I think, after reading the article a bit They get that 1720 foot wave from the location directly across the water from the rock slide that stripped vegetation to an elevation of 1720 feet.
"The spur of land between Gilbert Inlet and Lituya Bay that received the full force of the wave. Trees and soil were stripped away to an elevation of 1720 feet above the surface of Lituya Bay. Photo by D.J. Miller, United States Geological Survey."
Because in a normal pen and paper game, if the DM has taken more than 6 people into the game, its very crowded. Now think of a MMO-RPG that somehow got 30,000 subscribers (modest success I'd think). Just to have a 'crowded' experience that company would have to hire 5,000 "GM's" to facilitate play. In Addition to the people needed to maintain the backend, patch, and expand. Not to mention any additional CS they might need.
Even if the ratio was 1 GM to ever 100, thats still 300 'gms' If you are wow that's 110,000 'gms'
And those federal marshalls still need a warrant to search your home. So yea. Ask for the warrant, even if you think you are innocent, because with a warrant they can only search for the items specified in the warrant. Voluntarily opening your doors allows them even greater scope of rights in what they can look for and where.
$250,000 and 20 years. Definitely an issue cruel and unusual punishment if they got that, imho. At best I can see them being hit with some negligence suit from the pilot from the damage caused. Unless their is a law in place preventing members of the public from illuminating aircraft in operation. If they can prove though, that the couple had the intention of causing the aircraft to crash, they may have a good reason to pursue trial.
I only have one beef. The guy that accuratly comes into your home, and knows how to correct the issue, is not ripping you off if he offers to replace your defetive part for more than you can get on the internet. Complaining about a 35$ stick of RAM, when 'on the internet you can find it for only 25$' If it were for 100% or more, that might be an issue.
I think you based how valid this act is on what the speaker is saying. So long as his speach was not of the 'unprotected' type (think cursewords) he could say about anything he wanted. In fact, turning off the mic and arresting him, BECAUSE of what he had to say is a direct volation of his first amendment rights. Not saying thats why they dragged him off. But in your post, you imply that was a good enough reason, which it is not.
Police are to use the lowest level of force required. They cut the mic, waited a scant few seconds while he made a few backward steps to the Senator, made a grab at him. He raised his hands (universal signal of 'I am not a threat'), two people in uniforms grabed his arms and walked him about 15 feet before another came to assist. They go another 20 or so feet when another two came. They wrestle him to the ground. At one point in one video you can hear them asking him to stop resisting, to which he replies he will leave if they left him go. At that point, since he has shown no threat greater than refusing to leave the vicinity, they should have said OK and escorted him (hands off but close by) outside.
Saying "If you don't stop, I will shoot you in the leg" would not be justicifation in shooting him in the leg if he did not comply, subsituting 'taser' for 'gun' changes nothing.
The lowest level of force they truely needed was prehaps forceably turn him over, cuff him and carried him outside.
Your post de-humanized the student in an attempt to make the actions used aginst him acceptable. They are not.
Slashdot Mirror
I think, after reading the article a bit They get that 1720 foot wave from the location directly across the water from the rock slide that stripped vegetation to an elevation of 1720 feet.
"The spur of land between Gilbert Inlet and Lituya Bay that received the full force of the wave. Trees and soil were stripped away to an elevation of 1720 feet above the surface of Lituya Bay. Photo by D.J. Miller, United States Geological Survey."
You even get a picture.
...you don't watch planes fly, planes watch YOU!
Because in a normal pen and paper game, if the DM has taken more than 6 people into the game, its very crowded. Now think of a MMO-RPG that somehow got 30,000 subscribers (modest success I'd think). Just to have a 'crowded' experience that company would have to hire 5,000 "GM's" to facilitate play. In Addition to the people needed to maintain the backend, patch, and expand. Not to mention any additional CS they might need. Even if the ratio was 1 GM to ever 100, thats still 300 'gms' If you are wow that's 110,000 'gms'
Void for vagueness is all I want to hear about this law in a few months. How can you prove what someone REALLY feels
And those federal marshalls still need a warrant to search your home. So yea. Ask for the warrant, even if you think you are innocent, because with a warrant they can only search for the items specified in the warrant. Voluntarily opening your doors allows them even greater scope of rights in what they can look for and where.
$250,000 and 20 years. Definitely an issue cruel and unusual punishment if they got that, imho. At best I can see them being hit with some negligence suit from the pilot from the damage caused. Unless their is a law in place preventing members of the public from illuminating aircraft in operation. If they can prove though, that the couple had the intention of causing the aircraft to crash, they may have a good reason to pursue trial.
I only have one beef. The guy that accuratly comes into your home, and knows how to correct the issue, is not ripping you off if he offers to replace your defetive part for more than you can get on the internet. Complaining about a 35$ stick of RAM, when 'on the internet you can find it for only 25$' If it were for 100% or more, that might be an issue.
I think you based how valid this act is on what the speaker is saying. So long as his speach was not of the 'unprotected' type (think cursewords) he could say about anything he wanted. In fact, turning off the mic and arresting him, BECAUSE of what he had to say is a direct volation of his first amendment rights. Not saying thats why they dragged him off. But in your post, you imply that was a good enough reason, which it is not. Police are to use the lowest level of force required. They cut the mic, waited a scant few seconds while he made a few backward steps to the Senator, made a grab at him. He raised his hands (universal signal of 'I am not a threat'), two people in uniforms grabed his arms and walked him about 15 feet before another came to assist. They go another 20 or so feet when another two came. They wrestle him to the ground. At one point in one video you can hear them asking him to stop resisting, to which he replies he will leave if they left him go. At that point, since he has shown no threat greater than refusing to leave the vicinity, they should have said OK and escorted him (hands off but close by) outside. Saying "If you don't stop, I will shoot you in the leg" would not be justicifation in shooting him in the leg if he did not comply, subsituting 'taser' for 'gun' changes nothing. The lowest level of force they truely needed was prehaps forceably turn him over, cuff him and carried him outside. Your post de-humanized the student in an attempt to make the actions used aginst him acceptable. They are not.