I did not realize that every aspect of my life needs to be devoted toward helping some other person out.
Wow!
This means a major change for me!
The toilet paper I choose seems to help nothing.
93.7% of my/. posts help no one.
I watched the news last night. No one helped there.
I failed to watch some lecture. No helping there.
This post.
You are so right. Have no more time for anything now that I have seen the light.
People enter the US illegally all the time. The buy/rent houses. Get jobs with faked or stolen SS numbers. Pop out babies that become automatic citizens.
For the most part they are not hunted down and sentenced to 12 years in prison.
Fucking lefty. Get it right. You can not run around and defend long prison sentences for crossing a border and use the US as a fucking example.
Are you brain dead?
Could you not tell by my use of the word evil that I sir am actually in complete agreement with you.
I too feel that the American people have lost their way. Believing that some how giving LCD TV's to people for not working is wrong. Giving away free stuff and expecting no productive work from it was what made this country great.
Now thanks to his holiness the Awesome "Sends a shiver down my leg.", "The B Man" Obama. I soon shall be able to quit my job. Get that nose job I have always wanted, Ummm... Needed so that I can.. Ummm... Breath properly and collect unemployment for the next 3 to 5 years.
Yay!
You and the GP are both so far off base I do not know what to think.
The first one took so long because those who have the skill to do these hacks are not people looking to rip off games.
They are people who are driven to take their hardware and do interesting stuff with it. Those people for the most part were satisfied because Sony allowed the "Other OS" option.
Other consoles did not. they were hacked, the PS3 was not.
The fact that right after Sony took out the "Other OS" option it was hacked should tell you really fast what is going on. If it dose not I can not help that shortcoming in yourself.
But I think you can see it. I think you are just being dis-ingenious.
One day an evil person decided to steal wealth from all the poor around him by starting a corporation.
That evil corporation stole its money by allowing people that had a little extra money feel safer by allowing
them to pay a small fee now and it would cover certain medical expenses up to a certain amount.
Then after many horrible decades of some people not living forever and being covered for everything no matter what
by the evil corporation the government decided to step in and give it to everyone. Free!
Well...Where costs allow....If it is covered....Ummm....Uhhh....After cost/benefit analysis.... For...
The federal government wants to force itself to become my insurer. Offering me its one policy that covers what it decides to cover while forcing out choice and competition.
It wasn't expensive and bad enough by just allowing the states to mandate shit and reduce competition. We need the federal government to make it even worse.
I wear glasses that only let me see white people making $250,000/yr or more that do not have a criminal record. Your experience may vary.
Or maybe I just have no clue what is going on in the world.
Hmm. So you are saying that it may be safer to have 80% of the traffic going 65 and 20% at 90?
You are an idiot. Following the flow of traffic is safer. Creating a group of people that can go faster on the same road at the same time is unsafe.
Give us all 90mph.
Again. I find it hard to believe that you are mentally incapable of finding any other solution to a problem such as this.
I will help you out.
1. Could write the law so that whatever the judgement obvious innocence should always be a complete defense.
2. Could require judges to read the most basic parts of the cases they adjudicate.
Either of those would work well. Both would work best.
That way is someone sues me for something there is no way I could held liable for I could just sit back. Judge would actually look at the case and throw it out. Or...When they try to collect I can show my obvious innocence and not pay. Then they can fire the judge for not doing his job.
Easy.
Actually. I do not believe in Global Warming...Umm sorry Global Climate Change.
So I am sure that one day soon the libs will come and get me in the middle of the night and disappear me.
That did address what you said.
If you were to sue me for breach of contract on a contract written 30 years before I was born I should be able to sit on my ass at home watching Big Bang Theory and not have to think one moment about it.
The realistic alternative that you describe is bullshit used to make your point. It is not a choice between the way it is and getting shot.
But truly if those are the only two choices your mind can come up with then I am sorry I assumed you were misleading when in reality you would just be stupid.
You are right. The burden should always be on the accused. Even if there is zero proof they have ever done anything wrong. Fuck the little guys.
I think that there should be many more lawyers out there sending out threatening extortion letters. Why do those work so well. Because defending yourself is meant to be a fucking hassle so that the Judged and Lawyers have jobs and money.
Way to argue a point.
But it dose not have to be all one way or the exact opposite. Dose it? Can we not have a system that allows you to sue. But always puts justice above law?
Follow the law till it dose not make sense. Then dole out justice. We could also be much tougher than we are on punishing those that bring frivolous lawsuits. We could start by looking at lawyers that are filling hundreds of ADA lawsuits against small businesses just for settlement cash.
Then we could start disbarring lawyers that file IP cases in Texas when there is no reason to do so. We could disbar the Judges. We could easily fix major parts of the legal system in the US.
The real reasons we have such a broken system is that the Judges and Lawyers want it this way. They want 90,000 cases filed every second. It keeps them employed.
If a suit is that ridiculous, the judge probably won't grant judgment. Here, however, that wasn't the case. How is the judge supposed to immediately realize that where you have two gossip websites, the one the plaintiff said published the defamatory statements isn't the right one?
You sir need to show up in court in Santa Ana, CA or send me a registered certified mailing stating that you are not in fact the corykings that owes me $450,000.00
We know the legal system is fucked up. Just admit it.
People who do no wrong should not be forced to jump through hoops for stupid fuckers. Ever.
I think he is right. Crotch punching would result in lower sperm counts. Less breeding by those people. Less fuckheads that we do not want around in future generations.
You do realize that this happens often enough -- that the wrong person or company gets served -- that there are established court procedures for dealing with it?
All of them requiring time, money and effort on the part of those who did no wrong. Ignoring something like this IS the right thing to do. The problem is the fucked up laws do not see it that way.
There is a problem when any idiot can drag you into court or make you hire a lawyer for dumb ass shit.
Laws are made to create justice for a case that has already been done wrong by laws that were made for a previous case that was done wrong.
The only law I would currently like to see pass through congress is one where anyone hearing someone say "There ought to be a law!" is required to shoot said person in the face.
Slashdot Mirror
I did not realize that every aspect of my life needs to be devoted toward helping some other person out.
Wow! /. posts help no one.
This means a major change for me!
The toilet paper I choose seems to help nothing.
93.7% of my
I watched the news last night. No one helped there.
I failed to watch some lecture. No helping there.
This post.
You are so right. Have no more time for anything now that I have seen the light.
Oh wait.
I meant to say.
Fuck off.
That is a mighty shitty smelling ambient gas you are spewing there.
He is. But that is because he is also an idiot.
People enter the US illegally all the time. The buy/rent houses. Get jobs with faked or stolen SS numbers. Pop out babies that become automatic citizens. For the most part they are not hunted down and sentenced to 12 years in prison.
Fucking lefty. Get it right. You can not run around and defend long prison sentences for crossing a border and use the US as a fucking example.
Are you brain dead?
Could you not tell by my use of the word evil that I sir am actually in complete agreement with you. .. Ummm ... Breath properly and collect unemployment for the next 3 to 5 years.
I too feel that the American people have lost their way. Believing that some how giving LCD TV's to people for not working is wrong. Giving away free stuff and expecting no productive work from it was what made this country great.
Now thanks to his holiness the Awesome "Sends a shiver down my leg.", "The B Man" Obama. I soon shall be able to quit my job. Get that nose job I have always wanted, Ummm... Needed so that I can
Yay!
You and the GP are both so far off base I do not know what to think.
The first one took so long because those who have the skill to do these hacks are not people looking to rip off games. They are people who are driven to take their hardware and do interesting stuff with it. Those people for the most part were satisfied because Sony allowed the "Other OS" option. Other consoles did not. they were hacked, the PS3 was not.
The fact that right after Sony took out the "Other OS" option it was hacked should tell you really fast what is going on. If it dose not I can not help that shortcoming in yourself.
But I think you can see it. I think you are just being dis-ingenious.
One day an evil person decided to steal wealth from all the poor around him by starting a corporation. That evil corporation stole its money by allowing people that had a little extra money feel safer by allowing them to pay a small fee now and it would cover certain medical expenses up to a certain amount.
.... For ...
Then after many horrible decades of some people not living forever and being covered for everything no matter what by the evil corporation the government decided to step in and give it to everyone. Free!
Well...Where costs allow....If it is covered....Ummm....Uhhh....After cost/benefit analysis
The federal government wants to force itself to become my insurer. Offering me its one policy that covers what it decides to cover while forcing out choice and competition. It wasn't expensive and bad enough by just allowing the states to mandate shit and reduce competition. We need the federal government to make it even worse.
Can we ball up the WHO, the FCC, the WTO, the US senate, the US House, IP Lawyers and CARB and ship them all off to China?
Please?
I wear glasses that only let me see white people making $250,000/yr or more that do not have a criminal record. Your experience may vary.
Or maybe I just have no clue what is going on in the world.
Hmm. So you are saying that it may be safer to have 80% of the traffic going 65 and 20% at 90?
You are an idiot. Following the flow of traffic is safer. Creating a group of people that can go faster on the same road at the same time is unsafe.
Give us all 90mph.
He is probably just thinking back to 93. When AOL allowed him to look at the interwebtubes.
I will help you out.
1. Could write the law so that whatever the judgement obvious innocence should always be a complete defense.
2. Could require judges to read the most basic parts of the cases they adjudicate.
Either of those would work well. Both would work best.
That way is someone sues me for something there is no way I could held liable for I could just sit back. Judge would actually look at the case and throw it out. Or...When they try to collect I can show my obvious innocence and not pay. Then they can fire the judge for not doing his job.
Easy.
Actually. I do not believe in Global Warming...Umm sorry Global Climate Change.
So I am sure that one day soon the libs will come and get me in the middle of the night and disappear me.
That did address what you said.
If you were to sue me for breach of contract on a contract written 30 years before I was born I should be able to sit on my ass at home watching Big Bang Theory and not have to think one moment about it.
The realistic alternative that you describe is bullshit used to make your point. It is not a choice between the way it is and getting shot.
But truly if those are the only two choices your mind can come up with then I am sorry I assumed you were misleading when in reality you would just be stupid.
You are right. The burden should always be on the accused. Even if there is zero proof they have ever done anything wrong. Fuck the little guys.
I think that there should be many more lawyers out there sending out threatening extortion letters. Why do those work so well. Because defending yourself is meant to be a fucking hassle so that the Judged and Lawyers have jobs and money.
Way to argue a point.
But it dose not have to be all one way or the exact opposite. Dose it? Can we not have a system that allows you to sue. But always puts justice above law?
Follow the law till it dose not make sense. Then dole out justice. We could also be much tougher than we are on punishing those that bring frivolous lawsuits. We could start by looking at lawyers that are filling hundreds of ADA lawsuits against small businesses just for settlement cash.
Then we could start disbarring lawyers that file IP cases in Texas when there is no reason to do so. We could disbar the Judges. We could easily fix major parts of the legal system in the US.
The real reasons we have such a broken system is that the Judges and Lawyers want it this way. They want 90,000 cases filed every second. It keeps them employed.
How is the judge to know that it's the wrong shady gossip site?
Reading.
You have to see that the entire premise here is fucked.
The legal system sucks. How can it work well. It is a system created by, run by and for the benefit of Judges and Lawyers.
If a suit is that ridiculous, the judge probably won't grant judgment. Here, however, that wasn't the case. How is the judge supposed to immediately realize that where you have two gossip websites, the one the plaintiff said published the defamatory statements isn't the right one?
I would start with the ability to read.
We know the legal system is fucked up. Just admit it.
People who do no wrong should not be forced to jump through hoops for stupid fuckers. Ever.
Awesome idea!
You do realize that this happens often enough -- that the wrong person or company gets served -- that there are established court procedures for dealing with it?
All of them requiring time, money and effort on the part of those who did no wrong. Ignoring something like this IS the right thing to do. The problem is the fucked up laws do not see it that way.
If you do not immediately respond to this accusation you are implying I am correct.
Damm. I hear some stupid shit on this site.
Some of it mine.
Laws are made to create justice for a case that has already been done wrong by laws that were made for a previous case that was done wrong.
The only law I would currently like to see pass through congress is one where anyone hearing someone say "There ought to be a law!" is required to shoot said person in the face.