What?! So you are implying that the definition of the word "regulate" had changed to a sufficient degree that it means something totally different? Lunacy! I call shenanigans. Prove it, dude.
Your website makes no sense, either. What is your schtick? Trying to figure this out.
Oh, don't get your frilly little panties in such a knot. This is a "humourous" flash animation. There is nobody selling anyone out in this news story. It's a FRIGGIN JOKE! MY GOODNESS, PEOPLE. If you want to rant about net neutrality, please do it on an article that actually gives you something to rant about.
So what, we are making flash animations of bad CEOs and then getting mad at them for what the animations say? Bunch of lusers!
Ok, now, can you PLEASE PLEASE stop spouting off nonsense? There are no ColdFusion jobs out there. And why would you not want to get paid 100K a year to write ColdFusion? It's like getting paid a lot of money to...to...do something really, really easy.
"As the previous poster pointed out, there are large non-anthropogenic sources of CO2, but until recently they have been essentially balanced by non-anthropogenic sinks of CO2, so that net CO2 concentrations remained pretty much constant on timescales of millennia. We are now sourcing CO2 at a much greater rate than it can be sunk, leading to a rapid rate of accumulation."
Put down the thesaurus and learn some science. It might help you in discussions like this.
So, ever get any girls into mom's basement? And girls dressed like Uhuro and Solo don't count.
Jarjar the jedi? Surely you jest. He became a sythe like darf mall.
I knew Gene Roddenberry. I used to cut his grass as a kid. I'd know.
"Indeed. As I understand it, the primary aim of SupCom was to create a strategic--rather than tactical--game."
Bzzzzzzzt! Wrong. As one of the developers of this game (worked mostly on character animation algorithims), I can tell you that you are wrong. We wanted to make a game that was enjoyable if played in a strategic fashion or in a more tactical way. There's nothing worse than a know-nothing who tries to make dumb guesses about someone's intention.
As for the graphics being bland, I'll agree with you. I for one, wanted to make things a bit more exciting (being an animation guy, naturally), but there are reasons that the game looks the way it does, minimalism was an objective. It does lend to the feel of the game, though it could be much cooler.
"there's an entire other class you should find much more threatening: the ones who believe that one day their religion will triumph over the entire globe.
On the other hand, from what I can tell, most of these believe that Christianity will achieve this as a "victory of love", and most of them tent to be non-violent, anti-war types. Either way."
What do you mean by that? Many religions believe that their religion will triumph. It's the ones who feel that THEY will cause that to happen (and not their god) that you need to watch. With all the religions out there, god will choose the right one and not the other way around. Or at least, that's the reasoning I hear from the more sensible ones.
Slashdot Mirror
First things first, from your bio
"I have a doctorate in literature and have wrote several plays."
With grammar like that, you are obviously one of the wikipedia pseudo-intellectuals. The only thing you are is a troll.
As for your views, well, let's just say any idiot can poke holes. It takes someone with a brain to actually think of something constructive.
If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, well, I'd have a dollar.
Now you'll have to excuse me. Your mother and I have some unfinished business to tend to. Now go away, or I shall taunt you a second time!
*Sigh*
You obviously have no idea what you are talking about.
Maybe the latest version didn't depend on IE, but older versions did. I gave up on them after v6.
What?! So you are implying that the definition of the word "regulate" had changed to a sufficient degree that it means something totally different? Lunacy! I call shenanigans. Prove it, dude.
Your website makes no sense, either. What is your schtick? Trying to figure this out.
who is the buttsucker who modded this overrated? some pasty faced girlie moderator, that's who.
Oh, don't get your frilly little panties in such a knot. This is a "humourous" flash animation. There is nobody selling anyone out in this news story. It's a FRIGGIN JOKE! MY GOODNESS, PEOPLE. If you want to rant about net neutrality, please do it on an article that actually gives you something to rant about.
So what, we are making flash animations of bad CEOs and then getting mad at them for what the animations say? Bunch of lusers!
Netscape is no more. They are owned by AOL and it actually DEPENDS on IE. Another rambling piece of crap from AOL. Nothing to see here, folks.
I defer to beg. ... ... ...
Ok, now, can you PLEASE PLEASE stop spouting off nonsense? There are no ColdFusion jobs out there. And why would you not want to get paid 100K a year to write ColdFusion? It's like getting paid a lot of money to...to...do something really, really easy.
Stop being a twit. Python is ALWAYS wrong.
Nah, the guy who wrote that has a thing for other dudes. It's always the closet homos who have to put everyone else down. Look at J Edgar Hoover.
Um ... yeah. As though trying to get girls into your mother's basement wasn't enough of a deterrent.
ZOMG, How are you SO stupid?
"I challenge you to justify that claim with published data."
Fine. Here is it.
"As the previous poster pointed out, there are large non-anthropogenic sources of CO2, but until recently they have been essentially balanced by non-anthropogenic sinks of CO2, so that net CO2 concentrations remained pretty much constant on timescales of millennia. We are now sourcing CO2 at a much greater rate than it can be sunk, leading to a rapid rate of accumulation."
Put down the thesaurus and learn some science. It might help you in discussions like this.
So, ever get any girls into mom's basement? And girls dressed like Uhuro and Solo don't count. Jarjar the jedi? Surely you jest. He became a sythe like darf mall. I knew Gene Roddenberry. I used to cut his grass as a kid. I'd know.
Wow. Nothing you say makes any sense. Stop. It. Now.
Puff of Logic is a good name for you. Try to take deeper breaths, it's for your own good. It would make you sound more intelligent.
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."
So you are saying they just had a few chinks in their security?
Hot-cha-cha-cha-cha!
"Indeed. As I understand it, the primary aim of SupCom was to create a strategic--rather than tactical--game."
Bzzzzzzzt! Wrong. As one of the developers of this game (worked mostly on character animation algorithims), I can tell you that you are wrong. We wanted to make a game that was enjoyable if played in a strategic fashion or in a more tactical way. There's nothing worse than a know-nothing who tries to make dumb guesses about someone's intention.
As for the graphics being bland, I'll agree with you. I for one, wanted to make things a bit more exciting (being an animation guy, naturally), but there are reasons that the game looks the way it does, minimalism was an objective. It does lend to the feel of the game, though it could be much cooler.
"there's an entire other class you should find much more threatening: the ones who believe that one day their religion will triumph over the entire globe.
On the other hand, from what I can tell, most of these believe that Christianity will achieve this as a "victory of love", and most of them tent to be non-violent, anti-war types. Either way."
What do you mean by that? Many religions believe that their religion will triumph. It's the ones who feel that THEY will cause that to happen (and not their god) that you need to watch. With all the religions out there, god will choose the right one and not the other way around. Or at least, that's the reasoning I hear from the more sensible ones.