Slashdot Mirror


First Peek at Netscape Navigator 9

lisah writes "Netscape released a beta version of Navigator 9 (Linux.com shares corporate overlordship with Slashdot) today that includes several new components while giving some old ones the boot. This release will no longer ship with mail or composer but does have URL correction, a pre-populated RSS feed menu, and a neat clipboard in the browser's sidebar that will hold links to websites you want to visit again but not necessarily bookmark."

186 comments

  1. goddamit! by ILuvRamen · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Oh like I really need one more browser to worry about when I'm making a webpage. I already have to write most of the scripts twice for IE and Firefox! I hope nobody uses it :(

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    1. Re:goddamit! by andy666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't need another version to bring back sad memories of the 90s.

    2. Re:goddamit! by WaZiX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's basically a re branded version of Firefox 2.0...

      From About: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.5pre) Gecko/20070604 Firefox/2.0.0.4 Navigator/9.0b1

    3. Re:goddamit! by xENoLocO · · Score: 2, Informative

      Code to web standards, test in IE.

      Also, in TFA, it says it's based on firefox.

      --
      "The need to build the internet comes from something inside us, something programmed... something we can't resist."
    4. Re:goddamit! by killbert · · Score: 1

      Well... in all fairness... Netscape was the first widely accepted browser before any of the aforementioned web surfing tools. Therefore it deserves a place in the 'wars' even if it is all but dead. Also... Internet Explorer 7 is a big leap above IE6 in all aspects so it is a bit more like Firefox now, albeit not as widely admired.

    5. Re:goddamit! by s1oan · · Score: 1

      Yeah! let's criticize the competition! Forget about the real problem with the vagueness of web standards. You should also forget that Netscape has the same engine than firefox and be as hard as you can with the competition so you can write html faster.

    6. Re:goddamit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozilla == Firefox === Netscape ==== Gecko layout engine..

  2. Netscape eh? by scott.crooks · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I may be a little out of the loop, but I'm surprised that Netscape is still around. I thought the Microsoft monopolizing juggernaut that is Internet Explorer wiped out the once famous net browser...guess I was wrong.

    --
    He then proceeds to order an Aristotle of the most ping-pong tiddly in the nuclear sub.
    1. Re:Netscape eh? by Taco+Meat · · Score: 0

      Netscape is no more. They are owned by AOL and it actually DEPENDS on IE. Another rambling piece of crap from AOL. Nothing to see here, folks.

      --
      It's not narcissicism if it's true!
    2. Re:Netscape eh? by OverlordsShadow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. Not since the 4.X's have I used or even heard of Netscape from anywhere or anyone. Had a short stint with only IE and Opera and now I'm fully Firefox. I never really even questioned where Netscape went, it just disappeared and I got Firefox and life was good. Thanks Firefox your tabs make browsing fun.

      --
      Legalize Green Today!
    3. Re:Netscape eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are not the only one

    4. Re:Netscape eh? by HappySmileMan · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It doesn't depend on IE, it can use the IE rendering engine if it's incapable of rendering a page by itself...

      Also how could something which is available for linux depend on IE?

    5. Re:Netscape eh? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Well it doesn't take much. It's mostly Firefox rebranded, with a couple features added here and there.

    6. Re:Netscape eh? by sussane · · Score: 0

      These days netscape is really hard to hear. Only left is Mozilla Firefox

      --
      Best Regards, Eliena Andrews
    7. Re:Netscape eh? by TavoX · · Score: 1

      Netscape 8 depended on IE and was NOT available for linux. It seems they are not depending on it any longer with NS9

    8. Re:Netscape eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I thought the Microsoft monopolizing juggernaut that is Internet Explorer wiped out the once famous net browser...guess I was wrong. Err.. Firefox pretty much is Netscape, isn't it? Maybe there's no code left from the original open sourced Netscape anymore, but still - Mozilla Browser was based on Netscape, and Firefox is based on Mozilla. So Firefox is a heavily forked/rewritten Netscape, right?

      Or maybe I'm just an idiot.
    9. Re:Netscape eh? by Kelson · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's a bit more complicated than that:

      Old Netscape --> Mozilla
      Mozilla --> Netscape 6-7 (at the time, Moz was Netscape's testbed)
      Mozilla --> Firefox
      Firefox --> Netscape 8+

      But yes, as far as I'm concerned, the name may have gone one way, but the core of what Netscape signified ended up as Firefox.

    10. Re:Netscape eh? by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Most of it was written by Netscape paid engineers until AOL finally put the last nail in the coffin of Netscape as a software producer.

    11. Re:Netscape eh? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      How does firefox-extensions = firefox+features? Sorry, but once you take the the extension from firefox, you might as well be using IE 7 since it has all the basic functionality.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    12. Re:Netscape eh? by nine-times · · Score: 3, Informative
      A) It could still be Firefox + features - features (the result of which could theoretically be more or less than "Firefox").
      -and-
      B) From the "What's new" page on Netscape 9:

      Extension Compatibility
      Navigator 9 shares an architecture with the latest Mozilla technologies; as such, Navigator 9 will let you install extensions that are compatible with Firefox ® 2.

      That being said, I don't see anything in Netscape that I want that isn't already in Firefox.

    13. Re:Netscape eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Actually it is more like this:

      1. NSCA Mosaic --> Netscape
      1.1 Microsoft wakes up and worries that people will use the Internet as their primary computing platform so...
      1.2 NSCA Mosaic --> IE 1.0 --> I.E 2.0 --> I.E 3.0, etc. Don't believe me, go to IE and look under 'Help, About Internet Explorer'
      2. Netscape starts losing the browser war with MS and open sources the code to Mozilla so...
      3. Mozilla --> <URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gecko_(layout_en gine)> Gecko rendering engine
      4. Mozilla --> Netscape 6-7
      5. Mozilla --> Firefox
      6. Firefox --> Netscape 8+
      Anyone else getting tired of this soap opera?
    14. Re:Netscape eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There is no direct lineage from NSCA Mosaic to Netscape: Marc Andreesson worked on Mosaic, and the original name of Netscape Corp. was Mosaic Communications, but no source from NCSA Mosaic was used in Netscape. The lineage to Internet Explorer is more also accurately:

      NCSA Mosaic -> Spyglass Mosaic -> Internet Explorer 1.0

      But even with that, no source from NCSA Mosaic was used in Spyglass Mosaic: Spyglass mearly licensed the technology and trademarks.

      In other words, NCSA Mosaic was a dead end.

    15. Re:Netscape eh? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Netscape 8 could use IE on a page if necessary.

    16. Re:Netscape eh? by Random832 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Old Netscape --> DEAD, and well-deserved at that.

      Total Rewrite --> Mozilla

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    17. Re:Netscape eh? by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      The clipboard thing sounds like something useful, that maybe should be in Firefox.

    18. Re:Netscape eh? by Necrolin · · Score: 1

      That's funny. I downloaded NS8 and it wouldn't load 30% of pages regardless of whether I chose FF or IE as the rendering agent. The pages would just turn up white or white with a bit of writing on the top of the page. That's the reason I tossed it. Aside from the point that it didn't load pages it had some great features.

      Besides, while doing a computer science project I actually discovered that MS actually licensed the NS code to create IE. So I tend to think of IE as a really bad version of NS. So everyone still uses Netscape!!! (Actually in reality they probably re-wrote all of the code for IE by now, but still, it's funny that MS used their "photocopiers" to create IE.)

    19. Re:Netscape eh? by Taco+Meat · · Score: 0

      who is the buttsucker who modded this overrated? some pasty faced girlie moderator, that's who.

      --
      It's not narcissicism if it's true!
    20. Re:Netscape eh? by MarkKB · · Score: 2, Informative

      The original (think v1.0) code was licensed from Spyglass Mosaic, which in turn licensed the tech from NCSA Mosaic. In other words, no, it's not based on Netscape at all.

    21. Re:Netscape eh? by Moochman · · Score: 1

      As I recall Netscape was also based on Mosaic. Perhaps that's what the parent poster was referring to.

    22. Re:Netscape eh? by Moochman · · Score: 1

      Actually, AFAIK Old Netscape was trashed and they started Mozilla from scratch after they tried to use Old Netscape's source code but it was just too messy and irreparable.

    23. Re:Netscape eh? by Taco+Meat · · Score: 0

      *Sigh*

      You obviously have no idea what you are talking about.

      Maybe the latest version didn't depend on IE, but older versions did. I gave up on them after v6.

      --
      It's not narcissicism if it's true!
  3. Netscape is dead by Celt · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I used to be a big fan of Netscape back in the day but to be honest its dead, AOL screwed it and now its as good as dead and buried. On the plus side AOL/TW did donate alot of money to the Mozilla Org and that allowed it to get behind Firefox big time and get it where it is today.

    I have to say Netscape was a good browser and I can't fault it back in the 3.x and 4.x days but since the 4.x tree ended and they've released 6.x, 7.x etc its always felt buggy as hell and bloated, its a sad sad end for one of the first real Dot Coms.

    I think we need to lay Netscape to rest now....

    --
    "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
    1. Re:Netscape is dead by Mockylock · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      AOL?

      What is AOL?

      --
      "Please, shut up. Just when I think you can't say anything more stupid, you speak again." -Archie Bunker.
    2. Re:Netscape is dead by ThirdPrize · · Score: 0

      It's going back a bit now but IE4 and NS4 were both considered the bane of internet devs the world over. No one liked NS4 as far as i remember.

      --
      I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
    3. Re:Netscape is dead by MrMr · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think the correct way to phrase that question is:

      WHAT IS AOL????

    4. Re:Netscape is dead by _xeno_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have to say Netscape was a good browser and I can't fault it back in the 3.x and 4.x days but since the 4.x tree ended...

      Netscape 4.x is what killed Netscape. Maybe the early 4.0 versions were acceptable, I really can't remember, but by around 4.5 it was a bloated, slow, buggy browser. Netscape 4.x is what made Internet Explorer popular. IE 5 was a breath of fresh air compared with Netscape 4. (Personally, I think that IE 4 was also many times better than NS 4, but that's a different argument. It's really unarguable that IE 5 was superior, though.)

      Now some people might cry out that IE is a security nightmare and that no one should choose it over Netscape for that reason, but NS 4 was also a security nightmare. It was, simply, a worse browser than IE 5. It was in the NS 4 days that I switched to IE, and it was because IE was simply a better browser.

      Netscape died in the 4.x days, when the browser became a large, slow, and bloated piece of crap. Compared with Netscape 4, IE was a fast, light, agile browser with many more features and provided a much better experience. As someone writing webapps around the Netscape 4.5/IE 5 days, I can say that IE provided a much nicer platform to write webapps for.

      That changed around the release of Mozilla 1.0; but around the time of Netscape 4.5, IE was simply the better browser while Netscape was simply no longer improving their browser.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    5. Re:Netscape is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does netcraft confirm it?

    6. Re:Netscape is dead by Scaba · · Score: 1

      Can I get a "ME TOO!!!"?

    7. Re:Netscape is dead by wbren · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're both wrong. The correct phrasing is: WHAT IS AOL????!!?!!!!111

      --
      -William Brendel
    8. Re:Netscape is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      What is AOL?

      It's the company that makes Winamp. They used to make free backup diskettes that you had to reformat before using. They sent hundreds of millions of them around for free by attaching them to anything that moved. I used to have to peel them off my car each night when I got home from work. Later, they got into the landfill business by making and distributing hundreds of millions of non re-writeable CD's.

    9. Re:Netscape is dead by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Did you actually /use/ Netscape 4.0x? I can only assume you didn't, because Communicator/Navigator 4.0x was bloated and unstable shite.

      Maybe you're thinking of 4.5 and later, but I had given up and bought an Opera license before that version was released.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    10. Re:Netscape is dead by DarkFencer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Though I agree that Netscape 4.x was bad in all the ways you say - the major reason IE became popular was because it was installed on most people's desktops as an icon called "The Internet".

    11. Re:Netscape is dead by Andrew_T366 · · Score: 1

      Netscape 4 didn't "kill" Netscape in the popular conscience. The five year gap between it and Netscape 7 did. Netscape 5 was skipped, version 6 was a glorifed beta, and version 4 got WAY long in the tooth. Even so, I used it sporadically myself well into 2003!

      Netscape 4 was slower than Netscape 3. However, so were IE 4 and IE 5, and they were hardly lightweights in any sense of the term...especially when your computer had to labor twice as long at startup to bring all of IE 4/5's web-integrated "shell enhancements" to boot...if anything, IE was more sluggish at rendering. As for bugs, the later versions (i.e., 4.08 and 4.6-4.8) were much more stable than the earlier ones, and Netscape crashes seldom if ever brought down the whole system in the way IE's did.

      As for Netscape 4 being a security nightmare, how was that so? It didn't contain ActiveX. It wasn't tied stock and barrel to the OS like IE was. If Netscape 4 did in fact have rampant security issues in its era, I certainly didn't hear a word about them at the time.

    12. Re:Netscape is dead by milatchi · · Score: 0

      IE was a fast, light, agile browser with many more features and provided a much better experience.

      Let's not get too crazy there. IE 5 was okay, but it wasn't that good.

      --
      Slashdot = -1 Redundant, Asperger, kdawson FUD, Libertarian, and Linux
    13. Re:Netscape is dead by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Netscape died in the 4.x days, when the browser became a large, slow, and bloated piece of crap. Compared with Netscape 4, IE was a fast, light, agile browser with many more features and provided a much better experience. As someone writing webapps around the Netscape 4.5/IE 5 days, I can say that IE provided a much nicer platform to write webapps for.

      That changed around the release of Mozilla 1.0; but around the time of Netscape 4.5, IE was simply the better browser while Netscape was simply no longer improving their browser. Yeah, I remember those days. I stubbornly stuck with Nutscrape 4.x for the longest time simply because I could not bring myself to use IE. I ended up working at a place that was standardized to all IE5 and realized "you know what? It doesn't suck as bad as Nutscrape." It was what, a 20 or 30mb download and then came bundled with four different kinds of this and that software? what a pain!

      It took me a long time to switch from IE over to Firefox but I'm loving it now. The best part is losing the web browser doesn't take down the desktop along with it. :)
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    14. Re:Netscape is dead by MechaShiva · · Score: 1

      OMGROTFLMAOBBQ!11!!!1!! r u serius? (I'll be quiet now...)

      --
      After calming me down with some orange slices and some fetal spooning, E.T. revealed to me his singular purpose.
    15. Re:Netscape is dead by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Well, both are kind of right... I actually liked IE4's object model better than NN4.0x, I worked at a place that had to support NN4.04 (that specific version, as our biggest client used it).. as well as IE4+ for everyone else... dealing with document.layers vs. document.all was easily in favor of document.all methods.. especially since I could hide portions of a form, without breaking up pieces into each layer that would be visible or not... Not even to mention the flickering when creating dynamic elements (usually covered the entire page with a white element while rendering, and hid it when done... Netscape
      Now, this was before the wave after wave of security exploits surrounding the ActiveX/COM code used and or available to IE scripting, let alone the insane default security under IE's engine in Outlook, and OE. As of Firefox 1.0 FF was so far ahead of IE it isn't even funny. IE7 has made a lot of gains, but to be honest, the new UI in IE bugs the hell out of me. Of course, you need some wiz bank to get people to want to upgrade, and think something impressive has happened. Oh well... to end this bit of a rant, NN4 had issues all around... 4.0x had a lot of memory issues until 4.08 in my experience, and the 4.5x was hugely bloated crap. At least now (6-8 years later), we have computers that can handle a little more bloat and features.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    16. Re:Netscape is dead by richman555 · · Score: 1

      Yes, also take note of the versions and timelines. IE 4 (Oct. 1997) was released after Netscape 4 (Jun. 1997). IE 5 isn't really a fair comparison. IE 4 was pretty much a match feature for feature, but the default browser on the OS meant the loss of significant sales to Netscape. Netscape never really released another version because of the financial hit, just minor bug fix releases of 4.0 - 4.5

    17. Re:Netscape is dead by AaronLawrence · · Score: 1

      Netscape 4.x sure was worse than IE5. I remember the relief of changing away from it, even though I had some loyalty to Netscape (even bought two versions of it!). And a lot of the mistake was spending 2-3 years rewriting everything to create Mozilla.

      But I would like to THANK Netscape and AOL for the millions of dollars they poured into doing that rewrite. Even though it's not perfect, they (and NOT, mainly, open source developers working for free) created the vast majority of what is now the best browser in the world. There was an enormous amount of code created to do a cross platform toolkit, a fine renderer, and a good javascript implementation.

      All that Firefox has done on top of that has been mainly polishing and adjustments. To date, relatively little has been changed at a fundamental level (I guess with FF3 and various new engines that will change).

      From the outside, it was very obvious when the funding dried up and Mozilla org was created. For quite a while it appeared that development almost stopped. That was obviously due to most of the engineers beind dismissed.

      So, thanks again Netscape and AOL (!)

      --
      For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
  4. My linkpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    vi ~/www_notes
    It's revolutionary!
    1. Re:My linkpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      rm `which vi` && emacs ~/www_notes


      No wait. Make that

      shred `which vi` && emacs ~/www_notes
      I wouldn't want vi to come back from the grave.
    2. Re:My linkpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Emacs is to text editors what a tour bus is to a bicycle.

      sudo rm -f `which emacs` && vi ~/www_notes
    3. Re:My linkpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sudo rm -f `which emacs` `which vi` && nano ~/www_notes

      Seriosly people, why not just use an editor that understands all these brand new keys like 'home', 'end', 'delete' and let's not forget cursor keys.

    4. Re:My linkpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, that's a shell command.

      Thanks for playing though!

    5. Re:My linkpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emacs is to operating systems what Windows is to operating systems.
      Yes I meant operating system both times.

    6. Re:My linkpad by munpfazy · · Score: 1

      Emacs is to text editors what a tour bus is to a bicycle.


      Sure. But, when you find yourself living out of your vehicle, a tour bus has certain advantages.

      sudo rm -f `which vi` && export EDITOR=/usr/bin/emacs-*.*-no-x11 && emacs -nw --load=www-notes-mode.elc --funcall=www-notes-mode --funcall=www-notes-enable-electric-entry --funcall=www-notes-jump-to-last-entry

      (Yeah, okay - now we're really starting to get really silly.)

    7. Re:My linkpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      random meaningless answer is meaningless and random

  5. Firefox with a Netscape toolbar by powerpants · · Score: 2, Insightful
    FTFA:

    Netscape has released the first beta of Netscape 9, based on Firefox. This release includes URL correction, compatibility with Firefox 2 extensions, a "mini browser" sidebar, and integrates Netscape.com sitemail. It makes me sad to see this once-great brand dragged through so many different flavors of me-too mud. Does anyone actually want this?
    1. Re:Firefox with a Netscape toolbar by blueZhift · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It makes me sad to see this once-great brand dragged through so many different flavors of me-too mud. Does anyone actually want this?

      I can only see this of use in situations where the PHB is fixated on the Netscape name for some reason. They'll refuse Firefox, but Netscape is fine since they've used that forever.

    2. Re:Firefox with a Netscape toolbar by fuzzdot · · Score: 1

      I would compare that with companies using Windows 2000 or even 98 having the same excuse, it's outdated, almost no-one uses it but it works for us so lets continue using it untill it is no longer developed/supported. The funny think is that some companies even then continue to use it.

    3. Re:Firefox with a Netscape toolbar by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      I remember the excitement when Netscape 4.x was originally ported to Linux. The mainstream browser / email client / whatever (who cared about IE?) was now available for us.

      The last place I worked which used it was in 2004 - maybe they still do - 'cos somehow their management thought anything from Mozilla was too experimental (and anything from Microsoft too insecure). I suppose this is for them.

      The flame has been passed on.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    4. Re:Firefox with a Netscape toolbar by MindStalker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most companies swore off Netscape 6-8 which caused horrible problems. Unless their jumping from Netscape 4 to Netscape 9 I doubt the company line of "Netscape is the way to go" still exist.

      On the topic of why they are still releasing it, personally I think its just about portal integration now. There are still many Netscape ISP users, and some Netscape portal users. This browser if perfect for those folks. Otherwise, its pretty pointless.

    5. Re:Firefox with a Netscape toolbar by linuxci · · Score: 1

      I remember the excitement when Netscape 4.x was originally ported to Linux. The mainstream browser / email client / whatever (who cared about IE?) was now available for us.

      The last place I worked which used it was in 2004 - maybe they still do - 'cos somehow their management thought anything from Mozilla was too experimental (and anything from Microsoft too insecure). I suppose this is for them.

      The flame has been passed on. Netscape 4.x was available for Linux from the very beginning as well as on a host of other UNIX platforms. The number of platforms that Netscape supported in those days was very impressive. I think that's what scared Microsoft - if the web became the platform and Netscape remained the browser of choice it wouldn't matter if the user was running Windows, Mac, OS/2, Linux or a number of Unix variants.

      When I started using Linux Netscape 3 was the current release and a Linux version was definitely available for it.
  6. What's the point? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Honestly, I don't mean this as a troll, but does anyone use Netscape? Even AOL doesn't use Netscape. What's the point?

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:What's the point? by Predathar · · Score: 1

      I know of exactly 1 person that uses Netscape, that's it. And he is a PHB, go figure.

    2. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still use an old version of Netscape in my old Windows 98 computer, which I haven't even turned on in a couple of months, because it has a bad monitor.

    3. Re:What's the point? by LoaTao · · Score: 1

      I know one person who still uses Netscape... for mail. Oh, well.

      --
      The smartest man in the whole, wide world really don't know that much. - Mose Allison
    4. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I know one person who does because he:
      • Think Netscape is better than IE
      • For ideology reasons, can't wrap his head around the fact that Netscape is based on Mozilla/Firefox, and not vice versa.
      Mind you, he's still got Netscape 7.2 (and Opera) on his box.
    5. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My brother still uses Netscape no matter how many times I tell him about Firefox. I think he is just used to the brand name.

    6. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We use Netscape 4.5 for an ancient (c.1998) web app that my employer apparently refuses to upgrade called TimeSite. ..and we are essentially a web software company ourselves.

    7. Re:What's the point? by IhuntCIA · · Score: 1

      Here are the points:

      Netscape has the site controls and use the Trust Settings that can be customised. The trust settings are used to keep the users away from malicious code on the web.
      Netscape has the nasty habit to crashes itself while loading malicious code that is on the page. This prevents spreading the viruses on to windows or warns of ongoing infection.
      Netscape had the best POP3/SMTP mailer ever. The most of the modern POP3/SMTP mailers are crap compared to Netscape 7.2 mailer.
      Old Netscape versions did not bind to the windows, so no need to reinstall .. You just make the shortcut and everything is set up and ready to go. Backup was easy. Just install Netscape on the partition that has no Windows on it !
      Buggy part of Netscape 6.x and 7.x was the bug reporting tool. Installing the Netscape without that tool fixed most of the issues.
      People complaining about Netscape being slow and buggy used crappy computers with 32 or less megs of RAM or had Intel CPU-s :P The most of that RAM was used by embedded IExplore.exe code. That is why IE4 and IE5 was loading lightning fast compared to the Netscape 4.x or 6.x.

      I'll never say that any version of Netscape was flawless. Because of the Netscape I do not need to pay protection racket to the AV companies to keep my Windows virus free. Yes I DO NOT need the antiviral software to scan my internet traffic and I DO NOT need the AV software to plow my hard drives all the time to search for the infected files. That IS the point of using the Netscape.

      BTW I feel sorry for the IE users. I really do.

  7. Souped-up? by nametaken · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "For those who remember the Netscape Navigator suite, it's lost a little weight -- Navigator no longer includes mail or HTML composer components, just a souped-up Firefox build with a number of features that integrate with the Netscape.com portal."

    I'm glad to hear it's been slimmed down, but really, is integration with the Netscape.com portal a big feature?

    1. Re:Souped-up? by Talian · · Score: 1

      I hope not, I just tried to go to the portal page and got this...

      Rendered in 1181147666141.9ms

    2. Re:Souped-up? by hollywoodb · · Score: 1

      I really like some of the features of the new Navigator, but one of the integration with the Netscape.com portal things that I had to get rid of right away is the "Share" button in the navigation bar.

      You can do so by heading to about:config and changing "extensions.netscape.vote.disabled" to "true"

      --
      I may have to share this planet with animals, but I'm doing my damn best to eat every last one of them.
    3. Re:Souped-up? by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Well if you used the Netscape.com portal I'm guessing it would be.

    4. Re:Souped-up? by Moochman · · Score: 1

      You can also do so the easy way, by going to Tools, Options, Netscape.com, and clicking the option at the bottom, "Disable integrated Netscape.com voting and story submission."

  8. Brand power by future+assassin · · Score: 3, Informative

    I wonder if Netscape still have the brand power to draw in old skool internet users to use their product once again if it turns out to be a good alternative to IE/FF/Opera/etc...

    I first started using Netscape back in 95 and used it for years till IE5 came out. After that I just got stuck with IE and used Opera here and there but I always had Netscape in the back on my mind. Hey its its based on FF and works good I'd switch to it just because it was my first browser.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:Brand power by mnmn · · Score: 1

      I remember when Firefox was having trademark issues with its name (Firebird?).

      I so wish Netscape would hand over its name to the Mozilla foundation. I want to see Ballmer's face when the growing firefox browser's name is changed to Netscape.

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    2. Re:Brand power by Kelson · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Netscape still have the brand power to draw in old skool internet users to use their product once again if it turns out to be a good alternative to IE/FF/Opera/etc...

      I would guess not. Firefox has managed to build up a highly recognizable name, and probably has a bigger following in raw numbers than Netscape did back in its heyday, considering how many more people are on the internet than there were 10 years ago. (Just remember, 78.3% of statistics are made up on the spot.)

      On the other hand, if Firefox were to really screw up, I can see an opportunity for Netscape to step in and win back some of its former glory. Though to be honest, at this point if Firefox were to fade, I'd rather see Opera than Netscape. Get some more rendering engines into the mix, get "designers" out of this two-browser mindset.

    3. Re:Brand power by MidVicious · · Score: 1

      Stranger things have happened. However, I doubt we will see an resurgence of Netscape as a viable browser unless they come out with some wicked killer app that changes the way we look at the Internet.

      That was the growth point for Netscape in the interim 1994 glory days, if you can remember. The excitement of graduating to Netscape Navigator 2.0 from the reliably mundane Mosaic browser was intense, the features were incredible and the HTML markup standards had taken a giant leap forward. It was hello exciting new table structured content, colorful backgrounds and jpeg support, and goodbye top down web content and plain grey backdrop (which to me carries a minimilist charm).

      Remember, when Internet Explorer jumped onto the scene, it was laughable, a browser used only by the clueless and the elderly. Not even the IE exclusive Marquee tag could save it. Oh but of course, no one expects the Microsoft Inquisition... of lawyers. And no one expected Netscape to drop the ball by releasing a giant bundle of useless crap (aka features). Oh and don't forget... sigh... "Layers", the div-tag alternative which doubled the need for web designers in the late nineties (so, uh... thanks?).

      It was over for Netscape when Opera had more credibility as a reliable web browser than Netscape 5 or 6 or wait, which version did they skip 7 or 8 or... Jesus... what a cluster fuck.

      Sorry, Netscape. We had some good times, but it's over now. Not only did you get too fat for my tastes, but you cheated on me. You see, I saved the best reason for never downloading your tired web browser ever again. One word.

      Weatherbug.
      (For the uninitiated, it's spyware! Shame on you, Netscape. Shame... on... you.)

    4. Re:Brand power by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You've forgotten the Netscape 4.x disaster haven't you? The last several versions of Netscape were horrible, horrible things. Netscape squandered most of the goodwill they had by that series of trainwreck releases.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    5. Re:Brand power by throup · · Score: 1

      Just remember, 78.3% of statistics are made up on the spot. I thought it was 79.4%.
    6. Re:Brand power by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Why in the hell would designers want more rendering engines with their own quirks and varying levels of standards compliance? There's already Opera, Safari, Firefox and *multiple major versions of IE*. You can tell people to use the latest of Opera or Firefox but Apple and MS have managed to force operating system upgrades on people wanting to use the latest versions of their browsers.

    7. Re:Brand power by Kelson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why in the hell would designers want more rendering engines with their own quirks and varying levels of standards compliance?

      Why? I'm glad you asked. For all the varying levels of standards compliance, they're at least converging, so that targeting standards, then tweaking for quirks, has a better chance of succeeding across browsers than targeting the browsers to begin with. On the other hand, security vulnerabilities (other than misuse of intentional functionality, like the IDN spoofing attacks a while back) tend to be specific to an engine+platform combination.

      If we've got two major IE versions, Gecko, Opera and Safari, and if each engine has a big enough userbase that "designers" can't afford to ignore it, then maybe we'll actually see more web development instead of IE/Gecko development.

    8. Re:Brand power by FST777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm a web developer. I write tons of JavaScript / CSS code each day. I have compatibility at the top of my priority list. I try to code to standards, using Firefox as the testbed. Then I make it compatible with IE. Finally, I test with Konqueror and Opera. You know how often I have to recode something to make it work with Konqueror? Maybe once in a month, minor changes, no more than a few minutes work.

      You know how often I have to recode for Opera? Twice so far, in the last three years.

      When you mostly code to standards, and don't use browser detects but functionality detects to get stuff working with IE, it's very rare that you need any change at all for Opera or KHTML. More fragmentation is good, but not because of the web pages and web applications. It's good because it gives competition a boost and we might actually see innovation in the browser field (SVG, CANVAS, OpenGL :-P ). We won't see more web development.
      (At least, not from the ones who already grasp the bottom line. Maybe from the ones who now only code for IE.)

      --
      Free beer is never free as in speech. Free speech is always free as in beer.
    9. Re:Brand power by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      You must not do too much scripting then, because I've seen weird bugs in Opera lots of times... open a window with window.open, now close the window.. now try to test if the window is still open with a simple (window && (!window.closed)) .. it will throw an error... try using extjs, or prototype to bind against keyboard events.. well, they work differently than IE or Gecko in opera... These are just two of many I've experienced.. given a lot of times a new version may fix things, but it can be a pain in the neck... Honestly, 1/2 the time I give it a half hour to figure a work around, then may or may not give up on it depending on what it is for.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    10. Re:Brand power by FST777 · · Score: 1

      Only 3000 lines of JavaScript code in the current project :-)

      --
      Free beer is never free as in speech. Free speech is always free as in beer.
    11. Re:Brand power by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      I used the original Firebird (0.7 I think), and I really liked the name. Back then, you had extract the tarball and create a desktop shortcut yourself. So, I used a picture of a Firebird doing a smoky burnout as the icon. Now if only I could get my Camaro to do a burnout like that!

      Firefox is also the name of a really good Clint Eastwood movie.

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
  9. Bloat? by Mastadex · · Score: 0

    Netscape Navigator is already the slowest browser out there. It has seen more bloat then William Shatner in the last few years.

    *Loads up Netscape Navigator*
    Me: "Scotty, More power to Structual Integrity!"
    Scotty: "I have nay power to give! Its just too damn Fat!"

    --
    A morning without coffee is like something without something else.
  10. Bookmarks are dead by solevita · · Score: 3, Funny

    Netscape confirms it.

    1. Re:Bookmarks are dead by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, lame was that joke.

      Hey, what do you know? Some things ARE universal.

      --
      blah blah blah
  11. Long live Netscape! by The+Complete+Geek · · Score: 1

    Ah, I remember using Netscape before I'd even heard of IE... That was back when all I knew about Microsoft was that Windows was the wrong kind of computer, because my family had a MAC! (System 7.5) How I'll miss that shooting star in the upper right-hand corner of the screen...

    --
    Because I have only one radiation suit...
    1. Re:Long live Netscape! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have been pretty fucking stupid.

    2. Re:Long live Netscape! by freakxx · · Score: 1

      you can never be more right....me too....i can still remember my 1st year of B.Tech. when we were leaning using computers....and god, I loved those starts roaming around here and there in a square box located top-right corner....I dont know what did they remove that later and put another logo out there....I got to remember Mary Hopkin's that song: "Those were the days my friend we thought they never end"...well, I really mean it....

  12. Just kill it already! by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

    No, wait, let me do it. Please?

  13. Version 7 was nice, 8 not so.. by GreggBz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Netscape 7 really was a nice browser. I can't fault it. It was fast, stable and lean. I actually think it was more stable then Firefox. Just make sure you don't install all that junk that came with it. I used 7.2 on Linux until about 1 year ago. Unfortunately, it became pretty antiquated and started rendering some pages wrong, handling things like google video not very well. Firefox eventually became the better option for me. Now version 8 was horrible. It lasted about 5 minutes on my Windows laptop. This version looks promising. After a brief spin, I like it. Not that it has so many great advantages or anything, but curiosity usually encourages me to change around because things get boring. I think everyone is really starting to get the browser right and refined. I like all the new ones, IE7, Opera and Mozilla. The competition is helping keep quality in check.

  14. Clipboard feature in FF or SM by chemindefer · · Score: 3, Funny

    "...a neat clipboard in the browser's sidebar that will hold links to websites you want to visit again but not necessarily bookmark." I do this in Firefox or Seamonkey by putting a folder called Temp in my Bookmarks toolbar, to which links can be dragged.
    1. Re:Clipboard feature in FF or SM by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I do this in Firefox or Seamonkey by putting a folder called Temp in my Bookmarks toolbar, to which links can be dragged.

      The point of this feature is you can clipboard links which you WANT to visit again, but do NOT want to bookmark. That's quite an innovation in my opinion.

      I also heard they plan in Netscape 10 to introduce a place where you put links which you WANT to visit, but do NOT want to bookmark and do NOT want to clipboard.

      Next to this, they plan to introduce a "address board" - a place where you can type links to visit, but you do NOT want to type them in the address bar.

    2. Re:Clipboard feature in FF or SM by dcroxton · · Score: 1

      I don't know why someone modded your comment funny; I do the same thing. It's useful for things like forum posts that I want to monitor, but don't want to have permanently in my bookmarks.

      --
      Sincerely, Derek

      A curious little blog
  15. I remember calling it by Tyten · · Score: 0

    Nutscrape Masturbator

    1. Re:I remember calling it by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

      Then do you also say "Internet Exploder"?

      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    2. Re:I remember calling it by Captain+Murdock · · Score: 1

      Oh no he didn't...

    3. Re:I remember calling it by sconeu · · Score: 1

      No, I say "Insecure Exploder".

      Of course, I also call Outlook, "LookOut!"

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    4. Re:I remember calling it by McNihil · · Score: 1

      Outlook should be called Outhouse.

  16. Wow! by CrazyTalk · · Score: 0, Redundant

    They still make Netscape?

    1. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? That's crazy talk!

  17. I think I speak for everyone here when I say by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny

    NetWho? Is that some sort of Mozilla knockoff?

    1. Re:I think I speak for everyone here when I say by BenoitRen · · Score: 1

      All the Netscapes since Netscape 6.0 have been Mozilla knock-offs.

    2. Re:I think I speak for everyone here when I say by linzeal · · Score: 1

      I still have a Netscape navigator 3 in original box. It was a classic till AOL bought it out and plumped it.

    3. Re:I think I speak for everyone here when I say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's something to do with Mosaic, I hear you can use it for the world wide web as well as gopher.

    4. Re:I think I speak for everyone here when I say by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Ah, Netscape. This takes me back to my youth and the early days of the web. Tables were simple, frames were unheard of, graphics were unanimated, CSS and dynamic html were just dreams, Ajax was a cleaning product, and we all used to hang our with Ritchie, Ralph, and the Fonz at Al's Diner.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:I think I speak for everyone here when I say by linuxci · · Score: 1

      Ah, Netscape. This takes me back to my youth and the early days of the web. Tables were simple, frames were unheard of, graphics were unanimated, CSS and dynamic html were just dreams, Ajax was a cleaning product, and we all used to hang our with Ritchie, Ralph, and the Fonz at Al's Diner. But Netscape were the inventors of frames (and of course the blink tag) and they're probably the first to introduce the animated gif to browsers. They also created JavaScript (originally called LiveScript IIRC).
  18. How well does it work with Napster? by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wasn't Netscape a cheap ISP for a while? Now it's a browser again?
    I'm confused.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:How well does it work with Napster? by ChetOS.net · · Score: 1

      I think it was Mindscape that was a cheap ISP for a while.

      --
      "If God had intended us to walk he would not have invented roller skates." -- Willy Wonka
    2. Re:How well does it work with Napster? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I think it was Mindscape that was a cheap ISP for a while. No no, Netscape, logo and all. I even saw ads on TV for s a short while.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:How well does it work with Napster? by Kelson · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Believe it or not, at one point AOL actually had a low-cost connection service that they branded as "Netscape." They were convinced that they should be able to get something out of the brand name, even if they were practically ignoring the browser and didn't own the server (IIRC, Netscape sold their server division to Sun before AOL bought them), so they were slapping it on anything they could think of.

    4. Re:How well does it work with Napster? by laffer1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was under the impression AOL didn't want the server products. For awhile, the products were sold under the "Sun-Netscape Alliance" as iPlanet and then Sun renamed them "Sun One [product type]". Now I think they have a new name again.. Java Enterprise System [product type]?

      product type would be webserver, mail server, collaboration, etc.

      The whole process was confusing. Aside from losing Netscape with the AOL deal, I miss the Netscape Developer Center content. In the old days, Netscape and Microsoft provided great documentation on using new web technologies. AOL killed a good share of the old Netscape content over time and Microsoft merged their content with MSDN and slowly targeted it to web application developers exclusively.

      I remember downloading Netscape 2.0 beta to look at porn sites. When I first got on the web, it seemed like porn sites used new technologies like tables and animated gifs first. Well I was in high school at the time. The IE enhanced porn sites weren't as good. Who cared about a scrolling marquee on a porn site? Still, I had to switch to IE because Netscape 3 crashed all the time on me. I got back onboard with Netscape 4 but it was never the same.

    5. Re:How well does it work with Napster? by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, Netscape was an ISP along the lines of JUNO, and a few others... AOL used their infrastructure to run the back end, just had a different front end to it. I think the GP may of been thinking of Mindspring, which was bought out by Earthlink in 2000 or so.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  19. I am shocked.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..that people still use Netscape Navigator.

    Is this article for real, or some dupe from 10 years ago?

  20. Still a good thing by wazzzup · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would I ever use Netscape over Firefox or Camino? Probably not. Does it seem like some queer throwback to days gone by? Yes. Does it, on some level, seem kind of pathetic in the same way when A Flock of Seagulls shows up at some local bar/theater for a concert? Yes.

    But I quickly realize that, as a web developer I can only stand behind them and cheer them on as a great alternative to IE. There's nothing wrong with another standards-compliant, Gecko-based browser on the market.

    I just realized the irony that there is a Gecko broswer called Flock.

    1. Re:Still a good thing by hollywoodb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually I've been playing with this "new" Netscape Navigator for a few hours now. I really like it; I think the theme is pleasant, and some of the features are "why didn't I think of that" type stuff I actually find myself using instead of disabling. I'm sure most if what it offers could be replicated via FF+extensions, but it is also nice to have it all in one package.

      I'm going to give this browser an honest run. For me, like many people (from what I hear), FF 2.0 wasn't a big step in the right direction from FF 1.5. Navigator 9.0b really offers some neat functionality and I have yet to find any big showstoppers or extra cruft. In my mind, what FF 2.0 should have been if they were going to add features to FF 1.5.

      Release Notes are here: http://browser.netscape.com/releasenotes/

      --
      I may have to share this planet with animals, but I'm doing my damn best to eat every last one of them.
  21. No mail or composer since Netscape 7 by VWJedi · · Score: 3, Informative

    This release will no longer ship with mail or composer but does have...

    Didn't Netscape drop mail and composer a while back? Let's see...

    From Netscape's Browser FAQ (emphasize is mine):

    Does Netscape Navigator 9 include a mail client/HTML composer/newsreader/...?
    No. Navigator 9 is a standalone browser; Netscape 7 is the most recent browser suite produced by Netscape.

    If I recall correctly, Netscape 7 was based on the Mozilla suite (now known as SeaMonkey) and included those components, and with version 8, they based it on Firefox (which never included mail and composer) and went back to calling it "Navigator".

    You'd think that "journalists" might research their stories a little bit.

    1. Re:No mail or composer since Netscape 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd think that "journalists" might research their stories a little bit.

      But it's from a site that's related to Slashdot, so it doesn't surprise me in the least.

  22. Magic 8 Ball is Always Right by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

    "Outlook not so good" was our favorite phrase during a recent (somewhat painful) mail conversion.

    --
    What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    1. Re:Magic 8 Ball is Always Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try using lotus notes. You'll WISH you had outlook.

  23. Comments without Experience by hexed_2050 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How many people actually have commented on this article already without actually downloading and trying the product?

    Let's all give it a good shot first before making some quick judgments. Sure it may just be a branded Firefox, but it also may have some great uses. Maybe this is a browser that may be the recommended browser for your aunts and uncles when they get a new system? Who knows.. Let's at least give it a shot before shooting it and leaving it for dead.

    h

    --
    Valkyrie is about to die! Wizard needs food -- badly!
    1. Re:Comments without Experience by kodiakbri · · Score: 1

      Hi, I find it interesting that many are commenting, few are downloading. I won't download either, not until I hear it has some features worth checking out. So far, I haven't heard of any new wiz bang. Netscape's track record in the last six years or so put most folks in the I'll try it later if it has great features buzz. Are they going to make me fill out a 3 page questionaire like what was that NS 6 or 7??? I don't understand why browsers are both so ubiquitious and so boring. In the last five years they've added css stuff and tabbed browsing - YAWN! I'm not excited about NS8. Please convince me that there is something to look at here. peace

    2. Re:Comments without Experience by Java+Pimp · · Score: 1

      I'd download it to try it except I just finished cleaning out all the crappy "Try AOL" shortcuts that were installed in every dark corner of my computer the last time I did something silly like that.

      --
      Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
      Kull: She told me she was 19!
    3. Re:Comments without Experience by hexed_2050 · · Score: 1

      I just finished cleaning out all the crappy "Try AOL" shortcuts that were installed in every dark corner of my computer the last time I did something silly like that

      Agreed. But since I am an IT professional I have sort of a duty to download and test these things so I can make some recommendations to my clients regarding the software when I encounter it in the workforce.

      That said, I did not find any "Try AOL [OMGWTF!11 ALLYOURBASEBELONGTOUS]" shortcuts in NS9 thank god. Installation was almost a complete clone of what you would expect from a Firefox installation. It was even polite enough to ask if I wanted shortcuts on my desktop, quick launch, or program files listings. I was rather impressed and is a good step in the correct direction for Netspace.
      h

      --
      Valkyrie is about to die! Wizard needs food -- badly!
  24. Dead? Appropriate terminology... by Kelson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    JWZ, of original Netscape, famously referred to AOL's continual efforts to slap the "Netscape" name on something, anything -- a browser variant, a portal, a low-cost internet connection, whatever -- as "brand necrophilia".

  25. Nothing new here, move along... by rfc1394 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Navigator 9... includes several new components while giving some old ones the boot. This release will no longer ship with mail or composer...

    This reviewer apparently has not used any recent releases of Netscape (as I have). I am currently using Netscape version 7.2, now, to write this article (I abandoned Internet Explorer a long time ago due to security issues; I only use it when I get a site that will only work with IE). I have Netscape 8.1 installed, but I don't use it a whole lot, because (1) they moved the menus from the left side to the right side (2) they removed the print button, and (most significant) (3) they removed mail and composer. Without mail as part of the program it has reduced functionality. With mail as part of the program I can just click on 'Window' and 'Mail' to send a message; otherwise I have to go to the start menu and find whatever the hell the program is that is the mail suite spun out of Mozilla, Evolution? (I looked it up in the start menu; it's called Thunderbird.) I used to use composer and sometimes I use it when I need to build a table, so while it's unfortunate I can live without it. Mail and composer has been gone since at least 8.1, was this guy unaware of this?

    Paul Robinson — My Blog
    --
    The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
    1. Re:Nothing new here, move along... by BenoitRen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Netscape 7.2 is based on Mozilla 1.7.2. There have been many security and stability updates since then. The latest version is Mozilla 1.7.13.

      However, some time after the release of Mozilla 1.7.5, if I remember correctly, it was announced that the Mozilla Foundation would cease development of it. Developers didn't like this, and the SeaMonkey project was born. The latest SeaMonkey is SeaMonkey 1.1.2, equal to the latest Firefox 2 version, as they share the Gecko rendering engine.

      I urge you to upgrade to the latest SeaMonkey. You'll find that it's almost exactly the same as Netscape 7. SeaMonkey will find your profile and start using it (same format). Of course, best to back-up your profile folder just in case.

  26. Could try Seamonkey by swg101 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Seamonkey suite is the ongoing project of the original Mozilla Suite. It has the functionality of Netscape 7 (plus some) as well as the updated support of the rendering engine from Firefox 2 and other security updates. (see the news release for more info.

    Disclosure: I have been running Mozilla suite and now Seamonkey since about 1999.

    --
    Like pi? Try 10,000 digits.
    1. Re:Could try Seamonkey by just_another_sean · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's what I've been doing too. I happen to like Composer and think that Netscape removing it (along with Mail/News) basically takes away the features that make the "suite" a better choice then just the browser in a lot of situations. I'm grateful that the Mozilla folks have so far opted to keep the suite alive, I hope they don't follow the same path as Netscape on this one.

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    2. Re:Could try Seamonkey by bigbigbison · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually Mozilla did kill the Mozilla Suite. They announced that they weren't going to develope it any more in favore of Firefox and Thunderbird. A new group, called the Seamonkey Council is developing it. The Mozilla foundation said that they would provide the infrastructure for them but that seems to be all they are doing.

      http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/news.htm l#2005-07-02
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SeaMonkey

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
  27. I'm not convinced netscape is dead by catbutt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think Netscape lives on in Firefox and other Gecko based browsers (of which the one currently called "Netscape" is just one). It's just a name change.

    Sure, there was a complete rewrite from the original netscape, but at least initially, that was mostly done by employees of netscape (well, the netscape division of AOL).

    People get too hung up on the names, in my opinion. If Firefox was just called "Netscape The Next Generation" and this thing was just called "AOL's branded version of Netscape TNG", the only real difference between today would be that no one could claim that Netscape was dead.

    1. Re:I'm not convinced netscape is dead by dn15 · · Score: 1

      People get too hung up on the names, in my opinion. If Firefox was just called "Netscape The Next Generation" and this thing was just called "AOL's branded version of Netscape TNG", the only real difference between today would be that no one could claim that Netscape was dead.
      Indeed, at some point the discussion is just a matter of semantics. Netscape as a brand basically committed suicide a few years ago, but the source they released in the form of Mozilla has made a big difference to the the Web by making a standards-compliant, cross-platform available browser available to the world. Regardless of the brand's status, Netscape is still very much alive.
  28. Won't import from Firefox by Kelson · · Score: 1

    On installing the beta, I found that it'll import settings & bookmarks from:

    MSIE
    Netscape 8
    Netscape 6/7/Mozilla 1.x
    Netscape 4.x
    Opera

    I'm impressed that it'll import from Opera. But I'm astonished that it won't import from the second-most-used browser out there -- the one with which it shares the most code! Guess users are stuck with exporting the bookmarks from Firefox and then importing them from the file.

    I certainly hope this is on the buglist to get fixed before the final release.

    1. Re:Won't import from Firefox by Myen · · Score: 1

      Firefox has no importer from Firefox. Firefox has importers for all of those things listed.

      Netscape 9 is heavily based on Firefox. Hence it inherits all the bookmarks importers... :)

  29. You are thinking of Netcom by CranberryKing · · Score: 0

    Compuserve, Prodigy, AOL, all that shit..

  30. Comments from Experience by bunratty · · Score: 1

    Maybe this is a browser that may be the recommended browser for your aunts and uncles when they get a new system? Who knows.
    If Netscape repeats what it's done in the past, Netscape release versions will be several security release versions behind Firefox, and perhaps include a few extra security vulnerabilities as an added bonus. Right now, Netscape 8 seems to be the only browser that Secunia reports as having highly critical vulnerabilities. Let's all sit and wait to see if it's safe to use before we decide to give Netscape 9 a try.
    --
    What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
  31. Turn Firefox into Netscape by InvisiBill · · Score: 1

    Yes, this is basically just a slightly modded version of Firefox. They have a link from http://browser.netscape.com/ to https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/user/5683 6 if you want to add their stuff to your Firefox. I'm not sure on the details, but this should give you at least some of the benefits of Netscape without having to use their full product.

  32. "Linux.com shares corporate overlordship with /." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Framing your conflicts of interest in cutesy, please-like-us, please-agree-anyway terms is not only illegal, it's putridly immoral.

  33. It needed to be asked... by i_liek_turtles · · Score: 0

    Will it run Vista?

    1. Re:It needed to be asked... by BosstonesOwn · · Score: 1

      Let's face it ! Nothing will run vista.

      --
      This package Does Not Contain a Winner
  34. SeaMonkey by bunratty · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why not use SeaMonkey instead? It's from the same code base as Netscape 7.2 with all kinds of new features and bug fixes, and (most significantly) many years of security vulnerability fixes. It also has menus on the left side, a print button, and mail and composer.

    --
    What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
  35. Netscape ISP by Scrameustache · · Score: 1
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  36. No Netscape on Linux since Netscape 7 by bunratty · · Score: 1

    Netscape 8 was Windows only. So this is the first release of Netscape for Linux that does not have mail or composer. That is important to note, as the review is on linux.com.

    --
    What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    1. Re:No Netscape on Linux since Netscape 7 by VWJedi · · Score: 1

      OK, I could accept the idea that the this is new to the author (and other Linux users)...

      ...until I read the last sentence of the article:

      Netscape 8's update feature will not update the browser to Netscape 9.

      Something doesn't add up.

    2. Re:No Netscape on Linux since Netscape 7 by bunratty · · Score: 1

      That last sentence was for the benefit of any Windows users reading the article. ;-)

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
  37. We Use netscape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have worked for two school districts and both have used Netscape as a primary Browser.

    The reasoning is that Netscape provided a little security from Hi-jacking and installation of viruses via site visits and pop-up installations.

    Since we have been using Netscape for x number of years and 99 percent of the 1000+ people use Netscape at work changing would actually cause a bit of a helpdesk nightmare as people with minimal PC experience have a real problem with change.

    I personally use firefox and don't care for the "extras" included in netscape. And my boss who uses Netscape 8 has far more bugs and issues than I have ever had with firefox.

  38. linux! by zakeria · · Score: 0

    well I downloaded it before I read any of this stuff cause I do believe we owe a great deal to the Netscape people!! but it never worked... Undefined symbol XineramalsActive?

  39. I realize it's a joke, but... by Kelson · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can simplify things a lot by focusing your testing on engines, rather than browsers.

    For instance, Firefox 2, SeaMonkey, 1.2, Camino 1.5 and Netscape 9 all use the same major version of Gecko. Unless you're dealing with something controlled by the UI -- extensions, for instance, or the search box on the toolbar -- they're going to treat your code more or less the same. You'll start seeing bigger differences in screen size and platform.

  40. Firefox Brand by rlp · · Score: 1

    I have several Firefox T-shirts (yeah, I know, I'm a geek). About half the time, when I walk into a store, an employee or another customer will see the shirt and make a positive comment about Firefox. So, anecdotally, there's a positive perception of the Firefox brand out there. I remember a time when Mosaic and then Netscape WERE synonymous with the Web. I suspect that time is long gone.

    (It would be an interesting experiment walking around with an IE shirt. But I'm not brave enough to do it).

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Firefox Brand by BosstonesOwn · · Score: 1

      I tried it once , sadly it ended in many painful days to follow.

      I could never understand why so many old ladies would just walk up to me and kick me in the groin. It was a rather traumatic moment in my life I would like to forget.

      --
      This package Does Not Contain a Winner
    2. Re:Firefox Brand by linuxci · · Score: 1

      I have several Firefox T-shirts (yeah, I know, I'm a geek). About half the time, when I walk into a store, an employee or another customer will see the shirt and make a positive comment about Firefox. So, anecdotally, there's a positive perception of the Firefox brand out there. I remember a time when Mosaic and then Netscape WERE synonymous with the Web. I suspect that time is long gone.

      (It would be an interesting experiment walking around with an IE shirt. But I'm not brave enough to do it). I get a lot of people commenting on the Firefox t-shirt too, I normally wear the t-shirts when travelling and I've had positive comments from check-in staff, airport security staff, passengers and cabin crew.
  41. Opera links by eldepeche · · Score: 1

    I like how the toolbar in the screenshot is full of links about Opera.

    1. Re:Opera links by Kelson · · Score: 1

      LOL! I hadn't noticed that!

      The reviewer probably just imported his settings from Opera, but it doesn't make it any less amusing.

    2. Re:Opera links by eldepeche · · Score: 1

      I downloaded it out of morbid curiosity, and it won't even run.

      ./navigator-bin: symbol lookup error: ./navigator-bin: undefined symbol: XineramaIsActive

      I guess that's what I get for running dwm...

  42. Netscape == Mozilla? by jshriverWVU · · Score: 1

    Thought after IE came out and Netscape more or less died, it was released as OSS which became Mozilla and eventually Firefox. So confused over this new release, is this an updated fork of the original code that became Mozilla?

    1. Re:Netscape == Mozilla? by Kelson · · Score: 1

      Mozilla was originally a testbed for future versions of netscape, then they went their separate ways.

      More info in this comment.

  43. Re:Dead? Appropriate terminology... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

    JWZ, of original Netscape, famously referred to AOL's continual efforts to slap the "Netscape" name on something, anything

    I do not think that word means what you think it means ...

  44. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know you were obviously joking but anyway...

    I never knew any companies used anything OTHER than Lotus until I came here. With the continuous errors that LookOut spews out, the failed backups, the downtime, the bugs it has when Word is open, the sluggishness, the failed backups, and just the overall lack of features, I want my Lotus Notes back!

    Good grief, even the Daylight savings fix didn't work in LookOut! Why can't Microsoft ever use standards like UNIX time_t, like all other companies have been doing since the 70s?

  45. Re:please help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then which one is you? I am confused.

  46. Mod Parent Idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry I don't think anybody views your webpage anyways. Why don't you shell out some cash for some free frameworks that work automatically? Oh yeah, Opera users think your webpage suck too.

  47. Netscape Developer Center lives on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The original Netscape DevEdge site is mirrored here at mozilla.org, and most of its content has already been moved to Mozilla Developer Center.

  48. Sources? by mdemonic · · Score: 1

    So, this is built on Stallmans code, but where can I find the sources? Or is there some other license coming into effect here?

  49. you morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still use netscape 7.2, on a socket 478 machine no less.....renders just fine and netscape mail is integrated.

    Those of you who complain about 4.X and up must either have some shitty machines or ride the short bus everywhere.

    Those of you who like IE don't know what a well running browser is (or ride the short bus everywhere). You're also pinko commie bastards almost as bad as the macintrash faggots.

  50. Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was actually crazy enough to stick with Netscape 4.71 (or was that 4.72?), horrible crashing and all, clear up until I heard about Mozilla (it was pre-1.0, but in the late betas), later to go on to Firefox.

    Yeah, it was pretty painful, but DAMN, it made Mozilla feel so much more awesome because of the huge difference you felt in making such a sudden change.

  51. Re-Focus for FireFox by businessnerd · · Score: 1

    Wow, didn't know Netscape was still developing. I was under the assumption that Mozilla/Seamonkey took over Netscape's role, but hey, you learn something new everyday. I was also wondering what the point of developing Netscape really is. I mean everyone uses Firefox, and if you want the extra bloat, you can use Seamonkey. But then it hit me. Netscape's core is Firefox. All they really did was take Firefox and repackage it with their own selection of extensions. Seamonkey is also the same, but with different extensions. So this indicates to me that Firefox needs to really get back to basics. The Firefox team should work on keeping their browser lean and mean. Just the basics to get the job done and keep improving Gecko. The Netscapes and Seamonkeys and Flocks out there can worry about packaging features, and most of us geeks will "roll our own." Essentially, Firefox becomes more like the Linux Kernel and Netscape et. al. become the distributions (OK OK I know Gecko is probably more like the kernel, but work with me here).

    --
    "It's not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get." -- H. J. Simpson
    1. Re:Re-Focus for FireFox by cyborg_zx · · Score: 1

      I've always felt this too - really because of the Javascript based architecture that forms the browser front end really instead of having a load of default scripts they should be moved into the Extensions API. For example Firefox 2.0 added dictionary capabilities that existed previously in extesions - what I couldn't figure out is why they decided that this should not be a pluggable component rather than integrating it into the core. It seems rather silly to me - reduce coupling, don't increase it. It also means that the updating cycle can be more efficiently streamlined for the various browser components.

  52. Is this going to be the one by ClosedSource · · Score: 2, Funny

    that is written from the ground up in Java to blow away IE 4.0?

  53. Netscape.com/.net by Timothy+Chu · · Score: 1

    I used Netscape as a primary browser on my linux box (just b/c Firefox refused to install for the longest time) and the default home page, netscape.com was the worst portal site I've seen. It probably could've been customized, but 40% of it was pop gossip culture, 40% of it was relationship talk, and maybe 20% of it was news. It looks like they've changed it somewhat, but seeing that type of news on a default page changed my perception of netscape permanently.

    I signed up for a netscape.net email address 8 years ago (now AOL mail), and the interface was terrible. It's one redeeming factor was it was the only one of my email addresses that never got spammed, while my unpublished hotmail one, which I never used, was spammed from day 1.

  54. Netscape Navigator: by loonicks · · Score: 1

    Beating the dead horse since 2005 (tm).

  55. History do repeat itself... in different ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's going like Linux distros... we now have too many distro to choose from. Ends up confusing new end users and they don't want to switch partly because they don't know which one to choose ! Things are only turning slightly better now with the newer version of Ubuntu...

  56. Netscape Brand by emjoi_gently · · Score: 1

    Oh Netscape....
    *sigh* such a frittered away opportunity.
    Ya could have been a contender!

  57. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least, we get a new line from... The Book of Mozilla.

  58. Who built it? by betona · · Score: 1

    AOL laid off all of the Netscape engineers many years ago and the last browser was outsourced to Mercurial (small Canadian company). So who developed this one?

    1. Re:Who built it? by _.-+thimk!+-._ · · Score: 1

      While mostly true, that's not entirely accurate. A few of the original pre-acquisition Netscape developers are still at AOL, though now in different capacities.

      Since AOL purchased Netscape, development support has gone though various internal dev teams, and Netscape had has it's own dedicated development team again for over a year and a half.

      The Netscape 8 Browser was indeed outsourced to Mercurial. Netscape 9 however, coming full circle as has already been noted, was developed internally based upon the firefox codebase.

  59. Wow! by jav1231 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How happy those 5 people who still use it are going to be!

  60. Netscape? by dwiget001 · · Score: 0

    I thought Microsoft killed Netscape. Or, rather, I thought Netscape 6 killed Netscape. Never have I used (very briefly) a more computer resource hogging piece of crap...er...software than Netscape 6.

  61. Netscape is back! by BobWeiner · · Score: 1

    I've actually enjoyed using the beta of NN v9.0 over the last few days. Gone are the e-mail and web design components - this browser is lean and mean, and enjoys two very useful features that aren't bundled with other browsers: Mini Browser and Link Pad. I also like the smaller buttons. Netscape Navigator is FAST - and works with all of Firefox 2.0's plug-ins.

    I doubt Netscape Navigator will ever reach its former level of glory, but they've certainly won me with this release.

    --
    The PC Weenies: 11 Years of Online Tech 'Too