You mean via the same mechanism where you type information into 'Bing', and then 'Bing' responds with your search results?
No, I meant web forms, not Bing.
Most people don't type in 100 character URL's (I don't know of any) they either have it bookmarked, or they search for it via, you guess it, the search engine like Google, Bing, or whatnot.
That's not true, if they wanted to keep it anonymous, they wouldn't send session cookie with each request. Yet they do. Session id is not required for auto-suggestions.
Once again they don't just receive everything you type in address bar, they also associate it with your session.
What's so hard to understand about this problem? Most users want to use suggestions only for their searches, not URLs they enter. Chrome only allows toggling suggestions for both.
Why do we need complete pressurized module there? I understand that cupola is not the most expensive section of ISS, but wouldn't it make financial sense just to mount bunch of hi def cameras for this? Hell, you can go RealD 3D for this price tag.
What's wrong about the sentence? It was pretty much copied from TFA... The orbit is almost geostationary, considering the distance, so it's not like it'll be doing 8's around Earth and Moon, like Apollo crafts.
Before.NET both Delphi and C++ Builder had a large user base between Java and other C++ folks. They also benefited greatly because of rapid improvements. This gap now is constantly being squeezed by developments in C++ and appearance of C#. So considering how this affects stability of CodeGear and marketability of both your project and your skill set, I'd probably avoid these products for new projects.
Let's see how the new leadership will look at further spending for space programs after the current one has led everyone to reconsider the role of the US as a world's savings bank.
Any particular examples? Application designed following guidelines of win95 (e.g. Office) will work properly in Vista and will not even require folder/registry virtualization (btw, I assume a lot of effort went into this feature to minimize UAC prompts and it for some reason is rarely mentioned among usual rants about them).
I consider the opposite: Microsoft spends too much effort for app-compat. Would Win2k have defaulted users to be "restricted", while win98/ME were viable alternatives (i.e. MS could still cash in on their sale) for compatibility, this effort could have been much more successful and, nowadays, when you try to get Intuit Quickbooks to start under limited user (you don't have much choice in college setting), you didn't have to give write access to whole CLASSES_ROOT registry branch (don't get me started on this...).
So in short, yes, I believe UAC is a great compromise, which forces lousy coders to reconsider their approach to the stuff they ship.
Nowadays I code heavily in C# and occasionally have to modify libraries used by other people. C++ has much better facilities to avoid breaking existing code: typedefs, macros, better implicit cast operators. Even though first two are relics from C era and the last one somewhat complicates the language, C++ wouldn't be C++ without them.
Unlike TIFF, BMP is one of the easiest formats to read, on par with formats like PCX and TGA. Which begs the question: how would you end up with a vulnerability in processing of such format, when validating of your inputs does not require much effort?
... but when you open any 80-port session next morning, you can be easily fed those (relevant - this what TFA is all about) ads. Also, no need to alter traffic: think about how some public wifi providers do that. Just don't let anyone access the web until they go through provider's homepage and register.
Encrypted traffic to a pr0n site is still a traffic to a pr0n site. ISP sees that and serves you related ads. Or sells the info to content providers (e.g. google).
Slashdot Mirror
To be fair a good percentage of those being brought up as Muslims are being taught that it'd be an honor to kill a few infidels like Matt and Trey.
You mean via the same mechanism where you type information into 'Bing', and then 'Bing' responds with your search results?
No, I meant web forms, not Bing.
Most people don't type in 100 character URL's (I don't know of any) they either have it bookmarked, or they search for it via, you guess it, the search engine like Google, Bing, or whatnot.
Yeah and most of they use AOL keywords anyway...
That's not true, if they wanted to keep it anonymous, they wouldn't send session cookie with each request. Yet they do. Session id is not required for auto-suggestions.
Once again they don't just receive everything you type in address bar, they also associate it with your session.
They (M$) do collect this information locally if you have form auto-completion. But they don't send anywhere, unlike google.
What's so hard to understand about this problem? Most users want to use suggestions only for their searches, not URLs they enter. Chrome only allows toggling suggestions for both.
IMO parent has a point, what's flamebait about it?
Why do we need complete pressurized module there? I understand that cupola is not the most expensive section of ISS, but wouldn't it make financial sense just to mount bunch of hi def cameras for this? Hell, you can go RealD 3D for this price tag.
What's wrong about the sentence? It was pretty much copied from TFA... The orbit is almost geostationary, considering the distance, so it's not like it'll be doing 8's around Earth and Moon, like Apollo crafts.
It's interesting how for a model of vegetative man's head in TFA's video they used a wooden texture.
If anything, we should think about banning DirectX from the Web? We should also ban ActiveX.
And flash, and flash!!! ...with other Adobe products
Before .NET both Delphi and C++ Builder had a large user base between Java and other C++ folks. They also benefited greatly because of rapid improvements.
This gap now is constantly being squeezed by developments in C++ and appearance of C#. So considering how this affects stability of CodeGear and marketability of both your project and your skill set, I'd probably avoid these products for new projects.
I hate you, SQL people. You seem to be fond of NULL but abandon it (like many other ideas) half way. And then make a living out of it.
Let's see how the new leadership will look at further spending for space programs after the current one has led everyone to reconsider the role of the US as a world's savings bank.
Skipping 3.1 is a huge marketing miss
Wouldn't angular velocity stay the same but radius/circumference shrink? Any relativity geeks around to clear this up?
CNN got some action pics in their article:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/08/11/invisibility.cloak.ap/
Any particular examples? Application designed following guidelines of win95 (e.g. Office) will work properly in Vista and will not even require folder/registry virtualization (btw, I assume a lot of effort went into this feature to minimize UAC prompts and it for some reason is rarely mentioned among usual rants about them).
I consider the opposite: Microsoft spends too much effort for app-compat. Would Win2k have defaulted users to be "restricted", while win98/ME were viable alternatives (i.e. MS could still cash in on their sale) for compatibility, this effort could have been much more successful and, nowadays, when you try to get Intuit Quickbooks to start under limited user (you don't have much choice in college setting), you didn't have to give write access to whole CLASSES_ROOT registry branch (don't get me started on this...).
So in short, yes, I believe UAC is a great compromise, which forces lousy coders to reconsider their approach to the stuff they ship.
Nowadays I code heavily in C# and occasionally have to modify libraries used by other people. C++ has much better facilities to avoid breaking existing code: typedefs, macros, better implicit cast operators. Even though first two are relics from C era and the last one somewhat complicates the language, C++ wouldn't be C++ without them.
I don't mind paying $9 dollars, I mind paying them exclusively to Verisign.
Unlike TIFF, BMP is one of the easiest formats to read, on par with formats like PCX and TGA.
Which begs the question: how would you end up with a vulnerability in processing of such format, when validating of your inputs does not require much effort?
... but when you open any 80-port session next morning, you can be easily fed those (relevant - this what TFA is all about) ads.
Also, no need to alter traffic: think about how some public wifi providers do that. Just don't let anyone access the web until they go through provider's homepage and register.
Encrypted traffic to a pr0n site is still a traffic to a pr0n site. ISP sees that and serves you related ads. Or sells the info to content providers (e.g. google).
Yep, I too cannot look without repulsion at that awful JPEG logo atop Reaction Engines site.
There are several bands of spectrum in the vicinity of 700 MHz. 22 MHz each. Which is still not bad for a Spectrum though...