urbanites will have nothing but rats and litter to eat. And that won't last long.
Ask yourself, do you enjoy eating? Now look around the city or suburb you live in and count the total acres of grazing land or crops you see growing.
Think about it, what pisses you off more, an extra cable or one cable too few?
Clearly you have forgotten the state of affairs before the EU pressured manufacturers the last time, back when even different models from the same manufacturer had their own special snowflake chargers. Without that, they wouldn't be USB at all.
Have you BEEN in a government office?
Would you consider fraud to be just another voluntary exchange? Because pump and dump is a form of fraud.
Yeah! If those old ladies didn't wanna be mugged, what were they doing in the park?
Ans according to the SEC, it's a crime. So I guess you're saying the market runs on crime?
In the private sector sure. This is government, they probably have the oldest still (somewhat) functional IP phones ever. The ones with the 'pass through' that might or might not actually pass-through, and if they did, it was 10Mbps half duplex.
More like technically habitable but not salable.
Certainly, many HR departments don't understand that, just look at the requirements they post. The author is probably writing to that audience.
Agreed to a point. Enlarging, if you just want a privacy fence you don't hire an architect, an engineer, a general contractor, and a work crew. You just hire one guy who probably doesn't have a degree in anything and he hires a couple helpers and they put up a fence. You certainly don't hire people degreed in materials science and physics.
Likewise, you don't need to hire a EE to put a dimmer switch in your dining room. You don't hire an ME to figure out why your Ford stumbles on acceleration.
The guys who install home theater speakers aren't acoustic engineers.
Given the many false accusations, it is also reasonable to argue that a mere accusation is worthless to any policy, particularly when there is no legal consequence at all for a false accusation. Where's the proof, preferably in the form of a finding by a court of law?
Essentially an argument that given the public knowledge that the accusations tend to be based on nothing more than buggy algorithms and scanners that have been publicly documented to not only flag non-infringing content but also to accuse the wrong source IP, the mere receipt of such a report is not actionable. Further that the 13 strikes rule was based on the assumption, now proven false, that the *AA and it's agents would perform some reasonable level of due diligence before sending a complaint.
Evidence for CO2 emissions being harmful is legion. Climatologists have gathered their data and applied a hypothesis to make a prediction. The prediction is coming true.
Of course none of that would have anything to do with the RIAA frivolously filing DMCA complaints for birdsong, personal non-music recordings titled similarly to an RIAA song, brief bits of songe in the background of recordings, and similar ass-hattery.
Pole neutrality is restricting the incumbant's on the pole by not allowing them to block the newcomer. Net neutrality is restricting the ISPs from blocking 3rd parties in support of their own services.
The internet is a DARPA project that made good and the ISPs are using that as well as access to the public domain ( through right-of-way). If not for those two things, there would BE no ISPs.
The only reason non-neutrality can work out for an ISP is the sweetheart deals they got from government that allowed them to dominate whole regions of the country. Pole neutrality says Comcast has to get out of the way for Google. Net neutrality says Time-Warner has to get out of the way for Netflix.
If you don't like net neutrality, you are effectively fine with Ford producing cars where only a Chevron station's nozzle can fill the tank, even if, through special deals, there isn't a non-ford dealership to be found within 500 miles of you.
And so every last bit that travels through the net is traveling through cables that are graciously allowed to traverse public property.
Probably because the incumbents have been treating a public right-of-way that they have been graciously permitted to use as if it was their own private property. If you leave your bike in the common hallway, eventually someone will move it out back against the wall.