I had attempted to transfer a domain name out of their control last month. They never sent the acknowledgement confirmations, so the transfer was denied. I spoke with NetSol and they assured me it would work this time and to have the new registrar try again. I did so and nothing happened, so they tried once more. By this time, the domain had expired and NetSol refused to transfer it.
I strongly suspect this is policy. Jerk folks around until they have to pay us for one more year.
Who can be formally complained to about this? Is ICANN really involved in taking action against dirty players? Is there any recourse or any way around NetSol at this point? Now that the domain has expired, could I simply re-register with a different registrar?
This petition won't do anything, and has some of the most atrocious spelling errors I've seen in awhile, but it's a nice effort. While I sincerely doubt that FOX will do more than glance at the top page before throwing it away, I have to wonder who's in charge of scheduling there. They've lost a lot of shows that had decent followings, and kept some absolute crap on.
Tupperware has a lifetime replacement guarantee. If it truly is TUPPERWARE and not some rubbermaid or walmart-branded joke, then just call up your friendly Tupperware representative and let her know you need to replace a broken item. you'll have it, or an equivalent replacement, shipped to you post haste.
Does the DMCA criminalize technology that already existed BEFORE the copy protection was created? Software that allows burst mode reading on cd-rom drives has been around for a long time. A lot of the ripping software has this built in already. The programs weren't specially designed in the last month to tackle this new Macrovision protection and get those Charlie Pride mp3's onto the net asap!
In fact, I wonder if Audiograbber could sue Macrovision for attempting to interfere with their existing rip technology by circumventing standard copying technology.
If it happens up here in Seattleland, I'm up the creek. I've got a stack of lecture notes from magic lectures over the years.
Can I sue the people who sold them to me?
Slashdot Mirror
I had attempted to transfer a domain name out of their control last month. They never sent the acknowledgement confirmations, so the transfer was denied. I spoke with NetSol and they assured me it would work this time and to have the new registrar try again. I did so and nothing happened, so they tried once more. By this time, the domain had expired and NetSol refused to transfer it.
I strongly suspect this is policy. Jerk folks around until they have to pay us for one more year.
Who can be formally complained to about this? Is ICANN really involved in taking action against dirty players? Is there any recourse or any way around NetSol at this point? Now that the domain has expired, could I simply re-register with a different registrar?
You wasted a FiRsT PoSt!!!! on that?? aw man.
;)
This petition won't do anything, and has some of the most atrocious spelling errors I've seen in awhile, but it's a nice effort. While I sincerely doubt that FOX will do more than glance at the top page before throwing it away, I have to wonder who's in charge of scheduling there. They've lost a lot of shows that had decent followings, and kept some absolute crap on.
Tupperware has a lifetime replacement guarantee. If it truly is TUPPERWARE and not some rubbermaid or walmart-branded joke, then just call up your friendly Tupperware representative and let her know you need to replace a broken item. you'll have it, or an equivalent replacement, shipped to you post haste.
Does the DMCA criminalize technology that already existed BEFORE the copy protection was created? Software that allows burst mode reading on cd-rom drives has been around for a long time. A lot of the ripping software has this built in already. The programs weren't specially designed in the last month to tackle this new Macrovision protection and get those Charlie Pride mp3's onto the net asap! In fact, I wonder if Audiograbber could sue Macrovision for attempting to interfere with their existing rip technology by circumventing standard copying technology.
Oh, PLEASE can I say "All your base are belong to us" ???? It just seems like the most appropriate thing to say after reading that.
great parody. where's cartman, though?
If it happens up here in Seattleland, I'm up the creek. I've got a stack of lecture notes from magic lectures over the years. Can I sue the people who sold them to me?