Slashdot Mirror


Comrade, You Are So Not Getting a Dell

theodp writes "At the World Economic Forum, Michael Dell's pitch to help Russia with its computers got the cold-as-Siberia shoulder from Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. 'We don't need help,' shot back Putin. 'We are not invalids. We don't have limited mental capacity' (video — rant starts at 1:24). 'Our programmers are some of the best in the world,' Putin continued. 'No one would contest that here — not even our Indian colleagues.'"

600 comments

  1. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    the State tells you what it needs...

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia by suso · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, ex-soviet computer scientists apparently where not happy with the former governments choice to use non-soviet produced computers and protocols. They felt that it dampened the ability for them to make their own technologies.

      Check out the history of Soviet computer technology on wikipedia sometime, its interesting. Most of it cuts off in the 60s and 70s and then they just started using IBMs and stuff.

    2. Re:In Soviet Russia by suso · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_computer_hardware_in_communist_countries

      What I mean by cut off is that they mostly just started using processors from the free world instead of making their own.

    3. Re:In Soviet Russia by 0racle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most of it was also just a carbon copy of what was being done in the US. At some point in time, intelligent people say 'lets just buy the wheel and move on to making a cart.'

      Not Invented Here slows down a lot more progress then it helps.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    4. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's just as well. They can configure the OS scheduler to divide time equally between all processes.

    5. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unless, of course, the owner of a process is a Party official.

    6. Re:In Soviet Russia by suso · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not Invented Here slows down a lot more progress then it helps.

      Maybe in the short term, but in the long term when you are talking about a whole society inventing things. The USSR, having different needs and different mindsets, may have come up with unique technologies that where not tried here. For instance, what if they would have gone the trinary route instead of binary, or if they had made their first computers more like the ideas behind the thinking machine from MIT. I think then you wouldn't be saying that it was a waste of time because their technology would show more of what is possible.

    7. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where not happy

      were not happy

    8. Re:In Soviet Russia by samriel · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Mister SVCHost, Tear Down This Thread!"

    9. Re:In Soviet Russia by ravenshrike · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Um, given the nature of computing based on electricity trinary computing would have simply been higher order code, unless your talking about levels of electric power, say 0, 1/2, and 1, but then the tech would have been vastly more complicated and almost certainly more prone to breakdown for a relatively small return.

    10. Re:In Soviet Russia by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 2, Interesting

      -1, 0, 1?

    11. Re:In Soviet Russia by Unordained · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure that was meant as an example only. The point being that GroupThink can hold us back. One of the arguments for capitalism is that you have N people all trying to find the best way to solve a problem, being rewarded when they do -- we're betting that it's more efficient in the long run to waste resources in the short term exploring different options and seeing which ones survive. When you see a whole group of players "give up" in a sense, and use the existing solution, you've got to be worried that there was some innovation there that just won't happen anytime soon now -- and if the idea is instilled that you should always go with the short-term efficiency of using off-the-shelf solutions, then you've got a long-term problem to deal with: entire generations raised to go with COTS rather than innovating. The bet here is that in the long term, it's more profitable to at least have some trained R&D people than an entire population of "users", dependent on others, and you can't have that without sometimes saying "no" to the salespeople.

    12. Re:In Soviet Russia by CatsupBoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's just as well. They can configure the OS scheduler to divide time equally between all processes.

      Except for the colonel of course, he always seems to get more than the normal process.

    13. Re:In Soviet Russia by vvaduva · · Score: 1

      polit bureau processes get priority!!

    14. Re:In Soviet Russia by chooks · · Score: 5, Funny

      -1, 0, 1?

      And of course, FILE_NOT_FOUND.

      --
      -- The Genesis project? What's that?
    15. Re:In Soviet Russia by Cyberax · · Score: 5, Informative

      USSR _did_ have successful computers using ternary math: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Setun

      Unfortunately, it was abandoned in favor of copying foreign binary computers :(

    16. Re:In Soviet Russia by sdturf · · Score: 1, Troll

      The Soviets probably got around 90% of their technology through corporate theft and spying. It's not like they could have come up with something innovative. There at the end there was so much brain drain, or so little incentive, that some government agency was caught with stolen plans for a US washing machine.

    17. Re:In Soviet Russia by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When has it ever been about intelligence when Politics or politicians are involved?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    18. Re:In Soviet Russia by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1

      Not Invented Here slows down a lot more progress then it helps.

      I have to disagree. NIH never ends up helping.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    19. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looked into your own computer lately? It might be based on binary logic, but the buses are NOT binary anymore, and have not been binary for some time now.

      So, if someone is talking about trinary computing, they're talking about logic. The EEs that make things work have not limited themselves to binary for a long time now. We are a lot more smarter than THAT!

    20. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, ex-soviet computer scientists apparently where not happy...

      ...may have come up with unique technologies that where not tried here.

      Suso, you have plenty of great things to say, but it's a bit frustrating to see simple spelling errors occur in your writing. Sure, I'm an anonymous troll, but I'm hoping that this is seen as help.

      You have been using "where" to mean "were".
      "where" = location of something ("Where is it?")
      "were" = past tense of "are" ("We were hungry.")

    21. Re:In Soviet Russia by XcepticZP · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seriously, back that up with more than just cliches and rhetoric. 90% seems way too high, perhaps you just pulled it out of your ass to illustrate your point?

      Secondly. Who is to say that "corporate theft and spying", or rather, the less rhetoric and hate filled "acquired by means other than inventing", is wrong? Most of the world did/does this. Not only that, but many developing nations are required to do this, else they would fall further behind the rest of the "honest" world.

      Thirdly. Did you really need to phrase things the way you did? Do you really subscribe to the "west is best" or "west invented everything" attitude? If you do, then history disagrees with you, for the most part.

    22. Re:In Soviet Russia by powerlord · · Score: 2, Informative

      For instance, what if they would have gone the trinary route instead of binary

      Actually ... they tried that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ternary_computer

      The only modern ternary computer Setun was built in the late 1950s in the Soviet Union at the Moscow State University, and it had notable advantages over the binary computers (such as lower electricity consumption and lower production cost) which eventually replaced it.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    23. Re:In Soviet Russia by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Funny

      Even Apply dumped the commie PowerPC and went with Western capitalist x86.

    24. Re:In Soviet Russia by TheUglyAmerican · · Score: 2

      Hey guys, the USSR doesn't existing any more.

      --
      "Written on the pages is the answer to the never ending story..."
    25. Re:In Soviet Russia by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The Soviets probably got around 90% of their technology through corporate theft and spying. It's not like they could have come up with something innovative.

      That is possibly misleading. What the Soviets did fairly well was incrementally perfect existing technology rather than overhaul all the time with a "new generation". This has worked well on their space capsules, which are about 4 times more reliable than our current systems.

      It's difficult to apply the same principle to computers because of Moore's Law. But they could have tried to perfect certain older computer technologies. For example, having a mouse-able character-based interface with overlapping windows etc. Most business and clerical activities don't need bitmapped graphics. Text and symbols (along with "box-drawing" line-ish symbols) is sufficient to do the job.

      Thus, if they would have made a Windows-like interface composed entirely of characters and symbols, they could have produced a very small resource-footprint desktop computer that is cheap yet does 90% of what bitmapped-based GUI does for an office.

      By being "ugly" you can skimp on a lot of hardware and take advantage of the symmetry of fixed-width fonts. I used to roll-my-own sub-totalling generic report writers in the DOS days. The same thing in the Windows world would take about 7 times more code. (Early VB for mousy DOS is sort of an example of a mousey character interfaces.)
             

    26. Re:In Soviet Russia by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Well, I read that, and it seems that they were right to give up, since their stuff was crap?

      This link

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Soviet_computer_systems
      Seems to show that most of their (successful) stuff was cloned?

    27. Re:In Soviet Russia by damnfuct · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What I mean by cut off is that they mostly just started using processors from the free world instead of making their own.

      "Free" ;)

    28. Re:In Soviet Russia by jargon82 · · Score: 1

      I still like VBDOS for some things. It's very, very easy to make something in it that fills the screen but allows the flexibility of a GUI. I have a couple home automation things built in it on an oldish tablet PC simply because it's nice and simple to write with. I'd love a modern character based system that was as easy to code for :)

    29. Re:In Soviet Russia by againjj · · Score: 1

      How do you know? Because "it's obvious"? Maybe you have some reasons, but some really good ideas seemed really stupid at the time. The point of the GP is that doing parallel inventing can come up with alternate ideas that are really interesting, rather than limiting everyone to a monoculture.

    30. Re:In Soviet Russia by R2.0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Except for the colonel of course, he always seems to get more than the normal process."

      That's because some processes are more equal than others.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    31. Re:In Soviet Russia by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Damn. Beat me to it.

    32. Re:In Soviet Russia by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      -,0,1

    33. Re:In Soviet Russia by profplump · · Score: 1

      Really? Because AFAIK most of my buses are binary. Heck, most of my busses are differential pairs -- SATA, PCIe, DisplayPort, RS-432, DDR, 10 GbE, Infiniband, Hypertransport

      Am I missing something? What busses are you using that aren't binary?

    34. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then quit. There's no use being a damn fool about it. - W. C. Fields

    35. Re:In Soviet Russia by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      When you see a whole group of players "give up" in a sense, and use the existing solution, you've got to be worried that there was some innovation there that just won't happen anytime soon now

      When you see a whole group of wheel designers "give up" in a sense, and use the existing round ones, you've got to be worried that maybe square ones would have been better. Or triangular ones. They won't roll away if you park on a hill.

      IAWY0P,AMGHMOYS.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    36. Re:In Soviet Russia by geekoid · · Score: 1

      At that point in computer history it made sense. What we have now is pretty much defacto standard and inventing something that does that same thing would be a hard sell getting into the entrenched market.

      I'm not saying it's good, or can't be improved.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    37. Re:In Soviet Russia by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Thus, if they would have made a Windows-like interface composed entirely of characters and symbols, they could have produced a very small resource-footprint desktop computer that is cheap yet does 90% of what bitmapped-based GUI does for an office.

      I'm sure I've used something like that on DOS. It looked like the installation gui on some old linuxen (RH 7) - I think thse used ncurses?

      Sort of like a PC version of *gulp* CICS.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    38. Re:In Soviet Russia by speed+of+lightx2 · · Score: 1

      You could always try using magnetic triodes: plus, minus, zero.

    39. Re:In Soviet Russia by bheading · · Score: 1

      The USSR, having different needs and different mindsets, may have come up with unique technologies that where not tried here.

      Well, they didn't. They used espionage to steal equipment from the West, which they then reverse engineered and duplicated. If there are any cases of actual Soviet technological innovation in the IT area, they're not very well documented.

    40. Re:In Soviet Russia by repka · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I hate you, SQL people. You seem to be fond of NULL but abandon it (like many other ideas) half way. And then make a living out of it.

    41. Re:In Soviet Russia by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pervasive corruption was what did in the Soviet Union.

      Stealing or cheating to achieve a group objective was
      not considered a big thing there and such practices
      were actually institutionalized.

      This can be a bit problem for ex-Soviets abroad. ...as far as "West is best goes": where would the Soviets
      be without stolen German techonology and some of the
      corresponding scientists.

            Although the same goes for the US though...

            Russia certainly has the potential. They just have chosen
      to squander much of it for the past few decades. When their
      engineers cease fleeing to London to work as waiters, things
      will probably shape up considerably.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    42. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe English isn't his/her first language.

    43. Re:In Soviet Russia by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      For instance, what if they would have gone the trinary route instead of binary, or if they had made their first computers more like the ideas behind the thinking machine from MIT?

      They did.

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    44. Re:In Soviet Russia by kylegordon · · Score: 1

      Electrical power can use negative numbers as well y'know. Your very own PC will use -5v and -12v in places.

    45. Re:In Soviet Russia by sortius_nod · · Score: 0

      WTF is Apply?

    46. Re:In Soviet Russia by etnoy · · Score: 1
      --
      Quantum hacker.
    47. Re:In Soviet Russia by scribblej · · Score: 1

      First off, you must mean, say, given 5v, that you would use 0v, 2.5v, and 5v as the targets for distinction, but there's a better, easier, and smarter way. Use -5v, 0v, and +5v.

      Secondly, I've already replaced all the 1s and 0s in my computer with .5s and 0s, and it does run much faster.

    48. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHAHA ----- LMAO!!!

    49. Re:In Soviet Russia by Wovel · · Score: 1

      I hope he responds, I think this will be fascinating. Maybe he is thinking of TCAM, which of course is not a bus (although accessed from one), not in anyone's desktop PC and probably not what he was thinking of at all.

    50. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This makes me think that if we have three states -- negative, zero, and positive -- we can use two alternative binary systems on the same computer. One with base 2, the other with base (-2).

      The advantage of the (-2) system is that it doesn't require special treatment of negative numbers.

      For example:
      -7 would be "101", -7 == (-2)^3+(-2)^0,
      7 would be "11011", 7 == (-2)^4 + (-2)^3 + (-2)^1 + (-2)^0 .

      The dis-advantage is that with the (-2) base we have longer number representations. Which reminds me that there is a proof that with the ternary base one has the most economical number representation.

    51. Re:In Soviet Russia by Darinbob · · Score: 0

      D'oh. "Apple".

    52. Re:In Soviet Russia by nbauman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A visitor to the USSR brought home a Soviet clone of the Apple II, which they called IIRC a "Blaht," which means apple in Russian. He wrote an article about it for Byte.

      It was a pretty clunky, unreliable device. It was kind of disappointing that the Soviets couldn't clone a western computer cheaply, something that gave the Taiwanese and Koreans no trouble.

      One theory was that the Soviets could equal western technology when they made it a top military priority, but not otherwise.

      Loren Graham, the MIT professor who probably knows more about Soviet science than any American, said that the Russians had the "blackboard theory": anything you could do with a blackboard and chalk, they could do. But when they actually had to build something, they had trouble. This was ironic for an ideology built on materialism.

      But give them credit -- they did have the first satellite in space, the first man in space, and the first woman in space. The Moscow Institute of Cardiology developed the precursor of what would turn out to be tissue plasminogen activator, which is used today to treat people with heart attacks and strokes. Graham said that one thing they did well was their education system. They educated more chemists than anybody else in the world.

    53. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. There are no "limited mental capacity" phrase. He said "'We are not invalids. We don't need help. Poor need help..." and so on. This is a translator error.

    54. Re:In Soviet Russia by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that Brits often pronounce the words, "were" and "we're" and "where" as sounding the same. Possible source for the errors.

    55. Re:In Soviet Russia by Myrddin+Wyllt · · Score: 1

      'lets just buy the wheel and move on to making a cart.'

      If no-one ever re-invented the wheel, Ferraris would be running on sliced logs.

      --
      [ ]Half Empty [ ]Half Full [x]Twice as big as it needs to be
    56. Re:In Soviet Russia by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      So do poodles. This doesn't make their technologies robust, effective, or scalable.

      The Soviet Union, and now Russia, suffer from a great burden for innovation: central planning. The raw cunning and human resources burned to get equipment and tools there to fulfill changing needs for industry and research that weren't on the 5-year plan are stunning and detract directly from time available to do good work. The result is that titanium nosecones are well manufactured, but there's no market, so they wound up selling them to Americans to use as vats for microbreweries.

    57. Re:In Soviet Russia by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      It's very common in DC analog circuitry, and can be theoretically useful in high frequency signal transfer. It helps reduce ground coupling and ground bounce, properly done, and helps reduce signal coupling to other parts of your device by using balanced signals.

    58. Re:In Soviet Russia by Miseph · · Score: 1

      And it's not like they were ever in first place... I still don't get what people thought was so scary. Prior to WWII, their technology was way behind that of the US or UK, immediately after it was still way behind that of the US or UK, and all of a sudden people thought they might magically pull sci-fi weapons out of thin air? Maybe at the time it seemed more plausible.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    59. Re:In Soviet Russia by siyavash · · Score: 1

      USA is more "Soviet" than any other country right now. In Soviet States of America, the state gives You free money. Helicopter Ben baby! :)

    60. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where
      were
      we're
      wear
      ware

      nice... if its not your native tongue and you have to look at its spelling because it all sounds the the same you've really progressed

    61. Re:In Soviet Russia by Bu11etmagnet · · Score: 1

      Or maybe English isn't his/her first language.

      Nope. This kind of mistake is more likely to be made by native English speakers.

      My theory is that there is no "English" language; there are two distinct languages: Written English and Spoken English. Non-native English users often start with Written English (learning from books); they are less likely to confuse similar-sounding words. Learning Spoken English early appears to be a serious obstacle to learning proper Written English. :)

      --
      Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts.
    62. Re:In Soviet Russia by Alioth · · Score: 1

      In the 80s, as a normal Russian you just couldn't go out and buy a computer - most of the clones were homebuilt. The Soviets built about 100 different types of clones of the Sinclair ZX Spectrum - the Speccy was very popular in Russia because it was easy to smuggle in software and the machine was simple enough that you could build it using the local Z80 clone and a bunch of TTL. The Apple clone they had was probably quite similar, at most built by a cottage industry.

    63. Re:In Soviet Russia by Alioth · · Score: 1

      100 MBps ethernet is 3 level at the physical layer, and it's very reliable. It uses levels 1, 0 and -1.

      But that's not to say you don't have a point; binary is much, much easier to do on mass, even today. Ethernet is just a special case, and the 3 level nature is basically a means to get more bandwidth out of a long piece of copper.

    64. Re:In Soviet Russia by BlackBloq · · Score: 1

      Yea as we all know the rush to go out and buy quality Russian goods has never ended. Like the watches or jeans or cars! Nothing like a good old Zaporozhet !! http://www.mindspring.com/~corvair/zaz.html

    65. Re:In Soviet Russia by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

      Functions built with ternary math could efficiently returns statuses such as (abort, retry, ignore). :-)

    66. Re:In Soviet Russia by Metasquares · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If my gradually fading secondhand knowledge of history is still accurate, it was more the rate of the USSR's modernization that was so alarming. Stalin began industrialization initiatives that, though absolutely brutal on the people, did result in rapid modernization. They saw no alternative: "modernize or perish".

      Then there was Sputnik... imagine seeing that (the booster was essentially the first ICBM) in 1957 and then hearing that the USSR was building missile bases in direct striking distance of the USA five years later. It would have certainly freaked me out, and secondhand as my knowledge of the Cuban Missile Crisis may be, I'm old enough to remember the air raid drills that still took place three decades after it ended.

    67. Re:In Soviet Russia by the_other_chewey · · Score: 1

      Except for the colonel of course, he always seems to get more than the normal process.

      That's because some processes are more equal than others.

      Eight bits good. Two bits bad.

    68. Re:In Soviet Russia by earlymon · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_State_Logic

      I should suppose 0, 1 and user defined...

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    69. Re:In Soviet Russia by LinuxLuver · · Score: 1

      The Russian are top-notch informatics people. They really don't need any help from Dell in this area. Dell would mean Microsoft and every government knows that having Microsfot software on your PCs means the US government has access to them. Even allies like the Germans don't let Windows anywhere near sensitive information.

      --
      Only boring people are ever bored.
    70. Re:In Soviet Russia by revery · · Score: 1

      1. 0
      2. 1
      3. Profit?

      --
      The dwarves know how to make gold.

    71. Re:In Soviet Russia by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      It was more that 'building' PC,s is was fabrication of the parts that constituted the PC. Dell is largely a middle man, contracting the hardware out to ODM, other device manufacturers, and all Dell do is some final optioning. Even service and support is contracted out. So it really is the journalist demonstrating their ignorance and implying that the Soviet President lacks knowledge about Dells business segment. The reality is you don't really want middle men sucking up resources when you are trying to develop your own industries.

      So it really wasn't appropriate for Dell to publicly offer charity to the president of Russia at that particular forum, culturally speaking huge mistake and he got his head bitten off for doing it. Personally I think Putin would likely have taken it in the way a US corporate executive normally presents it to a bought and paid for US politician and, found it to be particularly unpalatable. It all comes off as a condescending arrogant journalist, sticking up for a condescending arrogant corporate executive and just another non-conservative dig at Russia and their political leaders for being 'refusniks' and not towing the neocon line. Oh my god, a foreign political leader publicly told a major US corporate executive where to shove it when being talked down to.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    72. Re:In Soviet Russia by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Never thought of it but I might just try it. Dodging bullets ain't no fun these days. (-,+,null) Is that better?

  2. And Michael Looked Back by LordKaT · · Score: 5, Funny

    and said "Well ... ok then."

    1. Re:And Michael Looked Back by James_Duncan8181 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course, Putin is actually also correct to be worried. The 90s was full of foreign consultants coming over to Moscow and giving unbelievably bad advice that lead to premature loosening of all controls and a kleptocratic oligarchy shortly after that.

      Now imagine that combined with a foreign profit seeking company offering to do the helping. I'm not entirely surprised Putin reacted as you would if Bill Gates came over to your FOSS startup and asked if you'd like an MS sales team to give you some free help and advice. Quite how naive do we assume Putin to be here? Russia isn't some failed state that cannot run it's own programs and make it's own choices. Authoritarian, yes, but competent at it.

      --
      "To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
    2. Re:And Michael Looked Back by El+Torico · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Beware of Greeks bearing gifts.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    3. Re:And Michael Looked Back by swb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't give them too much credit. Now that the petrodollar tap has been turned off, Putin is terrified of any real decline in standard of living. Like China, authoritarianism works on a population accustomed to it and enjoying a rapidly rising standard of living. Manufacturing brought this to China, and oil exports (and some raw materials exports) brought this to Russia.

      With the collapse in oil prices and raw materials demand, Putin is in a tough spot. His currency sucks and they've wasted a ton of money trying to defend the ruble, pissing away a lot of their foreign currency reserves in the process. The stock exchange has been closed down a number of days due to declines.

      If a bad global economy wasn't enough, the little tete-a-tete they had with Georgia made a lot of nervous investors even more nervous and they pulled a lot of resources out of Russia fearing all the usual problems that come with a nationalist thug like Putin.

      We've seen what the USSR could accomplish as a go-it-alone economy, and it wasn't enough. Having a nominally capitalist system will help, but Putin needs to stop with the saber rattling and the blind nationalism.

    4. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Bearhouse · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Authoritarian, yes, but competent at it.

      Bollocks. Competent at being authoritarian, yes, as you'd expect from a bunch of Chekists.

      Oil production (output) has fallen since the re-nationalisation by Putin and his cronies, and now that oil prices have fallen, the dependance of the Russian economy on commodity exports, and - shock - foreign investment has been revealed.

      Make no mistake, they're in big truoble just like the other major world economies.

    5. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Beware of geeks bearing gifts.

      Fixed that for you.

    6. Re:And Michael Looked Back by James_Duncan8181 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Make no mistake, they're in big truoble just like the other major world economies.

      If this state is shared with the other large economies, it would fail to support your argument that the Russian government is not in fact reasonably competent. Other than that I would have to infer that you are claiming that all governments are incompetent. While I appreciate that this is a popular position for the Norquist/Libeterian crowd, I do not agree.

      --
      "To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
    7. Re:And Michael Looked Back by ibsteve2u · · Score: 2, Informative

      With the collapse in oil prices and raw materials demand, Putin is in a tough spot.

      Not quite as tough a spot as those European nations who are dependent upon Russia's natural gas, I don't think.

      --
      Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    8. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like China, authoritarianism works on a population accustomed to it and by threatening or eliminating opposition. Mao brought this to China, and Russia always had it.

      There. Fixed that for you.

    9. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe look a bit further in your history books because before Russia was the USSR it was a depressed failing post-war economy run by a Czar.

      The one thing history has shown is that Russian people are not afraid of radical change that has little to do with you version of "how the global economy should work."

      Putin is in the same spot as the rest of the world's failing economies, but the one thing they have, alongside China, is experience with a Plan B. A historically murderous plan B, but a plan B none the less.

    10. Re:And Michael Looked Back by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Not quite as tough a spot as those European nations who are dependent upon Russia's natural gas, I don't think.

      Okay, but what does that have to do with anything being discussed in this thread?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    11. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Arthur+B. · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If price fell, it's good management to cut down production.

      At least the Russian government is smart enough to steal money making industries as opposed to the US which bails out money losing businesses.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    12. Re:And Michael Looked Back by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Why did everything that you mention equally remind me of the US? The big exception is that its been a long time since we've tried isolationism though we were attached to it for a long while.

    13. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not just nationalism. It's hubris. That has been a part of Russia's collective psyche for at least the past 100 years. They're not going to let anyone tell them what to do, and they balk at receiving help from anyone - it's a sign of weakness. They have a strong "us and them" mentality which has not faded away one bit since the end of Communism.

      I can't really fault Russians or Putin for that, other countries are loud and proud of themselves and can also be a bit protectionist from time to time. But in Putin's case, it could be incredibly self-destructive, although I would bet that his people will support him even if it means economic disaster.

      I'll probably get modded troll for that second paragraph, but just remember, in post-Soviet Russia, troll mods YOU.

    14. Re:And Michael Looked Back by jgalun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If the advice of foreign consultants was so bad - why has it worked fine for the other members of the Eastern bloc? If the fault is of the foreigners coming up telling Russia what to do, then how did Poland end up democratic and prosperous while Russia is autocratic and at the whim of oil/gas prices?

    15. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn, the other one hidden when i posted that. what a waste of karma

    16. Re:And Michael Looked Back by James_Duncan8181 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "Like China, authoritarianism works on a population accustomed to it and enjoying a rapidly rising standard of living."

      This is surely incorrect. The USSR functioned for almost seven decades. The people of the Ukraine clearly had a falling standard of living as Stalin starved them but failed to successfully revolt or change the system. Likewise in China, the cultural revolution was not something associated with a huge rise in living standards but Communism survived. Or the Castros in Cuba after the fall of the USSR and resultant drop in subsidy. Or Afghanistan moving from Soviet subsidy to Taliban control. Or the long reign of Pinochet in Chile. Or, indeed, the continued existence of Zimbabwe as a state.

      I would suggest that authoritarianism does not require a rise in living standards to keep on going, and indeed I would suggest that a perception of danger and mass insecurity in the face of either economic or military threat is what often creates it in hard times. If you are American you have surely just lived through a period where the political utility of the perceptual emergency was clear.

      --
      "To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
    17. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Bearhouse · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While I appreciate that this is a popular position for the Norquist/Libeterian crowd, I do not agree.

      Well, never though of myself as a Libertarian...
      To clarify my thoughts; well, all G7 Govs. seem to have dropped the economic ball - in some way or another - in recent times, so we may, I suggest, reasonably claim that they're all incompetent in that regard.

      Let's turn to the main point, to whit Putin. He has ruthlessly and systematically concentrated power just as much as any Tzar, (to be fair, so have others - think Burlusconi, Chavez...) I suggest it is therefore reasonable to assign the current condition of the Russian economy and state pretty much to him.

      Now, do you seriously suggest that those two things are in good shape? Major western economies are in the toilet, for sure, but on all other criteria (democracy, corruption, life expectancy...) we're way ahead. My concern is that the signs are not good for progress in Rusia on ANY front.

    18. Re:And Michael Looked Back by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

      Not quite as tough a spot as those European nations who are dependent upon Russia's natural gas, I don't think.

      Okay, but what does that have to do with anything being discussed in this thread?

      Thank you.

      To be criticized for going off-thread when my comment was about and contained an embedded quote drawn from the thread itself is unique in my experience.

      After all of these years on the web and the BBS systems before them, I find some value in uniqueness. Not a lot, but some.

      --
      Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    19. Re:And Michael Looked Back by XcepticZP · · Score: 1

      Parent has a really good point.

      The US is in a huge deficit and is continuing to burn cash like it's paper! Well, it's not even real money they're burning, they're just taking out more and more loans.

    20. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Bearhouse · · Score: 4, Informative

      They did not cut production. During 2008, a time of record high oil prices, in case you have forgotten, production fell by nearly 1%.

      Historically, major increases in production had been achieved with the investment and expertise of western companies, working with Russian (OK kleptocratic) private organisations.

      Putin then threw them all out / locked 'em all up. (By the way, where the money goes now is fairly obscure...Gazprom, for example, has subsidiaries in such oil-rich nations as the Caymen Islands, Cyprus...)

      Surprise, surprise, production then fell. Was not reduced, just damn fell. Reminds me of, well, Venezuela, for example?
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/southamerica/venezuela/3183417/Venezuelas-oil-output-slumps-under-Hugo-Chavez.html

    21. Re:And Michael Looked Back by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      To be criticized for going off-thread when my comment was about and contained an embedded quote drawn from the thread itself is unique in my experience.

      After all of these years on the web and the BBS systems before them, I find some value in uniqueness. Not a lot, but some.

      Uniqueness is fun! I like things that are unique! They're, like, almost one of a kind! OOOOHH, and BBS systems! I remember those! They were cool! With fun little ANSI characters and TradeWars 2000! Whee!

      Am I still on topic?

    22. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      Like China, authoritarianism works on a population accustomed to it and enjoying a rapidly rising standard of living.

      You mean it didn't work for China for the 5,000 years before that when there wasn't a rapidly rising standard of living?

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    23. Re:And Michael Looked Back by eln · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agreed. Capitalism is the system that requires a steadily rising standard of living to survive. Authoritarian states are created and thrive when standards of living are low.

      In fact, if a Capitalist states endures a falling standard of living for long enough, it will often end up being replaced by force with an authoritarian controlled economy.

    24. Re:And Michael Looked Back by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      We've seen what the USSR could accomplish as a go-it-alone economy...

      Heh. I'm sure that the various TLA agencies in the US had absolutely *nothing* to do with the decline of the USSR. No sir. ;)

    25. Re:And Michael Looked Back by James_Duncan8181 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Let's turn to the main point, to whit Putin. He has ruthlessly and systematically concentrated power just as much as any Tzar, (to be fair, so have others - think Burlusconi, Chavez...) I suggest it is therefore reasonable to assign the current condition of the Russian economy and state pretty much to him.

      Now, do you seriously suggest that those two things are in good shape? Major western economies are in the toilet, for sure, but on all other criteria (democracy, corruption, life expectancy...) we're way ahead. My concern is that the signs are not good for progress in Rusia on ANY front.

      I would agree that the West is indeed ahead on all fronts (including economically, in fact) but it is important to bear in mind the legacy that Putin came into power with. It is not entirely propaganda that makes people compare him positively to Yeltsin, I would say. The Russian body politic looks at Putin and compares him to Gorbachev's dismantling of the USSR and Yeltsin's disposal of the assets of the state for pennies on the dollar and loss of societal control. It is therefore not surprising that a program of controlling the oligarchs and bringing them under Kremlin control is popular. The Russian economy was starting to diversify, but was indeed focussed in energy. I think it is however fair to say that the economy did better under Putin than under any Russian leadership for at least a generation.

      In terms of democracy, it is of course going backwards. I am however not entirely sure that's not what Russians as a body politic (which is very different from the urban intelligentsia) actually wants. It's a problem. I would also say that in a country where Stalin almost won a greatest Russian poll (while being Georgian, oddly enough) Putin's centralisation of power is not only not as big as any Tzar's but actually quite restrained. The rule of Stalin was essentially that of a Communist Tzar, and he killed millions.

      The counterargument is that Putin's air force almost bombed me in Gori, Georgia. I was however mildly amused by this.

      --
      "To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
    26. Re:And Michael Looked Back by MightyYar · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      But why did you mention Europe? The parent post was talking about Russia and the economic situation there. You may as well have said, "Not quite as tough a spot as those starving Ethiopians!"

      Maybe if you went somewhere with it, but you didn't... just left it at "Europe is worse off," which even if true isn't at all on topic.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    27. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite how naive do we assume Putin to be here? Russia isn't some failed state that cannot run it's own programs and make it's own choices. Authoritarian, yes, but competent at it.

      I don't assume Putin is naive. I assume he is something else.

      Here's a quote from him in a recent interview:

      Q: What's the best advice you ever got, and from whom?

      Putin: It has to be my mom. Don't ask for anything, and never complain.

      Now what do I consider Putin? I consider Putin a whining little bitch. Every time he opens his mouth I can hear the whine. It just oozes out.

      That is honestly the impression I get these days. Poor, little, put-upon Vladimir Putin. The whole world is against him. Oh woe is him.

      The man needs to grow a pair. He talks tough. But when I listen to how he's saying what he says I only hear whining.

    28. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

      Beware of geeks bare in gifs?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    29. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      Putin is actually also correct to be worried. The 90s was full of foreign consultants coming over to Moscow and giving unbelievably bad advice that lead to premature loosening of all controls and a kleptocratic oligarchy shortly after that.

      I guess that is cause for him to worry. After all, the only person allowed to be kleptocratic oligarch is him!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    30. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Quite. I can see why Putin's nationalist bluster about not needing the outside world might appeal to Joe Vodkabottle types in the sticks in Russia, but I'm surprised it appeals here on /.

      If an American President had said it, you'd be mocking him.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    31. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      if a Capitalist states endures a falling standard of living for long enough, it will often end up being replaced by force with an authoritarian controlled economy.

      You mean when shove comes to Putch?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    32. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beware of geeks bearing gifs.

      There, fixed that for you.

    33. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually I think China and Russia have always been authoritarian apart from a few brief interregnums. Like the joke about women who date nice guys only when they are 'between bastards', China and Russia only have reformist governments when they are between tyrants. Typically those reformist governments collapse under attack from multiple would be tyrants. One tyrant wins and things go back to normal.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    34. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      before Russia was the USSR it was a depressed failing post-war economy run by a Czar.

      See? That's where they went wrong. They only has one czar. Here in the United States, we have dozens of czars. We have the drug czar, the car czar, the banking czar, and the list goes on.

      On a more serious note, when you have a shitload of natural resources and share a 4,000 mile border with a country that has a 60,000,000 boy surplus and an insatiable appetite for said resources, and your population is declining so rapidly that in 15 years you will have NO air force for lack of pilots, you have no plan B.

    35. Re:And Michael Looked Back by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'We've seen what the USSR could accomplish as a go-it-alone economy, and it wasn't enough. Having a nominally capitalist system will help, but Putin needs to stop with the saber rattling and the blind nationalism.'

      No we've seen what the USSR could accomplish as a go-it-alone economy in a constant state of keeping up with the jones and war. The USSR didn't bankrupt itself, the US bankrupted the USSR.

    36. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe his point is this: Russia supplies 1/4 of Europe's natural gas. Putin can use that leverage to keep his economy afloat.

    37. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Agree. Slightly confused by your dual usage of 'body politic', tho'. Yes, the Moscow clique support Putin, (through little choice), whilst he - for reasons you allude to - does enjoy genuine popular support. Indeed a problem, and going the wrong way.

      By a strange quirk of history, they nearly got me too; but that was another time, and another place...

      Still, seemingly like you, I cannot bear a grudge again such a genuinely charming people, who have been foully served by their leaders for centuries.

    38. Re:And Michael Looked Back by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

      But why did you mention Europe? The parent post was talking about Russia and the economic situation there. You may as well have said, "Not quite as tough a spot as those starving Ethiopians!" Maybe if you went somewhere with it, but you didn't... just left it at "Europe is worse off," which even if true isn't at all on topic.

      I had assumed that the situation vis-à-vis Europe, Russia, the Ukraine, and natural gas was relatively common knowledge, even to Americans such as myself. Further information may be obtained by googling; a quick rundown can be found at http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-01-29-voa33.cfm/

      --
      Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    39. Re:And Michael Looked Back by MightyYar · · Score: 0

      Ahhhh, okay. Well, in that case he should have said as much.

      In any event, Russia can't jack the price of gas since the market would take care of that very quickly. If they are hoping to pull some kind of gas shortage off all by themselves, they will be sorely disappointed. Europe buys from Russia because it is cost effective, not because Russia is the only source of gas.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    40. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      beware of geeks boring gfs

    41. Re:And Michael Looked Back by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's not just nationalism. It's hubris. That has been a part of Russia's collective psyche for at least the past 100 years. They're not going to let anyone tell them what to do, and they balk at receiving help from anyone - it's a sign of weakness.

      Russians are Klingons. They are belligerent and drunk all the time, use brute force whenever possible, would rather die that surrender. Yet somehow they are a spacefaring society that always ends up saving the day with their cargo ships and scrapped together heaps. It defies logic.

    42. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES

    43. Re:And Michael Looked Back by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      Not exactly. Russian gas was the cheapest/easiest, so they built the infrastructure around the availability of Russian gas. So when the Russians cut it off recently, there were a LOT of chilly people, because the authorities couldn't simply turn a valve to a different pipeline. And I'm not sure there are any bulk CNG tankers commissioned, much less the port facilities.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    44. Re:And Michael Looked Back by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      Europe buys from Russia because it is cost effective, not because Russia is the only source of gas.

      Europe could survive without oil from Russia. However, the current infrastructure to supply 100% of their need from sources not inculding Russia doesnt exsist. Concept supported by the oil/gas shortages caused when the Ukraine limited the flow to Europe from Russia in 2006. So, if all imports from Russia stopped, there would be a period of time wher there would be oil/gas shortages in Europe.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    45. Re:And Michael Looked Back by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I'm very aware of that situation - I just don't see how it helps Russia.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    46. Re:And Michael Looked Back by quarterbuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We've seen what the USSR could accomplish as a go-it-alone economy, and it wasn't enough. Having a nominally capitalist system will help, but Putin needs to stop with the saber rattling and the blind nationalism.
      We have so far seen what a large communist economy can accomplish in USSR. We have seen what a minimally capitalist Russia can do. But from the way Putin has been moving, he is not planning to stop there. It seems like he wants to be a monopoly player in any sector Russia has the power to do it. He is playing a game of chess with eastern Europe as his chessboard when it comes to oil pipelines. Attacking Georgia was a case of sacrificing a pawn to make a move on the queen - The BTC pipeline is the pipeline that will break Russia's monopoly on gas and Russia just made a move on it.
      The same thing goes for any natural resources, Aluminium to Manganese -- Russia lets the oligarchs consolidate the industry with no regards to monopoly issues and at the last minute captures them back from them (or gets enough power to control the exports). You can't fault Russia for lack of extreme capitalism.
      That said, it works for natural resources, but lack of protection for entrepreneurs has been a disaster in all other fields. Their productivity is actually falling in most sectors and they have been able to export limited number of branded products. If I were Putin, I would have asked for help in developing entrepreneurial culture,

      --
      http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
    47. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Pollardito · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would suggest that authoritarianism does not require a rise in living standards to keep on going, and indeed I would suggest that a perception of danger and mass insecurity in the face of either economic or military threat is what often creates it in hard times. If you are American you have surely just lived through a period where the political utility of the perceptual emergency was clear.

      military threats and economic threats are pretty different. military threats are generally external and so they don't seem to always damage the regime that's in power, but economic threats generally are perceived to be due to an internal problem and so people want a change to rectify that problem. Right now Putin is trying to emphasize that he thinks that the economic problem was caused by the US and not their own system, so that he can avoid just that problem.

    48. Re:And Michael Looked Back by einar2 · · Score: 1

      "... and now that oil prices have fallen..."

      Where do you live? Yes, due to the economical crisis capital was removed and some speculative prices fell. However, do you seriously believe that energy prices will fall?

    49. Re:And Michael Looked Back by the_B0fh · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Let's turn to the main point, to whit Putin. He has ruthlessly and systematically concentrated power just as much as any Tzar, (to be fair, so have others - think Burlusconi, Chavez...)

      What about Bush? OK, he hasn't been ruthless against his own citizens, only a subset of foreign citizens, but he has systematically concentrated power too.

    50. Re:And Michael Looked Back by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points for you.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    51. Re:And Michael Looked Back by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      That's true, but if they try to reduce supply to increase price two things will happen:
      1. Alternate sources will quickly step in (weeks/months, not instantaneously)
      2. They will be selling less, so this will reduce the income somewhat, offsetting some of the price increase.

      If they simply jack the price, the same thing will happen, though #2 would be delayed somewhat.

      Ukraine was willing to sit in the cold rather than cave on prices (though it's not like they had the extra cash), and Russia had better not underestimate the rest of Europe.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    52. Re:And Michael Looked Back by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, but Russia can't stop either - they need the money! Russia needs money, Europe needs oil/gas... if Russia thinks that they can put the screws on Europe to get them through a rough economic time, I think they'll be surprised.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    53. Re:And Michael Looked Back by AlXtreme · · Score: 2, Interesting

      how did Poland end up democratic and prosperous while Russia is autocratic and at the whim of oil/gas prices?

      Naomi Klein answers (among others) this question in The Shock Doctrine. The Poles are where they are despite the 'foreign consultants' and have had a very rough time.

      An excerpt from a NY Times review:

      Even the shock of 9/11, she said in an interview, was "harnessed by leaders to end the discussion of global justice."

      Nor are democratic governments exempt. Solidarity in Poland in 1989, she writes, was forced to reverse positions on which it was elected -- i.e., backing worker cooperatives -- and impose a state of emergency after being strong-armed by the I.M.F. and other lenders that refused to extend aid and credit unless Poland adopted a radical free-market program.

      "We did not lose the battle of ideas," Ms. Klein likes to say. Alternatives to the free market were "crushed by army tanks and think tanks."

      I highly recommend Shock Doctrine, a good antidote against Friedmannism. She makes some comparisons I feel uneasy about, but overall a worthwhile read.

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank
    54. Re:And Michael Looked Back by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind those European nations could start getting their gas the same way we in parts of the US do: LNG tankers. It ain't that much more expensive than piping.

    55. Re:And Michael Looked Back by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      How could alternate sources step in so quickly? Convert everyone to oil or electric heat? Build a new pipeline?

      Europe's price/demand curve for gas is the same as the US's for oil - short term inelastic, long term elastic. In the short term suppliers can stick it up our (collective) asses. But in the long term, infrastructure gets put in place, and SUV's get replaced with Priapisms, and then when the price drops demand won't really increase a lot.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    56. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Hatta · · Score: 1

      So you've seen the Linus Torvalds speedo pic too huh?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    57. Re:And Michael Looked Back by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      how did Poland end up democratic and prosperous

      I don't know where you live, but here in London we have a massive Polish immigrant community that arrived after the Polish membership of the EU. The reason why they're here? The poor state of the Polish economy, with rates of pay that leave little or no disposable income. Sure, there's some foreign investment, but it's going into crap like hotels and shopping centres, not infrastructure that's going to support a decent economy in the long term. Since joining the EU, costs of production have risen across the Polish economy leaving it less able to compete (compare Polish and German shipbuilding for instance - similar quality, but Polish shipyards are losing their price competitiveness).

    58. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      ... Or, indeed, the continued existence of Zimbabwe as a state.

      Don't forget North Korea, Zimbabwe is worse off, but probably not by much.

    59. Re:And Michael Looked Back by richlv · · Score: 1

      frankly, russia has turned into a totalitarian state once more. that's darn scary - just look at what they did in georgia.
      putin himself is a modern day napoleon or hitler - short man with huge ambitions, heartless, ruthless and huge powers. maybe we'll get another history record of a great war started by a small man. i do hope russians will shrug him off, but the hope is small, given that they (at least as reported by media) tend to keep his photo right besides holy virgin.

      --
      Rich
    60. Re:And Michael Looked Back by flosofl · · Score: 1

      Yes, due to the economical crisis capital was removed and some speculative prices fell. However, do you seriously believe that energy prices will fall?

      What? In the past six months I have seen gasoline prices plummet. Compared to this time last year my natural gas bill is much lower. My electric has stayed fairly consistent over the last 12 months.

      I assure you, my usage has not changed in any significant way. As matter of fact I'm certain my natural gas usage is higher than last year due to the longer lasting cold spells we have experienced where I live.

      Where are you that you have seen no impact to your energy prices? Of course you may have your state to thank for that, they may be mapped to a fixed rate or unregulated altogether. I know in IL, NG is mapped to market rates.

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    61. Re:And Michael Looked Back by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      How could alternate sources step in so quickly?

      What's your definition of "quickly"? I just mean that jacking up the prices and putting the screws to Europe would simply buy them a little bit of time and would absolutely kill them in the long term.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    62. Re:And Michael Looked Back by ibsteve2u · · Score: 0

      Keep in mind those European nations could start getting their gas the same way we in parts of the US do: LNG tankers. It ain't that much more expensive than piping.

      True, but building terminal facilities and the requisite connecting pipelines is not cheap, and doing it as a rush job in the middle of winter is obviously out of the question.

      Likewise, given that world's LPG/LNG tanker fleet is already fully committed, some rather expensive new ships will have to be built, which does not happen overnight.

      --
      Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    63. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "kleptocratic oligarchy"? Sounds familiar.

    64. Re:And Michael Looked Back by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind communism and totalitarianism aren't mutually beneficial things.

      We've not really seen a true communist state, but we've seen a few dictatorships with communism as a guise for continuing their agenda.

      We did see lines for simple state sponsored items like bread and toilet paper in the USSR, though I don't honestly know if that was routine or on occasion. We also know that people were unhappy but also fearful of expressing that.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    65. Re:And Michael Looked Back by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No, they aren't competent at it actually. If they were it would be successful.

      "..advice that lead to premature loosening of all controls and a kleptocratic oligarchy shortly after that."

      I'm confused, was it bad advice or not~

      Of course they can make their own choices. And yes, Dell want's a market their, but that doesn't mean they can't have a little help.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    66. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nein. Sie haben das nicht gemacht.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    67. Re:And Michael Looked Back by DarthLion · · Score: 1

      That would make the Americans the Ferengi, and te Europeans the Vulcans.

    68. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Well, in that case he should have said as much.

      He did. Which part of "European nations dependent on Russian gas" is giving you a problem?

      Europe buys from Russia because it is cost effective, not because Russia is the only source of gas.

      Europe buys from Russia because it was cost effective, and now they more or less are the only source of gas. If Ukraine could have had some sent by FedEx from Nigeria, they would have.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    69. Re:And Michael Looked Back by DarthLion · · Score: 1

      It's not just nationalism. It's hubris. That has been a part of Russia's collective psyche for at least the past 100 years. They're not going to let anyone tell them what to do, and they balk at receiving help from anyone - it's a sign of weakness.

      Russians are Klingons. They are belligerent and drunk all the time, use brute force whenever possible, would rather die that surrender. Yet somehow they are a spacefaring society that always ends up saving the day with their cargo ships and scrapped together heaps. It defies logic.

      That would make Americans be the Ferengi, and Europeans the vulcans, and chinese the Borg.

    70. Re:And Michael Looked Back by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      He did. Which part of "European nations dependent on Russian gas" is giving you a problem?

      The part where I'm supposed to infer "and therefore Russia can solve their economic problems by extorting money from Europe". It was not at all clear to me that he was suggesting as much.

      If Ukraine could have had some sent by FedEx from Nigeria, they would have.

      But Russia did not extract any significant amount of money from Ukraine... so that tactic is probably not going to work in the future, either. You can't get blood from a stone.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    71. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, "Endergone Zwiebeltuete" seems to be a fan of JPEGs: http://www.addicks.net/gallery/zwiebeltu

    72. Re:And Michael Looked Back by scientus · · Score: 1

      yes, what Mr. Dell said was incredibly vague and demeaning. I think putin said exactally the right response. If Dell had said something with some meaning to it then it would have been worthy of consideration, but this was not the case. He just said "you development is not as good as it could be" with really nothing more, sounds like BS to me.

      And putin said the sound basics in defending himself, that Russia has complete coverage of computers and internet in all classrooms, including far North and East. Thats a big thing that is definetely one of the most important, much more than any vague 'how do i do better without having any idea how' goals.

    73. Re:And Michael Looked Back by amilo100 · · Score: 1

      You know that Putin may be the richest man in the world? He is corrupt.

      If Putin was really against the oligarchy wouldn't it strain the relationship with his buddy Roman Abramovich?

    74. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Morten+Hustveit · · Score: 1

      Sure, there's some foreign investment, but it's going into crap like hotels and shopping centres, not infrastructure that's going to support a decent economy in the long term.

      Are you sure? I motorcycled through Poland a few months ago, and I saw some massive spending on infrastructure, especially the A2 motorway. If you've used the roads of Poland, you'll agree that an upgrade is vitally important. In particular, roads leading to Berlin are important for transportation of goods.

      Warszawa seemed modern in most regards (probably because it needed rebuilding after World War 2), and they have a very nice subway system under construction (already partly operational) as well as modern surface trams.

      Still, most of the population live in thousands of small villages, and those people probably aren't noticing the economic growth too much.

      Since joining the EU, costs of production have risen across the Polish economy leaving it less able to compete.

      That's what happens when you become a developed nation, no?

    75. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've seen what the USSR could accomplish as a go-it-alone economy, and it wasn't enough.

      Er, no we haven't. We saw what the USSR could accomplish as an agressive superpower trying to bury the West. Had they concentrated that wealth and talent on simply a defendable go-it-alone economy they probably could have achieved that, with a rather nice standard of living that the bulk of Russians have never, ever known.

      Having a nominally capitalist system will help, but Putin needs to stop with the saber rattling and the blind nationalism.

      Does he? I mean, that's his whole schtick. He of the KGB is the only surviving structure of the USSR after the West collapsed it. The miserable crime-laced chaos of the following years included a number of Western partnerships (ie the gas industry) that were simply an invasion from his point of view. His following elimination of democracy and nationalization of partnership & oligachy assets is the retaking of lost ground.

      I don't like the guy or what he's about, but if you're going to think about Russia you've got to figure out how Russian works by looking at Russian perspectives. This isn't so different from WW2 to Putin & Co., and like then they fully intend to push the invaders all the way back out of their country.

      It doesn't bode well for the future. I appreciate that people have a laundry list of blames for the Bush years, but one of the worst was the way he kept saying what a great guy Putin is in exchange for Putin's approval of Bush's international excesses. Those were the years the West needed to take a stand about Russian democracy, and it's just too bloody late now.

      [I know this is /., but I'm honestly putting that out for your consideration, not as contradiction. Cheers.]

    76. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Communism did not survive the Cultural Revolution in China. The Communist Party did. These are not even close to the same thing.

    77. Re:And Michael Looked Back by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      concentrated power just as much as any Tzar, (to be fair, so have others - think Burlusconi, Chavez...)

      I don't know much about Italian politics, but putting Burlusconi in the same sentence as Putin and Chavez is a pretty harsh comparison, isn't it?

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    78. Re:And Michael Looked Back by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The people of the Ukraine clearly had a falling standard of living as Stalin starved them but failed to successfully revolt or change the system.

      They didn't fail to revolt; the revolt just wasn't successful, and it was quickly dismissed by Soviets as "Nazi collaboration" and swiped under the rug.

    79. Re:And Michael Looked Back by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Still, seemingly like you, I cannot bear a grudge again such a genuinely charming people, who have been foully served by their leaders for centuries.

      [Given sufficiently long period of time] all peoples have the rulers they deserve.

      Russia had plenty of time, and moments of choice. And the choice was made.

    80. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea of blaming the leader of a country solely, no matter how authoritarian he is is sheer stupidity.

      Sure they might be dictators who's whim is law, but you can't run something as big as a whole country personally, theres just too fucking much of it. Theres a million and one minor things that keep a country going, even bad countries. And no one person could possibly track them all, even out and out dictators still need ministers and deputies (no matter what the position is actually called) to actually operate the machinery of government once he gives out the orders.

      In most cases out of sheer realisim even dictators usually only dictate policy, if I dictate that my country needs more rail infrastructure im not going to sit down and design four thousand kilometeres of rail systems, I'll find somebody who's good and that type of shit and tell him to do it for me.

      The reverse is true, no one man could ever read all the briefs, reports, and intel generated by a realistically sized government, you have advisers who do that shit for you, and then tell you the important bits that actually need your direct attention. And GIGO applies, a leader who's given bad information makes bad decisions.

      Like just about anywhere else its the Bureaucracy that runs a government and its usually that self same Bureaucracy you can blame when things go bad.

      Take the USA as an easy example, for our Bureaucracy of choice we go with the TSA. Now the TSA has managed, and its truly an accomplishment to become less popular than the IRS. Yes, it holds the dubious distinction of making the tax man look good, that takes some doing.

      Did you elect the TSA? Its employees? It's director even? Nope, and now that its in place even if another administration wanted to get rid of it its harder to get rid of it than it was to create, more so the longer it exists.

      If theres something wrong with a country, sure look to its leaders. But make sure you save plenty of blame to share out with the Bureaucracies as well.

    81. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems what they have in common apart from a large nationalist streak is they have all been invaded and occupied, often multiple times in recent history.

    82. Re:And Michael Looked Back by visible.frylock · · Score: 1

      Just curious, when you say petrodollar, what are you referring to?

      I've always heard it used to describe the (T-bill -> 3rd-party-oil-sales -> US-deficit) cycle, with the oil exporting nations getting strong "encouragement" to sell for only US denominated assetts.

      Are you talking about something different? Any links appreciated.

      --
      Billy Brown rides on. Yolanda Green bypasses Gary White.
    83. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whiskey Tango Foxtrot? What NeoCon Bible are you preaching from today? II Chronicles 7:14??

      "My fellow Americans, tonight we are launching an (abortive, bogus, Star Wars) effort which holds the promise of changing the course of human history. There will be risks, and results take time. But I believe we can do it. As we cross this threshold, I ask for your prayers and your support. Thank you, good night and God bless you."

      Without the fortuitous invention of the 8086 microprocessor, and a "freebee tech bubble" he copped on his "trickle down your back" economic theories, Reagan's legacy would've made Putin's look like the Sun King.

    84. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LISTER: I dunno though. This wooden horse of Troy malarkey, I'm not buyin' that.
      RIMMER: It's one of the most famous military maneuvers in history!
      LISTER: I mean, the Greeks have been camped outside Troy, kerpowing, zapping, and kersplatting the Trojans for the best part of a decade, yeah?
      RIMMER: So?
      LISTER: So all of a sudden they wake up one mornin' and the Greeks have gone. And there outside the city walls they've left this gift; this tribute to their valiant foes: a huge wooden horse, just large enough to happily contain 500 Greeks in full battle dress and still leave adequate room for toilet facilities? Are you telling me not one Trojan goes, "Hang on a minute, that's a bit of a funny prezzy. What's wrong with a couple hundred pairs of socks and some aftershave?" No, they don't -- they just wheel it in and all decide to go for an early night! People that stupid deserve to be kerpowed, zapped and kersplatted in their beds! You know what the big joke is? From this particular phase in history we derive the phrase, "Beware of Greeks bearing gifts," when it would be much more logical to derive the phrase, "Beware of Trojans, they're complete smegheads!"
      RIMMER: Well, thank you, A.J.P. Taylor.

    85. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to correct that properly: Beware of Danians (Greeks), especially when bearing gifts. Or for the poster below... Beware of classicists (geeks), even when bearing gifts.

    86. Re:And Michael Looked Back by sFurbo · · Score: 1

      I haven't read it myself, but the reviews when it came out were not too good, to the point off pointing out massive amounts off factual errors and logical fallacies (the only one I remember was stating that Friedman visited Chile shortly after the coup, which is correct, and using that to conclude that he supported the coup, which isn't. Oh, sorry, stating that it was necessary to implement his economic polities). Some fact-checking might be in order before relying too much on "the shock doctrine".

    87. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia isn't some failed state that cannot run it's own programs and make it's own choices. Authoritarian, yes, but competent at it.

      Not yet, but it's getting pretty close. While the economic crissis is a major PITA in Europe and America it is absolutley devastating to Russia especially the falling oil (and what follows also natural gas) prices.

    88. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Like China, authoritarianism works on a population accustomed to it and enjoying a rapidly rising standard of living."

      This is surely incorrect. The USSR functioned for almost seven decades. The people of the Ukraine clearly had a falling standard of living as Stalin starved them but failed to successfully revolt or change the system. Likewise in China, the cultural revolution was not something associated with a huge rise in living standards but Communism survived. Or the Castros in Cuba after the fall of the USSR and resultant drop in subsidy. Or Afghanistan moving from Soviet subsidy to Taliban control. Or the long reign of Pinochet in Chile. Or, indeed, the continued existence of Zimbabwe as a state.

      One on those is not like the others.

      The long reign of Pinpchet rescued the Chilian economy and brought about the Chillian economic miracle creating a thriving free market.

    89. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lowering the standard of living of those above you can have a similar psychological effect as increasing your personal standard of living.

    90. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't really know what happened with Georgia, do you? Next time do a little research before you throw in half a sentence to pretend you know what you're talking about.

    91. Re:And Michael Looked Back by sqldr · · Score: 1

      Beware of geeks bearing gifts.

      Beware of geeks.

      Fixed!

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    92. Re:And Michael Looked Back by laa · · Score: 1

      But why did you mention Europe?

      Maybe because large parts of the population of Russia (including the inhabitants of its capital) lives in Europe? Just a hunch, though...

      --
      Why does the kernel go through stable and then unstable forks? Can't it always be a stable build, like with Windows?
    93. Re:And Michael Looked Back by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Maybe because large parts of the population of Russia (including the inhabitants of its capital) lives in Europe? Just a hunch, though...

      I think you are even more off base with his comment than I was. :) He was alluding to the ability of Russia to squeeze Europe via the gas supply to climb out of economic trouble. I'm glad to see there is someone else that found the statement to be ambiguous.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    94. Re:And Michael Looked Back by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

      Beware of geeks bare in gifs

      Classic. I'm going to use that one at every available opportunity.

      Oh, and "kleptocratic oligarchy" might come in useful, too.

      --
      Squirrel!
    95. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      These similarities are no coincidence, you know.

    96. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putin is just overconfident. No industry can be built using that 20 guys who win world championship.

      Russians as a nation hate themselves and hate everybody else. The Russian mass media cultivate xenophobia like in no other country i can watch (I know three languages including Russian).

      If pressed to put in one line what Russia is i would say: vodka, corruption, xenophobia.

      The country has so many problems and the government does so little to change the situation.
      They attribute the last 10 years of relative success to the Putin's smartness, but in reality it was pure luck of US Fed keeping low interest rates for so long. In essence US feeds Russia and Russians think that this is Russia which feeds the US.

    97. Re:And Michael Looked Back by simstick · · Score: 1

      "If you are American you have surely just lived through a period where the political utility of the perceptual emergency was clear.

      I perceive that I have not had to worry about being blown up by terrorists recently for whatever that has to do with the price of computers in Russia.

      --
      The best way to ruin your hobby is to try to make a living at it. Waiting on the paperless office since 1997
    98. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Chilean economic miracle" resulted in catastrohpically lowered standards of living for most Chileans. A few rich people got much richer though.

    99. Re:And Michael Looked Back by avoiceinthewildernes · · Score: 1

      Naomi Klein is a vicious, hateful liar. Her absurd claims are exposed here: http://www.reason.com/news/show/128903.html. Seriously, she can't be stupid enough to say of the crap in that book, so one can only infer she's maliciously lying. And you're buying it. Disgusting.

    100. Re:And Michael Looked Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, in this case Putin's reaction was justified.
      Poor Michael Dell thought he can give him sales pitch.
      "They're not going to let anyone tell them what to do" Right, Americans for example they do exactly that all the time :)

    101. Re:And Michael Looked Back by toiletsalmon · · Score: 1

      "so we may, I suggest, reasonably claim that they're all incompetent in that regard."

      I think you just mispronounced "exceptionally greedy". They didn't drop the ball, there are LOTS of dirty, stinking rich people in the G7 countries. They've done just fine. Which is all they've ever really intended anyway.

      Mission accomplished?

  3. The Cold War Called ... by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "We don't need help. We are not invalids. We don't have limited mental capacity. Our programmers are some of the best in the world. No one would contest that here -- not even our Indian colleagues."

    Failure to address the real issues (corruption, economy, etc) plaguing your society? Check.

    Playing up a sense of extreme national pride, isolation and bullheadedness? Double check.

    Burning a bridge? Triple check.

    Putin, you would have made a fine leader during the Cold War for either side.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:The Cold War Called ... by vivaoporto · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Failure to address the real issues (corruption, economy, etc) plaguing your society? Check.

      Playing up a sense of extreme national pride, isolation and bullheadedness? Double check.

      Burning a bridge? Triple check.

      Putin, you would have made a fine leader during the *past eight years* for either side.

      There, fixed that for you

    2. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes, a nation with a spine is more respectable than one without.

      Putin, you are fine.

    3. Re:The Cold War Called ... by R2.0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not going back far enough. The Russian fear of being perceived as backass country folk goes all the way back to the Tsars. Russia really wanted to be counted among European nobility, but could never really cut it, so they are hyper-sensitive to anything indicating that they are not up-to-date/cutting edge. AFAIK, "nekulturny" (literally, uncultured) is still the highest insult you can throw at a Russian.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    4. Re:The Cold War Called ... by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      Yeah because Reaganomics didn't work, did they? Oh wait.....

    5. Re:The Cold War Called ... by X.25 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Failure to address the real issues (corruption, economy, etc) plaguing your society? Check.

      Playing up a sense of extreme national pride, isolation and bullheadedness? Double check.

      Burning a bridge? Triple check.

      Putin, you would have made a fine leader during the Cold War for either side.

      I'm sorry - what country are you talking about, because quite few fit into this profile.

    6. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Ninnle+Linux · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      They worked at giving us hundreds of billions in national debt, for sure.

    7. Re:The Cold War Called ... by freedomseven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Cheap shots at Bush are tired and old. The guy was a bad president. We get it. The thing that you need to worry about is the God like persona that the media is painting Obama with. He may wind up being a good or even a great president, but no one is going to be able to live up to the hype that is being heaped upon him.

    8. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...the highest insult you can throw at a Russian.

      Not a shoe?

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    9. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Chabo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Speaking of God-like personae...

      He Must Be Like Putin

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    10. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I couldn't have said it better. Bush is gone, now everyone please shut up and move on.

    11. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GOP still

    12. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bush is gone...

      But his mess isn't.

    13. Re:The Cold War Called ... by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth recovered strongly after the 1982 recession and grew during Reagan's remaining years in office at an annual rate of 3.4% per year,[13] slightly lower than the post-World War II average of 3.6%.[14] Unemployment peaked at over 10.7% percent in 1982 then dropped during the rest of Reagan's terms, and inflation significantly decreased.[15] A net job increase of about 16 million also occurred.

          I would say he helped topple the USSR but it's coming back :(

    14. Re:The Cold War Called ... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounded like a clumsy translation more than anything... that translator is working on the fly in a literal word-for-word sense. Get a spin-meister on the transcript and you'll get something out like "Thank you for your generous offer Mr. Dell, however, Russia is a proud and self-sufficient nation who can provide for her own IT needs."

    15. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      Very true. Tolstoy's War and Peace depicted a French-speaking Russian aristocracy even at the time of the Napoleon's invasion of Russia!

    16. Re:The Cold War Called ... by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      I'd like to know if Putin took off his shoe, and pounded it on the stand while making his "we're not invalids" speech.

      That's how you know we've returned to Cold War-style Russia.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    17. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Spatial · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's an unreasonable expectation. If you fuck up for eight years in a row, you don't simply stop hearing about it a few weeks after you begin to stop.

    18. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leading economists today are downplaying the value of GDP as a measuring stick, saying it fails to take into account many important aspects of the economy - not least of which the actual social and growth benefits to the products produced.

      GDP went up under Reagan, but at what cost? (rhetorical question)

    19. Re:The Cold War Called ... by russotto · · Score: 1

      Putin, you would have made a fine leader during the Cold War for either side.

      No surprise; it's not exactly a new idea that his ambition is to become the next Joe Stalin.

    20. Re:The Cold War Called ... by CannonballHead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, those annoying conservative types and their spending. What we need are some good liberals in Congress and the White House to cut spending. Especially in times of recession. Prime example of cutting spending, of course, is the current Democrat-formed stimulus bill!

      Sarcasm aside, if you look at past recessions (even CNN did this), Reagan's presidency/Congress got the US out of a recession that apparently Carter put us into. Reagan did spend, but certainly not like FDR spent. It seems that most liberals/democrats (I realize there is a different, but they tend to go together in practice) like FDR's version better - spend more, bigger government. Cutting taxes always seems to bring the outcry of "But the government doesn't have enough income to CUT taxes!" ... but then they want to spend MORE.

      Obama is different, one might say? Well, he doesn't seem particularly interested in cutting spending, so far. He's trying to get Republican/Conservative support on basically a spending bill (the "stimulus" plan). I haven't seen him pushing democrats to cut spending yet. And I haven't heard any reform of the programs yet, either. Just more money. Wonder where the money will come from.

      Great way to get the US out of a recession is to go further into debt. Yay.

      And by the way, Clinton economics led TO a recession, not out of a recession. Recessions don't happen overnight, as seen with this one. Am I defending Bush II? Not exactly, although we DID get out of the recession that occurred right after Clinton's presidency (dot-com bubble bursting). But one also happened at the end of Bush II, and IMO he was far too spendy. But if he, a republican, was spending too much, I can't imagine what we're in for now.

    21. Re:The Cold War Called ... by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Reagan's great innovation was figuring out that if you fill people's pockets, they love you for it, even if the money is just a loan taken out in their name.

      Last night npr had a story about Obama's huge stimulus plan being the first real test of Keynesianism, and how conservatives (they quoted somebody from the Cato Institute) hated it.

      I thought, Huh? It was Reagan who ushered in the modern era of huge government spending to juice the economy. Both Bushes did it too, with Jr taking it to new heights.

      The main difference I see with Obama is that less of the money will go to the military-industrial complex and tax cuts for the rich, and more into infrastructure and services that benefit greater number of people. I think that's potentially good, but doesn't change the fact that the federal budget deficit is downright terrifying and unsustainable.

      As for Reagan breaking up the Soviet Union, give me a break. Communism never works, with or without Reagan. It was Clinton who was smart enough to reap the peace dividend by closing bases and bring a govt. surplus, which Reagan never would have done.

    22. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      Leading economists today are downplaying the value of GDP as a measuring stick,

      ...because otherwise they look like the idiots they are for advocating economic policy that doesn't work.

    23. Re:The Cold War Called ... by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Russia really wanted to be counted among European nobility,

      In that case Russia should just join the EU like everyone else is doing. Then they can truly consider themselves "european" in not just name, but also fact. An EU extending from the Atlantic to the Pacific would make the U.S. shake in fear, and at last Europeans could restore their colonial-style hegemony over the entire world.

      Oh wait. I've revealed too much.

      (shh)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    24. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      You mean Clinton's? How quickly the details of history are forgotten...

    25. Re:The Cold War Called ... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Putin, you would have made a fine leader during the Cold War for either side.

      Would have?

      I think for Putin (I probably don't need to remind you that he is ex-KGB), an argument could be made that to him the cold war hasn't ended yet.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    26. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Failure to address the real issues (corruption, economy, etc) plaguing your society? Check.

      Playing up a sense of extreme national pride, isolation and bullheadedness? Double check.

      Burning a bridge? Triple check.

      America, you would have made a fine leader during the Cold War for either side.

      Fixed it for you.

    27. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You mean like all the Republicans "moved on" after Clinton left office? Because we sure didn't hear anything about that guy after he wasn't acting president anymore...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    28. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TBH the translation was a bit harsher than what Putin actually said in Russian. His speech had more the tone of "The truth is, we don't need help. We have to help the people who need it - the poor, developing countries, etc..."

    29. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      You mean Clinton's? How quickly the details of history are forgotten...

      Details like Clinton's $127 BILLION dollar budget surplus that the Shrub immediately wasted on fruitless 'refunds' that did nothing to strengthen the economy and everything to start it on the path to the economic shitpit we inhabit today??

      Get stuffed, Republitard.

    30. Re:The Cold War Called ... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      If you fuck up for eight years in a row, you don't simply stop hearing about it a few weeks after you begin to stop.

      That's reasonable, but I guess I was hoping that the shoehorning of Bush into every unrelated Slashdot topic would end. It's one thing to hate the guy and speak out about it, and it's quite another to pollute every single discussion on slashdot with anti-Bush rhetoric. He's gone, already! We have a new sheriff.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    31. Re:The Cold War Called ... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Obama is that less of the money will go to the military-industrial complex and tax cuts for the rich, and more into infrastructure and services that benefit greater number of people. I think that's potentially good, but doesn't change the fact that the federal budget deficit is downright terrifying and unsustainable.

      I have no argument that Bush (and both GOP/Democrat congresses) spent way too much, but the current "Stimulus/Recovery/Whatever-the-hell" bill is good money after bad. A significant portion of the money goes into Medicaid, Medicare, and "state-aid".

      Cover state budget holes, and state legislatures will spend the money on something else. Meanwhile, the federal budget gets a new, higher, $1 trillion dollar deficit a year floor.

      You want Keynesian Stimulus? Spend $200-400 billion on infrastructure. You want Reagan Stimulus? Spend $200-400 on infrastructure, and another $200-400 on pro-business tax cuts.

      The current bill is neither of those things, pays a small amount towards national 'capital' assets, and borrows a vast amount of money to fill structural holes in state budgets.

      *shrug*

      I don't think you can stimulate the economy, or fix long-term structural budgetary problems, by kicking funding for schools, healthcare, and other transfer payments down the road 2 years (which is *exactly* what this bill does). So; Pell Grants get $20 billion for 2009-2010? What about 2011? Not only does the shortfall get bigger, but then we have to cope with the additional interest on the borrowed money to fill today's budgetary hole.

      I'm all for targeted tax cuts that increase future tax revenue (capital gains taxes). I'm all for infrastructure funding that either reduces future budgetary needs (energy efficiency can do that), or increases economic activity (better ports, internet, and highways ->more business->bigger tax base).

      But if we spend/borrow $1 trillion, and don't get a significant amount of long term growth out of it, we're just digging a deeper hole, and that's exactly what the big O is planning to do.

      I've told other people, and I'll post it on Slashdot, for which I'll get ridiculed. Unless there are some dramatic sunset provisions in this bill, or the economy starts magically growing at 4-5% a year, people will remember the days of Bush as "The Good Old Days", when budget deficits were no more than a few hundred billion, and the national debt was under $20 trillion. When spending $600 billion on a war over 5 years was considered profligate waste.

      We've pole-vaulted over the $1 trillion dollar per-year deficit level, and we don't even have anything cool to show for it (like, I dunno, space factors, a city on the moon, or Nuclear Fusion).

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    32. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Perf · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's an unreasonable expectation. If you fuck up for eight years in a row, you don't simply stop hearing about it a few weeks after you begin to stop.

      You talking about 'W' or Clinton? ;-)
      (You DID mention the 'F' word.)

    33. Re:The Cold War Called ... by R2.0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "In that case Russia should just join the EU like everyone else is doing. Then they can truly consider themselves "european" in not just name, but also fact. An EU extending from the Atlantic to the Pacific would make the U.S. shake in fear, and at last Europeans could restore their colonial-style hegemony over the entire world."

      Ahh, but now you bring up the second Russian socio-political hangup from Tsarist times - fear of being invaded, of having their territory taken away, of being manipulated. they have good reason, as well - they HAVE been invaded a number of times, and it cost them dearly. But it's become a blockade to better relations - they see ALL interaction with the West as potential to lose something - territory, prestige, resources.

      I saw a map by a Russian political thinker which shows the US split into 4 regions, with Canada taking the North Central states, Mexico taking South Central over to Florida, China taking the West Coast, and the EU taking the East Coast. The map was wholly preposterous (can you imagine SC and NY in a voluntary political union?), until you looked at the cultural background of the author. The Russian's greatest fear is being invaded by outsiders and parceled up. So they projected that onto the US, looking at the States as territory and not individual political entities.

      Besides which, I already know how it will go after the USA falls apart: the New England states will form the nation of...New England; NY will go their own way, California will split into 3, and the Confederacy will rise again.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    34. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "nekulturniy" is still the highest insult, what?
      when was it the highest insult?
      it seems i've been living in some other russia.

    35. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Cyberax · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, you're wrong (I'm Russian, BTW).

      Russians are not very hypersensitive about _everything_. Only about things in which Russia was the best :)

      All engineers here realize that USSR was far behind in electronics/computing - "Soviet microcomputers are the biggest microcomputers in the world!"

    36. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem is that their culture and everything else is diametrically backwards from the rest of the western world. Someone reading Russian literature will notice the extreme difference from western, same with lots of other things. a couple of my Russian friends were able to crack the encryption on a Home automation systems software encryption in literally minutes. It would have taken me days to do it. They try to explain it to me but you have to "think Russian", as they put it to me, to understand it.

      Backwards and different is not a bad thing, I think it's a great thing... But their desire to be "like us" is nuts. Be yourself instead.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    37. Re:The Cold War Called ... by jgalun · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how a failure to address the real issue is representative of the American side of the Cold War. In case you didn't notice, America's economy grew massively throughout the Cold War, the highway system was built, the Internet was created, civilian space exploration stood up, civil rights and women's rights were achieved, etc. It's not like the US stood still during that time.

    38. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Naw, we save that for our own (ex)leaders

    39. Re:The Cold War Called ... by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Informative

      the federal budget deficit is downright terrifying and unsustainable.

      Unsustainable, yes, but at the current interest rate they are paying, they'd be silly NOT to borrow. Now, that is all starting to change... yesterday they had to pay out more interest than expected to sell some 5-year treasuries. I expect that this will only get worse, so borrowing is about to get expensive.

      As for Reagan breaking up the Soviet Union, give me a break. Communism never works, with or without Reagan. It was Clinton who was smart enough to reap the peace dividend by closing bases and bring a govt. surplus, which Reagan never would have done.

      It's about being the right guy at the right time in history. Clinton NEVER would have won the election in 1980... and I doubt Governor Reagan would have won post-Cold War. Reagan almost certainly hastened the fall of the USSR, even if a fall was inevitable in the end. Also, Bush the first started reaping the peace dividends... Clinton carried this on. Bush I inherited about $480 billion (in constant dollars) and left Clinton with about $400 billion, so he knocked off about 16%. Clinton inherited the $400 billion and left with $345 billion, so he brought it down another 14% but in 8 years. Granted he had to deal with Republicans and a blowjob (in that order) the last couple of years, but you still have to give Bush I some credit.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    40. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 2, Funny

      A shoe is the *furthest* insult you can throw. But we're looking for *highest* for this particular trivia question.

    41. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Ninnle+Linux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, those annoying conservative types and their spending.

      Are you saying this in complete ignorance of the fact that during the Reagan, Bush I and II administrations that the most national debt was piled on?

    42. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bush, you would have made a fine leader during the Cold War for either side.

      There, fixed that for you.

    43. Re:The Cold War Called ... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Informative

      AFAIK, "nekulturny" (literally, uncultured) is still the highest insult you can throw at a Russian.

      I see that you've read Heinlein. However, that particular thing that he wrote wasn't true then, much less now.

      Depending on the social class, the highest insult you can throw at a Russian is probably either "intelligent" (as in belonging to intelligentsia) when directed by a prole against someone he perceives as a smartass, or "bydlo" (this is a Polish loanword that literally means "cattle", and figuratively someone who lives to eat and copulate, and nothing above that) when it is the other way around.

    44. Re:The Cold War Called ... by wbren · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...the highest insult you can throw at a Russian.

      Not a shoe?

      Not a chair?

      Oh right, this is Dell, not Microsoft.

      --
      -William Brendel
    45. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to disagree, but I am not sure this applied only to Russians.

      In most Eastern European countries, the word you mention is considered an insult and shameful (I am from former Yugoslavia).

      Being literate, educated and informed is (was) very much valued in Eastern Europe. It's probably stereotyping, but I am not sure if those same values apply in the US.

    46. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Ninnle+Linux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And if you think I'm making this up, just look at this graph: http://www.cedarcomm.com/~stevelm1/usdebt_files/image002.jpg

      Notice the very different slopes between the last 3 republican presidential administration and Clinton's. Reagan almost tripled the national debt, Bush I made it go up almost 50% to it and then good ole Baby Bush made it go up almost 80%. Damn that tax and spend "liberal", Bill Clinton, and his not piling on to the national debt as much as those "fiscally responsible" conservative presidents!

    47. Re:The Cold War Called ... by deKernel · · Score: 1

      As for Reagan breaking up the Soviet Union, give me a break. Communism never works, with or without Reagan. It was Clinton who was smart enough to reap the peace dividend by closing bases and bring a govt. surplus, which Reagan never would have done.

      Though I agree that communism never works on a large scale, it was Reagan who realized that the large spending on military advancements that would trigger the Russian paranoia to spend themselves into destruction. Reagan himself was not for large military deployments.

      Regarding Clinton being "smart" and capitalizing on the base closing, I believe he did it because of his dislike for the military as a whole. Just my $0.02.

    48. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and how conservatives (they quoted somebody from the Cato Institute)

      Cato is Libertarian. They fucking hated Bush and continue to hate the neoconservatives.

    49. Re:The Cold War Called ... by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine called a Russian QA person that, and she was SORELY pissed. And this was only a few years ago, so that's why I believed the term was current.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    50. Re:The Cold War Called ... by plantman-the-womb-st · · Score: 1

      Um, Given that Putin was the leader *for the other side* during the past eight years, I took it to be a cheap shot at Putin. You're the one that brought US politics up. Enough already, stop whipping the dead horse.

      --
      Say bad words about my book, in cold oatmeal, or I shall sue!
    51. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Exactly! Everything in history is the fault of the DemocRAT party.

      It's not as if $7.5T of the $10.5T debt was run up under Republican presidents. It's not like $5T was run up under Bush while his party had control of the House, Senate, Supreme Court, and Federal courts. It was the LIEberals!

      It's all the fault of TAX and SPEND Democrats who.. uh.. had a surplus when they were last in office? Uh. No it HAS to be Clinton's fault, otherwise there might be some flaw in my world view. That's impossible, because I'm a Conservative!

      Er, yeah. Clinton fucked a chubby intern. That's what caused this mess. If he hadn't done that, Alan Greenspan would never have left interest rates criminally low for too long. In 2004, the SEC would never have raised the leverage limit from 12:1 to 30:1 (making a 3% decline in asset values wipe our your company).

      And whatever wasn't the fault of Clinton was CARTER's fault. That damn CRA, which passed in 1977. It broke the economy 30 years later because it forced the GSEs to make loans to black people (a.k.a. the lazy poor who are only poor because they are irresponsible and they drive Cadillacs and have cable TV that they buy with their welfare checks which they don't deserve) even though the mess extends far beyond subprime mortgages and that private, non-GSE mortgages account for 3/4 of the problem. It's the fault of Clinton, Carter, Fannie, and Freddie. All LIEberals.

      (I'm not racist. My church once had a black guy in it. I just think all black people are lazy. But that's not racism. Read the "Bell Curve", a fine scholarly work.)

      And, anyway, Bush's tax cuts worked as promised. His tax cuts created the same number of jobs in eight years as Clinton created in thirteen months! They are why we located all those WMDs and why the fundamentals of our economy are strong. It was TOO MUCH REGULATION that caused the problems that are purely psychological. There's no problem with the economy, except for all the problems with it, which are ONLY the fault of DemocRATs.

      Also, the media is liberal. Like Joe Scarborough. I mean, it's not like liberal MSNBC would put a Conservative congressman on TV for three hours a day. (Shout out to Lori Klausutis!)

      Yup. I can't believe how quickly the LIEberals on Slashdot forget the details of history.

      I'm a small government, free market Conservative who wants Sarah Palin to be Dictator for Life. She gives me star-bursts in my pants.

      --

      Did I get that right? I think that's the current Conservative orthodoxy. It's certainly got all the wonderfully truthy proclamations I've heard from Conservatives THIS FUCKING WEEK.

    52. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell

      We haven't been in your party for years; maybe you've noticed all of the empty seats.

    53. Re:The Cold War Called ... by MeisterVT · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      ... immediately wasted on fruitless 'refunds' that did nothing to strengthen the economy

      Would that be the refunds that the current President is trying to emulate on a larger scale?

      But come now, those refunds were really just welfare checks for everyone, something you democrats should just pee your pants with glee over.

      --
      Government - If you think the problems we create are bad, you should see our solutions!
    54. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Not a shoe?

      That would be Iraq I believe, but then again I sure there are plenty of people who would have thrown shoes at the last US leader, though Balmer would have kept to chairs - tried and tested.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    55. Re:The Cold War Called ... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      ...the highest insult you can throw at a Russian.

      Not a shoe?

      Well, they're a bit hypersensitive since they failed to "bury us"...

      BTW Khrushchev didn't throw his shoe - he just took it off and hammered away at his desk.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    56. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of giving everyone a single check, these refunds will be spread out across a year. According to behavioral economics, this will cause people to spend it, instead of paying off debt, thus keeping the economy afloat.

      It's very literally not welfare and Democrats don't pee their pants over it.

      Grow up and stop flinging petty insults.

    57. Re:The Cold War Called ... by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      Whooosh

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    58. Re:The Cold War Called ... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      If they don't want to be perceived as backwards country folk then they should sober up and quit drinking the dodgy vodka and produce something decent. They can't ride the Tetris thing forever.

    59. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reagan did spend, but certainly not like FDR spent.

      Uh huh. This is one of those things we've all been programmed to believe, but it's just not true. Reagan's irresponsible budgets and tax cuts (and eventual tax hikes) caused the largest increase in non-military spending in US history (until Dubya).

      Go find the raw debt numbers and then come back and see if you can still plausibly claim that the debt is the fault of Democrats and the New Deal.

      Great way to get the US out of a recession is to go further into debt.

      Yes. Exactly. It's investment, just in society in general, instead of the stock market. It has much better returns in the long run.

      John Maynard Keynes welcomes you to 1936 with a copy of his book, "General Theory".

    60. Re:The Cold War Called ... by TarrVetus · · Score: 1

      I've told other people, and I'll post it on Slashdot, for which I'll get ridiculed. Unless there are some dramatic sunset provisions in this bill, or the economy starts magically growing at 4-5% a year, people will remember the days of Bush as "The Good Old Days", when budget deficits were no more than a few hundred billion, and the national debt was under $20 trillion. When spending $600 billion on a war over 5 years was considered profligate waste.

       
      Do you think they'll remember money in that future, or see the first few years of the 21st century as some sort of romantic time when you had your economic credits, and chose what you wanted?
       
      Money is meant as a representation of available goods and services. The more we inflate it, and the more we print it out and hand it out without a second thought, the more we misrepresent our resources and invalidate currency by continuing to devalue it. By undermining such an old, evolved system, we play terrifyingly dangerous games with society as a whole.

    61. Re:The Cold War Called ... by anagama · · Score: 1

      Republicans and Democrats both suck, both parties are at fault, and neither will lead us to salvation.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    62. Re:The Cold War Called ... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Whooosh

      Whooosh back, young'un. Krushchev's episode with the shoe is a rather famous bit of history. It's unlikely Bush's duck'n'cover will even be remembered in a few years.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    63. Re:The Cold War Called ... by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      I know full well about Kruschev's shoe - I even know WHY he did it. (Or at least I used to.) But the original reference was obviously the Bush incident.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    64. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I always wondered if he had dropped LSD and was wailing away at an imaginary spider. I guess he should've turned 90 degrees to get the real spider.

      With the drugs du jour, you'd likely be trying to [ wrestle | mate | unite ] with the machine elves.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    65. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

      Communism works on a small scale and if no one is cheating.
      But there is one realm where similar ideas are possible on a large scale too. Non-material realm, it is, where an additional copy costs very close to nothing so everyone can actually take all he wants with no expense from the rest of the community.
      From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs. Sounds familiar? I know that anyone who point such similarities between communism and free software is modded as a troll, but you can surely spot some.
      Ideas aren't that bad in this case, but limited resources make them impossible in the real world.

    66. Re:The Cold War Called ... by renoX · · Score: 1

      >The guy was a bad president. We get it

      Uhm, no if people had really 'get it' then he wouldn't have been reelected.

    67. Re:The Cold War Called ... by MBCook · · Score: 1

      Unsustainable, yes, but at the current interest rate they are paying, they'd be silly NOT to borrow.

      Isn't that the argument that many people used to borrow against their homes to go on vacations to the Caribbean they couldn't afford? Isn't that how they bought the two brand new SUVs that later just got repossessed a few months ago?

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    68. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Phil06 · · Score: 0

      Reagan cut the maximum tax rate from well over 50% down to 33%. This was brilliant, get out of the way of people who make lots of money, they make money flow better than anyone else. He didn't step in and stop the Democrats from pushing money all their pet projects, so that made money flow too. Lots of money flowing, half of it borrowed. Success?

      --
      "...and yet, I blame society" Duke - Repo Man
    69. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Off the f-ing topic, aren't you?

      I wish I had my mod points now

    70. Re:The Cold War Called ... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Isn't that the argument that many people used to borrow against their homes to go on vacations to the Caribbean they couldn't afford? Isn't that how they bought the two brand new SUVs that later just got repossessed a few months ago?

      Sort of... treasury interest rates don't go up a few years in like the adjustable rate mortgages, so in theory the government won't be caught by surprise.

      But you raise a good point. The government just sold $30 billion in 5-year treasuries for about 1.8%... so far so good... but what happens in 5 years? Unless you believe that the government will be sitting on $30 billion in excess cash, they'll have a big bill due and will have to borrow again at whatever the rate is in 5 years.

      That said, if someone wanted to loan me money at 1.8% fixed, I'd borrow as much as they would give me. I'm fairly confident that I could do better than 1.8% annually... and if not, oh well I had a good run.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    71. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Faggot. No wait, you're a Republican aren't you? Nazi closet faggot. There, fixed it.

    72. Re:The Cold War Called ... by black_lbi · · Score: 1

      Very true. Tolstoy's War and Peace depicted a French-speaking Russian aristocracy even at the time of the Napoleon's invasion of Russia!

      Which proves exactly what? French was all rave in the 18th and 19th century throughout the whole Europe ... particularly in the middle-wannabe-aristocratic class.

      Some deluded French even in this day behave like theirs is still the most common spoken language in Europe. Well, I have some news for you buddy, it isn't.

      If you come to my country, it would be really absurd for me to demand you should learn Romanian. But at least cover half of the way, you know? Don't address to me in French like I'm supposed to know what you're saying ... I mean, I've managed to learn another language. Could you please not be so stuck up, stop pretending it's 1850 and do the same?

      Now seriously, don't mean to troll. I'm all for cultural identity, but communication would be so much easy if we would all learn a universal language. And so far, English seems to be the best candidate.

    73. Re:The Cold War Called ... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      And you're hoping to recreate the results of the years directly following Clinton's presidency by having Democrats now act like Republicans then?

      I'm sure that will end well.

    74. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      And what of the Oregon Territory, Louisiana Purchase, and Texas?

    75. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Viewsonic · · Score: 1

      You talk like 1 trillion is a lot of money. It isn't. Compared to what we will be facing over the next eight years to clean up this mess. We're talking about 4-6 trillion being spent. We all know its coming. What this stimulus bill is providing is a grain of sand of what truly needs to be injected back into the economy.

    76. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Besides which, I already know how it will go after the USA falls apart: the New England states will form the nation of...New England; NY will go their own way, California will split into 3, and the Confederacy will rise again.

      Naw, I've seen how it goes down. The western states will combine under new leadership based in Wyoming, the eastern states will combine with their government in Ohio, and The Republic of Texas will be the tie-breaker. =D

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    77. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      the highest insult you can throw at a Russian is probably either "intelligent" (as in belonging to intelligentsia)

      Wikipedia says:
      The intelligentsia is a social class of people engaged in complex mental and creative labor directed to the development and dissemination of culture, encompassing intellectuals and social groups close to them (e.g., artists and school teachers).

      Well, that can't be helping their situation...

    78. Re:The Cold War Called ... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      And indeed it doesn't. Note that the very same article also explains how the word became an insult, if you read the section about its use by the Bolsheviks early on.

    79. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea of Keynes was to put idle resources (people) to work in dire times. The supply-side idea is to give money to people hording money in hopes that they will invest it into putting idle resources to work. That they may both result in government debt is the same, but the ideas in question are quite different.

    80. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      I wanted to emphasize that French was the language of upper-class snobbery, and that it is shameful to not be an upper-class snob. If you're not being sarcastic, take heed: I live in America, where people aren't even required to know English to move here! Even Canada requires that you know some French to move there.

      Many American towns also have public, paid-with-your-tax-dollars Spanish-only(officially "ESL" which stands for "English as a Second Language" classes in schools which implicitly cater to Mexican migrants.

      But why should English be the world's language? Because it's a helluva lot easier to learn than every other spoken language is! I'd hate to see China dominate the world and force everybody to learn Mandarin( where one word means twenty different things depending on tone and context) or even Russian(who don't even have a word for "security", only a word for "lack of insecurity"!).

    81. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Communism never works, with or without Reagan. It was Clinton who was smart enough to reap the peace dividend by closing bases and bring a govt. surplus, which Reagan never would have done.

      Communism doesn't work, but nor does your silly capitalistic democratic republic.
      For nations to thrive, they need to switch back and forth every once in a while.
      Most European countries are considered socialist, but every once in a while focus shifts from a social point of view to a financial point of view.

      Funny how our right is your left, and our left is "their" right, eh?

    82. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, "nekulturny" (literally, uncultured) is still the highest insult you can throw at a Russian.

      In terms of absolute magnitude, how does that compare to telling a Turk he's not really European?

    83. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Tracy+Reed · · Score: 1

      Depending on the social class, the highest insult you can throw at a Russian is probably either "intelligent" (as in belonging to intelligentsia) when directed by a prole against someone he perceives as a smartass, or "bydlo" (this is a Polish loanword that literally means "cattle", and figuratively someone who lives to eat and copulate, and nothing above that) when it is the other way around.

      What about us intelligent smartasses who love to eat and copulate?

    84. Re:The Cold War Called ... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The problem is that their culture and everything else is diametrically backwards from the rest of the western world. Someone reading Russian literature will notice the extreme difference from western, same with lots of other things. a couple of my Russian friends were able to crack the encryption on a Home automation systems software encryption in literally minutes. It would have taken me days to do it. They try to explain it to me but you have to "think Russian", as they put it to me, to understand it.

      Backwards and different is not a bad thing, I think it's a great thing... But their desire to be "like us" is nuts. Be yourself instead.

      We've "been ourselves" for ages. Lesse... autocracy (and that's not quite the same as European monarchies - the Russian idea of autocracy meaning that "everyone else, even the nobles, are as slaves to the Tsar" never held true in European feudal societies) - check. Religion, since its inception, subservient to the rulers - check. Institutionalized slavery (serfdom) at its worst - check. Disdain for all kinds of individualism and freethinking - check. So, what good did "being ourselves" ever do for us?

      Also, you have to keep in mind that Eastern Slavs were culturally European - the autocratic Asian social mentality was forced onto us during the Mongol invasion. Maybe it's time to look far back, to days when Russian (or rather, Old East Slavic) had a special word for a voting assembly of all free adult males, the decisions of which carried the force of the law...

    85. Re:The Cold War Called ... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      What about us intelligent smartasses who love to eat and copulate?

      Nothing wrong with either, so long as that doesn't encompass everything you do in your whole life.

    86. Re:The Cold War Called ... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The Russian's greatest fear is being invaded by outsiders and parceled up.

      That fear is quite rational - the present-day Russia is quite unstable as a single entity. It's not a proper nation-state - it doesn't have a single ethnicity at the core (Russians are the majority, but large parts of the country are dominated by minorities, which are sometimes quite hostile), nor does it have sufficiently strong single culture. Nor, anymore, an ideology to serve as a unifying force. After seeing how easy the USSR was taken apart from inside, it's only reasonable to expect Russia in its present shape to follow the suit eventually.

    87. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it seems to me I really haven't heard much about clinton in years other than to hear people bitch and whine about people bitching and whining about clinton... but then again liberals still bitch and whine about carter getting a bad wrap because he was the last sad sack liberal asshole to drive this country off a cliff. No I am bitching and whining about this new asshole that compares himself to a republican named lincoln when and appropriate comparison would be to carter.

    88. Re:The Cold War Called ... by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      I actually sat down and figured out where all the states would fall out; those were just examples.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    89. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And neither is Clinton's....

      -Fartnog Buttstinkle

    90. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if we spend/borrow $1 trillion, and don't get a significant amount of long term growth out of it, we're just digging a deeper hole, and that's exactly what the big O is planning to do.

      That buys a LOT of viagra/chicks.

      I've told other people, and I'll post it on Slashdot, for which I'll get ridiculed. Unless there are some dramatic sunset provisions in this bill, or the economy starts magically growing at 4-5% a year, people will remember the days of Bush as "The Good Old Days", when budget deficits were no more than a few hundred billion, and the national debt was under $20 trillion. When spending $600 billion on a war over 5 years was considered profligate waste.

      Me: "Ahh, Jimmy, I remember the days when I was rich, not just rich in posessions but rich in heart, we truly had freedom then, I had a massively inflated house value, four or more SUV's or small trucks in the driveway and two acres of fertile grassland in the back yard."

      Jimmy: "Well where is it?, What happened to all of it?"

      Me: "You inherited the debt!, We had to sell our house just to pay for food and this small patch of farm, All the massive debt and repayments are in the deed, yes son, you're going to be paying off our fuckups for at least your lifetime and your sons lifetime, but hey at least you have this farm and the Honda in the driveway when we die."

      We've pole-vaulted over the $1 trillion dollar per-year deficit level, and we don't even have anything cool to show for it (like, I dunno, space factors, a city on the moon, or Nuclear Fusion).

      Heh, I can't wait for the day when the debt collectors arrive to the U.S.'s doorstep:

      *Knock on door*
      Me: "Hi, Who are you?"

      Them: "We're A debt collection agency financed by China, Russia, all of Europe and everybody else you can think of, We want to take your house, your kids to work in slave labour camps, oh and I could do with that American beer you're holding right now."

      Me: "Wait? What!?, Fine, Here's my credit card, Visa, American Express, Discover..."

      Them: "No good, Didn't half of those collapse? Besides, We only accept China Card."

      Me: "Here! Take the kids! They're good for at least a million bucks each working overseas, but please leave my wife, RV and big screen tv alone!, I want to watch the Russians and Chinese go to mars."

      Them: "Thats fine, I think we can arrange some kind of a soviet-state loan, after all we wouldn't want to leave you with nothing, oh wait, I'm going to have to ask you and your family to strip naked and follow me out front for a tick inspection."

      Cheers, *drinks a Canadian beer*

    91. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      What if we copulate with food animals?

    92. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but we did get Brownie in FEMA and a NASA probe of Uranus, so there's $70 BILLION a year well spent!
      http://www.democraticunderground.com/articles/04/01/16_uranus.html

    93. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Fool! Kzinti and hominid genitalia aren't compatible.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    94. Re:The Cold War Called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way it's supposed to work is the government stimulates the economy when things are slow, going into debt if need be. Then during the good times pay off the debt by running a surplus. This seems to be what Obama is trying to accomplish. The problem is the borrow-and-spend Republicans starting with Reagan who refuse to give up deficit spending during the good times instead prefering to run up large debts.

    95. Re:The Cold War Called ... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I've told other people, and I'll post it on Slashdot, for which I'll get ridiculed. Unless there are some dramatic sunset provisions in this bill, or the economy starts magically growing at 4-5% a year, people will remember the days of Bush as "The Good Old Days", when budget deficits were no more than a few hundred billion, and the national debt was under $20 trillion. When spending $600 billion on a war over 5 years was considered profligate waste.

      I don't see it that way, as we've haven't really paid for things like the war yet. All that Bush did was put everything on the credit card for eight years, and managed to almost get away with it, except that the inevitable meltdown started about 5 months too early. Of course, I guess you could then argue that the "Good Old Days" ended a long time ago as deficit spending has been the norm for a long time, with only a few attempts to address it in past few decades.

  4. Real World Experience by R2.0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Our programmers are some of the best in the world,"

    Of course - after all, those viruses don't program themselves, now do they?

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    1. Re:Real World Experience by hardburn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Exactly. Most of the best Russian programmers are currently either making botnets or breaking DRM. During the late stages of the Cold War, they spent most of their time buying or stealing code from the West. A fact that the CIA once exploited to cause one of the largest non-nuclear man made explosions.

      While you might like the DRM breakers, nothing here is much to get excited about.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    2. Re:Real World Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll be amused by quantity of outsorcing development shops in Russia and satellite states. And most of them are significantly better than in India.

      Also MSFT, IBM, Google etc. - all have major R&D there.

    3. Re:Real World Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually that's something to consider. How many viruses and botnets come out of India?

      My company recently (within the past 6 months) switched from using an Indian outsourcer to a Russian one.

      The Russians don't feel comfortable speaking the language (but CAN read/write it, so IM and email are the standard communications outside of conf calls w/project manager), as opposed to the Indians who theoretically were native speakers (as a former British colony), but usually were much worse in terms of:

      -Program ethic
      -Using common sense

      Our projects are actually getting completed regularly and to spec, instead of needing to hand-hold the Indian outsourcer through EVERY LITTLE BIT OF CODE!

      I'm assuming that Russia has a stronger cultural connection to the US than India does (making it easier to share ideas), and has a cultural heritage of thinking and problem solving (which is CERTAINLY evidenced by viruses and bot-nets, along with the old tradition of Chess and the great Russian playwrights would think most problems to death :) ).

    4. Re:Real World Experience by Neeperando · · Score: 1

      If you ever talk to a Russian, the phrase "Russian _____s are the best in the world" is actually a fairly common one.

      I had this conversation times, as well:

      Russian: I hate my country, I want to move to America.

      Me: Yeah, I agree, I can't wait to get home.

      Russian: WHAT!!!! Russia is the greatest country on earth! How dare you!

      --
      Being a computer scientist means you tell people how computers should work, not that you know how they actually work.
    5. Re:Real World Experience by linzeal · · Score: 1

      The Russian military and space program have some of the best programmers in the world doing avionics, robotics and communications. The mechanical and electrical engineering sectors of their economy are nothing to laugh about either. Russia would love you to think they are a bunch of script kiddies when they are working at modernizing their weapon programs and building ever more reliable spacecraft. The US may have better programmers in some of these fields than Russia for sure but no one outside Russia, China, India and the EU do this sort of stuff and I would wager Russia would beat all but the US on a good day.

    6. Re:Real World Experience by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The cause of the pipe-line explosion is controversial. Some analysts suggest it was merely poor maintenance practices, not trojan western software. Perhaps it was a combo. But it's still telling that our gov't (attempted to) pull such a trick. No wonder we are so loved abroad.

    7. Re:Real World Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turkeys can fly; not very far mind you, but they can fly.

    8. Re:Real World Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ""Our programmers are some of the best in the world,""

      "Of course - after all, those viruses don't program themselves, now do they?"

      Isn't that sort of what they do by definition?

    9. Re:Real World Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      List the best 3 Russian softwares you know of:

            a) Tetris
            b) ?
            c) ??

    10. Re:Real World Experience by yttrstein · · Score: 1

      No, the fact is that Michael Dell (as anyone who's met the man can attest) is a jackass. He assumes superiority in every situation, despite the mediocrity of the hardware on which his name is embossed. I'm not at all surprised he got spanked by Putin.

    11. Re:Real World Experience by Gverig · · Score: 1

      Excellent way to globalize without any substance, I see Putin isn't the only one that's insecure. I can attest that I have seen much more good programmers in Russia than in US. There are simple reasons- mathematics and logic is taught much better in school (it's virtually nonexistent here), almost any software was free (VSS=Maya=3dMax=Office=whatever else you want=$1.50) and people took full advantage of it. US students are starting to get similar opportunities with OSS and with free versions of most major development software).
      Sun, Intel, Microsoft and maaaaany other companies opened development houses in Russia and it now has a few very strong game dev comapnies.

      Yes, science in Russia needs financial investment but not as help but as a very viable ROI prospect not as "help". A problem with that is that science is still mostly government venture in Russia and it's kinda hard to invest in government :-\

    12. Re:Real World Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the Soviet Union started to fall apart, a large number of these people had left to Israel, as many of these scientists are Jews.

      I remember reading this about Russian mathematics at some point... I can't remember the source. Probably a book called "Mathematical Events of the Twentieth Century" featuring articles by a number of Russian mathematicians.

    13. Re:Real World Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia would love you to think they are a bunch of script kiddies when they are working at modernizing their weapon programs and building ever more reliable spacecraft.

      Interesting, because that's exactly the opposite of what they did during the 80's. In the 80's they managed to convince the US that they were building large number of weapons. There were a few analysts saying it wasn't possible because the soviet economy couldn't possible be paying for that much, but Reagen bought it. As a result the US went massively into debt and created a huge military industrial economy that's still calling the shots. I wish the Russians had pretended to be meek.

    14. Re:Real World Experience by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      I used to get that way talking to foreigners about Bush.

      Me: "I freaking hate George Bush."
      Them: "Yeah, how could the Americans actually elect such a loser?"
      Me: "Hey, watch it, fool! America is awesome!"

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    15. Re:Real World Experience by linzeal · · Score: 1

      They may not be building what the programmers and engineers are designing in large numbers but they are designing them and have significantly more access to resources than they ever did during the Soviet times. Do not underestimate the Russians.

    16. Re:Real World Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idea http://jetbrains.com/ (It's the best Java IDE and had a good refactoring long before Eclipse)
      There are some good OCR software firms.
      Heroes of Might and Magic V

  5. Prideful Putin ? by OrangeTide · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Pride goeth before a fall.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Prideful Putin ? by Lux · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He's got a point. Building computers is simply not a terrifically difficult business.

      I was in St. Petersburg (Putin's hometown) a few months ago visiting in-laws, and I helped them pick out their first computer from a local vendor. What they got was a pretty nice machine for the money. The selection was good. A fine consumer experience, overall.

      Do they need a foreign corporation in that market locally? Would they benefit immensely from that? Not really.

    2. Re:Prideful Putin ? by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Do they even need an Intel or AMD chip to be in their computers, not really. A 2-3 ghz dual core chip could be pumped out of a Russian fab any day now and it would be enough for 95% of the people out there.

    3. Re:Prideful Putin ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pride goeth before a fall.

      And that from a Duhmerican, a natural born jingoist? W-O-W!

    4. Re:Prideful Putin ? by Gverig · · Score: 1

      Please don't confuse person asking the question with the question itself. Even though question was asked by Dell it wasn't phrased around PC hardware supply, it was centered around science and technology sector and this is a very interesting question with several sides:
      1) Is Russia technologically or scientifically weak today? Hell no, I don't like Putin for a second but he is right, Russia does have very strong technological sector.
      2) Will science survive long in Russia? Not without significant foreign interest. Science is a government venture there and government fails to finance it. Technology boom is there only because of cheap quality work force. With rising salaries in CS sector and economy crisis everywhere else technology will likely start suffering soon. So, unless there is a door opened for foreigners to invest in science and unless there is a new wave of outsourcing/investing in technology both sectors will suffer dearly and soon.
      3) Does this mean that Russia needs help with this? Again, as much as I hate it I agree with mr. Putin. Russia is not in a position to beg (at least not yet). Russia would benefit from foreign investors and needs them but so would those investors. Russia needs entrepreneurs, not elves.

    5. Re:Prideful Putin ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't seem to realize that a computer isn't necessarily ordinary beige box. There's vast category of different kind of computers from small embedded devices to big supercomputers, data communication devices and whole infrastucture. And to run a large country all those are badly needed.

      Cooperating with Dell building reliable servers, enterprise workstations etc. would a) get investiments to russia what they have been graving instead just importing b) teach a lot of logistics which Dell is clearly a leading expert in this world.

      Not just Chinese and India but majority of asian countries understood that joint ventures are fastest way learning things and then start competing with rest of the world in markets.

      Putin is plain idiot not realising that. His hubris is going to waste a *ell lot of money otherwise better invested would benefit the country and it's citizen.

      But anyway. I don't really care what they do. I'm not living there. If they don't realize themselves how silly they are and how they would make their country viable technology exporter instead just exporting commodities and importing all high tech then they are completely free to end up being sad losers till sun will die.

      The offer has been made. Putin turned it down. Now if he later complains not getting investiments there ask him take a look at the mirror and find the reasons why not from there.

  6. dude, by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    you're getting a polonium 210!

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:dude, by Chabo · · Score: 1

      Polonium 209 is good, too. :)

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    2. Re:dude, by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      Customer: My hair is falling out...
      Tech Support: Disable your firewall and reset your DSL modem.
      Customer: I'm now experiencing organ failure...
      Tech Support: Try rebooting.
      Customer: Glurkkk! [silence]
      Tech Support: Your welcome sire, can I help you with anything else?

  7. Russian Computing by LaminatorX · · Score: 4, Funny

    Our botnets span the globe! Our shadowy hosting providers are without peer! Our ability to ddos former republics who move monuments is second to none...

    1. Re:Russian Computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and your grandmothers are starving ....

  8. Look out Mike! by G-Man · · Score: 1

    You made Polonium Putin mad!

    1. Re:Look out Mike! by AioKits · · Score: 2, Funny

      He's almost to the point of provoking pretentious Polonium Putin!

      --
      "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    2. Re:Look out Mike! by DougF · · Score: 1

      Did Dell previously provoke pretentious Polonium Putin's puissance?

      --
      Impetuous! Homeric!
    3. Re:Look out Mike! by TheLinuxSRC · · Score: 1

      Possibly poor planning provoked pretentious Polonium Putin's puissance, previously.

  9. Programmers? by Ohio+Calvinist · · Score: 1

    Aren't quite a few of the major botnets and viruses coming out of Russia? I don't think Dell or anyone else is questioning that there are some good anf talented programmers who come out of Russia; just that those good programmers aren't working for the government and they might want to hire some consultants for which Dell would be happy to provide at a good price if they can get a Dell on very desk in the Kremlin.

    On a side note, why does he bring up that they have good programmers given that Dell is primarly a hardware company simply looking for a government contract?

    --
    Forgive my spelling from time to time. I'm often posting during short breaks.
    1. Re:Programmers? by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Swell.

      Your understanding of the situation reminds me of Bush looking at his polls.

      Putin, not big on technology, took Dell's question as an insult, and retorted with a prideful display. Nothing more than that.

      Chances of Dell selling much into Russia? Poorer-- although it would be a great counter-culture way to insult Putin. For that alone, an offset may have been made so as to prevent Dell from having to file an 8K (for downward trend warning due to sales-geek faux pas).

      Don't go in to politics.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    2. Re:Programmers? by zappepcs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not entirely convinced that you are 100% correct here. Recent tech spats with Russia et al include MS and piracy in Russian schools, OSS software directives, and several minor stories I seem to remember about the Russian government pulling away from outsiders. I'm pretty certain that after the cold war they have more reason to not want 'help' than any of us might imagine. My point is I don't think this is an isolated incidence of over reaction. I think it fits with an overall plan for IT infrastructure for government, as far as I can tell.

      In truth, after RefFlag Linux and some other efforts around the globe, I've been waiting for Russia et al to announce something that more or less tells Redmond to get stuffed. By way of guilt by association reasoning, if Putin and Russia manage to thumb their noses at North American software/hardware manufacturers, it's nearly certain that many others will follow suit. I suspect there are a lot of politics involved though... and that causes me curiosity.

    3. Re:Programmers? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      just that those good programmers aren't working for the government

      I wouldn't be so sure about that.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    4. Re:Programmers? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I felt like Putin missed the point entirely. Dell was basically asking, "What can we do to convince you to buy our hardware?" and Putin's response seemed to be, "We don't need your charity because we have good programmers!"

      Now I can understand wanting to use computers manufactured in Russia for economic reasons, for security reasons, or even just for the sake of pride, but the conversation didn't make a hell of a lot of sense to me.

    5. Re:Programmers? by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      You don't recognize a typical negotiating stance when you see one. Russian pride is important, just like German pride, Chinese pride, etc. Home grown efforts are typical chest-thumping moves. Michael Dell pissed off Putin. Putin thumped his chest.

      Much of the world, including in the USA, would like to tell Microsoft to self fornicate. Do you think we LIKE to pay money to Microsoft? Microsoft is a business plan. There's no inherent love for what they produce, only the value of what they produce gives you or I.

      For Putin, BeetWare is a great way to snub the pseudo-erudite Dell at a major world conference. His 'status' is therefore enhanced, in the same stupid way that the Premier of Turkey is now a local hero.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    6. Re:Programmers? by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      I understand that, and agree that is an important part of what happened, but I suspect there is more behind the scenes than we are hearing about. Just a suspicion.

    7. Re:Programmers? by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Nothing more than nationalistic pride.

      And if a better version of the Linux kernel emerges, so much the better. Utilities that work and software that's supported knows no boundaries.

      Michael Dell is a follower, not a leader. He's trying to be Steve, but it doesn't work. You could collapse about 2/3rds of Dell's mgmt, IMHO, and make them a lot more profitable and take the funds and do real R&D. Then he'd be more like Steve-- except he'd need to grow a beard and start wearing sweatshirts.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    8. Re:Programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, of course, have a lot of homosexual intercourse and acquire HIV. Duh.

    9. Re:Programmers? by Daswolfen · · Score: 1

      Bah.. Steve wouldn't even be Steve without Woz.

      --
      Don't rush me, Sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.
  10. Russia has a cool new blackberry competitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It weighs in at 350 lbs and is bigger than a kaypro.

    They hope to have it scaled down in the next 5-year plan.

    1. Re:Russia has a cool new blackberry competitor by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Yeah but it is also a mini-tank with a 10 mm auto-cannon and 50% of them will actually work.

  11. he sounds by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1, Funny

    like a man refusing to ask for directions.

    'Honey, we're fine, I know where we are, the main road has to intersect this one eventually, I'm not an idiot.'

    Meanwhile dueling banjos are heard...

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:he sounds by Neeperando · · Score: 1

      Except it is Russia, so it will be dueling balalaikas.

      --
      Being a computer scientist means you tell people how computers should work, not that you know how they actually work.
  12. "Best" by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > Our programmers are some of the best in the world

    Yes. Just look at how they dominate the malware industry. And nobody is better at herding bots.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:"Best" by jmorris42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Just look at how they dominate the malware industry. And nobody is better at herding bots.

      That is one good example. They have lots of skilled people in a hellhole economy. And sending hard currency they don't have (mostly because of corrupt politicians like Putin it must be said) to buy stuff they could do themselves with labor so underutilized they accept the low returns of the malware industry out of desperation is do dumb even Putin gets it.

      And I can totally understand why they wouldn't want a Dell. If they want Chinese made crap they have China's number, why would they want to cut the US in on the action just to get a Dell sticker on the box?

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    2. Re:"Best" by scubamage · · Score: 1

      I just heard 1 billion screamin' Chinamen boggle at your comment. It sounded... well, you can imagine.

    3. Re:"Best" by NinjaCoder · · Score: 1

      (mostly because of corrupt politicians like Putin it must be said)

      Really? I'd thought one of his strengths was supposed to be his personal incorruptibility.

    4. Re:"Best" by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > I'd thought one of his strengths was supposed to be his personal
      > incorruptibility.

      And if you say otherwise he has some Polonium for you.

      On the other hand, how could the Czar be corrupt anyway? You can't steal from yourself!

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    5. Re:"Best" by SpinyNorman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Eastern european programmers do tend to dominate things like the Top Coder and Google Code Jam competitions (although a Chinese guy won the latter last year), so there's certainly plenty of talent there. Let's not also forget that they've got things like the unmanned Progress ISS supply ship that we're totally dependent on - something that neither the US, Europe nor anywhere else has to offer.

    6. Re:"Best" by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Let's not also forget that they've got things like the unmanned
      > Progress ISS supply ship that we're totally dependent on - something
      > that neither the US, Europe nor anywhere else has to offer.

      The Jules Verne seemed to work pretty well.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    7. Re:"Best" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I can totally understand why they wouldn't want a Dell. If they want Chinese made crap they have China's number

      Ummm, most Dell stuff is made in China. Or Malaysia.

    8. Re:"Best" by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      Ah - right! I'd forgetten that it's already had a successful mission! But let's note how proud Europe is of it, and US comments about it demonstrating a first-rate space capability. Any country capable of developing such a thing (Progress or Jules Verne) obviously isn't overly technically challenged!

    9. Re:"Best" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot Europes new ATV:
      http://www.esa.int/esaMI/ATV/index.html

    10. Re:"Best" by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Let's not also forget that they've got things like the unmanned Progress ISS supply ship that we're totally dependent on - something that neither the US, Europe nor anywhere else has to offer.

      Yeah, the Progress is a wonderful low performance thirty year old design. But the Shuttle still flying, we have the European ATV ready to enter service and the Japanese HTV ready to start testing this year. Then there is the Commercial Resupply Program contract that NASA recently signed with SpaceX.
       
      Or, in short, not only are we not totally dependent on Progress... Within a few years its obsolescent ass will be redundant and it will be obsolete not long after.

    11. Re:"Best" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying the Czar owns his entire country?

    12. Re:"Best" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except of course Europe's unmanned Automated Transfer Vehicle (aka "Jules Verne") that can fly and dock itself as well.

    13. Re:"Best" by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Which was his point.

    14. Re:"Best" by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      Dunno about Progress, or the Soyuz for that matter, being low performance... They are dependable workhorses that do the job 10x cheaper and more reliably than the Shuttle. What will replace the Shuttle, and whether it's any better remains to be seem. The new NASA launch vehicle, Ares, sounds like a complete cluster-fuck (simulations show it susceptible to shaking itself apart on the launch pad), so hopfully it'll either be replaced by the skunkworks alternate, or by Obama letting NASA use a DOD rocket instead. Ditto for a crew module - hard to say whether it's as reliable/safe as Soyuz until it actually exists!

      Your notion of Progress being obsolete, but European or US alternatesd being better is a bunch of crap. For a start the Eupoean ATV's most critical component, the docking procedure, is based on the Soviet design, and more importantly Progress does the job reliably. The US seems incapable of utilizing the incremental improvement approach of the Japanese or Russia - it's always a matter of redesigning from scratch every time, then wondering why each time the brand new design is full of design problems and overran it's cost estimate due to unforseen problems. By the time the US makes it back to the moon, I'd not be surprised if the Japanese already have a moon buggly production plant up there, and probably a space sex hotel that the Russian's have been ferrying tourists to for a decade before the "innovative" Americans arrive with their own state-of-the-art buggy that craps out after a day.

    15. Re:"Best" by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Short answer: You have no idea what you are talking about.

      Long answer:

      Dunno about Progress, or the Soyuz for that matter, being low performance... They are dependable workhorses that do the job 10x cheaper and more reliably than the Shuttle.

      Performance is independent of reliability or cost. And though Soyuz and Progress may be cheaper per launch - when you compare the costs of the multiple launches required to replace a single Shuttle flight, all the sudden they aren't a bargain anymore. The last numbers I saw indicated it would take nearly 18 launches of Soyuz and Progress to partially replace a single Shuttle flight. I say partially because Soyuz/Progress cannot support spacewalks, cannot return cargo/tools/handling equipment, and cannot deliver equipment much larger than a medium sized suitcase.
       
      You want to compare Soyuz and Shuttle reliability? Let's do, let's compare 95 odd Soyuz flights to 120 odd Shuttle flights...
       
      Fatal Accidents

      • Soyuz - 2, Shuttle - 2

      Non fatal accidents

      • LOM (loss of mission) caused by booster failure. Soyuz-2 (booster fire on pad, failure of the 2nd stage to separate), Shuttle-0
      • LOM accidents caused by spacecraft failure. Soyuz-3 (all unable to dock before batteries exhausted), Shuttle-0.
      • Partial LOM accidents. Soyuz-0, Shuttle-1 (Shuttle executed ATO resulting in an orbit too low for some tasks, mission completed otherwise normally and approximately 75% of the affected tasks were later reflown - which Soyuz cannot do at all.)
      • Significant (life threatening) on orbit failures. Soyuz-1 (jettisoned orbital module, which contains virtually all life support, and then subsequently was unable to reenter on schedule but reentered before life support was completely exhausted), Shuttle-0
      • Significant (life threatening) reentry accidents Soyuz-2 (both a failure of the service module to seperate on schedule resulting in a nose reentry until the service module burned away, one of these on the most recent flight!), Shuttle-0
      • Landing accidents (life threatening) Soyuz-3 (landed on a frozen lake and ended up submerged under the ice, bounced down a mountainside ending up just inches from a drop off, landed off target in subzero weather), Shuttle-0
      • Significant but non life threatening landing accidents. Soyuz-7 (all off target high G reentries, four of these in the last eight years, all four cause by complete computer failure), Shuttle-0

      It's not a pretty picture - and it gets worse when you consider the Progress collision with MIR, something Shuttle has never done...
       
      Ares will have to be a poor performer indeed to even approach the Soyuz record.
       
       

      Your notion of Progress being obsolete, but European or US alternatesd being better is a bunch of crap.

      I didn't say it was currently obsolete, I said it will be obsolete. Currently it is obsolescent.
       
       

      For a start the Eupoean ATV's most critical component, the docking procedure, is based on the Soviet design

      So what? That doesn't change the fact that ATV's performance (cargo capacity) is far higher.
       
       

      more importantly Progress does the job reliably.

      Being reliable doesn't mean it isn't obsolescent and approaching obsolescence.
       
       

      The US seems incapable of utilizing the incremental improvement approach of the Japanese or Russia - it's always a matter of redesigning from scratch every time

      Care to cite a Japanese spacecraft design exhibiting this characteristic? Meanwhile, we can discuss how Soyuz has steadily lost capability in its evolution from general purpose orbiter to hyper specialized space station taxi. Then there is Progress, which has made some progress. Then there is Shuttle - which has new computers, a new flight control system, a new display system, new solid rocket motors, new SSME's (increasing thrust), a new external tank that increases payload to orbit by many tons.

    16. Re:"Best" by ignavus · · Score: 1

      Not to forget Tetris, although some considered that to be the 1980s' version of malware as thousands of Western businessmen wasted hours of worktime playing the addictive game.

      I can also think of tsearch2, the text search facility in PostgreSQL - written by two Russian programmers.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    17. Re:"Best" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that industry, but when it comes down to it russians are fucking crazy.
      The mindset has gone from "do what you're told to do. Put in 16 hours in a day, just like everyone else. Don't make more effort than anyone else." to "Do what you're interested in. Put in 8-16 hours in a day, and strive for excellency.".

      Now, a lot of people on /. like to find fault in MySQL, but that's more to do with the feature set from a few years ago, along with some nasty gotchas.

      The amount of people complaining about the optimizer is rather minimal.

      Guess where the majority of the optimizer team is/was from?
      One of the most brilliant people I've seen is Peter Zaitzev who went from being one of the MySQL performance gurus and part of the optimizer team to being one of the guys behind percona, a HP/HA consulting company.
      I believe he's 24-27 -- looked younger last time I saw him, but he's gutsy and knows what he's talking about.

      During a mysql conference he called various mysql people out on their mistakes, without notes detailing a lot of the complexity (down to even line number, iirc) in the optimizer.

      Now, while the behavior might not be the most examplary, and might in fact be corrosive to any department, the guy is BRIGHT.
      It's the singleminded focus that resulted in that technical prowess.

      The scary thing is he's far from the only one extremely bright hailing from that corner of the world.

      Look at russia's cyberwar against estonia and you'll again see some very, very talented people from eastern europe.

      Again, nasty attitude, more often than not involved with something illegal, but man are they good at what they do when they set their mind to it.

    18. Re:"Best" by forceman130 · · Score: 1

      Actually the EU just finished the first test flight of their unmanned automated transfer vehicle, the Jules Verne.

      --
      Wow, a 7 digit ID - let that be a lesson in the perils of procrastination.
    19. Re:"Best" by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Lets also not forget that many of these ``great russian programmers'' don't actually live in russia.

      ie: The dude who wrote Tetris, wr0ks for Microsoft!

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    20. Re:"Best" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinese made crap? I bet you used one to type this message.

    21. Re:"Best" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jules Verne?

    22. Re:"Best" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's not also forget that they've got things like the unmanned Progress ISS supply ship that we're totally dependent on - something that neither the US, Europe nor anywhere else has to offer.

      because things like the ATV don't exist

    23. Re:"Best" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...] they've got things like the unmanned Progress ISS supply ship that we're totally dependent on - something that neither the US, Europe nor anywhere else has to offer.

      The ATV must new here.

  13. zzzzz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I watched most of the video before I got utterly bored. It wasn't much of a rant. It wasn't much of anything. Don't any of these talking heads have useful work to do at home?

  14. Summary much more interesting than actual rant by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

    I hope their programmers are a lot better than their translators. Or was Putin's original Russian as rambling and incoherent? Reminded me of the rare times when Bush would talk at length without having written it out ahead of time.

    1. Re:Summary much more interesting than actual rant by electricbern · · Score: 1

      Reminded me of the rare times when Bush would talk at length without having written it out ahead of time.

      Are you actually implying that Bush writes/wrote his own stuff?

      --
      alias possession='chmod 666 satan && ls /dev > il && tail daemon.log'
    2. Re:Summary much more interesting than actual rant by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      I never claimed he wrote it from his own thoughts. He has to rewrite what Dick and Karl dictate to him in his own special phonetics.

  15. It was a very mild rebuke by MykePagan · · Score: 5, Informative

    Did anyone actually watch the clip? It appeared to me that Putin gave a very mild rebuke to Dell, and then went on to do just as much marketing of Russian IT :-) It was not a big "F-You Dell, F-you The West" like the headlines imply.

    1. Re:It was a very mild rebuke by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, it was more like "when are you going to start treating us as equals?"

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:It was a very mild rebuke by TopSpin · · Score: 1

      when are you going to start treating us as equals?

      Right about the time you figure out how to govern without dictators.

      Actually, the whole exchange is rather refreshing. I dream of similar behavior from some of our 'leaders' and citizens...

      Worker: I won't be needing 24 months of unemployment money printed up, thanks.

      Unions: We provide actual value that potential members want so we won't be needing card check legislation to prosper, thanks.

      Surf: We're not actually starving out here so please don't drop another $20 billion of food stamps on us, thanks.

      --
      Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    3. Re:It was a very mild rebuke by internetizen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yes, it was more sensationalist and selective reading. It was more a bad simultaneous translation, as many Russians are noting. Plus it was not about Dell per se, it was "the IT sector" in general. see http://www.russiatoday.com/news/news/36591

    4. Re:It was a very mild rebuke by Darth+Cider · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, it seemed mild to me too, so I transcribed TFV, in the interests of honesty and fairness. (I'm not a sympathizer of any sort!)

      Here's the transcript:

      People with limited capacities should be helped. Pensioners should be helped. Developing countries should be helped. And help must not only be simply in the form of giving the money, perpetuating the circle of poverty. Why negotiations at the WTO (?) are at an impasse? Because rich countries cannot meet the needs of the developing economies...let's be frank about it and open... One must look for a compromise, speaking of Russia and our partners in Europe, our partners in Europe and the United States and Indonesia... one needs fully fledged equal partnership. In many respects, our economies are complementary. Indeed, we've managed to achieve a lot in developing informatization, as we say of our society. A few years ago, imagine a village in Siberia with a computer system and internet access. We did it. We made it. We have a government program for that. In every school, I stress, every Russian school has both computer rooms and internet access. In the Far East, in the Far North, everywhere. This movement of IT in the society will continue as dictated by both the development of economy and society... No one would ever think of doubting opportunities of information offered by (the) internet as an open source for information and for opinion sharing. You may like something, you may not like something. But complete freedom is the word here. Speaking of the intentions of the State, we have a program, a federal program - it is called Electronic Russia. We intend to continue this individual program in cooperation with our partners, and it is great pleasure that we will accept, as we have done before, investments into this sector and will continue developing our own products and presenting them to the global market. Many companies of Russia are major operators of the cellular services in a number of the developed economies of the world and we will continue facilitating such experts in the future. We have quite a few coinciding interests in these and in this area of course we will find a few more. Many companies (I will not name them) work in these areas. Of course, it doesn't only deal with hardware, as they say, but also and most importantly with intellectual products, the software, Here we have a few things to offer to the market, and I am grateful to you for this allusion. Traditionally, we have a very strong school of mathematics in Russia, and our programmers are among the best in the world, no doubt about it, and nobody would contest it here, even our Indian colleagues. I would say, let's do [with] the job. Thank you.

    5. Re:It was a very mild rebuke by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      No, it was more like "when are you going to start treating us as equals?"

      The First World can start treating us as equals when we will be that in practice (rather than our own persistent assertions).

    6. Re:It was a very mild rebuke by kmike · · Score: 1

      I guess 50% of slashdot visitors do not even finish the summary to begin with :)
      Even less are going to the linked source. And watching the video? Unlikely!

      Here's "lost in translation" explanation from linked article comments:
      http://www.russiatoday.com/news/news/36591

    7. Re:It was a very mild rebuke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right about the time you figure out how to govern without dictators.

            Dictators, two party system complete with nepotism and oligarchies - what's the difference?

            The democrats were given a lot of seats a couple years ago on an anti-war ticket. Oh dear, is the US STILL in Iraq? What happened?

            Obama was elected promising "change", and yet he prints another trillion dollars (ok, just short) putting another nail in the US dollar's coffin. Where's the "change"? The more things change, the more they stay the same. Oh, but Americans aren't in a "dictatorship", America is a "democracy". You can say whatever you like. Just make sure say it in your designated "free speech" zones, far far away from the TV cameras. Enjoy your tasering.

    8. Re:It was a very mild rebuke by Unoti · · Score: 1

      You're totally, sadly, right. Our government isn't much more democratic than Russia's. People reading slashdot: if any of parent's statements resonate with you-- and especially if they dont-- read Manufactoring Consent by Noam Chomsky.

    9. Re:It was a very mild rebuke by Risujin · · Score: 1

      I agree, the headline is very disproportionate. Especially if you watch the response in Russian, he simply says that rather than philanthropy, a level playing field (fair trade) would help the Russian IT sector. This is hardly news. A link to the video in Russian:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWwcVckT2Io

    10. Re:It was a very mild rebuke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did anyone actually watch the clip? It appeared to me that Putin gave a very mild rebuke to Dell, and then went on to do just as much marketing of Russian IT :-) It was not a big "F-You Dell, F-you The West" like the headlines imply.

      Michael Dell wasn't even asking if Dell specifically could help Russia. He was asking how the IT sector in general can help improve the economy in Russia. The description and title of this article is very misleading. It figures that the description would tell you to jump ahead to the point in the clip where Putin response so that you miss Michael Dell's question.

  16. spin by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

    The media spun this as if it makes Dell look bad. It doesn't. It actually makes Putin look insecure because he felt the need to lash out like that.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:spin by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say Putin was lashing out - the bulk of his response wasn't that Russia doesn't need IT help, it was that help might be better directed to the third world or developing economies that do need it. Of course Dell - being a public company - isn't actually interested in charity - he wants a big paid-for order of computers (maybe at a "helpful" discount. I'm sure Dell's not about to start gifting IT tech to the third world.

  17. The Best! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heck, Russia was the nation that granted us Tetris!

    In Soviet Russia, block rotates you!

  18. Nice slap down by MisterSquirrel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In Putin's defense, he was slapping down a marketing pitch. The linked article gets it wrong on a subtle but significant detail: Mr. Dell didn't ask "If" Dell could help, he asked "How" Dell could help.

    Who can blame Putin for being offended by the implication that Russia needed Mr. Dell's help? So he let him have it with both barrels, much as any of us might react to an unwanted and annoying telemarketer, if they gave us a similarly arrogant pitch.

    And by the way, shouldn't the lame jokes be changed to start with "In post-Soviet Russia"?

    1. Re:Nice slap down by Greg_D · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a huge difference between declining assistance and going off on a childish diatribe because a businessman offered his services to you. Putin seems to be playing up to the state-owned press in Russia which lionizes everything he does.

    2. Re:Nice slap down by DougF · · Score: 1

      In Putin's Russia, if you don't lionize him you end up dead, along with anyone who sees you get assassinated...

      --
      Impetuous! Homeric!
    3. Re:Nice slap down by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Putin seems to be playing up to the state-owned press in Russia which lionizes everything he does.

      Does anyone realize this guy is a politician? Of course he's playing up to the press, that's his job, just like M. Dell's job is to hawk hardware sales.

    4. Re:Nice slap down by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Possibly, but I'd direct you to Robert Heinlein's essays on how to deal with Russians and the Russian system, "Pravda Means Truth" and "Inside Intourist", both in Expanded Universe. These were written based on personal experience travelling inside Russia, with his wife learning Russian fluently enough to talk to people there without needing a translator. They provide quite a bit of insight into why Putin reacts the way he does.

    5. Re:Nice slap down by shiftless · · Score: 0, Troll

      "childish diatribe"? Thanks for illustrating the very thing that I hate about modern American pussies. You people label anything that is not 100% polite, refined, politically correct, and/or free of emotion to be "childish." Ridiculous.

    6. Re:Nice slap down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more likely pre-Soviet Russia II.

    7. Re:Nice slap down by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      It could also be a bit of tit-for-tat. Dell made a swipe first:

      "Mister Prime Minister, you spoke of the dangers of excessive government involvement, and I found myself really struck by that comment and surprised to hear that comment," Mr. Dell said. "Six months ago, I would have never imagined hearing that comment from yourself, but I have to say I completely agree with you."

      While I might agree with Dell's comments, I could imagine someone like Putin wouldn't pass up the opportunity to strike back.

    8. Re:Nice slap down by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Who can blame Putin for being offended by the implication that Russia needed Mr. Dell's help?

      Well, with some of the paranoid cold-war rhetoric coming out of the man the past couple of years, we thought they had time warped to the 1960's.

    9. Re:Nice slap down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think Westerners don't understand that the word
      'help' has a very negative almost insulting
      connotation in many countries. In the West,
      especially in the US, it is used casually
      ("Can I help you?", "How can we help?", etc.).
      If Michael Dell had phrased his question differently
      he would have got a more benign answer.

    10. Re:Nice slap down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I believe it was a tiger...

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/blog/2008/sep/01/russia?gusrc=rss&feed=networkfront

    11. Re:Nice slap down by geekoid · · Score: 1

      A little overly touchy.
      If I see someone I perceive to need help, I will ask how I can help.
      I won't demand that I help.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Nice slap down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you WTFV?? Of course not. This is slashdot.

      It was neither a rant, diatribe or childish.

    13. Re:Nice slap down by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Please, read about the people in 1960s Russia, because of course Russia didn't change a bit over the past forty years. Similarly, I advice all people who want to understand Obama to read "Uncle Tom's Cabin", or people that want to understand current Iranian politics to read "1001 nights".

      Do not consider at all that in the main Russian towns you could get a decent prepaid umts before you could get it in europe, or the many russian freelance IT workers that work online via sites like elance, and earn a pretty income with that.

      Putin is not talking out of his ass, and the one to read up about how to do business with Russians is Mr. Dell. He could have just hired an experienced advisor on how to get his product in Russia, paid a few bucks for that, and probably sold quite a bit. Instead he preferred to be a dickhead and screw his perspectives of getting in this growing market. Well done!

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    14. Re:Nice slap down by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 1

      We aren't talking about tech. Tech changes quickly. People change slowly, if at all. Look at how long it took from the passage of the first civil-rights laws in the US to the point where blacks could assume fair treatment everywhere without having to think twice about it or push for it and where the Klan was non-existent as a political force. Oh, that's right, we haven't gotten there yet! Witness David Duke. Do you think Russia changes faster than the US?

      Consider this: Putin grew up in the Russia of the 60s. Do you think he forgot all of that and changed his basic attitudes when a simple wall came down? I doubt it.

    15. Re:Nice slap down by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Look at how long it took from the passage of the first civil-rights laws in the US to the point where blacks could assume fair treatment everywhere without having to think twice about it or push for it and where the Klan was non-existent as a political force. Oh, that's right, we haven't gotten there yet! Witness David Duke.

      Oh come on. The Klan has been completely marginalized. David Duke made a minor splash 20 years ago. We just elected a black president. Bill Cosby goes around and tells the black community to stop blaming all their problems on others. Do racial tensions still exist? Of course. However, if you want to talk about rights in the 60s vs now it's night and day.

  19. Wow, watch out by meist3r · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You really hit Putin's raw nerves here. Outside their country their mafia tactics are practically worthless (granted, some actual mafia tactics and the one or other radioactive sushi bar here and there) so they have little to be proud of. The Russians have let their game slide and now they are in a desperate economic state.

    I would have taken Putin by the word 20 years ago and they probably would have blasted IBM out of the country with some Lada-type Diesel computer made from scrap metal and old nuclear reactors. But today. Not so sure anymore. What kind of sensible person would actually install a Russian operating system (let alone entire hardware solution)? We know they write spyware, so do the Americans but does that bother us? No. Because at least the Americans hide their stuff at all costs. Russians are just too straight forward. "I don't like, I kill you.", "I want information, I break your legs, then encryption."

    The course that Putin is sailing right now leads to the edge of the world and from his point of view ... he's very close to actually falling over it. You can't keep your economy running only with gas extortion and MP3 sites.

    1. Re:Wow, watch out by imboboage0 · · Score: 1

      The Russians have let their game slide and now they are in a desperate economic state.

      Disregarding the world's current overall economy, what is your justification for this statement? They have no national debt, and that's more than many states on the globe can say.

      --
      Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
    2. Re:Wow, watch out by meist3r · · Score: 1

      The Russians have let their game slide and now they are in a desperate economic state.

      Disregarding the world's current overall economy, what is your justification for this statement? They have no national debt, and that's more than many states on the globe can say.

      Which economic sector heavily relies on Russian trade nowadays? I can't name any. Maybe some resources like gas to Europe but you can hardly call that a solid foundation. From what I can tell the overall state of Russia has been deteriorating for decades. Some rich cream on top that skims off profits from the international markets and the rest goes down the spiral of neglect and misconduct. I mean, in a country where human rights activists and lawyers get assassinated on an almost regular basis, where the (former) president leads a double life of communist megalomaniac and self-glorification media whore on the other, where foreign capital holds more power than anyone else ... how could they NOT be in dire straits? The fact that Medwedew is a puppet, alone says enough about the Russian system.

      I infer all this from some observations I made and you probably will show me figures that disprove my point. Thing is, what numbers can you trust coming out of that country? In my country, Germany, the statistics for unemployment are heavily doctored and we're talking about a huge economy here that shouldn't have to hide this. Yet, they're not truthful about their politics. Same in Russia, there also not truthful or democratic in their elections. Why would you accept their numbers to be true? You say they have no national debt. Really? Who says that? And how can they claim that when their population is obviously in a worse state than several years ago. I measure economic state by matter of influence and I can't recall one russian project or product in the last two decades that was in any way important to key markets world-wide. Given that 30 years ago they used to dominate some industries and where considered ahead at times the number of public interest in Russia has dwindled significantly after the Cold War. If that's not an indicator for desperate economic state I don't know what is.

  20. Bah. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In Soviet Russia, polonium 210 gets you. (said without a trace of irony)

    1. Re:Bah. by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      In London, polonium 210 gets Soviet Russian.

      (said without a trace of humor... but i tried)

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    2. Re:Bah. by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's more like in Soviet Russia, you get 210Po. In London, 210Po gets you.

  21. It may be a misconseption on my part but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    "not even our Indian colleagues."

    Am I the only one who thinks that even if there may be some good programers among them, most of the indians programmers are cheap labor like the chinese in manufacturing, they work long hours doing a so-so job without having much qualifications nor having to think much about the problems? This is based on what I've heard since I haven't worked with indians myself.

    1. Re:It may be a misconseption on my part but... by Puchku · · Score: 5, Informative

      In India, we have thousands (literally) of kids graduating with computer engineering degrees every year. Now, the thing is, a lot of these degrees are pretty useless since the college/university that issued them is basically a money making machine, and nothing else.

      However, there are a bunch of good places that produce very good engineers. The Indian Institutes of Technology are the most well known, but there are some others that are equally good (some of the top Regional Enginnering Colleges, and so on)

      I think it boils down to numbers. Say we have 30,000 comp sci grads every year. Now say 60 percent of them are hacks who know nothing much and are only good for repetitive code work and stuff like that. 20 percent will be quite good, easily as competent as a good programmer in the US or wherever. 10 percent will be skilled at code and other stuff like management, the types who end up heading into upper management, 8 percent will be very good, and 2 percent will be fantastic.

      The 2 percent mostly heads off to MIT, or CMU, or $TOPSCHOOL to do an MS or a Phd, but that still leaves a pretty substantial number of good people.

      Now, when you realize that 30,000 is a low estimate, since the acutal figure is 175,000 (source: http://www.timesascent.co.in/index.aspx?Page=article&sectid=2&contentid=20080930200809301249051997b5b53a, and http://www.rediff.com/money/2006/jun/09bspec.htm ) you begin to see that while we do have a huge number of terrible programmers, we have a pretty good talent pool too. It's all about the numbers!

    2. Re:It may be a misconseption on my part but... by spiffmastercow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've worked with a few H1-B's, and that's generally the impression I got. We had one guy who had a CS Masters from some Indian university, but after 6 months of trying, he still couldn't write a simple text processing app. At another job, we had hired a Crystal Reports 'expert' to create some reports that none of the staff had time for. For a couple of days the guy would ask how to make the numbers round down, rather than just rounding off. On the second day I took pity on him and showed him the joys of the Floor function. I had never programmed anything in CR, but I knew that there had to be a floor operator in there somewhere.

      I'm sure there are good Indian programmers. I'm also relatively certain that most of them are here on student visas, working on their grad school degrees. Those not in school most likely expect the same level of pay as their American counterparts. Never forget that you get what you pay for.

    3. Re:It may be a misconseption on my part but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went to an IIT. From what I know the IIT's are not the only places from where good programmers come out. IIT tends to have students good at math so they make good programmers, but you can find good people outside colleges or even without a proper college degree.
      And about the 2% going to MIT's, that was true up until 2001. After the crash, for some reason the number of people going abroad never recovered atleast at IITs. At IIT Madras, 60% of the class in 2000 went to the US for higher studies, now it is closer to 20%. At other IIT's this number is even lower. Most seem to go into management, IAS (indian govt) or into indian companies (ITC, McKinsey,Software companies etc.)

    4. Re:It may be a misconseption on my part but... by listen · · Score: 1

      The problem is the attitude that the vast majority of indian programmers have.

      1. They can never be wrong, or hav e made a mistake.
      2. They deny reality - ie everything is always going fine, until its blatantly clear that its not, and even then its somehow still ok, if you ignore the reality that the system was meant to work.
      3. Its impossible to know whether they actually understand what you said. Because they will always claim to have understood, you literally have to quiz them in detail, which can be very tedous..
      4. They can't bear to disappoint someone, even when they should. I've had programmers impersonate each other on the phone, just to avoid admitting that they weren't there. But its such a half assed job that they don't even tell the other guy that they impersonated them.

      Any halfway decent indians move to the UK, US and Europe *very* quickly. Also, I've seen *plenty* of utterly shit programmers from IITs. The vast majority of "successful" indian outsourcing I've seen has consisted of ~20 indian programmers producing reams of shit, and then their UK based "boss" rewriting the lot and getting a pat on the back for making outsourcing work.

      Now Eastern Europeans are arrogant fucks who find it very hard to admit they are wrong as well. They do have a good sense of doom however, which makes them far less likley to lie about the state of their projects. In general they are hugely better than indians.

      This is all cultural - its shocking how much more angry a westernised ( can admit mistakes, doesn't have to be percieved as omniscient) will get at working with the standard dross. I've never heard of these kinds of cultural traits being engineered in or out of a society, but I seriously hope it can be done for Indias sake. Unfortunately, this would involve facing reality and admitting they have a problem....

  22. Re:HP rox, dell sux by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    Where is ESR and his guns when you need 'em?

  23. Delphi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Maybe Putin meant to say that Russians were the best Delphi programmers in the world, which is probably true.

    Unfortunately no one gives a crap about Delphi.

    bezumetz, begletz dorogi net.. ti vidish neverni svet...

  24. Dell needs a class in international business by MoellerPlesset2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not that I agree with him, but I understand Putin's response. Look at it from Putin's POV: Putin is a very strong nationalist. And just about every country, not least Russia, tends to be quite sensitive to American condescension or arrogance, real or perceived. So when Dell says, in what would be an okay-ish remark between Americans, 'how can we help you', it's easily felt as condescending in foreign eyes. Especially Russian ones and especially Putin's. Add to that the cultural factor of Russian temperament and you get what Putin said. Dell probably should have phrased it in a more neutral manner. For instance, he could have been more generalized and simply ask "How can the IT sector in Russia be expanded to better utilize the reserves of talent there?" Or something similar. By his response, you'll find out if there's a role for you or not. So simply by dropping the 'How can we help' bit, you avoid the implication that they _need_ help (even if they do, nobody really wants to be told that by someone else) and the further implication that 'we' are the only ones who can do so.

    1. Re:Dell needs a class in international business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words: Do a better job of bootlicking.

    2. Re:Dell needs a class in international business by MoellerPlesset2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In other words: Do a better job of bootlicking.

      Bzzzt! Wrong attitude. Unless your objective is to get into a pointless argument or pissing contest.
      Taking into account the opposing POV is hardly 'bootlicking', it's common sense. It also costs nothing. Arrogance OTOH, has no value. What consolation is it to you that you refused to be a 'bootlicker' in your opinion, if it means you fail to achieve your goals?

      You take into account the opposing POV to find the course of action most likely to produce the desired result. If Dell had phrased his question differently, he could have gotten the answer he was looking for. Instead, he got some useless nationalistic banter. If it'd been a business negotiation, Dell would have risked losing out on the deal, and both sides would probably lose.

      Diplomacy is not a zero-sum game, and it's not pandering or bootlicking. It's the dignified art of getting stuff done without getting sidetracked into pointless discussions. Saying 'my way or the highway' does not tend to get things done, and does not make someone a good leader, if that's what you think. Because leaders, pretty much by definition, are people who get things done.

    3. Re:Dell needs a class in international business by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Look at it from Putin's POV: Putin is a very strong nationalist.

      He isn't, really. He's a very good populist, and as aggressive nationalism bordering on xenophoby and hatred of US is popular in Russia, that's what is demonstrated.

    4. Re:Dell needs a class in international business by Dusty00 · · Score: 1

      Dell probably should have phrased it in a more neutral manner.

      Dell probably should have exhibited a lot more humility. There's a big difference in stature between a company figurehead and a countries figurehead. This is about on par with a the head of a 50 person consulting company seeing Steve Balmer at a tech conference and saying "Hey I think we could help you get Microsoft back on track."

    5. Re:Dell needs a class in international business by moshez · · Score: 1

      Apparently, only in doing business with Russians?

      When Dell came to Israel, a similar (I imagine) spiel has got him started negotiating for building a Dell R&D center here.

  25. Indeed by quax · · Score: 1

    Slightly different account here.

    Reminds me of this whole Ahmadinejad "Wiping Israel from the map" translation flap.

    Once an incorrect translation takes hold it is pretty much impossible to correct.

  26. World Best Hackers, Maybe? by alphatel · · Score: 1
    'Our programmers are some of the best in the world,' Putin continued.

    Yes, best in the world at illegally creating a government-sanctioned (but never acknowledged), botnet of ungodly proportions.

    So what exactly do the other 99% of Russians know about PCs? Not much, based on my dealings with thousands of Russians every year.

    Let them eat Dells!

    --
    When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    1. Re:World Best Hackers, Maybe? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >So what exactly do the other 99% of Russians know about PCs?

      An analysis of some botnet code (WaPo security fix blog a few days ago) showed that they wont install if the default character set is russian. Why would a botnet operator give up the opportunity to get millions of russian computers? I think there's a real and concrete connection here between these scammers and the FSB or Putin himself.

      Putin likes to play himself off as a legitimate politician, but he's a thug and a criminal. Talking shit about American business gets votes and influence, but not real world results. Reminds me of all the middle-east dictators and theocrats who give long rambling speeches against the west. Its a great distraction from the real corruption and poverty at home.

  27. Summary is a bit off by SpinyNorman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Putin wasn't reacting to Dell offering computers so much as Dell suggesting that Russia had a problem with technical talent that needed addressing, which *is* obviously absurd! Even if Russia did have a problem developing IT talent, the solution isn't a big order of Dell computers, even if Dell honestly thinks it is.

  28. And then there is this whole virgin mary thing ... by quax · · Score: 1
  29. TopCoder by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    According to the TopCoder algorithm competition stats:

    1 Russian Federation 2930.06
    2 China 2843.33
    3 Poland 2842.79
    4 Ukraine 2557.06
    5 Japan 2483.83
    6 Canada 2426.56
    7 United States 2320.98
    8 Slovakia 2291.73
    9 South Korea 2226.98
    10 Belarus 2206.81

    Let's just hope the next war isn't fought with robots.

    1. Re:TopCoder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that Belarus is effectively just a state of Russia. Open borders, no visa needed. And Ukranian programmers can get to Russia (an do so, because Ukraine economy is dead) almost as easily.

    2. Re:TopCoder by meeotch · · Score: 1

      Let's just hope the next war isn't fought with robots.

      Wait - I don't get you. Are you saying you *wouldn't* welcome them?

    3. Re:TopCoder by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Hmmm according to Putin, the gold standard for programmers is India, and they are not even on the list!

    4. Re:TopCoder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any reason why the results are like that? I'm curious on why eastern europeans do so well. Better/different education system?

    5. Re:TopCoder by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 1

      My theory is that the colder it is, the more kids tend to play inside =)

    6. Re:TopCoder by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Informative

      Any reason why the results are like that? I'm curious on why eastern europeans do so well. Better/different education system?

      I think it's mostly strong emphasis on math and other hard sciences starting with high school, and the system of "advanced" (but still public/free) schools for bright students (you usually have to pass some fairly hard exams to get in) with even more emphasis. I've studied in two such schools in my last 4 years of school studies - we had about 8 hours of math and 4 hours of physics each week, and in the last two years math involved solving cubic and quadratic equations, dealing with derivatives, integrals and logarithms, functional analysis, stereometry (solid geometry) and so on. It helps to set the right frame of mind.'

      That said, IT & CS education in Russia is still crappy, and mostly non-existent. I've yet to see any university offering a CS course, and IT/IS ones usually involve outdated technologies and incompetent teachers. All good Russian programmers I know are entirely self-taught when it comes to programming itself - most have engineering or math degree otherwise.

    7. Re:TopCoder by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Let's just hope the next war isn't fought with robots.

      You know, you may have found a good reason to expand the US H1-B visa program...

    8. Re:TopCoder by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Seems that if you had to live in Russia, staying in your parent's basement is a good idea

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    9. Re:TopCoder by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

      Didn't know this.
      Nice -- three ex-Soviet lands, plus two East Block land plus China. 6 out of 10 it is... Democracy is bad for your programming skills ;)
      Note how a Belarus with ist 10 million population is almost on par with all-mighty USA. Very interesting statistics indeed. Sure, western nations can buy those programers from Eastern Europe and China, but they don't seem to be able to educate enough themselves.
      We still see remnants of a very stong soviet education system (IMO world's best).

    10. Re:TopCoder by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Let's just hope the next war isn't fought with robots.

      Oh I don't know, the American bots will blue-screen, the Russian bots will go off and try to steal credit-cards and the Chinese bots will spend all their time trying to build a firewall... sounds pretty safe to me.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    11. Re:TopCoder by gregorio · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's mostly strong emphasis on math and other hard sciences starting with high school, and the system of "advanced" (but still public/free) schools for bright students (you usually have to pass some fairly hard exams to get in) with even more emphasis. I've studied in two such schools in my last 4 years of school studies - we had about 8 hours of math and 4 hours of physics each week, and in the last two years math involved solving cubic and quadratic equations, dealing with derivatives, integrals and logarithms, functional analysis, stereometry (solid geometry) and so on. It helps to set the right frame of mind.'

      That's not what I hear from friends at work who migrated from Russia to, on their words, "any country on the west that would accept me". They often told histories about how smart young people from Russia had to survive by doing "tricks" and acting "cute" to foreigners and big national companies at events such as Math/Chess/Programming competitions. A good and modern example of this situation is the malware scene.

      It's all about need. Those eastern european kids really need to win these competitions. They can't afford to be "normal" because the job market for normal people was always a great mess at Russia.

      The same kid from the west, with the same capabilities, will simply dismiss so much work just for some competition and say "ohhh, screw this, I tried". The number of kids from the west who actually need this kind of victory is extremely small and this group is mostly composed of empoverished folks and people with extremely serious issues related to socialization and self-esteem.

      Being quick and dirty: "spoiled" (that's always relative - I'm considering a eastern european view) kids won't put that much effort into this kind of event. They don't really care about being named "Top Coder" as they're living an extremely confortable life at the moment and will achieve good job positions at the future just for beinga national with a good diploma. That's why the malware scene is really weak at the US: people have better options.

      That's also bad for the west: if you were born at the US and attended a good university, you'll end up being a manager without needing much knowledge or even an IT-related graduation. That sucks because it means that our companies are being run by spoiled idiots instead of leading the race of improvement technology creation.

    12. Re:TopCoder by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's not what I hear from friends at work who migrated from Russia to, on their words, "any country on the west that would accept me"

      I am myself a Russian who migrated from Russia to "any country that would accept me" - which is Canada for now. What I told in my previous post was my personal experience, not hearsay.

      It's all about need. Those eastern european kids really need to win these competitions. They can't afford to be "normal" because the job market for normal people was always a great mess at Russia.

      That's just not true. First of all, regarding the job market - for software developers in particular, it's actually very good in Russia (or was until the crisis hit) - too few skilled people, too many opened positions. In my last 3 years of working in Moscow, I always knew that, at any given moment, I could walk out of my job and find a new one within 2 weeks. I've got salary which was several times larger than the average in the country. I've seen other people progress from junior to lead developer within 2 years because there were not enough properly experienced devs to fill all the lead positions. And that's not one particular company - that's the whole Moscow IT job market. Of course, Russia isn't just Moscow, but in practice most bright guys who can (and it doesn't take much) move to Moscow anyway because that's where the jobs are.

      As for why the kids want to win competitions... I participated in some of the local/regional Russian ones myself at school, and it wasn't about getting job offers at all. It was because taking part in one was expected of all the bright students, and because winning one could help getting into a better university later on (they're free, even the better ones, but the exams are hard, and this could help). And yes, of course, merely the feeling of being the smartest kid on the block is worth a lot - but that's only if the culture you grew up in fosters that, which it does in Russia for some kids (not all of them, not by a long shot - but I think we still do better than USA with their overemphasis on physical sports in school).

    13. Re:TopCoder by xant · · Score: 1

      How many people from each of those countries is participating? Russia, China and Poland all have higher populations than the US. And probably a lot less technology employment. Nobody I know is on that site, we have real jobs. (Not that I'm not impressed by someone who can do well on those competitions, they are hard. Just saying nobody I know has time to get involved.)

      --
      It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
    14. Re:TopCoder by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Neither Russia or Poland have higher populations than the US. Hell, Google says the stat as its first result, I didn't even have to click anything!

    15. Re:TopCoder by gregorio · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I've seen other people progress from junior to lead developer within 2 years because there were not enough properly experienced devs to fill all the lead positions.

      When your social class allows this kind of progression, or after years of hard work to achieve this possibility... Most people aren't born with all these opportunities and actually need to spend lots of years of their childhood working real hard. You mentioned lack of skilled/experienced workers: that's a bad sign. It's a sign that people aren't being given the proper opportunities. It's a sign that people actually need competitions and other kinds of events/programs to enter this specific job market.

      As for why the kids want to win competitions... I participated in some of the local/regional Russian ones myself at school, and it wasn't about getting job offers at all. It was because taking part in one was expected of all the bright students, and because winning one could help getting into a better university later on (they're free, even the better ones, but the exams are hard, and this could help).

      So you actually joined the competition to achieve a better life status. It means that you needed it. You were living a situation were your future was not a certainty and you tried your best to improve this situation.

      For your specific case, a direct job or scolarship offer wasn't an issue. But it is for a lot of kids.

      For some kids, winning a competition like this is necessary so their parents can allow them to study hard and avoid serving as cheap child labour. It's like a desperate scream of "please, daddy, leave me alone". At least that's what people from Russia, raised on different conditions than you, tell me.

      And yes, of course, merely the feeling of being the smartest kid on the block is worth a lot - but that's only if the culture you grew up in fosters that, which it does in Russia for some kids (not all of them, not by a long shot - but I think we still do better than USA with their overemphasis on physical sports in school).

      The fact that Russian culture fosters that kind of thing is not a good sign, actually. It's a good charateristic, but it's a symptom of other not-so-good things.

    16. Re:TopCoder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it normalized (divided by the number of citizens or sth)?

    17. Re:TopCoder by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      When your social class allows this kind of progression

      Not at all. We're not talking about kids in rich families here. I have to admit I could be counted in that category - my mom got a credit and started a successful small business in mid-90s, enough to climb the social ladder above your average Soviet family back then. But most of my friends whose success I described in my previous post couldn't be called "rich kids" in any sense of the word.

      after years of hard work to achieve this possibility

      Not really. Think "straight out of university". Universities in Russia are still free, so long as you can pass the entry exams - and yes, that takes an effort, but why shouldn't it? And, really, a school student who does enjoy solving hard problems (think math again) won't have much trouble there.

      As for myself, I don't even have a degree, but that didn't prevent me from finding well-paid jobs (senior & lead dev, architect) solely based on my skills and knowledge.

      So you actually joined the competition to achieve a better life status. It means that you needed it. You were living a situation were your future was not a certainty and you tried your best to improve this situation.

      No, I didn't. Personally, when I did take part, it was always for the fun of competition. Some kids might do it to be able to go to a better university later on, but you don't really need that to get a good job, and it's not a requirement, anyway. It just helps.

      And, pray tell, in what country today one's future is a "certainty", and why would we ever want that? IMO, in a just society, one's future should be a product of one's choices and natural abilities, no less, no more. We had "certainty" in the USSR - you'd be guaranteed work for life, but you wouldn't get to choose that work. No, thanks.

      For some kids, winning a competition like this is necessary so their parents can allow them to study hard and avoid serving as cheap child labour. It's like a desperate scream of "please, daddy, leave me alone". At least that's what people from Russia, raised on different conditions than you, tell me.

      I can imagine that happening in certain isolated cases, but I'm not aware of any (and yes, I do have plenty of social contacts on all social strata back home), so it's certainly not the norm. Then again, Russia is large, and culture may differ in different places, just like it does in US or EU.

      The fact that Russian culture fosters that kind of thing is not a good sign, actually.

      What's wrong about teaching people to try to achieve, and prove by their deeds, intellectual rather than physical superiority? You'd rather teach them about how everyone is equal, and how being a "smartass" is hurting the feelings of the mediocre? We tried that in the USSR, too - that's why "intelligentsia" was an insult then (and still to some extent today). I don't want that back, either.

    18. Re:TopCoder by eples · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing - we've all got jobs.

      --
      I'm a 2000 man.
    19. Re:TopCoder by kanguro · · Score: 1

      all-mighty USA..... yeah, right. Soon the only way you will be able to put an american ass in orbit, it will be riding an ol' good Soyuz rocket. So many smart usa people posting here...

    20. Re:TopCoder by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      I too though about the lack of a solid CS course. Here at NSU we have started offering an experimental CS course to one group of third year students. But the more I think about it the more I doubt it's necessity. After all if you look at standard US textbooks (like Rosen's) CS the way is taught is a collection of watered down topics from other branches of math. Why do we need CS if during the first semester alone we study Higher Algebra, Number Theory, Theory of Algorithms, Mathematical Logic - all part of a CS course.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    21. Re:TopCoder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as a CS major at the Warsaw University (Poland), I have a theory a to way this is the case: in a country with a well developed IT sector like the US the best and brightest students quit and start their own companies (or at least are bought off by major corporations) instead of playing in contests.

    22. Re:TopCoder by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

      Some people fail to see even the most obvious sarcasm...

    23. Re:TopCoder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude topcoder.com is a contest to see who can make the prettiest flash applets. russia has very deep technical skill in terms of real computer science, but this is far from a good metric for measuring computer science skill depth

  30. Proper translation of Putin's statement... by Anonymusing · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here.

    âoeYou know, the trick is we're not someone in need of help. We're not invalids. Help is something that you should give to poor people, to people with limited capacities, to pensioners, to developing countries... As for Russia and our partners in Europe, in the United States, in some Asian countries, there should be a partnership of equals.â

    --
    Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    1. Re:Proper translation of Putin's statement... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      I trust russiatoday as far as I can throw Putin - not at all. They're the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin, with stories and coverage singularly designed to promote Russian image abroad.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    2. Re:Proper translation of Putin's statement... by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

      Their translation is still much better and more complete than that of the summary not to mention the headline.

    3. Re:Proper translation of Putin's statement... by SEE · · Score: 1

      Since Peter the Great, Russia has alternated between two states:

      1) Importing foreign expertise from the West with the hope that it will cure its backwardness.
      2) Blustering that it doesn't need foreign expertise from the West, that it isn't backwards, that it's the full equal of the West.

      During those three hundred-plus years, it never caught up with Britain, France, Germany, or Italy, while places like the U.S., Canada, Australia, Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea have gone from well behind Russia to well ahead of it. Russia has spent three hundred years proving that it is a country of limited capacities and overweening pride.

      So, this is entirely expected. It's entirely in the centuries-demonstrated Russian character to strut and bluster about being an advanced, developed country. It doesn't seem to have actually helped Russia become an equal with the West, of course.

    4. Re:Proper translation of Putin's statement... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Do you know Russian? Or are you guessing that the translation is more accurate? As far as I'm concerned, their translation is about as accurate as Blagojevich's story on what really happened on those tapes.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  31. Poor translations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Russian to English translation was mediocre (at least for the bits I could hear Putin say), so I wonder whether Dell's question had similarly poor translation and Putin didn't get the real meaning of what was asked.

    I can see how his question could be translated to mean that Russian IT still sucks and needs help.

  32. In Soviet Russia by Stoned+Necromancer · · Score: 1, Funny

    What comrade Putin says is that Soviet Russia produces some of the best cracks, viruses, hacks, worms, backdoors, keygenerators and hacking utilities in the world. Besides, it's all in cyrillic and nobody except soviet russians understand it anyway. :-)

  33. Full of shit you are, young Jedi by melted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. Putin has been addressing the economy pretty darn well. There was pretty dramatic GDP growth during his tenure.

    2. While corruption is still high, it is MUCH lower than it was during Yeltsin years. Oligarchs don't open the doors in Kremlin with their foot anymore. The guy who tried to buy up enough of the parliament to pass his own laws (Khodorkovsky) is in the prison, where he will remain for a long time. Needless to say, the Russian people have much less sympathy to him that those who don't know what he's really in the prison for.

    3. It's about time Russia asserted itself internationally. For nearly a decade and a half, Russia did exactly as IMF and Washington DC told it. Needless to say, neither of the two had Russia's interests in mind.

    4. Putin was merely putting Dell in his place. Just because you got a ticket to Davos doesn't mean you're entitled to any kind of preferential treatment from the government. Dell is just "screwdriver assembly" company. There are plenty of those in Russia.

    Questions?

    1. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by ravenshrike · · Score: 4, Informative

      The amount of corruption hasn't declined in the least, rather, the competitors have all been eliminated and now the source of corruption is coming solely from the Putin faction and also the Russkie mafia. Entrepreneurial corrupt politicians not welcome.

    2. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by russotto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1. Putin has been addressing the economy pretty darn well. There was pretty dramatic GDP growth during his tenure.

      I'm sure $150/bbl oil had nothing to do with it.

      2. While corruption is still high, it is MUCH lower than it was during Yeltsin years. Oligarchs don't open the doors in Kremlin with their foot anymore. The guy who tried to buy up enough of the parliament to pass his own laws (Khodorkovsky) is in the prison, where he will remain for a long time.

      You have any room in that prison? There's a few US oligarchs who probably deserve a stay there.

    3. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aye, basically Mike just got an "F" in diplomacy.

      Putin (and across the way, the Chinese) both understand thoroughly that they need to have their own manufacturing and design capability. Dell offering to "come help" rightfully raises all sorts of alarm bells (as it *should* have in the US before it outsourced most of its capabilities).

    4. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by jgalun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      1) Putin did not address the economy well. Rising commodity prices addressed the Russian economy. No structural problems were addressed, and until they are, Russia will falter every time commodity prices go down. What happened to the scientific prowess of the Soviet Union? Putin has not restored that. Russia is not a leader in any high-tech industries, despite what Putin thinks.

      3) Putin is asserting Russia's interests in a typically moronic Russian manner. That is to say, he is trying to set Russia up as a Great Power and an ideological competitor to the West. But it doesn't have the population, resources, or technology to do this, so all it is doing is spending its money wastefully on these vanity projects. I mean, take something like selling missiles to Syria. It gains Russia almost nothing (some small money in arms sales and close ties with an country that still leaves Russia without any real leverage in the Middle East), but Russia pursues it because it is a poke in the eye to America. Much of Russia's policy seems more geared towards annoying the US (to prove that Russia can do what it wants) than doing anything useful for Russia.

      Let me put it this way. In 20 years, China and India will be rich and fully integrated into the global system. Russia, which 20 years ago was far ahead of both, will likely not be. For that, Putin needs to answer.

      4) What Dell said is standard business/political talk. It's a polite way of asking, "Is there anything we can invest in that would make both of us rich?" That's why politicians go on foreign trips trying to drum up business from investors, and why countries fly their own investors overseas to meet with foreign countries to solidify relations. Even if there are no specific opportunities for Dell right now, it is incredibly stupid for Putin to respond this one. It just sends a message to foreign investors that they are not wanted in Russia (a message already sent by Putin's actions to seize foreign investments in Russia's oil). How does eliminating foreign investment help the Russian people?

    5. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putin has been addressing the economy pretty darn well. There was pretty dramatic GDP growth during his tenure.

      Oil price high, sell oil, brilliant!

    6. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 2, Interesting

      3. It's about time Russia asserted itself internationally. For nearly a decade and a half, Russia did exactly as IMF and Washington DC told it. Needless to say, neither of the two had Russia's interests in mind.

      Questions?

      Yes, I have questions. Do not change the subject by talking about what America does. What I want to know from you, since you seem to think you are an expert is... How does this "reassertion" benefit non-Russians?
      Is there more to this reassertion than simply supporting noxious dictators (ie. Sudan, Cuba) and stealing territory from other countries (ie. Georgia)?
      I'm not going to deny that Russia benefited little from doing what it was told to do, mostly because President Bush was too idiotic to understand the concept of "quid pro quo", but I fail to see how this new, proud Russia is really any better than the old Soviet one, which also supported noxious dictators and stole land (end of WWII for example).

    7. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Putin has been addressing the economy pretty darn well. There was pretty dramatic GDP growth during his tenure.

      It's no coincidence that oil prices tripled during his stay in the office. Now they're back down, and we'll see how long that GDP growth will last.

      While corruption is still high, it is MUCH lower than it was during Yeltsin years. Oligarchs don't open the doors in Kremlin with their foot anymore. The guy who tried to buy up enough of the parliament to pass his own laws (Khodorkovsky) is in the prison, where he will remain for a long time. Needless to say, the Russian people have much less sympathy to him that those who don't know what he's really in the prison for.

      I won't even comment on Khodorkovsky - anyone who knows enough about the case knows that it was a case of political persecution, pure and simple. Even if you go by the official version, he was charged with tax evasion, not "buying the parliament".

      Anyway, corruption is still there and as rampant as ever - it's just that, now that the official party of power is the "party of bureaucracy", it's considered normal. Meanwhile, the number of government workers (read: bureaucrats) in Russia has grown steadily during Putin's reign, and today actually exceeds their number in the USSR, for a country which has less than 2/3rds of the population of the USSR!

      It's about time Russia asserted itself internationally ... Questions?

      Good luck doing that with demotivated, undertrained and abused conscript cannon fodder making up the bulk of the military, with military tech 20 years old (very few new developments since the collapse of the USSR, and most of those don't even leave prototype stage), and with no coherent ideology save for "We are awesome 'cause we say so, and we're gonna whine a lot if you disagree, and maybe even punch you if we think you're weak enough".

      - fellow Russian

    8. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

      Keeping Russia's interests in mind ...

      Others in this thread have already pretty convincingly refuted most of this. Let me just point out one more thing:

      You said "For nearly a decade and a half, Russia did exactly as IMF and Washington DC told it. Needless to say, neither of the two had Russia's interests in mind."

      Iit is not in Washington's interest to have the biggest country in the world be an embittered, paranoid and resentful second-rate superpower-wannabe. It is in Washington's interest -- indeed, in all of ours -- to have Russia evolve into peaceful, stable, prosperous democracy through the rule of law. A partner in maintaining world stability, no different than Canada, Australia, Italy, Poland, Germany, or dozens of other first-world nations.

      Tell me again how this is not also in Russia's best interest?

          - Alaska Jack

    9. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by jojisan · · Score: 1

      1. Raising the GDP from a dismal level to anything resembling stable is probably a large percent increase, there in a bs statistic. Not mentioning the money and effort the US and IMF put in helping create that stability. With the oil money they were collecting they were enabled to do alot of things. If you think that the raise was Putin's doing only, I think you are a fanboy.

      2. Wining the war between Russian Mobsters and solidifying the corrupt power base doesn't mean that it is less corrupt, its just better organized, congrats "Godfather".

      3. What benefit does Russia "asserting" itself really have. Between the direct threats to its neighbors like the Ukraine and holding Europe over a barrel with its control of natural resources, it just seems like another Dictator State to me. If anything it seems like a step backwards.

      4. Putin is an ego maniac, I wouldn't call one of the largest computer companies in the world a screwdriver assembly company. If it wasn't for Dell there would be alot of companies that would have spent millions more than they had to for technology. Dell might not be the company it was, but for a time period they put the old pc manufacturers to shame and made a good benefit to consumers in terms of real competition. If there was such companies in Russia, then please explain why no one hears about them? Beside raw commodities, weapons, and some space technology what does Russia really offer?

      --
      <sig> I wish I had a </sig>
    10. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, sir, you missed #2

    11. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by MBCook · · Score: 1

      It's no coincidence that oil prices tripled during his stay in the office. Now they're back down, and we'll see how long that GDP growth will last.

      I'm not saying he didn't have a hand in it (Iraq war, for example), but it's not like it was all his fault (see: hurricanes, inability to build new refineries, inability to tap into our own sources (ANOIR, the gulf, etc), rising foreign demand (China, India, et. all)).

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    12. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by bheading · · Score: 0, Troll

      What happened to the scientific prowess of the Soviet Union?

      The Soviets had scientific prowess ?

      What did they do, other than steal Western innovations and pour massive state resources into enhancing them ?

    13. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heheh, you said number two...

    14. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me put it this way. In 20 years, China and India will be rich and fully integrated into the global system. Russia, which 20 years ago was far ahead of both, will likely not be. For that, Putin needs to answer.

      In twenty years, China and India will be outsourcing jobs to America.
      Over the next five to ten years, Chinese and Indian companies will be learning everything they can from western project leaders and project managers.

      Right now, freshly graduated analysts and project people are making over thirty grand per month, including very good living arrangements etc.

      Expect those salaries to fall to perhaps 20k/month, with the amount of people doing it going up twenty times.
      Ten years from now, the Chinese and Indians will be able to churn out some of the best project managers and execs the world has to offer.

      Russians aren't the only ones with hubris.

    15. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by makomk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, they had scientific prowess - it just wasn't exploited all that well.

      (They also had some very good mathematicians, which is probably partly why the NSA modified the DES S-boxes to make it more secure. In fact, they still do have good mathematicians.)

    16. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4) What Dell said is standard business/political talk. It's a polite way of asking, "Is there anything we can invest in that would make both of us rich?"

      Just as Putin's response was the standard political way of saying "Fuck you Mr. Dell."

    17. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by sw155kn1f3 · · Score: 1

      are you kidding, right? first of all, WWII: you're talking about the country who destroyed the nazis and who had the full right to do anything with acquired land by the all international laws for that time.
      second: it's funny to hear about stealing and invading from the us citizen, which invaded several sovereign nations in 20th century.

      --
      - Arwen, I'm your father, Agent Smith.
      - Well, you're just Smith, but my father is Aerosmith!
    18. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by composer777 · · Score: 1

      Let me put it this way. In 20 years, China and India will be rich and fully integrated into the global system. Russia, which 20 years ago was far ahead of both, will likely not be. For that, Putin needs to answer.

      In twenty years, China and India will be outsourcing jobs to America.
      Over the next five to ten years, Chinese and Indian companies will be learning everything they can from western project leaders and project managers.

      Right now, freshly graduated analysts and project people are making over thirty grand per month, including very good living arrangements etc.

      To fill the worldwide shortage of middle-managers no doubt. That's all we need is an army of middle managers to solve all of the world's problems.

    19. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by melted · · Score: 1

      >> I'm sure $150/bbl oil had nothing to do with it.

      It sure did. But at least those profits were properly taxed and put into Russia's reserve fund. If Yeltsin was running the country, the taxpayer wouldn't see a dime.

    20. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by melted · · Score: 1

      >> That is to say, he is trying to set Russia up as a Great
      >> Power and an ideological competitor to the West.

      It is a power to be reckoned with, particularly in its immediate area of influence. If Washington DC doesn't like it, they can go pound sand. Military exercises in Venezuela were just a response for NATO military ships in Georgia. You shit on their doorstep, they shit on yours. Simple. You don't talk down to a sovereign country with enough firepower to turn the entire north American continent into nuclear desert. You don't shit on its doorstep. You don't put your military bases near its densely populated areas. You don't buy out the governments of neighboring countries with which Russia has historical relationship dating back three hundred years. That, in short, is Putin's message. And the way I see it, it's the right message to deliver.

      If they really wanted to pit themselves against the US, they'd be arming Iran with their latest gear right now, not with the previous generation stuff.

      And I don't see where the "ideological" competition is. They're a capitalist country now. Their only big problem is a bit of a personality cult, but that will pass in time.

      And India? Please, over a half of the population there _can't_read_.

    21. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I thought you were talking about Obama!

    22. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happened to the scientific prowess of the Soviet Union? Putin has not restored that. Russia is not a leader in any high-tech industries, despite what Putin thinks.

      You're kidding, right? Definitely haven't heard about ISS, or Sea Launch?

    23. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      You don't get it, do you? Foreign investment means foreign control, and the only Russian People that matter to comrade Putin, are HIS People. Putin sent the exact message he wanted: Fuck you all, I am the ONLY one who will control Russia and money in Russia and business in Russia, and I don't care about anything or anyone.

      Get it now?

    24. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pft, the nazis would have never have had such success if the russians wouldn't have worked with them in the beginning.

    25. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1
      I'm sure $150/bbl oil had nothing to do with it.

      Russian economic growth -- and Putin's growing reputation -- happened long before $150/barrel oil. The high price lasted only a few months anyhow.

    26. Re:Full of shit you are, young Jedi by Raenex · · Score: 1

      What Dell said is standard business/political talk. It's a polite way of asking, "Is there anything we can invest in that would make both of us rich?"

      That was certainly his intention, though it's easy to offend somebody in foreign relations. Here's what Dell said:

      "...but when we look at the level of talent, scientific and technical talent, there is still room to further utilize the IT sector. So my question to you really is, how can we as an IT sector help you [here Putin raises his eyebrows at Dell] broaden the economy as you move out of the crisis and take advantage of that great scientific talent that you have."

      Even if there are no specific opportunities for Dell right now, it is incredibly stupid for Putin to respond this one. It just sends a message to foreign investors that they are not wanted in Russia

      At one point during his reply he said:

      "and it is with great pleasure that we will accept, as we've done before, investments into this sector".

      I think Putin was just sensitive to the idea that Russia needed IT help as some backwards country from the United States. If Dell had just asked where there was room for cooperation, Putin wouldn't have gone on his tirade.

  34. Today's Top 5 In Soviet Russia... by CompMD · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...help pitches YOU! ...programming talent has YOU! ...botnets control YOU! ...malware writes YOU! ...Windows boxes infect YOU!

    Hm, I wonder what Polonium tastes like, because right now my Pepsi

  35. A failed state? by swm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From

              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Russia

    Lower birth rates and higher death rates reduced Russia's population at a 0.5% annual rate, or about 750,000 to 800,000 people per year during the late 1990s and most of the 2000s. The UN warned that Russia's 2005 population of about 143 million could fall by a third by 2050.

    From

            http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/state

    State: 5 a: a politically organized body of people usually occupying a definite territory

    If you need a body of people to be a state,
    the I'd say that Russia is on its way to failure.

    Russia - Where Russians go to die
    -- The Onion

    1. Re:A failed state? by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

      The UN warned that Russia's 2005 population of about 143 million could fall by a third by 2050.

      Okay, interesting data, but what about this indicates failure of a state? When the biggest pressure the world faces comes from a ridiculously high ratio of people to resources, it looks as if Russia is headed in the right direction for long-term sustainability.

      Or am I missing something here?

    2. Re:A failed state? by emocomputerjock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think you're overlooking the billion plus people to the south that would gladly reallocate their people to resource ratio at the expense of the Russians.

    3. Re:A failed state? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Okay, interesting data, but what about this indicates failure of a state? When the biggest pressure the world faces comes from a ridiculously high ratio of people to resources, it looks as if Russia is headed in the right direction for long-term sustainability.

      Or am I missing something here?

      Yes. For one thing, given the area of Russia, and the abundance of natural resources, it has pretty much been underpopulated for its entire history; figures dropping even further mean that it's nearly impossible to further advance into areas such as Siberia.

      Also, rapidly diminishing population is pretty bad for the economy, especially one trying to support a welfare state. The reasons, I hope, are obvious.

  36. He does not say limited mental capacity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He says limited capacity, and the whole tone of the comment is completely different from what's discussed here.

    Pretty pathetic that you link to a video but obviously none of the /. readers don't UNDERSTAND the video.

  37. Re:Obama hype by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The thing that you need to worry about is the God like persona that the media is painting Obama with. He may wind up being a good or even a great president, but no one is going to be able to live up to the hype that is being heaped upon him.

    Ah, in my best 3rd-grade impersonation I can muster...He started it.

    Seriously, you can blame the media up to a point, but the media didn't make over 500 campaign promises. He did. Let's see if he can merely live up to his own hype.

  38. Beware of geeks bearing gifts. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1, Funny

    Beware of geeks bearing gifts.

    Really, how could you miss that joke. Hand in your slashdot ID and go have some sex you traitor! You are not one of us, you probably even talk to girls!

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Beware of geeks bearing gifts. by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Beware of geeks bearing gifts.

      Really, how could you miss that joke. Hand in your slashdot ID and go have some sex you traitor! You are not one of us, you probably even talk to girls!

      --
      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

      Does not your sig also make you a traitor then? ;P

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    2. Re:Beware of geeks bearing gifts. by linzeal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because the beauty of his joke was that everyone who read it would come up with, "Geeks bearing gifts", as it was just a simple substitution of one letter and at the same time educate some of the people who do not know where the original adage comes from.

      The best textbooks are like this, in that they give you enough theory to draw your own hypothesis about a specific application. The worst textbooks give you a theory and than the author's own application of said theory.

    3. Re:Beware of geeks bearing gifts. by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      Nah a proper geek reads all the manuals he can get a hold of, even for topic he will never use.

    4. Re:Beware of geeks bearing gifts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He never said the group had any women in it...

  39. So, exactly what can Mr. Dell offer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not pretend to know Dell, at all, and I have been active in computing since mainframes.

    Historically, Russians have significant technology skills, and they lack nothing.

    Mr. Dell has nothing Russians (or I) need that they could not provide themselves, if they so wished. Maybe not the newest, maybe not in scale or quantity, but others would be more than happy to trade for these gaps.

  40. TIME Magazine's man of the Year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whenever TIME Magazine elects someone as Man of the year, his popularity goes to the crapper.
    It happened to Hitler, George W.Bush, Web 2.0 (You) and now Putín.

  41. Hot Russian chicks... by DreadfulGrape · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... aren't part of this story, but they really ought to be.

    --
    sig has been sent away for a few small repairs...
    1. Re:Hot Russian chicks... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      You can't be a hot chick being raised on vodka and cabbage.

    2. Re:Hot Russian chicks... by kanguro · · Score: 1
  42. Dell asked for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell isn't known for developing any significant technology. It is just another giant system integrator. What kind of "help" Dell can offer to Russia? The know how of getting customers' money before production?

    I wouldn't fault someone to sense a certain "look down" attitude in Dell's offer.

  43. Sounded like a context problem to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I listened to Michael Dell's question, it was a bit mixed up in the use of pronouns. It sounded like he wanted to approach it from the IT point of view but included Dell in the forefront of his speech. Thus when he said we, I think he meant that as we in IT, not we as in Dell.

    When the translator probably heard quickly what Dell said, and given only a fraction of a second to translate and the inaccuracy of translating any language, it got screwed up.

  44. Apparently you do not ask yourself what the quality is of the coders who wrote the software that could be so easily exploited to be botted. If russian hackers are crap then what does that say about the coders from Redmond?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  45. and when does it become the next guy's mess? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    because I am curious.

    I would say two years in, because 9/11 wasn't Bush's mess either, he just got stuck with it.

    1. Re:and when does it become the next guy's mess? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you allow it to happen then it's your mess. Simple as that. If you need a grace period then you're not cut out to be president.

  46. I'm Communist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You insensitive clod!

  47. OK, so oil prices went up by junkgoof · · Score: 4, Informative

    Coincidentally oil prices went way up shortly after Bush jr was elected, and went way down after he left. In the interim Iran, Russia, and a number of other countries made out really, really well. The economic gains were very much due to oil prices and very little due to anything Putin did. Still better than Bush's economic plan that involved claiming deficit spending as a GDP increase, giving money to rich people is NOT Keynesian, making them work for it is.

    Putin has basically done a Lenin so far. He has taken power completely so he can help his friends and persecute his enemies. He has said a lot, especially about Russians being a great people and Russia being a superpower. He has not done a whole lot.

    Note: Reagan gets credit for a lot, but he was sort of all over the place as pres. Lower taxes, raise taxes, lower spending, raise spending, whatever. As for ending "communism," or, more accurately the Stalinist dictatorship (Lenin ENDED any semblance of communism in Russia, and started a totalitarian dictatorship, Stalin took over after a few years and continued for decades), it ended when Gorbachev told the East German leadership they could not shoot protesters, and if they did he would not send out the army to support them; the tyrants started picking up their gold and planning their luxurious retirements instantly.

    Oh well, at least Putin has less secret police and executions than Lenin did...

    --
    You got me into this! You were the ideologue! I'm only a poor assassin! - Twenty evocations, Bruce Sterling
    1. Re:OK, so oil prices went up by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      High oil prices helped but it was not the most important factor. The budget was planned based on the much lower price, for instance USD 50 per barrel when it was already above 100. The rest was put away into a stabilization fund. Think of it - did high oil price help Nigeria? Nope, it only made the poor even poorer and further enriched a small elite. That what would have happened if the oil boom took place during the Yeltsin/Oligarch era. Putin did a lot of smart things for the economy in the background but the way Russia is reported in the West they were overshadowed by his perceived authoritarian tendencies.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    2. Re:OK, so oil prices went up by replicant108 · · Score: 1

      Coincidentally oil priceswent way up shortly after Bush jr was elected

      Why do you assume that it was coincidental?

  48. They all need a class in international business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with you. Americans yet have to learn how to treat others in equal terms. That's why US is seen as an arrogant guy in other's views. Everyone love their own country just like Americans do. And being rich is by no means a reason to assume right to advice others.

  49. Death of a Salesman... by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

    Mike is going to need to start selling the acres and acres of land in Kauai that he owns. Land that used to be public. Maybe it's time he gave it back.

  50. One word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tetris...

    He could have rested his case there.. :-)

  51. He got what he called for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, Dell started his question with something like "Oh I was very surprised to hear from a person like you that you are against too much government intervention into economy" and then proceeded "now how could we help Russia with IT?"

    So what kind of answer he expected if he started his question with a kind of insult?

  52. Sure, the best programmers in mother russia... by alexborges · · Score: 1

    Work for the fucking RBN!

    They are good, they just are in the service of the mob.

    Great, Mr Vladimir!

    --
    NO SIG
  53. Bright Side by Demonantis · · Score: 3, Funny

    At least Putin wouldn't have to deal with their shitty customer support...

  54. Citation Nazi by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1

    King James Bible:

    "Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall."

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    1. Re:Citation Nazi by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I was quoting a famous author who paraphrased the famous Hebrew proverb.

      If you cannot guess the author by the end of the day, I will revoke your citation nazi license.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  55. Rant? by Torodung · · Score: 1

    If a rant is a calmly delivered, if mildly peeved, response where you demand respect as an equal from another who, due to translational problems, appears to be treating you as a child, then what I'm writing right here is the Magna Carta.

    He doesn't want a Dell. Big whoop. Neither do I. I'm sick of their crappy support. I get more friendly support calls from friends with Dells than any other machine combined.

    --
    Toro

  56. If both do it, I prefer the one that does openly by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Obama is different, one might say? Well, he doesn't seem particularly interested in cutting spending, so far. He's trying to get Republican/Conservative support on basically a spending bill (the "stimulus" plan). I haven't seen him pushing democrats to cut spending yet.

    I didn't see the republicans pushing for smaller government recently.

    There was a lot of big talk, but the government spending and debt kept getting bigger, and bigger, and bigger.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  57. Fuck salespeople by linzeal · · Score: 0, Troll

    Lol, when people cold call me I tell them to go fuck themselves. If it is a woman I tell her she is a malodorous cunt and should die giving birth to the Antichrist and if it is a man I tell him I hope his prostrate is filled with writhing-gnawing worms and the next time he voids it in his wife's mouth they consume all the flesh from her skull.

    Once, when a persistent salesman came to the office and attempted to hoodwink his way past the front desk he called the police because we were lampooning him so bad. The police were not as amused. I however could not stop laughing.

    1. Re:Fuck salespeople by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      Lol, when people cold call me I tell them to go fuck themselves. If it is a woman I tell her she is a malodorous cunt and should die giving birth to the Antichrist and if it is a man I tell him I hope his prostrate is filled with writhing-gnawing worms and the next time he voids it in his wife's mouth they consume all the flesh from her skull.

      Funny, I just say I'm not interested and hang up. If I'm feeling really frisky, I find out what company they're with and file a complaint for violating the do-not-call list.

      Do you really get a lot of joy out of playing telephone tough-guy with some poor slob making minimum wage in a call-center? His/her job sucks regardless of how you behave, why go out of your way to make it worse for them?

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    2. Re:Fuck salespeople by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Telephone tough guy, lol. I do it all in good fun to watch idiots get riled up, if they want to impinge themselves upon my life I will return the favor. I hope they think of my words for some time afterward; I do try to be imaginative, not just mindlessly vituperative.

      I don't have some Christian good neighbor morality stopping me from enjoying myself at others' expense, but that is not the point. If people want to have a slave morality hawking whatever and however the masters at the call center want them to. I do not get myself at so much joy as I do get to better choose my relations to others' and their beliefs, actions and politics that affect my existence. I don't depend on some generic sense of good will towards everyone to orient myself morally, will not treat all strangers with cordiality because it is expected by them or you or anyone else and I most certainly will not waste good sport at demonstratively ridiculing those who are indeed culpable of their loathsome annoyances and the craven methods they use to spread them.

      I am capable of much more and those that act like slaves, should be treated as such.

      Feisty waitresses, grumbling grocery store clerks and others who resent their positions I have the utmost respect and admiration for. Those that feign altruism, good will and such bullshit towards every customer they come in contact with have too much the odor of shit clinging to their breath for me to think of them of anything but sacks designed to conceal 100-200 lbs of fecal matter. Fuck them.

  58. Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything here in Russia is way better than in the west! We have about the best infrastru[NO CARRIER]

  59. Culture Shock.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "How can I help you" is a classic sales technique. Much like a magician's misdirection, the goal is to keep the victim thinking about what YOU want them thinking about.

    I'm sure Dell was trying to get Putin to do his convincing for him, and didn't expect the question to be interpreted differently by a mind that developed in a different culture.

    1. Re:Culture Shock.. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I was thinking exactly the same. Can I help you and how can I help you are stock greetings in retail for everything from cars to computers to cameras to lumber yards. Even receptionists start off with can I help you and similar techniques.

      This is more of a clash of cultures with a little lost in translation mixed in with it. Dell could probably put a computer on Putin's desk tomorrow if they explained where the comment was coming from and that people in America see that as a friendly greeting when people are wanting to sell you something.

      I say this not as a Dell Supporter. I think their tech support sucks, their computers leave a lot to be desired and their sales campaigns piss me off (the stoner dude who gets a chubby when someone buys a dell or the interns who aren't competent enough to see if someone is still in the room before shutting the lights down). But fair is fair, and I'm not against dell, I believe your on spot with your analysis.

  60. Putinmania! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 0, Troll

    "We don't have limited mental capacity"

    He's just doing an amazing simulation.

  61. Russia Has No Computer Manufacturing Capability by darkmeridian · · Score: 0, Troll

    Putin's rhetoric is pretty empty considering that Russia cannot make its own consumer desktop microprocessors and has no domestic operating system. Russia cannot make it own hard drives or RAM, or many other basic computer components. Dell doesn't make those either, but accusing others of idiocy when you cannot even make a x86 CPU is pretty dumb.

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    1. Re:Russia Has No Computer Manufacturing Capability by oDDmON+oUT · · Score: 1

      Russia cannot make it own hard drives or RAM, or many other basic computer components.

      They don't *have* to... their natural gas reserves will translate into enough clout that they can buy whatever they damn well please.

      Besides, it's not the iron that runs stuff that really matters, it's the code. You have no further to look than IBM and Microsoft to see that.

      Putin is right...Russia isn't a country to dismiss or underestimate. They could very well bring something to market that will make Windows© and OS X® look weak, and sell it to markets that don't need, want, or can afford, the bloated American alternatives.

      Just my 2

      --
      Some days it's just not worth
      chewing through my restraints.
    2. Re:Russia Has No Computer Manufacturing Capability by Max_W · · Score: 1

      They did in a way already. Sergey Brin's Google or Sanja Byelkin' MySQL. They just will not be playing by the rules: OS, hardware, etc. MySQL and Google are OS, but not as we used to know it.

  62. "Comrade"? The Soviet Union collapsed 18 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know that most Slashdotters's geopolitical awareness starts and ends with the same Yakob Smirnoff non-joke they've been repeating since birth, but, get a fuckin' clue.

  63. exploitation by monsterzero2002 · · Score: 0

    Under capitalism, we have exploitation of man by man, but under communism, it is just the opposite.

  64. Birds of a feather? by macraig · · Score: 2, Insightful

    However arrogant and egotistical you might think Putin is, Michael Dell is worse. I thought how Putin responded was restrained by comparison to what I would have said in the same situation. The larger context illuminates just how bigoted were Dell's comments. What a putz.

    As an American socialist, Dell's attitude and values exemplify why I despise the American economic system as it is, and by extension our political system, since the same selfish arrogant egotistical bigoted putzes move freely back and forth between the two.

    1. Re:Birds of a feather? by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps you should move to Russia and put your childish rebelion to work,

      However, from what I heard in the video, the problem is more of a translation problem then an insult. Dell was simply saying we will be happy to set up shop and allow you to tap our resources because we want to sell things to you. It's obvious that the word help which when companies speak of it in the US, they usually mean provide something you want to buy, got translated in a way that questioned Russia's competence in IT. As Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said in the beginning, we are not invalids, you should help them. Where in the later part of the video, he talks about using imports and partners from other countries as crutched more or less but stated their goals were to build Russia's abilities and support local development and sources.

      Now, he basically conflicts the impression of the beginning statement with an actual statement made further into the video. This tells me that Micheal Dell was a country boy in a big city where what he thought he said meant something else. In America, the sales person generally asks how can I help you with the intentions of making a sale. In this case, Russia's terminology or customs probably aren't aware of this so it came across insulting instead of just a sales pitch. The comments were not bigoted, arrogant or egotistical at all, they were just different styles that were lost in translation.

    2. Re:Birds of a feather? by macraig · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Revolutions are never child's play.

      You can make whatever rationalization you like, but hard sales pitches ARE insulting. Dell's hard sales pitch was especially insulting given the context in which it was delivered.

      To any true socialist (which I doubt Putin is), Dell's comments are even more insulting. Allow me to rephrase Dell's question to be more transparent to his motives: "What goods and services can we sell you at inflated prices, so that we may unfairly enrich ourselves and our own and disadvantage you and yours?" Remember, a goal of socialism is exchanges of equal value in every transaction, as much as that is humanly possible. What Dell's offer implied was anything but philanthropic or socialistic.

      And Dell did this on a public stage at an economic forum. Putin had every reason to be insulted.

    3. Re:Birds of a feather? by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      Oh the political irony.

      Socialism/Fascism/Statism/Communism: I'm form the government, and I'm going to help.
      Capitalism: Hi, I'm form a business, how can I help?

      IMO those calling the second arrogant and insulting are being petty and bigoted. Asking someone if they NEED help is often worse than asking if they would like help or how you can help them. Regardless of the situation if you ask Putin if he NEEDs help he will always say no - no way he would admit to NEEDing help. He *might*, even if highly unlikely admit to wanting help. And the least offensive question is to ask how you can help. That Putin took offense at that is either a fault of translation or nothing less than sheer arrogance.

      As a libertarian, I find you Socialist's never ending insistence that non-Socialists are the arrogance- and corruption-mongers hypocritical, self-serving, and demonstrably incorrect. Particularly when in the context of a capitalist offering help versus socialism's mandatory redistribution as alleged help.

      If this was Dell offering money to help in the wake of a natural disaster we'd not hear from you. If there was a natural disaster and Dell did not offer help, we'd hear form you. But here we have Dell simply asking how it can help and you people (there are others on this page doing it - Socialist or not), get bent out of shape. Keep going, it merely illustrates the hypocrisy of the failed ideology of mass-Socialism

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
    4. Re:Birds of a feather? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Revolutions are never child's play.

      Your crazy if you think your starting a revolution or that you would have a chance.

      You can make whatever rationalization you like, but hard sales pitches ARE insulting. Dell's hard sales pitch was especially insulting given the context in which it was delivered.

      No, it wasn't insulting. He said I heard your comment, agreed with it, and i'm here to offer any services you can use. The words were different but that's the context of what was said. Culture and translation got in the way though.

      To any true socialist (which I doubt Putin is), Dell's comments are even more insulting. Allow me to rephrase Dell's question to be more transparent to his motives: "What goods and services can we sell you at inflated prices, so that we may unfairly enrich ourselves and our own and disadvantage you and yours?" Remember, a goal of socialism is exchanges of equal value in every transaction, as much as that is humanly possible. What Dell's offer implied was anything but philanthropic or socialistic.

      Lol.. That's just crazy. Dell didn't say anything about prices nor did they say anything about control or that they would be at a disadvantage. All of that is your warped little mind injecting predetermined thoughts into the mix. Putin would have had the choice to go it alone just as he would have had the choice to take them up on it if they found the costs to their liking. That's the benefit of a free society, if you don't like the price, you can look somewhere else. But even in a socialist point of view, one side doesn't get to dictate the value of something. They can only express the value to themselves.

      And Dell did this on a public stage at an economic forum. Putin had every reason to be insulted.

      Nope. He had no reason if he would have understood the point coming across and how it wasn't meant to be demeaning. Dell was within the topic of the summit and addressed issues on topic. He probably would have been better off making the statement in a more personal setting so as questions on the intent and misunderstandings could have followed but it wasn't an insult.

    5. Re:Birds of a feather? by macraig · · Score: 1

      You have the former wrong: socialism is an economic system, not a system of government. It has been misapplied as Socialism and Communism, which are forms of government. A true socialist would probably say, "Hey, I think we might be able to help each other equally well".

      True socialism wouldn't FORCE redistribution of resources, it would happen voluntarily. "Communism" existed because humans aren't capable of doing that yet. As long as there are foxes like you in the socialist henhouse, the system can never work. You are selfish and would never voluntarily respect the rights of others to equal use of those resources; you would be trying to grab as large a chunk for yourself as you could manage, and presuming that everyone else was behaving just as selfishly. That is the descriptive basis of capitalism and libertarianism: competition to see who can disadvantage the other more. Socialism, by contrast, is prescriptive in that it proposes a fully cooperative way of doing things - absent the competition - that is still largely foreign to humans. Until we can transcend our innate selfishness, socialism can never work.

      As a Libertarian, you are likely the most Darwinian and self-centered of any ideologist. You revel in the notion of nature - the revered "free market" just being allowed to run its course. There's nothing about that I would call ethical, rather it's an ethically neutral proposal. Just like Mother Nature itself, a Libertarian economy would have no ethics at all.

      If Dell had offered money, you'd still have heard from me: I'd have been asking what strings or expectations were attached to that alleged philanthropism.

      Your understanding of what you call socialism is very limited, probably because you've never really spent any time thinking about it; you haven't spent any time thinking about it because you have no shame about your selfish nature, and so feel no need to spend time trying to imagine a solution. Libertarians revel in self-centrism rather than expend any energy trying to overcome it.

    6. Re:Birds of a feather? by macraig · · Score: 1

      Riiight. Michael Dell is just an incredibly nice and selfless guy trying to lend a hand with no strings attached. I'm sure that same egalitarianism and selflessness is also how be came to be CEO of a major competitive corporation.

      What I'm saying, in case the above isn't obvious enough, is that your view of the motives here is delusional, not at all realistic. I at least recognize Dell's true motives, while at the same I recognize that my socialism is a GOAL to overcome motivation and behavior like Dell's. I have a self-centric nature just like Dell; the difference is that I fight it every minute of the day and don't manipulate people to my own selfish benefit. If Dell were to behave likewise, of course he would have to voluntarily agree to it, or it wouldn't be very socialistic. I'd be a lousy and hypocritical socialist if I tried to somehow force him.

    7. Re:Birds of a feather? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Riiight. Michael Dell is just an incredibly nice and selfless guy trying to lend a hand with no strings attached. I'm sure that same egalitarianism and selflessness is also how be came to be CEO of a major competitive corporation.

      How about he became the CEO of a major competitive corporation because he started it in his garage and grew it through niche marketing campaigns into what it has become today.

      I never said he was UberNice or or anything of the sort. You don't need to be to offer a fair product for a fair cost. There is nothing except your imagination to say that he or his sales staff would not offer services for a just compensation.

      What I'm saying, in case the above isn't obvious enough, is that your view of the motives here is delusional, not at all realistic. I at least recognize Dell's true motives, while at the same I recognize that my socialism is a GOAL to overcome motivation and behavior like Dell's. I have a self-centric nature just like Dell; the difference is that I fight it every minute of the day and don't manipulate people to my own selfish benefit. If Dell were to behave likewise, of course he would have to voluntarily agree to it, or it wouldn't be very socialistic. I'd be a lousy and hypocritical socialist if I tried to somehow force him.

      Your right, your views of the motivation are delusional. Do you think he should provide the services completely free? At his expense? then where is the fairness mark your claiming to reach and how do you know that Dell wouldn't reach it? Keep in mind that Russia would have to invest way more money to develop in house, it would take way more time and lots more resources. So where is that "fair mark" and what makes you think Putin is so incompetent that he wouldn't be able to find it and negotiate for it. Making a 2% profit on a project as big as the country of Russia is still quite a bit of money as well as prestige that would influence other contracts.

      Now given that we just don't know what Dell would have charged or whether or not Russia would have found it an equal exchange, I am left to only assume that you are transfixing your own perceived short comings to Dell. Here is a newsflash, you aren't Dell and you aren't Russia. In fact, your abandoning real just trade where people exchange equally valuable parts of a transaction for your own arbitrary and restrictive ideals. All Dell needs to do is cover costs plus make a profit, Russia will have to cover those same costs plus some extra because of a development cycle. Dell's profit can actually be less then the extra amount that Russia would have to spend on top of the costs. Russia can actually see that as a more then fair deal given specific considerations about their needs. It may be more beneficial to them to get the infrastructure working while developing their own compatible replacements.

      What we have is possible scenarios that you just haven't stopped to consider. Dell won't have set prices for contracts that large and above all else, Russia is not obligated to use them. They won't be any worse off then they are now if they can't come to an arrangement they both will agree to. I don't understand how you can even look at this and claim someone is going to screw someone else over. If Russia decides whatever deal Dell works out is worth it, then an exchanges of equal value has taken place. Your precious socialism isn't damaged at all. This is because we are free and live in a free world and we have the choice to buy something or not. This is especially true for something as large as Russia that actually does have the resources and abilities to make their own solutions from scratch.

  65. All scedulers are commies by wsanders · · Score: 4, Funny

    "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need" describes schedulers more accurately. Dividing the time up equally would be like .... oh, I dunno, something about a Ferrari and hot grits ...

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  66. You are very funny folk. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Constantly claiming that the government is useless and unable to affect the economy, unless it is a government you don't like in which case a natural financial bubble can be blamed on them, even if the politician in question did all what he could to have a sane economy (balancing the budget).

    But hey, revisionism is fun, so keep enjoying it.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  67. A recession is just a reduction in credit by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    and a correlated reduction in debt.

    The way to get out is to print (no, not borrow) money. Reducing the deficit, paying off the national debt, reducing personal or corporate debt will all cause a recession under the existing monetary system because it nukes the equivalent amount of credit.

    It's all fairly simple once you understand that 95% of US money is credit and realise that growth == inflation == credit and debt.
     

    --
    Deleted
  68. There are a lot of good people, but... by junkgoof · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think the difference between top schools, average schools, and poor schools in India is way more pronounced than in the US, and the US is already fairly unbalanced compared to say, the system here in Canada (OK, here Waterloo is way above the others for CS/eng, but the worst places are not too bad; in the US top tier vs State is often pretty ridiculous). I have an Indian friend who keeps going on about how great Indian schools are, but his tech knowledge is pretty feeble. From his anecdotes his classes were all memorize, regurgitate, forget, repeat. All rote, no real learning. I know some really good Indian/Pakistani/ guys, but they generally finished up their schooling in Singapore/Europe/US/Canada.

    In contrast most of the Russian people I know who were educated in Russia seriously know their stuff in various fields. It is a bit biased as in many cases there was competition to leave, so you don't see the underachievers, (sort of like how foreign exchange students tend to be likable extroverts because likeable extroverts tend to become foreign exchange students), but even so.

    1 billion Indians, 300 million Americans, 650 million literate Indians, 297 million literate Americans, and the numbers get closer as you go toward higher education. Offshoring companies tend to claim lots of stuff, but if you read the company interviews as opposed to the marketing you see "we had all these Ph.ds trying to replace part-time aspiring actors for English/writing jobs at 25% of salary and yet we failed to deliver on all our contracts; not one successful project."

    I'm not trying to knock Indians but infrastructure counts for something. And offshore companies have really had the marketing going *sigh*.

    --
    You got me into this! You were the ideologue! I'm only a poor assassin! - Twenty evocations, Bruce Sterling
  69. Dear Comrade: +1, Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who needs Dell or Intel when you have Open Sparc?

    I hope this helps the revolution.

    Yours In Socialism,
    Kilgore Trout

  70. You're getting a polonium 210! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the trailware doesn't kill you, the ionizing radiation will.

  71. Putin - Sharp Abeit Near Dictator by gpronger · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If you listened to the whole thing, it seemed pretty clear that Russia under Putin is still very much a controlled economy (I realize I am likely stating the obvious to a lot of people and to those I apologize). Dell's statement was in fact fairly demeaning, and if Putin wanted to tell him to F***-off, to a large extent I do not blame him.

    There has been much discussion on this article also though, that Russia is unwilling to buy technology that they do not manufacture. However, later in the interview Putin states quite the opposite. As I recall in reference was to tariffs, he admits to having tariffs on goods competing with Russian manufacturers that are still developing, but not having tariffs on the very high tech they do not have to allow these sectors to develop.

    He is also fairly frank Russian problems regarding issues with distribution and available capital.

    Putin may be a hair-breadth from an old-fashioned USSR dictator, none the less, he's one of the sharpest. He is likely no friend of ours, and his astuteness makes it all the more problematic.

  72. Geek girls would be ok by redstar427 · · Score: 1

    Well, if the bare Geeks were women, that would be ok.

    --
    "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Geek girls would be ok by srealm · · Score: 1

      Maybe if they've shaved.

    2. Re:Geek girls would be ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever seen a female geek? Euwwww!

    3. Re:Geek girls would be ok by Repossessed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You haven't met many geek girls have you?

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
  73. Bush is Sacred? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheap shots at Bush are tired and old.

    People are still taking cheap shots at Clinton, but I don't hear you complaining about that. Why does Bush deserve special treatment?

    The thing that you need to worry about is the God like persona that the media is painting Obama with.

    No, the thing we need to worry about is the state of our country. Obama is a big boy; he can handle his own image. Bush is also a big boy; he can handle criticism. Our responsibility is to recognize what went wrong in the past and make sure it doesn't happen again.

  74. Re:If both do it, I prefer the one that does openl by CannonballHead · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You're right, and I would criticize Bush II for not pushing for smaller government, less spending, etc. I don't criticize him for spending where government SHOULD spend.

    On the other hand, we appear to want to spend more on a lot more programs now. It was bad enough with the spending by republicans; it appears that it will be worse with the spending by democrats.

    There was a lot of big talk by Obama and democrats, too. But post-election, I have heard very little about "cutting spending." New cars for government employees doesn't exactly sound like "cutting unnecessary spending."

    I will criticize republicans or democrats, I don't care. Right now, though, republicans are voting against spending, and I give them credit for that. Democrats, overwhelmingly, are for it, pushing for it, EXCITED about the government, gov't spending, and debt getting bigger. And their version of "bipartisan" means "republicans have to vote for this, too, but we're not changing anything in it." So, I'll criticize them for that.

    Openly, you say? Didn't Obama, for example (I know, Obama != Congress), very much stress the problem of the spending the last 8 years? In his first week or so in office, has he done anything about it? Not really, but he sure is pushing other things (including abortion stuff). IMO, what you push for when you are first given the power to push shows where your real priorities are. Openly? Yeah, openly now, but he wasn't necessarily elected on a policy of "I want to spend more on unreformed government programs." At least, that's not the message I got.

  75. Revised Thinking by mpapet · · Score: 1

    Reasoning like this is weak and has nothing to do with the actual argument of who produces the best engineers.

    Having worked for and with Eastern European/Formerly Soviet satellite State people, the story goes that Education was thought to be the Great Way Forward for their society. The result was a society with many more legitimately educated people with few opportunities.

    I generally agree with this notion as the ones I have met that migrated to the U.S. are pretty damn smart. Furthermore, some of the best OCR software I've *ever* seen is out of a Russian software company. Abbyy.com

    Anecdotal evidence to be sure.

    The point being, let's get the discussion back on track by modding down political history comments filled with American propaganda.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    1. Re:Revised Thinking by gwait · · Score: 1

      During the height of the USSR it can be argued that they had a better education system in place than the US.

      Why didn't they excel at modern technology? A total lack of a consumer electronics market to lower the price of semiconductors thru mass production.

      Texas Instruments were able to grow rapidly with the sale of pocket calculators, lowering the cost of silicon and starting the Moore's law runaway train.

      USSR had no such advantage, and rapidly fell behind the US in technology after the Second World War.

      China gets this, and as such began to allow a form of a mass market to grow from Hong Kong inwards, modernizing their economy.

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
  76. Re:The Cold War Called by MRe_nl · · Score: 1

    pictures or it didn't happen...
    http://englishrussia.com/images/unique/1.jpg

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  77. Farewell Dossier by robert899 · · Score: 1

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4394002

    Then in the 80's as the KGB was attempting to steal technology, the CIA slipped them some "modified" hardware and software. Much hilarity ensued. Once the Soviets got wise, they couldn't trust the reliability of their own weapons.

  78. Be yourself... by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    A decent sentiment Putin would be served well by:

    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile.
    Be yourself, no matter what they say.

    -- Sting

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  79. not even our Indian colleagues by kiehlster · · Score: 1

    Clearly Putin just doesn't want his country to suffer on the phone for five hours with Dell's outsourced Indian technical support lines.

  80. About cybernetics.. by Petersson · · Score: 1

    At least, communists stopped called cybernetics a "burgeois pseudoscience" http://www.economicexpert.com/a/Bourgeois:pseudoscience.html

    --
    I'm not insane. My mother had me tested.
  81. Dodge the Chair! by srobert · · Score: 1

    That would be funny to see. Just be prepared to Dodge the flying chair.

  82. Newsflash by gillbates · · Score: 1

    have let their game slide and now they are in a desperate economic state

    They're not the only ones who let their game slide and have ended up in a desperate economic state. I know of a country which fought a war for oil only see their energy costs go through the roof, sending their economy into a recession and destroying the gains made by the middle class in the last decade. Currently, this country has the odd distinction that for most part, their children have a lower standard of living than their parents. To make matters worse, their current President is planning to increase the federal deficit even more - offering cash bonuses to those who fomented the crisis in the first place.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  83. Re:Gun Control == aid to authoritarian governments by Chabo · · Score: 1

    I agree with what your premise, but one of your quotes was never uttered:
    http://www.guncite.com/gun_control_gcbogus.html

    --
    Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
  84. Don't Make Me Laugh - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Our programmers are some of the best in the world."

    Yeah, at writing computer viruses and helping criminals commit identity theft. And Dell wants to help that shit country? That's like donating an OC-48 backbone to Nigeria.

  85. Who knows what Putin was reacting to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the translation we heard was any indication, Putin might have been reacting to anything in a lousy or insulting translation of Mr. Dell's remarks.

  86. Re:Obama hype by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

    but the media didn't make over 500 campaign promises. He did.

    Making him different than every other presidential candidate because...

  87. Vladamir, by geekoid · · Score: 1, Informative

    Your country is dissolving, internal strife is increasing. Your countries move away from communism should have included through people in power from the previous regime out.
    We know the people there are smart, but sometimes a little help is need. Someone wanting to help with a piece of infrastructure is a good thing.
    I want to see Russia succeed, but spurning people and become m,ore isolationist will not help your country in the long run.

    It will of course allow you to create imaginary enemies so you can gain more power over your people, but the real challenge is being a global player and dominate others through open competition.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Vladamir, by Abuzar · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... the parent post is not a troll. I suspect foul play. Spooks are probably tampering with online forums to change public opinions, slashdot included.

    2. Re:Vladamir, by BBird · · Score: 1

      troll(s) is who modded this way

  88. Re:Obama hype by Soylent+Beige · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He's off to a fair (6 and 1) start. Track it here http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/

    --
    Everyone hates me because I'm paranoid.
  89. Ternary system by Merdalors · · Score: 1

    I read somewhere (long ago) that the ternary system is more efficient because it is the closest to base 'e' (2.71...), the most efficient numbering system for calculations.

    --
    Slashdot entertains. Windows pays the mortgage.
  90. Never, ever. by jeko · · Score: 4, Funny

    Never, ever underestimate the awesome destructive power of a drunk, belligerent, brute-force-loving, pissed-off engineer...

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:Never, ever. by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

      But... Scotty wasn't a Klingon...

      --

      If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    2. Re:Never, ever. by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      Yes, particularly if you insult his "bairns" at a bar after he's had some scotch whiskey.

      Some starship captains found that out the hard way.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
  91. Re:If both do it, I prefer the one that does openl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It was bad enough with the spending by republicans; it appears that it will be worse with the spending by democrats.

    History does not support this.

    It is very simple: go look at any graph of the US debt. Look at where it goes up, look at where it goes down, and look at who was President.

  92. No one writes viruses and trojans like the Russia by Latinhypercube · · Score: 0

    He's right. No one writes viruses and trojans like the Russia.

  93. Err, whoops, guess it's not population by xant · · Score: 1

    "Poland" was not a typo but I genuinely thought Russia had a higher pop. Apparently not. My bad.

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
  94. Not just viruses, web servers too by Pegasus · · Score: 1

    Look, majority of our infrastucture runs on russian software: OpenVZ/Virtuozzo virtualization, nginx web server, php-fpm russian patches ... And it pumps out about 10 times the pages pure american technology would on the same hardware. I say more power to the Russians, they know how to squeeze everything from poor old hardware. Maybe that's why they don't need newer machines from Dell ;)

  95. Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To clarify my thoughts; well, all G7 Govs. seem to have dropped the economic ball - in some way or another - in recent times, so we may, I suggest, reasonably claim that they're all incompetent in that regard.

    The Canadian banks are solvent, we had years (decade?) of balanced federal budgets (and many provincial ones), and our house prices have only slightly cooled (~10%) with no large scale defaults.

    Our economy is slowing, but it's mostly a side effect of the US since >75% of our exports go to the US. That can be construed as a problem (though ~25% of US exports come to us), but being middle of the road saved our bacon this time around.

    Capitalism and wanting more is fine, but the "irrational exuberance" that occurs in the US can just look plain silly at times from this side of the border.

  96. if only you could speak Russian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can keep critizing Putin and his policies but that's not exactly what he said I'm blaming translators, these idiots must be fired after creating this media mess. I listened to his reply to Dell's question (my native language is Russian) and I must say that although he was a bit arrogant while saying that Russian programmers are the best he simpl1y said that Russia is not interested in commoditized computer hardware and he wants to invest more into software projects.

  97. Hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey look, it's an AC flinging personal attacks. What a refreshing turn for slashdot.

    It's one thing for Americans to have a leader that allows torture. It's another thing to have a leader that personally committed torture.

  98. Re:If both do it, I prefer the one that does openl by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

    Ok.

    Like this one?

  99. I'm not worried about war with robots by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    Their best coders didn't even make it into the top 10.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  100. A failure to communicate--or is it? by rangergordon · · Score: 1
    The Davos-Putin exchange could be seen as an example of cross-cultural miscommunication. But it could be something more interesting.

    Davos' offer of "help"--delivered no doubt with sparkling visions of new markets dancing before his eyes--was surely not intended as a patronizing, unfavorable assessment of Russia's technological prowess. It reads like standard, feelgood, let's-be-friends sales jargon, akin to "Now, what do I have to do to get you into this '92 Toyota Tercel today?"

    People in the U.S. are accustomed to tuning out and toning down this kind of sales pitch, but Russia's nascent capitalistic culture seems much more direct, even brutal in certain respects. Putin probably doesn't have much of a frame of reference for all this Dale Carnegie happy crap.

    So, while it's plausible that Putin simply took it the wrong way, who knows? He's no idiot--maybe he intentionally misinterpreted Davos as a signal that Russia intends to take advantage of the United States' weakened economic situation as an opportunity to change the rules of the game.

    1. Re:A failure to communicate--or is it? by rangergordon · · Score: 1

      Er ... and, of course, when I say "Davos" (the name of a place in Switzerland) all through that last post, I mean to say "Dell" (the name of a CEO). Careless mistake.

    2. Re:A failure to communicate--or is it? by rangergordon · · Score: 1
      OK, and now that I've seen Dell's actual question--it seems a lot more hostile and less helpful than I originally assumed.

      The U.S. financial media certainly seems to be reporting this story in a limited way.

  101. Better than Indians? by freedom_india · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... that is a half truth.
    On one hand, Indian IT companies rock the world. There are very few Russian IT companies beyond Russia.
    Second Russians make kaspersky. Indians make Quick Heal.
    QuickHeal beats Kaspersky in many areas...
    Both have built super computers...
    Skill-wise in sheer ingenuity, Russians win.
    Skill-wise in knowing packaged software and developing corporate applications, Indians win.

    --
    "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    1. Re:Better than Indians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. Google lists every site that has Quick Heal available with a warning that "it may harm your computer."

      Not that the Russians are trying to do that!

    2. Re:Better than Indians? by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Well, google did say www.google.co.uk could harm my computer.
      How did the Russians manage to do that?

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  102. I'd have to agree. by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

    'Our programmers are some of the best in the world,'

    From what I can tell, they write some of the best virii and keyloggers out there, hands down.

  103. Finished sentence by linzeal · · Score: 1

    If people want to have a slave morality [wikipedia.org] hawking whatever and however the masters at the call center want them to than they can go fuck themselves with a rusty chainsaw.

  104. Re:If both do it, I prefer the one that does openl by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    It was bad enough with the spending by republicans; it appears that it will be worse with the spending by democrats.

    There was a lot of big talk by Obama and democrats, too. But post-election, I have heard very little about "cutting spending." New cars for government employees doesn't exactly sound like "cutting unnecessary spending."

    Is that new-car money spent from the car-maker saving money pushed by Bush, by any chance?

    "republicans have to vote for this, too, but we're not changing anything in it." So, I'll criticize them for that.

    They have changed things in it to accommodate republicans, so you're full of shit.

    In his first week or so in office, has he done anything about it? Not really, but he sure is pushing other things (including abortion stuff).

    He's reinstating logic in sexual health policies. Good for him, the religious nuts had a strangelhold on policy long enough to do some real damage.

    IMO, what you push for when you are first given the power to push shows where your real priorities are.

    Stopping torture: YAY!

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  105. Proof that they are master programmers by Moochman · · Score: 1

    They invented Tetris!

    1. Re:Proof that they are master programmers by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      What a coincidence, my attempted tag which died a horrible death was: Tetrisisso80sdude

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  106. Western misunderstanding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guys, this whole story, in my opinion, is the result of a bad translation and even worse interpretation by journalists.

    I'm a native Russian speaker, and know English enough to claim I fully understand Dell's words. The first result on Google for "putin dell" search (an article from CNN, http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/28/news/companies/dell.davos.fortune/) cuts Putin's words in half - exactly where he was putting the context to his reply. The (Putin's) intonation means a lot in this particular case. Words, I guess, were too unexpected for interpretors, so they've failed to translate the phrase properly and caused much of this misunderstanding.

  107. Quote incorrect in article by Viperlin · · Score: 0

    He never says "We don't have limited mental capacity" according to the video you linked to, he says (according to translation on your video) "we do not have limited capacity's" examples given were old people and developing countries (debatable if Russia is one of these admittedly)

  108. Re:Obama hype by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

    What are you, a kid? Santa didn't bring all the gifts in your christmas list, so now you cry to mama.

    Kids are easy to control. Give them some candy and tell them santa is late because ms. santa is giving him a blowjob, and they'll be happy. No?

    Drawing up targets with detailed and transparent plans on how to reach them, yet assuming they'll need to be changed, postponed or even discarded along the way is a sign of _GOOD MANAGEMENT_. What you've had thus far is like the PHB kind of management.

    How has it worked for you guys thus far?

    Grow up.

    Learn to deal with the Real World, not Fantasy Land.

    --
    - These characters were randomly selected.
  109. OBLIGATORY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, you don't get Dell!

  110. The Soviet revolution did improve living standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think that the Soviet revolution did not result in an improvement in living standards you must only be thinking of the minority middle classes, who, it is true, suffered a fall in their own lifestyle. The peasants on the other hand, received a proper education for the first time and were able to progress if they had the ability and will. During the Soviet era, the majority of presidents and prime ministers came from lowly origins, from the bottom of the pile to the top.

    In contrast, in the US, the land of opportunity, although a lot of effort goes into highlighting the poor background of a select few presidents, in fact, the majority were born into relatively wealthy families - where they were not rich themselves, they were surrounded by rich supporters who influenced policy. Obama is no different.

    I'm not defending the Soviet Union in all its aspects, but providing an education for the people was an achievement, and the majority of the poor did benefit.

    Of course, the middle classes got a bit fed up with that over time, and slowly worked together to bring the whole thing down. Now it's back as it should be - the few living off the backs of the many.

  111. incredibly.. by GuniGuGu · · Score: 1

    ..this will be the only post with a score lower than 5, unless...

    --
    "Honeeey I'm 127.0.0.1"
  112. Re: Digital Research had that... by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

    I saw stuff like that at Digital Research when I worked there. Character mode displays of file drawers that popped open and displays folder tab labels and such. Around GEM time or so.

  113. ! true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  114. That's alright... by commrade · · Score: 1

    ...I prefer thinkpads anyway.

  115. Not incompetent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember, this is the same group of people that implemented base10 computer systems.

    We all know how well that worked out for them.

  116. What help exactly can Dell offer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not sure what's that special that Dell can offer to HELP Russia, or any other country? Does Dell have any extraordinary intellectual property, technology, innovation that can "help" better than any other commodity computer put together anywhere in the world?

  117. Re:Obama hype by geekmux · · Score: 1

    ...

    Grow up.

    Learn to deal with the Real World, not Fantasy Land.

    Ah, perhaps if we didn't have a certain group of completely ignorant individuals who actually think they don't have to work anymore, now that "da man" is in office?

    Yeah, you were saying about Fantasyland? Curious as how we didn't exactly have the same reaction over campaign promises over the last couple of centuries...

  118. In soviet Russia.... by fjhb · · Score: 1

    ...invalids help *YOU*

  119. US not first into space by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1
    The Soviets had scientific prowess ?

    If you're American, congratulations on being a citizen of the second space-faring country. Guess which country was first?

  120. Russia is behind .. by Azoth's+Revenge · · Score: 1

    The biggest reason Russia may be behind in some IT fields has nothing to do with the capability of the professionals in Russia and everything to do with the tariffs imposed on IT related products such as computers and other types of electronics.

    In response to Putin's critics...
    The best thing that happened to the non raw material dependent economy of Russia was the 1998 monetary crisis. Unfortunately, as many posters have pointed out Russia's heavy reliance upon oil and gas exports in recent years has undone much of the competitive gains made by Russian business that survived that crisis.

    I'm not a huge Putin fan, but Russia did heavily invest in infrastructure such as roads and communication lines through out the country during his tenure as president.

  121. Perceived? by junkgoof · · Score: 1

    He looks like Lenin, having power trumps doing meaningful stuff with power.

    --
    You got me into this! You were the ideologue! I'm only a poor assassin! - Twenty evocations, Bruce Sterling
  122. Depends on the clone by DrYak · · Score: 1

    It depends on the clone. Some clone probably where of really bad quality.

    Meanwhile, the Bulgarian Pravetz serie earned quite a popularity in the eastern block in the eighties.

    So probably the visitor just did find the best brand of clones.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  123. You need foreign corporations because by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    It's all made in Asia anyways.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  124. You are mistaken about the role of the government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are mistaken about the role of the government. The main function of the government is not to do the commerce by itself, but to create an environment that is friendly to all businesses - Russian, American, whatever. The correct answer Dell was expecting should sound like this: "We welcome all foreign businesses and non-profit organizations to do business in Russia. If you can find customers inside our country, good for you".