And on Windows you simply download trojan.zip, unzip it and run the setup.exe.
Of course, you probably just have to download and run a setup.exe, but that's the point: it does not say it's a trojan even if you have to compile it with many dependencies (which do not include libtrojan and libmalware).
(non-original versions can be deleted, of course, but until they are, everything is stored, or it has to be generated when someone follows the link the first time)
PS putting Ogg (a TRUE free sound CODEC) and WebM (Google's licensed AFTER-the-fact terrible rip-off of H264) in the same sentence is as misleading an attempt at pro-Google propaganda as you can get.
Why not combine H.264 with Vorbis or Opus, then? Why does the format MP4 promoters propose, as far as I know, require MP3 or AAC?
Because this page is not about Apple, and everyone is supposed to know of Apple's evils already, and those against Microsoft are not necessarily with Apple as Microsoft wanted people to believe in the past.
So is the IRC channel empty? Doesn't really matter - if there is a considerable benefit in learning the target language, then someone needs to study that and quantify it.
Maybe I visit it at the wrong time, but even last time, lojbanists were discussing in English something about the newsgroup. Another time, over half of the messages were people asking in English how to translate something into Lojban. Maybe they just have poor learning methods/tools.
In which way? There are 2 million Esperanto speakers after 120 years (and that's a very generous estimate).
I'm afraid I will say something which may not be a very good argument for learning Esperanto.:>
How short should it take for an "artificial" (bad word for many!) language to become popular after its use has been persecuted or limited by the government for years or tens of years, when most people don't really care about language study if it's advertised heavily?
If Lojban is better (or even easier to learn) then it would be more beneficial to use that.
Even if Lojban is somehow easier to learn, it is probably not easy enough to speak: look at its IRC channel.
Slashdot Mirror
Anyone living in Vladivostok or Siberia probably welcomes global warming.
Vladivostok seems to be a bad example there. It is only a few degrees colder than Moscow, and is a port.
And on Windows you simply download trojan.zip, unzip it and run the setup.exe. Of course, you probably just have to download and run a setup.exe, but that's the point: it does not say it's a trojan even if you have to compile it with many dependencies (which do not include libtrojan and libmalware).
People deciding on suicide for real rarely make future plans, but his last tweets were full of them.
How far is "future"?
They should be replaced with my comments, expressing my opinion in a similar style. What's mine is mine and what's yours is mine.
H.264 has never been supported there. So they didn't decide to stop selling fish and chips, they have never sold them.
It's a *free* encyclopedia, as its every page says.
Also, the RFC was more about Wikimedia Commons.
(non-original versions can be deleted, of course, but until they are, everything is stored, or it has to be generated when someone follows the link the first time)
Looks like a quotation from a press release advocating copyright extension or advertising a new DRM to users.
What about storage costs? Videos are viewed or downloaded once in a while, but they are stored always and forever.
PS putting Ogg (a TRUE free sound CODEC) and WebM (Google's licensed AFTER-the-fact terrible rip-off of H264) in the same sentence is as misleading an attempt at pro-Google propaganda as you can get.
Why not combine H.264 with Vorbis or Opus, then? Why does the format MP4 promoters propose, as far as I know, require MP3 or AAC?
Would you accept a format that can only be played with proprietary freeware on Windows or only on Mac OS X?
Fighting H.264 is tilting at windmills..
And accepting H.264 is being beaten by a windmill.
with a paper notebook and a pen: http://veronika-funtom.livejournal.com/519477.html (in Russian)
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html ; http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/copyleft.html and links
Because this page is not about Apple, and everyone is supposed to know of Apple's evils already, and those against Microsoft are not necessarily with Apple as Microsoft wanted people to believe in the past.
“On-line education is using a flawed Creative Commons license” -- Richard Stallman — a personal article on a problem with NC non-ND licenses.
What to do with CDs that contain only non-free software (like operating systems, games or drivers)? Some are old, others come with hardware.
http://issues.mediagoblin.org/ticket/109
Or English is the Lojban IRC-speak. ;-)
So is the IRC channel empty? Doesn't really matter - if there is a considerable benefit in learning the target language, then someone needs to study that and quantify it.
Maybe I visit it at the wrong time, but even last time, lojbanists were discussing in English something about the newsgroup. Another time, over half of the messages were people asking in English how to translate something into Lojban.
Maybe they just have poor learning methods/tools.
Esperanto has proven itself already
In which way? There are 2 million Esperanto speakers after 120 years (and that's a very generous estimate).
I'm afraid I will say something which may not be a very good argument for learning Esperanto. :>
How short should it take for an "artificial" (bad word for many!) language to become popular after its use has been persecuted or limited by the government for years or tens of years, when most people don't really care about language study if it's advertised heavily?
If Lojban is better (or even easier to learn) then it would be more beneficial to use that.
Even if Lojban is somehow easier to learn, it is probably not easy enough to speak: look at its IRC channel.
For Esperanto you have to learn 1 word and 3 suffixes/prefixes. For English you have to learn 4 words and a prefix.
Of every 4 words and a prefix in English, how many do have an irregular pronunciation?
s/author/creator/, sorry. Not sure which one fits better in this case.
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.08/es.languages.html?pg=4&topic=&topic_set= cites "Lawrence Schoen, director of the Klingon Language Institute," saying there are about a dozen of fiuent(sic) Klingon speakers, and the language's author is not one of them.