We have done it now!
We have proved that an international company is talking to a bank in ANOTHER COUNTRY!
Fucking OP should feel bad for being such a shitty shill. If you are going to shill and spread FUD make it at least pass a cursory exam. Fucking horrible person should feel bad. Shit title. Shit OP. Shit people for voting it to visibility without even glancing at the article. (Not that I would ever advocate a full read of an article.)
Might want to look a good charities then.
Mercury One spends almost all of its donations on the work itself.
In fact it has an entirely separate fund that you donate to for operating expenses. If you donate for a relief efforts, then 100% of that money goes to that. You have to specifically donate money for operating expenses.
You are correct.
I am sure had the RNC been hacked and documents released making Trump look bad the White House would be all over it.
If you are at least honest with yourself, people will tend to not completely dismiss your point of view entirely.
Russia and China can hack all of our companies, steal their IP. Take their data and use it to compete against us.
The White House stays silent.
DNC hack.
Different story there. Not that it makes a difference. People will vote for Hillary regardless. Women will vote for her while she calls them crazy for getting abused by her husband. Women will vote for her as she takes money from and supports those who stone them to death. People are stupid and get the government they deserve. When what you can get for free is more important than your freedoms, you will suffer. Deservedly so.
Being ignorant of a thing does not make you an idiot.
Commenting on a thing in which you are ignorant makes you an idiot.
So we are back down to 2 things.
Update October 5th, 1PM ET: Apple has confirmed to The Verge that the company uses sapphire in its iPhone camera lens. It appears the correct testing conditions weren't adhered to in JerryRigEverything's tests. "Apple confirms the iPhone 7 camera lens is sapphire, and under proper testing conditions achieves the hardness and purity results expected from sapphire," says an Apple spokesperson.
I have always seen it as...
Spelling: The rules governing the creation of words.
Grammar: The rules governing the communication of ideas using words and punctuation.
It is though possible that it is just the way I see it and not a fact.
Ok. If you really need to believe that Hillary tells no lies to vote for her, then you can use any convoluted train of though you need so you can justify it.
Just do not try to convince others she does not lie.
It would be better if they sold bandwidth.
Data amount = Unlimited.
Pay for a specific minimum speed, possibly with higher speeds than paid for if there is room.
They advertise the hell out of the speed. The speed is what everyone else is paying for.
From the group of 30,000 emails returned to the State Department in 2014, 110 emails in 52 email chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was top secret at the time they were sent; 36 of those chains contained secret information at the time; and eight contained confidential information at the time. That's the lowest level of classification.
So. Yes there was stuff that was done retroactively, but the director of the FBI made it really clear that hundreds of emails were Classified, Top Secret or Confidential at the time they were sent or received.
I do not want to destroy government.
I want to destroy the establishment.
(vague, unproven things proven on twitter)
What vague unproven things on twitter?
From the group of 30,000 emails returned to the State Department in 2014, 110 emails in 52 email chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was top secret at the time they were sent; 36 of those chains contained secret information at the time; and eight contained confidential information at the time. That's the lowest level of classification.
That?
This is vague and unproven shit on Twitter?
You can decide your vote however you want. If you think that Clinton, Sanders, Johnson, Rubio, Cruz, Bush, or anyone else with a vested interest in the Letter D or R is going to fix shit, you are deluded. Their power does not come from fixing shit. It comes from pointing at broken shit and blaming it on others.
All they want is power for that class. Both the Dems and the Republicans are in that class.
I never called for the destruction of Government, I do not think it is a good idea. Though its powers need to be curbed on the federal level and that power needs to get transferred back to the States and local governments.
I know what Clinton is in government for, and I am against it.
I have no idea why Trump is running, I can guess, but I do not know.
To me it is either vote for what I know is the same shit we had with Bush 1, Clinton, Bush 2, and Obama with a Clinton 2 OR
Try something different. You go right ahead and think that a win for Clinton 2 will change the way things are done.
Not talking about Trump, and I have already allowed that if people choose Hillary that is their absolute right.
Not. About devices.
11 Blackberries in succession. Now they will not, even under direct questioning really answer if there was overlap, which is likely because of the fact that she had 2 phone numbers for that period of time it is likely that she had 2 devices. Not going to push that hard though, because we do not have to. She also, during that time used 3 iPads to do email.
I find it almost impossible to believe that when she had the iPads that she discontinued use of any Blackberry on her 2 phone numbers. Her testifying to congress that the reason for the private email was to consolidate to a single device in demonstratively false.
She lied. If you think that she is still a better choice than Trump, more power to you. Again. My problem is that you seem to need to believe that she did not lie about these things, when we have reports from the FBI that prove otherwise. She lied. Fact. If she would make a better President than Trump is an opinion.
Intent. It was his opinion that there was no intent.
First and foremost. By law, intent is not needed to prosecute for mishandling of classified data.
Second, and to the point. He is not saying that Clinton did not Send or Receive Classified data. Only that in his opinion there was no intent.
In his briefing he went over how there was classified material sent and received.
So again. Point out one statement where he says it did not happen. Because in the report and the words that came out of his mouth during the press conference, he stated clearly that it did in fact occur.
Facts are a bitch.
Where did Comey say there were no emails deleted? (He did not.)
Where did Comey say that she only used one device at a time? (He did not.)
Where did Comey say that no classified documents were sent or received by the private server? (He did not.)
He never looked at any of the other things and made no statements about those at all.
Show me a single statement from Comey saying that nothing of that sort happened. Because in the FBI report and his press conference he stated that those things were true. He only stated that he did not recommend prosecution.
Did you get your facts from the report? From his press conference? Where did you even get the idea that he stated that none of that happened?
Where ever you got that info from should be stricken as a future place to get your facts. They did you wrong.
Slashdot Mirror
We have done it now!
We have proved that an international company is talking to a bank in ANOTHER COUNTRY!
Fucking OP should feel bad for being such a shitty shill. If you are going to shill and spread FUD make it at least pass a cursory exam. Fucking horrible person should feel bad. Shit title. Shit OP. Shit people for voting it to visibility without even glancing at the article. (Not that I would ever advocate a full read of an article.)
Show me a day where he hit 10% of that or fuck off like the dumb ass partisan AC you are.
It would be different by doing it 5000 times a day.
My comment was fairly short. Used no big words. I fail to understand how you could misread it.
Possibly you are under the impression that Trump tweets 5000 times a day already. Where did you get this idea from?
I would set up a bot to tweet stupid shit 5000 times a day to give Hillary all the monies. I would troll the shit out of the donors.
Might want to look a good charities then.
Mercury One spends almost all of its donations on the work itself.
In fact it has an entirely separate fund that you donate to for operating expenses. If you donate for a relief efforts, then 100% of that money goes to that. You have to specifically donate money for operating expenses.
I think sir that it is you that needs to learn what a Fascist is.
The left have never been able to be civil with dissenting opinions. The left in the US is fascist.
You do not get to Hijack other stories because of what you want. You are not three years old. Stop acting like one.
You are a bad human being.
Not even once.
You are correct.
I am sure had the RNC been hacked and documents released making Trump look bad the White House would be all over it.
If you are at least honest with yourself, people will tend to not completely dismiss your point of view entirely.
Russia and China can hack all of our companies, steal their IP. Take their data and use it to compete against us.
The White House stays silent.
DNC hack.
Different story there. Not that it makes a difference. People will vote for Hillary regardless. Women will vote for her while she calls them crazy for getting abused by her husband. Women will vote for her as she takes money from and supports those who stone them to death. People are stupid and get the government they deserve. When what you can get for free is more important than your freedoms, you will suffer. Deservedly so.
Being ignorant of a thing does not make you an idiot.
Commenting on a thing in which you are ignorant makes you an idiot.
So we are back down to 2 things.
Update October 5th, 1PM ET:
Apple has confirmed to The Verge that the company uses sapphire in its iPhone camera lens. It appears the correct testing conditions weren't adhered to in JerryRigEverything's tests. "Apple confirms the iPhone 7 camera lens is sapphire, and under proper testing conditions achieves the hardness and purity results expected from sapphire," says an Apple spokesperson.
Shit. I like hating Apple too.
Sure a lot of people assumed that they folded for the searching of accounts.
How many knew it for a fact?
Very few is my guess.
How many know that they were running a search on all incoming mail?
Not me.
I have always seen it as ...
Spelling: The rules governing the creation of words.
Grammar: The rules governing the communication of ideas using words and punctuation.
It is though possible that it is just the way I see it and not a fact.
To be fair, he failed at spelling, not grammar.
Ok. If you really need to believe that Hillary tells no lies to vote for her, then you can use any convoluted train of though you need so you can justify it.
Just do not try to convince others she does not lie.
I claimed no criminal cover up. I only claimed that she lied.
Which I have proved.
Show me in my comments where I alleged a criminal cover up.
It would be better if they sold bandwidth.
Data amount = Unlimited.
Pay for a specific minimum speed, possibly with higher speeds than paid for if there is room.
They advertise the hell out of the speed. The speed is what everyone else is paying for.
From the group of 30,000 emails returned to the State Department in 2014, 110 emails in 52 email chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was top secret at the time they were sent; 36 of those chains contained secret information at the time; and eight contained confidential information at the time. That's the lowest level of classification.
So. Yes there was stuff that was done retroactively, but the director of the FBI made it really clear that hundreds of emails were Classified, Top Secret or Confidential at the time they were sent or received.
I want to destroy the establishment.
(vague, unproven things proven on twitter)
What vague unproven things on twitter?
From the group of 30,000 emails returned to the State Department in 2014, 110 emails in 52 email chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was top secret at the time they were sent; 36 of those chains contained secret information at the time; and eight contained confidential information at the time. That's the lowest level of classification.
That?
This is vague and unproven shit on Twitter?
You can decide your vote however you want. If you think that Clinton, Sanders, Johnson, Rubio, Cruz, Bush, or anyone else with a vested interest in the Letter D or R is going to fix shit, you are deluded. Their power does not come from fixing shit. It comes from pointing at broken shit and blaming it on others.
All they want is power for that class. Both the Dems and the Republicans are in that class.
I never called for the destruction of Government, I do not think it is a good idea. Though its powers need to be curbed on the federal level and that power needs to get transferred back to the States and local governments.
I know what Clinton is in government for, and I am against it.
I have no idea why Trump is running, I can guess, but I do not know.
To me it is either vote for what I know is the same shit we had with Bush 1, Clinton, Bush 2, and Obama with a Clinton 2 OR
Try something different.
You go right ahead and think that a win for Clinton 2 will change the way things are done.
Not talking about Trump, and I have already allowed that if people choose Hillary that is their absolute right.
Not. About devices.
11 Blackberries in succession. Now they will not, even under direct questioning really answer if there was overlap, which is likely because of the fact that she had 2 phone numbers for that period of time it is likely that she had 2 devices. Not going to push that hard though, because we do not have to. She also, during that time used 3 iPads to do email.
I find it almost impossible to believe that when she had the iPads that she discontinued use of any Blackberry on her 2 phone numbers. Her testifying to congress that the reason for the private email was to consolidate to a single device in demonstratively false.
She lied. If you think that she is still a better choice than Trump, more power to you. Again. My problem is that you seem to need to believe that she did not lie about these things, when we have reports from the FBI that prove otherwise. She lied. Fact. If she would make a better President than Trump is an opinion.
Intent. It was his opinion that there was no intent.
First and foremost. By law, intent is not needed to prosecute for mishandling of classified data.
Second, and to the point. He is not saying that Clinton did not Send or Receive Classified data. Only that in his opinion there was no intent.
In his briefing he went over how there was classified material sent and received.
So again. Point out one statement where he says it did not happen. Because in the report and the words that came out of his mouth during the press conference, he stated clearly that it did in fact occur.
Facts are a bitch.
Where did Comey say there were no emails deleted?
(He did not.)
Where did Comey say that she only used one device at a time?
(He did not.)
Where did Comey say that no classified documents were sent or received by the private server?
(He did not.)
He never looked at any of the other things and made no statements about those at all.
Show me a single statement from Comey saying that nothing of that sort happened. Because in the FBI report and his press conference he stated that those things were true. He only stated that he did not recommend prosecution.
Did you get your facts from the report? From his press conference? Where did you even get the idea that he stated that none of that happened?
Where ever you got that info from should be stricken as a future place to get your facts. They did you wrong.
The FBI report clearly shows the use of multiple devices at the same time. It is in the report. From her account. Not a guess.
Fuck it. You win. Hillary is running the most transparent campaign ever. She said it, so it is true.