To the contrary my experience with Opera on Debian (x86_64) is better described as rock solid. I'm not using hotmail however so I don't know how it's working there.
Actually parent is not troll. Most sites don't really need Javascript unless you use IE where it is used for tweaking. So you can surf the web just fine without it most of the time. Unless you are a fan of XMLHttpRequest and friends of course.
a) sucks as spirit successor b) has way too many characters c) has way too smal character development d) has numerious story inconsistencies e) there is no Magus f) it was unfinished junk lumped together with the last time they had at hand.
Alternative variant our machines overcome limitations of being well... machines.
Opera's Speed dial is not the same as "top sites". You need to manually choose your sites for it.
It uses PNGs for those shots btw.
To the contrary my experience with Opera on Debian (x86_64) is better described as rock solid. I'm not using hotmail however so I don't know how it's working there.
Actually there are two serializations. So there are HTML5 and XHTML5 so to speak.
Protect content? You sure love jokes!
Don't sure what you are talking about. Opera works for me 100% of the time.
Besides HTML5 is being created not only by Opera you know.
They had him in T3. And it didn't help much. Somehow if feelt mediocre compared to previous films (some retcons didn't help either).
It seems NetBeans authors are "stupid and don't know how to code" sadly. Because it eats about 400 MB of RAM while opening 4 KB Javascript file.
Go memory-hungry!
Shouldn't oracle know beforehand of all things he wants to know?
Fucking pony? Are you sure you want a pony for this?
/. links to narod.ru. What's next? Is the world going to its end?
You shouldn't expect anything reliable from there. // Yeah, I'm Russian.
They are just trolls with heavy regeneration.
Actually parent is not troll. Most sites don't really need Javascript unless you use IE where it is used for tweaking. So you can surf the web just fine without it most of the time. Unless you are a fan of XMLHttpRequest and friends of course.
Negative reactions for CC were solely because it:
a) sucks as spirit successor
b) has way too many characters
c) has way too smal character development
d) has numerious story inconsistencies
e) there is no Magus
f) it was unfinished junk lumped together with the last time they had at hand.
More or less like this.
Anticipation is all good but waiting that much time is a but risky I'd say. It seems more as a backup position if FF fails some time in the future.
It sucks as "spiritual successor" though.
And how is doing nothing at all helps this?
######
#.>.##
#....T
#.@.##
######
Are you sure?
No thanks. Why would I?
Somewhere around it's next version. There is KDE 4 in experimental now. Stable of course use KDE 3 but there are backports for KDE4 as well.
Or Debian.
I see, they doesn't seem to like aliens from Vega in Utah.
Who knows, maybe font embedding will become new web0.5/web3.0 (who the hell inserted those ".0" anyway?).
GP implies that user will see "oh new and shiny Windows", while under the hood it is something they should not know about.